Abstract
Background
Desminopathy is a clinically heterogeneous muscle disease caused by over 60 different mutations in desmin. The most common mutation with a clinical phenotype in humans is an exchange of arginine to proline at position 350 of desmin leading to p.R350P. We created the first CRISPR‐Cas9 engineered rat model for a muscle disease by mirroring the R350P mutation in humans.
Methods
Using CRISPR‐Cas9 technology, Des c.1045‐1046 (AGG > CCG) was introduced into exon 6 of the rat genome causing p.R349P. The genotype of each animal was confirmed via quantitative PCR. Six male rats with a mutation in desmin (n = 6) between the age of 120–150 days and an equal number of wild type littermates (n = 6) were used for experiments. Maximal plantar flexion force was measured in vivo and combined with the collection of muscle weights, immunoblotting, and histological analysis. In addition to the baseline phenotyping, we performed a synergist ablation study in the same animals.
Results
We found a difference in the number of central nuclei between desmin mutants (1 ± 0.4%) and wild type littermates (0.2 ± 0.1%; P < 0.05). While muscle weights did not differ, we found the levels of many structural proteins to be altered in mutant animals. Dystrophin and syntrophin were increased 54% and 45% in desmin mutants, respectively (P < 0.05). Dysferlin and Annexin A2, proteins associated with membrane repair, were increased two‐fold and 32%, respectively, in mutants (P < 0.05). Synergist ablation caused similar increases in muscle weight between mutant and wild type animals, but changes in fibre diameter revealed that fibre hypertrophy in desmin mutants was hampered compared with wild type animals (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
We created a novel animal model for desminopathy that will be a useful tool in furthering our understanding of the disease. While mutant animals at an age corresponding to a preclinical age in humans show no macroscopic differences, microscopic and molecular changes are already present. Future studies should aim to further decipher those biological changes that precede the clinical progression of disease and test therapeutic approaches to delay disease progression.
Keywords: Precision medicine, Muscular dystrophy, Injury, Exercise, Force transfer
Introduction
Desminopathies or desmin‐related myopathies are a clinically heterogeneous group of myofibrillar myopathies caused by mutations of the desmin gene or its interactive partners. To date, more than 60 mutations in the desmin (DES) gene have been reported, the majority of which follow an autosomal‐dominant inheritance 1 ; however, autosomal‐recessive cases and sporadic patients have been reported. 2 There seems to be a vague correlation between the genotype and the phenotype 2 ; however, symptoms and disease progression vary widely. 3 Most patients first develop symptoms in their 30s, although the age of onset ranges from infancy to late adulthood. 4 , 5 , 6 Desminopathy is associated with progressive skeletal myopathy and cardiomyopathy. The skeletal muscle myopathies may present as a classic progressive bilateral distal myopathy, but scapuloperoneal, limb girdle, and generalized myopathy phenotypes have also been reported. 7 , 8 , 9 When the diaphragm is affected, respiratory insufficiency can lead to further disability and higher mortality. 10 DES mutations can lead to different types of cardiomyopathy, oftentimes accompanied by cardiac conduction disease. 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 The progressive impairment of muscle function often leads to limitation of mobility, loss of ambulation, and dependence on assistive devices. The result is that life expectancy is reduced, mainly as a result of cardiac and pulmonary complications. No specific treatment for desminopathies exists to date.
The exact molecular pathogenesis of desminopathies remains to be fully understood. Desmin is the primary intermediate filament of striated muscle and forms a three‐dimensional network between the contractile apparatus, the extracellular matrix, and other cell organelles like mitochondria, T‐tubules, and nuclei. 16 , 17 , 18 This continuous cytoskeleton network promotes structural integrity, mechanotransduction, and mechanochemical signalling, making desmin a significant contributor to the maintenance of skeletal muscle structure and function. Disease‐causing mutations are spread over the entire DES gene on chromosome 2q35. 1 Most DES mutations generate desmin protein incapable of forming the physiological intracellular filamentous network, causing an accumulation of intracellular aggregates containing desmin and other cytoskeletal proteins. 19 Misfolded desmin resists degradation and recycling by the cellular enzymatic machinery. 20 , 21 Consequently, the main histopathological hallmarks of desminopathy are sarcoplasmic and subsarcolemmal desmin‐positive protein aggregates. 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 Other myopathic features include increased fibre size variability, central nuclei, atrophic or necrotic fibres, fibre splitting, mitochondrial dysfunction, rimmed vacuoles, inflammation and increased intramuscular connective, and fat tissue. 22 , 26 , 27 , 28 However, these features vary significantly from patient to patient.
To elucidate the molecular mechanisms in this disease, several animal models have been developed in zebrafish and mice. Although the first mouse Des knock‐out models yielded essential insights into desmin function, the total lack of desmin and therefore desmin aggregates was, among others, a major limitation in comparing the model with the human disease. 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 Since the original knock‐out, various knock‐in and transgenic mouse models have been established and studied. These models, however, continued to have varying success in reflecting the human disease course, as some only developed a mild or even no obvious cardiac phenotype and only homozygous mice showed skeletal myopathy. 20 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36
Here, we present the first rat model of desminopathy created using CRISPR‐Cas9 technology. The model mirrors the R350P DES mutation, the most frequent genotype causing desminopathies in humans. 7 , 8 , 20 It is caused by a single amino acid exchange from arginine to proline at position 350, and as rodent desmin lacks a serine at position 82, the ortholog of the human missense mutation is created as an R349P mutation in the rat protein. Unlike similar murine models of this mutation, there are several inherent advantages of using a rat model. Rats share more genetic and physiological traits with humans and are approximately an order of a magnitude larger than their murine counterparts. 37 Having an animal model that more closely resembles the human phenotype would be an advantage in the pursuit of a better understanding of the disease and therapeutic approaches to ameliorate it. As a first characterization of our model, we report here the clinical, myopathological, functional, and molecular findings in young adult mutant rats (homozygous R349P) compared with wild type littermates.
Methods
Animals and ethical approval
All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of California, Davis, which is an AAALAC‐accredited institution. Animal housing was in accordance with recommendations of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Animals were housed in a conventional vivarium and were specific pathogen free from the following pathogens: all ectoparasites and endoparasites, sialodacryoadenitis virus (RCV, SDAV), Sendai, Pneumonia Virus of Mice (PVM), Hantavirus, Rat Parvoviruses [RPV, RV (KRV), H‐1], Reovirus (REO‐3), Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus (LCMV), Theiloviruses [MEV (TMEV), RTV (GDVII)], Cilia‐Associated Respiratory Bacillus (CAR Bacillus; CARB), and Mycoplasma arthritidis and pulmonis. Male rats between 120 to 150 days were selected to study functional, histological, and biochemical differences in the phenotype of CRISPR‐Cas9 created knock‐in animals carrying a mutation in desmin (Des; n = 6) or healthy, wild type littermates (WT; n = 8). Animals were housed in 12:12 h light–dark cycles and fed ad libitum.
CRISPR‐Cas9‐mediated knock‐in
Design and constructs
Guide RNA (gRNA) selection targeting rat Des utilized the online tool ChopChop (chopchop.cbu.uib.no) to assess optimal gRNA candidates. 38 The following guide sequence, gatgaggcagatgagggagctgg, was selected and converted into a single guide RNA (sgRNA) using the Precision gRNA Synthesis Kit following manufacturer's instruction (Invitrogen, A29377, Waltham MA). The guide was verified in vitro to ensure the ability to completely cleave 400 pmol of PCR fragment produced from the rat genomic region (Figure 1A). An ssODN repair template was designed with the engineered Arg to Pro modification approximately one nucleotide (nt) from the Cas9 cleavage site and utilized an offset homology arm method consisting of a 36 nt 3′ arm and 91 nt 5′ arm. 39 The ssODN was synthesized as an Ultramer (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville IA).
Delivery of Cas9 reagents to rat zygotes
Five‐week‐old Sprague–Dawley rats (Envigo, SD, Livermore CA) were superovulated by sequential intraperitoneal injection of 20 International Units of Pregnant Mare Serum Gonadotropin (Lee BioSolutions, Maryland Heights, MO) followed 47 h later with 25 International Units of human chorionic gonadotropin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and then paired overnight with 10‐week‐old male Sprague–Dawley studs. The next morning, female rats with visible copulation plugs were euthanized, and their oviducts collected in M2 media (Zenith, ZFM2‐100, Guilford CT). Clutches of zygotes were released from the ampulla and treated with hyaluronidase (300 U/mL) (Sigma, H4272, St. Louis, MO) in M2 media at room temperature for 3–5 min to remove cumulus cells, washed through three drops of 200 μL KSOMaa media (Zenith, ZEKS‐050) and cultured with 200 μL drops of KSOMaa media in an incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2 until either microinjection or electroporation.
Microinjection
On the morning of injection, Cas9 protein (Integrated DNA technologies, 1081058, Coralville IA) and the sgRNA were complexed at 37°C for 10 min in 10 μL of 10 mM Tris; 0.1 mM EDTA injection buffer. The ssODN was added and brought up to a volume of 50 μL with final concentrations of 0.13 μM Cas9, 58 μM sgRNA, and 1.2 μM ssODN. The mix was centrifuged at 12 000 rpm for 3 min and 40 μL taken from the top for the injection. The prepared CRISPR/Cas9 solution was backloaded with a microloader into a newly prepared microinjection pipette using a Sutter Instruments Co. P‐97 micropipette puller from a glass capillary tube and set up onto a Nikon micromanipulator microscope system. Injections were performed under 400× magnification using continuous flow positive pressure of 0.1 psi from a Narishige IM‐300 microinjector. A group of up to 100 zygotes with two visible pronuclei was injected under continuous flow with ~2 pL, or until 50% swelling of the pronuclear cavity was observed. The continuous flow also resulted in ~1 pL of reagent being introduced to the cytoplasm. Zygotes were returned to a culture dish of 200 μL drops of KSOMaa in the incubator until surgical transfer to pseudopregnant recipients the same day.
Electroporation
On the morning of electroporation, a final electroporation mix of 8 μM Cas9 protein (Integrated DNA technologies, 1081058, Coralville IA), 12 μM sgRNA, and 19 μM ssODN was prepared following the previously published electroporation (EZ) method. 40 Prior to electroporation, a group of up to 40 zygotes were treated with Acidic Tyrode's solution (Sigma, T1788, St. Louis MO) for ~30 s or until ~30% zona erosion was observed. The zygotes were then immediately washed through four 50 μL drops of M2 media with 1% bovine serum albumin (Sigma, A3311, St Louis, MO) then combined with the ribonucleoprotein mixture in a 20 μL final volume mixture. The zygotes with then electroporated with six pulses each lasting 3 ms in duration with 100 ms between pulses at 30 V using a Bio‐Rad Gene Pulser XCell (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA) in a 0.1 cm cuvette (Bio‐Rad, #1652089,Hercules, CA). The zygotes were then recovered and cultured in 200 μL drops of KSOMaa in the incubator until surgical transfer to pseudopregnant recipients the same day.
Zygote transfer
Synchronization of the 9‐week‐old Sprague–Dawley recipient females was achieved using injection of 40 μL IP injection of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist (Sigma Aldrick Inc, L4513‐5MG, Milwaukee WI) then paired overnight with 10‐month‐old vasectomized males 24 h prior to zygote transfer surgery to induce pseudopregnancy. The next day, female rats with visible copulation plugs were anaesthetized with isoflurane (Fluriso, VetOne, Boise ID) (2–5%) for the embryo transfer surgical procedure. After sterile preparation of the surgical site, a dorsal midline incision through the skin was performed. An incision was made through the body wall to exteriorize the oviduct, and a small opening was made with a 26‐gauge needle near the infundibulum in order to transfer approximately 10 zygotes into the ampulla. This procedure was then repeated for the opposite oviduct. After transfer, the oviducts were returned to the abdominal cavity, the muscle wall was sutured closed, and the skin was closed using surgical staples. Upon completion of the surgery, animals received 0.1 mg/kg Buprenorphine (JHP Pharmaceuticals, Parsippany, NJ) (0.03 mg/mL). Recipients were placed on heating pads and had respiration rate and anaesthesia recovery closely monitored until becoming fully ambulatory.
Genetic screening
Genomic DNA was extracted from approximately 3 mm tail snips utilizing DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit following manufacturer's instruction (Qiagen, 69504, Hilden Germany). Approximately 50 ng of DNA was PCR amplified with a gene specific forward primer, CCAGATGAGTGGATTCCTAGTTGGG, and reverse primer, CACCTAAGCTCTCACCTGCTCTCCT, producing 546 bp amplicon. Fifteen microlitres PCR reactions included 0.4 μM of each primer, 1X PCR buffer, 1.7 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM each dNTPs, 1 Unit Amplitaq polymerase (Applied Biosystem, N8080153, Waltham MA), and 1.3 M Betaine, 1.3% DMSO (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Thermal cycling included an initial denaturing at 94°C for 5 min; 10 cycles of 94°C for 15 s, 65°C to 55°C for 30 s (↓1°C/cycle), 72°C for 40 s; 30 cycles of 94°C for 15 s, 55°C for 30 s, 72°C for 40 s; final extension of 72°C for 5 min and maintained at 4°C. PCR reactions included a non‐template control, negative wild type control (B6). Subsequent amplicons were separated on 1% Agarose gel for 60 min at 120 V, and appropriately sized amplicons were gel extracted using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit following manufacturer's instruction (Qiagen, 28115, Hilden Germany). Purified fragments were submitted for Sanger sequencing and analysed using Sequencher sequence analysis software (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor MI). For screening, the amplicon was quantified using probes that recognized either the WT, tagged with VIC, or MUT sequence, coupled to the FAM fluorophore (Figure 1B).
Surgical intervention and muscle collection
Synergist ablation surgery
Rats were anaesthetized using 2.5% inhaled isoflurane vaporized in oxygen. The right gastrocnemius and soleus muscles were isolated and excised at the Achilles tendon while leaving the plantaris (PLN) muscle, blood, and nerve supply intact. The overlying fascia and skin were closed separately using sterile suture and clips, respectively. All animals were treated with analgesics to ease post‐operative pain (buprenorphine, 0.1 mg kg−1) and monitored daily for signs of pain or post‐operative infection.
Muscle collection
Control and synergist ablated (14 days postoperative) rats were anaesthetized with 2.5% inhaled isoflurane, the PLN was excised from both hindlimbs, rinsed in phosphate buffered saline to remove blood, blotted dry, and weighed. Subsequently, the PLN was pinned on cork at resting length and frozen in liquid nitrogen‐cooled isopentane for histological and biochemical analyses. Tibialis anterior muscles, heart, liver, and fat were also collected, blotted dry, and weighed before freezing at −80°C.
Histology
The frozen PLN muscles were blocked, and serial cross‐sections (10 μm) were cut from the PLN using a Leica CM 3050S cryostat (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA). For haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, sections were brought to room temperature, then consecutively submerged in EtOH 90% and then tap water for 30 s. Four hundred microlitres Mayer's hemalum solution (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were applied per slide and left to incubate for 6 min. Slides were then blued under running lukewarm tap water for 2 min, then dipped in tap water for another 8 min. Three hundred microlitres 0.5% aqueous eosin γ‐solution (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were applied to each slide for 1 min. Sections were dehydrated in sequential steps using 70%, 90%, and 100% EtOH for 1 min each. Alcohol was removed by submerging sections in Xylene for 5 min. After sections were air dried, they were mounted with DPX Mountant for histology (Sigma, Darmstadt, Germany).
For immunohistochemistry, PLN muscle sections were fixed in cold acetone for 5 min at −20°C, followed by three 5 minute phosphate‐buffered saline washes in 0.1% Tween‐20 before blocking with 5% natural goat serum (NGS) for 30 min at room temperature. Sections were then incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4°C. For determination of fibre types, SC‐71 (myosin heavy chain 2A, mouse, IgG1, 1:250 in NGS), BF‐F3 (myosin heavy chain 2B, mouse, IgM, 1:250 in NGS), and a polyclonal laminin antibody (rabbit, IgG (H + L), 1:500 in NGS) were used. For detection of desmin aggregates, a monoclonal desmin antibody (mouse, IgG2a, 1:200 in NGS) was used. After incubation in primary antibody, sections were washed three times with phosphate‐buffered saline washes in 0.1% Tween‐20 for 5 min and then incubated in secondary antibody (goat anti‐mouse Alexa Fluor® 488 and 555, Life Technologies and goat‐anti‐rabbit AlexaFluor® 647 for fibre typing, goat anti‐mouse Alexa Fluor® 488 for desmin) for 30 min at room temperature. Sections were mounted using ProLong Gold Antifade reagent (Life Technologies). Anti‐myosin heavy chain antibodies were purchased from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (Iowa City, Iowa), anti‐laminin antibody was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St Louis, Missouri), and anti‐desmin antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, Texas).
Slides were imaged using a Leica DMi8 inverted microscope using the HC PL FLUOTAR 10x/0.32 PH1 objective (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and using the LAS X software. For comparative analysis, exposure length remained fixed for all samples. Whole‐muscle sections were imaged using auto‐stitching with a 10% overlap.
Muscle fibre properties and fibre types were analysed using FIJI and SMASH (MATLAB) software from the whole muscle sections. In FIJI, images were cropped, and all areas with obviously false positive fluorescence, that is debris or folds, were deleted. In SMASH, Initial Segmentation was performed with segmentation factor 5 and appropriate pixel size (1.29 μm). Segmentation was checked and manually corrected, if necessary. The fibre filter parameters used were Minimum Fibre Area 500 μm2, Maximum Fibre Area 10 000 μm2, Maximum eccentricity 0.95, and Minimum Convexity 0.8. The fibre filter was checked, and false positives (e.g. vessels) were manually deleted. Threshold for fibre typing parameters was assessed and adjusted individually for each image.
Nuclei were analysed from H&E‐stained whole muscle sections using FIJI software with the grid tool. All fibres with distinctly central nuclei were counted except fibres in the two outer fibre layers because fibres at the edge of all sections showed more artefacts. The data were expressed as the percentage of fibres with centralized nuclei.
Immunoblotting
Frozen muscle trimmings, acquired during sectioning of the PLN for histological analysis, were used for immunoblotting. Frozen PLN muscle sections were homogenized in 200 μL sucrose lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 250 mM sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X‐100, 1% protease inhibitor complex) on a vortexer for 60 min at 4°C. Following centrifugation at 10 000 g for 10 min, the supernatant was collected. Protein concentrations were determined in triplicates using the DC protein assay (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Samples concentrations were adjusted using sucrose lysis buffer, and following dilution Laemmli sample buffer, 1 μg protein/μL were denatured at 100°C for 5 min. Proteins (10–15 μg protein per lane) were loaded on 4–20% Criterion TGX Stain‐free gels (Bio‐Rad) and run for 45 min at 200 V, and the proteins were visualized after a UV‐induced 1 min reaction to produce fluorescence. Following quantification of total protein, proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane at 100 V for 30–60 min, depending on the size of the protein of interest. Efficient transfer was confirmed used Ponceau staining of the membrane. Membranes were then washed and blocked in 1% fish skin gelatin dissolved in Tris‐buffered saline with 0.1% Tween‐20 for 1 h. Membranes were then rinsed and probed with primary antibody overnight at 4°C. The next day, membranes were washed and incubated with HRP‐conjugated secondary antibodies at 1:7500 to 1:10 000 in 1% skim milk‐Tris‐buffered saline with 0.1% Tween‐20 for 1 h at room temperature. Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP substrate (Millipore, Hayward, CA, USA) was then applied to the membranes for protein visualization by chemiluminescence. Image acquisition and band quantification were performed using the ChemiDoc MP System and Image Lab 5.0 software (Bio‐Rad). Protein levels of each sample were calculated as band intensities relative to total protein. The following antibodies were used in this study at a concentration of 1:1000: dystrophin (Santa Cruz, cat. no. 365954, lot no. E2711), β‐dystroglycan (Hybridoma Bank, cat. no. MANDAG2 (7D11)), desmin (Santa Cruz, cat. no. 271677, lot no. F1913), desmuslin (Santa Cruz, cat. no. 374484, lot no. B0207), dysferlin (Santa Cruz, cat. no. 16635, lot no. H162), Annexin A2 (Cell Signalling, cat. no. 8235S, lot no. 2), and muscle LIM protein (Santa Cruz, cat. no. 166930, lot no. E2814). Sarcospan and syntrophin cross‐reacted with the antibody for dystrophin (Santa Cruz, Cat. no. 365954) and were determined by molecular weight. 41
Statistics
Depending on the number of the groups compared, an unpaired t‐test or a two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a post hoc Tukey's multiple comparisons test was used to test the null hypothesis. An alpha of P < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant, and a P value between 0.05 and 0.1 was called a trend. Data in the text are reported as mean ± standard deviation, and data in the figures are visually represented as scatter dot plot with error bars indicating standard error of the mean. All analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism Version 7 (La Jolla, CA, USA).
Results
Generation of a CRISPR‐Cas9‐engineered rat model for desminopathy
Desminopathy caused by a single nucleotide polymorphism in the DES gene that converts arginine 350 to proline (R350P), the most prevalent mutation of desmin in humans, commonly presents as progressive muscular atrophy and muscle weakness. We created an analogue rat model by engineering the rat missense mutation Des c.1045‐1046 (AGG > CCG) in exon 6 using CRISPR‐Cas9 leading to p.R349P in rats (Figure 1A). Because the length of desmin in the rat is 469 amino acids compared with 470 in humans, R349P in rats is orthologous to R350P in humans. All embryo transfer recipients (n = 5) successfully produced litters, and all five recipients implanted with either EZ, microinjection, or a mix of both EZ and microinjection embryos yielded homology directed repair (HDR) positive or potential frameshift insertion or deletion positive offspring (confidence probability of pot + = 0.015). The Precise two‐point mutation was confirmed by the absence of c.1045‐1046 (AGG > CCG) via quantitative PCR (Figure 1B) in all HDR offspring. Homozygous rats carrying the mutation in desmin are called MUT throughout the manuscript. The bodyweight of male 120‐day‐old to 150‐day‐old MUT (n = 6) was on average 7% lower than wild type littermates (WT) (n = 8) without reaching statistical significance [473 ± 45 g (WT) to 443 ± 38 g (MUT)] (Figure 1C). Heart weight did not differ between WT and MUT at that age [1437 ± 166 mg (WT) to 1430 ± 127 mg (MUT)] (Figure 1D). Neither plantaris [484 ± 48 mg (WT) to 481 ± 48 (MUT)] (Figure 1E) nor tibialis anterior muscle weight [794 ± 73 mg (WT) to 753 ± 58 mg (MUT)] (Figure 1F) differed significantly either.
Histological symptoms precede a clinical phenotype
Cross‐sectional analysis of plantaris muscle sections of WT and MUT stained with H&E revealed early symptoms of myopathy such as increased variation of myofiber size (left shift in median fibre size with a right side shoulder indicating larger fibres), an increased number of regenerating and necrotic fibres, as well as increased number of fibres with central nuclei (Figure 2A and 2E). Immunohistochemical analysis of desmin showed an even distribution of desmin around the sarcolemma of WT fibres, but an aggregated distribution of desmin in MUT animals, a classical feature of desminopathy in patients and other animal models (Figure 2B). 1 , 9 , 20 Whole muscle cross‐sectional analysis (Figure 2C) shows a shift to a higher number of smaller fibres (2000 μm2) in MUT compared with WT rats where the highest frequency of occurring fibres is substantially larger (2750 μm2) (Figure 2D). Because the weight of the MUT plantaris muscle are not different (Figure 1E), this would suggest a higher number of fibres in MUT compared with WT. Fibre number in WT tended indeed to be lower than in MUT, albeit not statistically significant [4212 ± 444 (WT) to 4497 ± 271 (MUT)] (data not shown). Muscle fibre type analysis showed a tendency for fewer type 2b fibres compared with 2a fibres in WT (P = 0.08) and MUT animals (P = 0.11) (Figure 2(F)). No type 1 fibres were found in either WT or MUT, indicating that the remaining fibres in both genotypes express predominantly 2x myosin heavy chain.
Proteins associated with structural integrity, force transfer, and injury
We next investigated levels of proteins important for skeletal muscle structure, force transfer, sarcolemma stability, and indicators of injury in MUT muscle compared with wild type littermates (WT). Multiple proteins appeared differentially regulated in MUT compared with WT rats. The MUT animals had 36‐fold lower desmin levels compared with WT (P < 0.01) (Figure 3A). To investigate potential compensatory effects in MUT animals, we chose to examine proteins known to interact with desmin or to be otherwise involved in the structural integrity of skeletal muscle. Desmuslin (synemin), known to interact with desmin and the dystrophin‐glycoprotein complex, did not differ between WT and MUT animals (Figure 3B). However, dystrophin levels were increased by 54% in MUT compared with WT animals (P < 0.05; Figure 3C). While β‐dystroglycan levels did not differ between WT or MUT animals (Figure 3D), sarcospan showed a 45% increase in MUT animals compared with WT animals (P < 0.05; Figure 3E). Syntrophin levels were not different between WT and MUT animals (Figure 3F). We found a four‐fold increase in muscle LIM protein levels (CSRP3), a protein known to have a central role in architectural maintenance, in MUT animals compared with WT (P < 0.001; Figure 3G). Dysferlin, which has been shown to be indispensable in membrane repair and fusion of repair vesicles to the plasma membrane, was increased by two‐fold in MUT compared with WT animals (P < 0.05; Figure 3H). Annexin A2, which interacts with dysferlin during membrane repair, was also increased in MUT compared with WT animals (P < 0.05; Figure 3I).
Overload‐induced injury, muscle growth, and force production
To investigate how MUT muscle would respond to a loading challenge, we performed synergist ablation surgery. The gastrocnemius and soleus muscles were removed from the right leg, while the left leg served as an internal control. Synergist ablation is commonly associated with rapid changes in muscle mass and fibre cross‐sectional area. 42 Indeed, both WT and MUT plantaris muscles responded with stark increases in muscle mass (Figure 4A). Plantaris weight increased from 484 ± 48 mg to 767 ± 102 mg in WT animals while it increased from 481 ± 48 mg to 714 ± 82 mg in MUT animals (Figure 4A). This is equivalent to a 59% increase in muscle mass in WT rats compared with a 48% in MUT rats. We measured maximal force of the overloaded plantaris of WT animals (5103 ± 2667 nm), which was 26% higher than in overloaded MUT animals (4060 ± 1615 nm) albeit not statistically significantly different based on high variability (Figure 4B). In order to investigate desmin MUT on the fibre level, we employed H&E staining (Figure 4C) and immunohistochemistry with subsequent quantification of fibre size and distribution, revealing pronounced differences in the ability of MUT fibres to adapt to synergist ablation compared with WT. We found a clear and evenly distributed right shift in fibre CSA in WT animals with overload, the median fibre area shifting from 2750 to 3750 μm2 (Figure 4D). In addition, there was a distinct increase in very small fibres ~500 μm2 in WT animals, potentially indicating new fibres, fibre splitting, or fibre death. In contrast, MUT animals show a less evenly distributed curve under control conditions with the highest frequency of fibres occurring at 2000 μm2, which is slightly evened out through overload where the highest frequency of fibres in MUT now matches the baseline condition of healthy littermates at 2750 μm2 (Figure 4E). The increase in small fibres seen in WT with overload is substantially less pronounced after overload in MUT. These changes in fibre size distribution and ability to adapt to increased loading of skeletal muscle are confirmed by differences in the amplitude of change in minimum Feret's diameter and mean fibre cross sectional area between WT and MUT (Figure 4F and 4G). Two‐way ANOVA revealed an effect for genotype (P = 0.02) and overload (P = 0.002), as well as a trend towards an interaction between genotype and overload (P = 0.1) in respect to minimum Feret's diameter (Figure 4F). In WT, minimum Feret's diameter increased with overload (P < 0.01; Figure 4F). In contrast, the increase in Feret's diameter with overload in MUT was not statistically significant (Figure 4F). Similarly, two‐way ANOVA of mean fibre cross‐sectional area showed an effect for overload (P < 0.01) as well as a tendency for an effect for genotype (P = 0.054) and an interaction between overload and genotype (P = 0.059; Figure 4G). Post hoc analysis showed a significant change in mean fibre cross‐sectional area in WT (P < 0.01), but not MUT (Figure 4G).
Discussion
To our knowledge, we have created the first CRISPR‐Cas9‐engineered rat to mimic a human muscle disease. This model mimics early desminopathic changes and might be a good model to investigate interventions to decrease the impact of this devastating disease.
We successfully replicated the exact two‐point mutation in the rat desmin gene, originally identified in a family of patients, using a precision dynamic nuclear polarization knock‐in by single stranded DNA assisted HDR. The result was that a whole body Des c.1047 (AGG > CCG) mutation in exon 6 was produced via CRISPR‐Cas9. Both electroporation and microinjection are capable of producing viable HDR offspring following embryo transfer and HDR founders were capable of passing the same 2‐point mutation to their offspring and establish a line of HDR knock‐in rats.
With a mean age of the onset of the first neuromuscular symptoms of 35 years, patients suffering from a mutation in desmin often present fairly late in life compared to other inheritable neuromuscular diseases. 3 When patients first present, they already suffer from a clinically manifest myopathy. As there is currently no treatment available, damage to the muscle is irreversible, and therapy is usually focused on controlling the symptoms. Therefore, having an animal model that allows researchers to identify early signs of the disease and the underlying biological changes driving the progression of the disease is particularly important to pave the way for interventions that slow or treat the disorder. While there are a number of murine models of desmin mutations available, 20 , 33 , 34 no rat model for desminopathy had been developed. Because rat muscle is an order of magnitude bigger and better mimics the physiology of human muscle, 37 we felt that a rat model would provide more tissue and better insight into the disease.
In order to be able to investigate early biological changes that precede the strong phenotype at later stages, we chose adult animals between 120 and 150 days of age. This age corresponds to an age in humans of approximately 15–25 years, where most patients with a DES R350P mutation have yet to develop severe clinical symptoms. 43 As in humans, at this age body, heart, and muscle weights were not statistically different. This supports our hypothesis that the age of the animals corresponds to a pre‐clinical stage. In spite of this being a pre‐clinical time point, we found macroscopic, phenotypic, and physiologic differences between MUT and WT animals.
Desmin is an intermediate filament that interacts with microfilaments, other intermediate filaments and microtubules to maintain the structural integrity of the cytoskeleton in cardiac, skeletal, and smooth muscle. 17 , 44 Together with syncoilin, it is thought to link the intermediate filaments with the dystrophin‐associated protein complex. 45 Thus, desmin is not only the main protein responsible for linking adjacent myofibrils to each other but also impacts the connection between the cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix. Desminopathies are clinically defined as a myofibrillar myopathy characterized by desmin positive protein aggregates and degenerative changes to contractile fibres. 1 , 46 These pathological aggregates have been implied to be directly involved in muscle cell degeneration and impaired degradation, potentially via increased oxidative damage. 46 , 47 Histochemistry and immunohistochemistry of MUT rats confirmed that these degenerative changes occur before onset of clinical symptoms. Concomitant with aggregate formation, there was an increased number of central nuclei in MUT compared with WT, indicating that an increased number of fibres were undergoing pathological changes. Indeed, central nuclei are a common feature observed in many desminopathies and several other types of myopathies and are thought to be a sign of ongoing myofiber repair. 48 , 49 , 50 In addition to those classic symptoms of desminopathy, we found a left shift towards a higher number of small fibres in MUT compared with WT indicating difficulty to grow to or maintain regular muscle fibre size. In line with this observation, we found a tendency towards more type 2a and 2b fibres and fewer type 2x fibres in MUT compared with WT. Because type 2x fibres together with type 2b fibre are commonly among the larger fibres in rat skeletal muscle and we found a slightly higher number of total fibres in MUT (data not shown), this could explain the fact that the left shift towards smaller fibres was not reflected in decreased muscle weight.
Even though desmin is known to be a major structural protein in skeletal muscle and heart, relatively little is known on the effects of mutated desmin on other structural proteins. We investigated several proteins associated with force transmission, structural integrity, and injury of skeletal muscle. Desmin protein levels were 36‐fold lower in MUT animals than in WT. This is in line with data from Des R349P knock‐in mice, which showed that homozygous animals have almost no desmin when probed for with a regular desmin antibody detecting R349, while they have a distinct band for mutated desmin (P349). 20 We found that with this decrease in functional desmin protein, many other major structural protein levels were increased. Dystrophin levels were 54% higher in MUT than in WT animals. The primary role of dystrophin in skeletal muscle is to link the intracellular cytoskeleton to the extracellular matrix through a complex of transmembrane proteins called the dystrophin‐associated protein complex. 51 , 52 Desmin is thought to interact with this complex via α‐dystrobrevin and syncoilin, the latter that has been proposed to attach desmin to the complex at the sarcolemma to help organize myofibril structure. 45 The fact that dystrophin levels are increased in MUT animals may hint at a compensatory effect to balance the lack of functional desmin in an effort to maintain myofibril alignment and attachment. Further indicative of the struggle of MUT skeletal muscle to maintain structural integrity are elevated levels of proteins associated with muscle membrane injury and repair. Dysferlin levels were increased two‐fold in MUT compared with WT. Dysferlin is involved in wound healing of membranous microlesions in a calcium‐dependent manner and mutations in dysferlin cause limb girdle muscular dystrophy 2B. 53 , 54 In skeletal muscle with functional dysferlin, injury causes an increase in dysferlin protein levels similar to what we see in MUT rats. 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 Annexin A2 works in concert with dysferlin to sense membrane damage and facilitate repair. 57 Annexin A2 levels were similarly increased (32%) in MUT compared with WT animals. Finally, we found a four‐fold increase in muscle LIM protein in MUT compared with WT animals. Muscle LIM protein is a cytoskeleton associated protein that has been implicated in a variety of functions in the contractile apparatus such as myofibril organization and mechanical stress sensing. 58 , 59 , 60 Similar to desmin, muscle LIM protein appears to interact with proteins around the z‐disk such as α‐actinin and has been suggested to be involved in the regulation of desmin expression in response to stretch. 61 , 62 , 63 Overall, these data support the histological findings of structural instability and an increased susceptibility to injury.
To determine the capacity of MUT skeletal muscle to cope with stress, we employed the synergist ablation model to overload the plantaris muscle. Following 14 days of overload, macroscopic changes such as muscle mass did not differ between MUT and WT animals as both increased the weight of the plantaris muscle to a similar extent. However, maximal force output was 26% lower in the overloaded plantaris of MUT animals compared with WT, and this effect was concomitant with impaired muscle fibre hypertrophy. WT animals showed a right shift in muscle fibre distribution and a 23% increase in mean fibre area, whereas the MUT mean fibre area increased only 6%. This indicates that the MUT muscle fibres are not able hypertrophy to the same degree as WT muscle. Interestingly, WT animals also showed a small but pronounced increase in fibres with a very small cross‐sectional area that is absent in overloaded MUT muscle. Together, these data indicate that MUT muscles have a decreased ability to grow and are unable to split or generate new smaller fibres in response to a supra‐physiological load. The fact that the MUT rats were still able to increase muscle weight to a similar extent despite only mild hypertrophy and the absence of hyperplasia may point towards other coping mechanisms with loading, such as changes in connective tissue or muscle length. 64 For patients affected by an orthologous mutation, these data in conjunction with the results from above indicate that while an increase in muscle mass and cross‐sectional area is possible when loading desminopathic muscle, caution should be used when therapists make decisions on the degree of loading. While still potentially useful in the prevention or slowing of muscle atrophy, the decreased ability to cope with very high loads and a higher susceptibility to muscle damage warrants a particularly careful approach to resistance exercise in these patients. This is similar to what has been seen in retrospective cohort studies of patients affected by dysferlinopathy, where vigorous physical activity and exercise during a young age could be associated with an earlier onset of symptoms with aging. 65 Strategies known to cause hypertrophy and improved strength in the absence of high external loads (such as blood flow restriction training) could be an interesting consideration in this scenario, but more human data are needed to confirm such hypotheses.
In conclusion, we created a new animal model of desminopathy that is orthologous to the human mutation DES R350P. While models for this mutation are available in mice, we engineered the first CRISPR‐Cas9 rat model for the disease in an attempt to improve the biological resemblance of the human phenotype. As in the human disease, young individuals (120–150 days equivalent to 15–25 years old) show no overt muscle phenotype at an age corresponding to a pre‐clinical stage in human patients. Even though no overt phenotype was observed, microscopic evidence, characterized by regenerating fibres and protein aggregates, were already present in MUT rats. On a molecular level, desmin mutants showed an array of differentially regulated proteins that are associated with the structural integrity as well as injury of muscle fibres. Most of the levels of these proteins were increased in desmin mutant animals, likely as a compensatory response to dysfunctional intermediate filament alignment as a result of mutant desmin. Finally, a load challenge exacerbated the histological phenotype in the MUT animals resulting in impaired muscle fibre growth.
There is a wealth of intriguing avenues for future analysis of this animal model, most importantly concerning respiratory and cardiac muscle. As cardiac myopathies are a frequent cause of death in humans with a R350P mutation in desmin, investigating the heart will be pivotal to our understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease and attempts to improve life expectancy. In addition, future studies are necessary to elucidate metabolic complications induced by possible mitochondrial alterations in our model. We would be delighted to share this new model with other laboratories in an effort to find therapeutic solutions to ameliorate or delay the onset of symptoms associated with desminopathy.
Author Contributions
H.T.L., A.A.M., H.Z.F., and K.B. conceived the study design. H.T.L., A.A.M., B.J.W., K.N.G., J.A.W., K.C.K.L., H.Z.F., and K.B. performed the experiments, H.T.L., A.A.M., H.Z.F., and K.B. analysed and interpreted results. All authors wrote, revised, and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The current study was funded by a generous gift from the Bertin‐Barbe Family to H.Z.F., and K.B. H.T.L., A.A.M., B.J.W., K.N.G., J.A.W., K.C.K.L., and H.Z.F. declare that they have no conflict of interest. K.B. is paid by professional sports and Olympic teams to consult on tendon/performance issues and has received grants, honoraria, and travel support from PepsiCo for nutrition research.
Ethics Declarations
The authors of this manuscript certify that they comply with the ethical guidelines for authorship and publishing in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle. 66
Acknowledgements
The research was made possible by a generous gift from the Bertin‐Barbe Family. The work was further supported by the National Institute of Aging through project grants (R01AG056999 and R01AG45375). A.A.M. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. We would like to thank Diana L. Young, Nichole L. Anchell, Kayla M. Jager, Phuong T. Dao, and the other technical staff at the UC Davis Mouse Biology Program for their work in generating this rat model. We would like to thank Dr Lucas Smith for his SMASH software and use of his microscope.
Langer H. T., Mossakowski A. A., Willis B. J., Grimsrud K. N., Wood J. A., Lloyd K. C. K., Zbinden‐Foncea H., and Baar K. (2020) Generation of desminopathy in rats using CRISPR‐Cas9, Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 11, 1364–1376, 10.1002/jcsm.12619.
Henning T. Langer and Agata A. Mossakowski contributed equally to the work.
References
- 1. Clemen CS, Herrmann H, Strelkov SV, Schroder R. Desminopathies: pathology and mechanisms. Acta Neuropathol 2013;125:47–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Goldfarb LG, Olive M, Vicart P, Goebel HH. Intermediate filament diseases: desminopathy. Adv Exp Med Biol 2008;642:131–164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. van Spaendonck‐Zwarts KY, van Hessem L, Jongbloed JD, de Walle HE, Capetanaki Y, van der Kooi AJ, et al. Desmin‐related myopathy. Clin Genet 2011;80:354–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Pinol‐Ripoll G, Shatunov A, Cabello A, Larrode P, de la Puerta I, Pelegrin J, et al. Severe infantile‐onset cardiomyopathy associated with a homozygous deletion in desmin. Neurom disorders: NMD 2009;19:418–422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Palmio J, Penttila S, Huovinen S, Haapasalo H, Udd B. An unusual phenotype of late‐onset desminopathy. Neurom disorders: NMD 2013;23:922–923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Munoz‐Marmol AM, Strasser G, Isamat M, Coulombe PA, Yang Y, Roca X, et al. A dysfunctional desmin mutation in a patient with severe generalized myopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:11312–11317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bar H, Fischer D, Goudeau B, Kley RA, Clemen CS, Vicart P, et al. Pathogenic effects of a novel heterozygous R350P desmin mutation on the assembly of desmin intermediate filaments in vivo and in vitro. Hum Mol Genet 2005;14:1251–1260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Walter MC, Reilich P, Huebner A, Fischer D, Schroder R, Vorgerd M, et al. Scapuloperoneal syndrome type Kaeser and a wide phenotypic spectrum of adult‐onset, dominant myopathies are associated with the desmin mutation R350P. Brain 2007;130:1485–1496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Clemen CS, Fischer D, Reimann J, Eichinger L, Muller CR, Muller HD, et al. How much mutant protein is needed to cause a protein aggregate myopathy in vivo? Less an excepl desmi Hum Mutat 2009;30:E490–E499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Dagvadorj A, Goudeau B, Hilton‐Jones D, Blancato JK, Shatunov A, Simon‐Casteras M, et al. Respiratory insufficiency in desminopathy patients caused by introduction of proline residues in desmin c‐terminal alpha‐helical segment. Muscle Nerve 2003;27:669–675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Taylor MR, Slavov D, Ku L, di Lenarda A, Sinagra G, Carniel E, et al. Prevalence of desmin mutations in dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2007;115:1244–1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Lorenzon A, Beffagna G, Bauce B, de Bortoli M, Li Mura IE, Calore M, et al. Desmin mutations and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2013;111:400–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Arbustini E, Pasotti M, Pilotto A, Pellegrini C, Grasso M, Previtali S, et al. Desmin accumulation restrictive cardiomyopathy and atrioventricular block associated with desmin gene defects. Eur J Heart Fail 2006;8:477–483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Li D, Tapscoft T, Gonzalez O, Burch PE, Quinones MA, Zoghbi WA, et al. Desmin mutation responsible for idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1999;100:461–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kostera‐Pruszczyk A, Pruszczyk P, Kamińska A, Lee H‐S, Goldfarb LG. Diversity of cardiomyopathy phenotypes caused by mutations in desmin. Int J Cardiol 2008;131:146–147. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Lazarides E. Intermediate filaments as mechanical integrators of cellular space. Nature 1980;283:249–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Lazarides E, Hubbard BD. Immunological characterization of the subunit of the 100 A filaments from muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1976;73:4344–4348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Capetanaki Y. Desmin cytoskeleton: a potential regulator of muscle mitochondrial behavior and function. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2002;12:339–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Bar H, Strelkov SV, Sjoberg G, Aebi U, Herrmann H. The biology of desmin filaments: how do mutations affect their structure, assembly, and organisation? J Struct Biol 2004;148:137–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Clemen CS, Stockigt F, Strucksberg KH, Chevessier F, Winter L, Schutz J, et al. The toxic effect of R350P mutant desmin in striated muscle of man and mouse. Acta Neuropathol 2015;129:297–315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Cabet E, Batonnet‐Pichon S, Delort F, Gausseres B, Vicart P, Lilienbaum A. Antioxidant treatment and induction of autophagy cooperate to reduce desmin aggregation in a cellular model of desminopathy. PLoS ONE 2015;10:e0137009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Goebel HH, Bornemann A. Desmin pathology in neuromuscular diseases. Virchows Archiv B Cell pathology incl mole path 1993;64:127–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Fidzianska A, Ryniewicz B, Barcikowska M, Goebel HH. A new familial congenital myopathy in children with desmin and dystrophin reacting plaques. J Neurol Sci 1995;131:88–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Goebel HH, Blaschek A. Protein aggregation in congenital myopathies. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2011;18:272–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Bastian A, Goebel HH. Protein aggregation in inclusion body myositis, a sporadic form among protein aggregate myopathies, and in myofibrillar myopathies—a comparative study. Romanian j internal med = Revue roumaine de med inte 2010;48:377–384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Vrabie A, Goldfarb LG, Shatunov A, Nagele A, Fritz P, Kaczmarek I, et al. The enlarging spectrum of desminopathies: new morphological findings, eastward geographic spread, novel exon 3 desmin mutation. Acta Neuropathol 2005;109:411–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Goebel HH, Voit T, Warlo I, Jacobs K, Johannsen U, Muller CR. Immunohistologic and electron microscopic abnormalities of desmin and dystrophin in familial cardiomyopathy and myopathy. Rev Neurol 1994;150:452–459. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Milner DJ, Mavroidis M, Weisleder N, Capetanaki Y. Desmin cytoskeleton linked to muscle mitochondrial distribution and respiratory function. J Cell Biol 2000;150:1283–1298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Li M, Andersson‐Lendahl M, Sejersen T, Arner A. Knockdown of desmin in zebrafish larvae affects interfilament spacing and mechanical properties of skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol 2013;141:335–345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Capetanaki Y, Milner DJ, Weitzer G. Desmin in muscle formation and maintenance: knockouts and consequences. Cell Struct Funct 1997;22:103–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Agbulut O, Li Z, Mouly V, Butler‐Browne GS. Analysis of skeletal and cardiac muscle from desmin knock‐out and normal mice by high resolution separation of myosin heavy‐chain isoforms. Biol Cell 1996;88:131–135. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Li Z, Mericskay M, Agbulut O, Butler‐Browne G, Carlsson L, Thornell LE, et al. Desmin is essential for the tensile strength and integrity of myofibrils but not for myogenic commitment, differentiation, and fusion of skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol 1997;139:129–144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Raats JM, Schaart G, Henderik JB, van der Kemp A, Dunia I, Benedetti EL, et al. Muscle‐specific expression of a dominant negative desmin mutant in transgenic mice. Eur J Cell Biol 1996;71:221–236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Kostareva A, Sjoberg G, Bruton J, Zhang SJ, Balogh J, Gudkova A, et al. Mice expressing L345P mutant desmin exhibit morphological and functional changes of skeletal and cardiac mitochondria. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 2008;29:25–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Diermeier S, Iberl J, Vetter K, Haug M, Pollmann C, Reischl B, et al. Early signs of architectural and biomechanical failure in isolated myofibers and immortalized myoblasts from desmin‐mutant knock‐in mice. Sci Rep 2017;7:1391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Joanne P, Chourbagi O, Hourdé C, Ferry A, Butler‐Browne G, Vicart P, et al. Viral‐mediated expression of desmin mutants to create mouse models of myofibrillar myopathy. Skeletal muscle 2013;3:4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Gibbs R, Weinstock G, Metzker M, Muzny D, Sodergren E, Scherer S, et al. Genome sequencing of the Brown Norway Rat yields insights into mammalian evolution. Nature 2004;428:493–521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Labun K, Montague TG, Krause M, Torres Cleuren YN, Tjeldnes H, Valen E. CHOPCHOP v3: expanding the CRISPR web toolbox beyond genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res 2019;47:W171–W174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Richardson CD, Ray GJ, DeWitt MA, Curie GL, Corn JE. Enhancing homology‐directed genome editing by catalytically active and inactive CRISPR‐Cas9 using asymmetric donor DNA. Nat Biotechnol 2016;34:339–344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Modzelewski AJ, Chen S, Willis BJ, Lloyd KK, Wood JA, He L. Efficient mouse genome engineering by CRISPR‐EZ technology. Nat Protoc 2018;13:1253–1274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Ohlendieck K, Campbell KP. Dystrophin‐associated proteins are greatly reduced in skeletal muscle from mdx mice. J Cell Biol 1991;115:1685–1694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Timson BF. Evaluation of animal models for the study of exercise‐induced muscle enlargement. J Appl Physiol 1990;69:1935–1945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Sengupta P. The laboratory rat: relating its age with human's. Int J Prev Med 2013;4:624. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Milner DJ, Weitzer G, Tran D, Bradley A, Capetanaki Y. Disruption of muscle architecture and myocardial degeneration in mice lacking desmin. J Cell Biol 1996;134:1255–1270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Poon E, Howman EV, Newey SE, Davies KE. Association of syncoilin and desmin: linking intermediate filament proteins to the dystrophin‐associated protein complex. J Biol Chem 2002;277:3433–3439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Goldfarb LG, Vicart P, Goebel HH, Dalakas MC. Desmin myopathy. Brain 2004;127:723–734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Janue A, Olive M, Ferrer I. Oxidative stress in desminopathies and myotilinopathies: a link between oxidative damage and abnormal protein aggregation. Brain patho (Zurich, Switzerland) 2007;17:377–388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Engel WK, Gold GN, Karpati G. Type I fiber hypotrophy and central nuclei: a rare congenital muscle abnormality with a possible experimental model. Arch Neurol 1968;18:435–444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Mazzotti AL, Coletti D. The need for a consensus on the locution "central nuclei" in striated muscle myopathies. Front Physiol 2016;7:577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Schmalbruch H. The morphology of regeneration of skeletal muscles in the rat. Tissue Cell 1976;8:673–692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Gao QQ, McNally EM. The dystrophin complex: structure, function, and implications for therapy. Compr Physiol 2015;5:1223–1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Ervasti JM. Dystrophin, its interactions with other proteins, and implications for muscular dystrophy. Biochim Biophys Acta 2007;1772:108–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Han R, Campbell KP. Dysferlin and muscle membrane repair. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2007;19:409–416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Bansal D, Miyake K, Vogel SS, Groh S, Chen C‐C, Williamson R, et al. Defective membrane repair in dysferlin‐deficient muscular dystrophy. Nature 2003;423:168–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Lek A, Evesson FJ, Lemckert FA, Redpath GM, Lueders AK, Turnbull L, et al. Calpains, cleaved mini‐dysferlinC72, and L‐type channels underpin calcium‐dependent muscle membrane repair. J neurosc: official j Society for Neurosci 2013;33:5085–5094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Defour A, van der Meulen JH, Bhat R, Bigot A, Bashir R, Nagaraju K, et al. Dysferlin regulates cell membrane repair by facilitating injury‐triggered acid sphingomyelinase secretion. Cell Death Dis 2014;5:e1306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Defour A, Medikayala S, van der Meulen JH, Hogarth MW, Holdreith N, Malatras A, et al. Annexin A2 links poor myofiber repair with inflammation and adipogenic replacement of the injured muscle. Hum Mol Genet 2017;26:1979–1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Vafiadaki E, Arvanitis DA, Sanoudou D. Muscle LIM protein: master regulator of cardiac and skeletal muscle functions. Gene 2015;566:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Rashid MM, Runci A, Polletta L, Carnevale I, Morgante E, Foglio E, et al. Muscle LIM protein/CSRP3: a mechanosensor with a role in autophagy. Cell Death Dis 2015;1:15014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Paudyal A, Dewan S, Ikie C, Whalley BJ, de Tombe PP, Boateng SY. Nuclear accumulation of myocyte muscle LIM protein is regulated by heme oxygenase 1 and correlates with cardiac function in the transition to failure. J Physiol 2016;594:3287–3305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Knoll R, Hoshijima M, Hoffman HM, Person V, Lorenzen‐Schmidt I, Bang ML, et al. The cardiac mechanical stretch sensor machinery involves a Z disc complex that is defective in a subset of human dilated cardiomyopathy. Cell 2002;111:943–955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Kadrmas JL, Beckerle MC. The LIM domain: from the cytoskeleton to the nucleus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004;5:920–931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Louis HA, Pino JD, Schmeichel KL, Pomies P, Beckerle MC. Comparison of three members of the cysteine‐rich protein family reveals functional conservation and divergent patterns of gene expression. J Biol Chem 1997;272:27484–27491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Jorgenson KW, Hornberger TA. The overlooked role of fiber length in mechanical load‐induced growth of skeletal muscle. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2019;47:258–259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Moore UR, Jacobs M, Fernandez‐Torron R, Jang J, James MK, Mayhew A, et al. Teenage exercise is associated with earlier symptom onset in dysferlinopathy. a retrospec cohort study 2018;89:1224–1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. von Haehling S, Morley JE, Coats AJS, Anker SD. Ethical guidelines for publishing in the journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle: update 2019. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2019;10:1143–1145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]