Abstract
Aims: To compare the effects of maternal subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) diagnosed by the 2011 or 2017 “Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) for the diagnosis and management of thyroid disease during pregnancy and the postpartum” during the first trimester on adverse pregnancy outcomes in thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb)–negative pregnant women.
Methods: There were 1,556 Chinese singleton pregnant women with negative TPOAb diagnosed with either SCH or euthyroidism who were investigated, and the prevalence and risk of obstetric outcomes were compared between the two groups using 2011 and 2017 ATA standards, respectively. The effects of a mildly elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentration on adverse pregnancy outcomes were evaluated by binary logistic regression.
Results: Maternal SCH identified by the 2011 ATA guidelines correlated with higher rates and risks of pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), preeclampsia, and low-birth-weight infants, while maternal SCH diagnosed by the 2017 ATA guidelines was more likely to develop PIH, preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, preterm delivery, placenta previa, and total adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Moreover, a mildly elevated TSH level was significantly associated with PIH after adjustment for confounding factors.
Conclusions: Compared with the 2011 ATA guidelines, the 2017 ATA guidelines could be more applicable to Chinese pregnant women to screen the effects of SCH on the majority of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Keywords: subclinical hypothyroidism, pregnancy, adverse maternal outcomes, adverse neonatal outcomes, guidelines of the American thyroid association
Introduction
Despite the well-known harmful effects of overt hypothyroidism on pregnancy outcomes in women at childbearing ages (1–3), the impacts of subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH), characterized by an elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) with normal thyroxine (fT4), on adverse obstetric outcomes have not been yet clearly identified. Some studies indicated that SCH was associated with several obstetric complications, including preeclampsia, preterm delivery, and placental abruption (4–6), whereas others revealed that SCH did not result in poor pregnancy outcomes (7, 8) These inconsistencies may be mainly attributed to the differences of the diagnostic criteria for SCH (different TSH cutoffs) in different studies. Therefore, how to define SCH in pregnancy has been increasingly debated in recent years.
The 2011 “Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Thyroid Disease During Pregnancy and the Postpartum” recommended that the ideal upper limit of serum TSH was 2.5 mIU/L in early pregnancy (9). However, in recent years, several scholars found that SCH may be overdiagnosed in a large proportion of pregnant, which may bring anxieties to pregnant woman and thus add their psychological stresses (10–12). Additionally, results regarding whether a mildly elevated TSH concentration could increase adverse pregnancy outcomes have been vigorously debated (8, 13, 14). Therefore, accordingly, a more liberal reference upper limit of TSH at 4.0 mIU/L in healthy pregnant women has been recommended by the 2017 ATA guidelines (15).
However, studies regarding comparisons between the effects of SCH diagnosed the 2011 and 2017 ATA guidelines on adverse perinatal outcomes are extremely limited. And there is still insufficient evidence on current studies whether the 2017 ATA guidelines are applicable to Chinese pregnant women. Therefore, one of the aims of our study was to compare and evaluate the influence of different maternal SCH, defined by the 2011 and 2017 ATA criteria, respectively, during the first trimester, on diversified adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in Chinese pregnant women with negative anti–thyroperoxidase antibodies (TPOAbs). Furthermore, we also explored whether a mildly elevated TSH concentration during the first trimester could increase the risks of obstetric outcomes or not.
Materials and Methods
Study Population
It was a cross-sectional study with data from our previous study (16). Briefly, 4,178 pregnant women delivered at the obstetrics department of Shanghai JiaoTong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital from January to December in 2016 were collected as potential participants. First, 1,542 candidates without the thyroid function test results during 10–12 weeks, 373 candidates without oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) results during 24–28 weeks, and 86 women with incomplete data were removed. Second, two candidates with reproductive system anatomy abnormalities and 92 candidates with known chronic and autoimmune diseases, such as preexisting diabetes and chronic hypertension, were also excluded. Third, for the remaining 2,083 cases, 527 candidates were successively eliminated based on the recent ATA guidelines (9, 17) that pregnant women with (1) known or clinically antepartum thyroid diseases and goiter, (2) current or previous treatment with antithyroid drugs or levothyroxine (LT4), (3) history of iodine-131 therapy or thyroidectomy, (4) use of medications that may influence thyroid function, (5) family history of thyroid diseases, (6) history of head and neck external radiotherapy, (7) TSH concentration less than the lower limit of the reference range provided by the test kit (0.27 mIU/L in this study) or higher than 10 mIU/L, (8) FT4 out of the reference range (12–22 pmol/L in this study), and (9) anti-TPOAb levels higher than the upper limit of the reference value (35 KIU/L in this study). Ultimately, 1,556 TPOAb-negative pregnant women joined in our study.
According to the 2011 and 2017 ATA criteria (9, 15), the subjects were divided into two groups including euthyroidism (ET) and SCH. In addition, to analyze the impact of a mildly elevated TSH concentration on adverse pregnancy outcomes, all patients were further stratified into three groups as maternal TSH values 0.27–2.5 mIU/L (the normal TSH group, n = 971), 2.5–4.0 mIU/L (the TSH mildly elevated group, n = 433), and 4.0–10 mIU/L (the TSH significantly elevated group, n = 152). Our study was approved by the ethics committee of the Shanghai JiaoTong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, and written consent was obtained from the subjects individually.
Data Collection
Details on the maternal age, prepregnancy's height and body weight, primiparity, number of pregnancies and previous births, gestational age, gestational weight gain, neonatal sex, birth weight and height, and Apgar scores, as well as adverse pregnancy outcomes, were obtained from their medical records. The pregestational body mass index (BMI) was equal to the weight divided by height squared (kg/m2).
Laboratory Examinations
Blood sample was obtained from each participant after an overnight fast during 10–12 weeks. TSH, FT4, and TPOAb were measured by a chemiluminescence immunoassay (Roche Cobas 6000; Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland). A standard 75-g OGTT was performed at 24 to 28 weeks of gestation after an 8- to 10-h fast.
Outcomes and Diagnostic Criteria
Both maternal and neonatal outcomes were obtained in our results. And pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), preeclampsia, GDM, cesarean delivery (CS), preterm delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, placental previa and abruption, and dystocia were shown in our maternal outcomes, and one or more of the above complications resulted in the total adverse maternal outcomes. Moreover, low birth weight, preterm birth, macrosomia, fetal distress, fetal asphyxia, fetal deformities, and stillbirth were exhibited in our neonatal outcomes, and one or more above characters generated the total adverse neonatal outcomes. The above definitions had already been defined in our early study [(16), Supplementary Table 1].
The 2011 ATA guidelines define SCH in pregnancy as TSH >2.5 mU/L with normal FT4 levels (9), and pregnant women with TSH >4.0 mU/L with normal FT4 levels were defined as SCH according to the 2017 ATA guidelines (15). In addition, the normal reference ranges of FT4 and anti-TPOAb levels provided by the test kit were 12–22 pmol/L and 35 KIU/L, respectively, in this study.
Statistical Analyses
The data were analyzed using SPSS 19.0 software. Data were presented as either mean ± standard deviation or median with interquartile range or frequency following the below rules. First, normality was checked for continuous variables. And t-test was employed, and the variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation if the data showed a normal distribution, whereas the Mann-Whitney U test was used, and the variables were exhibited as median with interquartile range if not. Second, the χ2 test was employed, and variables were demonstrated by absolute numbers (percentages) on categorical variables. Moreover, binary logistic regression was further performed to assess the differences in categorical variables. P < 0.05 (two-sided) was considered to be statistically significant, whereas P < 0.10 (two-sided) was regarded as evident of statistical trends.
Results
Basic Characteristics of Pregnant Women and Their Offspring by Different SCH Standards
Of all the 1,556 enrolled women, the median age was 29 (27–33) years, and the median pregestational BMI was 21.48 (19.56–24.34) kg/m2. And the basic characteristics of pregnant women and their newborns by different SCH standards are shown in Table 1. According to the 2011 ATA criteria, 971 women were in the ET group, and 585 women were in the SCH group, and women diagnosed with SCH had significantly lower maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, and higher gestation age compared with those ET subjects (all P < 0.05). Based on the 2017 ATA criteria, there were 1,404 ET and 152 SCH pregnant women, and women identified with SCH in the early pregnancy had a lower prepregnancy BMI and neonatal birth weight and a higher gestation age compared with those with ET (all P < 0.05).
Table 1.
Characteristics of pregnant women and their offspring by different SCH standards.
| Variables | ET | SCH | P value | P′ value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCH diagnosed by 2011 standards | ||||
| Number | 971 | 585 | ||
| Maternal age (years) | 30 ± 5 | 29 ± 4 | 0.008 | — |
| Prepregnancy BMI (kg/m2)a | 22.58 (18.73–25.39) | 20.57 (17.95–22.59) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Number of pregnancies, n (%) | 0.377 | 0.865 | ||
| 1 | 408 (42) | 267 (45.6) | ||
| 2 | 283 (29.2) | 160 (27.4) | ||
| 3+ | 280 (28.8) | 158 (27) | ||
| Number of previous births, n (%) | 0.896 | 0.591 | ||
| 0 | 472 (48.6) | 286 (48.9) | ||
| 1 | 479 (49.3) | 285 (48.7) | ||
| 2+ | 20 (2.1) | 14 (2.4) | ||
| Primiparity, n (%) | 472 (48.6) | 286 (48.9) | 0.915 | 0.401 |
| Gestational age (weeks)a | 38 (36–39) | 39 (37–40) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Gestational weight gain (kg) | 12.1 ± 4.1 | 12.0 ± 4.0 | 0.584 | 0.405 |
| Neonatal | ||||
| Male, n (%) | 461 (49.4) | 311 (54) | 0.084 | 0.082 |
| Birth weight (g) | 3,288 ± 459 | 3,275 ± 501 | 0.595 | 0.647 |
| Birth height (cm) | 49.7 ± 2.3 | 49.7 ± 1.4 | 0.761 | 0.789 |
| Apgar scores | 9.9 ± 1.0 | 9.9 ± 0.7 | 0.219 | 0.249 |
| SCH diagnosed by 2017 standards | ||||
| Number | 1,404 | 152 | ||
| Maternal age (years) | 30 ± 4 | 29 ± 4 | 0.119 | — |
| Prepregnancy BMI (kg/m2)a | 21.64 (19.66–24.56) | 20.29 (18.81–22.04) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Number of pregnancies, n (%) | 0.571 | 0.790 | ||
| 1 | 603 (42.9) | 72 (47.4) | ||
| 2 | 402 (28.6) | 41 (27) | ||
| 3+ | 399 (28.5) | 39 (25.6) | ||
| Number of previous births, n (%) | 0.961 | 0.824 | ||
| 0 | 685 (48.8) | 73 (48) | ||
| 1 | 688 (49) | 76 (50) | ||
| 2+ | 31 (2.2) | 3 (2) | ||
| Primiparity, n (%) | 685 (48.8) | 73 (48) | 0.858 | 0.470 |
| Gestational age (weeks)a | 39 (36–39) | 39 (38–40) | <0.001 | 0.045 |
| Gestational weight gain (kg) | 12.1 ± 4.1 | 12.0 ± 4.1 | 0.142 | 0.554 |
| Neonatal | ||||
| Male, n (%) | 684 (50.3) | 88 (58.7) | 0.053 | 0.053 |
| Birth weight (g) | 3,292 ± 468 | 3,206 ± 533 | 0.036 | 0.039 |
| Birth height (cm) | 49.7 ± 2.0 | 49.5 ± 2.1 | 0.184 | 0.158 |
| Apgar scores | 9.9 ± 0.9 | 9.9 ± 1.1 | 0.054 | 0.501 |
ET, euthyroidism; SCH, subclinical hypothyroidism.
Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD or median with interquartile range, whereas categorical variables are expressed as percentages.
Non-normal distribution of continuous variables.
P′value, adjusted for age.
Association of Maternal SCH and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes by the 2011 ATA Standards
As shown in Table 2, based on the 2011 ATA guidelines, compared with the ET group, the prevalence and risks of PIH [3.8 vs. 1.5%, odds ratio (OR) = 4.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.95–9.33], preeclampsia (2.1 vs. 0.5%, OR = 7.40, 95% CI = 2.08–26.35), and low-birth-weight infants (4.3 vs. 2.7%, OR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.02–3.62) were significantly higher in the SCH group after controlling for confounding factors. And a rising trend was observed in the SCH group for the risks of CS (36.9 vs. 36.4%, OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.98–1.59) and placenta previa (1.9 vs. 1.3%, OR = 2.21, 95% CI = 0.92–5.32) in contrast to the ET group. However, no demonstrable differences were found in the incidence of GDM, preterm delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, placenta abruption, dystocia, macrosomia, fetal distress, fetal asphyxia, fetal deformities, stillbirth, and total adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Table 2.
Association of maternal SCH and adverse pregnancy outcomes according to 2011 ATA standard.
| Outcomes | ET, n (%) | SCH2011, n (%) | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | Model I OR (95% CI) | Model II OR (95% CI) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ET | SCH2011 | P-value | ET | SCH2011 | P-value | ET | SCH2011 | P-value | |||
| PIH | 15 (1.5%) | 22 (3.8%) | 1 (ref) | 2.49 (1.28–4.84) | 0.007 | 1 (ref) | 3.86 (1.81–8.23) | <0.001 | 1 (ref) | 4.27 (1.95–9.33) | <0.001 |
| Preeclampsia | 5 (0.5%) | 12 (2.1%) | 1 (ref) | 4.05 (1.42–11.54) | 0.009 | 1 (ref) | 6.08 (1.82–20.28) | 0.003 | 1 (ref) | 7.40 (2.08–26.35) | 0.002 |
| GDM | 194 (20%) | 116 (19.8%) | 1 (ref) | 0.99 (0.77–1.28) | 0.943 | 1 (ref) | 1.09 (0.83–1.44) | 0.524 | 1 (ref) | 1.07 (0.81–1.41) | 0.644 |
| CS | 353 (36.4%) | 216 (36.9%) | 1 (ref) | 1.03 (0.83–1.27) | 0.821 | 1 (ref) | 1.21 (0.96–1.53) | 0.115 | 1 (ref) | 1.25 (0.98–1.59) | 0.069 |
| Preterm delivery | 468 (48.2%) | 277 (47.4%) | 1 (ref) | 0.97 (0.79–1.19) | 0.746 | 1 (ref) | 1.14 (0.91–1.43) | 0.259 | 1 (ref) | 1.15 (0.92–1.45) | 0.223 |
| Postpartum hemorrhage | 12 (1.2%) | 13 (2.2%) | 1 (ref) | 1.82 (0.82–4.01) | 0.139 | 1 (ref) | 1.48 (0.65–3.33) | 0.348 | 1 (ref) | 1.54 (0.68–3.52) | 0.303 |
| Placenta previa | 13 (1.3%) | 11 (1.9%) | 1 (ref) | 1.41 (0.63–3.17) | 0.403 | 1 (ref) | 2.31 (0.96–5.56) | 0.062 | 1 (ref) | 2.21 (0.92–5.32) | 0.078 |
| Placenta abruption | 1 (0.1%) | 1 (0.2%) | 1 (ref) | 1.66 (0.10–26.61) | 0.720 | 1 (ref) | 1.99 (0.11–36.51) | 0.644 | 1 (ref) | 1.94 (0.09–40.65) | 0.670 |
| Dystocia | 14 (1.4%) | 8 (1.4%) | 1 (ref) | 0.95 (0.40–2.27) | 0.904 | 1 (ref) | 0.94 (0.38–2.33) | 0.891 | 1 (ref) | 0.93 (0.38–2.29) | 0.868 |
| Low birth weight | 26 (2.7%) | 25 (4.3%) | 1 (ref) | 1.62 (0.93–2.84) | 0.090 | 1 (ref) | 2.00 (1.06–3.76) | 0.032 | 1 (ref) | 1.93 (1.02–3.62) | 0.042 |
| Preterm birth | 468 (48.2%) | 277 (47.4%) | 1 (ref) | 0.97 (0.79–1.19) | 0.746 | 1 (ref) | 1.14 (0.91–1.43) | 0.223 | 1 (ref) | 1.15 (0.92–1.45) | 0.223 |
| Macrosomia | 47 (4.8%) | 27 (4.6%) | 1 (ref) | 0.95 (0.59–1.55) | 0.840 | 1 (ref) | 0.94 (0.57–1.57) | 0.823 | 1 (ref) | 0.94 (0.56–1.58) | 0.801 |
| Fetal distress | 17 (1.8%) | 15 (2.6%) | 1 (ref) | 1.48 (0.73–2.98) | 0.278 | 1 (ref) | 1.68 (0.79–3.57) | 0.179 | 1 (ref) | 1.71 (0.80–3.69) | 0.168 |
| Fetal asphyxia | 3 (0.3%) | 2 (0.3%) | 1 (ref) | 1.11 (0.18–6.64) | 0.912 | 1 (ref) | 0.92 (0.08–10.11) | 0.948 | 1 (ref) | 0.86 (0.08–9.36) | 0.903 |
| Fetal deformities | 12 (1.2%) | 2 (0.3%) | 1 (ref) | 0.27 (0.06–1.23) | 0.091 | 1 (ref) | 0.74 (0.12–4.37) | 0.736 | 1 (ref) | 0.64 (0.08–4.78) | 0.659 |
| Stillbirth | 9 (0.9%) | 3 (0.5%) | 1 (ref) | 0.55 (0.15–2.04) | 0.373 | 1 (ref) | 0.48 (0.09–2.51) | 0.387 | 1 (ref) | 0.53 (0.10–2.96) | 0.470 |
| Total adverse | 481 (49.5%) | 290 (49.6%) | 1 (ref) | 1.00 (0.82–1.23) | 0.989 | 1 (ref) | 1.14 (0.91–1.43) | 0.268 | 1 (ref) | 1.17 (0.93–1.47) | 0.177 |
| maternal outcomes | |||||||||||
| Total adverse | 513 (52.8%) | 299 (51.1%) | 1 (ref) | 0.93 (0.76–1.15) | 0.510 | 1 (ref) | 1.18 (0.94–1.48) | 0.150 | 1 (ref) | 1.18 (0.94–1.49) | 0.155 |
| neonatal outcomes | |||||||||||
Model I, adjusted for maternal age, pregestational BMI, and gestation age; Model II, adjusted for maternal age, pregestational BMI, gestational age, number of previous pregnancies, number of previous births, primiparity, and gestational weight gain.
Association of Maternal SCH and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes According to the 2017 ATA Standards
As depicted in Table 3, according to the 2017 ATA guidelines, pregnant women with SCH were more likely to have PIH (6.6 vs. 1.9%, OR = 5.16, 95% CI = 2.30–11.54), preeclampsia (5.3 vs. 0.6%, OR = 10.91, 95% CI = 3.72–32.01), CS (42.1 vs. 36%, OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.16–2.42), preterm delivery (53.9 vs. 47.2%, OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.16–2.37), and placenta previa (3.3 vs. 1.4%, OR = 4.12, 95% CI = 1.42–11.97) than those with ET, and their infants were more inclined to have lower birth weight (5.9 vs. 3%, OR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.00–4.80) and experience fetal distress (3.9 vs. 1.9%, OR = 2.27, 95% CI = 0.89–5.78). Moreover, we observed that the prevalence and risks of total adverse maternal outcomes (69.1 vs. 62.5%, OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.10–2.34) and neonatal outcomes (58.6 vs. 51.5%, OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.19–2.44) in women identified with SCH displayed prominent rise compared with those with ET even after adjustment for relevant confounders. However, there were no significant differences in the prevalence of GDM, postpartum hemorrhage, placental abruption, dystocia, macrosomia, fetal asphyxia, fetal deformities, and stillbirth between the two groups.
Table 3.
Association of maternal SCH and adverse pregnancy outcomes according to the 2017 ATA standard.
| Outcomes | ET, n (%) | SCH2017, n (%) | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | Model I OR (95% CI) | Model II OR (95% CI) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ET | SCH2017 | P-value | ET | SCH2017 | P-value | ET | SCH2017 | P-value | |||
| PIH | 27 (1.9%) | 10 (6.6%) | 1 (ref) | 3.59 (1.70–7.57) | 0.001 | 1 (ref) | 5.12 (2.31–11.38) | <0.001 | 1 (ref) | 5.16 (2.30–11.54) | <0.001 |
| Preeclampsia | 9 (0.6%) | 8 (5.3%) | 1 (ref) | 8.61 (3.27–22.66) | <0.001 | 1 (ref) | 11.07 (3.80–32.24) | <0.001 | 1 (ref) | 10.91 (3.72–32.01) | <0.001 |
| GDM | 277 (19.7%) | 33 (21.7%) | 1 (ref) | 1.13 (0.75–1.70) | 0.562 | 1 (ref) | 1.21 (0.79–1.85) | 0.376 | 1 (ref) | 1.21 (0.79–1.85) | 0.373 |
| CS | 505 (36%) | 64 (42.1%) | 1 (ref) | 1.30 (0.92–1.82) | 0.136 | 1 (ref) | 1.62 (1.13–2.32) | 0.009 | 1 (ref) | 1.68 (1.16–2.42) | 0.006 |
| Preterm delivery | 663 (47.2%) | 82 (53.9%) | 1 (ref) | 1.31 (0.94–1.83) | 0.116 | 1 (ref) | 1.60 (1.12–2.29) | 0.009 | 1 (ref) | 1.65 (1.16–2.37) | 0.006 |
| Postpartum hemorrhage | 22 (1.6%) | 3 (2.0%) | 1 (ref) | 1.27 (0.37–4.28) | 0.705 | 1 (ref) | 1.08 (0.32–3.67) | 0.907 | 1 (ref) | 1.01 (0.29–3.48) | 0.986 |
| Placenta previa | 19 (1.4%) | 5 (3.3%) | 1 (ref) | 2.48 (0.91–6.74) | 0.075 | 1 (ref) | 3.81 (1.33–10.95) | 0.013 | 1 (ref) | 4.12 (1.42–11.97) | 0.009 |
| Placenta abruption | 2 (0.1%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (ref) | — | 0.996 | 1 (ref) | — | 0.996 | 1 (ref) | — | 0.996 |
| Dystocia | 19 (1.4%) | 3 (2.0%) | 1 (ref) | 1.47 (0.43–5.02) | 0.538 | 1 (ref) | 1.45 (0.42–5.04) | 0.560 | 1 (ref) | 1.46 (0.42–5.09) | 0.556 |
| Low birth weight | 42 (3%) | 9 (5.9%) | 1 (ref) | 2.04 (0.97–4.28) | 0.059 | 1 (ref) | 2.25 (1.03–4.92) | 0.042 | 1 (ref) | 2.19 (1.00–4.80) | 0.050 |
| Preterm birth | 663 (47.2%) | 82 (53.9%) | 1 (ref) | 1.31 (0.94–1.83) | 0.116 | 1 (ref) | 1.60 (1.12–2.29) | 0.009 | 1 (ref) | 1.65 (1.16–2.37) | 0.006 |
| Macrosomia | 68 (4.8%) | 6 (3.9%) | 1 (ref) | 0.81 (0.34–1.89) | 0.623 | 1 (ref) | 0.82 (0.35–1.96) | 0.662 | 1 (ref) | 0.83 (0.35–2.00) | 0.676 |
| Fetal distress | 26 (1.9%) | 6 (3.9%) | 1 (ref) | 2.18 (0.88–5.37) | 0.092 | 1 (ref) | 2.32 (0.91–5.87) | 0.077 | 1 (ref) | 2.27 (0.89–5.78) | 0.085 |
| Fetal asphyxia | 5 (0.4%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (ref) | — | 0.996 | 1 (ref) | — | 0.996 | 1 (ref) | — | 0.996 |
| Fetal deformities | 14 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (ref) | — | 0.996 | 1 (ref) | — | 0.996 | 1 (ref) | — | 0.996 |
| Stillbirth | 10 (0.7%) | 2 (1.3%) | 1 (ref) | 1.86 (0.40–8.56) | 0.426 | 1 (ref) | 1.48 (0.17–12.99) | 0.724 | 1 (ref) | 1.79 (0.20–16.12) | 0.603 |
| Total adverse | 686 (48.9%) | 85 (55.9%) | 1 (ref) | 1.33 (0.95–1.86) | 0.099 | 1 (ref) | 1.59 (1.09–2.31) | 0.015 | 1 (ref) | 1.61 (1.13–2.30) | 0.009 |
| maternal outcomes | |||||||||||
| Total adverse | 723 (51.5%) | 89 (58.6%) | 1 (ref) | 1.33 (0.95–1.87) | 0.099 | 1 (ref) | 1.69 (1.18–2.42) | 0.004 | 1 (ref) | 1.71 (1.19–2.44) | 0.004 |
| maternal outcomes | |||||||||||
Model I, adjusted for maternal age, pregestational BMI, and gestation age; Model II, adjusted for maternal age, pregestational BMI, gestational age, number of previous pregnancies, number of previous births, primiparity, and gestational weight gain.
Comparisons on the Basic Characteristics and Incidences of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Between SCH Defined by the 2011 and 2017 ATA Standards
The basic characteristics and incidences of maternal and neonatal outcomes are compared between SCH defined by the 2011 and 2017 ATA standards (Table 4). There was no difference in basic characteristics between the 2011 and 2017 ATA standards. The prevalence of preeclampsia in SCH women diagnosed by the 2017 ATA standards was 5.3%, which was significantly higher than those SCH women diagnosed the 2011 ATA standards at 2.1% even when other traditional risk factors were considered. And we also found that SCH women defined by the 2017 ATA standards had increased trends in prevalence of CS (42.1 vs. 36.9%), preterm delivery (53.9 vs. 47.4%), total adverse maternal (69.1 vs. 62.2%), and neonatal outcomes (58.6 vs. 51.1%) than those defined by the 2011 ATA standards, although no statistically significant differences were observed between them. However, the prevalence of other adverse pregnancy outcomes was not significantly different between the two groups.
Table 4.
Comparisons on the basic characteristics and the incidences of adverse pregnancy outcomes between SCH defined by the 2011 and 2017 ATA standards.
| Variables | SCH 2011 | SCH 2017 | P-value | P′ value | *P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal age (years)a | 29 (26–32) | 28 (26–32) | 0.725 | 0.807 | 0.746 |
| Prepregnancy BMI (kg/m2) | 21.03 ± 2.86 | 20.64 ± 2.56 | 0.127 | 0.144 | 0.162 |
| Number of pregnancies, n (%) | 0.920 | 0.907 | 0.363 | ||
| 1 | 267 (45.6) | 72 (47.4) | |||
| 2 | 160 (27.4) | 41 (27) | |||
| 3+ | 158 (27) | 39 (25.6) | |||
| Number of previous births, n (%) | 0.927 | 0.879 | 0.709 | ||
| 0 | 286 (48.9) | 73 (48) | |||
| 1 | 285 (48.7) | 76 (50) | |||
| 2+ | 14 (2.4) | 3 (2) | |||
| Primiparity, n (%) | 286 (48.9) | 73 (48) | 0.850 | 0.654 | 0.786 |
| Gestational age (weeks) | 38 ± 3 | 38 ± 3 | 0.451 | 0.575 | 0.613 |
| Gestational weight gain (kg)a | 12 (10–14) | 12 (9–14.25) | 0.848 | 0.675 | 0.738 |
| Neonatal | |||||
| Male, n (%) | 311 (54) | 88 (58.7) | 0.305 | 0.330 | 0.825 |
| Birth weight (g) | 3,275 ± 501 | 3,206 ± 533 | 0.138 | 0.212 | 0.498 |
| Birth height (cm) | 49.7 ± 1.4 | 49.5 ± 2.1 | 0.194 | 0.129 | 0.279 |
| Apgar scores | 9.9 ± 0.7 | 9.9 ± 1.1 | 0.372 | 0.288 | 0.395 |
| PIH, n (%) | 22 (3.8%) | 10 (6.6%) | 0.129 | 0.018 | 0.114 |
| Preeclampsia, n (%) | 12 (2.1%) | 8 (5.3%) | 0.030 | 0.035 | 0.037 |
| GDM, n (%) | 116 (19.8%) | 33 (21.7%) | 0.607 | 0.454 | 0.464 |
| CS, n (%) | 216 (36.9%) | 64 (42.1%) | 0.241 | 0.096 | 0.092 |
| Preterm delivery, n (%) | 277 (47.4%) | 82 (53.9%) | 0.147 | 0.064 | 0.076 |
| Postpartum hemorrhage, n (%) | 13 (2.2%) | 3 (2.0%) | 0.851 | 0.825 | 0.842 |
| Placenta previa, n (%) | 11 (1.9%) | 5 (3.3%) | 0.288 | 0.307 | 0.344 |
| Placenta abruption, n (%) | 1 (0.2%) | 0 (0%) | 0.610 | 0.676 | 0.658 |
| Dystocia, n (%) | 8 (1.4%) | 3 (2.0%) | 0.583 | 0.605 | 0.607 |
| Low birth weight, n (%) | 25 (4.3%) | 9 (5.9%) | 0.388 | 0.420 | 0.371 |
| Preterm birth, n (%) | 277 (47.4%) | 82 (53.9%) | 0.147 | 0.064 | 0.076 |
| Macrosomia, n (%) | 27 (4.6%) | 6 (3.9%) | 0.723 | 0.773 | 0.804 |
| Fetal distress, n (%) | 15 (2.6%) | 6 (3.9%) | 0.361 | 0.430 | 0.434 |
| Fetal asphyxia, n (%) | 2 (0.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0.270 | — | — |
| Fetal deformities, n (%) | 2 (0.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0.470 | 0.466 | 0.519 |
| Stillbirth, n (%) | 3 (0.5%) | 2 (1.3%) | 0.283 | 0.598 | 0.308 |
| Total adverse maternal outcomes, n (%) | 290 (49.6%) | 85 (55.9%) | 0.163 | 0.078 | 0.093 |
| Total adverse neonatal outcomes, n (%) | 299 (51.1%) | 89 (58.6%) | 0.102 | 0.047 | 0.058 |
Non-normal distribution of continuous variables.
P value, not adjusted.
P′ value, adjusted for maternal age, pregestational BMI.
P value, adjusted for maternal age, pregestational BMI, gestational age, number of previous pregnancies, number of previous births, primiparity, and gestational weight gain.
Association of Maternal TSH Levels and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes
Table 5 displays the associations of maternal TSH levels and adverse pregnancy outcomes classified by maternal TSH values. First, except PIH (2.8 vs. 1.5%, OR = 2.99, 95% CI = 1.24–7.23), almost no correlations were observed on the adverse pregnancy outcomes between the normal TSH group (0.27–2.5 mIU/L) and the mildly elevated TSH group (2.5–4.0 mIU/L), after adjustment for potential confounders. Second, compared with the mildly elevated TSH group and the normal TSH group, the significantly elevated TSH group (4.0–10 mIU/L) exhibited remarkably higher incidences and risks of PIH (6.6 vs. 2.8 vs. 1.5%), preeclampsia (5.3 vs. 0.9 vs. 0.5%), CS (42.1 vs. 35.1 vs. 36.4%), preterm delivery (53.9 vs. 45 vs. 48.2%), and total adverse maternal (58.6 vs. 48.5 vs. 52.8%) and neonatal outcomes (69.1 vs. 60 vs. 63.5%). Third, compared with the normal TSH group, the significantly elevated TSH group had significantly increased rates and risks of placenta previa (3.3 vs. 1.3%, OR = 4.79, 95% CI = 1.53–14.93) and low birth weight (5.9 vs. 2.7%, OR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.14–6.14), whereas no such differences were found when compared with the mildly elevated TSH group. Finally, no statistically significant differences were found in the prevalence and risks of GDM, postpartum hemorrhage, placental abruption, dystocia, macrosomia, fetal distress, fetal asphyxia, fetal deformities, and stillbirth among these three groups.
Table 5.
Association of maternal TSH with adverse pregnancy outcomes.
| Outcomes | Normal TSH group | Mildly elevated TSH group | Significantly elevated TSH group | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 971) | (n = 433) | (n = 152) | ||
| PIH, n (%) | 15 (1.5%) | 12 (2.8%) | 10 (6.6%) | |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 1.82 (0.84–3.91) | 4.49 (1.98–10.18)*+ | 0.002 |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 2.99 (1.24–7.23) | 8.18 (3.23–20.73)*+ | <0.001 |
| Preeclampsia, n (%) | 5 (0.5%) | 4 (0.9%) | 8 (5.3%) | |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 1.80 (0.48–6.74) | 10.73 (3.46–33.26)*+ | <0.001 |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 3.37 (0.76–15.04) | 18.56 (4.77–72.21)*+ | <0.001 |
| GDM, n (%) | 194 (20%) | 83 (19.2%) | 33 (21.7%) | |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 0.95 (0.71–1.27) | 1.11 (0.73–1.68) | 0.794 |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 1.02 (0.75–1.38) | 1.22 (0.79–1.89) | 0.668 |
| CS, n (%) | 353 (36.4%) | 152 (35.1%) | 64 (42.1%) | |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 0.95 (0.75–1.20) | 1.27 (0.90–1.80) | 0.298 |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 1.11 (0.85–1.44) | 1.74 (1.19–2.54)*+ | 0.017 |
| Preterm delivery, n (%) | 468 (48.2%) | 195 (45%) | 82 (53.9%) | |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 0.88 (0.70–1.11) | 1.26 (0.89–1.77) | 0.159 |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 1.01 (0.79–1.30) | 1.66 (1.15–2.40)*+ | 0.023 |
| Postpartum hemorrhage, n (%) | 12 (1.2%) | 10 (2.3%) | 3 (2.0%) | |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 1.89 (0.81–4.41) | 1.61 (0.45–5.77) | 0.323 |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 1.66 (0.69–4.00) | 1.25 (0.34–4.62) | 0.530 |
| Placenta previa, n (%) | 13 (1.3%) | 6 (1.4%) | 5 (3.3%) | |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 1.04 (0.39–2.74) | 2.51 (0.88–7.13) | 0.205 |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 1.64 (0.55–4.33) | 4.79 (1.53–14.93)+ | 0.026 |
| Placenta abruption, n (%) | 1 (0.1%) | 1 (0.2%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 2.25 (0.14–35.98) | — | 0.849 |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 2.64 (0.12–57.86) | — | 0.827 |
| Dystocia, n (%) | 14 (1.4%) | 5 (1.2%) | 3 (2.0%) | |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 0.80 (0.29–2.23) | 1.38 (0.39–4.85) | 0.760 |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 0.78 (0.27–2.24) | 1.34 (0.37–4.90) | 0.762 |
| Low birth weight, n (%) | 26 (2.7%) | 16 (3.7%) | 9 (5.9%) | |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 1.40 (0.74–2.63) | 2.29 (1.05–4.98)+ | 0.105 |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 1.65 (0.81–3.36) | 2.64 (1.14–6.14)+ | 0.065 |
| Preterm birth, n (%) | 468 (48.2%) | 195 (45%) | 82 (53.9%) | |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 0.88 (0.70–1.11) | 1.26 (0.89–1.77) | 0.159 |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 1.01 (0.79–1.30) | 1.66 (1.15–2.40)*+ | 0.023 |
| Macrosomia, n (%) | 47 (4.8%) | 21 (4.8%) | 6 (3.9%) | |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 1.00 (0.59–1.70) | 0.81 (0.34–1.92) | 0.886 |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 1.22 (0.49–3.00) | 1.19 (0.46–3.06) | 0.912 |
| Fetal distress, n (%) | 17 (1.8%) | 9 (2.1%) | 6 (3.9%) | |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 1.19 (0.53–2.69) | 2.30 (0.89–5.94) | 0.224 |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 1.40 (0.58–3.35) | 2.58 (0.95–7.03) | 0.178 |
| Fetal asphyxia, n (%) | 3 (0.3%) | 2 (0.5%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 1.50 (0.25–8.99) | — | 0.907 |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 1.16 (0.11–12.40) | — | 0.993 |
| Fetal deformities, n (%) | 12 (1.2%) | 2 (0.5%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 0.37 (0.08–1.66) | — | 0.432 |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 0.82 (0.11–6.40) | — | 0.982 |
| Stillbirth, n (%) | 9 (0.9%) | 1 (0.2%) | 2 (1.3%) | |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 0.25 (0.03–1.96) | 1.43 (0.31–6.66) | 0.341 |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 0.31 (0.03–3.05) | 1.37 (0.15–12.60) | 0.548 |
| Total adverse maternal outcomes, n (%) | 481 (49.5%) | 205 (47.3%) | 85 (55.9%) | |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 0.92 (0.73–1.15) | 1.29 (0.92–1.82) | 0.192 |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 1.04 (0.81–1.33) | 1.63 (1.13–2.36)*+ | 0.032 |
| Total adverse neonatal outcomes, n (%) | 617 (63.5%) | 260 (60%) | 105 (69.1%) | |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 0.84 (0.67–1.06) | 1.26 (0.89–1.78) | 0.083 |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1 (ref) | 1.03 (0.80–1.33) | 1.72 (1.19–2.50)*+ | 0.014 |
Adjusted OR: adjusted for maternal age, pregestational BMI, number of pregnancies, number of previous births, primiparity, gestational age, and gestational weight gain.
P < 0.05 (2.5 ≤ TSH <4.0 mIU/L vs. 4 ≤ TSH <10 mIU/L).
P < 0.05 (0.29 ≤ TSH <2.5 mIU/L vs. 4 ≤ TSH <10 mIU/L).
Discussion
The extremely high circulating human chorionic gonadotropin levels along with the increased synthesis of thyroxine-binding globulin in the first trimester can trigger maternal thyroid hormone alteration and result in a variety of thyroid disorders (18). Some studies have discovered the adverse effects of maternal abnormal thyroid disorders on pregnancy outcomes (1, 19, 20). However, the associations between maternal SCH in pregnancy and adverse obstetrical outcomes still remain unclear, which also obtained increasing concerns from endocrinologists and gynecologists recently. Therefore, we carried out the present study to evaluate and compare the effects of maternal SCH diagnosed by the 2011 and 2017 ATA guidelines on adverse perinatal outcomes during the early pregnancy in TPOAb-negative pregnant women. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time to systematically compare the prevalence and risks of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes through different SCH diagnostic criteria in healthy pregnant population.
In the current study, SCH pregnant women diagnosed by both the 2011 and 2017 ATA guidelines successively exhibited the significantly higher incidences and risks of PIH and preeclampsia in the first trimester compared with those euthyroid pregnant women. More interestingly, we found the incidence of preeclampsia but not PIH was significantly higher in SCH women identified by the 2017 ATA guidelines than that in those SCH women diagnosed by the 2011 ATA guidelines after controlling for various confounding factors, which indicated that the elevated TSH concentration may be related to the severity of gestational hypertension. Consistently with us, Wu et al. (21) found that Chinese pregnant women diagnosed with SCH in the first and second trimesters were more likely to develop hypertensive disorders of pregnancy during the remainder of their pregnancy. Similar with us, another population-based study involving 24,883 Hispanic women demonstrated that the incidence of hypertension in the SCH group identified by TSH levels more than 4.13 mIU/L was 10.9%, which was significantly greater than that in the euthyroid group at 6.2% (4), while different from us and Wu et al. (21). There was the only remaining significant association between SCH and severe preeclampsia after adjusting for confounding factors in their study. A possible explanation for the difference was that the latter did not consider the screening time for thyroid function and TPOAb status. The mechanism of remarkable link between SCH and pregnancy-associated hypertension had been partially clarified by a molecular research, which demonstrated that individuals with SCH were characterized by impaired endothelium-related vasodilation due to the reduction of nitric oxide availability, and this alteration could be reversed by LT4 supplementation (22).
Another interesting and unexpected finding were that SCH women identified by the 2017 ATA criteria exhibited significantly higher risks of developing CS, placenta previa, preterm labor, and overall adverse pregnancy outcomes when compared with euthyroid women, whereas no such remarkable associations were observed in women with SCH diagnosed by the 2011 ATA criteria. The risks of above pregnancy complications in relation to maternal SCH had been previously studied with contradictory conclusions that several trails showed positive associations of SCH with adverse pregnancy outcomes (5, 23), whereas others did not demonstrate increased risks between them (7, 21). For example, Su et al. (5) found that SCH defined as TSH greater than the 95th percentile (at least 3.77 mIU/L) in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy may result in 3.32 (1.22–9.05)-fold risk of preterm delivery. But Wu et al. (21) reported that no statistical difference in preterm labor was noted between SCH women (TSH greater than the 95th percentile) and euthyroid women in the first trimester. Therefore, different cutoffs and definitions of SCH leading to different perinatal outcomes among the same crowd in our present study may well-explain these discrepancies. Consistent with our findings, Nazarpour et al. (24) found that LT4 could precisely decrease the risk of preterm delivery using the TSH cutoff ≥4.0 mIU/L, whereas there was no beneficial effect of LT4 therapy in reducing this complication in SCH women with negative TPOAb with a TSH cutoff point of 2.5 mIU/L.
Additionally, we also found that women with SCH diagnosed by the 2011 ATA standards were at significantly greater risk of low-birth-weight delivery, same as the results reported by Leung et al. (25). But no such an association was found among women with SCH diagnosed by the 2017 ATA standards; even the incidence of low birth weight among women with SCH diagnosed by the 2011 ATA standards was almost two times higher than that among euthyroid women, which suggested that SCH diagnosed by the 2011 ATA standards could predict a small portion of adverse pregnancy outcomes, and whether the interventions were needed to reduce these adverse events is still worth further study.
However, we did not find that SCH diagnosed by either 2011 or 2017 ATA guidelines increased the risk of GDM, postpartum hemorrhage, placental abruption, dystocia, macrosomia, fetal asphyxia, fetal distress, fetal deformities, and stillbirth development. Tudela et al. (26) documented that the likelihood of GDM remarkably increased with elevated TSH level, but similar with us, no significant association was observed in patients with SCH after adjustment for confounding factors. Likewise, Krassas et al. (27) and Matalon et al. (28) revealed that no association was seen between SCH and postpartum hemorrhage, although Feldthusen et al. (23) observed the notably higher prevalence of postpartum hemorrhages in women with SCH than that in euthyroid women in the first trimester without adjusting the interfering factors such as BMI. In addition, the significant association of SCH with placental abruption was observed only in one study (29), whereas this was not found in our study and others (30, 31). Chen et al. (31) also displayed that no significant differences were noted in GDM, placental abruption, fetal distress, stillbirth, and malformation between the SCH and euthyroid groups in the first trimester. Wu et al. (21) also reported there were no statistical differences in GDM, fetal distress, perinatal mortality, and birth weight more than 4,000 g between the SCH and euthyroid groups in the first trimester after controlling for confounding parameters.
Nowadays, there is a remaining controversial issue regarding whether a mildly elevated TSH concentration is related to obstetric complications. Some studies have reported that a mildly elevated TSH positively correlated with multiple possible gestational complications, such as spontaneous abortion, GDM (26, 32). For example, a prospective study performed in TPOAb-negative southern Italy pregnant women by Negro et al. (32) found a significantly higher rate of spontaneous fetal loss in pregnant women with TSH between 2.5 and 5 mIU/L in the first trimester compare with those with TSH <2.5 mIU/L. However, Li et al. (14) and Rosario et al. (13) argued that there were no associations between TPOAb-negative women with TSH concentration between 2.5 and 4.0 mIU/L during their first trimesters and the incidences of recorded adverse pregnancy outcomes without controlling for other confounding factors. Consistent with the studies by Li et al. (14) and Rosario et al. (13), before adjustment for potential risk factors, our results showed that no statistical significance was observed between a mildly elevated TSH concentration and a variety of obstetric complications in Chinese TPOAb-negative pregnant women. However, we found a significant association between a mildly elevated TSH and PIH after adjustment for other factors, which suggested that these additional variables may act as compounding factors. When we adjusted them, the association between a mildly elevated TSH and PIH was obvious. Therefore, our current study further provided the evidence that a mildly elevated TSH concentration only remarkably related to a small portion of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
On the contrary, we found that pregnant women with TSH >4.0 mIU/L had remarkably higher incidences and risks of PIH, preeclampsia, CS, preterm delivery, and total adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes when compared with those with TSH <2.5 mIU/L and TSH between 2.5 and 4 mIU/L. And women with TSH >4.0 mIU/L exhibited significantly higher rate and risks of placenta previa and low-birth-weight delivery compared with those with TSH <2.5 mIU/L. These results indicated that pregnant women with TSH > 4.0 mIU/L remarkably related to the most portion of adverse pregnancy outcomes. In line with us, Arbib et al. (33) displayed that women with TSH 2.5–4.0 mIU/L and >4.0 mIU/L successively had 1.81- and 2.33-fold risk of preterm delivery even when other traditional risk factors were considered. A study by Carty et al. (8) also demonstrated that women with TSH >5 mU/L delivered infants with lower birth weight than those with TSH <2.5 mU/L. However, there were no differences in preeclampsia, CS, preterm delivery in their study, which was different from us and may be explained by the facts that pregnant women in our study had higher prevalence of CS than those in the study by Carty et al. (8). Additionally, women with TSH level of > 5 mU/L in the study of Carty et al. included some women with FT4 levels below the non-pregnant reference range (9–21 pmol/L). In summary, our above results further fortify and enhance the current body of evidence suggesting that SCH diagnosed by the standards of 2017 ATA were apt to screen high-risk Chinese pregnant women compared with the 2011 ATA guidelines.
In addition, our findings were obtained from Chinese pregnant women with negative TPOAb, which provided robust evidence to support the opinion from Rotondi et al. (34). They thought the 2017 ATA guidelines overemphasized thyroid autoantibodies status and recommended treatment with LT4 in pregnant women with TSH levels ranging between the upper limit of the reference range and 10.0 μIU/mL independent from their thyroid antibody status. And our present study also further confirmed that some detrimental effects of maternal SCH may be actually present even in women with negative tests for TPOAb. This could be explained by the facts that thyroid antibodies may be falsely negative during gestation and that chronic autoimmune thyroiditis with serum negative thyroid autoantibodies is a well-known clinical entity even outside pregnancy (35, 36).
Our study has some limitations. First, the study population of these findings is Chinese, and thus more studies may need to verify whether these findings may be generalized to other populations. Second, long-term outcomes of the offspring like IQ are not considered in our study as we only make research to examine obstetric outcomes. Third, we did not consider the effect of thyroglobulin antibody on pregnancy outcome and not assess the effects of SCH in different trimesters on maternal and perinatal outcomes.
Conclusions
In general, our results extended and enhanced previous work and indicated that maternal SCH diagnosed by the 2017 ATA guidelines increased the risks of multiple adverse pregnancy outcomes, whereas maternal SCH diagnosed by the 2011 ATA guidelines was associated with only a small portion of adverse pregnancy outcomes in Chinese healthy pregnancy women with negative TPOAb during early pregnancy. Moreover, our current study further provided the evidence that a mildly elevated TSH concentration remarkably related to PIH even after adjustment. Our findings suggest that the 2017 ATA guidelines could be more applicable to Chinese pregnant women to screen the effects of SCH on the majority of detrimental maternal and neonatal outcomes, whereas the 2011 ATA guidelines were more suitable to evaluate SCH effects on a small portion of adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as PIH, preeclampsia, and low birth weight.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Shanghai Jiao-Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author Contributions
L-XL designed the study, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. LM conducted the obstetric and surgical clinical practice. YZ, T-PY, and J-FK collected samples and clinical data. YL performed statistical analysis. M-FL and Q-MF worked together and wrote the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Funding. This work was funded by grants from the National Key Research and Development Plan (2018YFC1314900 and 2018YFC1314905) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81170759, 81770813, and 81502316).
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2020.580380/full#supplementary-material
References
- 1.Nazarpour S, Ramezani TF, Simbar M, Azizi F. Thyroid dysfunction and pregnancy outcomes. Iran J Reprod Med. (2015) 13:387–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bryant SN, Nelson DB, McIntire DD, Casey BM, Cunningham FG. An analysis of population-based prenatal screening for overt hypothyroidism. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2015) 213:565.e1–6. 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dong AC, Stagnaro-Green A. Differences in diagnostic criteria mask the true prevalence of thyroid disease in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thyroid. (2019) 29:278–89. 10.1089/thy.2018.0475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wilson KL, Casey BM, McIntire DD, Halvorson LM, Cunningham FG. Subclinical thyroid disease and the incidence of hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. (2012) 119:315–20. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318240de6a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Su PY, Huang K, Hao JH, Xu YQ, Yan SQ, Li T, et al. Maternal thyroid function in the first twenty weeks of pregnancy and subsequent fetal and infant development: a prospective population-based cohort study in China. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2011) 96:3234–41. 10.1210/jc.2011-0274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fan X, Wu L. The impact of thyroid abnormalities during pregnancy on subsequent neuropsychological development of the offspring: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. (2016) 29:3971–6. 10.3109/14767058.2016.1152248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cleary-Goldman J, Malone FD, Lambert-Messerlian G, Sullivan L, Canick J, Porter TF, et al. Maternal thyroid hypofunction and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. (2008) 112:85–92. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181788dd7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Carty DM, Doogan F, Welsh P, Dominiczak AF, Delles C. Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) ≥2.5mU/l in early pregnancy: prevalence and subsequent outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. (2017) 210:366–69. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.01.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stagnaro-Green A, Abalovich M, Alexander E, Azizi F, Mestman J, Negro R, et al. Guidelines of the American thyroid association for the diagnosis and management of thyroid disease during pregnancy and postpartum. Thyroid. (2011) 21:1081–125. 10.1089/thy.2011.0087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li C, Shan Z, Mao J, Wang W, Xie X, Zhou W, et al. Assessment of thyroid function during first-trimester pregnancy: what is the rational upper limit of serum TSH during the first trimester in Chinese pregnant women? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2014) 99:73–79. 10.1210/jc.2013-1674 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wiles KS, Jarvis S, Nelson-Piercy C. Are we overtreating subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnancy? BMJ. (2015) 351:h4726. 10.1136/bmj.h4726 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Korevaar TI, Medici M, Peeters RP. Subclinical hypothyroidism overdiagnosis in pregnant women. JAMA Intern Med. (2015) 175:1872–3. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rosario PW, Carvalho M, Calsolari MR. TSH reference values in the first trimester of gestation and correlation between maternal TSH and obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a prospective Brazilian study. Arch Endocrinol Metab. (2016) 60:314–8. 10.1590/2359-3997000000132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li P, Lin S, Li L, Cui J, Zhou S, Fan J. Effect of mildly elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone during the first trimester on adverse pregnancy outcomes. BMC Endocr Disord. (2018) 18:64. 10.1186/s12902-018-0294-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Alexander EK, Pearce EN, Brent GA, Brown RS, Chen H, Dosiou C, et al. 2017 guidelines of the American thyroid association for the diagnosis and management of thyroid disease during pregnancy and the postpartum. Thyroid. (2017) 27:315–89. 10.1089/thy.2016.0457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li MF, Ma L, Yu TP, Zhu Y, Chen MY, Liu Y, et al. Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with abnormal glucose metabolism. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2020) 161:108085. 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Garber JR, Cobin RH, Gharib H, Hennessey JV, Klein I, Mechanick JI, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for hypothyroidism in adults: cosponsored by the American association of clinical endocrinologists and the American thyroid association. Thyroid. (2012) 22:1200–35. 10.1089/thy.2012.0205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Feldt-Rasmussen U, Mathiesen ER. Endocrine disorders in pregnancy: physiological and hormonal aspects of pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2011) 25:875–84. 10.1016/j.beem.2011.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Budenhofer BK, Ditsch N, Jeschke U, Gärtner R, Toth B. Thyroid (dys-)function in normal and disturbed pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. (2013) 287:1–7. 10.1007/s00404-012-2592-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kumru P, Erdogdu E, Arisoy R, Demirci O, Ozkoral A, Ardic C, et al. Effect of thyroid dysfunction and autoimmunity on pregnancy outcomes in low risk population. Arch Gynecol Obstet. (2015) 291:1047–54. 10.1007/s00404-014-3533-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wu MQ, Liu J, Wang YQ, Yang Y, Yan CH, Hua J. The impact of subclinical hypothyroidism on adverse perinatal outcomes and the role of thyroid screening in pregnancy. Front Endocrinol. (2019) 10:522. 10.3389/fendo.2019.00522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Taddei S, Caraccio N, Virdis A, Dardano A, Versari D, Ghiadoni L, et al. Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in subclinical hypothyroidism: beneficial effect of levothyroxine therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2003) 88:3731–7. 10.1210/jc.2003-030039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Feldthusen AD, Larsen J, Pedersen PL, Toft Kristensen T, Kvetny J. Pregnancy-induced alterations in mitochondrial function in euthyroid pregnant women and pregnant women with subclinical hypothyroidism; relation to adverse outcome. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. (2013) 1:e13–7. 10.1016/j.jcte.2013.12.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nazarpour S, Ramezani Tehrani F, Simbar M, Tohidi M, Minooee S, Rahmati M, et al. Effects of levothyroxine on pregnant women with subclinical hypothyroidism, negative for thyroid peroxidase antibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2018) 103:926–35. 10.1210/jc.2017-01850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Leung AS, Millar LK, Koonings PP, Montoro M, Mestman JH. Perinatal outcome in hypothyroid pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. (1993) 81:349–53. 10.1016/0020-7292(93)90343-U [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tudela CM, Casey BM, McIntire DD, Cunningham FG. Relationship of subclinical thyroid disease to the incidence of gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol. (2012) 119:983–8. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318250aeeb [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Krassas GE, Poppe K, Glinoer D. Thyroid function and human reproductive health. Endocr Rev. (2010) 31:702–55. 10.1210/er.2009-0041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Matalon S, Sheiner E, Levy A, Mazor M, Wiznitzer A. Relationship of treated maternal hypothyroidism and perinatal outcome. J Reprod Med. (2006) 51:59–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Casey BM, Dashe JS, Wells CE, McIntire DD, Byrd W, Leveno KJ, et al. Subclinical hypothyroidism and pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. (2005) 105:239–45. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000152345.99421.22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Männistö T, Vääräsmäki M, Pouta A, Hartikainen AL, Ruokonen A, Surcel HM, et al. Thyroid dysfunction and autoantibodies during pregnancy as predictive factors of pregnancy complications and maternal morbidity in later life. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2010) 95:1084–94. 10.1210/jc.2009-1904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chen LM, Du WJ, Dai J, Zhang Q, Si GX, Yang H, et al. Effects of subclinical hypothyroidism on maternal and perinatal outcomes during pregnancy: a single-center cohort study of a Chinese population. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e109364. 10.1371/journal.pone.0109364 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Negro R, Schwartz A, Gismondi R, Tinelli A, Mangieri T, Stagnaro-Green A. Increased pregnancy loss rate in thyroid antibody negative women with TSH levels between 2.5 and 5.0 in the first trimester of pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2010) 95:E44–8. 10.1210/jc.2010-0340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Arbib N, Hadar E, Sneh-Arbib O, Chen R, Wiznitzer A, Gabbay-Benziv R. First trimester thyroid stimulating hormone as an independent risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. (2017) 30:2174–8. 10.1080/14767058.2016.1242123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rotondi M, Chiovato L, Pacini F, Bartalena L, Vitti P. Management of subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnancy: a comment from the italian society of endocrinology and the italian thyroid association to the 2017 American thyroid association guidelines— “The Italian Way”. Thyroid. (2018) 28:551–5. 10.1089/thy.2017.0424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Glinoer D, Riahi M, Grün JP, Kinthaert J. Risk of subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnant women with asymptomatic autoimmune thyroid disorders. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (1994) 79:197–204. 10.1210/jcem.79.1.8027226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Smyth PP, Wijeyaratne CN, Kaluarachi WN, Smith DF, Premawardhana LDKE, Parkes AB, et al. Sequential studies on thyroid antibodies during pregnancy. Thyroid. (2005) 15:474–77. 10.1089/thy.2005.15.474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.