Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Neurology (Seoul, Korea) logoLink to Journal of Clinical Neurology (Seoul, Korea)
. 2020 Sep 9;16(4):547–555. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2020.16.4.547

Antiepileptic Drug Selection According to Seizure Type in Adult Patients with Epilepsy

Hyeyun Kim a, Dong Wook Kim b, Soon-Tae Lee c, Jung-Ick Byun d, Jong-Geun Seo e, Young Joo No f, Kyung Wook Kang g, Daeyoung Kim h, Keun Tae Kim i, Yong Won Cho i,, Kwang Ik Yang j,; on behalf of the Drug Committee of Korean Epilepsy Society
PMCID: PMC7541973  PMID: 33029959

Abstract

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder that is mainly treated using antiepileptic drugs. Several antiepileptic drugs such as phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, and ethosuximide were developed in the early 20th century. More than 10 types of antiepileptic drugs have been developed since the 1990s, and there are now more than 20 antiepileptic drugs in active clinical use. The choice of antiepileptic drugs is based on the clinical features of the seizure types, electroencephalogram findings, epileptic syndrome, and drug stability. Currently there are 19 antiepileptic drugs approved by the Korean Food and Drug Administration, 18 of which (with the exclusion of brivaracetam) are covered by the National Health Insurance Service in Korea. We reviewed the selection of antiepileptic drugs according to the classification of epileptic seizures.

Keywords: antiepileptics, seizure, epilepsy, adults

INTRODUCTION

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder for which antiepileptic drugs are the main treatment. Several antiepileptic drugs such as phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, and ethosuximide were developed in the early 20th century. More than 10 types of antiepileptic drugs have been developed since the 1990s, and there are now more than 20 antiepileptic drugs in active clinical use.1 These so-called new antiepileptic drugs were rarely used in the early stage of development as a monotherapy alone, instead normally being used as an add-on therapy. However, they are now increasingly being used as a monotherapy because their underlying mechanisms have many properties that differ from those of conventional antiepileptic drugs, they have less-severe adverse effects, and they are superior in terms of drug interactions. These drugs include vigabatrin, zonisamide, lamotrigine, gabapentin, topiramate, fosphenytoin, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, pregabalin, lacosamide, rufinamide, eslicarbazepine, perampanel, and brivaracetam.

The history of antiepileptic drugs is summarized in Fig. 1 based on their approval dates in the Republic of Korea. For example, ethosuximide was first introduced in 1989, then discontinued in before being used again from 2012 after being approved by the Korean Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Since 1990, more than a dozen new antiepileptic drugs with various mechanisms have been introduced, thereby greatly expanding the range of drug choices for treating epilepsy.

Fig. 1. Timeline of antiepileptic drugs, showing the dates on which their use by patients was approved by the Korean Food and Drug Administration.

Fig. 1

Several considerations such as the type of epilepsy and seizure, drug-related factors, and the patient's characteristics should be taken into account when selecting the most-suitable drug. However, it remains unclear which treatments are best for a certain patient with epilepsy. Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide the strongest evidence, very few RCTs directly compare multiple active treatments in a single trial. Instead, most studies have compared treatments with placebos when assessing the effectiveness and safety of antiepileptic drugs.2,3 Moreover, most RCTs have investigated patients with drug-resistant seizure.4 Under these circumstances, appropriate treatment guidelines can help both clinicians as well as nonspecialists in epilepsy to choose antiepileptic drugs. Treatment guidelines have been suggested by some epilepsy societies: the American Academy of Neurology,5 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence,6 the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network,7 and the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE).8 The Korean Epilepsy Society provided the “clinical guideline for antiepileptic drug treatment in patients with epilepsy” in 2015 (Table 1).9 The experts leading the medical care for and research into epilepsy in the Republic of Korea contributed to the guidelines. However, the guidelines are quite limited (as also stated by their authors), in terms of them essentially representing proposals rather than guidelines, not being exhaustive, and needing to be updated.

Table 1. Clinical guideline for selecting AEDs according to seizure type in patients with epilepsy in the guideline of the Korean Epilepsy Society published in 2015.

Seizure type First-line AEDs Second-line AEDs Adjunctive AEDs Considered additional AEDs Not recommended
Focal CBZ, OXC, LTG LVT, VPA CBZ, GBP, LTG, LVT, OXC, VPA, TPM LCM, PB, PHT, PGB, VGB, ZNS
GTCS VPA, LTG CLB, LTG, LVT, VPA, TPM
Absence ESM, VPA LTG CLB, CZP, LVT, TPM, ZNS CBZ, OXC, GBP, PHT, PGB, VGB
Myoclonic VPA LVT, TPM CBZ, CZP, ZNS CBZ, OXC, GBP, PHT, PGB, VGB
Atonic or tonic VPA LTG TPM CBZ, OXC, GBP, PHT, PGB, VGB

AED: antiepileptic drug, CBZ: carbamazepine, CLB: clobazam, CZP: clonazepam, ESM: ethosuximide, GBP: gabapentin, GTCS: generalized tonic-clonic seizure, LCM: lacosamide, LTG: lamotrigine, LVT: levetiracetam, OXC: oxcarbazepine, PB: phenobarbital, PGB: pregabalin, PHT: phenytoin, TPM: topiramate, VGB: vigabatrin, VPA: valproate, ZNS: zonisamide.

Currently there are 18 antiepileptic drugs approved by the Korean FDA and covered by the National Health Insurance Service in Korea (Table 2). Here we focus on the selection of antiepileptic drugs according to the type of seizure as part of a series of articles on antiepileptic drug treatment for epilepsy.

Table 2. Available antiepileptic drugs in Korea and their effects on seizure types.

Focal GTCS Absence Myoclonic Atonic or tonic
PB 1st 1st X 1st
PHT 1st 1st W W 1st
PRM 1st 1st X
ESM X X 1st X X
CBZ 1st 1st W X X
CLB 2nd 2nd W W W
VPA 1st 2nd 1st 1st 1st
VGB 2nd 2nd W W U
ZNS 1st 1st U 1st U
LTG 1st 1st 2nd 2nd 2nd
GBP 1st X W W X
TPM 1st 2nd U 2nd 2nd
OXC 1st 1st X X X
LEV 1st 2nd 2nd
PGB 2nd X X X X
LCM 2nd U U U U
RFN 2nd
PRP 2nd 2nd U U U
BVC 2nd

BVC: brivaracetam, CBZ: carbamazepine, CLB: clobazam, ESM: ethosuximide, GBP: gabapentin, GTCS: generalized tonic-clonic seizure, LCM: lacosamide, LEV: levetiracetam, LTG: lamotrigine, OXC: oxcarbazepine, PB: phenobarbital, PGB: pregabalin, PHT: phenytoin, PRM: primidone, PRP: perampanel, RFN: rufinamide, TPM: topiramate, U: unknown effect and mechanism, VGB: vigabatrin, VPA: valproate, W: worsening effect, X: no effect, ZNS: zonisamide, 1st: first choice, 2nd: second choice.

GENERAL CONCEPTIONS OF ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS

The mechanisms of antiepileptic drugs were previously divided into four categories: 1) modulation of voltage-dependent ion channels, including Na+, Ca2+, and K+ (phenytoin, carbamazepine, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, ethosuximide, and zonisamide), 2) potentiation of γ-amino butyric acid (GABA) (phenobarbital, benzodiazepines, vigabatrin, and tiagabine), 3) multiple mechanisms of action (sodium valproate, gabapentin, felbamate, and topiramate), and 4) another mechanism of action (levetiracetam).10 For example, valproate works via multiple mechanisms that are similar to those of phenytoin, such as the frequency-dependent prolongation of Na+-channel inactivation, weak attenuation of T-type Ca2+ channels, and augmentation of release of GABA by increasing its synthesis from the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamic acid.11 Levetiracetam and lacosamide may act as antiepileptic drugs with a modulating mechanism—the exocytolic function of synaptic vesicle protein SV2A—that could enhance the release of inhibitory neurotransmitters such as GABA.12 Lacosamide has another additional mechanism, which is enhancing the modulation of the slow inactivation of Na+ channels without affecting the fast inactivation of voltage-gated Na+ channels.12 Perampanel has a novel mechanism of action as a noncompetitive agonist of the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor.

Pharmacokinetics is the study of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. The concentrations of antiepileptic drugs in vivo are determined by complex interactions of the basic processes of the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of drugs. Drug concentrations are the primary determinants of therapeutic and toxic effects, and the rational use of antiepileptic drugs therefore requires an understanding of their pharmacokinetics (Table 3), the dosage and medication intervals (Table 4), drug interactions, and monitoring the level of the drug in the plasma.

Table 3. Pharmacokinetics of antiepileptic drugs.

F (%) Tmax (h) Vd (L/kg) Protein binding (%) Renal excretion* (%) Metabolic organ (%) Thalf-life (h) TSS (d) Therapeutic range (mg/L)
PB 70–90 0.5–8.6 0.6–0.9 55 20–25 Hepatic (50–80) 53–118 10–15 15–40
Renal (20–50)
PHT 90–100 8–12 0.7–0.8 87–93 −5 Hepatic (95) 6–60 15–20 10–20
Renal (5)
PRM 60–80 4–6 N/A 20–45 −65 Hepatic (60–70) 7–22 2–3 -
Renal (30–40)
ESM >90 1.5–7.0 0.6–0.7 0 −20 Hepatic 25–60 5–15 50–100
CBZ 85 3–8 0.8–2.0 76 <2 Hepatic 12–17 2–6 4–12
CLB >95 0.9–1.4 85 - Hepatic 18 100–400
VPA >95 4–17 0.1–0.2 90 1–3 Hepatic (95) 6–17 2 50–100
Renal (5)
VGB 60–80 1 0.8 0 100 Renal 5–8 2 -
ZNS 90 2–6 1.0–1.9 40 −35 Hepatic (70) 27–70 10–40 10–40
Renal (30)
LTG >95 1–4 0.9–1.3 55 10 Hepatic 15–35 5–6 -
GBP 35–60 2–4 0.85 0 100 Renal 5–7 2 -
TPM 80 1.4–4.3 0.6–0.8 15 20–60 Hepatic (30) 20–30 4–6 2–13
Renal (70)
OXC 90 4.5–6.0 0.75 60 <1 Hepatic (80) 8–15 1 -
Renal (20)
LEV 95 0.3–2.0 0.5–0.7 <10 −66 Renal 6–8 5 6–21
PGB 90 1.3 0.57 0 −98 Renal 5–7 2 3.0–9.5
LCM 100 1–4 0.5–0.8 <30 40 Hepatic (60) 13 2–3 -
Renal (40)
RFN 85 4–6 0.71–1.14 35 −4 Hepatic 6–10 1–3 5–30
PRP 100 0.5–2.5 ≤95 2 Hepatic 70 -
BVC 100 1 0.5 ≤20 9 Hepatic (20) 9 2 0.2–2.0

*Unchanged excretion.

BVC: brivaracetam, CBZ: carbamazepine, CLB: clobazam, ESM: ethosuximide, F: drug fraction, GBP: gabapentin, LCM: lacosamide, LEV: levetiracetam, LTG: lamotrigine, OXC: oxcarbazepine, PB: phenobarbital, PGB: pregabalin, PHT: phenytoin, PRM: primidone, PRP: perampanel, RFN: rufinamide, Tmax: time to reach maximum plasma concentration, TPM: topiramate, TSS: time to reach steady-state plasma concentration, Vd: volume of distribution, VGB: vigabatrin, VPA: valproate, ZNS: zonisamide.

Table 4. Recommended titration rate and maintenance dose for AEDs in adult patients with epilepsy.

AED Titration rate Initial target maintenance dose (mg/day) Usual maintenance dose (mg/day) Frequency of administration
PB Start at 30–50 mg at bedtime and increase if indicated after 10–15 days 50–100 50–200 1 time/day
PHT Start at 100–300 mg/day and increase to target dosage over 3–7 days at up to 50 mg/day 200–300 200–400 1–2 times/day
PRM Start at 62.5 or 125 mg/day and increase to target dosage over about 3 weeks 500–750 500–1500 2–3 times/day
A faster titration may be used in patients on enzyme-inducing comedication
ESM Start at 500 mg/day and increase at 5- to 7-day intervals in increments of 250 mg/day 500–750 500–1500
CBZ Start at 200 or 400 mg/day and increase to target dosage over 1–4 weeks at up to 200 mg/day 400–600 400–1600 2–3 times/day
CLB Start at 5–10 mg/day and increase to 20 mg/day after 1–2 weeks 10–20 10–40 1–2 times/day
VPA Start at 500 mg/day and increase at 5- to 7-day intervals in increments of 500 mg/day 500–1000 500–2500 2–3 times/day
VGB Start at 250 or 500 mg/day and increase by 500 mg/day over 1–2 weeks 1000 1000–3000 1–2 times/day
ZNS Start at 50–100 mg/day, increase to 100 mg/day at interval of 1–2 weeks 200–300 200–500 2 times/day
LTG Monotherapy: start at 25 mg/day for 2 week, then increase to 50 mg/day for 2 weeks. Further increases of 50 mg/day every 2 weeks 50–150 (monotherapy) 50–150 (monotherapy or add-on valproate) 2 times/day (once daily possible with monotherapy and valproate comedication)
Valproate comedication: start at 25 mg on alternate days for 2 weeks, then 25 mg/day for 2 weeks. Further increases of 25–50 mg/day every 2 weeks. 50–100 (add-on valproate) 200–500 (add-on enzyme inducers)
Enzyme-inducing comedication: start at 25 or 50 mg/day for 2 weeks. Further increases of 50–100 mg/day every 2 weeks 200–300 (add-on enzyme inducers)
GBP Start at 300–900 mg/day and increase to target dosage over 5–10 days 900–1800 900–3600 2–3 times/day
TPM Start at 25–50 mg/day and increase in 25- or 50-mg/day increments every 2 weeks 100 100–400 2 times/day
OXC Start at 300 mg/day and increase at 2-day intervals by 150 mg/day to target dosage over 1–3 weeks 600–900 600–3000 2–3 times/day
LEV Start at 500 or 1000 mg/day and increase at 1- to 2-week intervals at up to 500 mg/day after 2 weeks 1000–2000 1000–3000 2 times/day
PGB Start at 50 or 75 mg/day and increase at 3- to 7-day intervals at up to 50–300 mg/day 150–300 150–600 2–3 times/day
LCM Start at 100 mg/day and increase to target dosage in increments of 100 mg/day every week 200–300 200–400 2 times/day
RFN Start at 400 mg/day and increase every 2–4 days by 400 mg/day 1200 1200–3200 2 times/day
PRP Start at 2 mg and increase by 2 mg/day to target dosage at 2-week intervals 4–8 4–12 1 time/day
BVC Start at either 50 or 100 mg/day and increase to target dose at intervals of 1–2 weeks 50–200 50–200 2 times/day

AED: antiepileptic drug, BVC: brivaracetam, CBZ: carbamazepine, CLB: clobazam, ESM: ethosuximide, GBP: gabapentin, LCM: lacosamide, LEV: levetiracetam, LTG: lamotrigine, OXC: oxcarbazepine, PB: phenobarbital, PGB: pregabalin, PHT: phenytoin, PRM: primidone, PRP: perampanel, RFN: rufinamide, TPM: topiramate, VGB: vigabatrin, VPA: valproate, ZNS: zonisamide.

After an antiepileptic drug is administered via a specific route, its serum concentration is determined by various pharmacokinetic parameters. The serum concentration of the drug, which influences its therapeutic effects, is determined by absorption, distribution, and conversion processes in the human body, and the rate of excretion, bioavailability, and protein binding. The main pharmacokinetic parameters are summarized in Table 3. Older antiepileptic drugs generally show strong protein binding and clinically significant changes in drug effects resulting from changes in the drug-free fractions. As one example of a clinical application, the effect of drugs exhibiting strong protein binding (e.g., phenytoin and valproate) could be reduced when the serum level of albumin is low, such as in renal or hepatic disease, pregnancy, and malnutrition with various medical conditions.11 On the other hand, newer antiepileptic drugs exhibit fewer drug interactions and more-predictable pharmacokinetics.13 Antiepileptic drugs have different half-lives, which in general are related to the time taken to reach the steady-state plasma concentration. This is a useful indicator to consider when determining the maintenance dosage of a specific antiepileptic drug. The titration rates and maintenance doses for the various antiepileptic drugs are listed in Table 4.

The pharmacokinetic properties of an antiepileptic drug determine the time course of its serum concentration after its administration, while pharmacodynamics describes the relationship between the drug concentration and its therapeutic effect. When applying combination therapy of antiepileptic drugs, pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic interactions can occur between multiple drugs, which could be either beneficial or harmful. Adding an antiepileptic drug with different pharmacodynamic properties is recommended in combination therapy because antiepileptic drugs such as carbamazepine, phenytoin, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, and lacosamide that act on Na+ channels have more adverse effects. On the other hand, the synergistic combination of valproate and lamotrigine elicits beneficial drug interactions and is often recommended when monotherapy fails. Combination therapy should be considered when there are few side effects, since seizure control using this method is superior to that in monotherapy.

SEIZURE TYPE AND EPILEPSY CLASSIFICATION

The ILAE guidelines revised in 2017 classify seizure into focal, generalized, unknown, or unclassifiable based on its onset (Fig. 2).14 The old term “partial” was changed to “focal” seizure, while the term “generalized seizure,” in which seizure begins in both hemispheres, was retained. If the onset of seizure is unknown, but subsequent seizure types are known, the seizure is classified as “unknown.” A seizure event that does not belong to any of the above categories is designated as “unclassified.” Depending on whether consciousness in lost during a seizure event, the old terms “simple” and “complex” were changed to the new terms of “aware” and “impaired awareness.” After classifying the loss of consciousness, the next step is to assess the “motor” or “nonmotor” category at the onset of seizure. A secondary generalized seizure was newly named “focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizure.”

Fig. 2. ILAE 2017 classification of seizure type. In the guidelines of the ILAE revised in 2017, seizures are classified into focal, generalized, and unknown based on their onset. ILAE: International League Against Epilepsy.

Fig. 2

Epilepsy is classified into the following four types: “focal,” “generalized,” “combined generalized and focal,” and “unknown.” A few epileptic syndromes that involve both focal and generalized seizure types (e.g., Dravet syndrome and Lennox- Gastaut syndrome) were included in “combined generalized and focal epilepsy.” Epilepsy events in which information about the type of seizure and patient is insufficient are categorized as “unknown.”

In order to select appropriate drugs, the diagnosis of the patient must first be accurate, in terms of the cause, seizure type, and epilepsy syndrome. The most useful diagnostic classification for antiepileptic drug selection is based on the seizure type (Fig. 2 and Table 2). Most antiepileptic drugs are effective against focal seizures and generalized tonic-clonic seizures, but special medications are needed for absence and myoclonic seizures, for which broad-spectrum antiepileptic drugs such as valproate are effective. In contrast, ethosuximide has a small indication range and can only be used in absence seizures. Therefore, diagnosing the seizure type is most important when initiating treatment for patients with epilepsy.

ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUG SELECTION ACCORDING TO SEIZURE TYPES

Focal onset seizure with awareness or impaired awareness

First single drug

Carbamazepine,15 oxcarbazepine,15 and lamotrigine16 are recommended for patients with their first diagnosed focal seizures. In the 2019 Expert Opinion Survey in Korea, the first choices for focal seizure were levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and lamotrigine.17 Carbamazepine is the most-frequent antiepileptic drug used in RCTs for patients with focal seizures. A 2007 large-scale, open-label RCT with carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate involving 1,721 patients with partial-onset seizures found that lamotrigine exhibited noninferiority compared with carbamazepine.18

If carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and lamotrigine are not suitable or the patient does not tolerant them, levetiracetam19 or valproate20 can be used. A meta-analysis of 17 trials involving 3,205 patients found levetiracetam to be an effective antiepileptic drug for partial-onset refractory seizures.21

Additional drug

If the primary treatment is ineffective or the patient does not tolerate it, the frequently chosen options for additional treatment are carbamazepine, clobazam,22 gabapentin,23 lamotrigine,24 levetiracetam,25 oxcarbazepine,26 valproate,27 tiagabine,28 and topiramate.29 If the additional treatment is ineffective or the patient cannot tolerate it, the patient can be transferred to a tertiary institution. Lacosamide, phenobarbital, phenytoin, pregabalin, vigabatrin, and zonisamide can be considered as the next step in the process. Lacosamide30 has been used as a single drug for controlling the first focal seizure in Europe and the United States, but has only been approved as an additional antiepileptic drug for focal seizure in Korea.31 In a 2-year follow-up of 322 patients with partial-onset seizure, lacosamide monotherapy produced a favorable outcome and safety profiles.30

Brivaracetam increases the binding affinity of the synaptic vesicle protein SV2A by 10-fold more than levetiracetam. It was approved by the Korean FDA in 2019, and has been available for prescribing as an additional treatment in patients with focal seizure since 2020.32 The voltage-gated Na+-channel antagonist eslicarbazepine acetate is a novel antiepileptic drug that is used as an additional therapy for patients with focal seizure in the United States and Europe, but it has not yet been released in Korea.33 Retigabine is another novel antiepileptic drug approved for use in patients with refractory focal seizure in the United States and Europe that has not been introduced into Korea.34

GENERALIZED ONSET SEIZURE

Generalized tonic-clonic seizure

First single drug

Valproate35 is recommended for patients who are first diagnosed with generalized tonic-clonic seizure. When valproate is administered to females of childbearing age, there is a risk of the development of fetal deformities and neurodevelopmental disorders. The use of valproate should therefore be minimized as much as possible. If valproate is not suitable, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, zonisamide, and topiramate are considered as a first-line treatment.31 In the 2019 Expert Opinion Survey in Korea, valproate and lamotrigine were frequently selected for generalized tonic-clonic seizure.17 However, care is need with lamotrigine since this can aggravate myoclonus.35

There is double-blind and open-label RCT evidence for the effectiveness of carbamazepine, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, phenytoin, and valproate as first-line antiepileptic drugs in patients with generalized tonic-clonic seizures. A large-scale RCT compared lamotrigine, valproate, and topiramate in 716 patients with generalized-onset and unclassifiable seizures.36 The subgroup analysis of idiopathic generalized epilepsy showed that valproate was more effective and had a lower failure rate than lamotrigine and topiramate.

Additional drug

If the primary treatment is not effective or tolerated, clobazam,37 lamotrigine, levetiracetam,38 valproate, topiramate,35 and perampanel39 can be considered as additional drugs. Carbamazepine, gabapentin, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, pregabalin, and vigabatrin are not used in cases of absence or myoclonic seizure. A randomized trial showed that adjunctive therapy with perampanel was well tolerated and improved the control of drug-resistant generalized tonic-clonic seizure in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy.39

Nonmotor (absence) seizure

First single drug16

Ethosuximide or valproate40 is recommended for absence seizures. Lamotrigine31 can be considered if ethosuximide or valproate is inappropriate, ineffective, or not tolerated by the patient. A large study of ethosuximide, valproate, and lamotrigine demonstrated the superior effectiveness of ethosuximide and valproate compared with lamotrigine as a first-line treatment for patients with absence seizure.41 A 2010 double-blind trial of 446 patients with absence seizure found that the rate of seizure-free outcomes was 58% for valproate, 53% for ethosuximide, and 29% for lamotrigine.40 If the patient has coexisting generalized tonic-clonic seizures, valproate should be considered in preference to ethosuximde.42

Additional drug

If the primary treatment is not effective or is not tolerated by the patient, two of the following drugs can be considered: ethosuximide, lamotrigine, and valproate. If the additional treatment is ineffective or the patient cannot tolerate it, the patient can be transferred to a tertiary institution. Clobazam,37 clonazepam,43 levetiracetam,44 topiramate,35 and zonisamide45 can be considered as a next step.

Myoclonic seizure

First single drug16

Valproate35 is recommended as the primary treatment for myoclonic seizures. Levetiracetam,46 zonisamide,31 and topiramate35 can be considered as first-line antiepileptic drugs if valproate is inappropriate. An unblinded RCT performed in the United Kingdom over 5 years found that valproate was better tolerated than topiramate and more effective than lamotrigine.34

Additional drug

If the first single antiepileptic drug fails to control myoclonic seizures, lamotrigine47 or zonisamide48 can be considered as an additional drug. A prospective RCT involving patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy found that lamotrigine was effective and better tolerated than valproate, even though lamotrigine often elicited idiosyncratic reactions such as skin eruption.46 Carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, gabapentin, vigabatrin, and tiagabine worsen myoclonic seizure.

Tonic or atonic seizure16

Phenytoin and lamotrigine36 are effective at treating tonic seizures. Valproate35 is the drug of choice for atonic seizure, especially in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, but it is less effective in controlling tonic seizure. Antiepileptic drugs with broad-spectrum effects such as lamotrigine,35 topiramate,35 zonisamide, and levetiracetam are used for mixed seizures that include tonic seizure.

Lamotrigine,49 topiramate,50 and rufinamide51 are also used as adjunctive treatment for atonic seizure. However, rufinamide has recently been reported to aggravate atonic seizure.52 Levetiracetam and zonisamide, which are broad-spectrum antiepileptic drugs, are expected to be useful in the treatment of atonic seizure, although the data regarding outcomes are currently insufficient.

CONCLUSION

Recently developed antiepileptic drugs act via various novel mechanisms that increase their effectiveness while minimizing side effects. Since there is a wide range of antiepileptic drug available, selecting appropriate treatments requires broadening our understanding of the use of antiepileptic drugs based on seizure types in order to provide customized treatments for patients with epilepsy. This review has summarized the antiepileptic drugs that are available in Korea for different seizure types based on medical evidence and Korean expert opinions (Table 5). The most-important reference information when treating with antiepileptics is medical evidence. Expert opinion cannot be a substitute for the medical literature, and should only be consulted in specific clinical situations.

Table 5. Recommendations of antiepileptic drugs from Korean Expert-Opinion Surveys.

Monotherapy Adjunctive therapy Not recommended
Treatment of choice First-line treatment Treatment of choice First-line treatment
Focal seizure LEV, LTG, LCM OXC, TPM, ZNS, CBZ, VPA
 Without dyscognitive seizure LEV, OXC, LTG CBZ
 With dyscognitive seizure LTG, OXC, LEV CBZ
 With bilateral convulsion LEV, OXC, LTG CBZ, LCM, VPA
Generalized seizure VPA, LEV LTG, TPM, ZNS
 GTCS VPA, LEV LTG, TPM, ZNS
 Absence ESM, VPA LEV CBZ, OXC, GBP, PHT, PGB, VGB
 Myoclonic VPA, LEV ZNS, TPM CBZ, OXC, GBP, PHT, PGB, VGB

CBZ: carbamazepine, ESM: ethosuximide, GBP: gabapentin, GTCS: generalized tonic-clonic seizure, LCM: lacosamide, LEV: levetiracetam, LTG: lamotrigine, OXC: oxcarbazepine, PGB: pregabalin, PHT: phenytoin, TPM: topiramate, VGB: vigabatrin, VPA: valproate, ZNS: zonisamide.

Acknowledgements

None.

Footnotes

Author Contributions:
  • Conceptualization: all authors.
  • Data curation: all authors.
  • Formal analysis: Hyeyun Kim, Yong Won Cho, Kwang Ik Yang.
  • Investigation: all authors.
  • Methodology: Hyeyun Kim, Yong Won Cho, Kwang Ik Yang.
  • Supervision: Yong Won Cho, Kwang Ik Yang.
  • Validation: all authors.
  • Visualization: Hyeyun Kim, Yong Won Cho, Kwang Ik Yang.
  • Writing—original draft: Hyeyun Kim.
  • Writing—review & editing: Hyeyun Kim, Yong Won Cho, Kwang Ik Yang.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  • 1.Brodie MJ. Antiepileptic drug therapy the story so far. Seizure. 2010;19:650–655. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2010.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Scott LJ. Lacosamide: a review in focal seizures in patients with epilepsy. Drugs. 2015;75:2143–2154. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0514-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hoy SM. Topiramate extended release: a review in epilepsy. CNS Drugs. 2016;30:559–566. doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0344-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fabris RR, Cascino TG, Mandrekar J, Marsh WR, Meyer FB, Cascino GD. Drug-resistant focal epilepsy in women of childbearing age: reproduction and the effect of epilepsy surgery. Epilepsy Behav. 2016;60:17–20. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.French JA, Kanner AM, Bautista J, Abou-Khalil B, Browne T, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs, I: treatment of new-onset epilepsy: report of the TTA and QSS Subcommittees of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society. Epilepsia. 2004;45:401–409. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.06204.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Appleton RE, Freeman A, Cross JH. Diagnosis and management of the epilepsies in children: a summary of the partial update of the 2012 NICE epilepsy guideline. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97:1073–1076. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. SIGN 50: a guideline developer's handbook. Revised ed. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN); 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Glauser T, Ben-Menachem E, Bourgeois B, Cnaan A, Chadwick D, Guerreiro C, et al. ILAE treatment guidelines: evidence-based analysis of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes. Epilepsia. 2006;47:1094–1120. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00585.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Korean Epilepsy Society. Clinical guideline for antiepileptic drug treatment in patient with epilepsy. Seoul: Korean Epilepsy Society; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Davies JA. Mechanisms of action of antiepileptic drugs. Seizure. 1995;4:267–271. doi: 10.1016/s1059-1311(95)80003-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhu MM, Li HL, Shi LH, Chen XP, Luo J, Zhang ZL. The pharmacogenomics of valproic acid. J Hum Genet. 2017;62:1009–1014. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2017.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Howard P, Remi J, Remi C, Charlesworth S, Whalley H, Bhatia R, et al. Levetiracetam. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018;56:645–649. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Johannessen SI, Tomson T. Pharmacokinetic variability of newer antiepileptic drugs: when is monitoring needed? Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45:1061–1075. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200645110-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fisher RS, Cross JH, D'Souza C, French JA, Haut SR, Higurashi N, et al. Instruction manual for the ILAE 2017 operational classification of seizure types. Epilepsia. 2017;58:531–542. doi: 10.1111/epi.13671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Maiti R, Mishra BR, Sanyal S, Mohapatra D, Parida S, Mishra A. Effect of carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine on serum neuron-specific enolase in focal seizures: a randomized controlled trial. Epilepsy Res. 2017;138:5–10. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Marson AG, Al-Kharusi AM, Alwaidh M, Appleton R, Baker GA, Chadwick DW, et al. The SANAD study of effectiveness of carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate for treatment of partial epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369:1000–1015. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60460-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Byun JI, Kim DW, Kim KT, Yang KI, Lee ST, Seo JG, et al. Treatment of epilepsy in adults: expert opinion in South Korea. Epilepsy Behav. 2020;105:106942. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.106942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Marson AG, Appleton R, Baker GA, Chadwick DW, Doughty J, Eaton B, et al. A randomised controlled trial examining the longer-term outcomes of standard versus new antiepileptic drugs. The SANAD trial. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11(37) doi: 10.3310/hta11370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cereghino JJ, Biton V, Abou-Khalil B, Dreifuss F, Gauer LJ, Leppik I. Levetiracetam for partial seizures: results of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Neurology. 2000;55:236–242. doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.2.236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chadwick DW. Valproate monotherapy in the management of generalized and partial seizures. Epilepsia. 1987;28 Suppl 2:S12–S17. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1987.tb05766.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chen D, Bian H, Zhang L. A meta-analysis of levetiracetam for randomized placebo-controlled trials in patients with refractory epilepsy. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019;15:905–917. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S188111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Montenegro MA, Cendes F, Noronha AL, Mory SB, Carvalho MI, Marques LH, et al. Efficacy of clobazam as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2001;42:539–542. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.31600.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.The US Gabapentin Study Group No. 5. Gabapentin as add-on therapy in refractory partial epilepsy: a double- blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Neurology. 1993;43:2292–2298. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.11.2292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jozwiak S, Terczynski A. Open study evaluating lamotrigine efficacy and safety in add-on treatment and consecutive monotherapy in patients with carbamazepine- or valproate-resistant epilepsy. Seizure. 2000;9:486–492. doi: 10.1053/seiz.2000.0444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Steinhoff BJ, Somerville ER, Van Paesschen W, Ryvlin P, Schelstraete I. The SKATE study: an open-label community-based study of levetiracetam as add-on therapy for adults with uncontrolled partial epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2007;76:6–14. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2007.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Barcs G, Walker EB, Elger CE, Scaramelli A, Stefan H, Sturm Y, et al. Oxcarbazepine placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial in refractory partial epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2000;41:1597–1607. doi: 10.1111/j.1499-1654.2000.001597.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sun MZ, Deckers CL, Liu YX, Wang W. Comparison of add-on valproate and primidone in carbamazepine-unresponsive patients with partial epilepsy. Seizure. 2009;18:90–93. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2008.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jedrzejczak J. Tiagabine as add-on therapy may be more effective with valproic acid--open label, multicentre study of patients with focal epilepsy. Eur J Neurol. 2005;12:176–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2004.00874.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Krakow K, Lengler U, Rettig K, Schreiner A, Schauble B TOP-GER-3 investigators. Topiramate in add-on therapy: results from an open-label, observational study. Seizure. 2007;16:593–600. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2007.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vossler DG, Wechsler RT, Williams P, Byrnes W, Therriault S; Long-term exposure and safety of lacosamide monotherapy for the treatment of partial-onset (focal) seizures: results from a multicenter, open-label trial. Epilepsia. 2016;57:1625–1633. doi: 10.1111/epi.13502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shih JJ, Whitlock JB, Chimato N, Vargas E, Karceski SC, Frank RD. Epilepsy treatment in adults and adolescents: expert opinion, 2016. Epilepsy Behav. 2017;69:186–222. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.von Rosenstiel P. Brivaracetam (UCB 34714) Neurotherapeutics. 2007;4:84–87. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2006.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Almeida L, Soares-da-Silva P. Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) Neurotherapeutics. 2007;4:88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2006.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.French JA, Abou-Khalil BW, Leroy RF, Yacubian EM, Shin P, Hall S, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ezogabine (retigabine) in partial epilepsy. Neurology. 2011;76:1555–1563. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182194bd3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Marson AG, Al-Kharusi AM, Alwaidh M, Appleton R, Baker GA, Chadwick DW, et al. The SANAD study of effectiveness of valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate for generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369:1016–1026. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60461-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.National Clinical Guideline Centre. The epilepsies: the diagnosis and management of the epilepsies in adults and children in primary and secondary care. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Allen JW, Oxley J, Robertson MM, Trimble MR, Richens A, Jawad SS. Clobazam as adjunctive treatment in refractory epilepsy. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983;286:1246–1247. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6373.1246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kumar SP, Smith PE. Levetiracetam as add-on therapy in generalised epilepsies. Seizure. 2004;13:475–477. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2003.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.French JA, Krauss GL, Wechsler RT, Wang XF, DiVentura B, Brandt C, et al. Perampanel for tonic-clonic seizures in idiopathic generalized epilepsy: a randomized trial. Neurology. 2015;85:950–957. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Glauser TA, Cnaan A, Shinnar S, Hirtz DG, Dlugos D, Masur D, et al. Ethosuximide, valproic acid, and lamotrigine in childhood absence epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:790–799. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Brigo F, Igwe SC. Ethosuximide, sodium valproate or lamotrigine for absence seizures in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:CD003032. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003032.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nevitt SJ, Marson AG, Weston J, Tudur Smith C. Sodium valproate versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;8:CD001769. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001769.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dahlin MG, Amark PE, Nergårdh AR. Reduction of seizures with lowdose clonazepam in children with epilepsy. Pediatr Neurol. 2003;28:48–52. doi: 10.1016/s0887-8994(02)00468-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Verrotti A, Cerminara C, Domizio S, Mohn A, Franzoni E, Coppola G, et al. Levetiracetam in absence epilepsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:850–853. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03099.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kessler SK, McGinnis E. A practical guide to treatment of childhood absence epilepsy. Paediatr Drugs. 2019;21:15–24. doi: 10.1007/s40272-019-00325-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Noachtar S, Andermann E, Meyvisch P, Andermann F, Gough WB, Schiemann-Delgado J, et al. Levetiracetam for the treatment of idiopathic generalized epilepsy with myoclonic seizures. Neurology. 2008;70:607–616. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000297512.18364.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Machado RA, García VF, Astencio AG, Cuartas VB. Efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy in adults: a prospective, unblinded randomized controlled trial. Seizure. 2013;22:846–855. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2013.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Vossler DG, Conry JA, Murphy JV ZNS-502/505 PME Study Group. 505 PME Study Group. Zonisamide for the treatment of myoclonic seizures in progressive myoclonic epilepsy: an open-label study. Epileptic Disord. 2008;10:31–34. doi: 10.1684/epd.2008.0168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Motte J, Trevathan E, Arvidsson JF, Barrera MN, Mullens EL, Manasco P. Lamotrigine for generalized seizures associated with the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Lamictal Lennox-Gastaut Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1807–1812. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199712183372504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Verrotti A, Striano P, Iapadre G, Zagaroli L, Bonanni P, Coppola G, et al. The pharmacological management of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and critical literature review. Seizure. 2018;63:17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Balagura G, Riva A, Marchese F, Verrotti A, Striano P. Adjunctive rufinamide in children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: a literature review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020;16:369–379. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S185774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bektaş G, Çalışkan M, Aydın A, Pembegül Yıldız E, Tatlı B, Aydınlı N, et al. Aggravation of atonic seizures by rufinamide: a case report. Brain Dev. 2016;38:654–657. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2016.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Neurology (Seoul, Korea) are provided here courtesy of Korean Neurological Association

RESOURCES