Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Hematology & Blood Transfusion logoLink to Indian Journal of Hematology & Blood Transfusion
. 2020 Feb 27;36(4):745–748. doi: 10.1007/s12288-020-01265-0

A Pilot Study to Assess Transfusion Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus

Ahmed El-Nawawy 1, Shams Abdel-Fattah Arafa 2, Adham Ahmed Badeib 1, Manal A-M Antonios 1,
PMCID: PMC7572922  PMID: 33100720

Abstract

Alexandria University blood bank adopted double screening tests: a fully automated chemiluminescence immunoassay followed by nucleic acid testing. The aim of the study was to assess the efficiency of dual check of HCV in preventing transfusion related infection among patients admitted to PICU. A prospective cohort study was carried on patients admitted to PICU during 6 months. The included patients performed HCV RNA detection on admission by conventional reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technique. Only negative cases were recruited, then patients receiving blood or its product were checked after 4 weeks from discharge by RT-PCR for HCV RNA. A total of 33 patients received 108 transfusions: 9 patients of them deceased during PICU stay and the remaining 24 patients were all found to be negative for HCV. The dual screening of HCV should be implemented in all blood banks of Egypt especially for critically ill pediatric patients.

Keywords: Hepatitis C virus, Transfusion transmision, Safe blood HCV testing

Introduction

Egypt has the highest prevalence of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) in the world, estimated nationally at 14.7% [1]. Many individuals living with HCV are unaware of their infectious status [2]. Therefore, receipt of HCV-infected blood transfusions remains an important source of infection [3]. In general, the main screening assay for detecting anti-HCV is the enzyme immunoassay (EIA). However, one of the major risk factor causing HCV-transfusion transmission is the so-called “window period” during which the antibody tests are unable to identify subjects where the virus is present in plasma in large quantities while antibodies have not yet been produced [4]. Therefore, in the acute stage, anti-HCV reactivity may remain undetectable for several months even by the most sensitive assays [5].

In Egypt, HCV screening of donor blood through national protocols mandates only HCV antibodies detection by EIA [6]. While, Alexandria University blood bank adopted double screening tests: a fully automated chemiluminescence immunoassay followed by Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT). The aim of the present study was to assess the efficiency of this dual check of HCV in preventing transfusion related infection among patients admitted to Alexandria Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU).

Subjects and Methods

A prospective cohort study was designed after obtaining an informed consent from caregivers of patients admitted to PICU during 6 months period starting from first of October 2017. All admitted cases to the PICU were screened and those having past history of HCV infection or treatment or at risk of acquiring HCV from previous blood donation, dialysis, surgery, or HCV positive mothers were excluded. The included patients were subjected to routine laboratory and clinical data collection and performed HCV RNA detection on admission by conventional reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technique. Only negative cases were recruited, then the group of patients who were candidates for blood or blood products transfusion during their PICU stay were followed up after 4 weeks from discharge to repeat RT-PCR for HCV RNA detection.

Sample Size

Based on Prati review [7], a sample size of 33 patients was estimated enough required sample as statistically significant with 80% power and at a significance level of 95% (alpha error = 0.05) for a pilot study. Sample size was calculated using MedCalc Statistical Software version 14.8.1.

RT-PCR Detection Technique Steps

  1. RNA extraction from serum using QIA amp viral RNA Qiagen kit according to the manufacturer instructions.

  2. C DNA synthesis was generated from RNA template using ready to go RT-PCR beads (GE healthcare). Ready-to-go RT-PCR utilize Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus (M-Mul. V) reverse transcriptase and Taq DNA polymerase to generate PCR.

  3. Nested primers based on highly conserved 5′-non-coding region where the sequences of the outer primers (1CH-2CH) and the inner primers (i TS-4CH).

Results

Figure 1 shows the flow-diagram summarizing the recruitment strategy of the studied population, and Table 1 shows the comparison between transfused and non-transfused patients. The data showed that patients presenting with sepsis or gastrointestinal diseases were more in need for transfusion therapy. Transfused patients had significantly more days of PICU stay and their death rate was significantly higher than non-transfused patients.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

RECORD flow-diagram of the strategy of recruitment of the studied population

Table 1.

Comparison between transfused and non-transfused patients

Blood transfusion Test of sig. p
Transfused (n = 33) Non-transfused (n = 35)
No % No %
Age (months)
Min–max 5.00–96.0 1.00–168.0 Z = 1.959 0.050
Mean (SD) 10.99 (16.43) 33.17 (44.45)
Median (IQR) 6.0 (3–13) 13.0 (4–72)
Sex
Male 19 57.6 19 54.3 χ2 = 0.075 FEp = 0.758
Female 14 42.4 16 45.7
PIM 2 score
Min–max 4.60–97.0 3.50–99.0 Z = 0.976 0.329
Mean (SD) 54.65 (23.01) 50.66 (25.15)
Median (IQR) 64.0 (40.2–70) 50.0 (32.3–66)
Disease categorya
GIT cases 20 60.6 11 31.4 χ2 = 5.829* FEp = 0.016*
Respiratory cases 6 18.2 10 28.6 χ2 = 1.019 FEp = 0.313
Renal cases 4 12.1 3 8.6 χ2 = 0.232 FEp = 0.705
Cardiac cases 15 45.5 13 37.1 χ2 = 0.484 FEp = 0.486
Sepsis cases 21 63.6 9 25.7 χ2 = 9.908* FEp = 0.002*
DKA cases 0 0.0 3 8.6 χ2 = 2.959 FEp = 0.239
Drug toxicity cases 0 0.0 2 5.7 χ2 = 1.943 FEp = 0.493
Hematology cases 4 12.1 1 2.9 χ2 = 2.140 FEp = 0.191
Neurology cases 13 39.4 13 37.1 χ2 = 0.036 FEp = 0.849
Length of PICU stay (days)
Min–max 1.0–28.0 1.0–20.0 Z = 3.321* 0.001*
Mean (SD) 9.21 (5.82) 5.14 (4.52)
Median (IQR) 10.0 (4–13) 4.0 (2–6)
Fate
Deceased 9 27.27 2 5.7 χ2 = 7.066* FEp = 0.008*
Discharged 24 72.73 33 94.3

Z Z for Mann Whitney test, χ2 Chi square test, FE fisher exact for Chi square test, SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range, PIM 2 pediatric index of mortality, GIT gastrointestinal tract, DKA diabetic ketoacidosis

*Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05

aOne patient may have more than one disease category

A total of 33 patients received 108 transfusions: 53 times plasma, 34 packed red blood cells, and 21 times platelets. Nine patients of them deceased during PICU stay and the remaining 24 patients were all found to be negative for RT-PCR at follow-up after 4 weeks from PICU discharge.

Discussion

Developed countries have successfully implemented stringent donor screening, voluntary blood donation and advanced sensitivities of technologies for blood donation screening to reach acceptable levels of blood safety [8]. Blood safety presents a serious challenge in Egypt, having the highest recorded prevalence of HCV in the world [9]. The anti-HCV assays used for screening HCV infection in most Egyptian blood banks seems inadequate because most anti-HCV antibodies do not correlate well with viremia [10]. Second/third generation HCV antibody screening EIAs coupled with HCV RNA detection by NAT has resulted in marked reduction in transfusion transmission risk [8]. The Alexandria University blood bank adopted dual technique of HCV screening (PRISM, Abbott® anti-HCV immunoassay) followed by NAT (Procleix® Ultrio Elite, version: 2.4.5 NOVARTIS®) with a very high sensitivity ranging from 96 to 99.96% in literature [11, 12]. This meticulous screening has resulted in the not-astonishing results of the current study where no patients acquired HCV infection even after multi-transfusion. This is in accordance with many studies that stated that when both measures are associated, the risk of HCV infection post transfusion becomes negligible close to 0.1 per million blood supplies [8, 13, 14].

In 2015, Egypt launched an ambitious national HCV treatment program aiming to treat over 250,000 chronically infected individuals per year with the goal to reach a prevalence < 2% by 2025. Despite this progress, existing evidence suggests ongoing HCV transmission in Egypt, and medical care seems to be the primary source of past and present HCV transmission [15]. That is why screening of blood donations is of utmost importance especially in critically ill pediatric patients whose clinical condition is significantly worse than non-transfused patients as evidenced in Table 1 with a higher Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM-2) score, a longer length of stay and a higher mortality rate. These patients deserves all effort to prevent blood-borne HCV in order to avoid further complications to their originally critical situation.

Conclusion

The dual screening of HCV using serological licensed EIA and NAT should be implemented in all blood banks of Egypt together with a meticulous reporting of donors proved to be HCV positive for receiving adequate treatment and this could be an integral part of the current Egyptian National Screening program for HCV infection.

Author contributions

AEN responsible for research idea, draft revision. MAMA revision of the collected data and results, the manuscript writing. SAFA microbiological assessment. AAB collection of data.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors of this article declare no conflict of interest and all of them declare that they did not receive any financial support.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Ahmed El-Nawawy, Email: Dr_anawawy@yahoo.com.

Shams Abdel-Fattah Arafa, Email: shamsarafa@hotmail.com.

Adham Ahmed Badeib, Email: limaadham@yahoo.com.

Manal A.-M. Antonios, Email: malakmanal@yahoo.com

References

  • 1.Mahmoud YA, Mumtaz GR, Riome S, et al. The epidemiology of hepatitis C virus in Egypt: a systematic review and data analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:288. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Denniston MM, Jiles RB, Drobeniuc J, et al. Chronic hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, National health and nutrition survey. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:293–300. doi: 10.7326/M13-1133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hladik W, Kataaha P, Mermin J, et al. Prevalence and screening costs of hepatitis C virus among Ugandan blood donors. Trop Med Int Health. 2006;11:951–954. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01643.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lerat H, Blaine HF. HCV occult infection or occult HCV RNA detection. J Infect Dis. 2004;1:3–6. doi: 10.1086/380203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Busch MP, Rawal BD, Feibig EW, et al. Dynamics of HCV viremia and seroconversion in transfusion-acquired HCV infections. Transfusion. 1998;38:72s. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Takamizawa A, Mori C, Fuke I, et al. Structure and organization of the hepatitis C virus genome isolated from human carriers. J Virol. 1991;65:1105–1113. doi: 10.1128/JVI.65.3.1105-1113.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Prati D. Transmission of hepatitis C virus by blood transfusions and other medical procedures: a global review. J Hepatol. 2006;45:606–616. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Marwaha N, Sachdev S. Current testing strategies for hepatitis C virus infection in blood donors and the way foreword. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(43):12510–12512. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i43.12510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Omran D, Hussein AE, Nagib M. Safety of blood transfusion: an Egyptian study. J Infect Dis Ther. 2013;2(1):1–124. doi: 10.1007/s40121-013-0007-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Abdelrazik AM, Ezzat GM. Priority needs and wisdom strategy for blood transfusion safety in developing low resource countries. Transfus Apheresis Sci. 2016;54:147–9. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2015.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Halfon P, Bourlière M, Pénaranda G, et al. Real-time PCR assays for hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA quantitation are adequate for clinical management of patients with chronic HCV infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(7):2507–11. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00163-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chaurasia R, Rout D, Zaman S, et al. Comparison of Procleix Ultrio Elite and Procleix Ultrio NAT assays for screening of transfusion transmitted infections among blood donors in India. Int J Microbiol. 2016 doi: 10.1155/2016/2543156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zou S, Dorsey KA, Notari EP, et al. Prevalence, incidence and residual risk of HIV and HCV infections among US blood donors since the introduction of NAT. Transfusion. 2010;50(7):1495–1504. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02622.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Weusten J, Vermeulen M, van Drimmelen H, et al. Refinement of a viral transmission risk model for blood donations in seroconversion window phase screened by NAT in different pool sizes and repeat test algorithms. Transfusion. 2011;51:203–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02804.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kouyoumjian SP, Chemaitelly H, Abu-Raddad LJ. Characterizing HCV epidemiology in Egypt: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Nat Sci Rep. 2018 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17936-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Hematology & Blood Transfusion are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES