Skip to main content
Elsevier Sponsored Documents logoLink to Elsevier Sponsored Documents
. 2020 Nov;107:82–90. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.05.021

Intraflagellar transport trains and motors: Insights from structure

Stephanie Webb 1, Aakash G Mukhopadhyay 1, Anthony J Roberts 1,*
PMCID: PMC7561706  PMID: 32684327

Abstract

Intraflagellar transport (IFT) sculpts the proteome of cilia and flagella; the antenna-like organelles found on the surface of virtually all human cell types. By delivering proteins to the growing ciliary tip, recycling turnover products, and selectively transporting signalling molecules, IFT has critical roles in cilia biogenesis, quality control, and signal transduction. IFT involves long polymeric arrays, termed IFT trains, which move to and from the ciliary tip under the power of the microtubule-based motor proteins kinesin-II and dynein-2. Recent top-down and bottom-up structural biology approaches are converging on the molecular architecture of the IFT train machinery. Here we review these studies, with a focus on how kinesin-II and dynein-2 assemble, attach to IFT trains, and undergo precise regulation to mediate bidirectional transport.

Keywords: Intraflagellar transport, Cilia, Microtubule, Kinesin, Dynein, Motor protein

1. Introduction

Cilia and flagella (here ‘cilia’) are multifunctional organelles that project from the surface of virtually every cell type in the human body and many other eukaryotic cells [1]. Their cylindrical structure is supported by nine microtubule doublets, which extend from the basal body at the plasma membrane (Fig. 1A). Motile cilia beat with a wave-like motion to generate fluid flow and propulsion. Their motility is essential for numerous biological processes, including the swimming of sperm and protozoa, generation of left-right body patterning, and mucus clearance in the respiratory tract [2,3]. Non-motile, primary cilia are recognised as the ‘signalling antennae’ of the cell [4,5]. They are rich in signaling molecules involved in functions as diverse as morphogenesis, appetite control, olfaction, and photoreception [[4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Overview of the IFT cycle and anterograde IFT trains.

(A) Schematic of the IFT cycle. (B) Diagram of an anterograde IFT train moving to the tip the cilium. (+) and (-) indicate polarity of the microtubule (MT) doublet, which consists of a complete A-tubule attached to an incomplete B-tubule. Dynein-2 complexes along the train are shown in alternating dark and light blue for distinction. Length of the depicted train is 180 nm (anterograde trains vary in length from 100 to 700 nm in C. reinhardtii [28]). (C) Cross-section view depicting an anterograde IFT train moving in the confined space between the microtubule doublet, outer dynein arms (ODAs), and ciliary membrane. Created using EMD-4304 (sub-tomogram average of IFT-A), EMD-4303 (sub-tomogram average of IFT-B and dynein-2) [28], PDB-6SC2 (atomic model for dynein-2) [49], EMD-6872 (sub-tomogram average of microtubule-doublets and ODAs) [50], and PDB-4RH7 (used to model ODA stalks) [51]. Approximate position of kinesin is shown with orange triangles. (D) Sub-tomogram averages of IFT-A (yellow) at 33 Å resolution (EMD-4304) and IFT-B (grey) and dynein-2 (blue) at 37 Å resolution (EMD-4303) [28].

To assemble and perform their critical functions, cilia use a conserved system to transport cargoes and signaling molecules to and from their tip [10]. This process of intraflagellar transport (IFT) involves multi-megadalton polymers, termed IFT ‘trains’, which move along the microtubule doublets [11,12] (Fig. 1A). IFT train movement is powered by the oppositely-directed motor proteins, kinesin-II and dynein-2 [[13], [14], [15]]. This review focuses on recent advances in understanding the molecular mechanisms of IFT trains and motors, which are of biomedical importance due to their dysfunction in a variety of human disorders (‘ciliopathies’) [16].

The size, complexity, and transient nature of the IFT machinery have made it difficult to study by structural biology techniques. However, recent studies have risen to these challenges using a variety of approaches and model organisms. For simplicity, in this review, we use human subunit names, except for the IFT proteins, where we use the well-established Chlamydomonas reinhardtii nomenclature (even when discussing orthologues in other species) [17,18]. Exciting progress has also been made in understanding the structures of the cargo-binding BBSome complex and the microtubule doublet, for which the reader is referred to recent articles [[19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]].

2. Overview of the IFT cycle

IFT trains (initially termed ‘rafts’) were first spotted between the ciliary membrane and microtubule doublets of C. reinhardtii cilia [11], and were confirmed as the vehicles of IFT by correlative light and electron microscopy [12]. Each train is a polymer of two large complexes, IFT-A and IFT-B (∼0.8 MDa and 1 MDa respectively in mammals), which interact with kinesin-II, dynein-2, and cargoes [17,27,28]. These interactions appear to be weak, as train components readily dissociate upon isolation from cilia [17,27,29,30]. In vivo, IFT trains assemble at the base of the cilium, near the transition fibres that connect the basal body to the membrane [17,[31], [32], [33]] (Fig. 1A, stage 1). IFT trains then pass through the ‘transition zone’; part of the diffusion barrier that separates the cilium from the cytosol [34] (stage 2). Anterograde train movement to the ciliary tip is powered by kinesin-II (stage 3) [12,35,36]. It occurs on the B-tubule of microtubule doublets [37], and can also occur on the singlet A-tubules found in the distal regions of primary cilia [[38], [39], [40]]. At the ciliary tip, anterograde trains remodel into retrograde trains (stage 4) [28,37,[41], [42], [43], [44]], which return to the ciliary base by moving along the A-tubule under the power of dynein-2 (stage 5) [37,[45], [46], [47]]. Here we focus on the molecular mechanisms underlying these events. Cargo binding to IFT trains is a highly regulated process, which has been reviewed recently [48].

3. Architecture of the anterograde IFT train

The structure of IFT trains has been studied by top-down approaches – illuminating train morphology [12,28,37,44,54,55] – and bottom-up approaches – providing insights into the molecular components of the train (reviewed in [18]). To date, the most detailed insights into the architecture of IFT trains in situ have come from sub-tomogram averaging, providing views of the C. reinhardtii anterograde train at 33–37 Å resolution [28]. The overall positions of IFT-A, IFT-B, and dynein-2 have been mapped [28], exploiting the availability of C. reinhardtii mutants [56,57].

Cryo-electron tomography shows that the IFT-A and -B complexes display distinct periodicities within the polymer: IFT-B repeats every 6 nm, whereas IFT-A repeats every 11 nm [28] (Fig. 2A,B). The IFT-B polymer tends to extend by several repeats beyond IFT-A, and does not require stoichiometric IFT-A in order to form [28]. These data illuminate IFT-B as the backbone of the train [28], consistent with genetic evidence that IFT-B is critical for IFT and cilium formation [17,58,59].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The IFT-A and IFT-B complexes.

(A) Schematic of an anterograde IFT train, viewed from the ciliary membrane. Dynein-2 is omitted for clarity. IFT-B repeats every 6 nm along the long axis of the train, whereas IFT-A repeats every 11 nm [28]. (B) Sub-tomogram averages of IFT-A (EMD-4304) and IFT-B (EMD-4303) [28]. Dynein-2 density from EMD-4303 (shown in Fig.1D) has been removed to provide a clearer view of IFT-B. (C) IFT subunits, which form the IFT-A, IFT-B1, and IFT-B2 sub-complexes. β-propeller domains are depicted as heptagons. (D) Crystal structure of the IFT70/52 complex from C. reinhardtii (PDB-4UZY) [52]. (E) Crystal structure of the IFT22/74/81 complex from Trypanosoma brucei (PDB-6IAN) [53]. CH; calponin homology. (F) Table of IFT-B crystal structures.

The IFT-A complex lies directly underneath the ciliary membrane [28], compatible with its role in the ciliary import of a variety of membrane proteins [60,61] (Fig. 1B). As discussed below, IFT-A is also important for retrograde IFT [[62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67]]. The IFT-A complex consists of six proteins (Fig. 2C). Three of these (IFT144/140/122) form a core, important for the stability of IFT-A, whereas the others (IFT139/121/43) form a peripheral complex [60,66,68]. While no molecular resolution structural information is yet available for IFT-A, four of its proteins (IFT144/140/122/121) have a domain organization reminiscent of membrane coat proteins (two N-terminal β-propeller domains, followed by C-terminal tetratricopeptide repeats) [[69], [70], [71]].

IFT-B lies between IFT-A and the microtubule track [28] (Fig. 1B). It comprises at least 16 different proteins, which biochemical and proteomic studies have classified into two sub-complexes: IFT-B1 (10 subunits) and IFT-B2 (6 subunits) (Fig. 2C) [[72], [73], [74]]. Crystal structures of a number of important IFT-B proteins have been solved in the last 10 years (Fig. 2D-F) [52,53,72,[75], [76], [77]].

These structures, together with biochemical studies, have revealed two organizational principles within the IFT-B1 sub-complex. First, two proteins (IFT81/74) form a twisted heterodimeric coiled coil [53] that scaffolds several domains involved in cargo binding, including the calponin-homology domain of IFT81 (mediating tubulin binding [76,78]); the Rab-like domains of IFT22 and IFT27 and jelly-roll fold of IFT25 (involved in the BBSome pathway [79,80]); and the heterodimeric domains of IFT46 and IFT56 (implicated in Kif17 and axonemal dynein binding [[81], [82], [83]]) [53] (Fig. 2C,E). Second, IFT52 bridges multiple partners. Its central region interacts with the tetratricopeptide repeat proteins IFT70 and IFT88, while its C-terminal domain binds IFT46, and its N-terminal GIFT domain associates with IFT-B2 (Fig. 2C,D) [52,72].

Less is known about the structure of the IFT-B2 sub-complex, but a pair of coiled coil proteins (IFT57/38) also plays a central role in its formation (Fig. 2C). Their coiled coil interacts with IFT54/20, while their N-terminal calponin-homology domains bind to IFT172 and IFT80 [72,73]. IFT172 and IFT80 both consist of two N-terminal β-propeller domains, followed by C-terminal tetratricopeptide repeats. The IFT80 β-propellers have been crystallised, and, interestingly, tend to homodimerize via the C-terminal α-helical domain [77]. Atomic structures of the IFT-A, -B1 and -B2 complexes are highly anticipated to shed further light on how IFT trains polymerize and generate binding sites for cargoes, adaptors, and motors.

4. Navigating the microtubule doublet and transition zone

At ∼50 nm across [28], the anterograde IFT train is similar in width to the microtubule doublet and scarcely fits between the outer dynein arms that power the beating of motile cilia (Fig. 1C). Together with the closely apposed ciliary membrane, the shape of the anterograde IFT train is likely to position kinesin-II on the protofilaments of the B-tubule near the junction with the A-tubule [22,28]. The width of the IFT train also has implications for how it crosses the transition zone, which is characterized by Y-shaped links between the microtubule doublets and ciliary membrane. As the Y-links appear to emerge near the junction between the A- and B-tubules [84], they may clash with the position of the anterograde IFT train seen in the body of the cilium [28]. It will be interesting to decipher if passage through the transition zone requires a conformational change in the IFT train or Y-link. Recent studies show that mutations in IFT-A and dynein-2 subunits can perturb the localization of transition zone proteins, highlighting a connection between IFT and transition zone integrity [[85], [86], [87]].

5. The anterograde motor

The principal motor driving anterograde movement of IFT trains is heterotrimeric kinesin-II (Kif3 in mammals) [12,35,36,88,89]. Within the heterotrimer, the Kif3A and Kif3B subunits each comprise an N-terminal motor domain, coiled-coil segments mediating heterodimerization, and putatively disordered tail (Fig. 3A,B). The third protein, Kap3, contains Armadillo repeats. Kap3 was found to be dispensable for Kif3 motility in vitro [90] but required for proper IFT in vivo, suggesting it plays a regulatory role [91].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Heterotrimeric kinesin-II, the anterograde motor.

(A) Domain organization of human heterotrimeric kinesin-II, Kif3. Major phosphorylation sites in the human subunits are shown (putative sites in parenthesis) [[108], [109], [110], [111], [112]]. Kif3A numbering is given relative to canonical 699 amino acid isoform. A 702 amino acid isoform also exists containing 3 additional amino acids in the charged region. In the literature some phosphorylation sites are given using this numbering (making the ICK site T675 and the CaMKII site S690). In Kif3B, the residue equivalent to S631 in the C. reinhardtii ortholog is phosphorylated by CrCDPK1 [112]. (B) Schematic of Kif3 and its interaction with IFT-B [113]. (C) Crystal structure of the Kif3B motor domain bound to ADP (PDB-3B6U) .

Kif3 composition is further complicated in mammals, in which another chain, Kif3C, can pair with Kif3A in place of Kif3B [92,93]. Only Kif3AB is demonstrated to function in IFT with Kap3, whereas Kif3AC has cytoplasmic functions in neurons [92,93]. This suggests that Kif3B contains elements important for incorporation of the kinesin into the IFT machinery. While Kif3AB also has cytoplasmic roles, for example in mRNA and vesicle transport [94,95], its subunits appear to have co-evolved with cilia and IFT is likely its ancestral function [13].

The Kif3B motor domain, revealed by an unpublished crystal structure from the Structural Genomics Consortium (PDB-3B6U), has a classic kinesin organization (Fig. 3C). It consists of a β-sheet flanked by α-helices and contains the sites of ATP hydrolysis and microtubule binding. Based on high sequence identity (∼64 %), Kif3A’s motor domain is likely to share a highly similar structure. Nonetheless, the Kif3A and Kif3B motor domains display interesting differences in their motile properties, the extent of which varies among species [[96], [97], [98], [99]].

Sequence analysis suggests that Kif3A and Kif3B are held together via three segments of coiled-coil: one proximal to the motor domains [100], and two longer segments separated by a di-glycine hinge (Fig. 3A,B). Folding about this hinge is likely to give rise to the extended and compact forms of Kif3 identified by sedimentation analysis [101]. Assuming the standard 0.15 nm per residue, the total length of coiled coil in Kif3 is approximately 29 nm, compatible with observations from rotary shadow electron microscopy [90,101]. A region of two heptad repeats in the distal coiled coil is important for nucleating heterodimerization [102,103]. The distal coiled coil may be stabilized by the binding of Kap3 [104], whose Armadillo repeats have been predicted to wrap around the coiled coil [105].

C-terminal to the coiled coil is the putatively disordered tail, which is longer in Kif3B (∼160 residues) than in Kif3A (∼110 residues). The tail may be a focal point for regulation. It is widely held that Kif3 is inhibited at the ciliary tip, enabling it to be recycled back to the cell body. Akin to other kinesins [106], Kif3 is thought to be auto-inhibited by folding of its tails or coiled coil onto the motor domains [97]. In C. reinhardtii, binding of Kap3 has been found to relieve auto-inhibition [98]. In mammals, the Kif3 heterotrimer appears to be more tightly auto-inhibited as additional factors are required for its activation in the case of mRNA transport [107]. The Kif3 tail contains multiple phosphorylation sites (Fig. 3B). For example, the Kif3A tail is reported to be phosphorylated by the kinases ICK, PKA, and CaMKII [[108], [109], [110], [111]], whereas the C. reinhardtii Kif3B ortholog (FLA8) is phosphorylated by CrCDPK1 (a homolog of CaMKII) [112].

How does Kif3 attach to the IFT train? Insight into the binding site of Kif3 on the train has been obtained using a visible immunoprecipitation (VIP) assay [113]. This revealed that Kif3 interacts with a four-protein complex (IFT88/52/57/38) that represents the interface between IFT-B1 and IFT-B2. The tail of Kif3B is important for this interaction [113]. In C. reinhardtii, phosphorylation of Kif3B by CrCDPK1 disrupts the interaction with IFT-B, showing how kinesin-train association can be regulated [112]. In the sub-tomogram average of the anterograde IFT train, density connecting to the microtubule doublet is observed, probably corresponding to Kif3 [28]. It is interesting to note that the surface of IFT-B is closely apposed to the microtubule in anterograde trains [28], suggesting that the ∼29 nm of coiled coil in Kif3 is either folded into the train or lays across multiple repeats. This may contribute to Kif3 motility regulation upon binding to the IFT train; a process that awaits elucidation.

5.1. Homodimeric kinesin-II

While heterotrimeric kinesin-II is the sole motor for anterograde IFT in most organisms, in Caenorhabditis elegans chemosensory cilia, a striking division of labour occurs [114,115]. Here, heterotrimeric kinesin-II (Klp20-Klp11-Kap1) propels IFT trains through the transition zone and along proximal segment of the cilium, but is gradually replaced by a homodimeric kinesin-II (OSM-3) which drives faster movement along the distal segment [116]. The molecular mechanism underlying train handover from heterotrimeric kinesin-2 to OSM-3 is still emerging. Recent data implicate two kinases (DYF-5 and DYF-18, homologs of MAK and ICK) in the transition [117,118].

The study of C. elegans OSM-3 has also proved fertile ground for understanding kinesin-II regulation. OSM-3′s two identical subunits consist of an N-terminal motor domain, coiled-coil segments mediating homodimerization, and a tail. Akin to Kif3, a hinge exists within the coiled coil, and sedimentation analysis suggests that OSM-3 can exist in compact or extended forms [119]. The compact form is an auto-inhibited state, in which the tail is thought to interact with the motor domains [119,120]. Reconstitution studies revealed that binding of four IFT-B1 proteins (IFT88/70/52/46) is sufficient to activate OSM-3 in vitro [121]. Notably, while IFT70 alone is sufficient to relieve OSM-3 auto-inhibition, the other three IFT-B proteins are required for maximal motor velocity [121]. These data provide a paradigm for IFT motor regulation by the IFT train [121].

In vertebrates, a homodimeric kinesin-II (Kif17) also localizes to cilia, but does not function in conventional IFT [88,122]. Kif17 has been found to interact with a different site of the IFT train compared to C. elegans OSM-3 [81], and appears to be carried into cilia as a cargo; a process that is regulated by its nuclear localization signal [123]. In vitro studies show that Kif17 exhibits auto-inhibition [124] and, when activated, is a processive motor [124,125], but further studies are required to elucidate its function in cilia. For example, it is possible that Kif17 is involved in the direct transport of membrane proteins [126].

6. The retrograde motor

The conserved motor for retrograde IFT is dynein-2, a large protein complex consisting of at least 8 different proteins in mammals (Fig. 4A) (reviewed in [14,15,127]). Dynein-2 activity is tightly regulated, as it is carried as a cargo on anterograde trains before being activated for retrograde transport at the ciliary tip. Recent advances in understanding the structural mechanism of dynein-2 include the crystal structure of the dynein-2 motor domain [51], a structural mechanism for dynein-2 auto-inhibition [128], visualization of inhibited dynein-2 on anterograde IFT trains [28], and a cryo-EM structure of the dynein-2 complex at 3.9–4.5 Å resolution [49].

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Dynein-2, the retrograde motor.

(A) Domain organization of the human dynein-2 subunits. The heavy chain (DYNC2H1) is divided into a tail and motor domain. The tail consists of a N-terminal domain (ND) and a series of α-helical bundles [49]. The motor region contains a lever-like linker domain, six AAA+ modules (AAA1−6) and a C-terminal domain (CTD). AAA1 is the ATPase site that drives dynein-2 movement, whereas AAA2 and AAA3−4 are ATP and ADP binding sites respectively [51]. The microtubule-binding domain lies at the tip of a coiled-coil stalk. The canonical isoform of human DYNC2H1 is 4307 amino acids; a non-canonical isoform featuring a 7 amino acid insertion in AAA5 also exists. Trypanosomatids feature two distinct dynein-2 heavy chains that form a heterodimer [129]. (B) Cryo-EM structure of the human dynein-2 complex [49]. Subunits are shown in surface representation, except for the flexibly attached subunits DYNLT and TCTEX1D2. (C) Diagram showing how the asymmetric tail domain and auto-inhibited motor domains of dynein-2 spread out over ∼8 IFT-B repeats. (D) Docking of the dynein-2 cryo-EM structure (PDB-6SC2) [49] into the sub-tomogram average of IFT-B and dynein-2 (EMD-4303; transparent isosurface) [28]. Individual dynein-2 complexes are shown in alternating surface and cylinder representation for distinction. Adapted from [49].

The cryo-EM structure of the human dynein-2 complex shows how it is built around two copies of a >4000 amino acid heavy chain (DYNC2H1) [49] (Fig. 4B). The N-terminal region forms the tail, which is involved in dimerization and binding of associated subunits. The C-terminal region forms the ring-shaped AAA+ motor domain [51], whose functional elements are described in Fig. 4A.

The two motor domains of dynein-2 intrinsically tend to stack against each other in a conformation that inhibits their ATPase activity and motility [128]. This auto-inhibited “cross-legged” state of dynein-2 [128] is conserved in cytoplasmic dynein-1 [130], suggesting it is an ancient form of dynein motility regulation. Auto-inhibition of dynein-2 was proposed to facilitate the transport of dynein-2 to the ciliary tip by kinesin-II [128]. Supporting this model, in vitro assemblies of dynein-2 and kinesin-II were found to move efficiently along microtubules in the kinesin direction [128]. Sub-tomogram averaging provided in vivo evidence for inhibited dynein-2 on anterograde IFT trains and showed how its stalks point away from the microtubule [28]. These data shed light on how dynein-2 is transported to the tip of the cilium in an inactive state.

The two copies of the dynein-2 heavy chain are highly asymmetric in the tail [49] (Fig. 4B,C). The tail asymmetry is generated by an unusual stoichiometry sub-complex of intermediate and light chains [49]. The C-terminal β-propeller domains of the intermediate chains (WDR34 and WDR60) each bind a copy of the heavy chain, and are heterodimerized by their N-proximal regions and an array of light chains (one DYNLRB dimer, three DYNLL dimers, and a presumptive DYNLT-TCTEX1D2 heterodimer) [29,49,[131], [132], [133], [134], [135], [136]]. This sub-complex of intermediate and light chains stabilizes straightening of one heavy chain in the tail and steers the other into a zigzag conformation, which tailors dynein-2′s structure to the repeat of the IFT-B polymer [49].

The specific IFT-B proteins that interact with dynein-2 on anterograde trains are still emerging. Molecular genetic studies implicate the C-terminal region of IFT172 in anterograde transport of dynein-2 or its activation at the ciliary tip [44,137,138]. Interestingly, dynein-2 heavy chain immunoprecipitated with IFT172 migrates differently by SDS-PAGE compared to that from crude extract, suggesting that it could be differentially modified [44]. Additional IFT-B proteins have been associated with dynein-2 in trypanosomes (IFT22/25/27) [[139], [140], [141]] and mammalian cells (IFT25/54/57/74/88/172) [86].

Cryo-electron tomography shows that dynein-2 repeats at 18 nm intervals along the anterograde train (e.g. every 3 IFT-B repeats), and successive complexes pack against each other [28]. Docking the high-resolution cryo-EM structure of dynein-2 [49] into the sub-tomogram average [28] reveals that the light-intermediate chain (DYNC2LI1) of one complex contacts the motor domain of its neighbour (Fig. 4D). These data suggest that dynein-2 complexes may load cooperatively onto the assembling IFT train at the ciliary base, as binding of one dynein-2 complex to the train would create extra binding surface for the next.

7. IFT train remodeling and turnaround

In C. reinhardtii, an average anterograde IFT train is approximately 300 nm long, and comprises 25 IFT-A repeats, 50 IFT-B repeats, and 13 dynein complexes (in addition to a less well-defined number of kinesin-II complexes) [28]. Thus, the theoretical mass of an anterograde IFT train is >80 MDa. This remarkable value is comparable to one of the largest molecular machines in the cell, the nuclear pore complex (66–125 MDa, depending on species).

In contrast to the nuclear pore complex, the architecture of IFT trains is linear and extremely dynamic. Upon reaching the ciliary tip, anterograde trains “remodel” into retrograde trains, involving multiple events whose mechanism is still emerging [28,37,[41], [42], [43], [44]]. Fluorescence microscopy suggests that anterograde IFT trains at least partially fragment at the tip [41,42,142], consistent with observations of more trains leaving the tip than entering it (for example [41,43,[142], [143], [144]]). Although retrograde trains have not proved sufficiently ordered to allow sub-tomogram averaging to date, raw tomograms suggest they have a distinctive periodicity, displaying a loose zigzag or helicoid shape (pitch ∼40 nm) (Fig. 5B), in contrast to the densely packed anterograde train (Fig. 5A) [28,37]. The remodelling event – which occurs within seconds [41,42] – also coordinates inactivation of kinesin-II with activation of dynein-2, and can promote the release of cargo [48].

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

IFT train turnaround.

Open questions surrounding the conversion of anterograde trains (A) into retrograde trains (B) at the ciliary tip. Within the retrograde train, the relative positions of IFT-A and IFT-B and the structure of dynein-2 are unknown.

What might be the biochemical and biophysical mechanisms underlying these events? The large-scale remodelling between anterograde and retrograde trains at the tip implies the need for an energy source or the release of internally stored strain within the IFT train polymer. The former mechanism could involve tip-localized biochemical modification of the train or motor subunits. For example, the IFT train involves a number of GTPases (IFT22, IFT27, RabL2) [145], whose nucleotide status could affect train assembly or cargo binding [146]. Kinases have been reported to localise at the tip, including ICK in mammals and CrCDPK1 in C. reinhardtii, both of which target kinesin-II [110,112]. Furthermore, ubiquitination has recently been found to regulate coupling of cargo to the IFT machinery [147,148].

In C. reinhardtii, kinesin-II has been found to detach from the train at the tip of the cilium and return to the base predominantly by diffusion, whereas in metazoa, kinesin-II appears to be principally transported on retrograde trains (discussed in [41]). It has been reported that dynein-2 can fully detach from the train at the tip [28], at least transiently [41,42]. Release of kinesin-II or dynein-2 from the train could destabilize the train polymer, since dynein-2 makes multi-valent interactions across multiple IFT-B repeats [49,28] (Fig. 4C,D). Indeed, the anterograde IFT train might be inherently unstable and require apposition between the ciliary membrane and microtubule doublet to remain intact. In this scenario, running off the end of the microtubule at the ciliary tip could be sufficient to evoke anterograde train fragmentation and remodeling. The involvement of local biochemistry and the physical environment of the ciliary tip in train remodeling is not mutually exclusive, and both may contribute to the turnaround event.

The conformation of the IFT train polymer is likely to be coupled with the activity of kinesin-II and dynein-2. For instance, the distinct periodicity of the retrograde train would destroy the multi-valent binding site for inhibited dynein-2, facilitating dynein-2′s reconfiguration into an active conformation [49,28,128]. The relative positions of IFT-A and IFT-B in the retrograde train are not yet clear. A wealth of data demonstrates that IFT-A is required for retrograde transport [[62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67]], whereas it is partially dispensable for the formation of anterograde trains [28]. In the simplest model, IFT-A may bind to and activate dynein-2 directly. Alternatively, IFT-A could be an essential structural component of the retrograde train and thus indirectly required for dynein-2 activation. In either case, dynein-2 must undergo a major conformational change to become active, involving unstacking of its motor domains [128,28] and changes in its asymmetric tail domain [49]. Major open questions surrounding the mechanism of IFT train remodeling are summarized in Fig. 5.

8. Conclusion

Twenty-seven years since the discovery of IFT [11], top-down and bottom-up studies are converging on the functional architecture of the IFT train and motors. In the coming years, we can anticipate a more complete fusion of these approaches, which should provide atomic models for IFT train assembly, locomotion, and turnaround, and assist in the precise manipulation of IFT within living cells. We can also look forward to a more complete understanding of regulated cargo binding by IFT trains, and its interplay with the geometries of the ciliary base, transition zone, and tip. The integrative methods developed to address these challenges will likely help in understanding other transient, mesoscopic machines in the cell.

Acknowledgements

We thank Katerina Toropova for comments on the manuscript and Esben Lorentzen for helpful feedback on Fig. 2. We apologize to the authors whose work could not be cited due to space limitations. This work is supported by grants from the Wellcome Trust [217186/Z/19/Z; 214998/Z/18/Z] and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Grant [BB/P008348/1].

References

  • 1.Bloodgood R.A. From central to rudimentary to primary: the history of an underappreciated organelle whose time has come. The primary cilium. Methods Cell Biol. 2009;94:3–52. doi: 10.1016/S0091-679X(08)94001-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fliegauf M., Benzing T., Omran H. When cilia go bad: cilia defects and ciliopathies. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007;8:880–893. doi: 10.1038/nrm2278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sironen A., Shoemark A., Patel M., Loebinger M.R., Mitchison H.M. Sperm defects in primary ciliary dyskinesia and related causes of male infertility. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2019;77:2029–2048. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03389-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pazour G.J., Witman G.B. The vertebrate primary cilium is a sensory organelle. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2003;15:105–110. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(02)00012-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Singla V., Reiter J.F. The primary cilium as the cell’s antenna: signaling at a sensory organelle. Science. 2006;313:629–633. doi: 10.1126/science.1124534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Huangfu D., Liu A., Rakeman A.S., Murcia N.S., Niswander L., Anderson K.V. Hedgehog signalling in the mouse requires intraflagellar transport proteins. Nature. 2003;426:83–87. doi: 10.1038/nature02061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Corbit K.C., Aanstad P., Singla V., Norman A.R., Stainier D.Y.R., Reiter J.F. Vertebrate Smoothened functions at the primary cilium. Nature. 2005;437:1018–1021. doi: 10.1038/nature04117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Haycraft C.J., Banizs B., Aydin-Son Y., Zhang Q., Michaud E.J., Yoder B.K. Gli2 and Gli3 localize to cilia and require the intraflagellar transport protein polaris for processing and function. PLoS Genet. 2005;1:e53. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Siljee J.E., Wang Y., Bernard A.A., Ersoy B.A., Zhang S., Marley A. Subcellular localization of MC4R with ADCY3 at neuronal primary cilia underlies a common pathway for genetic predisposition to obesity. Nat. Genet. 2018;50:180–185. doi: 10.1038/s41588-017-0020-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rosenbaum J.L., Witman G.B. Intraflagellar transport. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002;3:813–825. doi: 10.1038/nrm952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kozminski K.G., Johnson K.A., Forscher P., Rosenbaum J.L. A motility in the eukaryotic flagellum unrelated to flagellar beating. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993;90:5519–5523. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.12.5519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kozminski K.G., Beech P.L., Rosenbaum J.L. The Chlamydomonas kinesin-like protein FLA10 is involved in motility associated with the flagellar membrane. J. Cell Biol. 1995;131:1517–1527. doi: 10.1083/jcb.131.6.1517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Scholey J.M. Kinesin-2: a family of heterotrimeric and homodimeric motors with diverse intracellular transport functions. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2013;29:443–469. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101512-122335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Roberts A.J. Emerging mechanisms of dynein transport in the cytoplasm versus the cilium. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2018;46:967–982. doi: 10.1042/BST20170568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Vuolo L., Stevenson N.L., Mukhopadhyay A.G., Roberts A.J., Stephens D.J. Cytoplasmic dynein-2 at a glance. J. Cell. Sci. 2020:133. doi: 10.1242/jcs.240614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Reiter J.F., Leroux M.R. Genes and molecular pathways underpinning ciliopathies. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017;18:533–547. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cole D.G., Diener D.R., Himelblau A.L., Beech P.L., Fuster J.C., Rosenbaum J.L. Chlamydomonas kinesin-II-dependent intraflagellar transport (IFT): IFT particles contain proteins required for ciliary assembly in Caenorhabditis elegans sensory neurons. J. Cell Biol. 1998;141:993–1008. doi: 10.1083/jcb.141.4.993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Taschner M., Lorentzen E. The intraflagellar transport machinery. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2016;8 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chou H.T., Apelt L., Farrell D.P., White S.R., Woodsmith J., Svetlov V. The molecular architecture of native BBSome obtained by an integrated structural approach. Structure. 2019;27:1384–1394. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2019.06.006. e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Singh S.K., Gui M., Koh F., Yip M.C., Brown A. Structure and activation mechanism of the BBSome membrane protein trafficking complex. Elife. 2020;9 doi: 10.7554/eLife.53322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Klink B.U., Gatsogiannis C., Hofnagel O., Wittinghofer A., Raunser S. Structure of the human BBSome core complex. Elife. 2020;9 doi: 10.7554/eLife.53910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ma M., Stoyanova M., Rademacher G., Dutcher S.K., Brown A., Zhang R. Structure of the decorated ciliary doublet microtubule. Cell. 2019;179:909–922. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.030. e12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ichikawa M., Khalifa AAZ Kubo S., Dai D., Basu K., Maghrebi M.A.F. Tubulin lattice in cilia is in a stressed form regulated by microtubule inner proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2019;116:19930–19938. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911119116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Khalifa A.A.Z., Ichikawa M., Dai D., Kubo S., Black C.S., Peri K. The inner junction complex of the cilia is an interaction hub that involves tubulin post-translational modifications. Elife. 2020;9 doi: 10.7554/eLife.52760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Song K., Shang Z., Fu X., Lou X., Grigorieff N., Nicastro D. In situ structure determination at nanometer resolution using TYGRESS. Nat. Methods. 2020;17:201–208. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0651-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bahl K., Yang S., Chou H.-T.-T., Woodsmith J., Stelzl U., Walz T. Near-atomic structures of the BBSome reveal a novel mechanism for transition zone crossing. BioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.01.29.925610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Piperno G., Mead K. Transport of a novel complex in the cytoplasmic matrix of Chlamydomonas flagella. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997;94:4457–4462. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.9.4457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jordan M.A., Diener D.R., Stepanek L., Pigino G. The cryo-EM structure of intraflagellar transport trains reveals how dynein is inactivated to ensure unidirectional anterograde movement in cilia. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018;20:1250–1255. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0213-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rompolas P., Pedersen L.B., Patel-King R.S., King S.M. Chlamydomonas FAP133 is a dynein intermediate chain associated with the retrograde intraflagellar transport motor. J. Cell. Sci. 2007;120:3653–3665. doi: 10.1242/jcs.012773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mencarelli C., Mitchell A., Leoncini R., Rosenbaum J., Lupetti P. Isolation of intraflagellar transport trains. Cytoskeleton. 2013;70:439–452. doi: 10.1002/cm.21121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Deane J.A., Cole D.G., Seeley E.S., Diener D.R., Rosenbaum J.L. Localization of intraflagellar transport protein IFT52 identifies basal body transitional fibers as the docking site for IFT particles. Curr. Biol. 2001;11:1586–1590. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00484-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rogowski M., Scholz D., Geimer S. Electron microscopy of flagella, primary cilia, and intraflagellar transport in flat-embedded cells. Meth. Enzymol. 2013;524:243–263. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-397945-2.00014-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wingfield J.L., Mengoni I., Bomberger H., Jiang Y.-Y., Walsh J.D., Brown J.M. IFT trains in different stages of assembly queue at the ciliary base for consecutive release into the cilium. Elife. 2017;6 doi: 10.7554/eLife.26609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nachury M.V., Mick D.U. Establishing and regulating the composition of cilia for signal transduction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019;20:389–405. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0116-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cole D.G., Chinn S.W., Wedaman K.P., Hall K., Vuong T., Scholey J.M. Novel heterotrimeric kinesin-related protein purified from sea urchin eggs. Nature. 1993;366:268–270. doi: 10.1038/366268a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Walther Z., Vashishtha M., Hall J.L. The Chlamydomonas FLA10 gene encodes a novel kinesin-homologous protein. J. Cell Biol. 1994;126:175–188. doi: 10.1083/jcb.126.1.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Stepanek L., Pigino G. Microtubule doublets are double-track railways for intraflagellar transport trains. Science. 2016;352:721–724. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf4594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sun S., Fisher R.L., Bowser S.S., Pentecost B.T., Sui H. Three-dimensional architecture of epithelial primary cilia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2019;116:9370–9379. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821064116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kiesel P., Alvarez Viar G., Tsoy N., Maraspini R., Honigmann A., Pigino G. The molecular structure of primary cilia revealed by cryo-electron tomography. BioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.03.20.000505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Prevo B., Scholey J.M., Peterman E.J.G. Intraflagellar transport: mechanisms of motor action, cooperation, and cargo delivery. FEBS J. 2017;284:2905–2931. doi: 10.1111/febs.14068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chien A., Shih S.M., Bower R., Tritschler D., Porter M.E., Yildiz A. Dynamics of the IFT machinery at the ciliary tip. Elife. 2017;6 doi: 10.7554/eLife.28606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mijalkovic J., van Krugten J., Oswald F., Acar S., Peterman E.J.G. Single-molecule turnarounds of intraflagellar transport at the C. elegans ciliary tip. Cell Rep. 2018;25:1701–1707. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.050. e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Iomini C., Babaev-Khaimov V., Sassaroli M., Piperno G. Protein particles in Chlamydomonas flagella undergo a transport cycle consisting of four phases. J. Cell Biol. 2001;153:13–24. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.1.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pedersen L.B., Geimer S., Rosenbaum J.L. Dissecting the molecular mechanisms of intraflagellar transport in Chlamydomonas. Curr. Biol. 2006;16:450–459. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Porter M.E., Bower R., Knott J.A., Byrd P., Dentler W. Cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain 1b is required for flagellar assembly in Chlamydomonas. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1999;10:693–712. doi: 10.1091/mbc.10.3.693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pazour G.J., Dickert B.L., Witman G.B. The DHC1b (DHC2) isoform of cytoplasmic dynein is required for flagellar assembly. J. Cell Biol. 1999;144:473–481. doi: 10.1083/jcb.144.3.473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Signor D., Wedaman K.P., Orozco J.T., Dwyer N.D., Bargmann C.I., Rose L.S. Role of a class DHC1b dynein in retrograde transport of IFT motors and IFT raft particles along cilia, but not dendrites, in chemosensory neurons of living Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell Biol. 1999;147:519–530. doi: 10.1083/jcb.147.3.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lechtreck K.F. IFT-cargo interactions and protein transport in cilia. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2015;40:765–778. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Toropova K., Zalyte R., Mukhopadhyay A.G., Mladenov M., Carter A.P., Roberts A.J. Structure of the dynein-2 complex and its assembly with intraflagellar transport trains. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2019;26:823–829. doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0286-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kubo T., Hou Y., Cochran D.A., Witman G.B., Oda T. A microtubule-dynein tethering complex regulates the axonemal inner dynein f (I1) Mol. Biol. Cell. 2018;29:1060–1074. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E17-11-0689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Schmidt H., Zalyte R., Urnavicius L., Carter A.P. Structure of human cytoplasmic dynein-2 primed for its power stroke. Nature. 2015;518:435–438. doi: 10.1038/nature14023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Taschner M., Kotsis F., Braeuer P., Kuehn E.W., Lorentzen E. Crystal structures of IFT70/52 and IFT52/46 provide insight into intraflagellar transport B core complex assembly. J. Cell Biol. 2014;207:269–282. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201408002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wachter S., Jung J., Shafiq S., Basquin J., Fort C., Bastin P. Binding of IFT22 to the intraflagellar transport complex is essential for flagellum assembly. EMBO J. 2019;38 doi: 10.15252/embj.2018101251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pigino G., Geimer S., Lanzavecchia S., Paccagnini E., Cantele F., Diener D.R. Electron-tomographic analysis of intraflagellar transport particle trains in situ. J. Cell Biol. 2009;187:135–148. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200905103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Vannuccini E., Paccagnini E., Cantele F., Gentile M., Dini D., Fino F. Two classes of short intraflagellar transport train with different 3D structures are present in Chlamydomonas flagella. J. Cell. Sci. 2016;129:2064–2074. doi: 10.1242/jcs.183244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Engel B.D., Ishikawa H., Wemmer K.A., Geimer S., Wakabayashi K., Hirono M. The role of retrograde intraflagellar transport in flagellar assembly, maintenance, and function. J. Cell Biol. 2012;199:151–167. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201206068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li X., Patena W., Fauser F., Jinkerson R.E., Saroussi S., Meyer M.T. A genome-wide algal mutant library and functional screen identifies genes required for eukaryotic photosynthesis. Nat. Genet. 2019;51:627–635. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0370-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Pazour G.J., Dickert B.L., Vucica Y., Seeley E.S., Rosenbaum J.L., Witman G.B. Chlamydomonas IFT88 and its mouse homologue, polycystic kidney disease gene tg737, are required for assembly of cilia and flagella. J. Cell Biol. 2000;151:709–718. doi: 10.1083/jcb.151.3.709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Perkins L.A., Hedgecock E.M., Thomson J.N., Culotti J.G. Mutant sensory cilia in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 1986;117:456–487. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90314-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Mukhopadhyay S., Wen X., Chih B., Nelson C.D., Lane W.S., Scales S.J. TULP3 bridges the IFT-A complex and membrane phosphoinositides to promote trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors into primary cilia. Genes Dev. 2010;24:2180–2193. doi: 10.1101/gad.1966210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Picariello T., Brown J.M., Hou Y., Swank G., Cochran D.A., King O.D. A global analysis of IFT-A function reveals specialization for transport of membrane-associated proteins into cilia. J. Cell. Sci. 2019;132 doi: 10.1242/jcs.220749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Piperno G., Siuda E., Henderson S., Segil M., Vaananen H., Sassaroli M. Distinct mutants of retrograde intraflagellar transport (IFT) share similar morphological and molecular defects. J. Cell Biol. 1998;143:1591–1601. doi: 10.1083/jcb.143.6.1591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Blacque O.E., Li C., Inglis P.N., Esmail M.A., Ou G., Mah A.K. The WD repeat-containing protein IFTA-1 is required for retrograde intraflagellar transport. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2006;17:5053–5062. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e06-06-0571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Tran P.V., Haycraft C.J., Besschetnova T.Y., Turbe-Doan A., Stottmann R.W., Herron B.J. THM1 negatively modulates mouse sonic hedgehog signal transduction and affects retrograde intraflagellar transport in cilia. Nat. Genet. 2008;40:403–410. doi: 10.1038/ng.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Iomini C., Li L., Esparza J.M., Dutcher S.K. Retrograde intraflagellar transport mutants identify complex A proteins with multiple genetic interactions in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Genetics. 2009;183:885–896. doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.101915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hirano T., Katoh Y., Nakayama K. Intraflagellar transport-A complex mediates ciliary entry and retrograde trafficking of ciliary G protein-coupled receptors. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2017;28:429–439. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E16-11-0813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Yi P., Li W.-J., Dong M.-Q., Ou G. Dynein-driven retrograde intraflagellar transport is triphasic in C. elegans sensory cilia. Curr. Biol. 2017;27:1448–1461. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.015. e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Behal R.H., Miller M.S., Qin H., Lucker B.F., Jones A., Cole D.G. Subunit interactions and organization of the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii intraflagellar transport complex A proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:11689–11703. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.287102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.van Dam T.J.P., Townsend M.J., Turk M., Schlessinger A., Sali A., Field M.C. Evolution of modular intraflagellar transport from a coatomer-like progenitor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013;110:6943–6948. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221011110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Devos D., Dokudovskaya S., Alber F., Williams R., Chait B.T., Sali A. Components of coated vesicles and nuclear pore complexes share a common molecular architecture. PLoS Biol. 2004;2:e380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Avidor-Reiss T., Maer A.M., Koundakjian E., Polyanovsky A., Keil T., Subramaniam S. Decoding cilia function: defining specialized genes required for compartmentalized cilia biogenesis. Cell. 2004;117:527–539. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00412-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Taschner M., Weber K., Mourão A., Vetter M., Awasthi M., Stiegler M. Intraflagellar transport proteins 172, 80, 57, 54, 38, and 20 form a stable tubulin-binding IFT-B2 complex. EMBO J. 2016;35:773–790. doi: 10.15252/embj.201593164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Katoh Y., Terada M., Nishijima Y., Takei R., Nozaki S., Hamada H. Overall architecture of the intraflagellar transport (IFT)-B complex containing Cluap1/IFT38 as an essential component of the IFT-B peripheral subcomplex. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:10962–10975. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.713883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Boldt K., van Reeuwijk J., Lu Q., Koutroumpas K., Nguyen M.T., Texier Y. An organelle-specific protein landscape identifies novel diseases and molecular mechanisms. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:11491. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Bhogaraju S., Taschner M., Morawetz M., Basquin C., Lorentzen E. Crystal structure of the intraflagellar transport complex 25/27. EMBO J. 2011;30:1907–1918. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Bhogaraju S., Cajanek L., Fort C., Blisnick T., Weber K., Taschner M. Molecular basis of tubulin transport within the cilium by IFT74 and IFT81. Science. 2013;341:1009–1012. doi: 10.1126/science.1240985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Taschner M., Lorentzen A., Mourão A., Collins T., Freke G.M., Moulding D. Crystal structure of intraflagellar transport protein 80 reveals a homo-dimer required for ciliogenesis. Elife. 2018;7 doi: 10.7554/eLife.33067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kubo T., Brown J.M., Bellve K., Craige B., Craft J.M., Fogarty K. Together, the IFT81 and IFT74 N-termini form the main module for intraflagellar transport of tubulin. J. Cell. Sci. 2016;129:2106–2119. doi: 10.1242/jcs.187120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Eguether T., San Agustin J.T., Keady B.T., Jonassen J.A., Liang Y., Francis R. IFT27 links the BBSome to IFT for maintenance of the ciliary signaling compartment. Dev. Cell. 2014;31:279–290. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Liew G.M., Ye F., Nager A.R., Murphy J.P., Lee J.S., Aguiar M. The intraflagellar transport protein IFT27 promotes BBSome exit from cilia through the GTPase ARL6/BBS3. Dev. Cell. 2014;31:265–278. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Funabashi T., Katoh Y., Michisaka S., Terada M., Sugawa M., Nakayama K. Ciliary entry of KIF17 is dependent on its binding to the IFT-B complex via IFT46-IFT56 as well as on its nuclear localization signal. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2017;28:624–633. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E16-09-0648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hou Y., Qin H., Follit J.A., Pazour G.J., Rosenbaum J.L., Witman G.B. Functional analysis of an individual IFT protein: IFT46 is required for transport of outer dynein arms into flagella. J. Cell Biol. 2007;176:653–665. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200608041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ishikawa H., Ide T., Yagi T., Jiang X., Hirono M., Sasaki H. TTC26/DYF13 is an intraflagellar transport protein required for transport of motility-related proteins into flagella. Elife. 2014;3 doi: 10.7554/eLife.01566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Garcia-Gonzalo F.R., Reiter J.F. Open sesame: how transition fibers and the transition zone control ciliary composition. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2017;9 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Scheidel N., Blacque O.E. Intraflagellar transport complex A genes differentially regulate cilium formation and transition zone gating. Curr. Biol. 2018;28:3279–3287. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.08.017. e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Vuolo L., Stevenson N.L., Heesom K.J., Stephens D.J. Dynein-2 intermediate chains play crucial but distinct roles in primary cilia formation and function. Elife. 2018;7 doi: 10.7554/eLife.39655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Jensen V.L., Lambacher N.J., Li C., Mohan S., Williams C.L., Inglis P.N. Role for intraflagellar transport in building a functional transition zone. EMBO Rep. 2018;19 doi: 10.15252/embr.201845862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Engelke M.F., Waas B., Kearns S.E., Suber A., Boss A., Allen B.L. Acute inhibition of heterotrimeric Kinesin-2 function reveals mechanisms of intraflagellar transport in mammalian cilia. Curr. Biol. 2019;29:1137–1148. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.02.043. e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Signor D., Wedaman K.P., Rose L.S., Scholey J.M. Two heteromeric kinesin complexes in chemosensory neurons and sensory cilia of Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1999;10:345–360. doi: 10.1091/mbc.10.2.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Yamazaki H., Nakata T., Okada Y., Hirokawa N. Cloning and characterization of KAP3: a novel kinesin superfamily-associated protein of KIF3A/3B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996;93:8443–8448. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.16.8443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Mueller J., Perrone C.A., Bower R., Cole D.G., Porter M.E. The FLA3 KAP subunit is required for localization of kinesin-2 to the site of flagellar assembly and processive anterograde intraflagellar transport. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2005;16:1341–1354. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e04-10-0931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Muresan V., Abramson T., Lyass A., Winter D., Porro E., Hong F. KIF3C and KIF3A form a novel neuronal heteromeric kinesin that associates with membrane vesicles. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1998;9:637–652. doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.3.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Yang Z., Goldstein L.S. Characterization of the KIF3C neural kinesin-like motor from mouse. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1998;9:249–261. doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.2.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Aronov S., Aranda G., Behar L., Ginzburg I. Visualization of translated tau protein in the axons of neuronal P19 cells and characterization of tau RNP granules. J. Cell. Sci. 2002;115:3817–3827. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Yamazaki H., Nakata T., Okada Y., Hirokawa N. KIF3A/B: a heterodimeric kinesin superfamily protein that works as a microtubule plus end-directed motor for membrane organelle transport. J. Cell Biol. 1995;130:1387–1399. doi: 10.1083/jcb.130.6.1387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Gilbert S.P., Guzik-Lendrum S., Rayment I. Kinesin-2 motors: kinetics and biophysics. J. Biol. Chem. 2018;293:4510–4518. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R117.001324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Brunnbauer M., Mueller-Planitz F., Kösem S., Ho T.H., Dombi R., Gebhardt J.C.M. Regulation of a heterodimeric kinesin-2 through an unprocessive motor domain that is turned processive by its partner. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010;107:10460–10465. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005177107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Sonar P., Youyen W., Cleetus A., Wisanpitayakorn P., Mousavi S.I., Stepp W.L. Kinesin-2 from C. reinhardtii is an atypically fast and auto-inhibited motor that is activated by heterotrimerization for intraflagellar transport. Curr. Biol. 2020;30:1160–1166. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.046. e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Andreasson J.O.L., Shastry S., Hancock W.O., Block S.M. The mechanochemical cycle of mammalian Kinesin-2 KIF3A/B under load. Curr. Biol. 2015;25:1166–1175. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Phillips R.K., Peter L.G., Gilbert S.P., Rayment I. Family-specific kinesin structures reveal neck-linker length based on initiation of the coiled-coil. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:20372–20386. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.737577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Wedaman K.P., Meyer D.W., Rashid D.J., Cole D.G., Scholey J.M. Sequence and submolecular localization of the 115-kD accessory subunit of the heterotrimeric kinesin-II (KRP85/95) complex. J. Cell Biol. 1996;132:371–380. doi: 10.1083/jcb.132.3.371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Vukajlovic M., Dietz H., Schliwa M., Ökten Z. How kinesin-2 forms a stalk. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2011;22:4279–4287. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-02-0112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.De Marco V., Burkhard P., Le Bot N., Vernos I., Hoenger A. Analysis of heterodimer formation by Xklp3A/B, a newly cloned kinesin-II from Xenopus laevis. EMBO J. 2001;20:3370–3379. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.13.3370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Ahmed Z., Mazumdar S., Ray K. Kinesin associated protein, DmKAP, binding harnesses the C-terminal ends of the Drosophila kinesin-2 stalk heterodimer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020;522:506–511. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.11.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Doodhi H., Ghosal D., Krishnamurthy M., Jana S.C., Shamala D., Bhaduri A. KAP, the accessory subunit of kinesin-2, binds the predicted coiled-coil stalk of the motor subunits. Biochemistry. 2009;48:2248–2260. doi: 10.1021/bi8018338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Friedman D.S., Vale R.D. Single-molecule analysis of kinesin motility reveals regulation by the cargo-binding tail domain. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999;1:293–297. doi: 10.1038/13008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Baumann S., Komissarov A., Gili M., Ruprecht V., Wieser S., Maurer S.P. A reconstituted mammalian APC-kinesin complex selectively transports defined packages of axonal mRNAs. Sci. Adv. 2020;6 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz1588. eaaz1588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Phang H.-Q.-Q., Hoon J.-L.-L., Lai S.-K.-K., Zeng Y., Chiam K.-H.-H., Li H.-Y.-Y. POPX2 phosphatase regulates the KIF3 kinesin motor complex. J. Cell. Sci. 2014;127:727–739. doi: 10.1242/jcs.126482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Ichinose S., Ogawa T., Hirokawa N. Mechanism of Activity-Dependent Cargo Loading via the Phosphorylation of KIF3A by PKA and CaMKIIa. Neuron. 2015;87:1022–1035. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Chaya T., Omori Y., Kuwahara R., Furukawa T. ICK is essential for cell type-specific ciliogenesis and the regulation of ciliary transport. EMBO J. 2014;33:1227–1242. doi: 10.1002/embj.201488175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Oh Y.S., Wang E.J., Gailey C.D., Brautigan D.L., Allen B.L., Fu Z. Ciliopathy-associated protein kinase ICK requires its non-catalytic carboxyl-terminal domain for regulation of ciliogenesis. Cells. 2019;8 doi: 10.3390/cells8070677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Liang Y., Pang Y., Wu Q., Hu Z., Han X., Xu Y. FLA8/KIF3B phosphorylation regulates kinesin-II interaction with IFT-B to control IFT entry and turnaround. Dev. Cell. 2014;30:585–597. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Funabashi T., Katoh Y., Okazaki M., Sugawa M., Nakayama K. Interaction of heterotrimeric kinesin-II with IFT-B-connecting tetramer is crucial for ciliogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 2018;217:2867–2876. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201801039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Ou G., Blacque O.E., Snow J.J., Leroux M.R., Scholey J.M. Functional coordination of intraflagellar transport motors. Nature. 2005;436:583–587. doi: 10.1038/nature03818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Snow J.J., Ou G., Gunnarson A.L., Walker MRS Zhou H.M., Brust-Mascher I. Two anterograde intraflagellar transport motors cooperate to build sensory cilia on C. elegans neurons. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004;6:1109–1113. doi: 10.1038/ncb1186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Prevo B., Mangeol P., Oswald F., Scholey J.M., Peterman E.J.G. Functional differentiation of cooperating kinesin-2 motors orchestrates cargo import and transport in C. elegans cilia. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015;17:1536–1545. doi: 10.1038/ncb3263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Burghoorn J., Dekkers M.P.J., Rademakers S., de Jong T., Willemsen R., Jansen G. Mutation of the MAP kinase DYF-5 affects docking and undocking of kinesin-2 motors and reduces their speed in the cilia of Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007;104:7157–7162. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606974104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Yi P., Xie C., Ou G. The kinases male germ cell-associated kinase and cell cycle-related kinase regulate kinesin-2 motility in Caenorhabditis elegans neuronal cilia. Traffic. 2018;19:522–535. doi: 10.1111/tra.12572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Imanishi M., Endres N.F., Gennerich A., Vale R.D. Autoinhibition regulates the motility of the C. elegans intraflagellar transport motor OSM-3. J. Cell Biol. 2006;174:931–937. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200605179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Pan X., Ou G., Civelekoglu-Scholey G., Blacque O.E., Endres N.F., Tao L. Mechanism of transport of IFT particles in C. elegans cilia by the concerted action of kinesin-II and OSM-3 motors. J. Cell Biol. 2006;174:1035–1045. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200606003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Mohamed M.A.A., Stepp W.L., Ökten Z. Reconstitution reveals motor activation for intraflagellar transport. Nature. 2018;557:387–391. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0105-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Pooranachandran N., Malicki J.J. Unexpected roles for ciliary kinesins and intraflagellar transport proteins. Genetics. 2016;203:771–785. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.180943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Dishinger J.F., Kee H.L., Jenkins P.M., Fan S., Hurd T.W., Hammond J.W. Ciliary entry of the kinesin-2 motor KIF17 is regulated by importin-beta2 and RanGTP. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010;12:703–710. doi: 10.1038/ncb2073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Hammond J.W., Blasius T.L., Soppina V., Cai D., Verhey K.J. Autoinhibition of the kinesin-2 motor KIF17 via dual intramolecular mechanisms. J. Cell Biol. 2010;189:1013–1025. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201001057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Milic B., Andreasson J.O.L., Hogan D.W., Block S.M. Intraflagellar transport velocity is governed by the number of active KIF17 and KIF3AB motors and their motility properties under load. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2017;114:E6830–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708157114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Jenkins P.M., Hurd T.W., Zhang L., McEwen D.P., Brown R.L., Margolis B. Ciliary targeting of olfactory CNG channels requires the CNGB1b subunit and the kinesin-2 motor protein, KIF17. Curr. Biol. 2006;16:1211–1216. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.04.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Hou Y., Witman G.B. Dynein and intraflagellar transport. Exp. Cell Res. 2015;334:26–34. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.02.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Toropova K., Mladenov M., Roberts A.J. Intraflagellar transport dynein is autoinhibited by trapping of its mechanical and track-binding elements. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017;24:461–468. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Blisnick T., Buisson J., Absalon S., Marie A., Cayet N., Bastin P. The intraflagellar transport dynein complex of trypanosomes is made of a heterodimer of dynein heavy chains and of light and intermediate chains of distinct functions. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2014;25:2620–2633. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E14-05-0961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Zhang K., Foster H.E., Rondelet A., Lacey S.E., Bahi-Buisson N., Bird A.W. Cryo-EM reveals how human cytoplasmic dynein is auto-inhibited and activated. Cell. 2017;169:1303–1314. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.025. e18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Patel-King R.S., Gilberti R.M., Hom E.F.Y., King S.M. WD60/FAP163 is a dynein intermediate chain required for retrograde intraflagellar transport in cilia. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2013;24:2668–2677. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E13-05-0266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Asante D., Stevenson N.L., Stephens D.J. Subunit composition of the human cytoplasmic dynein-2 complex. J. Cell. Sci. 2014;127:4774–4787. doi: 10.1242/jcs.159038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Hamada Y., Tsurumi Y., Nozaki S., Katoh Y., Nakayama K. Interaction of WDR60 intermediate chain with TCTEX1D2 light chain of the dynein-2 complex is crucial for ciliary protein trafficking. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2018;29:1628–1639. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E18-03-0173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Tsurumi Y., Hamada Y., Katoh Y., Nakayama K. Interactions of the dynein-2 intermediate chain WDR34 with the light chains are required for ciliary retrograde protein trafficking. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2019;30:658–670. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E18-10-0678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Schmidts M., Hou Y., Cortés C.R., Mans D.A., Huber C., Boldt K. TCTEX1D2 mutations underlie Jeune asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy with impaired retrograde intraflagellar transport. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:7074. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Gholkar A.A., Senese S., Lo Y.-C., Capri J., Deardorff W.J., Dharmarajan H. Tctex1d2 associates with short-rib polydactyly syndrome proteins and is required for ciliogenesis. Cell Cycle. 2015;14:1116–1125. doi: 10.4161/15384101.2014.985066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Tsao C.-C., Gorovsky M.A. Different effects of Tetrahymena IFT172 domains on anterograde and retrograde intraflagellar transport. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008;19:1450–1461. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-05-0403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Williamson S.M., Silva D.A., Richey E., Qin H. Probing the role of IFT particle complex A and B in flagellar entry and exit of IFT-dynein in Chlamydomonas. Protoplasma. 2012;249:851–856. doi: 10.1007/s00709-011-0311-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Huet D., Blisnick T., Perrot S., Bastin P. The GTPase IFT27 is involved in both anterograde and retrograde intraflagellar transport. Elife. 2014;3 doi: 10.7554/eLife.02419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Huet D., Blisnick T., Perrot S., Bastin P. IFT25 is required for the construction of the trypanosome flagellum. J. Cell. Sci. 2019;132 doi: 10.1242/jcs.228296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Adhiambo C., Blisnick T., Toutirais G., Delannoy E., Bastin P. A novel function for the atypical small G protein Rab-like 5 in the assembly of the trypanosome flagellum. J. Cell. Sci. 2009;122:834–841. doi: 10.1242/jcs.040444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Buisson J., Chenouard N., Lagache T., Blisnick T., Olivo-Marin J.-C., Bastin P. Intraflagellar transport proteins cycle between the flagellum and its base. J. Cell. Sci. 2013;126:327–338. doi: 10.1242/jcs.117069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Reck J., Schauer A.M., VanderWaal Mills K., Bower R., Tritschler D., Perrone C.A. The role of the dynein light intermediate chain in retrograde IFT and flagellar function in Chlamydomonas. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2016;27:2404–2422. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E16-03-0191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Mijalkovic J., Prevo B., Oswald F., Mangeol P., Peterman E.J.G. Ensemble and single-molecule dynamics of IFT dynein in Caenorhabditis elegans cilia. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:14591. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Blacque O.E., Scheidel N., Kuhns S. Rab GTPases in cilium formation and function. Small GTPases. 2018;9:76–94. doi: 10.1080/21541248.2017.1353847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Kanie T., Abbott K.L., Mooney N.A., Plowey E.D., Demeter J., Jackson P.K. The CEP19-RABL2 GTPase complex binds IFT-B to initiate intraflagellar transport at the ciliary base. Dev. Cell. 2017;42:22–36. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.05.016. e12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Desai P.B., Stuck M.W., Lv B., Pazour G.J. Ubiquitin links smoothened to intraflagellar transport to regulate hedgehog signaling. BioRxiv. 2019 doi: 10.1101/2019.12.18.880799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Shinde S.R., Nager A.R., Nachury M.V. Lysine63-linked ubiquitin chains earmark GPCRs for BBSome-mediated removal from cilia. BioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.03.04.977090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES