Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 Oct 15;9(42):e01004-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01004-20

Draft Genome Sequences of Three Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum Isolates Used in Designing Markers for Race Differentiation

Owen Hudson a, Dylan Hudson b, Pingsheng Ji a, M Emran Ali a,
Editor: Christina A Cuomoc
PMCID: PMC7561697  PMID: 33060278

Here, we report the draft genome sequences of three Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum isolates that were used to design markers for molecular race differentiation. The isolates were collected from watermelon fields in Georgia (USA) and were determined to be different races of F. oxysporum f. sp. niveum using a traditional bioassay.

ABSTRACT

Here, we report the draft genome sequences of three Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum isolates that were used to design markers for molecular race differentiation. The isolates were collected from watermelon fields in Georgia (USA) and were determined to be different races of F. oxysporum f. sp. niveum using a traditional bioassay.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Fusarium wilt in watermelon is caused by the fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum, which is one of the most impactful pathogens for watermelon production worldwide (https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/PP352) (13). Three isolates of F. oxysporum f. sp. niveum were obtained from infected watermelon plants (Citrullus lanatus) with typical symptoms of Fusarium wilt in commercial fields in Georgia. Traditional diagnostic methods are unable to identify the pathogen as F. oxysporum f. sp. niveum with 100% confidence, so molecular assays are required to confirm the identity of an isolate (46). Additionally, it is currently recognized that F. oxysporum f. sp. niveum has 4 races (R0, R1, R2, and R3) which require a bioassay for differentiation, as at the date of this writing, only race 2 may be distinguished molecularly (https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/PP352) (1, 3, 7).

The three isolates that were chosen for sequencing were isolated from the lower stem (hypocotyl region) of diseased watermelon plants. Samples were surface-disinfested in 0.6% NaOCl, rinsed in sterile distilled water, and cultured on semiselective peptone pentachloronitrobenzene agar plates (8). Fungal cultures grown from the samples were identified based on the morphological characteristics, and single-spore isolates were grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates and incubated at 25°C for 7 days. The races of the isolates were identified by inoculating differential watermelon plants and evaluating the disease development as reported previously (5, 7). Three isolates, representing three races of F. oxysporum f. sp. niveum, were grown on PDA for 10 days; next, 100 mg of mycelia was used for DNA extraction. DNA was extracted using the DNeasy plant minikit (Qiagen) and was concentrated and purified using Quantum Prep PCR Kleen Spin columns (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR was performed on all isolates using FON-1/FON-2, primers specific to F. oxysporum f. sp. niveum, to confirm the identity of all F. oxysporum f. sp. niveum isolates, and the race 2-specific primer set FONSIX6F/R to confirm the race 2 isolate (9, 10). DNA was standardized at 200 ng/µL for each extraction and submitted to Novogene Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) for whole-genome sequencing.

Libraries were prepped using an NEB Ultra II kit and sequenced using the paired-end strategy PE150 on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform. The original optic data obtained by high-throughput sequencing were transformed into raw sequenced reads using Casava v.1.8 base calling and stored in FASTQ (fq) format. Quality control was performed using readfq v.10 (https://github.com/lh3/readfq) using default parameters, and low-quality sequences were removed (11, 12). Raw reads were assembled into scaffolds using SPAdes v.3.14.1 with the k-mer values 21, 33, 55, and 77 (13). Bowtie 2 v.2.4.1 was used to align the paired-end reads against the scaffolds produced by SPAdes, producing the SAM alignment files (14). SAMtools v.1.10 was used to convert the alignment files to BAM format and then sort and index the BAM files. Pilon v.1.23 (using - -frags mode) was used to polish the BAM files, yielding the final output of FASTA files (15, 16). Contigs shorter than 200 bp were removed from polished FASTA files using a novel Python script for contig filtration (17). The genome characteristics and accession numbers are given in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Genome assembly data and accession numbers for sequenced Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum isolates

Isolate Genome size (bp) No. of contigs>50,000 bp N50 (bp) Avg coverage (×) G+C content (%) GenBank BioSample accession no. GenBank BioProject accession no. SRA accession no.
FONR1 61,207,430 245 154,443 28.65 48.79 SAMN15791673 PRJNA656528 SRR12492378
FONR2 54,074,873 217 161,737 22.92 47.53 SAMN15791674 PRJNA656528 SRR12492379
FONR3 55,220,015 220 158,709 22.38 47.54 SAMN15791675 PRJNA656528 SRR12492380

Data availability.

All data for this whole-genome sequencing project were deposited under the GenBank BioProject accession number PRJNA656528. The raw reads of the genomic data for the isolates were deposited under the following SRA accession numbers: SRR12492378, SRR12492379, and SRR12492380. The accession numbers for each isolate are as follows: SAMN15791673, SAMN15791674, and SAMN15791675.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by funds from the Georgia Department of Agriculture Specialty Crop Block Grant (grant number AWD00011227).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Egel DS, Martyn RD. 2007. Fusarium wilt of watermelon and other cucurbits. Plant Health Instruct 10:1094. doi: 10.1094/PHI-I-2007-0122-01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Netzer D, Weintall C. 1980. Inheritance of resistance in watermelon to race 1 of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum. Plant Dis 64:853–854. doi: 10.1094/PD-64-853. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhou XG, Everts KL, Bruton BD. 2010. Race 3, a new and highly virulent race of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum causing Fusarium wilt in watermelon. Plant Dis 94:92–98. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-94-1-0092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chittarath K, Mostert D, Crew KS, Viljoen A, Kong G, Molina AB, Thomas JE. 2018. First report of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4 (VCG 01213/16) associated with Cavendish bananas in Laos. Plant Dis 102:449. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-17-1197-PDN. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kleczewski NM, Egel DS. 2011. A diagnostic guide for Fusarium wilt of watermelon. Plant Health Progress 12:27. doi: 10.1094/PHP-2011-1129-01-DG. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Manulis S, Kogan N, Reuven M, Ben-Yephet Y. 1994. Use of the RAPD technique for identification of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. dianthi from carnation. Phytopathology 84:98–101. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-84-98. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Petkar A, Harris-Shultz K, Wang H, Brewer MT, Sumabat L, Ji P. 2019. Genetic and phenotypic diversity of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum populations from watermelon in the southeastern United States. PLoS One 14:e0219821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nash SM, Snyder WC. 1962. Quantitative estimations by plate counts of propagules of the bean root rot Fusarium in field soils. Phytopathology 52:567–572. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lin Y-H, Chen K-S, Chang J-Y, Wan Y-L, Hsu C-C, Huang J-W, Chang P-FL. 2010. Development of the molecular methods for rapid detection and differentiation of Fusarium oxysporum and F. oxysporum f. sp. niveum in Taiwan. New Biotechnol 27:409–418. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2010.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Niu X, Zhao X, Ling K-S, Levi A, Sun Y, Fan M. 2016. The FonSIX6 gene acts as an avirulence effector in the Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum-watermelon pathosystem. Sci Rep 6:28146. doi: 10.1038/srep28146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu H, Zeng Q, Wang W, Zhang R, Yao J. 2020. Complete genome sequence of Bacillus velezensis strain AL7, a biocontrol agent for suppression of cotton Verticillium wilt. Microbiol Resour Announc 9:e01595-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01595-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gu X, Ding J, Liu W, Yang X, Yao L, Gao X, Zhang M, Yang S, Wen J. 2020. Comparative genomics and association analysis identifies virulence genes of Cercospora sojina in soybean. BMC Genomics 21:172. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6581-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie. Nat Methods 9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup . 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, Cuomo CA, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Young SK, Earl AM. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hudson D. 2020. contig_length_filter.py https://github.com/dylanhudson/genomics/blob/master/contig_length_filter.py.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data for this whole-genome sequencing project were deposited under the GenBank BioProject accession number PRJNA656528. The raw reads of the genomic data for the isolates were deposited under the following SRA accession numbers: SRR12492378, SRR12492379, and SRR12492380. The accession numbers for each isolate are as follows: SAMN15791673, SAMN15791674, and SAMN15791675.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES