In the original article, there were mistakes in Table 1 as published. Table 1 aimed to compare all glum values at specific wavelengths of four LnIII tris(β-diketonates) (LnIII: EuIII and TbIII) upon intermolecular chirality transfer from CABu, CTA, Glu (D- and L-), Ara (D- and L-), and α-pinene for clarity and readability. However, although the glum values described in the main text are correct, most data in the three right-side columns of Table 1 are incorrectly displayed. Also, in Table 1 caption, D-/L-glucose pentameyhyl esters should be D-/L-glucose pentamethyl esters. The corrected Table 1 with corrected numerical values in the three right-side columns and corrected caption appears below.
Table 1.
CPL characteristics (dissymmetry ratio, glum in 10−2 at specific wavelength) of EuIII and TbIII coordinated with three β-diketonates as achiral ligands embedded in two polysaccharide alkyl esters (CABu and CTA), D-/L-glucose pentamethyl esters (D-/L-Glu), and D-/L-Arabinose tetramethyl esters (D-/L-Ara).
| LnIII tris(β- diketonates) | CABu glum/10−2 (nm) | CTA glum/10−2 (nm) | Glu glum/10−2 (nm) | Ara glum/10−2 (nm) | α-pinene glum/10−2 (nm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D- | L- | D- | L- | (1R) | (1S) | |||
| Eu(fod)3 | +6.71 (593)a −0.59 (613)b | +4.63 (593)a −0.40 (613)b | +1.05 (594)a −0.19 (612)b | −0.81 (596)a +0.08 (613)b | +0.19 (593)a −0.02 (607)b | −0.30 (591)a +0.06 (611)b | −0.49 (593)f +0.05 (613)f | +0.41 (593)f −0.04 (613)f |
| Eu(dpm)3 | n.d. g | n.d. g | n.d. g | n.d. g | n.d. g | n.d. g | n.d. g | n.d. g |
| Tb(fod)3 | −0.29 (490)c +0.78 (540)d −0.18 (552)e | −0.10 (490)c +0.35 (542)d −0.07 (553)e | n.d. g | n.d. g | n.d. g | n.d. g | n.d. g | n.d. g |
| Tb(dpm)3 | −0.53 (491)c +0.37 (537)d −0.59 (547)e | −0.44 (489)c – +0.80 (547)e | n.d. g | n.d. g | n.d. g | n.d. g | n.dg (~490) +0.44d (537) −0.13e (547) | n.dg (~490) −0.49d (537) +0.34e (548) |
All numerical values in bracket mean wavelength extremum for CPL signals.
EuIII5F1 (593 nm),
EuIII5F2 (613 nm),
TbIII5F6 (490 nm),
TbIII5F5 (I) (540 nm),
TbIII5F5 (II) (552 nm),
Data were taken from literature (Jalilah et al., 2018).
Not characterized or no data.
Also, there was an error in Introduction. The sentence starting with “Particularly, chirogenesis in metal coordination chemistry by the chirality transfer has long been one of the central subjects in inorganic chemistry 1 (Mason and Norman, 1965…)” should read as follows: “Particularly, chirogenesis in metal coordination chemistry by the chirality transfer has long been one of the central subjects in inorganic chemistry (Mason and Norman, 1965…)”.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
References
- Jalilah A. J., Asanoma F., Fujiki M. (2018). Unveiling controlled breaking of the mirror symmetry of Eu(Fod)3 with α-/β-pinene and BINAP by circularly polarised luminescence (CPL), CPL excitation, and 19F-/31P{1H}-NMR spectra and mulliken charges. Inorg. Chem. Front. 5, 2718–2733. 10.1039/C8QI00509E [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mason S. F., Norman B. J. (1965). Outer-sphere co-ordination and optical activity in transition-metal complexes. Chem. Commun. 335–336. 10.1039/c19650000335 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
