Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nanomaterials logoLink to Nanomaterials
. 2020 Sep 10;10(9):1801. doi: 10.3390/nano10091801

A Simple Drug Delivery System for Platelet-Derived Bioactive Molecules, to Improve Melanocyte Stimulation in Vitiligo Treatment

Karolina Vocetkova 1,2,3,*, Vera Sovkova 1,2,3, Matej Buzgo 1,3, Vera Lukasova 1,3, Radek Divin 1,2,3, Michala Rampichova 1, Pavel Blazek 4, Tomas Zikmund 4, Jozef Kaiser 4, Zdenek Karpisek 5, Evzen Amler 2,3, Eva Filova 1,2
PMCID: PMC7559479  PMID: 32927642

Abstract

Vitiligo is the most common depigmentation disorder of the skin. Currently, its therapy focuses on the halting of the immune response and stimulation of the regenerative processes, leading to the restoration of normal melanocyte function. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) represents a safe and cheap regenerative therapy option, as it delivers a wide spectrum of native growth factors, cytokines and other bioactive molecules. The aim of this study was to develop a simple delivery system to prolong the effects of the bioactive molecules released from platelets. The surface of electrospun and centrifugally spun poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) fibrous scaffolds was functionalized with various concentrations of platelets; the influence of the morphology of the scaffolds and the concentration of the released platelet-derived bioactive molecules on melanocytes, was then assessed. An almost two-fold increase in the amount of the released bioactive molecules was detected on the centrifugally spun vs. electrospun scaffolds, and a sustained 14-day release of the bioactive molecules was demonstrated. A strong concentration-dependent response of melanocyte to the bioactive molecules was observed; higher concentrations of bioactive molecules resulted in improved metabolic activity and proliferation of melanocytes. This simple system improves melanocyte viability, offers on-site preparation and is suitable for prolonged topical PRP administration.

Keywords: vitiligo, melanocyte, platelets, electrospinning, centrifugal spinning

1. Introduction

Vitiligo is the most common depigmentation disorder affecting approximately 1% of the population in the US and Europe; however, the occurrence ranges from 0.1% to 2% worldwide [1,2]. The disease is characterized by an acquired, idiopathic and progressive loss of pigment in hair and/or skin, secondary to the loss of functional melanocytes [3]. Although vitiligo is not a life-threatening condition, it can result in depression, anxiety, poor body image and social difficulties, affecting the quality of life of patients [4,5]. The currently available treatment options focus on the re-pigmentation of the existing lesions and include pharmacotherapy (such as topical corticosteroids) [6], narrow-band UVB (NB-UVB) phototherapy [7] or use of an excimer laser [8]. Furthermore, in recalcitrant lesions, autologous melanocyte transplantation may be used. Taking into account the not yet fully understood, diverse and complex etiopathogenesis of the disease, the outcomes are unsatisfactory [6].

Recently, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been successfully used in vitiligo therapy, resulting in improved and sustained repigmentation [9,10]. Platelets, owing to the high content of native growth factors, chemokines and cytokines in their α-granules, represent a cost-effective and possibly autologous reservoir of bioactive molecules, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) or Regulated upon Activation, Normal T Cell Expressed and Secreted (RANTES) [11,12,13]. Platelet products have recently been used in various applications in dermatology, including face rejuvenation procedures [14,15], hair regrowth [16] or scar management [17,18].

The half-life of the growth factors is generally very short, limiting their bioavailability [19,20]. Therefore, drug delivery systems combining a biomaterial matrix protecting the soluble growth factors and preventing their fast clearance and/or diffusion from the site of administration, would control their spatial–temporal release [21]. Nanofibers could be suitable for use as a biomaterial. Their unique properties, such as high volume-to-surface ratio, porous structure, and nanoscale microarchitecture, predetermine them for tissue engineering applications [22]. The most common large-scale techniques of nanofiber fabrication include electrospinning (using electrostatic forces to produce fibers) and centrifugal spinning (producing fibers using centrifugal forces) [23,24,25]. As a postproduction modification, surface adhesion is the simplest method for scaffold functionalization; however, the loading efficiency and release rate may be quite variable and difficult to optimize. Furthermore, the adsorbed molecules may be released quickly, and such systems are better suited for short-term delivery. Several types of bioactive molecules have been successfully adsorbed to the surface of nanofibers, such as growth factors for the acceleration of tissue regeneration in hernia repair [26], antibiotics for the prevention of post-op adhesions [27] or liposomes loaded with growth factors to promote cell proliferation [28,29].

In this study, a simple drug delivery system consisting of native platelets immobilized to the surface of the fibrous scaffolds was tested. The nanofibers were fabricated from poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) using two different techniques, electrostatic and centrifugal spinning. Various concentrations of platelets, the differing morphology of the fibrous layers, and the effect of the released molecules, were tested using melanocytes in vitro, as the role of platelet-rich plasma in melanocyte stimulation is not fully understood.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The Fabrication of Electrospun and Centrifugally Spun Scaffolds

The electrospun PCL scaffolds were fabricated using the Nanospider™ NS 500 device (Elmarco, Liberec, Czech Republic). To perform the electrospinning process, a 24% (w/v) solution of PCL (MW 45,000; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), dissolved in a mixture of chloroform and ethanol (volume ratio 9:1) was used. The polymer solution was connected to the high-voltage source (Spellman HV, Hauppauge, NY, USA). The voltage used for electrospinning was 70 kV, the distance was set at 35 cm and the polymer flow rate was 50 mL/h. The solution was electrospun using a needleless wire electrode and the nanofibers were deposited on a non-woven, supporting Spunbond textile (Pegas Nonwovens, Znojmo, Czech Republic). The conditions during the process were maintained at 23° ± 2 °C and 60 ± 15% relative humidity.

The centrifugally spun PCL scaffolds were fabricated using a centrifugal spinning device (Cyclone L-1000D Forcespinning® device; FibeRio, McAllen, TX, USA). To perform the centrifugal spinning process, a 40% (w/v) solution of PCL (MW 45,000; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) dissolved in a mixture of chloroform and ethanol (volume ratio 9:1) was used. An orifice G30 at a rotation speed of 6000× g, was used to prepare the layers. The formed fibers were deposited on a non-woven textile (Pegas Nonwovens, Czech Republic) using a vacuum-assisted deposition.

2.2. Characterization of the Scaffolds Using Sub-µCT

The samples were scanned using the Rigaku Nano3DX device (Rigaku Corporation, Tokio, Japan) with a Cu target operating at 30 kV, 3300 × 2500 px2 X-ray CCD camera and 0.27 × 0.27 µm2 pixel size. The exposure time was set at 12 s to reach a sufficient amount of signal. 800 projections were acquired over 180° rotation. Binning 2 was set (information from 2 × 2 px2 area was summed) to decrease data noise and measurement time. The voxel size of (0.54 µm) 3 was reached. The phase retrieval algorithm [30,31] was used to enhance the contrast between the fibers and background. Data were reconstructed using Rigaku reconstruction software. The analysis was performed in software VGStudio MAX 3.2 (Volume Graphics GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). The advanced method of thresholding based on local gray valued differences, was applied to segment the fibers. The volume of the cells between fibers was analyzed using a Foam structure analysis module, with a merge threshold set to 5% and fast precision [32].

2.3. The Functionalization of Fibrous Scaffolds with Native Platelets

The surface of the prepared electrospun and centrifugally spun PCL samples was functionalized with different concentrations of platelets. The fabricated PCL samples (diameter 6 mm) were punched out of the fibrous mats. The samples were sterilized using 70% ethanol and rinsed with a phosphate buffered saline (PBS) three times. Fresh human leukocyte-poor platelet concentrate derived from a buffy-coat (in additive solution) was obtained from the Blood Transfusion Service (Šumperk, Czech Republic). The bag was prepared from the blood of four donors (All subjects gave their informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Institute of Experimental Medicine CAS, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of 2020/04). The platelet concentration in the bag was 967 × 109 platelets/L. The tested platelet concentrations are given in Table 1. The solutions containing the appropriate concentration of platelets were prepared by diluting the platelet concentrate in SSP+™ additive solution (Macopharma, Tourcoing, France). In the event of a solution with a platelet concentration being higher than the platelet concentration in the bag, the platelet concentrate was firstly centrifuged (3100× g for 10 min) and then re-suspended in the appropriate volume of SSP+™ to obtain the desired platelet concentration. Finally, 50 μL of the prepared solutions were added to the sterile nanofibrous samples in a 96-well plate. The samples were incubated for 2 h at a temperature of 22 °C. The samples were subsequently washed with PBS and placed into new wells. Plain PCL scaffolds served as controls (E0 for electrospun PCL samples, C0 for centrifugally spun PCL samples).

Table 1.

The composition of the electrospun and centrifugally spun samples functionalized with platelets. In the scaffold abbreviations, E stands for electrospun samples, C for centrifugally spun samples and the number indicates the fold change of the physiological concentration of platelets (300 × 109 platelets/L).

Sample Platelet Concentration
Electrospun scaffolds
10× physiological concentration E10 3000 × 109 platelets/L
3× physiological concentration E3 900 × 109 platelets/L
Physiological concentration E1 300 × 109 platelets/L
3× diluted physiological concentration E0.3 100 × 109 platelets/L
10× diluted physiological concentration E0.3 30 × 109 platelets/L
Control E0 No platelets
Centrifugally spun scaffolds
10× physiological concentration C10 3000 × 109 platelets/L
3× physiological concentration C3 900 × 109 platelets/L
Physiological concentration C1 300 × 109 platelets/L
3× diluted physiological concentration C0.3 100 × 109 platelets/L
10× diluted physiological concentration C0.1 30 × 109 platelets/L
Control C0 No platelets
Open in a new tab

2.4. Characterization Using Scanning Electron Microscopy

The structure of the fabricated scaffolds was visualized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The dry samples were sputter coated with gold using a Q150RS device (Quorum Technologies, Lewes, UK). A Vega3 SBU (Tescan, Brno, Czech Republic) microscope was used for image acquisition. The fiber diameter and pore size of the prepared samples was determined using ImageJ software (version 1.53a, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) from at least 200 independent measurements.

To visualize the platelets adhered to the surface of the scaffolds, the samples were fixed using 2.5% glutaraldehyde (3 h, 4 °C; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) following the 2-h incubation of the fibrous samples with the respective platelet solutions. Subsequently, the samples were dehydrated with ethanol changes (35%, 48%, 70%, 96% and 100% ethanol). Hexamethyldisilazane (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) was used to remove any residual water from the samples. The samples were sputter-coated with gold (app. 30 nm) and visualized using Vega 3 SBU microscope (Tescan, Czech Republic).

2.5. Analysis of Bioactive Molecules Contained in Platelets

To characterize the bioactive molecules contained in platelets, platelet lysate was firstly prepared. The samples underwent three freeze/thaw cycles (−80 °C/37 °C) and were centrifuged to discard the cellular debris. The Bio-Plex 200 Multiplex System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) was then employed. The commercially available cytokine panel (Bio-Plex Pro™ Human Cytokine 27-plex Assay, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) was used, in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The assay allows multiple bioactive molecules to be quantified simultaneously in one well. The following analytes were quantified: interleukin-1b (IL-1b), interleukin 1ra (IL-1ra), interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-5 (IL-5), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-7 (IL-7), interleukin-8 (IL-8), interleukin-9 (IL-9), interleukin-10 (IL-10), interleukin-12 (IL-12), interleukin-13 (IL-13), interleukin-15 (IL-15), interleukin-17 (IL-17), granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interferon-gamma (INF-γ), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), CXCL10 chemokine (C-X-C motif ligand-10), macrophage inflammatory protein-1a and 1-b (MIP-1a, MIP-1b), RANTES, eotaxin, PDGF, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and VEGF. Furthermore, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to determine the concentration of thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) and TGF-β1 in the platelet lysate according to the manufacturer’s instructions (DuoSet®; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA).

2.6. The Detection of Released Growth Factors

To determine the release profiles of growth factors from the platelet-functionalized samples, TSP-1 and TGF-β1 were chosen as model molecules. The samples were weighed (approximately 80 mg) and to each sample, 500 µL of PBS was added. The samples were kept at 37 °C. On days 1, 3, 7 and 14 of the experiment, the PBS was collected, frozen (−80 °C) and replaced by new PBS. The concentration of TSP-1 and TGF-β1 released from platelets adhered to the electrospun and centrifugally spun samples, was quantified by ELISA in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (DuoSet®; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA).

2.7. Cell Culture and Seeding

Murine melan-a cell line (melanocytes) were purchased from the Welcome Trust Functional Genomics Cell Bank at St. George’s University of London. The cells were cultured in a humidified incubator (37 °C, 10% CO2 and 80–90% relative humidity) in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma Aldrich, Cat. No. F7524, MO, USA), penicillin/streptomycin (100 IU/mL, 100 μg/mL respectively), 2 mM L-glutamine and 200 nM 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate TPA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) mixture. Sub-confluent cells were washed with PBS-EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) solution and treated with 0.05% trypsin/EDTA solution. The scaffolds were seeded with cells at a density of 17,850 cells/cm2. Half of the volume of the medium was changed every 7 days.

2.8. Cell Metabolic Activity Testing

On days 1, 3, 7, 10, and 14, the metabolic activity of melanocytes was determined using the MTS (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) assay (CellTiter96® AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay; Promega, Madison, WI, USA). To each scaffold, 20 μL of MTS solution and 100 μL of fresh medium were added. After incubation (3 h at 37 °C, 10% CO2, 80–90% relative humidity), the absorbance of the media was detected at 490 nm with a microplate reader (Infinite® M200 PRO; Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). The background absorbance (690 nm) was subtracted from the measured data, along with the absorbance of a plain medium. Platelets contain mitochondrial enzymes and thus metabolize the MTS substrate. To exclude misrepresentation of the cell metabolic activity due to the presence of platelets on the surface of nanofibers, an MTS assay of samples with platelets was performed; the detected absorbance was subtracted from the measured data.

2.9. Cell Proliferation Testing

On days 1, 3, 7, and 14, melanocyte proliferation was determined using a fluorescence-based kit (Quant-iT™ PicoGreen® dsDNA Assay Kit, Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The samples used for the MTS assay were transferred to a cell lysis buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 0.2% v/v Triton X-100). To facilitate the cell lysis and DNA release, the samples underwent three freeze/thaw cycles. In between the cycles, the samples were vortexed. Fluorescence intensity was detected using a microplate reader (Infinite® M200 PRO; Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland; λex = 485 nm, λem = 535 nm) and the DNA content was determined according to the λDNA calibration curve of the kit.

2.10. Cell Visualization Using Confocal Microscopy

Confocal microscopy was used to visualize the cells. The cells seeded on scaffolds were fixed with methanol (−20 °C), rinsed with PBS and stained. 3,3’-Dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide (DiOC6(3)) was used to visualize the cellular membranes (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA; 1 μg/mL in PBS, 30 min) and propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA; 5 μL/mL, 10 min) to visualize the cell nuclei. Between the incubations, the samples were rinsed with PBS. A Zeiss LSM 510 DUO confocal microscope was used for imaging (λex maximum = 488 nm, λem maximum = 501 nm for DiOC6(3); λex maximum = 536 nm, λem maximum = 617 nm for propidium iodide).

2.11. Statistical Analysis

The acquired data were statistically evaluated using SigmaStat 3.5 software (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). The statistical significance between a pair of groups was determined using ANOVA testing. Tukey’s comparative test was used for post-hoc analysis. The data are presented as a mean value plus/minus standard deviation. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Morphology Characterization of the Scaffold

Nano-/microfibrous scaffolds were prepared using the two fiber-forming techniques: electrospinning and centrifugal spinning. Firstly, the morphology of the plain fibrous scaffolds without any platelets was studied. In the electrospun samples, we observed a bimodal distribution of nanofibers with a dominant thin nanofiber population (195 ± 85 nm) and a thick nanofiber population (875 ± 253 nm). In the case of centrifugally spun fibers, the thin nanofiber population (357 ± 153 nm) was much less abundant. The major population was microfibrous (1–2 µm) forming a bimodal nano-/microfibrous morphology. A histogram of fiber diameter distribution is given in Figure 1D. The X-ray computed sub-micron tomography (sub-µCT) evaluation of the fibrous samples showed that the morphology of the electrospun mesh was more compact than the centrifugally spun mesh based on the fiber density visualized in the 3D rendering (Figure 1A). This confirms the comparison of pore size median values, which are 458 µm3 for electrospun mesh and 2475 µm3 for centrifugally spun mesh. Histograms of pore volume frequency were compared using the Mann–Whitney test. A null hypothesis asserting that the medians of the two samples are identical was rejected against an alternative hypothesis that the median of the centrifugally spun sample is greater than that of the electrospun spun sample at p-value 0.0001.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Morphology characteristics of the fibrous samples. The morphology of the electrospun (ES) and centrifugally spun (CS) samples was assessed using the sub-micron tomography (µCT) technique. (A)—3D rendering visualization of a 30 µm thick layer of the electrospun fibrous sample. (B)—3D rendering visualization of a 30 µm thick layer of the centrifugally spun fibrous sample. (C)—Histogram comparison of electrospun and centrifugally spun fibrous samples showing distributions of pore volume. (D)—Histogram comparison of electrospun and centrifugally spun samples showing the distributions of fiber diameter.

Furthermore, the fibrous scaffolds were functionalized with platelets and their morphology was examined using SEM (Figure 2). The acquired images showed a fine fibrin network formed on the electrospun and centrifugally spun scaffolds, with the two highest platelet concentrations (samples E10, C10, E3 and C3). On the samples with the lower platelet concentrations, the fibrin network was very scarce. The presence of the fibrin network was decreasing with the decreasing platelet concentration, and on the samples E0.1 and C0.1, no fibrin network was detected.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Scanning electron microscopy of the electrospun and centrifugally spun poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) nanofibrous samples with adhered platelets. The images acquired on day 1 illustrate the fibrin network formed on the surface of the two samples with the highest platelet concentrations (E10, C10, E3, and C3) and the electrospun (E0) and centrifugally spun (C0) control samples. In the scaffold abbreviation, E stands for electrospun samples, C for centrifugally spun samples and the number indicates the fold change of the physiological concentration of platelets (300 × 109 platelets/L). Magnification 6000×; scale bar 10 µm.

On the centrifugally spun samples, there were more platelets embedded within the fibrin network. The platelets showed morphology typical for their activated state-spread platelets with filopodia.

3.2. Characterization of the Platelet-Derived Bioactive Molecules

The concentrations of bioactive molecules contained in the platelets were determined using X-MAP (Multi-Analyte Profiling) technology. The obtained results are shown in Figure 3 and the obtained values are summarized in Supplementary Table S1. The acquired data confirmed that platelets contained various pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors. The most abundantly present bioactive molecules were chemokine RANTES and PDGF-BB. Furthermore, the platelet lysate contained a high level of TSP-1 (1.9 ± 0.7 µg/mL) and TGF-β1 (59.3 ± 2.6 ng/mL). The data are included in Supplementary Table S1.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Concentration of the assayed bioactive molecules in the platelet concentrate. The bioactive molecules were determined using multiplexed assay.

3.3. Release Characteristics of the Bioactive Molecules

To characterize the release of bioactive molecules from the functionalized samples, levels of TSP-1 and TGF-β1 released from the electrospun and centrifugally spun scaffolds were detected. TSP-1 and TGF-β1 were chosen as models of large and small molecules, respectively. Both of them are bioactive molecules abundant in platelets, fostering the proliferative processes during wound healing. The obtained data are shown in Figure 4. Detectable amounts of TSP-1 were only present in the samples with the three highest concentrations of platelets (E10 and C10, E3 and C3, and E1 and C1). The cumulative release of TSP-1 (Figure 4A) showed that the adhesion of platelets to the centrifugally spun scaffolds resulted in an approximately two-fold increase in the TSP-1 amount, when compared to the respective electrospun scaffolds. In the centrifugally spun sample with the highest concentration of platelets (C10), a significant amount of TSP-1 was detected, even on day 14. On the contrary, all of the TSP-1 was released from all the electrospun samples by day 3 of the experiment. Furthermore, the release of TGF-β1 from the platelet-functionalized scaffolds was investigated (Figure 4B). In contrast to the results observed in the TSP-1 release study, a significant amount of TGF-β1 was detected, even in the samples E0.3 and C0.3. The data followed a similar trend when compared to the TSP-1 data. There was a significantly higher concentration of detected TGF-β1 on the centrifugally spun scaffolds when compared to the respective electrospun scaffolds. Furthermore, in the higher tested platelet concentrations (C10, C3), the two-fold increase seen in TSP-1 was also observed in the case of TGF-β1.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Cumulative release of thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β1) from the platelet functionalized electrospun and centrifugally spun samples. In the scaffold abbreviations, E stands for electrospun samples, C for centrifugally spun samples and the number indicates the fold change of the physiological concentration of platelets (300 × 109 platelets/L). Only data for the samples with analyte concentration above the detection limit of the assay are shown. (A)—Cumulative release of TSP-1 from the electrospun (E10, E3, E1) and centrifugally spun (C10, C3, C1) samples. (B)—Cumulative release of TGF-β1 from the electrospun (E10, E3, E1, and E0.3) and centrifugally spun (C10, C3, C1, and C0.3) samples.

Based on the acquired data, the half-time release of the investigated growth factors was determined. The half-time release of TSP-1 from the platelet-functionalized samples ranged from 0.5 day to almost 1 day and is shown in Table 2. The graphs showing the relative release of TSP-1 and TGF-β1 are shown in Supplementary Figure S1.

Table 2.

Half-time of TSP-1 and TGF-β1 release from the platelet-functionalized samples. The table represents the time to the release of 50% of the contained TSP-1 and TGF-β1 in days. In the scaffold abbreviations, E stands for electrospun samples, C for centrifugally spun samples and the number indicates the fold change of the physiological concentration of platelets (300 × 109 platelets/L).

Sample Half-Time of TSP-1 Release (Days) Half-Time of TGF-β1 Release (Days)
C10 0.98 0.72
C3 0.59 0.73
C1 0.5 0.91
E10 0.57 1.39
E3 0.50 0.84
E1 0.50 0.61
Open in a new tab

The half-time release detected in TGF-β1 was generally longer when compared to the detected levels of TSP-1.

3.4. Melanocytes Seeded on the Platelet-Functionalized Samples

To test the biocompatibility of the scaffolds, the metabolic activity and proliferation of melanocytes seeded on platelet-functionalized scaffolds was determined. The metabolic activity of the melanocytes is shown in Figure 5A. For simplicity and clarity, the graphs only contain statistical significance if the detected metabolic activity on the sample was statistically significantly higher than all the samples with lower platelet concentrations. The graphs containing full statistical analysis are given in Supplementary Figure S2.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Metabolic activity and proliferation of melanocytes seeded on the electrospun and centrifugally spun scaffolds. (A)—Metabolic activity of melanocytes was determined by the MTS assay. (B)—Proliferation of melanocytes determined by dsDNA staining. For the sake of clarity, statistical significance is only included if the detected metabolic activity/proliferation on the respective scaffold was significantly higher when compared to all the samples functionalized with a lower concentration of platelets and the control sample containing no platelets. The data, including the statistical analysis in its entirety, are presented in Supplementary Figure S1. The level of significance was set at p < 0.001. In the scaffold abbreviations, E stands for electrospun samples, C for centrifugally spun samples and the number indicates the fold change of the physiological concentration of platelets (300 × 109 platelets/L).

The acquired data showed a clear tendency of a dose-dependent effect of the platelet concentration, adsorbed to the scaffolds. On the electrospun scaffolds, the bioactive compounds released from the platelets significantly improved the melanocyte metabolic activity, in comparison to the plain PCL control (E1) from day 3 of the experiment. By the end of the experiment, the three highest platelet concentrations (samples E10, E3, and E1) significantly improved melanocyte metabolic activity, in comparison to the below-physiologic platelet concentration, with the sample E3 showing the highest metabolic activity. Furthermore, even the below-physiologic platelet concentrations (E0.3 and E0.1) resulted in improved melanocyte metabolic activity, when compared to the E0 control sample.

Similarly, as in the case of the electrospun scaffolds, the metabolic activity of melanocytes seeded on the centrifugally spun scaffolds, was platelet concentration dependent. In contrary to the below-physiological platelet concentrations (C0.1 and C0.3), the melanocyte metabolic activity was significantly improved in comparison to the C0 control from day 3. By the end of the experiment, the highest melanocyte metabolic activity was detected on the scaffold with the highest platelet concentration (C10), followed by the second highest platelet concentration (C3) and the physiological platelet concentration (C1).

The overall statistical analysis of all the obtained data (data not shown in the graph) showed there were no statistically significant differences between the electrospun and centrifugally spun samples on days 1, 3, and 7. However, on day 14, the metabolic activity of melanocytes seeded on the C10 scaffolds was significantly improved not only in comparison to all the other tested centrifugally spun scaffolds, but also in comparison to all the tested electrospun scaffolds. Furthermore, even the metabolic activity of melanocytes seeded on the second highest tested concentration of platelets adhered to the centrifugal scaffold (C3) was significantly improved in comparison to all the tested electrospun samples. These differences were levelled out at the physiological platelet concentration, as there was no significant difference in the metabolic activity of melanocytes seeded on the C1 and E1 samples. Furthermore, the morphology of the electrospun and centrifugally spun nanofibrous samples did not seem to affect the melanocyte metabolic activity, as there were no significant differences detected between the plain PCL control samples E0 and C0.

A similar trend was observed in the melanocyte proliferation data shown in Figure 5B (full statistical analysis shown in Supplementary Figure S3). There were only moderate statistically significant differences in the proliferation of melanocytes seeded on the electrospun scaffolds, with the E3 scaffold achieving the highest proliferation on day 7 of the experiment. Furthermore, the scaffolds with the three highest platelet concentrations (E10, E3, and E1) reached a significantly improved proliferation, in comparison to the E0 sample on day 14. The differences in melanocyte proliferation were more pronounced on the centrifugally spun samples. Until day 3, there were no statistically significant differences in melanocyte proliferation. However, on day 7, the proliferation of melanocytes seeded on the centrifugally spun scaffolds with the highest platelet concentration (C10), was significantly higher when compared to all the other centrifugally spun scaffolds, followed in the trend by the second highest platelet concentration (C3). The same trend was observed on day 14 of the experiment. The melanocyte proliferation on samples C1 and C0.3 was improved, compared to the plain PCL control C0. However, on the sample functionalized with the lowest platelet concentration (C0.1), no improvement in melanocyte proliferation was achieved. The overall statistical analysis (data not shown in the graph) confirmed the trend observed in the metabolic activity data. On day 7, the metabolic activity of melanocytes seeded on the centrifugally spun C10 scaffold showed the highest proliferation, when also compared to all the centrifugally spun and electrospun scaffolds. Furthermore, the response was further observed on day 14, when the C10 and the C3 samples showed a superior proliferation when compared to all the electrospun samples (in addition to the centrifugally spun samples). Similarly, there was no difference in the proliferation of melanocytes seeded on the E0 or C0 control samples, suggesting the sole effect of the platelet-derived molecules on the behavior of melanocytes, regardless of the scaffold morphology.

Melanin synthesized on the electrospun and centrifugally spun scaffolds was visible by the naked eye and detected using photography (Supplementary Figure S4). Since day 7, melanin deposits were visible on the electrospun and centrifugally spun scaffolds. The melanin synthesis was more pronounced and uniform on the centrifugally spun scaffolds, when compared to the electrospun scaffolds. There was very scarce melanin synthesis on the PCL controls (E0, C0) without any functionalization by platelets.

The morphology of melanocytes seeded on the platelet-functionalized samples was visualized using confocal microscopy (Figure 6). The confocal microscopy images confirmed the other obtained data. A significant increase in cell numbers was observed from day 7 to day 14, on the electrospun and the centrifugally spun nanofibrous scaffolds. There was an obvious difference in cell numbers on the platelet-functionalized samples and on the PCL control, on both the electrospun and the centrifugally spun scaffolds. Furthermore, the melanocytes cultured on the centrifugally spun scaffolds showed a more dendritic morphology and formed a more complex network, in comparison to the melanocytes cultured on the more 2D-like electrospun morphology.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Confocal images of melanocytes seeded on the platelet-functionalized electrospun or centrifugally spun samples. Cellular membranes were stained by DiOC6(3) (green color), cell nuclei using propidium iodide (red color). For each sample, a representative image from day 7 and day 14 is given. In the scaffold abbreviations, E stands for electrospun samples, C for centrifugally spun samples and the number indicates the fold change of the physiological concentration of platelets (300 × 109 platelets/L). Objective = 20×, scale bar 50 µm.

4. Discussion

Vitiligo is the most commonly acquired depigmentation skin disorder. The currently available treatment modalities are not satisfactory, and they often suffer from poor patient compliance due to their long-term nature. Therefore, PRP has recently attracted much attention, as its beneficial effects have already been used in dermatology for skin rejuvenation and acne scar treatments [33]. The bioactive substances contained in PRP not only inhibit the inflammation processes but stimulate the regenerative processes that are also necessary to restore the normal melanocyte function in the epidermis [34].

PRP in vitiligo treatment was first mentioned by Lim et al., who concluded that intradermal PRP injections were ineffective in 20 studied patients [35]. Several clinical trials have subsequently been performed, to evaluate the efficacy of PRP application in combination with conventional therapy. Ibrahim et al. compared intradermal PRP in combination with NB-UVB phototherapy. Their study demonstrated that the combination resulted in significantly improved re-pigmentation over a short period of time, when compared to the sole phototherapy group (75% of patients in the PRP+NB-UVB group achieved an excellent or good response, in comparison to no response in the NB-UVB group) [9]. Similarly, the intradermal PRP application in combination with fractional CO2 laser therapy [10,36] and excimer laser use [37], proved to be superior when compared to the respective laser monotherapy. The combination of laser/NB-UVB phototherapy and PRP application reduces phototherapy exposure [37], improves re-pigmentation and thus patient compliance. Saify et al. studied the route of administration of PRP. They compared the topical administration of PRP following micro-needling, intradermal injections and intravenous administration. According to their results, topical administration resulted in a good color match and promoted repigmentation [38]. Therefore, a drug delivery system that could prolong the topical delivery of growth factors following a micro-needling treatment would be beneficial. The aim of this study was to develop a simple and effective drug delivery system for platelet-derived bioactive molecules.

Firstly, the morphology of the prepared fibrous scaffolds was characterized, as differing morphology, e.g., fiber diameter and roughness, may affect cell behavior and platelet activation. The detected mean diameter of the centrifugally spun fibers was higher in comparison to the diameters obtained via electrospinning, with a greater variance that is due to the less controlled fabrication procedure; this is in accordance with previous studies [39,40]. The fiber diameter above 2 µm and mainly above 5 µm significantly increased platelet adhesion, activation and thrombin formation on electrospun vascular grafts [41]. Generally, both types of scaffolds mimic the native extracellular matrix (ECM) owing to their porosity, pore interconnection and fibrous structure. However, the electrospun fibrous layer is more planar, forming a rather 2D-like structure, in comparison to the centrifugally spun fluffy 3D-like scaffolds with higher porosity, improving cell penetration that is impeded to some degree in the 2D-like electrospun layers [25,39]. The µCT evaluation showed a higher number of larger pores in the centrifugally spun samples, when compared to the electrospun samples. Similar results were described by Krifa et al., who compared fiber diameter and pore size in electrospun and centrifugally spun membranes made of nylon 6 [42]. According to their results, centrifugally spun fibers were looser, had higher fiber diameter and broader diameter distribution. A study performed on PCL confirmed that a centrifugally spun fibrous scaffold showed higher porosity, pore size and fiber diameter [25]. It has been shown that the more open morphology of the centrifugally spun samples is a desirable feature in tissue engineering applications, as it fosters cell penetration into the deeper layers of the scaffold and its colonization [43]. The higher mean pore size relevant to the size of platelets in combination with the results from growth factor release studies, indicate higher platelet adhesion on the centrifugally spun nanofibers. The open structure of the centrifugally spun scaffolds with higher pore size enabled deeper penetration of the platelets and resulted in an increased adsorption surface. Therefore, the platelets adsorbed on the centrifugally spun fibers released a larger amount of growth factors.

The higher metabolic activity of platelets on the surface of the centrifugally spun samples suggested a more pronounced adhesion of platelets to the samples. The performed SEM analysis demonstrated the presence of a fine fibrin network on the surface of the fibrous samples, functionalized with the highest concentrations of platelets. A similar fibrin network was observed in other studies, evaluating the positive effect of combining platelets and nanofibrous scaffolds [25,44,45]. It has been shown that the structure of the fibrin network, in terms of diameter, branching and density, may be influenced by various factors including pH and calcium, thrombin or fibrinogen concentration [46]. In our previous study, we even observed a fibrin network had formed on the PCL scaffolds functionalized with a lower platelet concentration than in this study [45]. The explanation for this may be due to the decreased concentration of fibrinogen in the platelet concentrate solutions, as fibrinogen is mainly present in plasma. Fibrinogen is the main factor affecting the fibrin matrix composition; its concentration is proportional to the fibrin stiffness and fibrin network degradation rate. It was determined that the platelet concentration affects the formation of the fibrin network; higher platelets concentrations resulted in a finer (lower fiber diameter) fibrin network [47]. Several studies were conducted to investigate the effect of fibrin stiffness on cell proliferation; the results showed for example that keratinocytes preferred softer matrices, whereas fibroblasts preferred stiffer fibrin networks [48]. The mechanical properties and rapid breakdown of fibrin-only matrices described by several studies [49,50] limit the use of fibrin in some of the tissue engineering applications. Combining the fibrin network with nanofibers improves the handling of the scaffolds and prolongs their stability. The SEM analysis of a similar drug delivery system showed that platelets and fibrin network residual were present on the nanofibrous samples, even on day 14 [25].

Not only does the fibrin network provide a scaffolding system for cells, it also serves as a reservoir of growth factors released from the activated platelets and affects their spatiotemporal release [48,51]. Several growth factors have been shown to interact with the components of the fibrin matrix, such as VEGF [52], bFGF [53,54] and TGF-β1 [55]. In our study, the half-time of TGF-β1 release was generally longer when compared to the detected levels of TSP-1. These findings indicated a stronger interaction of TGF-β1, with the fibrin matrix formed on the surface of the nanofibers. This is in accordance with the findings of a study that investigated the binding of several growth factors (TGF-β1 included) to fibrin. In the study, the growth factors were combined with a fibrinogen solution; the fibrinogen was polymerized using thrombin and factor XIII. The concentration of growth factors released from the fibrin matrix was determined. The study showed a strong interaction of TGF-β1 with fibrinogen, via its heparin-binding domain. In the study, 50% of the contained TGF-β1 was released after 1.5 days, which is in accordance with our results [56]. Thus, by exploitation of a naturally occurring phenomenon, the release of bioactive molecules may be controlled, and a simple drug delivery system may be developed.

To test the biocompatibility of the scaffolds and the response of melanocytes to the bioactive molecules released from the drug delivery system, the scaffolds were seeded with melanocytes and evaluated. The melanocyte metabolic activity and proliferation was significantly affected by the presence of platelets and the platelet-derived bioactive molecules in a concentration-dependent manner; both measures increased with the increasing concentration of platelets. The best results were obtained in the centrifugally spun samples with the highest concentration of platelets (the highest tested concentration of platelet-derived molecules, C10). Nanofibers made of PCL, using electrospinning, were successfully used for the melanocyte culture [45,57,58]. Savkovic et al. showed PCL nanofibers to be superior to a 2D cell culture substrate, in terms of melanin synthesis [57]. The functionalization of PCL nanofibers with platelets led to improvements of cell metabolic activity and proliferation, not only in melanocytes but also in keratinocytes and fibroblasts [45]. Such pleotropic effects of PRP may be very useful in vitiligo therapy, as keratinocytes and fibroblasts were also implicated in its etiopathogenesis [9]. The acquired data further showed that the metabolic activity and proliferation of melanocytes was not affected by the morphology of the scaffolds, as there were no statistically significant differences between the electrospun and centrifugally spun control samples. However, the confocal microscopy study revealed changes in the morphology of melanocytes, cultured on the centrifugally spun samples. Similar changes in melanocyte morphology in a platelet lysate-enriched culture medium were observed [58]. These changes may be attributed to the high PDGF-BB contained in the platelets, as the PDGF-BB has been shown to stimulate melanogenesis, dendritogenesis, and the differentiation of human melanocytes [59].

The principles of tissue engineering also became apparent in vitiligo treatment. To improve the melanocyte transplantation outcomes, a “cellular patch” concept was proposed. Such a patch consisting of a suitable biomaterial, would allow in vitro expansion of the harvested melanocytes [60]. Accordingly, human amniotic membrane [61] or various polymer films consisting of poly (DL-lactic acid) [62], plasma-treated polyvinyl chloride and silicone [63] or polystyrene [64] were investigated in vitro and in clinical practice. Therefore, the active stimulation of melanocyte proliferation and mechanical support provided by our system would be beneficial in clinical applications. Furthermore, given the cytokines, growth factors, and other bioactive molecules, the fibrous scaffolds functionalized with platelets could serve as a cell-free dressing with sustained delivery of biomolecules to the site of interest. This requires further investigation.

5. Conclusions

The PRP has proven to be useful in combination vitiligo therapy, as it represents a very safe and cheap regenerative therapy. Different drug delivery systems may improve the current re-pigmentation outcomes. The results of the study showed that the centrifugally spun scaffolds yielded almost a two-fold increase in the number of platelets adhered to the surface of the fibrous mesh, prolonging the delivery of platelet-derived bioactive molecules. A strong concentration-dependent behavior of melanocytes seeded on the platelet-functionalized scaffolds was observed, as with the increasing concentration of the bioactive molecules, the melanocyte response was also increasing. The most pronounced response of melanocytes was observed in the highest tested concentration of bioactive molecules.

Overall, the unique properties of nanofibers allow them to form non-woven textiles, with sufficient mechanical capacity, to be utilized as wound dressings in clinical practice. The key innovation for vitiligo treatment of the proposed scaffold system is its active stimulation of melanocytes by platelets as a source of growth factors. The system is overcoming other application systems for platelet delivery by their immobilization. Upon simple spraying on the skin, the platelets would be rapidly washed from the application site. If combined with coatings (i.e., films), the structure of the film would not provide sufficient porosity to enable optimal transition of moisture and fluids, resulting in a suboptimal skin reaction. Moreover, our group intensively builds on the industrialization of nanofiber production, leading to commercial viability of the proposed solution for topical administration, due to its simplicity and on-site preparation provision.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/10/9/1801/s1, Table S1: Concentration of the determined analytes in the platelet concentrate. LOQ stands for limit of quantification. Figure S1: Relative release of TSP-1 (A) and TGF-β1 (B) from the electrospun (E) and centrifugally spun (C) scaffolds. Figure S2: Metabolic activity of melanocytes seeded on the electrospun and centrifugally spun scaffolds. A—Metabolic activity of melanocytes seeded on the electrospun PCL scaffolds (statistical analysis p < 0.05). B—Metabolic activity of melanocytes seeded on the centrifugally spun PCL scaffolds (statistical analysis p < 0.05). The level of significance is denoted by the numbers above the bars in the graph. E stands for electrospun, C stands for centrifugally spun and the number indicates the fold change of the physiological concentration of platelets (300 × 109 platelets/L). Figure S3: Proliferation of melanocytes seeded on the electrospun and centrifugally spun scaffolds. A—Proliferation of melanocytes seeded on the electrospun and centrifugally spun scaffolds. A—Proliferation of melanocytes seeded on the electrospun PCL scaffolds (statistical analysis p < 0.05). B—Proliferation of melanocytes seeded on the centrifugally spun PCL scaffolds (statistical analysis p < 0.05). The level of significance is denoted by the numbers above the bars in the graph. E stands for electrospun, C stands for centrifugally spun and the number indicates the fold change of the physiological concentration of platelets (300 × 109 platelets/L). Figure S4: Visualization of melanin synthesis on the electrospun and centrifugally spun fibrous scaffolds.

Click here for additional data file. (969.9KB, pdf)

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.V.; scaffold fabrication, M.B.; scaffold functionalization and cell culture studies, K.V. and V.S.; confocal microscopy, K.V.; release kinetics studies, K.V. and M.R.; SEM, R.D. and V.L.; sub-microCT studies, P.B., T.Z. and J.K.; statistical analysis, K.V. and Z.K.; data curation, K.V.; writing—original draft preparation, K.V.; writing—review and editing, E.F. and M.R.; supervision, E.A. and E.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic within the National Sustainability Program I: projects No. LO1508, Operational Program–Prague Competitiveness CZ.2.16/3.1.00/21528, CEITEC 2020 (LQ1601) under the National Sustainability Program II, CzechNanoLab Research Infrastructure (LM2018110) and Czech Health Research Council (project no. 17-32285A).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  • 1.Alikhan A., Felsten L.M., Daly M., Petronic-Rosic V. Vitiligo: A comprehensive overview: Part I. Introduction, epidemiology, quality of life, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, associations, histopathology, etiology, and work-up. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2011;65:473–491. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang Y., Cai Y., Shi M., Jiang S., Cui S., Wu Y. The Prevalence of Vitiligo: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0163806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yaghoobi R., Omidian M., Bagherani N. Vitiligo: A review of the published work. J. Dermatol. 2011;38:419–431. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2010.01139.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Parambath N., Sharma V.K., Parihar A.S., Sahni K., Gupta S. Use of platelet-rich plasma to suspend noncultured epidermal cell suspension improves repigmentation after autologous transplantation in stable vitiligo: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Dermatol. 2019;58:472–476. doi: 10.1111/ijd.14286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Talsania N., Lamb B., Bewley A. Vitiligo is more than skin deep: A survey of members of the Vitiligo Society. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2010;35:736–739. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03765.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Felsten L.M., Alikhan A., Petronic-Rosic V. Vitiligo: A comprehensive overview: Part II: Treatment options and approach to treatment. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2011;65:493–514. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.10.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Xiao B.H., Wu Y., Sun Y., Chen H.D., Gao X.H. Treatment of vitiligo with NB-UVB: A systematic review. J. Dermatol. Treat. 2015;26:340–346. doi: 10.3109/09546634.2014.952610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nicolaidou E., Antoniou C., Stratigos A., Katsambas A.D. Narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy and 308-nm excimer laser in the treatment of vitiligo: A review. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2009;60:470–477. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.07.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ibrahim Z.A., El-Ashmawy A.A., El-Tatawy R.A., Sallam F.A. The effect of platelet-rich plasma on the outcome of short-term narrowband–ultraviolet B phototherapy in the treatment of vitiligo: A pilot study. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2016;15:108–116. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Abdelghani R., Ahmed N.A., Darwish H.M. Combined treatment with fractional carbon dioxide laser, autologous platelet-rich plasma, and narrow band ultraviolet B for vitiligo in different body sites: A prospective, randomized comparative trial. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2018;17:365–372. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.De Pascale M.R., Sommese L., Casamassimi A., Napoli C. Platelet Derivatives in Regenerative Medicine: An Update. Transfus. Med. Rev. 2015;29:52–61. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2014.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Burnouf T., Strunk D., Koh M.B.C., Schallmoser K. Human platelet lysate: Replacing fetal bovine serum as a gold standard for human cell propagation? Biomaterials. 2016;76:371–387. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Foster T.E., Puskas B.L., Mandelbaum B.R., Gerhardt M.B., Rodeo S.A. Platelet-Rich Plasma. Am. J. Sports Med. 2009;37:2259–2272. doi: 10.1177/0363546509349921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cameli N., Mariano M., Cordone I., Abril E., Masi S., Foddai M.L. Autologous Pure Platelet-Rich Plasma Dermal Injections for Facial Skin Rejuvenation. Dermatol. Surg. 2017;43:826–835. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Elnehrawy N.Y., Ibrahim Z.A., Eltoukhy A.M., Nagy H.M. Assessment of the efficacy and safety of single platelet-rich plasma injection on different types and grades of facial wrinkles. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2017;16:103–111. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.James R., Chetry R., Subramanian V., Ashtekar A., Srikruthi N., Ramachandran S., Koka P.S., Deb K. Efficacy of activated 3X platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of androgenic alopecia. J. Stem Cells. 2016;11:191–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Asif M., Kanodia S., Singh K. Combined autologous platelet-rich plasma with microneedling verses microneedling with distilled water in the treatment of atrophic acne scars: A concurrent split-face study. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2016;15:434–443. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang M., Park G., Zhou B., Luo D. Applications and efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in dermatology: A clinical review. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2018;17:660–665. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mitchell A.C., Briquez P.S., Hubbell J.A., Cochran J.R. Engineering growth factors for regenerative medicine applications. Acta Biomater. 2016;30:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mendes B.B., Gómez-Florit M., Babo P.S., Domingues R.M., Reis R.L., Gomes M.E. Blood derivatives awaken in regenerative medicine strategies to modulate wound healing. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018;129:376–393. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gurtner G.C., Werner S., Barrandon Y., Longaker M.T. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature. 2008;453:314–321. doi: 10.1038/nature07039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ma Z., Kotaki M., Inai R., Ramakrishna S. Potential of Nanofiber Matrix as Tissue-Engineering Scaffolds. Tissue Eng. 2005;11:101–109. doi: 10.1089/ten.2005.11.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dhandayuthapani B., Yoshida Y., Maekawa T., Kumar D.S. Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: A review. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2011;2011:1–19. doi: 10.1155/2011/290602. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Reneker D.H., Yarin A.L. Electrospinning jets and polymer nanofibers. Polymer. 2008;49:2387–2425. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.02.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lukášová V., Buzgo M., Vocetková K., Sovková V., Doupník M., Himawan E., Staffa A., Sedláček R., Chlup H., Rustichelli F., et al. Needleless electrospun and centrifugal spun poly-ε-caprolactone scaffolds as a carrier for platelets in tissue engineering applications: A comparative study with hMSCs. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2019;97:567–575. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Plencner M., East B., Tonar Z., Otahal M., Prosecka E., Rampichova M., Krejci T., Litvinec A., Buzgo M., Mickova A., et al. Abdominal closure reinforcement by using polypropylene mesh functionalized with poly-ε-caprolactone nanofibers and growth factors for prevention of incisional hernia formation. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014;9:3263–3277. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S63095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bölgen N., Korkusuz V.P., Menceloglu Y.Z., Piskin E. In vivo performance of antibiotic embedded electrospun PCL membranes for prevention of abdominal adhesions. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2007;81:530–543. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Staffa A., Vocetkova K., Sovkova V., Rampichova M., Filova E., Amler E. Polycaprolactone nanofiber mesh with adhered liposomes as a simple delivery system for bioactive growth factors. Transl. Med. Rep. 2017;1:58–63. doi: 10.4081/tmr.6716. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rampichova M., Buzgo M., Lukasova V., Mickova A., Vocetkova K., Sovkova V., Rustichelli F., Amler E. Functionalization of 3D fibrous scaffolds prepared using centrifugal spinning with liposomes as a simple drug delivery system. Acta Polytechnol. CTU Proc. 2017;8:24–26. doi: 10.14311/APP.2017.8.0024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Paganin D., Mayo S.C., Gureyev T.E., Miller P.R., Wilkins S.W. Simultaneous phase and amplitude extraction from a single defocused image of a homogeneous object. J. Microsc. 2002;206:33–40. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01010.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kalasova D., Zikmund T., Pina L., Takeda Y., Horvath M., Omote K., Kaiser J. Characterization of a laboratory-based X-ray computed nanotomography system for propagation-based method of phase contrast imaging. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2019;69:1170–1178. doi: 10.1109/TIM.2019.2910338. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.VGStudio MAX. Volume Graphics GmbH; Heidelberg, Germany: 2019. [(accessed on 5 May 2020)]. version 3.2; Software. Available online: https://www.volumegraphics.com. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Leo M.S., Kumar A.S., Kirit R., Konathan R., Sivamani R.K. Systematic review of the use of platelet-rich plasma in aesthetic dermatology. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2015;14:315–323. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Barbulescu C.C., Goldstein N.B., Roop D.R., Norris D.A., Birlea S.A. Harnessing the Power of Regenerative Therapy for Vitiligo and Alopecia Areata. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2020;140:29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.03.1142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lim H., Shin M., Lee M. Clinical application of platelet-rich plasma in vitiligo: A pilot study; Proceedings of the International Pigment Cell Conference; Bordeaux, France. 21–24 September 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kadry M., Tawfik A., Abdallah N., Badawi A., Shokeir H. Platelet-rich plasma versus combined fractional carbon dioxide laser with platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of vitiligo: A comparative study. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2018;11:551–559. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S178817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Khattab F.M., Abdelbary E., Fawzi M. Evaluation of combined excimer laser and platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of nonsegmental vitiligo: A prospective comparative study. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2019;19:869–877. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Saify K., Gupta P., Sharma D.C. Treatment of Vitiligo by PRP and Umbilical Cord Blood: A prospective study in Treatment of Vitiligo by PRP and Umbilical Cord Blood: A prospective study in 120 cases. IOSR J. Den. Med. Sci. 2019;18:1–5. doi: 10.9790/0853-1805120105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Buzgo M., Rampichova M., Vocetkova K., Sovkova V., Lukasova V., Doupnik M., Mickova A., Rustichelli F., Amler E. Emulsion centrifugal spinning for production of 3D drug releasing nanofibres with core/shell structure. RSC Adv. 2017;7:1215–1228. doi: 10.1039/C6RA26606A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rogalski J., Bastiaansen C., Peijs T. PA6 Nanofibre Production: A Comparison between Rotary Jet Spinning and Electrospinning. Fibers. 2018;6:37. doi: 10.3390/fib6020037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Milleret V., Hefti T., Hall H., Vogel V., Eberli D. Influence of the fiber diameter and surface roughness of electrospun vascular grafts on blood activation. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:4349–4356. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.07.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Krifa M., Yuan W. Morphology and pore size distribution of electrospun and centrifugal forcespun nylon 6 nanofiber membranes. Text. Res. J. 2016;86:1294–1306. doi: 10.1177/0040517515609258. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rampichová M., Buzgo M., Chvojka J., Prosecká E., Kofroňová O., Amler E. Cell penetration to nanofibrous scaffolds Forcespinning, an alternative approach for fabricating 3D nanofibers. Cell Adhes. Migr. 2014;8:36–41. doi: 10.4161/cam.27477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jakubova R., Mickova A., Buzgo M., Rampichova M., Prosecka E., Tvrdik D., Amler E. Immobilization of thrombocytes on PCL nanofibres enhances chondrocyte proliferation in vitro. Cell Prolif. 2011;44:183–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2011.00737.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Vocetkova K., Buzgo M., Sovkova V., Bezdekova D., Kneppo P., Amler E. Nanofibrous polycaprolactone scaffolds with adhered platelets stimulate proliferation of skin cells. Cell Prolif. 2016;49:568–578. doi: 10.1111/cpr.12276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wolberg A.S. Plasma and cellular contributions to fibrin network formation, structure and stability. Haemophilia. 2010;16:7–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02253.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pretorius E., Briedenhann S., Marx J., Smit E., Van Der Merwe C., Pieters M., Franz C. Ultrastructural comparison of the morphology of three different platelet and fibrin fiber preparations. Anat. Rec. 2007;290:188–198. doi: 10.1002/ar.20413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Heher P., Mühleder S., Mittermayr R., Redl H., Slezak P. Fibrin-based delivery strategies for acute and chronic wound healing. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018;129:134–147. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ehrbar M., Zeisberger S.M., Raeber G.P., Hubbell J.A., Schnell C., Zisch A.H. The role of actively released fibrin-conjugated VEGF for VEGF receptor 2 gene activation and the enhancement of angiogenesis. Biomaterials. 2008;29:1720–1729. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhang Y., Heher P., Hilborn J., Redl H., Ossipov D.A. Hyaluronic acid-fibrin interpenetrating double network hydrogel prepared in situ by orthogonal disulfide cross-linking reaction for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater. 2016;38:23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.04.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Spicer P.P., Mikos A.G. Fibrin glue as a drug delivery system. J. Control. Release. 2010;148:49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.06.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sahni A., Francis C.W. Vascular endothelial growth factor binds to fibrinogen and fibrin and stimulates endothelial cell proliferation. Blood. 2000;96:3772–3778. doi: 10.1182/blood.V96.12.3772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sahni A., Odrljin T., Francis C.W. Binding of basic fibroblast growth factor to fibrinogen and fibrin. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:7554–7559. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.13.7554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sahni A., Altland O.D., Francis C.W. FGF-2 but not FGF-1 binds fibrin and supports prolonged endothelial cell growth. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2003;1:1304–1310. doi: 10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00250.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Catelas I., Dwyer J.F., Helgerson S. Controlled Release of Bioactive Transforming Growth Factor Beta-1 from Fibrin Gels In Vitro. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods. 2008;14:119–128. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2007.0262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Martino M.M., Briquez P.S., Ranga A., Lutolf M.P., Hubbell J.A. Heparin-binding domain of fibrin(ogen) binds growth factors and promotes tissue repair when incorporated within a synthetic matrix. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:4563–4568. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221602110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Savkovic V., Flämig F., Schneider M., Sülflow K., Loth T., Lohrenz A., Hacker M.C., Schulz-Siegmund M., Simon J.C. Polycaprolactone fiber meshes provide a 3D environment suitable for cultivation and differentiation of melanocytes from the outer root sheath of hair follicle. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2016;104:26–36. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sovkova V., Vocetkova K., Rampichova M., Mickova A., Buzgo M., Lukasova V., Dankova J., Filova E., Necas A., Amler E. Platelet lysate as a serum replacement for skin cell culture on biomimetic PCL nanofibers. Platelets. 2018;29:395–405. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2017.1316838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hirobe T., Shibata T., Fujiwara R., Sato K. Platelet-derived growth factor regulates the proliferation and differentiation of human melanocytes in a differentiation-stage-specific manner. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2016;83:200–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lin S.J., Jee S.H., Hsiao W.C., Lee S.J., Young T.H. Formation of melanocyte spheroids on the chitosan-coated surface. Biomaterials. 2005;26:1413–1422. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Redondo P., Gimenez de Azcarate A., Marques L., Garcia-Guzman M., Andreu E., Prosper F. Amniotic membrane as a scaffold for melanocyte transplantation in patients with stable vitiligo. Dermatol. Res. Pract. 2011;532139:1–6. doi: 10.1155/2011/532139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ghosh D., Kuchroo P., Viswanathna C., Sachan S., Shah B., Bhatt D., Parasramani S., Savant S. Efficacy and safety of autologous cultured melanocytes delivered on poly(DL-lactic acid) film: A prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter study. Dermatol. Surg. 2012;38:1981–1990. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Eves P.C., Bullett N.A., Haddow D., Beck A.J., Layton C., Way L., Shard A.G., Gawkrodger D.J., Neil S.M. Simplifying the delivery of melanocytes and keratinocytes for the treatment of vitiligo using a chemically defined carrier dressing. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2008;128:1554–1564. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5701214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lin S.J., Jee S.H., Hsiao W.C., Yu H.S., Tsai T.F., Chen J.S., Hsu C.J., Young T.H. Enhanced cell survival of melanocyte spheroids in serum starvation condition. Biomaterials. 2006;27:1462–1469. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (969.9KB, pdf)

Articles from Nanomaterials are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES