Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Oct 21;99(3):115258. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115258

COVID-19 in Brazil: 150,000 deaths and the Brazilian underreporting

Tatiana Aline Carvalho a,b,1, Matheus Negri Boschiero a,1, Fernando Augusto Lima Marson a,b,
PMCID: PMC7576323  PMID: 33279819

Highlights

  • Monitoring of death indicators is a strategy recommended by the World Health Organization to assess the direct and indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • The global underreporting is a challenge to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic and it is associated with political, technological, and economic burden associated with different territories.

  • In our data, the high number of unexpected deaths by natural causes during the COVID-19 pandemic is evident.

  • A total of 118,406 unexpected deaths by natural causes was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • Maybe, our data represent the Brazilian underreporting for severe patients affected by COVID-19 due to limitations to perform the SARS-CoV-2 screen by RT-PCR.

Keywords: Brazil, COVID-19, Diagnosis, Pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 virus

Abstract

Brazil is one of the epicenters of the COVID-19 pandemic and has reported 5,113,628 cases and 150,998 deaths by the disease. Comparing the deaths by natural causes expected and the excess mortality rate, there is a 22% increase in deaths mainly of male patients and individuals over 60 years old.


On October 12, 2020, Brazil reported a total of 5,113,628 confirmed cases of COVID-19, being 4,526,975 recovered, 435,655 active COVID-19, and 150,998 deaths, besides, on this same date, in a 24-hour period, Brazil also reported 10,220 new confirmed cases and 309 deaths (Painel COVID-19, 2020a, 2020b). The incidence (ratio between the number of cases and the number of individuals in the population) and mortality (ratio between the number of deaths and the number of individuals in the population) rate were, respectively, 2,433.4 and 71.9 individuals per 100,000 inhabitants. Moreover, the case fatality rate (CFR; ratio between the number of deaths and the number of cases in the population) was 3.0 (Painel COVID-19, 2020b). In the same period, the total deaths by natural causes expected were 529,659 and the excess mortality rate (deaths) by natural causes was 118,406, thus, an increase of 22% in deaths by natural causes was observed by official government agencies (Painel de análise do excesso de mortalidade por causas naturais no Brasil, 2020). Brazil has an annual increase in deaths by natural causes ∼1,000 to 2,000 new deaths, mainly related to an aging population.

Brazilian regions presented a rise in the percentage of excess deaths, with the lowest rates in the South region (5%) and the highest in the North region (48%). Regarding Brazilian states and the Federal District, the lowest percentage of excess deaths was 2%, observed in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (RS). Furthermore, the highest percentage of excess deaths among states occurred in the state of Amazonas (AM), which reached 74%. Curiously, both males and individuals over 60 years old demonstrated a higher excess death percentage, compared to deaths by natural causes expected for 2020.

In this context, a data analysis was performed for the COVID-19 pandemic epidemiology and for the number of deaths in Brazil. The following markers were evaluated: COVID-19 cases with diagnoses by SARS-CoV-2 real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR); deaths by COVID-19; CFR; incidence per 100,000 inhabitants; mortality per 100,000 inhabitants; excess mortality rate (deaths) by natural causes; deaths by natural causes expected according to previous years and excess mortality rate (%). The expected deaths by natural causes in 2020 were projected according to data collected from the Sistema de Informações sobre Mortalidade (Mortality Information System) of the Brazil between 2015 and 2019. The data on deaths in 2020 were obtained from Portal da Transparência do Registro Civil (Civil Registry Transparency Portal). Both datasets were compiled by the National Council of Health Secretary of Brazil (Painel de análise do excesso de mortalidade por causas naturais no Brasil, 2020).

The main findings included: data for confirmed COVID-19 cases; deaths by COVID-19; CFR; incidence and mortality per 100,000 inhabitants; excess mortality rate (deaths) by natural causes; deaths by natural causes expected according to previous years and its percentage (excess deaths by natural causes per expected deaths by natural causes). These data are presented according to gender and age for Brazilian States and the Federal District and geographic regions (Table 1 ).

Table 1.

Epidemiologic data for COVID-19 cases including deaths, case fatality rate, incidence, and mortality and for deaths by natural causes in Brazil.

Location COVID-19 casesa Death by COVID-19a Case fatality ratea Incidence per 100,000 inhabitantsa Mortality per 100,000 inhabitantsa Excess mortality rate (deaths) by natural causesb Deaths by natural causes expected according to previous yearsb Excess mortality rate (%)b
Brazil 5,113,628 150,998 3.0 2,433.40 71.9 118,406 529,659 22
Midwest 638,750 13,731 2.1 3,919.40 84.3 8,521 33,974 25
 MS 75,076 1,449 1.9 2,701.60 52.1 746 6,758 35
 GO 230,184 5,211 2.3 3,279.70 74.2 3,345 14,601 23
 DF 201,230 3,466 1.7 6,673.70 114.9 2,058 5,791 36
 MT 132,260 3,605 2.7 3,795.70 103.5 2,372 6,824 11
South 638,065 12,899 2.0 2,128.60 43.0 3,912 84,318 5
 PR 194,692 4,805 2.5 1,702.80 42.0 1,964 29,642 7
 SC 228,403 2,927 1.3 3,187.90 40.9 1,121 17,213 7
 RS 214,970 5,167 2.4 1,889.50 45.4 826 37,463 2
North 656,821 15,401 2.3 3,563.70 83.6 15,405 32,286 48
 RO 68,126 1,406 2.1 3,833.30 79.1 868 3,065 28
 TO 71,269 1,012 1.4 4,531.20 64.3 639 2,870 22
 AM 147,864 4,254 2.9 3,567.60 102.6 4,939 6,675 74
 AC 29,272 675 2.3 3,319.10 76.5 533 1,702 31
 AP 49,593 727 1.5 5,863.90 86.0 533 1,306 41
 RR 52,701 670 1.3 8,700.00 110.6 462 996 46
 PA 237,996 6,657 2.8 2,766.50 77.4 1,525 10,801 47
Northeast 1,391,655 40,492 2.9 2,438.40 70.9 47,055 133,376 35
 BA 327,327 7,188 2.2 2,200.80 48.3 10,708 33,967 32
 PB 126,073 2,944 2.3 3,137.60 73.3 1,525 10,801 14
 AL 88,954 2,151 2.4 2,665.40 64.5 2,887 7,196 40
 PE 153,299 8,417 5.5 1,604.00 88.1 8,652 23,700 37
 SE 80,234 2,107 2.6 3,490.40 91.7 1,459 5,206 28
 PI 102,813 2,237 2.2 3,141.00 68.3 671 8,480 8
 MA 179,170 3,885 2.2 2,532.40 54.9 8,137 14,148 58
 RN 73,143 2,423 3.3 2,085.70 69.1 1,696 8,550 20
 CE 260,642 9,140 3.5 2,854.10 100.1 11,319 21,328 53
Southeast 1,788,337 68,475 3.8 2,023.70 77.5 43,514 245,705 18
 SP 1,039,029 37,314 3.6 2,262.70 81.3 18,444 121,822 15
 ES 140,629 3,680 2.6 3,499.40 91.6 2,947 9,282 32
 RJ 284,053 19,336 6.8 1,645.30 11.2 16,086 57,779 28
 MG 324,626 8,145 2.5 1,533.50 38.5 6,037 56,821 11
Excess mortality rate (number of deaths) by natural causes (and percentage representing each group) and excess mortality rate (%) according to sex and age groups
Regionc Male Female <59 years old ≥60 years old Male and <59 years old Male and ≥60 years old Female and <59 years old Female and ≥60 years old
Brazil 73,464 (62%) 44,941 (38%) 35,282 (30%) 83,124 (70%) 23,376 (20%) 50,088 (42%) 11,906 (10%) 33,036 (28%)
 Excess mortality rate (%) 27% 18% 28% 21% 32% 25% 23% 16%
Midwest 5,484 (64%) 3,037 (36%) 2,918 (34%) 5,603 (66%) 2,016 (24%) 3,468 (41%) 902 (11%) 2,135 (25%)
 Excess mortality rate (%) 30% 20% 32% 23% 38% 26% 23% 18%
South 2,493 (64%) 1,418 (36%) 2,267 (58%) 1,644 (42%) 1,505 (38%) 988 (25%) 762 (19%) 656 (17%)
 Excess mortality rate (%) 6% 4% 13% 2% 15% 3% 11% 2%
North 10,252 (67%) 5,153 (33%) 3,471 (23%) 11,933 (77%) 2,381 (15%) 7,871 (51%) 1,091 (7%) 4,063 (26%)
 Excess mortality rate (%) 57% 36% 31% 56% 36% 68% 24% 42%
Northeast 28,499 (61%) 18,566 (39%) 12,436 (26%) 34,619 (74%) 8,286 (18%) 20,206 (43%) 4,153 (9%) 14,413 (31%)
 Excess mortality rate (%) 41% 29% 35% 35% 40% 41% 29% 29%
Southeast 26,747 (61%) 16,767 (39%) 14,189 (33%) 29,324 (67%) 9,191 (21%) 17,556 (40%) 4,999 (11%) 11,768 (27%)
 Excess mortality rate (%) 21% 14% 26% 15% 29% 19% 22% 12%
a

Last update and data collection was carried out on October 13, 2020. The data were retrieved from https://www.conass.org.br/painelconasscovid19/.

b

Last update was carried out on September 21, 2020 and the data collection was carried out on October 13, 2020. The data were retrieved from https://www.conass.org.br/indicadores-de-obitos-por-causas-naturais/.

c

The first line for each region represents the excess mortality rate (number of deaths) by natural causes and the percentage at each group according to sex and age. The second line for each region represents the excess mortality rate (%) according to sex and age groups. The number of expected deaths by natural causes in 2020 was projected according to the data collected from Sistema de Informações sobre Mortalidade (Mortality Information System) of the Brazil between 2015 and 2019. The data on deaths in 2020 were obtained from Portal da Transparência do Registro Civil (Civil Registry Transparency Portal). Both datasets were compiled by the National Council of Health Secretary of Brazil. Excess mortality rate (%) was calculated based on the ratio between excess number of deaths by natural causes and the expected number of deaths by natural causes to date.

A significant Spearman correlation coefficient (CC) was found between the excess mortality rate by natural causes (number of cases) and (1) number of COVID-19 cases (CC = 0.765; P value ≤0.001); (2) number of deaths by COVID-19 (CC = 0.862; P value ≤0.001); (3) CFR (CC = 0.664; P value ≤0.001); and (4) incidence per 1000,000 inhabitants for COVID-19 (CC = -0.530; P value = 0.004); as well as, excess deaths by natural causes per expected deaths by natural causes with the mortality per 100,000 inhabitants due COVID-19 (CC = 0.464; P value = 0.015).

Currently, monitoring of death indicators is a strategy recommended by the World Health Organization to assess the direct and indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic (World Health Organization, 2020). However, the excess deaths should not be associated as a direct cause of the COVID-19 pandemic; even though, they might be indirectly associated with it, due to overload in health services, interruption of chronic disease treatments, and patient's resistance to seek health assistance due to fear of SARS-CoV-2 virus infection.

In our data, the high number of unexpected deaths by natural causes during the COVID-19 pandemic is evident. Perhaps our data represent under reporting by the Brazilian government for severe patients affected by COVID-19 due limitations to perform the SARS-CoV-2 screen by RT-PCR (Marson, 2020). The Brazilian regions with the highest percentage of unexpected deaths by natural causes had the lowest availability for RT-PCR tests and intensive care units during the pandemic, mainly, in the North region (Palamim and Marson, 2020). In brief, Brazil should improve the COVID-19 diagnosis, implement better clinical policy guidelines by the government to treat patients with COVID-19 mainly for severe cases when the intensive care unit beds and intubation are needed, improve the adherence to social distancing, improve awareness of the severity of the disease to residents and optimize the acquisition of drugs and personal protective equipment necessary for the management of COVID-19, mainly anesthetics and muscle relaxants that are lacking in the Brazilian market as well as other drugs such as Dexamethasone, Remdesivir, and Tocilizumab that showed efficacy to treat patients with COVID-19 (Beigel et al., 2020; Guaraldi et al., 2020; Horby et al., 2020). So what? As discussed in the Lancet editorial, in Brazil, the authors concluded: “The challenge is ultimately political, requiring continuous engagement by Brazilian society as a whole to secure the right to health for all Brazilian people.” (The Lancet, 2020). At the same time, it is necessary to have transparency and clarity in the data about COVID-19, which includes the real rate of deaths and cases associated with the disease.

1. What is already known on this subject?

  • (i)

    Monitoring of death indicators is a strategy recommended by the World Health Organization to assess the direct and indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • (ii)

    The global underreporting is a challenge to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic and it is associated with political, technological, and economic burden associated with different territories.

2. What does this study add?

  • (i)

    In our data, the high number of unexpected deaths by natural causes during the COVID-19 pandemic is evident.

  • (ii)

    A total of 118,406 unexpected deaths by natural causes was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • (iii)

    Maybe, our data represent the Brazilian underreporting for severe patients affected by COVID-19 due to limitations to perform the SARS-CoV-2 screen by RT-PCR.

Funding

Not applicable.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have approved the manuscript and agreed with its submission.

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

All authors have approved the manuscript and agreed with its submission to the journal. Also, all authors wrote and revised the manuscript.

Tatiana Aline Carvalho, Matheus Negri Boschiero, and Fernando Augusto Lima Marson approved the manuscript and agreed with its submission. Also, all authors contributed equally to this study in conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; methodology; validation; writing the original draft; and writing the review.

References

  1. Beigel JH, Tomashek KM, Dodd LE, Mehta AK, Zingman BS, Kalil AC. Remdesivir for the treatment of Covid-19 – final report. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1813–1826. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2007764. NEJMoa2007764Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Guaraldi G, Meschiari M, Cozzi-Lepri A, Milic J, Tonelli R, Menozzi M. Tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020;2:e474–e484. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30173-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR, Mafham M, Bell JL, Linsell L. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19 – preliminary report. N Engl J Med. 2020 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021436. NEJMoa2021436Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Marson FAL. COVID-19 – six million cases worldwide and an overview of the diagnosis in Brazil: a tragedy to be announced. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;98 doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Painel COVID-19. Ministério da Saúde do Brasil (in English language – COVID-19 Panel. Ministry of Health of Brazil). (2020a). Available https://covid.saude.gov.br.
  6. Painel COVID-19. Conselho Nacional de Secretário da Saúde do Brasil (in English language – COVID-19 Panel. National Council of Health Secretary of Brazil). (2020b) Available https://www.conass.org.br/painelconasscovid19/.
  7. Painel de análise do excesso de mortalidade por causas naturais no Brasil em 2020. Conselho Nacional de Secretário da Saúde do Brasil (in English language – analysis panel of excess mortality due to natural causes in Brazil in 2020. National Council of Secretary of Health of Brazil). (2020). Available https://www.conass.org.br/indicadores-de-obitos-por-causas-naturais/.
  8. Palamim CVC, Marson FAL. COVID-19 – the availability of ICU beds in Brazil during the onset of pandemic. Ann Global Health. 2020;86:100. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. The Lancet COVID-19 in Brazil: “so what?”. Lancet. 2020;395:1461. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31095-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. World Health Organization . 2020. Revealing the toll of COVID-19: a technical package for rapid mortality surveillance and epidemic response.https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/revealing-the-toll-of-covid-19 Available. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES