Skip to main content
Frontiers in Neurology logoLink to Frontiers in Neurology
. 2020 Sep 25;11:526550. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.526550

Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas With Brainstem Engorgement: An Under-Recognized Entity in Diagnosis and Treatment

Kun Hou 1,, Guichen Li 2,, Lai Qu 3, Hongping Liu 2, Kan Xu 1,*,, Jinlu Yu 1,*,
PMCID: PMC7546322  PMID: 33101168

Abstract

Background: In rare circumstances, patients with intracranial (dural arteriovenous fistulas) DAVFs could be complicated with brainstem engorgement, which might lead to delayed or false diagnosis and subsequent improper management.

Methods: On July 2th, 2019, a systematic search was conducted in the PubMed database for patients with intracranial DAVFs complicated with brainstem engorgement.

Results: Sixty-eight articles reporting of 86 patients were included for final analysis. The patients were aged from 20 to 76 years (57.10 ± 12.90, n = 82). The female to male ratio was 0.68 (35:51). Thirty-three (40.2%, 33/82) patients were initially misdiagnosed as other diseases. The specific location distributions were cranio-cervical junction, cavernous sinus, superior petrosal sinus, transverse and/or sigmoid sinus, tentorium, and other sites in 27 (32.5%), 11 (13.2%), 9 (10.8%), 10 (12.0%), 21 (25.3%), and 5 (6.0%) patients, respectively. The Cognard classification of DAVFs were II, III, IV, and V in 9 (10.7%, 9/84), 1 (1.2%, 1/84), 1 (1.2%, 1/84), and 73 (86.9%, 73/84) patients. Eighteen (22%, 18/82) patients were demonstrated to have stenosis or occlusion of the draining system distal to the fistula points. The mean follow-up period was 7.86 (n = 74, range 0–60 months) months. Fifty-four (70.1%, 54/77) patients experienced a good recovery according to the mRS score.

Conclusions: Intracranial DAVFs complicated with brainstem engorgement are rare entities. Initial misdiagnosis and delayed definite diagnosis are common in the past three decades. The treatment outcome is still unsatisfactory at present. Early awareness of this rare entity and efficiently utilizing the up to date investigations are of utmost importance.

Keywords: dural arteriovenous fistula, brainstem engorgement, transarterial embolization, transvenous embolization, open surgery

Introduction

Dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF) is a unique subtype of vascular malformations along the central nervous system, which is characterized by abnormal connections between meningeal/pial arteries and dural venous sinuses, meningeal veins, or cortical veins. The estimated detection rate was 0.29 per 100,000 persons per year according to a Japanese survey published in 2016 (1). In rare circumstances, patients with intracranial DAVFs could be complicated with brainstem engorgement, which might lead to delayed or false diagnosis and subsequent improper management (24). An illustrate case of intracranial DAVF with brainstem engorgement was presented in Figure 1. As a result of its rarity in occurrence, large case series in a single center is extremely hard to be anticipated. In order to explore the epidemiological, clinical, imaging, and prognostic characteristics of this specific entity, we conducted a systematic review of the literature.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) A 35-years-old female was admitted for 3-days history of headache and vomiting. MRI on FLAIR sequence reveals a hyperintense left cerebellar lesion (white circle) with the adjacent brainstem involvement. Besides, vascular flow voids are also noted at the posterior fossa. (B) CTA shows an abnormally enlarged vein (asterisk) draining from the cerebellar surface to the brainstem. And some enlarged veins (ellipse) around the brainstem are also noted. (C) MIP of CTA shows the enlarged draining veins in the cerebellum (ellipse) and around the brainstem (asterisks). (D) Angiogram of the left ECA in lateral view shows a DAVF supplied by the MMA (asterisk) and OA and drained to the deep veins via an enlarged superficial vein (arrow). (E) Angiogram in late arterial phase shows the deep veins (arrow) around the brainstem. (F) Angiogram of the left ECA in anteroposterior view shows enlarged veins in the left cerebellar hemisphere. The ellipse indicates the midline veins. (G) Unsubtracted angiogram shows the DAVF is embolized with Onyx (ellipse) via the MMA (asterisk). (H) Follow-up MRA 1 month postoperatively shows disappearance of the DAVF. (I) Follow-up MRI on FLAIR sequence shows remission of the brainstem and cerebellar edema and deposition of hemosiderin (arrow). CTA, computed tomography angiography; DAVF, dural arteriovenous fistula; ECA, external carotid artery; FLAIR, fluid attenuated inversion recovery; MIP, maximum intensity projection; MMA, middle meningeal artery; MRA, magnetic resonance angiography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; OA, occipital artery.

Methods

On July 2th, 2019, a systematic search was conducted in the PubMed database for patients with intracranial DAVFs complicated with brainstem engorgement. Brainstem engorgement, brain stem engorgement, brainstem edema, brainstem oedema, brain stem edema, brain stem oedema, brainstem congestion, brain stem congestion, brainstem venous congestion, brain stem venous congestion, venous congestion of brain stem, venous congestion of brainstem, myelopathy, and dural arteriovenous fistula were used as key words in relevant combinations. Articles included were: (1) of which the full text could be obtained, or (2) sufficient data could be obtained from the abstract if the full text is inaccessible. Of note, studies reporting large case series were excluded from the final analysis if sufficient description of the individual clinical information was not provided. Manual searching of the reference lists of the identified articles were also performed for additional studies. We used modified Rankin Scale (mRS) for outcome assessment. An mRS score ≤ 3 was defined as good recovery.

Results

The PubMed search yielded 183 records. After a primary screening of the titles and abstracts, 97 records were excluded. After full text assessment of the 86 identified articles, 28 records were further excluded. We manually searched the reference lists of the remaining 58 articles. And 10 additional articles were identified. Finally, 68 articles reporting of 86 patients were included in the final analysis (Table 1) (269). The flow chart of searching strategy was presented in Figure 2. The patients were aged from 20 to 76 years (57.10 ± 12.90, n = 82). The female to male ratio was 0.68 (35:51).

Table 1.

Intracranial DAVFs complicated with brainstem engorgement.

No. Author/year Age/sex Presentation/interval to definite diagnosis Initial misdiagnosis DAVF location Concurrent with venous sinus stenosis/occlusion Signal alteration on MRI Region of congestion Feeding artery Draining vein Cognard classification Treatment Degree of DAVF obliteration Follow-up period Retreatment Outcome (mRS)
T1, T1 C+ T2 FLAIR DWI, ADC Abnormal vascular flow-void
1 Probst et al. (5) 40/F Headache, nausea, and dnormalrientation/ NA/NM Yes (brain tumor) TS Yes NA/NM, inhomogeneous enhancement Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Pons, cerebellum, and thalamus OA and branches of the ICA Straight sinus → vein of Galen → pontomesencephalic vein → vein of Rosenthal Type V Endovascular + surgical Completely NA/NM No 0
2 Uchino et al. (6) 68/F Gait disturbance, dysarthria, and urinary incontinence/4 years No CS Yes Hypo, enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Pons Branches of ECA and ICA Vein of Rosenthal, inferior anastomotic vein of Labbe, pontine venous congestion Type IIB Subtotal TAE of ECA branches with polyvinyl alcohol particles Incompletely 2 years No 5
3 74/M Chemosis, proptosis, and gait disturbance/ NA/NM No CS Yes Hypo, enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Pons and cerebellum Branches of ECA and ICA Cortical veins of the posterior fossa, pontine venous congestion Type IIA+B Subtotal TAE of ECA branches with polyvinyl alcohol particles Incompletely 4 months No 2
4 Ernst et al. (7) 71/M Paraparesis, nausea, and vomiting/ NA/NM No SPS No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Hypoer medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord MHT of the ICA PMV Type V Open surgery Completely 18 months No 1
5 58/F Tetrapraresis/many years No CCJ No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the entire cervical cord Ascending cervical artery of ECA, VA, ophthalmic artery PMV Type V TAE with PVA and silk thread Incompletely 4 years No 4 or 5
6 Chen et al. (2) 47/M Tetrapareis, paresthesia, urinary retention/1 year No Torcular No NA/NM, NA/NM NA/NM NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Hypoer medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord Meningeal branch of the VA Cerebellar vein → veins of the hypoer brainstem → PMV Type V Open surgery Completely 2 months No 4 or 5
7 Ricolfi et al. (8) 53/M Paraparesis, paresthesia, urinary retention/several months No Tentorium No Hypo, non-enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Hypoer medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord MHT of the ICA, MMA Lateral pontomesencephalic veins → cervical and thoracic PMV Type V TAE with NBCA via MMA and occluding ICA Incompletely 2 years Yes/ coagulated the draining veins 1 or 2
8 40/F Tetrapareis, sphincter disturbance, bulbar signs/1 year No CS No Hypo, non-enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Hypoer medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord MHT of the ICA, MMA, sphenopalatine artery and AphA Superior ophthalmic vein and SPS → lateral mesencephalic veins → PMV Type V TAE with NBCA via MMA and sphenopalatine arteries, with PVA particles via APhA Completely 5 days No Dead
9 75/M Tetraplegia, sphincter disturbance, bulbar signs, dysautonomia/a few days No SPS Yes Hypo, non-enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM No Hypoer pons and medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord MMA PMV Type V TAE with NBCA via MMA Completely 5 years No 0
10 51/F Paraparesis, sphincter disturbance, bulbar signs, dysautonomia/3 months Yes (initial negative) SS Yes NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord OA, MMA Lateral medullary vein → PMV Type V TAE with NBCA via MMA and OA Completely 1 year No 0
11 Bousson et al. (9) 36/M Tetrapraresis, paresthesia/4 months No Tentorium No NA/NM, intensely enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the entire cervical cord OA Vein around brainstem → PMV Type V TAE to occlude the OA Incompletely 2 weeks No NA/NM
12 Hurst et al. (10) 54/M Tetrapraresis/ NA/NM No CCJ No NA/NM, enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM/ NA/NM Yes Hypoer medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord Dural branch of VA PMV Type V TAE with PVA via the dural branch of VA Completely 3 months No 3
13 50/M Tetrapraresis, pain, hypoer CN deficits/ NA/NM No CCJ No Hypo/ NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM/ NA/NM Yes Hypoer medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord AphA PMV Type V TAE with polyvinyl alcohol via APhA Completely 12 months No 4
14 Takahashi et al. (11) 49/M Diplopia, vertigo/3 weeks No CS Yes Hypo, enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Pons and cerebellar hemisphere MHT of the ICA SPS → ophthalmic vein, petrosal vein → cortical venous reflux Type IIA+B TVE with coils Completely 3 months No 0 or 1
15 62/F Loss of visual acuity, chemosis, exophthalmos/ NA/NM No CS No Hypo, markedly enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Pons and medulla oblongata Branches of bilateral ECA and ICA CS → superior ophthalmic vein Type IIA+B TVE with coils Completely 1 month No 2
16 Shintani et al. (12) 65/F Chemosis, CN (III, IV, VI) palsy, vertigo/8 months No CS No Hypo, markedly enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM No Pons Branches of ICA IPS NA/NM NA/NM NA/NM NA/NM NA/NM Dead
17 Wiesmann et al. (13) 46/M Paraparesis, dysarthria, urinary incontinence/4 days No CCJ Yes NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM No Pontomedullary region NMB of AphA Anterior median pontine and anterior medullary veins → anterior and posterior spinal veins Type V TAE with NBCA via AphA Completely 12 months No 1
18 Kalamangalam et al. (14) 68/M Paraparesis, urinary incontinence/4 months Yes (stroke) CCJ (Clivus) No Normal, non-enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Hypoer medulla oblongata extending to the entire cervical cord MHT of the ICA Veins around brainstem → PMV of cervical spinal cord Type V Surgical clipping draining vein Completely 4 months No 3
19 Weigele et al. (15) 53/M Cranial neuropathies, hemidysesthesia, and personality changes/several months Yes (brainstem glioma) Galen vein No Normal, non-enhanced Hyper Hyper NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Pons, midbrain, and thalamus MMA, NMB of AphA, marginal artery, vermin branch of SCA Pontomedullary and anterior cortical veins → superior sagittal sinus Type IV TAE with NBCA via MMA and AphA Completely 6 months No 0
20 Asakawa et al. (16) 64/M Tetrapraresis, urinary incontinence, respiratory insufficiency/2 weeks No CCJ (foramen magnum) No Hypo, enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Hypoer medulla oblongata extending to the upper thoracic cord AphA Spinal veins Type V Combined TAE and surgical interruption Completely 3 months No 4
21 Lanz et al. (17) 68/F Diplopia, dysarthria, syncope, transient Paraparesis, respiratory insufficiency/1 year No SS Yes Normal, non-enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord MMA SS → vein around brainstem → PMV Type V TAE with NBCA via MMA Completely NM No 0
22 Kai et al. (18) 56/F Proptosis, double vision, visual disturbance, hemiparesis/2 weeks No CS No NA/NM, moderately enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM No Brainstem Branches of the ECA Petrosal vein → cerebellar veins Type IIA+B TVE via petrosal vein cannulation with coils Incompletely 1 month No 3
23 70/F Double vision, chemosis, exophthalmos, ataxia/2 months No CS Yes Normal, non-enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM No Midbrain Dural branches of the bilateral ICAs and ECAs Sphenoparietal sinus → deep sylvian vein → pontomesencephalic veins Type IIA+B Packing of CS with sponges via open surgery Completely 1 months No 0
24 Li et al. (19) 73/M Tetrapraresis, unconsciousness and dyspnea/1 year Yes (acute cerebral infarction) TS Yes NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper Hyper NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Temporal lobe and medulla oblongata extending to the upper thoracic cord MMA, OA, AphA Cortical vein, stenotic TS → anterior and posterior spinal vein Type V TVE with coiling the TS Completely 5 days No NA/NM
25 Pannu et al. (20) 42/M Tetrapraresis, bowel and urinary incontinence/1 year No Tentorium No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper Hyper NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord MHT of the ICA Superior petrosal vein → lateral medullary vein → the anterior and posterior spinal veins Type V Coagulating DAVF and draining vein Completely 12 months No 3
26 Crum et al. (21) 35/M Paraparesis, ataxia, diplopia/several weeks Yes (uncertain brainstem lesion) CCJ (jugular foramen) No Normal, patchy enhancement Hyper Hyper NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord Branches of the VA and PICA Spinal medullary veins Type V Coagulated and divided the DAVF and draining vein Completely 3 months No 1
27 Oishi et al. (22) 68/F Disturbance of brainstem function/NA/NM NA/NM TS NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper Hyper NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata NA/NM SPS → spinal PMV Type V TVE with coils Completely NA/NM No NA/NM
28 Satoh et al. (23) 38/F Tetrapraresis, nystagmus, Horner syndrome/NA/NM No TS-SS Yes Hypo, NA/NM Hyper Hyper NA/NM, NA/NM No Medulla oblongata MMA, OA, AphA, MHT of the ICA, PMA of the VA SS → spinal PMV Type V TVE with coiling the SS Completely 1 month No 3
29 Tanoue et al. (3) 70/M Tetrapraresis, sensory disturbance/2 years No CCJ (foramen magnum) No Normal, non-enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the entire cervical cord Jugular branch of OA, NMH of AphA Anterior condylar vein → inferior petrosal sinus → pontomesencephalic vein → anterior spinal vein Type V TAE with NBCA via AphA and OA Incompletely 14 months No 4 or 5
30 Akkoc et al. (24) 45/M Paraparesis, urinary retention/2 months Yes (brainstem ischemia or myelitis) CCJ No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the entire cervical cord OA, NMH of AphA PMV Type V TAE with NBCA via OA Completely 3 months Yes/repeated TAE with NBCA via AphA 4 or 5
31 Iwasaki et al. (25) 71/F Decreased abduction of the right eye/5 months Yes (brain neoplasm) CS No Normal, patchy-enhancement Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM No Upper pons MMA, meningeal branch of the ICA SPS → straight sinus → cerebellar cortical veins → anterior pontomesencephalic vein → PMV Type V Stereotactic radiosurgery Completely 3 years No 0
32 Lagares et al. (26) 65/M Tetrapraresis, respiratory insufficiency/3 months Yes (cerebellar infarction) Torcular No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper Hyper Hypo, hyper Yes Medulla oblongata OA, PMA of the VA Cerebellar vein → petrosal vein and PMV Type V Open surgery Completely 6 months No 1
33 van Rooij et al. (27) 58/M Tetrapraresis, bladder retention/3 months Yes (NA/NM) Tentorium No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the entire cervical cord MHT of the ICA, MMA, AphA Petrosal vein → PMV Type V TAE with NBCA via MMA Completely 1 years No 0
34 72/F Tetrapraresis, paresthesias, bladder retention/2 years Yes (NA/NM) CCJ (foramen magnum) No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the middle thoracic cord OA PMV Type V TAE with NBCA via OA Completely 2 years No 4 or 5
35 Sakamoto et al. (28) 65/F Progressive mental and gait disturbance/1 month No TS-SS Yes Hypo, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM Hetero-geneous, hyper No Brainstem and cerebellum OA, NMH of AphA, posterior branch of MMA, anterior and posterior auricular arteries NA/NM TypeIIB TVE with coils Completely NA/NM No 0
36 Tsutsumi et al. (29) 62/F Tetraparesis, occipitalgia and bulbar symptoms/1 year Yes (intramedullary glioma) CCJ (foramen magnum) No Hypo, rim-like enhancement Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM No Medulla oblongata extending to the upper thoracic cord NMH of AphA, meningeal branch of OA Retrograde drainage to the inferior petrosal sinus → cavernous sinuses Type IIA TVE with coils Completely Immediately No NA/NM
37 Sugiura et al. (30) 69/F Vomiting, ataxia and weakness/2 months No SS Yes NA/NM, patchy-enhancement Hyper NA/NM Normal, hyper Yes Medulla oblongata and hypoer pons OA Veins around brainstem → spinal PMV Type V TVE with coiling the SS Completely 3 weeks No 4 or 5
38 Wang et al. (31) 68/M Focal motor deficit/ NA/NM NA/NM CCJ (foramen magnum) No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata NMB of AphA PMV and anteromedullary cervical veins Type V TAE with NBCA via AphA Completely 2 years No 4 or 5
39 Khan et al. (32) 20/F Tetrapraresis, urinary retention and respiratory distress/1 month Yes (demyelinating disease) Tentorium No NA/NM, non-enhanced Hyper Hyper NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Pons extending to the upper cervical cord MHT of the ICA Cerebellar vein and anterior spinal vein Type V Open surgery Completely 3 months No 3
40 Ko et al. (33) 54/M Tetrapraresis, hypesthesia, diplopia/5 years Yes (Tolosa-Hunt syndrome) CS No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord MHT of the ICA, MMA Pontomesencephalic vein → cervical PMV Type V TAE with NBCA via multiple feeders Incompletely 10 months Yes/Second-stage embolization and gamma-knife radiosurgery 4 or 5
41 Kleeberg et al. (34) 60/M Difficulty to walk/6 weeks No Tentorium No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the hypoer cervical cord MHT of the ICA Cerebellar vein → PMV Type V Combined TAE and open surgery Completely Immediately No 1 or 2
42 Patsalides et al. (35) 53/M Syncope attacks and tingling of the fingertips/3 months Yes (NA/NM) SPS Yes NA/NM, enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM No Medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord MHT of the ICA, MMA Veins around brainstem → spinal veins Type V TAE with NBCA via MHT of the ICA Completely 6 months No 0
43 Aixut Lorenzo et al. (36) 67/F Neck pain, Tetrapraresis, urinary retention/several days No Tentorium (petrosal ridge) Yes NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the entire cervical cord MMA, AphA, and OA Vein around brainstem → spinal PMV Type V TAE with Onyx via OA Completely 12 months Yes/TVE 0 or 1
44 Kim et al. (37) 45/M Tetrapraresis and respiratory distress/6 months Yes (demyelinating disease) Tentorium (petrosal ridge) No NA/NM, enhanced Hyper Hyper Normal, NA/NM No Medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord Meningeal branches of bilateral ICAs Cervical PMV Type V Open surgery Completely 2 weeks No 3
45 Peltier et al. (38) 58/F Tetrapraresis, urinary retention and breathing difficulty/2 months No CCJ No NA/NM, enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord PMA of the VA C1 radiculomedullary vein Type V Clipping and section of the venous stem Completely 6 months No 3
46 Clark et al. (39) 49/F Dysarthric with monotonal hypophonia and ataxia/3 months No CS No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper Hyper NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Pons extending to the upper cervical cord MHT of the ICA NA/NM NA/NM TAE to coil the DAVF Completely 10 days No 2 or 3
47 Ogbonnaya et al. (40) 64/F Paraparesis, unsteady gait/3 months No Tentorium No NA/NM, non-enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord MMA PMV Type V TAE Completely Immediately No 4 or 5
48 Kulwin et al. (41) 44/F Paraparesis, altered mental status, hypopneic/ NA/NM Yes (brainstem stroke) SPS No NA/NM, enhanced NA/NM Hyper NA/NM, hyper No Pons and medulla oblongata MMA, dural branch of VA SPS → perimesencephalic vein → PMV Type V Surgical disconnection by clipping draining vein Completely Immediately No 4 or 5
49 Clark et al. (42) 65/F Tetrapraresis, gastroenteritis, urinary retention/several days No SPS No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM No Medulla oblongata and upper cervical spinal cord MMA, MHT of the ICA veins around brainstem → PMV Type V Combined TAE and surgical obliteration Completely Immediately No NA/NM
50 Mathon et al. (43) 60/F Progressive ascending myelopathy associated with autonomic dysfunction/NA/NM No SPS No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper Hyper NA/NM, NA/NM Yes medulla oblongata with cervical spinal cord, Meningeal arteries of the posterior surface of the internal carotid artery, MMA Dilated perimedullary veins. Type V TAE with glue via MMA Completely 1 month No 0
51 Salamon et al. (44) 43/M Paraparesis, urinary retention, vomiting, hiccups/NA/NM No CCJ (foramen magnum) No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Hypoer medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord Meningeal branch from the VA Cerebellar veins → venous drainage along the medulla → PMV Type V TAE with Onyx Completely 3 months No 0
52 Singh et al. (45) Middle-aged/M Paraparesis, urinary retention, vomiting, hiccups/4 months Yes (periodic paralysis) Tentorium No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper Hyper NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Pons, medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord MHAs of the ICAs, MMA Perimesencephalic vein and PMV Type V Open surgery Completely 3 months No 0
53 El Asri et al. (46) 48/M Tetrapraresis, hypaesthesia, breathing difficulty/10 days No Tentorium No NA/NM, non-enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Hypoer medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord MHT of the ICA Cerebellar veins → PMV Type V Open surgery Completely 2 years No 4 or 5
54 Foreman et al. (47) 59/F Tetrapraresis, pain, urinary retention/3 weeks Yes (infarction or contusion) CCJ No NA/NM, non-enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata and entire cervical spinal cord MHT of the ICA Pontomesencephalic vein → PMV Type V Open surgery Completely Immediately No 4 or 5
55 Gross et al. (48) 69/M Progressive hypoer extremity weakness and urinary retention/3 days Yes (Guillian-Barre syndrome) Tentorium No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper Hyper NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Pons, medulla, and upper cervical spine MMA, tentorial branch of ICA, dural branches of OA and posterior auricular artery Cervical spinal veins Type V TAE with Onyx Completely 10 weeks No 3
56 34/F Progressive extremity weakness/1 week Yes (transverse myelitis) TS-SS No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper Hyper NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Brainstem and cervicomedullary junction OA SPS → petrosal vein and medullary vein → anterior spinal vein and cervicomedullary vein Type V TAE with Onyx Completely 3 months No 0
57 Wu et al. (49) 46/F Paraparesis, vertigo, vomiting and dysphagia/1 month Yes (brainstem infarction) CCJ No NA/NM, partial enhancement Hyper Hyper NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Pons, medulla oblongata. Meningeal branch from the radicular artery of the VA Pontomesencephalic veins → basal vein and anterior spinal vein Type V TAE with Onyx Completely 6 months No 0
58 Haryu et al. (50) 62/M Upper limb weakness and difficulty in walking/4 months NA/NM Tentorium (petrosal ridge) NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Cervical spinal cord and medulla oblongata MMA Petrosal vein into the anterior spinal veins Type V Open surgery Completely 18 months No 2
59 64/M Myelopathy, bulbar palsy/NA/NM Yes (NA/NM) NA/NM NA/NM NA/NM, heterogeneously enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Cervical spinal cord and medulla oblongata NA/NM Spinal veins Type V NA/NM NA/NM NA/NM NA/NM 3
60 68/M Myelopathy, respiratory failure/NA/NM NA/NM NA/NM NA/NM NA/NM, non-enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Cervical spinal cord and medulla oblongata AphA Anterior spinal veins Type V Open surgery NA/NM NA/NM NA/NM 4
61 Roelz et al. (51) 76/M Nausea and vomiting, inability to walk, and blurred vision/8 months Yes (brainstem glioma or lymphoma) CCJ (Posterior jugular foramen) No NA/NM, enhanced Hyper Hyper NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Pontomedullary junction extending to inferior cerebellar peduncle MMA, AphA, PAA, and OA Lateral medullary into the anterior perimedullary/perispinal veins Type V TAE with Onyx via MMA, AphA, PAA Completely 10 months Yes/combined endovascular (via OA) and surgical approach 2
62 Le et al. (52) 36/M Headache, hypoesthesia, vomiting, ataxia/2 months Yes (brainstem glioma) Tentorium (petrosal apex) No Normal, punctiform enhancement Hyper Hyper NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata MMAs, AphA, internal maxillary artery Spinal PMV Type V TAE with NBCA Completely 1 year No 0
63 Alvare et al. (53) 69/M Nausea, vomiting, paraparesis/NA/NM Yes (encephalitis) Tentorium (petrosal ridge) No NA/NM, enhanced Hyper Hyper Normal, hyper No Pons and medulla oblongata MMA, anterior inferior cerebellar artery Veins of the cerebello-pontine angle → veins around the brainstem → spinal PMV Type V Combined TAE and clip and coagulate the draining vein Completely 3 months No 0
64 Pop et al. (54) 38/M Seizure, tetraplegia, respiratory difficulty/1 month Yes (Guillain-Barre syndrome) CCJ (foramen magnum) No Low, non-enhanced Hyper Hyper NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the entire cervical cord OA, AphA Bidirectional drainage to cortical temporal vein and spinal veins Type V TAE with Onyx via OA Completely 6 months No 3
65 Abud et al. (55) 66/F Tetraparesis/1 month No SS No NA/NM, non-enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord OA Cerebellar cortical venous drainage → PMV Type V TAE with Onyx via OA Completely 3 months No 0
66 Abdelsadg et al. (56) 65/F Tetraparesis, dizziness, urination difficulty/several days No CCJ Yes NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper Hyper NA/NM, Hyper No Medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord MHT of the ICA, MMA, SPS → brainstem and cervical PMV Type V TAE Completely 3 months No 3
67 Enokizono et al. (57) 50s/F Tetraparesis, numbness of limbs, urination difficulty/1 month No CCJ No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the upper thoracic cord Meningeal branch from the radicular artery of the VA Anterior and posterior spinal veins Type V Open surgery Completely NA/NM No NA/NM
68 60s/M Tetraparesis, numbness of limbs, urination difficulty/7 months No Tentorium No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the upper thoracic cord MHT of the ICA, MMA, accessory meningeal artery Petrosal vein → veins around the brainstem → PMV Type V Open surgery Completely NA/NM No NA/NM
69 60s/M Tetraparesis, numbness of limbs, respiratory difficulty/2 months No Tentorium No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the entire cervical cord MMA Petrosal vein → veins around the brainstem → PMV Type V Combined TAE and clip the draining vein Completely NA/NM No NA/NM
70 Tanaka et al. (58) 64/M Paraparesis, bladder dysfunction/NA/NM No Occipital sinus Yes NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM No Medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord PMAs of the VAs Occipital sinus → anterior spinal vein Type V TAE with Onyx via PMAs of the VAs Completely 8 months No 2
71 Emmer et al. (59) 65/M Eye movement abnormalities, limb weakness, and gait instability/2 years Yes (tumor) CCJ No NA/NM, heterogeneously enhanced Hyper Hyper NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata and cerebellum PMA of the VA Cerebellar vein Type III TAE with NBCA via PMA Completely Immediately No 4 or 5
72 Duan et al. (60) 67/F Paraparesis, headache and progressive Confusion/1 month Yes (brainstem tumor) SPS No NA/NM, partially enhanced Hyper Hyper Hyper, NA/NM No Cerebellum and pons MMA, OA SPS → PMV Type V TAE Completely Immediately No 4 or 5
73 Chen et al. (61) 25/F Paresthesias and paralysis of hypoer extremity, dyspnea/several days Yes (encephalitis and myelitis) Posterior fossa No NA/NM, enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Pons to C2/C3 Posterior meningeal branch of VA Anterior spinal vein Type V TAE Completely NA/NM No NA/NM
74 Bernard et al. (62) 65/M Progressive ataxia, swalhypoing dnormalrders, and bilateral tinnitus/5 months Yes (glioma) CCJ No NA/NM, enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla and hyper cervical cord Branches of AphA Cerebellar medullary vein (white arrowhead) reaching perimedullary veins Type V Open surgery Completely 1 month No 0
75 Zhang et al. (4) 33/M Progressive weakness of the hypoer extremities and gait disturbance/2 months Yes (transverse myelitis) Tentorium No NA/NM, patchy enhancement Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata and cervical spinal cord MHT of ICA Perimedullary veins Type V TAE with Onyx Completely 1 month No 2
76 Li et al. (63) 54/F Limb weakness and sphincter dysfunction/20 days No Tentorium (petrosal apex) No NA/NM, non- enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata and cervical spinal cord MHT of ICA Medullary into the perimedullary Type V Open surgery Completely 1 month No 1
77 Wang et al. (64) 53/M Numbness of the limbs, gait disturbance and cough/NA/NM No CCJ No NA/NM, patchy enhancement Hyper Hyper Hyper, NA/NM Yes Pons to medulla oblongata OA of the VA SS and cortical venous drainage Type IIB TAE with Onyx via OA Completely Immediately No 3
78 53/M Tetrapraresis, hypaesthesia, swalhypoing difficulty/2 months No CCJ No Low, non- enhanced Hyper Hyper Normal, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata Dural branch of VA Posterior spinal veins Type V Coagulating and cutting draining veins Completely Immediately No 4 or 5
79 Takahashi et al. (65) 63/M Tetraparesis, respiratory failure/5 months No CCJ No NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata OA, AphA Anterior spinal vein Type V TAE Completely 2 months No 3
80 Copelan et al. (66) 59/M Dizziness, nausea, and vomiting, vertigo/5 weeks No SPS No NA/NM, mild patchy enhancement Hyper Hyper Mild hyper, hyper Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord MMA, OA, AphA Petrosal vein → PMV Type V Combination of endovascular embolization and surgical resection Completely 3 years No 1 or 2
81 72/M Slurred speech, and dysphagia/3 months No CCJ (anterior condylar vein) No NA/NM, enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata and cerebellar flocculus AphA Anterior condylar vein, petrosal vein and PMV Type V TAE with Onyx via AphA Completely 5 months No 1 or 2
82 35/F Progressive unsteady gait and paraparesis/1 month No SPS No NA/NM, mildly enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata OA SPS → PMV Type V TAE with Onyx Completely 3months No 2
83 64/M Tetraparesis/6 months Yes (transverse myelitis) SPS No NA/NM, enhanced Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Medulla oblongata extending to the upper cervical cord MHT of ICA, OA PMV Type V TAE and surgical resection Completely 12 months No 4 or 5
84 Rodriguez et al. (67) 68/M Progressive hypoer extremity weakness/NA/NM No Tentorium No NA/NM, NA/NM NA/NM NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM No Cervicomedullary junction to C7 PMA Doral and ventral perimedullary veins Type V TAE with 50% ethanol Incompletely NA/NM Yes/open surgery 3
85 Shimizu et al. (68) 75/M Paraparesis, hypaesthesia, urinary retention/6 months No Anterior cranial fossa Yes NA/NM, NA/NM Hyper NA/NM NA/NM, NA/NM Yes Cerebellum and hypoer pons extending to the upper cervical cord Anterior ethmoidal artery Olfactory vein → basal vein of Rosenthal → veins around the brainstem → PMV Type V Open surgery Completely 2 months No 4 or 5
86 Chen et al. (69) 66/M Dizziness, truncal ataxia, impaired gait/1 month Yes (NA/NM) CCJ No NA/NM, partially enhanced Hyper NA/NM Normal, hyper Yes Hypoer pons and medulla oblongata OA, meningeal branch of VA PMV, reflux into veins around the brainstem Type V TAE with Onyx Completely 3 months No 1 or 2

CCJ, cranio-cervical junction; CS, cavernous sinus; DAVF, dural arteriovenous fistula; ECA, external carotid artery; F, female; ICA, internal carotid artery; M, male; MHT, meningohypophysal trunk; MMA, middle meningeal; AphA, ascending pharyngeal artery; VA, vertebral artery; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; mRS, modified Rankin scale; NA/NM, not applicable/not mentioned; NBCA, N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate; NMB, neuromeningeal branch; OA, occipital artery; PAA, posterior auricular artery; PMA, posterior meningeal artery; PMV, perimedullary vein; PVA, polyvinyl alcohol; SPS, superior petrosal sinus; SS, sigmoid sinus; TAE, transarterial embolization; TS, transverse sinus; TVE, transvenous embolization; VA, vertebral artery.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Flow chart of the searching strategy.

Interval From Symptom Onset to Definite Diagnosis

Of the 68 cases interval from symptom onset to definite diagnosis was provided, 15 (22.1%, 15/68) patients were definitely diagnosed with intracranial DAVFs in the 1st month since symptom onset. Nineteen (28.0%, 19/68) patients were definitely diagnosed between the 2nd and 3rd months. Sixteen (23.5%, 16/68) patients were between the fourth and 6th month. Six (8.8%, 6/68) patients were between the seventh and twelfth month. Twelve (17.6%, 12/68) patients were definitely diagnosed 1 year later from symptom onset. Thirty-three (40.2%, 33/82) patients were initially misdiagnosed as other diseases.

DAVFs Characteristics

The intracranial location of DAVFs could be determined in 83 patients. The specific location distributions were anterior fossa, cranio-cervical junction, cavernous sinus, vein of Galen, occipital sinus, superior petrosal sinus, transverse/sigmoid sinus, torcular, and tentorium in 1 (1.2%), 27 (32.5%), 11 (13.2%), 1 (1.2%), 1 (1.2%), 9 (10.8%), 10 (12.0%), 2 (2.4%), and 21 (25.3%) patients, respectively (Figure 3). The Cognard classification of DAVFs were II, III, IV, and V in 9 (10.7%, 9/84), 1 (1.2%, 1/84), 1 (1.2%, 1/84), and 73 (86.9%, 73/84) patients (Figure 4). The feeding arteries were solely from the external carotid artery (ECA) in 32 (38.6%, 32/83) patients, solely from the internal carotid artery (ICA) in 14 (16.9%, 14/83) patients, solely from the vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) in 12 (14.5%, 12/83) patients, conjointly from ECA and ICA in 18 (21.7%, 18/83) patients, conjointly from ECA and VBA in 5 (6.0%, 5/83) patients, and conjointly from ECA, ICA, and VBA in 2 (2.4%, 2/83) patients.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The specific location of intracranial DAVFs complicated with brainstem engorgement. DAVF, dural arteriovenous fistula.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The Cognard classification of intracranial DAVFs complicated with brainstem engorgement. DAVF, dural arteriovenous fistula.

Findings on Imaging Modalities

Eighteen (22%, 18/82) patients were demonstrated to have stenosis or occlusion of the draining system distal to the fistula points during conventional angiography. The signals of the engorged brainstem were hypointense or normal on T1 weighted imaging (T1WI) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 15 (65.2%, 15/23) and 8 (34.8%, 8/23) patients, respectively. The engorged brainstem was enhanced on T1WI with different degrees in 37 (72.5%, 37/51) patients after gadolinium contrast. The signal was hyperintense in all of the 82 patients T2 weighted imaging (T2WI) sequence was provided. And the signal was also hyperintense for all of the 25 patients who had undergone fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence. The signals on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) were heterogeneous, hyperintense, hypointense, and normal in 1 (10%), 3 (30%), 1 (10%), and 5 (50%) patients, respectively. All of the six patients showed hyperintensity on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. Besides, abnormal vascular flow voids could be identified in 69 (80.2%, 69/86) patients on MRI.

Treatment and Outcome

Forty-five (53.6%, 45/84) patients were treated solely with transarterial embolization, of which 7 (15.6%, 7/45) patients were incompletely embolized and 3 (6.7%, 3/45) patients experienced recurrence in spite of previous complete obliteration. Eight (9.5%, 8/84) patients underwent transvenous embolization, of which 1 (12.5%, 1/8) patient was incompletely embolized. Twenty-two (26.2%, 22/84) patients underwent open surgery, of which no recurrence was reported. One (1.2%, 1/84) patient underwent one-session successful stereotactic radiosurgery. Eight (9.5%, 8/84) patients were successfully treated conjointly with the endovascular and open surgical approaches. In general, the DAVFs were completely obliterated in 74 (89.2%, 74/83) patients during one hospitalization. Six (7.2%, 6/83) patients underwent retreatment. The mean follow-up period was 7.86 (n = 74, range 0–60 months) months. Fifty-four (70.1%, 54/77) patients experienced a good recovery according to the mRS score.

Discussion

The pathophysiology of intracranial DAVFs is still enigmatic. Though a small proportion of the DAVFs are demonstrated to be secondary to trauma, craniotomy, infection, or dural venous thrombosis, a substantial number of them are idiopathic (70). Some authors believe that progressive stenosis or thrombosis of the dural venous sinus might be the underlying mechanism of DAVF formation (61, 70). In this review, 22% of the patients with brainstem engorgement were definitely recorded to have stenosis or occlusion of the draining system distal to the fistula points. The actual occurrence of stenosis or occlusion of the draining system might be higher, as some reports did not give a detailed description of the draining system. According to a study by Luo et al. 7 (77.8%) of the nine patients with aggressive cavernous sinus DAVFs had inferior petrous sinus occlusion or stenosis, two patients (22.2%) had compartment of inferior petrous sinus-cavernous sinus (77). Hence, progressive insufficient drainage (stenosis, occlusion, or compartment) of the draining system might play an important role in the genesis of brainstem engorgement in patients with intracranial DAVFs.

The brainstem has a complex venous draining system. In general, the veins of the brainstem can be divided into the transverse and longitudinal groups, which are named on the basis of the subdivision (mesencephalon, pons, or medulla), surface (median anterior, lateral anterior, or lateral), and the direction (transverse or longitudinal) of the brainstem drained (71). From cranial to caudal, the transverse groups are peduncular vein, posterior communicating vein, vein of pontomesencephalic sulcus, transverse pontine vein, vein of pontomedullary sulcus, and transverse medullary vein. From median to lateral, the longitudinal groups are median veins (median anterior pontomesencephalic vein, median anterior medullary vein), anterolateral veins (lateral anterior pontomesencephalic vein, lateral anterior medullary vein), and lateral veins (lateral mesencephalic vein, lateral medullary and retro-olivary veins). The veins of the transverse group have extensive anastomoses with those of the longitudinal group. Besides, the terminal end of the veins draining the brainstem and cerebellum form bridging veins that are divided into three groups: (1) a galenic group draining into the vein of Galen; (2) a petrosal group draining into the petrosal sinuses; and (3) a tentorial group draining into the sinuses converging on the torcula. Hence, DAVFs in the posterior fossa or even cavernous sinus could lead to brainstem engorgement. Venous drainage of the brainstem is presented in Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Ventral (A) and dorsal (B) venous drainage of the brainstem. Ant., anterior; Bas., basilar; Br., bridging; Cer., cerebellar; Com., communicating; Inf., inferior; Lat., lateral; Med., median, medullary; Mes., mesencephalic; Ped., peduncle; Pon., pontine; Post., posterior; Sul., sulcus; Sup., superior; Trans., transverse; Trig., trigeminal; V., vein.

The diagnosis of intracranial DAVFs with brainstem engorgement is still challenging. Patients that were diagnosed with neoplasm to undergo brainstem biopsy or given corticosteroids for misdiagnosing as myelitis were not uncommonly reported (4, 51). According to our analysis, 40.2% (33/82) of the patients were initially misdiagnosed as other diseases. Of note, the rate of initial misdiagnosis did not decrease in the past three decades (Figure 6). Considering the unspecific clinical manifestations of intracranial DAVFs with brainstem engorgement, meticulous and comprehensive interpretation of the auxiliary investigations is of utmost importance.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The state of diagnosis and treatment of intracranial DAVFs complicated with brainstem engorgement in the past three decades.

While conventional angiography is the gold standard for definite diagnosis of intracranial DAVFs, taking good advantage of different sequences of MRI data could help screen out those patients with high suspicion. Abnormal vascular flow voids on MRI are reliable evidence highly suggestive of vascular lesions. Abnormal vascular flow voids could only be identified in 80.2% (69/86) of the patients in this survey, including those identified after repeated review of the MRI or those identified during multiple investigations of MRI after symptom aggravation. T2WI or FLAIR sequence is highly sensitive (in 100% of the patients) for the engorged brainstem but with low specificity. The signals on T1WI are so polytropic that 65.2% (15/23) of the analyzed patients presented with low hypointensity and 34.8% (8/23) of the patients were normal. The engorged brainstem was enhanced on T1WI with different degrees in 72.5% (37/51) of the patients after gadolinium contrast. DWI and ADC were rarely performed in these patients. All of the six patients with ADC map showed hyperintensity which denotes the vascular origin of brainstem edema. The signal of DWI is so variable that heterogeneous, hyper, hypo, and normal intensity could be in 1 (10%), 3 (30%), 1 (10%), and 5 (50%) of the 10 identified patients, which might reflect the different degree and duration of venous congestion around the brainstem. Furthermore, contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance angiography is more sensitive to find out occult vascular abnormalities (50, 72). T2*WI and susceptibility-weighted imaging are emerging sequences of MRI that are good at detecting fine vasculature and microbleeds (73). Hypointense signal could be noticed in the engorged brainstem on T2*WI and susceptibility-weighted imaging, for long-term venous congestion might lead to intraparenchymal microbleeding in the brainstem (57, 60). Besides, some authors also demonstrated decreased cerebral blood volume and prolongation of the mean transit time on magnetic resonance perfusion in the engorged brainstem (66). Hence, advanced MRI sequences could increase the sensitivity and specificity in differential diagnosis of lesion nature and avoid delayed treatment and unnecessary conventional angiography.

There is no consensus on the treatment option for intracranial DAVFs with brainstem engorgement. Of note, premature administration of corticosteroid could be dangerous even fatal in case of undiagnosed DAVFs with brainstem or spinal cord engorgement (74, 75). Hence, precise and comprehensive diagnosis is crucial for further treatment. The treatment should be based on the specific angioarchitecture, intracranial location, and technique availability. Generally speaking, the treatment strategies for DAVFs include open surgery, endovascular embolization, and radiotherapy. As the lag time of effect could be up to 3 years (76), radiotherapy is unsuitable for patients with brainstem engorgement. With the development of endovascular technique and materials, endovascular embolization has become the first-line choice for the majority of intracranial DAVFs (63, 70). Besides, endovascular treatment can be an adjunctive step of further open surgery. For patients with difficult arterial/venous access, incomplete fistula obliteration, recanalization after embolization, open surgery can be considered. Whereas, in patients where a transfemoral approach is impaired for the tortuosity of feeding arteries or the presence of isolated sinuses, percutaneous or intraoperative puncture of perforating arteries or draining veins and venous sinuses represent a new choice to facilitate distal access to the DAVFs (70, 77). In this review, 63.1% of the patients were treated endovascularly (transarterial or transvenous), 26.2% of the patients underwent open surgery, and 9.5% of the patients were treated conjointly with endovascular and open surgical approaches.

The prognosis of patients with DAVFs associated brainstem engorgement is still unsatisfactory, though slight increase in good recovery could be noted in the past three decades (Figure 3). Only 70% of the patients experienced a good recovery (mRS score ≤ 3). A substantial number of patients can have more or less neurological deficits. Except for the peculiar location of DAVFs, angioarchitecture, and surrounding neural structures, early diagnosis is the most important factor impacting prognosis. According to this review, correct diagnosis could be achieved in only 50% of the patients in the first 3 months after symptom onset. What's more, the rate of initial misdiagnosis did not decrease in the past three decades (Figure 3). Hence, early awareness of this rare entity and efficiently utilizing the up to date investigations are of utmost importance.

Limitations

The opinion of this review was deduced from retrospective review of the published case reports or small case series. The results would be biased by many factors. Firstly, the levels in diagnosis and treatment vary greatly between different centers. Secondly, due to the reporting customs among different authors, a lot of key information was missing. Thirdly, the mean follow-up period was only 7.86 (n = 74, range 0–60 months) months, which could impair the accuracy in outcome assessment. Of note, there were two studies reporting larger case series of DAVFs with brainstem engorgement (63, 77) that were not included in this analysis because so much information was missing according to our inclusion criteria.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

JY contributed to the conception and design of the manuscript. LQ and HL performed literature review. KH and GL wrote the manuscript. KX and JY critically revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Funding. This research received funding support from the Ninth Youth Scientific Research Funding of The First Hospital of Jilin University (jdyy92018035).

References

  • 1.Kuwayama N. Epidemiologic survey of dural arteriovenous fistulas in japan: clinical frequency and present status of treatment. Acta Neurochir Suppl. (2016) 123:185–8. 10.1007/978-3-319-29887-0_26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chen CJ, Chen CM, Lin TK. Enhanced cervical MRI in identifying intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae with spinal perimedullary venous drainage. Neuroradiology. (1998) 40:393–7. 10.1007/s002340050609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tanoue S, Goto K, Oota S. Endovascular treatment for dural arteriovenous fistula of the anterior condylar vein with unusual venous drainage: report of two cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2005) 26:1955–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhang S, Liu H, Li J. Cervical myelopathy caused by intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula with acute worsening after steroid administration. World Neurosurg. (2018) 120:328–30. 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Probst EN, Christante L, Zeumer H. Brain-stem venous congestion due to a dural arteriovenous fistula in the posterior fossa. J Neurol. (1994) 241:175–7. 10.1007/BF00868346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Uchino A, Kato A, Kuroda Y, Shimokawa S, Kudo S. Pontine venous congestion caused by dural carotid-cavernous fistula: report of two cases. Eur Radiol. (1997) 7:405–8. 10.1007/s003300050175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ernst RJ, Gaskill-Shipley M, Tomsick TA, Hall LC, Tew JM, Jr, et al. Cervical myelopathy associated with intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula: MR findings before and after treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (1997) 18:1330–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ricolfi F, Manelfe C, Meder JF, Arrue P, Decq P, Brugieres P, et al. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae with perimedullary venous drainage. Anatomical, clinical and therapeutic considerations. Neuroradiology. (1999) 41:803–12. 10.1007/s002340050846 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bousson V, Brunereau L, Vahedi K, Chapot R. Intracranial dural fistula as a cause of diffuse MR enhancement of the cervical spinal cord. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (1999) 67:227–30. 10.1136/jnnp.67.2.227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hurst RW, Bagley LJ, Scanlon M, Flamm ES. Dural arteriovenous fistulas of the craniocervical junction. Skull Base Surg. (1999) 9:1–7. 10.1055/s-2008-1058166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Takahashi S, Tomura N, Watarai J, Mizoi K, Manabe H. Dural arteriovenous fistula of the cavernous sinus with venous congestion of the brain stem: report of two cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (1999) 20:886–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shintani S, Tsuruoka S, Shiigai T. Carotid-cavernous fistula with brainstem congestion mimicking tumor on MRI. Neurology. (2000) 55:1929–31. 10.1212/WNL.55.12.1929 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wiesmann M, Padovan CS, Pfister HW, Yousry TA. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula with spinal medullary venous drainage. Eur Radiol. (2000) 10:1606–9. 10.1007/s003300000382 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kalamangalam GP, Bhattacharya J, Teasdale E, Thomas M. Myelopathy from intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2002) 72:816–8. 10.1136/jnnp.72.6.816 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Weigele JB, Chaloupka JC, Lesley WS. Galenic dural arteriovenous fistula: unusual clinical presentation and successful endovascular therapy. Case report. J Neurosurg. (2002) 97:467–70. 10.3171/jns.2002.97.2.0467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Asakawa H, Yanaka K, Fujita K, Marushima A, Anno I, Nose T. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula showing diffuse MR enhancement of the spinal cord: case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol. (2002) 58:251–7. 10.1016/S0090-3019(02)00861-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lanz M, Thiemann U, Grzyska U, Ebke M, Schwendemann G, Kraus JA. Transient brainstem ischemia and recurrent syncope caused by a dural arteriovenous fistula. Neurology. (2003) 61:1152–3. 10.1212/WNL.61.8.1152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kai Y, Hamada JI, Morioka M, Yano S, Ushio Y. Brain stem venous congestion due to dural arteriovenous fistulas of the cavernous sinus. Acta Neurochir. (2004) 146:1107–11. 10.1007/s00701-004-0315-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li J, Ezura M, Takahashi A, Yoshimoto T. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula with venous reflux to the brainstem and spinal cord mimicking brainstem infarction–case report. Neurol Med Chir. (2004) 44:24–8. 10.2176/nmc.44.24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pannu Y, Shownkeen H, Nockels RP, Origitano TC. Obliteration of a tentorial dural arteriovenous fistula causing spinal cord myelopathy using the cranio-orbito zygomatic approach. Surg Neurol. (2004) 62:463–7. 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.01.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Crum BA, Link M. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula mimicking brainstem neoplasm. Neurology. (2004) 62:2330–1. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000130342.68494.78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Oishi H, Horinaka N, Shmizu T, Ozaki Y, Arai H. A case of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula presenting with brainstem infarction. No Shinkei Geka. (2005) 33:1095–9. 10.11477/mf.1436100147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Satoh M, Kuriyama M, Fujiwara T, Tokunaga K, Sugiu K. Brain stem ischemia from intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula: case report. Surg Neurol. (2005) 64:341–5. 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.12.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Akkoc Y, Atamaz F, Oran I, Durmaz B. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula draining into spinal perimedullary veins: a rare cause of myelopathy. J Korean Med Sci. (2006) 21:958–62. 10.3346/jkms.2006.21.5.958 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Iwasaki M, Murakami K, Tomita T, Numagami Y, Nishijima M. Cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula complicated by pontine venous congestion. A case report. Surg Neurol. (2006) 65:516–8. 10.1016/j.surneu.2005.06.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lagares A, Perez-Nunez A, Alday R, Ramos A, Campollo J, Lobato RD. Dural arteriovenous fistula presenting as brainstem ischaemia. Acta Neurochir. (2007) 149:965–7. 10.1007/s00701-007-1250-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, Beute GN. Intracranial dural fistulas with exclusive perimedullary drainage: the need for complete cerebral angiography for diagnosis and treatment planning. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2007) 28:348–51. 10.1016/S0098-1672(08)70215-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sakamoto S, Ohba S, Shibukawa M, Kiura Y, Okazaki T, Kurisu K. Course of apparent diffusion coefficient values in cerebral edema of dural arteriovenous fistula before and after treatment. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. (2008) 110:400–3. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2007.12.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tsutsumi S, Yasumoto Y, Ito M, Oishi H, Arai H. Posterior fossa dural arteriovenous fistula as a probable cause of congestive myelopathy. Case report. Neurol Med Chir. (2008) 48:171–5. 10.2176/nmc.48.171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sugiura Y, Nozaki T, Sato H, Sawashita K, Hiramatsu H, Nishizawa S. Sigmoid sinus dural arteriovenous fistula with spinal venous drainage manifesting as only brainstem-related neurological deficits without myelopathy: case report. Neurol Med Chir. (2009) 49:71–6. 10.2176/nmc.49.71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wang HC, Lin WC, Kuo YL, Yang TM, Ho JT, Tsai NW, et al. Factors associated with brainstem congestive encephalopathy in dural arterio-venous fistulas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. (2009) 111:335–40. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Khan S, Polston DW, Shields RW, Jr, Rasmussen P, Gupta R. Tentorial dural arteriovenous fistula presenting with quadriparesis: case report and review of the literature. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2009) 18:428–34. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2008.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ko SB, Kim CK, Lee SH, Yoon BW. Carotid cavernous fistula with cervical myelopathy. J Clin Neurosci. (2009) 16:1350–3. 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.12.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kleeberg J, Maeder-Ingvar M, Maeder P. Progressive cervical myelopathy due to dural craniocervical fistula. Eur Neurol. (2010) 63:374. 10.1159/000292430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Patsalides A, Tzatha E, Stubgen JP, Shungu DC, Stieg PE, Gobin YP. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula presenting as an enhancing lesion of the medulla. J Neurointerv Surg. (2010) 2:390–3. 10.1136/jnis.2009.001750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Aixut Lorenzo S, Tomasello Weitz A, Blasco Andaluz J, Sanroman Manzanera L, Macho Fernandez JM. Transvenous approach to intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula (Cognard v): a treatment option. A case report. Interv Neuroradiol. (2011) 17:108–14. 10.1177/159101991101700117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kim NH, Cho KT, Seo HS. Myelopathy due to intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula: a potential diagnostic pitfall. Case report. J Neurosurg. (2011) 114:830–3. 10.3171/2010.5.JNS10128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Peltier J, Baroncini M, Thines L, Lacour A, Leclerc X, Lejeune JP. Subacute involvement of the medulla oblongata and occipital neuralgia revealing an intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula of the craniocervical junction. Neurol India. (2011) 59:285–8. 10.4103/0028-3886.79153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Clark SW, Dang T, Toth G, Pride GL, Greenberg B, Warnack W. Carotid cavernous fistula imitating brainstem glioma. Arch Neurol. (2011) 68:256–7. 10.1001/archneurol.2010.366 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ogbonnaya ES, Yousaf I, Sattar TM. Intracranial dural arterio-venous fistula presenting with progressive myelopathy. BMJ Case Rep. (2011) 2011:4828. 10.1136/bcr.09.2011.4828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kulwin C, Bohnstedt BN, Scott JA, Cohen-Gadol A. Dural arteriovenous fistulas presenting with brainstem dysfunction: diagnosis and surgical treatment. Neurosurg Focus. (2012) 32:E10. 10.3171/2012.2.FOCUS1217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Clark CN, Saifee TA, Cowley PO, Ginsberg L. Dural arteriovenous fistula of the medulla initially mimicking Guillain-Barre syndrome. Arch Neurol. (2012) 69:786–7. 10.1001/archneurol.2011.2934 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mathon B, Gallas S, Tuillier T, Bekaert O, Decq P, Brugieres P, et al. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula with perimedullary venous drainage: anatomical, clinical and therapeutic considerations about one case, and review of the literature. Neurochirurgie. (2013) 59:133–7. 10.1016/j.neuchi.2013.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Salamon E, Patsalides A, Gobin YP, Santillan A, Fink ME. Dural arteriovenous fistula at the craniocervical junction mimicking acute brainstem and spinal cord infarction. JAMA Neurol. (2013) 70:796–7. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.1946 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Singh D, Garg A, Gupta A, Goel G, Gupta R, Bansal A. Tentorial dural arteriovenous fistula presenting as episodic weakness mimicking periodic paralysis. J Neurointerv Surg. (2013) 5:e32. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.El Asri AC, El Mostarchid B, Akhaddar A, Naama O, Gazzaz M, Boucetta M. Factors influencing the prognosis in intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with perimedullary drainage. World Neurosurg. (2013) 79:182–91. 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Foreman SM, Stahl MJ, Schultz GD. Paraplegia in a chiropractic patient secondary to atraumatic dural arteriovenous fistula with perimedullary hypertension: case report. Chiropr Man Therap. (2013) 21:23. 10.1186/2045-709X-21-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gross R, Ali R, Kole M, Dorbeistein C, Jayaraman MV, Khan M. Tentorial dural arteriovenous fistula presenting as myelopathy: case series and review of literature. World J Clin Cases. (2014) 2:907–11. 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i12.907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wu Q, Wang HD, Shin YS, Zhang X. Brainstem congestion due to dural ateriovenous fistula at the craniocervical junction. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. (2014) 55:152–5. 10.3340/jkns.2014.55.3.152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Haryu S, Endo T, Sato K, Inoue T, Takahashi A, Tominaga T. Cognard type V intracranial dural arteriovenous shunt: case reports and literature review with special consideration of the pattern of spinal venous drainage. Neurosurgery. (2014) 74:E135–42. 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Roelz R, Van Velthoven V, Reinacher P, Coenen VA, Mader I, Urbach H, et al. Unilateral contrast-enhancing pontomedullary lesion due to an intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula with perimedullary spinal venous drainage: the exception that proves the rule. J Neurosurg. (2015) 123:1534–9. 10.3171/2014.11.JNS142278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Le Guennec L, Leclercq D, Szatmary Z, Idbaih A, Reyes-Botero G, Delattre JY, et al. Dural arteriovenous fistula mimicking a brainstem glioma. J Neuroimaging. (2015) 25:1053–5. 10.1111/jon.12220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Alvarez H, Sasaki-Adams D, Castillo M. Resolution of brainstem edema after treatment of a dural tentorial arteriovenous fistula. Interv Neuroradiol. (2015) 21:603–8. 10.1177/1591019915591741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pop R, Manisor M, Aloraini Z, Chibarro S, Proust F, Quenardelle V, et al. Foramen magnum dural arteriovenous fistula presenting with epilepsy. Interv Neuroradiol. (2015) 21:724–7. 10.1177/1591019915609783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Abud LG, Abud TG, Nakiri GS, Queiroz RM, Abud DG. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula with perimedullary drainage treated by endovascular embolization. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. (2016) 74:178–9. 10.1590/0004-282X20150171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Abdelsadg M, Kanodia AK, Keston P, Galea J. Unusual case of intracranial dural AV fistula presenting with acute myelopathy. BMJ Case Rep. (2016) 2016:bcr2016215227. 10.1136/bcr-2016-215227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Enokizono M, Sato N, Morikawa M, Kimura Y, Sugiyama A, Maekawa T, et al. “Black butterfly” sign on T2*-weighted and susceptibility-weighted imaging: A novel finding of chronic venous congestion of the brain stem and spinal cord associated with dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurol Sci. (2017) 379:64–8. 10.1016/j.jns.2017.05.066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tanaka J, Fujita A, Maeyama M, Kohta M, Hosoda K, Kohmura E. Cognard type Vdural arteriovenous fistula involving the occipital sinus. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2017) 26:e62–3. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Emmer BJ, van Es AC, Koudstaal PJ, Roosendaal SD. Infratentorial dural arteriovenous fistula resulting in brainstem edema and enhancement. Neurology. (2017) 88:503–4. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Duan SS, Liu H, Wang WL, Zhao CB. A case of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula mimicking brainstem tumor. Chin Med J. (2017) 130:2519–20. 10.4103/0366-6999.216398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chen PM, Chen MM, McDonald M, McGehrin K, Steinberg J, Handwerker J, et al. Cranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistula. Stroke. (2018) 49:e332–4. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Bernard F, Lemee JM, Faguer R, Fournier HD. Lessons to be remembered from a dural arteriovenous fistula mimicking medulla and high cervical cord glioma. World Neurosurg. (2018) 113:312–5. 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Li J, Ren J, Du S, Ling F, Li G, Zhang H. Dural arteriovenous fistulas at the petrous apex. World Neurosurg. (2018) 119:e968–e76. 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wang XC, Du YY, Tan Y, Qin JB, Wang L, Wu XF, et al. Brainstem congestion due to dural arteriovenous fistula at the craniocervical junction: case report and review of the literature. World Neurosurg. (2018) 118:181–7. 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Takahashi H, Ueshima T, Goto D, Kimura T, Yuki N, Inoue Y, et al. acute tetraparesis with respiratory failure after steroid administration in a patient with a dural arteriovenous fistula at the craniocervical junction. Intern Med. (2018) 57:591–4. 10.2169/internalmedicine.9115-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Copelan AZ, Krishnan A, Marin H, Silbergleit R. Dural arteriovenous fistulas: a characteristic pattern of edema and enhancement of the medulla on MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2018) 39:238–44. 10.3174/ajnr.A5460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Rodriguez Rubio R, Chae R, Rutledge WC, De Vilalta A, Kournoutas I, Winkler E, et al. Clipping of a high-risk dural arteriovenous fistula of the posterior fossa: 3d operative video. World Neurosurg. (2019) 126:413. 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Shimizu A, Ishikawa T, Yamaguchi K, Funatsu T, Ryu B, Nagahara A, et al. Brainstem venous congestion caused by perimedullary drainage in anterior cranial fossa dural arteriovenous fistula. World Neurosurg. (2019) 127:503–8. 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Chen PY, Juan YH, Lin SK. An isolated unilateral pontomedullary lesion due to an intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula mimicking a brain tumor - case and review. J Nippon Med Sch. (2019) 86:48–54. 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2019_86-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Reynolds MR, Lanzino G, Zipfel GJ. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae. Stroke. (2017) 48:1424–31. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Rhoton AL, Jr. The posterior fossa veins. Neurosurgery. (2000) 47(Suppl.3):S69–92. 10.1093/neurosurgery/47.3.S69 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Meckel S, Maier M, Ruiz DS, Yilmaz H, Scheffler K, Radue EW, et al. MR angiography of dural arteriovenous fistulas: diagnosis and follow-up after treatment using a time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2007) 28:877–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Di Ieva A, Lam T, Alcaide-Leon P, Bharatha A, Montanera W, Cusimano MD. Magnetic resonance susceptibility weighted imaging in neurosurgery: current applications and future perspectives. J Neurosurg. (2015) 123:1463–75. 10.3171/2015.1.JNS142349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Zalewski NL, Rabinstein AA, Brinjikji W, Kaufmann TJ, Nasr D, Ruff MW, et al. Unique gadolinium enhancement pattern in spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. JAMA Neurol. (2018) 75:1542–5. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Nasr DM, Brinjikji W, Rabinstein AA, Lanzino G. Clinical outcomes following corticosteroid administration in patients with delayed diagnosis of spinal arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurointerv Surg. (2017) 9:607–10. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Soderman M, Edner G, Ericson K, Karlsson B, Rahn T, Ulfarsson E, et al. Gamma knife surgery for dural arteriovenous shunts: 25 years of experience. J Neurosurg. (2006) 104:867–75. 10.3171/jns.2006.104.6.867 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Luo CB, Chang FC, Teng MM, Lin CJ, Wang AG, Ting TW. Aggressive cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula: angioarchitecture analysis and embolization by various approaches. J Chin Med Assoc. (2016) 79:152–8. 10.1016/j.jcma.2015.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.


Articles from Frontiers in Neurology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES