Abstract
Commensal yeast from the genus Candida is part of the healthy human microbiota. In some cases, Candida spp. dysbiosis can result in candidiasis, the symptoms of which may vary from mild localized rashes to severe disseminated infections. The most prevalent treatments against candidiasis involve fluconazole, itraconazole, miconazole, and caspofungin. Moreover, amphotericin B associated with prolonged azole administration is utilized to control severe cases. Currently, numerous guidelines recommend echinocandins to treat invasive candidiasis. However, resistance to these antifungal drugs has increased dramatically over recent years. Considering this situation, new therapeutic alternatives should be studied to control candidiasis, which has become a major medical concern. Limonene belongs to the group of terpene molecules, known for their pharmacological properties. In this study, we evaluated in vitro the limonene concentration capable of inhibiting the growth of yeast from the genus Candida susceptible or resistant to antifungal drugs and its capacity to induce fungal damage. In addition, intravaginal fungal infection assays using a murine model infected by Candida albicans were carried out and the fungal burden, histopathology, and scanning electron microscopy were evaluated. All of our results suggest that limonene may play a protective role against the infection process by yeast from the genus Candida.
Keywords: Candidiasis, Candida spp., limonene, treatment, intravaginal infection
1. Introduction
Candidiasis, caused by the opportunistic fungus Candida albicans, is one of the most prevalent infections that affect humans and can display severe morbidity in immunosuppressed individuals [1]. In fact, hospitalized patients infected with HIV/AIDS (human immunodeficiency virus/Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or undergoing chemotherapy treatments and transplant patients represent the most relevant groups at risk of developing Oropharyngeal Candidiasis (OPC) [2,3].
Candidiasis treatment involves different types of traditional antifungals but can be hindered by the emergence of drug-resistance strains of C. albicans. This fact has stimulated researchers to develop new therapeutic alternatives against candidiasis [4].
Limonene belongs to the group of terpenes, which is a group of molecules widely present in essential oils from different species of plants (particularly in their flowers and fruit). Many of these compounds have been shown to display antibacterial, antiprotozoal, and antitumor activity, both in vitro and in vivo [5,6,7]. Farnesol, a sesquiterpene, has been shown to inhibit the growth of C. albicans yeasts by interfering in the Ras1-cAMP pathway [8], while thymol—a monoterpene—has been shown to induce morphological changes in this fungus [9].
Limonene is also a monoterpene, found in a wide variety of plants, especially in citrus fruits, such as lemons and oranges. Original studies aimed at characterizing the pharmacological properties of this molecule described as R-(+)-limonene, such as antitumoral, antiparasitary, and antifungal activities. At a 5% concentration, limonene was effective in reducing the average size and number of breast carcinomas in an experimental model using laboratory rats [10]. Subsequently, several studies demonstrated the promising effect of R-(+)-limonene against different tumor cells, such as human lung cancer [11], prostate cancer [12], breast cancer [13], and the lymphoma cell line [14]. Limonene also induces apoptosis in gastric cancer and inhibits liver and peritoneal metastasis [15].
Additionally, some authors have demonstrated that limonene can exert a protective effect against diabetes in a treatment experimental model using rats [16]. Moreover, limonene increases the permeation of other drugs, both in in vitro and in vivo models [17,18].
The antimicrobial effects of limonene also involve a variety of mechanisms, as has been verified in Plasmodium falciparum. In fact, in vitro assays involving this parasite showed that limonene could inhibit protein isoprenylation, as well as the biosynthesis of some ubiquinones. Limonene has also been tested in combination with other antimalarial drugs, such as fosmidomycin, with promising results for the development of a new strategy of malaria treatment [19]. Arruda and collaborators (2009) showed that limonene is effective at reducing the size of ulcerative lesions in mice experimentally infected with Leishmania amazonensis after both topic and intrarectal treatment. Moreover, they revealed the low toxicity of limonene in mammalian cell lines, which was even lower than that observed for the control Leishmania amazonensis. The CC50 values (concentrations that killed 50% of mammalian cells) for the cell lines HEK-293 (Human Embryonic Kidney cells) and LLC-MK2 (Rhesus monkey epithelial kidney cells) were higher than 1.012 µM, while the concentration that killed 50% of the parasites (EC50) was 252 µM [20].
Furthermore, limonene seems to induce apoptosis in Trypanosoma cruzi, accompanied by fragmentation of the parasite’s DNA [21]. This terpene can similarly modulate specific aspects of the immune response in treated animals, including an increase in nitric oxide production in peritoneal macrophages of BALB/c mice [14,22,23].
Therefore, given the great antimicrobial potential of this monoterpene, the present work aims to evaluate both the in vitro and in vivo effects of limonene against different Candida spp. strains.
2. Material and Methods
2.1. Animals
Isogenic female BALB/c mice (six animals per group) that were six to eight weeks old were housed in polypropylene cages under Specific-Pathogen-Free (SPF) conditions with a sawdust substrate. Food and water were provided ad libitum and all mice environments were sterilized. Animals used in this study were bred at the University of São Paulo animal facility. All experiments involving animals were conducted and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of São Paulo (No. 042-127-02) and were conducted in accordance with international recommendations.
To set up the vulvovaginal candidiasis model, it was necessary to induce the female mice to a pseudo-oestrus phase by the subcutaneous administration of 0.5 mg of 17 beta-estradiol valerate (Sigma Chemicals, St Louis, MO, USA) dissolved in sesame oil (Sigma Chemicals, St Louis, MO, USA) three days before vaginal infection, as described by Hamad et al. [24].
2.2. Candida albicans Strains
We used Candida albicans ATCC 90028, Candida krusei ATCC 6558, Candida glabrata ATCC 2001, Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019, and 10 C. albicans clinical isolates from patients with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis provided by the strain bank of the MICROS group, Universidad del Rosario, Colombia. Fungal cells were cultivated in modified Yeast Extract–Peptone–Dextrose (YPD) medium (1% yeast extract, 2% casein peptone, 2% glucose, pH 6.5) at 36 °C (yeast phase), and liquid cultures were kept at 120 rpm in an orbital shaker.
2.3. Antimicrobial Compounds
(R)-(+)-limonene was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) for in vitro experiments. To carry out in vivo assays, we prepared a 10% (308.28 µM) limonene topical formulation, adding the compound to commercial neutral cream (10% Wax self-nonionic emulsifier, 2% mineral oil, 5% propylene glycol, and 84% distilled water). Fluconazole (Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA) was dissolved in PBS solution to obtain a concentration of 10 mg/kg and then mixed with the same neutral cream described above.
2.4. Conditions of Limonene Exposure for Growth Inhibition Assays
Limonene was added to a 30 mL suspension of C. albicans and non-albicans yeast cultures (OD600 = 0.4) at final concentrations of 25, 50, 250, and 500 µM (1% DMSO concentration). Cultures were then incubated under the conditions described above, for 12 h, and fungal growth was monitored hourly, through OD600 measurements. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
2.5. MTT Assay
The viability of C. albicans (1 × 106) after treatment with limonene was tested in vitro by cultivating cells in increasing concentrations of limonene (0 µM, 25 µM, 50 µM, 100 µM, 250 µM, 500 µM, and 600 µM) for 8 and 17 h. The cell viability was determined by measuring the cleavage of 3(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After incubation with limonene, 50 µL of MTT solution (5 mg/mL) was added and cultures were further incubated, at 37 °C, for 5 h. Next, samples were centrifuged at 10.000 rpm for two minutes, the MTT solution was carefully removed, and 100 µL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to solubilize the produced formazan, prior to absorbance measurements at 570 nm. Assays were performed in triplicate, and results are expressed as the mean percent reduction of cells, compared to untreated controls.
2.6. Intravaginal Infection of BALB/c Mice
The C. albicans ATCC 90028 virulent strain was grown in brain heart infusion (Hi-Media Laboratories, Mumbai, India), at 37 °C, for 24 h, under 200 rpm agitation. Afterward, yeasts were centrifugated, washed in PBS (pH 7.2), and analyzed to determine the cell viability. Six animals per group were inoculated intravaginally with a maximum volume of 10 µL of 3 × 105 yeast cells, as described by Muñoz et al. (2017) [25].
2.7. Assay for Colony-Forming Units (CFUs)
BALB/c female mice were infected intravaginally with the virulent C. albicans strain ATCC 90028 (3 × 105 yeast cells) and submitted to limonene or fluconazole treatment 24 h post-infection. Treatment was continuous for seven days, every 24 h. On the 8th day, mice were sacrificed, and the vaginal canal was removed, weighed, and homogenized in PBS. A 100 µL sample of this suspension was plated on solid brain heart infusion medium (BHI), supplemented with 10 IU/mL streptomycin/penicillin (Cultilab, São Paulo, Brazil), and 500 µg/mL cycloheximide (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). The petri dishes were then incubated at 37 °C, for 24 h, and colonies were counted (1 colony = 1 CFU).
2.8. Histopathology
The vaginal canal was removed and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for subsequent paraffin embedding. Sections (5 mm thick) were stained with silver (Grocott stain) and examined microscopically at 100× magnification (Optiphot-2, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
2.9. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
C. albicans ATCC 90028 yeasts untreated (control group) or treated with 500 µM limonene for 24 h at 37 °C, in RPMI 1640 and buffered with 0.16 M MOPS were harvested in log phase and fixed at room temperature, for two hours, with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. After this process, yeasts were incubated in 1% osmium for 2 h, dehydrated, and embedded in araldite-Epon, as previously described [26]. Ultrathin sections were collected on grids stained with alcoholic 1% uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The grids were analyzed using a Jeol 100 CX (Tokyo, Japan) transmission electron microscope.
2.10. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
Vaginal canals from untreated or limonene-treated mice were excised and then fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde, for 1 h, at room temperature. Afterwards, samples were transferred to a critical point drier (BAL-TEC CPD-030—Electron Microscopy Sciences, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA). Sample assembly was conducted as previously described [26] and observed using an EM Jeol 100 CX transmission electron microscope.
2.11. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism, version 7.05 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Results were expressed as means ± the standard deviations (SD) of the indicated numbers of animals or experiments. Statistical comparisons were conducted by analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) followed by nonparametric Tukey’s test. p Values of ≤0.05 and ≤0.01 indicated statistical significance. Conditions of limonene exposure for the growth inhibition assay were performed in triplicate, and the graphs show the average values and their respective standard deviations. Figure 1 shows the under-curve area values of the growth patterns of the different strains exposed or not exposed to the limonene treatment for 12 h. The one-way ANOVA was carried out followed by a nonparametric test.
3. Results
3.1. Evaluation of the Antifungal Activity of Limonene In Vitro
The time-dependent growth of C. albicans ATCC 90028, exposed to different concentrations of limonene (0 μM, 25 μM, 50 μM, 250 μM, and 500 μM), for a period of 12 h, showed inhibition at concentrations of 250 and 500 μM (Figure 1). Moreover, we observed a significant decrease in the cell viability of C. albicans when yeasts were previously treated with limonene, at 500 μM and 600 μM concentrations, for a period of 8 h (Figure 2). The calculated EC50% was 444 ± 35 μM.
Limonene antifungal activity using 250 and 500 µM was analyzed in ATCC strains of C. albicans, C. krusei, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and in 10 additional C. albicans clinical isolates. In the case of the three non-albicans species, a significant growth decrease was observed compared to the control group that did not receive limonene treatment. The clinical strains (n = 10) analyzed showed a less marked, but statistically significant, growth decrease, as shown in Figure 3.
3.2. Treatment with Limonene Reduces the Fungal Burden in Mice with Vaginal Candidiasis
The number of CFUs in the vaginal canal of mice that received 10% (308.28 µM) limonene was significantly reduced compared to the control (infected but not treated) group. Moreover, we observed a decrease in the number of CFUs in the limonene-treated animals, when compared with the group of animals treated with fluconazole (Figure 4).
3.3. Histopathology of the Vaginal canal in Treated, Intravaginally Infected, BALB/c Mice
The vaginal canal of the untreated control animals showed multiple yeast-like cells (Figure 5A). In contrast, the animals that received treatment with 10% (308.28 µM) limonene displayed significantly reduced numbers of yeast cells and large areas of preserved vaginal tissue (Figure 5B).
3.4. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
C. albicans ATCC 90028 cells treated with different concentrations of limonene displayed a marked decrease in cell density, as fewer cells were detected within the microscope’s field when compared to the untreated controls. A total of 48% of the yeasts treated with 500 µM of limonene showed morphological modifications such as cell wall disruption and significant intracellular damage when compared to the untreated control group (Figure 6).
3.5. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
Yeast cells could be easily detected by SEM in the vaginal canal of animals inoculated with C. albicans without limonene treatment (Figure 7A), but not in the vaginal canal of animals infected and treated with 500 µM of limonene. However, we observed some epithelial irritation signs, as evidenced by the presence of squamous cells (Figure 7B).
4. Discussion
In the present work, we evaluated the antifungal activity of R-(+)-limonene against clinical and ATCC isolates of Candida spp. susceptible or resistant to antifungal drugs. R-(+)-limonene is largely used in food, beverage, and cosmetic industries and is classified as a low-toxicity additive [27]. The efficacy of limonene as an anti-diabetic, anticarcinogenic, and antimicrobial agent has also been evaluated with relative success [27].
In vivo and preclinical models identified that the oral administration of R-(+)-limonene was absorbed from the rat gastrointestinal tract by diffusion (reviewed by Chandrakala et al., 2018) and also by humans with little toxicity [28]. These data are important considering the small amount of R-(+)-limonene used here in the intravaginal treatment compared with the oral treatment. Future studies may be carried out to analyze the possible absorption of R-(+)-limonene by the vaginal mucous.
To define the best concentration of R-(+)-limonene able to interfere with the growth of yeast cells, a kinetic analysis was performed and our results confirmed that limonene at concentrations ≥500 µM can inhibit the growth of C. albicans, C. krusei, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis in vitro, reinforcing previous observations made by Freire and collaborators (2017), who originally evaluated the antimicrobial properties of limonene-containing essential oils, derived from Mentha piperita L., Origanum vulgare, and Zingiber officinalepara [29]. Interestingly, all these oils were capable of exerting a fungicidal effect on Candida strains (obtained from dental prostheses), inducing morphological alterations in yeast cells and inhibiting pseudohyphae formation [29]. Similarly, Leite and coworkers (2014) detected that C. albicans yeasts treated with citrus essential oils, containing several substances structurally related to limonene, also displayed morphological alterations and decreased chlamydoconidia production, which directly affected the pathogenicity of the treated yeasts [30].
In addition to inhibiting growth, we assessed the ability to interfere with the viability of yeast. We observed that the viability of the yeasts treated with limonene in concentrations ≥500 µM was significantly reduced. Previous studies described that the use of this monoterpene in concentrations between 0.6 to 5 mM induces apoptosis in C. albicans, due to the damage caused to both the cell wall and membrane. In that study, the authors claimed that cell death was likely due to oxidative stress produced by limonene, which leads to DNA damage, alterations of the cell cycle, and, finally, yeast apoptosis [31].
Mondello and collaborators (2003) employed a rat vulvovaginal candidiasis model to demonstrate that the essential oils of Malaleuca alternifolia (composed of a complex mixture of monoterpenes) were protective against C. albicans strains either susceptible or resistant to fluconazole and/or itraconazole [32]. Cases of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis, mainly caused by C. albicans, have drawn particular attention from the medical community over the past years, given their high prevalence and challenging treatment. It has been described that the difficulty in treating this mycosis is directly associated with a variety of factors, including the presence of drug-resistant Candida strains (mostly non-albicans species), overall predisposition of patients to infection, use of antibiotics, uncontrolled diabetes, estrogen use, pregnancy, a host’s genetic factors, and alterations in the vaginal microbiota, among others [33,34,35].
To the best of our knowledge, the present work represents the first example of a successful R-(+)-limonene-based treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis in mice. Moreover, our studies lead us to verify that limonene also exerts a protective role against C. albicans infections, since animals that were submitted to intravaginal limonene treatments showed a significant decrease in the fungal burden when compared to untreated animals.
Transmission electron microscopy studies performed on Candida yeasts showed damage to the cell wall, as well as to intracellular structures, including nuclear alterations, such as the condensation of genetic material and specific changes in mitochondria. Moreover, yeasts treated with limonene also displayed dramatic structural changes in organelles, accompanied by cell wall rupture in most of the observed fields. These alterations may have derived from the action of limonene on the yeast genetic material, as described by Thakre and collaborators (2018). Recent work has also demonstrated that monoterpenes can interfere with the permeability and fluidity of plasma membranes and can inhibit efflux pumps, possibly creating permanent membrane pores, resulting in cytoplasmic leakage and irreversible cellular damage [36].
Finally, scanning electron microscopy analyses showed distinct alterations in the appearance of the vulvovaginal canal epithelium, possibly due to an irritation process. This observation conflicts with observations made by Arruda and coworkers (2009), who carried out cytotoxic assays using R-(+)-limonene at concentrations reaching up to 1.012 μM, which resulted in no observable cytotoxic effect on monkey epithelial cells (LLCMK2) or human cells (HEK-293). Another important aspect is that R-(+)-limonene did not induce mutagenic, carcinogenic, or nephrotoxic effects in humans [37]. In mice, the oral LD50 for limonene was reported to be 5.6 g/kg body weight in males and 6.6 g/kg body weight in females [37].
Since vulvovaginal candidiasis is an infection that affects up to 70% of all women, at least once during their reproductive years, and given the fact that approximately 10% of these cases may turn into recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis, it is important to search for new therapeutic alternatives to treat this pathology [33]. In this sense, the present study strongly suggests that topical R-(+)-limonene has significant therapeutic benefits in experimental vulvovaginal candidiasis.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical support provided by the University of São Paulo, and the School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, J.E.M., D.C.A., and D.C.P.R.; methodology, J.E.M., D.C.P.R., D.L.J., D.A.B., F.F.M.C., and D.C.A.; software, J.E.M., D.C.P.R., D.A.B., and D.C.A.; validation, J.E.M., D.C.P.R., and D.C.A.; formal analysis, J.E.M., D.C.P.R., and D.C.A.; investigation, J.E.M. and D.C.A.; resources, J.E.M., D.C.P.R., D.L.J., D.A.B., F.F.M.C., L.R.N., D.C.A., and C.P.T.; data curation, J.E.M. and D.C.A.; writing—original draft preparation, J.E.M.; writing—review and editing, J.E.M., L.R.N., D.C.A., and C.P.T.; visualization, J.E.M.; supervision, J.E.M.; project administration, C.P.T.; funding acquisition, C.P.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by grants 2016/08730-6 and 2018/11972-7 from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior–Brasil-CAPES (http://www.capes.gov.br/), and the School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Miceli M.H., Díaz J.A., Lee S.A. Emerging opportunistic yeast infections. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2011;11:142–151. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70218-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Alvarez-Moreno C., Cortes J., Denning D. Burden of Fungal Infections in Colombia. J. Fungi. 2018;4:41. doi: 10.3390/jof4020041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vila T., Sultan A.S., Montelongo-Jauregui D., Jabra-Rizk M.A. Oral candidiasis: A disease of opportunity. J. Fungi. 2020;6:15. doi: 10.3390/jof6010015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shapiro R.S., Robbins N., Cowen L.E. Regulatory circuitry governing fungal development, drug resistance, and disease. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2011;75:213–267. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00045-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Arruda D.C., Alexandri F.L., Katzin A.M., Uliana S.R.B. Antileishmanial Activity of the Terpene Nerolidol. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005;49:1679–1687. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.5.1679-1687.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Slade D., Galal A.M., Gul W., Radwan M.M., Ahmed S.A., Khan S.I., Tekwani B.L., Jacob M.R., Ross S.A., ElSohly M.A. Antiprotozoal, anticancer and antimicrobial activities of dihydroartemisinin acetal dimers and monomers. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2009;17:7949–7957. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.10.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Matsuo A.L., Figueiredo C.R., Arruda D.C., Pereira F.V., Borin Scutti J.A., Massaoka M.H., Travassos L.R., Sartorelli P., Lago J.H.G. α-Pinene isolated from Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi (Anacardiaceae) induces apoptosis and confers antimetastatic protection in a melanoma model. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011;411:449–454. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.06.176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Langford M.L., Atkin A.L., Nickerson K.W. Cellular interactions of farnesol, a quorum-sensing molecule produced by Candida albicans. Future Microbiol. 2009;4:1353–1362. doi: 10.2217/fmb.09.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ricci D., Braga P.C. Atomic Force Microscopy in Biomedical Research. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011;736:355–377. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-105-5_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Elson C.E., Maltzman T.H., Boston J.L., Tanner M.A., Gould M.N. Anti-carcinogenic activity of d-limonene during the initiation and promotion/progression stages of dmba-induced rat mammary carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 1988;9:331–332. doi: 10.1093/carcin/9.2.331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yu X., Lin H., Wang Y., Lv W., Zhang S., Qian Y., Deng X., Feng N., Yu H., Qian B. D-limonene exhibits antitumor activity by inducing autophagy and apoptosis in lung cancer. Onco. Targets. Ther. 2018;11:1833–1847. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S155716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yang C., Chen H., Chen H., Zhong B., Luo X., Chun J. Antioxidant and anticancer activities of essential oil from gannan navel orange peel. Molecules. 2017;22:1391. doi: 10.3390/molecules22081391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Haag J.D., Lindstrom M.J., Gould M.N. Limonene-induced Regression of Mammary Carcinomas. Cancer Res. 1992;52:4021–4026. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Del Toro-Arreola S., Flores-Torales E., Torres-Lozano C., Del Toro-Arreola A., Tostado-Pelayo K., Ramirez-Dueñas M.G., Daneri-Navarro A. Effect of D-limonene on immune response in BALB/c mice with lymphoma. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2005;5:829–838. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2004.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lu X.G., Zhan L.B., Feng B.A., Qu M.Y., Yu L.H., Xie J.H. Inhibition of growth and metastasis of human gastric cancer implanted in nude mice by d-limonene. World J. Gastroenterol. 2004;10:2140–2144. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i14.2140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Murali R., Karthikeyan A., Saravanan R. Protective Effects of d-Limonene on Lipid Peroxidation and Antioxidant Enzymes in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2013;112:175–181. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sakeena M.H.F., Elrashid S.M., Muthanna F.A., Ghassan Z.A., Kanakal M.M., Laila L., Munavvar A.S., Azmin M.N. Effect of limonene on permeation enhancement of ketoprofen in palm oil esters nanoemulsion. J. Oleo Sci. 2010;59:395–400. doi: 10.5650/jos.59.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Krishnaiah Y., Al-Saidan S. Limonene Enhances the In Vitro and In Vivo Permeation of Trimetazidine Across a Membrane-Controlled Transdermal Therapeutic System. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2008;5:70–76. doi: 10.2174/156720108783330970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Goulart H.R., Kimura E.A., Peres V.J., Couto A.S., Duarte F.A.A., Katzin A.M. Terpenes arrest parasite development and inhibit biosynthesis of isoprenoids in Plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004;48:2502–2509. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.7.2502-2509.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Arruda D.C., Miguel D.C., Yokoyama-Yasunaka J.K.U., Katzin A.M., Uliana S.R.B. Inhibitory activity of limonene against Leishmania parasites in vitro and in vivo. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2009;63:643–649. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2009.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Moreno É.M., Leal S.M., Stashenko E.E., García L.T. Induction of programmed cell death in Trypanosoma cruzi by Lippia alba essential oils and their major and synergistic terpenes (citral, limonene and caryophyllene oxide) BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2018;18:1–16. doi: 10.1186/s12906-018-2293-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hamada M., Uezu K., Matsushita J., Yamamoto S., Kishino Y. Distribution and immune responses resulting from oral administration of D-limonene in rats. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. (Tokyo) 2002;48:155–160. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.48.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Evans D.L., Miller D.M., Jacobsen K.L., Bush P.B. Modulation of immune responses in mice by d-limonene. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. 1987;20:51–66. doi: 10.1080/15287398709530961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hamad M., Abu-Elteen K.H., Ghaleb M. Estrogen-dependent induction of persistent vaginal candidosis in naive mice. Ostrogen-abhangige Induktion der persistierenden Vaginalcandidose in naiven Mausen. Mycoses. 2004;47:304–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2004.00994.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Muñoz J.E., Rossi D.C.P., Ishida K., Spadari C.C., Melhem M.S., Garcia D.M., Caires A.C.F., Taborda C.P., Rodrigues E.G. Antifungal activity of the biphosphinic cyclopalladate C7a against Candida albicans yeast forms in vitro and in vivo. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:771. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Polonelli L., Ciociola T., Elviri L., Zanello P.P., Giovati L., Arruda D.C., Muñoz J.E., Mortara R.A., Morace G., Borghi E., et al. A Naturally Occurring Antibody Fragment Neutralizes Infectivity of Diverse Infectious Agents. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:35018. doi: 10.1038/srep35018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ravichandran C., Badgujar P.C., Gundev P., Upadhyay A. Review of toxicological assessment of d-limonene, a food and cosmetics additive. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018;120:668–680. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.07.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Crowell P.L., Elson C.E., Bailey H.H., Elegbede A., Haag J.D., Gould M.N. Human metabolism of the experimental cancer therapeutic agent d-limonene. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 1994;35:31–37. doi: 10.1007/BF00686281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Freire J.C.P., de Oliveira Júnior J.K., de Figueredo Silva D., de Sousa J.P., Guerra F.Q.S., de Oliveira Lima E. Antifungal Activity of Essential Oils against Candida albicans Strains Isolated from Users of Dental Prostheses. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2017;2017:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2017/7158756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Leite M.C.A., De Brito Bezerra A.P., De Sousa J.P., Guerra F.Q.S., De Oliveira Lima E. Evaluation of antifungal activity and mechanism of action of citral against Candida albicans. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2014 doi: 10.1155/2014/378280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Thakre A., Zore G., Kodgire S., Kazi R., Mulange S., Patil R., Shelar A., Santhakumari B., Kulkarni M., Kharat K., et al. Limonene inhibits Candida albicans growth by inducing apoptosis. Med. Mycol. 2018;56:565–578. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myx074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mondello F., De Bernardis F., Girolamo A., Salvatore G., Cassone A. In vitro and in vivo activity of tea tree oil against azole-susceptible and -resistant human pathogenic yeasts. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003;51:1223–1229. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yano J., Sobel J.D., Nyirjesy P., Sobel R., Williams V.L., Yu Q., Noverr M.C., Fidel P.L. Current patient perspectives of vulvovaginal candidiasis: Incidence, symptoms, management and post-treatment outcomes. BMC Womens. Health. 2019;19:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0748-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cassone A. Vulvovaginal Candida albicans infections: Pathogenesis, immunity and vaccine prospects. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2015;122:785–794. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Babula O., Lazdane G., Kroica J., Ledger W.J., Witkin S.S. Relation between Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis, Vaginal Concentrations of Mannose-Binding Lectin, and a Mannose-Binding Lectin Gene Polymorphism in Latvian Women. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003;37:733–737. doi: 10.1086/377234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bae Y.S., Rhee M.S. Short-Term Antifungal Treatments of Caprylic Acid with Carvacrol or Thymol Induce Synergistic 6-Log Reduction of Pathogenic Candida albicans by Cell Membrane Disruption and Efflux Pump Inhibition. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2019;53:285–300. doi: 10.33594/000000139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sun J. D-limonene: Safety and clinical applications. Altern. Med. Rev. 2007;12:259–264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]