Abstract
Classically, neurexins are thought to mediate synaptic connections through trans interactions with a number of different postsynaptic partners. Neurexins are cleaved by metalloproteases in an activity-dependent manner, releasing the soluble extracellular domain. Here, we report that in both immature (before synaptogenesis) and mature (after synaptogenesis) hippocampal neurons, the soluble neurexin-1β ectodomain triggers acute Ca2+-influx at the dendritic/postsynaptic side. In both cases, neuroligin-1 expression was required. In immature neurons, calcium influx required N-type calcium channels and stimulated dendritic outgrowth and neuronal survival. In mature glutamatergic neurons the neurexin-1β ectodomain stimulated calcium influx through NMDA-receptors, which increased presynaptic release probability. In contrast, prolonged exposure to the ectodomain led to inhibition of synaptic transmission. This secondary inhibition was activity- and neuroligin-1 dependent and caused by a reduction in the readily-releasable pool of vesicles. A synthetic peptide modeled after the neurexin-1β:neuroligin-1 interaction site reproduced the cellular effects of the neurexin-1β ectodomain. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that the soluble neurexin ectodomain stimulates growth of neurons and exerts acute and chronic effects on trans-synaptic signaling involved in setting synaptic strength.
Subject terms: Synaptic vesicle exocytosis, Cellular neuroscience, Molecular neuroscience
Introduction
A great diversity in properties of synapses in the central nervous system is determined by a variety of synaptic cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), which play a key role in specifying and tuning synaptic plasticity1. Neurexins (NXs) constitute a family of CAMs, which encompasses three members, NX1-3, expressed as long (α-NXs) and short (β-NXs) isoforms driven by alternative promotors2–4 yielding thousands of isoforms in the brain5,6. Neurexins interact with key synaptic organizers to initially orchestrate discrete synaptic signaling pathways1,7, and a number of ligand proteins including postsynaptically expressed neuroligins (NLs) and Leucine-Rich Repeat Trans Membrane proteins (LRRTMs) to mediate synapse formation, maturation and function1,2,8–15. Other β-NX interaction partners are presynaptic CIRL1/Latrophilin-116, secreted synaptic protein cerebellin17, neuroxophilin18, dystroglycan18, as well as GABAA19 and acetylcholine receptors20.
Heterologous overexpression of NLs or NXs in non-neuronal cells promotes initial synapse formation in co-cultured neurons21,22 through NX:NL-pairing23. After synapse formation the NX:NL interaction is required for synapse stabilization and maturation24,25. Furthermore, the NX:NL trans synaptic connection modulates presynaptic release properties via retrograde signaling26. For instance, overexpression of NL-1 in immature neurons increases the recycling vesicle pool size27 and postsynaptic expression of NL-1 in brain slices increases the presynaptic release probability26. Conversely, in Caenorhabditis elegans neuromuscular junction, the NX:NL interaction mediates a retrograde signal, which inhibits fusion of synaptic vesicles distal to Ca2+ entry sites28 mediated by NX binding to N-type voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC)29.
Endogenous NLs grant properties onto their resident synapses30. Mice with genetic deletion of NL-1 have a reduced NMDA/AMPA-ratio, which is typical for juvenile synapses30,31. In contrast, NL-1 overexpression causes increases in AMPA EPSC amplitude and NMDA/AMPA-ratio30. These changes depend on neuronal activity, indicating a role in synapse validation and function27,30. Conditional knockout of endogenous β-NXs in mice markedly impairs neurotransmitter release and β-NXs are similarly involved in synaptic regulation processes and control synaptic strength specifically via postsynaptic synthesis of endocannabinoids, which exert their function presynaptically through the CB1 receptor32. Taken together, the NX:NL trans synaptic connection has the potential to dictate bidirectional changes in (pre-)synaptic strength. A still open question is whether NXs have the potential for not only dynamic tuning, but also acutely regulating synaptic transmission. An acute role in regulating synapse function might be anticipated from the observation that NXs—like NLs—are sequentially cleaved by α- and γ-secretases herewith shedding the ectodomain and thus releasing the intracellular C-terminal fragment33–36. It is well-established that ectodomain shedding of several neural CAMs, including N-cadherin, NCAM and NL-1, can modulate the adhesive, synaptogenic and signaling properties of these CAMs35,37–42. However, for the soluble NX-1β ectodomain the physiological role in neuronal growth and acute regulation of synaptic transmission is not clear.
Here, we studied the functional ramifications of the NX-1β ectodomain and a synthetic peptide modeled on the minimal binding sequence in NX-1β for NL-1. Notably, we find that both the ectodomain and the peptide potently stimulate neuritogenesis in immature neurons and induce an acute (within a few seconds) increase in synaptic strength in mature glutamatergic neurons, which progresses into an activity-dependent homeostatic down-regulation within two hours. These effects are found to be NL-1 and Ca2+-dependent, and indicate that the NX-1β ectodomain is potentially involved in acutely adjusting synaptic strength.
Results
NX-1β ectodomain induces Ca2+ influx and neurite outgrowth in immature neurons in a NL-1-dependent manner
To investigate the potential function of the ectodomain of NX-1β, we used a NX-1β ectodomain lacking the splice site 4 (SS4), synthesized as a Fc-chimera (henceforth referred to as NX-1βe). It is well-known that NX-1β lacking SS4 interacts with NL-19,43,44. Consistently, surface plasmon resonance analysis confirmed binding of NX-1βe to recombinant NL-1 (Fig. S1a). The dissociation constant (KD) was 32 nM, (Fig. S1a) however the covalent immobilization of the receptor, i.e., NL-1, to the chip at least partially masks the binding interface, and does not mimick native NL-1 in the cell surface environment. Thus, a lower concentration of the protein might yield a functional response.
Initially, we studied the effect of NX-1βe on neurite outgrowth in immature cultured hippocampal neurons (DIV 1). Primary cultures of neurons are known to express both NX-1 and NL-1 prior to synapse formation45. Application of NX-1βe strongly stimulated neurite outgrowth within 24 h after seeding, in a concentration-dependent manner. The resultant bell-shaped dose-dependency with the most efficacious concentrations was found between 0.01 and 0.1 nM (rat neurons: Fig. 1a; mouse neurons: Supplementary Fig. S1b). At higher concentrations, no effect was seen. Importantly, the neuritogenic effect of NX-1βe was abrogated by shRNA-induced knockdown of NL-1 in rat hippocampal neurons (Fig. 1b). Note that for shRNA-experiments neurons were plated on L929 fibroblasts and given a more nutrient-rich medium; possibly for this reason, the neurite length was larger in this experiment (Fig. 1a,b). Similarly, in primary neurons isolated from NL-1 knockout (KO) mice the effect of NX-1βe was absent (Fig. 1c). This specifies that the role of NX-1βe in neurite outgrowth depends on NL-1 expression.
Calcium is required for neuronal development46, and α-NXs have been implicated in the regulation and targeting of Ca2+ channels24. The neuritogenic effect of the NX-1βe might therefore require intracellular Ca2+ signaling. Indeed, in hippocampal cultures ω-conotoxin MVIIA (an inhibitor of N-type VGCCs) reduced the neuritogenic effects of NX-1βe (Supplementary Fig. S1c). To test whether NX-1βe itself modifies Ca2+ homeostasis, we performed experiments in immature neurons loaded with the membrane permeable fluorescent Ca2+-sensitive dye Fura-2AM. Strikingly, acute application of NX-1βe (~ 55 pM, i.e. the concentration leading to maximal outgrowth, Fig. 1a) led to a strong increase in the intracellular Ca2+-concentration ([Ca2+]i) in both neurites and the somatic compartment (Fig. 1d,e). The increase was mediated by Ca2+-influx since omitting Ca2+ from the bath abrogated the effect (Fig. 1e). Furthermore, it was blocked by cadmium ions (Fig. 1f), and ω-conotoxin, (Fig. 1g), indicating the involvement of N-type VGCCs.
Several neural CAMs, including NCAM and CIRL1 are known to function as survival factors47,48. We tested whether NX-1βe possessed protective properties in hippocampal and cerebellar granule neurons by H2O2-induced cell death and potassium deprivation-induced apoptosis. We found that NX-1βe promoted survival of both hippocampal and cerebellar granule neurons, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S1d). As a control, treatment with previously identified neuroprotective compounds, S100A4 protein49 and insulin-like growth factor-150 was used and found to rescue both cell types (Supplementary Fig. S1f,g). Thus the NX-1β ectodomain functions, in accordance with other neural CAMs, as a survival factor.
Collectively, these data show that the NX-1βe exerts potent effects at low concentrations (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Fig. S1b,d,e) on neuronal survival and neuritogenesis in vitro, in a process that depends obligatorily on the expression of NL-1. Possibly, NL-1 acts as an activation receptor for NX-1βe, which upon binding causes Ca2+-influx utilizing another part of the ectodomain. Alternatively, NX-1βe induced Ca2+-influx and induction of neurite outgrowth might depend on NX-1βe:NL-1 binding itself, in which case only the binding interface of the NX-1β ectodomain would be needed.
A synthetic NX-1β-derived peptide, Neurexide, mimics the effect of NX-1β ectodomain
To distinguish between these possibilities we next investigated whether a minimal peptide modeled after the NX-1β:NL-1 interface could mimic the effect of NX-1βe. Based on the crystal structures of the NX-1β:NL-1 complex43,51,52 we designed a 10-mer peptide, termed Neurexide (Neurexin peptide; sequence in single-letter code: ARPSTRADRA), modeled after the NX-1β binding site for NL-1 (Fig. 2a,b). The peptide was synthesized either as a C-terminally amidated monomer or a multimer (dimer and tetramer) on a lysine backbone (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. S2a). Similar to NX-1βe, the tetrameric form of Neurexide strongly induced neurite outgrowth in rat or mouse primary hippocampal neurons, whereas the monomeric form was much less effective. The dimeric peptide induced an intermediate effect at higher concentrations (Fig. 2c,d and Supplementary Fig. S2b,c). The tetrameric form was therefore used in subsequent experiments. As for the NX-1βe, the Neurexide-induced effect on neurite outgrowth was abolished by knockdown (Supplementary Fig. S2d) or KO (Fig. 2e) of NL-1. To verify the specificity of the Neurexide-induced neuritogenic response Neurexide-derived peptides with scrambled or reversed sequences or single alanine substitutions of Arg2, Pro3, Thr5, Arg6, or Arg9 was employed. None showed activity (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Fig. S2e). Neurexide predominantly increased dendritic growth, as evident after immunostaining against a dendritic marker (MAP2), while axonal growth was unaffected (marked with Neurofilament) (Supplementary Fig. S3).
In the neuronal survival assay, Neurexide displayed a significant survival effect on hippocampal neurons, whereas a noticeable (but statistically insignificant) trend in cerebellar granule neurons survival was seen (Supplementary Fig. S1e). As for NX-1βe, the stimulation of outgrowth by Neurexide in hippocampal neurons was inhibited by ω-conotoxin MVIIA (Supplementary Fig. S2f), indicating that Neurexide promotes outgrowth in a Ca2+-dependent manner similar to that of NX-1βe. We finally tested whether Neurexide interacts with NL-1. Surface plasmon resonance analysis indeed showed that this interaction occurs with sub-μM affinity (Supplementary Fig. S2g, estimated KD = 480 nM). The lower affinity compared to full-length NX-1βe correlates with the higher concentration of Neurexide needed for optimal effect (Fig. 2d).
In sum, the effect of the NX-1β ectodomain on neurite outgrowth and survival is mimicked by a minimal peptide modeled after the NX-1β:NL1 binding site, indicating that we have identified the minimal region of the ectodomain required for this effect.
The NX-1β ectodomain acutely enhances glutamatergic synaptic transmission
After having established that both the NX-1β ectodomain and the synthetic peptide Neurexide affect neuritogenesis, we set out to investigate whether the compounds affect synaptic transmission in already formed synapses. To this end, we used rat hippocampal glutamatergic neurons grown in autaptic culture for 10–14 days53. Since only one autoinnervating neuron is present per glial island, differences in neuronal survival will not affect the results in this preparation. In voltage clamp experiments individual action potentials (APs) are evoked upon brief depolarization, while spontaneous APs are effectively prevented when keeping the membrane potential at -70 mV during inter-stimulus intervals. Therefore, it is possible to assess both evoked postsynaptic currents and mini events in the same experiment without the use of tetrodotoxin (TTX). After establishing a whole-cell configuration, the neurons were stimulated by AP pairs (inter-stimulus interval 50 ms) every 20 s. First evoked EPSC (eEPSC) amplitude and Paired-Pulse Ratio (PPR) were quantified for each stimulus pair, and miniature EPSCs (mEPSCs) were analyzed in-between stimuli.
We acutely exposed rat glutamatergic neurons to NX-1βe using a local superfusion multibarrel system during the recording (concentration ~ 55 pM, similar to the concentration causing maximal stimulation of neuritogenesis, Fig. 1a). Strikingly, local application of NX-1βe acutely enhanced synaptic transmission manifested as an increased frequency of mEPSC release (Fig. 3a1) and an increase in eEPSC amplitude (Fig. 3a3). This occurred concomitantly with a decrease in PPR (Fig. 3a4), indicative of an increase in synaptic release probability54. The mEPSC amplitude remained unchanged (Fig. 3a2). Importantly, the effects of NX-1βe were reversible upon wash (Fig. 3a1–4, Supplementary Fig. S4), indicating that this type of synaptic enhancement requires continued presence of NX-1βe. The increase in mEPSC frequency and decrease of PPR indicate that the effect of NX-1βe is presynaptic. Note that the mEPSC frequency sharply increases after each paired stimulation due to increases in calcium concentrations, resulting in a sawtooth pattern. During NX-1βe application the activity-induced increase in mEPSC frequency is even more pronounced (higher peaks) and lasts longer (slower relaxation), indicating that NX-1βe affects presynaptic calcium homeostasis. Indeed, when glutamatergic neurons were incubated with BAPTA-AM to chelate Ca2+, the vast majority of mEPSCs were blocked, also during NX-1βe application (Supplementary Fig. S4). This shows that mEPSCs are Ca2+-dependent both in the presence and absence of NX-1βe.
In line with results above on neuritogenesis, we asked whether the effect of NX-1βe depends on NL-1 expression. Applying NX-1βe to WT mouse neurons resulted in similar changes (Fig. 3b1–3) both on mEPSC frequency, eEPSC amplitude and PPR, which establishes the effect of NX-1βe also in mouse neurons. In contrast, in neurons from NL-1 KO littermates the effects were largely abrogated (Fig. 3b1–4), indicating that the effect mostly depends on NL-1 expression.
Strikingly, application of our peptide Neurexide (10 μM, Supplementary Fig. S5) mimicked the effects of NX-1βe on mEPSC frequency, eEPSC amplitude and PPR, whereas again the mEPSC amplitude was unaffected. Overall, our data show that the NX-1β ectodomain acutely enhances synaptic function in glutamatergic neurons through an increase in release probability. This increase is mimicked by Neurexide emulating the NX1β:NL-1 interaction site and therefore it is not caused by the intracellular part of NX-1β (see “Discussion”). This shows that NX1βe can modify synaptic efficacy on a time scale of seconds in a NL1-dependent manner.
The NX-1β ectodomain causes Ca2+-influx via NMDA-receptors
To identify the intracellular events, which lead to increased presynaptic release upon exposure to NX-1βe, we loaded autaptic glutamatergic neurons with Fura-2 and combined electrophysiological measurements with fluorescence imaging. Application of NX-1βe rapidly led to an increase in intracellular [Ca2+], measured as an increase in 340/380 nm fluorescent ratio in the cell body and in dendrites (Fig. 4a3–4). Note, the increase in mEPSC frequency and eEPSC amplitude were verified in the same cells (Fig. 4a1–2). Previous experiments show that NL-1 interacts with and stabilizes NMDA-receptors at the synapse30,55. Therefore, we asked if the source of the Ca2+ increase might be influx through NMDA-receptors. Indeed, superfusion with the NMDA-blocker AP-5 abolished both the NX-1βe induced increase in intracellular [Ca2+] (Fig. 4b3–4), and the effect of NX-1βe on mEPSC frequency and eEPSC amplitude (Fig. 4b1,b2). Note that AP5 applied alone already reduced Ca2+ influx during AP stimulation (Fig. 4b4), indicating that our experimental conditions do allow for NMDA-receptor stimulation. Thus Ca2+-influx through NMDA-receptors is a prerequisite for the stimulatory effect of NX-1βe on presynaptic release.
NMDA-receptors are most commonly found postsynaptically, where they interact with NL-1, but they can also be expressed presynaptically56. Given the finding that NX-1βe affects presynaptic release and N-type VGCC in developing neurons, we wanted to investigate the effect of NX-1βe on presynaptic [Ca2+], which could be due to presynaptic NMDA-receptors56 or VGCCs. An effect on Ca2+ channels could be expected if the added NX-1βe interferes with presynaptic NMDA-receptors or Ca2+ channels24,57. Fura-infusion into autaptic neurons does not allow for distinction between pre- and postsynaptic compartments, so in other experiments we expressed a genetically encoded Ca2+-sensor fused to synaptophysin, syGCaMP2, which is targeted to synaptic vesicles58. Patching the cells and stimulating with short AP trains (10 stimuli @ 40 Hz) before, during and after NX-1βe application revealed clear increases in fluorescence, as expected (Supplementary Fig. S6). We found again NX-1βe increased eEPSC amplitude and concomitantly decreased PPR (Supplementary Fig. S6d,f). However, NX-1βe application did not modify the activity dependent fluorescence increase (ΔF/F), indicating that AP-induced increases in [Ca2+]i were unaffected. However, the basal fluorescence slightly increased upon application of NX-1βe, suggesting that resting presynaptic [Ca2+] was mildly affected by NX-1βe (Supplementary Fig. S6c). The signal-to-noise relationship of a genetically expressed Ca2+ indicator is generally less than that of Fura-2, therefore small changes in presynaptic [Ca2+]i might be underestimated. Together, these data support the notion that [Ca2+]i is increased by NX-1βe, which leads to a potentiation of synaptic release (see “Discussion”).
Long-term (hours) exposure to the NX-1β ectodomain homeostatically down regulates the readily-releasable pool of vesicles
Previous investigations making use of the NX-1βe added to neuronal cultures reported a decrease in mEPSC frequency59, which correlated with impaired NL-1-dependent synapse formation, presumably due to inhibition of the NX1:NL1 interaction22,59. In those experiments, the NX-1β ectodomain was added during the period of active synaptogenesis over longer time (2–3 days) and at higher concentrations than in the present study. The different findings prompted us to investigate whether the effect of the ectodomain might be time or activity dependent. Indeed, after exposure of autaptic neurons to the NX-1βe for 10 days during the period of synaptogenesis (from DIV 1 to 10), the mEPSC frequency and eEPSC amplitudes were severely reduced (Supplementary Fig. S7a,d). In contrast, the mEPSC amplitude and decay time were unchanged (Supplementary Fig. S7b,c), indicating a presynaptic effect. In parallel experiments, NX-1βe was applied for only 2 h to mature cultures to investigate synaptic adaptation independent of synapse development. Intriguingly, 2 h of NX-1βe exposure of mature neurons led to identical changes in synaptic features (DIV 10–14 days; Supplementary Fig. S7), while overnight exposure to NX-1βe did not affect synapse number or neuronal morphology (Supplemental Fig. S10). Taken together, the effects seen here are not due to NX-1βe induced differences in synaptogenesis (see also below).
The acute upregulation of synaptic strength by NX-1βe identified above might indirectly lead to down-regulation of vesicular release, in a homeostatic plasticity regulative manner which counteracts the global increase in synaptic strength60,61. To investigate this point, we added either TTX or a mixture of CNQX and AP5, to block ionotropic glutamate receptors, immediately before adding the NX-1β ectodomain and compared these groups to neurons that were treated only with NX-1βe for 2 h. Also in this independent experimental series 2 h of NX-1βe exposure—when added alone—reduced mEPSC frequency, and eEPSC amplitude (Fig. 5a,d). mEPSC amplitude and decay were unaffected (Fig. 5b,c). Strikingly, application of either TTX or CNQX/AP5 abrogated the effects of NX-1βe (Fig. 5a,d), indicating that neural activity and ionotropic glutamatergic neurotransmission are both prerequisites for long-term NX-1βe induced homeostatic down-regulation of synaptic strength.
Application of hypertonic sucrose solution can be used to probe the readily-releasable pool (RRP) of vesicles62. The Rosenmund and Stevens experiments showed that the RRP was depressed in neurons treated with long-term NX-1βe (Fig. 5e), while the vesicular release probability (eEPSC charge divided by the sucrose pool) remained unchanged (Fig. 5f. The same was found in another independent set of experiments (Supplementary Fig. S7e,f; The reduction in RRP was complete within 2 h of exposure to NX-1βe and did not change, even when NX-1βe was present continuously for 10 days (Supplementary Fig. S7e,f). This reduction of RRP size sufficiently explains the inhibition of spontaneous and evoked synaptic transmission caused by long-term NX-1βe exposure.
Overall, these results show that the calcium dependent increase in vesicular release probability induced by acute addition of NX-1βe leads to a secondary long-term activity-dependent down-regulation of the RRP.
Endogenous metalloproteases and α-secretases regulate the size of the readily-releasable pool
If shedding of ectodomains from endogenous proteins (including, but not limited to, NX-1β) is involved in setting the synaptic strength in neuronal cultures, then blocking metalloproteases to prevent shedding should induce compensation of the synaptic strength in the opposite direction. We therefore incubated mouse autaptic cultures (DIV 12–14 days) overnight with two broad-spectrum metalloprotease inhibitors, GM6001 (38 µM) and TAPI-1 (30 µM), which have been shown to prevent NX-1β (and NL-1) ectodomain shedding35. Other culture dishes from the same neuronal preparations were incubated only with NX-1βe, or left as controls. Strikingly, metalloprotease inhibitors caused an increase in mEPSC frequency, eEPSC amplitude and RRP size beyond control values (Fig. 6a–c), whereas NX-1βe again caused a decrease in those parameters (see Supplementary Fig. S8 for additional parameters from this experiment, and Supplementary Fig. S9 for similar findings in rat neurons). Immunostaining of neurons for synaptophysin and MAP2 did not show any significant differences in synaptic number or dendritic branching after overnight exposure to NX-1βe, or GM6001/TAPI-1 (Supplementary Fig. S10). These findings are consistent with the notion that regulated shedding of endogeneous ectodomains can be involved in bidirectional alterations of synaptic strength.
We next investigated whether NL-1 is a prerequisite for the physiological effects of the NX-1βe and the effect of metalloprotease inhibitors. Notably, all effects were abolished in neurons cultured from NL-1 KO mice (Fig. 6a–c). These data show that NL-1 is an obligatory intermediary key player for metalloproteases to modulate presynaptic strength, both acutely and during long-term exposure. However, it does not rule out that other metalloprotease targets—of which there are many in the synapse41—could also be required.
Discussion
This study delineates roles for the NX-1β ectodomain in neuronal development (dendrite formation and neuronal survival), and in acute and chronic modulation of synaptic transmission (temporarily increasing presynaptic efficacy, while concurrently triggering down-regulation of the RRP to rebalance synaptic strength).
Neurite outgrowth is a complex process accompanying neuronal differentiation. This process involves different CAMs (e.g. NCAM, N-cadherin and L1) and neurotrophic factors (e.g. NGF and BDNF) and leads to intracellular events, including activation of receptor tyrosine kinases, Ca2+-influx, inhibition of actin-capping proteins and altered actin dynamics63,64. Our data obtained from immature neurons indicate that NX-1β and NL-1 expressed before synaptogenesis45 can be recruited for neuritogenesis. Indeed, it has been shown that NL-1 with the B-insert induces neurite outgrowth through interaction with NX-165. Reciprocally, we show here that the soluble NX-1β ectodomain without the SS4 insert strongly induced neuritogenesis in NL-1-expressing hippocampal neurons. Interestingly, both dose–response curves are bell-shaped (present study and50,65), and thus the effect is not apparent at 1 nM NX-1βe (Fig. 1a) or 10 nM soluble NL-165. Previous experiments did not report NX-1βe-induced neurite outgrowth22,59, consistent with the higher concentrations used in those studies. This result together with the fact that the employed NX-1βe is a dimer (a FC-chimera) and the finding that tetrameric and dimeric Neurexide were more effective than monomeric peptide indicates that clustering of NL-1 (or NX-1β65), is involved. Using Fura-imaging we show that NX-1βe induces Ca2+-influx via mechanisms that include N-type Ca2+ channels, and blocking N-type Ca2+-channels abolishes the neuritogenic effect of NX-1βe. Ca2+-influx has repeatedly been implicated in supporting growth of neurites66–68, and thus, clustering of NL-1 might act as a gatekeeper mechanism to allow localized Ca2+-influx to stimulate formation of dendrites in the part of the neuron where NL-1 is ligated. The complementary data obtained with soluble NL-1 (NX-1-dependent outgrowth of axons65) and NX-1βe/Neurexide [NL-1 dependent outgrowth of dendrites (Supplementary Fig. S3)] is parallel to previous findings, that NL-1 binding to NX-1β induces presynaptic specializations69, and that binding of NXs to NLs induces post-synaptic specializations21. Our data thus indicate that even before synaptogenesis, NL-1 and NX-1β can stimulate neurite outgrowth. These data were obtained in vitro and it should be stressed that in vivo there are likely many redundant pathways for synaptogenesis and neurite outgrowth, some of which are independent of NXs and NLs.
In developing cultured neurons, postsynaptic NL-1 enhanced the size of the RRP27, whereas cleaving of NL-1 led to a decrease in release probability (increase in PPR) within 30 min40. Notably, we show here that the acute application of NX-1βe or Neurexide to neurons that have already formed functional synapses increases synaptic release probability (decreases PPR) and increases mEPSC frequency within a few seconds in a NL-1 dependent manner. Two different NL-1 binding compounds (NX-1βe or Neurexide), which are produced using different protocols elicits identical results, which are abolished in NL-1 KO cells, and depends on NMDA-receptors. The two latter findings—and the known interaction between NL-1 and NMDA-receptors—make it likely that NX-1βe acts at least in part via binding to NL-1. However, it should be kept in mind that there are many other interaction partners of NX-1β (see “Introduction”), and they typically bind via sites that overlap with the NL-1 binding site. It is therefore possible that other NX binding partners are also required for the effect seen.
A generalized adaptation of both pre- and postsynaptic Ca2+-homeostasis seems to underlie the NX-1βe-dependent effects of synaptic release. We show that NX-1βe causes acute Ca2+-influx and that blocking NMDA receptors blocks the effect of NX-1βe on presynaptic release. Using presynaptic Ca2+-imaging, we found a small change in presynaptic Ca2+-homeostasis upon NX-1β application, suggesting that the mechanism could involve a direct (NL-1 dependent) effect on presynaptic boutons or involve a retrograde signal that travels from the post- to the presynapse to trigger changes in [Ca2+]presynaptic. Since the effect of neurexin ectodomain or neurexide application was acute and appeared within a few seconds, it can be effectively ruled out that Ca2+ or another signal could diffuse intracellularly from the postsynaptic to the presynaptic side to elicit the effect. The effects on presynaptic release could be blocked by inhibiting NMDA-receptors and might involve NMDA-receptors on either the postsynaptic or the presynaptic side56 of the synapse; neurexin ectodomain might interact with either or both upon binding to NL-1 in the synapse. Interestingly, it has been found that dopamine acting on D1-receptors can stimulate Ca2+-influx through NMDA-receptors in D2R-neurons in a reaction that requires metalloproteinase activity in an intermediate step70. Furthermore, NX-1β has been shown to regulate presynaptic calcium channels via a retrograde synaptic endocannabinoid signaling pathway32. NX-1βe does not contain the C-terminal end of Neurexin, and Neurexide, which only contains the minimal NL-1 binding sequence, elicited a similar effect. Thus, the cytoplasmic tail of neurexin is not required for NX:NL-dependent strengthening of the presynapse, just as it is dispensable for synapse formation71. It is in principle possible that application of NX-1βe could break up existing NX:NL-dimers, leading to relaxation of a persistent presynaptic inhibition by the cytoplasmic neurexin-tail. Alternatively, or in addition, the acute increase in postsynaptic [Ca2+]i upon NX-1βe application might represent a further augmentation of a signaling process already going on tonically32,55,72,73.
Whereas short-term exposure to NX-1βe increases the release probability, longer-term treatment results in a decrease in the RRP, which is complete within 2 h. A significant effect on mEPSC amplitude was seen in one experiment (Supplementary Fig. S8), but not in others (Supplementary Fig. S7, Fig. 5b). This indicates that the effects were predominantly presynaptic. The fact that the down-regulation is abolished in the NL-1 KO, by blocking ionotropic glutamatergic transmission, or by inhibiting activity with TTX, suggests that it is a downstream consequence of the initial synaptic strengthening induced by NX-1βe, rather than a separate phenomenon. The activity dependent reduction in RRP size is the hallmark of presynaptic homeostatic mechanisms61,74,75, which counteracts the short-term NX-1βe-induced increase in release probability. Previously, a role for α-NXs in synaptic homeostasis at the mouse neuromuscular junction has been described76. Our data imply the acute effects of NX-1βe on synaptic function can be similarly controlled using homeostatic mechanisms in central synapses.
This mechanism might explain the reduction in RRP size upon K+-depolarization in autaptic hippocampal neurons77, which indeed is also expected to lead to increased Ca2+ influx, and activity-induced enhancement of metalloprotease activity35,40,78. Either K+ or NX-1βe application will increase synaptic transmission and activity, which might stimulate metalloproteases to cleave NL-135. This suggestion aligns with data indicating presynaptic down-regulation upon acute cleavage of NL-140 and also with the increase in eEPSC size and presynaptic vesicle pool seen upon NL-1 overexpression26,27,30. Consistent with this model we show that overnight incubation with a mixture of two metalloprotease inhibitors induces an increase in RRP and eEPSCs size. Metalloproteases are likely to cleave many different synaptic proteins; however, strikingly we found that they did not modulate synaptic function in NL-1 KO neurons, indicating that NL-1 is a necessary component—not necessarily the only one—for their action in cultured neurons.
Collectively, our findings provide evidence for the involvement of the NX-1β ectodomain in neurite formation and in acute and chronic regulation of synaptic transmission. Using a synthetic peptide, modeled based on the minimal NL-1 binding sequence, Neurexide, we show that this effect can be mimicked by pharmacological manipulation. This adds to mounting evidence that NXs are intricately involved in synaptic plasticity mechanisms.
Methods
Animal experiments
Permission to keep and breed knockout mice for this study was obtained from The Danish Animal Experiments Inspectorate. Neuroligin-1 KO mice25 were kindly provided by Dr. Nils Brose (Max-Planck-Institute for Experimental Biology, Göttingen), and maintained in the heterozygous condition. Heterozygous crosses were used to recover knockout animals (NL-1 KO). All animals used for experiments were genotyped using a PCR-protocol79. All animals were maintained in an AAALAC-accredited stable and all protocols were performed in accordance with institutional guidelines as overseen and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Copenhagen. Adult mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation; embryos were sacrificed by decapitation.
Peptides and proteins
The Neurexide peptide (ARPSTRADRA) was synthesized as a monomer, a dimer or a tetramer coupled to a lysine backbone. Scrambled (RDATAPRSAR, DARRSATARP), reversed (ARDARTSPRA), and alanine-substituted derivatives of Neurexide were synthesized as tetramers (> 80% purity; Schafer-N, Copenhagen, Denmark). Human neurexin-1β Fc-chimera (NX-1βe) contained two ectodomains and was obtained from R&D Systems (Cat#:5268-NX, Minneapolis, MN, USA).
Primary hippocampal and cerebellar granule neuron cultures for neurite outgrowth and neuronal survival
Hippocampal neurons were isolated from Wistar rats on embryonic day 19 or C57Bl6 mice on embryonic day 18 (Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany) essentially as previously described64,80. Cerebellar granule neurons were isolated from Wistar rats on postnatal day 7, as described80. In short, dissociated cultures of neurons were seeded on LabTek Permanox slides (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) at a density of 12,500 cells/cm2 on top of a confluent monolayer of mouse fibroblastoid L929 cells to improve the survival of electroporated cells (NL-1 knockdown cultures; DIV1), or directly on poly-l-lysine (wildtype cultures used for neurite outgrowth analysis; DIV1 and wildtype cultures used for morphological analysis; and DIV7 cultures) as previously described81. The cultures were incubated in neurobasal medium supplemented with 2% (v/v) B27, 0.4% (w/v) BSA, 2 mM GlutaMAX, 20 mM HEPES, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (all purchased from Gibco BRL, Paisly, UK) at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Immediately after seeding, soluble NX-1β or Neurexide (see below) was added to the cultures. For knockdown of Neuroligin-1 (NL-1) expression, the neurons were transfected with a p-GFP-V-RS vector that encodes short-hairpin RNA targeting NL-1 (OriGene, Rockville, MD, USA) using a nucleofector device and a Rat Neuron Nucleofector kit (Amaxa, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), and seeded in neurobasal A medium supplemented with 5% (v/v) horse serum, 2% (v/v) B27, 2 mM GlutaMAX, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 100 U/ml penicillin and 2.5 μg/ml fungizone for 24 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2. As a control, neurons were transfected with a pGFP-V-RS vector that encodes scrambled short-hairpin RNA. Only cells positive for GFP fluorescence were analyzed. Pharmacological inhibitors were added to the cultures 10 min prior to the addition of 42 pM soluble NX-1β or 17 µM Neurexide. ω-Conotoxin MVIIA (Nordic Biosite, Täby, Sweden) was used to inhibit N-type voltage-dependent calcium channels. Ryanodine and Xestospongin C (both from Merck) were used to inhibit intracellular Ca2+ release.
Analysis of neuronal survival
Potassium deprivation
Cerebellar granule neurons were seeded at a density of 62,500 cells/cm2 in eight-well poly-d-lysine (0.01 μg/cm2)-coated LabTek Permanox slides (Nunc) and grown for 7 days at 37 °C and 5% CO282. Apoptosis was induced by reducing the potassium levels in the medium from 40 to 5 mM and increasing concentrations of NX-1βe or Neurexide were added. Forty-eight hours later, the cells were fixated, stained and numbers of survived neurons was determined as previously described82.
Oxidative stress
Hippocampal neurons were grown as described for the potassium deprivation model. On DIV 7, NX-1βe or Neurexide were added. One hour later, H2O2 (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to a final concentration of 60 µM, and the cultures were incubated for 24 h, fixated, stained, and analyzed similarly to the potassium deprivation model.
Analysis of neurite outgrowth
The DIV1 neuronal cultures (Figs. 1a–c, 2c–f and Supplementary Fig. S1a–c, S2b–f) were fixed in PBS with 3.7% formaldehyde and immunostained with rabbit anti-growth-associated protein (GAP)-43 antibody (Millipore, Bioscience Research Reagents, Denmark), visualized with Alexa-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (Invitrogen, Denmark), and micrographs were recorded using a systematic random mode and evaluated as previously described64,83.
The DIV7 cultures (Supplementary Fig. S3) were fixed and immunostained with either mouse anti-MAP2 antibody diluted 1:400 (BD Pharmingen, CA, USA) or mouse anti-SMI312 antibody diluted 1:1000 (Covance, Princeton, NJ, USA), visualized with Alexa-conjugated goat anti-mouse (Invitrogen), and mounted with antifade mounting medium (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Micrographs were recorded and evaluated as for the DIV1 cultures.
Surface plasmon resonance analysis
The analysis was performed with a Biacore 2000 machine (GE Healthcare, Hilleroed, Denmark). NL-1 (cat#4340-NL; R&D Systems) was immobilized on a CM4 sensor chip using an amine coupling kit (GE Healthcare). Immobilization was performed at 5 µl/min, and the activation and deactivation time was 7 min. Injections of 45 μl NL-1 (0.033 μg/μl) in 10 mM sodium-acetate, pH 4.0, resulted in immobilization of ~ 2800 resonance units (RU). The analysis was performed at 25 °C using Ca2+-supplemented HBS-P (10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 0.005% (v/v) Surfactant P20, 3 mM CaCl2) as running buffer for analysis of NX-1β or Neurexide binding to NL-1. The NX-1β Fc chimera (0.05–0.8 μM) or Neurexide (1.25–20 µM) was diluted in running buffer, and injected at a flow rate of 30 μl/min. Regeneration was performed with an injection of 15 μl of 1 M NaCl2. The data were analyzed by non-linear curve fitting using the software package BIAevaluation v.4 (GE Healthcare). The curves were fitted to a 1:1 Langmuir binding model, and rate and equilibrium constants were calculated.
Primary hippocampal cultures for electrophysiology
Hippocampi were dissected from embryonic day 19 Wistar rat (Charles River) or embryonic day 18 neuroligin-1 null mutant (−/−) mice and control littermates (+/+). Hippocampal neurons were plated at 2500/cm2 on micro islands of mouse (NMRI) glia, as described84. Glial islands were obtained by first coating glass coverslips with 0.15% agarose. After drying and UV sterilization custom-made rubber stamps were used to print dots (islands) using a substrate mixture containing 0.25 mg/ml rat tail collagen and 0.4 mg/ml poly-d-lysine dissolved in 17 mM acetic acid; glial cells were plated at 4800/cm2 two days before use, ensuring confluent coverage of microdot islands. Soluble NX-1β (R&D Systems) was applied at a concentration of 5 ng/ml in long-term (> 10 days, added on DIV1), short-term (~ 2 h) and acute application experiments. Neurexide tetramer was applied at an end-concentration of 47.6 µg/ml. Matrix metalloprotease mixture was added 16 h before recording and contained GM6001 (38 µM, Millipore) and TAPI-1 (30 µM, Calbiochem).
Neuronal morphology
At DIV9 autaptic hippocampal neurons were treated with soluble NX-1βe, or the matrix metalloprotease mixture (see above), and fixed at DIV10 for 15 min in PBS with 4% paraformaldehyde. Cells were permeabilized for 10 min with 0.02% Tween-20 in PBS (PBST), and incubated for 1 h with blocking solution (4% normal goat serum in PBST). The fixed neurons were incubated overnight at 4 °C with monoclonal anti-Synaptophysin-1 (Synaptic Systems, cat no. 101011, 1:750), and chicken polyclonal anti-MAP2 (Abcam, cat no. ab5392, 1:1500) antibodies. After washing, cells were incubated for 1.5 h with Alexa-labeled secondary antibodies [Molecular Probes, goat anti-chicken (cat no. A-11039, 1:1000), goat anti-mouse (cat no. A-21235, 1:1000)], and mounted on glass slides with FluorSave. Confocal images of autaptic neurons were recorded using a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal laser point scanning system (Zeiss, 20×/0.8 air objective, 488 nm laser Argon 25 mW, 633 nm laser NeHe 5 mW). A (semi)-automated analysis routine in MATLAB (Synapse and neurite detection, SynD) was used to examine dendritic arborization and synapse density/localization85.
Electrophysiological recordings
Isolated neurons cultured from embryonic Wistar rats, NL-1 KO mice and their wildtype littermates were recorded on DIV10-14. The patch pipette solution contained (in mM): 136 KCl, 18 HEPES, 4 Na-ATP, 4.6 MgCl2, 4 K2-ATP, 15 Creatine Phosphate, 1 EGTA and 50 U/ml Phosphocreatine Kinase (300 mOsm, pH 7.30). The standard external medium used contained 2 mM/2 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ [in mM: 140 NaCl, 2.4 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 14 Glucose (300 mOsm, pH 7.30)]. Cells were whole-cell voltage clamped at − 70 mV with a double EPC-10 amplifier (HEKA Elektronik, Lambrecht/Pfalz, Germany) under control of Patchmaster v2x32 software (HEKA Elektronik). Currents were low-pass filtered at 3 kHz and stored at 20 kHz. Patch pipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass using a multi-step puller (P-897; Sutter Instruments). Pipette resistance ranged from 3 to 5 MΩ and was compensated to 85%. Only cells with series resistances < 15 MΩ were included in analysis. All recordings were made at room temperature. EPSCs were evoked by depolarizing the cell from − 70 to 0 mV for 2 ms. A fast local multi-barrel perfusion system (Warner SF-77B, Warner Instruments) was used to establish acute application of NX-1βe or Neurexide. For dendritic Ca2+-measurements in mature neurons Fura-2 (200 µM) was added to the internal medium and infused for ~ 20 min to allow optimal infusion. Neurons used for presynaptic Ca2+-measurements were transduced with syGCaMP258 expressing lentiviral particles on DIV1 and recorded on DIV 10–14. Experiments were conducted in regular external recording medium on an inverted Zeiss Axiovert 200 microscope equipped with an F-Fluar 40×/1,30 numerical aperture oil-immersion objective (Carl Zeiss Microscopy). Fluorophores were excited by a monochromator (Polychrome V, TILL Photonics) controlled by TILLVision, and images (1376 × 1040 pixels) were acquired with a cooled digital 12-bit CCD camera (SensiCam, PCO-Tech). A custom analysis procedure in Igor Pro (Wavemetrics Inc.) was used for offline analysis of evoked and sucrose responses. Spontaneous events were detected using Mini Analysis program (Synaptosoft). Fiji (ImageJ) was used for analysis of fluorescence data.
Ca2+-measurements in immature rat neurons
Rat neurons were prepared as described above (primary hippocampal and cerebellar granule neuron cultures for neurite outgrowth and neuronal survival). After 24 h the neuronal cultures were treated with 6 µM Fura-2AM (Sigma) for 30 min at 37 °C and 5% CO2 (dark). After incubation with Fura-2AM the cells were washed 2 times with prewarmed supplemented neurobasal medium. After washing the treated cells were put back into the incubator for 10 min at 37 °C and 5% CO2 (dark) to complete enzymatic removal of the acetoxymethyl (AM) group of internalized Fura-2AM. Imaging experiments were conducted on the experimental setup described above, but without patching the cells. Bath applications were performed using a local gravity-driven perfusion system.
Statistics and graphical presentation
For neuronal outgrowth data, n denotes the number of cultures; a minimum of 150 neurons per condition were included. For electrophysiological recordings, the results are shown as average ± SEM with n referring to the number of cells for each group unless otherwise stated. When comparing two groups, the variances were first compared using an F test. In case of homoscedastic data (F test insignificant), we tested differences between group means using a Student's t test. In case of heteroscedastic data (F test significant), we tested difference between group medians using a Mann–Whitney U test. Significance was assumed when p < 0.05. Graphical presentation and statistical testing was performed using SigmaPlot 12.3 (Systat Software Inc). In figures, the significance levels are indicated by asterisks (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001).
For neurite outgrowth and neuronal survival, the statistical analyses and graphical presentations were performed using Prism software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). Differences between groups were analyzed using two-tailed Student’s t test or one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test. The data are presented as mean ± SEM. Significance differences from designated controls are indicated by asterisks (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge A.M.N. Petersen for excellent technical assistance and Nils Brose for providing Neuroligin-1 KO mice. The authors are indebted to Vladimir Berezin, who initiated the investigation, but passed away during the project period.
Author contributions
Conception and design of research: K.W., T.L.T.-B., E.B., and J.B.S.; conduction of the experiments: K.W., T.L.T.-B., C.R.P., E.P., I.K., J.N., M.L.B., A.B.K., S.O., M.G., and M.S.; analysis of data: K.W., T.L.T.-B., C.R.P., E.P., I.K., J.N., M.L.B., A.B.K., S.O., M.G., and M.S; interpretation of results: K.W., T.L.T.-B., E.B., and J.B.S.; preparation of figures: T.L.T.-B and K.W.; drafting, editing and revising manuscript: T.L.T.-B., K.W., C.R.G., and J.B.S.
Competing interests
E.B. is shareholder of Neoloch Aps, which was a partner of the FP7 European Union collaborative project MemStick. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all policies on sharing data and materials. All other authors declare not having any competing financial interests. This work was supported by grants from the Lundbeck Foundation, the Lundbeck Foundation Center for Biomembranes in Nanomedicine, the Independent Research Fund Denmark, the Novo Nordisk Foundation, FP7 European Union collaborative project MemStick (Grant Agreement No. 201600), large integrating project “SynSys” (Grant Agreement HEALTH-F2-2009-242167) and the COST action BM1001 “Brain Extracellular Matrix in Health and Disease”.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Keimpe D. B. Wierda and Trine L. Toft-Bertelsen.
Contributor Information
Keimpe D. B. Wierda, Email: keimpe.wierda@kuleuven.be
Trine L. Toft-Bertelsen, Email: trineto@sund.ku.dk
Jakob B. Sørensen, Email: jakobbs@sund.ku.dk
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-75047-z.
References
- 1.Sudhof TC. Synaptic neurexin complexes: a molecular code for the logic of neural circuits. Cell. 2017;171:745–769. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Reissner C, Runkel F, Missler M. Neurexins. Genome Biol. 2013;14:213. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-9-213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ushkaryov YA, Petrenko AG, Geppert M, Sudhof TC. Neurexins: synaptic cell surface proteins related to the alpha-latrotoxin receptor and laminin. Science. 1992;257:50–56. doi: 10.1126/science.1621094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ushkaryov YA, Sudhof TC. Neurexin III alpha: extensive alternative splicing generates membrane-bound and soluble forms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993;90:6410–6414. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.14.6410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Treutlein B, Gokce O, Quake SR, Sudhof TC. Cartography of neurexin alternative splicing mapped by single-molecule long-read mRNA sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014;111:E1291–E1299. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1403244111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ullrich B, Ushkaryov YA, Sudhof TC. Cartography of neurexins: more than 1000 isoforms generated by alternative splicing and expressed in distinct subsets of neurons. Neuron. 1995;14:497–507. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90306-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kim JA, Kim D, Won SY, Han KA, Park D, Cho E, Yun N, An HJ, Um JW, Kim E, Lee JO, Ko J, Kim HM. Structural insights into modulation of neurexin-neuroligin trans-synaptic adhesion by MDGA1/neuroligin-2 complex. Neuron. 2017;94(1121–1131):e1126. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.05.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.de Wit J, Sylwestrak E, O'Sullivan ML, Otto S, Tiglio K, Savas JN, Yates JR, 3rd, Comoletti D, Taylor P, Ghosh A. LRRTM2 interacts with Neurexin1 and regulates excitatory synapse formation. Neuron. 2009;64:799–806. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.12.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ichtchenko K, Hata Y, Nguyen T, Ullrich B, Missler M, Moomaw C, Sudhof TC. Neuroligin 1: a splice site-specific ligand for beta-neurexins. Cell. 1995;81:435–443. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90396-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ko J, Fuccillo MV, Malenka RC, Sudhof TC. LRRTM2 functions as a neurexin ligand in promoting excitatory synapse formation. Neuron. 2009;64:791–798. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.12.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Krueger DD, Tuffy LP, Papadopoulos T, Brose N. The role of neurexins and neuroligins in the formation, maturation, and function of vertebrate synapses. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2012;22:412–422. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schroeder A, Vanderlinden J, Vints K, Ribeiro LF, Vennekens KM, Gounko NV, Wierda KD, de Wit J. A modular organization of LRR protein-mediated synaptic adhesion defines synapse identity. Neuron. 2018;99(329–344):e327. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shen K, Scheiffele P. Genetics and cell biology of building specific synaptic connectivity. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2010;33:473–507. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Siddiqui TJ, Pancaroglu R, Kang Y, Rooyakkers A, Craig AM. LRRTMs and neuroligins bind neurexins with a differential code to cooperate in glutamate synapse development. J. Neurosci. 2010;30:7495–7506. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0470-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sudhof TC. Neuroligins and neurexins link synaptic function to cognitive disease. Nature. 2008;455:903–911. doi: 10.1038/nature07456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Boucard AA, Ko J, Sudhof TC. High affinity neurexin binding to cell adhesion G-protein-coupled receptor CIRL1/latrophilin-1 produces an intercellular adhesion complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:9399–9413. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.318659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Uemura T, Lee SJ, Yasumura M, Takeuchi T, Yoshida T, Ra M, Taguchi R, Sakimura K, Mishina M. Trans-synaptic interaction of GluRdelta2 and Neurexin through Cbln1 mediates synapse formation in the cerebellum. Cell. 2010;141:1068–1079. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Reissner C, Stahn J, Breuer D, Klose M, Pohlentz G, Mormann M, Missler M. Dystroglycan binding to alpha-neurexin competes with neurexophilin-1 and neuroligin in the brain. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:27585–27603. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.595413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang C, Atasoy D, Arac D, Yang X, Fucillo MV, Robison AJ, Ko J, Brunger AT, Sudhof TC. Neurexins physically and functionally interact with GABA(A) receptors. Neuron. 2010;66:403–416. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cheng SB, Amici SA, Ren XQ, McKay SB, Treuil MW, Lindstrom JM, Rao J, Anand R. Presynaptic targeting of alpha4beta 2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors is regulated by neurexin-1beta. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:23251–23259. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.017384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Graf ER, Zhang X, Jin SX, Linhoff MW, Craig AM. Neurexins induce differentiation of GABA and glutamate postsynaptic specializations via neuroligins. Cell. 2004;119:1013–1026. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Scheiffele P, Fan J, Choih J, Fetter R, Serafini T. Neuroligin expressed in nonneuronal cells triggers presynaptic development in contacting axons. Cell. 2000;101:657–669. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80877-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tsetsenis T, Boucard AA, Arac D, Brunger AT, Sudhof TC. Direct visualization of trans-synaptic neurexin-neuroligin interactions during synapse formation. J. Neurosci. 2014;34:15083–15096. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0348-14.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Missler M, Zhang W, Rohlmann A, Kattenstroth G, Hammer RE, Gottmann K, Sudhof TC. Alpha-neurexins couple Ca2+ channels to synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Nature. 2003;423:939–948. doi: 10.1038/nature01755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Varoqueaux F, Aramuni G, Rawson RL, Mohrmann R, Missler M, Gottmann K, Zhang W, Sudhof TC, Brose N. Neuroligins determine synapse maturation and function. Neuron. 2006;51:741–754. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Futai K, Kim MJ, Hashikawa T, Scheiffele P, Sheng M, Hayashi Y. Retrograde modulation of presynaptic release probability through signaling mediated by PSD-95-neuroligin. Nat. Neurosci. 2007;10:186–195. doi: 10.1038/nn1837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wittenmayer N, Korber C, Liu H, Kremer T, Varoqueaux F, Chapman ER, Brose N, Kuner T, Dresbach T. Postsynaptic Neuroligin1 regulates presynaptic maturation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009;106:13564–13569. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905819106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hu Z, Hom S, Kudze T, Tong XJ, Choi S, Aramuni G, Zhang W, Kaplan JM. Neurexin and neuroligin mediate retrograde synaptic inhibition in C. elegans. Science. 2012;337:980–984. doi: 10.1126/science.1224896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tong XJ, Lopez-Soto EJ, Li L, Liu H, Nedelcu D, Lipscombe D, Hu Z, Kaplan JM. Retrograde synaptic inhibition is mediated by alpha-neurexin binding to the alpha2delta subunits of N-type calcium channels. Neuron. 2017;95:326–340 e325. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chubykin AA, Atasoy D, Etherton MR, Brose N, Kavalali ET, Gibson JR, Sudhof TC. Activity-dependent validation of excitatory versus inhibitory synapses by neuroligin-1 versus neuroligin-2. Neuron. 2007;54:919–931. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fang M, Wei JL, Tang B, Liu J, Chen L, Tang ZH, Luo J, Chen GJ, Wang XF. Neuroligin-1 knockdown suppresses seizure activity by regulating neuronal hyperexcitability. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016;53:270–284. doi: 10.1007/s12035-014-8999-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Anderson GR, Aoto J, Tabuchi K, Foldy C, Covy J, Yee AX, Wu D, Lee SJ, Chen L, Malenka RC, Sudhof TC. beta-Neurexins control neural circuits by regulating synaptic endocannabinoid signaling. Cell. 2015;162:593–606. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bot N, Schweizer C, Ben Halima S, Fraering PC. Processing of the synaptic cell adhesion molecule neurexin-3beta by Alzheimer disease alpha- and gamma-secretases. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:2762–2773. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.142521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Saura CA, Servian-Morilla E, Scholl FG. Presenilin/gamma-secretase regulates neurexin processing at synapses. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e19430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Suzuki K, Hayashi Y, Nakahara S, Kumazaki H, Prox J, Horiuchi K, Zeng M, Tanimura S, Nishiyama Y, Osawa S, Sehara-Fujisawa A, Saftig P, Yokoshima S, Fukuyama T, Matsuki N, Koyama R, Tomita T, Iwatsubo T. Activity-dependent proteolytic cleavage of neuroligin-1. Neuron. 2012;76:410–422. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Trotter JH, Hao J, Maxeiner S, Tsetsenis T, Liu Z, Zhuang X, Sudhof TC. Synaptic neurexin-1 assembles into dynamically regulated active zone nanoclusters. J. Cell Biol. 2019;218:2677–2698. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201812076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Conant K, Allen M, Lim ST. Activity dependent CAM cleavage and neurotransmission. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015;9:305. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hinkle CL, Diestel S, Lieberman J, Maness PF. Metalloprotease-induced ectodomain shedding of neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) J. Neurobiol. 2006;66:1378–1395. doi: 10.1002/neu.20257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hubschmann MV, Skladchikova G, Bock E, Berezin V. Neural cell adhesion molecule function is regulated by metalloproteinase-mediated ectodomain release. J. Neurosci. Res. 2005;80:826–837. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Peixoto RT, Kunz PA, Kwon H, Mabb AM, Sabatini BL, Philpot BD, Ehlers MD. Transsynaptic signaling by activity-dependent cleavage of neuroligin-1. Neuron. 2012;76:396–409. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shinoe T, Goda Y. Tuning synapses by proteolytic remodeling of the adhesive surface. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2015;35:148–155. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2015.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shoval I, Ludwig A, Kalcheim C. Antagonistic roles of full-length N-cadherin and its soluble BMP cleavage product in neural crest delamination. Development. 2007;134:491–501. doi: 10.1242/dev.02742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chen X, Liu H, Shim AH, Focia PJ, He X. Structural basis for synaptic adhesion mediated by neuroligin-neurexin interactions. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008;15:50–56. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Shen KC, Kuczynska DA, Wu IJ, Murray BH, Sheckler LR, Rudenko G. Regulation of neurexin 1beta tertiary structure and ligand binding through alternative splicing. Structure. 2008;16:422–431. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2008.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Dong H, Xiang YY, Farchi N, Ju W, Wu Y, Chen L, Wang Y, Hochner B, Yang B, Soreq H, Lu WY. Excessive expression of acetylcholinesterase impairs glutamatergic synaptogenesis in hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci. 2004;24:8950–8960. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2106-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Leclerc C, Neant I, Moreau M. The calcium: an early signal that initiates the formation of the nervous system during embryogenesis. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2012;5:3. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2012.00064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ditlevsen DK, Berezin V, Bock E. Signalling pathways underlying neural cell adhesion molecule-mediated survival of dopaminergic neurons. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2007;25:1678–1684. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05436.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hulley P, Schachner M, Lubbert H. L1 neural cell adhesion molecule is a survival factor for fetal dopaminergic neurons. J. Neurosci. Res. 1998;53:129–134. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19980715)53:2<129::AID-JNR1>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dmytriyeva O, Pankratova S, Owczarek S, Sonn K, Soroka V, Ridley CM, Marsolais A, Lopez-Hoyos M, Ambartsumian N, Lukanidin E, Bock E, Berezin V, Kiryushko D. The metastasis-promoting S100A4 protein confers neuroprotection in brain injury. Nat. Commun. 2012;3:1197. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kohler LB, Soroka V, Korshunova I, Berezin V, Bock E. A peptide derived from a trans-homophilic binding site in neural cell adhesion molecule induces neurite outgrowth and neuronal survival. J. Neurosci. Res. 2010;88:2165–2176. doi: 10.1002/jnr.22380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Arac D, Boucard AA, Ozkan E, Strop P, Newell E, Sudhof TC, Brunger AT. Structures of neuroligin-1 and the neuroligin-1/neurexin-1 beta complex reveal specific protein-protein and protein–Ca2+ interactions. Neuron. 2007;56:992–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Fabrichny IP, Leone P, Sulzenbacher G, Comoletti D, Miller MT, Taylor P, Bourne Y, Marchot P. Structural analysis of the synaptic protein neuroligin and its beta-neurexin complex: determinants for folding and cell adhesion. Neuron. 2007;56:979–991. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wierda KD, Sorensen JB. Innervation by a GABAergic neuron depresses spontaneous release in glutamatergic neurons and unveils the clamping phenotype of synaptotagmin-1. J. Neurosci. 2014;34:2100–2110. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3934-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zucker RS, Regehr WG. Short-term synaptic plasticity. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2002;64:355–405. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.092501.114547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Budreck EC, Kwon OB, Jung JH, Baudouin S, Thommen A, Kim HS, Fukazawa Y, Harada H, Tabuchi K, Shigemoto R, Scheiffele P, Kim JH. Neuroligin-1 controls synaptic abundance of NMDA-type glutamate receptors through extracellular coupling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013;110:725–730. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1214718110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gill I, Droubi S, Giovedi S, Fedder KN, Bury LA, Bosco F, Sceniak MP, Benfenati F, Sabo SL. Presynaptic NMDA receptors—dynamics and distribution in developing axons in vitro and in vivo. J. Cell Sci. 2015;128:768–780. doi: 10.1242/jcs.162362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zhang W, Rohlmann A, Sargsyan V, Aramuni G, Hammer RE, Sudhof TC, Missler M. Extracellular domains of alpha-neurexins participate in regulating synaptic transmission by selectively affecting N- and P/Q-type Ca2+ channels. J. Neurosci. 2005;25:4330–4342. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0497-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Dreosti E, Odermatt B, Dorostkar MM, Lagnado L. A genetically encoded reporter of synaptic activity in vivo. Nat. Methods. 2009;6:883–889. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Levinson JN, Chery N, Huang K, Wong TP, Gerrow K, Kang R, Prange O, Wang YT, El-Husseini A. Neuroligins mediate excitatory and inhibitory synapse formation: involvement of PSD-95 and neurexin-1beta in neuroligin-induced synaptic specificity. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:17312–17319. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413812200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Pozo K, Goda Y. Unraveling mechanisms of homeostatic synaptic plasticity. Neuron. 2010;66:337–351. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Turrigiano GG. The self-tuning neuron: synaptic scaling of excitatory synapses. Cell. 2008;135:422–435. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rosenmund C, Stevens CF. Definition of the readily releasable pool of vesicles at hippocampal synapses. Neuron. 1996;16:1197–1207. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80146-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Menna E, Fossati G, Scita G, Matteoli M. From filopodia to synapses: the role of actin-capping and anti-capping proteins. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2011;34:1655–1662. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07897.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Nielsen J, Gotfryd K, Li S, Kulahin N, Soroka V, Rasmussen KK, Bock E, Berezin V. Role of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF)-neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) interactions in induction of neurite outgrowth and identification of a binding site for NCAM in the heel region of GDNF. J. Neurosci. 2009;29:11360–11376. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3239-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Gjorlund MD, Nielsen J, Pankratova S, Li S, Korshunova I, Bock E, Berezin V. Neuroligin-1 induces neurite outgrowth through interaction with neurexin-1beta and activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor-1. FASEB J. 2012;26:4174–4186. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-202242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hong K, Nishiyama M, Henley J, Tessier-Lavigne M, Poo M. Calcium signalling in the guidance of nerve growth by netrin-1. Nature. 2000;403:93–98. doi: 10.1038/47507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Williams EJ, Furness J, Walsh FS, Doherty P. Characterisation of the second messenger pathway underlying neurite outgrowth stimulated by FGF. Development. 1994;120:1685–1693. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.6.1685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Zamburlin P, Ruffinatti FA, Gilardino A, Farcito S, Parrini M, Lovisolo D. Calcium signals and FGF-2 induced neurite growth in cultured parasympathetic neurons: spatial localization and mechanisms of activation. Pflugers Arch. 2013;465:1355–1370. doi: 10.1007/s00424-013-1257-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Dean C, Scholl FG, Choih J, DeMaria S, Berger J, Isacoff E, Scheiffele P. Neurexin mediates the assembly of presynaptic terminals. Nat. Neurosci. 2003;6:708–716. doi: 10.1038/nn1074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Li Y, Partridge J, Berger C, Sepulveda-Rodriguez A, Vicini S, Conant K. Dopamine increases NMDA-stimulated calcium flux in striatopallidal neurons through a matrix metalloproteinase-dependent mechanism. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2016;43:194–203. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Gokce O, Sudhof TC. Membrane-tethered monomeric neurexin LNS-domain triggers synapse formation. J. Neurosci. 2013;33:14617–14628. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1232-13.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Comoletti D, Grishaev A, Whitten AE, Tsigelny I, Taylor P, Trewhella J. Synaptic arrangement of the neuroligin/beta-neurexin complex revealed by X-ray and neutron scattering. Structure. 2007;15:693–705. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2007.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Shipman SL, Nicoll RA. Dimerization of postsynaptic neuroligin drives synaptic assembly via transsynaptic clustering of neurexin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012;109:19432–19437. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217633109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Thalhammer A, Cingolani LA. Cell adhesion and homeostatic synaptic plasticity. Neuropharmacology. 2013;78:23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Vitureira N, Goda Y. Cell biology in neuroscience: the interplay between Hebbian and homeostatic synaptic plasticity. J. Cell Biol. 2013;203:175–186. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201306030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Sons MS, Busche N, Strenzke N, Moser T, Ernsberger U, Mooren FC, Zhang W, Ahmad M, Steffens H, Schomburg ED, Plomp JJ, Missler M. alpha-Neurexins are required for efficient transmitter release and synaptic homeostasis at the mouse neuromuscular junction. Neuroscience. 2006;138:433–446. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.11.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Moulder KL, Jiang X, Taylor AA, Olney JW, Mennerick S. Physiological activity depresses synaptic function through an effect on vesicle priming. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:6618–6626. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5498-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Dziembowska M, Milek J, Janusz A, Rejmak E, Romanowska E, Gorkiewicz T, Tiron A, Bramham CR, Kaczmarek L. Activity-dependent local translation of matrix metalloproteinase-9. J. Neurosci. 2012;32:14538–14547. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6028-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Zeidan A, Ziv NE. Neuroligin-1 loss is associated with reduced tenacity of excitatory synapses. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e42314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Maar TE, Ronn LC, Bock E, Berezin V, Moran J, Pasantes-Morales H, Schousboe A. Characterization of microwell cultures of dissociated brain tissue for studies of cell-cell interactions. J. Neurosci. Res. 1997;47:163–172. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19970115)47:2<163::AID-JNR5>3.0.CO;2-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Hansen RK, Christensen C, Korshunova I, Kriebel M, Burkarth N, Kiselyov VV, Olsen M, Ostergaard S, Holm A, Volkmer H, Walmod PS, Berezin V, Bock E. Identification of NCAM-binding peptides promoting neurite outgrowth via a heterotrimeric G-protein-coupled pathway. J. Neurochem. 2007;103:1396–1407. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04894.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Neiiendam JL, Kohler LB, Christensen C, Li S, Pedersen MV, Ditlevsen DK, Kornum MK, Kiselyov VV, Berezin V, Bock E. An NCAM-derived FGF-receptor agonist, the FGL-peptide, induces neurite outgrowth and neuronal survival in primary rat neurons. J. Neurochem. 2004;91:920–935. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02779.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ronn LC, Ralets I, Hartz BP, Bech M, Berezin A, Berezin V, Moller A, Bock E. A simple procedure for quantification of neurite outgrowth based on stereological principles. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2000;100:25–32. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0270(00)00228-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Bekkers JM, Stevens CF. Excitatory and inhibitory autaptic currents in isolated hippocampal neurons maintained in cell culture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1991;88:7834–7838. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.17.7834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Schmitz SK, Hjorth JJ, Joemai RM, Wijntjes R, Eijgenraam S, de Bruijn P, Georgiou C, de Jong AP, van Ooyen A, Verhage M, Cornelisse LN, Toonen RF, Veldkamp WJ. Automated analysis of neuronal morphology, synapse number and synaptic recruitment. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2011;195:185–193. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.