Abstract
A recent challenge in the field of bioimaging is to image vital, thick, and complex tissues in real time and in non-invasive mode. Among the different tools available for diagnostics, nonlinear optical (NLO) multi-photon microscopy allows label-free non-destructive investigation of physio-pathological processes in live samples at sub-cellular spatial resolution, enabling to study the mechanisms underlying several cellular functions. In this review, we discuss the fundamentals of NLO microscopy and the techniques suitable for biological applications, such as two-photon excited fluorescence (TPEF), second and third harmonic generation (SHG-THG), and coherent Raman scattering (CRS). In addition, we present a few of the most recent examples of NLO imaging employed as a label-free diagnostic instrument to functionally monitor in vitro and in vivo vital biological specimens in their unperturbed state, highlighting the technological advantages of multi-modal, multi-photon NLO microscopy and the outstanding challenges in biomedical engineering applications.
Keywords: nonlinear microscopy, stem cells, tissue engineering, label-free microscopy, live imaging
Introduction
One of the most fascinating advancements in bioengineering is the possibility to observe and control the microscopic universe of cells in order to understand the biological mechanisms involved in physiological and pathological phenomena of life (Vo-Dinh, 2003). Since researchers are concerned to find high speed, effective, and non-invasive diagnostic tools to identify the state of biological samples, several micro-scale imaging techniques have been developed recently, aiming at applications usable by clinicians on human patients (König et al., 2019). The power of optical microscopy is to provide a non-invasive morphological and functional characterization of the observed living specimen over time (Stephens, 2003). Among the existing microscopy techniques, brightfield microscopy is suitable to observe unlabelled vital and thin samples, and it is the easiest to use. However, monolayered cells appears transparent and contrast methods, like phase contrast microscopy, differential interference contrast microscopy or digital holography, are necessary to distinguish cells or parts of them (Murphy, 2001). Nevertheless, these methods provide low amount of information from live samples, being limited to qualitative estimation on cell morphology and growth (e.g., % area occupied by the cells over time in the field of view) and being capable of simply distinguishing endoplasmic reticulum, nucleus and vesicles. To gain more details, biological specimens can be characterized by means of cyto-histopathological assays, which however, require fixative procedure to color specific cellular structures, thus affecting vitality. Another common technique to enrich the information content achievable from a vital biological sample is fluorescence microscopy (Combs and Shroff, 2017). In this technique, highly specific light-emitting probes (dye molecules, semiconductor nanoparticles, or fluorescent proteins) chemically bound to specific biological targets (i.e., DNA, phospholipids, and proteins) are administered to the live or fixed samples. By exciting the fluorescent species with a lamp or a laser, it is possible to filter the longer wavelength (Stokes shifted) emitted signal, detecting it in either a widefield or a point scanning approach and reconstructing images (Murphy, 2001; Lichtman and Conchello, 2005). Technological advances consist in the addition of automated scanners, vertical stages, high numerical aperture objectives (oil or water immersion), and corrective pinholes and filters to detect fluorescence over the volume of the specimen (<100 μm thick) (Combs and Shroff, 2017). Furthermore, systems equipped with incubator chambers allow performing live imaging and time-lapse microscopy. However, fluorescence-based techniques show limits related to the required short excitation wavelengths with continuous lasers that cause photobleaching of fluorophores, scattering and absorption affecting the signal collection and the penetration depth in thick samples. Moreover, the use of fluorescent probes can influence the vitality of biological specimens and it often involves complex preparatory treatments to ensure a proper binding with their biological target, thus resulting toxic over time (Liu et al., 1999). The advent of nonlinear optical (NLO) microscopy techniques allowed to overcome these limitations exploiting multi-photon processes stimulated by pulsed lasers with infrared wavelengths. NLO microscopy offers deep tissue penetration (>500 μm) since the infrared excitation wavelengths inherently provide a reduced light scattering and absorption (Konig, 2000; Sanderson et al., 2016). Furthermore, NLO processes based on multi-photon excitation overcome the use of staining, allowing one to obtain rich morphological/structural/molecular information from a sample, which shows nonlinear properties and/or distinctive chemical composition. NLO-based microscopy offers inherent advantages with respect to single-photon fluorescence (SPF), such as label-free observations, 3D-sectioning capability, small focal volume and greater penetration depth, thus making functional imaging possible (Helmchen and Denk, 2005; Hoover and Squier, 2013). Despite NLO microscopy comprises several techniques, the most relevant for biological investigations are: two-photon excited fluorescence (TPEF) (W Denk et al., 1990), second and third harmonic generation (SHG and THG) (Barad et al., 1997; P. J. Campagnola et al., 2001) and coherent Raman scattering (CRS) (Evans and Xie, 2008) microscopy.
Two-photon fluorescence allows the visualization of both exogenous (dye molecules, semiconductor quantum dots, and fluorescent proteins such as GFP, RFP, and YFP) (Xu et al., 1996; Drobizhev et al., 2011) and endogenous fluorophores (such as nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate-NAD(P) H-, flavin adenine dinucleotide - FAD-, flavoprotein -FP-), and it is often exploited in fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) studies, resulting suitable for metabolic and hybrid investigations. SHG microscopy enables the observation of non-centrosymmetric structures in unperturbed biological specimen, for example collagen fibers, myosin filaments and microtubules and their spatial distribution (Campagnola et al., 2001; Chu et al., 2003). THG microscopy is sensitive to refractive index mismatch between structures in the focal plane, allowing to image interfaces for example between aqueous interstitial fluids and lipid-rich structures, such as cellular membranes, lipid droplets and calcified bone (Weigelin et al., 2016). Finally, CRS techniques are based on the coherent excitation of vibrational modes related to specific chemical bonds of the molecules present in the focal volume, such as lipids, proteins, and DNA (Yue et al., 2011; Zumbusch et al., 2013). Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) and stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopies benefit from the fact that the signal provides information on the chemical composition and the molecular structure, identified in the peaks of the Raman spectrum (Krafft, 2012).
The growing interest in NLO microscopy is testified by the variety of biological studies performed using the previously mentioned techniques in their individual (single-modality), combined (multi-modality) and multi-spectral (multi-color) conditions, resulting in continuously improved acquisition systems. In order to underline the importance of live imaging in the investigation of fundamental biological processes, we provide a background on the physical principles of the different NLO microscopies and we discuss the state of the art and new advanced applications of label-free multi-modal microscopy in living organisms.
Fundamentals of Nonlinear Optical Microscopy
Generally, in SPF microscopy the light sources used to probe the specimen are in the visible wavelength range. As shown in the left side of the panel in Figure 1A, the energy of the incident photon is absorbed by promoting the electron from the ground to the excited state. After non-radiative relaxation in the excited state, the electron returns to the ground state releasing a photon with lower energy (longer wavelength) with respect to the incoming one, thus emitting fluorescence (Williams et al., 1994). On the other hand, when an electron absorbs the energy of multiple photons, it will decay by emitting a photon with higher energy (shorter wavelength) with respect to the excitation photons (Zinselmeyer et al., 2009).
Multi-photon absorption phenomena, exploited in NLO microscopy, are typically achieved with ultrashort-pulsed lasers in the near-infrared wavelength range. NLO processes require a high spatial and temporal density of low-energy photons (Figure 1A; Sanderson et al., 2016). To increase the probability of multi-photon absorption and to gain sufficient signal intensity in NLO microscopy, tightly focused ultrashort pulses are typically used, for which high peak power can be obtained, while keeping the average power comparatively low, thus minimizing the risk of photodamage (Chen et al., 2018).
In NLO microscopy, the strong electric fields achievable in a laser pulse can drive the motion of electrons and atoms to create a polarization which depends nonlinearly on the driving light field, expressed by high-order terms in the electric susceptibility [χ(n) where n > 1] (Bloembergen, 1982; Shen, 1985; Di Bartolo and Collins, 2013; Gupta, 2017; Kumar et al., 2018). Due to the strong intensity dependence of the signal, NLO microscopy allows to confine the generation to a very small volume, localized at the laser focus, with respect to the extended excitation obtainable with single photon absorption (Figure 1B). The use of NLO-based techniques is therefore advantageous due to the intrinsic capability of sectioning the specimens. In this way, one can obtain a 3D high-resolution reconstruction of the sample without background noise with just one laser source (Piston et al., 1994).
Two-Photon Excited Fluorescence
Two-photon fluorescence is a third order NLO process based on the principle of two-photon absorption established in 1931 by Maria Göppert-Mayer in her doctoral thesis (Göppert-Mayer, 1931) and firstly validated 30 years later with the advent of lasers (Kaiser and Garrett, 1961). Here the combined action of two or more photons, which simultaneously interact with the matter, induces an electronic transition from the ground to an excited electronic state. This process is possible when the sum of the energies of these photons is enough to match the energy gap between the fundamental and the excited state. Hence, the most intense excitation is confined within a small volume (voxel) and no out-of-focus light is generated, removing the need for spatial filters (confocal pinholes) to block the unwanted background (Figure 1B; Rubart, 2004). As a matter of fact, since the voxel is small (less than femtoliter for high numerical aperture objectives) and the trajectories of emitted photons are close to the collection angle of objective lens, the TPEF microscopy enables the pulse to penetrate scattering samples in depth, enabling to perform 3D scanning (Denk et al., 1995). Moreover, since the risk of photodamage is limited to the focal volume, TPEF is preferable with respect to single photon fluorescence. The absorption efficiency depends on the physical properties of the fluorophore, the so called two-photon absorption cross-section, and on the excitation light (Helmchen and Denk, 2005; Drobizhev et al., 2011). The unit used to identify this phenomenon is the Göppert-Mayer (GM per photon) that corresponds to 10–50 cm4 s per photons. Intrinsic molecules such as NAD(P)H are characterized by small cross-sections (<10–4 GM), while common fluorescent dyes show absorption cross-sections in the range of 1-300 GM. Hence, the higher is the two-photon absorption cross-section, the higher is the loss in resolution while increasing the peak power (Zipfel et al., 2003a). However, under normal operation the photodamage is very low in TPEF (Hopt and Neher, 2001).
Harmonic Generation
The harmonic generation is an instantaneous process of coherent nonlinear light scattering, which involves two or three photons in phase matching conditions (Zipfel et al., 2003b). SHG is a second-order NLO process, which happens when two low-energy photons at the same frequency interacting with a nonlinear material are annihilated to generate a new photon with twice the energy of the excitation photons (Campagnola, 2012; Figure 1A). The second-order symmetry of SHG imposes restrictions on active molecular arrays (called “harmonophores”) (Tokarz et al., 2012) and requires the environment to be non-centrosymmetric at the excitation wavelength scale, otherwise the SHG signal vanishes (Campagnola et al., 2001). Since SHG signals occur as a consequence of induced nonlinear polarization instead of absorption phenomena, they exploit the excitation of endogenous factors. The SHG signal has a well-defined polarization, whose anisotropy can be used to determine the hierarchical organization of proteins in tissues. Therefore, the scattering nature of SHG signal drives its intensity emission within a preferential direction. Forward SHG signal is more intense when thin samples are imaged, instead, only backscattered photons can be collected from thick specimens (Mertz and Moreaux, 2001).
In THG microscopy, a third-order NLO process occurs when the fundamental wavelength, typically above 1200 nm, irradiates a medium with intrinsic inhomogeneities due to refractive index mismatch (Yelin and Silberberg, 1999; Rehberg et al., 2011). In THG the combined energy of three photons is converted into a photon emitted at the triple of the energy (a third of the excitation wavelength) (Barad et al., 1997; Figure 1A). In THG microscopy, due to the Guoy phase shift of the fundamental beam, the nonlinear signals generated at symmetric planes with respect to the focus interfere destructively, resulting in zero signal from a homogeneous medium. The THG signal thus reveals the optical heterogeneities of the material illuminated by the laser beam, such as those occurring at the interface between two optically different materials. In contrast to SHG microscopy, no specific symmetries in the material are required to produce a THG signal (Meshulach et al., 1997; Müller et al., 1998).
Coherent Raman Scattering Microscopy
Raman scattering is a powerful technique for label-free identification of a molecule/material based on the characteristic vibrational spectrum. In spontaneous Raman (SR) microscopy, a monochromatic laser at frequency ωp (“pump”) excites the molecules to a virtual state, which then relax to the ground state scattering photons with lower frequency ωS (“Stokes”). The inelastic frequency shifts Ω = ωp – ωS match the molecular vibrations, which in turn reflect the molecular structure. The resulting SR spectrum provides a detailed picture of the biochemical composition of the measured cells/tissues (Cantarero, 2015). SR microscopy has been translated to clinics e.g., to obtain direct local information from intraoperative analysis of cancer detection (Santos et al., 2016) in human brain (Jermyn et al., 2015; Santos et al., 2017). Despite its advantages, SR microscopy suffers from the drawback of the very weak scattering cross section, due to its incoherent nature, which is 10–12 orders of magnitude lower than fluorescence. This results in low acquisition speed, with pixel dwell times of ≈ 1 s (up to several hours for an image), preventing the acquisition of high spatial resolution images of cells and tissues.
Coherent Raman scattering microscopy overcomes this limitation by generating the Raman signal from a coherent superposition of the molecules in the sample, illuminated by two synchronized ultrashort laser pulses of different color, the pump (at frequency ωp) and the Stokes (at frequency ωS). When the difference between pump and Stokes frequencies matches a vibrational frequency Ω, i.e., ωp – ωS = Ω, then all the molecules in the focal volume are resonantly excited and vibrate in phase. This vibrational coherence enhances the Raman response by many orders of magnitude with respect to the incoherent SR process, decreasing the acquisition times from seconds to microseconds per pixel. Like other NLO microscopies, CRS provides further advantages: (i) the signal is generated only in the focal volume, allowing three-dimensional imaging; (ii) working out of electronic resonance, it minimizes photo-damage to biological samples.
The two most widely employed CRS techniques are coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) (Cheng and Xie, 2004) and stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) (Nandakumar et al., 2009). In CARS (Figure 2A) the vibrational coherence is read by a further interaction with the pump beam, generating a coherent radiation at the anti-Stokes frequency ωaS = ωp + Ω. In SRS (Figure 2B) the coherent interaction with the sample induces stimulated emission from a virtual state of the sample to the investigated vibrational state, resulting in a Stokes-field amplification (Stimulated Raman Gain, SRG) and in a simultaneous pump-field attenuation (Stimulated Raman Loss, SRL). By comparing CARS and SRS, a delicate balance of advantages and drawbacks emerges: CARS benefits from being a background-free process, since the emitted signal has a frequency ωaS differing from those of pump and Stokes (Figure 2C). In this sense, it is similar to TPEF, SHG, and THG microscopies. On the other hand, it suffers from the so-called non-resonant background (NRB) generated both by the molecular species under study and by the surrounding medium, according to a four-wave mixing scheme. The NRB does not carry any chemically specific information and, when the concentrations of the target molecules are low, can distort and even overwhelm the resonant signal of interest. In addition, the CARS signal scales as N2, where N is the number of oscillators in the focal volume, so that its sensitivity rapidly drops with decreasing oscillator concentration, making it difficult to detect the less abundant biomolecules, and in particular their characteristic signatures in the fingerprint region. The SRS signal is proportional to the imaginary part of the third-order susceptibility tensor χ(3): Since the NRB is a real quantity, SRS is inherently free from NRB. Furthermore, SRS scales linearly with N, thus allowing the detection of weakly concentrated species. On the other hand, SRS requires the detection of a weak differential transmission signal (SRG/SRL) sitting on the large background given by the Stokes (pump) light. Extraction of this signal calls for the use of sophisticated techniques, involving high-speed modulation and lock-in detection, to overcome the laser fluctuations and achieve shot-noise limited detection. Such techniques are particularly challenging to implement at high speeds, with integration times of few tens of microseconds, and over a broad spectrum, required to extract the entire Raman fingerprint of the molecules (Wang et al., 2007; Gupta, 2017; Kumar et al., 2018). Briefly, CARS microscopy can be preferentially performed on high molecular concentration specimens, while SRS with high-sensitive and high-speed acquisition systems can be performed on less chemically dense samples (Kumar et al., 2018).
Table 1 summarizes the physical principles, the main advantages and limitations that still affect the above-described techniques within biophysical application.
TABLE 1.
Tech | Principle | Contrast mechanism | Biological target | Advantages | Limits |
TPEF | Two low energy photons simultaneously absorbed to excite a fluorescent species | Fluorescence | Endogenous fluorescent proteins and molecules, cell autofluorescence |
|
|
SHG | Two photons at the same frequency simultaneously interact with nonlinear species to generate a photon with the double frequency | Second-order nonlinear polarization of non-centrosymmetric structures | Non-centrosymmetric biological structures such as: collagen fibrils I/II, myofibrils, myosin filaments, microtubules |
|
|
THG | Three photons simultaneously interact with a medium with refractive index mismatch to generate a photon with the triple frequency | Refractive index mismatch within inhomogeneous medium | Interfaces between lipid and water, cell membranes and vesicles |
|
|
CARS | The difference in frequency between the pump and Stokes pulses match the vibrational resonance of the chemical bond emitting an anti-Stokes photon | Anti-Stokes frequency match the resonance frequency of the target molecular bond | Chemical bond resonant frequency from fingerprint region (nuclei acids and proteins) to the C-H stretch region (lipids and proteins) of the Raman shift |
|
|
SRS | The difference in frequency between the pump and Stokes pulses match the vibrational resonance of the chemical bond enhancing the vibrational transition emitting a photon | SRG or SRL on the Stokes or on the pump pulse, respectively, match the resonant frequency of the target molecular bond | Chemical bond resonant frequency from fingerprint region (nuclei acids and proteins) to the C-H stretch region (lipids and proteins) of the Raman shift |
|
|
Biological Applications
Nowadays, there is an ever-growing need to develop diagnostic techniques capable to reveal and quantify at the cellular level the expression of pathological processes that affect human health. A valid solution is represented by NLO microscopy techniques which allow to perform label-free, vital and three-dimensional observations in biological specimens, from in vitro samples to preclinical in vivo models and, potentially, to clinical applications. In the last 30 years, NLO microscopy techniques have been applied to a broad range of biomedical problems, such as tumor infiltration and growth (Lu et al., 2015; Gavgiotaki et al., 2017; De Bortoli et al., 2018; You et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2019), stem cell differentiation and proliferation (Quinn et al., 2013; Meleshina et al., 2016, 2017), tissue regeneration (Yu et al., 2012) and repair (Huemer et al., 2017; Rico-Jimenez et al., 2020). In Figure 3A a schematic representation of a NLO microscope in inverted configuration, in which the excitation light irradiates the sample from the bottom to the top. The collection of the emitted signal can be performed both in reflection than in transmission modality, depending on the sample thickness. In biological applications, several specimens can be imaged, as shown in Figure 3B. As described in the following sections, in vitro monolayer cell models are easy to investigate since thick and transparent media facilitates the orientation and the focusing. Within that, the detection of the generated signal can be dual, especially in case of fixed specimens, without taking care of sterility in case of contact with immersion objectives and environmental air. In vivo analyses, on the other hand, are more difficult since they can be preferentially performed in reflection. Hence, imaging windows for long-term time-dependent studies are often created in specific sites of the animal, thus resulting highly invasive. For this reason, an intermediate application of NLO microscopy to both replicate the heterogenous in vivo environmental conditions without involving direct animal experimentations, is from bioengineering cellular constructs. Thus, 3D, vital and functional imaging of a more realistic patho-physiological condition with respect to cell monolayer and less invasive than preclinical model, is guaranteed.
Nonlinear Imaging of Cellular Models
The majority of label-free, vital NLO microscopy techniques in biology are applied in vitro using cell culture models that allow to reproduce and to control complex phenomena such as lineage differentiation of stem cells (Quinn et al., 2013; Meleshina et al., 2016, 2017), cell response to drugs (Fu et al., 2014; De Bortoli et al., 2018), synthesis or inhibition of single cellular structures (Zhang et al., 2012; Van Steenbergen et al., 2019). Table 2 summarizes a selection of representative biological studies on vital cultured cells through NLO microscopy published during the last decade. Several works involve the use of multi-frequency SRS microscopy, since it is the most recently developed technique able to provide molecular information of less chemically concentrated biological specimens without the signal impairments typical of CARS, i.e., NRB. Moreover, SRS microscopy is frequently applied to the study of tumor microenvironment, cancer cell composition and dynamics (Zhang et al., 2012; Lu et al., 2015) since the outcomes are often comparable with their histopathological counterparts using conventional hematoxylin and eosin staining (Ji et al., 2013; Chan, 2014). Fa-Ke Lu published in 2015 (Lu et al., 2015) an innovative study based on label-free DNA imaging in cancer cells during their mitotic phase by the use of multi-frequency SRS microscopy (Figure 4A). Both the fingerprint region and the C-H-stretch region of the Raman spectrum were investigated. The best result was reached by linear decomposition of three distinctive peaks at different wavenumbers in the C-H-stretching region thus subtracting the strong protein background and enhancing the Raman signal of the distinct cellular structures (lipids, proteins and nucleic acids) (Figure 4B). Another example of NLO imaging in biology is represented by the study of Meleshina et al. (2016, 2017) based on TPEF-FLIM and SHG microscopy. FLIM was employed to evaluate the metabolic rate of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) during controlled differentiation toward adipogenic, chondrogenic and osteogenic phenotypes at different time-points. SHG microscopy, allowed to monitor collagen formation during chondrogenesis. While differentiation occurred, a metabolic shift was estimated from redox ratio of FAD/NAD(P)H and the lifetimes of bound and free state of NADH in all the phenotypes investigated. The application of THG microscopy is testified by the work of Wu et al. in 2016 (Wu et al., 2016) since different type of white blood cells from the immune system showed distinctive morphological features and intrinsic organelles distribution. Similarly, Gavgiotaki et al. (2017) demonstrated that a discrimination among several sub-types of breast cancer cells was possible by the use of TPEF and THG imaging comparing primary, immortalized cells with peripheral mononuclear cells (control). CARS microscopy is a powerful technique to follow lipid production because the large number of C-H bonds in lipid molecular tail corresponds to high Raman signal intensity (Cheng and Xie, 2004). Saarinen et al. (2017) applied CARS microscopy to a transwell culture configuration on an intestinal epithelium model of Caco-2 cells to evaluate drug permeability throughout the cell layer over 21 days of culture monitoring lipid formation. Another interesting study at the cell scale is from Van Steenbergen et al. (2019) where SHG microscopy is used to observe microtubular structures, a cytoskeletal component involved in protein intracellular transport and mitosis, in neural cells axons derived from different regions of the nervous system. This unusual application of SHG was aimed to validate label-free microscopy as a promising alternative to immunofluorescence staining, since microtubules can be imaged in their native and dynamic configuration. Moreover, this group demonstrated that cell fixation and dehydration with acetone, methanol and common aldehydes highly impaired SHG emission in microtubules, suggesting the potentialities of this technique for imaging untreated live cells. Although Van Steenberg et al. demonstrated that SGH is suitable for investigating in label-free condition single cell process, limitations due to the weakness of the generated signal and the microtubular concentration-dependence of the cell type need to be overcome.
TABLE 2.
References | Tech | Cell type | Study | Main findings and criticalities |
Zhang et al. (2012) | SRS | Salivary gland cells of drosophila melanogaster and human epithelial cell line (HEK-293) and human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) | In vitro study of the distribution of nuclei acids, proteins, and lipids with fingerprint SRS of salivary gland cells of drosophila larvae and mammalian cells | Assignment of single Raman resonant peaks corresponding to the single biochemical components. Drosophila cells allowed to imaging high level of DNA content with SRS thus tailoring the system for imaging mammalian cells |
Quinn et al. (2013) | TPEF | Human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) | Evaluation of the metabolic changes associated with in vitro human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation via NADH and FAD autofluorescence and their relative redox state FAD/(NADH+FAD) | Correlation between the optical redox ratio and concentration of cofactors estimated by conventional approach (liquid chromatography); overall decrease in redox ratio describes the beginning of differentiation and a new synthesis of fatty acids within adipogenic differentiation. During differentiation process a clustering of mitochondria was found out |
Fu et al. (2013, 2014) | SRS | Murine bone marrow-derived cell line (BaF3) | In vitro temporal visualization and quantification of tyrosine kinase inhibitor, a drug for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia in cancer cells | Imaging of drugs accumulation within the cells was independent from the binding to the relative target: SRS spectra of investigated drugs resembled the spontaneous one. SRS reveal lysosomal enrichment over time of about 1000-fold of drugs after few hours and the interaction of chloroquine with tyrosine kinase showed a reduction of imatinib and an enrichment of nilotinib in the lysosome |
Lu et al. (2015) | SRS | Human cancerous cervical cell line (HelaS3) | In vitro and in vivo study of chromosome dynamics inside nuclei during mitosis, in vivo cell proliferation in mouse skin induced by drug treatment and label-free histology method for human skin cancer diagnosis through SRS | Linear decomposition reveals three distinctive resonance peaks in the C-H stretch region for DNA, lipids and proteins. Imaging of cell mitosis at different time points: 0, 10, 20, and 30 min |
Pope et al. (2013); Bradley et al. (2016) | TPEF CARS | Mouse oocytes and embryos | In vitro and in vivo label-free study of the number, size and distribution of lipid droplets in mouse oocytes and embryos | Quantification of lipids at different levels of Z-stack images of the same embryo. Estimation of maturation capacity of eggs after CARS imaging. Comparison between CARS of lipids and fluorescence staining (BODIPY) on fixed eggs (co-localization verified). Hyperspectral CARS imaging of eggs, oocytes and embryos to obtain a developmental trend of chemical components |
Meleshina et al. (2016, 2017) | TPEF (FLIM) SHG | Human MSCs | Non-invasive study of in vitro mesenchymal stem cell differentiation toward adipogenic, osteogenic and chondrogenic phenotype through metabolic variation of NAD(P)H, FAD and SHG to assess collagen presence | Redox ratio and lifetime of bound NAD(P)H showed a general metabolic shift toward glycolysis during differentiation. Within this osteogenic differentiation was preceded by an oxidative phosphorylation |
Wu et al. (2016) | THG | Human leukocytes | A novel approach applied to cytometry: discrete analysis of circulating and/or suspended cells from the immune system both in vitro and in vivo on human patients through the skin | Isolation (extraction and separation with cell sorter) and observation with THG of white blood cells avoiding environmental stresses and changes in cell morphology were done before and after cytometry. Differentiable features to distinguish cell type were THG intensity and cell size after image segmentation. Neutrophils, monocytes and lymphocytes have been identified from different donors |
Gavgiotaki et al. (2017) | TPEF THG | Human breast cancer cell lines (MCF7, BT474, MDA-MB231), primary non-tumorigenic human breast cancer cells (MCF10a) and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells | Validation of THG technique to diagnose and distinguish different subtypes of breast cancer cells through qualitative and quantitative analyses compared to control cells (peripheral mononuclear blood cells) | Distinction of THG signaling pattern of different cell types and subtypes in terms of cellular and intracellular membranes. Co-localization of Nile red staining identified with TPEF and THG of intracellular lipid vesicles. THG signal intensity and distribution from nuclei, cellular membranes and intracellular membranes allowed to distinguish cell types compared with FTIR analysis |
Saarinen et al. (2017) | CARS | Intestinal epithelial cell line (Caco-2) | Evaluation of drug permeability of Caco-2 cells grown in transwell membrane inserts by lipid droplets detection | Membrane inserts of transwell culture plates made by PTFE, PET and PC were tested: PTFE resulted more durable during CARS. Cell viability after CARS imaging on Caco-2 showed photodamage (morphological variations and cell detachment) increasing laser powers over 40 mW (pump) and 20 mW (Stokes). CARS at 2840 cm–1 showed lipid formation after 7 days of culture and lipid droplets growth in size over 21 days |
Crisafi et al. (2018); De Bortoli et al. (2018) | CARS | MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-157 human breast cancer cell lines | Study of the chemical composition of intracellular vesicles in vivo and in vitro model of human breast cancer cells after iron depletion | CARS allowed to identify the chemical composition of vacuoles produced by cancer cells after iron depletion, mainly composed of medium surrounded by lipid shells |
Sun et al. (2019) | TPEF THG | Mouse melanoma cell line (B16-F10) | Comparative study of melanin deposition with different concentrations in live melanoma cell line model via THG microscopy. TPEF detected the signal intensity as the indicator of the melanin concentration | Comparison between synthetic and natural melanin via THG and TPEF mean intensity quantification respect to melanin mass density |
Van Steenbergen et al. (2019) | SHG | Primary mouse neuronal cells (hippocampal, enteric nervous system, dorsal root ganglion cultures) | Axonal microtubule network and microtubule polymerization/depolymerization (colchicine and nocodazole treatment) in neurodegenerative pathologies. Deepening of the knowledge related to SHG molecular detection in weak harmonophores | SHG signal originated from guanosine-5’-triphosphate (GTP)-bound tubulin dimer conformation in the plus-end and along the microtubule network. SHG signal generation depended on microtubules polarity, number and organization (constructive interference). Post-treatment with Taxol, increase SHG signal from more stable GTP-bound tubulin in less organized microtubular configurations in another cell type apart from neuronal cells. Fixation with acetone, methanol and paraformaldehyde alters the microtubules SHG signal |
Label-Free Nonlinear Microscopy in Animal Studies
Completely label-free and vital NLO microscopy applications in vivo are less available in literature since these acquisition techniques are often hybridized with fluorescent tags in situ or directly ex vivo on freshly/cryopreserved tissue slices to improve the orientation within heterogenous samples. Adapting the design of a microscope for animal or human imaging often requires reflection configuration (epi-detection) coupled with immersion objectives and fixative stages to reduce image blurring, aberrations and resolution losses. Table 3 collects in vivo applications of NLO microscopy on vital and unlabeled animal models. Imaging small organism such as zebrafishes (Yu et al., 2012; Huemer et al., 2017), is relatively common in developmental and regenerative time-lapse microscopy thanks to the small size and the low cost related to animal growth. However, the mouse model is still the most used animal in biology to resemble human physiopathology. In NLO microscopy, this is especially employed to reproduce the tumor infiltration dynamics. In fact, You et al. (2018) presented an innovative NLO multi-modal imaging system based on four photodetectors to speed up the acquisition time by sequentially collecting autofluorescence signals of FAD with TPEF, NAD(P)H with three-photon fluorescence, extracellular matrix (ECM) with SHG, and interfaces through THG microscopy on intravital mouse model of mammary gland tumor (Figure 5). Despite the high quality and the good level of interpretability of the results, the intravital approach is highly invasive since a direct access to the imaging site is necessary. The animal underwent surgery to expose the tumor mass and at the end it was euthanized. Similarly, Alonzo et al. (2016) performed a metabolic study by TPEF microscopy coupled with time-resolved analysis of NAD(P)H and FAD of adipose cells from white, brown and induced-beige adipose tissue, to assess the thermoregulatory property of fat. In vivo observations confirmed the estimations previously obtained ex vivo: time-variant metabolic profiles corresponded to a different function of tissue, thus offering more significant results with respect to gene expression analysis. Instead, Lu et al. (2015) studied the proliferation kinetics of tumor cells via multi-color SRS microscopy through a dorsal skinfold chamber. This system is based on a thin layer of skin stretched and encaged between two glasses, thus creating a window that allows optical accessibility to monitor tissue growth over time, and minimizing animal movement and ensuring repetitive analysis in the same area of the sample. A time-dependent analysis of scar tissue formation after superficial dorsal wounding, has been presented by Rico-Jimenez et al. (2020). A comparative preclinical analysis of diabetic mouse model exposed to placebo, low and high dose of drug (hypoxia-inducible factor coupled with prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor) allowed to reveal, via TPEF-FLIM and SHG microscopy, wound healing, angiogenesis, and metabolic behavior differences among cell populations in the injured site at different time points. In this work, the animal survival was guaranteed for the whole duration of the experiments, allowing repetitive observations of the same area without invasive surgical intervention and imaging window implant.
TABLE 3.
References | Tech | Model | Study | Level of invasiveness | Main findings and criticalities |
Yu et al. (2012) | CARS SRS | Cephalochordate amphioxus and zebrafish | In vivo study of the chemical composition of the notochord structure in cephalochordate amphioxus and zebrafish through non-invasive CARS and SRS microscopy | Low | Large SRS images of notochord of both lipids (2845 cm–1) and proteins (2950cm–1). Compared to CARS, SRS did not suffer from non-resonant background thus resulting clearer in protein visualization |
Lu et al. (2015) | SRS | Mouse | In vitro and in vivo study of chromosome dynamics inside nuclei during mitosis, in vivo cancer cell proliferation in mouse skin (dorsal skinfold chamber) induced by drug treatment and label-free histology method for human skin cancer diagnosis through SRS | Medium | Observation of cell division on mouse skin after epidermal carcinogenesis induction through a dorsal skinfold chamber: strong DNA signal with well-defined condensed chromosomal components at different time-points. Lipids, proteins and nuclei resulted well-defined and visible by linear decomposition of resonant frequencies in the C-H stretch region |
Alonzo et al. (2016) | TPEF (FLIM) | Mouse | 3D functional imaging of different types of adipocytes related to their metabolic activity in terms of fluorescence lifetime of NADH and FAD and their relative redox ratio. The thermogenic function of the adipose tissue corresponded to a different metabolic activity | High | Functional metabolic imaging enabled to distinguish thermogenic from non-thermogenic adipose tissue. White and brown adipose tissue had different lifetimes comparing ex vivo tissue slices with vital mouse |
Huemer et al. (2017) | SHG | Zebrafish | In vivo long-term time-lapse and 3D imaging of wound healing on zebrafish using an engineered entrapment device for high-resolution microscopy | High | Design of specific entrapment cage for optical study of larvae tail regeneration. SHG compared to fluorescence confocal microscopy give more defined and label-free results at different time points for time lapse observations |
Wu et al. (2016) | THG | Human | A novel approach applied to cytometry: discrete analysis of circulating and/or suspended cells from the immune system both in vitro and in vivo on human patients through the skin | Low | Identification of white blood cells circulating in the dermal papilla region beneath the skin via video-rate THG. Cell types were distinguished by large cross-sectional area, smaller size and area. Preliminary clinical experiment |
You et al. (2018) | TPEF ThPF SHG THG | Mouse | Simultaneous label-free and time lapse microscopy of FAD and NADH autofluorescence (2 and 3 photon fluorescence) and SHG/THG signal to track cell interaction within extracellular components in vitro and in vivo mouse mammary gland tumor model | High | Observation of tumor microenvironment in live animal model at different depths. Live observation of leukocyte recruitment in the circulatory system as indicator of innate immune response. Different phases of this process had been identified since a reduced velocity of blood cells was evident. Leukocytes were followed in their trans-migratory and interstitial nature in the pathological site |
Rico-Jimenez et al. (2020) | TPEF (FLIM) SHG | Mouse | Study of the wound healing process and scar tissue formation in diabetic mice (four groups: control, placebo, low and high concentration of drug) to investigate the metabolic changes that occurs in cell populations of the skin and the signaling cascade involving angiogenesis and collagen fibers organization | Medium | Longitudinal tracking of wound healing and quantification of physiological changes during healing. Pharmacodynamic prediction based on imaging results within the repair mechanism was provided |
Nowadays, although the NLO techniques presented have allowed a wide range of label-free observations with increasingly high-performance, they are still limited in transferring their application from the bi-dimensional in vitro model to complex in vivo samples. Hence, the big challenge of label-free imaging of vital animal models remains to be addressed due to the high level of difficulty when observing several tissue layers and multiple packed populations of cells. A step in between, would be to characterize bioengineered cellular models aimed at emulating in vitro the biological environment in its structural, physical and chemical compositions for modeling tissue regeneration or for local tissue repair. Therefore, the advantages offered by the imaging of in vitro systems are combined with the study of systems near to the preclinical model without incurring the costs and limits of animal experimentation and allowing to obtain equally useful data for scientific research.
In the following section, we will present exemplificative applications of nonlinear imaging in tissue engineering and our preliminary steps in multi-modal NLO microscopy based on a 3D synthetic scaffold for cell culture.
Nonlinear Microscopy Toward 3D Bioengineered Systems
In the last decade, it has been demonstrated that non-invasive nonlinear microscopy represents a promising strategy for label-free live imaging of 3D engineered tissues. In fact, several studies had been performed to characterize morphology (Hofemeier et al., 2016; Nguyen et al., 2017; Syverud et al., 2017; Costa Moura et al., 2018; Kaushik et al., 2019; Moura et al., 2019), functionality (Hofemeier et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017; Syverud et al., 2017; Cong et al., 2019; Okkelman et al., 2020), composition and distribution of chemicals (Hofemeier et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017; Syverud et al., 2017; Costa Moura et al., 2018; Moura et al., 2019; Sood et al., 2019), invasion, infiltration and mechano-regulation of cellular constructs (Hofemeier et al., 2016; Nguyen et al., 2017; Syverud et al., 2017; Costa Moura et al., 2018; Kaushik et al., 2019; Moura et al., 2019; Sood et al., 2019), which have been collected in Table 4. A representative study made by Hofemeier et al. (2016) carried out a multi-spectral CARS and SHG imaging on an engineered bone tissue from stem cell differentiation toward osteogenic phenotype within 3 weeks of culture. Similarly, Syverud et al. (2017) generated a fully-differentiated musculoskeletal tissue and exploited NLO microscopy with TPEF for imaging the autofluorescence of NAD(P)H, and SHG to identify collagen and myosin fibers. This work established label-free NLO microscopy as a valid alternative to collagen and myosin immunostaining, even if the tissue construct was fixed and sliced before the acquisitions, and only monolayered cells were imaged in their entirety and vitality. Contrarily, Moura et al. (Costa Moura et al., 2018; Moura et al., 2019) investigated the composition and the distribution of collagen, proteins and lipids with bioengineered cartilage constructs by the use of multi-modal TPEF, SHG and CARS microscopy both in the fingerprint than in the C-H stretch region of the Raman spectrum. To date, Moura provided a comparison between SHG and CARS imaging of collagen to highlight the difference in signal distribution and observed the synthetic constructs in their thickness. Another innovative example of label-free, vital NLO imaging in tissue engineering is the study of Kaushik et al. (2019) which observed blood vessels formation in a dynamic bioreactor providing multi-well plates with media-flow re-circulation circuits. By monitoring the endogenous TPEF from the cells encapsulated and differentiated within a 3D hydrogel, they were able to reconstruct the network in its three-dimensionality. Furthermore, diameter, density, branch nodes amount and anisotropy of self-assembled blood vessel networks in static, recirculating and continuous flow conditions were estimated from image post-processing. Unfortunately, this study was limited by the duration of the acquisition which prevented the analysis over multiple days. The biological investigations described previously, performed on vital adherent and suspended cells, spheroids/organoids, cellular constructs and small-sized animals, exclusively by the use of label-free NLO microscopy, provided functional information otherwise difficult to obtain through conventional methods. Limited versatility of the acquisition systems, poor optical accessibility of the engineered tissue construct and slow acquisition speed may require further technological improvements in this field. In our group, we built a customize transmission inverted multi-photon NLO microscope designed to perform parallel CARS and SRS microscopy (Crisafi et al., 2017, 2018) and recently adapted also for SHG and TPEF microscopy with pulses < 100 fs. The advantage offered from our personalized acquisition system relies in the possibility to perform in series and on the same area of a sample, CARS, TPEF, SHG, and SRS imaging by filtering properly the emitted signals. We applied these technologies on an optically accessible in vitro experimental model to investigate the behavior of rat bone marrow-derived MSCs growth in a microfabricated 3D scaffold, named Nichoid (Nava et al., 2012; Raimondi et al., 2013; Zandrini et al., 2019) with the aim to perform serial 3D scanning multi-modal NLO imaging over time (Figure 6A). For example, MSCs were cultured inside Nichoids and differentiated toward adipogenic and chondrogenic phenotypes and they were characterized with both conventional biochemical assays and NLO microscopy. Conventional results on the cellular adipogenic phenotype were obtained from bright field imaging of cyto-histological oil red-O staining of lipid droplets produced inside cells after cell fixation and staining. This technique is effective and fast but, unfortunately, returns only qualitative results. On the other hand, CARS microscopy provided the chemical selectivity for lipids, resonant at 2845 cm–1 Raman shift, in vital and unperturbed adipocytes, also allowing to distinguish the droplets volumetric distribution with higher spatial resolution (less than 1 μm of axial resolution) (Figure 6B). Similarly, conventional approach to recognize chondrogenic phenotype, revealed the ECM formation within Nichoids after cell fixation and staining with toluidine blue staining. Conversely, SHG and CARS imaging (2940 cm–1) enable to observe the distribution and quantify the level of collagen, in vital cultured MSC growth inside Nichoids (Figure 6C). In conclusion, our multi-modal set-up, just switching among different techniques (TPEF, SHG, and multi-color CARS/SRS) is able to perform functional imaging on several tissue and on optically accessible 3D device to investigate the phenomena governing the healthy and pathological conditions of cells.
TABLE 4.
References | Tech | Cell type | Study | Main findings and criticalities |
Hofemeier et al. (2016) | SHG CARS | Human inferior turbinate stem cells | Study of markers of in vitro induced osteogenesis of stem cells by hydroxyapatite calcium deposit detection through CARS and SHG at different time points (every 7 days for 3 weeks) | Multimodal imaging to follow the osteogenic differentiation of the cell construct reveal calcium deposits and collagen formation with CARS (959 cm–1) and SHG from 14 days to 21 days after the beginning of the differentiation respect to undifferentiated samples |
Fu et al. (2013), Li et al. (2017) | SRS | Human ovarian cancer cell line (COV362 and OVCAR5) and primary human ovarian cancer cells | In vitro single ovarian cancer cell analysis through hyperspectral SRS to assess the level of saturation of intracellular lipids both in 2D and in 3D spheroids | Study of lipid composition inside cells from fingerprint to C-H stretch region. Increased level of lipid unsaturation in spheroids respect to monolayer cells. Inhibition of lipid desaturation limits ovarian cancer cell stemness and spheroids growth |
Nguyen et al. (2017) | TPEF SHG | Human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from chondrocytes | 3D bioprinted iPSCs within nanofibrillated cellulose composite bioink to recreate a bioengineered cartilage and characterized by label-free TPEF for cell autofluorescence and SHG microscopy for collagen fibrils formation | SHG and TPEF identified label-free vital cells within ECM. The addition of alginate to the bioink enhanced the iPSCs proliferation, differentiation (reduced expression of pluripotency markers) and the production of collagen-II |
Syverud et al. (2017) | TPEF SHG | Primary murine muscle. cells | Structural and metabolic study of 3D skeletal engineered muscle tissue before implantation in the injured site of muscle loss. Collagen and myosin observed with SHG and redox ratio between NADH and FAD with TPEF. The engineered tissues were exposed to different culture conditions (metabolic stressed and steroid supplemented) to establish if changes in cell behavior were observable | Multiple time-points were observed to assess the metabolic activity of both monolayer and 3D engineered tissue to characterized differentiated and metabolically stressed tissues: an overall decrease of metabolic activity over time (0–8 min) in both sample type. Increase of metabolic activity during force production was not significant. Structural maturity assessed with SHG of myosin and collagen with sarcomere length and distribution. Correlation between myosin density and force production estimated both with SHG and force transducers |
Costa Moura et al. (2018), Moura et al. (2019) | TPEF SHG CARS | Human fetal skeletal stem cells | Temporal assessment of cartilage tissue formation through stem cell differentiation and validation of bioengineered cartilage through label-free microscopy | Quantification of collagen fibers (width, length and straightness) within engineered cartilaginous tissue at different time points. The number and the size of the cells within the pellet was obtained from CARS to gain the amount of collagen fibers per cell. CARS and SHG were used to characterize collagen and its protein composition and resonance in the whole volume |
Cong et al. (2019) | TPEF (FLIM) | Metastatic murine breast cancer cell line (4T1) | Metabolic assessment of tumor cells in 3D culture model made by collagen matrix exposed to two different drugs. Different levels of NAD(P)H lifetimes were found in between the flat and 3D culture configurations while exposed to drugs | Cell behavior, distribution and assembling depended on substrates stiffness and differed from 2D and 3D culture configuration. NAD(P)H levels and lifetime varied upon cell configuration resulting more longer in 3D systems. Metabolic results were obtained from the two culture configurations also under drug treatments to inhibit monocarboxylate transporters (pyruvate and lactate transport after glycolysis) to assess the reliability of FLIM measurements |
Kaushik et al. (2019) | TPEF | Human embryonic-stem cell-derived endothelial cells and primary human pericytes | Non-invasive monitoring of autofluorescent signal of vessel formation in two dynamic bioreactors through recirculating and continuous media flows. Cells encapsulated in hydrogels self-assembled in 3D vascular networks stable in time | Fluorescence signal from NADH and NAD(P)H enabled to identify self-assembled vessels. Diameter, density, branch nodes amount and anisotropy of networks in static, recirculating, and continuous flow conditions after 6 days of study were estimated. Results from label-free TPEF were compared with immunocytochemistry and confocal fluorescence microscopy with similar trends in morphological parameters but different absolute values due to sample staining. Faster TPEF scanning systems will enable time dependent study in vessel formation |
Okkelman et al. (2020) | TPEF (FLIM) | Intestinal stem cells Lgr5+ | Metabolic study involving intestinal stem cells during development and differentiation toward 3D intestinal organoid via NAD(P)H lifetime fluorescence and TPEF for GFP | Organoid metabolism was established exposing stem cells (GFP) and differentiated cells (unlabeled) to different levels of glucose (low and high) and no pyruvate. TPEF-FLIM revealed any changes in lifetime in the three conditions for unlabeled cells while lower and variables lifetimes were obtained for stem cells thus suggesting a different metabolic trend. Data were confirmed by the fraction of protein bound. Stem cells exposed to low level of glucose showed an oxidative metabolism than differentiated cells |
Sood et al. (2019) | TPEF-FLIM CARS | Primary human pediatric and adult brain tumor cells and human induced neural stem cells | Metabolic assessment of tumor cells in 3D silk protein scaffold embedded with ECM and hydrogels for engineered in vitro platform to establish the role of the material stiffness in the expression of different tumor subtypes. Further characterization of the model involved the use of CARS microscopy to quantify the lipid content and correlate the drug permeability | FLIM microscopy revealed variable tumor proliferation with different metabolic behavior and redox ratio trends depending on hydrogel compositions. A cross-check of lipid droplets formed during adult brain tumor cells was done by BODIPY fluorescence staining and chemically specific CARS in the C-H stretch region |
Conclusion
This first NLO imaging assessment is a starting point for tissue engineering, oncological research and drug testing applications since conventional methods commonly used to assess phenotypic expression are often disruptive (gene expression analyses) and perturbative (immuno-histochemical staining) thus limiting long-term studies. In this review we presented the main NLO techniques for functional observation of label-free and vital biological specimens, such as TPEF, SHG, THG, CARS, and SRS microscopy and their physical principles. Each of these methods exploits different properties of the light-matter interaction and it is useful to image characteristics of biological specimens in unlabeled conditions. TPEF is recognized as the main NLO techniques capable to excite endogenous molecules and co-factors, and exogenous fluorophores, reaching a great penetration depth (>500 μm). If combined with a fast detector such as a time-correlated single photon counter, it is possible to perform TPEF-FLIM for lifetime measurements of auto-fluorescent molecules, such as NADH and flavoproteins. SHG microscopy, instead, is very useful to reveal label-free signal from a non-centrosymmetric medium such as collagen fibrils, myosin and microtubules. THG, instead, enables the observation of interfaces within media with different refraction indexes, for example, enabling the identification of lipid-water interfaces in cellular vesicles. Vibrational-based CRS techniques excite the vibrational resonance frequency of the main chemical bonds with a specific and distinguishable fingerprint to investigate the chemical composition of the specimens. Finally, CARS and SRS allow the characterization of the biochemical composition of living samples both at the single-cell and at the tissue levels by measuring the vibrational spectrum of the specimen at every position, thus quantifying the concentration of e.g., DNA, lipids and proteins. Despite, all the advantages related to these techniques i.e., 3D sectioning capability, vital imaging and label-free acquisitions, they present a resolution close to the one achievable with confocal microscopy (lateral 200–300 nm and axial 600–900 nm). Currently, single-photon microscopy techniques are used for super resolution microscopy (SRM) such as stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy, thus enabling to image molecules with dimension under the diffraction limit (<100 nm) thanks to specific fluorophores or combinations of techniques to extrapolate signals. However, even if the development of SRM-NLO is recent, we believe that this combination results in efficient functional microscopy enabling the observation of dynamic processes at the molecular level in the absence of dyes. Multi-modal and multi-spectral nonlinear imaging will be of a great interest for tissue engineering applications thanks to the variety of biological information observable, from single cell components to heterogenous tissues, without the use of staining in unperturbed and non-destructive way. Hence, future challenging applications would be in clinic since the need for rapid and label-free diagnostic tools is far from being satisfied. In fact, pre-operatory assessments and surgical observations at the cellular level would highly reduce the risk of tissue damage due to unprecise excisions and uncertainty in the identification of injured/pathological sites.
Author Contributions
VP wrote the manuscript and selected published scientific articles. EJ, DP, and MR structured the manuscript. EJ, RO, GC, DP, and MR reviewed the work. DP and MR provided financial support. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
MR, GC, and RO were co-founders of a university spin-off company, MOAB S.r.l., and hold shares. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
- 2D
bi-dimensional
- 3D
three-dimensional
- Caco-2
Caucasian colon adenocarcinoma cells
- CARS
coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering
- C-H
carbon-hydrogen
- CRS
coherent Raman scattering
- DNA
deoxyribonucleic acid
- ECM
extracellular matrix
- FAD
flavin-adenine dinucleotide
- FLIM
fluorescent lifetime imaging
- FP
flavoprotein
- FRAP
fluorescence recovery after photobleaching
- FRET
florescence resonance energy transfer
- FTIR
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
- GFP
green fluorescent protein
- GTP
guanosine-5’-triphosphate
- HEK
human embryonic kidney cells
- HelaS3
Henrietta Lacks cervical cancer cells
- iPSC
induced pluripotent stem cells
- MCF
Michigan cancer foundation
- MDA-MB
M. D. Anderson metastasis breast cancer
- MSCs
mesenchymal stem cells
- NAD(P)H
nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
- NLO
nonlinear optical
- NRB
non-resonant background
- PC
polycarbonate
- PET
polyethylene
- PTFE
polytetrafluoroethylene
- RFP
red fluorescent protein
- SEM
scanning electron microscopy
- SHG
second harmonic generation
- SR
spontaneous Raman
- SRG
stimulated Raman gain
- SRL
stimulated Raman loss
- SRM
super resolution microscopy
- SRS
stimulated Raman scattering
- STED
stimulated emission depletion
- THG
third harmonic generation
- TPEF
two-photon excited fluorescence
- YFP
yellow fluorescent protein.
Footnotes
Funding. This project received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program (grant agreements Nos. 646990 – NICHOID, 754467 – NICHOIDS, 648615 – VIBRA, and GRAPHENE CORE 3- 881603), the Regione Lombardia project NEWMED (Grant No. POR FESR 2014-2020), the Italian FARE-MIUR project CH2ROME project (Grant No. R164WYYR8N), and BEYOND project (Grant No. R16ZNN2R9K).
References
- Alonzo C. A., Karaliota S., Pouli D., Liu Z., Karalis K. P., Georgakoudi I. (2016). Two-photon excited fluorescence of intrinsic fluorophores enables label-free assessment of adipose tissue function. Sci. Rep. 6:31012. 10.1038/srep31012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barad Y., Eisenberg H., Horowitz M., Silberberg Y. (1997). Nonlinear scanning laser microscopy by third harmonic generation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 70 922–924. 10.1063/1.118442 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bloembergen N. (1982). Nonlinear optics and spectroscopy. Rev. Mod. Phys. 54 685–695. [Google Scholar]
- Bradley J., Pope I., Masia F., Sanusi R., Langbein W., Swann K., et al. (2016). Quantitative imaging of lipids in live mouse oocytes and early embryos using CARS microscopy. Development 143 2238–2247. 10.1242/dev.129908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campagnola P. (2012). Second harmonic generation imaging microscopy: applications to diseases diagnostics. Anal. Chem. 83 3224–3231. 10.1021/ac1032325.Second [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campagnola P. J., Clark H. A., Mohler W. A., Lewis A., Loew L. M. (2001). Second-harmonic imaging microscopy of living cells. J. Biomed. Opt. 6:277 10.1117/1.1383294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cantarero A. (2015). Raman scattering applied to materials science. Proc. Mat. Sci. 9 113–122. 10.1016/j.mspro.2015.04.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chan J. K. C. (2014). The wonderful colors of the hematoxylin–eosin stain in diagnostic surgical pathology. Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 22 12–32. 10.1177/1066896913517939 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen X.-D., Li S., Du B., Dong Y., Wang Z.-H., Guo G.-C., et al. (2018). High-resolution multiphoton microscopy with a low-power continuous wave laser pump. Opt. Lett. 43:699 10.1364/OL.43.000699 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng J.-X., Xie X. S. (2004). Coherent anti-stokes raman scattering microscopy: instrumentation, theory, and applications. J. Phys. Chem. B 108 827–840. 10.1021/jp035693v [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chu S.-W., Chen S.-Y., Tsai T.-H., Liu T.-M., Lin C.-Y., Tsai H.-J., et al. (2003). In vivo developmental biology study using noninvasive multi-harmonic generation microscopy. Opt. Express 11 3093–3099. 10.1364/OE.11.003093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Combs C. A., Shroff H. (2017). Fluorescence microscopy: a concise guide to current imaging methods. Curr. Prot. Neurosci. 79 2.1.1–2.1.25. 10.1002/cpns.29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cong A., Pimenta R. M. L., Lee H. B., Mereddy V., Holy J., Heikal A. A. (2019). Two-photon fluorescence lifetime imaging of intrinsic NADH in three-dimensional tumor models: 2P FLIM of intrinsic NADH in 3D tumor models. Cytometry Part A 95 80–92. 10.1002/cyto.a.23632 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Costa Moura C., Lanham S. A., Monfort T., Bourdakos K. N., Tare R. S., Oreffo R. O. C., et al. (2018). Quantitative temporal interrogation in 3D of bioengineered human cartilage using multimodal label-free imaging. Integr. Biol. 10 635–645. 10.1039/C8IB00050F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crisafi F., Kumar V., Perri A., Marangoni M., Cerullo G., Polli D. (2018). Multimodal nonlinear microscope based on a compact fiber-format laser source. Spectrochim. Acta A 188 135–140. 10.1016/j.saa.2017.06.055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crisafi F., Kumar V., Scopigno T., Marangoni M., Cerullo G., Polli D. (2017). In-line balanced detection stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. Sci. Rep. 7:10745. 10.1038/s41598-017-09839-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Bortoli M., Taverna E., Maffioli E., Casalini P., Crisafi F., Kumar V., et al. (2018). Lipid accumulation in human breast cancer cells injured by iron depletors. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 37:75. 10.1186/s13046-018-0737-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Denk W., Piston D. W., Webb W. W. (1995). “Two-photon molecular excitation in laser-scanning microscopy,” in Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, ed. Pawley J. B. (Cham: Springer; ), 445–458. 10.1007/978-1-4757-5348-6_28 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Denk W., Strickler J., Webb W. (1990). Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science 248 73–76. 10.1126/science.2321027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Di Bartolo B., Collins J. (2013). Nano-Optics for Enhancing Light-Matter Interactions on a Molecular Scale Plasmonics, Photonic Materials and Sub-Wavelength Resolution. Cham: Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Drobizhev M., Makarov N. S., Tillo S. E., Hughes T. E., Rebane A. (2011). Two-photon absorption properties of fluorescent proteins. Nat. Methods 8 393–399. 10.1038/nmeth.1596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans C. L., Xie X. S. (2008). Coherent anti-stokes raman scattering microscopy: chemical imaging for biology and medicine. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 1 883–909. 10.1146/annurev.anchem.1.031207.112754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fu D., Holtom G., Freudiger C., Zhang X., Xie X. S. (2013). Hyperspectral imaging with stimulated raman scattering by chirped femtosecond lasers. J. Phys. Chem. B 117 4634–4640. 10.1021/jp308938t [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fu D., Zhou J., Zhu W. S., Manley P. W., Wang Y. K., Hood T., et al. (2014). Imaging the intracellular distribution of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in living cells with quantitative hyperspectral stimulated Raman scattering. Nat. Chem. 6 614–622. 10.1038/nchem.1961 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gavgiotaki E., Filippidis G., Markomanolaki H., Kenanakis G., Agelaki S., Georgoulias V., et al. (2017). Distinction between breast cancer cell subtypes using third harmonic generation microscopy. J. Biophot. 10 1152–1162. 10.1002/jbio.201600173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Göppert-Mayer M. (1931). Über Elementarakte mit zwei quantensprüngen. Annal. Phys. 401 273–294. 10.1002/andp.19314010303 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta V. P. (2017). Molecular and Laser Spectroscopy: Advances and Applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
- Helmchen F., Denk W. (2005). Deep tissue two-photon microscopy. Nat. Methods 2 932–940. 10.1038/nmeth818 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hofemeier A. D., Hachmeister H., Pilger C., Schürmann M., Greiner J. F. W., Nolte L., et al. (2016). Label-free nonlinear optical microscopy detects early markers for osteogenic differentiation of human stem cells. Sci. Rep. 6:26716. 10.1038/srep26716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoover E. E., Squier J. A. (2013). Advances in multiphoton microscopy technology. Nat. Photonics 7 93–101. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hopt A., Neher E. (2001). Highly nonlinear photodamage in two-photon fluorescence microscopy. Biophys. J. 80, 2029–2036. 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76173-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huemer K., Squirrell J. M., Swader R., LeBert D. C., Huttenlocher A., Eliceiri K. W. (2017). zWEDGI: wounding and entrapment device for imaging live Zebrafish larvae. Zebrafish 14 42–50. 10.1089/zeb.2016.1323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jermyn M., Mok K., Mercier J., Desroches J., Pichette J., Saint-Arnaud K., et al. (2015). Intraoperative brain cancer detection with Raman spectroscopy in humans. Sci. Transl. Med. 7:274ra19 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa2384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ji M., Orringer D. A., Freudiger C. W., Ramkissoon S., Liu X., Lau D., et al. (2013). Rapid, label-free detection of brain tumors with stimulated raman scattering microscopy. Sci. Transl. Med. 5:201ra119. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaiser W., Garrett C. G. B. (1961). Two-photon excitation in Ca F 2: Eu 2 +. Phys. Rev. Lett. 7 229–231. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.7.229 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kaushik G., Gil D. A., Torr E., Berge E. S., Soref C., Uhl P., et al. (2019). Quantitative label-free imaging of 3D vascular networks self-assembled in synthetic hydrogels. Adv. Healthcare Mat. 8:1801186. 10.1002/adhm.201801186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Konig K. (2000). Multiphoton microscopy in life sciences. J. Microsc. 200 83–104. 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2000.00738.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- König T. T., Goedeke J., Muensterer O. J. (2019). Multiphoton microscopy in surgical oncology- a systematic review and guide for clinical translatability. Surg. Oncol. 31 119–131. 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.10.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krafft C. (2012). Raman and coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microspectroscopy for biomedical applications. J. Biomed. Opt. 17:040801 10.1117/1.JBO.17.4.040801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar V., Coluccelli N., Polli D. (2018). “Coherent optical spectroscopy/microscopy and applications,” in Molecular and Laser Spectroscopy, Chap. 5. 87–115. 10.1016/B978-0-12-849883-5.00005-X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li J., Condello S., Thomes-Pepin J., Ma X., Xia Y., Hurley T. D., et al. (2017). Lipid desaturation is a metabolic marker and therapeutic target of ovarian cancer stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 20 303–314.e5. 10.1016/j.stem.2016.11.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lichtman J. W., Conchello J.-A. (2005). Fluorescence microscopy. Nat. Methods 2 910–919. 10.1038/nmeth817 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu H.-S., Jan M.-S., Chou C.-K., Chen P.-H., Ke N.-J. (1999). Is green fluorescent protein toxic to the living cells? Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 260 712–717. 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu F.-K., Basu S., Igras V., Hoang M. P., Ji M., Fu D., et al. (2015). Label-free DNA imaging in vivo with stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112 11624–11629. 10.1073/pnas.1515121112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meleshina A. V., Dudenkova V. V., Bystrova A. S., Kuznetsova D. S., Shirmanova M. V., Zagaynova E. V. (2017). Two-photon FLIM of NAD(P)H and FAD in mesenchymal stem cells undergoing either osteogenic or chondrogenic differentiation. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 8:15 10.1186/s13287-017-0484-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meleshina A. V., Dudenkova V. V., Shirmanova M. V., Shcheslavskiy V. I, Becker W., Bystrova A. S., et al. (2016). Probing metabolic states of differentiating stem cells using two-photon FLIM. Sci. Rep. 6:21853. 10.1038/srep21853 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mertz J., Moreaux L. (2001). Second-harmonic generation by focused excitation of inhomogeneously distributed scatterers. Opt. Commun. 196 325–330. 10.1016/S0030-4018(01)01403-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Meshulach D., Barad Y., Silberberg Y. (1997). Measurement of ultrashort optical pulses by third-harmonic generation. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 14 2122–2125. 10.1117/1.3477535 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Moura C. C., Bourdakos K. N., Tare R. S., Oreffo R. O. C., Mahajan S. (2019). Live-imaging of bioengineered cartilage tissue using multimodal non-linear molecular imaging. Sci. Rep. 9:5561. 10.1038/s41598-019-41466-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Müller M., Squier J., Wilson K. R., Brakenhoff G. J. (1998). 3D microscopy of transparent objects using third-harmonic generation. J. Microsc. 191 266–274. 10.1046/j.1365-2818.1998.00399.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murphy D. B. (2001). Fundamentals of Light Microscopy and Electronic Imaging. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss. [Google Scholar]
- Nandakumar P., Kovalev A., Volkmer A. (2009). Vibrational imaging based on stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. New J. Phys. 11:033026 10.1088/1367-2630/11/3/033026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nava M. M., Raimondi M. T., Pietrabissa R. (2012). Controlling self-renewal and differentiation of stem cells via mechanical cues. J. Biomed. Biotech. 2012:797410. 10.1155/2012/797410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen D., Hägg D. A., Forsman A., Ekholm J., Nimkingratana P., Brantsing C., et al. (2017). Cartilage tissue engineering by the 3D bioprinting of iPS cells in a nanocellulose/alginate bioink. Sci. Rep. 7:658. 10.1038/s41598-017-00690-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Okkelman I. A., Neto N., Papkovsky D. B., Monaghan M. G., Dmitriev R. I. (2020). A deeper understanding of intestinal organoid metabolism revealed by combining fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) and extracellular flux analyses. Redox Biol. 30:101420. 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Piston D. W., Kirby M. S., Cheng H., Lederer W. J., Webb W. W. (1994). Two-photon-excitation fluorescence imaging of three-dimensional calcium-ion activity. Appl. Opt. 33:662 10.1364/AO.33.000662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pope I., Langbein W., Watson P., Borri P. (2013). Simultaneous hyperspectral differential-CARS, TPF and SHG microscopy with a single 5 fs Ti:Sa laser. Opt. Express 21:7096. 10.1364/OE.21.007096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quinn K. P., Sridharan G. V., Hayden R. S., Kaplan D. L., Lee K., Georgakoudi I. (2013). Quantitative metabolic imaging using endogenous fluorescence to detect stem cell differentiation. Sci. Rep. 3:3432. 10.1038/srep03432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raimondi M. T., Eaton S. M., Laganà M., Aprile V., Nava M. M., Cerullo G., et al. (2013). Three-dimensional structural niches engineered via two-photon laser polymerization promote stem cell homing. Acta Biomat. 9 4579–4584. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rehberg M., Krombach F., Pohl U., Dietzel S. (2011). Label-free 3D visualization of cellular and tissue structures in intact muscle with second and third harmonic generation microscopy. PLoS One 6:e28237. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rico-Jimenez J., Lee J. H., Alex A., Musaad S., Chaney E., Barkalifa R., et al. (2020). Non-invasive monitoring of pharmacodynamics during the skin wound healing process using multimodal optical microscopy. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care 8:e000974. 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rubart M. (2004). Two-photon microscopy of cells and tissue. Circ. Res. 95 1154–1166. 10.1161/01.RES.0000150593.30324.42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saarinen J., Sözeri E., Fraser-Miller S. J., Peltonen L., Santos H. A., Isomäki A., et al. (2017). Insights into Caco-2 cell culture structure using coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) microscopy. Int. J. Pharmac. 523 270–280. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanderson M. J., Smith I., Parker I., Bootman M. D. (2016). Flourescence microscopy. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2014:36 10.1101/pdb.top071795.Fluorescence [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santos I. P., Barroso E. M., Bakker Schut T. C., Caspers P. J., van Lanschot C. G. F., Choi D.-H., et al. (2017). Raman spectroscopy for cancer detection and cancer surgery guidance: translation to the clinics. Analyst 142 3025–3047. 10.1039/C7AN00957G [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santos I. P., Caspers P. J., Bakker Schut T. C., van Doorn R., Noordhoek Hegt V., Koljenoviæ S., et al. (2016). Raman spectroscopic characterization of melanoma and benign melanocytic lesions suspected of melanoma using high-wavenumber Raman spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 88 7683–7688. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen Y. R. (1985). “The principles of nonlinear optics,” in Optics Laser Technology, ed. Cusano A. (Cham: Springer; ), 17. 10.1016/0030-3992(85)90011-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sood D., Tang-Schomer M., Pouli D., Mizzoni C., Raia N., Tai A., et al. (2019). 3D extracellular matrix microenvironment in bioengineered tissue models of primary pediatric and adult brain tumors. Nat. Commun. 10:4529. 10.1038/s41467-019-12420-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stephens D. J. (2003). Light microscopy techniques for live cell imaging. Science 300 82–86. 10.1126/science.1082160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun C.-K., Liu W.-M., Liao Y.-H. (2019). Study on melanin enhanced third harmonic generation in a live cell model. Biomed. Opt. Express 10:5716. 10.1364/BOE.10.005716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Syverud B. C., Mycek M.-A., Larkin L. M. (2017). Quantitative, label-free evaluation of tissue-engineered skeletal muscle through multiphoton microscopy. Tissue Eng. Part C 23 616–626. 10.1089/ten.tec.2017.0284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tokarz D., Cisek R., Prent N., Fekl U., Barzda V. (2012). Measuring the molecular second hyperpolarizability in absorptive solutions by the third harmonic generation ratio technique. Anal. Chim. Acta 755 86–92. 10.1016/j.aca.2012.09.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Steenbergen V., Boesmans W., Li Z., de Coene Y., Vints K., Baatsen P., et al. (2019). Molecular understanding of label-free second harmonic imaging of microtubules. Nat. Commun. 10:3530. 10.1038/s41467-019-11463-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vo-Dinh T. (2003). Biomedical Photonics Handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
- Wang H., Fu Y., Cheng J.-X. (2007). Experimental observation and theoretical analysis of Raman resonance-enhanced photodamage in coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24:544 10.1364/JOSAB.24.000544 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Weigelin B., Bakker G.-J., Friedl P. (2016). Third harmonic generation microscopy of cells and tissue organization. J. Cell Sci. 129 245–255. 10.1242/jcs.152272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams R. M., Piston D. W., Webb W. W. (1994). Two−photon molecular excitation provides intrinsic 3−dimensional resolution for laser−based microscopy and microphotochemistry. FASEB J. 8 804–813. 10.1096/fasebj.8.11.8070629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu C.-H., Wang T.-D., Hsieh C.-H., Huang S.-H., Lin J.-W., Hsu S.-C., et al. (2016). Imaging cytometry of human leukocytes with third harmonic generation microscopy. Sci. Rep. 6:37210. 10.1038/srep37210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu C., Zipfel W., Shear J. B., Williams R. M., Webb W. W. (1996). Multiphoton fluorescence excitation: new spectral windows for biological nonlinear microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93 10763–10768. 10.1073/pnas.93.20.10763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yelin D., Silberberg Y. (1999). Laser scanning third-harmonic-generation microscopy in biology. Opt. Express 5:169. 10.1364/OE.5.000169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- You S., Tu H., Chaney E. J., Sun Y., Zhao Y., Bower A. J., et al. (2018). Intravital imaging by simultaneous label-free autofluorescence-multiharmonic microscopy. Nat. Commun. 9:2125. 10.1038/s41467-018-04470-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu Z., Chen T., Zhang X., Fu D., Liao X., Shen J., et al. (2012). Label-free chemical imaging in vivo: three-dimensional non-invasive microscopic observation of amphioxus notochord through stimulated Raman scattering (SRS). Chem. Sci. 3:2646 10.1039/c2sc20316b [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yue S., Slipchenko M. N., Cheng J.-X. (2011). Multimodal nonlinear optical microscopy. Laser Phot. Rev. 5 496–512. 10.1002/lpor.201000027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zandrini T., Shan O., Parodi V., Cerullo G., Raimondi M. T., Osellame R. (2019). Multi-foci laser microfabrication of 3D polymeric scaffolds for stem cell expansion in regenerative medicine. Sci. Rep. 9:11761. 10.1038/s41598-019-48080-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang X., Roeffaers M. B. J., Basu S., Daniele J. R., Fu D., Freudiger C. W., et al. (2012). Label-free live-cell imaging of nucleic acids using stimulated raman scattering microscopy. Chem. Phys. Chem. 13 1054–1059. 10.1002/cphc.201100890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zinselmeyer B. H., Dempster J., Wokosin D. L., Cannon J. J., Pless R., Parker I., et al. (2009). Chapter 16 two−photon microscopy and multidimensional analysis of cell dynamics. Methods Enzymol. 461 349–378. 10.1016/S0076-6879(09)05416-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zipfel W. R., Williams R. M., Christie R., Nikitin A. Y., Hyman B. T., Webb W. W. (2003a). Live tissue intrinsic emission microscopy using multiphoton-excited native fluorescence and second harmonic generation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 7075–7080. 10.1073/pnas.0832308100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zipfel W. R., Williams R. M., Webb W. W. (2003b). Nonlinear magic: multiphoton microscopy in the biosciences. Nat. Biotechnol. 21 1369–1377. 10.1038/nbt899 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zumbusch A., Langbein W., Borri P. (2013). Nonlinear vibrational microscopy applied to lipid biology. Prog. Lipid Res. 52 615–632. 10.1016/j.plipres.2013.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]