Abstract
Pigs have anatomical and physiological characteristics comparable to those in humans and, therefore, are a favorable model for immune function research. Interferons (IFNs) and inflammasomes have essential roles in the innate immune system. Here, we report that G10, a human-specific agonist of stimulator of interferon genes (STING), activates both type I IFN and the canonical NLRP3 inflammasome in a STING-dependent manner in porcine cells. Without a priming signal, G10 alone transcriptionally stimulated Sp1-dependent p65 expression, thus triggering activation of the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling pathway and thereby priming inflammasome activation. G10 was also found to induce potassium efflux- and NLRP3/ASC/Caspase-1-dependent secretion of IL-1β and IL-18. Pharmacological and genetic inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasomes increased G10-induced type I IFN expression, thereby preventing virus infection, suggesting negative regulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in the IFN response in the context of STING-mediated innate immune activation. Overall, our findings reveal a new mechanism through which G10 activates the NLRP3 inflammasome in porcine cells and provide new insights into STING-mediated innate immunity in pigs compared with humans.
Keywords: STING agonist, NLRP3 inflammasome, interferon, negative regulation, innate immunity
Introduction
The innate immune system detects pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) via germline-encoded pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) (1). Subsequently, innate immune responses are activated, and inflammatory cytokines, such as interferons (IFNs), proinflammatory cytokines, and chemokines, are generated. DAMPs and PAMPs comprise self- and foreign-derived double-stranded DNA in the cytosol (2). Stimulator of interferon genes (STING) is an ER-resident adaptor protein that is critical in mediating the signaling triggered by cytosolic nucleic acids (3, 4). After activation by an agonist, STING undergoes a conformational change resulting in the recruitment of TANK binding kinase (TBK1) to STING (5, 6). TBK1 subsequently phosphorylates IFN-regulated factor 3 (IRF3) and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), which translocate into the nucleus and stimulate expression of type I IFN and proinflammatory cytokines (7). Given the importance of the STING-mediated pathway in the activation of innate immunity and host protection from pathogens, harnessing the innate immunity activated by STING agonists is a promising strategy for antiviral and antitumor therapeutics (8, 9). G10 is a synthetic small molecule that indirectly activates human STING and triggers IRF3-dependent IFNs expression but not NF-κB activation, thereby protecting against infection with emerging alphaviruses (10).
Inflammasomes are intracellular supramolecular complexes that assemble in response to the detection of microbial infection or stress-associated stimuli in innate immunity. The assembly of inflammasomes is a well-regulated process initiated by the recognition of DAMPs and PAMPs by PRRs (11). The nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich-repeat-containing proteins (NLRs), including NLRP1, NLRP3, NLRP6, NLRP7, and NLRP9, are notable inflammasome-forming PRRs (12–17). The NLRP3 inflammasome, the best-characterized inflammasome, contains NLRP3, the adaptor protein apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase-recruitment domain (ASC) and the proinflammatory protein Caspase-1 (18). Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome requires a priming signal and an activating signal. The priming process often involves TLRs, which activate NF-κB, thus resulting in the expression and activation of NLRP3, pro–IL-1β, and pro–IL-18 (19). Canonical activation is characterized by the oligomerization of NLRP3, ASC, and pro–Caspase-1, thus leading to the maturation of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18, and the induction of pyroptotic cell death (20). The NLRP3 inflammasome is activated after exposure to a broad range of signals, including potassium efflux, calcium mobilization, mitochondrial damage, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) (21–24).
Activation of innate immunity by DAMPs and PAMPs usually leads to type I IFN expression and inflammasome activation. Because IL-1β, IL-18, and type I IFN are key players in both infectious and autoimmune diseases, reciprocal regulation between IFNs and inflammasome is essential for immune homeostasis. Type I IFN has been reported to induce Caspase-11 expression, thereby activating non-canonical inflammasome (25), whereas other studies have suggested that type I IFN inhibits inflammasome activation (26). IFN-inducible PYRIN domain (PYD)-only protein 3 interferes with the interaction between absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) and ASC, thus inhibiting the AIM2 inflammasome (27). Another IFN-inducible protein, cholesterol 25-hydroxylase, converts cholesterol into 25-hydroxycholesterol, thus inhibiting pro–L-1β transcription and inflammasome activation (28). In contrast, type I IFN is antagonized by inflammasomes (29, 30). Caspase-1 cleaves cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS), thus inhibiting cGAS-STING-mediated type I IFN production (31).
Pigs are a validated model for use in biomedical research fields, such as xenotransplantation and immune disorders (32, 33). However, the interplay between type I IFN and inflammasomes has not been well documented in pigs to date. Here, we report that G10 triggers the activation of a STING-dependent type I IFN response and the NLRP3 inflammasome in porcine cells. G10 provides priming and activating signals, both of which are required for NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Furthermore, the NLRP3 inflammasome negatively regulates the type I IFN response in porcine cells after G10 treatment. Our results reveal a new mechanism through which G10 activates the NLRP3 inflammasome in porcine cells.
Materials and Methods
Antibodies and Reagents
The antibodies anti-P65 (#8242), anti-p-P65 (#3033), and anti-Lamin B1 (#13435) were from Cell Signaling Technology; anti-Flag M2 (F1804) was from Sigma; anti-Sp1 (10500-1-AP), anti-ASC (21962-1-AP), and anti-β-actin (20536-1-AP) were from Proteintech; anti-IL-1β was from R&D Systems (AF-401-NA); anti-Caspase-1 was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (sc-398715).
G10 (HY-19711), LPS (HY-D1056), ATP (HY-B2176), nigericin (HY-127019), MCC950 (HY-12815), and VX765 (HY-13205) were from MedChemExpress; and CL097 (tlrl-c97) was from InvivoGen.
Cells and Viruses
PK-15 (CCL-33, ATCC), 3D4/21 (CRL-2843, ATCC), HEK293 (CRL-1573, ATCC), HEK293T (CRL-11268, ATCC), and Vero (CL-81, ATCC) were cultured in DMEM (10566-016, GIBCO) supplemented with 10% FBS (10099141C, GIBCO), 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin sulfate (B540732, Sangon). THP-1 (TIB-202, ATCC) were cultured in RPMI 1640 (21870-076, GIBCO) supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin sulfate. All cells were grown in monolayers at 37°C under 5% CO2. PRV-QXX was used as previously described (34).
THP-1 Macrophage Differentiation
THP-1 cells were differentiated overnight with DMEM/10% FBS supplemented with 100 ng/ml phorbol-12-myristate 13-acetate (P1585, Sigma). After being washed three times with PBS, the cells were re-plated in DMEM/10% FBS and allowed to recover for 2 days.
Cell Stimulation
For NLRP3 inflammasome activation, cells were primed by incubation with LPS (1 μg/ml) at 37°C for 3 h. Then, NLRP3 inflammasomes were activated by incubation of cells with nigericin (2.5 μM, denoted LPS + Nig) or ATP (5 mM, denoted LPS + ATP) for the indicated times.
Plasmids
The plasmids pcDNA3-N-Flag-NLRP3 (#75127) and pLEX-MCS-ASC-GFP (#73957) were from Addgene. The human STING-Flag plasmid was a gift from Chun-Fu Zheng (Fujian Medical University, China).
To clone individual small guide RNAs (sgRNAs), 24-bp oligonucleotides containing the sgRNA sequences were synthesized (Sangon). These sequences included a 4-bp overhang in the forward (CACC) and complementary reverse (AAAC) oligonucleotides to enable cloning into the BsmBI site of the lentiCRISPR v2 (#52961, Addgene). The sgRNA sequences were as follows: p65-sgRNA1: 5′-GCGCTCAGCCGGCAGTATCC-3′; p65-sgRNA2: 5′-GCTCTCGCCCGGGATACTGC-3′; Nlrp3-sgRNA: 5′-GTGCAAGCTGGCTCGTTACC-3′; Asc-sgRNA: 5′-GAAGCTCGTCAACTACTACC-3′; and Caspase-1-sgRNA: 5′-GAACGCTACAGTTATGGATA-3′. The sgRNA sequences for Sting, Tbk1, Irf3, and Ifnar1were used as previously described (34).
For luciferase reporter assays, the porcine p65 promoter 1800 bp upstream of the transcription initiation site (+1), as well as Sp1 binding site mutants, were synthesized (Genscript) and cloned into pGL3-Basic (E1751, Promega) through the KpnI and HindIII sites to generate p65-Luc plasmids. Sp1 binding site 1 (−698) of 5′-CCGGCAGTGA-3′ was mutated to 5′-ACAAAAAAAC-3′ (p65-Luc mut1). Sp1 binding site 2 (−1300) of 5′-GAGGCACGGA-3′ was mutated to 5′-ACAAACAAAC-3′ (p65-Luc mut2). Sp1 binding site 3 (−482) of 5′-CCGGCAGTGA-3′ was mutated to 5′-AAAAACAGAC-3′ (p65-Luc mut3).
RT-qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from cells with TRIzol Reagent (9108, TaKaRa) and reverse-transcribed to cDNA with a PrimeScript RT reagent Kit (RR047A, TaKaRa) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT-qPCR was performed in triplicate with SYBR Premix Ex Taq (RR820A, TaKaRa) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The results were normalized to the level of β-actin expression. Amounts were quantified with the 2–ΔΔCt method. Primer sequences are as follows: porcine IFN-β-Fw: 5′-AGTTGCCTGGGACTCCTCAA-3′, porcine IFN-β-Rv: 5′-CCTCAGGGACCTCAAAGTTCAT-3′; porcine IL-1β-Fw: 5′-GCCCTGTACCCCAACTGGTA-3′, porcine IL-1β-Rv: 5′-CCAGGAAGACGGGCTTTTG-3′; porcine IL-18-Fw: 5′-AGGGACATCAAGCCGTGTTT-3′, porcine IL-18- Rv: 5′-CGGTCTGAGGTGCATTATCTGA-3′; porcine P65-Fw: 5′-GCATCCACAGCTTCCAGAAC-3′, porcine P65-Rv: 5′-GC ACAGCATTCAGGTCGTAG-3′; porcine ISG15-Fw: 5′-AAGG TGAAGATGCTGGGAGG-3′, porcine ISG15-Rv: 5′-CAGGATG CTCAGTGGGTCTC-3′; porcine NLRP1-Fw: 5′-TGAGTGAGG AGCAGTATGA-3′, porcine NLRP1-Rv: 5′-CAGAGCAGGTGT TCAGAC-3′; porcine NLRP3-Fw: 5′-AGAGGAGGAGGAGG AAGA-3′, porcine NLRP3-Rv: 5′-CACCAATCGCTGAGAATAT G-3′; porcine β-actin-Fw: 5′-CTGAACCCCAAAGCCAACCGT- 3′, porcine β-actin-Rv: 5′-TTCTCCTTGATGTCCCGCACG-3′.
Immunoblotting Analysis
Cells were washed once in PBS and lysed with cell lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, and 2 mM MgCl2) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (HY-K0010 and HY-K0022, MedChemExpress). Lysates were then centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 15 min, and the insoluble fraction was removed. Protein concentrations were measured with a BCA Protein Assay Kit (BCA01, DINGGUO Biotechnology). Equal amounts of protein were loaded onto each lane and separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (ISEQ00010, Millipore), and incubated in 5% nonfat milk (A600669, Sangon) for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were incubated with primary antibody at 4°C overnight and then incubated with horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (709-035-149 or 715-035-150, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) for 1 h. Immunoblotting results were visualized with Luminata Crescendo Western HRP Substrate (WBLUR0500, Millipore) on a GE AI600 imaging system.
Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction
Nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction was performed with NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (78833, Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted fractions were subjected to immunoblotting analysis.
ASC Speck Oligomerization Assay
Cells were lysed in homogenization buffer (20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.5, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, and 320 mM sucrose) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail via passage through a 21-gage needle 30 times. The lysates were subjected to centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 10 min. The supernatants were diluted with 1 volume of CHAPS buffer (20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EGTA, and 0.1% CHAPS) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail and were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 min. The pellets were washed three times with ice-cold PBS and then re-suspended in 30 μl of CHAPS buffer supplemented with 2 mM DSS crosslinker (21655, Thermo Fisher Scientific). After incubation at 37°C for 20 min, the reaction was quenched by the addition of Laemmli buffer, and the samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE.
Immunofluorescence Analysis
Cells were grown on coverslips (12-545-80, Thermo Fisher Scientific) in 12-well plates and fixed with PBS/4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 30 min. The cells were then permeabilized with PBS/0.1% Triton X-100 at room temperature for 3 min. After being washed twice with PBS, the cells were incubated with PBS/10% FBS supplemented with the primary antibody at room temperature for 1 h. After being washed three times with PBS, the cells were labeled with 10% FBS/PBS supplemented with fluorescent secondary antibody (#A-11034, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at room temperature for 1 h. Images were captured under a Zeiss LSM 800 confocal microscope and processed in ImageJ software for quantitative image analysis.
Dual Luciferase Reporter Assays
Cells cultured in 24-well plates were co-transfected with pCMV–Renilla (normalization plasmid) and p65–Luc (luciferase reporter plasmid) with Lipofectamine 3000 (L3000015, Invitrogen). At 24 h post transfection, luciferase reporter assays were performed with the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (E1910, Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The luminescence signal was detected with a Fluoroskan Ascent FL Microplate Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assays
Cells grown in 10-cm dishes were cross-linked with DMEM containing 1% formaldehyde for 15 min, and then the crosslinking was stopped by the addition of 125 mM glycine for 5 min. After being washed twice with PBS, the cells were incubated in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, and 0.5% NP40) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail on ice for 10 min and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 min. The cell pellets containing chromatin were suspended in SDS lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.9, 10 mM EDTA, and 0.5% SDS) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail and sonicated into fragments with an average length of 1 kb. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were performed with IgG or antibody against Sp1. Primer specific for p65 promoter was as follows: Fw: 5′-CCCCTCGGTGCCTTCT-3′ and Rv: 5′-CGATGGGTGCACGCTA-3′.
Lentivirus Production
HEK293T cells were seeded at 4 × 106 cells per 10-cm dish in DMEM/10% FBS. Cells were cultured for 24 h and transfected with 2 μg/dish lentiviral construct, 1.5 μg/dish psPAX2 (packaging plasmid, #12260, Addgene), and 0.5 μg/dish pMD2.G (envelope plasmid, #12259, Addgene) with Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen). After 18 h, the medium was aspirated and replaced with 10 ml of DMEM/10% FBS. Lentivirus particles were harvested at 48 and 72 h post transfection and stored at −80°C.
Generation of Gene Knockout Cell Lines via CRISPR/Cas9
Sting–/–, Tbk1–/–, Irf3–/–, and Ifnar1–/– PK15 cells were used as previously described (34). Sting–/– and Ifnar1–/– 3D4/21 cells were generated through the same procedure as Sting–/– and Ifnar1–/– PK15 cells (34). p65–/–, Nlrp3–/–, Asc–/–, and Caspase-1–/– PK15 cells and p65–/–, Nlrp3–/– and Asc–/–, Caspase-1–/– 3D4/21 cells were generated by infection of the cells with lentivirus particles containing SpCas9 and the sgRNAs of interest for 48 h and then selected with puromycin (4 μg/ml) for 7 days. Single clonal knockout cells were obtained by serial dilution and verified by Sanger sequencing.
RNA Interference
Cells were seeded in 60-mm dishes at a density of 4 × 105 cells per dish and were transfected with small interfering RNA (siRNA, GenePharma, Shanghai) at a final concentration of 0.12 nM. Transfections were performed with Lipofectamine RNAiMAX Reagent (13778500, Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions in Opti-MEM reduced serum medium (31985062, GIBCO). The medium was replaced with DMEM containing 10% FBS at 8 h post-transfection. The knockdown efficacy was assessed by immunoblotting analysis at 48 h post-transfection. The siRNA sequences were as follows: siControl: 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGU-3′; siSp1–1: 5′-GCAACAUCAUUGCUGCUAU-3′; siSp1–2: 5′-GGGAAACGCUUCACACGUU-3′; and siSp1–3: 5′-CCAUUAAUAUCAGUGGCAA-3′.
ELISA
Concentrations of IFN-β and interleukins were measured in the cell supernatants with ELISA kits from R&D Systems (human IL-1β, PDLB50 and porcine IL-1β, PLB00B) and Advanced BioChemical (porcine IFN-β, ABCE-EL-P1819 and porcine IL-18, ABCE-EL-P007), according to the manufacturers’ instructions.
Caspase-1 Activity Assays
Caspase-1 activity was assessed with a Caspase-Glo 1 Inflammasome Assay kit (G9951, Promega) with cell lysates treated as indicated, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The Tissue Culture Infective Dose Assays
Vero cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells per well. On the next day, the cells were inoculated with serially diluted viruses (10–1–10–12-fold) for 1 h at 37°C. The excess viral inoculum was removed by washing with PBS. Then, 200 μl of DMEM/2% FBS was added to each well, and the cells were further cultured for 3–5 days. The cells demonstrating the expected cytopathic effects were observed daily, and the tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) value was calculated with the Reed–Muench method.
Plaque Assays
Vero cells were cultured just to confluency in six-well plates and inoculated with serially diluted viruses (10–1–10–7-fold) for 1 h at 37°C. The excess viral inoculum was removed by washing with PBS. Then, 4 ml of DMED/1% methylcellulose (M8070, Solarbio) was added to each well, and the cells were further cultured for 4–5 days. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min and stained with 1% crystal violet for 30 min before the plaques were counted.
Statistical Analysis
GraphPad Prism 7 software was used for data analysis. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviations from three independent experiments. Statistical significance between two groups was analyzed with two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA.
Results
G10 Activates the Type I IFN Response in Porcine Cells
G10 is a human-specific STING agonist that activates the IFN response (Figure 1A) (10). We aimed to determine whether G10 might activate porcine STING-mediated type I IFN activation. We found that G10 up-regulated the transcription of IFN-β mRNA in both porcine PK15 kidney epithelial cells and 3D4/21 alveolar macrophages, in a manner dependent on STING and its downstream effectors TBK1 and IRF3, but not on IFNAR1 (Figures 1B,C). Ablation of Sting abolished G10-stimulated IFN-β secretion in PK15 and 3D4/21 cells (Figure 1D). We further detected the expression of IFN-stimulated gene 15 (ISG15) under G10 treatment by using RT-qPCR analysis. As shown in Figure 1E, challenge of Sting–/–, Tbk1–/–, Irf3–/–, and Ifnar1–/– PK15 cells with G10 had no effect on ISG15 transcription. This finding was also confirmed in Sting–/– and Ifnar1–/– 3D4/21 cells, thus suggesting that G10 activates type I IFN and IFN signaling in porcine cells (Figure 1F).
We next assessed the antiviral activity of G10 against pseudorabies virus (PRV), a member of the subfamily Alphaherpesvirinae in the family Herpesviridae, and the causative pathogen of Aujeszky’s disease in pigs (35). G10 treatment inhibited PRV infection in porcine PK15 and 3D4/21 cells (Figure 1G). STING deficiency in PK15 and 3D4/21 cells abrogated the antiviral activity of G10 and enhanced PRV infection (Figure 1G). These findings demonstrate that G10 acts on STING, resulting in activation of type I IFN and antiviral activity in porcine cells.
G10 Activates P65 Gene Transcription in Porcine Cells
G10 activates human STING and triggers IRF3-dependent IFNs expression but not NF-κB activation. Unexpectedly, porcine 3D4/21 and PK15 cells showed significant P65 mRNA up-regulation in response to G10 in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2A). Knockout of STING inhibited G10-, but not LPS-induced p65 transcription in 3D4/21 and PK15 cells (Figure 2A). Replenishment of STING expression in Sting–/– 3D4/21 cells rescued G10-induced p65 transcription (Supplementary Figure S1A).
We next sought to address how G10 transcriptionally activates porcine p65 expression. We analyzed the promoter of the porcine p65 gene and found three consensus binding sites for the transcriptional factor Sp1 (Figure 2B). Promoter mutation analysis with dual luciferase reporter assays indicated that the second Sp1 binding site (−1300) in the p65 promoter was essential for G10-mediated induction of p65 expression in a STING-dependent manner in 3D4/21 and PK15 cells (Figures 2C,D). However, LPS-stimulated p65 transcription was not dependent on these three Sp1 binding sites or on STING (Figures 2C,D). In addition, knockdown of Sp1 with RNA interference affected the expression of P65 mRNA in 3D4/21 and PK15 cells under G10 treatment (Figures 2E,F). Knockdown of Sp1 did not prevent LPS-induced p65 transcription, thus suggesting that G10 and LPS regulate p65 transcription through different mechanisms in porcine cells (Figure 2F). Furthermore, ChIP assays showed that Sp1 was recruited to the promoter of p65 after G10 treatment, in a manner dependent on either STING or Sp1 (Figure 2G). Collectively, these data suggest that G10 induces p65 transcription through STING and Sp1 in porcine cells.
G10 Activates the Porcine NF-κB Signaling Pathway
On the basis of the above findings, we attempted to determine whether G10 might activate the porcine NF-κB signaling pathway. We first addressed whether G10 induced the translocation of P65 into the nucleus. G10 did not stimulate P65 translocation into the nucleus, as indicated by immunofluorescence in human THP-1 cells (Supplementary Figure S1B). However, treatment of wild-type (WT) 3D4/21 and PK15 cells with G10 significantly promoted STING-dependent nuclear localization of P65 (Figure 3A). However, the percentage of cells with nuclear localized P65 in WT and Sting–/– 3D4/21 and PK15 cells was unchanged by LPS treatment (Figure 3A). LPS, but not G10, induced P65 translocation into the nucleus in Sting–/– 3D4/21 cells, as indicated by immunoblotting of nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts (Figure 3B).
We next investigated the transcription of the NF-κB target genes Il-1β and Il-18 (36). G10 treatment significantly induced the transcription of IL-1β and IL-18 mRNA in 3D4/21 and PK15 cells, in a manner dependent on STING (Figures 3C,D). Knockdown of Sp1 abrogated G10- but not LPS-induced transcription of IL-1β and IL-18 mRNA (Figures 3E,F). Furthermore, we ablated p65 with CRISPR/Cas9 editing in 3D4/21 and PK15 cells (Figure 3G and Supplementary Figure S1C). The mRNA levels of IL-1β and IL-18 were not up-regulated by the treatment of G10 and LPS in p65–/– 3D4/21 and PK15 cells, thus suggesting that G10- and LPS-induced expression of IL-1β and IL-18 mRNA was dependent on P65 (Figures 3H,I). These data indicate that G10 activates the NF-κB signaling pathway in porcine cells.
G10 Induces IL-1β and IL-18 Secretion in Porcine Cells
We asked whether G10 might promote porcine IL-1β and IL-18 secretion. Stimulation of human THP-1 cells with G10 did not affect IL-1β secretion (Supplementary Figure S1D). As a positive control, incubation of LPS-primed THP-1 cells with nigericin (LPS + Nig) significantly induced IL-1β secretion (Supplementary Figure S1D). However, G10 treatment stimulated STING-dependent secretion of IL-1β and IL-18 in 3D4/21 and PK15 cells (Figures 4A,B). IL-1β and IL-18 secretion was unchanged in WT and Sting–/– 3D4/21 and PK15 cells treated with LPS + Nig (Figures 4A,B).
To further establish the role of G10 in IL-1β and IL-18 secretion in porcine cells, we assessed the secretion of these cytokines in cells with Sp1 or P65 expression interference. Knockdown of Sp1 by RNA interference decreased G10-induced IL-1β and IL-18 secretion in 3D4/21 and PK15 cells (Figures 4C,D). IL-1β and IL-18 secretion was constitutively up-regulated in response to LPS + Nig treatment, regardless of Sp1 deficiency (Figures 4C,D). In addition, P65-deficient 3D4/21 and PK15 cells, compared with WT cells, did not respond to G10 or to LPS + Nig in terms of induction of IL-1β and IL-18 secretion (Figures 4E,F). G10 promoted mature IL-1β secretion in 3D4/21 cells in a STING-dependent manner, as indicated by immunoblotting analysis of mature IL-1β (Figure 4G). Transfection of STING-Flag plasmid into Sting-deficient 3D4/21 cells resulted in G10-induced IL-1β and IL-18 secretion, to levels comparable to those in WT cells (Figure 4H). Together, these data demonstrate that STING-mediated NF-κB activation is essential for G10-induced IL-1β and IL-18 secretion in porcine cells.
G10-Induced ASC Oligomerization and Caspase-1 Activation Promote IL-1β and IL-18 Maturation in Porcine Cells
IL-1β and IL-18 maturation requires nucleation of the adaptor protein ASC, which controls Caspase-1 activation and subsequent cleavage of pro–IL-1β and pro–IL-18 (37). We observed that G10 treatment induced bright fluorescent ASC specks in WT but not Sting–/– 3D4/21 and PK15 cells, whereas induction of ASC specks by LPS + Nig treatment was independent of STING (Figure 5A). Moreover, STING was responsible for G10-mediated induction of ASC oligomerization in PK15 cells, as indicated by immunoblotting analysis (Figure 5B).
Next, we investigated whether Caspase-1 might be activated by G10 treatment. As shown in Figures 5C,D, G10 dramatically increased Caspase-1 activity in 3D4/21 and in PK15 cells through STING. An inhibitor of Caspase-1, YVAD-CHO, blocked G10- and LPS + Nig-induced Caspase-1 activation (Figures 5C,D). Additionally, we examined the roles of ASC and Caspase-1 in G10-induced IL-1β and IL-18 secretion in Asc–/– and Caspase-1–/– 3D4/21 and PK15 cells generated by CRISPR/Cas9 editing (Supplementary Figures S1E,F). Knockout of ASC and Caspase-1 in 3D4/21 and PK15 cells abolished IL-1β and IL-18 secretion when cells were treated with G10 or LPS + Nig (Figures 5E–H). These data suggest that the STING/ASC/Caspase-1 axis is essential for G10-induced IL-1β and IL-18 secretion in porcine cells.
G10 Activates the NLRP3 Inflammasome in Porcine Cells
Because our data suggested that G10 is a bona fide inflammasome activator, we sought to investigate which PRRs might be involved in G10-mediated activation of inflammasomes. We first analyzed the mRNA expression of inflammasome effectors under G10 treatment. As indicated by RT-qPCR analysis, G10 did not induce NLRP1 transcription in 3D4/21 and PK15 cells (Supplementary Figures S2A,B). However, NLRP3 mRNA was significantly up-regulated by G10 treatment in WT but not in Sting–/– 3D4/21 and PK15 cells (Figure 6A). Because NLRP3 inflammasome activation leads to NLRP3 aggregation (38), we detected NLRP3 aggregation by immunofluorescence. We observed that multiple puncta of NLRP3 appeared after G10 treatment in WT but not STING-deficient 3D4/21 and PK15 cells (Figure 6B). We stimulated 3D4/21 cells with G10 to observe whether STING co-localized to NLRP3. No obvious co-localization was observed when cells were treated with DMSO (Supplementary Figure S2C). G10 treatment induced multiple puncta of STING formation, some of which co-localized with NLRP3 (Supplementary Figure S2C). These results demonstrated that G10 activates porcine NLRP3.
We then established the roles of NLRP3 in IL-1β and IL-18 secretion, ASC oligomerization, and Caspase-1 activation in response to G10 treatment. After G10 treatment, knockout of STING, NLRP3, ASC, and Caspase-1 in 3D4/21 and PK15 cells suppressed IL-1β and IL-18 secretion (Supplementary Figure S2D and Figures 6C,D). Treatment of WT and Sting–/– 3D4/21 and PK15 cells with LPS + Nig or LPS + ATP [another canonical NLRP3 activator (24)] stimulated IL-1β and IL-18 secretion (Figures 6C,D). An inhibitor of Caspase-1, VX756 (39), prevented WT, Sting–/–, Nlrp3–/–, and Asc–/– 3D4/21 and PK15 cells from secreting IL-1β and IL-18 in response to G10, LPS + Nig, or LPS + ATP (Figures 6C,D). ASC oligomerization disappeared in G10- and LPS + Nig-treated Nlrp3–/– cells, as indicated by fluorescence analysis of ASC specks (Figure 6E) or by immunoblotting analysis of ASC oligomerization (Figure 6F). Caspase-1 was not activated in Nlrp3–/– 3D4/21 cells treated with G10 or LPS + Nig (Figure 6G). The cleavage of pro-IL-1β and pro-Caspase-1 induced by G10 and LPS + Nig did not occur, owing to the NLRP3 ablation in 3D4/21 cells (Figure 6H). Together, these data indicate that G10 promotes canonical NLRP3 inflammasome activation in porcine cells.
G10 Induces Potassium Efflux, Thus Activating the NLRP3 Inflammasome in Porcine Cells
Several mechanisms have been proposed to be critical for NLRP3 inflammasome activation, such as potassium efflux, calcium mobilization, mitochondrial damage, and ROS (21–24). We sought to address the mechanism through which G10 activates the NLRP3 inflammasome. Because potassium efflux has been proposed to play a central role in NLRP3 inflammasome activation (40), we tested whether K+ replenishment might rescue the effects on IL-1β and IL-18 secretion induced by G10. ELISA of IL-1β and IL-18 indicated that supplementation with K+ gradually down-regulated G10-induced secretion of IL-1β and IL-18 from 3D4/21 and PK15 cells to basal levels (Figures 7A–D). Nigericin is an ionophore that induces potassium efflux, thus promoting NLRP3 inflammasome activation (40), and K+ replenishment also down-regulated LPS + Nig-induced IL-1β and IL-18 secretion to the levels observed in untreated cells (Figures 7A–D). NLRP3 inflammasome activation by CL097 is K+ efflux-independent (41). Extracellular K+ did not completely abrogate CL097-stimulated IL-1β and IL-18 secretion, as expected (Figures 7A–D).
G10 and LPS + Nig induced formation of ASC specks in 3D4/21 cells, and this effect was reversed by K+ replenishment but not Na+ replenishment (Figure 7E). Extracellular K+ inhibited Caspase-1 activation in 3D4/21 and PK15 cells under G10 or LPS + Nig treatment (Figure 7F). K+ replenishment inhibited G10- and LPS + Nig-induced cleavage of pro-IL-1β and pro-Caspase-1 in 3D4/21 cells (Figure 7G). Together, these results suggest that G10 activates the NLRP3 inflammasome through K+ efflux in porcine cells.
Inhibition of the NLRP3 Inflammasome Enhances G10-Induced Type I IFN in Porcine Cells
Type I IFN and inflammasomes are reciprocally regulated, in a process essential for immune homeostasis (42). Therefore, we defined the role of the NLRP3 inflammasome in the regulation of type I IFN in response to G10 in porcine cells. Ablation of p65 further increased G10-, but not LPS-induced IFN-β and ISG15 mRNA transcription, as well as IFN-β secretion in 3D4/21 and PK15 cells (Supplementary Figures S3A,B and Figure 8A). Inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome by MCC950, or of Caspase-1 by VX765, prevented G10-mediated induction of IL-1β and IL18 secretion and enhanced IFN-β secretion in 3D4/21 and PK15 cells (Supplementary Figures S3C,D and Figures 8B,C). In addition, G10-induced Nlrp3–/–, Asc–/–, Caspase-1–/–, and p65–/– 3D4/21 and PK15 cells generated more IFN-β than WT and Ifnar1–/– cells (Figures 8D,E). These data demonstrate that inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome enhances G10-induced type I IFN expression in porcine cells.
We then asked whether G10 might effectively prevent PRV infection through inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome in porcine cells. Viral titer assays indicated that G10 combined with MCC950 or VX765 had greater antiviral activity against PRV than G10 alone in 3D4/21 and PK15 cells, but not in Ifnar1–/– 3D4/21 cells (Figures 8F,G and Supplementary Figures S3E,F). Knockout of Sting or Ifnar1 promoted PRV proliferation, whereas knockout of Nlrp3, Asc, Caspase-1, and p65 inhibited PRV proliferation (Figures 8H,I). Compared with WT 3D4/21 and PK15 cells, Nlrp3–/–, Asc–/–, Caspase-1–/–, and p65–/– cells treated with G10 showed significantly repressed PRV proliferation (Figures 8H,I). Collectively, these data indicate that G10-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation negatively regulates type I IFN in porcine cells.
Discussion
In this study, we demonstrated that G10 activates the porcine type I IFN response, in line with previous observations in human cells. Intriguingly, we further demonstrate that G10 primes the NLRP3 inflammasome through up-regulation of NLRP3, pro–IL-1β, and pro–IL-18 through STING, in contrast to the process in human cells. Furthermore, G10 induces potassium efflux and the oligomerization of NLRP3 and ASC, thus resulting in the formation of active Caspase-1, which in turn induces the secretion of mature IL-1β and IL-18. Treatment of NLRP3 inflammasome-deficient cells with G10 enhanced type I IFN expression and effectively inhibited viral infection. Our data indicate that type I IFN is negatively regulated by the NLRP3 inflammasome in porcine cells (Figure 9).
Nuclear factor-κB, a central mediator of immune and stress responses, is activated by multiple intra- and extracellular stimuli (43, 44). Our work shows that G10 can activate the NF-κB pathway in porcine cells, but this activation does not occur in human cells. We found that G10 induces porcine p65 transcription through STING and Sp1. A previous study has indicated that the human p65 promoter lacks both TATA and CCAAT consensus sequences and contains three consensus binding sites for Sp1 (45). Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection increases Sp1 expression and activates transcription of p65 through its promoter Sp1-binding sites (46, 47). Because cGAS and STING are key sensors of HCMV in primary human monocyte-derived DCs and macrophages (48, 49), our data may explain the mechanism through which HCMV infection activates p65 transcription. We also show that LPS-induced p65 transcription is independent of STING and Sp1 in porcine cells. LPS activates NF-κB through Toll-like receptor 4-mediated signaling and causes Sp1 protein degradation by an LPS-inducible Sp1-degrading enzyme (50). Therefore, these findings combined with our current findings suggest that NF-κB is regulated by diverse stimuli through distinct mechanisms in different species.
Several studies have suggested that STING is involved in inflammasome activation. The cyclic dinucleotides 3′5′-diadenylate and 3′5′-diguanylate are bacterial second messengers that activate STING-mediated innate immune responses (51). They stimulate robust secretion of IL-1β through NLRP3 inflammasome signaling that is independent of STING (52). The intrinsic STING agonist cGAMP is catalyzed by cGAS from GTP and ATP (53), and it induces inflammasome activation through a STING, AIM2, NLRP3, ASC, and Caspase-1 dependent process in human and mouse cells (54). Cyclic dinucleotides from prokaryotes and eukaryotes are involved in different pathways of STING-mediated activation of inflammasomes. Nevertheless, our data demonstrate that STING is essential for G10-mediated activation of the canonical NLRP3 inflammasome in porcine cells. We did not determine whether AIM2 is involved in G10-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation, because AIM2 is not present in pigs (55). Importantly, given that STING is a promising target for cancer immunotherapy, our results suggest that the roles of STING agonist-induced type I IFN in inflammasome activation should be assessed in clinical trials.
The sustained robust inflammation may lead to collateral damage due to the overproduction of inflammatory cytokines (56). Aside from the antimicrobial functions of IFNs, aberrant IFN production is associated with a variety of autoimmune disorders (57). We demonstrated that the NLRP3 inflammasome negatively regulates type I IFN, which may be essential for immune homeostasis in pigs. Multiple reports have demonstrated that the NLRP3 inflammasome can induce and regulate the development of adaptive immunity (58). Both IL-1β and IL-1β are involved in T cell activation and memory cell formation (59–62). Additionally, IL-1β and IL-18 have adjuvant capacity. Moreover, IL-1β enhances humoral immunity (63), and IL-18 augments IgE antibody production (64). Therefore, these beneficial aspects on the NLRP3 inflammasome may support the use of G10 as an effective vaccine adjuvant in the pig industry.
Conclusion
Stimulator of interferon genes is an ER-resident transmembrane protein that integrates cytosolic dsDNA-triggered activation of innate immune responses. G10 is a synthetic agonist of human STING that stimulates only STING-dependent IFN expression. However, we found that G10 acts on STING and activates both type I IFN and the canonic NLRP3 inflammasome. G10 activates the NLRP3 inflammasome in porcine cells through simultaneous priming and activation. Our data indicate that the G10-activated NLRP3 inflammasome negatively regulates type I IFN, a process that may be essential for immune homeostasis in pigs.
Data Availability Statement
All datasets presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.
Author Contributions
S-LM, LZ, Y-KG, G-YY, JW, and B-BC: project conception and design. S-LM, LZ, Y-KG, SZ, GL-L, Y-XM, YY-Z, W-RC, and LY: data collection. S-LM, LZ, Y-KG, SZ, and G-LL: data analysis and interpretation. S-LM, G-YY, JW, and B-BC: original manuscript drafting. JW and B-BC: manuscript review, editing, and final approval. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Funding. This work was supported by grants from the Ten Thousand Talents Program for Young Talents (W03070106), Outstanding Talents of Henan Agricultural University (30600773), and Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China (2016ZX08006001-006).
Supplementary Materials
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.575818/full#supplementary-material
References
- 1.Takeuchi O, Akira S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell. (2010) 140:805–20. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Paludan SR, Bowie AG. Immune sensing of DNA. Immunity. (2013) 38:870–80. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ishikawa H, Barber GN. STING is an endoplasmic reticulum adaptor that facilitates innate immune signalling. Nature. (2008) 455:674–8. 10.1038/nature07317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ishikawa H, Ma Z, Barber GN. STING regulates intracellular DNA-mediated, type I interferon-dependent innate immunity. Nature. (2009) 461:788–92. 10.1038/nature08476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wu J, Sun L, Chen X, Du F, Shi H, Chen C, et al. Cyclic GMP-AMP is an endogenous second messenger in innate immune signaling by cytosolic DNA. Science. (2013) 339:826–30. 10.1126/science.1229963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ablasser A, Goldeck M, Cavlar T, Deimling T, Witte G, Rohl I, et al. cGAS produces a 2′-5′-linked cyclic dinucleotide second messenger that activates STING. Nature. (2013) 498:380–4. 10.1038/nature12306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tanaka Y, Chen ZJ. STING specifies IRF3 phosphorylation by TBK1 in the cytosolic DNA signaling pathway. Sci Signal. (2012) 5:ra20. 10.1126/scisignal.2002521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ma Z, Ni G, Damania B. Innate sensing of DNA virus genomes. Annu Rev Virol. (2018) 5:341–62. 10.1146/annurev-virology-092917-043244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Su T, Zhang Y, Valerie K, Wang XY, Lin S, Zhu G. STING activation in cancer immunotherapy. Theranostics. (2019) 9:7759–71. 10.7150/thno.37574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sali TM, Pryke KM, Abraham J, Liu A, Archer I, Broeckel R, et al. Characterization of a novel human-specific STING agonist that elicits antiviral activity against emerging alphaviruses. PLoS Pathog. (2015) 11:e1005324. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.de Zoete MR, Palm NW, Zhu S, Flavell RA. Inflammasomes. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. (2014) 6:a016287. 10.1101/cshperspect.a016287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Martinon F, Burns K, Tschopp J. The inflammasome: a molecular platform triggering activation of inflammatory caspases and processing of proIL-beta. Mol Cell. (2002) 10:417–26. 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00599-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Agostini L, Martinon F, Burns K, McDermott MF, Hawkins PN, Tschopp J. NALP3 forms an IL-1beta-processing inflammasome with increased activity in Muckle-Wells autoinflammatory disorder. Immunity. (2004) 20:319–25. 10.1016/s1074-7613(04)00046-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Elinav E, Strowig T, Kau AL, Henao-Mejia J, Thaiss CA, Booth CJ, et al. NLRP6 inflammasome regulates colonic microbial ecology and risk for colitis. Cell. (2011) 145:745–57. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.04.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Khare S, Dorfleutner A, Bryan NB, Yun C, Radian AD, de Almeida L, et al. An NLRP7-containing inflammasome mediates recognition of microbial lipopeptides in human macrophages. Immunity. (2012) 36:464–76. 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhu S, Ding S, Wang P, Wei Z, Pan W, Palm NW, et al. Nlrp9b inflammasome restricts rotavirus infection in intestinal epithelial cells. Nature. (2017) 546:667–70. 10.1038/nature22967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Franchi L, Amer A, Body-Malapel M, Kanneganti TD, Ozoren N, Jagirdar R, et al. Cytosolic flagellin requires Ipaf for activation of caspase-1 and interleukin 1beta in salmonella-infected macrophages. Nat Immunol. (2006) 7:576–82. 10.1038/ni1346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhou R, Yazdi AS, Menu P, Tschopp J. A role for mitochondria in NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nature. (2011) 469:221–5. 10.1038/nature09663 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bauernfeind FG, Horvath G, Stutz A, Alnemri ES, MacDonald K, Speert D, et al. Cutting edge: NF-kappaB activating pattern recognition and cytokine receptors license NLRP3 inflammasome activation by regulating NLRP3 expression. J Immunol. (2009) 183:787–91. 10.4049/jimmunol.0901363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sharma D, Kanneganti TD. The cell biology of inflammasomes: mechanisms of inflammasome activation and regulation. J Cell Biol. (2016) 213:617–29. 10.1083/jcb.201602089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Petrilli V, Papin S, Dostert C, Mayor A, Martinon F, Tschopp J. Activation of the NALP3 inflammasome is triggered by low intracellular potassium concentration. Cell Death Differ. (2007) 14:1583–9. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Murakami T, Ockinger J, Yu J, Byles V, McColl A, Hofer AM, et al. Critical role for calcium mobilization in activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2012) 109:11282–7. 10.1073/pnas.1117765109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liu Q, Zhang D, Hu D, Zhou X, Zhou Y. The role of mitochondria in NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Mol Immunol. (2018) 103:115–24. 10.1016/j.molimm.2018.09.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cruz CM, Rinna A, Forman HJ, Ventura AL, Persechini PM, Ojcius DM. ATP activates a reactive oxygen species-dependent oxidative stress response and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines in macrophages. J Biol Chem. (2007) 282:2871–9. 10.1074/jbc.M608083200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rathinam VA, Vanaja SK, Waggoner L, Sokolovska A, Becker C, Stuart LM, et al. TRIF licenses caspase-11-dependent NLRP3 inflammasome activation by gram-negative bacteria. Cell. (2012) 150:606–19. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Guarda G, Braun M, Staehli F, Tardivel A, Mattmann C, Forster I, et al. Type I interferon inhibits interleukin-1 production and inflammasome activation. Immunity. (2011) 34:213–23. 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Khare S, Ratsimandresy RA, de Almeida L, Cuda CM, Rellick SL, Misharin AV, et al. The PYRIN domain-only protein POP3 inhibits ALR inflammasomes and regulates responses to infection with DNA viruses. Nat Immunol. (2014) 15:343–53. 10.1038/ni.2829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Reboldi A, Dang EV, McDonald JG, Liang G, Russell DW, Cyster JG. Inflammation. 25-Hydroxycholesterol suppresses interleukin-1-driven inflammation downstream of type I interferon. Science. (2014) 345:679–84. 10.1126/science.1254790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Banerjee I, Behl B, Mendonca M, Shrivastava G, Russo AJ, Menoret A, et al. Gasdermin D restrains type I interferon response to cytosolic DNA by disrupting ionic homeostasis. Immunity. (2018) 49:413–26.e5. 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.07.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu BC, Sarhan J, Panda A, Muendlein HI, Ilyukha V, Coers J, et al. Constitutive interferon maintains GBP expression required for release of bacterial components upstream of pyroptosis and anti-DNA responses. Cell Rep. (2018) 24:155–68.e5. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang Y, Ning X, Gao P, Wu S, Sha M, Lv M, et al. Inflammasome activation triggers caspase-1-mediated cleavage of cGAS to regulate responses to DNA virus infection. Immunity. (2017) 46:393–404. 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Vadori M, Cozzi E. The immunological barriers to xenotransplantation. Tissue Antigens. (2015) 86:239–53. 10.1111/tan.12669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mair KH, Sedlak C, Kaser T, Pasternak A, Levast B, Gerner W, et al. The porcine innate immune system: an update. Dev Comp Immunol. (2014) 45:321–43. 10.1016/j.dci.2014.03.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang J, Wang CF, Ming SL, Li GL, Zeng L, Wang MD, et al. Porcine IFITM1 is a host restriction factor that inhibits pseudorabies virus infection. Int J Biol Macromol. (2019) 151:1181–93. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.10.162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mettenleiter TC. Aujeszky’s disease (pseudorabies) virus: the virus and molecular pathogenesis–state of the art, June 1999. Vet Res. (2000) 31:99–115. 10.1051/vetres:2000110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hayden MS, Ghosh S. NF-kappaB in immunobiology. Cell Res. (2011) 21:223–44. 10.1038/cr.2011.13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Man SM, Kanneganti TD. Regulation of inflammasome activation. Immunol Rev. (2015) 265:6–21. 10.1111/imr.12296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chen J, Chen ZJ. PtdIns4P on dispersed trans-Golgi network mediates NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nature. (2018) 564:71–6. 10.1038/s41586-018-0761-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wannamaker W, Davies R, Namchuk M, Pollard J, Ford P, Ku G, et al. (S)-1-((S)-2-{[1-(4-amino-3-chloro-phenyl)-methanoyl]-amino}-3,3-dimethyl-butanoy l)-pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid ((2R,3S)-2-ethoxy-5-oxo-tetrahydro-furan-3-yl)-amide (VX-765), an orally available selective interleukin (IL)-converting enzyme/caspase-1 inhibitor, exhibits potent anti-inflammatory activities by inhibiting the release of IL-1beta and IL-18. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. (2007) 321:509–16. 10.1124/jpet.106.111344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Munoz-Planillo R, Kuffa P, Martinez-Colon G, Smith BL, Rajendiran TM, Nunez G. K(+) efflux is the common trigger of NLRP3 inflammasome activation by bacterial toxins and particulate matter. Immunity. (2013) 38:1142–53. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.05.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gross CJ, Mishra R, Schneider KS, Medard G, Wettmarshausen J, Dittlein DC, et al. K(+) efflux-independent NLRP3 inflammasome activation by small molecules targeting mitochondria. Immunity. (2016) 45:761–73. 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.08.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Labzin LI, Lauterbach MA, Latz E. Interferons and inflammasomes: cooperation and counterregulation in disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2016) 138:37–46. 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Li Q, Verma IM. NF-kappaB regulation in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. (2002) 2:725–34. 10.1038/nri910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pahl HL. Activators and target genes of Rel/NF-kappaB transcription factors. Oncogene. (1999) 18:6853–66. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ueberla K, Lu Y, Chung E, Haseltine WA. The NF-kappa B p65 promoter. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. (1993) 6:227–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yurochko AD, Kowalik TF, Huong SM, Huang ES. Human cytomegalovirus upregulates NF-kappa B activity by transactivating the NF-kappa B p105/p50 and p65 promoters. J Virol. (1995) 69:5391–400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yurochko AD, Mayo MW, Poma EE, Baldwin AS, Jr., Huang ES. Induction of the transcription factor Sp1 during human cytomegalovirus infection mediates upregulation of the p65 and p105/p50 NF-kappaB promoters. J Virol. (1997) 71:4638–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Paijo J, Doring M, Spanier J, Grabski E, Nooruzzaman M, Schmidt T, et al. cGAS senses human cytomegalovirus and induces type I interferon responses in human monocyte-derived cells. PLoS Pathog. (2016) 12:e1005546. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lio CW, McDonald B, Takahashi M, Dhanwani R, Sharma N, Huang J, et al. cGAS-STING signaling regulates initial innate control of Cytomegalovirus infection. J Virol. (2016) 90:7789–97. 10.1128/JVI.01040-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ye X, Liu SF. Lipopolysaccharide causes Sp1 protein degradation by inducing a unique trypsin-like serine protease in rat lungs. Biochim Biophys Acta. (2007) 1773:243–53. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.09.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Abdul-Sater AA, Grajkowski A, Erdjument-Bromage H, Plumlee C, Levi A, Schreiber MT, et al. The overlapping host responses to bacterial cyclic dinucleotides. Microbes Infect. (2012) 14:188–97. 10.1016/j.micinf.2011.09.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Abdul-Sater AA, Tattoli I, Jin L, Grajkowski A, Levi A, Koller BH, et al. Cyclic-di-GMP and cyclic-di-AMP activate the NLRP3 inflammasome. EMBO Rep. (2013) 14:900–6. 10.1038/embor.2013.132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sun L, Wu J, Du F, Chen X, Chen ZJ. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is a cytosolic DNA sensor that activates the type I interferon pathway. Science. (2013) 339:786–91. 10.1126/science.1232458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Swanson KV, Junkins RD, Kurkjian CJ, Holley-Guthrie E, Pendse AA, Morabiti R. El, et al. A noncanonical function of cGAMP in inflammasome priming and activation. J Exp Med. (2017) 214:3611–26. 10.1084/jem.20171749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Dawson HD, Smith AD, Chen C, Urban JF., Jr. An in-depth comparison of the porcine, murine and human inflammasomes; lessons from the porcine genome and transcriptome. Vet Microbiol. (2017) 202:2–15. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chen GY, Nunez G. Sterile inflammation: sensing and reacting to damage. Nat Rev Immunol. (2010) 10:826–37. 10.1038/nri2873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ivashkiv LB, Donlin LT. Regulation of type I interferon responses. Nat Rev Immunol. (2014) 14:36–49. 10.1038/nri3581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Chen M, Wang H, Chen W, Meng G. Regulation of adaptive immunity by the NLRP3 inflammasome. Int Immunopharmacol. (2011) 11:549–54. 10.1016/j.intimp.2010.11.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ghiringhelli F, Apetoh L, Tesniere A, Aymeric L, Ma Y, Ortiz C, et al. Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in dendritic cells induces IL-1beta-dependent adaptive immunity against tumors. Nat Med. (2009) 15:1170–8. 10.1038/nm.2028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sutton C, Brereton C, Keogh B, Mills KH, Lavelle EC. A crucial role for interleukin (IL)-1 in the induction of IL-17-producing T cells that mediate autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Exp Med. (2006) 203:1685–91. 10.1084/jem.20060285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Gris D, Ye Z, Iocca HA, Wen H, Craven RR, Gris P, et al. NLRP3 plays a critical role in the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by mediating Th1 and Th17 responses. J Immunol. (2010) 185:974–81. 10.4049/jimmunol.0904145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Nakanishi K, Yoshimoto T, Tsutsui H, Okamura H. Interleukin-18 is a unique cytokine that stimulates both Th1 and Th2 responses depending on its cytokine milieu. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. (2001) 12:53–72. 10.1016/s1359-6101(00)00015-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Curtsinger JM, Schmidt CS, Mondino A, Lins DC, Kedl RM, Jenkins MK, et al. Inflammatory cytokines provide a third signal for activation of naive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. J Immunol. (1999) 162:3256–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Yoshimoto T, Mizutani H, Tsutsui H, Noben-Trauth N, Yamanaka K, Tanaka M, et al. IL-18 induction of IgE: dependence on CD4+ T cells, IL-4 and STAT6. Nat Immunol. (2000) 1:132–7. 10.1038/77811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All datasets presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.