Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Parasitology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Parasitology
. 2020 Jul-Sep;15(3):321–331. doi: 10.18502/ijpa.v15i3.4196

Detection and Molecular Characterization of Babesia canis vogeli and Theileria annulata in Free-Ranging Dogs and Ticks from Shahriar County, Tehran Province, Iran

Gholamreza HABIBI 1,*, Alireza IMANI 2, Asghar AFSHARI 1, Soghra BOZORGI 1
PMCID: PMC7548474  PMID: 33082796

Abstract

Background:

We aimed to detect and characterize vector-borne parasites of Babesia and Theileria in dog and ticks by PCR assay. Canine babesiosis is a significant tick-borne disease caused by different Babesia species. As the infection has not been reported in Shahriar region Tehran, Iran, molecular techniques allowed us to identify tick-borne parasites in asymptomatic dogs.

Methods:

The number of 40 dog peripheral blood samples and 27 skin attached ticks were analyzed by molecular PCR assay. The specific primers were used for detecting Babesia canis, B. gibsoni and T. annulata.

Results:

B. c. vogeli was detected in 10 dog blood samples (25%). Additionally, T. annulata infection was identified in 13 dog blood samples (32.5%) and 18 isolated tick DNAs (66.7%). The results of PCR were confirmed by 18S rRNA and Tams1 gene sequence analyzing and have been registered in GenBank under following accession numbers for B. c. vogeli (MH793502) and T. annulata (MK105284). Conclusion: The verification of T. annulata infection in free-ranging dogs and ticks shows dogs might be considered as important natural carriers/reservoirs for T. annulata in enzootic region for bovine theileriosis. The obtained data may be useful for veterinary practitioners and dog owners to aware of Babesia and Theileria infection in dog and tick to establish the effective preventive measures.

Keywords: Babesia canis vogeli, Theileria annulata, Polymerase chain reaction, Dog, Tick

Introduction

Canine babesiosis is a tick-borne disease caused by the hemoprotozoa Babesia canis and B. gibsoni with world-wide distribution. The classic symptoms and signs of acute infection are characterized by hemolytic anemia, fever, hemoglobinuria, and may be lethal mainly in puppies (1).

B. canis is a large piroplasm (3.0–5.0 μm) and B. gibsoni is a small piroplasm (1.5–2.5 μm) during blood smear evaluation. There are three different subspecies of B. canis: B. canis canis, B. canis rossi, and B. canis vogeli. These subspecies are morphologically similar but had different vectors and pathogenicity (2).

Molecular methods, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), present a higher sensitivity and specificity than the peripheral blood smear evaluation to detect Babesial infection at the subspecies level differentiation (3).

With the advancement of molecular phylogenetic analysis, particularly 18S rRNA gene, it was recognized that B. canis has distinct subspecies, mainly B. canis rossi, B. canis canis, and B. canis vogeli (46). B. canis vogeli is found worldwide and is transmitted by Rhipicephalus sanguineus tick vector (7).

B. canis vogeli is the least virulent subspecies, but can cause clinical disease with severe anemia in puppies and subclinical infections with a low parasitemia in adult dogs (8, 9). Theileria annulata a protozoan parasite of cattle, but the strange occurrence of T. annulata infection has been recognized in dog in some parts of the world (10, 11).

Theileria species are intracellular protozoan parasites of wild and domestic ruminants transmitted by ixodid ticks. T. annulata is the causative agent of bovine theileriosis a disease of cattle widely distributed across southern Europe, North Africa and central Asia including Iran. T. annulata is transmitted by several Hyalomma tick species. Theileria infection causes a severe, and often fatal, disease of pure and cross-bred cattle. The tick vectors transmit Theileria infection from persistently infected cattle (carrier state) to a susceptible animal. Therefore, the existence of carrier animals is important for control and preventive program against theileriosis. The most probable reservoirs for T. annulata are ruminants like as cattle, sheep and camel, as well as wild ruminants, but recently some reports are for the role of canine from Europe, South Africa and Iran for Theileria infection in dogs (1014).

Newly, we have pursued canine babesiosis in provided dog blood DNA samples with history of carrying tick on their surface bodies from Shahriar region, Tehran, Iran.

We aimed to examine free-ranging dog blood samples and their ticks for Babesia spp. and T. annulata infection by specific PCR assay.

Materials and Methods

Blood and tick samples

Peripheral EDTA-anticoagulated whole blood samples and skin attached ticks were taken from asymptomatic free-ranging owned dogs. Between Apr 2016 and Apr 2017, a total of 40 free-ranging owned dogs were examined for haemoprotozoan infection and tick infestations. Of these, 27 adult ticks were collected and preserved in 70% ethanol for morphological identification and DNA extraction.

The study was approved by local Ethics Committee.

Morphological tick identification

Males Rhipicephalus tick species found on dogs could be differentiated by comparing the shape of adanal plates, accessory shields, and spiracular plates. Similarly, females of the same species could be distinguished based on genital opening, dorsal scutum, and spiracular plate shapes.

Sampling region

Free-ranging owned dogs were brought to private Zhaweh petclinic in Shahriar County, Tehran Province, Iran (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1:

Fig. 1:

Location of Shahriar County in Tehran Province, Iran. This area has a large livestock population and numerous dairy cow farming, according to T. annulata infection the region is considered an enzootic district for bovine theileriosis (www.wikipedia.org)

DNA isolation

Proteinase K and further phenol chloroform purification were done for DNA extraction (15). Hard ticks were minced using liquid nitrogen, and then the tick lysate was subjected to lysis buffer and proteinase K treatment. The extracted DNA concentration was measured either by agarose gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometry (A260) and determining the ratio of A260/A280. Additionally, quality of the isolated DNA was estimated by agarose gel electrophoresis.

PCR

Specific PCR assay for canine babesiosis was performed according to the Birkenheuer for detection and differentiation of three B. canis subspecies and B. gibsoni based on 18S rRNA gene sequence by semi-nested PCR technique (16) (Table 1). Specific PCR for T. annulata was performed based on the Tams1 gene sequence using a semi-nested PCR assay (Table 1).

Table 1:

Oligonucleotide primers used for canine Babesia spp. and Theileria annulata amplification

Primer Sequence (5′-3′) Reaction and/or use
5–22F GTTGATCCTGCCAGTAGT Full-length 18S rRNA forward primer
1661R AACCTTGTTACGACTTCTC Full-length 18S rRNA reverse primer
455–479F GTCTTGTAATTGGAATGATGGTGAC Seminested PCR outer forward primer
793–772R ATGCCCCCAACCGTTCCTATTA Seminested PCR outer reverse primer
BgibAsia-F ACTCGGCTACTTGCCTTGTC Seminested PCR B. gibsoni specific forward primer
BCV-F GTTCGAGTTTGCCATTCGTT Seminested PCR B. c. vogeli specific forward primer
BCC-F TGCGTTGACGGTTTGACC Seminested PCR B. c. canis specific forward primer
BCR-F GCTTGGCGGTTTGTTGC Seminested PCR B. c. rossi specific forward primer
Tms92F GAGACAAGGAATATTCTGAGTCC Specific for T. annulata forward primer
Tms92R TTAAGTGGCATATAATGACTTAAGC Specific for T. annulata reverse primer
Tms92nF CGGCACTGGAAAGAAGTACACC Specific for T. annulata forward inner primer
*

T. annulata PCR product for F and R primers is 597 and for semi-nested PCR by nF and R primers is 470 base pairs

PCR was performed in a final reaction volume of 20 μl containing 1X PCR premixed YektaTajhizTM, 6 ul ddH2O, 10 pmol of each primers, and 2 μl of DNA template. The reactions were performed in an automatic DNA thermal cycler (Techne, Germany) with the first denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min and were followed by 35 cycles, each cycle consisted of a denaturing step of 10 seconds at 94 °C, an annealing step of 20 sec at (58 °C for Babesia spp. and 54 °C for T. annulata), and an extension step of 35 sec at 72 °C, followed by final extension step of 5 min at 72 °C.

PCR product detection and sequencing

Amplified PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel, stained with RedSafeTM (Nucleic Acid Staining Solution), and visualized by UV transillumination. PCR products were cleaned and extracted from agarose gel and were submitted for bidirectional DNA sequencing by using chain termination method (Takapouzist, Bioneer, South Korea).

Blast analysis

The online program of blastn “Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST)” was used to find regions of local similarity between sequences by comparing the nucleotide or protein sequences to sequence databases and calculates the statistical significance of matches (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Two B. canis vogeli and T. annulata Shahriar isolates have sequenced and were analyzed using online blastn and finally registered in Gen-Bank.

Phylogenetic analysis

The DNA sequences obtained from two studied B. c. vogeli and T. annulata samples and registered sequence databases in GenBank, were used for phylogenetic analysis by BLAST pairwise alignment. BLAST computes a pairwise alignment between a query and the database sequences searched. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method (17). For purposes of this sequence tree presentation an implicit alignment between the database sequences is constructed, based upon the alignment of those (database) sequences to the query (Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis, Ver. 6 [MEGA6]). All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated (18).

Results

The expected amplicons with the sizes of 192 bp for B. c. vogeli 18S rRNA gene, partial sequence and 470 bp for T. annulata Tams1 gene, partial sequence were observed in all of the examined positive samples (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3).

Fig. 2:

Fig. 2:

Gel electrophoresis for Babesia canis vogeli specific PCR on dog blood DNA. Lanes 1 to 4 are specific PCR for B. gibsoni, B. c. vogeli (positive sample, the expected size is 192 bp), B. c. canis and B. c. rossi respectively, M is 100 bp DNA size marker and C- is the negative control

Fig. 3:

Fig. 3:

Gel electrophoresis for Theileria annulata specific seminested-PCR on dog blood DNAs. All samples except number 2 and 6 were shown positive as well as positive control (C+). C− is the negative control and M is 100 bp DNA size marker

The PCR for Babesia spp. identification were performed by the specific primers for 18S rRNA gene sequences of B. c. canis, B. c. rossi, B. c. vogeli and B. gibsoni. The results have revealed no amplification for B. c. canis, B. c. rossi and B. gibsoni, but the specific amplification was seen in 10 of all 40 dog blood samples for B. c. vogeli subspecies (Fig. 2).

The PCR for T. annulata by the specific primers for Tams1 gene sequence of T. annulata was determined that 13 of all 40 dog blood samples and 18 of all 27 R. sanguineus tick lysates were positive for T. annulata infection (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4).

Fig. 4:

Fig. 4:

Gel electrophoresis for T. annulata specific PCR on tick DNAs. Lanes 1 to 6 are specific PCR for T. annulata on tick DNAs (samples 1 to 4 are positive), lane 7, T. annulata positive control, lane 8, negative control and M is 100 bp DNA size marker

The sequences of the 18S rRNA gene of the B. c. vogeli Shahriar isolate and Tams1 gene of T. annulata Shahriar isolate were verified by DNA sequencing and registered in GenBank under accession number of MH793502 and MK105284 respectively.

Results of nucleotide Blast and phylogenetic analysis for B. c. vogeli. The identity percent was determined by online Blastn program for comparison of the obtained B. c. vogeli 18S rRNA sequence Iran isolate and other registered sequences in GenBank. The Blast analysis has showed 99–100% identity between Shahriar isolate and other registered B. c. vogeli sequences from Turkey, Romania and Egypt. Moreover, MEGA6 program analysis verified the mentioned above results. The sequence of B. c. vogeli 18S rRNA Iran isolate shows a very high degree of similarity with the isolates from Egypt, Turkey, Tunisia and Romania (100% identical). The moderate degree of sequence divergence was seen between Iran isolate and sequences from Brazil, Peru, Paraguay, Zambia, China, Thailand and Portugal (0.006 to 0.010). But the highest level of diversity was estimated between B. c. vogeli Iran isolate and sequences from India and Russia (0.026, 0.049 respectively).

The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the 18S rRNA gene sequence for B. c. vogeli Iran isolate and registered sequences in Gen-Bank. The phylogenetic analysis was performed using Neighbor-Joining method depicted in a rooted tree. The analysis involved 17 B. c. vogeli 18S rRNA nucleotide sequences. There were total of 309 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6 program. The B. c. vogeli 18S rRNA gene sequences were divided in two main clades and B. c. vogeli Iran isolate was close to isolates from Turkey, Romania, Egypt and Tunisia in clade B. However, B. c. vogeli isolates from China, Brazil, Zambia, Peru, Thailand, India, Paraguay and Portugal were in clade A (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5:

Fig. 5:

The rooted phylogenetic tree for B. c. vogeli Iran isolate and 16 different 18S rRNA gene sequences registered in GenBank. The sequences were grouped in two major clades (detailed described in the text). Theileria annulata as an outgroup sequence is the least related to the group of taxa that we are studying). Scale bar represents nucleotide substitutions per position

Results of nucleotide Blast and Phylogenetic analysis for Theileria annulata. The identity percent was determined by online blastn program for comparison of the obtained T. annulata Tams1 sequence of dog isolate (MK105284) and other registered sequences in GenBank. The homology was shown up to 98 percent between T. annulata Iran dog isolate and other T. annulata Tams1 sequences registered in GenBank.

The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the Tams1 gene sequence of T. annulata for Shahriar dog isolate and registered Tams1 sequences in GenBank. The phylogenetic analysis was performed using Neighbor-Joining method depicted in an unrooted tree. The analysis involved 17 T. annulata Tams1 nucleotide sequences.

Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6. Tams1 gene sequences were divided in two main clades and T. annulata dog isolate was close to T. annulata isolates from India and Bahrain, Italy, Egypt, Sudan, Spain, Mauritania, Iraq and Iran (Boein Zahra isolate) in the first clade. The second clade consists of T. annulata isolates from Tunisia, China, Turkey, Portugal and Iran (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6:

Fig. 6:

Phylogenetic analysis of T. annulata based on Tams1 gene sequences. The analysis involved of 17 T. annulata Tams1 gene sequences including Shahriar dog isolate. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree

The results of morphological inspection of ticks. As mentioned earlier, the number of 27 ticks were collected and studied for identification of Piroplasmida. All ticks were examined and according to the key criteria were identified as Rhipicephalus sanguineus (brown dog tick) (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7:

Fig. 7:

Rhipicephalus sanguineus adult male tick infected with Theileria annulata from Shahriar County. The adult brown dog tick (R. sanguineus) is small and red brown in color and no ornamentation on the body. It can be recognized by its elongated body and hexagonal capituli. Hexagonal basis capituli, an identifying character for the brown dog tick, R. sanguineus (shown in the right picture)

Discussion

Tick-borne piroplasms consist of two important protozoan genera Theileria and Babesia. Canine babesiosis is a significant tick-borne disease caused by different Babesia species. As the infection has not been reported in Shahriar region, molecular techniques allowed us to identify of tick-borne parasites in asymptomatic free-ranging owned dogs and ticks. First, the aim of this study was to identify Babesia spp., but according to the reports on the presence of Theileria spp. infection in dogs, the investigation was extended for detecting T. annulata. The results of the present study revealed a significant number of samples have infected to Babesia and Theileria in dog blood samples and ticks.

The specific PCR primers were used for detection of canine babesiosis for 18S rRNA gene, based on the nested-PCR and semi-nested PCR by four specific primers for differentiation of three B. canis sub species; B. c. canis, B. c. rossi and B. c. vogeli and B. gibsoni as well. The results showed us 25% of dog blood samples were infected to B. c. vogeli and the obtained data of DNA sequencing has recon-firmed the result.

Generally, R. sanguineus is often collected from domestic ruminants. Nevertheless, R. sanguineus is considered an important vector to transmit many bacterial and parasitic agents, including B. vogeli, Ehrlichia canis, Mycoplasma haemocanis, Hepatozoon canis to carnivores (19, 20).

In this study the number of 27 ticks was collected in Shahriar county of Tehran Province, and all were diagnosed as R. sanguineus, in agreement with previous reports performed in Iran reported from different geographic areas; R. sanguineus in Isfahan Province (6.5% in cattle), Rhipicephalus spp. in West and North-West of Iran (in transmission of bovine Babesia spp.), R. sanguineus in west parts of Iran (62% in small ruminants), R. sanguineus in Alashtar of Iran (17% in cattle) and R. sanguineus in Northern of Iran (82.35% of small ruminants), R. sanguineus in Southeast of Iran (2126).

The obtained results of this study for B. c. vogeli infection in 10 of 40 dogs blood samples (25%) in Shahriar region confirmed previous studies; B. canis was reported in one splenectomized dog in north of Iran (27), B. canis DNA were detected by PCR from 9 (7.5%) out of 120 dogs in Chaharmahal Va Bakhtiari provinces of Iran (28), B. canis was detected among 400 dogs (3.75%) in Ahwaz distric of Iran (29).

According to the previous unusual reports for T. annulata infection in free-ranging dogs from Spain and Southern Iran, thus we examined the dog blood samples and ticks for T. annulata infection. In this study the DNA sequences for T. annulata were found in 13 samples of 40 dog blood samples (32.5%) as well as 18 tick lysates of 27 ticks (66.7%) in Shahriar County of Tehran Province. These findings are in accordance with previous studies; T. annulata infection in dog from Shiraz (South of Iran) was detected by PCR (11), T. annulata infection in dog from Spain (10), Theileria spp., and T. equi infection in dog from South Africa (14), and T. annae infection in dog from Spain and Sweden (12, 13).

However, based on the recent reports, it seems that other hosts like as dogs could be a natural carrier for Theileria spp. infection, including T. annulata. Hyalomma spp. group are considered as main vector for Theileria transmission but according to the above mentioned reports, R. sanguineusis the brown dog tick with a vast worldwide distribution may be have an important role in Theileria spp. transmission.

Although, the blood smear examination by microscopy considered a routine and applied method for detection of babesiosis, but its sensitivity is less than molecular methods to finding a precise diagnosis (19), Moreover, B. c. vogeli could not easily be identified by microscopic examination (30). For this reason, more sensitive molecular methods like as PCR-based methods, are recommended (31).

The clinical symptoms of canine babesiosis are different, from subclinical infections to involvement of various organs and even fatal risk. It should be noted that many carrier dogs that have chronic infection, will not show clinical signs, due to premunition, unless there is a major problem with animal health (32).

PCR is a useful screening tool in dogs that are constantly exposed to piroplasms. The chronic condition of infection in these dogs makes them susceptible for illness relapse or continuing the chronic infection. In these situations, the PCR can be used appropriately to show whether the infection remains or has been likely removed (33).

The most important way to prevent canine babesiosis is tick control. Vertical transmission of Babesia spp. in tick vectors indicates that the tick population in the area has been able to remain infected for a long time and the dogs in that area are re-infected, and this progressive increasing of infected ticks will be repeated. The preventive measures consist of regular monitoring for ticks by pet owners and veterinarians, as well as the use of acaricidal treatment (34).

Additionally, a vaccine is available to prevent babesiosis in dogs. This vaccine is designed to protect dogs against B. canis called Pirodog® (Merial). The vaccine contains parasite-soluble antigens isolated from culture medium and provides a partial protection for dogs that are newly exposed to B. canis infection, which reduces the severity of clinical symptoms. However, vaccination does not prevent infection, but it seems to stop many pathological processes involved in the disease (35).

Conclusion

This study is the first molecular detection and characterization of B canis vogeli from free ranging dogs in Shahriar County by specific PCR method. Moreover, co-infection of T. annulata as a ruminant pathogen was detected and characterized in dog blood samples and R. sanguineus tick vectors by PCR. This asymptomatic state of B. c. vogeli and T. annulata infected dog as well as T. annulata infection in R. sanguineus tick vector might be important for better understanding the epizoology of canine babesiosis and bovine theileriosis in enzootic region and potential role of infected dog for natural reservoir to continuing T. annulata life cycle.

Ethical considerations

Ethical issues (Including plagiarism, informed consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or falsification, double publication and/or submission, redundancy, etc.) have been completely observed by the authors.

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to our respectable Dr. Alireza Golmohamadi passed away colleague, who had a critical role in this study. All the Zhaweh Pet-Clinic staff is appreciated for providing invaluable samples for performing this study and Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute for financial support.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Uilenberg G, Franssen FF, Perie NM, et al. Three groups of Babesia canis distinguished and a proposal for nomenclature. Vet Q. 1989;11(1):33–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zahler M, Schein E, Rinder H, et al. Characteristic genotypes discriminate between Babesia canis isolates of differing vector specificity and pathogenicity to dogs. Parasitol Res.1998; 84(7):544–548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Criado-Fornelio A, Gonzalez-del-Rio MA, Buling-Sarana A, et al. Molecular characterization of a Babesia gibsoni isolate from a Spanish dog. Vet Parasitol. 2003; 117(1–2):123–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schnittger L, Rodriguez AE, Florin-Christensen M, et al. Babesia: a world emerging. Infect Genet Evol. 2012; 12(8):1788–1809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lack JB, Reichard MV, Van Den Bussche RA. Phylogeny and evolution of the Piroplasmida as inferred from 18S rRNA sequences. Int J Parasitol. 2012; 42(4):353–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Uilenberg G. Babesia – a historical overview. Vet Parasitol. 2006; 138(1–2):3–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Inokuma H, Yoshizaki Y, Matsumoto K, et al. Molecular survey of Babesia infection in dogs in Okinawa, Japan. Vet Parasitol. 2004; 121(3–4): 341–346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Irwin PJ, Hutchinson GW. Clinical and pathological findings of Babesia infection in dogs. Aust Vet J. 1991; 68(6):204–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Penzhorn BL. Why is Southern African canine babesiosis so virulent? An evolutionary perspective. Parasit Vectors. 2011; 4:51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Criado A, Martinez J, Buling A, et al. New data on epizootiology and genetics of piroplasms based on sequences of small ribosomal subunit and cytochrome b genes. Vet Parasitol. 2006; 142(3–4):238–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bigdeli M, Mashhady Rafie S, Namavari MM, et al. Report of Theileria annulata and Babesia canis infections in dogs. Comparative Clin Pathol. 2012; 21(3):375–377. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dixit P, Dixit AK, Varshney JP. Evidence of new pathogenic Theileria species in dogs. J Parasit Dis. 2010; 34(1):29–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Falkenö U, Tasker S, Osterman-Lind E, et al. Theileria annae in a young Swedish dog. Acta Vet Scand. 2013; 55(1):50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rosa CT, Pazzi P, Nagel S, et al. Theileriosis in six dogs in South Africa and its potential clinical significance. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2014; 85(1):1114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Volume 3, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor; NY, 1989. B.16. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Birkenheuer AJ, Levy MG, Breitschwerdt EB. Development and evaluation of a seminested PCR for detection and differentiation of Babesia gibsoni (Asian genotype) and B. canis DNA in canine blood samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41(9):4172–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol.1987; 4:406–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, et al. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011; 28(10): 2731–2739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Solano-Gallego L, Baneth G. Babesiosis in dogs and cats - expanding parasitological and clinical spectra. Vet Parasitol. 2011; 181(1):48–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jongejan F, Uilenberg G. Ticks and control methods. Rev Sci Tech. 1994; 13(4):1201–1226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Akhtardanesh B, Saberi M, Nurollahifard SR, et al. Molecular Detection of Babesia spp. in Tick-infested Dogs in Southeastern Iran. J Dis Glob Health. 2016; 8(2):72–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Noaman V, Abdigoudarzi M, Nabinejad AR. Abundance, diversity, and seasonal dynamics of hard ticks infesting cattle in Isfahan Province, Iran. Arch Razi Inst. 2017; 72(1):15–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tavassoli M, Tabatabaei M, Mohammadi M, et al. PCR-based Detection of Babesia spp. Infection in Collected Ticks from Cattle in West and North-West of Iran. J Arthropod Borne Dis. 2013; 7(2):132–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fatemian Z, Salehzadeh A, Sedaghat MM, et al. Hard tick (Acari: Ixodidae) species of livestock and their seasonal activity in Boyer-Ahmad and Dena cities of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province, Southwest of Iran. Vet World. 2018; 11(9):1357–1363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Davari B, Nazari Alam F, Nasirian H, et al. Seasonal distribution and faunistic of ticks in the Alashtar county (Lorestan Province), Iran. Pan Afr Med J. 2017; 27:284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Telmadarraiy Z, Oshaghi MA, Hosseini Vasoukolaei N, et al. First molecular detection of Theileria ovis in Rhipicephalus sanguineus tick in Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2012; 5(1):29–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Niak A, Anwar M, Khatibi S. Canine babesiosis in Iran. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1973; 5(3):200–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Raki A, Doosti A, Shahrani M. Detection of Babesia canis in the blood samples of dogs in Iran by PCR method. Int J Biosci. 2014; 4(1):118–124. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Razi Jalali MH, Mosallanejad B, Avizeh R, et al. Babesia infection in urban and rural dogs in Ahvaz district, Southwest of Iran. Arch Razi Inst. 2013; 68(1):37–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Solano-Gallego L, Trotta M, Carli E, et al. Babesia canis canis and Babesia canis vogeli clinicopathological findings and DNA detection by means of PCR-RFLP in blood from Italian dogs suspected of tick-borne disease. Vet Parasitol. 2008; 157(3–4):211–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Solano-Gallego L, Capri A, Pennisi MG, et al. Acute febrile illness is associated with Rickettsia spp infection in dogs. Parasites & Vectors. 2015; 8:216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kraje AC. Canine haemobartonellosis and babesiosis. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet. 2001; 23:310–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Irwin PJ. Canine babesiosis: from molecular taxonomy to control. Parasit Vectors. 2009; 2(Suppl 1):S4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Solano-Gallego L, Sainz Á, Roura X, et al. A review of canine babesiosis: the European perspective. Parasit Vectors. 2016; 9:336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fukumoto S, Tamaki Y, Igarashi I, et al. Immunogenicity and growth inhibitory efficacy of the prime-boost immunization regime with DNA followed by recombinant vaccinia virus carrying the P29 gene of Babesia gibsoni in dogs. Exp Parasitol. 2009; 123(4):296–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES