Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Oct 9;10:16878. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73665-1

Origin of enhanced chemical precompression in cerium hydride CeH9

Hyunsoo Jeon 1, Chongze Wang 1, Seho Yi 1, Jun-Hyung Cho 1,
PMCID: PMC7547066  PMID: 33037271

Abstract

The rare-earth metal hydrides with clathrate structures have been highly attractive because of their promising high-Tc superconductivity at high pressure. Recently, cerium hydride CeH9 composed of Ce-encapsulated clathrate H cages was synthesized at much lower pressures of 80–100 GPa, compared to other experimentally synthesized rare-earth hydrides such as LaH10 and YH6. Based on density-functional theory calculations, we find that the Ce 5p semicore and 4f/5d valence states strongly hybridize with the H 1s state, while a transfer of electrons occurs from Ce to H atoms. Further, we reveal that the delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons plays an important role in the chemical precompression of clathrate H cages. Our findings not only suggest that the bonding nature between the Ce atoms and H cages is characterized as a mixture of ionic and covalent, but also have important implications for understanding the origin of enhanced chemical precompression that results in the lower pressures required for the synthesis of CeH9.

Subject terms: Superconducting properties and materials, Chemical physics

Introduction

In recent years, rare-earth metal hydrides have attracted much attention due to the possibility of their realization of room-temperature superconductivity (SC)18. First-principles density-functional theory (DFT) calculations together with the Migdal–Eliashberg formalism have predicted that rare-earth metal hydrides such as yttrium, lanthanum, cerium hydrides host high-Tc SC at megabar pressures9,10, the origin of which is based on phonon-mediated electron pairing11. Subsequently, such a conventional SC of LaH10 was experimentally observed with a superconducting transition temperature Tc of 250–260 K at a pressure of 170 GPa3,4. This Tc record of LaH10 has been the highest temperature so far among experimentally available superconducting materials including cuprates12,13 and Fe-based superconductors14,15. Therefore, the experimental realization of room-temperature SC in LaH10 has stimulated interests of the high-Tc community towards compressed metal hydrides under high pressure1623.

However, since the synthesis of LaH10 was performed at 170 GPa3,4, it has been quite demanding to discover H-rich rare-earth hydrides synthesized at a moderate pressure below 100 GPa, which is easily and routinely achievable in the diamond anvil cell (DAC)24,25. Motivated by the first theoretical prediction9 of cerium hydride CeH9 with a clathrate hydrogen cage structure, two experimental groups5,6 achieved its successful synthesis at a lower pressure of 80–100 GPa. X-ray diffraction measurements and DFT calculations5,6 confirmed the previously predicted9 crystal structure of CeH9, which adopts a hexagonal clathrate structure with the space group P63/mmc. Here, each Ce atom is surrounded by the H29 cage consisting of 29 H atoms (see Fig. 1a). It is remarkable that the H–H bond lengths in CeH9 are close to those of solid metallic hydrogen that can be produced at high pressure above 400 GPa2629. Therefore, the discovery of CeH9 having clathrate hydrogen networks suggests that the metallic state of solid hydrogen can be attained at relatively lower pressures by using binary hydrides with f-electron metals. It is noteworthy that the sizable reduction of H–H bond lengths in CeH9 reflects the presence of a larger chemical precompression3032 compared to other rare-earth metal hydrides such as LaH10 and YH109,10,3337. However, the underlying mechanism of how the pressure required for the synthesis of CeH9 is much reduced is yet to be identified.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Optimized structure of CeH9 at 100 GPa and (b) hexagonal-close-packed (hcp) lattice of Ce atoms. Three different species of H atoms, H1, H2, and H3, exist in H29 cage. The isolated H29 cage surrounding a Ce atom is displayed in (c), together with its constituent parts, i.e., six tetragon rings, six pentagon rings, and six hexagon rings.

In this paper, we investigate the electronic structure and bonding properties of CeH9 at high pressure using first-principles DFT calculations with the inclusion of Hubbard on-site Coulomb interaction. The calculated band structure of CeH9 shows a strong hybridization of the Ce 5p semicore and 4f/5d valence states with the H 1s state. We reveal that the delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons contributes to yield a much larger chemical precompression of clathrate H29 cages along the c axis than in the ab plane. Despite a strong hybridization between the Ce- and H-derived electronic states, our Bader charge analysis shows a charge transfer from Ce to H atoms, thereby suggesting that the bonding nature between the Ce atoms and H29 cages features the mixed ionic and covalent bonding. The present results provide new insight into understanding the underlying mechanism of the chemical precompression that requires relatively lower pressures for the synthesis of CeH95,6, compared to other experimentally synthesized rare-earth hydrides LaH103,4 and YH67,8.

Results and discussion

We begin by optimizing the structure of CeH9 using the PBE + U calculation. Figure 1a shows the optimized structure of CeH9 at a pressure of 100 GPa, which is the same pressure employed in previous DAC experiments5,6. Here, Ce atoms form a hcp lattice (see Fig. 1b) with the lattice constants a=b=3.717 Å and c=5.666 Å, in good agreement with the experimental5,6 data of a=b=3.66 Å and c=5.58 Å. Meanwhile, the H29 cage surrounding a Ce atom is constituted by six tetragon rings, six pentagon rings, and six hexagon rings (see Fig. 1c). Note that there are three species of H atoms [termed H1, H2, and H3 in Fig. 1a composing the H29 cage. We find that the H1-H1, H1-H2, H1-H3, and H3-H3 bond lengths are 1.190, 1.486, 1.275, and 1.065 Å, respectively. These H–H bond lengths in CeH9 are close to those (0.98 and 1.21 Å) predicted from metallic hydrogen at 500 GPa28. It is thus likely that the synthesized5,6 binary compound CeH9 with the clathrate H29 cages is able to generate H networks comparable to metallic hydrogen even at a low pressure of 100 GPa.

Figure 2a shows the calculated total charge density ρtot of CeH9. It is seen that H atoms in the H29 cage are bonded to each other with covalent-like bonding. Here, the charge densities of H–H and Ce–H bonds exhibit the saddle-point characters at their midpoints, similar to that of the C–C covalent bond in diamond38. As shown in Fig. S1 in the Supplementary information, the calculated electron localization function also shows the covalent-like H–H and Ce–H bonds. The charge densities at the midpoints of the H1-H2, H1-H3, and H3-H3 bonds are 0.39, 0.56, and 0.85 e3, respectively. These values in CeH9 are larger than the corresponding ones (0.32, 0.45, and 0.76 e3 in Fig. 2b) obtained from the isolated H29 cages whose structure is taken from the optimized structure of CeH9. This result implies that the H–H covalent bonds in CeH9 are strengthened by a charge transfer from Ce to H atoms. Interestingly, the electrical charges of Ce and H atoms are connected to each other, reflecting a covalent-like bonding character. It is noteworthy that the charge densities at the points marked “×” (in Fig. 2a) between Ce and H1/H2/H3 atoms are close to that at the midpoint of the H1-H2 bond. This covalent nature of Ce–H bonds is attributed to a strong hybridization between the Ce and H electronic states, as discussed below.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Calculated total charge density ρtot of (a) CeH9 and (b) isolated H29 cages. The saddle points of charge densities between Ce and H1/H2/H3 atoms are marked “×” in (a). The charge densities in (a) and (b) are plotted on the (110) plane with the contour spacings of 0.07 e3. The charge density difference Δρ (defined in the text) is displayed in (c), with the contour spacing of ±0.03 e3. The Bader basins of Ce and H atoms are displayed in (d).

To examine the charge transfer between Ce to H atoms, we calculate the charge density difference, defined as Δρ = ρtotρCeρH, where ρCe and ρH represent the charge densities of the isolated Ce lattice (Fig. 1b) and the isolated H29 cages (Fig. 2b), respectively. As shown in Fig. 2c, Δρ illustrates how electronic charge is transferred from Ce to H atoms. It is seen that the charge transfer occurs mostly from Ce to H1 and H2. Meanwhile, the charge transfer from Ce to H3 is minor. We further calculate the Bader charges39 of CeH9 to estimate the number of transferred electrons between Ce and H atoms. Figure 2d shows the Bader basins of the constituent atoms, obtained from the gradient of ρtot39. We find that the calculated Bader charges of Ce, H1, H2, and H3 basins are -9.47e (including the 5s25p6 semicore electrons), -1.34e, -1.31e, and -1.09e, respectively. Thus, we can say that Ce atoms lose electrons of 2.53e per atom, while H1, H2, and H3 atoms gain electrons of 0.34e, 0.31e, 0.09e per atom, respectively.

In Fig. 3a, we display the calculated band structure of CeH9, together with the local density of states (LDOS) for Ce and H atoms. The narrow bands located at 2 eV above EF originate from Ce 4f electrons, while those located at around −20 eV below EF are associated with Ce 5p semicore electrons. It is noticeable that the LDOS shape of Ce atoms is very similar to that of H atoms in the energy range between −15 eV and EF, indicating a strong hybridization between Ce and H electronic states. In order to resolve the orbital characters of electronic states, we plot the partial density of states (PDOS) projected onto the Ce 5p-semicore and 4f/5d-valence states and the H 1s state in Fig. 3b. We find that the Ce 5p-semicore states are extended upward to reach up to EF, while the 4f- and 5d-valence states are distributed downward to about −10 and −13 eV below EF, respectively. Hence, these delocalized semicore and valence states hybridize well with the H 1s state. Such a strong hybridization between Ce and H electrons is likely associated with the Ce-encapsulated spherical H-cage structure of CeH9. Consequently, the electron charges of Ce and H atoms show covalent characteristics between the Ce and H1/H2/H3 atoms (see the “×” points in Fig. 2a). Based on this covalent feature of the Ce–H bonds and the charge transfer from Ce to H atoms, we can say that the bonding nature between the Ce atoms to H29 cages is characterized as a mixture of ionic and covalent.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Calculated band structure of CeH9 together with the LDOS for Ce and H atoms. The energy zero represents EF. The PDOS of CeH9 is also given in (b).

As mentioned above, the synthesis of CeH9 requires much lower pressures 80–100 GPa5,6 compared to that (170 GPa) for the synthesis of LaH103,4, indicating the variation of chemical precompression with respect to the occupation of f electrons. Here, we note that Ce atom with the electron configuration [Xe]4f15d16s2 has one 4f electron, while La atom with [Xe]5d16s2 represents no occupation of f orbitals. It is thus expected that the lower synthesis pressure of CeH9 would be caused by the presence of the delocalized Ce 4f states (see Fig. 3b). To confirm how the delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons contributes to the chemical precompression of H29 cages, we optimize the structure of CeH9 as a function of pressure using the f-core scheme, where Ce 4f electrons are considered as core electrons. Therefore, the interactions of 4f electrons with valence electrons are completely removed to simulate the localized nature of 4f electrons40. The band structure and PDOS of CeH9 calculated using the f-core scheme are displayed in Fig. S2. We find that the band dispersions of the Ce 5d and H 1s states change largely around EF because their hybridizations with the Ce 4f states are avoided in the f-core scheme. In Fig. 4a, the lattice parameters computed using the f-core scheme are compared with those of the f-valence scheme as well as the experimental data5. We find that in the pressure range between 100 and 160 GPa, both the f-core and f-valence schemes predict similar values for a and b, close to the experimental values5. However, the f-core scheme predicts larger c values than the f-valence scheme and experiment5 by 6% in the same pressure range. As a result, in contrast to both the f-valence scheme and experiment5, the f-core scheme gives relatively larger values of the c/a ratio between 100 and 160 GPa (see Fig. 4b). These results indicate that the delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons plays an important role in determining the chemical precompression along the c axis, while it hardly affects the chemical precompression in the ab plane.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) Calculated lattice constants of CeH9 as a function of pressure using the f-valence scheme, in comparison with those obtained using the f-core scheme and experiment5. The resulting c/a ratios as a function of pressure are also given in (b).

In order to check whether the localized/delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons influences the dynamical stability of CeH9, we calculate the phonon spectrum at 100 GPa using both the f-core and f-valence schemes. The calculated phonon spectrum of the f-core scheme exhibits imaginary frequencies in the whole Brillouin zone [see Fig. S3(a) in the Supplementary information], indicating that CeH9 is dynamically unstable. On the other hand, the f-valence scheme shows that CeH9 is dynamically stable without any imaginary-frequency phonon mode [see Fig. S3(b)]. Therefore, we can say that the delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons is necessary for stabilizing the clathrate structure of CeH9.

Conclusion

Our first-principles DFT + U calculations for CeH9 have shown that (i) the Ce 5p semicore and 4f/5d valence states strongly hybridize with the H 1s state, (ii) the charge transfer occurs mostly from Ce to H1 and H2 atoms, and (iii) the delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons is an essential ingredient in the chemical precompression of clathrate H29 cages. The present results not only suggest that the bonding nature between the Ce atoms and H cages is characterized as a mixture of ionic and covalent, but also provide an explanation for the enhanced chemical precompression in CeH9. We thus proposed that the large chemical precompression of H-rich clathrate structures can be attained in rare-earth hydrides with delocalized 4f electrons. It is noteworthy that, according to DFT calculations, PrH916 with clathrate H cages begins to destabilize at a pressure below about 100 GPa, which is relatively lower than that (226 GPa) of YH1036. These different destabilization pressures of PrH9 and YH10 are likely to reflect the variation of chemical precompression, due to the influence of delocalized f electrons. Indeed, PrH9 was experimentally synthesized at a pressure of 100 GPa16. We also note that YH6 containing no f electrons begins to destabilize at a pressure below 72 GPa, which is much lower than that (226 GPa) of YH1036. Here, the different stabilization pressures of YH6 and YH10 were explained36 in terms of the size of Y atom: i.e., YH10 having denser, larger hydrogen cages with shorter H–H distances requires a higher stabilization pressure.

Methods

Our DFT calculations were performed using the Vienna ab initio simulation package with the projector-augmented wave method4143. For the exchange-correlation energy, we employed the generalized-gradient approximation functional of Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE)44. The 5s25p6 semicore electrons of Ce atom were included in the electronic-structure calculations. For Ce 4f electrons, we considered the effective on-site Coulomb interaction of Ueff(=U-J) = 4 eV, where the Hubbard parameter U is 4.5 eV and the exchange interaction parameter J is 0.5 eV5. A plane-wave basis was used with a kinetic energy cutoff of 1000 eV. The k-space integration was done with 12×12×8 k points for the structure optimization and 24×24×16 k points for the DOS calculation. All atoms were allowed to relax along the calculated forces until all the residual force components were less than 0.005 eV/Å. Phonon calculations were preformed by a finite displacement method with the PHONOPY code45.

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean Government (Grants No. 2019R1A2C1002975, No. 2016K1A4A3914691, and No. 2015M3D1A1070609). The calculations were performed by the KISTI Supercomputing Center through the Strategic Support Program (Program No. KSC-2019-CRE-0183) for the supercomputing application research.

Author contributions

H.J., C.W., and S.Y. contributed equally to this work. J.H.C. designed the research; H.J. and C.W. performed the theoretical calculations; all the authors analyzed the data and wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-73665-1.

References

  • 1.Bi, T., Zarifi, N., Terpstra, T. & Zurek, E. The Search for Superconductivity in High Pressure Hydrides (Reference Module in Chemistry, Molecular Science and Chemical Engineering, 2020).
  • 2.Flores-Livas JA, et al. A perspective on conventional high-temperature superconductors at high pressure: Methods and materials. Phys. Rep. 2020;856:1. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Somayazulu M, et al. Evidence for superconductivity above 260 K in lanthanum superhydride at megabar pressures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;122:027001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.027001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Drozdov AP, et al. Superconductivity at 250 K in lanthanum hydride under high pressures. Nature. 2019;569:528. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1201-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Li X, et al. Polyhydride CeH9 with an atomic-like hydrogen clathrate structure. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:3461. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11330-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Salke NP, et al. Synthesis of clathrate cerium superhydride CeH9 at 80–100 GPa with atomic hydrogen sublattice. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:4453. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12326-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kong, P. P. et al. Superconductivity up to 243 K in yttrium hydrides under high pressure. arXiv:1909.10482 (2019).
  • 8.Troyan, I. A. et al. Synthesis and superconductivity of yttrium hexahydride Im3¯m-YH6. arXiv:1908.01534 (2019).
  • 9.Peng F, et al. Hydrogen clathrate structures in rare earth hydrides at high pressures: Possible route to room-temperature superconductivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;119:107001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.107001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu H, Naumov II, Hoffmann R, Ashcroft NW, Hemley RJ. Potential high-Tc superconducting lanthanum and yttrium hydrides at high pressure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:6990. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704505114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bardeen J, Cooper LN, Schrieffer JR. Microscopic theory of superconductivity. Phys. Rev. 1957;106:162. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.106.162. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schilling A, Cantoni M, Guo JD, Ott HR. Superconductivity above 130 K in the Hg-Ba-Ca-Cu-O system. Nature. 1993;363:56. doi: 10.1038/363056a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Varma C. High-temperature superconductivity: Mind the pseudogap. Nature. 2010;468:184. doi: 10.1038/468184a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang J, et al. Superconductivity at 53.5 K in GdFeAsO1-δ. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2008;21:8. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wu G, et al. Superconductivity at 56 K in samarium-doped SrFeAsF. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2009;21:14. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/14/142203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhou D, et al. Superconducting praseodymium superhydrides. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eaax6849. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax6849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhou D, et al. High-pressure synthesis of magnetic neodymium polyhydrides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:2803. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b10439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Salke NP, et al. Prediction and synthesis of dysprosium hydride phases at high pressure. Inorg. Chem. 2020;59:5303. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b03078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mozaffari S, et al. Superconducting phase diagram of H3S under high magnetic fields. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2522. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10552-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lesik M, et al. Magnetic measurements on micrometer-sized samples under high pressure using designed NV centers. Science. 2019;366:1359. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw4329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sun Y, Lv J, Xie Y, Liu H, Ma Y. Route to a superconducting phase above room temperature in electron-doped hydride compounds under high pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;123:097001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.097001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhao Z, et al. Predicted pressure-induced superconducting transition in electride Li6P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;122:097002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.097002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ma, L. et al. Experimental syntheses of sodalite-like clathrate EuH6 and EuH9 at extreme pressure. arXiv:2002.09900 (2020).
  • 24.Bassett WA. Diamond anvil cell 50th birthday. High Press. Res. 2009;29:163. doi: 10.1080/08957950802597239. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mao HK, Chen XJ, Ding Y, Li B, Wang L. Solids, liquids, and gases under high pressure. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2018;90:015007. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.McMahon JM, Morales MA, Pierleoni C, Ceperley DM. The properties of hydrogen and helium under extreme conditions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2012;84:1607. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1607. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.McMinis J, Clay RC, Lee D, Morales MA. Molecular to atomic phase transition in hydrogen under high pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;114:105305. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.105305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Borinaga M, Errea I, Calandra M, Mauri F, Bergara A. Anharmonic effects in atomic hydrogen: superconductivity and lattice dynamical stability. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;93:174308. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.174308. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dias RP, Silvera IF. Observation of the Wigner-Huntington transition to metallic hydrogen. Science. 2017;355:715. doi: 10.1126/science.aal1579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ashcroft NW. Hydrogen dominant metallic alloys: High temperature superconductors? Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004;92:187002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.187002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Feng, J. et al. Structures and potential superconductivity in SiH4 at high pressure: En route to “metallic hydrogen”. Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 017006 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 32.Eremets MI, Trojan IA, Medvedev SA, Tse JS, Yao Y. Superconductivity in hydrogen dominant materials: Silane. Science. 2008;319:1506. doi: 10.1126/science.1153282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Liu L, et al. Microscopic mechanism of room-temperature superconductivity in compressed LaH10. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;99:140501(R). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.140501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang C, Yi S, Cho J-H. Pressure depencence of the superconducting transition temperature of comprresed LaH10. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;100:060502(R). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.060502. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang C, Yi S, Cho J-H. Multiband nature of room-temperature superconductivity in LaH10 at high pressure. Phys. Rev. B. 2020;101:104506. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.104506. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Heil C, Cataldo S, Bachelet GB, Boeri L. Superconductivity in sodalite-like yttrium hydride clarhartes. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;99:220502(R). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.220502. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Errea I, et al. Quantum crystal structure in the 250-kelvin superconducting lanthanum hydride. Nature (London) 2020;578:66. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1955-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kaxiras E. Atomic and Electronic Structure of Solids. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003. p. 152. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bader RFW. Atoms in molecules. Acc. Chem. Res. 1985;18:9. doi: 10.1021/ar00109a003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kim J, Kim K, Choi HC, Min BI. Volume contraction in CeB4 induced by delocalized Ce 4f electrons. Phys. Rev. B. 2011;84:113108. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.113108. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kresse G, Hafner J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for open-shell transition metals. Phys. Rev. B. 1993;48:13115. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.13115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 1996;6:15. doi: 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Blöchl PE. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B. 1994;50:17953. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett.1996, 77, 3865; 78, 1396 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 45.Togo A, Tanaka I. First principles phonon calculations in materials science. Scr. Mater. 2015;108:1. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES