Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2020 Oct 10;27(4):648–650. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.10.005

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in children with pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 and heart dysfunction

Luis M Prieto 1,2,3,4,, Belén Toral 5, Ana LLorente 6, David Coca 7, Daniel Blázquez-Gamero 1,2,3,4
PMCID: PMC7547828  PMID: 33049415

To the Editor,

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) appears to affect proportionally fewer children than adults and with a less severe clinical presentation. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, a new childhood disorder has emerged worldwide characterized by fever, elevated inflammatory markers, and organ dysfunction [1,2]. A case definition was published in April 2020 by The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health in the United Kingdom, and was named “pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)”, or PIMS-TS. World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have subsequently also published their own case definitions.

We describe the recent experience with five patients affected by this condition from April 28 to May 11, 2020. All were previously healthy children, with a median age of 7 years old, [interquartile range (IQR), 5-12 years]. They presented at admission with fever, tachycardia and hypotension. The median white cell count was 9100 cells/mm3 (IQR: 7700-9660) and the median lymphocytes count was 1700 cells/mm3 (IQR: 610-1760). Other ancillary tests revealed elevated cardiac biomarkers [median troponin T was 66.6 ng/l (IQR: 3.2-75.2) and NT-proBNP of 14,407 pg/ml (IQR: 3988–16,150)], and markedly increased inflammatory biomarkers like C-reactive protein and procalcitonin [10.2 mg/dl (IQR: 9.4-26.9) and 10.5 ng/ml (IQR: 3.4-14.8), respectively]. The median ferritin was 421 μg/l (IQR: 369-639) and the median interleukin 6 was 63.5 pg/ml (IQR: 27.2-216.2). The echocardiography revealed mild to moderate heart dysfunction in all of the patients (Table 1 ). All of them had a positive serology against SARS-CoV-2 (Ig anti receptor-binding domain) and met criteria for PIMS-TS according to UK, WHO and CDC definitions.

Table 1.

Demographic, clinical characteristics, ancillary tests, treatmenta and outcomes of children with PIMS-TS and heart dysfunction

Variable Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4 Patient 5
Demographics and epidemiology
Age (years) 6 9 5 7 12
Sex Male Male Female Female Male
Ethnicity Sub-Saharan African Arabic Hispanic Caucasian Caucasian
Medical history Healthy Psoriasis Healthy Healthy Tonsillectomy
Family cluster of SARS-CoV-2 infection No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Signs and symptoms at admission
Temperature (°C) 40.3 38.5 40.2 39.3 40.7
Days of fever before admission (>38°C) 5 7 5 6 5
Rash Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Distribution of the rash Thorax, arms and legs Hands and feet Palms, thorax and legs Palms
Conjunctivitis Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Lymphadenitis No No No No No
Lips Normal Cracked lips Normal Normal Normal
Tongue Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal
Abdominal pain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Diarrhea No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cough No No No No Yes
Oxygen saturation (%) 87 97 95 98 95
Heart rate (bpm) 125 182 130 116 112
Blood pressure (mmHg) 86/44 75/42 88/46 90/50 87/38
Image and heart evaluation
Chest X-rays Mild left pulmonary infiltrate Normal Normal Normal Normal
Echocardiography (at admission
  • Mild systolic disfunction (LVEF 52%)

  • Moderate systolic disfunction (LVEF 40%)

  • Moderate systolic disfunction (LVEF:40%)

  • Moderate systolic disfunction (LVEF: 40%)

  • Mild systolic disfunction (LVEF 50%)

  • Diastolic dysfunction

  • Diastolic dysfunction

  • Diastolic dysfunction

  • Normal coronary arteries: LCA 2.7mm (z score +0.2) and RCA 2.5mm (z score +0.4).

  • Normal coronary arteries: LCA: 3,8mm (z score +0.6), RCA: 3,4mm (z score +0.5).

  • Normal coronary arteries: LCA 2,4mm (z score -1.6) and RCA 2,3mm (z score -1).

  • Normal coronary arteries: LCA 2,8mm (z score 0), LAD 2,8mm (z score: +1.5) and RCA 2.5mm (z score 0).

  • Severe mitral regurgitation and moderate tricuspid regurgitation

  • Normal coronary arteries: LCA 2,9mm (z score +1.4), LAD 2,2mm (z score +1), RCA 2,7mm (z score +1.5).

Electrocardiogram
  • Normal

  • Repolarization abnormalities

  • Normal

  • Repolarization abnormalities

  • Normal

Treatment Dopamine Dopamine Ceftriaxone Ceftriaxone Norepinephrine
Norepinephrine Cefotaxime Clindamycin IVIG (2gr/kg) Amoxicillin-clavulanate
Ceftriaxone IVIG (2 gr/kg) IVIG (2gr/kg) Steroids (2 mg/kg) IVIG (2gr/kg)
IVIG (2 gr/kg) Steroids (2 mg/kg)
Steroids (2 mg/kg)
Hydroxychloroquine
Azithromycin
PICU admission Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Respiratory support/oxygen therapy BiPAP Nasal cannula Nasal cannula Nasal cannula
Outcome
Echocardiography Complete resolution of abnormalities on day 7 of admission. LVEF 70%. Normal coronary arteries. Complete resolution of abnormalities on day 5 of admission. LVEF 55%. Normal coronary arteries. Evaluation on day 6 of admission. Mild tricuspid regurgitation. Resolution of mitral regurgitation. LVEF 60%. Normal coronary arteries Complete resolution of abnormalities on day 5 of admission. LVEF 70%. Normal coronary arteries Complete resolution of abnormalities on day 8 of admission. LVEF 70%. Normal coronary arteries
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance LVEF 60% (EDV 76 ml/m2)
RVEF 57% (EDV 84 ml/m2)
No myocardial edema or enhancement abnormalities
LVEF 65% (EDV 78 ml/m2)
RVEF 69% (EDV 83 ml/m2)
No myocardial edema or enhancement abnormalities
LVEF 57% (EDV 70 ml/m2)
RVEF 57% (EDV 73 ml/m2). Mild trycuspid regurgitation.
No myocardial edema or enhancement abnormalities
LVEF 66% (EDV 64 ml/m2)
RVEF 67% (EDV 63 ml/m2)
No myocardial edema or enhancement abnormalities
LVEF 66% (EDV 64 ml/m2)
RVEF 67% (EDV 63 ml/m2)
No myocardial edema or enhancement abnormalities

BiPAP, Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure; LAD, Left Anterior Descending; EDV, End-Diastolic Volume; IVIG, Intravenous Immunoglobulin; LCA: Left Coronary Artery; LVEF, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction; ND, not done; PICU, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit;; RCA: Right Coronary Artery; RVEF: Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Z-score for coronary artery diameters was assessed according to: Dallaire F, Dahdah N. New equations and a critical appraisal of coronary artery Z scores in healthy children. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Jan; 24:60-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2010.10.004.

They received IGIV, and in three cases steroids were added because of persistent fever 48 hours after IVIG administration. They were discharged home with total recovery of the heart function.

The exact mechanisms of how SARS-CoV-2 causes this transient myocardial dysfunction in children with PIMS-TS are not well understood. During the last decade, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) has become the diagnostic tool of choice for patients with evidence for acute nonischemic myocardial injury, including myocarditis. The largest pediatric study assessing the role of CMRI in myocarditis included 143 children and young adults up to 21 years old. CMRI abnormalities were identified most commonly with late gadolinium enhancement. Based on CMRI features 117 children (82%) were interpreted as positive for myocarditis, 18 as negative (13%) and equivocal in 7 (5%) [3].

CMRI allows for targeting several features of myocardial injury: inflammatory hyperemia and edema, necrosis/scar, contractile dysfunction and pericardial effusion. CMRI is also a predictor of functional and clinical recovery. In summary, on the basis of available research, CMRI allows for a robust assessment of the extent of injury and dysfunction in clinically acute scenarios of myocardial injury [4]. However, the diagnostic value of echocardiography for myocardial injury is limited by the fact that many patients with less severe disease have a normal echocardiogram and the highly variable echocardiographic findings lack specificity.

A cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) was performed after discharge [median day after admission: +16, (9-17)]. The protocol performed included steady-state free precession cine 2D sequences (short axis, 4, 3 and 2 Chamber views); study of edema (Inversion Recovery sequence in short axis), hyperemia and capillary leak (early gadolinium enhancement) and myocyte necrosis and fibrosis (late gadolinium enhancement). Both ventricles had normal function and no edema or abnormalities in early and late gadolinium enhancement were observed in any cases.

CMRI did not show any myocardial damage in this series. CMRI is considered a highly sensitive technique to evaluate myocardial injury. Although the number of patients in this series was small, heart dysfunction did not seem secondary to myocardial viral injury in these children. An alternative hypothesis is that the exaggerated inflammatory response observed in these children with PIMS-TS could be the cause of the heart dysfunction [5]. The rapid recovery of the heart function after immunomodulatory treatment and the absence of myocardial abnormalities in CMRI support this hypothesis. Studies to further elucidate the cause of myocardial dysfunction in children with multisystem inflammatory syndrome related to COVID-19 are warranted.

Author contributions

LP, DB, AL, DC and BT had full access to all of the data in the study and take the responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. ALL authors contributed equally in writing the paper and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Transparency declaration

Potential conflicts of interest

No conflicts of interest.

Funding

There was not funding source for any of the authors.

Editor: E. Roilides

References

  • 1.Whittaker E., Bamford A., Kenny J., Kaforou M., Jones C.E., Shah P. Clinical characteristics of 58 children with a pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2. JAMA. 2020 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.10369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Feldstein L.R., Rose E.B., Horwitz S.M., Collins J.P., Newhams M.M., Son M.B.F. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in U.S. Children and adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:334–346. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Banka P., Robinson J.D., Uppu S.C., Harris M.A., Hasbani K., Lai W.W. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques and findings in children with myocarditis: a multicenter retrospective study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015;17:96. doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0201-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Canter C.E., Simpson K.E. Diagnosis and treatment of myocarditis in children in the current era. Circulation. 2014;129:115–128. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Imazio M., Klingel K., Kindermann I., Brucato A., De Rosa F.G., Adler Y. COVID-19 pandemic and troponin: indirect myocardial injury, myocardial inflammation or myocarditis? Heart. 2020 doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317186. heartjnl-2020-317186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Microbiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES