Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2016 May 10;138(20):6340–6343. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b01628

Photoinduced Formation of Hybrid Aryl Pd-Radical Species Capable of 1,5-HAT: Selective Catalytic Oxidation of Silyl Ethers into Silyl Enol Ethers

Marvin Parasram 1,, Padon Chuentragool 1,, Dhruba Sarkar 1, Vladimir Gevorgyan 1,*
PMCID: PMC7577783  NIHMSID: NIHMS1637680  PMID: 27149524

Abstract

A direct visible light-induced generation of a hybrid aryl Pd-radical species from aryl iodide and Pd(0) is reported to enable an unprecedented (for hybrid Pd-radical species) hydrogen atom-transfer event. This approach allowed for efficient desaturation of readily available silyl ethers into synthetically valuable silyl enols. Moreover, this oxidation reaction proceeds at room temperature without the aid of exogenous photosensitizers or oxidants.


Aryl halides are vital starting materials for a variety of important Pd(0)-catalyzed C–C and C–heteroatom bond-forming reactions, which usually involve Pd(II) intermediates A, formed via a two-electron oxidative addition process (Scheme 1a).1 Alternatively, if a hybrid aryl Pd-radical species B, possessing both traditional Pd and radical nature, can be realized, it may exhibit novel reactivity.2 Thus, if conditions for a direct conversion of easily available aryl halides into B are found, it could trigger the development of an array of novel transformations. The work described herein features: (1) the first direct visible light-induced generation of a hybrid aryl Pd-radical species (i) from aryl iodide and Pd(0); (2) capability of the formed hybrid aryl Pd-radical species to undergo a 1,5-hydrogen atom-transfer (HAT) process (iii); (3) a new method for general, efficient, and mild desaturation of silyl ethers (1) into silyl enol ethers (2) (Scheme 1b).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Traditional and Proposed Novel Reactivity of Aryl Halides in Pd(0)-Catalyzed Reactions

In his pioneering work, Curran reported a remote C–H functionalization of alcohols via a 1,5-HAT process utilizing a halo-aryl silane tether (1) (eq 1).3a Standard radical initiation of 1′ led to the aryl radical iii, which underwent 1,5-HAT to produce alkyl radical iv capable of undergoing further useful free radical reactions.3 We thought of developing an oxidative hybrid Pd-radical version of Curran’s free radical chemistry as a potentially useful new method. Indeed, if a hybrid aryl Pd-radical complex i, capable of HAT and a subsequent β-hydride elimination, could be generated (Scheme 1b), it would allow for a direct oxidation of silyl ethers (1) into silyl enols (2).4,5 Clearly, the success of this process hinges on the efficient generation of the hybrid aryl Pd-radical species (i) from aryl halides and capability of the latter to undergo HAT, both of which, to the best of our knowledge, are unprecedented.6,7 We envisioned that putative species i could possibly be generated either via thermal6,8 or photochemical9,10 activation of an aryl iodide in the presence of Pd(0) complex.

graphic file with name nihms-1637680-f0004.jpg (1)

To this end, we first tested silyl-tethered alcohol 1a under various thermal Pd-catalyzed conditions that have been developed for hybrid Pd-radical reactions of alkyl halides (Table 1).2,6,11 However, employment of Pd(PPh3)4 or PEPPSI-IPr complexes resulted in hydro-dehalogenation12 of 1a (entries 1, 2). The combination of Pd(OAc)2 and bidentate ferrocene ligands was also incompetent (entries 3, 4). Evidently, other means of activation were needed to stimulate this process. We were intrigued by recent reports of beneficial effect of visible light on promoting radical-type transition-metal-catalyzed transformations.9 Thus, we examined the reaction under irradiation of visible light (blue LED). Excitingly, product 2a was obtained in 72% using Pd(PPh3)4 catalyst at room temperature (Table 1, entry 5). Remarkably, the reaction proceeded quite efficiently without the use of any exogenous photosensitizers.13 Next, bidentate phosphine ligand dppf with Pd(OAc)2 was tried, although it was less efficient (entry 6). Delightfully, 1-diphenylphosphino-1′-(di-tert-butylphosphino)ferrocene (L) was found to be the best ligand, producing desaturated product 2a in 79% yield (entry 7). Notably, performing the reaction with a 23W CFL led to lower efficiency (entry 8). A control experiment indicated that the Pd-catalyst is crucial for this reaction (entry 9). It was also found that both dimethyl- and diisopropyl-substituted substrates were less efficient.14 Obviously, this novel desaturation protocol requires no external oxidants, which makes it milder compared to other desaturation methods.4b,c,15

Table 1.

Optimization of the Reaction Conditionsa

graphic file with name nihms-1637680-t0005.jpg
entry catalyst ligand conditions yield, %b
1 Pd(PPh3)4 120 °C 0c
2 PEPPSI-IPr 120 °C 0c,d
3 Pd(OAc)2 dppf 120 °C 0c
4 Pd(OAc)2 L 120 °C 0c
5 Pd(PPh3)4 rt, blue LED 72
6 Pd(OAc)2 dppf rt, blue LED 67
7 Pd(OAc)2 L rt, blue LED 79 (79)e
8 Pd(OAc)2 L rt, 23W CFL 49f
9 L rt, blue LED NR
a

Standard conditions: 1a 0.05 mmol scale, PhH 0.1 M, 120 °C or 34W blue LED.

b

NMR Yield.

c

14–35% of hydro-dehalogenation of 1a was obtained.

d

5 mol % of catalyst was used.

e

Isolated yield.

f

51% conversion of 1a.

With the optimized conditions in hand, the generality of this reaction was examined. Thus, cyclohexanol derivatives (1b–d) reacted smoothly to produce silyl enol ethers 2b–d in good yields. Heterocycles, possessing 4-hydroxyltetrahydropyran (1e), 4-chromanol (1f), and 4- hydroxylpiperidine (1g) motifs, afforded products 2e–g in good yields (Table 2). Cyclopentanol derivatives 1h–j were found to produce 2h–j in reasonable yields. Moreover, cyclobutanol (1k) and medium-sized cyclicalcohol derivatives (1l–m) were found to be competent substrates as well, producing the corresponding products 2k–m in moderate to good yields. Next, we tested this methodology on desaturation of acyclic ethers, which are known to react inefficiently in dehydrogenation reactions.16 Hence, desaturation of 2-propanol derivative 1n produced 2n efficiently. Likewise, substrates possessing bulky groups at the β-position, such as -t-Bu (1o) and -TMS (1p), provided 2o and 2p in 95% and 97% yields, respectively. The practicality of this method was supported by a scale-up experiment with 1.2 g of 1o, where the oxidation product 2o was produced in nearly quantitative yield. Desaturation of 4-substituted benzylic alcohol derivatives 1q–w containing different functionalities, including aryl chloride (1r), cyanide (1s), and unprotected 2° alcohol (1w), proceeded well, producing moderate to good yields of the corresponding silyl enol ethers. Moreover, a double-fold desaturation of diol derivative 1x led to the dienol ether 2x in good yield. This methodology also has proven to be efficient on challenging linear substrates, which are known to be unselective in HAT protocols.3a,d,17 Thus, 4-heptanol 1y and 2-hexanol 1z, selectively generated their respective α–β desaturated products (2y,z) in good yields, although as a mixture of stereoisomers.18 Then, we investigated our technology toward functionalization of more complex molecules. Thus, terpenes 1aa and 1ab reacted well, though the former produced an unstable silyl enol (2aa) that resulted in 40% isolated yield along with 55% yield of desilylated ketone product (camphor). Oxidation of steroid androstanone 1ac, bearing multiple sites of desaturation, proceeded smoothly, producing 2ac in 75% yield as a sole regioisomer.

Table 2.

Photoinduced Pd-Cat. Oxidation of Silyl Ethersa

graphic file with name nihms-1637680-t0006.jpg
a

Standard Conditions: 1 0.2 mmol, Pd(OAc)2 0.02 mmol, L 0.04 mmol, Cs2CO3 0.4 mmol, PhH 0.1 M, 34W blue LED, rt. Isolated yields.

b

10:1 ratio, major isomer shown.

c

3 mmol scale = 99% isolated yield.

d

Yield based on NMR ratios.

e

Z:E = 3:1.

f

Z:E:terminal =7:3:1.

g

Yield based on isolation of desilylated product, camphor (55% isolated yield).

We foresee two distinct mechanistic scenarios for this novel oxidation reaction, a radical pathway (Path A) and a concerted metalation deprotonation (CMD) protocol (Path B) (Scheme 2). First, under visible light (blue LED), a direct SET2,6,10,11 from excited Pd(0) complex to aryl iodide 1a produces a hybrid Pd-radical intermediate 3 (Path A). In an alternative, though, less likely scenario,19 the latter can form through a conventional oxidative addition of Pd(0) complex to 1a to form the Pd(II) intermediate 4, followed by its excitation into 520 and a subsequent homolysis.21 Then, 3 undergoes a 1,5-HAT of Hα to generate the hybrid alkyl Pd-radical complex 6, which subsequently produces silyl enol 2a either via recombination and successive β-hydride elimination of Hβ (Path A1)11 or via a direct Hβ-atom elimination22 with Pd(I)I (Path A2). Potentially, 6 can also be converted to 2a either via oxidation by Pd(I)I into a Scheme 2. Possible Mechanisms cationic intermediate 8, followed by its deprotonation (Path A3), or via an atom-transfer/HI-elimination sequence (Path A4).23,24 In the alternative pathway (Path B), intermediate 4 undergoes a CMD process16a,25 of Hα (4 → 10) to produce palladacycle 11. The following β-hydride (Hβ) elimination of the latter occurs to generate the aryl Pd(II) silyl enol intermediate 12. A subsequent reductive elimination yields 2a′ and regenerates the Pd(0) catalyst. However, the performed deuterium-labeling experiments disproved this mechanism (Path B).14

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

Possible Mechanisms

The intermediacy of radical species (Path A) was supported by the use of radical scavengers11 and radical clock experiments.14,26 Hence, it was found that employment of radical traps, such as galvinyloxy and TEMPO, completely suppressed the reaction.14 It was also found that cyclopropyl-containing substrate 13 under standard reaction conditions underwent smooth ring opening of the cyclopropyl ring producing 16 as the major product (Scheme 3). Notably, formation of product 14 with preserved cyclopropyl unit and the β–C elimination product27 15 were not detected.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3.

Radical Clock Experiment

In conclusion, we demonstrated the first direct generation of a hybrid aryl Pd-radical species from aryl halides and Pd(0) and its capability of promoting 1,5-HAT process, which allowed for a general mild and efficient conversion of easily available silyl ethers into valuable silyl enol ethers. Notably, this photoinduced Pd-catalyzed reaction proceeds at room temperature without any exogenous photosensitizers or oxidants. We envision that this methodology can be applied for a late-stage desaturation of complex molecules.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank National Science Foundation (CHE-1362541) for financial support of this work.

Footnotes

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b01628.

Experimental details and data (PDF)

REFERENCES

  • (1).(a) For selected reviews on Pd-catalyzed reactions, see: Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for Organic Synthesis; Negishi E; John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex, U.K., 2003. [Google Scholar]; (b) In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions, 2nd ed.; de Meijere A, Diederich F; Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004, 815. [Google Scholar]; (c) Selander N; Szabó KJ Chem. Rev 2011, 111, 2048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Molnar A Chem. Rev 2011, 111, 2251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Knappke CEI; Wangelin AJ Chem. Soc. Rev 2011, 40, 4948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Seechun CJ; Kitching MO; Colacot TJ; Snieckus V Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2012, 51, 5062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).(a) Recently, a plethora of methods involving alkyl hybrid-Pd radical intermediates have been reported, most of which have led to unique reactivity and selectivity due to the intrinsic characteristics of the hybrid intermediates. However, direct formation and utilization of aryl hybrid-Pd radical intermediates has not been reported. For a recent review on Pd involved radical reactions, see: Liu Q; Dong X; Li J; Xiao J; Dong Y; Liu H ACS Catal 2015, 5, 6111. [Google Scholar]; (b) For a review on catalyzed radical reactions, see: Studer A; Curran DP Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2016, 55, 58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3)(a).Curran DP; Kim D; Liu HT; Shen WJ Am. Chem. Soc 1988, 110, 5900. [Google Scholar]; (b) For HAT reviews, see: Majetich G; Wheless K Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 7095. [Google Scholar]; (c) Radicals in Organic Synthesis; Renaud P, Sibi MP; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2001; Vol. 2. [Google Scholar]; (d) Robertson J; Pillai J; Lush RK Chem. Soc. Rev. 2001, 30, 94. [Google Scholar]; (e) Nechab M; Mondal S; Bertrand MP Chem. - Eur. J 2014, 20, 16034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).(a) For an impressive example on photoinduced desaturation reaction involving HAT process, see: Breslow R; Baldwin S; Flechtner T; Kalicky P; Liu S; Washburn W J. Am. Chem. Soc 1973, 95, 3251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) For efficient desaturation reactions involving both free radical and cationic intermediates, see: Voica A; Mendoza A; Gutekunst WR; Fraga JO; Baran PS Nat. Chem 2012, 4, 629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Hollister KA; Conner ES; Spell ML; Deveaux K; Maneval L; Beal MW; Ragains JR Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2015, 54, 7837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).(a) For desilylative oxidation of silyl ethers into carbonyl derivatives, see: Reddy MS; Narender M; Nageswar YVD; Rao KR Synthesis 2005, 2005, 714. [Google Scholar]; (b) Chandrasekhar S; Mohanty PK; Takhi MJ Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 2628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Liu H-J; Han I-S Synth. Commun. 1985, 15, 759. [Google Scholar]; (d) Olah G; Balaram Gupta GB Synthesis 1980, 1980, 44. [Google Scholar]
  • (6).For isopropyl iodide-promoted generation of a hybrid aryl Pd-radical complex catalyzing Kumada cross-coupling reaction, see: Manolikakes G; Knochel P Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2009, 48, 205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).(a) For 1,5-HAT of aryl radical species generated in the presence of Fe catalyst, see: Yoshikai N; Mieczkowski A; Matsumoto A; Ilies L; Nakamura E J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132, 5568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) For 1,5-HAT of aryl radical species generated in the presence of Ni catalyst, see: Wetjes WC; Wolfe LC; Waller PJ; Kalyani D Org. Lett 2013, 15, 5986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).For a review on formation of hybrid transition metal-radical alkyl species of groups 10–11, see: Jahn U Top. Curr. Chem 2011, 320, 323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).(a) For examples of photoinduced Cu-catalyzed transformations involving alkyl iodides, see: Ratani TS; Bachman S; Fu GC; Peters JC J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 13902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Do H-Q; Bachman S; Bissember AC; Peters JC; Fu GC J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 2162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Bissember AC; Lundgren RJ; Creutz SE; Peters JC; Fu GC Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2013, 52, 5129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) For examples of photoinduced Cu-catalyzed multicomponent and cross coupling reactions, see: Sagadevan A; Ragupathi A; Hwang KC Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2015, 54, 13896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Sagadevan A; Hwang KC Adv. Synth. Catal 2012, 354, 3421. [Google Scholar]
  • (10).For a review on UV-induced Pd-catalyzed transformations involving alkyl iodides, see: Sumino S; Fusano A; Fukuyama T; Ryu I Acc. Chem. Res 2014, 47, 1563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11) (a).Bloome KS; McMahen RL; Alexanian EJ J. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 20146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Parasram M; Iaroshenko VO; Gevorgyan VJ Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 17926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Bonney KJ; Proutiere F; Schoenebeck F Chem. Sci 2013, 4, 4434. [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Hydro-dehalogenation of the reactants is the common side process Pd-catalyzed and radical type reactions, see, e.g., refs 11 and 3. [Google Scholar]
  • (13).(a) For recent reviews on visible light photocatalytic reactions employing exogenous photosensitizers, see: Prier CK; Rankic DA; MacMillan DWC Chem. Rev 2013, 113, 5322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Xi Y; Yi H; Lei A Org. Biomol. Chem 2013, 11, 2387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Reckenthaler M; Griesbeck AG Adv. Synth. Catal 2013, 355, 2727. [Google Scholar]; (d) Jeffrey JL; Terrett JA; MacMillan DWC Science 2015, 349, 1532 For aryl radicals species in visible light photoinduced reactions with photosensitizers, see: Kalyani, D.; McMurtrey, K. B.; Neufeldt, S. R.; Sanford, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 18566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14). See SI for details. [Google Scholar]
  • (15) (a).Diao T; Stahl SS J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 14566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Nicolaou KC; Gray DLF; Montagnon T; Harrison ST Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2002, 41, 996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Uyanik M; Akakura M; Ishihara KJ Am. Chem. Soc 2009, 131, 251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16) (a).Yao W; Zhang Y; Jia X; Huang Z Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2014, 53, 1390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lyons TW; Bezier D; Brookhart M Organometallics 2015, 34, 4058. [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Curran DP; Xu JJ Am. Chem. Soc 1996, 118, 3142. [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Tsunoi S; Ryu I; Okuda T; Tanaka M; Komatsu M; Sonoda NJ Am. Chem. Soc 1998, 120, 8692. [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Attempts to isolate intermediate complex 4 via reaction of Pd(0) complexes with 1a failed, presumably due to steric hindrance of bulky silyl tether. Therefore, the SET path is considered as more likely. See SI for details. [Google Scholar]
  • (20).(a) For examples utilizing photoinduced Pd(II) excited complexes, see: To W-P; Liu Y; Lau T-C; Che C-M Chem. - Eur. J 2013, 19, 5654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Ozawa F; Yamamoto A; Ikariya T; Grubbs RH Organometallics 1982, 1, 1481. [Google Scholar]; (c) Wakatsuki Y; Yamazaki H; Grutsch PA; Santhanam M; Kutal CJ Am. Chem. Soc 1985, 107, 8153. [Google Scholar]
  • (21).(a) For examples of generating radical species from Pd(II) complexes, see: Kraatz H-B; van der Boom ME; Ben-David Y; Milstein D Isr. J. Chem 2001, 41, 163. [Google Scholar]; (b) Seligson AL; Trogler WC J. Am. Chem. Soc 1992, 114, 7085. [Google Scholar]; (c) Lanci MP; Remy MS; Kaminsky W; Mayer JM; Sanford MS J. Am. Chem. Soc 2009, 131, 15618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22) (a).Kuo JL; Hartung J; Han A; Norton JR J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 1036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Crossley SWM; Barabe F; Shenvi RA J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 16788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).However, an attempt to detect intermediate 9 in stoichiometric NMR experiment failed. See SI for details. [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Alternative hypothetical scenarios may include radical chain mechanism (see ref 6), or electron catalysis mechanism. See: Studer A; Curran DP Nat. Chem 2014, 6, 765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25) (a).Kefalidis CE; Davi M; Holstein PM; Clot E; Baudoin OJ Org. Chem 2014, 79, 11903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Baudoin O; Herrbach A; Gueritte F Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2003, 42, 5736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Motti E; Catellani M Adv. Synth. Catal 2008, 350, 565. [Google Scholar]
  • (26) (a).Newcomb M; Toy PH Acc. Chem. Res 2000, 33, 449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Baldwin JE Chem. Rev 2003, 103, 1197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Satoh T; Miura M Top. Organomet. Chem 2005, 14, 1. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES