Abstract
Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is the entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2, and recombinant ACE2 decoys are being evaluated as new antiviral therapies. We designed and tested an antibody-like ACE2-Fc fusion protein, which has the benefit of long pharmacological half-life and the potential to facilitate immune clearance of the virus. Out of a concern that the intrinsic catalytic activity of ACE2 may unintentionally alter the balance of its hormonal substrates and cause adverse cardiovascular effects in treatment, we performed a mutagenesis screening for inactivating the enzyme. Three mutants, R273A, H378A and E402A, completely lost their enzymatic activity for either surrogate or physiological substrates. All of them remained capable of binding SARS-CoV-2 and could suppress the transduction of a pseudotyped virus in cell culture. This study established new ACE2-Fc candidates as antiviral treatment for SARS-CoV-2 without potentially harmful side effects from ACE2's catalytic actions toward its vasoactive substrates.
Keywords: ACE2-Fc, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, Mutagenesis
1. Introduction
As COVID-19 pandemic is still unfolding and no specific antiviral treatments are available, there is an unmet need to explore new drug candidates that are effective and safe, and broad spectrum against the evolving virus. In addition to the ongoing clinical trials of repurposed compounds and patient-derived antibodies, new drugs are being developed through targeted screening and rational design.
One of the focuses is on drug candidates that target receptor-mediated viral entry. A diverse group of human coronaviruses including SARS-CoV of 2002, HCoV-NL63 of 2004 and SARS-CoV-2 of COVID-19 rely on their spike proteins to bind angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) cell receptor as the first step in viral entry [[1], [2], [3], [4]]. ACE2 is a membrane-bound carboxypeptidase that is best known for its activity against vasoactive peptides including angiotensin II, Apelin-13, among others [5]. These activities regulate cardiovascular functions and fluid balance. Additional functions of ACE2 were also discovered as chaperone of neutral amino acid transporter in intestine [6]. These enzymatic and nonenzymatic activities are not directly associated with ACE2's role as the gateway of viral entry. It has been shown that soluble ACE2 at generous abundance as compared to viral concentration can lower infectivity of cultured human cells, similar to experimental anti-spike antibodies [[7], [8], [9]]. Prior to the pandemic, one of the human recombinant soluble ACE2 (hrsACE2) drugs developed by Apeiron Biologics and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) had completed Phase I and Phase II clinical trials for human pulmonary arterial hypertension and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [10,11], and is now repositioned for investigational treatment of COVID-19 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04335136).
The current focus has been on improving binding affinity, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD), antiviral specificity and neutralization efficacy of ACE2-based biologics through bioengineering design [8,[12], [13], [14]]. Also in a different context unrelated to COVID-19, our group had previously constructed a chimeric fusion between the ectodomain of ACE2 and the Fc segment of IgG1 (“hinge” plus CH2 and CH3 regions) (Fig. 1A). In keeping with a well-recognized function of Fc to extend protein half-life through its cognate neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), ACE2-Fc has improved pharmacokinetics as compared to untagged soluble ACE2 [15]. The enzymatic activity of ACE2 in the fusion degraded angiotensin II (AngII) and rendered blood pressure control for up to two weeks. In comparison to its untagged counterpart to treat COVID-19, ACE2-Fc is predicted to offer superior pharmacological benefits, which make it also suitable for prophylactic usages by frontline healthcare workers and caregivers [13].
Our study attempts to address another potential drawback of hrsACE2 biologic. Although it was originally believed that the catalytic activity of ACE2 delivered in an excess quantity through therapeutic hrsACE2 may alleviate ARDS based on mouse studies [10,16], the relevance in human disease remains unclear. COVID-19 mortality is prevalent among patients with underlying conditions such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes and chronic lung disease [[17], [18], [19], [20]], a large number of COVID-19 patients are on existing angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEI)/Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) blockade therapy for preexisting cardiovascular and diabetic comorbidities [21]. There have been different opinions on whether Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SysteFm (RAAS) blockade medications had improved or worsened COVID-19 recovery [[22], [23], [24], [25], [26]]. However, studies discovered a correlation between RAAS blockade and upregulation of endogenous ACE2 expression, causing concern of increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection [[27], [28], [29], [30], [31]]. The carboxypeptidase activity of therapeutic hrsACE2 hydrolyses a broad range of vasoactive hormonal substrates including AngII, apelin-13, bradykinin metabolites, among others, and exerts systemic RAAS blockade that affects the heart, the blood vessels, the kidney and the lung. Severe cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection frequently have multiorgan involvement [[32], [33], [34], [35], [36]]. In our view, the dual functions of investigational drug hrsACE2 to simultaneously act on viral neutralization and RAAS can potentially complicate clinical assessment of therapeutic efficacy. In order to achieve an exclusive antiviral function in an ACE2-derived biologic, we sought to modify ACE2 catalytic center to limit the catalysis of its vasoactive substrates.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Construction of ACE2-Fc mutant plasmids
DNA sequence encoding the ectodomain of human ACE2 (aa 1–740) was cloned from a human kidney cDNA library. DNA encoding human Fc of IgG1 has been described previously [15]. An in-frame fusion between ACE2 and Fc was constructed in pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Site-directed mutagenesis by PCR was performed to create the panel of ACE2-Fc mutants. All mutants were confirmed by sequencing.
2.2. Recombinant protein expression and purification
The workflow for generating recombinant ACE2-Fc variants was similar to what had been reported before [15]. Briefly, HEK293 cells were transfected with individual ACE2-Fc variants by standard polyethylenimine (PEI) method. In transgene transfection studies, on day two of transfection cells were switched to serum-free DMEM. On day four, the culture media were harvested by centrifugation, and further concentrated using Amico Ultra Filters (Millipore, Billerica, MA). ACE2-Fc proteins were then purified by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) using Superdex 200 Increase column (GE healthcare, Chicago, IL) and stored at −80 °C until used in experiments.
∆ACE2-Fc Arg273Ala, His378Ala and Glu402Ala, and wild-type ACE2-Fc selected for scaled production were produced from clonal stable-expressing cells. The general method was described previously [15]. Following plasmid transfection of HEK293 cells, the cells were selected under 1 mg/mL G418 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) for ~14 days until isolated cell colonies appeared in the dishes. Individual cell clones were seeded into 96-well plates. When cells reached 50–100% density in the wells, the culture media were tested for their ACE2-Fc contents using a custom ELISA (anti-ACE2 antibody [Abcam, Cambridge, MA] for capturing and anti-human IgG-Fc-HRP [SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL] for detection). Clones with the highest expression of recombinant ACE2-Fc variants were selected, and individually expanded to five 150 mm dishes. Once reached ~90% confluency, the cultures were switched to serum-free DMEM medium. After 4–5 days the culture media were harvested, and further concentrated using a VIVAFLOW 200 filtration system (100,000 MWCO by Sartorius, Stonehouse, UK). Recombinant ACE2-Fc proteins were purified using SEC as described above.
2.3. ACE2 peptidase activity measured using surrogate Mca-APK(Dnp)
ACE2-Fc peptidase activity assay using surrogate fluorogenic substrate Mca-APK(Dnp) (Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY) was performed in black microtiter plates. The reaction buffer contained 50 mM 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid, pH = 6.5, 300 mM NaCl, 10 μM ZnCl2, 0.01% Triton X-100 and 20 μM of Mca-APK(Dnp). The total reaction volume was 100 μL at room temperature and the duration of the reactions were 20 min. Peptidase activities were calculated as fluorescence intensity at 320 nm excitation and 420 nm emission wavelength.
2.4. ACE2 peptidase activity measured using physiological substrates of AngII and apelin-13
We described the method previously and referred to the workflow as Phenylalanine Assay, which was tested using AngII and apelin-13 as substrates in reactions with ACE2 [37]. It involves two coupled reactions, hydrolysis of the C-terminus phenylalanine residues from the substrates by ACE2 catalysis and the measurement of free amino acid phenylalanine using yeast enzyme of phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) in a colorimetric assay (Supplementary Fig. S2).
The reactions were carried out using indicated concentrations of ACE2-Fc proteins together with either AngII or apelin-13 at indicated concentrations in reaction buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH = 7.4, 136 mM NaCl and 10 μM ZnCl2. The first reaction was proceeded at 37 °C after 20 min before stopped by 80 °C heat inactivation for 5 min. The second reaction used a phenylalanine detection kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). 1 μL enzyme mix and 1 μL developer from the kit were added to the above reaction, which was allowed to proceed for 20 min at room temperature. Fluorescence intensity was measured at 535 nm excitation and 585 nm emission wavelength, and all reactions were performed in triplicate.
2.5. SARS-CoV-2 RBD binding assay
Recombinant viral RBD protein was purchased from Sino Biological (Beijing, China). ELISA wells were precoated with either PBS as controls or 100 ng/well of RBD protein. Serial concentrations of individual ACE2-Fc variants were added to the wells. After overnight incubation at 4 °C, the wells were washed three times with TBST buffer before HRP-conjugated anti-human IgG-Fc secondary antibody was added. HRP reactions were developed with TMB substrate and the binding strength derived from OD450 (nm) readings of the reactions. The EC50 values were determined by log(agonist) vs. response nonlinear regression fit analysis (GraphPad Prism).
2.6. Inhibition of viral transduction with purified ∆ACE2-Fc mutants
Spike (SARS-CoV-2) pseudotyped lentivirus with luciferase reporter gene was purchased from BPS Bioscience (San Diego, CA). The virus was used to transduce HEK293 with stable expression of receptor full-length ACE2. The stable cell line was created from plasmid expressing full-length human ACE2 in pcDNA3 vector. Followed a similar procedure for generating ACE2-Fc clones, stable HEK293 clones with receptor ACE2 expression was identified using immune detection of ACE2 in the cells. The ACE2-HEK293 cells were seeded at a density of 10,000 cells per well into white 96-well cell culture microplate one day before transduction. To test inhibition of viral transduction, 5 μL pseudotyped lentivirus were preincubated with 5 μL vehicle or serially diluted ACE2-Fc variants at 37 °C for 1 h and then added into the cells. After overnight incubation, the cells were refed with fresh medium and incubated for another 36 h. Luciferase activity was measured using ONE-Glo™ Luciferase Assay System according to the manufacture's protocol (Promega, Madison, WI). The IC50 values were determined by log(inhibitor) vs. response nonlinear regression fit analysis (GraphPad Prism).
2.7. ACE2-Fc pharmacokinetics in mice
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Northwestern University approved the animal procedure in this study (approved protocol number IS00009990).The general method for pharmacokinetic measurements were described previously [15]. Briefly, a bolus intravenous injection of ACE2-Fc proteins (0.5 mg/kg body weight) was performed in 10 weeks old female BALB/c mice. Subsequently, serial blood samples were collected from tail bleeding at indicated time points. Collected blood samples were left undisturbed on ice, and sera were isolated by centrifugation at 6000 ×g for 10 min at 4 °C. The levels of ACE2-Fc in the sera were measured by ELISA using anti-ACE2 capturing antibody and anti-human IgG-Fc-HRP antibody for detection as described above.
3. Results
3.1. ACE2-Fc mutagenesis strategy to remove catalytic activity
We constructed an ACE2-Fc template by using the ectodomain of ACE2 fused with an Fc sequence (Fig. 1A). The chimeric fusion naturally formed a dimer of >250 kDa as expected (Fig. 1B). There is an extensive amount of information with regard to the structural characteristics of ACE2 in relationship to SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) [1,2,[38], [39], [40]]. SARS-CoV-2 binds a surface segment of ACE2 through the apex of its spike protein (Fig. 1C). ACE2 is a metallopeptidase that requires divalent cation such as zinc for activity. A Zn2+ ion is buried deep in the catalytic cleft within the proximal lobe relative to the viral binding site. Based on an inhibitor-bound structure of ACE2 [41], both proximal and distal residues that line the catalytic cleft form interactions with the inhibitor, which occupies the presumed substrate pocket (Fig. 1D). Zn2+ is coordinated by three residues, His374, His378 and Glu402, which are the obvious choices for mutagenesis when making enzymatically inactive mutants [8] (Fig. 1E). In addition to these Zn2+-binding sites, we sought to look for catalytic residues in contact with the substrates that are further away from RBD binding segment. The inhibitor-bound structure indicates six residues that extend their side chains toward the substrate direction. These are Glu145, Arg273, His345, Pro346, Asp368 and His505 (Fig. 1F).
3.2. Substrate-dependent inactivation among ACE2-Fc mutants
Next, we made alanine-substitution of each residue including the three that bind Zn2+ and the additional six that potentially bind substrates (Supplementary Fig. S1). Wild-type and 9 mutants of ACE2-Fc were produced using a HEK293 expression system as soluble proteins (Fig. 1B). Purified proteins were subjected to a set of enzymatic assays using a surrogate Mca-APK(Dnp) fluorogenic substrate and physiological substrates such as AngII and apelin-13 (Fig. 2 ). It should be noted that although the surrogate substrate Mca-APK(Dnp) is traditionally used for measuring ACE2 activity, the sequence does not resemble those of the physiological substrates, which share a Pro-Phe motif at their C-termini (Supplementary Fig. S2). Instead, the catalysis of AngII and apelin-13 by ACE2-Fc variants was measured by the hydrolysis rate of their C-terminus Phe amino acid [37].
We performed Mca-APK(Dnp) measurements, alongside phenylalanine hydrolysis assays using AngII and apelin-13 as substrates to determine the enzymatic activities of the ACE2-Fc variants (Fig. 2A–C). In order to better characterize the catalytic performances of individual ACE2-Fc mutants relative to their wild-type counterpart, we conducted two types of enzymatic assays. The first method used an excess amount of the enzyme (100 ng) in reactions with varying concentrations of the three substrates. This would potentially detect low partial activity of enzymes. The second method had a lower amount of purified ACE2-Fc variants (10 ng each) to react with an excess quantity of the substrates (2 or 10 nmol: see Methods) in order to distinguish among mutants with high activities. As it turned out, the results from these two methods were to an extend in agreement with each other (Fig. 2: left panels compared to right panels). One of the surprising findings was that there was a clear evidence of substrate-dependent inactivation of individual mutations, particularly among those lining the inhibitor/substrate space. For instance, while Mca-APK(Dnp) showed no activity of 7 ACE2-Fc mutants, including 4 substrate-binding residues of Arg273Ala, His345Ala, Pro346Ala and His505Ala (Fig. 2A), His345Ala, Pro346Ala and His505Ala remained active toward AngII and apelin-13 (Fig. 2B, C). These differences may attribute to unique steric conformation of the catalytic pocket for each substrate, and therefore individual ACE2 residues display distinct substrate-specific importance as seen in our results. In addition, His374Ala, one of the Zn2+-binding residues, retained a low level of activity against Apelin-13 (Fig. 2C). When all three substrates are considered, Arg273Ala, His378Ala and Glu402Ala were completely lack of peptidase activity. We referred these three mutants to as ∆ACE2-Fc (∆: loss-of-activity) and considered them as candidate variants emerged from the screen.
3.3. Binding affinities of individual ACE2-Fc mutants to SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain
Next, we performed binding assays using individual variants against purified spike RBD protein. As expected, all mutants displayed similar levels of binding to viral RBD, considering the relatively minor changes from the point mutations made to ACE2-Fc (Fig. 3 ). Overall, the wild-type protein showed the highest binding affinity, whereas all three Zn2+-binding site mutants, His374Ala, His378Ala and Glu402Ala, had the lowest affinities to RBD. This is consistent with the expectation that the ion pocket is in proximity to the viral binding site on ACE2 (Fig. 1C), and also that changing ion-binding can potentially induce structurally instability of the protein. In contrast, Arg273Ala mutant of the substrate-binding pocket, which showed complete loss-of-activity toward all three substrates, is situated on the distal lobe and is less likely to affect desired viral binding.
3.4. Competitive inhibition of pseudotyped viral transduction by R273A, H378A and E402A mutants of ∆ACE2-Fc
∆ACE2-Fc Arg273Ala, His378Ale and Glu402Ala, and wild-type ACE2-Fc proteins were further tested for their antiviral potency. We conducted a series of viral inhibition assays using a pseudotyped reporter virus decorated with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The virus was able to transduce HEK293 cells that express full-length receptor ACE2 (See Materials and methods). Each of the four ACE2-Fc variants in a range of concentrations was added to culture medium to test the potential of viral inhibition. As expected, all variants showed similar levels of efficacy to block pseudoviral transduction (Fig. 4A), with wild-type ACE2-Fc had a leading IC50 of 0.13 μg/mL, followed by His378Ala, Arg273Ala and Glu402Ala with their IC50s of 0.16 μg/mL, 0.19 μg/mL and 0.25 μg/mL, respectively (Fig. 4B). In terms of neutralization activity of ACE2-Fc, we expect the pseudotyped virus and authentic SARS-CoV-2 react to the biologic similarly.
3.5. Pharmacokinetics of lead ∆ACE2-Fc proteins
We have previously shown the in vivo longevity of mouse ACE2-Fc, as well as the fact that mouse FcRn recognizes human Fc [15]. Here we intravenously injected the ACE2-Fc variants in mice and measured pharmacokinetics of biologics. All three ∆ACE2-Fc and their wild-type control exhibited long half-lives in the range between 52.61 h and 69.88 h (Fig. 5 ), consistent with the expectation for Fc-fusion proteins.
4. Discussions
Our study followed a design strategy of screening for ACE2-Fc variants of having an exclusive SARS-CoV-2 affinity with the absence of enzymatic activity toward vasoactive substrates. Based on the structure of ACE2's catalytic center, we selected a total of 9 residues to be individually replaced with alanine. These included 3 residues with their side chains binding to divalent cation and 6 residues that line the substrate pocket. We used a surrogate fluorogenic substrate as well as two physiological substrates of ACE2 in reactions and discovered an unexpected substrate-dependent inactivation among individual mutants of ACE2-Fc. The screening identified three loss-of-activity variants (∆ACE2-Fc), one with a mutation of substrate-binding site and two others having impairment of cation-binding. All three lead candidates maintained their binding capacity toward SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and inhibited the transduction of a pseudotyped reporter virus.
Although we focused on inactivating ACE2 enzymatic activity to separate its actions on RAAS from SARS-CoV-2 neutralization, it has been widely speculated that the dual actions may benefit treatment of COVID-19. As ACE2 catalyzes the conversion of AngII to Ang-(1–7), therapeutic hrsACE2 or ACE2-Fc will change the balance from AngII-mediated stimulation of AT1 receptor to AT2 and/or Mas receptor activation, which may reduce pulmonary dysfunction due to AT1 associated inflammatory responses, lung edema and ARDS [17,[42], [43], [44], [45]]. Since there is no clinical data on ACE2-derived antiviral therapies, the hypotheses about beneficial RAAS inhibition are based on observations of COVID-19 patients who are on existing ACEI or ARB treatments. The general consensus is that these patients should continue RAAS blockade therapies for treating comorbidities during recovering from viral infection.
One of the main benefits of ACE2-Fc fusion construction is its long-acting time as compared to recombinant ACE2 without the tag [15]. It is expected to provide important assurance of sufficient drug levels to counteract the fluctuating levels of virions in patients, particularly during viremia. Based on clinical knowledge of Fc-tagged Factor VIII (ELOCTATE®) used in hemophilia A patients, dosing at 3–5 day intervals is sufficient to maintain a high blood level of the drug (US FDA recommendation).
The structural arrangement of ACE2-Fc resembles that of an antibody, with the replacement of antigen-binding Fab portion of antibody with ACE2 to bind SARS-CoV-2 spike. Meanwhile, the Fc portion can potentially induce immunological clearance of the virus, which, together in a fusion with ACE2, may be an effective immunoadhesin [13,46] to trigger complement activation, antibody-mediated cytotoxicity and opsonization, and agglutination of targets. With respect to the potential antibody-like benefits of ACE2-Fc, we compare our overall strategy with existing CD4 immunoadhesin (termed PRO 542) that has existing clinical data for the treatment of HIV infection [[47], [48], [49], [50], [51]]. PRO 542 (CD4-IgG2/Fc with CD4 targeting HIV gp120) antiviral is a tetravalent fusion protein using the constant region of IgG2 as opposed to IgG1 of ACE2-Fc. One notable difference is that IgG2 has extremely low affinity to FcγRs on phagocytic cells, while both IgG1 and IgG2 can activate complement. With regard to our proof-of-principle study of ACE2-Fc as candidate antiviral drugs, it is important to point out that in terms of choices of the Fc tag, there are alternative strategies in recombinant construction. Nevertheless, the inclusion of immunoadhesin potentials of the antiviral may have caveats. While it may certainly boost immune clearance of the virus, such as through FcγR's selective binding of clustered Fc, it may also elevate complement and cytokine responses to further aggravate the inflammation. Although these adverse side effects can be mitigated through modifications of the Fc domain, the ultimate therapeutic effects in the context of individual patients' conditions can only be determined through rigorous clinical studies.
With regard to drug toxicity, our mouse study of repeated doses of ACE2-Fc in mice had showed the biologic to be well tolerated for up to two months [15]. However, we cannot extrapolate that its will also be safe COVID-19 patients. As we consider it is not a simple neutralizing agent of the virus, its bifurcated ACE2 head groups can possibly trigger agglutination of the virus that can potentially aggravate the hypercoagulable state, making the drug less tolerable in these conditions.
From the perspective of recombinant manufacturing, there are challenges ahead for the simple fact that ACE2-Fc is a large protein (~130 kDa as a monomer and ~260 kDa as a dimer). Furthermore, cocrystal structures of ACE2 with an inhibitor showed large movements of the two lobes as compared to the Apo structures [41], suggesting an intrinsic instability of ACE2 protein. Also of note is an earlier study by Lei et al. using double mutations of His374 and His378 of the zinc-binding pocket for neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 [8]. However, the ion is important in maintaining protein structure and stability of metallopeptidases [52] [53,54]. This double mutation, as well as our His378Ala and Glu402Ala single mutations of the zinc-binding pocket may potentially suffer protein instability problems. In addition, multi-site mutagenesis increases the risk of structural instability and antigenic potentials. On the other hand, the Arg273Ala single site mutant that is predicted to change the substrate pocket will likely have a milder impact on overall protein stability, which is an important parameter in pharmaceutical production.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Pan Liu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft. Xinfang Xie: Validation, Writing - review & editing. Li Gao: Validation, Writing - review & editing. Jing Jin: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing - original draft.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgements
The design of the study was inspired by Dr. Robert Kruse's F1000Research article. We thank Drs. Danial Batlle and Jan Wysocki for their insightful comments.
Declaration of competing interest
Jing Jin and Pan Liu have applied for a provisional patent of the ACE2-Fc mutants described in the article.
Footnotes
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.120.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
References
- 1.Yan R., Zhang Y., Li Y., Xia L., Guo Y., Zhou Q. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science. 2020;367(6485):1444–1448. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wrapp D., Wang N., Corbett K.S., Goldsmith J.A., Hsieh C.L., Abiona O., Graham B.S., McLellan J.S. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science. 2020;367(6483):1260–1263. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhou P., Yang X.L., Wang X.G., Hu B., Zhang L., Zhang W., Si H.R., Zhu Y., Li B., Huang C.L., Chen H.D., Chen J., Luo Y., Guo H., Jiang R.D., Liu M.Q., Chen Y., Shen X.R., Wang X., Zheng X.S., Zhao K., Chen Q.J., Deng F., Liu L.L., Yan B., Zhan F.X., Wang Y.Y., Xiao G.F., Shi Z.L. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579(7798):270–273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hoffmann M., Kleine-Weber H., Schroeder S., Kruger N., Herrler T., Erichsen S., Schiergens T.S., Herrler G., Wu N.H., Nitsche A., Muller M.A., Drosten C., Pohlmann S. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181(2):271–280. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052. (e8) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vickers C., Hales P., Kaushik V., Dick L., Gavin J., Tang J., Godbout K., Parsons T., Baronas E., Hsieh F., Acton S., Patane M., Nichols A., Tummino P. 277(17) 2002. Hydrolysis of Biological Peptides by Human Angiotensin-converting Enzyme-related Carboxypeptidase; pp. 14838–14843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Camargo S.M.R., Singer D., Makrides V., Huggel K., Pos K.M., Wagner C.A., Kuba K., Danilczyk U., Skovby F., Kleta R., Penninger J.M., Verrey F. Tissue-specific amino acid transporter partners ACE2 and collectrin differentially interact with Hartnup mutations. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(3):872–882.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.10.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Monteil V., Kwon H., Prado P., Hagelkruys A., Wimmer R.A., Stahl M., Leopoldi A., Garreta E., Hurtado Del Pozo C., Prosper F., Romero J.P., Wirnsberger G., Zhang H., Slutsky A.S., Conder R., Montserrat N., Mirazimi A., Penninger J.M. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 infections in engineered human tissues using clinical-grade soluble human ACE2. Cell. 2020;181(4):905–913. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.004. (e7) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lei C., Qian K., Li T., Zhang S., Fu W., Ding M., Hu S. Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 spike pseudotyped virus by recombinant ACE2-Ig. Nat. Commun. 2020;11(1):2070. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16048-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Iwanaga N., Cooper L., Rong L., Beddingfield B., Crabtree J., Tripp R.A., Kolls J.K. 2020. Novel ACE2-IgG1 Fusions With Improved Activity Against SARS-CoV2, bioRxiv. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Khan A., Benthin C., Zeno B., Albertson T.E., Boyd J., Christie J.D., Hall R., Poirier G., Ronco J.J., Tidswell M., Hardes K., Powley W.M., Wright T.J., Siederer S.K., Fairman D.A., Lipson D.A., Bayliffe A.I., Lazaar A.L. A pilot clinical trial of recombinant human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit. Care. 2017;21(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1823-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hemnes A.R., Rathinasabapathy A., Austin E.A., Brittain E.L., Carrier E.J., Chen X., Fessel J.P., Fike C.D., Fong P., Fortune N., Gerszten R.E., Johnson J.A., Kaplowitz M., Newman J.H., Piana R., Pugh M.E., Rice T.W., Robbins I.M., Wheeler L., Yu C., Loyd J.E., West J. A potential therapeutic role for angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in human pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur. Respir. J. 2018;51(6) doi: 10.1183/13993003.02638-2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chan K.K., Dorosky D., Sharma P., Abbasi S.A., Dye J.M., Kranz D.M., Herbert A.S., Procko E. Engineering human ACE2 to optimize binding to the spike protein of SARS coronavirus 2. Science. 2020;369(6508):1261–1265. doi: 10.1126/science.abc0870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kruse R.L. Therapeutic strategies in an outbreak scenario to treat the novel coronavirus originating in Wuhan, China. F1000Res. 2020;9:72. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.22211.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Miao X., Luo Y., Huang X., Lee S.M.Y., Yuan Z., Tang Y., Chen L., Wang C., Wu F., Xu Y., Jiang W., Gao W., Song X., Yan Y., Pang T., Chen C., Zou Y., Fu W., Wan L., Gilbert-Jaramillo J., Knight M., Tan T.K., Rijal P., Townsend A., Sun J., Liu X., James W., Tsun A., Xu Y. A novel biparatopic hybrid antibody-ACE2 fusion that blocks SARS-CoV-2 infection: implications for therapy. MAbs. 2020;12(1) doi: 10.1080/19420862.2020.1804241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liu P., Wysocki J., Souma T., Ye M., Ramirez V., Zhou B., Wilsbacher L.D., Quaggin S.E., Batlle D., Jin J. Novel ACE2-Fc chimeric fusion provides long-lasting hypertension control and organ protection in mouse models of systemic renin angiotensin system activation. Kidney Int. 2018;94(1):114–125. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.01.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Imai Y., Kuba K., Rao S., Huan Y., Guo F., Guan B., Yang P., Sarao R., Wada T., Leong-Poi H., Crackower M.A., Fukamizu A., Hui C.C., Hein L., Uhlig S., Slutsky A.S., Jiang C., Penninger J.M. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure. Nature. 2005;436(7047):112–116. doi: 10.1038/nature03712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rossi G.P., Sanga V., Barton M. Potential harmful effects of discontinuing ACE-inhibitors and ARBs in COVID-19 patients. Elife. 2020:9. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Guzik T.J., Mohiddin S.A., Dimarco A., Patel V., Savvatis K., Marelli-Berg F.M., Madhur M.S., Tomaszewski M., Maffia P., D’Acquisto F., Nicklin S.A., Marian A.J., Nosalski R., Murray E.C., Guzik B., Berry C., Touyz R.M., Kreutz R., Wang D.W., Bhella D., Sagliocco O., Crea F., Thomson E.C., McInnes I.B. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system: implications for risk assessment, diagnosis, and treatment options. Cardiovasc. Res. 2020;116(10):1666–1687. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lumbers E.R., Delforce S.J., Pringle K.G., Smith G.R. The lung, the heart, the novel coronavirus, and the renin-angiotensin system; the need for clinical trials. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 2020;7:248. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cai A., McClafferty B., Benson J., Ramgobin D., Kalayanamitra R., Shahid Z., Groff A., Aggarwal C.S., Patel R., Polimera H., Vunnam R., Golamari R., Sahu N., Bhatt D., Jain R. COVID-19: catastrophic cause of acute lung injury. S D Med. 2020;73(6):252–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zheng Y.Y., Ma Y.T., Zhang J.Y., Xie X. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020;17(5):259–260. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0360-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Danser A.H.J., Epstein M., Batlle D. Renin-angiotensin system blockers and the COVID-19 pandemic: at present there is no evidence to abandon renin-angiotensin system blockers. Hypertension. 2020;75(6):1382–1385. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sparks M.A., South A., Welling P., Luther J.M., Cohen J., Byrd J.B., Burrell L.M., Batlle D., Tomlinson L., Bhalla V., Rheault M.N., Soler M.J., Swaminathan S., Hiremath S. Sound science before quick judgement regarding RAS blockade in COVID-19. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2020;15(5):714–716. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03530320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bavishi C., Maddox T.M., Messerli F.H. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and renin angiotensin system blockers. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(7):745–747. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vaduganathan M., Vardeny O., Michel T., McMurray J.J.V., Pfeffer M.A., Solomon S.D. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors in patients with Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382(17):1653–1659. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr2005760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.South A.M., Brady T.M., Flynn J.T. ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2), COVID-19, and ACE inhibitor and Ang II (angiotensin II) receptor blocker use during the pandemic: the pediatric perspective. Hypertension. 2020;76(1):16–22. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mehra M.R., Desai S.S., Kuy S., Henry T.D., Patel A.N. Cardiovascular disease, drug therapy, and mortality in Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382(25):e102. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2007621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 28.South A.M., Diz D.I., Chappell M.C. COVID-19, ACE2, and the cardiovascular consequences. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2020;318(5):H1084–H1090. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00217.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sommerstein R., Kochen M.M., Messerli F.H., Grani C. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): do angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers have a biphasic effect? J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020;9(7):e016509. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhou F., Yu T., Du R., Fan G., Liu Y., Liu Z., Xiang J., Wang Y., Song B., Gu X., Guan L., Wei Y., Li H., Wu X., Xu J., Tu S., Zhang Y., Chen H., Cao B. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1054–1062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Guo J., Huang Z., Lin L., Lv J. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and cardiovascular disease: a viewpoint on the potential influence of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers on onset and severity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020;9(7):e016219. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Noris M., Benigni A., Remuzzi G. The case of complement activation in COVID-19 multiorgan impact. Kidney Int. 2020;98(2):314–322. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Renu K., Prasanna P.L., Valsala Gopalakrishnan A. Coronaviruses pathogenesis, comorbidities and multi-organ damage - a review. Life Sci. 2020;255 doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zaim S., Chong J.H., Sankaranarayanan V., Harky A. COVID-19 and multiorgan response. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2020;45(8) doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2020.100618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bosmuller H., Traxler S., Bitzer M., Haberle H., Raiser W., Nann D., Frauenfeld L., Vogelsberg A., Klingel K., Fend F. The evolution of pulmonary pathology in fatal COVID-19 disease: an autopsy study with clinical correlation. Virchows Arch. 2020;477(3):349–357. doi: 10.1007/s00428-020-02881-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Menter T., Haslbauer J.D., Nienhold R., Savic S., Hopfer H., Deigendesch N., Frank S., Turek D., Willi N., Pargger H., Bassetti S., Leuppi J.D., Cathomas G., Tolnay M., Mertz K.D., Tzankov A. Post-mortem examination of COVID19 patients reveals diffuse alveolar damage with severe capillary congestion and variegated findings of lungs and other organs suggesting vascular dysfunction. Histopathology. 2020;77(2):198–209. doi: 10.1111/his.14134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Liu P., Wysocki J., Serfozo P., Ye M., Souma T., Batlle D., Jin J. A Fluorometric method of measuring carboxypeptidase activities for angiotensin II and Apelin-13. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:45473. doi: 10.1038/srep45473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Walls A.C., Park Y.J., Tortorici M.A., Wall A., McGuire A.T., Veesler D. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell. 2020;181(2):281–292. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058. (e6) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shang J., Ye G., Shi K., Wan Y., Luo C., Aihara H., Geng Q., Auerbach A., Li F. Structural basis of receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2. Nature. 2020;581(7807):221–224. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2179-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lan J., Ge J., Yu J., Shan S., Zhou H., Fan S., Zhang Q., Shi X., Wang Q., Zhang L., Wang X. Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature. 2020;581(7807):215–220. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2180-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Towler P., Staker B., Prasad S.G., Menon S., Tang J., Parsons T., Ryan D., Fisher M., Williams D., Dales N.A., Patane M.A., Pantoliano M.W. ACE2 X-ray structures reveal a large hinge-bending motion important for inhibitor binding and catalysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279(17):17996–18007. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311191200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Namsolleck P., Moll G.N. Does activation of the protective renin-angiotensin system have therapeutic potential in COVID-19? Mol. Med. 2020;26(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s10020-020-00211-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chung M.K., Karnik S., Saef J., Bergmann C., Barnard J., Lederman M.M., Tilton J., Cheng F., Harding C.V., Young J.B., Mehta N., Cameron S.J., McCrae K.R., Schmaier A.H., Smith J.D., Kalra A., Gebreselassie S.K., Thomas G., Hawkins E.S., Svensson L.G. SARS-CoV-2 and ACE2: the biology and clinical data settling the ARB and ACEI controversy. EBioMedicine. 2020;58 doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sarzani R., Giulietti F., Di Pentima C., Giordano P., Spannella F. Disequilibrium between the classic renin-angiotensin system and its opposing arm in SARS-CoV-2-related lung injury. Am. J. Phys. Lung Cell. Mol. Phys. 2020;319(2):L325–L336. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00189.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lopes R.D., Macedo A.V.S., de Barros E.S.P.G.M., Moll-Bernardes R.J., Feldman A., D’Andrea Saba Arruda G., de Souza A.S., de Albuquerque D.C., Mazza L., Santos M.F., Salvador N.Z., Gibson C.M., Granger C.B., Alexander J.H., de Souza O.F., B.C. investigators Continuing versus suspending angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers: impact on adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)—the BRACE CORONA Trial. Am. Heart J. 2020;226:49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ashkenazi A., Chamow S.M. Immunoadhesins as research tools and therapeutic agents. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 1997;9(2):195–200. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(97)80135-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chamow S.M., Duliege A.M., Ammann A., Kahn J.O., Allen J.D., Eichberg J.W., Byrn R.A., Capon D.J., Ward R.H., Ashkenazi A. CD4 immunoadhesins in anti-HIV therapy: new developments. Int. J. Cancer Suppl. 1992;7:69–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fletcher C.V., DeVille J.G., Samson P.M., Moye J.H., Jr., Church J.A., Spiegel H.M., Palumbo P., Fenton T., Smith M.E., Graham B., Kraimer J.M., Shearer W.T., P.S.G. Pediatric Aids Clinical Trials Group Nonlinear pharmacokinetics of high-dose recombinant fusion protein CD4-IgG2 (PRO 542) observed in HIV-1-infected children. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007;119(3):747–750. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.10.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Jacobson J.M., Israel R.J., Lowy I., Ostrow N.A., Vassilatos L.S., Barish M., Tran D.N., Sullivan B.M., Ketas T.J., O’Neill T.J., Nagashima K.A., Huang W., Petropoulos C.J., Moore J.P., Maddon P.J., Olson W.C. Treatment of advanced human immunodeficiency virus type 1 disease with the viral entry inhibitor PRO 542. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004;48(2):423–429. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.2.423-429.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jacobson J.M., Lowy I., Fletcher C.V., O’Neill T.J., Tran D.N., Ketas T.J., Trkola A., Klotman M.E., Maddon P.J., Olson W.C., Israel R.J. Single-dose safety, pharmacology, and antiviral activity of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 entry inhibitor PRO 542 in HIV-infected adults. J. Infect. Dis. 2000;182(1):326–329. doi: 10.1086/315698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Shearer W.T., Israel R.J., Starr S., Fletcher C.V., Wara D., Rathore M., Church J., DeVille J., Fenton T., Graham B., Samson P., Staprans S., McNamara J., Moye J., Maddon P.J., Olson W.C. Recombinant CD4-IgG2 in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children: phase 1/2 study. The Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 351 Study Team. J. Infect. Dis. 2000;182(6):1774–1779. doi: 10.1086/317622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Fridrich S., Karmilin K., Stocker W. Handling metalloproteinases. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. 2016;83 doi: 10.1002/0471140864.ps2116s83. (21 16 1-21 16 20) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Namuswe F., Berg J.M. Secondary interactions involving zinc-bound ligands: roles in structural stabilization and macromolecular interactions. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2012;111:146–149. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2011.10.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.McCall K.A., Huang C., Fierke C.A. Function and mechanism of zinc metalloenzymes. J. Nutr. 2000;130(5S Suppl):1437S–1446S. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.5.1437S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.