Skip to main content
European Spine Journal logoLink to European Spine Journal
. 2011 May 4;20(6):991. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1805-7

Anterior lumbar discectomy and disc replacement

Dick Zeilstra, Wolter Oosterhuis
PMCID: PMC7574893  PMID: 21541670

The content is available as a PDF (78.8 KB).

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Download video file (218.6MB, wmv)

Supplementary material 1 (WMV 223799 kb)

References

  • 1.Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine. 2004;29(17):1938–1944. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000137069.88904.03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brau SA. Mini-open approach to the spine for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: description of the procedure, results and complications. Spine J. 2002;2(3):216–223. doi: 10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00184-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bao Q-B, Yuan HA. Artificial disc technology. Neurosurg Focus. 2000;9(4):e14. doi: 10.3171/foc.2000.9.4.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Le Huec JC, Mathews H, Basso Y, Aunoble S, Hoste D, Bley B, Friesem T. Clinical results of Maverick lumbar total disc replacement: two-year prospective follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005;36(3):315–322. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Eerenbeemt KD, Ostelo RW, Royen BJ, Peul WC, Tulder MW. Total disc replacement surgery for symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(8):1262–1280. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1445-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yajun W, Yue Z, Xiuxin H, Cui C. A meta-analysis of artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(8):1250–1261. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1394-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Berg S, Tullberg T, Branth B, Olerud C, Tropp H. Total disc replacement compared to lumbar fusion: a randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(10):1512–1519. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1047-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Guyer RD, Siddiqui S, Zigler JE, Ohnmeiss DD, Blumenthal SL, Sachs BL, Hochschuler SH, Rashbaum RF. Lumbar spinal arthroplasty: analysis of one center’s twenty best and twenty worst clinical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33(23):2566–2569. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318185941a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Banco RJ, Bitan FD, Cappuccino A, Geisler FH, Hochschuler SH, Holt RT, Jenis LG, Majd ME, Regan JJ, Tromanhauser SG, Wong DC, Blumenthal SL. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up. Spine J. 2009;9(5):374–386. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Download video file (218.6MB, wmv)

Supplementary material 1 (WMV 223799 kb)


Articles from European Spine Journal are provided here courtesy of Springer-Verlag

RESOURCES