Abstract
Objectives
The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) introduced to curb the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) also interrupted the transmission of influenza.
Study design
This is a descriptive epidemiological study.
Methods
Data on changes in the number of reported influenza cases, number of influenza-like illness (ILI) visits, ILI percentage and influenza virus positivity were compared between the first 18 weeks of 2020 and the same period of 2019.
Results
The changes in the weekly average number of influenza cases were statistically significant between 2020 and 2019 (−4319 vs −525 per week; P < 0.05). The slopes of regression lines for the number of ILI visits were also statistically significant between 2020 and 2019 (−911 vs −98 per week; P < 0.05).
Conclusions
This study found that the prevalence of influenza was substantially decreased when NPIs were implemented for the containment of COVID-19.
Keywords: Influenza activity, COVID-19, Non-pharmaceutical interventions, Containment
Highlights
-
•
The prevalence of influenza was substantially decreased when non-pharmaceutical interventions were implemented for the containment of coronavirus disease 2019.
-
•
Changes in the weekly average number of influenza cases were statistically significant between 2020 and 2019 (−4319 vs −525 per week; P < 0.05).
-
•
Changes in the number of influenza-like illness visits were also statistically significant between 2020 and 2019 (−911 vs −98 per week; P < 0.05).
In December 2019, a cluster of acute respiratory illness, now known as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), occurred in Wuhan, Hubei Province in China.1 The condition rapidly spread globally, and on 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization declared a COVID-19 pandemic.2
To curb the spread of COVID-19, Zhejiang Province, located on the east coast of China with a population of 58.5 million, initiated the level-1 provincial public health rapid response on 23 January 2020. Consistent with the national emergency response, Zhejiang provincial government developed and implemented a package of strict non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), including but not limited to traffic restriction, quarantine of travellers from COVID-19 epidemic areas, closure of public entertainment places, cessation of festival celebrations, reduction of public gatherings, postponement of work resumption and school opening and closure of highway entrances and exits.3 The intense and multifaceted NPIs in China lead to a dramatic reduction of COVID-19.4 On 2 March and 23 March, Zhejiang Province downgraded the rapid response level to level-2 and level-3, respectively.
Studies from Singapore, Hong Kong and Taiwan in China have suggested that influenza transmission also declined substantially during the period when the NPIs were implemented to combat COVID-19.5, 6, 7 However, to date, no study has been conducted to evaluate the influence of NPIs on the epidemic of influenza in mainland China where comprehensive NPIs have been strictly, widely and effectively applied to prevent COVID-19. In this study, changes in the prevalence of influenza are reported during the period of COVID-19 rapid response interventions, which may contribute to coping with future influenza epidemics.
Influenza-like illness (ILI) sentinel surveillance data were reported by 16 hospitals in Zhejiang Province as part of the National Sentinel Influenza Surveillance Network. The number of cases of COVID-19 and influenza was reported to the Chinese National Notifiable Diseases Reporting System by all hospitals within the province. This study compared the changes in the number of reported influenza cases, the number of ILI visits, ILI percentage and influenza virus positivity in the first 18 weeks of 2020 with those during the same period of 2019. In terms of influenza cases and ILI visits, changes within the two time periods were compared using simple linear regression. The definitions of ILI, ILI percentage and influenza virus detection rate are consistent with a previous analysis.8
The number of influenza cases at the beginning of 2020 was stable with a high incidence. Moreover, the weekly number of influenza cases in the first 4 weeks in 2020 was higher than that in the same period of 2019 (Fig. 1 , panel A). However, the number of influenza cases then decreased rapidly, coinciding with the initiation of rapid response interventions to control COVID-19. The weekly average number of influenza cases between the 5th and 18th weeks in 2020 decreased by 97.5% compared with the first 4 weeks. The changes in the weekly average number of influenza cases (slope of regression lines) were statistically significant between 2020 and 2019 (−4319 vs −525 per week; P < 0.05) (Fig. 1, panel A).
Fig. 1.
Influenza-like illness (ILI) sentinel surveillance results in Zhejiang Province during the first 18 weeks of 2020 and 2019. (A) Reported influenza and COVID-19 cases; (B) the number of ILI visits in all sentinel hospitals; (C) ILI percentage; (D) influenza positivity of the samples tested.
The number of ILI visits was declining at the beginning of 2020, and this decline accelerated after the initiation of the rapid response (from the 5th week). The weekly average number of ILI cases after the initiation of rapid response interventions decreased by 86.6% compared with the first 4 weeks in 2020. In contrast, the number of ILI visits remained at a high level during the same period in 2019. The slopes of regression lines for the number of ILI visits were also statistically significant between 2020 and 2019 (−911 vs −98 per week; P < 0.05) (Fig. 1, panel B).
The trend of the change in ILI percentage was similar to the number of ILI visits between 2020 and 2019 (Fig. 1, panel C). However, the decline of influenza positivity in 2020 was more striking; influenza positivity plummeted from more than 60% in the first three weeks to less than 10% at week 7 in 2020. Influenza positivity even reached, and remained at, zero in the 12th to 18th weeks of 2020 (Fig. 1, panel D).
The peak influenza season in Zhejiang Province is usually from December to February or March of the following year.8 This study demonstrates that the implementation of rapid responses to COVID-19 in Zhejiang also significantly decreased the seasonal prevalence of influenza. Circulation of influenza virus was almost completely interrupted 4 weeks after the initiation of the rapid response. The influenza virus detection rate in sentinel hospitals' ILI specimens maintained at zero for several weeks. This phenomenon is rare, even in non-influenza seasons of previous years. Without the massive introduction of specific measures, such as vaccines or antiviral drugs for influenza, NPIs to contain COVID-19 have been shown to significantly decrease the prevalence of influenza.
Notably, avoidance of care-seeking for ILI may be a confounder of the current findings. However, during the rapid response periods, more efforts were made to identify individuals with influenza-like symptoms, such as screening body temperatures in public places and encouraging ILI cases to seek medical help to identify causes of ILI during the COVID-19 pandemic.9 In addition, SARS-CoV-2 and the influenza virus have similar modes of transmission through respiratory and contact routes. Therefore, NPIs to reduce or stop transmission of COVID-19 should have the same effect on influenza.7
Results of this study are consistent with the studies in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore, although the interventions in their communities may not have been implemented in such a large scale.5, 6, 7 Therefore, it was reasonable to infer that containment of seasonal influenza in Zhejiang in 2020 is a result of the rapid responses that were originally developed for controlling the spread of COVID-19.
In the early stages of an emerging influenza epidemic, there can be some delays in the availability of specific vaccines and shortage of antiviral drugs.10 NPIs, such as those implemented in the COVID-19 rapid response, should be taken into consideration to seize the short window of opportunity to reduce prevalence. In the present study, successful containment of seasonal influenza as a result of COVID-19 control measures has provided some useful insights for controlling emerging influenza epidemics in the future.
Author statements
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the physicians and staff in the 16 influenza surveillance hospitals across Zhejiang Province for their dedication in completing the countless numbers of data forms that made this work possible.
Ethical approval
The National Commission ruled that the collection of data for influenza and COVID-19 was part of a continuing public health investigation of an emerging outbreak. The study was therefore exempt from institutional review board assessment.
Funding
This study was funded by the Zhejiang Scientific and Technological Major Project Grant no. 2020C03124, (2) Zhejiang University Project under the special scientific research fund for COVID-19 Grant no. 2020XGZX047 and (3) Medical and Health Research Project of Zhejiang Health Commission Grant no. 2021KY629.
Competing interests
None declared.
Author contributions
J.P. and E.C. conceived the idea of the study. W.C. and W.S. analysed the data. S.L., F.L. and Z.Y. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools for the study. J.P. wrote the article.
References
- 1.Li Q., Guan X., Wu P. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1199–1207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.World Health Organization Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) situation report – 51. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/%2020200311-sitrep-51-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=1ba62e57_10
- 3.Tian H., Liu Y., Li Y. An investigation of transmission control measures during the first 50 days of the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Science. 2020;368(6491):638–642. doi: 10.1126/science.abb6105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhang J., Litvinova M., Liang Y. Changes in contact patterns shape the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Science. 2020;368(6498):1481–1486. doi: 10.1126/science.abb8001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kuo S.C., Shih S.M., Chien L.H., Hsiung C.A. Collateral benefit of COVID-19 control measures on influenza activity, Taiwan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(8) doi: 10.3201/eid2608.201192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Soo R.J.J., Chiew C.J., Ma S., Pung R., Lee V. Decreased influenza incidence under COVID-19 control measures, Singapore. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(8) doi: 10.3201/eid2608.201229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cowling B.J., Ali S.T., Ng T.W.Y. Impact assessment of non-pharmaceutical interventions against coronavirus disease 2019 and influenza in Hong Kong: an observational study. Lancet Publ Health. 2020;5(5):e279–e288. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30090-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cheng W., Yu Z., Liu S. Comparison of influenza epidemiological and virological characteristics between outpatients and inpatients in Zhejiang province, China, March 2011-June 2015. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2017;14(2) doi: 10.3390/ijerph14020217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen S., Yang J., Yang W., Wang C., Barnighausen T. COVID-19 control in China during mass population movements at New Year. Lancet. 2020;395(10226):764–766. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30421-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Aledort J.E., Lurie N., Wasserman J., Bozzette S.A. Non-pharmaceutical public health interventions for pandemic influenza: an evaluation of the evidence base. BMC Publ Health. 2007;7:208. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]