Ectopic bone formation and systemic bone loss in a transmembrane TNF-driven model of human spondyloarthritis

Eleni Christodoulou-Vafeiadou; Christina Geka; Lydia Ntari; Ksanthi Kranidioti; Eleni Argyropoulou; Florian Meier; Marietta Armaka; Iordanis Mourouzis; Constantinos Pantos; Maritina Rouchota; George Loudos; Maria C Denis; Niki Karagianni; George Kollias

doi:10.1186/s13075-020-02327-4

. 2020 Oct 6;22:232. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02327-4

Ectopic bone formation and systemic bone loss in a transmembrane TNF-driven model of human spondyloarthritis

Eleni Christodoulou-Vafeiadou ¹, Christina Geka ¹, Lydia Ntari ¹, Ksanthi Kranidioti ¹, Eleni Argyropoulou ¹, Florian Meier ^2,³, Marietta Armaka ⁴, Iordanis Mourouzis ⁵, Constantinos Pantos ⁵, Maritina Rouchota ⁶, George Loudos ⁶, Maria C Denis ¹, Niki Karagianni ¹, George Kollias ^4,^7,^✉

PMCID: PMC7542121 PMID: 33023659

Abstract

Background

The transmembrane-TNF transgenic mouse, TgA86, has been shown to develop spontaneously peripheral arthritis with signs of axial involvement. To assess similarity to human spondyloarthritis, we performed detailed characterization of the axial, peripheral, and comorbid pathologies of this model.

Methods

TgA86 bone pathologies were assessed at different ages using CT imaging of the spine, tail vertebrae, and hind limbs and characterized in detail by histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis. Cardiac function was examined by echocardiography and electrocardiography and bone structural parameters by μCT analysis. The response of TgA86 mice to either early or late anti-TNF treatment was evaluated clinically, histopathologically, and by μCT analysis.

Results

TgA86 mice developed with 100% penetrance spontaneous axial and peripheral pathology which progressed with time and manifested as reduced body weight and body length, kyphosis, tail bendings, as well as swollen and distorted hind joints. Whole-body CT analysis at advanced ages revealed bone erosions of sacral and caudal vertebrae as well as of sacroiliac joints and hind limbs and, also, new ectopic bone formation and eventually vertebral fusion. The pathology of these mice highly resembled that of SpA patients, as it evolved through an early inflammatory phase, evident as enthesitis and synovitis in the affected joints, characterized by mesenchymal cell accumulation, and neutrophilic infiltration. Subsequently, regression of inflammation was accompanied by ectopic bone formation, leading to ankylosis. In addition, both systemic bone loss and comorbid heart valve pathology were evident. Importantly, early anti-TNF treatment, similar to clinical treatment protocols, significantly reduced the inflammatory phase of both the axial and peripheral pathology of TgA86 mice.

Conclusions

The TgA86 mice develop a spontaneous peripheral and axial biphasic pathology accompanied by comorbid heart valvular dysfunction and osteoporosis, overall reproducing the progression of pathognomonic features of human spondyloarthritis. Therefore, the TgA86 mouse represents a valuable model for deciphering the role of transmembrane TNF in the pathogenic mechanisms of spondyloarthritis and for assessing the efficacy of human therapeutics targeting different phases of the disease.

Keywords: Spondyloarthritis, Ectopic bone formation, Vertebral fusion, Ankylosis, Comorbidities, Transmembrane TNF, Anti-TNF treatment, Inflammation, Animal disease model

Background

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) describes a group of chronic inflammatory disorders that have been initially classified as clinically distinct and included ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), reactive arthritis (ReA), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-associated arthritis, and more [1, 2]. More recently, these pathologies have been unified based on common and overlapping features including inflammation of peripheral joints, the spine, and/or sacroiliac joints as well as structural damage dominated by bone destruction and progressive bone formation eventually evolving into axial and peripheral joint ankylosis [1, 3–5]. Additional features include extraarticular manifestations such as psoriasis, uveitis, IBD, aortitis, and osteoporosis [6, 7].

The development of SpA has been linked to several factors, with a focus on genetic factors such as HLA-B27 [2, 6] but also on the contribution of several pro-inflammatory cytokines [8, 9] that are central to the transformation and perpetuation of disease including TNF-α, IL23, IL17, and IL1β [10]. Despite the associations with pathogenic factors, the understanding of SpA pathogenesis remains incomplete and therapeutic approaches are targeting symptoms rather than the cause of the pathology.

Therefore, animal models of SpA are of high value as they can significantly contribute to the better understanding of the disease [11], addressing important questions such as the identification of the pathogenic factors that underlie disease causality and contribute to disease mechanisms responsible for the development of specific features of the pathology. A faithful mouse model of SpA should ideally reproduce both the progression, as well as the full complexity of the human pathology including main disease features such as inflammation of the spine and sacroiliac joints progressing to bone formation and ankylosis, peripheral joint arthritis, enthesitis, and dactylitis, accompanied by one or more relevant extraarticular manifestations of the disease.

The pro-inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is a key pathogenic factor involved in the development of SpA, with evidence stemming primarily from the significant therapeutic effect of TNF-blocking agents that, when administered early on in the development of the disease, can alleviate SpA symptoms [12–15]. It has been previously shown that overexpression of mouse TNF through the deletion of AU-rich elements in its 3′UTR, leads to the development of destructive polyarthritis, sacroiliitis, enthesitis, Crohn’s-like IBD, and aortic valve inflammation, however, without evidence of new bone formation [16, 17]. Similarly, mouse models overexpressing human TNF [18, 19] have been shown to develop spontaneous arthritis also missing however evidence of new bone formation, which is the main feature of SpA.

Interestingly, the TgA86 transgenic mouse model overexpressing specifically mouse transmembrane TNF (tmTNF) signaling through both TNFR1 and TNFR2 receptors has been previously shown to develop both peripheral and axial clinical manifestations [20], thus prompting us to further explore whether this model is faithfully reproducing key pathologic features of human SpA. Through computed tomography (CT) imaging and detailed histopathological analysis, we study here in great detail the features of the axial and peripheral pathology of the TgA86 mice and align them to those of human SpA. We show that the TgA86 model closely reproduces major aspects of human SpA including the development of spondylitis, sacroiliitis, enthesitis, and bone destruction gradually leading to activation of new bone formation mechanisms and ankylosis, while accompanied by comorbid heart valve pathology and osteoporosis. We propose that the TgA86 is an animal model faithfully reproducing the complexity of human SpA, a statement further supported by the finding that, in line with clinical findings in human patients, early anti-TNF treatment leads to the alleviation of its SpA manifestations. Overall, we propose that the TgA86 mouse model is suitable for the study of the role of tmTNF in SpA as well as for the study of SpA pathogenic mechanisms and for the in vivo efficacy evaluation of human therapeutics targeting different aspects of SpA pathology either at the early or later stages of the disease.

Methods

Mice

The TgA86 mice overexpressing tmTNF have been previously described [20]. Briefly, these mice carry a 3.2-kb genomic DNA fragment containing 5′-regulatory sequences and a muTNFΔ1-12 mutated gene linked to the 3′-UTR of the human β-globin gene. Mice used in this work were heterozygous for the transgene and were maintained on a CBA × C57BL/6J genetic background in Biomedcode’s animal facility, under SPF conditions. All mouse experimentations were performed according to National legislation. The wellbeing of all mice was regularly monitored and mice were euthanized when needed according to animal welfare guidelines. For the initial phenotyping experiments, the termination time point was set to a maximum of 40 weeks of age.

For the evaluation of the effect of anti-TNF treatment, groups of 6–10 age- and sex-matched TgA86 mice were treated subcutaneously either with saline or etanercept 30 mg/kg (Amgen/Pfizer) thrice weekly from 2.5 (early) or 9 weeks (late) up to 20 weeks of age.

Mice were monitored on a weekly basis to assess the clinical signs of peripheral and axial pathology. A group of age- and sex-matched wild type (wt) littermates was used as a control group. At the end of the treatment period, animals were sacrificed, and tails, hearts, ankle, and sacroiliac joints were collected and processed for further analysis.

Clinical scoring

The in vivo peripheral and axial pathology of the TgA86 mice was monitored on a weekly basis from 2.5 to 20 weeks of age. A peripheral pathology scoring system was developed to assess the severity of joint swelling, digit/limb deformation, and grip strength using a scale from 0 to 2 (Additional file 1: Table S1). Similarly, an axial pathology scoring system was developed that assessed severity on a scale from 0 to 3 based on the evaluation of tail bendings and stiffness (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Body length measurements, CT, and μCT imaging

Live photos of animals at 6, 10, and 15 weeks of age were acquired under standard conditions, and they were used to assess body length, from nose to tail tip, using the ImageJ processing software. CT imaging was performed using the x-CUBE (Molecubes), with no further need of a contrast agent. Mice were lightly anesthetized with isoflurane and acquisition was performed using a high-resolution and Multi Rotation protocol at 50 kVp. For whole body acquisitions, an Iterative Image Space Reconstruction Algorithm (ISRA) with 200 μm voxel size was used. For the local scans of specific regions, the reconstruction was done with 100 μm voxel size. Images were exported and post-processed on VivoQuant software, version 4.0 (Invicro, Boston), and further analysis was also performed with RadiAnt DICOM viewer (64-bit).

μCT imaging was performed using the Sky Scan 1172 μCT imaging system (Bruker). Tail and femur specimens were fixed in 4% aqueous formaldehyde solution overnight and scanned at 50 kV, 100 μA, and 5 W, with aluminum filter 0.5 mm, zoom 12, medium camera (2000X1332), and rotation step 0.4–0.8. 3D reconstruction images of the caudal vertebra C6 were generated using NRecon 1.6.8.4 software (Bruker). C6 vertebra length was measured on the shadow projection of tail scanning using the CTAn V1.14.4.1. software (Bruker). Structural indices of the femur trabecular bone (BV/TV, TbN, TbSp, Conn Den) were calculated using the CTAn analysis program.

Histological analysis and immunohistochemistry

Ankle joints, tails, sacroiliac joints, and hearts were harvested and fixed in 4% formalin. Ankle joints, tails, and sacroiliac joints were decalcified in EDTA-decalcification buffer, embedded in paraffin and cut into 4 μm sections. Paraffin sections were stained with hematoxylin/eosin (H&E), Safranin O (s/o), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) (SIGMA), or with specific antibodies in combination with the Vectastain Elite ABC HRP and the Vectastain DAB kits (Vector Laboratories). The antibodies used for immunochistochemistry included Gr1 (MCA2387GA; BioRad), Periostin (ab14041; Abcam), Osteopontin1 (OPN) (AF808; R&D Systems), B220 (553084; BD Pharmigen), and Vimentin (ab92547; Abcam). Images were acquired with Leica DM2500 microscope equipped with Leica SFL4000 camera (Leica Microsystems). Histopathological evaluation of peripheral and axial inflammation was performed on H&E stained sections, according to the scoring criteria outlined in Additional file 1: Tables S3 and S4.

The assessment of vertebral inflammation was performed on H&E tail sections focusing on 4–6 consecutive caudal vertebrae of each mouse (6–10 mice at each age of 10, 20, and 40 weeks of age) and was based on the scoring system described in Additional file 1: Table S4. Inflammation scores were classified in three different groups: low (score 0–1), medium (score > 1 and ≤ 2), and high (score > 2 and ≤ 3) inflammation; percentages represent the ratio of the number of inflamed vertebrae of a given severity to the total number of vertebrae scored for each age group.

Osteoclasts were counted in TRAP stained sections of TgA86 tails, focusing on the site of inflammation (enthesis) and adjacent area of 4 successive vertebrae of each mouse (2–3 mice of 10, 20, and 40 weeks of age).

New bone formation evaluation was performed on s/o stained sections, according to a scoring system ranging from 0 to 3 described in Additional file 1: Table S5.

Aortic valvular thickness measurement

Three independent measurements of the widest portion of the aortic valve leaflets were taken from 2 consecutive H&E-stained transverse heart sections using the ImageJ software (NIH).

Echocardiography and electrocardiogram

Echocardiography and electrocardiogram assessment was performed in 40 weeks of age animals, as previously described [21].

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± SEM, and Student’s t test was used for the evaluation of statistical significance, with P values < 0.05 being considered statistically significant.

Analysis was performed using the GraphPad Prism V.6.

Results

TgA86 tmTNF transgenic mice model key features of human SpA

TgA86 mice have been previously described to develop peripheral arthritis with signs of axial involvement [11, 20]. Here we analyze in greater detail these mice with a primary focus on the characterization of their axial pathology, thus assessing its similarities to human SpA.

TgA86 mice presented with a significantly reduced body weight and body length compared to wild type (wt) mice of the same age (Fig. 1a, b). As early as 3 weeks of age, all mice, with no gender bias (Additional file 1: Figure S1), developed clinical signs of arthritis in all four limbs, which manifested as joint swelling, digit/limb deformation, and joint stiffness ultimately resulting in loss of grip strength (Fig. 1c). Axial pathology was clinically evident as tail bending and eventually tail stiffness also accompanied by hyperkyphosis better evident by CT imaging (Fig. 1c, d). All pathological features worsened over time.

To better characterize the TgA86 axial and peripheral pathology, we performed CT imaging of 40-week-old TgA86 mice and wt littermates focusing on sites known to be important also in human SpA pathology, such as the spine, including the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, sacral, and caudal segments, as well as the sacroiliac joints. In addition, we also examined the hind limbs to get a better grasp of the peripheral pathology. Interestingly, CT imaging revealed previously undetected pathological features both in the spine, especially at the sacral vertebrae, and the sacroiliac joints. More specifically, the frontal view of the TgA86 sacrum revealed structural changes in sacral vertebrae S3/S4 involving loss of their intervertebral space and fusion of the vertebrae, evident in 83% of the transgenic mice examined (Fig. 2a; red arrow). The side view of the sacrum also showed loss of the intervertebral space (Fig. 2b; red arrow) and fusion of the spinous processes, evident in 80% of the TgA86 mice examined (Fig. 2b; yellow arrow). Moreover, the superior parts of the sacral ala presented with bilateral structural damages in TgA86 mice (Fig. 2a; yellow boxes).

CT imaging of the upper body revealed extensive hyperkyphosis (Fig. 2c). Cervical vertebrae of TgA86 mice were found to be compressed with reduced intervertebral spaces (Fig. 2d), while lumbar as well as thoracic vertebrae did not show major abnormalities.

CT imaging of the caudal area, where axial pathology of TgA86 mice was originally observed [20], revealed significant changes of the vertebrae structure including loss of their bar bell shape and roughening of their surface accompanied in many cases by vertebrae bridging and fusion (Fig. 2e; red arrowhead).

CT imaging of the peripheral joints revealed thickening of the metatarsal bones (Fig. 2f; red arrow) and phalanges (Fig. 2f; yellow arrow), roughening of their surface as well as structural deformation of the posterior calcaneus at the site of the Achilles entheseal insertion (Fig. 2f; blue arrow), while knee and ankle joints presented also with roughened surfaces and deformed tibia and femur heads (Fig. 2f).

To assess the alignment of the TgA86 phenotype, with human SpA pathology features, we have evaluated common SpA-related comorbid pathologies. By examining the intestine, eyes, and skin tissue during disease progression, we did not observe any signs of pathology. However, we demonstrated with functional and immunohistochemical data a comorbid left-sided heart valve pathology confirming and expanding previous findings [21]. More specifically, we observed that at 40 weeks of age, TgA86 mice displayed aortic valve thickening, consisting mainly of vimentin-positive mesenchymal cells and sparse Gr1-positive neutrophils (Additional file 1: Figure S2a, b). The aortic valve thickening and fibrosis resulted in functional changes including increased aortic velocity (Additional file 1: Figure S2c) with mild regurgitation which was observed in 10–20% of the tested 40-week-old mice. The mitral valve was not affected (Additional file 1: Figure S2b), and hence, mitral velocity remained unchanged (Additional file 1: Figure S2d). Importantly, ejection fraction was significantly decreased (Additional file 1: Figure S2e), indicating cardiac function impairment probably caused by aortic insufficiency. Despite their impaired heart valve function, TgA86 mice did not display premature death and their electrocardiogram was normal.

TgA86 axial and peripheral pathologies evolve through an early phase of inflammation and bone erosion gradually leading to new bone formation

The main pathological features as well as the progression of the axial pathology of TgA86 mice was further studied in the tail vertebrae that exhibit consistently the more pronounced pathology. As pathology first becomes apparent in the vertebrae proximal to the body of the mouse, all further analysis was based on evaluation of the first five-six caudal vertebrae.

Histopathological evaluation of H&E stained sections of tail vertebrae revealed signs of inflammation starting from 4 weeks of age and progressively worsening with time. By 20 weeks of age, 100% of the transgenic mice examined exhibited aggravated pathological features (Fig. 3a; H&E) at the intervertebral joint area with signs of severe enthesitis (Fig. 3a; H&E; black arrows) and intervertebral disk degeneration (Fig. 3a; H&E). These pathological features were homogeneous in the different vertebrae of the same mouse when examined at 20 weeks of age, but, as the disease progressed, heterogeneity of inflammation between different animals and also between the different vertebrae of the same animal was evident. Interestingly, while the percentage of vertebrae with high inflammation was increased at the age of 20 weeks in TgA86 mice, at the age of 40 weeks, it declined with a concomitant twofold increase in the percentage of vertebrae with low inflammation (Fig. 3c).

Fig. 3 — TgA86 axial pathology progresses through sequential stages of inflammation, bone erosion, and ectopic new bone formation. a Representative H&E-stained sections of the tail vertebrae show enthesitis with inflammatory cell accumulation at the periphery of the intervertebral disks (black arrows) of TgA86 mice, while representative TRAP-stained tail vertebrae show the accumulation of active osteoclasts at the sites of inflammation (black arrowheads). b Representative Safranin O-stained sections of tail vertebra show fibrocartilage formation at sites of enthesis in 20-week-old TgA86 mice and ectopic chondrocytes in 40-week-old TgA86 mice (black asterisk in higher magnification panels). c Inflammation is depicted as the percentage of vertebrae with low, intermediate, or high scores. An increase in the percentage of joints with high inflammation is observed at 20-week-old TgA86 mice and this percentage decreases by 40 weeks of age. Similarly, there is an increase in the number of osteoclasts at 20 weeks of age that drops by 40 weeks of age. d Safranin O staining of tail vertebra sections indicates increased presence of fibrocartilage (20 weeks) and of ectopic chondrocytes at later stages, 30 and 40 weeks of age. e Representative H&E-stained sections show inflammatory infiltrates accumulation in the sacroiliac joints of TgA86 mice (black arrowheads)

Additional pathological features that were observed as early as 10 weeks of age and progressively became more pronounced included the roughening of the vertebral surface, the squaring of the vertebral body, and alterations in the bone marrow cavity, where the formation of ectopic cartilaginous matrix and bone marrow cell aggregates was observed (Fig. 3a; H&E).

The extent of bone erosion was evaluated based on the number of osteoclasts stained with TRAP in tail sections of TgA86 mice at different ages. High numbers of osteoclasts were observed in the vertebral body of the tail of TgA86 mice highlighting an active bone remodeling process occurring in these mice (Fig. 3a; black arrowheads). More interestingly, when focusing on the osteoclasts present at the sites of inflammation (enthesitis), we observed an increase in their numbers between 10 and 20 weeks of age and a subsequent drop by 40 weeks of age (Fig. 3c).

Staining of TgA86 tail sections with Safranin O allowed the detection of ectopic cartilage, gradually leading to new bone formation which is a main pathological feature of human SpA. Starting at 20 weeks of age, we could observe fibrocartilage at the inflamed edges of the vertebrae (enthesis) (Fig. 3b, black asterisk and Fig. 3d), while at later ages, 30 and 40 weeks of age, specifically at sites where inflammation was reduced or absent, we could detect the presence of ectopic chondrocytes that occasionally bridged adjacent vertebrae (Fig. 3b, black asterisk and Fig. 3d).

Overall, the axial pathology in TgA86 mice appeared to evolve through an initial phase that involved pronounced inflammation and bone erosion, while as the disease progressed, between 20 and 30 weeks of age, the signs of inflammation and bone erosion were reduced and replaced by the formation of new cartilaginous tissue, eventually leading to bridging of the vertebrae detected later on in disease.

As sacroiliac joints are sites of preference for the manifestation of human SpA, we assessed histopathologically inflammation and tissue damage in the sacroiliac joints of TgA86 mice. As early as 10 weeks of age, TgA86 exhibited pannus-like tissue at the sacroiliac articular surface, while by 20 weeks of age, invasion of inflammatory cells to the sacrum and iliac bones was also evident (Fig. 3e, black arrowheads).

Peripheral pathology was studied by histopathological examination of the hind joints of TgA86 mice and was characterized by synovitis, enthesitis, and focal subchondral bone erosions. By 10 weeks of age, TgA86 mice exhibited extensive enthesitis (Fig. 4a, arrow 1), pannus formation (Fig. 4a, arrow 2), and bone erosion (Fig. 4a, box), while by 20 weeks of age, pannus evolved to progressive destruction of the articular cartilage and subchondral bone (Fig. 4a, black asterisk) that, by 40 weeks of age, was greatly exacerbated.

Increased numbers of osteoclasts were detected in the hind joints at 10 and 20 weeks of age by TRAP staining which, however, similarly to our observations in the tail vertebrae, decreased at 40 weeks of age (Fig. 4b). Interestingly, μCT trabecular analysis of femurs of 20- and 40-week-old TgA86 mice revealed an osteoporotic phenotype further indicating progressive systemic bone loss (Additional file 1: Figure S3).

At 20 weeks of age, we also observed the formation of ectopic Safranin O-stained cartilaginous tissue at the inflamed enthesis (Fig. 4c, arrows) that was more pronounced at 40 weeks of age (Fig. 4d), leading to the development of new ectopic bone tissue (Fig. 4c, arrows and Fig. 4d).

New bone formation in tmTNF transgenic mice involves mechanisms of endochondral and membranous ossification

Immunohistochemical characterization of the axial pathology of 20-week-old TgA86 mice revealed that the increased cellularity observed during the inflammatory phase consisted mainly of an increased number of mesenchymal cells and neutrophils. More specifically, we observed accumulation of vimentin-positive mesenchymal cells at the enthesis and along the ligaments surrounding the vertebrae, but also inside the bone marrow cavity (Fig. 5a). Osteopontin staining at sites of cortical and cancellous bone as well as inside the bone marrow cavity appeared also increased, suggesting the accumulation of osteoblastic lineage cells, while increased periostin staining was also observed in affected vertebrae, and particularly at sites where bone erosion was evident, also suggesting increased osteoblastic activity (Fig. 5a).

These stainings provided valuable insight on the mechanisms that eventually lead to new bone formation observed at the advanced ages of TgA86 mice. More specifically, the increased vimentin and periostin staining indicates mesenchymal cell accumulation and increased osteoblastic activity in the periosteum that suggests an ongoing active membranous ossification mechanism. Similarly, the increased vimentin and osteopontin staining in the osseous vertebral cavity indicates vimentin-positive mesenchymal cell accumulation and condensation leading to osteopontin-positive osteoblastic lineage differentiation, suggesting an active endochondral ossification process.

Cell aggregates in the bone marrow cavity of TgA86 mice were found to consist mostly of B220-positive B cells (Fig. 5b). Similar structures have been previously reported in human RA patients as well as in TNF-dependent mouse models involving bone pathologies [22, 23], with no evidence however of a critical contribution of bone marrow cells in the disease pathogenesis [22, 24]. Gr1-positive neutrophils were found to accumulate mainly at the sites of the enthesis as well as loosely scattered in the bone marrow cavity and along the periosteum (Fig. 5b).

In a similar fashion to the axial pathology, peripheral pathology in the hind joints was also characterized by the accumulation of vimentin-positive mesenchymal cells and Gr1-positive neutrophils at the sites of synovitis and enthesitis, while there was only sparse presence of B220-positive B cells in the bone marrow cavity (Additional file 1: Figure S4).

Anti-TNF therapy efficiently ameliorates both axial and peripheral TgA86 pathologies

We further assessed the response of the TgA86 model to anti-TNF treatment, a therapy that has been proven efficacious in the early treatment of human SpA patients [25, 26]. More specifically, we treated TgA86 mice with etanercept starting either from 2.5 weeks of age, i.e., early in the inflammation phase, or from 9 weeks of age, i.e., late in pathology when inflammation is more extensive leading to activation of cell types contributing to bone remodeling. Treatment continued up to 20 weeks of age and its effect was evaluated both in vivo and ex vivo.

Clinical monitoring of the TgA86 pathology was performed by assessing key phenotypic features of the disease evident up to 20 weeks of age. More specifically, peripheral pathology was assessed on a scale from 0 to 2 taking into consideration the severity of hind joint swelling, finger and limb deformation, and grip strength (Additional file 1: Table S1), while axial pathology was assessed on a scale from 0 to 3 taking into consideration the tail pathology, including the number and extent of tail bendings and tail ankylosis (Additional file 1: Table S2). Early treatment with etanercept completely abolished both the axial and peripheral clinical manifestations of the TgA86 pathology, while late treatment only partially ameliorated the peripheral arthritis pathology and had a minimal effect on the severity of the clinical manifestations of the axial pathology (Fig. 6a).

Fig. 6 — Early and late anti-TNF treatment can inhibit both the peripheral and axial TgA86 pathologies. a Early treatment with anti-TNF, starting at 2.5 weeks of age, and, to a lesser degree, late treatment, starting at 9 weeks of age, can ameliorate the clinical symptoms of both the peripheral and axial pathologies of 20-week-old TgA86 mice. b Representative H&E stained sections of hind limbs (top panel) and tail vertebrae (lower panel) show that both early and late anti-TNF treatment can ameliorate features of inflammation, bone erosion, and bone marrow cell aggregates in 20-week-old TgA86 mice. c Both peripheral and axial inflammation of 20-week-old TgA86 mice is ameliorated following either early or late treatment with anti-TNF. Early anti-TNF treatment has statistically significant inhibitory effect on the TgA86 inflammation compared to late treatment. d Both early and late anti-TNF treatment can partially restore the reduced vertebral length as this is measured by μCT imaging of the 6th caudal vertebra (C6) of 20-week-old TgA86 mice. e 3D μCT models (upper panel) and the longitudinal sections (lower panel) of reconstructed data sets of the C6 caudal vertebra of 20-week-old mice reveal that both early and late anti-TNF treatment can restore the surface, size, and shape characteristics as well as the bone marrow cavity structure of TgA86 vertebrae to more closely resembling those of the wild type mice [ETN, etanercept; data are presented as mean ± SEM; *P < 0.0222; **P < 0.004; ***P < 0.0007; ****P < 0.0001]

The effect of the early and late treatment protocols was also assessed histopathologically as well as by μCT analysis upon completion of the treatment. Histopathological evaluation of the axial and peripheral pathology involved the assessment of inflammation, since, at 20 weeks of age, this was the most prominent feature of the pathology. Axial inflammation was assessed in the first 5–6 caudal vertebra starting from the base of the tail, while peripheral inflammation was assessed in at least 3 different joints (ankle and metatarsal in sagittal plane) using a scoring scale from 0 to 3 (Additional file 1: Tables S3 and S4). Early treatment with etanercept completely abolished both the axial and peripheral inflammation, while late treatment also greatly ameliorated both the axial and peripheral inflammation although to a slightly lesser extent compared to the early treatment protocol (Fig. 6b, c).

The structural changes of the TgA86 tail vertebrae and their improvement following etanercept treatment were also visualized using 3D μCT modeling. The TgA86 tail vertebrae exhibited reduced length compared to the vertebrae of the wt mice and interestingly, early anti-TNF treatment, and to a lesser degree late treatment, could partially restore this feature (Fig. 6d). Moreover, 3D modeling highlighted the changes in the shape and surface of the TgA86 tail vertebrae that appeared squared with a rough surface and a dense matrix structure inside the bone marrow cavity, characteristics that were respectively restored following both early and late anti-TNF treatment to the bar belled shape and smoother surface with absence of dense matrix in the bone marrow cavity observed in wt mice vertebrae (Fig. 6e).

Discussion

SpA progresses through an early inflammatory phase affecting the sacroiliac joints, the spine, and the peripheral joints [27] and advances to a phase of reduced inflammation characterized by the formation of ectopic bone. This new bone formation leads to eventual joint ankylosis (ankylosing spondylitis) and functional disability [1, 5, 6].

As our understanding of how such a complex disease initiates and also progresses to its different pathological stages remains limited, there is a great need for the identification of prognostic and diagnostic markers, as well as for novel therapeutic approaches managing also the post-inflammatory phase of disease.

Therefore, the development and further exploitation of well-characterized animal models that highly reproduce the pathological features of SpA in a similar progressive manner as the one observed in human patients is crucial, especially if such models overexpress key molecules known to be involved in the development of the human pathology. TNF is a molecule proven to play a key pathogenic role in SpA [25], as its blockade is currently an effective therapy applied in the clinic for early treatment of human patients [25, 28]. Thus, a TNF-dependent model reproducing the full spectrum of the SpA pathological characteristics would be an invaluable addition in the field. To this end, we perform here a detailed analysis and characterization of the transmembrane TNF overexpressing TgA86 transgenic mouse model, which has been previously shown to develop arthritis [20], and we show that it reproduces main features of human SpA.

Similar to human patients, TgA86 mice developed SpA-like disease through an initial inflammatory phase manifested as enthesitis and subsequent erosive changes characterized by mesenchymal cell accumulation and neutrophilic infiltration, mainly at sites of attachment of the spinal ligament to bone. Later in the development of the disease, the inflammatory infiltrate is reduced and excessive tissue formation ensues, intervertebral disk degeneration and destruction and ectopic mature and hypertrophic chondrocytes that expanded between adjacent vertebrae in the caudal area of the axial skeleton. This ectopic new bone formation led to vertebral fusion, as revealed by CT imaging analysis, resembling imaging findings detected in human patients with ankylosing spondylitis [29–31]. Interestingly, severe inflammation was never found simultaneously with severe excessive tissue formation within the same joint supporting sequential, rather than parallel progression of these disease features. This led to a significant variability in the stage of the pathology seen at different segments of the skeleton of the same mouse, similar to what happens in human patients, as in one vertebra junction new bone formation could be in progress, whereas the next one might still be at the inflammatory phase. Finally, sacroiliitis was also observed in the TgA86 mice involving mainly synovitis and enthesitis, however, to a lesser degree than expected according to the human manifestations.

TgA86 mice developed all the features of human SpA, however, with a distinct anatomical distribution to that of the human patients. It has been previously reported that skeletal mechanical stress and tissue microdamage are among the early events preceding the development of entheseal inflammation and the establishment of SpA in humans [27] but also in mice, where it was shown that hind limb unloading in the TNF ΔARE mice significantly suppressed inflammation of the Achilles tendon [32]. Clearly, the biomechanical stress applied during ligament and tendon action differs significantly between species. Therefore, the obvious anatomical differences and distribution of pressure on the axial skeleton between mice and humans could explain the localization of the TgA86 axial pathology primarily at the sacral (S3–S4 junction) and caudal vertebrae that demonstrate increased movement in mice compared to humans, and the rather mild pathology observed in the sacroiliac joints which are the first sites affected in human patients [1].

As suggested by Benjamin et al. [33], entheseal new bone formation in humans follows a distinctive pattern involving all three ossification mechanisms, i.e., membranous, endochondral, and chondroidal ossification, as is also the case in TgA86 mice. More specifically, loss of normal vertebral shape of TgA86 tails was associated with histopathological findings of mesenchymal cell expansion (vimentin-positive cells) and osteoblast activation (periostin staining), both indicative of active intramembranous ossification. Additionally, the presence of a chondroid-osseous matrix in the bone marrow cavity, in combination with the accumulation of osteoblastic lineage cells (osteopontin staining), indicates an active endochondral ossification mechanism. Finally, mesenchymal expansion at the intervertebral disk areas and accumulation of mature and hypertrophic chondrocytes suggest an active chondroidal ossification mechanism resembling endochondral ossification mainly connected to ectopic bone formation [34].

Our findings support that the TgA86 model nicely reproduces cardinal features of the axial and peripheral pathology of the human SpA and, notably, we also show that these mice develop progressive systemic bone loss (osteoporosis), indicated by μCT trabecular analysis of the femur, as well as heart valvular dysfunction with both pathologies suggested to be prevalent comorbidities in human SpA patients [7, 35, 36]. Overall, these mice could be an advantageous SpA mouse model as they spontaneously mimic the complexity of human SpA in a tmTNF-driven manner. The main findings of the axial pathology, as well as the new bone formation observed in the TgA86 mice, could differentiate this model from the other mouse or human TNF overexpressing mice [16–19, 21] that express soluble and transmembrane TNF signaling through both TNFR1 and TNFR2 and have been reported to develop only peripheral arthritis. This could suggest that tmTNF-TNFR2 signaling may have a central role in the development of SpA, a hypothesis also supported by the high levels of tmTNF detected in human SpA patients [37]. Absence of evidence of ER stress (Additional file 1: Figure S5) differentiates this model from the HLAB27 and SKG models where the ER stress mechanism has been reported to play a central role [38, 39]. Additionally, undetectable protein levels of IL17A and IL23 in the sera and tail extracts of TgA86 mice at different stages of the disease (early and late) could not support that this clinically validated axis [40] contributes to SpA pathogenesis in this model. However, approaches involving genetic ablation and pharmacological inhibition of these cytokines would give more definite answers about the involvement of the axis in the disease pathogenesis in this model. Blockade of TNF early in the development of SpA has been proven to be highly advantageous in human patients alleviating early symptoms and signs of the disease and, more importantly, precluding further development of structural lesions such as ankylosis [28]. Similarly, we show here that both the peripheral as well as the axial pathology of the TgA86 model is ameliorated with anti-TNF treatment when this is initiated at an early stage of the disease during the inflammatory phase, when signs of new bone formation are absent. However, major challenges in the treatment of SpA remain, especially concerning patients at later stages of the disease, as early diagnosis is not always possible. The TgA86 model faithfully reproducing the two distinct phases of the SpA pathology allows the design of testing protocols both for the evaluation of drugs targeting the inflammatory as well as the post-inflammatory phase of the SpA pathology.

Conclusion

Our work supports that the TgA86 tmTNF transgenic mouse model reproduces key features of human SpA, including axial and peripheral pathologies, that progress through an early inflammatory and bone remodeling phase, eventually leading to a later phase that includes signs of new bone formation and ankylosis along with the manifestation of extraarticular heart valve pathology and osteoporosis. The coexistence of all these aspects of the SpA pathology in the TgA86 animal model renders it a valuable tool in the study of the role of transmembrane TNF in disease initiation and progression, and it also allows the study of pathogenic mechanisms of osteoproliferation as well as the involvement of entheseal resident cells in the development and progression of SpA. The TgA86 SpA mouse model can moreover serve as basis for the development of experimental protocols for the evaluation of the efficacy of therapeutics targeting mainly the TNF pathway, as well as other molecules involved in the pathogenesis of both the early inflammatory and late osteoproliferative stages of SpA.

Supplementary information

13075_2020_2327_MOESM1_ESM.docx^{(940.6KB, docx)}

Additional file 1: Table S1. Clinical evaluation of peripheral arthritis (hind limbs). Table S2. Clinical evaluation of axial spondylitis (tail). Table S3. Histopathological evaluation of peripheral inflammation (hind limbs). Table S4. Histopathological evaluation of axial inflammation (per vertebra). Table S5. Histopathological evaluation of new bone formation. Figure S1. Clinical and histopathological score of peripheral and axial pathology of TgA86 males and females at 20 weeks. In vivo arthritis (joints) and axial spondylitis (tails) pathology was evaluated at 20-week old males (M) and females (F). Histopathological evaluation of peripheral (joints) and axial (tails) inflammation was performed on H&E stained sections. (Data are presented as individual values, with mean ± SEM). Figure S2. Histopathological and functional analysis of the TgA86 hearts reveal comorbid aortic heart valve dysfunction. (A, B) Representative immunohistochemical stainings of aortic valve sections of wt and TgA86 mice at the age of 20 weeks with anti-Vimentin and anti-Gr1 antibodies (A) reveal that the thickened areas of the valve (B) are mainly composed by Vimentin+ resident fibroblasts as well as few Gr1+ infiltrated neutrophils. (C, D) Blood aortic (AoV) and mitral (MV E and A) velocity measurements, acquired by Doppler analysis of TgA86 mice and wt littermates at 40 weeks of age, reveal increased AoV, indicating aortic valve stenosis, while the function of mitral valve remains unaffected (data are presented as individual values, with mean ± SEM). (E) Reduced Ejection fraction (EF%) of TgA86 mice at 40 weeks of age, indicate contractile dysfunction of their left ventricle. (Data are presented as individual values, with mean ± SEM; **P < 0.01). Figure S3. TgA86 mice show enhanced bone resorption leading to osteoporosis-like pathology. Trabecular analysis of the metapheseal regions of the femurs of 20 and 40-week-old TgA86 and wt mice by μCT shows progressively reduced BV/TV (bone volume/ total volume, %), Tb. N (trabecular number per mm^− 1) and Con.Dens. (connectivity density, mm^− 3) as well as increased Tb. Sp (trabecular separation, mm). Figure S4. Immunohistochemical analysis of TgA86 peripheral pathology reveals Vimentin- and Gr1-positive cell accumulation at the sites of enthesis. Vimentin and Gr1 positive cells accumulate at sites of enthesis at the hind joints of 20-week-old TgA86. Figure S5. RT-PCR analysis of XBP1 gene splicing forms in mRNA samples from ankle joints and tail tissues of TgA86 mice. The unspliced form of XBP1 is the only one detected in ankle joints and tail tissues of TgA86 and wt mice. The spliced form of XBP1 indicating ER stress, is detected in mRNA samples of MEFs (mouse embryonic fibroblasts) induced with 2 mM DTT for 8 h.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Maria Mathopoulou for her help in processing and staining histological samples, Olga Graphou for lab and animal facility management, and Irineos Pilatis for his help in CT imaging. The authors also wish to thank the InfrafrontierGR Infrastructure (co-funded by the ERDF and Greek NSRF 2007-2013) for providing micro-CT services.

Parts of this work have been presented at the 2017 EWRR Congress (Abstract 06.13; Athens, Greece, 2017) and at the 2018 EULAR Congress (Abstract FRI0163; Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2018).

Abbreviations

AS: Ankylosing spondylitis
CT: Computed tomography
CVD: Cardiovascular disease
EDTA: Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
H&E: Hematoxylin and Eosin
IBD: Inflammatory bowel disease
MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging
OP: Osteoporosis
OPN: Osteopontin
PsA: Psoriatic arthritis
RA: Rheumatoid arthritis
ReA: Reactive arthritis
s/o: Safranin/O
SpA: Spondyloarthritis
Tg: Transgenic
tmTNF: Transmembrane mouse TNF
TNF-α: Tumor necrosis factor α
TRAP: Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase
UTR: Untranslated region
wt: Wild type
μCT: Micro-CT

Authors’ contributions

GK, ECV, NK, and MCD designed the study and interpreted the experimented results. ECV, CG, LN, KK, EA, IM, and MR performed the experiments and data analysis. FM, MA, CP, and GL contributed to data interpretation. EC, NK, and MCD wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors were involved in critically revising its final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was co-financed by the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH-CREATE-INNOVATE (Project code: T2ΕΔΚ-03807; SEPIA).

Availability of data and materials

All data that support the findings of this study are included in the article or uploaded as additional file.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of Institutional Committee of Protocol Evaluation in conjunction with the Veterinary Service Management of the Hellenic Republic Prefecture of Attika (Approval No.141688 24/04/19) and in accordance to national legislation and the European Union Directive 63/2010.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

GK participates in the BoD of Biomedcode; FM has received grants from Pfizer. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s13075-020-02327-4.

References

1.Baeten D, Breban M, Lories R, Schett G, Sieper J. Are spondylarthritides related but distinct conditions or a single disease with a heterogeneous phenotype? Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:12–20. doi: 10.1002/art.37829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Lories RJU, de Vlam K, Luyten FP. Are current available therapies disease-modifying in spondyloarthritis? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24:625–635. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2010.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Benjamin M, McGonagle D. The anatomical basis for disease localisation in seronegative spondyloarthropathy at entheses and related sites. J Anat. 2001;199:503–526. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2001.19950503.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Paramarta JE, Baeten D. Spondyloarthritis: from unifying concepts to improved treatment. Rheumatol (United Kingdom) 2014;53:1547–1559. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Lories RJ, Haroon N. Evolving concepts of new bone formation in axial spondyloarthritis: insights from animal models and human studies. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2017;31:877–886. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2018.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Terenzi R, Monti S, Tesei G, Carli L. One year in review 2017: spondyloarthritis [Internet] Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018;36:1–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Breban M, Araujo LM, Chiocchia G. Editorial: animal models of spondyloarthritis: do they faithfully mirror human disease? Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:1689–1692. doi: 10.1002/art.38636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Van Kuijk AWR, Reinders-Blankert P, Smeets TJM, Dijkmans BAC, Tak PP. Detailed analysis of the cell infiltrate and the expression of mediators of synovial inflammation and joint destruction in the synovium of patients with psoriatic arthritis: implications for treatment. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:1551–1557. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.050963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Simone D, Al Mossawi MH, Bowness P. Progress in our understanding of the pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2018;57:vi4–vi9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Hreggvidsdottir HS, Noordenbos T, Baeten DL. Inflammatory pathways in spondyloarthritis. Mol Immunol. 2014;57:28–37. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2013.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Vieira-Sousa E, Van Duivenvoorde LM, Fonseca JE, Lories RJ, Baeten DL. Review: animal models as a tool to dissect pivotal pathways driving spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:2813–2827. doi: 10.1002/art.39282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Braun J, Brandt J, Listing J, Zink A, Alten R, Golder W, et al. Treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with infliximab: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1187–1193. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08215-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Paramarta JE, De Rycke L, Heijda TF, Ambarus CA, Vos K, Dinant HJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of adalimumab for the treatment of peripheral arthritis in spondyloarthritis patients without ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1793–1799. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Mease PJ, Goffe BS, Metz J, VanderStoep A, Finck B, Burge DJ. Etanercept in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;356:385–390. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02530-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Brenner D, Blaser H, Mak TW. Regulation of tumour necrosis factor signalling: live or let die. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15:362–374. doi: 10.1038/nri3834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Kontoyiannis D, Pasparakis M, Pizarro TT, Cominelli F, Kollias G. Impaired on/off regulation of TNF biosynthesis in mice lacking TNF AU- rich elements: implications for joint and gut-associated immunopathologies. Immunity. 1999;10:387–398. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80038-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Sakkou M, Chouvardas P, Ntari L, Prados A, Moreth K, Fuchs H, et al. Mesenchymal TNFR2 promotes the development of polyarthritis and comorbid heart valve stenosis. JCI Insight. 2018;3:e98864. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.98864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Keffer J, Probert L, Cazlaris H, Georgopoulos S, Kaslaris E, Kioussis D, et al. Transgenic mice expressing human tumour necrosis factor: a predictive genetic model of arthritis. EMBO J. 1991;10:4025–4031. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04978.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Douni E, Akassoglou K, Alexopoulou L, Georgopoulos S, Haralambous S, Hill S, et al. Transgenic and knockout analyses of the role of TNF in immune regulation and disease pathogenesis. J Inflamm. 1995;47:27–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Alexopoulou L, Pasparakis M, Kollias G. A murine transmembrane tumor necrosis factor (TNF) transgene induces arthritis by cooperative p55/p75 TNF receptor signaling. Eur J Immunol. 1997;27:2588–2592. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830271018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Ntari L, Sakkou M, Chouvardas P, Mourouzis I, Prados A, Denis MC, et al. Comorbid TNF-mediated heart valve disease and chronic polyarthritis share common mesenchymal cell-mediated aetiopathogenesis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:926–934. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Görtz B, Hayer S, Redlich K, Zwerina J, Tohidast-Akrad M, Tuerk B, et al. Arthritis induces lymphocytic bone marrow inflammation and endosteal bone formation. J Bone Min Res. 2004;19:990–998. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.040205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Engels K, Oeschger S, Hansmann ML, Hillebrand M, Kriener S. Bone marrow trephines containing lymphoid aggregates from patients with rheumatoid and other autoimmune disorders frequently show clonal B-cell infiltrates. Hum Pathol. 2007;38:1402–1411. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Kaaij MH, van Tok MN, Blijdorp IC, Ambarus CA, Stock M, Pots D, et al. Transmembrane TNF drives osteoproliferative joint inflammation reminiscent of human spondyloarthritis. J Exp Med. 2020;217(10):e20200288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25.Menegatti S, Bianchi E, Rogge L. Anti-TNF therapy in spondyloarthritis and related diseases, impact on the immune system and prediction of treatment responses. Front Immunol. 2019;10:382. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Xi Y, Jiang T, Chaurasiya B, Zhou Y, Yu J, Wen J, et al. Advances in nanomedicine for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Int J Nanomedicine. 2019;14:8521–8542. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S216199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Watad A, Bridgewood C, Russell T, Marzo-Ortega H, Cuthbert R, McGonagle D. The early phases of ankylosing spondylitis: emerging insights from clinical and basic science. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2668. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Braun J, Sieper J. Therapy of ankylosing spondylitis and other spondyloarthritides: established medical treatment, anti-TNF-α therapy and other novel approaches. Arthritis Res. 2002;4:307–321. doi: 10.1186/ar592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.Jurik AG. Imaging the spine in arthritis—a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2011;2:177–191. doi: 10.1007/s13244-010-0061-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Tsoi C, Griffith JF, Lee RKL, Wong PCH, Tam LS. Imaging of sacroiliitis: current status, limitations and pitfalls. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019;9:318–335. doi: 10.21037/qims.2018.11.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31.Sieper J, Appel H, Braun J, Rudwaleit M. Critical appraisal of assessment of structural damage in ankylosing spondylitis: implications for treatment outcomes. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:649–656. doi: 10.1002/art.23260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.Jacques P, Lambrecht S, Verheugen E, Pauwels E, Kollias G, Armaka M, et al. Proof of concept: enthesitis and new bone formation in spondyloarthritis are driven by mechanical strain and stromal cells. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:437–445. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.Benjamin M, Toumi H, Suzuki D, Hayashi K, McGonagle D. Evidence for a distinctive pattern of bone formation in enthesophytes. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:1003–1010. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.091074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.Kawakami T, Kawai T, Kimura A, Hasegawa H, Tsujigiwa H, Gunduz M, et al. Characteristics of bone morphogenetic protein-induced chondroid bone: histochemical, immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization examinations. J Int Med Res. 2001;29:480–487. doi: 10.1177/147323000102900603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.Lai Y, Zhang Y, Mo S, Ma J, Ni T, Lei Z, et al. Prevalence of comorbidities and risk factors in spondyloarthritis: results of a cross-sectional study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020.. [DOI] [PubMed]
36.Fitzgerald GE, O’Shea FD. The fascinating paradox of osteoporosis in axial spondyloarthropathy. J Rheumatol. 2017;44:1767–1776. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.van Duivenvoorde LM, Ambarus CA, Masdar H, van Tok MN, Tak PP, Yeremenko NG, et al. A2.15 relative overexpression of Ttansmembrane versus soluble TNF in human and experimental spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:A9–10. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203215.15. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
38.Turner MJ, Sowders DP, DeLay ML, Mohapatra R, Bai S, Smith JA, et al. HLA-B27 Misfolding in transgenic rats is associated with activation of the unfolded protein response. J Immunol. 2005;175:2438–2448. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.4.2438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39.Benham H, Rehaume LM, Hasnain SZ, Velasco J, Baillet AC, Ruutu M, et al. Interleukin-23 mediates the intestinal response to microbial β-1,3-glucan and the development of spondyloarthritis pathology in SKG mice. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:1755–1767. doi: 10.1002/art.38638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40.Sieper J, Poddubnyy D, Miossec P. The IL-23–IL-17 pathway as a therapeutic target in axial spondyloarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019;15:747–757. doi: 10.1038/s41584-019-0294-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

13075_2020_2327_MOESM1_ESM.docx^{(940.6KB, docx)}

Data Availability Statement

All data that support the findings of this study are included in the article or uploaded as additional file.

[CR1] 1.Baeten D, Breban M, Lories R, Schett G, Sieper J. Are spondylarthritides related but distinct conditions or a single disease with a heterogeneous phenotype? Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:12–20. doi: 10.1002/art.37829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR2] 2.Lories RJU, de Vlam K, Luyten FP. Are current available therapies disease-modifying in spondyloarthritis? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24:625–635. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2010.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR3] 3.Benjamin M, McGonagle D. The anatomical basis for disease localisation in seronegative spondyloarthropathy at entheses and related sites. J Anat. 2001;199:503–526. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2001.19950503.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR4] 4.Paramarta JE, Baeten D. Spondyloarthritis: from unifying concepts to improved treatment. Rheumatol (United Kingdom) 2014;53:1547–1559. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR5] 5.Lories RJ, Haroon N. Evolving concepts of new bone formation in axial spondyloarthritis: insights from animal models and human studies. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2017;31:877–886. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2018.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR6] 6.Terenzi R, Monti S, Tesei G, Carli L. One year in review 2017: spondyloarthritis [Internet] Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018;36:1–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR7] 7.Breban M, Araujo LM, Chiocchia G. Editorial: animal models of spondyloarthritis: do they faithfully mirror human disease? Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:1689–1692. doi: 10.1002/art.38636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR8] 8.Van Kuijk AWR, Reinders-Blankert P, Smeets TJM, Dijkmans BAC, Tak PP. Detailed analysis of the cell infiltrate and the expression of mediators of synovial inflammation and joint destruction in the synovium of patients with psoriatic arthritis: implications for treatment. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:1551–1557. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.050963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR9] 9.Simone D, Al Mossawi MH, Bowness P. Progress in our understanding of the pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2018;57:vi4–vi9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR10] 10.Hreggvidsdottir HS, Noordenbos T, Baeten DL. Inflammatory pathways in spondyloarthritis. Mol Immunol. 2014;57:28–37. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2013.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR11] 11.Vieira-Sousa E, Van Duivenvoorde LM, Fonseca JE, Lories RJ, Baeten DL. Review: animal models as a tool to dissect pivotal pathways driving spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:2813–2827. doi: 10.1002/art.39282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR12] 12.Braun J, Brandt J, Listing J, Zink A, Alten R, Golder W, et al. Treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with infliximab: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1187–1193. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08215-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR13] 13.Paramarta JE, De Rycke L, Heijda TF, Ambarus CA, Vos K, Dinant HJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of adalimumab for the treatment of peripheral arthritis in spondyloarthritis patients without ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1793–1799. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR14] 14.Mease PJ, Goffe BS, Metz J, VanderStoep A, Finck B, Burge DJ. Etanercept in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;356:385–390. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02530-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR15] 15.Brenner D, Blaser H, Mak TW. Regulation of tumour necrosis factor signalling: live or let die. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15:362–374. doi: 10.1038/nri3834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR16] 16.Kontoyiannis D, Pasparakis M, Pizarro TT, Cominelli F, Kollias G. Impaired on/off regulation of TNF biosynthesis in mice lacking TNF AU- rich elements: implications for joint and gut-associated immunopathologies. Immunity. 1999;10:387–398. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80038-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR17] 17.Sakkou M, Chouvardas P, Ntari L, Prados A, Moreth K, Fuchs H, et al. Mesenchymal TNFR2 promotes the development of polyarthritis and comorbid heart valve stenosis. JCI Insight. 2018;3:e98864. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.98864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR18] 18.Keffer J, Probert L, Cazlaris H, Georgopoulos S, Kaslaris E, Kioussis D, et al. Transgenic mice expressing human tumour necrosis factor: a predictive genetic model of arthritis. EMBO J. 1991;10:4025–4031. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04978.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR19] 19.Douni E, Akassoglou K, Alexopoulou L, Georgopoulos S, Haralambous S, Hill S, et al. Transgenic and knockout analyses of the role of TNF in immune regulation and disease pathogenesis. J Inflamm. 1995;47:27–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR20] 20.Alexopoulou L, Pasparakis M, Kollias G. A murine transmembrane tumor necrosis factor (TNF) transgene induces arthritis by cooperative p55/p75 TNF receptor signaling. Eur J Immunol. 1997;27:2588–2592. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830271018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR21] 21.Ntari L, Sakkou M, Chouvardas P, Mourouzis I, Prados A, Denis MC, et al. Comorbid TNF-mediated heart valve disease and chronic polyarthritis share common mesenchymal cell-mediated aetiopathogenesis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:926–934. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR22] 22.Görtz B, Hayer S, Redlich K, Zwerina J, Tohidast-Akrad M, Tuerk B, et al. Arthritis induces lymphocytic bone marrow inflammation and endosteal bone formation. J Bone Min Res. 2004;19:990–998. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.040205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR23] 23.Engels K, Oeschger S, Hansmann ML, Hillebrand M, Kriener S. Bone marrow trephines containing lymphoid aggregates from patients with rheumatoid and other autoimmune disorders frequently show clonal B-cell infiltrates. Hum Pathol. 2007;38:1402–1411. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR24] 24.Kaaij MH, van Tok MN, Blijdorp IC, Ambarus CA, Stock M, Pots D, et al. Transmembrane TNF drives osteoproliferative joint inflammation reminiscent of human spondyloarthritis. J Exp Med. 2020;217(10):e20200288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[CR25] 25.Menegatti S, Bianchi E, Rogge L. Anti-TNF therapy in spondyloarthritis and related diseases, impact on the immune system and prediction of treatment responses. Front Immunol. 2019;10:382. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR26] 26.Xi Y, Jiang T, Chaurasiya B, Zhou Y, Yu J, Wen J, et al. Advances in nanomedicine for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Int J Nanomedicine. 2019;14:8521–8542. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S216199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR27] 27.Watad A, Bridgewood C, Russell T, Marzo-Ortega H, Cuthbert R, McGonagle D. The early phases of ankylosing spondylitis: emerging insights from clinical and basic science. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2668. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR28] 28.Braun J, Sieper J. Therapy of ankylosing spondylitis and other spondyloarthritides: established medical treatment, anti-TNF-α therapy and other novel approaches. Arthritis Res. 2002;4:307–321. doi: 10.1186/ar592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR29] 29.Jurik AG. Imaging the spine in arthritis—a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2011;2:177–191. doi: 10.1007/s13244-010-0061-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR30] 30.Tsoi C, Griffith JF, Lee RKL, Wong PCH, Tam LS. Imaging of sacroiliitis: current status, limitations and pitfalls. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019;9:318–335. doi: 10.21037/qims.2018.11.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR31] 31.Sieper J, Appel H, Braun J, Rudwaleit M. Critical appraisal of assessment of structural damage in ankylosing spondylitis: implications for treatment outcomes. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:649–656. doi: 10.1002/art.23260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR32] 32.Jacques P, Lambrecht S, Verheugen E, Pauwels E, Kollias G, Armaka M, et al. Proof of concept: enthesitis and new bone formation in spondyloarthritis are driven by mechanical strain and stromal cells. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:437–445. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR33] 33.Benjamin M, Toumi H, Suzuki D, Hayashi K, McGonagle D. Evidence for a distinctive pattern of bone formation in enthesophytes. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:1003–1010. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.091074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR34] 34.Kawakami T, Kawai T, Kimura A, Hasegawa H, Tsujigiwa H, Gunduz M, et al. Characteristics of bone morphogenetic protein-induced chondroid bone: histochemical, immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization examinations. J Int Med Res. 2001;29:480–487. doi: 10.1177/147323000102900603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR35] 35.Lai Y, Zhang Y, Mo S, Ma J, Ni T, Lei Z, et al. Prevalence of comorbidities and risk factors in spondyloarthritis: results of a cross-sectional study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020.. [DOI] [PubMed]

[CR36] 36.Fitzgerald GE, O’Shea FD. The fascinating paradox of osteoporosis in axial spondyloarthropathy. J Rheumatol. 2017;44:1767–1776. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR37] 37.van Duivenvoorde LM, Ambarus CA, Masdar H, van Tok MN, Tak PP, Yeremenko NG, et al. A2.15 relative overexpression of Ttansmembrane versus soluble TNF in human and experimental spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:A9–10. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203215.15. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR38] 38.Turner MJ, Sowders DP, DeLay ML, Mohapatra R, Bai S, Smith JA, et al. HLA-B27 Misfolding in transgenic rats is associated with activation of the unfolded protein response. J Immunol. 2005;175:2438–2448. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.4.2438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR39] 39.Benham H, Rehaume LM, Hasnain SZ, Velasco J, Baillet AC, Ruutu M, et al. Interleukin-23 mediates the intestinal response to microbial β-1,3-glucan and the development of spondyloarthritis pathology in SKG mice. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:1755–1767. doi: 10.1002/art.38638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR40] 40.Sieper J, Poddubnyy D, Miossec P. The IL-23–IL-17 pathway as a therapeutic target in axial spondyloarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019;15:747–757. doi: 10.1038/s41584-019-0294-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Ectopic bone formation and systemic bone loss in a transmembrane TNF-driven model of human spondyloarthritis

Eleni Christodoulou-Vafeiadou

Christina Geka

Lydia Ntari

Ksanthi Kranidioti

Eleni Argyropoulou

Florian Meier

Marietta Armaka

Iordanis Mourouzis

Constantinos Pantos

Maritina Rouchota

George Loudos

Maria C Denis

Niki Karagianni

George Kollias

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Background

Methods

Mice

Clinical scoring

Body length measurements, CT, and μCT imaging

Histological analysis and immunohistochemistry

Aortic valvular thickness measurement

Echocardiography and electrocardiogram

Statistical analysis

Results

TgA86 tmTNF transgenic mice model key features of human SpA

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

TgA86 axial and peripheral pathologies evolve through an early phase of inflammation and bone erosion gradually leading to new bone formation

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

New bone formation in tmTNF transgenic mice involves mechanisms of endochondral and membranous ossification

Fig. 5.

Anti-TNF therapy efficiently ameliorates both axial and peripheral TgA86 pathologies

Fig. 6.

Discussion

Conclusion

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

Abbreviations

Authors’ contributions

Funding

Availability of data and materials

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent for publication

Competing interests

Footnotes

Supplementary information

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases