Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020 Apr 14;15(1):81–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.03.007

Repeatability of quantitative pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation and coronary plaque burden from coronary CT angiography

Technical Report

Evangelos Tzolos 1,3,*, Priscilla McElhinney 2,*, Michelle C Williams 3,4, Sebastien Cadet 2, Mark R Dweck 3,4, Daniel S Berman 1, Piotr J Slomka 1, David E Newby 3,4, Damini Dey 2
PMCID: PMC7554067  NIHMSID: NIHMS1584678  PMID: 32312662

Abstract

Background

High pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) attenuation and non-calcified plaque burden (NCP) measured from coronary CT angiography (CTA) have been implicated in future cardiac events. We aimed to evaluate the interobserver and intraobserver repeatability of PCAT attenuation and NCP burden measurement from CTA, in a sub-study of the prospective SCOT-HEART trial.

Methods

Fifty consecutive CTAs from participants of the CT arm of the prospective SCOT-HEART trial were included. Two experienced observers independently measured PCAT attenuation and plaque characteristics throughout the whole coronary tree from CTA using semi-automatic quantitative software.

Results

We analyzed proximal segments in 157 vessels. Intraobserver mean differences in PCAT attenuation and NCP plaque burden were −0.05HU and 0.92% with limits of agreement (LOA) of ±1.54 and ±5.97%. Intraobserver intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for PCAT attenuation and NCP burden were excellent (0.999 and 0.978). Interobserver mean differences in PCAT attenuation and NCP plaque burden were 0.13HU [LOA ±1.67HU] and −0.23% (LOA ±9.61%). Interobserver ICC values for PCAT attenuation and NCP burden were excellent (0.998 and 0.944).

Conclusion

PCAT attenuation and NCP burden on CTA has high intraobserver and interobserver repeatability, suggesting they represent a repeatable and robust method of quantifying cardiovascular risk.

Keywords: Pericoronary adipose tissue, non-calcified plaque, computed tomography angiography, coronary artery disease, repeatability

TOC Summary

Pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) and non-calcified plaque (NCP) are important prognostic markers indicative of adverse plaque. We evaluated the intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of PCAT attenuation and NCP burden over the whole coronary tree using a semi-automated method of assessing computed tomography angiography (CTA). Interobserver coefficients of variation were low for both PCAT (0.80%) and NCP (6.81%), with high intraclass correlation (0.998 and 0.944; p<0.0001 for both). PCAT attenuation and NCP burden on CTA are robust and repeatable measures that could be used to quantify clinical cardiovascular risk.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1584678-f0001.jpg

Introduction

Computed tomography assessment of atherosclerotic plaque subtypes and pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) attenuation can identify patients at increased risk of cardiac events.1, 2 However, to date limited information is available on observer variability of plaque burden or PCAT assessment. Our aim was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of quantitative measurement PCAT attenuation and non-calcified plaque (NCP) burden in each coronary artery, using a standardized semi-automated method on coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA).

Methods

Study Population and CTA Acquisition

Fifty consecutive patients were included from 3 recruiting sites in the Scottish COmputed Tomography of the Heart (SCOT-HEART) trial.36 All participants underwent CTA using 64-multidetector or 320-multidetector row scanners. CTA was performed following intravenous injection of 50–70 mL of iodine-based contrast medium at a flow rate of 5.5–6.5 mL/sec.

CT Coronary plaque and PCAT analysis

Plaque analysis was performed on CTA data sets by semi-automated software (Autoplaque 2.5, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center) by two independent expert readers. After defining the proximal and distal limits of the vessel segment, semi-automated plaque quantification was performed as described previously.7, 8 Scan-specific thresholds for NCP and calcified plaque (CP) were automatically generated following a region-of-interest in the aorta, and plaque components were quantified using adaptive algorithms.810; vessel wall and calcified plaque were edited if required. Low density non-calcified plaque (LD-NCP) was defined as NCP<30 HU.

We performed PCAT and plaque analysis in the proximal 40 mm of the left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries, following a previously described method.11 We also analyzed the left main stem (LMS) provided that its length was at least 10 mm. PCAT measurement was automated following plaque analysis, and we reported the mean PCAT CT attenuation in Hounsfield units (HU) within a 3 mm radius from the outer vessel wall.6 After a minimum of 12 weeks, observers repeated the analyses for all studies in order to examine the intraobserver repeatability and minimize recall bias.

Statistical methods

Statistical analysis was performed using R (Version 1.2.1335) and SPSS (IBM Corp. Released 2016. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). Continuous parametric variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and non-parametric data were presented as median (interquartile range [IQR]). Categorial variables were reported as frequencies (in percent). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated using the two ways mixed effects model. The repeatability coefficient was defined as 1.96×the standard deviation of the absolute differences of each measure. A paired two-sided t-test or Wilcoxon ranksum test was used to test for statistically significant differences. Two-sided P values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Bland–Altman analysis and the repeatability coefficient were used to assess for intraobserver and interobserver repeatability.

Results

Of the 50 patients, 35 (70%) were male. The median [IQR] age was 59 [53–64] years. Mean (SD) BMI was 29.02 ± 4.20. We analyzed 157/200 vessels; 43 vessels did not meet the criteria of length and diameter. A detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis of all vessels is presented in Table 1.

Table 1:

Quantitative analysis of all vessels between observer 1 and observer 2.

Plaque and Lesion Characteristics All Vessels (N=157)
Observer 1 Observer 2 P-value
Total plaque burden (%) 43.39 (36.13–53.28) 42.58 (35.79–52.88) 0.92
CP burden (%) 0.24 (0–2.57) 0 (0–2.878) 0.42
NCP burden (%) 40.35 (34.99–46.92) 41.11(14.32–47.92) 0.77
LD-NCP burden (%) 5.17 (3.73–7.92) 5.40 (3.83–7.59) 0.67
Intermediate density NCP burden (%) 20.85 (16.94–25.37) 20.60 (16.12–25.65) 0.64
High density NCP burden (%) 14.83 (9.11–18.80) 14.73 (8.50–19.01) 0.82
Plaque length (mm) 39.86 (9.92–39.94) 39.86 (10.01–39.94) 0.69
Remodeling index 1.1 (1.01–1.28) 1.07 (1.01–1.25) 0.33
Stenosis (%) 28.17 (21.67–40.19) 29.24 (21.20–40.44) 0.90
Contrast density difference (%) 11.97 (2.86–21.09) 11.22 (3.77–25.11) 0.92
PCAT attenuation (HU) −80.16 ± 9.05 −80.28 ± 9.09 0.90
*

CP: calcified plaque, LD-NCP: low density non-calcified plaque, NCP: non-calcified plaque, PCAT: pericoronary adipose tissue

**

Mean ± SD are included for continuous variables.

Intraobserver Repeatability

There was excellent intraobserver correlation of the PCAT attenuation (HU) and NCP plaque burden (%) (Figure 2 A and C). Intraclass correlation coefficients for PCAT attenuation and NCP burden values were 0.999 (95% confidence interval: 0.998 to 0.999; p<0.0001) and 0.978 (95% confidence interval: 0.954 to 0.989; p<0.0001) respectively. Bland-Altman plots of PCAT attenuation and NCP burden are illustrated in Figure 2 B and D. The mean absolute differences between the two examinations for PCAT attenuation and NCP burden were −0.05 (limits of agreement: −1.59 to 1.49) HU and 0.92 (limits of agreement: −5.06 to 6.89) %. The repeatability coefficients for PCAT attenuation and NCP burden were 1.36 HU and 4.62% and the coefficients of variation were 0.87% and 5.73% respectively.

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Intraobserver PCAT attenuation (HU) correlation and NCP burden (%) (A, C) and Bland-Altman plots (B, D) by all vessel analysis.

*NCP: non-calcified plaque, LOA: limits of agreement, PCAT: pericoronary adipose tissue

Interobserver Repeatability

There was excellent interobserver correlation of the PCAT attenuation and NCP burden for all vessel analysis (r = 0.9956, and r = 0.8446 respectively; Figure 3 A and C). Bland-Altman plots for interobserver analysis of PCAT attenuation and NCP burden are shown in Figure 3 B and D. Intraclass correlation coefficients for PCAT attenuation and NCP burden were 0.998 (95% confidence interval: 0.997 to 0.998; p<0.0001) and 0.944 (95% confidence interval: 0.923 to 0.959; p<0.0001) respectively. The mean absolute differences between the two examinations for PCAT attenuation and NCP burden were 0.13 (limits of agreement: −1.54 to 1.80) HU and 0.23 (limits of agreement: −9.84 to 9.38) %. The repeatability coefficients for PCAT attenuation and NCP burden were 1.27 HU and 5.55%, and the coefficient of variation were 0.80% and 6.81% respectively.

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

Interobserver PCAT attenuation (HU) correlation and NCP burden (%) (A, C) and Bland-Altman plots (B, D) by all vessel analysis.

*NCP: non-calcified plaque, LOA: limits of agreement, PCAT: pericoronary adipose tissue

Discussion

Our data suggest excellent NCP and PCAT repeatability. We have previously demonstrated the excellent correlation between the quantification of plaque components from coronary CT angiography, compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).12, 13 To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically investigate simultaneously the interobserver and intraobserver agreement in measuring PCAT attenuation and coronary plaque burden using semi-automated software in a “real-world” trial. We are also the first to perform PCAT and plaque analysis in the LMS, which confirmed a similarly excellent repeatability compared to the other coronary arteries. Between observers, PCAT attenuation and NCP burden showed excellent correlation and small mean differences (0.13 HU and 0.23%).

Our study is not without limitations. We performed only interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility; the interscan repeatability of plaque burden measurement has been well described in two previous studies.10, 14 Further, agreement with invasive IVUS has also been shown before. 12, 13 While the number of patients in our study is small, we have demonstrated excellent reproducibility both at an interobserver and intraobserver level with no significant outliers.

Conclusion

PCAT attenuation and NCP burden on CTA has high intraobserver and interobserver repeatability, suggesting they represent a repeatable and robust method of quantifying cardiovascular risk.

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

A) Observer 1 and observer 2 plaque measurement (red is non-calcified plaque, yellow is calcified plaque) and 3D plaque composition (orange is low density non-calcified plaque, yellow is calcified plaque) in the left anterior descending artery. NCP burden was 34.13% and 37.83% for observer 1 and 2, respectively. B) Observer 1 and observer 2 PCAT quantification of the left anterior descending artery. PCAT attenuation was −79.54 HU and −79.77HH for observer 1 and 2, respectively.

Acknowledgments

Conflicts of Interest: Outside the current study, D.D., S.C., D.S., P.S. received software royalties from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; D.D., D.S. P.S. hold a patent.

Abbreviations

CTA

Computed tomography angiography

CP

Calcified plaque

LD-NCP

Low density non-calcified plaque

LMS

Left main stem

NCP

Non-calcified plaque

PCAT

Pericoronary adipose tissue

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Hulten E, Bittencourt MS, Singh A, et al. Coronary artery disease detected by coronary computed tomographic angiography is associated with intensification of preventive medical therapy and lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:629–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chang HJ, Lin FY, Lee SE, et al. Coronary Atherosclerotic Precursors of Acute Coronary Syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:2511–2522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.investigators S-H. CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease (SCOT-HEART): an open-label, parallel-group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385:2383–2391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Williams MC, Hunter A, Shah ASV, et al. Use of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Guide Management of Patients With Coronary Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1759–1768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Newby DE, Williams MC, Flapan AD, et al. Role of multidetector computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of patients attending the rapid access chest pain clinic, The Scottish computed tomography of the heart (SCOT-HEART) trial: study protocol for randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2012;13:184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Investigators S-H, Newby DE, Adamson PD, et al. Coronary CT Angiography and 5-Year Risk of Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:924–933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hell MM, Motwani M, Otaki Y, Cadet S, Gransar H, Miranda-Peats R, Valk J, Slomka PJ, Cheng V, Rozanski R, Tamarappoo BK, Hayes S, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Dey D.. Quantitative global plaque characteristics from coronary CT Angiography for the prediction of future cardiac death during 5 years of follow-up. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging. 2017;18:1331–1339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dey D, Schepis T, Marwan M, Slomka PJ, Berman DS, Achenbach S. Automated three-dimensional quantification of noncalcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography: comparison with intravascular US. Radiology. 2010;257:516–522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dey D, Cheng VY, Slomka PJ, Nakazato R, Ramesh A, Gurudevan S, Germano Berman DS. Automated Three-dimensional Quantification of Non-calcified and Calcified Coronary Plaque from Coronary CT Angiography. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. 2009:372–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schuhbaeck A, Dey D, Otaki Y, et al. Interscan reproducibility of quantitative coronary plaque volume and composition from CT coronary angiography using an automated method. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:2300–2308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Goeller M, Tamarappoo BK, Kwan AC, et al. Relationship between changes in pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation and coronary plaque burden quantified from coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dey D, Schepis T, Marwan M, Slomka PJ, Berman DS, Achenbach S. Automated Three-dimensional Quantification of Non-calcified Coronary Plaque from Coronary CT Angiography: comparison with Intravascular Ultrasound Radiology. 2010;257:516–522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Matsumoto H, Watanabe S, Kyo E, et al. Standardized volumetric plaque quantification and characterization from coronary CT angiography: a head-to-head comparison with invasive intravascular ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 2019;26:019–06219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ovrehus KA, Schuhbaeck A, Marwan M, et al. Reproducibility of semi-automatic coronary plaque quantification in coronary CT angiography with sub-mSv radiation dose. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10:114–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES