Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2020 Sep 23;117(40):24664–24669. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012980117

Tunable layered-magnetism–assisted magneto-Raman effect in a two-dimensional magnet CrI3

Wencan Jin a,1, Zhipeng Ye b, Xiangpeng Luo a, Bowen Yang c,d, Gaihua Ye b, Fangzhou Yin c,d, Hyun Ho Kim c,d,2, Laura Rojas b, Shangjie Tian e,f, Yang Fu e,f, Shaohua Yan e,f, Hechang Lei e,f, Kai Sun a, Adam W Tsen c,d, Rui He b,3, Liuyan Zhao a,3
PMCID: PMC7547278  PMID: 32968024

Significance

The two-dimensional (2D) magnetic semiconductor CrI3 hosts a variety of strong and tunable magneto-optical effects and allows for the development of novel magneto-optical devices. While the elastic magneto-optical effects in CrI3 are well understood, its recently discovered inelastic magneto-Raman effect remains to have case-specific interpretations varying upon the thickness of CrI3. We perform comprehensive Raman measurements on 2D CrI3 with polarization, temperature, layer number, and magnetic field dependence. We resolve a Davydov-split–induced N-fold multiplet in N-layer CrI3 and reveal the distinct magneto-Raman behaviors of individual phonons within the multiplet. Our results discover a layered-magnetism–coupled phonon scattering mechanism that explains the rich magneto-Raman effect in CrI3 of arbitrary thickness and elucidates the spin–phonon coupling physics in layered magnets.

Keywords: two-dimensional layered magnetism, magneto-Raman effect, Raman spectroscopy

Abstract

We used a combination of polarized Raman spectroscopy experiment and model magnetism–phonon coupling calculations to study the rich magneto-Raman effect in the two-dimensional (2D) magnet CrI3. We reveal a layered-magnetism–assisted phonon scattering mechanism below the magnetic onset temperature, whose Raman excitation breaks time-reversal symmetry, has an antisymmetric Raman tensor, and follows the magnetic phase transitions across critical magnetic fields, on top of the presence of the conventional phonon scattering with symmetric Raman tensors in N-layer CrI3. We resolve in data and by calculations that the first-order Ag phonon of the monolayer splits into an N-fold multiplet in N-layer CrI3 due to the interlayer coupling (N2) and that the phonons within the multiplet show distinct magnetic field dependence because of their different layered-magnetism–phonon coupling. We further find that such a layered-magnetism–phonon coupled Raman scattering mechanism extends beyond first-order to higher-order multiphonon scattering processes. Our results on the magneto-Raman effect of the first-order phonons in the multiplet and the higher-order multiphonons in N-layer CrI3 demonstrate the rich and strong behavior of emergent magneto-optical effects in 2D magnets and underline the unique opportunities of spin–phonon physics in van der Waals layered magnets.


Two-dimensional (2D) CrI3 of few-layer form features a layered-antiferromagnetic (AFM) order where the spins align along the out-of-plane direction ferromagnetically within each layer and antiferromagnetically between adjacent layers (15). It undergoes a layered-AFM to ferromagnetic (FM) phase transition upon applying a moderate magnetic field (17), or electric field (810), or electrostatic doping (11), or hydrostatic pressure (12, 13). The strong coupling between spin and charge degrees of freedom in 2D CrI3 allows magneto-optical effects manifested in a variety of ways including large magneto-optical Kerr effect (5) and magnetic circular dichroism (813), spontaneous helical photoluminescence (14), giant nonreciprocal second harmonic generation (15), and anomalous magneto-optical Raman effect (7, 1619). All of these magneto-optical effects can be tuned across the layered-AFM to FM phase transition, making 2D CrI3 a promising candidate for applications in magnetic sensors, optical modulation, and data storage.

Among all magneto-optical effects in CrI3, the magneto-optical Raman effect is of particular interest for two reasons. First, among all known magnets, the largest magnetism-induced optical rotation is observed for the linearly polarized, inelastically scattered light off the Ag phonon mode (∼129 cm−1) in the FM phase of CrI3 (16). Second, different phonon modes exhibit distinct magneto-optical behavior that the Ag mode emerges whereas its neighboring strongest antisymmetric mode (∼127 cm−1) disappears in the linear crossed polarization channel across the layered-AFM to FM transition (7, 1618). However, the physical origin of the magneto-optical Raman effect remains elusive with diverse proposals ranging from Davydov split for bilayer CrI3 (16, 18), to zone-folded phonon for few-layer CrI3 (17), to coupled magnetism–phonon scattering for bulk CrI3 (7), none of which can be trivially generalized to explain CrI3 of arbitrary thickness.

In this work, we systematically examine the magneto-optical Raman effect for N-layer CrI3 (N = 1 to 4) by performing polarization, temperature, and magnetic field-dependent micro-Raman spectroscopy measurements and unambiguously identify the layered-magnetism–assisted phonon scattering as the origin applicable for CrI3 of any thickness. N-layer CrI3 crystalline flakes were exfoliated from high-quality CrI3 single crystals, sandwiched between hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) thin flakes, and then placed onto SiO2/Si substrates inside a high-purity (>99.999%) nitrogen-filled glovebox. Micro-Raman spectroscopy measurements in the backscattering geometry were carried out with a 633-nm excitation laser resonant with the charge-transfer transition (14), inside a vacuum cryostat at a base pressure lower than 7×107 mbar, and under an out-of-plane magnetic field (B) up to 2.2 T.

We start with resolving in N-layer CrI3 the interlayer coupling-induced split of the Ag mode of monolayer CrI3 (20, 21). Fig. 1A shows Raman spectra in both parallel and crossed linear polarization channels taken at T = 10 K and B=0 T on 1L to 4L CrI3 (see full-range spectra in both channels and comparison to off-resonance 532-nm excitations in SI Appendix, section I and Figs. S1 and S2, respectively). It has been established for CrI3 that the modes in the crossed channel in Fig. 1A correspond to antisymmetric Raman tensor (RAS) whereas those in the parallel channel are for symmetric Raman tensor of Ag symmetry (RS) (19). We highlight three key observations that have not been reported in previous work (7, 1619, 22, 23) and summarize them in Fig. 1B with fitted mode frequencies vs. N. First, the number of modes increases proportional to the number of layers (with an exception for N = 3 that is explained in SI Appendix, section II). Second, the highest frequency remains constant while the lowest frequency decreases with increasing N, leading to a greater frequency separation between them. Third, the parallel and crossed channels show modes of the same frequencies for odd N whereas they select modes with distinct frequencies for even N. To interpret the Ag mode splitting, we take a simple linear chain model of N-layer CrI3, as introduced in few-layer transition metal dichalcogenides (2427),

H=H0+12i=2Nk(ui1ui)2,withH0=i=1N(12mu˙i2+12k0ui2),

where H0 represents the original Ag mode at frequency ω0=k0/m within individual layers, ui represents the displacement field in the ith layer, and k stands for the coupling constant between adjacent layers, equivalent to a coupling frequency ω=k/m. Diagonalizing H leads to N nondegenerate eigenfrequencies Ωi(ω0,ω) and their corresponding eigenmodes Ui (i = 1, 2, …, N) (i.e., Davydov splitting), with i = 1 being the highest-frequency mode and i = N being the lowest-frequency mode. By choosing ω0=129.10±0.10 cm−1 and ω=15.98±0.55 cm−1, the calculated frequencies Ωi (solid lines with open diamonds) match well with all of the experimental values (red solid squares and blue solid circles), as highlighted by the fan diagram in Fig. 1B. See detailed calculations of Ωi and Ui in SI Appendix, section II and Tables S1 and S2.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

(A) Raman spectra of 1L to 4L CrI3 acquired in linear parallel (red) and crossed (blue) channels at 10 K. The solid curves are fits to the raw data (dots). The vertical bars underneath individual spectra denote the fitted frequencies and Ui (i = 1, …, N) labels the corresponding modes in N-layer CrI3. (B) Plot of the fitted frequencies of the modes in A as a function of layer number N. Red solid circles and blue solid squares correspond to modes extracted from the linear parallel and crossed channels, respectively. Solid curves with open diamonds are fits to the Davydov-split frequencies calculated from the linear chain model. (C) Atomic displacement of the lowest-frequency mode UN along with the layered-AFM order to illustrate that Ui and M share the same parity and that Ui·M is maximized at i = N. The rectangular bar represents the atomic displacement amplitude and phase for individual layers, by its length and color (red and blue for opposite phase), respectively.

Because N-layer CrI3 is structurally centrosymmetric, its N-calculated eigenmodes have alternating parities, with the highest-frequency mode always parity even as a result of equal, in-phase atomic displacement between layers (i.e., U1=(1,1,,1)/N). In the parallel channel where only modes with even parity and symmetric Raman tensor RS can be detected, we expect to see every other mode starting with the highest-frequency one (i = 1, 3, 5, …). This expectation is indeed consistent with our data that U1 for N = 1 and 2 and U1,3 for N = 3 and 4 are observed in the linear parallel channel in Fig. 1 A and B. In contrast to the structure of N-layer CrI3, the layered-AFM order is centrosymmetric for odd N and noncentrosymmetric for even N. Therefore, it should couple to parity-even phonon modes for odd N and parity-odd phonons for even N to make the coupled layered-AFM–phonon entity parity even and thus Raman active. Due to the broken time-reversal symmetry from the magnetism, this layered-AFM–assisted phonon scattering corresponds to antisymmetric Raman tensor RAS and can appear only in the linear crossed channel. We anticipate observing in the linear crossed channel every other mode from the lowest-frequency one (i = N, N2, N4, …), because UN always has the same parity as the layered AFM for any N. The result in Fig. 1 A and B corroborates with this prediction that U1 for N = 1, U2 for N = 2, U3,1 for N = 3, and U4,2 for N = 4 are present in the linear crossed channel. The coupling efficiency between a phonon mode and the layered-AFM order can be evaluated by the projection Ui·M of the eigenmode vector Ui onto the pseudovector (i.e., axial vector) for the layered-AFM M=(1,1,..,(1)N1) with +1 for spin up and −1 for spin down in a single layer. In particular, for any N > 1, the lowest-frequency mode UN features out-of-phase atomic displacement between adjacent layers and matches best the pattern of alternating spin orientations in the layered-AFM state (Fig. 1C), yielding the strongest coupling strength of Ui·M and thus the most intense signal among the modes in the linear crossed channel (Fig. 1A). See the computed Ui·M in the layered-AFM state of 1L to 4L CrI3 in SI Appendix, Table S3.

So far we have established the physical origin of the N-fold multiplet for N-layer CrI3 as a combined effect of Davydov splitting and layered-AFM–phonon coupling, leading to the conventional phonons of RS in the linear parallel channel (2427) and the layered-AFM–coupled phonons of RAS in the linear crossed channel (7, 19). We note that a magnetism-induced symmetric Eg phonon mode splitting was previously reported in 2D Cr2Ge2Te6 (28). Here, the structural and magnetic nature of modes in the linear parallel and crossed channel, respectively, is further supported by their distinct temperature dependence in these two channels. Taking 2L CrI3 as an example, the crossed-channel signal emerges below the magnetic transition temperature TC = 45 K whereas the parallel channel signal is present above TC and increases only slowly below TC, as illustrated by representative spectra taken at 70, 40, and 10 K in Fig. 2A. Such a behavior extends beyond the first-order phonons (Fig. 2 A, Left) to the second- and third-order ones (Fig. 2 A, Center and Right, respectively). For all three orders, the temperature dependence of integrated intensity (I.I.) in the linear crossed channel fits well with an order parameter-like function I0+ITCT (blue curves in Fig. 2B), in contrast to those in the linear parallel channel following a smooth anharmonic decay behavior (29) (red curves in Fig. 2B). As pictorially summarized in Fig. 2C, we propose that a multiphonon process (30, 31) leads to conventional first-, second-, and third-order phonon modes (red) in the linear parallel channel, and their coupling with the layered-AFM order results in the magnetic counterparts (blue) in the linear crossed channel.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

(A) First-, second-, and third-order Raman spectra of 2L CrI3 in the linear parallel (red) and crossed (blue) channels at selected temperatures of 70, 40, and 10 K. Spectra are vertically offset for clarity. First-order spectra show raw data points and fitting curves, and second- and third-order spectra are raw spectra. (B) Temperature dependence of integrated intensity (I.I.) of first-, second-, and third-order Raman modes in the parallel (red circles) and crossed (blue squares) channels. Solid curves are fits to the anharmonic decay model in the parallel channel (red curves) and the order parameter-like function I0+ITCT in the crossed channel (blue curves). Critical temperature TC = 45 K is marked by a dashed vertical line in each panel. (C) Schematic illustration of the single- to multiphonon scattering (red) and its layered-AFM–assisted counterpart (blue). The springs with one to three windings represent first- to third-order process.

We then proceed to explore the magnetic field dependence of the layered-magnetism–assisted phonon modes in N-layer CrI3. From here on, we chose circularly polarized light to perform Raman measurements to prevent any artifacts from the Faraday rotation of light from passing through optical components in a stray magnetic field. In this work, we focus on two representative thicknesses, 2L and 4L CrI3, having one and two critical magnetic transitions, respectively (Raman spectra of 3L CrI3 at 0 T in SI Appendix, section II and Fig. S3). We note that the mechanism described below is applicable for arbitrary N-layer CrI3.

The 2L CrI3 undergoes a layered-AFM to FM transition at a critical magnetic field Bc=±0.6T (5). Fig. 3A presents Raman spectra of first-order modes taken at B=0T and ±1.4T, below and above Bc, respectively, at 10 K in both LL and RR channels, where LL(RR) stands for the polarization channel with the incident and scattered light being left(right)-hand circularly polarized. At 0 T, both modes (U1 and U2) of 2L CrI3 are present in Raman spectra that are identical in LL and RR channels. At ±1.4T, only the high-frequency mode (U1) survives, and it shows giant Raman circular dichroism of ±78% (I.I.LLI.I.RRI.I.LL+I.I.RR). See the comparison of selection rules between linear and circular polarization bases for 2L CrI3 in SI Appendix, Table S5. The magnetic field dependence of the U2 integrated intensity clearly shows its disappearance at Bc, whereas that of U1 increases (decreases) abruptly in the LL (RR) channel at Bc, as shown in Fig. 3B. Fig. 3 E and F shows the magnetic field dependence of the second- and third-order modes of 2L CrI3. Both of them mimic the magnetic field dependence of U1 with a reduction of circular dichroism above Bc, ±71% for the second order and ±50% for the third order. This observation suggests the participation of U1 in the second- and third-order multiphonon process.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

(A) Raman spectra of 2L CrI3 in cocircularly polarized channels, LL (red) and RR (blue), in selected out-of-plane magnetic field (B) of 1.4, 0, and 1.4T. Dots are raw data points and solid curves are fitting curves. (B) Magnetic field dependence of integrated intensities (I.I.) of the two modes of 2L CrI3, U1 and U2, in both LL (red circles) and RR (blue squares) channels. (C) List of phonon modes in 2L CrI3 that have finite coupling strength Ui·M for individual magnetic orders at B above and between Bc=±0.6T, the critical magnetic field for the layered-AFM to FM transition. (D) Calculated B dependence of U1 and U2 of 2L CrI3. (E) Second- and third-order Raman modes (raw spectra) acquired in the same condition as A. (F) B dependence of I.I. of second- and third-order modes of 2L CrI3.

We refer to the layered-magnetism–phonon coupling that we have developed above to understand the magnetic field dependence of the two first-order modes (U1 and U2) of 2L CrI3. For each mode Ui, its Raman tensor Ri is composed of the conventional structural (RSi) and the layered-magnetism–assisted magnetic (RASi) contributions; i.e., Ri=RSi+λiRASi, where RSi is magnetic field independent and is present only for parity-even modes, RASiUi·M reflects the magnetic origin and selects the zero-momentum component, and λi is the ratio of the magnetic to structural contribution for the ith mode that depends on microscopic parameters such as spin–orbit coupling. Here, M changes from (1,1) to (±1,±1) across the layered-AFM to FM transition at Bc=±0.6T with the fully polarized FM spin moments pointing upward/downward. Specifically, for the parity-even high-frequency mode of U1=12(1,1), RS1=(a100a1) at all magnetic fields and RAS1=U1·M(0a1+a10)=0 below Bc and (02a1±2a10) above Bc=± 0.6 T (Fig. 3 C, Top and Bottom), whereas for the parity-odd low-frequency mode of U2=12(1,1), RS2=0 always and RAS2=(02a2+2a20) below Bc and 0 otherwise (Fig. 3C, Middle), where =1 to account for the broken time-reversal symmetry and ai stands for the Raman scattering strength of the ith mode (see the calculated magnetic field dependence of U1 and U2 in SI Appendix, Tables S4 and S5). This model faithfully reproduces the magnetic field dependence of both first-order modes of 2L CrI3 in LL and RR channels by tuning only λi and ai (Fig. 3D).

Different from 2L CrI3, N-layer CrI3 (N > 2) undergoes two spin–flip transitions with increasing B, one at Bc1=±0.7T for spins in surface layers and the other at Bc2=±1.6T for spins in interior layers (1, 2). For simplicity but without losing any generality, we pick 4L CrI3 and focus on measurements with the upward magnetic field and in the RR polarization channel. Fig. 4A shows Raman spectra of first-order modes taken at B=0, 1, and 2 T, below Bc1, between Bc1 and Bc2, and above Bc2, respectively, at 10 K and in the RR channel. At 0 T, we can reliably resolve only three of the fourfold multiplet of 4L CrI3, namely, U1, U3, and U4 as fitted by the red, orange, and blue Lorentzian profiles, respectively. This is because U2 is spectrally so close to U1 but has a much weaker intensity (Fig. 1A), thus getting overwhelmed by the strong U1 in the RR channel. We observe both U1 and U4 decrease subsequently at 1 and 2 T to finite and zero intensity, respectively, whereas U3 increases at 1 T and then decreases at 2 T. The detailed magnetic field dependence of the U1, U3, and U4 integrated intensity is shown in Fig. 4B, displaying the contrasting trends of U3 to U1 and U4, and those of the second- and third-order modes are shown in Fig. 4 E and F, closely mimicking that of U1.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

(A) Raman spectra of 4L CrI3 in the RR channel in selected B of 0, 1, and 2 T. Gray dots are raw data points and black curves are fits to multiple Lorentzian functions. Lorentzian profiles in red, orange, and blue correspond to U1, U3, and U4 modes of 4L CrI3. (B) B dependence of I.I. of U1 (red circles), U3 (orange squares), and U4 (blue diamonds). Vertical dashed lines mark the critical magnetic fields for spin–flip transitions, Bc1=0.7T and Bc2=1.6T. (C) List of phonon modes in 4L CrI3 that have finite coupling strength Ui·M for magnetic orders below Bc1, between Bc1 and Bc2, and above Bc2. The dashed green box marks U2 that is not observed in A due to its weak intensity and closeness to U1. Solid boxes of red, orange, and blue color highlight U1, U3, and U4, respectively. (D) Calculated B dependence of U1 (red), U2 (green), U3 (orange), and U4 (blue) of 4L CrI3. (E and F) B dependence of second- and third-order modes of 4L CrI3.

We carry out a similar analysis as we have done for 2L CrI3 above, but add an additional intermediate magnetic phase M=(1,1,1,1) between the layered AFM of (1,1,1,1) and the fully spin-polarized FM of (1,1,1,1). While the structural contribution (RSi) is present only for parity-even modes, U1 and U3, and remains magnetic field independent, the layered-magnetism–coupled magnetic contribution (RASi) varies proportionally to Ui·M as M changes as a function of B. Fig. 4C lists the modes that have finite coupling to every layered magnetic order and thus nonzero RASi, according to which the magnetic contribution of U1 appears above Bc1, that of U3 emerges between Bc1 and Bc2, and U2,4 is present only below Bc2 (see the calculated magnetic field dependence of U1, U2, U3, and U4 in SI Appendix, Tables S6 and S7). By adjusting λi and ai, the ratio of the magnetic to structural contribution and the overall strength of the ith mode, we successfully show the consistency between the experimental and calculated magnetic field dependence of U1,3,4 and predict that of U2 despite its invisibility in our experiment (Fig. 4D).

In conclusion, we have established the Davydov splitting of the Ag mode of a monolayer into an N-fold multiplet in N-layer CrI3 and discovered, distinct from nonmagnetic few-layer atomic crystals (2427), a unique layered-magnetism–assisted phonon scattering mechanism in the magnetic phases of CrI3. We find this mechanism extends beyond first-order phonons to the multiphonon modes and further resolve the distinct magnetic field dependence for different first-order modes within the N-fold multiplet in N-layer CrI3. Our calculations based on the combination of Davydov splitting and layered-magnetism–phonon coupling successfully explain the selection rules for individual split modes and capture the rich behavior of their distinct magnetic field dependence, effective for 2D CrI3 of arbitrary thickness.

Materials and Methods

Sample Fabrication.

CrI3 single crystals were grown by the chemical vapor transport method, as detailed in ref. 19. The 1L to 4L CrI3 samples were exfoliated in a nitrogen-filled glovebox. Using a polymer-stamping transfer technique inside the glovebox, 1L to 4L CrI3 flakes were then sandwiched between two few-layer hBN flakes and transferred onto SiO2/Si substrates for Raman spectroscopy measurements.

Micro-Raman Spectroscopy.

Micro-Raman spectroscopy measurements were carried out using a 633-nm excitation laser. The incident beam was focused by a 40× objective down to ∼3 μm in diameter at the sample site, and the power was kept at 80 μW. The scattered light was collected by the objective in a backscattering geometry, then dispersed by a Horiba LabRAM HR Evolution Raman spectrometer, and finally detected by a thermoelectric cooled CCD camera. A closed-cycle helium cryostat is interfaced with the micro-Raman system for the temperature-dependent measurements. All thermal cycles were performed at a base pressure that is lower than 7 × 10−7 mbar. In addition, a cryogen-free magnet is integrated with the low-temperature cryostat for the magnetic field-dependent measurements. In this experiment, the magnetic field was applied along the out-of-plane direction and covered a range of 0 to 2.2 T.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary File

Acknowledgments

L.Z. acknowledges support by NSF Faculty Early Career Development Program (CAREER) Grant DMR-1749774. R.H. acknowledges support by NSF CAREER Grant DMR-1760668 and NSF Major Research Instrumentation Program Grant DMR-1337207. A.W.T. acknowledges support from the US Army Research Office (W911NF-19-10267), an Ontario Early Researcher Award (ER17-13-199), and the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2017-03815). This research was undertaken due in part to funding from the Canada First Research Excellence Fund. K.S. acknowledges support through NSF Grant NSF-EFMA-1741618. H.L. acknowledges support from the National Key R&D Program of China (Grants 2018YFE0202600 and 2016YFA0300504), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11574394, 11774423, and 11822412), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and the Research Funds of Renmin University of China (18XNLG14, 19XNLG17, and 20XHN062).

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. S.L.C. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.

This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2012980117/-/DCSupplemental.

Data Availability.

All study data are included in this article and SI Appendix.

References

  • 1.Klein D. R., et al. , Probing magnetism in 2D van der Waals crystalline insulators via electron tunneling. Science 360, 1218–1222 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Song T., et al. , Giant tunneling magnetoresistance in spin-filter van der Waals heterostructures. Science 360, 1214–1218 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kim H. H., et al. , One million percent tunnel magnetoresistance in a magnetic van der Waals heterostructure. Nano Lett. 18, 4885–4890 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang Z., et al. , Very large tunneling magnetoresistance in layered magnetic semiconductor CrI3. Nat. Commun. 9, 2516 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Huang B., et al. , Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit. Nature 546, 270–273 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim H. H., et al. , Evolution of interlayer and intralayer magnetism in three atomically thin chromium trihalides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 11131–11136 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li S., et al. , Magnetic-field-induced quantum phase transitions in a van der Waals magnet. Phys. Rev. X 10, 011075 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Huang B., et al. , Electrical control of 2D magnetism in bilayer CrI3. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 544–548 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jiang S., Shan J., Mak K. F., Electric-field switching of two-dimensional van der Waals magnets. Nat. Mater. 17, 406–410 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim H. H., et al. , Magneto-memristive switching in a 2D layer antiferromagnet. Adv. Mater. 32, e1905433 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jiang S., Li L., Wang Z., Mak K. F., Shan J., Controlling magnetism in 2D CrI3 by electrostatic doping. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 549–553 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li T., et al. , Pressure-controlled interlayer magnetism in atomically thin CrI3. Nat. Mater. 18, 1303–1308 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Song T., et al. , Switching 2D magnetic states via pressure tuning of layer stacking. Nat. Mater. 18, 1298–1302 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Seyler K. L., et al. , Ligand-field helical luminescence in a 2D ferromagnetic insulator. Nat. Phys. 14, 277–281 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sun Z., et al. , Giant nonreciprocal second-harmonic generation from antiferromagnetic bilayer CrI3. Nature 572, 497–501 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Huang B., et al. , Tuning inelastic light scattering via symmetry control in the two-dimensional magnet CrI3. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 212–216 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McCreary A., et al. , Distinct magneto-Raman signatures of spin-flip phase transitions in CrI3. Nat. Commun. 11, 3879 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang Y., et al. , Magnetic order-induced polarization anomaly of Raman scattering in 2D magnet CrI3. Nano Lett. 20, 729–734 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jin W., et al. , Raman fingerprint of two terahertz spin wave branches in a two-dimensional honeycomb Ising ferromagnet. Nat. Commun. 9, 5122 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Larson D. T., Kaxiras E., Raman spectrum of CrI3: An initio study. Phys. Rev. B 98, 085406 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Webster L., Liang L., Yan J.-A., Distinct spin-lattice and spin-phonon interactions in monolayer magnetic CrI3. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 23546–23555 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Djurdjić-Mijin S., et al. , Lattice dynamics and phase transition in CrI3 single crystals. Phys. Rev. B 98, 104307 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shcherbakov D., et al. , Raman spectroscopy, photocatalytic degradation, and stabilization of atomically thin chromium tri-iodide. Nano Lett. 18, 4214–4219 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Staiger M., et al. , Splitting of monolayer out-of-plane A′ Raman mode in few-layer WS2. Phys. Rev. B 91, 195419 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Song Q. J., et al. , Physical origin of Davydov splitting and resonant Raman spectroscopy of Davydov components in multilayer MoTe2. Phys. Rev. B 93, 115409 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Froehlicher G., et al. , Unified description of the optical phonon modes in N-layer MoTe2. Nano Lett. 15, 6481–6489 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kim K., Lee J.-U., Nam D., Cheong H., Davydov splitting and excitonic resonance effects in Raman spectra of few-layer MoSe2. ACS Nano 10, 8113–8120 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tian Y., Gray M. J., Ji H., Cava R. J., Burch K. S., Magneto-elastic coupling in a potential ferromagnetic 2D atomic crystal. 2D Mat. 3, 025035 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Klemens P. G., Anharmonic decay of optical phonons. Phys. Rev. 148, 845–848 (1966). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Martin R. M., Varma C. M., Cascade theory of inelastic scattering of light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 1241–1244 (1971). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Merlin R., et al. , Multiphonon processes in YbS. Phys. Rev. B 17, 4951–4958 (1978). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File

Data Availability Statement

All study data are included in this article and SI Appendix.


Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES