Skip to main content
PMC home page
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Oct 22;73:101567. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101567

First report on Cryptosporidium parvum, Escherichia coli K99, rotavirus and coronavirus in neonatal lambs from north-center region, Algeria

Hichem Dahmani a, Nassim Ouchene a,*, Ali Dahmani a, Nadjet Amina Ouchene-Khelifi a, Mustapha Oumouna b
PMCID: PMC7580686  PMID: 33157428

Highlights

  • •

    The etiology of neonatal diarrhea is multifactorial and remains one of the biggest problems in ruminant livestock farming. This study represent the first report in Algeria on Cryptosporidium parvum, Escherichia coli K99, rotavirus and coronavirus in the etiology of neonatal diarrhea in lambs.

  • •

    Faecal samples from 559 neonatal lambs aged less than 30 days from 30 sheepfolds were screened with pathogen-specific antigen ELISA for C. parvum, E. coli K99, rotavirus, and coronavirus.

  • •

    The prevalence of C. parvum was the highest compared to other enteric pathogens.

  • •

    In various combinations, mixed infections were detected only with C. parvum.

Keywords: Cryptosporidium parvum, E. coli K99, Rotavirus, Coronavirus, Diarrhea, Lamb, Algeria

Abstract

The etiology of neonatal diarrhea is multifactorial and remains one of the greatest health problems in sheep livestock farming. Faecal samples from 559 neonatal lambs aged less than 30 days from 30 sheepfolds located in the north-center region of Algeria were screened with pathogen-specific antigen ELISA for Cryptosporidium parvum, Escherichia coli K99, rotavirus, and coronavirus. Of the 559 lambs, 312 (58.81 %), 155 (27.72 %), 72 (12.88 %) and 20 (3.57 %) were positives for C. parvum, E. coli K99, rotavirus and coronavirus antigens, respectively. The prevalence of C. parvum was the highest (p < 0.0001). C. parvum, E. coli K99, rotavirus and coronavirus were observed in 23 (76.66 %), 17 (56.66 %), 9 (30 %) and 3 (10 %) sheepfolds, respectively. Compared to age, the prevalence of C. parvum was highest during the second and third week of age (p < 0.001). In contrast, other pathogens were found to be more frequent in lambs aged ≤7 days (p < 0.001). The number of lambs with diarrhea was 280 (50.09 %) of which 280 (100 %), 127 (45.35 %), 52 (18.57 %) and 10 (3.57 %) were found to be infected with C. parvum, E. coli K99, rotavirus and coronavirus, respectively (p < 0.0001). In various combinations, mixed infections were detected only with C. parvum. This is the first report of C. parvum, E. coli K99, rotavirus, and coronavirus in ≤30-days old neonatal lambs in Algeria. Special attention should be given to the first colostrum feeding, hygiene of the farm, prevention and control measures for a better prevention of neonatal diarrhea in lambs.

1. Introduction

Neonatal diarrhoea remains one of the greatest health problems in ruminant livestock production, resulting in significant economic losses due to morbidity and mortality, treatment costs and reduced growth rates of affected newborns [1,2]. Its etiology is multifactorial, resulting from an interaction between the animal and its environment, nutrition and the pathogens involved [3].

The etiology of this diarrhoeal syndrome can be infectious (viruses, bacteria and protozoa) or due to non-infectious factors such as herd management, nutritional and immunological status of the host [1,4,5]. Infectious diarrhoea in lambs is most often due to different types of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Cryptosporidium parvum, Rotavirus, and Coronavirus or a combination of these pathogens. They can cause clinical disease and/or may lead to suboptimal growth rate of affected animals [[6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]].

However, in a neonatal diarrhoea syndrome, it is difficult to situate the exact etiological role of each of these pathogens, due to their action which can be isolated or associated, producing practically similar clinical signs. Moreover, epidemiological studies have shown that the diversity in the degree of association between these agents is often fatal when the infections are mixed [6,7,12].

In Algeria, the overall sheep population was estimated at 28,393,602 [13]. Although, neonatal diarrhoea is one of the major preoccupations of livestock farmers in Algeria. However, to date no studies have been carried out in Algeria to investigate the main agents of neonatal diarrhoea in sheep (Cryptosporidium parvum, Escherichia coli K99, rotavirus and coronavirus). The majority of publications have only concerned cattle [[14], [15], [16]] and the very few studies that have been carried out on sheep are concerned only Cryptosporidium spp [17,18].

The present study was therefore conducted for evaluate the comparative role of Cryptosporidium spp and other enteric pathogens known as major agents of neonatal diarrhea in lambs on 30 farms located in the north-central region of Algeria.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Study area and sample collection

The study was carried out between January 2014 and December 2016 and concerned 559 lambs aged less than 30 days. Lambs were classified into four age groups: ≤ 7 days, 8−14 days, 15−21 days, 22–30 days.

The study was carried out in 30 sheepfolds with extensive farming methods, where sheep remain on pasture for the most part of the day. The study was carried out in north-center region of Algeria: Laghouate (33°47′59″ N 2°51′54″ E), Djelfa (34°40′22″ N 3°15′46″ E), Medea (36°15′51″ N 2°45′14″ E) and Bouira (36°22′29″N 3°54′07″ E) (Fig. 1 ).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Presentation of the study area.

Fecal samples were taken using a rectal swab from each lamb in a sterile plastic vial. The samples were then transported to the laboratory at 4 °C. Farm of origin, the date of sampling and the age of each animal were recorded. The aspect of the faeces was registered: diarrhoeal/non-diarrhoeal.

2.2. Laboratory analysis

Faecal samples were screened for antigens to C. parvum and the other enteric pathogens using a commercial faecal antigen ELISA test (Bio-X Easy-Digest, Bio K 151; Bio-X Diagnostics, Belgium). This kit simultaneously detects specific antigens from C. parvum, E. coli K99, rotavirus, and coronavirus and the tests were performed according to the kit manufactures' instructions.

2.3. Statistical analysis

Detection rate of prevalence in diarrheic lambs than in no-diarrheic and in the different age groups were compared by chi-square test (χ2) test. For multi-variable comparisons, one-way ANOVA was conducted, followed by Tukey-Kramer testing using the program R software version 3.0.1(R Core Team2013). Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.

3. Results

Of the 559 lambs, 312 (58.81 %), 155 (27.72 %), 72 (12.88 %) and 20 (3.57 %) tested by faecal antigen ELISA were positive for C. parvum, E. coli K99, rotavirus and coronavirus antigens, respectively. The prevalence of C. parvum was the highest (p < 0.0001) (Table 1 ).

Table 1.

Prevalence of C. parvum, E. coli (K99+), rotavirus and coronavirus in the faces of lambs.

Pathogens N° positive samples %
C. parvum 312 58.81*
E. coli (K99+) 155 27.72
Rotavirus 72 12.88
Coronavirus 20 3.57
Total 559
Open in a new tab

C. parvum, E. coli, rotavirus and coronavirus were observed in 23 (76.66 %), 17 (56.66 %), 9 (30 %) and 3 (10 %) sheepfolds, respectively. C. parvum was the most widespread (p < 0.0001).

Compared to age, the prevalence of C. parvum was highest during the second and third week of age (p < 0.001). In contrast, other pathogens were found to be more frequent in lambs aged ≤7 days (p < 0.001) (Table 2 ). Rotavirus and coronavirus were not revealed in lambs aged ≥ 15 days (Table 2).

Table 2.

Prevalence of C. parvum, E. coli (K99+), rotavirus and coronavirus according to the age of lambs.

Age (days) N° of samples C. parvum
 E. coli (K99+)
 Rotavirus
 Coronavirus
N°positive samples % N° positive samples % N° positive samples % N° positive samples %
≤7 155 21 13.54c 64 41.29*a 55 35.48*b 15 9.67*d
8−14 220 154 70*a 44 20b 17 7.72c 5 2.27c
15−21 100 85 85*a 15 15b 0 0 0 0
22−28 84 52 61.90a 32 38.09b 0 0 0 0
Total 559 312 155 72 20
Open in a new tab

a,b,c,dValues that have not the same letter in the same line are different at p < 0.05.

*

These values are significantly higher than the other values in the same column at p < 0.05.

Lambs aged ≤ 7 days were found to be more infested with E. coli K99 and rotavirus compared to C. parvum and coronavirus (p < 0.001) (Table 2). In the other age categories (≥8jours), lambs were more infested with C. parvum than other enteropathogens (p < 0.001) (Table 2).

The number of lambs with diarrhea was 280 (50.09 %) of which 280 (100 %), 127 (45.35 %), 52 (18.57 %) and 10 (3.57 %) were found to be infected with C. parvum, E. coli K99, rotavirus and coronavirus, respectively. All diarrheal lambs were found to be infected with C. parvum, which showed a significantly higher prevalence than other pathogens (p < 0.0001).

The prevalence of infection with C. parvum, E. coli and rotavirus was higher in lambs with diarrhea compared to lambs without diarrhea (p < 0.001). However, no significant difference was observed for coronavirus (Table 3 ).

Table 3.

Prevalence of C. parvum, E. coli (K99+), rotavirus and coronavirus according to diarrhoeal and non diarrhoeal faeces.

Faeces C. parvum
 E. coli (K99+)
 Rotavirus
 Coronavirus
N° positive samples % N° positive samples % N° positive samples % N° positive samples %
Diarrhoeal 280 89.74* 127 81.93* 52 72.22* 10 50
Non-diarrhoeal 32 10.26 28 18.06 20 27.78 10 50
Open in a new tab

C. parvum, E. coli K99, rotavirus and coronavirus were identified alone in 291, 146, 65 and 15 samples, respectively (Fig. 2 ). C. parvum was the most frequent (p < 0.0001).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Number of positive samples of C. parvum, E. coli (K99+), rotavirus and coronavirus alone or in association.

The association between these pathogens was observed only with C. parvum, where associations of C. parvum with E. coli K99, rotavirus and coronavirus were reported in 9, 7 and 5 samples, respectively (Fig. 2).

4. Discussion

The clinical diagnosis of infectious enteritis is difficult to establish because of the frequency of clinical signs, the implication of multiple agents, and the interactions between factors that predispose the host to infection [19]. C. parvum, E. coli K99, rotavirus and coronavirus are recognized as the most important enteropathogens in diarrhea in young ruminants [20]. To our knowledge, this is the first report of neonatal lambs in Algeria in which C. parvum along with E. coli K99, rotavirus, and coronavirus infections are reported using the ELISA test for fecal antigen detection. The results showed the existence of all this pathogens with a predominance of C. parvum.

Prevalence of lambs’ infections with C. parvum, E. coli K99, rotavirus and coronavirus revealed in this study were 58.81 %, 27.72 %, 12.88 % and 3.57 %, respectively. C. parvum was the most prevalent. This is in agreement with other findings ([[21], [22], [23], [24]]].

The prevalence of C. parvum infection found in our study is consistent with the results of other studies [[25], [26], [27]], but was higher than 10.24 % in Iran (Mohammad et al., 2013).

C. parvum plays an important role in neonatal diarrhea in lambs [28]. In our study, a strong association between diarrhea and the presence of C. parvum oocysts in lamb faeces have been recorded which is in concordance with several other studies [21,23,25,[29], [30], [31]]. The same finding was reported also in cattle [5,32,33].

C. parvum was observed in 23 sheepfolds (67.66 %) which is comparable with Causape et al. [25], Munoz et al. [23] and higher than of [34]in Iran, Rossanigo et al. [35] in Italy and Causape et al. [25] and Pablo et al. [36] in Spain.

In this study, the higher prevalence of cryptosporidial infection was observed in lambs aged between 8–21 days. The same was reported by Sevinç et al. [37]. The presence of Cryptosporidium infection in clinically asymptomatic lambs indicated that particular age group of animals might be reservoir for the parasite [38] and the prevalence rate decreases with increase in age and, this may be due to age related immunity [39].

Neonatal colibacillosis is highly contagious in lambs [40]. Our results show that E. coli K99 was reported in 27.72 % of lambs which is consistent with 26 % reported in Spain [23] and higher than 19.2 %, 9.42 % reported by Fernando et al. [41] in Brazil and Malik et al. [42] in Morocco, respectively.

The most severe diarrhea was recorded in calves less than three days old with E. coli K99 [43]. In our study, the highest prevalence of E. coli K99 was observed in lambs less than 7 days old which is in agreement with Erhan et al. [44].

E. coli K99 was identified in 81.93 % of the diarrhoeal lambs in our study which is in agreement with Aklilu et al. [45] in Etiopia (84 %). E. coli K99 was isolated from 4% of lambs in the Netherlands [46], 0.2 % in Italy [47], 31 % in USA [48] from sheep flock and between 12.5–26.6 % [49,50] in India. These reports are much lower than our finding.

The high prevalence of E. coli K99 observed in our study can be attributed to delayed or insufficient in first colostrum intake, unclean shepherd and lack of implementation of appropriate prevention and control measures. Olsson et al. [51] reported that each hour of delay in colostrum ingestion during the first 12 h of age resulted in a 10 % increased risk of a lamb becoming sick. The same observation was suggested by Aklilu et al. [45].

Lambs are susceptible to different rotavirus serotypes during their first week of life [43]. Rotavirus-associated enteritis in lambs has been the subject of numerous studies; the frequency of infection ranges from 2.1 % in Spain [23] and 5.3 % in Turkey [44] to 25 % in India [52]. In our study, the prevalence encountered (12.88 %) falls between these prevalences.

In the present study, rotavirus was more observed in lambs less than 7 days old (35.48 %). The quantitative and qualitative insufficiency of colostrum can be incriminated, especially since double births are frequent in ewes [53].

Several studies have shown high morbidity (75–100 %) in outbreaks of neonatal diarrhea in lambs [54]. In the present study, rotavirus was more prevalent in diarrhoea than non-diarrhoeal lambs, which is consistent with Kaminjolo et al. [55].

Rotavirus was isolated from 30 % of the farms in our study, which is lower compared to 46 % found in Scotland [52].

Coronavirus has been reported to play a role in the etiology of diarrhoea in association with rotavirus [56,57]. In the present study, coronavirus was detected in 3.57 % of lambs, which was lower than reported by other authors [44,58].

In addition, a survey of small ruminants in Spain failed to detect coronaviruses in diarrhoeal neonates [23].

Many enteric pathogens can exist simultaneously with cryptosporidium infection in the same animal [23]. Although infections with C. parvum alone were recorded, mixed infections with the other enteric pathogens tested were more frequent. As demonstrated also, single infections with E. coli K99, rotavirus and coronavirus may be associated with diarrhoea [59]. For mixed infections, C. parvum has been variably detected with E. coli K99, rotavirus and coronavirus. These mixed infections are common and are generally thought to increase the severity of the diarrhea when they occur [59].

In our study, mixed infections were observed between C. parvum and E. coli K99, rotavirus or coronavirus and no other form of association was found. This suggests that C. parvum is a primary agent in neonatal diarrhoea in lambs and that other agent is synergistic. The same observation has been reported by other authors [60,61].

5. Conclusion

The present study has documented C. parvum, as well as E. coli K99, rotavirus, and coronavirus in neonatal lambs from Algeria. These enteropathogens were observed in lambs with or without diarrhea. C. parvum was the most common, especially in lambs with diarrhea. For better prevention of neonatal diarrhea in lambs, special attention should be given to the first colostrum feeding, hygiene of the farm, prevention and control measures. To better understand the epidemiology of neonatal diarrhea in lambs in Algeria, more extensive and nationwide studies will be necessary.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors report no declarations of interest.

References

  • 1.Garaicoechea L., Bok K., Jones L.R., Combessies G., Odeon A., Fernandez F., Parreno V. Molecular characterization of bovine rotavirus circulating in beef and dairy herds in Argentina during a 10-year period (1994–2003) Vet. Microbiol. 2006;118:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Reidy N., Lennon G., Fanning S., Power E., O’Shea H. Molecular characterization and analysis of bovine rotavirus strains circulating in Ireland 2002–2004. Vet. Microbiol. 2006;117:242–247. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Scott P.R., Hall G.A., Jones P.W., Morgan J.H. Calf diarrhoea. In: Andrews A.H., Blowey R.W., Boyd H., Eddy R.G., editors. Bovin Medicine Diseases and Husbandry of Cattle. Wiley Blackwell; Oxford: 2004. pp. 185–214. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Maes R.K., Grooms D.L., Wise A.G., Han C., Ciesick V., Hanson L., Vickers M.J., Kanitz C., Holland R. Evaluation of a human group A Rotavirus assay for on-site detection of bovine rotavirus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003;41:290–294. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.1.290-294.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stipp D.T., Barry A.F., Alfieri A.F., Takiuchi E., Amude A.M., Alfieri A.A. Frequency of BCoV detection by a semi-nested PCR assays in faeces of calves from Brazilian cattle herds. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2009;41:1563–1567. doi: 10.1007/s11250-009-9347-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chatzopoulos D.C., Athanasiou L.V., Spyrou V., Fthenakis G.C., Billinis C. Rotavirus infection in domestic animals. J. Hell. Vet. Med. Soc. 2013;64:145–160. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hubalek Z., Rudolf I., Nowotny N. Arboviruses pathogenic for domestic and wild animals. Adv. Virus Res. 2014;89:201–227. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800172-1.00005-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Minetti C., Taweenan W., Hogg R., Featherstone C., Randle N., Latham S.M., Wastling J.M. Occurrence and diversity of Giardia duodenalis assemblages in livestock in the UK. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2014;61:60–67. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Scholes S.F.E., Welchman D., De B., Hutchinson J.P., Edwards G.T., Mitchell E.S. Clostridium perfringens type D enterotoxaemia in neonatal lambs. Vet. Rec. 2007;160:811–812. doi: 10.1136/vr.160.23.811-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yang R., Jacobson C., Gordon C., Ryan U. Prevalence and molecular characterisation of Cryptosporidium and Giardia species in pre-weaned sheep in Australia. Vet. Parasitol. 2009;16:19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yang R., Jacobson C., Gardner G., Carmichael I., Campbell A.J., Ryan U. Longitudinal prevalence, faecal shedding and molecular characterisation of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella enterica in sheep. Vet. J. 2014;202:250–254. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Martella V., Decaro N., Buonavoglia C. Enteric viral infections in lambs or kids. Vet. Microbiol. 2015;181:154–160. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.MADR . 2017. LA PRODUCTION AGRICOLE: Campagnes 2015/2016 Et 2016/2017, N°837.http://madrp.gov.dz/agriculture/statistiques-agricoles/ [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Khelef D., Saïb M.Z., Akam A., Kaidi R., Chirila V., Cozma V., Adjou K.T. Épidemiologie de la cryptosporidiose chez les bovins en Algérie. Rev. Elev. Med. Vet. Pays Trop. 2007;158(5):260–264. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ouchene N., Benakhla A., Khelifi N.A., Righi S., Paraud C., Chartier C. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium sp in dairy calves in north-eastern Algeria. Revue Méd. Vét. 2012;163(4):163–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ouchene N., Ouchene-Khelifi N.A., Khelifi M., Zeroual F., Bitam I., Benakhla A. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium in dairy cattle from farms in Algeria. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 2016;22(5):703–707. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Baroudi D., Hakem A., Adamu H., Amer S., Khelef D., Adjou K., Dahmani H., Chen X., Roellig D., Feng Y., Xiao L. Zoonotic Cryptosporidium species and subtypes in lambs and goat kids in Algeria. Parasit. Vectors. 2018;11(2018):582. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-3172-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sahraoui L., Thoma M., Chevillo A., Mammeri M., Polack B., Vallée I., Follet J., Ain-Baaziz H., Adjou K.T. Molecular characterization of zoonotic Cryptosporidium spp. And Giardia duodenalis pathogens in Algerian sheep. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2019;16:10028. doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2019.100280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Athanassious R., Marsolais G., Assaf R., Dea S., Descoteaux J.P., Dulude S., Montpetit C. Detection of bovine coronavirus and type A rotavirus in neonatal calf diarrhea and winter dysentery of cattle in Quebec: evaluation of three diagnostic methods. Can. Vet. J. 1994;35:163–169. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gulliksen S.M., Jor E., Lie K.I., Hamnes I.S., Loken T., Akerstedt J., Osteras O. Enteropathogens and risk factors for diarrhea in Norwegian dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2009;92:5057–5066. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ahamed I., Yadav A., Katoch R., Godara R., Saleem T., Nisar N.A. Prevalence and analysis of associated risk factors for Cryptosporidium infection in lambs in Jammu district. J. Parasit. Dis. 2015;39(3):414–417. doi: 10.1007/s12639-013-0353-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gencay Y.E. Sheep as an important source of E. coli O157/O157: H7 in Turkey. Vet. Microbiol. 2012;172:590–595. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Munoz M., Alvarez M., Lanza I., Carmenes P. Role of enteric pathogens in the aetiology of neonatal diarrhoea in lambs and goat kids in Spain. Epidemiol. Infect. 1996;117:203–211. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800001321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Paze Silva F.M., Lopes R.S., Bresciani K.D., Amarante A.F., Araujo J.R. High Occurrence of Cryptosporidium ubiquitum and Giardia duodenalis genotype E in sheep from Brazil. Acta Parasitol. 2014;59 doi: 10.2478/s11686-014-0223-5. 193–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Causape Ac., Quilez J., Sanchez-Acedo C., Del Cacho E., Lopez-Bernard F. Prevalence and analysis of potential risk factors for Cryptosporidium parvum infection in lambs in Zaragoza (northeastern Spain) Vet. Parasitol. 2002;104:287–298. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(01)00639-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Irshad A., Anish Y.A., Katoch R., Godara R., Taniya S., Nisar N.A. Prevalence and analysis of associated risk factors Cryptosporidium infection in lambs in Jammu district. J. Parasit. Dis. 2013 doi: 10.1007/s12639-013-0353-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Panousis N., Diakou A., Giadinis N., Papadopoulos E., Karatzias H., Haralampidis S. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in sheep flocks with a history of lambs’ diarrhoea. Revue Méd. Vét. 2008;159(10):528–531. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Andres S., Jimenez A., Sanchez J., Alonso J.M., Gomeza L., Lopez F., Rey J. Evaluation of some etiological factors predisposing to diarrhoea in lambs in “La Serena” (Southwest Spain) Small Rumin. Res. 2007;70:272–275. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mueller-Doblies D., Giles M., Elwin K., Smith R.P., Clifton Hadley F.A., Chalmers R.M. Distribution of Cryptosporidium species in sheep in the UK. Vet. Parasitol. 2008;154:214–219. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Paoletti B., Giangaspero A., Gatti A., Iorio R., Cembalo D., Milillo P., Traversa D. Immunoenzymatic analysis and genetic detection of Cryptosporidium parvum in lambs from Italy. Exp. Parasitol. 2009;122:349–352. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ulutaş B., Voyvoda H. Cryptosporidiosis in diarrhoeic lambs on a sheep farm. Türkiye Parazitol. Derg. 2004;28(1):15–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Brandão P.E., Villareal L.Y., De Souza S.L., Richtzenhain L.J., Jerez J.A. Mixed infections by bovine coronavirus, rotavirus and Cryptosporidium parvum in an outbreak of neonatal diarrhea in beef cattle. Arq. Inst. Biol. (Sao Paulo). 2007;74:33–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Izzo M.M., Kirkland P.D., Mohler V.L., Perkins N.R., Gunn A.A., House J.K. Prevalence of major enteric pathogens in Australian dairy calves with diarrhoea. Aust. Vet. J. 2011;89:167–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2011.00692.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nouri M., Ahdfavi S. Effect of nomada shepherds and their sheep on the incidence of cryptosporidiosis in an adjacent town. J. Infect. 1993;26:105–106. doi: 10.1016/0163-4453(93)97224-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rossanigo E.G., Gialletti L., Grelloni V. FloroniA,Rivero VB. Diagnosi di criptosporidiosi in alcunialle. vamentidell’ Italia Centrale. Riv. Zoot. Vet. 1987;15:9–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pablo D., Joaquín Q., Alberto P., Esther N., Ana P.C., Gonzalo F., Rosario P., Ceferino L., Pablo D.B., Patrocinio M. Cryptosporidium species and subtype analysis in diarrhoeic pre-weaned lambs and goat kids from north-western Spain. Parasitol. Res. 2015;114:4099–4105. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4639-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sevinç F., Uslu U., Derinbay Ö. The prevalence of Cryptosporidium parvum in lambs around Konya. Turk J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2005;29:1191–1194. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pritchard G.C., Marshall J.A., Giles M., Mueller-Doblies D., Sayers A.R., Marshall R.N., Elwin K., Chalmers R.M. Cryptosporidium species in lambs submitted for diagnostic postmortem examination in England and Wales. Vet. Rec. 2008;163:688–689. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zu Sx., Fang G.D., Fayer R., Guerrant R.L. Cryptosporidiosis: pathogenesis and immunology. Parasitol. 1992;8:24–27. doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(92)90307-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pritchard G.C., Marshall J.A., Giles M., Chalmers R.M., Marshall R.N. Cryptosporidium parvum infection in orphan lambs on a farm open to the public. Vet. Rec. 2007;161:11–14. doi: 10.1136/vr.161.1.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fernando H.M., Beatriz E.C.G., Roxane M.F.P., Waldir P.E., Sylvia Cl., Juan M., Ghizlane D., Azucena M., Miguel B., Jorge B., Jacinta Sp. Lambs are an important source of atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli in southern Brazil. Vet. Microb. 2016;196:72–77. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Malik J. 1983. Les entérites à E. coli K99 chez le veau et l’agneau nouveaux nés: Etude épidémiologique. Third cycle thesis. I. A. V., Hassan II, Rabat, Maracco. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.King T.J., Angus K.W. 2nd ed. Blackwell Scientific Publications; Oxford: 1991. Neonatal Diseases in Diseases of Sheep; pp. 12–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Erhan G., Ahmet Ü., Hidayet M.E. Enteric pathogens in the aetiology of diarrhoea in neonatal lambs. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 2010;5:717–722. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Aklilu M., Sisay T., Tefera G., Tekalign B. Identification and biotyping of Escherichia coli from diarrheic lambs in and around Debrebirhan Town, Ethiopia. J. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2013;1:115. doi: 10.4172/2332-0877.1000115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Heuvelink A.E., van de Kar N.C., Meis J.F., Monnens L.A., Melchers W.J. Characterization of verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 isolates from patients with haemolytic uraemic syndrome in Western Europe. Epidemiol. Infect. 1995;115:1–14. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800058064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bettelheim K.A., Beutin L. Rapid laboratory identification and characterization of verocytotoxigenic (Shiga toxin producing) Escherichia coli (VTEC/STEC) J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003;95:205–217. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02031.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Keenan K.P., Sharpnack D.D., Collins H., Formal S.B., O’Brien A.D. Morphologic evaluation of the effects of Shiga toxin and E coli Shiga-like toxin on the rabbit intestine. Am. J. Pathol. 1986;125:69–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bhat M.A., Nishikawa Y., Wani S.A. Prevalence and virulence gene profiles of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli from diarrhoeic and healthy lambs in India. Small Rumin. Res. 2008;75:65–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wani S.A., Bhat M.A., Samanta I., Nishikawa Y., Buch A.S. Isolation and characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) from calves and lambs with diarrhoea in India: the Society for Applied Microbiology. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2003;37:121–126. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2003.01364.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Olsson S.O., Viring S., Emanuelsson U., Jacobsson S.O. Calf diseases and mortality in Swedish dairy herds. Acta Vet. Scand. 1993;34:263–269. doi: 10.1186/BF03548190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wani S.A., Bhat M.A., Samanta I., Ishaq S.M., Ashrafi M.A., Buchh A.S. Epidemiology of diarrhoea caused by rotavirus and Escherichia coli in lambs in Kashmir valley, India. Small Rumin. Res. 2004;52:145–153. doi: 10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00255-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Theil K.W., Grooms D.L., Mccloskey C.M., Redman D.R. Group B rotavirus associated with an outbreak of neonatal lamb diarrhea. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 1995;7:148–150. doi: 10.1177/104063879500700124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Papp H., Malik Y.S., Farkas S.L., Jakab F., Martella V., Bànyai K. Rotavirus strains in neglected animal species including lambs, goats and camelids. Virus Dis. 2014;25(2):215–222. doi: 10.1007/s13337-014-0203-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kaminjolo J.S., Adesiyun A.A. Rotavirus infection in calves, piglets, lambs and goat kids in Trinidad. Br. Vet. J. 1994;150:293. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1935(05)80009-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Chapman P.A., Ellin M., Ashton R.A. Comparison of immunomagnetic separation and culture, Reveal (TM) and VIP (TM) for the detection of E. coli O157 in enrichment cultures of naturally-contaminated raw beef, lamb and mixed meat products. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2001;32:171–175. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2001.00883.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ozmen O., Yukari B.A., Haligur M., Sahinduran S. Observations and immunohisto-chemical detection of coronavirus, Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia intestinalis in neonatal diarrhoea in lambs and kids. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilkd. 2006;148:357–364. doi: 10.1024/0036-7281.148.7.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Burimuah V., Sylverken A., Owusu M., El-Duah P., Yeboah R., Lamptey J., Frimpong Y.O., Agbenyega O., Folitse R., Tasiame W., Emikpe B., Owiredu E.W., Oppong S., Adu-Sarkodie Y., Emikpe B. Sero-prevalence, cross-species infection and serological determinants of prevalence of Bovine Coronavirus in Cattle, Sheep and Goats in Ghana. Vet. Microbiol. 2020;241 doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.108544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cho Y.I., Yoon K.J. An overview of calf diarrhea - infectious etiology, diagnosis,and intervention. J. Vet. Sci. 2014;15:1–17. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2014.15.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.De La Fuente R., Luzon M., Ruiz-Santa-Quiteria J.A., Garcia A., Cid D., Orden J.A., Garcia S., Sanz R., Gomez-Bautista M. Cryptosporidium and Concurrent Infectious with Other Major Enteropathogenes in 1 to 30 day old diarrheic dairy calves in central Spain. Vet. Parasitol. 1999;80(3):179–185. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(98)00218-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tartera P., Naciri M., Chermette R. 2000. Quand Suspecter la cryptosporidiose? La Semaine Vétérinaire, 971, Pp 40-42, Avril 2000(B) [Google Scholar]

Articles from Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES