Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Oct 20;10:17815. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74130-9

Synthesis of bio-oil from waste Trichosanthes cucumerina seeds: a substitute for conventional fuel

Rajayokkiam Manimaran 1,, Kandasamy Murugu Mohan Kumar 1, Nagarajan Sathiya Narayanan 1
PMCID: PMC7575580  PMID: 33082402

Abstract

The present study explores the methodology for the synthesis of bio-oil from waste trichosanthes cucumerina seeds by the solvent extraction method. It investigates the yield percentage, concentration of free fatty acids and acid contents in the extracted bio-oil. Effects of size of the crushed seeds, moisture content, extraction time, solvent to seed ratio and extraction temperatures were examined. The non-polar hexane solvent resulted in a higher percentage of oil yield (28.4 ± 0.4%) for the crushed seed size of 0.21 mm, 6% moisture content, 270 min extraction time, 68 °C temperature and 6:1(ml/g) of solvent to seed ratio. The synthesized bio-oil was characterized using Fourier Transform Infra-Red spectrum and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectroscopy analysis. The properties of the bio-oil and biodiesel were assessed according to the American Society for Testing and Materials and the Association of Official Analytical Chemists standards. The obtained methyl-ester by trans-esterification process results in the fuel properties closer to the conventional fuel. Thus, Trichosanthes cucumerina bio-diesel can be used as a potential substitute.

Subject terms: Renewable energy, Mechanical engineering, Biodiesel

Introduction

The increase in the percentage of energy consumption by various sectors makes the fossil sources in deficiency and makes the researchers start to shift to renewable energy sources1. Among the various alternative sources, straight vegetable oil has identical fuel properties, sulphur-free and bio-degradable, which makes it as the substitute for fossil fuels2. The bio-diesel from renewable sources shown positive impacts for better engine performances and cleaner emissions in the automotive sector3. In general, the vegetable oils are classified as edible and non-edible feedstocks. The edible feedstocks namely coconut, olive, palm, peanut, rice bran, soybean and sunflower are the predominant in the production of bio-diesel but leads to risk in food supplies, bio-diversity and increase the cost of the fuel. Therefore, the non-edible feedstocks like cottonseed, jatropha, jojoba, polanga, karanja, linseed, mahua, neem, rubber seed and tobacco were considered as the substitutes4,5.

The bio-origin materials produce a variety of biofuels through the conversion routes of pressing, extraction, chemical processes (hydrolysis and trans-esterification), biochemical processes (fermentation and anaerobic digestion), thermochemical processes (flash pyrolysis, gasification and hydrothermal liquefaction) and direct combustion6. The reactive extraction is considered as the most viable technology in the production of bio-diesel compared with other methods. The reactive extraction based soxhlet extractor combines the oil extraction and transesterification processes used for the bio-oil production using various seeds7,8. Crotalaria juncea oil, jojoba oil, zanthoxylum bungeanum oil, jatropha oil, indigofera colutea oil, soybean oil, senna occidentalis oil, cassia javanica oil and palm oil were produced with the soxhlet extractor and reported in the literature9,10.

In the trans-esterification process, the traces of free fatty acids in the oil extracted gets removed and produce the by-products of ester and crude glycerol with the assistance of an acid catalyst, alkali catalyst and purification process1113. This trans-esterification process is considered as the most feasible and commercially used technique for the conversion of methyl esters and effective reduction of viscosity for the bio-oils14. The physicochemical properties such as cetane number, heating value, kinematic viscosity, density, flash and fire points of the bio-diesel obtained using trans-esterification processes were assessed with ASTM standard methods15.

The bio-oil extraction from jatropha curcas seeds was studied with the functional parameters of solvent namely extraction temperature, type of solvent used (n-hexane and petroleum ether), solvent-to-seed ratio, extraction time and particle size of the seeds. The n-hexane solvent was seen with the maximum efficiency and 1.3% higher when compared to petroleum ether for the optimum condition16. The separation of bio-oil from urban waste putranjiva roxbughii seeds were carried out with the five different solvents (Diethyl ether, Hexane, Isopropanol, Toluene and Chloroform). The non-polar solvent hexane seen with better results compared to other considered solvents and also reported that the higher boiling point of toluene requires more heat to form vapour during the solvent recovery distillation process compared to hexane17. The non-polar solvents (toluene, chloroform and n-hexane) produced maximum bio-oil yield compared to polar solvents (methanol and 2-propanol) in the extraction of bio-oil from date palm seeds18.

This research is focussed on the synthesis of bio-oil extraction from the waste trichosanthes cucumerina seeds and its fundamental properties were investigated. Further, the trans-esterification process was carried out to remove the free fatty acids in the bio-oil and converted to bio-diesel. The trichosanthes cucumerina biodiesel was obtained from trans-esterification processes with effective fuel properties. The presence of functional groups and the free fatty acid content were characterized using GC–MS and FTIR analysis. The properties of trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil and bio-diesel were measured using the AOAC and ASTM standard methods and compared with the conventional fuel.

Materials and methods

Trichosanthes cucumerina seed and solvents

The trichosanthes cucumerina is an oil-rich seed plant that comes under the family of curcubitaceae. It originated in Asian countries and referred as snake gourd, viper gourd and snake tomato. Figure 1 shows the trichosanthes cucumerina which are 40–120 cm long, pale-green in colour, 0.5–1 kg weight (single fruit) and contains 40–70 seeds. Seeds are received from the local market and segregated for the bio-oil production. Five solvents namely polar protic (methanol, ethanol and isopropanol), dipolar aprotic (acetone) and non-polar (hexane) purchased from SRL Chemicals Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India. The physical properties of the different solvents are listed in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Trichosanthes cucumerina fruit, waste seed, TCO and TCB. It presents the image of Trichosanthes cucumerina fruit and its collection of waste seed. Also, the extraction of bio-oil and production of bio-diesel.

Table 1.

Properties of different solvents used1821.

Solvent parameters Solvents used
Acetone Methanol Hexane Ethanol Isopropanol
Chemical formula C3H6O CH3OH C6H14 C2H5OH C3H7OH
Boiling point (°C) 56.1 64.5 68.7 78.3 82.3
Density (kg/m3) 784 791.4 655 789.3 786
Refractive index at 20 °C 1.36 1.33 1.375 1.36 1.376
Dielectric Constant at 20 °C 20.7 32.7 1.88 24.5 18.6
Latent heat of vaporization (kJ/kg) 511 1100 335 836 666
Viscosity at 20 °C (mPa-s) 0.33 0.593 0.32 1.19 2.37
Surface tension at 20 °C (mN/m) 25.20 22.70 18.43 22.10 23

Bio-oil extraction process

The segregated seeds were washed with distilled water (in-house) for the removal of impurities. The seeds outer layer were removed and dried in an oven at 65 °C temperature. The dried seeds were crushed in the oilseed crushing machine (SASTRA Deemed University, Tanjore, Tamil Nadu, India) and obtained with 7% of the bio-oil yield from the taken 200 g of trichosanthes cucumerina seeds. From the literature, the soxhlet extractor was selected to extract the bio-oil yield8,9. The round bottom flask of 500 ml capacity, filled with 280 ml of hexane and kept in the heating mantle. The powdered cucumerina seeds of 200 g were packed with a satin cloth which was held inside the thimble. A reflux condenser was attached at the top with inlet and outlet ports for cooling water circulation using aquarium motor. The heated solvent vapors were passed over the bio-mass through distillation path and cooled using a condenser. The cold vapor drips back into the chamber, which was emptied by siphoning action. It results in an extracted trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil with solvent and the oil retrieved seed waste is depicted in Fig. 2. In batch distillation process, the obtained bio-oil and solvent mixtures were heated (25 to 85 °C) to evaporate the solvents to separate the bio-oil from the solvent as shown in Fig. 3. The experimental work was performed for three times with each solvent and the average was considered.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil extraction flow process. The bio-oil extraction from powdered cucumerina seed with hexane using a Soxhlet apparatus produces the oil retrieved seed waste and bio-oil associated with hexane.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Batch distillation flow process. The mixture of bio-oil with solvent collected from Soxhlet extractor was separated through a separation process. It resulted in around 60% of the solvent, and 28.4% of bio-oil yield.

Trans-esterification process

The bio-oil leached from trichosanthes cucumerina seeds found with FFA content via GC–MS test which needs the trans-esterification process. In the process, the triglycerides of trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil converted into its mono-esters by reacting with alcohols in the presence of NaOH or KOH18,22. The bio-oil prepared from the seeds of trichosanthes cucumerina fruit was subjected to the transesterification process using acid-catalyzed esterification, alkali catalyzed esterification and purification stages. Initially, the bio-oil was mixed with methyl alcohol in 16:1 molar ratio then added with 1% of H2SO4. The mixture was heated at 60 °C for 45 min which reduced the acid value of bio-oil to less than 4 mg of KOH/g23. Next, the bio-oil (750 ml) and methyl alcohol (400 ml) were mixed with alkali catalyst (NaOH) and subjected to stirring at a constant speed of 1500 rpm for 30 min duration. The end of the process observed with fatty acid methyl ester, glycerol and the traces of NaOH. Further processing with the addition of HCL and H2O and followed by the purification process, the traces were removed and obtained with 93.4 ± 0.2% Trichosanthes Cucumerina Biodiesel (TCB). The trans-esterification process, as shown in Fig. 4, was carried out at SASTRA Deemed University, Tanjore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The sequence of trans-esterification process. It is the process to which triglycerides of Trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil converted into their mono-esters by reacting them with alcohols (methanol or ethanol) in the presence of a catalyst (NaOH or KOH).

Bio-oil yield

The percentage of bio-oil yield was calculated with the formula (1) for all the five different solvents considered in the research (methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, acetone and hexane).

%ofbio-oilyield.=Trichosanthescucumerinabio-oilgmTrichosanthescucumerinaseedgm×100 1

The corresponding percentage differences between the different solvents is shown in Fig. 5. It was evident that hexane resulted in a high percentage of yield was about 28.4 ± 0.4%. It may be attributed due to its low latent heat of vaporization, the minimum value of dielectric constant and surface tension, lower density and viscosity as compared with other solvents are listed in Table 1. The least percentage of 20.54 ± 0.2% was found with ethanol due to their higher polarity and solubility in water which declined the bio-oil yield. The results obtained in this research were in line with the results of the other researchers8,17,20,2427, are reported in Table 2.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The maximum percentage of bio-oil yield with different solvents. The bar charts represent the comparison of the maximum percentage of bio-oil yield with different solvents used.

Table 2.

Comparison of Trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil (TCO) yield using different solvents.

Bio-oils Bio-oil yield (%)
Acetone Methanol Hexane Ethanol Isopropanol Butanol Petroleum ether Chloroform Toulene
TCO [This study] 26.50 ± 0.2 22.35 ± 0.15 28.40 ± 0.4 20.54 ± 0.2 25.40 ± 0.3
ZSO8 20.2 26.3 23.4 25.3
PRSO17 43.07 40.61 36.9 25.6 30.5
CGAO20 8.6 11.76 9.8 7.6 9
ULO24 6.55 ± 0.04 7.51 ± 0.04 8.53 ± 0.04 7 ± 0.05 7.89 ± 0.06
SSO25 19.28 20.3 22.65 23.46 18.72 15.23
CFSO26 12.5 18 27.03 22 15.2
CJSO27 20.5 18.5 24.4 22.3 16.5 20.6

ZSO Zanthoxylum bungeanum seed oil, SSO Senna occidentalis seed oil, ULO Ulva lactuca oil, CFSO Cassia fistula seed oil, CJSO Cassia javanica seed oil, PRSO Putranjiva roxburghii seed oil, CGAO Cladophora glomerata algal oil.

Results and Discussion

Effect of moisture content

The weight of the seeds with moisture and without moisture was measured using infrared moisture analyzer. For the first set of experiments, trichosanthes cucumerina seeds with the moisture content of 1 ± 0.02% were considered to check the yield of bio-oil with hexane as the solvent and resulted in 20.5 ± 0.3%. The increase in bio-oil yield was observed for the moisture content of seed between 1 ± 0.02% to 6 ± 0.02%, as shown in Fig. 6. Further increase in moisture content reduced the yield since the penetration of hexane into the trichosanthes cucumerina seed, and the higher moisture content functioned as the barrier for bio-oil extraction2830. The higher percentage of yield (28.01 ± 0.3%) was observed at 6% of moisture content, by keeping other parameters as constant (size of seed as 0.21 mm, extraction time of 270 min, at 68 °C and the solvent-to-seed ratio of 6:1 ml/g hexane). The further increase in the percentage of moisture content shows in the reduction of bio-oil yield. Farsie and Singh31 reported that the maximum percentage of bio-oil yield was obtained from sunflower seeds expressed at 6% of moisture content. Muhammad Muhammad Fadhlullah et al.32 determined the effect of moisture content in the bio-oil generation using Calophyllum inophyllum L. seeds. It was observed that the yield was increased from 28.87% to 33.39% for the moisture content of the seeds of 0% and 1.2% respectively. In contrast, the increase in moisture content to 20% the yield gets reduced to 15.56%. Orhevba et al.33 experimented with 6.3, 8.1, 13.2 and 16.6% of moisture content of neem seed kernel and observed with 22.3, 24.86, 21.21 and 15.62% of bio-yield respectively. The maximum percentage of bio-oil yield of 24.86% was observed at the optimum moisture of 8.1% while the least yield of 15.62% was recorded at the highest moisture content of 16.6%. Suganya and Renganathan24 carried out bio-oil extraction from marine macroalgae Ulva Lactuca with 12 different solvents. The authors observed the maximum bio-oil yield at 5% of moisture content with hexane as solvent after with 5% the yield gets declined.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Effect of moisture content on bio-oil yield using hexane. The moisture content (%) of the seed increases with an increase in bio-oil yield with the optimum conditions of 0.21 mm seed size, 270 min extraction time, 68 °C temperature and 6:1(ml/g) of solvent to seed ratio.

Effect of seed size

The extraction of bio-oil was carried out with different sizes of the seed in the range 0.6 ± 0.02 mm to 0.15 ± 0.02 mm were present in Fig. 7. Initially, the seed of size 0.6 ± 0.02 mm was considered for the experimentation with hexane as a solvent which resulted in 20.54 ± 0.3% of bio-oil yield. Further experiments have seen with an increasing trend of yield till 0.21 ± 0.02 mm size of the seed (bio-oil yield as 28.30 ± 0.4%) after which for the seed size of 0.15 ± 0.02 mm, the bio-oil yield get declined. Thereby the seed size seems to be the next critical parameter for the bio-oil yield extraction. The increase in contact between the solvent and seed, and mass transfer of seed (solid-state) to solvent (liquid state) shows that the decrease in the size of the seeds increased the bio-oil yield34. Qian et al.35 reported that yield from cottonseed gets increased with the reduction of particle size; in contrast, the further reduction has not shown the improvement in the yield extraction. The decrease in seed size would not always increase the yield due to the range limit, which helps in optimizing the yield32. The results obtained in this work were in line with the reported works of literature, the Ulva Lactuca reported with a high yield of 10.9% with the seed size of 0.15 mm29 and Adenanthera pavonina seen with a high yield of 26.2% for the particle size of 0.25 mm25.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Effect of seed size on bio-oil yield using hexane. The crushed seed size (mm) decreases with an increase in bio-oil yield (optimum conditions: 6% moisture content, 270 min extraction time, 68 °C temperature and 6:1(ml/g) of solvent to seed ratio.

Effect of extraction time

The effect of extraction time at different time intervals of 90,150,210,270 and 330 min for the bio-yield was examined. Figure 8 illustrates that the increase in extraction time increased the bio-oil yield from 90 to 270 min, a further increase in extraction time decreased the yield (say at 330 min). The bio-oil extraction time increased gradually, which also increases the yield percentage up to a certain extent, after that the yield reaches a plateau at longer time duration36. Hence the extraction time 270 min was remarked to be the optimum time for further examinations. From the literature, it was observed that the Senna occidentalis seeds produced the maximum oil yield 23.46% with the optimum extraction time of 210 min37. Theresa et al.38 investigated the extraction time between 30 to 300 min using Indigofera colutea seeds with hexane as the solvent and seen with maximum yield (38.45%) obtained at 210 min, further extension of time decreased the bio-oil yield.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Effect of extraction time on bio-oil yield using hexane as a solvent. The bio-oil extraction from Trichosanthes cucumerina seed using hexane with the impact of time, as shown in the graph. The hexane produces maximum bio-oil yield (28.15 ± 0.3%) as compared with other solvents at an optimum extraction time of 270 min.

Effect of solvent-to-seed ratio

The effect of solvent-to-seed ratio was also explored by varying the ratio between 2:1 to 7:1, as given in Table 3. The increase in the bio-oil yield percentage was observed until 6:1, a further increase in ratio reduced the yield percentage. The increase in solvent volume significantly improved the yield until the value of the equilibrium reached, a further increase in solvent volume not seen with any improvement29. Suganya and Renganathan24 experimented on marine macroalgae Ulva Lactuca with the solvent-to-seed ratio varied from 3:1 to 6:1, which increased the bio-oil yield from 9% to 10.88%. The yield gets reduced for the further increase of solvent volume.

Table 3.

Effects of solvent-to-seed (ml/g) ration and temperature (°C) on bio-oil yield extraction.

Solvent-to-seed ratio (ml/g) Bio-oil yield (%) Extraction temperature (°C) Bio-oil yield (%)
2:1 12.85 ± 0.1 28 18.34 ± 0.15
3:1 20.35 ± 0.2 38 21.05 ± 0.2
4:1 22.35 ± 0.2 48 23.74 ± 0.2
5:1 26.5 ± 0.3 58 26.8 ± 0.3
6:1 28.4 ± 0.4 68 27.81 ± 0.4
7:1 26.2 ± 0.3 78 25.3 ± 0.3

Effect of extraction temperature

The variation of extraction temperature on the bio-oil yield obtained from Trichosanthes cucumerina seed with all solvents was conducted over the range of 28 to 78 °C. The increase in bio-oil yield (hexane as solvent) from 18.34 ± 0.15% to 25.3 ± 0.3 was obtained as given in Table 3. The rise in extraction temperature increases the bio-oil yield, due to the mass transfer rate and solubilization of hexane. The lower viscosity (0.32 mPa s) and surface tension (18.43 mN/m) of hexane which improves the diffusivity and solubilization inside the solid matrix at higher temperature resulted in maximum extraction rate. The solvent dissolution capacity also would increase the bio-oil yield. On the further rise in temperature beyond 68 °C (boiling point of hexane), the bio-oil yield content decreased39. This rise in temperature increased the solvent boil off and reduced the active contact area between solid and liquid phases40. The hexane provided the maximum amount of oil extraction (27.81 ± 0.4%) with the optimum temperature of 68 °C. It was detected that the solubility of the solvent increased with an increase in the diffusion rate41. Sayyar et al.16 considered the role of extraction temperature, the higher percentage of bio-oil yield of 47.3% from Jatropha curcas using hexane as the solvent at 68 °C. Milan D. Kostic et al.42 optimized the extraction of bio-oil from hemp seeds using n-hexane solvent. The results show that the extraction temperature of n-hexane (at 70 °C) increased the hemp seed oil yield because of improved oil solubility in the solvent. Karthikeyan Murugesan and Renganathan Sahadevan27 optimized the non-edible bio-oil extraction from Cassia javanica seeds using different solvents. The hexane was the best extractor to extract the maximum percentage of bio-oil yield was about 24.4% with the optimum conditions (extraction temperature at 68 °C and extraction time at 3.5 h).

GC–MS Analysis

The GC–MS test analysis (refer Table 4) was performed to measure the various factors of bio-oil, presence of FFA composition and different types of hydrocarbons43,44. The trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil organic compounds were measured by the test method of gas chromatography (Fig. 9), model PerkinElmer Clarus 500 coupled with a mass spectrometer. The Capillary Column Elite-5MS was used for the separation of components in bio-oil fraction for the length of 30 m. The flow rate of carrier gas fixed at 1 mL/min and the GC was operated at 58.3 min for the helium flow rate of 1 mL/min. The temperature ranges from 150 to 280 °C at 10 °C /min was maintained in the column. A sample volume of 1.0µL trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil in chloroform was injected through a split mode, with 1:10 split ratio. The MS condition for the mass range was set to 40 to 450 amu with the complete mode of electron ionization with the electron energy of 70 eV. The components in the sample have been identified using Turbomass ver 5.2.0 software and NIST 2005 mass spectral library. From the GC–MS analysis, 22 free fatty acids were found as listed in Table 4. The oleic acid (C18H34O2) contributed 43.27%, dodecanoic acid (C12H24O2) with 13.14%, n-Hexadecanoic acid (C16H32O2) with 13.21%, Octadecanoic acid (C18H36O2) with 12.3% of the total composition percentage. Among them, 61.14% of unsaturated and 34.09% of saturated fatty acids were present in the trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil.

Table 4.

Fatty acid composition of Trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil through GC–MS analysis.

Fatty acids Molecular formula Molecular weight Retention time %Peak area
Hexanoic acid C6H12O2 116 9.31 0.2581
Nonanoic acid C9H18O2 158 11.71 0.0418
Undecanoic acid, ethyl ester C13H26O2 214 13.85 0.0806
Octanoic Acid C8H16O2 144 14.04 2.7896
2-Decenal, (E)- C10H18O 154 15.34 0.3680
2-Dodecanone C12H24O 184 15.91 0.0403
2H-Pyran-2-one, 6-ethyltetrahydro- C7H12O2 128 16.25 0.6635
2,4-Decadienal C10H16O 152 16.82 0.3009
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-propyl- C8H14O2 142 22.86 0.2332
Dodecanoic acid C12H24O2 200 27.67 13.1398
2H-Pyran-2-one, 6-hexyltetrahydro- C11H20O2 184 32.62 0.1087
Decanoic acid, ethyl ester C12H24O2 200 34.41 0.0549
Tetradecanoic acid C14H28O2 228 34.61 7.5717
2-Nonadecanone C19H38O 282 37.08 0.0885
Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester C18H36O2 284 38.85 0.0460
n-Hexadecanoic acid C16H32O2 256 39.12 13.2114
Oleic Acid C18H34O2 282 42.62 43.2662
Octadecanoic acid C18H36O2 284 42.84 12.3392
Hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)ethyl ester C19H38O4 330 43.56 0.2971
Z,E-3,13-Octadecadien-1-ol C18H34O 266 43.81 0.4736
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, (Z,Z,Z)- C18H30O2 278 44.81 3.1031
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)ethyl ester C21H40O4 356 46.39 1.5240

Figure 9.

Figure 9

GC–MS Chromatogram of Trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil. The trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil organic compounds were measured by the test method of gas chromatography. It found twenty-two free fatty acids were present in the trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil. It results in the percentage of unsaturated fatty acids as high as saturated fatty acids.

FTIR analysis

The presence of polymer, organic and inorganic materials were identified through the Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy analyzer. An infrared light source scans the test samples and analyses the chemical properties45. This analytical method was used to analyze the chemical bonds and its nature, based on its stretching or bending on exposure to infrared radiation. In this study, the Deuterated Tri Glycine Sulphate (DTGS) detector was used, which works on the variation in the temperature and IR radiation intensity. The FTIR spectra were recorded between 500 and 4000 cm−1 in the transmission mode for the trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil, as shown in Fig. 10. The various functional groups which were identified are tabulated in Table 5. The C–H stretching at 2922.59 cm−1, 2855.1 cm−1 shows the presence of alkanes and the C=C stretch ensure the presence of the aromatic compounds17,46. The presence of oxygenated functional groups (O–H, C–O and C=O) indicated the high percentage of oxygen content in the bio-oil and inferred the acidic nature. The presence of hydrocarbon groups indicates the potential usage of bio-oil as the alternate source of energy47.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Spectra of Trichosanthes cucumerina seed oil according to FTIR analysis. The FTIR spectra were recorded between 500 cm−1 and 4000 cm−1 in the transmission mode for the trichosanthes cucumerina seed oil. The C–H stretching at 2922.59 cm−1and 2855.1 cm−1 shows the presence of alkanes. The C=C stretch proves the presence of the aromatic compounds. The presence of oxygenated functional groups (O–H, C-O and C = O) indicates the high percentage of oxygen content in the bio-oil.

Table 5.

Functional groups of Trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil according to FTIR analysis.

Wave Number (cm−1) Functional groups Compound class References
Theoretical Range Experimental value
3200–3600 3473.17 O–H Stretching Phenols, Alcohols 48
2810–3000 2922.59 C–H Stretching Aliphatics–Alkanes
2810–3000 2855.1 C–H Stretching Aliphatics–Alkanes
1715–1755 1743.33 C=O Stretching Aldehydes and Ketones 49
1400–1550 1458.89 C=C Stretching Aromatic 50
1210–1260 1244.83 C–O Bending Ester 51
1110–1210 1157.08 C–OH Stretching Tertiary Alcohol 47
1080–1160 1106.94 C–O Stretching Aliphatic ether, Secondary alcohol 52
950–1010 991.232  =C–H Bending Alkene 47
670–810 723.175 C–H Bending Aromatic 49

Fuel properties

The fuel properties of Trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil (TCO), Trichosanthes cucumerina biodiesel (TCB) and Diesel fuel (DF) are tested as per the AOAC and ASTM standards and carried out at Delta Inspection & Research Laboratory, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. The properties like kinematic viscosity (ν), fuel density (ρ), heating value, iodine number and saponification value (SV), cetane number, flash and fire points were checked and listed in Table 6.

Table 6.

Comparison of DF, TCO and TCB fuel properties.

Fuel properties Diesel fuel TCO TCB Standard methods
Chemical formula C10H22 C16H30O2 C12H26O2 Calculation
Molecular weight (g/mol) 142.282 252.487 203.61 Calculation
Kinematic viscosity (cSt) 2.71 42.85 4.26 ASTM D 445
Density (kg/m3) 836 912 856 ASTM D 4052
Heating value (MJ/kg) 42.5 32.45 38.50 ASTM D 3286
Cetane number (CN) 51 35 44 ASTM D 613
Flash Point (°C) 67 236 158 ASTM D 93
Fire Point (°C) 86 262 169 ASTM D 93
Acid value (mg KOH/g) 0.1 2.16 1.74 ASTM D 664
Sulphur (mg/kg) 29 ASTM D 2622
Iodine value (gI2/100 g) 38.3 82.4 67.2 AOAC CD1-25
Saponification value (mg KOH/g) 121.37 74.3 AOAC CD3-25

Fuel density (ρ) and kinematic viscosity (ν)

The fuel density was measured at the reference temperature of 15 °C using hydrometer and found to be 8.33% (TCO) and 6.14% (TCB) higher than diesel. The higher number of unsaturated fatty acid contents in the bio-oil increases the molecular weight. It results in higher fuel density which leads to increased compression ratio, specific fuel consumption and the rate of oxidation. The TCB density was very closer to the value of diesel fuel caused more thermal stability of the biodiesel53,54. The Redwood viscometer was used to measure the viscosity. The TCO obtained 42.75 cSt of kinematic viscosity which was 14.82 times higher than that of diesel which attributed to an increase in the free fatty acid chain, the breakdown of intermolecular forces and adhesion between biofuel molecules7. The TCB resulted in decreased kinematic viscosity and 9.05 times lesser than TCO, which improves the fuel characteristics of atomization and vaporization and provides better engine performance55.

Other properties

The other properties like fuel heating value, iodine number, saponification value, cetane number can also be referred in Table 6. The fuel heating values were numerically calculated using Dulong’s formula56. The higher proportion of oxygen content in the bio-oil resulted in lower heat energy (32.45 MJ/kg) as compared to diesel. The heating value of TCB moderately increased with the trans-esterification to 38.50 MJ/kg. It can release a higher amount of heat energy during fuel combustion, which improves engine performance57,58. The percentage of unsaturated FFA present in the bio-oil was measured as the iodine number. The Trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil has an iodine number of 82.4. The degree of unsaturation affects the thermal stability of the fuel and results in carbon deposits59. The saponification values were calculated as the amount of potassium hydroxide required for the complete hydrolysis per gram of bio-oil. The saponification value of the Trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil obtained as 121.37 mg KOH/g. In the other reported works, the saponification values of 192 and 212 mg KOH/g were obtained for Calophyllum inophyllum L. and Ulva lactuca seeds respectively24,60 which are higher than the value obtained in this research. The higher saponification values may result in corrosion problem in the diesel engine61. The cetane number of 51, 35 and 44 was obtained for diesel, TCO and TCB respectively. Higher cetane number of TCB entails shorter ignition delay leads to improved diffusion part of combustion equated with premixed phase39,62.

Conclusion

Five different solvents were used to synthesis the bio-oil from Trichosanthes cucumerina seeds. The hexane was found to be the better solvent as compared with other solvents. The maximum bio-oil yield was achieved of 28.4 ± 0.4% at a temperature of 68 °C, 0.21 mm crushed seed size, 6% moisture content, 270 min extraction time, and 6:1(ml/g) of solvent to seed ratio. The FTIR analysis shows the higher percentage of oxygen content and less sulphur content in the trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil. The GC–MS results are seen with the saturated (43.27%) and unsaturated fatty acids (61.14%). The biodiesel was produced from trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil through the three stages of the trans-esterification process, which produced 93.4 ± 0.2% of biodiesel. The physicochemical properties of the trichosanthes cucumerina bio-oil and biodiesel were analyzed using AOAC and ASTM standards. The biodiesel properties obtained (heating value—38.74 MJ/kg, kinematic viscosity—4.26 cSt and cetane number—44) were closer to diesel fuel, and it can be considered in the diesel engine as an efficient alternative source.

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank the management of SASTRA Deemed University for providing support in carrying out the synthesis, testing and measurements.

Author contributions

R. Manimaran as being the corresponding author, was worked on the synthesis of bio-oil, the conversion of biodiesel and testing. K. Murugu Mohan Kumar has guided in the processing and analysis of test results. N. Sathiya Narayanan contributed in the English reading and corrections. All authors are thankful to the unknown reviewers for their valuable inputs to improve the quality.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Balamurugan T, Arun A, Sathishkumar GB. Biodiesel derived from corn oil: a fuel substitute for diesel. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018;94:772–778. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rajkumar S, Thangaraja J. Effect of biodiesel, biodiesel binary blends, hydrogenated biodiesel and injection parameters on NOx and soot emissions in a turbocharged diesel engine. Fuel. 2019;240:101–118. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.11.141. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dhinesh B, Ambrose YM, Kalaiselvan C, Krishnamoorthy R. A numerical and experimental assessment of a coated diesel engine powered by high-performance nano biofuel. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018;171:815–824. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Balaji G, Cheralathan M. Potential of various sources for biodiesel production. Energy Sources Part A Recov. Util. Environ. Eff. 2013;35:37–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Atabani AE, Silitonga AS, Ong HC, Mahlia TMI, Masjuki HH, Badruddin IA, Fayaz H. Non-edible vegetable oils: A critical evaluation of oil extraction, fatty acid compositions, biodiesel production, characteristics, engine performance and emissions production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013;18:211–245. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Voloshin RA, Rodionova MV, Zharmukhamedov SK, Veziroglu TN. Review: Biofuel production from plant and algal biomass. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2016;41:17257–17273. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pradhan P, Raheman H, Padhee D. Combustion and performance of a diesel engine with preheated Jatropha curcas oil using waste heat from exhaust gas. Fuel. 2014;115:527–533. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang L, Wu H, Yang F, Zhang J. Evaluation of Soxhlet extractor for one-step biodiesel production from Zanthoxylum bungeanum seeds. Fuel Process. Technol. 2015;131:452–457. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.12.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Luque de Castro MD, Priego-Capote F. Soxhlet extraction: past and present panacea. J. Chromatogr. A. 2010;1217:2383–2389. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.11.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dutta R, Sarkar U, Mukherjee A. Extraction of oil from Crotalaria Juncea seeds in a modified Soxhlet apparatus: physical and chemical characterization of a prospective bio-fuel. Fuel. 2014;116:794–802. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.08.056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vijayakumar C, Ramesh M, Murugesan A, Panneerselvam N. Biodiesel from plant seed oils as an alternate fuel for compression ignition engines: a review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016;23:24711–24730. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7754-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shiu PJ, Gunawan S, Hsieh WH, Kasim NS, Ju YH. Biodiesel production from rice bran by a two-step in-situ process. Bioresour. Technol. 2010;101:984–989. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nanthagopal K, Ashok B, Saravanan B, Mathew S, Chandra S. Effect of next generation higher alcohols and Calophyllum inophyllum methyl ester blends in diesel engine. J Clean Prod. 2018;180:50–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.167. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Khamil KN, Mohd Sabri MF, Yusop AM. Study on novel nano mahua methyl ester powered DI diesel engine preheated with a thermoelectric waste heat recovery system. Energy Sources Part A Recov. Util. Environ. Eff. 2019;41:1–15. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2017.1300961. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Adekunle AS, Adekunle J, Oyekunle O, Obisesan OR, Ojo OS, Ojo OS. Effects of degumming on biodiesel properties of some non-conventional seed oils. Energy Rep. 2016;2:188–193. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2016.07.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sayyar S, Abidin ZZ, Yunus R, Muhammad A. Extraction of oil from jatropha seeds-optimization and kinetics. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 2009;6:1390–1395. doi: 10.3844/ajassp.2009.1390.1395. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Subramanian N, Mahendradas DK, Kasirajan R, Sahadevan R. Bio-oil separation from potential non-edible urban waste source Putranjiva roxburghii. Sep. Sci. Tech. 2015;50:2066–2074. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ali MA, Al-hattab TA, Al-hydary IA. Extraction of date palm seed oil (phoenix dactylifera) by soxhlet apparatus. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Technol. 2015;8:261–271. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Silva C, Garcia VAS, Zanette CM. Chia (Salvia hispanica L.) oil extraction using different organic solvents: oil yield, fatty acids profile and technological analysis of defatted meal. Int. Food Res. J. 2016;23:998–1004. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yuvarani M, Kubendran D, Salma Aathika AR, Karthik P, Premkumar MP, Karthikeyan V, Sivanesan S. Extraction and characterization of oil from macroalgae Cladophora glomerata. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util Environ. Eff. 2017;39:2133–2139. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2017.1400608. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jisieike CF, Betiku E. Rubber seed oil extraction: effects of solvent polarity, extraction time and solid-solvent ratio on its yield and quality. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020;24:101522. doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101522. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Degfie TA, Mamo TT, Mekonnen YS. Optimized biodiesel production from waste cooking oil (WCO) using calcium oxide (CaO) nanocatalyst. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:18982. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55403-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nanthagopal K, Ashok B, Saravanan B, Mathew S, Chandra S. Effect of next generation higher alcohols and Calophyllum inophyllum methyl ester blends in diesel engine. J. Clean. Prod. 2018;180:50–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.167. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Suganya T, Renganathan S. Optimization and kinetic studies on algal oil extraction from marine macroalgae Ulva lactuca. Bioresour. Technol. 2012;107:319–326. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kasirajan R, Pandian S, Tamilarasan S, Sahadevan R. Lipid extraction from natural plant source of Adenanthera pavonina using mixed solvent by superheated extractor. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2014;31:509–513. doi: 10.1007/s11814-013-0241-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.John Abraham AP, Chindhanaiselvam A, Subramanian N, Mahendradas D. Biodiesel from Indian laburnum (cassia fistula) kernal oil. Energy Sources Part A Recov. Util. Environ. Eff. 2017;39:1823–1830. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2017.1384867. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Murugesan K, Sahadevan R. Optimization of nonedible oil extraction from Cassia javanica seeds. Energy Sources Part A Recov. Util. Environ. Eff. 2017;39:1140–1146. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2017.1299259. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Omari A, Mgani QA, Mubofu EB. Fatty acid profile and physico-chemical parameters of castor oils in Tanzania. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2015;3:154–163. doi: 10.4236/gsc.2015.54019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kalavathy G, Baskar G. Synergism of clay with zinc oxide as nanocatalyst for production of biodiesel from marine Ulva lactuca. Bioresour. Technol. 2019;281:234–238. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Theresa V, Ernest Ravindran RS, Ajith Kumar R, Pandian K, Renganathan S. Novel approach to produce oil from non-edible seeds of Indigofera colutea. Energy Sources Part A Recov. Util. Environ. Eff. 2017;39:1369–1376. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2017.1331277. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Farsie A, Singh MS. Energy Models for Sunflower Oil Expression. Trans ASAE. 1985;28:275–279. doi: 10.13031/2013.32240. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fadhlullah M, Widiyanto SN, Restiawaty E. The potential of nyamplung (Calophyllum inophyllum L.) seed oil as biodiesel feedstock: effect of seed moisture content and particle size on oil yield. Energy Procedia. 2015;68:177–185. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.246. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Orhevba BA, Chukwu O, Osunde ZD, Ogwuagwu V. Influence of moisture content on the yield of mechanically expressed neem seed kernel oil. Acad. Res. Int. 2013;4:252–257. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Al-Sumri A, Al-Siyabi N, Al-Saadi R, Al-Rasbi S, Al-Dallal A. Study on the extraction of date palm seed oil using soxhlet apparatus. Int. J. Eng. Res. 2016;7:1266–1270. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Qian J, Wang F, Liu S, Yun Z. In situ alkaline transesterification of cottonseed oil for production of biodiesel and nontoxic cottonseed meal. Bioresour. Technol. 2008;99:9009–9012. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.04.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shuit SH, Teong K, Harun A, Yusup S. Reactive extraction and in situ esterification of Jatropha curcas L. seeds for the production of biodiesel. Fuel. 2010;89:527–530. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2009.07.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Govindhan P, Karthikeyan M, Kumar MD. Environmental Effects Extraction of bio-oil from non-edible novel source Senna occidentalis seeds. Energy Sources Part A Recov. Util. Environ. Eff. 2019;39:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Theresa V, Ernest Ravindran RS, Ajith Kumar R, Pandian K, Renganathan S. Novel approach to produce oil from non-edible seeds of Indigofera colutea. Energy Sources Part A Recov. Util. Environ. Eff. 2017;39:1–8. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2012.667506. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Keera ST, El Sabagh SM, Taman AR. Castor oil biodiesel production and optimization. Egypt. J. Pet. 2018;27:979–984. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpe.2018.02.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mohamad M, Ali MW, Ripin A, Ahmad A. Effect of extraction process parameters on the yield of bioactive compounds from the roots of Eurycoma Longifolia. Jurnal Teknologi (Sci & Eng.) 2013;60:51–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Denery JR, Dragull K, Tang CS, Li QX. Pressurized fluid extraction of carotenoids from Haematococcus pluvialis and Dunaliella salina and kavalactones from Piper methysticum. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2004;501:175–181. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2003.09.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kostic MD, Jokovic NM, Stamenkovic OS, Rajkovic KM, Milic PS, Veljkovic VB. Optimization of hempseed oil extraction by n-hexane. Ind. Crops. Prod. 2013;48:133–143. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.04.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shah Z, Cataluna Veses R, Silva RD. GC-MS and FTIR analysis of bio-oil obtained from freshwater algae (spirogyra) collected from Freshwater. Int. J. Environ Agric Res. 2016;2:2454–1850. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sutrisno B, Hidayat A. Pyrolysis of palm empty fruit bunch: Yields and analysis of bio-oil. MATEC Web Conf. 2018;154:1–4. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201815401036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Voli V, Singh RK. Production of bio-oil from de-oiled cakes by thermal pyrolysis. Fuel. 2012;96:579–585. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.01.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sharma V, Garg G, Alam A. Extraction and characterization of industrially valuable oil from Eruca sativa (L.) Mill through FTIR and GC-MS analysis. Am. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;2:23–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.El Farissi H, Lakhmiri R, El Fargani H, Albourine A, Safi M. Valorisation of a forest waste (Cistus Seeds) for the production of bio-oils. J. Mat and Environ Sci. 2017;8:628–635. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mulimani HV, Navindgi MC. Analysis of physiochemical properties of de-oiled neem seed cake for their suitability in producing bio-oil. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2016;5:5061–5067. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tayh SA, Muniandy R, Hassim S, Jakarni F. Aging and consistency characterization of bio-binders from domestic wastes. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 2017;12:2613–2622. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shah Z, Cataluña Veses R, Silva RD. GC-MS and FTIR analysis of bio-oil obtained from freshwater algae (spirogyra) collected from Freshwater. Int. J. Environ. Agric. Res. 2016;2:134–141. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Aigbodion AI, Bakare IO. Rubber seed oil quality assessment and authentication. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2005;82:465–469. doi: 10.1007/s11746-005-1095-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Vlachos N, Skopelitis Y, Psaroudaki M, Konstantinidou V, Chatzilazarou A, Tegou E. Applications of Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy to edible oils. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2006;573–574:459–465. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2006.05.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Refaat AA. Correlation between the chemical structure of biodiesel and its physical properties. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2009;6:677–694. doi: 10.1007/BF03326109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Shahabuddin M, Kalam MA, Masjuki HH, Bhuiya MMK, Mofijur M. An experimental investigation into biodiesel stability by means of oxidation and property determination. Energy. 2012;44:616–622. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.05.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Knothe G, Steidley KR. Kinematic viscosity of biodiesel fuel components and related compounds. Influence of compound structure and comparison to petrodiesel fuel components. Fuel. 2005;84:1059–1065. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.01.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mort RA, Spooner CE. The calorific value of carbon in coal: the Dulong relationship. Fuel. 1940;19(226–231):242–251. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ashraful AM, Masjuki HH, Kalam MA, Rizwanul Fattah IM, Imtenan S, Shahir SA, Mobarak HM. Production and comparison of fuel properties, engine performance, and emission characteristics of biodiesel from various non-edible vegetable oils: a review. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014;80:202–228. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.01.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yusuf NNAN, Kamarudin SK, Yaakub Z. Overview on the current trends in biodiesel production. Energy Convers. Manag. 2011;52:2741–2751. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.12.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tubino M, Aricetti JA. A green potentiometric method for the determination of the iodine number of biodiesel. Fuel. 2013;103:1158–1163. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.10.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bhuiya MM, Rasul M, Khan M, Ashwath N, Mofijur M. Comparison of oil extraction between screw press and solvent (n-hexane) extraction technique from beauty leaf (Calophyllum inophyllum L.) feedstock. Ind. Crops. Prod. 2020;114:112024. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.112024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Muhammad A, Ayub M, Zeb A, Wahab S, Khan S. Physicochemical analysis and fatty acid composition of oil extracted from olive fruit. Int. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2013;13:36–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Dhinesh B, Lalvani JI, Parthasarathy M, Annamalai K. An assessment on performance, emission and combustion characteristics of single cylinder diesel engine powered by Cymbopogon flexuosus biofuel. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016;117:466–474. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.03.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES