Abstract
We examined the kinetics and mechanisms by which monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) utilize complement to rapidly kill targeted cancer cells. Based on results from flow cytometry, confocal microscopy and high-resolution digital imaging experiments, the general patterns which have emerged reveal cytotoxic activities mediated by substantial and lethal Ca2+ fluxes. The Ca2+ fluxes are common to the reported pathways that have been utilized by other toxins in killing nucleated cells. These reactions terminate in very high levels of cell killing, and based on these considerations, we suggest additional strategies to further enhance mAb-based targeting of cancer with complement.
Keywords: complement, therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), Ca2+, fluorescence microscopy
1. Introduction
Complement was first described and characterized by Bordet more than 100 years ago [1]; he demonstrated it to be a heat-labile factor in serum that promoted destruction (lysis) of bacteria and/or hemolysis of erythrocytes, each opsonized with the antibodies in immune sera. Complement is an important “first responder” that orchestrates the rapid clearance and destruction of a variety of microbial invaders as well as damaged and dying cells. It is therefore quite reasonable to anticipate that it should also be capable of destroying antibody-opsonized tumor cells. The importance of complement (C) in health and disease is now very well recognized and several outstanding reviews that describe its pathways and biological actions are available [2,3,4].
The first figure in the review in this volume by Golay and Taylor succinctly summarizes the important steps and controls in C-mediated killing of malignant cells opsonized with specific mAbs [5]. The traditional view of the mechanism by which C mediates the killing of antibody-opsonized cells was based on classic experiments that focused on C-mediated lysis of non-nucleated sheep erythrocytes that were first opsonized with polyclonal rabbit antibodies before they were brought into contact with a source of C and then incubated for a considerable period of time at 37 °C to promote hemolysis [6,7,8]. The results of these studies led to the concept that insertion of the membrane attack complex (MAC) pore(s) into the erythrocyte cell membrane allowed for influx of water and ions into the cell, ultimately leading to swelling of the cells followed by osmotic lysis and killing of the cells [6,7,8,9,10]. This model system has of course proven to be invaluable for dissecting out and identifying virtually all of the key components of C, including pathways, activating factors and inhibitors.
2. Nucleated Cells Are More Complicated: Important Questions
However, a considerable body of evidence, based on a series of studies by Shin’s group on the lysis of nucleated Ehrlich ascites cells (EACs) opsonized with rabbit polyclonal antibodies, suggested that the osmotic lysis concept could not explain how these nucleated cells were killed. Instead, the influx of Ca2+ mediated by MAC pores appeared to be the predominant lethal event [10,11,12,13,14,15]. The focus of these studies, completed more than 20 years ago, was on the terminal steps in the complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) reaction. In the present review, in order to concentrate on mechanisms, we have examined multiple individual steps in the CDC reaction that start with mAb binding and end with cell death in a continuously monitored reaction mediated by Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved mAbs reacted with both cell lines and with primary malignant cells from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Step | Time Frame * | Method | Figure | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
mAb binding | 30 s | Flow cytometry | 8 | [16] |
C1q binding and colocalization with mAb | 60 s | Flow cytometry | 2, 8 | [16,17] |
C3b deposition and mAb colocalization | 90 s | Flow cytometry, high-resolution digital imaging (HRDI) | 3, 4, 10 | [16,18,19] |
C9 binding and colocalization of C9/C3b/mAb | 60–120 s | HRDI, confocal | 11, 12 | [20] |
Ca2+ influx, transition-state intermediate | 40–135 s | Confocal, flow cytometry | 9, 10, 15, 16 | [16,21] |
tunneling nanotubule (TNT) generation | 120 s | Spinning disk | 4, 7 | [19,22] |
mitochondrial poisoning | 180 s 60–180 s |
HRDI, confocal | 9–11 | [16,20] |
decay of transition-state intermediate | 225 s | Confocal | 9, 10, 15, 16 | [16,21] |
MAC formation and cell death | 60–240 s | Confocal | 8–10, 15 | [16,20,21] |
* Time estimates are based on a range of experiments and techniques.
In order to elucidate these mechanisms, we will address important questions with respect to the development of C-fixing mAbs to be used in cancer immunotherapy: How effective are these mAbs when they “attack” nucleated malignant cells in the presence of C (usually normal human serum (NHS))? What is the primary mechanism of cell killing? It would seem important to identify and optimize the primary killing mechanism to allow for efficient use of key resources, which comprise C and mAbs. Moreover, although the targeted malignant cells will employ a variety of defenses to ward off mAb-mediated attack [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30], it is reasonable to ask that if the cells can be killed by CDC, then is there a common and general killing pathway? We developed several “complementary” (excuse the pun!) approaches to address these questions, based on quantitation and direct visualization and identification of many of the key separate steps in the CDC reaction. Many of our measurements of CDC made use of CD20 and CD37 mAbs in the killing of B cell lines and of CLL cells [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,31,32,33]. The similar patterns we have observed in these and other systems provide considerable evidence that there is indeed a common mechanism in the CDC reaction mediated by anti-tumor mAbs. In conducting these experiments, we followed the “ask-the-question” paradigm described by Nobel Prize investigator George Wald [34]:
“When it (scientific research) is going well, it is like a quiet conversation with Nature. One asks a question and gets an answer, then one asks the next question and gets the next answer. An experiment is a device to make Nature speak intelligibly. After that, one only has to listen.”
3. Experimental Strategies
Our approaches make use of fluorescently-labeled probes and fluorescent indicators, which include anti-tumor mAbs (lightly labeled with Alexa (Al) dyes, so as not to interfere with their activities, but adequate to monitor their binding to cells); C1q; mAbs 7C12 and 3E7 (specific for C3b/iC3b deposited on the cell) [35,36]; mAb HB43, specific for the Fc region of human IgG and able to recognize cell-bound mAbs [37]; Fluo-4, a Ca2+ indicator which is very sensitive to increases in the Ca2+ concentration in the cytoplasm and mitochondria of the cell [16]; tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester (TMRME), which is highly fluorescent only in viable mitochondria [16]; mAb aE11, specific for membrane attack complex (MAC)-associated C9 deposited on cells [38]; and vital fluorescent dyes such as propidium iodide (PI), 7-aminoactinomycin D (7AAD) and TO-PRO-3 which enter dead permeabilized cells and, upon staining nuclear DNA, become highly fluorescent, thus providing reliable markers for cell death and successful CDC [16,19,22]. We have been able to use this array of reagents to interrogate the quantitative and kinetic details of mAb-mediated killing of cancer cells in parallel experiments based on flow cytometry, high-resolution digital imaging in a flow cytometry environment (HRDI, Amnis technology [18]), and real-time multicolor confocal fluorescent microscopy movies.
4. Quantitation and Visualization of Early Steps in mAb-Mediated CDC: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies
Table 1 summarizes the discrete events in mAb-mediated CDC that we have investigated. Initially, we were able to demonstrate rapid binding of the mAbs ofatumumab (OFA) and rituximab (RTX), specific for CD20, to B cell lines and to primary B cells from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) [17]. We found that both RTX and OFA bound to the cells at the same levels (Figure 1, panels I–H). However, considerably more C1q was bound to the cells reacted with OFA (Figure 1, panels A–C) [17].
It is well established that during C activation, innocent bystander opsonization or lysis of nearby non-targeted cells is negligible [4,39,40,41]. Therefore, implicit in the specificity of the lytic C cascade is the presumption that there is both concentration and localization of activated C components at the nexus of C activation, which, for the classical pathway, would be the cell-bound mAbs at the plasma membrane target site (e.g., CD20). We have demonstrated this phenomenon of colocalization of reactive proteins at multiple steps in the pathway, starting with C1q binding [17]. First, we observed a high level of colocalization of Al647 OFA with Al488 C1q on Daudi cells quantitated by HRDI measurements (Figure 2 and Table 2). However, when we performed the experiment under identical conditions with Al647 RTX-opsonized Daudi cells, we found that although the amount of cell-bound RTX was comparable to the amount of cell-bound OFA, there was a very modest level of C1q binding (Table 2) and considerably less colocalization of cell-bound C1q with RTX. Based on analyses of their CD20 epitope specificities, it is now well established that OFA binds much closer to the cell membrane and with a slower off rate than RTX [19,31,42,43,44], and this has also been reflected “downstream” in that OFA is able to mediate CDC of B cells much more effectively than does RTX. This is particularly apparent in the case of ARH77 cells and CLL B cells. These cells are more resistant to mAb-induced CDC than most B cell lines because they express low levels of CD20 but high levels of C control proteins CD55 and/or CD59, and therefore the differences in the CDC efficacy of OFA versus RTX are readily demonstrated [19,31,43,44].
Table 2.
Expt. 1 | Expt. 2 | Expt. 3 a | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Al647 mAb (GMF) b | Al488 C1q (GMF) | BDSS c | Al647 mAb (GMF) | Al488 C1q (GMF) | BDSS | Al647 mAb (GMF) | Al488 C1q (GMF) | BDSS | |
Al647 OFA | 181,000 | 162,000 | 3.0 | 116,000 | 113,000 | 3.4 | 206,000 | 30,000 | 2.5 |
Al647 RTX | 186,000 | 7500 | 0.9 | 61,000 | 6600 | 2.1 | 155,000 | 2200 | 1.0 |
Al647 7D8 d | 133,000 | 2300 | 0.6 | 104,000 | 1000 | 0.9 | 210,000 | 1300 | 0.7 |
a Different Al488 C1q preparation. b GMF, geometric mean fluorescence. c BDSS, bright detail similarity score. d IgG4 (K322A).
Table 2 was originally published in The Journal of Immunology. Pawluczkowycz, A.W. et al. 2009 Binding of submaximal C1q promotes CDC of B cells opsonized with anti-CD20 mAbs OFA or RTX: considerably higher levels of CDC are induced by OFA than by RTX. J. Immunol. 183: 749–758. Copyright © (2009) The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. [17].
These findings also speak to the issue of thresholds for C activation [9,45,46] and cell killing by the MAC. Binding of RTX to B cells does indeed allow for some C1q binding, C activation, and subsequent C3b deposition and colocalization of the deposited cell-bound C3b with cell-bound RTX (Figure 3) [18,19]. However, we found that on reaction in NHS, the amount of C3b deposited on OFA-reacted CLL cells was 5–10-fold greater than the amount of C3b deposited on RTX-opsonized CLL cells, quantitated with flow cytometry measurements [31]. Thus, although there is comparable binding of these CD20 mAbs to the CLL cells and there is enough C1q bound to RTX-opsonized cells to activate C, less C3b is deposited on the cells compared to the amount of C3b deposition mediated by OFA [17,31]. In other words, the C3b deposition threshold needed to achieve adequate generation of the MAC to enable cell killing is not reached for most RTX-opsonized CLL cells. It is therefore understandable why OFA is considerably more effective than RTX in promoting CDC of CLL cells.
However, RTX can promote very rapid C3b deposition on B cells in the circulation of non-human primates. We found that when RTX is infused intravenously into cynomolgus monkeys, it rapidly binds to circulating B cells and this is followed, within 2 min, by deposition of C3 fragments in close juxtaposition with B cell-bound RTX [36]. Moreover, we also obtained blood samples from CLL patients treated with either RTX or OFA, and we observed C3 fragments deposited on their B cells in close juxtaposition with cell-bound RTX/OFA on samples taken within an hour of the start of the mAb infusions [31,47,48]. We note that multiple lines of evidence indicate that mechanisms mediated by receptors for the Fc region of human IgG (FcγR) expressed on macrophages are principally responsible for the in vivo efficacy of RTX [49,50,51].
5. C3b Deposition Kinetics, a Key Intermediate Step in CDC; the “Discovery” of Streamers
We next asked whether the kinetics of C3b deposition and killing of B cell lines or of CLL cells opsonized with these CD20 mAbs would also reflect differences between OFA and RTX. We conducted real-time spinning disk confocal fluorescence microscopy experiments in which Alexa-labeled mAbs specific for CD20 were reacted with B cells and then incubated in NHS as a C source supplemented with Alexa-labeled mAb 3E7 as a marker to reveal C3b/iC3b deposition. Importantly, mAb 3E7 does not cross-react with C3 and therefore can report C3b deposition in situ. [19]. We confirmed that under these conditions, both RTX and OFA promoted rapid C activation (~2 min), and that substantial colocalization of deposited C3b with cell-bound RTX was easily demonstrable on Daudi cells (Figure 4, panels A–C). However, an unexpected and initially very puzzling observation set the stage for more detailed investigations that have ultimately allowed us to carefully decipher the intricacies of the CDC killing mechanism for nucleated cells. We found that very soon after the C3b deposition reaction could be detected, long very thin fragments of cell membrane extended from the Daudi cells before they were killed, and it was possible to detect both membrane-bound mAb (RTX or OFA) along with colocalized C3b on these fragments. Control experiments in the absence of mAb 3E7 clearly demonstrated that these structures were not an experimental artifact (Figure 4, panel D). We initially called these membrane fragments “streamers”, but additional experiments revealed that we were studying the formation of tunneling nanotubules (TNTs), in a reaction that is mediated by rapid entry of large amounts of Ca2+ into a cell [22,52,53].
We performed a similar experiment substituting ARH77 cells for Daudi cells. As noted previously, OFA, but not RTX, can mediate CDC of ARH77 cells. We observed colocalization of OFA or of RTX with C3b on ARH77 cells when the cells activated C in the presence of NHS. However, TNTs/streamers were released only by OFA-reacted ARH77 cells, but not by ARH77 cells reacted with RTX (Figure 5, panels A–D) [19]. This finding strongly suggests that C activation on ARH77 cells induced by RTX was not adequate to promote entry of Ca2+ into these cells. That is, in view of the large differentials in C3b deposition and cell killing for OFA versus RTX-opsonized CLL cells, these findings again support the idea that the threshold for C3b deposition required for generation downstream of sufficient amounts of the MAC to effectively permeabilize ARH77 cells and promote Ca2+ entry is not reached for RTX-reacted ARH77 cells. The patterns we have described (colocalization of mAb and C3b, formation of TNTs) are not unique to CD20 mAbs. Certain mAbs activate C very effectively on binding to target cells because they bind at very high levels (>80,000 mAbs per cell). These include HB28 (anti-β2 microglobulin, mouse (IgG2b), alemtuzumab (anti-CD52), and W6/32 (anti-HLA), and all of these mAbs have also been demonstrated to produce streamers/TNTs on binding to target cells in the presence of C [19,22,33,54].
6. On the Importance of Ca2+
Based on these observations, we next focused on investigating the possible role of Ca2+ in the cell-killing phase of the CDC reaction [22]. Upstream deposition of C3b occurs in a process which requires Ca2+, but the downstream terminal steps in the C cascade, in particular, generation of the MAC, do not directly require Ca2+. Therefore, we briefly reacted Daudi cells with OFA in C5-depleted serum to deposit active C3b but not permit subsequent MAC formation. The cells were then washed and incubated in NHS-EDTA (to chelate Ca2+) or in NHS. Under both conditions, the MAC is then generated and the cells are killed (Figure 6); however, TNTs are not produced when the cells are killed in NHS-EDTA, providing strong evidence that in NHS it is entry of Ca2+ into the cells that promotes TNT formation (Figure 7) [22]. The degree of killing for C3b-opsonized cells reacted in NHS-EDTA was somewhat lower and slower than in in NHS. We suggest that under these conditions, where Ca2+ entry into cells is precluded, we are instead studying “death by drowning” of the cells due to influx of large amounts of water and loss of cellular constituents upon permeabilization of the cell membrane. However, it is our working hypothesis that when the cells are killed under normal physiological conditions for CDC, it is the influx of lethal amounts of Ca2+ that provides the most immediate fatal blow. A similar finding of slower cell killing was reported by Papadimitriou et al., who examined MAC killing of EACs in the presence of EGTA in which Ca2+ was chelated, thus precluding its rapid entry into the cells [14,15].
At this point, our research direction was strongly influenced by a general theory as to how toxins kill cells, developed more than 40 years ago by Schanne et al. [55]. They noted that in a first step, toxin could compromise the integrity of cell membranes by a variety of mechanisms that were usually independent of Ca2+. However, they suggested that “the second step of toxin induced killing most likely represents an influx of Ca2+ across the damaged plasma membrane … and represents a final common pathway by which the cells are killed.” Indeed, under normal physiological conditions, the external extracellular Ca2+ concentration in blood and interstitial fluid is in the millimolar range, but the Ca2+ concentration in most nucleated cells is approximately 0.1 uM, and levels above 2 uM are usually lethal [9,56,57,58]. Therefore, it is quite reasonable to expect that when the plasma membrane of a cell is effectively permeabilized by the MAC “toxin”, the cell will then be killed as a consequence of influx of Ca2+ and poisoning of many of its major metabolic pathways due to Ca2+-mediated excessive activation of a variety of proteases, endonucleases, and phospholipases [12,14,15].
7. Hexamer-Forming mAbs are More Effective in Activating C
7.1. Cell-Bound Hexamer-Forming mAbs Bind C1q
In a very productive collaboration, we made use of hexamer-forming mAbs that were developed by Prof. Paul Parren and his colleagues at Genmab [16,20,59,60,61,62]. We used these mAbs to further study the role of Ca2+ entry into cells in the mAb-mediated CDC reaction. These mAbs are modified in the Fc region, which substantially enhances their potential to form hexamers upon binding to cells. The modifications (e.g., E430G) promote much more effective and rapid binding of the classical pathway initiating factor, hexameric C1q, to the mAb-opsonized cells, and thereby increase the CDC potential of a wide range of mAbs. We also note that numerous other strategies are under investigation for increasing the ability of mAbs to promote CDC of tumor cells [26,27,41,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72]. It will be interesting to compare the efficacy of these strategies if they progress to clinical trials.
We first compared 7D8 (a close analogue of OFA [73]), RTX and the hexamer-forming variants, 7D8-Hx and RTX-Hx. Although approximately comparable amounts of the different CD20 mAbs bind to a given cell, 7D8-Hx and RTX-Hx are considerably more effective at promoting C1q binding and rapid C-mediated killing of the target cells (Figure 8) [16]. We also found that all four mAbs bound to the cells within 1–2 min.
7.2. Four-Color Confocal Microscopy Movies
We next performed a series of kinetic experiments to study CDC-mediated by 7D8-Hx based on four-color confocal microscopy movies. Raji B cells or CLL cells were internally labeled with the green fluorescent Ca2+ indicator, Fluo-4, to monitor Ca2+ influx. Viable mitochondria were visualized with TMRME (red). The cells were dispersed in NHS containing Alexa-405-labeled anti-C3b/iC3b mAb 3E7 (blue) to follow C3b deposition and TO-PRO-3 (purple) was added to the medium as a live/dead indicator. The screenshots (Figure 9) [16] from the movies of Raji cells reacted with 7D8-Hx demonstrate that many of the cells are opsonized with C3b (binding of blue anti-C3b mAb 3E7) after approximately 90 s. Soon thereafter, enough MAC must have penetrated the cells, because many of them are bright green (indicating influx of Ca2+), but some are still alive, and their mitochondria appear to be alive and intact, based on the viable red TMRME signal (135 and 180 s). We have identified these bright green cells as “transition-state intermediates”. They are alive, but are doomed, because lethal amounts of Ca2+ had entered the cells. Soon, by 180–270 s, many of the cells are dying or are dead, and this is evident based on three separate criteria: first, most of the Fluo-4 has leaked out of the cells; second, the mitochondria have been poisoned and are no longer stained by TMRME; and third, TO-PRO-3 has entered the cells. Careful inspection of the movies suggested that there was a slight lag (5–10 s) between the coincident leakage of Fluo-4/loss of the TMRME signal, and the final entry of TOPRO-3 into the dead cells. More details on these phenomena can be found in the Figure 9 caption.
7.3. Kinetics of CDC Monitored by Multicolor HRDI
We also made use of HRDI technology to visualize cells during the CDC process. Figure 10, top panel identifies three distinct populations of cells at the 40 s mark that are either: alive—Fluo-4 very bright (transition-state intermediate) and TMRME positive; and finally dead—Fluo-4 weak, TMRME negative, C3b positive and TOPRO-3 positive [16]. Verification that the residual Fluo-4 stain is in the mitochondria (identified with Mitotracker Red) of the cells is demonstrated in Figure 10, bottom panel. It is also noteworthy that there is no noticeable swelling of the dead cells (Figure 10, top panel) at early times, soon after they are killed. This again emphasizes that there is no evidence for an early osmotic burst reaction when the nucleated cells are first killed, in agreement with Papadimitriou et al. [15].
We also used HRDI to follow the CDC reaction for Z138 cells. In these experiments, we monitored C9 binding instead of Ca2+ influx. We were able to verify that binding of C9 to the Z138 cells followed C3b deposition, and that live cells containing bound C9 could be identified (Figure 11), but we know that these are also “doomed” cells that will soon experience substantial fluxes of Ca2+ [20]. In agreement with earlier studies, there is considerable colocalization of cell-bound mAb with deposited C3b, and in addition deposited C3b clearly serves as a “landing site” for binding of C5b-9, based on the colocalization of C3b and C9 (Figure 12). The identification of the transition-state intermediate (very bright homogeneous Fluo-4 signal) raised an interesting question: could we better validate its existence and stabilize it by slowing leakage of Fluo-4 out of the cell? The coincident question raised in these studies centered on the role of C9; is C9 essential to kill the cells as part of the MAC?
8. On the Role of C9
We identified small populations of cells that were killed by CDC but did not appear to be stained by C9 [20] (Figure 11, panel E), and we also found that CLL cells and Z138 cells reacted with 7D8-Hx could be killed by CDC in C9-depleted serum. In fact, we reported that the cells could also be killed in sera depleted of Factor B and Factor D (Figure 13). Other mAbs that promote high levels of CDC, including alemtuzumab and W6/32 (Mouse IgG2b, anti-HLA) also were able to mediate CDC in C9-depleted serum, but in all cases mAb-mediated CDC had an absolute requirement for C1q. These findings suggest that the alternative pathway of C (APC) does not appear to be needed to promote effective CDC mediated by the mAbs under investigation. It is generally believed that the APC, based on its inherent exponential amplification loop is responsible for most of the efficacy of C [74,75]. Our findings would suggest this might not be the case for CDC of tumor cells mediated by mAbs, where it appears that the classical pathway (C1q requirement) is key.
The results of the experiments with C9-depleted serum are intriguing, but not definitive because trace amounts of C9 could still be present in the depleted serum. However, the smaller C5b-8 pores that penetrate cells are approximately 3.5 nm in size (pores formed with C5b-9 are 10–11.5 nm) and in principle the C5b-8 pores should be adequate to allow for Ca2+ entry and killing of the cell [76]. Therefore, in collaboration with Drs. Paul Morgan and Masashi Mizuno, we used flow cytometry to investigate whether CLL cells could be killed by Ca2+ fluxes in serum genetically deficient in C9 [21]. Although we had limited amounts of the C9-deficient serum, we were able to demonstrate that mAb 7D8-Hx promoted substantial CDC of the CLL cells from six different patients (Figure 14). Compared to the reaction in NHS, the CDC kinetics were only slightly slower in the C9-deficient serum. We also asked whether the smaller C5b-8 pores would stabilize the transition-state intermediate (bright green, Fluo-4 very positive) by slowing down exit of Fluo-4 from the cell. Indeed, at the 150 s point, approximately 70% of the cells had been killed, but the net Fluo-4 signal was maximized at this point, indicating that even though most of the cells had been killed due to Ca2+ poisoning, the Fluo-4 had not yet leaked out of the cells (Figure 15). The bright green “dead intermediate” was therefore stabilized over a period of approximately 200 s (t = 100 s to 300 s). Due to very limited amounts of C9-deficient serum, we were not able to investigate the reaction with confocal microscopy movies. However, we suggest that further studies with serum from donors genetically deficient in C9 [77] would allow for more comprehensive investigation of these phenomena in the future. For example, it could be quite informative and useful to identify and differentiate tumor cells that are/are not susceptible to CDC in sera lacking C9.
9. Ca2+ Appears to be the Key: Implications
Our findings, as well as those of the Shin group [10,11,12,13,14,15], provide compelling evidence that it is the influx of Ca2+ into nucleated cells that is the primary cause of cell death in the CDC reaction mediated by anti-tumor mAbs. On this basis, there are several additional strategies that could be employed to bring even more efficacy to this process, based on increasing the flux of lethal amounts of Ca2+ into the targeted cell. One possibility is also to stimulate the target cell with other mAbs and/or ligands that promote uptake of Ca2+ into the cell. For example, Fifadara reported that mast cells costimulated at the high-affinity receptor for the Fc region of IgE (FcεRI) and chemokine receptor 1 (both of which promote Ca2+ fluxes) were not killed, but produced TNTs [78]. Apparently, these cells were “on the edge” of being over-stimulated and killed by Ca2+, but they survived. If these mast cells were reacted with a mAb that only modestly activated C and the Ca2+ flux was inadequate, then perhaps synergy in killing could be achieved by coincident treatment with agents that stimulate FcεRI and/or chemokine receptor 1. This proof-of-concept experiment could be extended to target other stimulatory sites on tumor cells that are known to mediate Ca2+ entry. Another approach would be to make use of a mAb–drug conjugate. If a Ca2+ ionophore (A23187 or ionomycin) [23] could be stably coupled to a C-fixing mAb with no damage to the potential of the mAb to mediate C activation, then the ionophore could independently further increase Ca2+ entry into the targeted cell to increase its cell-killing potential. A similar strategy could be based on coupling pore-forming agents such as melittin or perforin to C-fixing anti-tumor mAbs [23]. Indeed, immunoconjugates of melittin have been investigated for cancer immunotherapy [79]. Finally, as we suggested recently, a third strategy would be to develop a C-fixing antibody drug conjugate that blocks the machinery that pumps Ca2+ out of cells, thus synergizing with the CDC action of the anti-tumor mAbs [16].
10. The Future
As new and effective C-fixing mAbs are developed for cancer immunotherapy, it is very likely that they will closely follow the patterns we have described here (Table 1). Indeed, in collaboration with investigators at Genmab and Drs. Clive Zent and Richard Burack at the University of Rochester, we recently reported on the properties of CD37 mAbs that contain the E430G hexamer-forming modification [32]. We found that these mAbs promote very high levels (>98%) of CDC of CLL cells taken from newly diagnosed patients. The very high levels of killing are likely due to the fact that most CLL cells express approximately twice as many CD37 epitopes as CD20 epitopes [32,80]. Moreover, based on four-color confocal microscopy real-time movies, we found that upon binding of the CD37-Hx mAb to CLL cells in the presence of NHS, C3b is rapidly colocalized with cell-bound CD37-Hx mAb, and the same pattern of rapid cell killing mediated by Ca2+ influx is evident [80]. This includes generation of transition-state intermediates followed by poisoning of mitochondria, leakage of Fluo-4 out of the cell, and finally cell death, all within just a few minutes. We suggest that this cytotoxicity pattern can serve as a “litmus test” for evaluation of the potential of future mAbs intended to be used for cancer immunotherapy based on C-mediated killing.
11. Summary
As illustrated in Figure 16, we have examined and characterized, from the “point of view” of the cell, many of the key steps in the classical complement pathway that are activated when highly effective C-activating mAbs bind to tumor cells. The entire reaction is quite rapid, and both cell lines and primary CLL cells can be killed within just a few minutes due to influx of lethal amounts of Ca2+, clearly not allowing much time for any complex signaling pathways to be activated. The patterns we have described are likely to be quite general, and it may be possible to make use of the lessons we have learned in the development of additional innovative strategies that employ C and mAbs in the treatment of cancer and other diseases as well.
12. Patents
R.P.T. and M.A.L. are listed as co-inventors on a patent that describes the use of hexamer-forming antibodies.
Acknowledgments
The work described herein could never have been accomplished without the enthusiastic participation of the following individuals: Paul Beum, Frank Beurskens, Ricard Burack, Erika Cook, Adam Kennedy, Joanne Lannigan, Monica Liu, Paul Parren, Andrew Pawluczkowycz, Elizabeth Peek, Michael Pokrass, Michael Solga, Janine Schuurman, Jillian Tupitza, Jan van de Winkel, and Clive Zent.
Abbreviations
7AAD | 7-aminoactinomycin D |
Al | Alexa dye |
APC | alternative pathway of complement |
BDSS | bright detail similarity score |
C | complement |
CDC | complement-dependent cytotoxicity |
CLL | chronic lymphocytic leukemia |
EAC | Ehrlich ascites cell |
FcεRI | the high-affinity receptor for the Fc region of IgE |
FcγR | receptor for the Fc region of IgG |
GMF | geometric mean fluorescence |
HRDI | high-resolution digital imaging in a flow cytometry environment |
MAC | membrane attack complex |
mAb | monoclonal antibody |
NHS | normal human serum |
OFA | ofatumumab |
PI | propidium iodide |
RTX | rituximab |
TNTs | tunneling nanotubules |
TMRME | tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester |
Author Contributions
R.P.T. and M.A.L. wrote and edited this manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
No funding provided for the preparation of this manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
RPT and MAL have licensed mAbs 3E7 and 7C12 for commercial use through the University of Virginia Licensing and Ventures Group.
References
- 1.Cavaillon J.M., Sansonetti P., Goldman M. 100th anniversary of Jules Bordet’s Nobel prize: Tribute to a founding father of immunology. Front. Immunol. 2019 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Reis E.D., Mastellos D.C., Ricklin D., Mantovani A., Lambris J.D. Complement in cancer: Untangling an intricate relationship. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2017 doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ricklin D., Mastellos D.C., Reis E.S., Lambris J.D. The renaissance of complement therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2018;14:26–47. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2017.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mastellos D.C., Ricklin D., Lambris J.D. Clinical promise of next-generation complement therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2019;18 doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0031-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Golay J., Taylor R.P. The role of complement in the mechanism of action of therapeutic anti-cancer mAbs. Antibodies. doi: 10.3390/antib9040058. Submitted. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mayer M.M. Mechanism of cytolysis by complement. PNAS. 1972;69:2954–2958. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.10.2954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ohanian S.H., Schlager S.I. Humoral immune killing of nucleated cells: Mechanisms of complement-mediated attack and target cell defense. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 1981;1:165–209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Walport M.J. Complement. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001;344:1058–1066. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200104053441406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Morgan B.P., Luzio J.P., Campbell A.K. Intracellular Ca2+ and cell injury: A paradoxical role of Ca2+ in complement membrane attack. Cell Calcium. 1986;7:399–411. doi: 10.1016/0143-4160(86)90042-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kim S.H., Carney D.F., Papadimitriou J.C., Shin M.L. Effect of osmotic protection on nucleated cell killing by C5b-9: Cell death is not affected by the prevention of cell swelling. Mol. Immmunol. 1989;26:323–331. doi: 10.1016/0161-5890(89)90087-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Carney D.F., Koski C.L., Shin M.L. Elimination of terminal complement intermediates from the plasma membrane of nucleated cells: The rate of disppearance differs for cells carrying C5b-7 or C5b-8 or a mixture of C5b-8 with a limited number of C5b-9. J. Immunol. 1985;134:1804–1809. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kim S., Carney D.F., Hammer C.H., Shin M.L. Nucleated cell killing by complement: Effects of C5b-9 channel size and extracellular Ca2+ on the lytic process. J. Immunol. 1987;138:1530–1536. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Carney D.F., Lang T.J., Shin M.L. Multiple signal messengers generated by terminal complement complexes and their role in terminal complement complex elimination. J. Immunol. 1990;145:623–629. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Papadimitriou J.C., Ramm L.E., Drachenberg C.B., Trump B.F., Shin M.L. Quantitative analysis of adenine nucleotides during the prelytic phase of cell death mediated by C5b-9. J. Immunol. 1991;147:212–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Papadimitriou J.C., Phelps P.C., Shin M.L., Smith M.W., Trump B.F. Effects of Ca2+ deregulation on mitochondrial membrane potential and cell viability in nucleated cells following lytic complement attack. Cell Calcium. 1994;15:217–227. doi: 10.1016/0143-4160(94)90061-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lindorfer M.A., Cook E.M., Tupitza J.C., Zent C.S., Burack R., De Jong R., Beurskens F.J., Schuurman J., Parren P.W., Taylor R.P. Real-time analysis of the detailed sequence of cellular events in mAb-mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity of B-cell lines and of CLL B-cells. Mol. Immunol. 2016;70:13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2015.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pawluczkowycz A.W., Beurskens F.J., Beum P.V., Lindorfer M., Van De Winkel J.G.J., Parren P.W., Taylor R.P. Binding of submaximal C1q promotes complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) of B cells opsonized with anti-CD20 mAbs ofatumumab (OFA) or rituximab (RTX): Considerably higher levels of CDC are induced by OFA than by RTX. J. Immunol. 2009;183:749–758. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Beum P.V., Lindorfer M.A., Hall B.E., George T.C., Frost K., Morrissey P.J., Taylor R.P. Quantitative analysis of protein co-localization on B cells opsonized with rituximab and complement using the ImageStream multispectral imaging flow cytometer. J. Immunol. Methods. 2006;317:90–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2006.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Beum P.V., Lindorfer M.A., Beurskens F., Stukenberg P., Lokhorst H.M., Pawluczkowycz A.W., Parren P.W., Van De Winkel J.G.J., Taylor R.P. Complement activation on B lymphocytes opsonized with rituximab or ofatumumab produces substantial changes in membrane structure preceding cell lysis. J. Immunol. 2008;181:822–832. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.1.822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cook E.M., Lindorfer M.A., van der Horst H., Oostindie S., Beurskens F.J., Schuurman J., Schuurman J., Zent C.S., Burack R., Parren P.W.H.I., et al. Antibodies that efficiently form hexamers upon antigen binding can induce complement-dependent cytotoxicity under complement-limiting conditions. J. Immunol. 2016;197:1762–1775. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Taylor R.P., Lindorfer M.A., Cook E.M., Beurskens F.J., Schuurman J., Parren P.W., Zent C.S., VanDerMeid K.R., Burack R., Mizuno M., et al. Hexamerization-enhanced CD20 antibody mediates complement-dependent cytotoxicity in serum genetically deficient in C9. Clin. Immunol. 2017;181:24–28. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2017.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Beum P.V., Lindorfer M.A., Peek E.M., Stukenberg P., De Weers M., Beurskens F.J., Parren P.W., Van De Winkel J.G.J., Taylor R.P. Penetration of antibody-opsonized cells by the membrane attack complex of complement promotes Ca2+ influx and induces streamers. Eur. J. Immunol. 2011;41:2436–2446. doi: 10.1002/eji.201041204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Reiter Y., Ciobotariu A., Jones J., Morgan B.P., Fishelson Z. Complement membrane attack complex, perforin, and bacterial exotoxins induce in K562 cells calcium-dependent cross-protection from lysis. J. Immunol. 1995;155:2203–2210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hörl S., Bánki Z., Huber G., Ejaz A., Windisch D., Muellauer B., Willenbacher E., Steurer M., Stoiber H. Reduction of complement factor H binding to CLL cells improves the induction of rituximab-mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Leukemia. 2013;27:2200–2208. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Okroj M., Holmquist E., Nilsson E., Anagnostaki L., Jirström K., Blom A.M. Local expression of complement factor I in breast cancer cells correlates with poor survival and recurrence. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2015;64:467–478. doi: 10.1007/s00262-015-1658-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bordron A., Bagacean C., Mohr A., Tempescul A., Bendaoud B., Deshayes S., Dalbies F., Buors C., Saad H., Berthou C., et al. Resistance to complement activation, cell membrane hypersialytion and relapses in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients treated with rituximab and chemotherapy. Oncotarget. 2018;9:31590–31605. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fishelson Z., Kirschfink M. Complement C5b-9 and cancer: Mechanisms of cell damage, cancer counteractions, and approaches for intervention. Front. Immunol. 2019 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Geller A., Yan J. The role of membrane bound complement regulatory proteins in tumor development and cancer immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 2019 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Roumenina L.T., Daugan M.V., Noe R., Petitprez F., Vano Y.-A., Sanchez-Salas R., Becht E., Meilleroux J., Le Clec’H B., A Giraldo N., et al. Tumor cells hijack macrophage-produced complement C1q to promote tumor growth. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2019 doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Roumenia L.T., Daugan M.V., Petitprez F., Sautes-Fridman C., Fridman W.H. Context-dependentt roles of complement in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2019;19:1–18. doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0210-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Beurskens F.J., Lindorfer M.A., Farooqui M., Beum P.V., Engelberts P., Mackus W.J.M., Parren P.W., Wiestner A., Taylor R.P. Exhaustion of cytotoxic effector systems may limit monoclonal antibody-based immunotherapy in cancer patients. J. Immunol. 2012;188:3532–3541. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Oostindie S.C., Van Der Horst H.J., Lindorfer M., Cook E.M., Tupitza J.C., Zent C.S., Burack R., VanDerMeid K.R., Strumane K., Chamuleau M.E.D., et al. CD20 and CD37 antibodies synergize to activate complement by Fc-mediated clustering. Haematologica. 2019;104:1841–1852. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.207266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pokrass M.J., Liu M.F., Lindorfer M.A., Taylor R.P. Activation of complement by monoclonal antibodies that target cell-associated á2-microglobulin: Implications for cancer immunotherapy. Mol. Immunol. 2013;56:549–560. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2013.05.242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wald G. Nobel Prize Lecture: The Molecular Basis of Visual Excitation. [(accessed on 25 August 2020)];1967 Available online: https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/wald-lecture.pdf.
- 35.Tosic L., Sutherland W.M., Kurek J., Edberg J.C., Taylor R.P. Preparation of monoclonal antibodies to C3b by immunization with C3b(i)-sepharose. J. Immunol. Methods. 1989;120:241–249. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(89)90248-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kennedy A.D., Solga M.D., Schuman T., Chi A.W., Lindorfer M.A., Sutherland W.M., Foley P.L., Taylor R.P. An anti-C3b(i) mAb enhances complement activation, C3b(i) deposition, and killing of CD20+ cells by Rituximab. Blood. 2003;101:1071–1079. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Edberg J.C., Wright E., Taylor R.P. Quantitative analyses of the binding of soluble complement-fixing antibody/dsDNA immune complexes to CR1 on human red blood cells. J. Immunol. 1987;139:3739–3747. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mollnes T.E., Lea T., Harboe M., Tschopp J. Monoclonal antibodies recognizing a neoantigen of poly(C9) detect the human terminal complement complex in tissue and plasma. Scand. J. Immunol. 1985;22:183–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1985.tb01870.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Risitano A.M., Notaro R., Pascariello C., Sica M., del Vecchio L., Horvath C.J., Fridkis-Hareli M., Selleri C., Lindorfer M.A., Taylor R.P., et al. The complement receptor 2/factor H fusion protein TT30 protects PNH erythrocytes from complement-mediated hemolysis and C3 fragment opsonization. Blood. 2012;119:6307–6316. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-12-398792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Markiewski M.M., DeAngelis R.A., Benencia F., Ricklin-Lichtsteiner S.K., Koutoulaki A., Gerard C., Coukos G., Lambris J.D. Modulation of the antitumor immune response by complement. Nat. Immunol. 2008;9:1225–1235. doi: 10.1038/ni.1655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Melis J.P., Strumane K., Ruuls S.R., Beurskens F.J., Schuurman J., Parren P.W. Complement in therapy and disease: Regulating the complement system with antibody-based therapeutics. Mol. Immunol. 2015;67:117–130. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2015.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cleary K.L.S., Chan H.T.C., James S., Glennis M.J., Cragg M.S. Antibody distance from the cell membrane regulates antibody effector mechanisms. J. Immunol. 2017;198:3999–4011. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Teeling J.L. Characterization of new human CD20 monoclonal antibodies with potent cytolytic activity against non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Blood. 2004;104:1793–1800. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Teeling J.L., Mackus W.J.M., Wiegman L.J.J.M., Brakel J.H.N.V.D., Beers S.A., French R.R., Van Meerten T., Ebeling S., Vink T., Slootstra J.W., et al. The biological activity of human CD20 monoclonal antibodies is linked to unique epitopes on CD20. J. Immunol. 2006;177:362–371. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.1.362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hughes-Jones N.C. The classical pathway. In: Ross G.D., editor. Immunobiology of the Complement System. Academic Press; Orlando, FL, USA: 1986. pp. 21–44. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Okroj M., Osterborg A., Blom A.M. Effector mechanisms of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in B cell malignancies. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2013;39:632–639. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kennedy A.D., Beum P.V., Solga M.D., DiLillo D.J., Lindorfer M.A., Hess C.E., Densmore J.J., Williams M.E., Taylor R.P. Rituximab infusion promotes rapid complement depletion and acute CD20 loss in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J. Immunol. 2004;172:3280–3288. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.5.3280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Williams M.E., Densmore J.J., Pawluczkowycz A.W., Beum P.V., Kennedy A.D., Lindorfer M.A., Hamil S.H., Eggleton J.C., Taylor R.P. Thrice-weekly low-dose rituximab decreases CD20 loss via shaving and promotes enhanced targeting in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J. Immunol. 2006;177:7435–7443. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.7435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Grandjean C.L., Montalvao F., Celli S., Michonneau D., Breart B., Garcia Z., Perro M., Freytag O., Gerdes C.A., Bousso P. Intravital imaging reveals improved Kupffer cell-mediated phagocytosis as a mode of action of glycoengineered anti-CD20 antibodies. Nat. Sci. Repts. 2016;6:34382. doi: 10.1038/srep34382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gül N., Babes L., Siegmund K., Korthouwer R., Bögels M., Braster R., Vidarsson G., Hagen T.L.T., Kubes P., Van Egmond M. Macrophages eliminate circulating tumor cells after monoclonal antibody therapy. J. Clin. Investig. 2014;124:812–823. doi: 10.1172/JCI66776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zent C.S., Elliott M.R. Maxed out macs: Physiologic cell clearance as a function of macrophage phagocytic capacity. FEBS J. 2017;284:1021–1039. doi: 10.1111/febs.13961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Rustom A., Saffrich R., Markovic I., Walther P., Gerdes H.H. Nanotubular highways for intercellular organelle transport. Science. 2004;303:1007–1010. doi: 10.1126/science.1093133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Dupont M., Souriant S., Lugo-Villarino G., Maridonneau-Parini I., Verollet C. Tunneling nanotubes: Intimate communication between myeloid cells. Front. Immunol. 2018 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zent C.S., Chen J.B., Kurten R.C., Kaushal G.P., Lacy H.M., Schichman S.A. Alemtuzumab (CAMPATH 1H) does not kill chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells in serum free medium. Leuk. Res. 2004;28:495–507. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2003.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Schanne F.A.X., Kane A.B., Young E.E., Farber J.L. Calcium dependence of toxic cell death: A final common pathway. Science. 1979;206:700–702. doi: 10.1126/science.386513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bagur R., Hajnoczky G. Intracellular Ca2+ sensing: Its role in calcium homeostasis and signaling. Mol. Cell. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Negulescu P.A., Shastri N., Cahalan M.D. Intracellular calcium dependence of gene expression in single T lymphocytes. PNAS. 1994;91:2873–2877. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Joseph N., Reicher B., Barda-Saad M. The calcium feedback loop and T cell activation: How cytoskeleton networks control intracellular calcium flux. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2014;1838:557–568. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.De Jong R., Beurskens F.J., Verploegen S., Strumane K., Van Kampen M.D., Voorhorst M., Horstman W., Engelberts P.J., Oostindie S.C., Wang G., et al. A novel platform for the potentiation of therapeutic antibodies based on antigen-dependent formation of IgG hexamers at the cell surface. PLoS Biol. 2016 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Diebolder C.A., Beurskens F.J., De Jong R., Koning R.A., Strumane K., Lindorfer M.A., Voorhorst M., Ugurlar D., Rosati S., Heck A., et al. Complement is activated by IgG hexamers assembled at the cell surface. Science. 2014;343:1260–1263. doi: 10.1126/science.1248943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tammen A., Derer S., Schwanbeck R., Rösner T., Kretschmer A., Beurskens F.J., Schuurman J., Parren P.W., Valerius T. Monoclonal antibodies against epidermal growth factor receptor require an ability to kill tumor cells through complement activation by mutations that selectively facilitate the hexamerization of Ig G on opsonized cells. J. Immunol. 2017;198:1585–1594. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Strasser J., de Jong R.N., Beurskens F.J., Wang G., Heck A.J., Schuurman J., Parren P.W.H.I., Hinterdorfer P., Preiner J. Unraveling the macromolecular pathways of IgG oliomerization and complement activation on antigenic surfaces. Nano Lett. 2019;19:4787–4796. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ajona D., Hus Y.F., Corrales L., Montuenga L.M., Pio R. Down-regulation of human complement factor H sensitizes non-small cell lung cancer cells to complement attack and reduces in vivo tumor growth. J. Immunol. 2007;178:5991–5998. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.9.5991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Derer S., Beurskens F.J., Rosner T., Peipp M., Valerius T. Complement in antibody-based tumor therapy. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 2014;34:199–214. doi: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.2014009761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Mamidi S., Cinci M., Hasmann M., Fehring V., Kirschfink M. Lipoplex mediated silencing of membrane regulators (CD46, CD55 and CD59) enhances complement-dependent anti-tumor activity of trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Mol. Oncol. 2013;7:580–594. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2013.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Mamidi S., Hone S., Kirschfink M. The complement system in cancer: Ambivalence between tumour destruction and promotion. Immunobiology. 2017;222:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2015.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Macor P., Tripodo C., Zorzet S., Piovan E., Bossi F., Marzari R., Amadori A., Tedesco F. In vivo targeting of human neutralizing antibodies against CD55 and CD59 to lymphoma cells increases the antitumor activity of rituximab. Cancer Res. 2007;67:10556–10563. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Macor P., Secco E., Mezzaroba N., Zorzet S., Durigutto P., Gaiotto T., De Maso L., Biffi S., Garrovo C., Capolla S., et al. Bispecific antibodies targeting tumor-associated antigens and neutralizing complement regulators increase the efficacy of antibody-based immunotherapy in mice. Leukemia. 2015;29:406–414. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kolev M., Markiewski M.M. Targeting complement-mediated immunoregulation for cancer immunotherapy. Semin. Immunol. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2018.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Lindorfer M.A., Beum P.V., Taylor R.P. CD20 mAb-Mediated Complement Dependent Cytotoxicity of Tumor Cells is Enhanced by Blocking the Action of Factor I. Antibodies. 2013;2:598–616. doi: 10.3390/antib2040598. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Hörl S., Bánki Z., Huber G., Ejaz A., Müllauer B., Willenbacher E., Steurer M., Stoiber H. Complement factor H-derived short consensus repeat 18-20 enhanced complement-dependent cytotoxicity of ofatumumab on chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Haematologica. 2013;98:1939–1947. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.089615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Ge X., Wu L., Hu W., Fernandes S., Wang C., Li X., Brown J.R., Qin X. rILYd4, a human CD59 inhibitor, enhances complement-dependent cytotoxicity of ofatumumab against rituximab-resistant B-cell lymphoma cells and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011;17:6702–6711. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Van Meerten T., Rozemuller H., Hol S., Moerer P., Zwart M., Hagenbeek A., Mackus W.J., Parren P.W., Van De Winkel J.G.J., Ebeling S.B., et al. HuMab-7D8, a monoclonal antibody directed against the membrane-proximal small loop epitope of CD20, can effectively eliminate CD20 low expressing tumor cells that resist rituximab mediated lysis. Haematologica. 2010;95:2063–2071. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2010.025783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Harboe M., Mollnes T.E. The alternative complement pathway revisited. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2008;12:1074–1084. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00350.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Harboe M., Ulvund G., Vien L., Fung M., Mollnes T.E. The quantitative role of alternative pathway amplification in classical pathway induced terminal complement activation. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2004;138:439–446. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02627.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Sharp T.H., Koster A.J., Gros P. Heterogeneous MAC initiator and pore structures in a lipid bilayer by phase-plate cryo-electron tomography. Cell Rep. 2016;15:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Fukumori Y., Yoshimura K., Ohnokl S., Yamaguchl H., Akagakl Y., Inal S. A high incidence of C9 deficiency among healthy blood donors in Osaka, Japan. Int. Immunol. 1989;1:1968–1973. doi: 10.1093/intimm/1.1.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Fifadara N.H., Beer F., Ono S., Ono S.J. Interaction between activated chemokine receptor 1 and FcîRI at membrane rafts promotes communication and F-actin-rich cytoneme extensions between mast cells. Int. Immunol. 2010;22:113–128. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxp118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Shaw P., Kumar N., Hammerschmid D., Privat-Maldonado A., Dewilde S., Bogaerts A. Synergistic effects of melittin and plasma treatment: A promising approach for cancer therapy. Cancers. 2019;11:1109. doi: 10.3390/cancers11081109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Taylor R., Lindorfer M., Oostindie S., Cook E., Zent C., Burack R., Beurskens F., Schuurman J., Breij E., Parren P. Hexamerization-enhanced CD37 and CD20 antibodies synergize in CDC to kill patient-derived CLL cells with unprecedented potency. Mol. Immmunol. 2018;102:218. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2018.06.222. [DOI] [Google Scholar]