In the article by Li et al., 1 the published version of Table 4 is incorrect. Its content is identical with Table 5
The correct version of Table 4 is displayed below:
Table 4.
Analysis of DSS for histologic subtypes within specific DMS
| Bone metastasis | Brain metastasis | Liver metastasis | Lung metastasis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | |
| Histology Type | ||||||||
| IDC | REF a | ‐ | REF | ‐ | REF | ‐ | REF | ‐ |
| MBC | 1.06(0.525‐2.14) | .87 | 0.894 (0.318‐2.515) | .832 | 0.949 (0.236‐3.823) | .942 | 1.381 (0.895‐2.133) | .145 |
| Medullary | ‐ b | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 2.812 (0.696‐11.357) | .147 |
| IDC and LC | 1.202 (0.703‐2.054) | .502 | 0.627 (0.197‐1.99) | .428 | 0.804 (0.397‐1.629) | .545 | 0.72 (0.23‐2.252) | .572 |
| LC | 0.693 (0.43‐1.117) | .132 | 1.438 (0.351‐5.884) | .613 | 1.549 (0.764‐3.139) | .225 | 3.787 (1.205‐11.905) | .023 |
| IDC and other | 1.289 (0.574‐2.893) | .539 | 0.528 (0.073‐3.801) | .526 | 1.017 (0.377‐2.738) | .974 | 0.534 (0.219‐1.298) | .166 |
| Apocrine | 1.619 (0.403‐6.51) | .497 | ‐ | ‐ | 3.772(0.525‐27.092) | .187 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Inflammatory | 1.425 (0.861‐2.358) | .169 | 1.282 (0.558‐2.945) | .558 | 1.53(0.783‐2.989) | .213 | 1.11(0.636‐1.936) | .714 |
Bold indicates statistically significant value.
a
For calculation of HR value, a group of patients were defined as reference.
b
The number of patients was not enough for further calculation.
The authors apologize for this error.
REFERENCE
- 1. Li Y, Su P, Wang Y, et al. Impact of histotypes on preferential organ‐specific metastasis in triple‐negative breast cancer. Cancer Med. 2020;9:872–881. 10.1002/cam4.2759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]