Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Oct 9;15(10):e0240308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240308

Transcriptome analysis of the growth performance of hybrid mandarin fish after food conversion

Wen-Zhi Guan 1,2, Gao-Feng Qiu 1,*,#, Feng-Liu 2,*,#
Editor: Tzong-Yueh Chen3
PMCID: PMC7546499  PMID: 33035258

Abstract

During recent years, China has become a hotspot for the domestication of mandarin fish, and this is of great commercial value. Although the food preference of domesticated mandarin fish has been studied, little is known about genes regulating their growth. We raised hybrid mandarin fish on artificial feed for 3 months, the results showed that the survival rate of hybrid mandarin fish was 60.00%. Their total length and body weight were 18.34 ±0.43 cm and 100.44 ±4.87 g. The absolute length and weight gain rates were 0.14 cm/d and 1.08 g/d, respectively. Finally, RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) was performed to identify potential genes and pathways activated in response to growth performance. The transcriptome analysis generated 68, 197 transcripts and 45,871 unigenes. Among them, 1025 genes were up-regulated and 593 genes were down-regulated between the fast- and slow-growth fish. Finally, we obtained 32 differentially expressed genes, which were mainly related to fatty acid biosynthesis (e.g. FASN and ACACB), collecting duct acid secretion (e.g. ATP6E and KCC4), cell cycle (e.g. CDC20 and CCNB), and the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system (IGFBP1). These pathways might be related to the growth of hybrid mandarin fish. In addition, more potential single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were detected in the fast-growth fish than in the slow-growth fish. The results suggest that the interaction of metabolism and abundant alleles might determine the growth of hybrid mandarin fish after food conversion.

Introduction

Mandarin fish, a delicacy, is an economically important fish. It is also one of the four popular freshwater fish and very popular in China. Siniperca chuatsi and Siniperca scherzeri are major mandarin fish. S. chuatsi grows fast, but it is easily prone to infection during culture. Contrarily, S. scherzeri has superior characteristics of strong disease resistance and easy domestication; they can be fed artificial feeds. However, they grow slowly. During recent years, China has become a hotspot for the domestication of mandarin fish [1, 2]. In the wild, mandarin fish feed on certain live fish, and this leads to some serious problems in the artificial culture of mandarin fish. For example, feeding live fish to mandarin fish is very expensive and labour intensive. Additionally, these fish can be a source of pathogens or parasites, which can lead to a significant loss of cultured mandarin fish [3]. To overcome this problem, we used S. chuatsi and S. scherzeri to develop a hybrid F1 generation in 2010, and then backcrossed it with S. scherzeri three times and bred for two generations. Finally, the fifth generation fish was backcrossed with S. chuatsi to obtain a new hybrid mandarin fish [4]. During domestication, we found that the new hybrid mandarin fish has a faster growth rate and stronger disease resistance than the F1 hybrid and its parents, and it was easier to domesticate [4]. Furthermore, there were obvious growth differences in the hybrid fish after months of domestication. Therefore, genetic breeding of mandarin fish is essential to study the effect of domestication on growth and the underlying mechanism in the future.

During recent years, RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) has been widely applied in fundamental research as an effective tool and the standard for transcriptome analysis. Transcriptome studies can holistically elucidate the functions and structures of genes and the molecular mechanisms of biological processes. The transcriptome is widely used to study the following: cold adaptation and thermal response of polar ectothermic species [5]; genetic diversity [6] and genetic management of commercially important fish [7]; genetic network regulating low-temperature tolerance in fish [8]; high-altitude adaptation [9] and the skeletal muscle of swimming fish [10]; adaptive responses to hypoxia [11], pathogenesis of diseases, and functions of the immune system in fish [12]; and sexual plasticity in sex-changing fish [13].

In the present study, in order to increase understanding the molecular mechanism of growth differences caused by food conversion, transcriptome sequencing was used to analysis the growth performance of hybrid mandarin fish after food conversion. We believe that these resources can be screened to reasonably explain the molecular mechanism of growth of fish, and would greatly aid domestication and breeding programs for mandarin fish.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The fish were handled in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Advisory Committee for Laboratory Animal Research. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Shanghai Fisheries Research Institute, Shanghai, China (Protocol Number: SHFRI-ACU-2018033). All surgery was performed under eugenol anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering.

Experiment fish

S. chuatsi and S. scherzeri were obtained from Shanghai Fisheries Research Institute, shanghai, China. In May 2010, S. scherzeri ♂ and S. chuatsi ♀ were used to produce hybrid F1. In 2013, the hybrid F1 ♂ and S. scherzeri ♀ were used to produce hybrid F2. In 2014, the hybrid F2 ♂ and S. scherzeri ♀ were used to produce hybrid F3. In 2015, the hybrid F3 and S. scherzeri ♀ were used to produce hybrid F4. In 2017, the hybrid F4 ♂ and S. scherzeri ♀ were used to produce hybrid F5 [4]. In May 2018, the hybrid F5 and S. chuatsi were used as male and female parents to produce hybrid F6 (H6) by artificial production and insemination. The selection criteria of the broodstock were the same in the experiment, and the parents were all mature adults with small growth differences. When the yolk of the H6 mandarin fry was almost absorbed, we offered small-sized Megalobrama amblycephala fry as food to them. When the H6 hybrid mandarin fish were 3 cm long, we began to domesticate them on an artificial feed (Qingdao Qihao Biotechnology Co., Ltd). Training was usually done in the morning and evening. During training, live prey fish were used as feed in the beginning, and then changed to less dynamic fish and finally to the artificial feed that contained 40% fish meat. The successful food transition took approximately 15 days. After that, some of the untamed individuals will be eliminated. When their body length reached about 5.5–6.0 cm, three net cages of size 2 m × 2 m × 1.2 m, with 200 fish of the same size per cage, were used to continue growth experiments. The fish were counted every month, and the feeding period was 90 days.

Growth performance and sample collection

In order to evaluate the growth performance, the body weight (accuracy = 0.01 g) of fish was measured using an electronic balance. Furthermore, the main traits (accuracy = 0.1 mm) including total length, body length, body height, and body width were measured using a compass and ruler at the end of the training period. Additionally, based on the body weight, the trained fish were divided into two groups, fast- (F) and slow-growth (S) groups, with five fish per group (S1 Table). The 10 fish were euthanised with Eugenol (JINYUAN, Jiangxi, China), and then the liver was collected in RNAstore Reagent (TIANGEN, Beijing, China), according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Total RNA extraction, library construction and sequencing

According to the manufacturer's protocol, the total RNA from the liver samples was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and purified using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). RNA quality was checked on 1% agarose gels. RNA purity was analysed using Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA). The Truseq™ RNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, USA) was used to construct a cDNA library, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Magnetic beads with oligo(dT) (Invitrogen, USA) were used to purify the mRNA from the total RNA. Fragmentation buffer was added to break the mRNA into short fragments of approximately 300 bp. The first strand cDNA was synthesised with a short mRNA fragment and random hexamers, and the second strand cDNA was subsequently synthesised using DNA polymerase I and RNase H, to obtain a stable double-chain structure. The adaptor-ligated, size-selected cDNA were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (15 cycles) and isolated on 2% agarose gels to construct the final cDNA library. Before sequencing, TBS-380 Picogreen (Invitrogen, USA) was used to quantify the DNA libraries. After cluster generation, the prepared libraries were sequenced on the Illumina Hiseq™ 4000 platform (Majorbio Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), generating 2 × 150 bp paired-end reads.

De novo assembly and functional annotation

In order to ensure the accuracy of the subsequent analysis results, we performed quality control of the original reads. Adapter sequences, >10% poly-N reads, and low quality reads were removed, to generate clean reads. All clean reads were then assembled using Trinity [14]. TransRate [15] and CD-HIT [16] were used to optimise and filter the assembled data. Subsequently, BUSCO [17] was used to evaluate the final sequences, which were considered unigenes or transcripts. Finally, the unigenes with E-value < 10−5 were compared against those in the Non-Redundant Protein (NR), SwissProt, Pfam, Clusters of Orthologous Group (COG), Gene Onthology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases to obtain annotation information, and then counted them.

Differential expression and functional enrichment analyses

To analyse the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) among different samples, RSEM [18] was used to quantify the unigenes (Anders and Huber, 2010). DESeq2 was used to perform differential gene expression analysis. Genes identified using DEGSeq2 with an adjusted P-value < 0.05 were considered DEGs [19]. The GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses were performed on the DEGs, using Goatools software [20] and R program, respectively.

Detection of simple sequence repeats and single nucleotide polymorphisms

To identify candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the assembled transcripts of all samples, SAMtools (http://samtools.sourceforge.net/) and BCF tools (https://github.com/samtools/bcftools) were used MISA (http://pgrc.ipk-gatersleben.de/misa/) was used for simple sequence repeat (SSR) detection in unigenes with the default parameters.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Quantitative real-time (qRT)-PCR was used to verify the reliability of the RNA-Seq results. RNA used for transcriptome sequencing was converted into cDNA using the PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara, Japan). The cDNA was then used for the qRT-PCR analysis using specific primers (Table 1). β-actin was used as the control mainly because of its stability. qRT-PCR was performed with SYBR Green Premix ExTaq (TaKaRa, Japan) using the CFX96 Touch™ real-time PCR Detection System (BioRad, USA). All the samples were analysed in triplicate, and fold changes in gene expression were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCT method [21].

Table 1. Primer sequences used for real-time RT-PCR.

Gene name Forward primer sequence (5’-3’) Reverse primer sequence (5’-3’)
FASN CGGTGACGCCACTCAACAAG GCACTGCAGGCCATAGCAAG
ACACB CTGGCCAAGATGGTGGGCTA CCTGCAGGCGAGGATTCAGT
ACSBG ATGTGTCACGGACGACAACG CTCCGACACCTTGGCTGCT
ATP6E TCGAGAAAGGTCGTCTGGTG TCCAAGTCTTTGACGAGCCT
CDC20 TTGGAGGGAAGCCGCTGAAT AGTCCTCCTCGCGCTCTAAC
CCNB CAGAGGTGCAGGTTCTGCCT ATGGCCCGCATGTTACCAGT
IGFBP1 CCCACATGATGCTCCCTTCT CGCAGGAGAAACTGAACGAC
β-actin ATCGCCGCACTGGTTGTTGAC CCTGTTGGCTTTGGGGTTC

Statistical analysis

Data pertaining to growth performance were analysed using SPSS 19.0 software, and one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and significance test were performed. The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Significance was accepted at the level of P < 0.05.

Results

Growth performance

The growth performance of the hybrid mandarin fish is shown in Fig 1. A comparison of data obtained at 30 and 90 days revealed that with the increase in domestication period, the survival rate of hybrid fish gradually decreased (Fig 1A). At the end of the training period, the survival rates of the fish was 60.00% (S2 Table). Before domestication, the mean total length (TL) and mean body weight (BW) were 5.82 ± 0.54 cm and 2.84 ± 0.65 g, respectively. After 3 months of breeding, their total length and body weight were 18.34 ± 0.43 cm and 100.44 ± 4.87 g (Fig 1C and 1D). The absolute length and weight gain rates were 0.14 cm/d and 1.08 g/d. Furthermore, these fish vary greatly in weight when the fish were counted at the end of the experiment (Fig 1B and S1 Table).

Fig 1. The growth performance of hybrid mandarin fish.

Fig 1

(A) The survival number of hybrid mandarin fish. (B) The morphology of domesticated hybrid mandarin fish. (C) The change of total length of hybrid mandarin fish. (D) The change of body weight of hybrid mandarin fish. IM, Initial Measurement (0 day). FM, Final Measurement (90days).

Sequencing and annotation of unigenes

After sequencing, 532.71 million paired-end reads (2 × 150 bp) and 80.44 billion bp were generated. After trimming and quality filtering, 526.65 million clean reads (98.86%) and 78.80 billion bp (97.96%) were obtained for the subsequent analyses. The number of clean reads per sample ranged from 46.12 to 56.58 million, with a mean of 52.67 million. The Q20 and Q30 values of all samples were approximately 98% and 94%, respectively, and the GC content was approximately 49%–50% (Table 2). An optimised assembly of the reads generated 68 197 transcripts and 45 871 unigenes, ranging from 201 to 24 264 bp, with an average length of 1472.99 bp. The N50 and E90N50 values of the obtained transcripts were 2324 and 2562 bp, respectively. Approximately 51% of the transcripts and 58% of the unigenes were distributed in the 0–1000 bp region (S1 Fig). A total of 45 871 unigenes were annotated against those in the six public databases (NR, Swiss-Prot, Pfam, COG, GO, and KEGG), using Blastx and Blastn. Among these unigenes, 21 039 (45.87%) were annotated in the NR, 17 911(39.05%) in the Swiss-Prot, 15 869 (34.59%) in the Pfam, 10 643(23.2%) in the COG, 6 187(13.49%) in the GO, and14 077(30.69%) in the KEGG databases.

Table 2. Summary of sequences analysis.

Sample Raw reads Raw bases Clean reads Clean bases Q20(%) Q30(%) GC content(%)
F1 46620884 7039753484 46118582 6906670060 97.98 93.95 49.18
F2 57149480 8629571480 56580896 8470705187 97.99 93.99 49.60
F3 55573022 8391526322 54997656 8228952151 97.99 94.00 49.36
F4 55056242 8313492542 54491194 8154164513 98.08 94.22 49.47
F5 56702058 8562010758 56105974 8393382060 98.04 94.13 49.55
S1 49655296 7497949696 49037308 7337067610 97.76 93.46 49.69
S2 53680550 8105763050 53094284 7942035364 97.93 93.85 49.57
S3 55210500 8336785500 54653148 8176427560 97.81 93.56 49.74
S4 51259504 7740185104 50524030 7559072542 97.78 93.51 50.11
S5 51798836 7821624236 51051630 7635673150 97.83 93.63 50.18
Total 532706372 80438662172 526654702 78804150197 --- --- ---

In the GO analysis, 30 400 unigenes (66.27%) had GO annotation, with 24.43% for molecular functions, 37.01% for cellular components, and 38.55% for biological processes. They were further assigned to 46 functional terms, and binding (3249 unigenes), catalytic activity (2497 unigenes), and cellular process (2489 unigenes) represented the major terms (Fig 2). Functional classification of the KEGG pathways provided a valuable resource for investigating specific processes and pathways in the liver of the hybrid mandarin fish. We mapped the 22 828 unigenes to the reference canonical pathways in the KEGG database to identify the biological pathways related to growth. They were classified into six main categories, comprising 43 main pathways. Human diseases was the largest category (6844 unigenes, 29.98%), followed by Organismal Systems (5669 unigenes, 24.83%) (S2 Fig).

Fig 2. Functional annotation of hybrid mandarin fish transcripts based on GO categorization.

Fig 2

Differential expression analysis and functional enrichment

We found a high number of unigenes with differential expression in the S vs. F groups. Differentially expressed genes with two-fold change in expression and adjusted p value < 0.05 were identified. We identified 1618 DEGS in the liver of the S vs. F groups, with 1025 up- and 593 down-regulated genes (Fig 3). The KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the DEGs showed that there were 20 pathway in five categories, among which cell cycle was the most significant pathway in the S vs. F groups after domestication (S3 Fig). This was followed by cell cycle, collecting duct acid secretion and fatty acid biosynthesis. Additionally, we identified the IGF system gene (IGFBP1) in the S vs. F groups. In all, we obtained 32 differentially expressed genes in the S vs. F groups (Fig 4 and S3 Table).

Fig 3. DEGs analysis and volcano plot for fast- (F) and slow-growth (S) groups of hybrid mandarin fish.

Fig 3

The x-axis is the value of Log2 (Fold Change), and the y-axis is the value of -Log10 (padjust). The red and blue dots reveal the up- and down-regulated DEGs, the black dots reveal non-significantly genes.

Fig 4. Hierarchical cluster analysis of DEGs involved in the growth superiority.

Fig 4

Red and blue gradients indicate the up- and down- regulation of DEGs, respectively.

SNP and SSR discovery

A large number of valuable and polymorphic markers were obtained from the RNA-Seq analysis. We detected 2 311 424 potential SNPs in the F group and 2 214 210 potential SNPs in S group (S4 Table). Transitions were more frequent than transversions among the identified SNPs. The frequency of A/G (26.23%) and T/C (25.90%) was the highest in transition and the frequency of A/T (14.30%) and T/A (14.20%) was the highest in transversion (Fig 5A). Additionally, we found 22 399 potential SSRs in 14 873 unigenes (32.42%). Most of the SSRs were mono-nucleotide (44.78%) and di-nucleotide repeats (36.27%) (Fig 5B). The mainly type repeat number of SSRs was 6–10 nucleotides.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

A, SNPs distribution in samples. The X-axis represents the type of SNP, and the y-axis represents the number of SNPs in different samples. B, the percentage of different SSR motifs. Different colors represent the number of different SSR types.

qRT-PCR validation

The qRT-PCR was performed to validate the data obtained by RNA-Seq. Seven genes (namely, ACACB, ACSBG, FASN, ATP6E, CCNB, CDC20, and IGFBP1) from various categories were selected for confirmation. The results showed that the data obtained by qPCR were basically consistent with those of the RNA-Seq analysis (Fig 6).

Fig 6. Validation of RNA-seq data by qRT-PCR.

Fig 6

(A) The RNA-seq data. (B) The qRT-PCR data. The values are the ratio of gene expression levels in the fast-growth group to those in the slow-growth group by the two methods.

Discussion

Fish domestication

Research on domestication of animals has been carried out for several years [22]. Environmental conditions significantly alter hybrids from wild types, and this considerably affects the efficiency of domestication. Some studies on the mechanism of animal domestication have been conducted [2325]. The domestication of fish with high commercial values can reduce labour force and cost, and also accelerate the development of aquaculture industry. So far, several fish have been domesticated, including some carnivorous fish [1, 26]; for example, Elopichthys bambusa [27], Epinephelus malabaricus [28], and Lateolabrax japonicus [29].

In recent years, some studies have been performed on the domestication for mandarin fish [1, 2, 30, 31]. It is confirmed that fish size, breeding density, starvation time, and artificial feed quality are closely related to the efficiency of mandarin fish culture [32]. In this study, the survival rates of mandarin fish was 60.00% at the end of the training period. The mortality of fish was mainly due to illness and swallow cause of individual differences. Here, we found that the growth performance of domesticated fish varied widely under the same feeding conditions, that would lead weak individuals are restricted by the strong individuals. Some behaviours in fish have a genetic basis, and therefore, the fish can respond to domestication selection. Different feeding conditions can lead to growth differences [1]. A previous study reported that sensory modality and associative learning appear to be critical factors in food conversion in fish [31]. Interestingly, domestication caused behaviour and brain size changes in clonal Oncorhynchus mykiss lines [25].

Differentially expressed genes of growth

Growth trait is of great economic importance for all species used in aquaculture. Fast-growth fish are more profitable than slow-growth fish, as it can accelerate the production. Previous studies have revealed the unique mechanisms controlling food preference in the mandarin fish, involving retinal photosensitivity, circadian rhythm, appetite control, learning and memory, and SNP abundance [2]. Here, we found that the growth of hybrid mandarin fish varied greatly in the later stages during the feeding experiment for 3 months. RNA-Seq was performed to identify genes associated with the difference in growth performance. We identified potential DEGs, mainly involved in fatty acid biosynthesis, collecting duct acid secretion, cell cycle and IGF system (Fig 7).

Fig 7. The predicted map of DEGs regulated growth superiority.

Fig 7

Red and purple represent the up- and down-regulation of DEGs, respectively.

Fatty acid biosynthesis

In animals, fatty acids (FAs) play an important role in several physiological processes, and the majority of complex lipid molecules are derived by the transformation of FAs through several biochemical pathways. Acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACACA) and fatty acid synthase (FASN) are crucial rate-limiting enzymes, and they play a crucial role in weight difference in the abdominal adipose tissue in growing animals [33]. Four genes involved in the FA biosynthesis pathway, namely, ACACA, ACACB, ACSBG, and FASN, were differentially expressed in the S vs. F groups of hybrid mandarin fish in our study. The highest expression of ACACA was observed in lipogenic tissues such as the liver and adipose tissue [34]. ACACB was significantly associated with milk yield, fat yield, fat percentage, protein yield, and protein percentage [35]. ACSBG is important for the lipid metabolism pathway in vertebrates [36]. FASN plays an important role in FA metabolism, and variation in FASN expression has been reported to be associated with both fat and meat traits [37]. Taken together, changes in the expression levels of these fatty acid biosynthesis-related genes in the F and S groups of mandarin fish might affect their growth.

Collecting duct acid secretion

H-K-ATPases are integral membrane proteins of the collecting duct, a segment critical for the final regulation of electrolyte excretion and bicarbonate (HCO3) synthesis and reabsorption [38, 39]. It has been shown that H(+)-K(+)-ATPase mediates net acid secretion in rat terminal inner medullary collecting duct [40]. In animals, CA2 can interconvert carbon dioxide and bicarbonate to maintain acid–base balance in the blood and other tissues, and to help transport carbon dioxide out of tissues (carbonic anhydrase-like isoform X2, CA2). KCC4 mediates potassium and chloride exit from cells, and it might play an important role in salt absorption via the distal convoluted tubule [41]. SLC4A1 plays a central role in CO2 transport, and it is the major glucose transporter in human erythrocytes [42]. In our study, the expression of ATP6E and KCC4 was significantly higher in fast-growth fish than in slow-growth fish, potentially contributing to acid secretion by the collecting duct.

Cell cycle

A previous study has shown that CCNB1/CDK1-mediated phosphorylation provides cells the energy for G2/M transition and shortens the overall cell cycle duration, and thus, plays an important role in the cell cycle and proliferation [43]. CDC20 can promote the proliferation of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma [44]. Moreover, overexpression of CDK1, CCNB1, CDC20, BUB1, MAD2L1, and BUB1B in tumour tissues could increase cell proliferation and division [45]. DMBT1 links mucosal defence and epithelial regeneration [46]. Esp1 expression is localised to the mitotic spindle during anaphase [47]. Innormal hepatocytes, Gadd45β facilitates cell survival, growth, and proliferation [48]. Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) is a serine/threonine kinase that is involved in the G2/M phase transition in the cell cycle in vertebrates [49]. TTK functions as a key regulator of spindle pole assembly, meiosis, DNA damage response, and cytokinesis [50]. In the present study, we found that the expression of 21 cell cycle-related genes was higher in the fast-growth fish than in the slow-growth fish; the up-regulation of these genes could influence cell proliferation and differentiation in mandarin fish.

IGF system

The IGF system plays a pivotal role in the regulation of growth. IGFBPs are important regulatory factors in the IGF system. They are mainly synthesised by the liver. Previous research has indicated that IGFBPs can inhibit and/or potentiate IGF activities depending on the physiological context [51, 52]. Under some conditions, IGFBP1 can also enhance IGF function rather than inhibit it. For instance, IGFBP1 potently promoted β-cell regeneration by potentiating α- to β-cell transdifferentiation in zebrafish [53]. Moreover, hypoxia significantly up-regulated hepatic Igfbp1 expression in the liver [54]. In the present study, we observed a higher expression of IGFBP1 in the fast-growth fish than in the slow-growth fish. Similar results have been reported in hybrid grouper, suggesting the gene related to the GH/IGF axis might play an important role in growth superiority of the hybrid fish [55].

Single nucleotide polymorphisms and simple sequence repeats

RNA-Seq technology has been effectively applied to develop molecular markers in fish [6]. High-quality transcriptomes and a large set of gene-linked SNPs would facilitate functional and population genomic studies in endangered species [56]. Studies on molecular markers in mandarin fish have been conducted, including food habit domestication traits (SNP) [30], growth traits (SNP) [57] and SSR [58], and population genetic analysis (SSR) [59]. These studies were performed in S. chuatsi. Furthermore, 40 polymorphic SSR markers have been developed and characterised in S. scherzeri [60]. In the present study, numerous SNPs and SSRs were detected. The number of SNPs in the F group was significantly higher than that in the S group. It has been confirmed that abundant variant alleles are closely linked to food preference [2]. Moreover, the main types of SSRs were 6–10 mono and di-nucleotide repeats. These markers will be useful for diversity, mapping, and marker-assisted studies in mandarin fish (S1 File) [59].

Conclusions

In the present study, new hybrid mandarin fish were raised for 3 months on an artificial feed containing 40% fish meat. The results showed that using appropriate methods can obtain better domestication effect, although the growth performance of domesticated fish varied widely under the same feeding conditions. The liver transcriptome analysis revealed that fatty acid biosynthesis, collecting duct acid secretion, cell cycle, IGF system, SNPs and SSRs were closely related to the growth of hybrid mandarin fish after food conversion. These results of transcriptome analysis will increase our understanding of the molecular mechanism involved in growth differences caused by food conversion. Future studies should focus on specific molecular markers related to growth and domestication in order to accelerate the process of domestication and breeding of mandarin fish.

Supporting information

S1 Table. The detailed sample information of hybrid mandarin fish.

(DOC)

S2 Table. The domestication rate and survival rate of hybrid mandarin fish.

(DOC)

S3 Table. The data of DEGs in the S vs. F groups of hybrid mandarin fish.

(DOC)

S4 Table. The SNP types information of hybrid mandarin fish.

(DOC)

S1 File. The SNP information for growth-related genes of hybrid mandarin fish.

(XLS)

S1 Fig. Length distribution of transcripts / unigenes of hybrid mandarin fish.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Functional annotation of hybrid mandarin fish transcripts based on KEGG categorization.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. The KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the DEGs.

The y-axis represents the KEGG pathway, and the x-axis represents the significance level of enrichment. Different colors represent 7 branches of the KEGG metabolic pathway, containing cellular processes (CP), metabolism (M), organismal systems (OS), environmental information processing (EIP), human diseases (HD).

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We show appreciation to Shanghai Majorbio Company for the dynamic help provided during the analysis of the sequencing data.

Data Availability

The RNA sequencing data for this study can be found in the Short Read Archive (SRA) of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under the accession numbers PRJNA610675. Online at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA610675.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Youth Talent Development Plan of Shanghai Municipal Agricultural System, China (Grant No. 20180303), and the Shanghai Agriculture Applied Technology Development Program, China (Grant No.Z20170204). This funding body has no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Li Y, L JZ, Lu JT, Li Z, Shi SC, Liu ZJ. Effects of live and artificial feeds on the growth, digestion, immunity and intestinal microflora ofmandarin fish hybrid (Siniperca chuatsi ♀×Siniperca scherzeri ♂). Aquaculture Research. 2017; (48): 4479–85. 10.1111/are.13273 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.He S, Liang XF, Sun J, Li L, Yu Y, Huang W, et al. Insights into food preference in hybrid F1 of Siniperca chuatsi (♀) x Siniperca scherzeri (♂) mandarin fish through transcriptome analysis. BMC Genomics. 2013; (14): 601 10.1186/1471-2164-14-601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tao JJ, Gui JF, Zhang QY. Isolation and characterization of a rhabdovirus from co-infection of two viruses in mandarin fish. Aquaculture. 2007; (262): 1–9. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.09.030 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu F, Guan W, Z., Wang C, L. Comparative analysis of domestication and growth of two hybrid mandarin fish. Fisheries Science and Technology Information. 2019; 46(6): 324–7. 10.16446/j.cnki.1001-1994.2019.06.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bilyk KT, Cheng CH. Model of gene expression in extreme cold—reference transcriptome for the high-Antarctic cryopelagic notothenioid fish Pagothenia borchgrevinki. BMC Genomics. 2013; 14: 634 10.1186/1471-2164-14-634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fang DA, Zhou YF, Duan JR, Zhang MY, Xu DP, Liu K, et al. Screening potential SSR markers of the anadromous fish Coilia nasus by de novo transcriptome analysis using Illumina sequencing. Genet Mol Res. 2015; 14(4): 14181–8. 10.4238/2015.November.13.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gomes F, Watanabe L, Vianez J, Nunes M, Cardoso J, Lima C, et al. Comparative analysis of the transcriptome of the Amazonian fish species Colossoma macropomum (tambaqui) and hybrid tambacu by next generation sequencing. PLoS One. 2019; 14(2): e0212755 10.1371/journal.pone.0212755 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hu P, Liu M, Liu Y, Wang J, Zhang D, Niu H, et al. Transcriptome comparison reveals a genetic network regulating the lower temperature limit in fish. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 28952 10.1038/srep28952 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kang J, Ma X, He S. Evidence of high-altitude adaptation in the glyptosternoid fish, Creteuchiloglanis macropterus from the Nujiang River obtained through transcriptome analysis. BMC Evol Biol. 2017; 17(1): 229 10.1186/s12862-017-1074-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Palstra AP, Beltran S, Burgerhout E, Brittijn SA, Magnoni LJ, Henkel CV, et al. Deep RNA sequencing of the skeletal muscle transcriptome in swimming fish. PLoS One. 2013; 8(1): e53171 10.1371/journal.pone.0053171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Qi D, Chao Y, Wu R, Xia M, Chen Q, Zheng Z. Transcriptome Analysis Provides Insights Into the Adaptive Responses to Hypoxia of a Schizothoracine Fish (Gymnocypris eckloni). Front Physiol. 2018; 9: 1326 10.3389/fphys.2018.01326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sudhagar A, Kumar G, El-Matbouli M. Transcriptome Analysis Based on RNA-Seq in Understanding Pathogenic Mechanisms of Diseases and the Immune System of Fish: A Comprehensive Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19(1). 10.3390/ijms19010245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liu H, Lamm MS, Rutherford K, Black MA, Godwin JR, Gemmell NJ. Large-scale transcriptome sequencing reveals novel expression patterns for key sex-related genes in a sex-changing fish. Biol Sex Differ. 2015; 6: 26 10.1186/s13293-015-0044-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011; 29(7): 644–52. 10.1038/nbt.1883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Smith-Unna R, Boursnell C, Patro R, Hibberd JM, Kelly S. TransRate: reference-free quality assessment of de novo transcriptome assemblies. Genome Res. 2016; 26(8): 1134–44. 10.1101/gr.196469.115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li W, Godzik A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2006; 22(13): 1658–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Simao FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31(19): 3210–2. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li B, Dewey CN. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011; 12: 323 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014; 15(12): 550 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Klopfenstein DV, Zhang L, Pedersen BS, Ramirez F, Warwick Vesztrocy A, Naldi A, et al. GOATOOLS: A Python library for Gene Ontology analyses. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1): 10872 10.1038/s41598-018-28948-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001; 25(4): 402–8. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jensen P. Behavior genetics and the domestication of animals. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2014; 2: 85–104. 10.1146/annurev-animal-022513-114135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wright D, Ward AJ, Croft DP, Krause J. Social organization, grouping, and domestication in fish. Zebrafish. 2006; 3(2): 141–55. 10.1089/zeb.2006.3.141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kaiser S, Hennessy MB, Sachser N. Domestication affects the structure, development and stability of biobehavioural profiles. Front Zool. 2015; 12(Suppl 1): S19 10.1186/1742-9994-12-S1-S19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Campbell JM, Carter PA, Wheeler PA, Thorgaard GH. Aggressive behavior, brain size and domestication in clonal rainbow trout lines. Behav Genet. 2015; 45(2): 245–54. 10.1007/s10519-014-9696-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lorenzen K, Beveridge MC, Mangel M. Cultured fish: integrative biology and management of domestication and interactions with wild fish. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2012; 87(3): 639–60. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00215.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hu P P., Fan Q X., Liu R P., Zhao Z B. Effects of initial stocking density on weaning and growth of juvenile yellowcheek carp (Elopichthys bambusa R). Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University. 2014; 33(04): 106–11. 10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.2014.04.019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang JG, Qiao ZG, Yu ZL. Elementary Study on Rearing Juvenile of Elineophelelus malabaricus (Bloch et Schneider) by Different Diets. Modern Fisheries Information. 2009; 24(5): 28–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xu H, Liao Z, Wang C, Wei Y, Liang M. Hepatic transcriptome of the euryhaline teleost Japanese seabass (Lateolabrax japonicus) fed diets characterized by alpha-linolenic acid or linoleic acid. Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics. 2019; 29: 106–16. 10.1016/j.cbd.2018.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sun J, He S, Liang XF, Li L, Wen Z, Zhu T, et al. Identification of SNPs in NPY and LEP and the association with food habit domestication traits in mandarin fish. J Genet. 2014; 93(3): e118–22. 10.1007/s12041-014-0442-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liang XF, OKu H, Ogata HY, Liu J, He X. Weaning Chinese perch Siniperca chuatsi (Basilewsky) onto arti®cial diets based upon its specific sensory modality in feeding. Aquaculture Research. 2001; 32: 76–82. 10.1046/j.1355-557x.2001.00006.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang L, Wang YJ, Hu MH, Fan QX, Chenung SG, Shin PK, et al. Effects of the timing of initial feeding on growth and survival of spotted mandarin fish Siniperca scherzeri larvae. J Fish Biol. 2009; 75(6): 1158–72. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02328.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pitel F, Fillon V, Heimel C, Le Fur N, el Khadir-Mounier C, Douaire M, et al. Mapping of FASN and ACACA on two chicken microchromosomes disrupts the human 17q syntenic group well conserved in mammals. Mamm Genome. 1998; 9(4): 297–300. 10.1007/s003359900752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hu G, Wang S, Tian J, Chu L, Li H. Epistatic effect between ACACA and FABP2 gene on abdominal fat traits in broilers. J Genet Genomics. 2010; 37(8): 505–12. 10.1016/S1673-8527(09)60070-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Han B, Liang W, Liu L, Li Y, Sun D. Genetic association of the ACACB gene with milk yield and composition traits in dairy cattle. Anim Genet. 2018; 49(3): 169–77. 10.1111/age.12651 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lopes-Marques M, Machado AM, Ruivo R, Fonseca E, Carvalho E, Castro LFC. Expansion, retention and loss in the Acyl-CoA synthetase "Bubblegum" (Acsbg) gene family in vertebrate history. Gene. 2018; 664: 111–8. 10.1016/j.gene.2018.04.058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Renaville B, Bacciu N, Lanzoni M, Mossa F, Piasentier E. Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in fat metabolism candidate genes with fatty acid profiles of muscle and subcutaneous fat in heavy pigs. Meat Sci. 2018; 139: 220–7. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lynch IJ, Greenlee MM, Gumz ML, Rudin A, Xia SL, Wingo CS. Heterogeneity of H-K-ATPase-mediated acid secretion along the mouse collecting duct. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010; 298(2): F408–15. 10.1152/ajprenal.00333.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lynch IJ, Rudin A, Xia SL, Stow LR, Shull GE, Weiner ID, et al. Impaired acid secretion in cortical collecting duct intercalated cells from H-K-ATPase-deficient mice: role of HKalpha isoforms. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008; 294(3): F621–7. 10.1152/ajprenal.00412.2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wall SM, Truong AV, DuBose TD Jr. H(+)-K(+)-ATPase mediates net acid secretion in rat terminal inner medullary collecting duct. Am J Physiol. 1996; 271(5 Pt 2): F1037–44. 10.1152/ajprenal.1996.271.5.F1037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Velazquez H, Silva T. Cloning and localization of KCC4 in rabbit kidney: expression in distal convoluted tubule. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2003; 285(1): F49–58. 10.1152/ajprenal.00389.2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Toye AA, Van Hest BJ, Sheldon BL, Moran C. Linkage between growth hormone (GH1) and solute carrier family 4 anion exchanger member 1 (SLC4A1) is conserved between birds and mammals. Anim Genet. 1997; 28(6): 457–8. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.1997.tb03296.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang Z, Fan M, Candas D, Zhang TQ, Qin L, Eldridge A, et al. Cyclin B1/Cdk1 coordinates mitochondrial respiration for cell-cycle G2/M progression. Dev Cell. 2014; 29(2): 217–32. 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.03.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chu Z, Zhang X, Li Q, Hu G, Lian CG, Geng S. CDC20 contributes to the development of human cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma through the Wnt/betacatenin signaling pathway. Int J Oncol. 2019; 54(5): 1534–44. 10.3892/ijo.2019.4727 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yang WX, Pan YY, You CG. CDK1, CCNB1, CDC20, BUB1, MAD2L1, MCM3, BUB1B, MCM2, and RFC4 May Be Potential Therapeutic Targets for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Integrated Bioinformatic Analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2019; 2019: 1245072 10.1155/2019/1245072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kang W, Reid KB. DMBT1, a regulator of mucosal homeostasis through the linking of mucosal defense and regeneration? FEBS Lett. 2003; 540(1–3): 21–5. 10.1016/s0014-5793(03)00217-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Baskerville C, Segal M, Reed SI. The protease activity of yeast separase (esp1) is required for anaphase spindle elongation independently of its role in cleavage of cohesin. Genetics. 2008; 178(4): 2361–72. 10.1534/genetics.107.085308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tian J, Locker J. Gadd45 in the liver: signal transduction and transcriptional mechanisms. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013; 793: 69–80. 10.1007/978-1-4614-8289-5_5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Matsuoka Y, Kobayashi T, Kihara K, Nagahama Y. Molecular cloning of Plk1 and Nek2 and their expression in mature gonads of the teleost fish Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Mol Reprod Dev. 2008; 75(6): 989–1001. 10.1002/mrd.20843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Liu XD, Yao DW, Xin F. TTK contributes to tumor growth and metastasis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma by inducing cell proliferation and invasion. Neoplasma. 2019; 66(6): 946–53. 10.4149/neo_2019_190207N109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Safian D, Fuentes EN, Valdes JA, Molina A. Dynamic transcriptional regulation of autocrine/paracrine igfbp1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 in the skeletal muscle of the fine flounder during different nutritional statuses. J Endocrinol. 2012; 214(1): 95–108. 10.1530/JOE-12-0057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Duan C, Xu Q. Roles of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding proteins in regulating IGF actions. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2005; 142(1–2): 44–52. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2004.12.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lu J, Liu KC, Schulz N, Karampelias C, Charbord J, Hilding A, et al. IGFBP1 increases beta-cell regeneration by promoting alpha- to beta-cell transdifferentiation. EMBO J. 2016; 35(18): 2026–44. 10.15252/embj.201592903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zhang S, Zhao Y, Hu X, Liu Z, Chen X, Chen X, et al. Distinct post-transcriptional regulation of Igfbp1 gene by hypoxia in lowland mouse and Qinghai-Tibet plateau root vole Microtus oeconomus. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2013; 376(1–2): 33–42. 10.1016/j.mce.2013.05.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sun Y, Guo CY, Wang DD, Li XF, Xiao L, Zhang X, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals the molecular mechanisms underlying growth superiority in a novel grouper hybrid (Epinephelus fuscogutatus ♀ x E. lanceolatus ♂). BMC Genet. 2016; 17: 24 10.1186/s12863-016-0328-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Garcia G, Rios N, Gutierrez V, Serra S, Loureiro M. Transcriptome-Based SNP Discovery and Validation in the Hybrid Zone of the Neotropical Annual Fish Genus Austrolebias. Genes (Basel). 2019; 10(10). 10.3390/genes10100789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sun CF, Sun HL, Dong JJ, Tian YY, Hu J, Ye X. Correlation analysis of mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi) growth hormone gene polymorphisms and growth traits. J Genet. 2019; 98(2). 10.1007/s12041-019-1100-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sun LF, Li J, Liang XF, Yi TL, Fang L, Sun J, et al. Microsatellite DNA markers and their correlation with growth traits in mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi). Genet Mol Res. 2015; 14(4): 19128–35. 10.4238/2015.December.29.22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tian CX, Liang XF, Yang M, Dou YQ, Zheng HZ, Cao L, et al. New microsatellite loci for the mandarin fish Siniperca chuatsi and their application in population genetic analysis. Genet Mol Res. 2014; 13(1): 546–58. 10.4238/2014.January.22.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Dou YQ, Liang XF, Yang M, Tian CX, He S, Guo WJ. Isolation and characterization of polymorphic EST-SSR and genomic SSR markers in spotted mandarin fish (Siniperca scherzeri Steindachne). Genet Mol Res. 2015; 14(4): 19317–22. 10.4238/2015.December.29.41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Tzong-Yueh Chen

12 Aug 2020

PONE-D-20-17403

Transcriptome analysis of the growth performance of hybrid mandarin fish after food conversion

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Guan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

1. The data cannot support the conclusions. PLOS ONE is designed to communicate primary scientific research,

and welcome submissions in any applied discipline that will contribute to the base of scientific knowledge. But

the data of this manuscript cannot support the conclusions.

2. This manuscript has the statistical analysis problem.

3. This manuscript needs to adhere the PLOS Data Policy. The authors need to make all methods, materials and

data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available.

4. There are concerns needed to be addressed and some descriptions need to be clarified. The revised manuscript needs to address each of the comments of the reviewers.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 26 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Tzong-Yueh Chen, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.  

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

  • The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

  • A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

  • A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The author wants to use the transcriptomic analysis to compare the differences in the molecular mechanism between individuals with different growth performance after domestication (food conversion), and to identify SNPs that may be related to this as a benchmark for subsequent selection. But the experimental design has many doubts as follows: First, the author should emphasize the selection criteria of the broodstock, otherwise the differences between the broodstock individuals may affect the representative meaning of the offspring. Second, in the process of domestication, the cannibalism might be occurred due to size selection of fish was not performed. Thus, the better growth performance might be due to eat more. Just like the author said the behavior might have a genetic basis, but the results are focused on growth performance instead of behavior. If the author wants to emphasize the growth performance, it is recommended that the experimental design should be rearrangement. For example, size sorting should be carried out during the domestication process, or the fish fry that has been domesticated with the same size should be selected for another growth experiment. In my opinion, the result will be more representative. There are, however a few inconsistencies that require further explanations or changes prior to publication in PLOS ONE.

Results:

Figure 1A and C: The result of 1A is not represented survival rate. The initial length of fish in Fig. 1C is between 5.69-5.92 cm, which is inconsistent of that mentioned in materials and methods.

Figure 6: The calculation method of fold change in RNA-seq and qRT-PCR is different. It is suggested that the FC results of two analyses should be separated. By the way, the FC results of CDC20 are different in these two analyses. In addition, “RNA-sep” should be changed to “RNA-seq”.

Furthermore, there are some typos in the indicated lines as follows:

Line 107, “De novo” should be italicized.

Line 132, There is an extra space between control and mainly.

Line 141, “Date” should be changed to “Data”.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript (PONE-D-20-17403) entitled "Transcriptome analysis of the growth performance of hybrid mandarin fish after food conversion" which submitted to PLOS ONE by Guan WZ et al. has been reviewed.

The author used artificial feed to raise hybrid mandarin fish for 3 months, and measured the food conversion rate, survival rate, total length, and body weight of the hybrid fish, absolute length and weight gain rate. Then use RNA-Seq to identify potential genes involved in the pathways activated growth performance. For example: fatty acid biosynthesis (FASN and ACACB), collection of duct acid secretion (ATP6E and KCC4), cell cycle (CDC20 and CCNB) and insulin-like growth factor (insulin) -like growth factor, IGF) system (IGFBP1) and other pathways may be related to the growth of mandarin fish. Finally, it was also found in fast-growth fish, more potential single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were detected than in slow-growing fish. However, there are still some problems with the experimental design and content of this manuscript, which need to be supplemented and further explained and clarified by the author.

Q1-

What is the breeding pattern and origin of “the fifth generation hybrid fish” mentioned in this manuscript material and method? Regarding the source and definition of breeding biological materials, it is necessary to ask the author to add more details in the manuscript.

Q2-

What is the control group for the measurement of food conversion rate, survival rate, total length, body weight, absolute length, and weight gain rate of hybrid fish? In theory, there should be non-hybrid pure breeds or hybrids of different generations for comparison. To use this to emphasize the advantages of hybrids, the author should add Siniperca chuatsi and Siniperca scherzeri two uncrossed pure breeds. It is the control group (triple group) and compares various growth and survival values.

Q3-

P156, Group1-3 in Figure 1(A) refers to the number of deaths at 0, 30, and 90 days in the triple-repeat population of the hybrid population. Why is there no 60-day data? It is impossible to understand why the author presented the triple-duplicate data of a hybrid species alone. What is the significance?

Q4-

Figure 1(C) and Figure 1(D) are the growth data of how many months old? It is suggested that the author should make up and give details.

Q5-

In order to make it easier for readers to understand, basically the author should provide the growth data or growth curve of the F and S groups at each month of age?

Q6-

Although the author mentioned in the manuscript that more potential single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are detected in fast-growth fish than in slow-growing fish. However, the author did not actually provide such comparative figures or tables in the manuscript.

Q7-

There are more potential single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) found in fast-growing fish. These nucleotide variation site markers are mainly located on those important growth genes. The authors also found in this result. No relevant research diagrams or tables are provided in this manuscript.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reviewer comments.docx

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 9;15(10):e0240308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240308.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


30 Aug 2020

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The author wants to use the transcriptomic analysis to compare the differences in the molecular mechanism between individuals with different growth performance after domestication (food conversion), and to identify SNPs that may be related to this as a benchmark for subsequent selection. But the experimental design has many doubts as follows: First, the author should emphasize the selection criteria of the broodstock, otherwise the differences between the broodstock individuals may affect the representative meaning of the offspring. Second, in the process of domestication, the cannibalism might be occurred due to size selection of fish was not performed. Thus, the better growth performance might be due to eat more. Just like the author said the behavior might have a genetic basis, but the results are focused on growth performance instead of behavior. If the author wants to emphasize the growth performance, it is recommended that the experimental design should be rearrangement. For example, size sorting should be carried out during the domestication process, or the fish fry that has been domesticated with the same size should be selected for another growth experiment. In my opinion, the result will be more representative. There are, however a few inconsistencies that require further explanations or changes prior to publication in PLOS ONE.

The selection criteria of the broodstock were the same in the experiment. H5 and S. chuatsi were used as male and female parents respectively, and they were all mature adults with small growth differences. In the manuscript, we have added the description as the reviewer suggested. (see line 79-82)

In fact, size sorting were carried out before the growth experiment. The methods are as follows: when hybrid mandarin fish grow to 3 cm, we start domesticating them with artificial feed. The successful food transition took approximately 15 days. After that, the untamed individuals will be eliminated. When successfully domesticated individuals reached about 5.5-6.0cm, 600 individuals of the same size were selected to continue the growth experiment.(see line 84-90)

Results:

Figure 1A and C: The result of 1A is not represented survival rate. The initial length of fish in Fig. 1C is between 5.69-5.92 cm, which is inconsistent of that mentioned in materials and methods.

As the reviewer mentioned, we have modified the Figure 1A. In addition, the ambiguous description in the MS may be puzzled the reviewer, the values (5.69-5.92 cm) in Fig 1C refers to the initial body length during the growth experiment, while the value (3 cm) in materials and methods refers to the body length at the beginning of domestication. Now, we have modified the descriptions in the corresponding section. (see line 84-90)

Figure 6: The calculation method of fold change in RNA-seq and qRT-PCR is different. It is suggested that the FC results of two analyses should be separated. By the way, the FC results of CDC20 are different in these two analyses. In addition, “RNA-sep” should be changed to “RNA-seq”.

As suggested, we have modified the Fig 6 and corrected the typo errors. The values of qRT-PCR is expressed the ratio of gene expression levels in the fast- growth group to those in the slow- growth group.

Furthermore, there are some typos in the indicated lines as follows:

Line 107, “De novo” should be italicized.

Line 132, There is an extra space between control and mainly.

Line 141, “Date” should be changed to “Data”.

As suggested, we have corrected the typos errors.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript (PONE-D-20-17403) entitled "Transcriptome analysis of the growth performance of hybrid mandarin fish after food conversion" which submitted to PLOS ONE by Guan WZ et al. has been reviewed.

The author used artificial feed to raise hybrid mandarin fish for 3 months, and measured the food conversion rate, survival rate, total length, and body weight of the hybrid fish, absolute length and weight gain rate. Then use RNA-Seq to identify potential genes involved in the pathways activated growth performance. For example: fatty acid biosynthesis (FASN and ACACB), collection of duct acid secretion (ATP6E and KCC4), cell cycle (CDC20 and CCNB) and insulin-like growth factor (insulin) -like growth factor, IGF) system (IGFBP1) and other pathways may be related to the growth of mandarin fish. Finally, it was also found in fast-growth fish, more potential single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were detected than in slow-growing fish. However, there are still some problems with the experimental design and content of this manuscript, which need to be supplemented and further explained and clarified by the author.

Q1-

What is the breeding pattern and origin of “the fifth generation hybrid fish” mentioned in this manuscript material and method? Regarding the source and definition of breeding biological materials, it is necessary to ask the author to add more details in the manuscript.

As suggested, we have added the breeding pattern and origin of “the fifth generation hybrid fish”in the MS. (see line75-79).

Q2-

What is the control group for the measurement of food conversion rate, survival rate, total length, body weight, absolute length, and weight gain rate of hybrid fish? In theory, there should be non-hybrid pure breeds or hybrids of different generations for comparison. To use this to emphasize the advantages of hybrids, the author should add Siniperca chuatsi and Siniperca scherzeri two uncrossed pure breeds. It is the control group (triple group) and compares various growth and survival values.

In our previous study, we have conducted the comparison experiments of hybrids F1 (S. scherzeri ♂× S. chuatsi ♀) and H6 (hybrid F5 ♂× S. chuatsi♀). The results showed that there was no significant difference in food conversion rate and survival rate (P > 0.05), however, the growth rate of H6 is 46.78% faster than that of F1 (P < 0.01) (Liu et al., 2019). In this study, we focus more on the growth differences in the hybrid fish after domestication, and the reason for this difference lies at the gene expression level.

Liu F, Guan W, Z., Wang C, L. Comparative analysis of domestication and growth of two hybrid mandarin fish. Fisheries Science and Technology Information. 2019; 46(6): 324-7.

Q3-

P156, Group1-3 in Figure 1(A) refers to the number of deaths at 0, 30, and 90 days in the triple-repeat population of the hybrid population. Why is there no 60-day data? It is impossible to understand why the author presented the triple-duplicate data of a hybrid species alone. What is the significance?

In fact, we counted the number of survivors every month, but the data of 60 days was missing in the data collation of the previous article . Thanks for your reminding, and now it has been added in Figure 1(A).

Q4-

Figure 1(C) and Figure 1(D) are the growth data of how many months old? It is suggested that the author should make up and give details.

Figure 1(C) and Figure 1(D) are the growth data of 0 day (Initial measurement) and 90 days (Final Measurement). AS suggested, we have added the details in MS (see line 166).

Q5-

In order to make it easier for readers to understand, basically the author should provide the growth data or growth curve of the F and S groups at each month of age?

As the reviewer mentioned, it would be nice to have the growth data at each month of age. But, the mandarin fish are timid and tend to hide. Each measurement can affect their eating situations in the next few days or even lead to death. Therefore, we only measured the pre-trial and post-trial growth data.

Q6-

Although the author mentioned in the manuscript that more potential single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are detected in fast-growth fish than in slow-growing fish. However, the author did not actually provide such comparative figures or tables in the manuscript.

As suggested, we have provided the corresponding table (See S4 table).

Q7-

There are more potential single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) found in fast-growing fish. These nucleotide variation site markers are mainly located on those important growth genes. The authors also found in this result. No relevant research diagrams or tables are provided in this manuscript.

As suggested, we have provided the corresponding table (See S1 File).

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviews.doc

Decision Letter 1

Tzong-Yueh Chen

24 Sep 2020

Transcriptome analysis of the growth performance of hybrid mandarin fish after food conversion

PONE-D-20-17403R1

Dear Dr. Guan,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Tzong-Yueh Chen, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have satisfactorily responded to my question and made the necessary changes to the manuscript. Thus, the revised version of the manuscript appears to be good for publishing in PLOS ONE.

Reviewer #2: The author has responded to related questions in the manuscript and actually provided supplementary information such as figures or tables.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Tzong-Yueh Chen

28 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-17403R1

Transcriptome analysis of the growth performance of hybrid mandarin fish after food conversion

Dear Dr. Guan:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Tzong-Yueh Chen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. The detailed sample information of hybrid mandarin fish.

    (DOC)

    S2 Table. The domestication rate and survival rate of hybrid mandarin fish.

    (DOC)

    S3 Table. The data of DEGs in the S vs. F groups of hybrid mandarin fish.

    (DOC)

    S4 Table. The SNP types information of hybrid mandarin fish.

    (DOC)

    S1 File. The SNP information for growth-related genes of hybrid mandarin fish.

    (XLS)

    S1 Fig. Length distribution of transcripts / unigenes of hybrid mandarin fish.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Functional annotation of hybrid mandarin fish transcripts based on KEGG categorization.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. The KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the DEGs.

    The y-axis represents the KEGG pathway, and the x-axis represents the significance level of enrichment. Different colors represent 7 branches of the KEGG metabolic pathway, containing cellular processes (CP), metabolism (M), organismal systems (OS), environmental information processing (EIP), human diseases (HD).

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewer comments.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviews.doc

    Data Availability Statement

    The RNA sequencing data for this study can be found in the Short Read Archive (SRA) of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under the accession numbers PRJNA610675. Online at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA610675.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES