Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) sequence type 630 (ST630) and spa type t4549 is an emerging lineage in Nordic countries, and some representatives carry the CRISPR-Cas system. Here, the complete genome sequences of two isolates from this lineage are presented, comprising chromosomes of 2,918,239 and 2,877,083 nucleotides, respectively, and a 2,473-nucleotide plasmid carrying erm(C).
ABSTRACT
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) sequence type 630 (ST630) and spa type t4549 is an emerging lineage in Nordic countries, and some representatives carry the CRISPR-Cas system. Here, the complete genome sequences of two isolates from this lineage are presented, comprising chromosomes of 2,918,239 and 2,877,083 nucleotides, respectively, and a 2,473-nucleotide plasmid carrying erm(C).
ANNOUNCEMENT
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) of sequence type 630 (ST630) and spa type t4549 harbors a staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type V element and a type III-A clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-Cas system (1). It has been reported in various Asian countries (2–4) and has recently emerged in Denmark, a low-MRSA-prevalence country, where it was among the most prevalent MRSA lineages in 2018 (5). Therefore, two representative strains of this lineage were sequenced on both a MinION flow cell (Oxford Nanopore Technologies [ONT]) and an Illumina NextSeq 550 sequencer to obtain high-quality reference genome sequences.
Strain 110900 was isolated from a nasal swab from a healthy carrier in the Central Region of Denmark, and strain 128254 was isolated from a skin swab taken from a patient with eczema in the Capital Region of Denmark. Pure cultures of the isolates were submitted to the Danish national reference laboratory as part of the mandatory national surveillance of MRSA. The purity of the isolates was confirmed by streaking onto 5% blood agar plates for visual inspection of the colony morphology prior to spa typing as described previously (6) and storage of a single colony of each sample at −80°C. Sample collection and analysis was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (protocol number 2001-14-0021).
A 1-ml loop of each frozen single-colony culture was then incubated aerobically overnight at 37°C on 5% blood agar for sequencing. For short-read sequencing, DNA from seven colonies was extracted using a DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen) and Nextera XT DNA library preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, USA) for library preparation prior to sequencing with a 2 × 151-bp paired-end midoutput kit. The reads were trimmed with Trimmomatic v0.36 (7) to remove sequencing adaptors and low-quality (Q ≤ 20) read ends. For Nanopore sequencing, DNA from seven colonies was extracted with the GenFind v3 kit (Beckman Coulter) using a DynaMag-2 magnet (Thermo Fisher Scientific). A library was prepared using the rapid barcoding sequencing kit (SQK-RBK004) and sequenced in an R9.4.1 flow cell with a MinION Mk1B instrument (ONT). Fast5 read files were base called and demultiplexed with Guppy v3.2.6 (ONT) in “fast” configuration and quality filtered to a Q value of >10 with NanoFilt v2.5.0 (8) prior to Illumina-Nanopore hybrid or Nanopore-only assembly using Unicycler v0.4.8-beta (9). Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified.
Finally, these assemblies were aligned against each other using BLAST (10) implemented in Geneious Prime v2020.1.2 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand), and regions of disagreement between the two assemblies were inspected and corrected manually in the locally accurate hybrid assembly. In regions with no hybrid assembly, the Nanopore-only assembly was used. Overlapping ends were identified from the BLAST results, confirmed by read mapping, and trimmed manually prior to closing and rotation of the genome sequences to match the numbering of the Mu50 genome sequence (GenBank accession number BA000017). The closed genomes were error corrected over four iterations of mapping both long and short reads using minimap v2.17 (11) and Geneious mapper (with maximum 3% mismatch, maximum 4 ambiguities, and maximum 10% gaps per match), respectively, followed by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) calling using the built-in Geneious algorithm. The final genome and sequencing statistics are presented in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Strain | Genome size (bp) | G+C content (%) | No. of genes | Chromosome assembly accession no. | Plasmid assembly accession no. | BioSample accession no. | Sequencing technology | No. of reads | Mean read length (bp) | Sequencing depth (×) | Raw read N50 (bp) | SRA accession no.a |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
110900 | 2,918,239 | 32.7 | 2,942 | CP058615 | CP058616 | SAMN15430096 | Illumina | 2,757,456 | 151 | 160 | NAb | SRR12142664 |
MinION | 118,776 | 9,348 | 201 | 16,875 | SRR12142658–SRR12142661 | |||||||
128254 | 2,877,083 | 32.7 | 2,904 | CP058613 | CP058614 | SAMN15430097 | Illumina | 2,261,340 | 151 | 192 | NA | SRR12142665 |
MinION | 57,843 | 9,519 | 111 | 7,685 | SRR12142662–SRR12142663 |
MinION read files were split into batches to avoid excessively large file sizes.
NA, not applicable.
The final genome sequences of strains 110900 and 128254 both contained a plasmid, identified by NCBI BLAST search as identical (0 SNP difference) to a previously published unnamed plasmid of strain UP_1484 (GenBank accession number CP047816) carrying the erythromycin resistance gene erm(C). Strain 110900 carried a CRISPR-Cas system associated with the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type V (5C2&5), while strain 128254 carried an SCCmec type V (5C2) and no CRISPR-Cas system.
Data availability.
The genome sequences of strains 110900 and 128254 were deposited in GenBank under the BioProject accession number PRJNA643825 and the accession numbers presented in Table 1.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank the technical staff of the Danish reference laboratory for staphylococci at Statens Serum Institut, who performed the initial typing of the isolates.
REFERENCES
- 1.Cao L, Gao C-H, Zhu J, Zhao L, Wu Q, Li M, Sun B. 2016. Identification and functional study of type III-A CRISPR-Cas systems in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Med Microbiol 306:686–696. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2016.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chao G, Bao G, Cao Y, Yan W, Wang Y, Zhang X, Zhou L, Wu Y. 2015. Prevalence and diversity of enterotoxin genes with genetic background of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different origins in China. Int J Food Microbiol 211:142–147. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dai Y, Liu J, Guo W, Meng H, Huang Q, He L, Gao Q, Lv H, Liu Y, Wang Y, Wang H, Liu Q, Li M. 2019. Decreasing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections is attributable to the disappearance of predominant MRSA ST239 clones, Shanghai, 2008–2017. Emerg Microbes Infect 8:471–478. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2019.1595161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chao G, Bao G, Jiao X. 2014. Molecular epidemiological characteristics and clonal genetic diversity of Staphylococcus aureus with different origins in China. Foodborne Pathog Dis 11:503–510. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2013.1717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Høg BB, Ellis-Iversen J, Sönksen UW, Korsgaard H, Henius AE, Pedersen KSS (ed). 2018. DANMAP 2018—use of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from food animals, food and humans in Denmark. Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark: https://www.danmap.org/-/media/arkiv/projekt-sites/danmap/danmap-reports/danmap-2018/danmap_2018.pdf?la=en. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stegger M, Andersen P, Kearns A, Pichon B, Holmes M, Edwards G, Laurent F, Teale C, Skov R, Larsen A. 2012. Rapid detection, differentiation and typing of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus harbouring either mecA or the new mecA homologue mecALGA251. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:395–400. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03715.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.De Coster W, D'Hert S, Schultz DT, Cruts M, Van Broeckhoven C. 2018. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics 34:2666–2669. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li H. 2018. minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34:3094–3100. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The genome sequences of strains 110900 and 128254 were deposited in GenBank under the BioProject accession number PRJNA643825 and the accession numbers presented in Table 1.