Abstract
Escherichia coli (E. coli), a main mastitis-causing pathogen in sows, leads to mammary tissue damage. Here, we explored the effects of Lactobacillus johnsonii L531 on attenuating E. coli-induced inflammatory damage in porcine mammary epithelial cells (PMECs). L. johnsonii L531 pretreatment reduced E. coli adhesion to PMECs by competitive exclusion and the production of inhibitory factors and decreased E. coli-induced destruction of cellular morphology and ultrastructure. E. coli induced activation of NLRP3 inflammasome associated with increased expression of NLRP3, ASC, and cleaved caspase-1, however, L. johnsonii L531 inhibited E. coli-induced activation of NLRP3 inflammasome. Up-regulation of interleukin (Il)-1β, Il-6, Il-8, Il-18, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and chemokine Cxcl2 expression after E. coli infection was attenuated by L. johnsonii L531. E. coli infection inhibited autophagy, whereas L. johnsonii L531 reversed the inhibitory effect of E. coli on autophagy by decreasing the expression of autophagic receptor SQSTM1/p62 and increasing the expression of autophagy-related proteins ATG5, ATG16L1, and light chain 3 protein by Western blotting analysis. Our findings suggest that L. johnsonii L531 pretreatment restricts NLRP3 inflammasome activity and induces autophagy through promoting ATG5/ATG16L1-mediated autophagy, thereby protecting against E. coli-induced inflammation and cell damage in PMECs.
Keywords: Escherichia coli, porcine mammary epithelial cell, inflammasome, autophagy, probiotic
1. Introduction
Coliform Mastitis (CM), one of the most significant cardinal symptoms of postpartum dysgalactia syndrome in sows [1,2,3], poses serious economic implications for the pig farming as both the health of postpartum sows and the growth of their piglets can be severely damaged by mastitis-induced lactation failure [4]. Among responsible influencing factors, Escherichia coli is of importance because of its prevalence and the damage this bacterium may induce. The main management strategies for preventing and treating CM involve the overuse and misuse of antibiotics, which goes generally ineffective, but actually increases the risk of spread of antimicrobial resistance to commensal and opportunistic bacteria. Therefore, it is urgent to develop antibiotic alternatives, especially in the veterinary field.
Probiotics, such as Lactobacillus, have anti-inflammatory potential and can attenuate systemic proinflammatory immune responses [5,6,7,8,9]. A recent finding demonstrated that L. johnsonii significantly inhibited pathogen infection such as E. coli, S. enteritidis, and Staphylococcus aureus [10]. Our recent study showed that L. johnsonii L531, a probiotic bacterium isolated from the intestinal contents of healthy newly weaned piglets, exhibits the ability to reduce pathogen load and maintain metabolic balance [11]. L. johnsonii L531 also ameliorates enteritis of newly weaned piglets during S. infantis infection [12]. However, whether L. johnsonii L531 could provide a new strategy for preventing and improving CM and the exact molecular mechanism underlying probiotic actions remains to be elucidated.
Mammary epithelial cells (MECs) play an important role in initiating and driving an immediate and rapidly innate immune response when pathogens have overcome physiological barriers and entered the mammary through the ducts of the mammary gland [13]. MECs react rapidly to invading microbes by binding to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP) via pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), such as transmembrane Toll-like receptors (TLR) and oligomerization domain NOD-like receptors (NLR), and inducing the production of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines [14,15]. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), binds to ligand lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in Gram-negative bacteria ligand delivery or recognition to activate NF-κB and induce gene transcription encoding the inactive pro-IL-1β precursor [16].
Besides, the inflammasome, a multi-protein complex, is of important in the innate immune system. In inflammasome complex platform, the adaptor protein ASC recruits caspase-1 and leads to auto-proteolytic processing of pro-caspase-1 into its active form, which triggers the release of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 [17,18]. At present, several inflammasomes have been described, such as NLRP3, NLRC4 and AIM2. Nlrp3-deficient mice susceptible to experimental colitis and decreased expression of IL-1 as well as the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 [19]. However, excessive activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome results in disorders of autoimmune and metabolic [20]. The NLRP3 inflammasome can be a new target for treating mastitis, avoiding the development of antibiotic resistance [21].
Autophagy is essential for maintaining cell biological homeostasis under pressurized conditions that also play important roles in many innate and adaptive immune processes [22,23,24]. Given that pathogen infections represent one of the major threats to the health of animals and human beings, thus, autophagy pathway is necessary to outcome host-microbe interactions. For example, E. coli O157:H7 dampens autophagy via a Tir-dependent pathway mechanism while autophagy activation suppresses the adhesion of E. coli O157:H7 to intestinal epithelial cells [25]. Moreover, recent evidence highlighted the cross-talk between autophagy and NLRP3 inflammasome activation [26]. Autophagy deficiency causes the accumulation of damaged mitochondria, resulting in NLRP3-ASC assembly [27]. An obvious elevation of IL-1β and IL-18 expression is observed in macrophages from ATG16L1-deficient mice infected with LPS [28]. Autophagy captures and degrades inflammasomes through protein ubiquitination, resulting in the recruitment of SQSTM1 and LC3 [29]. Our recent study found that L. rhamnosus GG dampens autophagy to protect against diarrhea induced by Salmonella Infantis and ameliorates intestinal inflammation in piglets [30]. It remains to be determined whether L. johnsonii L531 participates in the regulation of autophagy to relieve inflammation in CM.
In the present study, a PMEC model of E. coli infection was established to test the hypothesis that L. johnsonii L531 attenuates E. coli–induced inflammation and cell damages by restricting NLRP3 inflammasome activity and promoting ATG5/ATG16L1–mediated autophagy in PMECs.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Ethics Statement
All animals were treated in strict accordance with the Guidelines for Laboratory Animal Use and Care from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the Rules for Medical Laboratory Animals (1998) from the Chinese Ministry of Health, under protocol CAU20151001-1, which was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the China Agricultural University.
2.2. Porcine Mammary Epithelial Cell Culture
PMECs were kindly provided by Prof. Guoyao Wu of Texas A&M University (Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA). The PMECs were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium/Ham’s F-12 medium (DMEM/F12) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 5 μg/mL of insulin, 5 ng/mL of epidermal growth factor, 1 μg/mL of hydrocortisone, 50 μg/mL of gentamycin and 1× PSN (penicillin-G, streptomycin, and neomycin) antifungal/antibiotics [31] at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. And the cells were trypsinized with a 0.25% trypsin solution containing 1 mM EDTA.
2.3. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions
Lactobacillus johnsonii L531 was obtained from a healthy newly weaned piglet in our laboratory [11]. In our experiments, L. johnsonii L531 was inoculated into fresh De Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) broth (Oxid, Hampshire, UK) at a ratio of 1:100 and grown for 18 h until reaching the OD600 of 0.5 at 37 °C under microaerophilic conditions. Bacteria were washed three times by centrifugation at 3000× g for 10 min at 4 °C, and then resuspended in sterile physiologic saline. L. johnsonii L531 was plated on MRS agar after serial dilutions and quantified by determining the amount of colony forming unit (CFU).
Escherichia coli O111:K58 (CVCC1450), purchased from China Institute of Veterinary Drug Center (Beijing, China), was grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (Oxoid) at 37 °C with constant shaking to reaching mid-log phase. Recombinant E. coli strain constitutively expressing red fluorescent protein (RFP) was constructed using the plasmid pFPV-mCherry with ampicillin resistance by electroporation, cultured in LB broth containing ampicillin, and shaken overnight at 37 °C. Bacteria were then diluted 1:100 in fresh LB broth containing ampicillin (100 μg/mL), and grown for about 2.5 h until reaching the mid-log phase. As mentioned above, mCherry-E. coli was washed three times by centrifugation at 3000× g for 10 min at 4 °C, resuspended in sterile physiologic saline, and quantified by determination of CFU after serial dilutions.
2.4. Immunofluorescence
PMECs (4 × 104 cells/well) were seeded onto 24-well cell culture plates, and cells were divided into three groups: blank control group (cells without mCherry-E. coli treatment but treated with primary antibody), negative control group (cells treated with mCherry-E. coli and treated with PBS instead of primary antibody) and model group (cells infected with mCherry-E. coli and treated with primary antibody). On day 2, cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 5 min and infected with mCherry-E. coli (2 × 106 CFU). At 6 h after mCherry-E. coli infection, cells were washed three times with PBS for 5 min to removed non-adherent mCherry-E. coli, and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min on ice. Cells were rinsed three times with PBS for 5 min and incubated for 45 min in blocking solution (1× PBS/5% goat serum/0.3% Triton X-100) to reduce non-specific background. Then PMECs were incubated with mouse anti-cytokeratin-18 antibody (1:200 dilution, ab668, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for overnight at 4 °C, and were washed three times with PBS, following by secondary antibody FITC-labeled anti-mouse IgG (1:100 dilution, F4143, Sigma-Aldrich, Budapest, Hungary) for 1 h at room temperature. The 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma-Aldrich, Budapest, Hungary) was used to stain cell nuclei for 5 min at 37 °C. Cells were visualized and imaged using an Olympus BX41 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Canon EOS 550D camera head (Canon, Tokyo, Japan). The experiment was performed three independent times.
2.5. Adhesion Assay
The adhesion assay was performed, as previously described [7]. Briefly, PMECs (4 × 105 cells/well) were seeded on a 6-hole cell culture plate. After cultured for 24 h, PMECs were pretreated with (i) DMEM/F12 medium alone, (ii) live L. johnsonii L531 (2 × 107 CFU), (iii) UV-irradiated L. johnsonii L531 (2 × 107 CFU), (iv) heat-killed L. johnsonii L531 (2 × 107 CFU), (v) L. johnsonii L531 supernatant (pH 7.2), or (vi) DMEM/F12 medium containing lactic acid (pH 6.2) for 3 h. PMECs were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and exposed to E. coli (2 × 107 CFU). At 6 h after E. coli challenge, the monolayer cells were washed four times with PBS to remove non-adherent bacteria and then were harvested by 0.05% trypsin treatment for 10 min at 37 °C. The amount of E. coli recovered was cultured on LB agar containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin and quantified by measuring colony-forming unit (CFU), as described above. The inhibition of adhesion was calculated by taking the adhesion of E. coli without any treatment as positive controls (100% adhesion) by the formula described. The experiment was performed three independent times.
2.6. Internalization Assay
The internalization assays were conducted as previously described [7]. Briefly, cells were treated with L. johnsonii L531 (2 × 107 CFU) or E. coli (2 × 107 CFU). At 6 h after treatment, the number of internalized L. johnsonii L531 or E. coli was determined by adding 100 μg/mL of gentamicin to kill extracellular bacteria. The amount of E. coli and L. johnsonii L531 recovered was cultured on the selective growth plate LB agar containing ampicillin and MRS agar, respectively, and both quantified by measuring colony-forming unit (CFU), as described above. The experiment was performed three independent times.
2.7. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
PMECs were subjected to four conditions: (i) medium alone; (ii) E. coli alone (2 × 107 CFU) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 50:1; (iii) incubation with L. johnsonii L531 (2 × 107 CFU) for 3 h; or (iv) pre-incubation with L. johnsonii L531 (2 × 107 CFU) for 3 h prior to exposure to E. coli. Cells were washed three times with PBS after incubation with L. johnsonii L531 for 3 h before exposure to E. coli. At 6 h after E. coli infection, followed by four rinses with PBS to remove the non-adherent bacteria, a monolayer of cultured PMECs was harvested and fixed with 3% glutaraldehyde (pH 7.4). The cells were observed using a Quanta 200 FEG scanning electron microscope (FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) and an H7500 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), respectively. The experiment was performed three independent times.
2.8. Cell Death Assay
Cytotox96 cytotoxicity assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was applied to assess the cell death by detecting LDH levels according to the following formula ((LDH infected − LDH uninfected)/(LDH total lysis − LDH uninfected)) × 100. The experiment was performed three independent times.
2.9. Real-Time Quantitative PCR
At 3, 6 and 9 h after E. coli infection, total RNA was extracted from PMECs for gene expression analysis using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). An ABI 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was used for quantitative real-time PCR analyses. The sequences of the primers used were listed in Table 1. Relative mRNA expression data were shown as fold-change according to the 2−ΔΔCT method as previously described [15]. Data of gene expression were normalized to the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh) gene. The experiment was performed three independent times.
Table 1.
Primers Name | Direction a | Sequence (5′→3′) | Accession Number |
---|---|---|---|
Gapdh | F | CCAGAACATCATCCCTGCTT | NM_001206359 |
R | GTCCTCAGTGTAGCCCAGGA | ||
Il-1β | F | GGCCGCCAAGATATAACTGA | NM_214055 |
R | GGACCTCTGGGTATGGCTTTC | ||
Il-18 | F | GCTGCTGAACCGGAAGACAA | NM_213997.1 |
R | AAACACGGCTTGATGTCCCT | ||
Il-6 | F | GGGAAATGTCGAGGCTGTG | NM_214399 |
R | AGGGGTGGTGGCTTTGTCT | ||
Il-8 | F | TCCTGCTTTCTGCAGCTCTC | NM_213867 |
R | GGGTGGAAAGGTGTGGAATG | ||
Tnf-α | F | GCCCACGTTGTAGCCAATGTCAAA | NM_214022 |
R | GTTGTCTTTCAGCTTCACGCCGTT | ||
Cxcl2 | F | GGAAGTTTGTCTCAACCCCGC | NM_001001861 |
R | AGCCAGTAAGTTTCCTCCATCTC | ||
Tlr4 | F | GCCATCGCTGCTAACATCATC | NM_001113039 |
R | CTCATACTCAAAGATACACCATCGG | ||
Nlrp3 | F | GAGCCTAGGAACTCGGAGGA | NM_001256770.1 |
R | GCTCATCAAAGGCACCTTGC |
a F = forward; R = reverse.
2.10. Western Blotting
As stated above, PMECs (4 × 105 cells/well) were subjected to the following conditions: (i) medium alone; (ii) E. coli alone (2 × 107 CFU); (iii) incubation with L. johnsonii L531 (2 × 107 CFU) for 3 h; or (iv) pre-incubation with L. johnsonii L531 (2 × 107 CFU) for 3 h prior to exposure to E. coli (2 × 107 CFU). Total proteins were extracted from the PMECs for Western blotting assay. The following primary antibodies included rabbit polyclonal anti-NLRP3 (1:2000 dilution, 19771-1-AP), rabbit polyclonal anti-ASC (1:500 dilution, 10500-1-AP), rabbit polyclonal anti-ATG 5 (1:1000 dilution, 10181-1-AP), rabbit polyclonal anti-ATG 16L1 (1:1000 dilution, 19812-1-AP), rabbit polyclonal anti-sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1) (1:500 dilution, 18420-1-AP) (ProteinTech Group, Rosemont, IL, USA), rabbit polyclonal anti-LC3A/B (1:1000 dilution, 12741) (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), and rabbit polyclonal anti-caspase-1 (1:1000 dilution, ab179515) (Abcam). To verify equal sample loading, the membrane was incubated with mouse anti-β-actin (1:5000 dilution, 66009-1-Ig), mouse anti-GAPDH (1:5000 dilution, 60004-1-Ig), and rabbit anti-β-tubulin (1:1000 dilution, 10094-1-AP) (ProteinTech Group). HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (1:5000 dilution, SA00001-1) or anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000 dilution, SA00001-2) (ProteinTech Group) were used as secondary antibodies. Band intensity was quantified by densitometric analysis using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The experiment was performed three independent times.
2.11. Statistical Analysis
SAS statistical software, version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), was used for statistical analysis. With regard to small sample sizes, normal distribution and homogeneity of variance were assumed using the UNIVARIATE (Shapiro–Wilk test) and HOVTEST procedures. Natural logarithm transformation was performed prior to analysis for Il-1β and Il-18 data to yield a normal distribution. Data of normally distributed adhesion ratio, LDH, real-time PCR and Western blotting were evaluated using analysis of variance procedures. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. Differences between means were assessed using Tukey’s honestly significant difference test for post hoc multiple comparisons. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1. L. johnsonii L531 Pretreatment Reduces the Adhesion of E. coli to PMECs
To visualize the localization of E. coli O111:K58 in PMECs, an E. coli strain harboring the pFPV-mCherry plasmid as described in materials and methods was successfully created, and was observed clearly under the inversed fluorescent microscope (Figure S1A in the Supplementary Materials). Immunofluorescence analysis of fixed PMECs infected with recombinant E. coli O111:K58 showed positive staining for cytokeratin-18, a specific marker of the epithelial cell lineage, and adherent RFP-enriched E. coli was detected on the surface of PMECs at 6 h after infection (Figure 1A). In the experiment, the insertion of a recombinant plasmid expressing RFP had no effect on the growth activity of E. coli O111:K58 (Figure S1B in the Supplementary Materials). Besides, high genetic stability of pFPV-mCherry plasmid was observed across time, which indicated that recombinant E. coli O111:K58 can be used in in vitro experiments or animal infection studies regardless of the long experimental period.
After 6 h following E. coli stimulation, the number of adherent E. coli was 1.48 × 106 ± 1.74 × 104 CFU (means ± SEM). Pretreatment with live, UV-irradiated and culture supernatants of L. johnsonii L531 result in the reduction of E. coli adhesion rate to 27.22% (p < 0.001), 65.16% (p = 0.003), and 73.86% (p = 0.025), respectively, whereas no change was observed in cells pretreated with heat-killed L. johnsonii L531 and DMEM/F12 medium acidified with lactic acid (Figure 1B). The internalization of E. coli by PMECs was not observed. Compared with E. coli infection only, there was no alteration for the count of E. coli in the supernatant regardless of treatment (Figure 1C).
3.2. L. johnsonii L531 Pretreatment Reduces PMEC Damage Induced by E. coli
The morphology of monolayer cells was observed under the general light microscope to determine whether L. johnsonii L531 makes any difference to PMECs infected with E. coli (Figure S2 in the Supplementary Materials). The untreated control PMECs presented a cobblestone-like appearance as well as a conservative density of cell proliferation. However, following infection with E. coli, the PMEC monolayer was severely disrupted and the cells showed partly vacuolation. L. johnsonii L531 pretreatment effectively reduced E. coli-induced cell damage up to 6 h after E. coli infection.
3.3. L. johnsonii L531 Pretreatment Ameliorates Disruption of PMEC Ultrastructure and Decreased Cell Death Induced by E. coli
Under SEM, the untreated control PMECs appeared plump, with intact cell membranes and abundant slender microvilli on the surface of cells. However, at 6 h after E. coli infection, cell membranes were disrupted, microvilli became less evident and E. coli could be seen attached to the surface of cells. PMECs incubated with L. johnsonii L531 alone remained cell membrane integrity, and exhibited evident microvilli. Pretreatment with L. johnsonii L531 decreased the degree of cell membrane disruption for up to 6 h after E. coli infection, and both E. coli and L. johnsonii L531 could be seen attached to the surface of PMECs. E. coli is straight and short rod-shaped, which is thicker than L. johnsonii L531, while L. johnsonii L531 is elongated and rod-shaped, which is thinner and longer than E. coli (Figure 2A).
Under conventional TEM (Figure 2B), in untreated control PMECs, organelles in the cytoplasm were structurally complete and distinct exhibited homogeneous electron density, normal mitochondrial structures, and integrity endoplasmic reticulum. In contrast, E. coli infection caused abruption of microvilli, loosening of the cytoplasmic matrix structure, disorganization, large vesicular nuclei, and hazy mitochondria. PMECs incubated with L. johnsonii L531 alone maintained a normal appearance. Pretreatment with L. johnsonii L531 alleviated the damage of PMEC ultrastructure for up to 6 h after E. coli infection, and mitochondria were readily visible within autophagosomes with a characteristic double-membrane structure.
Cell death was assessed by measuring the release of LDH at 6 h after E. coli infection (Figure 2C). Obviously, E. coli infection increased the percentage of dead cells (p < 0.001), while L. johnsonii L531 pre-incubation effectively decreased the E. coli–induced PMEC death.
3.4. L. johnsonii L531 Pretreatment Ameliorates E. coli-Induced Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasome
There were no significant changes in Tlr4 mRNA expression of PMECs at 3 h after E. coli infection or L. johnsonii L531 pretreatment. Compared with untreated control cells, the mRNA expression of Tlr4 was increased in cells infected with E. coli alone at 6 and 9 h after challenge (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively; Figure 3A), whereas L. johnsonii L531 pretreatment prior to E. coli infection led to a decrease in Tlr4 mRNA expression in PMECs in comparision to cells only infected with E. coli at 6 and 9 h (p = 0.002 and p = 0.003, respectively). Moreover, no differences in Tlr4 mRNA expression were observed between control cells and cells pretreated with L. johnsonii L531 alone at 6 h post-infection.
Upon E. coli challenge, the Nlrp3 mRNA expression was upregulated at 3, 6 and 9 h post-infection in PMECs compared with untreated control cells (p < 0.001), but this increase was attenuated by L. johnsonii L531 pretreatment (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.038, respectively; Figure 3B). The Western blotting analysis was consistent with the qRT-PCR results, at 6 h, the PMECs exposed to E. coli alone had higher NLRP3 protein expression than the untreated control cells and cells only pretreated with L. johnsonii L531 (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001), while L. johnsonii L531 pretreatment followed by E. coli infection resulted in a decrease in NLRP3 protein expression in comparison to the cells only exposed to E. coli (p < 0.001, Figure 3C). Likewise, expression of ASC protein was elevated at 6 h after E. coli infection compared with the untreated control cells and cells only pretreated with L. johnsonii L531 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002), whereas this up-regulation was inhibited by pre-incubation with L. johnsonii L531 (p = 0.013, Figure 3D). Pretreatment with L. johnsonii L531 also attenuated E. coli-induced increase in the expression of active isoform caspase-1 p10 protein (p = 0.006, Figure 3E).
3.5. L. johnsonii L531 Pretreatment Suppresses E. coli-Induced Cytokine and Chemokine mRNA Expression in PMECs
With a particular focus on differentially expressed genes associated with inflammatory response, qRT-PCR was conducted to investigate the defense-related biological pathways of PMECs to E. coli infection.
Compared with untreated control PMECs, an immediate and strong up-regulation of Il-1β mRNA expression in cells infected with E. coli only was observed at all time points tested (p < 0.001), but not in cells incubated with L. johnsonii L531 only (Figure 4A). The increase in Il-1β mRNA expression induced by E. coli was attenuated by pre-incubation with L. johnsonii L531 at all time points (p = 0.001, p = 0.012, and p < 0.001, respectively). Similar profile of changes was observed in Tnf-α and Cxcl2 mRNA expression during E. coli infection (Figure 4E,F).
There was a dramatic up-regulation in the level of Il-18 expression in cells with E. coli infection alone, at different time points tested (3, 6, and 9 h), when compared with that in untreated control PMECs (p = 0.004, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively; Figure 4B). In PMECs, preincubate with L. johnsonii L531 led to a considerable decrease in the expression of Il-18 in comparision to cells only infected with E. coli at 6 h and 9 h (p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively).
The increase of Il-6 mRNA expression in cells infected with E. coli alone was statistically significant when compared with control PMECs at various time points after E. coli challenge (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.012, respectively). Whereas pretreatment with L. johnsonii L531 attenuated E. coli–induced increase in Il-6 expression at 3 h and 6 h (p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively; Figure 4C)
Likewise, an early increase in Il-8 mRNA expression was observed upon infection with E. coli at 3 h and 6 h post-infection (p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). Pretreatment with L. johnsonii L531 decreased the level of Il-8 expression in comparision to cells infected with E. coli alone at 3 and 6 h (p < 0.001, and p = 0.031, respectively; Figure 4D), whereas this phenomenon was not observed at later time points.
3.6. L. johnsonii L531 Pretreatment Reverses the Inhibitory Effect of E. coli on Autophagy in PMECs
Compared with untreated control cells, the expression of ATG5 protein was decreased at 6 h after E. coli infection in cells infected with E. coli alone (p = 0.026), while there was a statistically dramatic increase in ATG5 protein expression in cells incubated with L. johnsonii L531 alone or pretreated with L. johnsonii L531 followed by E. coli infection when compared with that in cells only infected with E. coli (p = 0.005 and p = 0.001, Figure 5A). Similarly, a lower expression of ATG16L1 protein was found in cells only infected with E. coli in comparision to the cells of untreated control (p = 0.019, Figure 5B). Compared with the cells infected with E. coli alone, an elevated expression of ATG16L1 protein in cells incubated with L. johnsonii L531 alone or pretreated with L. johnsonii L531 followed by E. coli infection was observed (p < 0.001, and p < 0.001), even than in cells of untreated control (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Interestingly, at 6 h, PMECs infected with E. coli alone had higher expression of SQSTM1 protein than did the cells of untreated control (p = 0.047, Figure 5C). However, SQSTM1 protein expression was decreased in PMECs incubated with L. johnsonii L531 or the group of L. johnsonii L531 pretreatment followed by E. coli infection than in PMECs infected with E. coli alone (P < 0.001, and P = 0.001), even lower than in untreated control cells (p = 0.001, and p = 0.023). There was a down-regulation in the expression of LC3A/B-II protein in PMECs infected with E. coli alone than in untreated contro cells (p = 0.049), but L. johnsonii L531 pretreatment upregulated LC3A/B-II protein expression compared with cells infected with E. coli alone (p = 0.010; Figure 5D). PMECs incubated with L. johnsonii L531 alone had higher expression of LC3A/B-II protein than did cells of untreated control, cells infected with E. coli alone or pretreated with L. johnsonii L531 (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.005, respectively).
To further explore the effect of L. johnsonii L531 on autophagy in PMECs induced by E. coli, cells were treated with Chloroquine (CQ) to inhibit autophagic degradation. Cells were treated with 20 μM CQ for 2 h (optimum working conditions shown in Figure 5E) and then the expression of LC3A/B-II was detected. Western blot results showed that cells treated with L. johnsonii L531 had higher expression of LC3A/B-II protein than did the control cells with or without CQ treatment (p = 0.001, and p = 0.020, respectively; Figure 5E). As expected, CQ increased the LC3A/B-II accumulation in both treated cells (p = 0.036 and p = 0.037). Compared with cells that CQ treatment alone, cells co-incubated with L. johnsonii L531 and CQ had higher expression of LC3A/B-II protein (p = 0.001), indicating L. johnsonii L531 still increased the LC3A/B-II accumulation when autophagic degradation was inhibited.
Furthermore, the autophagy inhibitor 3-methyladenine (3-MA) was used to inhibit the synthesis of autophagosomes. Cells were treated with 2.5 mM 3-MA for 12 h (optimum working conditions shown in Figure 5F) and then the expression of LC3A/B-II and SQSTM1 was detected. As shown in Figure 5F, in the absence of 3MA, compared with the untreated control cells, the LC3A/B-II expression was obviously increased (p = 0.003), but the SQSTM1 expression was obviously decreased (p = 0.310) in cells treated with L. johnsonii L531. Moreover, 3MA reduced the expression of LC3A/B-II (p = 0.003 and p = 0.039) but elevated the expression of SQSTM1 (p = 0.001 and p = 0.047) in both control cells and cells treated with L. johnsonii L531. Notably, in cells co-incubated with L. johnsonii L531 and 3-MA, LC3A/B-II expression was increased compared with cells treated with 3-MA alone (p = 0.035), and SQSTM1 expression was decreased in cells co-incubated with L. johnsonii L531 and 3-MA than cells treated with 3-MA alone (p = 0.001).
4. Discussion
Probiotics are widely used in the treatment of mastitis for their good antibacterial activity and multiple biological functions. Oral application of Lactobacillus salivarius PS2 in adequate amounts during late pregnancy can be an efficient approach to prevent infectious mastitis for women [32]. Some studies have shown that lactic acid bacteria (LAB) used in animal feed at the dry-off period constitutes an alternative tool for bovine mastitis prevention [33]. L. rhamnosus GR-1 is considered as a beneficial microbe to reduce bovine mastitis via the activities of inhibiting pathogen adhesion and immunomodulatory capacity [7]. However, Lactobacilli have species/strain-specific characteristics in response to external factors such as defense against pathogen infections. A meta-analysis showed that the effectiveness of preventing strategies in pathogen infection using probiotic supplements is associated with species of specific probiotic [34]. L. johnsonii L531 has been revealed to improve nutrient digestion and absorption, inhibit pathogeny microbiology growth and promote microbiota homeostasis of the intestinal tract in piglets during the critical weaning period [11]. Additionally, our recent study showed that administration of L. johnsonii L531 ameliorates enteritis of newly weaned piglets during S. infantis infection by promoting IgA secretion, reducing inflammation, and eliminating the damaged mitochondria [12]. In the present study, we found that pretreatment with L. johnsonii L531 restraints E. coli adhesion due to competitive exclusion and the production of inhibitory factors, thereby ameliorating E. coli–induced cell damages. L. johnsonii L531 also attenuates E. coli–induced inflammation by restricting NLRP3 inflammasome activity and promoting ATG5/ATG16L1-mediated autophagy in PMECs.
The adhesion to host epithelial cells is a prerequisite for E. coli successfully infection [35]. In this research, preincubation of PMECs with live, UV-irradiated and culture supernatants of L. johnsonii L531 had no killing effect on E. coli directly but did result in an obvious reduction of cell-adherent E. coli compared with that observed in PMECs infected with E. coli. The necessity of pretreatment implies that there is a competition for binding sites. Surface layer proteins and exopolysaccharides of probiotics are likely to make a significant contribution to establishing prior colonization and exclusion of pathogens by repressing the formation of pathogenic biofilms via inhibiting adhesion [36,37]. The competitive exclusion of pathogens from the surface of PMECs by L. johnsonii L531 proposed to be one of the potential mechanisms for inhibiting E. coli infections. Moreover, some metabolites produced by probiotics, such as bacteriocins, indole, and H2O2, can inhibit the growth and colonization by pathogenic bacteria [36,38]. Although the bacterium-specific mechanism by which L. johnsonii L531 exerted the benefits remains unclear, our data suggest that in addition to directly suppress E. coli adhesion by competitive exclusion or the production of inhibitory factors, L. johnsonii L531 can indirectly affect or interfere with E. coli infections by stimulating host immune defenses.
The innate immune system, being the first line of defense against pathogen infection, which helps initiate long-lasting adaptive immunity to provide enhanced protection against subsequent reinfection by the same microorganism. Innate recognition of PAMP is mediated by evolutionary conserved PRR such as membrane-associated TLRs and cytoplasmic NOD-like receptors, mostly stimulated by NF-ĸB signaling [39]. For instance, TLR2 identifies cell wall components of gram-positive bacteria [40,41], whereas TLR4 identifies LPS from gram-negative bacteria [16,42]. Studies show that TLR4 is the main pattern recognition receptor in response to E. coli-induced mastitis in mice, goats and dairy cows [43,44,45]. We found that E. coli–induced an up-regulation of Tlr4 in PMECs at 6 h after E. coli infection. Activation of TLR4-dependent signaling may recruit inflammatory cells and promote the process of mastitis during E. coli infection.
TLRs promotes the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, which is the key sensor of cell or tissue damage. With an N-terminal pyrin domain, NLRP3 interacts with the inflammasome adaptor protein ASC through interactions between pyrin domains. ASC also has a caspase recruitment domain, which recruits caspase-1 via self-oligomerization, to contribute to the activation of the protease, caspase-1 [19,46]. And then the downstream pathway is activated, thereby promoting the expression of NF-κB and the secretion of inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β and IL-18, which play a key role in recruiting neutrophils to sites of infection and promote inflammatory anti-bacterial immune responses [18,47]. We found that pre-incubation with L. johnsonii L531 restricts E. coli-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation, including the expression of receptor protein NLRP3, the adaptor protein ASC, the effector caspase-1 p10 and the release of Il-1β and Il-18. Consistent with other studies in vivo and the microarray analysis results [48,49,50,51], the expression of cytokines and chemokines, such as Il-6, Il-8, Tnf-α, and Cxcl2 was up-regulated after E. coli challenge, whereas this increase was attenuated by pre-incubation with L. johnsonii L531. L. johnsonii L531 inhibits the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome during E. coli infection.
In addition to regulating inflammatory responses to protect against pathogen infection, mammary epithelial cells can also utilize autophagy as a protective function against pathogens. Autophagy is an essential protective mechanism of innate immunity for degrading intracellular pathogens. A growing body of evidence suggested that ATG proteins have important roles in the process of autophagy. ATG5 is indispensable for the formation of the autophagic vesicle. Knocking down or knocking out Atg5 can result in down-regulation or total inhibition of autophagy. ATG5-ATG12-ATG16 complex is an ubiquitin-like complex that is required for autophagosome formation [52]. Knockout of Atg5 or Atg16l1 in intestinal epithelial cells leads to diminished resistance to Salmonella Typhimurium [53,54]. It was also reported that probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens induces autophagy to promote the elimination of intracellular E. coli in macrophages via upregulating the expression of Beclin1 and ATG5-ATG12-ATG16L1 complex, but not Akt/mTOR signaling pathway [55]. LC3 is conjugated with PE via a ubiquitin-like system and converted to LC3-II with the help of ATG4, ATG7, and ATG3 [56]. We showed that L. johnsonii L531 pretreatment increased the expression of ATG5, ATG16L1, as well as LC3A/B-II. In addition, when using CQ to inhibit autophagic degradation, we found that L. johnsonii L531 still increased the LC3A/B-II accumulation. Our findings suggest that L. johnsonii L531 promotes the synthesis of autophagosome during E. coli infection.
Alternatively, SQSTM1/p62, a well-known substrate of selective autophagy, can directly interact with LC3 on the isolation membrane and then be recruited into the autophagosome and degraded. Autophagy defect causes SQSTM1 aberrantly accumulation, leading to the formation of large aggregates including SQSTM1 and ubiquitin [26]. Impaired selective turnover of SQSTM1 is a primary cause of liver injury in autophagy-deficient mice [57]. The accumulation of SQSTM1 is indicative of aborted autophagy flux. In the present study, E. coli infection inhibited autophagy by decreasing the expression of LC3A/B-II, and increasing the expression of autophagic receptor SQSTM1/p62. We found that L. johnsonii L531 pretreatment markedly elevated the expression of LC3A/B-II protein, and decreased the expression of SQSTM1/p62 protein, indicating that L. johnsonii L531 could effectively improve the autophagy level of PMECs may due to its effect on promoting autophagic degradation. In addition, after 3-MA was used to inhibit the synthesis of autophagosomes, LC3A/B-II expression increased in cells co-incubated with L. johnsonii L531 and 3-MA compared with cells treated with 3-MA alone, and SQSTM1 expression was decreased in cells co-incubated with L. johnsonii L531 and 3-MA than the untreated control cells. Our data indicates that L. johnsonii L531 could promote autophagic degradation during E. coli infection.
Autophagy negatively regulates the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome through various mechanisms [24,52,58], including directly inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome activation by eliminating sources of endogenous NLRP3 inflammasome agonists, such as damaged mitochondria and mitochondrial DNA [27,59], suppression of IL-1β secretion by targeting pro-IL-1β for lysosomal degradation [60], and selective degradation of inflammasome components, such as NLRP3 and ASC [29,61]. Thus, autophagy deficiency leads to the accumulation of damaged mitochondria and the release of mitochondrial DNA, causing enhanced ROS generation and NLRP3-ASC assembly [62]. It was reported that macrophage-specific deletion of autophagy genes in mice leads to inflammasome-mediated IL-1β release and uveitis, which is an inflammation-mediated eye disease often observed in patients with CD [63]. In this study, E. coli infection resulted in autophagy inhibition in PMECs, which might cause enhanced NLRP3-ASC assembly and ROS generation. Whereas pretreatment with L. johnsonii L531 inhibited the E. coli–induced activation of NLRP3 inflammation, and promoted ATG5/ATG16L1-mediated autophagy, thereby ameliorating E. coli-induced inflammation and cell damage in PMECs. Alternatively, L. johnsonii L531 might stimulate autophagy by promoting the synthesis of autophagosomes, thus partially reducing the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome.
The application of L. johnsonii L531 to prevent E. coli infection in PMECs leads to a promising perspective on new strategies to improve the efficiency of mastitis treatment. This PMEC model provides an in vitro framework for evaluating response to L. johnsonii L531-based intervention in porcine mastitis. However, the involvement of autophagy in regulating NLRP3 inflammasome activation in PMECs after E. coli challenge and whether NLRP3 inflammasome activation is reduced by L. johnsonii L531-mediated autophagy is still undefined. Remarkably, no cell model can ever be a perfect analog of animals themselves. Undoubtedly, the primary result of this study requires more measurement of inflammasome activity and autophagosome function to explore the cross-talk between NLRP3 inflammasome activation and autophagy. And future in vivo studies including the optimal dosage of L. johnsonii L531 in clinical application and further research on the bacterium-specific mechanism will be essential for realizing the potential of L. johnsonii L531 strain against mastitis.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, in this study, E. coli infection resulted in excessive activation of NLRP3 inflammasome and inhibited autophagy, while pretreatment with L. johnsonii L531 ameliorates E. coli–induced inflammation and cell damage in PMEC model. On the one hand, L. johnsonii L531 directly suppresses the adhesion of E. coli by competitive exclusion and the production of inhibitory factors thereby decreasing the E. coli stimulation in PMECs and subsequently alleviating E. coli–induced inflammation and cell damage. On the other hand, once E. coli adheres to PMECs, L. johnsonii L531 pretreatment restricts NLRP3 inflammasome activity and weakens the inhibitory effect of E. coli on autophagy through promoting ATG5/ATG16L1-mediated autophagy, which, in turn, ameliorating the E. coli-induced inflammation in PMECs (Figure 6). Our results suggest that L. johnsonii L531 attenuates E. coli-induced inflammation and cell damage through restricting NLRP3 inflammasome activity and promoting ATG5/ATG16L1-mediated autophagy in PMECs.
Acknowledgments
We thank Guoyao Wu for providing PMECs.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/7/3/112/s1, Figure S1: Immunofluorescene analysis of recombinants of E. coli with a red fluorescent protein and the detection of a basic biological characteristic of E. coli. (A) Recombinants of E. coli with a red fluorescent protein. (B) Growth curves of the mCherry-E. coli and E. coli. Figure S2: Effect of L. johnsonii L531 on the morphology of monolayer PMECs. PMECs were treated with medium alone (A), mCherry-E. coli (B), L. johnsonii L531 alone (C), or preincubated with L. johnsonii L531 for 3 h followed by E. coli challenge (D). Cell morphology was evaluated with light microscopy at 6 h after E. coli challenge. Scale bars, 25 μm. Data are representative of three independent experiments.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Y.-J.Z., J.-F.W., and Y.-H.Z.; methodology, Y.-J.Z., J.-J.X., and X.W.; data analysis, Y.-J.Z., J.-J.X., X.W. and Q.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-J.Z.; writing—review & editing, Y.-J.Z., Q.W., J.-F.W., and Y.-H.Z.; supervision, J.-F.W., and Y.-H.Z.; funding acquisition, J.-F.W., Y.-H.Z., and Q.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant number 2017YFD0502200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project nos. 31702303 and 31873034), and Research Project for Youth Teachers of Beijing University of Agriculture (Project no. SXQN201904).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Gerjets I., Kemper N. Coliform mastitis in sows: A review. J. Swine Health Prod. 2009;17:97–105. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gerjets I., Traulsen I., Reiners K., Kemper N. Comparison of virulence gene profiles of Escherichia coli isolates from sows with coliform mastitis and healthy sows. Vet. Microbiol. 2011;152:361–367. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kemper N., Bardehle D., Lehmann J., Gerjets I., Preissler R. The role of bacterial pathogens in coliform mastitis in sows. Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 2013;126:130–136. doi: 10.2376/0005-9366-126-130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Persson A., Moerner A.P., Kuhl W. A long term study on the health status and performance of sows on different feed allowances during late pregnancy II. The total cell content and its percentage of polymorphonuclear leucocytes in pathogen-free colostrum and milk collected from clinically healthy sows. Acta Vet. Scand. 1996;37:279. doi: 10.2376/0005-9366-126-130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Frola I.D., Pellegrino M.S., Espeche M.C., Giraudo J.A., Nader-Macias M.E., Bogni C.I. Effects of intramammary inoculation of Lactobacillus perolens CRL1724 in lactating cows’ udders. J. Dairy Res. 2012;79:84–92. doi: 10.1017/S0022029911000835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Moal V.L., Servin A.L. Anti-infective activities of lactobacillus strains in the human intestinal microbiota: From probiotics to gastrointestinal anti-infectious biotherapeutic agents. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014;27:167–199. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00080-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wu Q., Liu M.C., Yang J., Wang J.F., Zhu Y.H. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 ameliorates Escherichia coli–induced inflammation and cell damage via attenuation of ASC-independent NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;82:1173–1182. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03044-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bereswill S., Ekmekciu I., Escher U., Fiebiger U., Stingl K., Heimesaat M.M. Lactobacillus johnsonii ameliorates intestinal, extra-intestinal and systemic pro-inflammatory immune responses following murine Campylobacter jejuni infection. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:2138. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02436-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zeighamy A.S., Bita B., Sara S., Coy A.I. The anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus on Shigella sonnei and Vibrio cholerae interaction with intestinal epithelial cells: A comparison between invasive and non-invasive bacteria. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0196941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang Y.P., Li A.Y., Jiang X., Zhang H., Mehmood K., Zhang L.H., Jiang J.H., Waqas M.H., Iqbal M., Li J.K. Probiotic potential of Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides and Lactobacillus strains isolated from Yaks. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:2987. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.He T., Zhu Y.H., Yu J., Xia B., Liu X., Yang G.Y., Su J.H., Guo L., Wang M.L., Wang J.F. Lactobacillus johnsonii L531 reduces pathogen load and helps maintain short-chain fatty acid levels in the intestines of pigs challenged with Salmonella enterica Infantis. Vet. Microbiol. 2019;230:187–194. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Xia B., Yu J., He T., Liu X., Su J.H., Wang M.J., Wang J.F., Zhu Y.H. Lactobacillus johnsonii L531 ameliorates enteritis via elimination of damaged mitochondria and suppression of SQSTM1-dependent mitophagy in a Salmonella infantis model of piglet diarrhea. FASEB J. 2019;34:2821–2839. doi: 10.1096/fj.201901445RRR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rainard P., Riollet C. Innate immunity of the bovine mammary gland. Vet. Res. 2006;37:369–400. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2006007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kawai T., Akira S. Toll-like receptors and their crosstalk with other innate receptors in infection and immunity. Immunity. 2011;34:637–650. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhu Y.H., Liu P.Q., Weng X.G., Zhuge Z.Y., Zhang R., Ma J.L., Qiu X.Q., Zhang X.L., Wang J.F. Short communication: Pheromonicin-SA affects mRNA expression of toll-like receptors, cytokines, and lactoferrin by Staphylococcus aureus-infected bovine mammary epithelial cells. J. Dairy Sci. 2012;95:759–764. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Skeldon A.M., Faraj M., Saleh M. Caspases and inflammasomes in metabolic inflammation. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2014;92:304–313. doi: 10.1038/icb.2014.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tack C.J., Stienstra R., Joosten L.A., Netea M.G. Inflammation links excess fat to insulin resistance: The role of the interleukin-1 family. Immunol. Rev. 2012;249:239–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01145.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Man S.M., Kanneganti T.D. Converging roles of caspases in inflammasome activation, cell death and innate immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016;16:7–21. doi: 10.1038/nri.2015.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hirota S.A., Ng J., Lueng A., Khajah M., Parhar K., Li Y., Lam V., Potentier M.S., Ng K., Bawa M., et al. NLRP3 inflammasome plays a key role in the regulation of intestinal homeostasis. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2011;17:1359–1372. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sharma D., Kanneganti T.D. The cell biology of inflammasomes: Mechanisms of inflammasome activation and regulation. J. Cell Biol. 2016;213:617–629. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201602089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mangan M.S.J., Olhava E.J., Roush W.R., Seidel H.M., Glick G.D., Latz E. Targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome in inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2018;17:688. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2018.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Deretic V., Saitoh T., Akira S. Autophagy in infection, inflammation and immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013;13:722–737. doi: 10.1038/nri3532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Abdelaziz D.H.A., Khalil H., Cormet-Boyaka E., Amer A.O. The cooperation between the autophagy machinery and the inflammasome to implement an appropriate innate immune response: Do they regulate each other? Immunol. Rev. 2015;265:194–204. doi: 10.1111/imr.12288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Deretic V., Levine B. Autophagy balances inflammation in innate immunity. Autophagy. 2018;14:243–251. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1402992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Xue Y., Du M., Sheng H., Hovde C.J., Zhu M.J. Escherichia coli O157:H7 suppresses host autophagy and promotes epithelial adhesion via Tir-mediated and cAMP-independent activation of protein kinase A. Cell Death Discov. 2017;3:17055. doi: 10.1038/cddiscovery.2017.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Takahama M., Akira S., Saitoh T. Autophagy limits activation of the inflammasomes. Immunol. Rev. 2018;281:62–73. doi: 10.1111/imr.12613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nakahira K., Haspel J.A., Rathinam V.A., Lee S.J., Dolinay T., Lam H.C., Englert J.A., Rabinovitch M., Cernadas M., Kim H.P., et al. Autophagy proteins regulate innate immune responses by inhibiting the release of mitochondrial DNA mediated by the NALP3 inflammasome. Nat. Immunol. 2011;12:222–230. doi: 10.1038/ni.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Saitoh T., Fujita N., Jang M.H., Uematsu S., Yang B.G., Satoh T., Omori H., Noda T., Yamamoto N., Komatsu M., et al. Loss of the autophagy protein Atg16L1 enhances endotoxin-induced IL-1beta production. Nature. 2008;456:264–268. doi: 10.1038/nature07383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shi C.S., Shenderov K., Huang N.N., Kabat J., Abu-Asab M., Fitzgerald K.A., Sher A., Kehrl J.H. Activation of autophagy by inflammatory signals limits IL-1beta production by targeting ubiquitinated inflammasomes for destruction. Nat. Immunol. 2012;13:255–263. doi: 10.1038/ni.2215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhang W., Zhu Y.H., Yang G.Y., Liu X., Xia B., Hu X., Su J.H., Wang J.F. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG affects microbiota and suppresses autophagy in the intestines of pigs challenged with Salmonella Infantis. Front. Microbiol. 2018;8:2705. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dahanayaka S., Rezaei R., Porter W.W., Johnson G.A., Burghardt R.C., Bazer F.W., Hou Y.Q., Wu Z.L., Wu G. Technical note: Isolation and characterization of porcine mammary epithelial cells. J. Anim. Sci. 2015;93:5186–5193. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fernández L., Cárdenas N., Arroyo R., Manzano S., Rodríguez J.M. Prevention of infectious mastitis by oral administration of Lactobacillus salivarius PS2 during late pregnancy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015;62:568–573. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pellegrino M., Berardo N., Giraudo J., Nader-Macías M.E.F., Bogni C. Bovine mastitis prevention: Humoral and cellular response of dairy cows inoculated with lactic acid bacteria at the dry-off period. Benef. Microbes. 2017;8:589–596. doi: 10.3920/BM2016.0194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Feng J.R., Wang F., Qiu X., McFarland L.V., Chen P.F., Zhou R., Liu J., Zhao Q., Li J. Efficacy and safety of probiotic-supplemented triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in children: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2017;73:1199–1208. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2291-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kleta S., Nordhoff M., Tedin K., Wieler L.H., Kolenda R., Oswald S., Oelschlaeger T.A., Bleiss W., Schierack P. Role of F1C Fimbriae, Flagella, and secreted bacterial components in the inhibitory effect of probiotic Escherichia coli nissle 1917 on atypical enteropathogenic E. coli infection. Infect. Immun. 2014;82:1801–1812. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01431-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Johnson H.K., Hagen K.E., Gordonpour M., Tompkins T.A., Sherman P.M. Surface-layer protein extracts from Lactobacillus helveticus inhibit enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 adhesion to epithelial cells. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9:356–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00791.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kim Y., Oh S., Kim S.H. Released exopolysaccharide (r-EPS) produced from probiotic bacteria reduce biofilm formation of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009;379:324–329. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.12.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Liu Q., Yu Z.M., Tian F.W., Zhao J.X., Zhang H., Zhai Q.X., Chen W. Surface components and metabolites of probiotics for regulation of intestinal epithelial barrier. Microb. Cell Fact. 2020;19:23. doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-1289-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rekha R.S., Rao Muvva S.S., Wan M., Raqib R., Bergman P., Brighenti S., Gudmundsson G.H., Agerberth B. Phenylbutyrate induces LL-37-dependent autophagy and intracellular killing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in human macrophages. Autophagy. 2015;11:1688–1699. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1075110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gabriela P., Castillo N.A., Alejandra L.B. Oral administration of a probiotic Lactobacillus modulates cytokine production and TLR expression improving the immune response against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection in mice. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11:177. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhang W., Zhu Y.H., Yang J.C., Yang G.Y., Zhou D., Wang J.F. A selected Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain promotes EGFR-independent Akt activation in an enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88-infected IPEC-J2 cell model. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0125717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Finamore A., Roselli M., Imbinto A., Seeboth J., Oswald I.P., Mengheri E. Lactobacillus amylovorus inhibits the TLR4 inflammatory signaling triggered by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli via modulation of the negative regulators and involvement of TLR2 in intestinal Caco-2 cells and pig explants. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e94891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Song X., Zhang W., Wang T., Jiang H.C., Zhang Z.C., Fu Y.H., Yang Z.T., Cao Y.G., Zhang N.S. Geniposide plays an anti-inflammatory role via regulating TLR4 and downstream signaling pathways in lipopolysaccharide-induced mastitis in mice. Inflammation. 2014;37:1588–1598. doi: 10.1007/s10753-014-9885-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Korkmaz F.T., Elsasser T.H., Kerr D.E. Variation in fibroblast expression of TLR4 and lipopolysaccharide-induced cytokine production between animals predicts control of bacterial growth but not severity of E. coli mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 2018;101:10098–10115. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-14372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cao D., Luo J., Chen D.K., Xu H.F., Shi H.P., Jing C.Q., Zang W.J. CD36 regulates lipopolysaccharide-induced signaling pathways and mediates the internalization of Escherichia coli in cooperation with TLR4 in goat mammary gland epithelial cells. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:6457. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42156-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sharif H., Wang L., Wang W.L., Magupalli V.G., Andreeva L., Qiao Q., Hauenstein A.V., Wu Z., Núñez G., Mao Y., et al. Structural mechanism for NEK7-licensed activation of NLRP3 inflammasome. Nature. 2019;570:338–343. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1295-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ramakrishnan S.K., Zhang H., Ma X., Jung I., Schwartz A.J., Triner D., Devenport S.N., Das N.K., Xue X., Zeng M.Y., et al. Intestinal non-canonical NFkappaB signaling shapes the local and systemic immune response. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:660. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08581-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhu Y.H., Fossum C., Berg M., Magnusson U. Morphometric analysis of proinflammatory cytokines in mammary glands of sows suggests an association between clinical mastitis and local production of IL-1beta, IL-6 and TNF-alpha. Vet. Res. 2007;38:871–882. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2007035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhu Y.H., Berg M., Fossum C., Magnusson U. Proinflammatory cytokine mRNA expression in mammary tissue of sows following intramammary inoculation with Escherichia coli. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2007;116:98–103. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2006.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jaeger A., Bardehle D., Oster M., Günther J., Muráni E., Ponsuksili S., Wimmers K., Kemper N. Gene expression profiling of porcine mammary epithelial cells after challenge with Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus in vitro. Vet. Res. 2015;46:50. doi: 10.1186/s13567-015-0178-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jaeger A., Hadlich F., Kemper N., Lübke-Becker A., Muráni E., Wimmers K., Ponsuksili S. MicroRNA expression profiling of porcine mammary epithelial cells after challenge with Escherichia coli in vitro. BMC Genom. 2017;18:660. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4070-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Shibutani S.T., Saitoh T., Nowag H., Munz C., Yoshimori T. Autophagy and autophagy-related proteins in the immune system. Nat. Immunol. 2015;16:1014–1024. doi: 10.1038/ni.3273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Conway K.L., Kuballa P., Song J.H., Patel K.K., Castoreno A.B., Yilmaz O.H., Jijon H.B., Zhang M., Aldrich L.N., Villablanca E.J., et al. Atg16l1 is required for autophagy in intestinal epithelial cells and protection of mice from Salmonella infection. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:1347–1357. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.08.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Khandia R., Dadar M., Munjal A. A comprehensive review of autophagy and its various roles in infectious, non-infectious, and lifestyle diseases: Current knowledge and prospects for disease prevention, novel drug design, and therapy. Cells. 2019;8:e674. doi: 10.3390/cells8070674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wu Y., Wang Y., Zou H., Wang B., Sun Q., Fu A., Wang Y., Wang Y., Xu X., Li W. Probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SC06 Induces Autophagy to Protect against Pathogens in Macrophages. Front. Microbiol. 2017;9:2987. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Benjamin J.L., Sumpter R., Jr., Levine B., Hooper L.V. Intestinal epithelial autophagy is essential for host defense against invasive bacteria. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;13:723–734. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Komatsu M., Waguri S., Koike M., Sou Y.S., Ueno T., Hara T., Mizushima N., Iwata J., Ezaki J., Murata S., et al. Homeostatic levels of p62 control cytoplasmic inclusion body formation in autophagy-deficient mice. Cell. 2007;131:1149–1163. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jo E.K., Kim J.K., Shin D.M., Sasakawa C. Molecular mechanisms regulating NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2016;13:148–159. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2015.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Van der Burgh R., Nijhuis L., Pervolaraki K., Compeer E.B., Jongeneel L.H., van Gijn M., Coffer P.J., Murphy M.P., Mastroberardino P.G., Frenkel J., et al. Defects in mitochondrial clearance predispose human monocytes to interleukin-1β hypersecretion. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:5000–5012. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.536920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Harris J., Hartman M., Roche C., Zeng S.G., O’Shea A., Sharp F.A., Lambe E.M., Creagh E.M., Golenbock D.T., Tschopp J., et al. Autophagy controls IL-1β secretion by targeting pro-IL-1β for degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:9587–9597. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.202911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chuang S.Y., Yang C.H., Chou C.C., Chiang Y.P., Chuang T.H., Hsu L.C. TLR-induced PAI-2 expression suppresses IL-1β processing via increasing autophagy and NLRP3 degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:16079–16084. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1306556110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zhong Z., Umemura A., Sanchez-Lopez E., Liang S., Shalapour S., Wong J., He F., Boassa D., Perkins G., Ali S.R., et al. NF-κB restricts inflammasome activation via elimination of damaged mitochondria. Cell. 2016;164:896–910. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Santeford A., Wiley L.A., Park S., Bamba S., Nakamura R., Gdoura A., Ferguson T.A., Rao P.K., Guan J.L., Saitoh T., et al. Impaired autophagy in macrophages promotes inflammatory eye disease. Autophagy. 2016;12:1876–1885. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1207857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.