Skip to main content
. 2020 May 8;49(12):2003–2014. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01332-w

Table 2.

Significance of various ES’s flowing from Bohal Spring-shed as perceived by the villagers (based on 0–10 score)

ESS Sub-types Score ± SE
Provisioning (12) Green fodder 9.36 ± 0.20
Dry fodder 8.33 ± 0.29
Water 5.27 ± 0.44
Wild food 1.55 ± 0.21
Aromatic herbs 0.79 ± 0.09
Medicinal plants 1.59 ± 0.22
Bamboo for baskets/mats 3.76 ± 0.35
Wood for agricultural implements 1.35 ± 0.19
Timber for houses 0.76 ± 0.07
Poles for fencing 3.45 ± 0.36
Grass for broom/ropes 0.47 ± 0.07
Fuel wood 9.82 ± 0.04
Regulating (9) Spring recharge 9.19 ± 0.15
Regulate soil erosion 7.49 ± 0.35
Purify air 8.94 ± 0.14
Purify water 7.21 ± 0.34
Soil moisture 5.98 ± 0.35
Soil fertility 6.8 ± 0.31
Regulate local rain/snow fall 8.35 ± 0.21
Habitat for wild animals 8.89 ± 0.15
Regeneration of native species/nursery function 8.42 ± 0.18
Cultural (4) Temple of a local deity 5.94 ± 0.35
Satisfaction for pure environment 6.76 ± 0.32
National/international students visit to study community management 5.076 ± 0.35
Nature lover 6.53 ± 0.36