Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming medical practice and precision medicine in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) [1]. The adoption of AI in healthcare began with the development of expert systems in the early seventies. Such systems have been utilised for centralised monitoring (e.g., tele-ICU), automated surveillance (e.g., VAEs, sepsis), and most recently to help with digital contact tracing amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
The current pandemic is accelerating the need to take advantage of AI to make real time clinical and operational decisions, wisely integrating the vast amount of heterogeneous data and emerging knowledge generated in the critical care environment [1]. Safe, effective, efficient, and ethical clinical management of COVID-19 patients in ICUs urgently requires bringing AI capabilities to the bedside.
Prior to COVID-19, up to 20 million people annually required ICU admission and mechanical ventilation (MV) [2]. The burden for critical care services has risen exponentially in response to the COVID-19 pandemic [3]. Facing this “new reality”, ICUs and emergency departments (EDs) need to be re-designed. For instance, creative ways of accommodating frequent ventilator adjustments while reducing the risk of exposure to health care workers need to be found (HCWs) [4]. AI, big data, and machine learning can help health care systems respond to these unprecedented challenges. If appropriately designed and deployed, AI can allow for early diagnosis (e.g. computer-aided methods to help radiologists identify COVID-19 specific lesions in chest X-rays), distance monitoring, and can assist the clinical decision-making process, and improve efficiency.
Predictive analytics can be used to estimate the probability of either presenting (diagnostic models) or developing a particular disease or outcome (prognostic models) [1]. Diagnostic models have been proposed in a variety of clinical situations including early detection or stratification of sepsis [5], bacterial and viral infections (e.g., COVID-19) [5], and delirium in the ICU [5], as well as pulmonary embolism in primary care [6]. Prognostic models have focused on predicting ICU-related mortality [7], infections (e.g., positive blood culture, MRSA) [5], responses to treatments [5], antibiotic resistance [5], asynchronies during assisted ventilation [8], prolonged MV [9], extubation failure [10], and death in influenza [11], COVID-19 [12], [13], and community-acquired pneumonia [14]. Best performances were observed in models that rely on clinical, laboratory, and radiological variables [14]. Most of these studies, however, have not included continuous physiological signals (e.g., ventilator parameters, vital signals) for prediction [1]. Indeed, such information would substantially improve prediction performance [15].
Beyond predicting specific outcomes, one should expect advances in the direction of predicting the entire temporal evolution of a patient. Techniques such as structured output prediction or latent embedding have been successfully used both in the ICU and elsewhere [16], [17]. This approach can be used for developing personalised patient management and treatment plans, based on the success on previous patients with similar prognosis.
AI and machine learning (ML) have largely been applied to the data collected since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Traditional epidemic models have described the spreading of a contagious disease in a population using differential equations. Most recently, AI has been used to predict COVID-19 incidence and evaluate the impact of mitigating measures such as population confinement and social distancing [18]. Geolocated critical care demand prediction, optimal hospital resource planning, and intelligent patient flow management with decision support algorithms can also be achieved by integrating real time clinical data with population statistics and health interventions. Computer-assisted detection systems can be used for early identification, grading, and monitoring of infectious and non-infectious lung diseases. Interestingly, they can also be used to distinguish viral pneumonia from bacterial pneumonia [19]. Most recently, however, ML techniques have focused on detecting COVID-19 infections in chest X-rays and CT scans [20], [21]. Overall, sensitivity of CT scan has ranged from 57–100% for symptomatic and 46–100% for asymptomatic COVID‐19 patients [21].
The worldwide shortage of personal protective equipment has promoted the utilisation of robotic technologies to minimise human-to-human contacts and the workload of health care workers. A robotic telepresence is seen as a natural successor to telemedicine. Robots have also been used to automate and scale up testing capabilities, with rapid prototyping, development, and validation of automated clinical diagnostic tests for COVID-19 [21]. Robot-assisted rehabilitation has been shown to be more effective than conventional therapy alone to improve functional recovery in critically ill patients, whereas the effectiveness of robot-assisted endovascular/intravenous catheterisation and tracheal intubation, for instance, are under investigation [22], [23], [24].
Novel sensor array techniques have been used in infectious and non-infectious lung diseases. For instance, exhaled breath biomarkers (e.g., volatile and non-volatile components) are promising alternatives to traditional microbiological diagnostics. Commercially available electronic nose sensors have been developed to diagnose ventilator-associated pneumonia (with and without Pseudomonas aeruginosa) [25]. Using several ML algorithms, a high diagnostic accuracy has been detected therein. In the future, detecting, tracing, and managing new viral outbreaks will require deploying inexpensive and ubiquitous sensor networks. Intelligent biosensors may be become part of our smart cities and buildings, integrated in our environment, air, sewage, and waste management systems. Wearable personal biosensors will monitor our bodies while synthetic molecular biosensors will be part of our tissues and cells.
Engineering biology capabilities are exponentially accelerating as DNA/RNA reading and writing costs rapidly approach zero. Every mutation of COVID-19 has been sequenced and synthesised in record time, and many regions in the world are beginning to integrate WGS human data with EHR systems for personalised medicine diagnostics and treatment [26]; research projects are now correlating genomic biomarkers with infection severity and prognostic treatment efficacy [27], [28]. ML allows searching libraries of available drugs and known molecules, accelerates effective vaccine and treatment development, enables digital modelling and testing, and engineering antibodies. Furthermore, by sharing information and using standards, synbio factories are able to locally manufacture physical biomolecules designed elsewhere.
Assessment tools for AI and robotics need to be further developed [29] and the standardisation of data and semantics coding, integration, and usability have to be further improved. In addition, signal processing and thus, signal quality control at the bedside have to be developed [1]. Better human interpretability, explainability and traceability of ML predictions and AI decisions are also required. While ML capabilities will be progressively embedded in every physical system in the ICUs, from sensors to medical devices to clinical and operational information systems, it is important and urgent to address the need of developing new AI management structures in our health systems, like the Clinical AI Department [30], that play an essential role in the implementation, utilisation and enhancement of the infrastructures that underlie AI solutions. Human-AI cooperation in ICUs is a growing must, which is accelerated and needed to treat COVID-19 and the next pandemics patients. Currently, due to poor interoperability between platforms, legal barriers and questions of data reliability, only a small fraction of the clinical data generated in the ICUs are accessible for research [1].
Conflict of interest
M. Jansson, J. Rubio and J. Rello declare no conflict of interest related to the current manuscript. R. Gavaldà is CEO and co-founder of Amalfi Analytics, a start-up that creates platforms for healthcare analytics using Machine Learning.
References
- 1.Pirracchio R., Cohen M.J., Malenica I., Cohen M.J., Chambaz A., Cannesson M., ACTERREA Research Group Big data and targeted machine learning in action to assist medical decision in the ICU. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2019;38:377–384. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2018.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ambrosino N., Vitacca M. The patient needing prolonged mechanical ventilation: a narrative review. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2018;13:6. doi: 10.1186/s40248-018-0118-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jansson M., Xuelian L., Rello J. Strengthening ICU health security for a Coronavirus epidemic. Int Crit Care Nurs. 2020;57 doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Connor C.W., Palmer L.J., Pentakota S. Remote control and monitoring of GE Aisys anesthesia machines repurposed as intensive care unit ventilators. Anesthesiology. 2020;6 doi: 10.1097/ALN.000000000000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Peiffer-Smadja N., Rawson T.M., Ahmad R., Buchard A., Pantelis G., Lescure F.-X. Machine learning for clinical decision support in infectious diseases: a narrative review of current applications. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;26:584–595. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hendiksen J.M.T., Geersing G.-J., Lucassen W.A.M., Erkens P.M.G., HEJH Stoffers, HCPM Weert. Diagnostic prediction models for suspected pulmonary embolism: systematic review and independent external validation in primary care. BMJ. 2015;351:h4438. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sun Y., Li S., Wang S., Chen L., Gang L., Xu J. Predictors of 1-year mortality in patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation after surgery in intensive care unit: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20:44. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-0942-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sousa M.L., Magrans R., Hayashi F.K., Blanch L., Kacmarek R.M., Ferreira J.C. Predictors of Asynchronies During Assisted Ventilation and Its Impact on Clinical Outcomes: The EPISYNC Cohort Study. J Crit Care. 2020;21:30–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wise E.S., Stonko D.P., Glaser Z.A., Garcia K.L., Huang J.J., Kim J.S. Prediction of prolonged ventilation after coronary artery bypass grafting: Data from an artificial neural network. Heart Surgery Forum. 2017;20:E7–E14. doi: 10.1532/hsf.1566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hsieh M.H., Hsieh M.J., Cheng A.C., Chen C.-M., Hsieh C.-C., Chao C.-M. Predicting weaning difficulty for planned extubation patients with an artificial neural network. Medicine. 2019;98 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hu C.-A., Chen C.-M., Fang Y.-C., Liang S.-J., Wang H.-C., Fang W.-F. Using a machine learning approach to predict mortality in critically ill influenza patients: a cross-sectional retrospective multicentre study in Taiwan. BMJ Open. 2020;10 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hassanien A.E., Salam A., Darwish A. 2020. Artificial intelligence approach to predict the COVID-19 patient´s recovery. https://easychair.org/publications/preprint/4bf1; [accessed 20 May 2020] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wynants L., Calster B.V., Bonten M.M.J., Collins G.S., Debray T.P.A., De Vos M. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19 infection: systematic review and critical appraisal. BMJ. 2020;369:m1328. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kwok C.S., Loke Y.K., Woo K., Myint P.K. Risk Prediction Models for Mortality in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review. BioMed Res Inter. 2013 doi: 10.1155/2013/504136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Moss T.J., Clark M.T., Calland J.F., Enfield K.B., Voss J.D., De lake. Cardiorespiratory dynamics measured from continuous ECG monitoring improves detection of deterioration in acute care patients: a retrospective cohort study. PlOS One. 2017;12 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Esteban C., Schmidt D., Krompaß D., Tresp V. 2015. Predicting sequences of clinical events by using a personalized temporal latent embedding model. International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, Dallas, TX. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Meiring C., Dixit A., Harris S., MacCallum N.S., Brealey D.A., Watkinson P.J. Optimal intensive care outcome prediction over time using machine learning. PLoS ONE. 2018;13 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yang Z., Zeng Z., Wang K., Wong S.-S., Liang W., Zanin M. Modified SEIR and AI prediction of the epidemics trend of COVID-19 in China under public health interventions. Journal Thorac Dis. 2020;12:165–174. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rahman T., Chowdhury M.E.H., Khandakar A. Transfer Learning with Deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for Pneumonia Detection using Chest X-ray. Appl. Sci. 2020;10:3233. doi: 10.3390/app10093233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ozturk T., Talo M., Yildirim E.A., Baloglu U.B., Yildirim O., Rajendra Acharya U. Automated detection of COVID-19 cases using deep neural networks with X-ray images. Comput Biol Med. 2020;121 doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shao J.M., Ayuso S.A., Deerenberd E.B., Elhage S.A., Augenstein V.A., Heniford B.T. A systematic review of CT chest in COVID-19 diagnosis and its potential application in a surgical setting. Colorectal disease. 2020 doi: 10.1111/codi.15252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Prokazova P.R., Piradov M.A., Ryabinkina Y.V., Kunzevich G.I., Gnedovskaya E.V., Popova L.A. Robot-assisted therapy using the MOTOmed letto 2 for the integrated early rehabilitation of stroke patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Hum Physiol. 2016;42:885–890. doi: 10.1134/S0362119716080107. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Legeza P., Britz G.W., Loh T., Lumsden A. Current utilization and future directions of robotic-assisted endovascular surgery. Expert Review of Medical Devices. 2020 doi: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1814742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Biro P., Hofmann P., Gage D., Boehler Q., Chautems C., Braun J., Spahn D.R., Nelson B.J. Automated tracheal intubation in an airway manikin using a robotic endoscope: a proof of concept study. Anaesthesia. 2020;75:848–851. doi: 10.1111/anae.14945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chen C.Y., Lin W.C., Yang H.-Y. Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia using electronic nose sensor array signals: solutions to improve the application of machine learning in respiratory research. Respir Res. 2020;21:45. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-1285-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.European Commission. European “1+ Million Genomes” Initiative, https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/european-1-million-genomes-initiative; 2020 [accessed 20 May 2020].
- 27.Alvarez A.C., PLapunzina P. 2020. Determinantes Genéticos y Biomarcadores genómicos de riesgo en pacientes con infección por coronavirus SARS-COV-2. https://www.isciii.es/QueHacemos/Servicios/Biblioteca/Paginas/Proyectos_investigacion.aspx; [accessed 20 May 2020] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Janus J. 2020. Using whole genome sequencing to help combat COVID-19. https://www.phgfoundation.org/blog/wgs-to-combat-COVID-19; [accessed 20 May 2020]. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Haverinen J., Keränen N., Falkenbach P., Maijala A., Kolehmainen T., Reponen J. Digi-HTA: Health technology assessment framework for digital healthcare services. FinJeHeW. 2019;11:326–341. doi: 10.23996/fjhw.82538. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cosgriff C.V., Stone D.J., Weissman G. The clinical artificial intelligence department: a prerequisite for success. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2020;27 doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100183. doi:10.1136/ bmjhci-2020-100183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]