Abstract
Background
Citrus sunki Hort. ex Tanaka peel has been traditionally used as an ingredient in folk medicine due to its therapeutic effects on promotion of splenic health and diuresis as well as relief of gastrointestinal symptoms. Although a growing interest in health-promoting natural products and the development of highly concentrated products have facilitated consumption of C. sunki peel, its safety assessment has not been explored, posing a potential health risk. In this study, we carried out a series of systemic and genetic toxicity tests on fermented C. sunki peel extract (FCPE) to provide the essential information required for safe use in human.
Methods
We conducted acute and 90-day repeated oral toxicity studies in Sprague-Dawley rats to evaluate systemic toxicity, and three genotoxicity assays to measure bacterial mutation reversion, cellular chromosome aberration and in vivo micronucleus formation.
Results
Single oral administration of FCPE did not cause any clinical signs and lethality in all animals, establishing LD50 to be over 2000 mg/kg BW. Repeated administration of up to 2000 mg/kg BW FCPE for 90 days revealed no test substance-related toxicity as demonstrated in analysis of body weight gain, food/water intake, blood, serum biochemistry, organ weight and histopathology, collectively determining that the no-observable-adverse-effect-level of FCPE is over 2000 mg/kg BW. In addition, we detected no mutagenicity and clastogenicity in FCPE at 5000 μg/plate for the in vitro assays and 2000 mg/kg BW for the in vivo micronucleus test.
Conclusion
FCPE did not cause systemic and genetic toxicity in our model systems at the tested dose levels. These results suggest a guideline for safe consumption of C. sunki peel in human.
Keywords: Citrus sunki, Fermented peel extract, Acute toxicity, Subchronic toxicity, Mutagenicity, Clastogenicity
Background
Citrus species have been widely consumed since ancient times. It belongs to a large family of Rutaceae which includes approximately 160 genera and more than 1600 species. Globally, citrus species, especially C. sinensis (sweet oranges) and C. reticulata (tangerines) as the most popular citrus fruits, are commercially cultivated in many countries, producing over 124 million tons in 2016 [1]. Beside their popularity as fruit, citrus species have been traditionally used as medicinal ingredients due to their pharmacological effects [2].
Citrus species has been known as a rich source of various biologically active compounds; a recent review reported that C. sinensis contains approximately 150 chemical compounds including flavonoids, steroids, hydroxyamides, alkanes and fatty acids, coumarins, peptides, carbohydrates, carbamates and alkylamines, carotenoids and volatile compounds [3]. Among these, citrus species are known as a rich source of various flavonoids [4], which has been a target of growing interests due to their therapeutic efficacy on chronic debilitating diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular diseases, neurodegenerative diseases and diabetes through interaction with key enzymes or modulation of gene expression as also reviewed in [5]. Flavonoids identified in citrus are mainly categorized into 1) flavone glycosides such as hesperidin and naringin, and 2) polymethoxy flavonoids including nobiletin and tangeretin. Interestingly, these compounds are more abundantly contained in the peel than other parts of citrus [6, 7], supporting the preferable use of citrus peels in folk medicine.
C. sunki Hort. ex Tanaka, locally called as ‘Jinkyool’ or ‘Sankyool’, is one of the oldest native citrus species in Jeju island, South Korea, as the first record appeared in the eleventh century [8]. Although C. sunki has been an unfavorable crop for commercial cultivation and mass production due to a low economical value (i.e., small size and poor taste), its dried peel ‘Jinpi’ has been preferably used as a herbal medicine ingredient for its therapeutic effects described in a Korean medical book Donguibogam published in 1613. Recently, several studies experimentally confirmed its pharmacological efficacy in various diseases including obesity [9, 10], inflammation and allergy [11, 12], and neuronal damage [13, 14]. Moreover, the levels of flavonoids in C. sunki peel has been found to be high among citrus species [15], leading to increase of its utilization as herbal drugs and supplements. Fermented C. sunki peel extract (FCPE) has been recently developed by refining the production process to further increase the concentration of pharmacologically active components such as flavonoids [16].
Citrus peel has been empirically regarded as relatively safe for human consumption due to a long history of use with low occurrence of side effects and therefore most of them have not been a subject of toxicity studies. However, low levels of toxicity associated with high doses of citrus peel-derived flavonoids [17, 18] and the increased risk of overdosing and misuse along with mass production and utilization of highly concentrated products necessitated an urgent attention to assessment of their potential health risk. To date, toxicity information on C. sunki peel extract, unlike the extensive investigation into its pharmacological effectiveness [9–14, 19], has not been available due to lack of investigation. In this study, we therefore conducted a systematic toxicity study on FCPE using oral acute and 90-day repeated toxicity tests with evaluation of genotoxic potential following the OECD guidelines as part of a preclinical toxicity study for its regulatory assessment as functional food. Our results show the safe range of FCPE in in vivo and in vitro model systems, providing an essential guideline for safe use of C. sunki peel extract in human.
Methods
Preparation of fermented C. sunki Hort. ex Tanaka peel extract
FCPE was prepared by EM Life Co. (Jeju, Korea) as described elsewhere [16]. Briefly, the peel from C. sunki harvested in Jeju Island, Korea, was purchased and authenticated by EM Life Co. Voucher specimen (SNUH 10005) has been deposited at Department of Experimental Animal Research, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital. Before fermentation, the peel was dried at 40 °C for a week and cut into 1 ~ 2 cm pieces. Fermentation was carried out in the sterilized filtrate of broth cultured with 5% (w/w) Lactobacillus plantarum (ATCC 8014, 3 × 106/mL) and 5% (w/w) Saccharomyces cerevisiae (IFO 0203, 4 × 106/mL) at 38 °C for 1 week. Then, the fermented peel underwent extraction at 98 ~ 100 °C for 2 h after mixing with 20 times volume of water. The extract was then filtered, converted into powder using a freeze dryer and stored with light protection at − 20 °C. The quality of the extract was determined by analyzing the levels of p-synephrine, nobiletin and tangeretin as reference compounds using HPLC (Waters 2995, USA).
Animals
SPF Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were chosen for this study as suggested in OECD guidelines due to abundance of historical and toxicity data. 5-Week old animals were purchased from Orient Bio Inc. (Gyeonggi-do, Korea) and only healthy animals were used in the study after two-week acclimation. As previously described [20], animals were housed in polycarbonate cages containing aspen bedding materials in an environment-controlled animal room at the AAALAC International-accredited animal facility (#001160) of Seoul National University Hospital. Animals were provided with sterilized laboratory rodent diet (LabDiet 5002, PMI Nutrition International) and autoclaved water at libitum. All experimental procedures were carried out during the light cycle in a separate laboratory. Prior to the start of toxicity tests, animals were weighed and randomly assigned to each group based on their body weight according to the stratified continuous randomization method. All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in Seoul National University Hospital in accordance with Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (8th edition) [21]. Our toxicity studies were performed in compliance with the relevant OECD test guidelines [22–26] and Good Laboratory Practice regulations published by Korea Food Drug Administration [27].
Oral toxicity study
Acute toxicity test was carried out as a limit test using 5 animals/gender/group (n = 20, male; 273.6 ~ 301.2 g and female; 174.5 ~ 207.5 g at the initiation of administration) with a single gavage of either 0 or 2000 mg FCPE homogeneously suspended in 10 mL vehicle (ddH2O)/kg BW followed by monitoring of clinical signs and body weight changes for 14 days. At the end of the observation period, all animals were sacrificed and examined for macroscopic legions on major organs.
For the 90-day repeated oral toxicity test, total 80 animals (n = 10 animals/gender/group, male; 248.0 ~ 275.4 g and female; 174.4 ~ 201.2 g at the initiation of administration) were orally administered with a dose of 0, 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg BW of FCPE daily for 90 days. During the administration period, animals were monitored daily for clinical signs with weekly measurement of body weight and feed/water consumption. Ophthalmological examination was performed on 5 animals/gender/group. At the end of the study, all surviving animals were euthanized by exsanguination via the vena cava after deep anesthesia with isoflurane and necropsy was performed.
Analysis of urine, blood and serum biochemistry
In the last week of 90-day toxicity study, urine was collected from 5 animals/gender/group and analyzed using a urinalysis stick (Roche) for pH, leukocyte, nitrite, ketone body, urobilinogen, bilirubin, glucose, occult blood. Specific gravity was measured by refractometry.
Whole blood was collected at necropsy from the vena cava and used for hematological and serum biochemical analysis. Whole blood collected in an EDTA tube was used for measurement of total and differential cell counts, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet and RBC indices using an MS9–5 Animal Blood Counter (Melet schloesing laboratoires), and reticulocytes using a Sysmex XE-2100 automated Blood Cell Counter (Sysmex). Blood coagulation capacity was assessed by measuring partial thromboplastin time and activated partial thromboplastin time in a Coagulation Analyzer (STA-R Evolution, Diagnostica Stago).
Serum was separated by brief centrifugation of coagulated whole blood and analyzed for blood urea nitrogen, total cholesterol, total protein, albumin, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, creatinine, triglycerides, glucose, potassium, chlorine, calcium, inorganic phosphorus and sodium using a Hitachi 7070 automatic chemistry analyzer (Hitachi).
Necropsy and histopathology
All major organs were excised immediately after gross examination and weighed. Then, testes and epididymides were fixed in Bouin’s solution, eyes and harderian glands in Davidson solution, and all other organs in 10% neutral buffered formalin. Femora and nasal cavities were decalcified after fixation. Sufficiently fixed organs were embedded in paraffin after dehydration in graded ethanol and xylene, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin after sectioning into 2–3 μm slices. Histopathological evaluation was carried out by a pathology specialist.
Genotoxicity assays
All the genotoxicity studies on FCPE here were carried out as previously described [28]. Briefly, the reverse mutation test was performed using five tester strains including Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and Escherichia coli WP2(uvrA) (MOLTOX Molecular Toxicology, USA). After determining cytotoxicity, all strains were treated in triplicate with either vehicle or a dose of FCPE (312.5, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 μg/plate) or appropriate positive controls. For metabolic activation, S9 mix (Orient Yeast, Japan) was co-incubated with FCPE at 37 °C for 30 min. After treatment, the tester strains were grown on either histidine or tryptophan-deficient agar plates at 37 °C for 48 h and the colonies formed were counted.
Chromosome aberration test was performed on Chinese Hamster Lung (CHL) cells. Cells plated at 1 × 105 were grown overnight and treated in duplicate with either non-toxic doses of FCPE (1250, 2500 and 5000 μg/mL) or controls for 6 h or 24 h. For treatment for 6 h, we employed an additional group for metabolic activation with S9 mix. The cells treated for 6 h were further incubated for 18 h after changing to normal media. After incubation, the cells were collected in 7.5 mM KCl after treatment with 0.2 μg/mL colcemid, and stained with 4% giemsa solution. The number of cells with chromosome aberration per 100 cells was determined from 2 slide glasses.
For the in vivo micronucleus test, 8-week old male ICR mice (Koatech, Korea) were used. Following determination of treatment doses and duration, 4 groups of animals (n = 5/group) were orally administered with either vehicle or a dose of FCPE (500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg BW) daily for 4 days, while 2 mg/kg BW mitomycin c was intraperitoneally injected for the positive control group. Animals were euthanized at 24 h from the last administration and bone marrow cells were collected by perfusion of femora with FBS. The cells were smeared on slide glasses and stained with 5% giemsa solution after fixation. Following treatment with 0.004% citric acid, the number of micronuclei-containing polychromatic erythrocytes (MNPCEs) per 1000 PCEs was determined in two samples per mouse. % PCE was calculated from PCE ÷ [PCE + normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE)].
Statistical analysis
All values are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed in a SPSS software (IBM) and a P value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Results
Acute toxicity study
FCPE was prepared from mature fruits collected in Jeju Island, Korea and we analyzed the levels of the reference compounds nobiletin, tangeretin and p-synephrine to confirm the validity of FCPE as the test substance for toxicity study. When analyzed using HPLC, the initial levels of nobiletin and tangeretin in raw material were respectively 5.34 ± 0.09 mg/g and 4.43 ± 0.09 mg/g, and increased to 8.22 ± 0.04 mg/g and 5.00 ± 0.14 mg/g by the fermentation process, while p-synephrine remained unchanged (3.40 ± 0.04 mg/g to 3.40 ± 0.08 mg/g), which were comparable to the previously reported values [13].
For the acute toxicity study, we conducted a limit test as the test substance is expected to be non- or weakly toxic based on its natural source and historical use. Following single oral administration of 2000 mg/10 mL/kg BW FCPE, no lethality nor toxicity-associated clinical signs were observed (data not shown), and body weight gain was similar between the vehicle and FCPE-administered groups during the 2-week observation period, (Fig. 1a). At necropsy, we did not find any pathologically meaningful lesions attributable to the test substance. These findings demonstrated that oral administration of FCPE did not cause acute toxicity in SD rats, indicating that the LD50 of FCPE is > 2000 mg/kg BW.
90-day repeated oral toxicity study
Based on the results from our acute toxicity study, we performed a 90-day repeated oral toxicity study. SD rats were daily administered with one of 0, 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg BW FCPE and examined daily for clinical signs with weekly measurement of body weight. During the entire test period, no animals were found with mortality, clinical signs and behavioral abnormality in relation to FCPE (data not shown). Body weight normally increased in all animals regardless of administered substances and doses (Fig. 1b). Consistently, food and water consumption (Fig. 1c-f) was similar across all groups with an exception of higher food intake (p <0.05) in the female 500 mg/kg group in week 5 compared to the vehicle control. Ophthalmological examination (data now shown) and urinalysis (Supplementary Table 1) carried out in the last week of FCPE administration did not find any FCPE-linked toxic effects in the treated groups when compared to their respective vehicle controls.
At the end of 90 days, blood was collected from all animals and analyzed for blood cell counts and coagulation ability (Table 1). Compared to the vehicle control group, male 1000 mg/kg group showed a 5.5% decrease (p < 0.05) in lymphocytes, while neutrophils were significantly increased by 35.1% (p < 0.05). % Reticulocyes in the male 500 mg/kg group was decreased by 18.5% (p < 0.05), but in female group, there was a 25.0% elevation (p < 0.05). These changes were considered as incidental and therefore unrelated to the test substance as they were isolated cases without dose-dependency, and there were no other noticeable changes observed in the other FCPE-treated groups. When coagulation ability was assessed, all groups showed comparable levels of the time until formation of coagulation, indicating normal function of the coagulation system in the FCPE-administered groups. Among serum biochemical parameters (Table 2), the levels of glucose in the male 500 mg/kg group showed an increase by 16.4% (p < 0.05) compared to the vehicle control without similar change detected in higher dose groups. Besides this, no other parameters showed a statistically meaningful change.
Table 1.
Dose of fermented Citrus sunki peel extract (mg/kg) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 500 | 1000 | 2000 | |
Male (n = 10/group) | ||||
WBC (103/mm3) | 9.4 ± 2.4 | 8.7 ± 3.8 | 8.4 ± 2.4 | 8.4 ± 1.0 |
RBC (106/mm3) | 8.1 ± 0.4 | 7.8 ± 0.4 | 8.2 ± 0.3 | 7.8 ± 0.5 |
HGB (g/dl) | 14.4 ± 0.7 | 13.9 ± 0.7 | 14.6 ± 0.6 | 14.1 ± 0.6 |
HCT (%) | 39.1 ± 2.0 | 37.6 ± 2.0 | 39.3 ± 1.9 | 35.3 ± 7.6 |
PLT (103/mm3) | 789.0 ± 84.8 | 768.8 ± 71.4 | 800.2 ± 83.3 | 724.8 ± 57.3 |
MCV (fl) | 48.3 ± 2.6 | 48.3 ± 1.5 | 47.8 ± 1.2 | 48.8 ± 2.5 |
MCH (pg) | 17.8 ± 0.8 | 17.9 ± 0.6 | 17.8 ± 0.4 | 18.1 ± 0.9 |
MCHC (g/dl) | 36.9 ± 0.7 | 37.1 ± 0.6 | 37.2 ± 0.9 | 37.0 ± 0.6 |
Neutrophils (%) | 11.1 ± 3.1 | 11.1 ± 3.4 | 15.0 ± 4.1* | 12.0 ± 2.4 |
Eosinophils (%) | 0.30 ± 0.22 | 0.21 ± 0.17 | 0.2 ± 0.09 | 0.15 ± 0.11 |
Basophils (%) | 0.57 ± 0.14 | 0.50 ± 0.15 | 0.56 ± 0.18 | 0.54 ± 0.16 |
Lymphocytes (%) | 83.1 ± 3.7 | 83.2 ± 4.0 | 78.5 ± 4.5* | 82.1 ± 3.3 |
Monocytes (%) | 3.7 ± 0.6 | 3.8 ± 0.7 | 4.5 ± 0.9 | 4.0 ± 1.0 |
Reticulocytes (%) | 2.7 ± 0.4 | 2.2 ± 0.2* | 2.9 ± 0.6 | 2.4 ± 0.3 |
PT (sec) | 16.0 ± 0.7 | 15.7 ± 0.5 | 15.7 ± 0.7 | 15.7 ± 0.8 |
aPTT (sec) | 43.0 ± 7.6 | 44.1 ± 2.0 | 42.7 ± 2.6 | 44.0 ± 4.3 |
Female (n = 10/group) | ||||
WBC (103/mm3) | 7.1 ± 1.6 | 6.7 ± 1.7 | 8.0 ± 2.0 | 7.8 ± 3.1 |
RBC (106/mm3) | 7.2 ± 0.2 | 7.2 ± 0.4 | 7.1 ± 0.4 | 7.0 ± 0.3 |
HGB (g/dl) | 13.6 ± 0.5 | 13.3 ± 0.3 | 13.3 ± 0.7 | 13.3 ± 0.4 |
HCT (%) | 36.9 ± 1.1 | 36.2 ± 1.2 | 36.2 ± 2.2 | 36.1 ± 1.2 |
PLT (103/mm3) | 700.0 ± 93.5 | 705.2 ± 41.3 | 654.3 ± 58.8 | 710.8 ± 48.6 |
MCV (fl) | 51.5 ± 0.9 | 50.2 ± 1.9 | 50.9 ± 2.0 | 51.3 ± 2.4 |
MCH (pg) | 19.0 ± 0.7 | 18.5 ± 0.7 | 18.7 ± 0.6 | 18.9 ± 0.7 |
MCHC (g/dl) | 36.9 ± 1.0 | 36.9 ± 0.9 | 36.8 ± 1.0 | 36.8 ± 0.7 |
Neutrophils (%) | 7.7 ± 1.4 | 7.4 ± 1.5 | 7.4 ± 2.0 | 8.6 ± 2.9 |
Eosinophils (%) | 0.12 ± 0.09 | 0.22 ± 0.18 | 0.17 ± 0.12 | 0.22 ± 0.19 |
Basophils (%) | 0.41 ± 0.10 | 0.47 ± 0.15 | 0.44 ± 0.13 | 0.42 ± 0.08 |
Lymphocytes (%) | 87.2 ± 2.0 | 87.4 ± 2.0 | 87.4 ± 2.5 | 86.1 ± 3.7 |
Monocytes (%) | 3.3 ± 0.5 | 3.4 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 0.6 | 3.6 ± 0.6 |
Reticulocytes (%) | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 2.5 ± 0.5* | 2.5 ± 0.4 | 2.2 ± 0.4 |
PT (sec) | 15.9 ± 0.8 | 16.3 ± 0.5 | 15.9 ± 0.6 | 15.9 ± 0.6 |
aPTT (sec) | 47.6 ± 5.9 | 49.5 ± 6.4 | 44.8 ± 8.0 | 41.6 ± 7.2 |
WBC white blood cells, RBC red blood cells, Hb hemoglobin, HCT hematocrit, PLT platelet, MCV mean corpuscular volume, MCH mean corpuscular hemoglobin, MCHC mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, PT partial thromboplastin time and aPTT activated partial thromboplastin time
*; p < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Dunnet’s test
Table 2.
Dose of fermented Citrus sunki peel extract (mg/kg) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 500 | 1000 | 2000 | |
Male (n = 10/group) | ||||
BUN (mg/dL) | 14.4 ± 1.5 | 13.5 ± 1.5 | 13.7 ± 1.4 | 14.1 ± 2.0 |
TC (mg/dL) | 72.4 ± 8.6 | 69.0 ± 13.7 | 61.9 ± 8.0 | 61.9 ± 13.1 |
TP (g/dL) | 6.0 ± 0.4 | 5.7 ± 0.3 | 5.8 ± 0.3 | 6.0 ± 0.2 |
Albumin (g/dL) | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.2 |
TB (mg/dL) | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.02 ± 0.04 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
ALP (IU/L) | 228.9 ± 43.7 | 208.3 ± 49.5 | 225.8 ± 61.4 | 205.7 ± 33.3 |
AST (IU/L) | 112.5 ± 20.7 | 97.8 ± 17.7 | 105.7 ± 22.6 | 92.9 ± 28.6 |
ALT (IU/L) | 34.5 ± 7.6 | 31.7 ± 2.5 | 33.8 ± 3.1 | 31.5 ± 7.7 |
Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.56 ± 0.04 | 0.52 ± 0.05 | 0.51 ± 0.11 | 0.58 ± 0.06 |
TG (mg/dL) | 59.8 ± 13.6 | 76.9 ± 26.7 | 85.1 ± 33.5 | 71.4 ± 29.8 |
Glucose (mg/L) | 153.1 ± 11.7 | 178.2 ± 25.7* | 154.3 ± 11.9 | 169.1 ± 25.4 |
Potassium (mmol/L) | 4.9 ± 0.2 | 4.8 ± 0.3 | 4.6 ± 0.2 | 4.8 ± 0.3 |
Chlorine (mmol/L) | 101.4 ± 2.9 | 102.3 ± 2.6 | 102.4 ± 1.5 | 104.2 ± 2.1 |
Calcium (mg/dL) | 9.8 ± 0.5 | 9.6 ± 0.4 | 9.5 ± 0.3 | 10.0 ± 0.3 |
Phosphorus (mg/dL) | 7.0 ± 0.4 | 6.7 ± 0.5 | 6.6 ± 0.5 | 7.1 ± 0.7 |
Sodium (mmol/L) | 138.0 ± 3.1 | 137.4 ± 2.9 | 138.5 ± 3.7 | 140.6 ± 1.8 |
Female (n = 10/group) | ||||
BUN (mg/dL) | 13.2 ± 2.3 | 15.0 ± 1.9 | 12.7 ± 1.2 | 13.6 ± 2.1 |
TC (mg/dL) | 76.2 ± 8.0 | 79.6 ± 15.2 | 72.7 ± 18.5 | 71.6 ± 18.6 |
TP (g/dL) | 6.3 ± 0.3 | 6.3 ± 0.4 | 6.5 ± 0.5 | 6.4 ± 0.4 |
Albumin (g/dL) | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 2.9 ± 0.3 | 2.9 ± 0.3 |
TB (mg/dL) | 0.04 ± 0.05 | 0.02 ± 0.04 | 0.01 ± 0.06 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
ALP (IU/L) | 112.9 ± 20.6 | 117.4 ± 36.9 | 107.1 ± 26.1 | 101.4 ± 23.7 |
AST (IU/L) | 103.0 ± 23.7 | 104.1 ± 48.1 | 90.2 ± 19.6 | 84.7 ± 14.8 |
ALT (IU/L) | 49.5 ± 10.6 | 43.0 ± 16.1 | 40.5 ± 16.4 | 35.5 ± 5.2 |
Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.71 ± 0.10 | 0.62 ± 0.10 | 0.60 ± 0.22 | 0.63 ± 0.05 |
TG (mg/dL) | 50.2 ± 38.7 | 75.4 ± 40.0 | 75.0 ± 107.8 | 50.1 ± 35.9 |
Glucose (mg/L) | 203.7 ± 22.1 | 216.4 ± 17.4 | 212.2 ± 15.5 | 201.4 ± 24.1 |
Potassium (mmol/L) | 4.3 ± 0.2 | 4.5 ± 0.161 | 4.4 ± 0.1 | 4.5 ± 0.2 |
Chlorine (mmol/L) | 106.0 ± 2.3 | 105.2 ± 2.1 | 105.2 ± 2.4 | 104.5 ± 2.2 |
Calcium (mg/dL) | 10.5 ± 0.3 | 10.6 ± 0.2 | 10.6 ± 0.5 | 10.5 ± 0.5 |
Phosphorus (mg/dL) | 6.2 ± 0.5 | 6.3 ± 0.6 | 6.4 ± 0.6 | 6.5 ± 0.6 |
Sodium (mmol/L) | 140.9 ± 1.9 | 140.5 ± 1.3 | 140.0 ± 1.7 | 141.3 ± 1.0 |
BUN blood urea nitrogen, TC total cholesterol, TP total protein, TB total bilirubin, ALP alkaline phosphatase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, ALT alanine aminotransferase, and TG triglycerides
*; p < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Dunnett's test
When the organs were excised and weighed at necropsy (Table 3), a significant change (p < 0.05) in absolute weight compared to the vehicle group was noted in the left testis (10.0% decrease), the heart (9.5% decrease) and the lung (8.2% decrease) in the male 500 mg/kg group, and in the heart (12.8% decrease), the lung (8.8% decrease) and, the pituitary grand (13.3% decrease) in the male 1000 mg/kg group. In female groups, the left kidney of the highest dose group was markedly increased by 10.1% (p < 0.05). On the contrary, the relative weight of all the organs examined were found to be comparable. Gross examination carried out on all organs revealed that a male animal from the 1000 mg/kg group had a 3 mm nodule in the liver and another had a duodenal diverticulum (5 × 7 mm). In female groups, red discolorization was observed in the left thymus and the left cranial lobe of the lung (500 mg/kg group), and the right ovary (1000 mg/kg group). These are likely sporadic legions as only single cases were detected without evident dose dependency and corresponding histopathological changes (Supplementary Table 2). The other histopathological lesions identified in microscopic examination were observed at similar frequencies between the vehicle control and 2000 mg/kg FCPE administered groups and therefore considered as spontaneous or incidental (Supplementary Table 2).
Table 3.
Dose of fermented Citrus sunki peel extract (mg/kg) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 500 | 1000 | 2000 | ||
Male (n = 10/group) | |||||
Liver | (g) | 17.1 ± 2.5 | 15.6 ± 1.5 | 15.3 ± 1.4 | 16.1 ± 2.1 |
(g%) | 2.83 ± 0.12 | 2.73 ± 0.18 | 2.737 ± 0.14 | 2.81 ± 0.18 | |
Spleen | (g) | 0.94 ± 0.16 | 0.84 ± 0.14 | 0.81 ± 0.09 | 0.87 ± 0.13 |
(g%) | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | |
Kidney (R) | (g) | 2.02 ± 0.19 | 1.83 ± 0.18 | 1.85 ± 0.17 | 1.90 ± 0.14 |
(g%) | 0.34 ± 0.02 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.03 | |
Kidney (L) | (g) | 1.99 ± 0.26 | 1.79 ± 0.21 | 1.82 ± 0.16 | 1.92 ± 0.18 |
(g%) | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0.31 ± 0.02 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | 0.34 ± 0.02 | |
Adrenal gl. (R) | (g) | 0.031 ± 0.004 | 0.028 ± 0.003 | 0.029 ± 0.006 | 0.031 ± 0.006 |
(g%) | 0.005 ± 0.001 | 0.005 ± 0.001 | 0.005 ± 0.001 | 0.005 ± 0.001 | |
Adrenal gl. (L) | (g) | 0.034 ± 0.006 | 0.029 ± 0.003 | 0.031 ± 0.005 | 0.032 ± 0.005 |
(g%) | 0.006 ± 0.001 | 0.005 ± 0.001 | 0.006 ± 0.001 | 0.006 ± 0.001 | |
Testis (R) | (g) | 1.78 ± 0.08 | 1.62 ± 0.16 | 1.70 ± 0.18 | 1.82 ± 0.16 |
(g%) | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.05 | 0.32 ± 0.05 | |
Testis (L) | (g) | 1.80 ± 0.09 | 1.62 ± 0.14* | 1.73 ± 0.20 | 1.82 ± 0.16 |
(g%) | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.06 | 0.32 ± 0.05 | |
Thymus | (g) | 0.28 ± 0.05 | 0.30 ± 0.10 | 0.28 ± 0.06 | 0.24 ± 0.06 |
(g%) | 0.047 ± 0.009 | 0.054 ± 0.018 | 0.051 ± 0.012 | 0.041 ± 0.009 | |
Heart | (g) | 1.79 ± 0.14 | 1.62 ± 0.13* | 1.56 ± 0.15* | 1.69 ± 0.16 |
(g%) | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.30 ± 0.02 | |
Lung | (g) | 1.70 ± 0.20 | 1.56 ± 0.05* | 1.55 ± 0.09* | 1.61 ± 0.09 |
(g%) | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.28 ± 0.03 | |
Brain | (g) | 2.22 ± 0.14 | 2.14 ± 0.11 | 2.11 ± 0.09 | 2.16 ± 0.14 |
(g%) | 0.37 ± 0.05 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | 0.38 ± 0.04 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | |
Pituitary gl. | (g) | 0.015 ± 0.002 | 0.015 ± 0.002 | 0.013 ± 0.001* | 0.014 ± 0.001 |
(g%) | 0.002 ± 0.000 | 0.003 ± 0.000 | 0.002 ± 0.000 | 0.002 ± 0.000 | |
Female (n = 10/group) | |||||
Liver | (g) | 8.2 ± 1.1 | 9.1 ± 0.9 | 8.6 ± 1.9 | 9.0 ± 1.7 |
(g%) | 2.74 ± 0.26 | 2.83 ± 0.14 | 2.63 ± 0.33 | 2.88 ± 0.25 | |
Spleen | (g) | 0.55 ± 0.05 | 0.57 ± 0.08 | 0.57 ± 0.07 | 0.55 ± 0.10 |
(g%) | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | |
Kidney (R) | (g) | 0.91 ± 0.07 | 0.97 ± 0.06 | 0.98 ± 0.13 | 1.00 ± 0.09 |
(g%) | 0.30 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.02 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | |
Kidney (L) | (g) | 0.89 ± 0.09 | 0.97 ± 0.04 | 0.98 ± 0.12 | 0.98 ± 0.07* |
(g%) | 0.30 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.02 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | |
Adrenal gl. (R) | (g) | 0.033 ± 0.003 | 0.037 ± 0.004 | 0.034 ± 0.008 | 0.034 ± 0.005 |
(g%) | 0.011 ± 0.001 | 0.011 ± 0.001 | 0.010 ± 0.002 | 0.011 ± 0.001 | |
Adrenal gl. (L) | (g) | 0.037 ± 0.005 | 0.037 ± 0.004 | 0.036 ± 0.009 | 0.037 ± 0.006 |
(g%) | 0.012 ± 0.002 | 0.011 ± 0.001 | 0.011 ± 0.003 | 0.012 ± 0.001 | |
Ovary (R) | (g) | 0.060 ± 0.007 | 0.113 ± 0.158 | 0.059 ± 0.010 | 0.061 ± 0.015 |
(g%) | 0.020 ± 0.003 | 0.038 ± 0.058 | 0.019 ± 0.004 | 0.020 ± 0.005 | |
Ovary (L) | (g) | 0.058 ± 0.009 | 0.056 ± 0.010 | 0.058 ± 0.013 | 0.058 ± 0.009 |
(g%) | 0.019 ± 0.003 | 0.018 ± 0.004 | 0.018 ± 0.005 | 0.019 ± 0.004 | |
Thymus | (g) | 0.25 ± 0.06 | 0.28 ± 0.05 | 0.26 ± 0.07 | 0.29 ± 0.10 |
(g%) | 0.084 ± 0.018 | 0.088 ± 0.016 | 0.083 ± 0.023 | 0.092 ± 0.023 | |
Heart | (g) | 0.94 ± 0.09 | 1.05 ± 0.10 | 0.99 ± 0.10 | 0.97 ± 0.10 |
(g%) | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.02 | |
Lung | (g) | 1.23 ± 0.06 | 1.25 ± 0.16 | 1.26 ± 0.20 | 1.22 ± 0.08 |
(g%) | 0.41 ± 0.03 | 0.39 ± 0.05 | 0.40 ± 0.08 | 0.40 ± 0.05 | |
Brain | (g) | 1.92 ± 0.07 | 1.95 ± 0.06 | 1.95 ± 0.09 | 1.90 ± 0.06 |
(g%) | 0.64 ± 0.04 | 0.61 ± 0.05 | 0.62 ± 0.08 | 0.62 ± 0.08 | |
Pituitary gl. | (g) | 0.016 ± 0.003 | 0.017 ± 0.002 | 0.018 ± 0.003 | 0.019 ± 0.005 |
(g%) | 0.005 ± 0.001 | 0.005 ± 0.001 | 0.006 ± 0.001 | 0.006 ± 0.001 |
*; p < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Dunnett’s test
Collectively, the combined results of our acute and 90-day repeated toxicity study demonstrated that FCPE was safe for oral consumption up to 2000 mg/kg BW in SD rats, suggesting that its no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) is higher than 2000 mg/kg BW.
Bacterial reverse mutation test
Next, we examined the genotoxicity of FCPE by assessing bacterial mutation reversion, chromosome aberration and in vivo micronucleus formation. FCPE was not cytotoxic to TA100 tester strain up to 5000 μg/plate as similar numbers of colonies were observed regardless of the presence of S-9 factor, while positive controls induced a marked increase of revertant colonies (Supplementary Table 3). To test reversion of mutation, we pre-treated up to 5000 μg/plate FCPE on 5 tester strains including 4 histidine-requiring S. typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and a tryptophan-requiring E. coli WP2(uvrA) and counted the number of colonies formed on histidine-deficient or tryptophan-deficient agar plates as the indicator of mutation reversion (Fig. 2). Treatment with FCPE resulted in similar numbers of colonies to the vehicle control in all the strains tested in the study, while the positive controls significantly increased their number. Moreover, metabolic activation of FCPE using S-9 mix also did not effectively increase the colony number, collectively indicating inability of FCPE to induce mutations in bacterial tester strains.
In vitro chromosome aberration test
Chromosome aberration was measured in 200 CHL cells in metaphase after treatment with FCPE. Notably, FCPE did not affect cell viability at up to 5000 μg/mL (Supplementary Table 4). Compared to the significantly increased number of cells with chromosome aberration in the positive control groups (Fig. 3), all doses of FCPE used here resulted in a similar number of chromosomally aberrant cells to the vehicle control irrespective of S-9 mediated metabolic activation.
In vivo micronucleus formation test
The results of above assays suggested that FCPE lack in vitro genotoxicity. To confirm these findings in an in vivo system, we administered FCPE in ICR mice and examined the number of micronuclei-containing polychromatic erythrocytes (MNPCE) as a readout of genotoxicity (Fig. 4). Oral administration of up to 2000 mg/kg BW FCPE for 4 days did not induce any change in either % PCE (Fig. 4a) or the number of MNPCE (Fig. 4b) at any doses compared to the vehicle control, while treatment with mitomycin C resulted in a marked increase. Collectively, these findings demonstrated that FCPE had no genotoxic potential in our test system.
Discussion
C. sunki peel has been a popular ingredient due to its empirically tested therapeutic effects in traditional folk medicine. Despite the long history of its use, toxicity information of C. sunki peel has not been available partly due to small-scaled usage along with a low rate of side effects. However, a growing body of evidence on its pharmacological effects from recent studies led to development of highly concentrated products and increased consumption, posing a higher risk of over-dosing. In this study, we systematically assessed the safety of water extract of fermented C. sunki peel by carrying out a series of systemic toxicity studies in combination with in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity assays. Our results on FCPE in this study were generally in line with the previous studies on other citrus species, but also there were different findings.
Among a handful of citrus species whose toxicity has been preclinically evaluated, C. aurantium L. (bitter orange) extract has been most extensively studied [29]; > 5000 mg/kg for LD50 [30], 1000 mg/kg for NOAEL [31] and no developmental toxicity at 100 mg/kg [32]. A recent study on C. unshiu Marcow. peel water extract also reported low toxicity with > 4000 mg/kg for LD50 and NOAEL [33]. Our findings of 2000 mg/kg FCPE for LD50 and NOAEL are closely consistent with these reports, suggesting the safety of FCPE for human consumption and recapitulating the general safety of citrus species peel by adding another layer of evidence.
Among the polymethoxy flavonoids in C. sunki peel, tangeretin is one of the most abundant components and has been associated with in vivo toxicity in mice; Although LD50 was > 3000 mg/kg BW, repeated administration of 50 mg/kg caused reduction of relative liver weight with hepatocellular alteration, and increased triglycerides and total cholesterol of female groups in a 28-day oral toxicity study [34]. Also, tangeretin was reported to be a mild immunotoxicant as demonstrated in a concurrent reduction of T cell-derived interleukins and Th17 cell population by oral administration of 50 mg/kg tangeretin [35] and reduction of circulating lymphocytes by 0.22 mg/day [36]. In our 90-day toxicity study, we did not observe such pathological changes in the SD rats fed with 2000 mg/kg FCPE (equivalent to 6.8 mg/kg/day tangeretin) except for mild reduction of circulating lymphocytes in the male 1000 mg/kg group. It is tempting to propose that the observed discrepancy may be caused due to the different species we used in our study (i.e., SD rats instead of mice) or the low levels of tangeretin contained in FCPE compared to the doses employed in the mice studies, but the responsible mechanism may need to be clarified in further investigation.
Genotoxicity of citrus species have been controversial with contradicting evidence reported from several studies. While no genotoxicity was detected in three studies on C. aurantium L. (bitter orange) extract [30], C. unshiu Marcow. peel water extract [33] and polymethoxy flavones extracted from citrus peel oil [18], Franke et al. showed that juice prepared from C. sinensis Linn. had a mild degree of mutagenicity in the Ames test [37] and the comet assay [38]. Our results on FCPE demonstrated no mutagenicity and clastogenicity, supporting lack of genotoxic potential in citrus peel. The difference observed among the studies may be explained by distinct composition of citrus components derived from usage of different species, part of citrus and extract methods. As quercetin and kaempferol have been detected as mutagenic in a mammalian cell line [39], quantification of these flavonols may be of great interest to understand their contribution to the differential responses of citrus species in genotoxicity assays. Although the responsible compounds for mutagenicity remain to be identified, currently accumulated evidence including our results collectively suggest that citrus peel have no genotoxicity.
In this study, we systematically assessed general and genetic toxicity of fermented C. sunki peel extract using in vivo and in vitro models, providing the toxicity information to be used for safe consumption in humans and adding another layer of evidence for the general safety of citrus species. As a health supplement, the oral dose range of commercial citrus peel extract is generally recommended to be 40 ~ 100 mg/kg/day in human with the usual duration of administration from days up to a month. Therefore, our findings suggest that FCPE may be consumed without harmful effects in human following the current guideline.
Conclusions
FCPE, under the test conditions we employed in the study, demonstrated no systemic toxicity in SD rats, establishing > 2000 mg/kg BW for LD50 as well as NOAEL, and absence of mutagenicity and clastogenicity at 5000 μg/plate for in vitro assays and 2000 mg/kg BW for in vivo micronucleus test.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- ALP
Alkaline phosphatase
- ALT
Alanine aminotransferase
- aPTT
Activated partial thromboplastin time
- AST
Aspartate aminotransferase
- BUN
Blood urea nitrogen
- CHL
Chinese Hamster Lung
- EDTA
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
- FBS
Fetal bovine serum
- FCPE
Fermented C. sunki peel extract
- Hb
Hemoglobin
- HCT
Hematocrit
- KFDA
Korea Food Drug Administration
- LD50
Lethal dose 50%
- MCH
Mean corpuscular hemoglobin
- MCHC
Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration
- MCV
Mean corpuscular volume
- MNPCE
Micronuclei-containing polychromatic erythrocyte
- NCE
Normochromatic erythrocyte
- NOAEL
No-observed-adverse-effect-level
- OECD
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
- PCE
Polychromatic erythrocyte
- PLT
Platelet
- PT
Partial thromboplastin time
- RBC
Red blood cell
- TB
Total bilirubin
- TC
Total cholesterol
- TG
Triglyceride
- TP
Total protein
- WBC
White blood cell
Authors’ contributions
B.-C.K. conceived and designed the study. J.-S.P. contributed to analysis of the data and wrote the manuscript. E.-Y.C., Y.-S.K and E.K. designed experiments and performed acquisition and analysis of the data. K.-M.H, S.-Y.K., C.-W.J., J.-W.Y. and J.-H.C. critically reviewed the analysis of the data and the manuscript. All the authors interpreted the data, and read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by a research fund (06–2009–325-0) and an Education and Research Encouragement Fund from Seoul National University Hospital, Korea. The funding body did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, and manuscript preparation.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study have been archived in Department of Experimental Animal Research, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, and are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in Seoul National University Hospital in accordance with Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th edition (NRC, 2000).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12906-020-03079-z.
References
- 1.Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Citrus fruit - fresh and processed statistical bulletin 2016. Rome; 2017.
- 2.Arias BÁ, Ramón-Laca L. Pharmacological properties of citrus and their ancient and medieval uses in the Mediterranean region. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;97(1):89–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2004.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Favela-Hernández JMJ, González-Santiago O, Ramírez-Cabrera MA, Esquivel-Ferriño PC, Camacho-Corona MDR. Chemistry and pharmacology of Citrus sinensis. Molecules. 2016;21(2):247. doi: 10.3390/molecules21020247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang S, Yang C, Tu H, Zhou J, Liu X, Cheng Y, Luo J, Deng X, Zhang H, Xu J. Characterization and metabolic diversity of flavonoids in Citrus species. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):10549. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10970-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Panche AN, Diwan AD, Chandra SR. Flavonoids: an overview. J Nutr Sci. 2016;5:e47. doi: 10.1017/jns.2016.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rafiq S, Kaul R, Sofi SA, Bashir N, Nazir F, Ahmad Nayik G. Citrus peel as a source of functional ingredient: a review. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2018;17(4):351–358. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ademosun AO, Oboh G, Olasehinde TA, Adeoyo OO. From folk medicine to functional food: a review on the bioactive components and pharmacological properties of citrus peels. Orient Pharm Exp Med. 2018;18(1):9–20. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kim HY. Distribution, taxonomy, horticultural characters of the local Citrus spp. in Cheju, and the genetic markers among them. Kwangju: Chonnam National University; 1988. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kang SI, Shin HS, Kim HM, Hong YS, Yoon SA, Kang SW, Kim JH, Kim MH, Ko HC, Kim SJ. Immature Citrus sunki peel extract exhibits antiobesity effects by beta-oxidation and lipolysis in high-fat diet-induced obese mice. Biol Pharm Bull. 2012;35(2):223–230. doi: 10.1248/bpb.35.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cui Z-G, Kim B-Y, Kang S-H, Lee Y-J, Lee D-H, Lee Y-K, Park D-B. Fermented Peel of Citrus sunki Hort. Ex Tanaka promotes ethanol metabolism and suppresses body fat accumulation. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2007;16(2):311–314. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Oh HA, Kim MJ, Shin TY, Kim HM, Jeong HJ. The antiallergic mechanisms of Citrus sunki and bamboo salt (K-ALL) in an allergic rhinitis model. Exp Biol Med (Maywood, NJ) 2014;239(1):83–93. doi: 10.1177/1535370213505826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Choi SY, Hwang JH, Ko HC, Park JG, Kim SJ. Nobiletin from citrus fruit peel inhibits the DNA-binding activity of NF-kappaB and ROS production in LPS-activated RAW 264.7 cells. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;113(1):149–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2007.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wu JJ, Cui Y, Yang YS, Jung SC, Hyun JW, Maeng YH, Park DB, Lee SR, Kim SJ, Eun SY. Mild mitochondrial depolarization is involved in a neuroprotective mechanism of Citrus sunki peel extract. Phytother Res. 2013;27(4):564–571. doi: 10.1002/ptr.4745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ko WC, Lee SR. Effect of Immature Citrus sunki Peel Extract on Neuronal Cell Death. 2015. pp. 144–149. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nogata Y, Sakamoto K, Shiratsuchi H, Ishii T, Yano M, Ohta H. Flavonoid composition of fruit tissues of citrus species. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2006;70(1):178–192. doi: 10.1271/bbb.70.178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Choi JG, Kim BY, Kang S-H, Lee YJ, Lee DH, Lee YK, Park DB, Lee CH, Lee YD, Yoon JH, et al. The Fermentation Forming Method of Citrus Sunki And The Product thereof. KIPO: KR101228554B1; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Delaney B, Phillips K, Buswell D, Mowry B, Nickels D, Cox D, Wang HB, Manthey J. Immunotoxicity of a standardized citrus polymethoxylated flavone extract. Food Chem Toxicol. 2001;39(11):1087–1094. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(01)00058-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Delaney B, Phillips K, Vasquez C, Wilson A, Cox D, Wang HB, Manthey J. Genetic toxicity of a standardized mixture of citrus polymethoxylated flavones. Food Chem Toxicol. 2002;40(5):617–624. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(02)00007-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yang EJ, Kim SS, Moon JY, Oh TH, Baik JS, Lee NH, Hyun CG. Inhibitory effects of Fortunella japonica var. margarita and Citrus sunki essential oils on nitric oxide production and skin pathogens. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2010;57(1):15–27. doi: 10.1556/AMicr.57.2010.1.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yun JW, Kwon E, Kim SH, You JR, Kim YS, Park IA, Kim HH, Che JH, Kang BC. Preclinical safety assessment of Angelica acutiloba using a 13-week repeated dose oral toxicity study in rats. Lab Anim Res. 2017;33(3):223–230. doi: 10.5625/lar.2017.33.3.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.National Research Council (NRC) Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Washington: National Academic Press; 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals, Test No. 473: In vitro mammalian chromosome abberation test. Paris: OECD; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) OECD guideline for testing of the chemicals, Test No. 474: Mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test. Paris: OECD; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) OECD Guideline for the tesitng of chemicals, Test No. 471: Baterial reverse mutation test. Paris: OECD; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) OECD Guideline for the testing of chemicals, Test No. 420: Acute oral toxicity - fixed dose procedure. Paris: OECD; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals, Test No. 408: Repeated dose 90-day oral toxicity study in rodents. Paris: OECD; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA) Good Laboratory Practice. Republic of Korea: KFDA; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yun JW, You JR, Kim YS, Kim SH, Cho EY, Yoon JH, Kwon E, Jang JJ, Park JS, Kim HC, et al. In vitro and in vivo safety studies of cinnamon extract (Cinnamomum cassia) on general and genetic toxicology. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018;95:115–123. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stohs SJ. Safety, efficacy, and mechanistic studies regarding Citrus aurantium (bitter Orange) extract and p-Synephrine. Phytother Res. 2017;31(10):1463–1474. doi: 10.1002/ptr.5879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Deshmukh NS, Stohs SJ, Magar CC, Kadam SB. Citrus aurantium (bitter orange) extract: safety assessment by acute and 14-day oral toxicity studies in rats and the Ames test for mutagenicity. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017;90:318–327. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.09.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Deshmukh NS, Stohs SJ, Magar CC, Kale A, Sowmya B. Bitter orange (Citrus aurantium L.) extract subchronic 90-day safety study in rats. Toxicol Rep. 2017;4:598–613. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2017.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hansen DK, Juliar BE, White GE, Pellicore LS. Developmental toxicity of Citrus aurantium in rats. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2011;92(3):216–223. doi: 10.1002/bdrb.20308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Park H, Hwang YH, Choi JG, Ma JY. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of systemic and genetic toxicity of Citrus unshiu peel. J Ethnopharmacol. 2018;215:120–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2017.12.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ting Y, Chiou YS, Jiang Y, Pan MH, Lin Z, Huang Q. Safety evaluation of tangeretin and the effect of using emulsion-based delivery system: Oral acute and 28-day sub-acute toxicity study using mice. Food Res Int. 2015;74:140–150. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.04.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Liu LL, Li FH, Zhang Y, Zhang XF, Yang J. Tangeretin has anti-asthmatic effects via regulating PI3K and notch signaling and modulating Th1/Th2/Th17 cytokine balance in neonatal asthmatic mice. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2017;50(8):e5991. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20175991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vanhoecke BW, Delporte F, Van Braeckel E, Heyerick A, Depypere HT, Nuytinck M, De Keukeleire D, Bracke ME. A safety study of oral tangeretin and xanthohumol administration to laboratory mice. In Vivo. 2005;19(1):103–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Franke SIR, Ckless K, Silveira JD, Rubensam G, Brendel M, Erdtmann B, Henriques JAP. Study of antioxidant and mutagenic activity of different orange juices. Food Chem. 2004;88(1):45–55. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Franke SI, Pra D, Giulian R, Dias JF, Yoneama ML, da Silva J, Erdtmann B, Henriques JA. Influence of orange juice in the levels and in the genotoxicity of iron and copper. Food Chem Toxicol. 2006;44(3):425–435. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2005.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Carver JH, Carrano AV, MacGregor JT. Genetic effects of the flavonols quercetin, kaempferol, and galangin on Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro. Mutat Res. 1983;113(1):45–60. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(83)90240-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study have been archived in Department of Experimental Animal Research, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, and are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.