Abstract
Mental disorders (MD) are one of the main causes of the disease burden worldwide. Associations between socioeconomic status (SES) and presence of MD in parents have been related with increased odds of MD in offspring. However, there is a lack of population-based research in this field. The aim of the present study was to examine together the relationship between the presence of MD in children, and the SES and presence of MD in their parents, in a whole of population data. A gender approach was undertaken aiming to discern how these variables influence children’s mental health when related with the father and the mother. Using administrative individual data from the National Health System, a retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted. The entire children population aged 6 to 15 resident in Catalonia in 2017 was examined. A logistic regression model was performed. Low SES was associated with increased odds of children’s MD. Offspring of a parent with MD were at more risk of presenting MD than offspring of parents without these problems. Although these associations were consistent for both boys and girls when looking at the father’s or mother’s SES and MDs, the mother’s SES and MDs showed a higher association with the offspring’s MDs than the father’s. Lowest associations, found for boys when looking at the father’s SES and MDs, were: OR of 1.21, 95%CI 1.16 to 1.27 for lowest SES, and OR of 1.66, 95%CI 1.61 to 1.70 for parental MDs. Children’s familiar environment, which includes SES and mental health of parents, plays an important role in their mental health. Socially constructed gender roles interfere with SES and parent’s MD. These findings support the relevance of examining MD and its risk factors within a gender approach.
Introduction
Mental health is an essential component of health [1], and mental disorders (MD) are one of the main causes of the disease burden worldwide [2]. In the case of children, poor mental health also impacts negatively the capacities and opportunities they will have in their adult life [3].
Worldwide, it is estimated that approximately 10–20% of children and adolescents have mental health problems [4]. The disorders they suffer the most are those of an emotional and mood type and those of behaviour or hyperactivity [5]. These problems in children and adolescents are associated with difficulties in emotional and intellectual development [6] and thus, becoming problematic in adulthood. First onset of MD usually occurs in childhood or adolescence [7] and it is known that half of all MD in adulthood have already started by the age of 14 [8].
Developmental psychopathology includes consideration of sex differences and, especially, differences in the socialization of males and females. Both symptomatology and behaviour patterns predictive of later MD differ for males and females [9], placing gender as a critical determinant of mental health. Although there do not appear to be gender differences in the overall prevalence of MD [10], significant differences in the patterns and symptoms of the MD have been reported: women and girls show higher rates and lifetime risk of mood or internalizing disorders, while men and boys have a higher prevalence of behavioural or externalizing disorders [5, 11–13].
This general pattern can be seen throughout all life stages, but some differences across age groups have also been reported. Studies find that in childhood, there is a higher prevalence of conduct disorders among boys than among girls. During adolescence, girls have a much higher prevalence of depression and eating disorders than boys, while boys present more anger problems and high-risk behaviours. The median age of onset has been found much earlier for anxiety disorders and impulse-control disorders than for substance use disorders and mood disorders [7, 14]. There have also been found gender differences in the age of onset of severe MD such as schizophrenia and bipolar depression, with men typically having an earlier onset of schizophrenia, while women being more likely to exhibit serious forms of bipolar depression [10].
There is evidence for genetic susceptibility underlying the development of MD, but it has also been found that adverse environmental exposures also play an important role [15–17]. Epigenetic mechanisms have been suggested by recent research as possible pathways through which the environment interacts with genes and produces biological responses that seem to have a role in the onset and maintaining of psychopathology [18–24]. These gene-environment interactions indicate that genetic influences on the risk of children’s psychopathology are moderated by environmental factors. Although the environment affects us throughout life, its effects are especially important during the sensitive periods of biological and brain development, which begin in the prenatal period and continue through childhood and adolescence [25].
During childhood and until the conclusion of adolescence, important biological, psychological and emotional changes occur in human beings. During this stage, the key dimensions of health are developed: the physical, cognitive and psychosocial dimensions [26]. While there is no uniformity in the terminology used to designate the stages of childhood nor the age ranges [27–29], it is well established that development throughout the different periods of childhood influence mental health outcomes across the lifespan: the prenatal period and early childhood -approximate age range: until 5 years of age- [30], middle childhood -approximate age range: 5 to 12 or so years of age- [31, 32] and also adolescence—approximate age range: 12 or so to 20 years of age, divided in early (11–14), middle (14–17) and late adolescence (17 and up)- [33–36]. During these life stages there is a greater vulnerability to the characteristics of the environment [30, 37–39] due to the high malleability of biological systems [40].
Children are strongly influenced by their environments, especially by their family unit. At this stage in life, the family is the main influence on the child's development, and the most influential characteristics of the family environment are its economic and social resources, including family members’ health, especially early in this period [30] but also in late childhood and adolescence [41, 42]. Different theories in developmental psychology conceive the interaction between the caregiver and the child as crucial to psychological outcomes. Following such theories, the risk of MD in children can be seen as a result of complex interactions across multiple levels of analysis from a child’s genetic predispositions to environmental exposures such as their family conditions [41, 43].
There has been consistent evidence to demonstrate that parental MD affects almost every aspect of child development [44] and negatively affects the mental and emotional health of children [6]. Children of parents with MD present a greater risk of psychological problems [45–48]. Previous research indicates that for mothers, the association between parental and child psychopathology is specific, whereas for fathers it is non-specific: mothers’ internalizing problems have been associated to child internalizing problems and the same applied for externalizing problems [49]. Furthermore, existing research, albeit limited, suggests that maternal intergenerational transmission of MD is particularly strong [49–54].
In addition, in situations of economic difficulty, there is a higher prevalence of MD in both children and adults [55, 56] and parents with mental health problems are at greater risk of socioeconomic disadvantage [44]. Adversity during childhood, including the presence of parental MD and economic difficulties, is associated with greater MD both in childhood and adulthood [57–60].
Since having a low socioeconomic status (SES) is a risk factor for suffering MD, children who grow up in deprived family environments are affected by both, the low SES and the greater likelihood that their parents will be suffering from MD. This places children on a disadvantaged situation, which will affect their present and future life trajectories, contributing to perpetuate inequalities.
Most of the previous studies that have examined the relationship between parental SES and mental disorders and children’s mental disorders, have used representative samples rather than the whole of population data. The aim of this study is to analyse, within a gender approach, the association between parent’s MD and SES and the prevalence of MD in their offspring using data from population registers of Catalonia. The specific objectives include the study of: 1) the association between parental MD and offspring’s MD; 2) the association between parental SES and offspring’s MD; and 3) the role played by the gender of both the parent and their offspring in these associations. We hypothesized that MD would be more prevalent in children with a parent with MD and with low SES. We also hypothesized that these associations would be higher in the case of maternal MD and low SES because socially constructed gender roles often place the woman as the principal caregiver. Finally, we hypothesized that there could be differences in the associations between parental characteristics and children's psychological outcome regarding the gender of the child.
Materials and methods
Ethics approval
This study adheres to the PADRIS Program. This Program is a data analytics program for health research and innovation of the Catalan healthcare administration. It has the mission of making available to the scientific community the related health data to promote research, innovation and evaluation in health through access to the reuse and crossing of health data generated by the comprehensive National Health System of Catalonia. It ensures the use of the data goes in accordance with the legal and regulatory framework, the ethical principles and transparency towards the citizens of the program. We have had access to the data as workers within the Catalan healthcare administration under the fulfilment of the established criteria to guarantee the respect to the ethical, security and risk analysis principles of the PADRIS Program, including the anonymization of all data made available to researchers. Thus, the study did not involve any data collection, requiring neither human participants nor patient consent. For that reason, and due to the use of existing anonymised data for research, the study was exempt from institutional review committee approval. It is the standard way of proceeding in the healthcare administration to reuse the data provided by the healthcare registers for scientific purposes and to systematically check health outcomes of our population in our context.
Study design and setting
A retrospective cross-sectional study with data from 2017 was conducted to examine the relationship between the presence of MD in children aged 6 to 15 resident in Catalonia, the presence of MD in one of their parents, and their SES.
Data was collected from three databases of the Catalan National Health System’s administrative registries.
The Central Registry of Insured Persons (RCA) provided the identification of CatSalut insurers, their sociodemographic characteristics, the linkage between children and their health cardholder (HCH) and an individual variable of SES, which corresponds to the health cardholder’s. Only a legal guardian of the children can legally be their HCH [61] which, in the vast majority of cases, will be a parent. Thus, from now on, the study will be referring to them as parents.
The Minimum Basic Data Set provided the records of all the contacts made by the target population with the public health care system for Primary Care, Hospitalization, Emergency and Mental Health Centers. Finally, the Pharmacy Billing Database provided information on the pharmaceutical dispensation of mental health drugs.
The RCA data was linked with the different registers of the Minimum Basic Data Set and the Pharmacy Billing Database by means of an anonymized individual code, obtained from the personal identification code.
Study population
According to the official population cut of the RCA from January 1, 2017, the insured population of Catalonia, which during that year was between 6 and 15 years old, comprised 1,048,576 children.
There are several reasons for not including children less than six. First, there has been controversy about the validity of diagnosis of MD in very young children aged 2 to 5 years [5]. Second, children until six are visited for MD in centers outside the Catalan NHS (CDIAP), managed by the social services.
Some exclusion criteria were applied to recruit the target population. Individuals who could not be assigned a reliable SES were excluded (less than 0,01%), containing individuals affected by the toxic syndrome and disabled LISMI. Individuals who could not be linked to a HCH were also excluded (10,8%). This exclusion criterion comprised minors not classified as beneficiaries of any HCH, minors classified as beneficiaries but who did not provide the HCH’s identifier, and minors guarded by the administration.
After the exclusion criteria, the final population included 934,948 children. However, missing data represented 1.03% of the target population (N = 9.669), due to the absence of information regarding nationality of the parent. These children were removed from the final sample, which included 925,279 children (Fig 1).
Measures
The primary outcome was the presence of MD in children, which was constructed by crossing the different records of (1) use of health care services and (2) consumption of psychotropic drugs. The original variables were all dichotomous and indicated usage (yes or no). The use of the health care services was defined as follows: all the codes from the Clinical Classifications Software (CCS) considered within the large classification group number 5 of Mental Health of the ICD-9-CM (International Classification of Diseases- Clinical Modification) were taken into account. This group includes the following subgroups, with their respective codes: Psychosis (290–299); Neurotic disorders, personality disorders and other non-psychotic mental disorders (300–316); and Intellectual disabilities (317–319). All these variables regarding the use of public health care services and drug prescription, were summarized in a single dichotomous variable of presence or non-presence of MD, being the presence a usage in any of the original variables.
To address the role of gender, sex of both the children and their parents were treated as stratification variables. Age of the children was divided into two age groups with a 5-year interval in order to adjust for the different developmental stages: 6 to 10 and 11 to 15. Nationality of the parent was dichotomized into locals or foreigners. Age and nationality were treated as potential confounders.
The exposure variable of parent’s SES was extracted from the sections of income and employment and social situation displayed by the pharmaceutical co-payment [62]. This variable is grouped into four categories: disadvantaged population (grouping all people who received an economical subsidy and those exempt from payment); income of less than 18,000 € per year; between 18,000 and 100,000 € per year; and more than 100,000 € per year.
The exposure to MD in parents was constructed following the same principles as in children.
Statistical analysis
A descriptive analysis of the child population for all the variables of interest was carried out. The distribution of presenting MD in boys and girls according to age, parent’s nationality, parent’s SES, and whether or not their parents had MD, was examined.
The bivariate analysis explored the relationship between the independent variables and the outcome by means of the Chi-square test.
Finally, logistic regression models were constructed to assess the association between the different independent variables with the presence of MD in boys and girls. All the analysis was stratified by the sex of both, the descendant and the parent. The adjustment variables were age, nationality of the parent, SES of the parent and the presence of MD in the parent. Three sets of logistic regression models were fit to test the hypotheses. Model 1 assessed whether a lower SES increased the risk of MD in children. Model 2 assessed whether the risk for MD was greater among children whose parent had MD. In Model 3, both variables were included. All models were adjusted for potential confounders, including age and parent’s nationality.
Statistical software Stata 14.2 was used for all analysis.
Results
The study included 925,279 children who were between 6 and 15 during 2017, 476,304 boys (51.48%) and 448,975 girls (48.52%). The mean age of this population was 10.45 years old (SD = 3.14). Main characteristics of this population for the interest variables are described in Table 1.
Table 1. Characteristics of children by sex.
Boys (n(%)) | Girls (n(%)) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | ||
Father as health card holder | 240,261 (51.61) | 225,280 (48.39) | |||
Age | |||||
6–10 | 121,994 | 50.78 | 114,234 | 50.71 | |
11–15 | 118,267 | 49.22 | 111,046 | 49.29 | |
Father's nationality | |||||
Locals | 181,006 | 75.34 | 170,787 | 75.81 | |
Foreigners | 59,255 | 24.66 | 54,493 | 24.19 | |
Father's socioeconomic status | |||||
Disadvantaged population | 15,485 | 6.45 | 14,615 | 6.49 | |
Annual income <18.000 | 131,281 | 54.64 | 121,407 | 53.89 | |
Annual income 18.000–100.000 | 89,517 | 37.26 | 85,406 | 37.91 | |
Annual income >100.000 | 3,978 | 1.66 | 3,852 | 1.71 | |
Mental disorders in the father | |||||
No | 190,314 | 79.21 | 178,606 | 79.28 | |
Yes | 49,947 | 20.79 | 46,674 | 20.72 | |
Mental disorders | |||||
No | 209,663 | 87.26 | 205,114 | 91.05 | |
Yes | 30,598 | 12.74 | 20,166 | 8.95 | |
Mother as health card holder | 236,043 (51.34) | 223,695 (48.66) | |||
Age | |||||
6–10 | 120,362 | 50.99 | 112,961 | 50.50 | |
11–15 | 115,681 | 49.01 | 110,734 | 49.50 | |
Mother's nationality | |||||
Locals | 209,023 | 88.55 | 198,324 | 88.66 | |
Foreigners | 27,020 | 11.45 | 25,371 | 11.34 | |
Mother's socioeconomic status | |||||
Disadvantaged population | 11,129 | 4.71 | 10,544 | 4.71 | |
Annual income <18.000 | 135,768 | 57.52 | 129,190 | 57.75 | |
Annual income 18.000–100.000 | 87,277 | 36.98 | 82,225 | 36.76 | |
Annual income >100.000 | 1,869 | 0.79 | 1,736 | 0.78 | |
Mental disorders in the mother | |||||
No | 171,298 | 72.57 | 162,586 | 72.68 | |
Yes | 64,745 | 27.43 | 61,109 | 27.32 | |
Mental disorders | |||||
No | 203,947 | 86.40 | 202,653 | 90.59 | |
Yes | 32,096 | 13.60 | 21,042 | 9.41 |
Disadvantaged population: People who received an economical subsidy and those exempt from pharmaceutical co-payment.
MD were more common among boys (12,74% and 13,60% for those with the father as HCH and those with the mother as HCH, respectively) than girls (8,95% and 9,41% for those with the father as HCH and those with the mother as HCH, respectively). In contrast, there were more MD among mothers (27,38%) than fathers (20,75%).
As seen in Table 2, the prevalence of MD was slightly higher among the oldest group of age for girls (i.e. 10.24%, 95%CI 10.06–10.42 for girls with the mother as HCH) and the youngest group of age for boys with the father as HCH (13.08%, 95%CI 12.89–13.27). For boys with a mother as a HCH there were no differences between ages. Locals presented higher rates of MD than foreigners did. These findings support including both variables as potential confounders.
Table 2. Prevalence of mental disorders for the different independent variables among children by sex.
Boys (n(%)) | Girls (n(%)) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | 95%CI | p-value | n | % | 95%CI | p-value | ||
Father as health card holder | 30,598 (12.74) | 20,166 (8.95) | |||||||
Age | |||||||||
6–10 | 15,961 | 13.08 | 12.89 to 13.27 | <0.001 | 9,462 | 8.28 | 8.12 to 8.44 | <0.001 | |
11–15 | 14,637 | 12.38 | 12.19 to 12.57 | 10,704 | 9.64 | 9.47 to 9.81 | |||
Father's nationality | |||||||||
Locals | 24,973 | 13.80 | 13.64 to 13.96 | <0.001 | 16,663 | 9.76 | 9.62 to 9.90 | <0.001 | |
Foreigners | 5,625 | 9.49 | 9.26 to 9.73 | 3,503 | 6.43 | 6.22 to 6.64 | |||
Father's socioeconomic status | |||||||||
Disadvantaged population | 2,292 | 14.80 | 14.25 to 15.37 | <0.001 | 1,519 | 10.39 | 9.90 to 10.90 | <0.001 | |
Annual income <18.000 | 16,495 | 12.56 | 12.39 to 12.75 | 10,945 | 9.02 | 8.85 to 9.18 | |||
Annual income 18.000–100.000 | 11,534 | 12.88 | 12.67 to 13.11 | 7,524 | 8.81 | 8.62 to 9.00 | |||
Annual income >100.000 | 277 | 6.96 | 6.19 to 7.80 | 178 | 4.62 | 3.98 to 5.33 | |||
Mental disorders in the father | |||||||||
No | 21,594 | 11.35 | 11.20 to 11.49 | <0.001 | 13,957 | 7.81 | 7.69 to 7.94 | <0.001 | |
Yes | 9,004 | 18.03 | 17.69 to 18.37 | 6,209 | 13.30 | 13.00 to 13.61 | |||
Mother as health card holder | 32,096 (13.60) | 21,042 (9.41) | |||||||
Age | |||||||||
6–10 | 16,361 | 13.59 | 13.40 to 13.79 | 0.950 | 9,706 | 8.59 | 8.43 to 8.76 | <0.001 | |
11–15 | 15,735 | 13.60 | 13.40 to 13.80 | 11,336 | 10.24 | 10.06 to 10.42 | |||
Mother's nationality | |||||||||
Locals | 29,379 | 14.06 | 13.91 to 14.21 | <0.001 | 19,150 | 9.66 | 9.53 to 9.79 | <0.001 | |
Foreigners | 2,717 | 10.06 | 9.70 to 10.42 | 1,892 | 7.46 | 7.14 to 7.79 | |||
Mother's socioeconomic status | |||||||||
Disadvantaged population | 2,354 | 21.15 | 20.40 to 21.92 | <0.001 | 1,670 | 15.84 | 15.15 to 16.55 | <0.001 | |
Annual income <18.000 | 19,971 | 14.71 | 14.52 to 14.90 | 13,377 | 10.35 | 10.19 to 10.52 | |||
Annual income 18.000–100.000 | 9,654 | 11.06 | 10.85 to 11.27 | 5,926 | 7.21 | 7.03 to 7.39 | |||
Annual income >100.000 | 117 | 6.26 | 5.20 to 7.46 | 69 | 3.97 | 3.11 to 5.00 | |||
Mental disorders in the mother | |||||||||
No | 18,186 | 10.62 | 10.47 to 10.76 | <0.001 | 11,560 | 7.11 | 6.99 to 7.24 | <0.001 | |
Yes | 13,910 | 21.48 | 21.17 to 21.80 | 9,482 | 15.52 | 15.23 to 15.81 |
CI: Confidence Interval.
p-value from Chi-square test comparing the presence and absence of mental disorders in children.
Disadvantaged population: People who received an economical subsidy and those exempt from pharmaceutical co-payment.
SES showed the highest prevalence of MD in children from the lowest SES (up to 21.15%, 95%CI 20.40–21.92 for boys with the mother as HCH) and the lowest prevalence in the more privileged SES in all groups. As for the presence of MD in the parent, higher rates of MD among children were found when the parent had a MD himself (up to 21.48%, 95%CI 20.17–21.80 for boys with the mother as HCH).
Table 3 presents the results of crude and adjusted analyses stratified by sex of the children and of the parent. Boys aged between 6 and 10 were at more risk of presenting a MD than those of older ages. On the contrary, for girls, the highest risk was found in the oldest group (11 to 15). Having a foreigner parent was always a protective factor.
Table 3. Risk of mental disorders among children associated with the parental socioeconomic status and presence of mental disorders.
Boys (n(%)) | Girls (n(%)) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude odds ratio | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Crude odds ratio | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||||||||
ORc | 95%CI | ORa | 95%CI | ORa | 95%CI | ORa | 95%CI | ORc | 95%CI | ORa | 95%CI | ORa | 95%CI | ORa | 95%CI | |
Father as health card holder | 240,261 (51.61) | 225,280 (48.39) | ||||||||||||||
Age | ||||||||||||||||
6–10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
11–15 | 0.94 | 0.92 to 0.96** | 0.91 | 0.89 to 0.93** | 0.90 | 0.87 to 0.92** | 0.90 | 0.87 to 0.92** | 1.18 | 1.15 to 1.22** | 1.14 | 1.11 to 1.18** | 1.13 | 1.09 to 1.16** | 1.12 | 1.09 to 1.16** |
Father's nationality | ||||||||||||||||
Locals | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
Foreigners | 0.66 | 0.64 to 0.68** | 0.61 | 0.59 to 0.63** | 0.67 | 0.65 to 0.69** | 0.64 | 0.62 to 0.66** | 0.64 | 0.61 to 0.66** | 0.59 | 0.57 to 0.62** | 0.67 | 0.64 to 0.70** | 0.63 | 0.60 to 0.65** |
Father's socioeconomic status | ||||||||||||||||
Disadvantaged population | 1.21 | 1.15 to 1.27** | 1.27 | 1.21 to 1.33** | 1.21 | 1.16 to 1.27** | 1.17 | 1.11 to 1.24** | 1.24 | 1.17 to 1.31** | 1.17 | 1.11 to 1.24** | ||||
Annual income <18.000 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||
Annual income 18.000–100.000 | 1.03 | 1.00 to 1.06* | 0.91 | 0.88 to 0.93** | 0.93 | 0.90 to 0.95** | 0.98 | 0.95 to 1.01 | 0.86 | 0.83 to 0.88** | 0.88 | 0.85 to 0.91** | ||||
Annual income >100.000 | 0.52 | 0.46 to 0.59** | 0.47 | 0.42 to 0.54** | 0.52 | 0.46 to 0.59** | 0.49 | 0.42 to 0.57** | 0.44 | 0.37 to 0.51** | 0.48 | 0.41 to 0.55** | ||||
Mental disorders in the father | ||||||||||||||||
No | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||
Yes | 1.72 | 1.67 to 1.77** | 1.69 | 1.64 to 1.73** | 1.66 | 1.61 to 1.70** | 1.81 | 1.75 to 1.87** | 1.76 | 1.70 to 1.81** | 1.72 | 1.66 to 1.77** | ||||
Mother as health card holder | 236,043 (51.34) | 223,695 (48.66) | ||||||||||||||
Age | ||||||||||||||||
6–10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
11–15 | 1.00 | 0.98 to 1.02 | 1.00 | 0.98 to 1.02 | 0.96 | 0.93 to 0.98** | 0.97 | 0.94 to 0.99* | 1.21 | 1.18 to 1.25** | 1.22 | 1.19 to 1.26** | 1.16 | 1.13 to 1.20** | 1.18 | 1.15 to 1.22** |
Mother's nationality | ||||||||||||||||
Locals | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
Foreigners | 0.68 | 0.66 to 0.71** | 0.59 | 0.57 to 0.62** | 0.73 | 0.70 to 0.76** | 0.65 | 0.62 to 0.68** | 0.75 | 0.72 to 0.79** | 0.65 | 0.62 to 0.69** | 0.82 | 0.78 to 0.86** | 0.72 | 0.68 to 0.76** |
Mother's socioeconomic status | ||||||||||||||||
Disadvantaged population | 1.56 | 1.48 to 1.63** | 1.60 | 1.52 to 1.68** | 1.42 | 1.36 to 1.50** | 1.63 | 1.54 to 1.72** | 1.67 | 1.58 to 1.77** | 1.48 | 1.40 to 1.56** | ||||
Annual income <18.000 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||
Annual income 18.000–100.000 | 0.72 | 0.70 to 0.74** | 0.68 | 0.66 to 0.70** | 0.73 | 0.71 to 0.75** | 0.67 | 0.65 to 0.69** | 0.64 | 0.61 to 0.66** | 0.68 | 0.66 to 0.70** | ||||
Annual income >100.000 | 0.39 | 0.32 to 0.47** | 0.37 | 0.31 to 0.44** | 0.43 | 0.36 to 0.52** | 0.36 | 0.28 to 0.46** | 0.34 | 0.26 to 0.43** | 0.40 | 0.31 to 0.51** | ||||
Mental disorders in the mother | ||||||||||||||||
No | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||
Yes | 2.30 | 2.25 to 2.36** | 2.28 | 2.23 to 2.34** | 2.17 | 2.12 to 2.23** | 2.40 | 2.33 to 2.47** | 2.37 | 2.30 to 2.44** | 2.23 | 2.17 to 2.30** |
Model 1 adjusts for age, parent's nationality and socioeconomic status. Model 2 adjusts for age, parent's nationality and mental disorders in the parent. Model 3 adjusts for all of the variables.
ORc: Crude Odds Ratio; ORa: Adjusted Odds Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval.
** p-value < 0.001
* p-value < 0.05.
Disadvantaged population: People who received an economical subsidy and those exempt from pharmaceutical co-payment.
There was an association between the presence of MD in the parent and MD in the children. Also, between SES of the parent and MD in the children. These associations persisted after controlling for all variables. Both in boys and girls, the highest risks of MD were observed in those with a mother presenting MD (OR 2.17, 95%CI 2.12–2.23 and OR 2.23, 95%CI 2.17–2.30, respectively) compared with having a father with MD (OR 1.66, 95%CI 1.61–1.70 and OR 1.72, 95%CI 1.66–1.77, respectively).
A gradient of risk by SES was observed. In the most disadvantaged population, there was an elevated risk of suffering MD when compared with the subsequent more privileged SES. This higher risk was more accentuated when the low SES was the mother’s (OR 1.42, 95%CI 1.36–1.50 for boys; OR 1.48, 95%CI 1.40–1.56 for girls), than when it was the father’s (OR 1.21, 95%CI 1.16–1.27 for boys; OR 1.17, 95%CI 1.11–1.24 for girls).
Discussion
The results of this study support the hypothesis that the exposure of children to adverse life conditions related with having a parent with MD increases the odds of presenting MD themselves. This is consistent with the results found in previous research, as one of the most consistent and potent non-specific risk factor for the development of MD in children is a parental history of MD [5, 45]. The underlying mechanism that could explain how parental MD can increase the risk of the offspring’s MD is likely to be complex and multifactorial, including both genetic and environmental factors. Existing literature has evidenced the genetic heritability of some MD [63] but also the importance of gene-environment interactions in the intergenerational transmission of MD [15, 18]. The adverse environment for the children derived from the presence of MD in the parent can come from the intercorrelation between parental MD and its effect through parenting abilities, cognitions, behaviours, affect and the capacity for quality paternal interactions [64].
Furthermore, this study found that the intergenerational transmission of MD from mothers to offspring had a higher association than the one from fathers to offspring, as previous research suggested [50–53]. This fact could be related with both, social and biological factors. Parental education is determinant for the healthy development of children [6]. As socially constructed gender roles place the woman as the principal caregiver, they may be the main familiar educational influence of the children. Healthy mother-infant interactions are critical to the development of healthy children and the quality of maternal caregiving behaviour during infancy has been linked to risk for psychopathology [65]. Heritable genetic factors of some MD [66] and intrauterine exposures to MD [65] could be also playing a role in explaining some of these differences.
Although a greater role of the mental health of the mother has been supported by the existing literature, it is also true that typically, studies have focused on the mother’s mental health, neglecting the importance of the father’s mental health. However, research has shown that paternal MD are also associated with MD in their children [67]. Moreover, research has found evidence that a good paternal mental health may buffer the influence of a mother’s poorer mental health on a child’s behavioural and emotional problems [68].
When adjusting for all variables, the association between the different SES and the presence of MD is also consistent with previous research. Those lower on the socioeconomical hierarchy are more likely to have MD, maybe due to their greater exposure to stressful events throughout life: less favorable economic, social, and environmental conditions and less access to buffers and supports [69]. The mother’s SES having a more pronounced effect could be explained also by the fundamental importance of the primary caregiver in the early years. The mother’s educational level, highly related with the level of income [70], has been found greatly associated to the health of their children [71].
As for the other adjusting variables, older ages (11 years old and more) resulted a protective factor in boys but a risk factor for girls. This could be related with the different age of onset of the disorders they tend to suffer, as girls have greater rates of mood and anxiety disorders, and boys have greater rates of behaviour disorders [5], which have earlier onsets than mood disorders [72]. Previous studies have found that MD that have a marked male preponderance such as autism, developmental language disorders, attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity, and dyslexia, have an earlier onset than emotional disorders, such as depressive conditions and eating disorders, which show a marked female preponderance and an adolescent-onset [73]. Also, boys and girls may differentially experience interactions of environmental influences [74] such as the effects of the exposure to a parent with a MD on their predisposition to suffer MD. Their relationship with the parents may also vary across both genders and children’s age ranges, modulating the potential effect of parental psychopathology on children’s mental health [75].
While previous studies found the migration process to be a risk factor [76], in this study there were less odds of presenting MD when the parent was a foreigner. This could be related with the way MD are approached and the fact that foreigners show a lower use of health services than locals [77]. The “healthy migrant effect” could be also playing a role [78].
Limitations and strengths
This study has some limitations. First, having anonymized data, it cannot be known exactly if the HCH is a parent or not, although it is known from the operation of the registry that this will be the predominant case. However, even if they are not the direct parents of the child, the minors will always be in charge of the insured person, and thus, exercising the role of legal tutor. Hence, whereas the genetic factors will not be playing a role, the environmental factors hypothesized as contributors to the associations will also be applicable.
The presence of MD is approached by the use of the health care services, but it is not possible to determine the degree of need behind this use. Therefore, it can only approximate the real state of MD of the target population. However, it has been found that need is the most important predictor of the probability of using any of the health care services [79].
Also important to note, this study only considered the presence of MD in the parents during the same target year, not assessing the possible existence of MD of the parents during the whole life of the children.
The variable of SES is based on the pharmacy copay that each individual has according to his/her income tax declaration. Therefore, it measures individual income. However, in those cases where couples are taxed together, it will reflect the joint rental amount. In addition, the data in which this variable relies, does not allow a more detailed disaggregation of socioeconomic categories, which could be especially relevant in the 18.000–100.000 category.
The study relies on an exclusive analysis of data of public health services and there may be an influence of double coverage in the SES gradients. Thus, a loss of information due to the use of private services cannot be discarded. This potential bias will occur mainly in the group with the highest SES and could occur, to a lesser extent, in the second group with the highest SES.
In acknowledging these limitations, this study has also several strengths. First, most of the previous research that has analyzed inequalities in health uses aggregate data or data from population samples, which have limitations in terms of being truly population representative. The potentiality of this study is the analysis of individual data of the whole population of Catalonia of the targeted age and year. To our knowledge, this is the first study about this subject conducted with a sample of these characteristics that has linked children with their parents.
Also remarkable, the data in which this study is based comes from administrative records of the public health system and thus, implies no extra economic cost for the collection of data, as data from medical records are repurposed. Linked administrative databases offer a powerful resource for public health research [80, 81].
While one large limitation of administrative data is the frequent lack of individual-level SES information [80], this is not the case of this study: the pharmaceutical co-payment provides an individual measure, entailing a great strength.
Another strength is that parents and children can be linked through administrative data. In addition, the possibility of analyzing separately the potential role of the father or mother’s MD and SES, is a meaningful strength. Moreover, most of the previous research determining that worse mental health of the child is associated with low SES or paternal MD, has treated these two factors separately. This study has assessed both together, also including gender approach.
Conclusions
This study points out the existence of an association between the presence of MD in parents and the presence of these problematics in their children. It also highlights a greater role of the mental health of the mother than the one from the father. An association between SES of the parent and MD in children has also been found, placing those children in a vulnerable socioeconomic position at greater risk of having MD. The influence of the SES is higher when it is the status of the mother than of the father.
The findings of this study offer a preliminary indication that policies aiming to reduce the intergenerational transmission of MD should target both socioeconomic inequalities and the causes behind parental MD, which have been seen to include a high environmental component. The findings also point to the importance of addressing gender differences in these associations. Gender roles intersect with critical structural determinants of health and so, incorporating a gender approach is essential when assessing MD and their intergenerational transmission.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
No financial support was received for this work. The authors thank all the helpful comments of the following: Garazi Carrillo Aguirre, Cristina Colls Guerra, Raúl González Rodríguez and Neus Carrilero Carrió. The authors have declared that they have no competing or potential conflicts of interest.
Abbreviations
- MD
Mental disorders
- SES
Socioeconomic status
- HCH
Health card holder
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. Individual level data cannot be shared publicly because of confidentiality. You can check up-to-date regulations at http://aquas.gencat.cat/ca/ambits/analitica-dades/padris/ and address any inquiries to AQuAS director, Dr. Cesar Velasco (cesarvelasco@gencat.cat).
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
References
- 1.World Health Organization. Mental health. Action plan 2013–2020. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Document Production Services; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vos T, Barber RM, Bell B, Bertozzi-Villa A, Biryukov S, Bolliger I, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet. 2015;386: 743–800. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60692-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Quiroga V, Guasch C. L’afectació de salut mental en la població infantil i adolescent en situació de risc a Catalunya. Educació social Revista d’intervenció sòcioeducativa. 2014; 135–153. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kieling C, Baker-Henningham H, Belfer M, Conti G, Ertem I, Omigbodun O, et al. Child and adolescent mental health worldwide: evidence for action. The Lancet. 2011;378: 1515–1525. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60827-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ries K, Nakamura EF, Kessler RC. Epidemiology of mental disorders in children and adolescents. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience. 2009;11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Coscolla R, Martínez S, Poll M. Atenció a la salut mental infantil i adolescent a Catalunya. 2016. 10.1088/0305-4470/18/13/024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kessler RC, Amminger GP, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alonso J, Lee S, Ustün TB. Age of onset of mental disorders: a review of recent literature. Current opinion in psychiatry. 2007;20: 359–64. 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32816ebc8c [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hewlett E, Moran V. Making Mental Health Count: the social and economic costs of neglecting mental health care. Paris: OECD; 2014. 10.1787/9789264208445-en [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sroufe L, Rutter M. The Domain of Developmental Psychopathology. Child Development. 1984;55: 17–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Department of Gender and Women’s Health. Gender and Mental Health. Geneva; 2002 Jun.
- 11.Seedat S, Scott KM, Angermeyer MC, Bromet EJ, Brugha TS, Girolamo G De, et al. Cross-national associations between gender and mental disorders in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. Archives of general psychiatry. 2009;66: 785–795. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McLean CP. Gender Differences in Anxiety Disorders: Prevalence, Course of Illness, Comorbidity and Burden of Illness. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2010;45: 1027–1035. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.03.006.Gender [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rosenfield S, Smith D. Gender and Mental Health: Do Men and Women Have Different Amounts or Types of Problems? A Handbook for the Study of Mental Health. Cambridge University Press; 2012. pp. 256–267. 10.1017/cbo9780511984945.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime Prevalence and Age-of-Onset Distributions of DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives Of General Psychiatry. 2005;62: 593–602. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tsuang MT, Bar JL, Stone WS, Faraone S V. Gene-environment interactions in mental disorders. World psychiatry: official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA). 2004;3: 73–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kendler KS, Aggen SH, Czajkowski N, Røysamb E, Tambs K, Torgersen S, et al. The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for DSM-IV personality disorders: A multivariate twin study. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2008;65: 1438–1446. 10.1001/archpsyc.65.12.1438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tambs K, Czajkowsky N, Røysamb E, Neale MC, Reichbom-Kjennerud T, Aggen SH, et al. Structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for dimensional representations of DSM-IV anxiety disorders. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2009;195: 301–307. 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.059485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Esposito G, Azhari A, Borelli JL. Gene × environment interaction in developmental disorders: Where do we stand and what’s next? Frontiers in Psychology. 2018;9: 26 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Szyf M. The early-life social environment and DNA methylation. Clinical Genetics. 2012;81: 341–349. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01843.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cimino S, Cerniglia L, Ballarotto G, Marzilli E, Pascale E, D’Addario C, et al. DNA methylation at the DAT promoter and risk for psychopathology: Intergenerational transmission between school-age youths and their parents in a community sample. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2018;8 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hayden EP, Hanna B, Sheikh HI, Laptook RS, Kim J, Singh SM, et al. Child dopamine active transporter 1 genotype and parenting: Evidence for evocative gene-environment correlations. Development and Psychopathology. 2013;25: 163–173. 10.1017/S0954579412000971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cimino S, Cerniglia L, Ballarotto G, Marzilli E, Pascale E, D’Addario C, et al. Children’s dat1 polymorphism moderates the relationship between parents’ psychological profiles, children’s dat methylation, and their emotional/behavioral functioning in a normative sample. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16 10.3390/ijerph16142567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Toth M. Mechanisms of non-genetic inheritance and psychiatric disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40: 129–140. 10.1038/npp.2014.127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tyrka AR, Price LH, Marsit C, Walters OC, Carpenter LL. Childhood Adversity and Epigenetic Modulation of the Leukocyte Glucocorticoid Receptor: Preliminary Findings in Healthy Adults. Uddin M, editor. PLoS ONE. 2012;7: e30148 10.1371/journal.pone.0030148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Herzman C, Boyce T. How experience gets under the skin to create gradients in developmental health. Annual Rev Public Health. 2010;31: 329–347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Graham H, Power C. Childhood disadvantage and health inequalities: A framework for policy based on lifecourse research. Child: Care, Health and Development. 2004;30: 671–678. 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00457.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Adolescence NRC (US) and I of M (US) F on, Kipke MD. Adolescent Development and the Biology of Puberty. 1999. [PubMed]
- 28.World Health Organization. Adolescence: a period needing special attention—recognizing-adolescence. 2014 [cited 4 Jul 2020]. Available: https://apps.who.int/adolescent/second-decade/section2/page1/recognizing-adolescence.html
- 29.Office of the High Commissioner. United Nations Human Rights. Convention on the Rights of the Child. 20 Nov 1989 [cited 4 Jul 2020]. Available: https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx
- 30.Irwin L, Siddiki A, Clyde H. Early Child Development: A Powerful Equalizer. World Health Organization, Commission on Social Determinants of Health; Geneva, Switzerland; 2007. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.10.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Feinstein L, Bynner J. The Importance of Cognitive Development in Middle Childhood for Adulthood Socioeconomic Status, Mental Health, and Problem Behavior. Child Development. 2004;75: 1329–1339. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00743.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schaffer HR. The early experience assumption: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 2000;24: 5–14. 10.1080/016502500383412 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Patton GC, Viner R. Pubertal transitions in health. Lancet. 2007;369: 1130–1139. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60366-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Berenbaum SA, Beltz AM, Corley R. The Importance of Puberty for Adolescent Development: Conceptualization and Measurement Advances in Child Development and Behavior. Academic Press Inc; 2015. pp. 53–92. 10.1016/bs.acdb.2014.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gutgesell ME, Payne N. Issues of Adolescent Psychological Development in the 21st Century. Pediatrics in Review. 2004;25: 79–85. 10.1542/pir.25-3-79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hornberger LL. Adolescent Psychosocial Growth and Development. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. 2006;19: 243–246. 10.1016/j.jpag.2006.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Comission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation. Geneva: OMS; 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hertzman C. The biological embedding of early experience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1999;896: 85–95. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08107.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Siddiki A, Irwin LG, Herzman C. Total Environment Assessment Model for Early Child Development. World Health Organization, Commission on Social Determinants of Health. 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bartley M, Blane D, Dorling D, Ferrie J, Jarvis M, Marmot M, et al. Social Determinants of Health: The Solid Facts. Copenhague, Denmark; 2003. 10.1016/j.jana.2012.03.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shaffer DR, Katherine Kipp. Developmental psychology: childhood and adolescence. 6th ed Australia: Wadsworth/Thomson; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Keown LJ. Predictors of boys’ ADHD symptoms from early to middle childhood: The role of father-child and mother-child interactions. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2012;40: 569–581. 10.1007/s10802-011-9586-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Patricia K Kerig, Amanda Ludlow. Developmental psychopathology: From infancy through adolescence. 6th ed McGraw-Hill; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Manning C, Gregoire A. Effects of parental mental illness on children. Psychiatry. 2006;5: 10–12. 10.1383/psyt.2006.5.1.10 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.McLaughlin KA, Gadermann AM, Hwang I, Sampson NA, Al-Hamzawi A, Andrade LH, et al. Parent psychopathology and offspring mental disorders: Results from the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2012;200: 290–299. 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.101253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Leijdesdorff S, van Doesum K, Popma A, Klaassen R, van Amelsvoort T. Prevalence of psychopathology in children of parents with mental illness and/or addiction. Current Opinion in Psychiatry. 2017;30: 312–317. 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Van Loon LMA, Van de Ven MOM, Van Doesum KTM, Witteman CLM, Hosman CMH. The Relation Between Parental Mental Illness and Adolescent Mental Health: The Role of Family Factors. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2014;23: 1201–1214. 10.1007/s10826-013-9781-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cents R. Like mother, like child?: Intergenerational transmission of psychopathology; a focus on genes and parenting. Erasmus University Rotterdam; 2016. 10.1037/a0039375 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Weijers D, van Steensel FJA, Bögels SM. Associations between Psychopathology in Mothers, Fathers and Their Children: A Structural Modeling Approach. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2018;27: 1992–2003. 10.1007/s10826-018-1024-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Möller EL, Majdandžić M, De Vente W, Bögels SM. The Evolutionary Basis of Sex Differences in Parenting and Its Relationship with Child Anxiety in Western Societies Invited Review. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology JEP. 2013;4: 88–117. 10.5127/jep.026912 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Silberg JL, Maes H, Eaves LJ. Genetic and environmental influences on the transmission of parental depression to children’s depression and conduct disturbance: An extended Children of Twins study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines. 2010;51: 734–744. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02205.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Schepman K, Collishaw S, Gardner F, Maughan B, Scott J, Pickles A. Do changes in parent mental health explain trends in youth emotional problems? Social Science and Medicine. 2011;73: 293–300. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Li P, Becker JB, Heitzeg MM, McClellan ML, Reed BG, Zucker RA. Gender differences in the transmission of risk for antisocial behavior problems across generations. PLoS ONE. 2017;12 10.1371/journal.pone.0177288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Cimino S, Cerniglia L, Paciello M. Mothers with Depression, Anxiety or Eating Disorders: Outcomes on Their Children and the Role of Paternal Psychological Profiles. Child Psychiatry & Human Development. 2015;46: 228–236. 10.1007/s10578-014-0462-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Reiss F. Socioeconomic inequalities and mental health problems in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine. 2013;90: 24–31. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sareen J, Afifi TO, McMillan KA, Asmundson GJG. Relationship Between Household Income and Mental Disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2011;68: 419 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Amone-P’Olak K, Burger H, Ormel J, Huisman M, Verhulst FC, Oldehinkel AJ. Socioeconomic position and mental health problems in pre- and early-adolescents: the TRAILS study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2009;44: 231–238. 10.1007/s00127-008-0424-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Heinonen E, Knekt P, Härkänen T, Virtala E, Lindfors O. Associations of early childhood adversities with mental disorders, psychological functioning, and suitability for psychotherapy in adulthood. Psychiatry Research. 2018;264: 366–373. 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.04.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kessler RC, McLaughlin KA, Green JG, Gruber MJ, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Childhood adversities and adult psychopathology in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2010;197: 378–385. 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.080499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Amone-P’Olak K, Burger H, Huisman M, Oldehinkel AJ, Ormel J. Parental psychopathology and socioeconomic position predict adolescent offspring’s mental health independently and do not interact: the TRAILS study. Journal of epidemiology and community health. 2011;65: 57–63. 10.1136/jech.2009.092569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ministerio de Trabajo Migraciones y Seguridad Social. Beneficiarios / Situaciones protegidas. [cited 14 Apr 2019]. Available: http://www.seg-social.es/wps/portal/wss/internet/Trabajadores/PrestacionesPensionesTrabajadores/10938/30475/30476
- 62.Generalitat de Catalunya. El nou model de copagament. CatSalut. Servei Català de la Salut. [cited 7 Nov 2018]. Available: http://catsalut.gencat.cat/ca/serveis-sanitaris/atencio-farmaceutica/medicaments-altres-productes/financament-public-medicaments/nou-model-copagament/
- 63.Anttila V, Bulik-Sullivan B, Finucane HK, Walters RK, Bras J, Duncan L, et al. Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain. Science. 2018;360: 8757 10.1126/science.aap8757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Berg-Nielsen TS, Vikan A, Dahl AA. Parenting related to child and parental psychopathology: A descriptive review of the literature. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2002;7: 529–552. 10.1177/1359104502007004006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Monk C, Spicer J, Champagne FA. Linking prenatal maternal adversity to developmental outcomes in infants: The role of epigenetic pathways. Development and Psychopathology. 2012;24: 1361–1376. 10.1017/S0954579412000764 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Schlotz W, Phillips DIW. Fetal origins of mental health: Evidence and mechanisms. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2009;23: 905–916. 10.1016/j.bbi.2009.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Fisher SD. Paternal Mental Health: Why Is It Relevant? American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine. 2017;11: 200–211. 10.1177/1559827616629895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kahn RS, Brandt D, Whitaker RC. Combined effect of mothers’ and fathers’ mental health symptoms on children’s behavioral and emotional well-being. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 2004;158: 721–729. 10.1001/archpedi.158.8.721 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.World Health Organization, Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. Social Determinants of Mental Health; Geneva, Switzerland; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Lynch JW, Kaplan GA. Socioeconomic Position. In: Berkman and Kawachi (eds), Social Epidemiology. 2000; 13–35. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Currie J, Moretti E. Mother’s Education and the Intergenerational Transmission of Human Capital: Evidence from College Openings. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2003;118: 1495–1532. 10.2307/25053945 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kessler RC, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alonso J, Chatterji S, Lee S, Ormel J, et al. The global burden of mental disorders: An update from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale. 2009;18: 23–33. 10.1017/s1121189x00001421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Rutter M, Caspi A, Moffitt TE. Using sex differences in psychopathology to study causal mechanisms: Unifying issues and research strategies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines. 2003;44: 1092–1115. 10.1111/1469-7610.00194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zahn-Waxler C, Shirtcliff EA, Marceau K. Disorders of Childhood and Adolescence: Gender and Psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2008;4: 275–303. 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Starrels ME. Gender Differences in Parent-Child Relations. Journal of Family Issues. 1994;15: 148–165. 10.1177/019251394015001007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Rousseau C, Frounfelker RL. Mental health needs and services for migrants: an overview for primary care providers. Journal of Travel Medicine. 2019;26 10.1093/jtm/tay150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Sarría-Santamera A, Hijas-Gómez AI, Carmona R, Gimeno-Feliú LA. A systematic review of the use of health services by immigrants and native populations. Public Health Reviews. 2016;37: 28 10.1186/s40985-016-0042-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Dhadda A, Greene G. ‘The Healthy Migrant Effect’ for Mental Health in England: Propensity-score Matched Analysis Using the EMPIRIC Survey. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2018;20: 799–808. 10.1007/s10903-017-0570-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Hernández C, Jiménez D. A comparison of the health status and health care utilization patterns between foreigners and the national population in Spain: New evidence from the Spanish National Health Survey. Social Science & Medicine. 2009;69: 370–378. 10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2009.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Jutte DP, Roos LL, Brownell MD. Administrative Record Linkage as a Tool for Public Health Research. Annual Review of Public Health. 2011;32: 91–108. 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-100700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Cadarette SM, Wong L. An Introduction to Health Care Administrative Data. The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy. 2015;68: 232–237. 10.4212/cjhp.v68i3.1457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]