Skip to main content
Cell Transplantation logoLink to Cell Transplantation
letter
. 2020 Jul 27;29:0963689720943571. doi: 10.1177/0963689720943571

A Case of Successful Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for HHV8-Positive Castleman’s Disease with a Review of the Literature

Zhen Wang 1,2,*, Shiwei Yang 3,4,*, Zunmin Zhu 2,3,4, Pingchong Lei 2, Jing Yang 2, Ping Zhang 2, Kai Sun 2,
PMCID: PMC7563820  PMID: 32713191

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the long-term clinical efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for patients with human herpes virus 8 (HHV8)-positive multicentric Castleman’s disease (MCD).

Methods:

A 17-year-old female patient was admitted to Henan Provincial People’s Hospital with the complaint of febrile for half a month, headache, and enlarged superficial lymph nodes on October 5, 2010. HHV8-positive mixed cellular Castleman’s disease was found by pathological diagnosis of lymph nodes biopsy. After the administration of CHOP and Hyper-CVAD-B, the patient was still febrile, we administrated the followed COAP, two courses of VAD(Vincristine, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone), the patient received CR. Six months after CR, the patient relapsed, we administrated VAD and two courses of bortezomide+dexamethasone chemotherapy, and then the patient received PR. After that, the patient underwent allo-HSCT from his human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched unrelated donor after conditioning with Bu/Cy+Etoposide+Smoustin.graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, which consisted of ATG (7.5 mg/kg, qd, ivdrip) from d-5 to d-2, cyclosporine (3 mg/kg/d, qd, ivdrip, for 24 h) started from day-1, MMF(0.5 g, tid, po.) started from day+1 to +28, and MTX (15 mg per time, ivdrip, d+1,+4,+7,+11). She received 3.5×106/L CD34+cells and 8.1×108/LMNC.

Results:

Granulocyte engraftment occurred on day+12, platelet engrafted on day+14. Bone marrow biopsy showed normalization of trilineage hematopoiesis on day+33, chimerism: 97.6%. The transplantation was successful and followed up for 7 years with CR.

Conclusion:

Allo-HSCT might cure patients with refractory/relapsed HHV8+ MCD.

Keywords: multicentric type, Castleman’s disease, allogeneic, hematopoietic stem cell, transplantation

Introduction

Castleman’s disease (CD) is a rare lymphoid proliferative disease with clinical manifestations, including lymphadenopathy and fever. Multicentric Castleman’s disease (MCD) might be associated with polyclonal immunoglobulin, anemia, and renal insufficiency. Its clinical manifestations are diverse and are often accompanied by multiple system involvement, while some other cases are associated with POEMS syndrome or progression to Kaposi’s sarcoma/malignant lymphoma. Hence, we describe a patient who was diagnosed with refractory MCD with a monoclonal IgG peak and was successfully treated using allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) from an unrelated donor. The medical report was obtained following informed patient consent and hospital Institutional Review Board approval. All procedures in this study were conducted in accordance with the Ethics Committee of Henan Provincial People’s Hospital and the Institutional Review Board and the Ethics Committee of Zhengzhou University-approved protocols.

Case Report

A 17-year-old female was admitted to our hospital on October 5, 2010, with the chief complaint of a fever lasting for more than two weeks, accompanied by headache, weakness, and muscle soreness. We noticed enlarged lymph nodes in the bilateral supraclavicular and groin regions during physical examination and with a temperature of 37.6°C. The blood tests showed the following results: WBCs 6.61 ×109/L, neutrophils 4.52×109/L, RBCs 3.26×1012/L, PLTs 265×109/L, and Hb 84 g/L. Serum globulin was 48.9 g/L. Viral serology was negative, therefore, HIV infection was ruled out. Additional laboratory values were as follows: PT 13.70, PT% 90, INR 10.7, APTT 44.30, FIB 11.43, TTT 22.50, C-reactive protein 16.6 mg/L, β2-microglobulin: 2.5 mg/L, IgGκ: single peak, IgG 39.5 g/L, IgA 3.81 g/L, IgM 1.48 g/L, κ 23.2 g/L, λ 10.5 g/L, and 24 h urinary κ light chain 1,560 mg/L. She was found to have splenomegaly by ultrasound. In terms of autoantibodies, her antinuclear antibody titer was 1:100 (nucleolar type), and plasma antineutrophil antibodies were weakly positive. Based on the pathology result from the biopsy of right inguinal lymph nodes combined with immunohistochemistry and histopathology, giant lymphadenopathy (CD) was considered. The immunohistochemical results were as follows: CD34 was positive on vascular structures, F8 was positive on vascular structures, and EBER was negative. After consultation with the Pathology Department of Peking University, it was concluded that the lymphatic follicles were scattered in the lymph nodes. Furthermore, the germinal center was narrowed, inner reticulocytes were dominant, and the surrounding cells were arranged in layers. A large number of plasmacytes were seen proliferating around the follicles, and many Russell bodies were found in the plasma cells. The pathological diagnosis was HHV8-positive, mixed CD (Fig. 1.). Morphological assessment of the bone marrow showed expansion of bone marrow, active granulocyte and erythroid compartments, altered size of mature red blood cells, abnormal pigmentation, and some rouletting of red blood cells. The lymphocyte ratio was decreased, and the monocyte ratio and morphology were normal. The ratio of plasma cells was increased, accounting for 4.4% of the total cells, and binuclear plasma cells were easily observed. Megakaryocytes were seen in the bone marrow. Of 50 classifiable cells, there were 44 granulocytes, 4 platelets, and 2 bare nuclei, and the platelets were easily observed with no obvious morphological abnormalities. The bone marrow biopsy showed active cell proliferation in the bone marrow, including obvious plasma cell proliferation, and binuclear plasma cells were observed. Chromosomal analyses revealed a karyotype of 46, XX. The patient’s blood type was A Rh-, and her HLA typing was as follows: HLA-A:30/32, HLA-B: 13/35, HLA-C: 04/06, HLA-DRB1:07/13, and HLA-DQB1:02/06. The patient was treated with three cycles of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, methylprednisolone, and epirubicin), hyper-CVAD-B (high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine), COAP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, methylprednisolone, and cytarabine) after the diagnosis, but symptoms remained uncontrolled. In the two subsequent cycles, we increased the dosage of corticosteroids and added two doses of VAD (vincristine, adriamycin, and dexamethasone). The enlarged lymph nodes disappeared, and her body temperature remained normal for 1 month in response to this treatment protocol. The patient experienced recurrence in June 2011, and she presented with fever accompanied by cervical lymph node enlargement, weight loss, and night sweating. We repeated the VAD (vincristine 0.5 mg/d, d1-4; doxorubicin and dexamethasone 40 mg/d, d1-4) regimen, but the symptoms remained uncontrolled. We administered two cycles of bortezomib+dexamethasone. After chemotherapy, the lymph nodes shrank, her body temperature decreased, and her fever remained intermittent, fluctuating between 37°C and 38°C. In October 2011, a potential marrow donor was found in the Chinese Medicine Library, and the HLA matching was 10/10. The patient underwent allo-HSCT from an unrelated HLA-matched donor (blood type: AB Rh+; 10/10 HLA-matched) after conditioning with Bu/Cy+etoposide+smoustin. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of ATG (7.5 mg/kg, qd, iv drip) from d-5 to d-2, cyclosporine (3 mg/kg/d, qd, iv drip, for 24 h) started on d-1, MMF (0.5 g, tid, po.) from d+1 to d+28, and MTX (15 mg per dose, iv drip, d+1,+4,+7,+11). The patient received 3.5 ×106 CD34+ cells/L and 8.1 ×108 MNCs/L. Blood levels of cyclosporine were monitored and well-controlled. Granulocyte engraftment occurred on d+12, and platelets engrafted on d+14. Bone marrow biopsy showed normalization of trilineage hematopoiesis on d+33, with chimerism of 97.6%. The patient was regularly checked in the outpatient clinic, the related laboratory tests and body temperature were normal, and fever and lymph node enlargement did not recur. However, the reproductive capacity of the patient was influenced, and she became menopausal.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(A) The pathology of the lymph node showed lymphoid follicle was penetrated by a sclerotic blood vessel. Follicular dendritic cells (FDCs) were hyperplastic in lymphoid follicle with small germinal center. The follicle was surrounded by mantle cells (so-called onion skin). The interfollicular regions were expanded by numerous mature plasma cells. (B) The follicle was radially penetrated by a sclerotic blood vessel together with proliferated FDCs, presenting a lollipop-shaped structure. There were plaques distributed in mature plasma cells with abundant red-staining cytoplasm and spoke-like nuclei.

Discussion

CD is a rare benign lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by lymphoid follicular hyperplasia. It currently exhibits several different histological patterns, including hyaline vascular (HV) variant and a plasma cell type (PC type)1. HHV8 (human herpesvirus 8)-related mixed CD cases account for approximately 2.5% of all cases and often occur in HIV-infected patients. These patients have shorter survival and are prone to infection and conversion to lymphoma, which is a common reason for death2. There are two types of clinical manifestations: localized/unicentric CD (UCD) and systemic/multicentric Castleman’s disease (MCD). UCD is the more common of the two and usually is limited to a lymph node group or region, takes on HV histology, and is cured by surgical removal of asymptomatic local lesions. MCD is the less common type, and most cases are of the PC subtype. MCD can progress to severe pancytopenia, multiple organ failure, and lymphoma. A small number of patients develop a terrible syndrome, including multiple neuropathies, organ enlargement, endocrine disorders, monoclonal gamma globulin disease, and skin changes. The median survival time is approximately 14 months3,4.

The pathophysiological basis and pathogenesis of CD are still unclear, leading to difficulties in diagnosis and treatment. A large amount of data indicate that CD is associated with viral infections such as those caused by HHV8, cytokine dysregulation such as elevated IL-6 expression, abnormal function of antigen-presenting cells, and angiogenesis. Interactions between inflammatory mediators, primarily IL-6, which in some cases are driven by HHV8, are prominent in MCD, leading to lymphangiogenesis and systemic manifestations of the disease5. Also, IL-1, the RAF pathway, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are associated with the pathogenesis of CD in limited studies. Therefore, blocking these pathways represents another attractive treatment strategy for this rare disease6. In our patient, the C-reactive protein was higher at disease onset and was positively correlated with the expression of IL-6, suggesting that IL-6 may also be increased. It is speculated that IL-6 plays an important role in cases of concurrent MCD and MM. Of course, the possibility that the polyclonal MCD gradually converts to MM cannot be excluded.

At present, there is no universal treatment for MCD. A combination of various treatments, such as chemotherapy, anti-HHV8 therapy, α-interferon, glucocorticoids, and targeted therapies (thalidomide, rituximab, and bortezomib), is often used7. The use of corticosteroids can lead to short-term improvement of symptoms. Similar outcomes can be achieved with CVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) or CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) regimen or targeted radiotherapy combined with targeted therapy. Q Lin et al. successfully used bortezomib to cure a mixed type of CD patient8. Several adult MCD patients have also been successfully treated with IL-6 receptor antibodies (tocilizumab), interferon-α, rituximab, and antiviral drugs9. In addition, there are also some less common treatments, such as intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, targeted agents, and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

In this case, the clinical manifestations of the disease in this patient was fever, fatigue, lymph node enlargement in multiple lymph nodes, increased monoclonal immunoglobulin, and increased C-reactive protein. Morphological analysis of bone marrow cells showed an increase in the PC ratio, accounting for 4.4% of the total cells. Binuclear PCs were easily observed. The patient was diagnosed with HHV8-associated mixed CD, which behaves like a PC disease clinically, and prone to MM. One month after the treatment with bortezomib, the patient developed a relapse.

Considering the generally poor condition of patients with refractory MCD and the importance of quality of life for the young patient, the use of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a preferred treatment. However, the patient had constant fever, which led to the failure of the collection of the patient’s stem cells. She had no chance to undergo the autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. As there was no sibling to use as a donor, an unrelated donor was selected for the allo-HSCT under the agreement of the patient and her guardians, and the treatment was successful, leading to long-term relief for the patient.

To our knowledge, only one case of a patient with severe MCD who received allo-HSCT after rituximab monotherapy followed by six months of follow-up has been reported10. The reasons why we added the etoposide in the conditioning regimen were as follows: (1) It was reported that both Bu/Cy plus etoposide as conditioning for autologous stem cell transplantation in MM was a safe regimen11 and treatment of HIV-associated MCD with etoposide12 had substantial efficacy. (2) The conditioning of aggressive CD is similar to high-grade lymphoma13,14.

Allo-HSCT is an effective treatment for adolescent patients with nonmalignant hematologic diseases, and the incidence of chronic GVHD was relatively low in this setting15. The impact of allo-HSCT on quality of life is different in malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases. The patients with nonmalignant hematologic diseases normally have better physical condition. When the recipients developed chronic GVHD, especially after matched unrelated donor allo-HSCT, their body condition declines16. In addition, after allo-HSCT, the occurrence of acute and chronic GVHD was associated with reduced overall survival (OS) rates17. Studies showed that in the patients with nonmalignant hematological diseases, the removal of T cells in the graft before HSCT can reduce the occurrence of GVHD without increasing the virus-related mortality18. Different from the malignant diseases, graft versus tumor effect is unnecessary in the nonmalignant diseases. Thus, complete protection from GVHD is the best strategy for nonmalignant patients receiving allo-HSCT. The experience of GVHD prophylaxis for nonmalignant hematologic disease such as MCD is rare. To avoid the incidence of GVHD, we applied cyclosporine treatment (gradually reduced the dose of cyclosporine) during the first year after allo-HSCT, both acute and chronic GVHD were not observed for over 9 years.

In conclusion, allo-HSCT is the preferred option for the patients with MCD as follows: (1) younger patients desire to have enough quality of life; (2) patients who do not respond to therapeutic monoclonal antibodies or recurrent; (3) patients who had an HLA-matched donor. After 9 years of follow-up, the patient has been living a normal and healthy life as others, and she works as an accountant. Clinical judgment, the doctor’s experience, and the patient’s wishes played an important role in the treatment planning process. Allo-HSCT can be recommended as an alternative treatment option for patients receiving long-term relief and improved quality of life.

Acknowledgments

We thank all colleagues who participated in this research. We thank Dr Lifu Wang (Department of Pathology, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital) for providing the actual histology image of lymph node. We also thank the residents and nurses who much cared for the patient.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was partially supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81971508, No. 81471589, No. 81273259).

References

  • 1. Casper C. The aetiology and management of castleman disease at 50 years: translating pathophysiology to patient care. Br J Haematol. 2005;129(1):3–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Dham A, Peterson BA. Castleman disease. Curr Opin Hematol. 2007;14(4):354–359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Jiang JP, Shen XF, Du JF. A retrospective study of 34 patients with unicentric and multicentric Castleman’s disease: experience from a single institution. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(2):2407–2412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Powles T, Stebbing J, Bazeos A, Hatzimichael E, Mandalia S, Nelson M, Gazzard B, Bower M. The role of immune suppression and HHV8 in the increasing incidence of HIV-associated multicentric Castleman’s disease. Acta Oncol. 2009;20(4):775–779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Hazem E, El-Osta, Kurzrock R. Castleman’s disease: from basic mechanisms to molecular therapeutics. Oncologist. 2011;16(4):497–511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Stephen J., Brandt, Bodine DM, Dunbar CE, Nienhuis AW. Dysregulated interleukin 6 expression produces a syndrome resembling castleman’s disease in mice. J Clin Invest. 1990;86(2):592–599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Katsume A, Saito H, Yamada Y, Yorozu K, Ueda O, Akamatsu K, Nishimoto N, Kishimoto T, Yoshizaki K, Ohsugi Y. Anti-interleukin 6 (IL-6) receptor antibody suppresses castleman’s disease like symptoms emerged in IL-6 transgenic mice. Cytokine. 2002;20(6):304–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lin Q, Fang B, Huang H, Yu F, Chai X, Zhang Y, Zhou J, Xia Q, Li Y, Song Y. Efficacy of bortezomib and thalidomide in the recrudescent form of multicentric mixed-type Castleman’s disease. Blood Cancer J. 2015;5(3):e298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Liu AY, Nabel CS, Finkelman BS, Ruth JR, Kurzrock R, van Rhee F, Krymskaya VP, Kelleher D, Rubenstein AH, Fajgenbaum DC. Idiopathic multicentric castleman’s disease: a systematic literature review. Lancet Haematology. 2016;3(4):e163–e175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Angenendt L, Kerkhoff A, Wiebe S, Mikesch JH, Rudat A, Wotzel F, Wenning C, Schliemann C, Kessler T, Schafers M, Wardelmann E, et al. Remissions of different quality following rituximab, tocillizumab and rituximab, and allogeneic stem cell transplantation in a patient with severe idiopathic multicentric Castleman’s disease. Ann Hematol. 2015;94(7):1241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Cogle CR, Moreb JS, Leather HL, Finiewicz HJ, Khan SA, Reddy VS, Wingard JR. Busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide as conditioning for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol. 2003;73(3):169–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Scott DCabral L, Harrington WJ. Treatment of HIV-associated multicentric Castleman’s disease with Ooral etoposide. Am J Hematol. 2001;66(2):148–150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Chan KL, Lade S, Prince HM, Harrison SJ. Update and new approaches in the treatment of Castleman disease. J Blood Med. 2016;7:145–458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Jun Y, Quan QM, Bin W, Hua ZG, Li Z, Rui Z, Guang JC, Hao MH, Long DY, Jing Y, Xuan Z. Haploidentical parental hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric refractory Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Pediatr Transplant. 2014;18(4):e124–e129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Bonfim C, Franco S, Vergilio AR, Fernandes JF. Outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in Brazil for children and adolescents with non-malignant diseases: a multicenter study on behalf on the Brazil-Seattle consortium study group. BBMT. 2018;24(3):S439–S440. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Oberg JA, Bender JG, Morris E, Harrison L, Basch CE, Garvin JH, Cairo MS. Pediatric allo-SCT for malignant and non-malignant diseases: impact on health-related quality of life outcomes. BMT. 2013;48(6):787–793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Umeda K, Imai K, Yanagimachi M, Yabe H, Kobayashi M, Takahashi Y, Kajiwara M, Yoshida N, Cho Y, Inoue M, Yet H, et al. Impact of graft-versus-host disease on the clinical outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for non-malignant diseases. INT J Hematol. 2020;111(6):869–876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Saif MA, Borrill R, Bigger BW, Lee H, Logan A, Poulton K, Hughes S, Turner AJ, Bonney DK, Wynn RF. In vivo T-cell depletion using alemtuzumab in family and unrelated donor transplantation for pediatric non-malignant disease achieves engraftment with low incidence of graft vs host disease. Pediatr Transplantation. 2015;19(2):211–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cell Transplantation are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES