To the Editor
Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is a commonly used therapy for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). DMF primarily affects the adaptive immune system - T cells (CD8+ > CD4+ and memory > naïve) and B cells (memory > naïve) [1]–[3]. A recent study identified effects of DMF on the NK cell compartment noting an increased proportion of CD56bright NK cells [4]. CD56bright NK cells play an immunoregulatory role through cytokine production, as well as cytolysis of autoreactive T cells [5]. Multiple MS therapies modulate NK cells, and altering the NK cell compartment is thought to be a key mechanism of action of daclizumab [6],[7]. Whether DMF has direct effects on NK cell function is not known.
We recruited 18 RRMS patients initiating DMF and obtained peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) at baseline and 6-months post-initiation. Cohort characteristics have been previously published [2]. We performed multiparametric flow-cytometry to identified immune cell subsets and noted no change in the NK cell population (Figure 1B, C) consistent with previous studies [1],[4]. However, DMF treatment led to a 44.5 % relative increase in the proportion of CD56bright NK cells (9.79 % vs 14.15 %, p=0.008; Figure 1D, E) confirming the findings of Medina et al. CD56bright NK cells can lyse autoreactive T cells by releasing perforin, granzyme-B and granzyme-K and potentially limit autoimmunity [5]. They are more likely to cross the blood brain barrier and are enriched in the CSF [8], highlighting the potential importance of changes noted with DMF treatment.
We then examined the effect of both DMF and MMF on NK cell function. NK cells were isolated and treated with either DMF or MMF for 24 hours. Using CD107a expression to measure NK cell degranulation, we noted an increase in the proportion of degranulated NK cells following treatment with a range of DMF and MMF concentrations (Figure 1F, G). These changes occurred in the absence of dramatic effects on NK cell viability (Figure 1H). We next assessed whether DMF or MMF treatment led to increased NK cell cytotoxicity in NK-T cell co-culture [8]. We cultured NK cells (pre-treated with either DMF or MMF) with autologous activated T cells and noted increased NK cell degranulation with DMF and MMF treatment compared to controls (Figure 1F, G). There has been some controversy about the relative importance of DMF and its metabolite MMF in mediating biological effects of this medication, however we noted significant effects with both DMF and MMF at biologically relevant concentrations [9].
To assess whether the observed changes in the NK cell compartment might be related to previously described immunological effects of DMF, we examined relationships between the change in CD56bright NK cells and various T cell populations. As noted in prior studies, we identified preferential depletion of CD8+ T cells (increased CD4:CD8 ratio) and reductions in the central memory and effector memory subsets in both CD8+ and CD4+ T cells [1],[10] (Figure 2 B-D). We noted a significant correlation between the change in CD56bright NK cells and the reduction in CD8+ memory cells (r= −0.56, p =0.01; Figure 2E). There was a weaker correlation with the change in CD4+ memory cells (r=−0.32, p=0.19; Figure 2E). We also noted significant correlations between the reduction in proportions of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells producing pro-inflammatory cytokines - interferon-gamma (IFNγ) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) and the change in CD56bright NK cells (CD8+ IFNγ vs CD56bright: r=−0.51, p=0.04, Figure 2F; CD8+ TNFα vs CD56bright: r=−0.54, p=0.03; CD4+ IFNγ vs CD56bright: r=−0.48, p=0.06; CD4+ IFNγ vs CD56bright : r=−0.56, p=0.02). These data provide additional support for the hypothesis that increases in CD56bright NK cell population mediate some of the immunological effects of DMF.
The interaction between T cells and NK cells involves multiple surface molecules on both cells. To further understand the preferential targeting of CD8+ and memory T cells by DMF, we profiled the expression of CD155 (Polio virus receptor) on activated T cells. CD155 interacts with CD226 (DNAM-1) on NK cells and leads to increased cytolysis of T cells [3]. We found a greater proportion of CD155+ cells among CD8+ T cells compared to CD4+ T cells (Figure 2G, H). We also noted increased CD155+ expression in central memory T cells compared to naive cells in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (Figure 2I). A recent study demonstrated that CD155 expression on activated T cells in MS is important for cytolysis by NK cells[8]. Thus, the observed pattern of expression of CD155 in the T cell compartment is consistent with the preferential targeting of CD8+ T cells and memory cells noted with DMF treatment.
In summary, we demonstrate immunological effects of DMF treatment in MS patients on the NK cell compartment. DMF led to increased proportion of immunoregulatory CD56bright NK cells and this change was correlated with the reductions in CD8+ memory T cells and pro-inflammatory cytokine producing T cells. We also demonstrate that DMF and its metabolite MMF lead to increased NK cell degranulation and this change in NK cell phenotype and function may be part of the immunological mechanism of action of DMF in patients with MS.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to acknowledge Cindy Darius and Julie Fiol for assistance with phlebotomy, Jinyan Bo and David Buchanan for technical assistance. This study was funded by an Investigator-initiated trial grant from Biogen (US-BGT-15-10858) to PAC. PB was supported by a Career Transition Award from the NMSS, the John F. Kurtzke Clinician scientist development award from the AAN and a Junior Faculty Award from the Race to Erase MS
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Mr. Smith has nothing to disclose. Dr. Bhargava has nothing to disclose. Dr. Calabresi reports grants from Medimmune, grants from Biogen, grants from Teva, grants from Novartis, personal fees from Vertex, personal fees from Biogen, outside the submitted work.
REFERENCES
- 1.Longbrake EE, et al. Mult Scler.2016;22:1061–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Smith MD, et al. Ann Clin Transl Neurol.2017;4:351–355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gross CC, et al. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation.2016;3:e183. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Medina S, et al. Mult Scler.2017:135245851771708. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jiang W, et al. J Immunol.2011;187:781–790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bielekova B, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.2006;103:5941–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Saraste M, et al. Neurol Sci.2007;28:121–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gross CC, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.2016;113:E2973–82. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Litjens NH, et al. BMC Pharmacol.2004;4:22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Spencer CM, et al. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation.2015;2:e76. [Google Scholar]