Abstract
The rare-earth metal hydrides with clathrate structures have been highly attractive because of their promising high- superconductivity at high pressure. Recently, cerium hydride composed of Ce-encapsulated clathrate H cages was synthesized at much lower pressures of 80–100 GPa, compared to other experimentally synthesized rare-earth hydrides such as and . Based on density-functional theory calculations, we find that the Ce 5p semicore and 4f/5d valence states strongly hybridize with the H 1s state, while a transfer of electrons occurs from Ce to H atoms. Further, we reveal that the delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons plays an important role in the chemical precompression of clathrate H cages. Our findings not only suggest that the bonding nature between the Ce atoms and H cages is characterized as a mixture of ionic and covalent, but also have important implications for understanding the origin of enhanced chemical precompression that results in the lower pressures required for the synthesis of .
Subject terms: Superconducting properties and materials, Chemical physics
Introduction
In recent years, rare-earth metal hydrides have attracted much attention due to the possibility of their realization of room-temperature superconductivity (SC)1–8. First-principles density-functional theory (DFT) calculations together with the Migdal–Eliashberg formalism have predicted that rare-earth metal hydrides such as yttrium, lanthanum, cerium hydrides host high- SC at megabar pressures9,10, the origin of which is based on phonon-mediated electron pairing11. Subsequently, such a conventional SC of was experimentally observed with a superconducting transition temperature of 250–260 K at a pressure of 170 GPa3,4. This record of has been the highest temperature so far among experimentally available superconducting materials including cuprates12,13 and Fe-based superconductors14,15. Therefore, the experimental realization of room-temperature SC in has stimulated interests of the high- community towards compressed metal hydrides under high pressure16–23.
However, since the synthesis of was performed at 170 GPa3,4, it has been quite demanding to discover H-rich rare-earth hydrides synthesized at a moderate pressure below 100 GPa, which is easily and routinely achievable in the diamond anvil cell (DAC)24,25. Motivated by the first theoretical prediction9 of cerium hydride with a clathrate hydrogen cage structure, two experimental groups5,6 achieved its successful synthesis at a lower pressure of 80–100 GPa. X-ray diffraction measurements and DFT calculations5,6 confirmed the previously predicted9 crystal structure of , which adopts a hexagonal clathrate structure with the space group P6/mmc. Here, each Ce atom is surrounded by the cage consisting of 29 H atoms (see Fig. 1a). It is remarkable that the H–H bond lengths in are close to those of solid metallic hydrogen that can be produced at high pressure above 400 GPa26–29. Therefore, the discovery of having clathrate hydrogen networks suggests that the metallic state of solid hydrogen can be attained at relatively lower pressures by using binary hydrides with f-electron metals. It is noteworthy that the sizable reduction of H–H bond lengths in reflects the presence of a larger chemical precompression30–32 compared to other rare-earth metal hydrides such as and 9,10,33–37. However, the underlying mechanism of how the pressure required for the synthesis of is much reduced is yet to be identified.
Figure 1.

(a) Optimized structure of at 100 GPa and (b) hexagonal-close-packed (hcp) lattice of Ce atoms. Three different species of H atoms, , , and , exist in cage. The isolated cage surrounding a Ce atom is displayed in (c), together with its constituent parts, i.e., six tetragon rings, six pentagon rings, and six hexagon rings.
In this paper, we investigate the electronic structure and bonding properties of at high pressure using first-principles DFT calculations with the inclusion of Hubbard on-site Coulomb interaction. The calculated band structure of shows a strong hybridization of the Ce 5p semicore and 4f/5d valence states with the H 1s state. We reveal that the delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons contributes to yield a much larger chemical precompression of clathrate cages along the c axis than in the a–b plane. Despite a strong hybridization between the Ce- and H-derived electronic states, our Bader charge analysis shows a charge transfer from Ce to H atoms, thereby suggesting that the bonding nature between the Ce atoms and cages features the mixed ionic and covalent bonding. The present results provide new insight into understanding the underlying mechanism of the chemical precompression that requires relatively lower pressures for the synthesis of 5,6, compared to other experimentally synthesized rare-earth hydrides 3,4 and 7,8.
Results and discussion
We begin by optimizing the structure of using the PBE + U calculation. Figure 1a shows the optimized structure of at a pressure of 100 GPa, which is the same pressure employed in previous DAC experiments5,6. Here, Ce atoms form a hcp lattice (see Fig. 1b) with the lattice constants Å and Å, in good agreement with the experimental5,6 data of Å and Å. Meanwhile, the cage surrounding a Ce atom is constituted by six tetragon rings, six pentagon rings, and six hexagon rings (see Fig. 1c). Note that there are three species of H atoms [termed , , and in Fig. 1a composing the cage. We find that the , , , and bond lengths are 1.190, 1.486, 1.275, and 1.065 Å, respectively. These H–H bond lengths in are close to those (0.98 and 1.21 Å) predicted from metallic hydrogen at 500 GPa28. It is thus likely that the synthesized5,6 binary compound with the clathrate cages is able to generate H networks comparable to metallic hydrogen even at a low pressure of 100 GPa.
Figure 2a shows the calculated total charge density of . It is seen that H atoms in the cage are bonded to each other with covalent-like bonding. Here, the charge densities of H–H and Ce–H bonds exhibit the saddle-point characters at their midpoints, similar to that of the C–C covalent bond in diamond38. As shown in Fig. S1 in the Supplementary information, the calculated electron localization function also shows the covalent-like H–H and Ce–H bonds. The charge densities at the midpoints of the , , and bonds are 0.39, 0.56, and 0.85 e/Å, respectively. These values in are larger than the corresponding ones (0.32, 0.45, and 0.76 e/Å in Fig. 2b) obtained from the isolated cages whose structure is taken from the optimized structure of . This result implies that the H–H covalent bonds in are strengthened by a charge transfer from Ce to H atoms. Interestingly, the electrical charges of Ce and H atoms are connected to each other, reflecting a covalent-like bonding character. It is noteworthy that the charge densities at the points marked “” (in Fig. 2a) between Ce and // atoms are close to that at the midpoint of the bond. This covalent nature of Ce–H bonds is attributed to a strong hybridization between the Ce and H electronic states, as discussed below.
Figure 2.

Calculated total charge density of (a) and (b) isolated cages. The saddle points of charge densities between Ce and // atoms are marked “” in (a). The charge densities in (a) and (b) are plotted on the (110) plane with the contour spacings of 0.07 e/Å. The charge density difference (defined in the text) is displayed in (c), with the contour spacing of 0.03 e/Å. The Bader basins of Ce and H atoms are displayed in (d).
To examine the charge transfer between Ce to H atoms, we calculate the charge density difference, defined as = − − , where and represent the charge densities of the isolated Ce lattice (Fig. 1b) and the isolated cages (Fig. 2b), respectively. As shown in Fig. 2c, illustrates how electronic charge is transferred from Ce to H atoms. It is seen that the charge transfer occurs mostly from Ce to and . Meanwhile, the charge transfer from Ce to is minor. We further calculate the Bader charges39 of to estimate the number of transferred electrons between Ce and H atoms. Figure 2d shows the Bader basins of the constituent atoms, obtained from the gradient of 39. We find that the calculated Bader charges of Ce, , , and basins are (including the semicore electrons), , , and , respectively. Thus, we can say that Ce atoms lose electrons of 2.53e per atom, while , , and atoms gain electrons of 0.34e, 0.31e, 0.09e per atom, respectively.
In Fig. 3a, we display the calculated band structure of , together with the local density of states (LDOS) for Ce and H atoms. The narrow bands located at 2 eV above originate from Ce 4f electrons, while those located at around −20 eV below are associated with Ce 5p semicore electrons. It is noticeable that the LDOS shape of Ce atoms is very similar to that of H atoms in the energy range between −15 eV and , indicating a strong hybridization between Ce and H electronic states. In order to resolve the orbital characters of electronic states, we plot the partial density of states (PDOS) projected onto the Ce 5p-semicore and 4f/5d-valence states and the H 1s state in Fig. 3b. We find that the Ce 5p-semicore states are extended upward to reach up to , while the 4f- and 5d-valence states are distributed downward to about −10 and −13 eV below , respectively. Hence, these delocalized semicore and valence states hybridize well with the H 1s state. Such a strong hybridization between Ce and H electrons is likely associated with the Ce-encapsulated spherical H-cage structure of . Consequently, the electron charges of Ce and H atoms show covalent characteristics between the Ce and // atoms (see the “” points in Fig. 2a). Based on this covalent feature of the Ce–H bonds and the charge transfer from Ce to H atoms, we can say that the bonding nature between the Ce atoms to cages is characterized as a mixture of ionic and covalent.
Figure 3.
(a) Calculated band structure of together with the LDOS for Ce and H atoms. The energy zero represents . The PDOS of is also given in (b).
As mentioned above, the synthesis of requires much lower pressures 80–100 GPa5,6 compared to that (170 GPa) for the synthesis of 3,4, indicating the variation of chemical precompression with respect to the occupation of f electrons. Here, we note that Ce atom with the electron configuration [Xe]456 has one 4f electron, while La atom with [Xe]56 represents no occupation of f orbitals. It is thus expected that the lower synthesis pressure of would be caused by the presence of the delocalized Ce 4f states (see Fig. 3b). To confirm how the delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons contributes to the chemical precompression of cages, we optimize the structure of as a function of pressure using the f-core scheme, where Ce 4f electrons are considered as core electrons. Therefore, the interactions of 4f electrons with valence electrons are completely removed to simulate the localized nature of 4f electrons40. The band structure and PDOS of calculated using the f-core scheme are displayed in Fig. S2. We find that the band dispersions of the Ce 5d and H 1s states change largely around because their hybridizations with the Ce 4f states are avoided in the f-core scheme. In Fig. 4a, the lattice parameters computed using the f-core scheme are compared with those of the f-valence scheme as well as the experimental data5. We find that in the pressure range between 100 and 160 GPa, both the f-core and f-valence schemes predict similar values for a and b, close to the experimental values5. However, the f-core scheme predicts larger c values than the f-valence scheme and experiment5 by 6% in the same pressure range. As a result, in contrast to both the f-valence scheme and experiment5, the f-core scheme gives relatively larger values of the c/a ratio between 100 and 160 GPa (see Fig. 4b). These results indicate that the delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons plays an important role in determining the chemical precompression along the c axis, while it hardly affects the chemical precompression in the a–b plane.
Figure 4.
(a) Calculated lattice constants of as a function of pressure using the f-valence scheme, in comparison with those obtained using the f-core scheme and experiment5. The resulting c/a ratios as a function of pressure are also given in (b).
In order to check whether the localized/delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons influences the dynamical stability of , we calculate the phonon spectrum at 100 GPa using both the f-core and f-valence schemes. The calculated phonon spectrum of the f-core scheme exhibits imaginary frequencies in the whole Brillouin zone [see Fig. S3(a) in the Supplementary information], indicating that is dynamically unstable. On the other hand, the f-valence scheme shows that is dynamically stable without any imaginary-frequency phonon mode [see Fig. S3(b)]. Therefore, we can say that the delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons is necessary for stabilizing the clathrate structure of .
Conclusion
Our first-principles DFT + U calculations for have shown that (i) the Ce 5p semicore and 4f/5d valence states strongly hybridize with the H 1s state, (ii) the charge transfer occurs mostly from Ce to and atoms, and (iii) the delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons is an essential ingredient in the chemical precompression of clathrate cages. The present results not only suggest that the bonding nature between the Ce atoms and H cages is characterized as a mixture of ionic and covalent, but also provide an explanation for the enhanced chemical precompression in . We thus proposed that the large chemical precompression of H-rich clathrate structures can be attained in rare-earth hydrides with delocalized 4f electrons. It is noteworthy that, according to DFT calculations, 16 with clathrate H cages begins to destabilize at a pressure below about 100 GPa, which is relatively lower than that (226 GPa) of 36. These different destabilization pressures of and are likely to reflect the variation of chemical precompression, due to the influence of delocalized f electrons. Indeed, was experimentally synthesized at a pressure of 100 GPa16. We also note that containing no f electrons begins to destabilize at a pressure below 72 GPa, which is much lower than that (226 GPa) of 36. Here, the different stabilization pressures of and were explained36 in terms of the size of Y atom: i.e., having denser, larger hydrogen cages with shorter H–H distances requires a higher stabilization pressure.
Methods
Our DFT calculations were performed using the Vienna ab initio simulation package with the projector-augmented wave method41–43. For the exchange-correlation energy, we employed the generalized-gradient approximation functional of Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE)44. The 55 semicore electrons of Ce atom were included in the electronic-structure calculations. For Ce 4f electrons, we considered the effective on-site Coulomb interaction of (=U) = 4 eV, where the Hubbard parameter U is 4.5 eV and the exchange interaction parameter J is 0.5 eV5. A plane-wave basis was used with a kinetic energy cutoff of 1000 eV. The -space integration was done with 12128 k points for the structure optimization and 242416 k points for the DOS calculation. All atoms were allowed to relax along the calculated forces until all the residual force components were less than 0.005 eV/Å. Phonon calculations were preformed by a finite displacement method with the PHONOPY code45.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean Government (Grants No. 2019R1A2C1002975, No. 2016K1A4A3914691, and No. 2015M3D1A1070609). The calculations were performed by the KISTI Supercomputing Center through the Strategic Support Program (Program No. KSC-2019-CRE-0183) for the supercomputing application research.
Author contributions
H.J., C.W., and S.Y. contributed equally to this work. J.H.C. designed the research; H.J. and C.W. performed the theoretical calculations; all the authors analyzed the data and wrote the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-73665-1.
References
- 1.Bi, T., Zarifi, N., Terpstra, T. & Zurek, E. The Search for Superconductivity in High Pressure Hydrides (Reference Module in Chemistry, Molecular Science and Chemical Engineering, 2020).
- 2.Flores-Livas JA, et al. A perspective on conventional high-temperature superconductors at high pressure: Methods and materials. Phys. Rep. 2020;856:1. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Somayazulu M, et al. Evidence for superconductivity above 260 K in lanthanum superhydride at megabar pressures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;122:027001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.027001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Drozdov AP, et al. Superconductivity at 250 K in lanthanum hydride under high pressures. Nature. 2019;569:528. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1201-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Li X, et al. Polyhydride with an atomic-like hydrogen clathrate structure. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:3461. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11330-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Salke NP, et al. Synthesis of clathrate cerium superhydride at 80–100 GPa with atomic hydrogen sublattice. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:4453. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12326-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kong, P. P. et al. Superconductivity up to 243 K in yttrium hydrides under high pressure. arXiv:1909.10482 (2019).
- 8.Troyan, I. A. et al. Synthesis and superconductivity of yttrium hexahydride Imm-. arXiv:1908.01534 (2019).
- 9.Peng F, et al. Hydrogen clathrate structures in rare earth hydrides at high pressures: Possible route to room-temperature superconductivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;119:107001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.107001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liu H, Naumov II, Hoffmann R, Ashcroft NW, Hemley RJ. Potential high-Tc superconducting lanthanum and yttrium hydrides at high pressure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:6990. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704505114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bardeen J, Cooper LN, Schrieffer JR. Microscopic theory of superconductivity. Phys. Rev. 1957;106:162. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.106.162. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schilling A, Cantoni M, Guo JD, Ott HR. Superconductivity above 130 K in the Hg-Ba-Ca-Cu-O system. Nature. 1993;363:56. doi: 10.1038/363056a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Varma C. High-temperature superconductivity: Mind the pseudogap. Nature. 2010;468:184. doi: 10.1038/468184a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yang J, et al. Superconductivity at 53.5 K in . Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2008;21:8. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wu G, et al. Superconductivity at 56 K in samarium-doped SrFeAsF. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2009;21:14. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/14/142203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhou D, et al. Superconducting praseodymium superhydrides. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eaax6849. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax6849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhou D, et al. High-pressure synthesis of magnetic neodymium polyhydrides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:2803. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b10439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Salke NP, et al. Prediction and synthesis of dysprosium hydride phases at high pressure. Inorg. Chem. 2020;59:5303. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b03078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mozaffari S, et al. Superconducting phase diagram of S under high magnetic fields. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2522. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10552-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lesik M, et al. Magnetic measurements on micrometer-sized samples under high pressure using designed NV centers. Science. 2019;366:1359. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw4329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sun Y, Lv J, Xie Y, Liu H, Ma Y. Route to a superconducting phase above room temperature in electron-doped hydride compounds under high pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;123:097001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.097001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhao Z, et al. Predicted pressure-induced superconducting transition in electride P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;122:097002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.097002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ma, L. et al. Experimental syntheses of sodalite-like clathrate and at extreme pressure. arXiv:2002.09900 (2020).
- 24.Bassett WA. Diamond anvil cell 50th birthday. High Press. Res. 2009;29:163. doi: 10.1080/08957950802597239. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mao HK, Chen XJ, Ding Y, Li B, Wang L. Solids, liquids, and gases under high pressure. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2018;90:015007. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.McMahon JM, Morales MA, Pierleoni C, Ceperley DM. The properties of hydrogen and helium under extreme conditions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2012;84:1607. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1607. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.McMinis J, Clay RC, Lee D, Morales MA. Molecular to atomic phase transition in hydrogen under high pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;114:105305. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.105305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Borinaga M, Errea I, Calandra M, Mauri F, Bergara A. Anharmonic effects in atomic hydrogen: superconductivity and lattice dynamical stability. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;93:174308. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.174308. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dias RP, Silvera IF. Observation of the Wigner-Huntington transition to metallic hydrogen. Science. 2017;355:715. doi: 10.1126/science.aal1579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ashcroft NW. Hydrogen dominant metallic alloys: High temperature superconductors? Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004;92:187002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.187002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Feng, J. et al. Structures and potential superconductivity in at high pressure: En route to “metallic hydrogen”. Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 017006 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 32.Eremets MI, Trojan IA, Medvedev SA, Tse JS, Yao Y. Superconductivity in hydrogen dominant materials: Silane. Science. 2008;319:1506. doi: 10.1126/science.1153282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liu L, et al. Microscopic mechanism of room-temperature superconductivity in compressed . Phys. Rev. B. 2019;99:140501(R). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.140501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang C, Yi S, Cho J-H. Pressure depencence of the superconducting transition temperature of comprresed . Phys. Rev. B. 2019;100:060502(R). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.060502. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang C, Yi S, Cho J-H. Multiband nature of room-temperature superconductivity in at high pressure. Phys. Rev. B. 2020;101:104506. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.104506. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Heil C, Cataldo S, Bachelet GB, Boeri L. Superconductivity in sodalite-like yttrium hydride clarhartes. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;99:220502(R). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.220502. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Errea I, et al. Quantum crystal structure in the 250-kelvin superconducting lanthanum hydride. Nature (London) 2020;578:66. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1955-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kaxiras E. Atomic and Electronic Structure of Solids. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003. p. 152. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bader RFW. Atoms in molecules. Acc. Chem. Res. 1985;18:9. doi: 10.1021/ar00109a003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kim J, Kim K, Choi HC, Min BI. Volume contraction in induced by delocalized Ce 4 electrons. Phys. Rev. B. 2011;84:113108. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.113108. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kresse G, Hafner J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for open-shell transition metals. Phys. Rev. B. 1993;48:13115. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.13115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 1996;6:15. doi: 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Blöchl PE. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B. 1994;50:17953. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett.1996, 77, 3865; 78, 1396 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 45.Togo A, Tanaka I. First principles phonon calculations in materials science. Scr. Mater. 2015;108:1. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


