Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Physiol. 2020 Aug 23;17:197–206. doi: 10.1016/j.cophys.2020.08.010

Regulation of Ca2+ exchanges and signaling in mitochondria

Edmund J Carvalho 1,2, Peter B Stathopulos 3, Muniswamy Madesh 1
PMCID: PMC7584127  NIHMSID: NIHMS1623704  PMID: 33103015

Abstract

Mitochondrial calcium (mCa2+) homeostasis also plays a key role in the buffering of cytosolic calcium (cCa2+) and calcium transported into the mitochondrial matrix regulates cellular metabolism, migration and cell fate decisions. Recent work has highlighted the importance of mCa2+ homeostasis in regulating cellular function. The discovery of the mCa2+ uptake complex has shed new light on the role of mCa2+ dynamics in cytoskeletal remodeling, mitochondrial shape and motility in cellular dynamics. Here we attempt to decipher the vast landscape of calcium regulatory effects of the mitochondria, the underlying mechanisms and the dynamics that control cellular function.

Introduction

Spatio-temporal regulation of cellular signals by the calcium ion (Ca2+) as a versatile second messenger is essential for a variety of kinetically different cellular processes from fertilization to cell death [1]. Temporally, short processes like endocytosis and long processes such as gene transcription are regulated by Ca2+. Intracellular Ca2+ signals are regulated by Ca2+ influx through the plasma membrane (PM) (extracellular [Ca2+] ~1 mM) [2] and Ca2+ release from intracellular stores, in particular from the Golgi ([Ca2+] ~300 μM) [3] and the ER ([Ca2+] ~200–650 μM [4]). Plasma membrane channels or release from intracellular Ca2+ stores cause a transient Cytosolic Ca2+(cCa2+) rise [5]. The main path for Ca2+ entry in non-excitable cells is (inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate) IP3-induced ER store release and store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE), allowing extracellular Ca2+ entry into the cell through plasma membrane localized Ca2+-activated Ca2+-release channels, made up of ORAI1/2/3 protein subunits and gated by interactions with STIM1/2, or TRPC (TRPC1–6).

Putney et al proposed capacitive calcium entry as a mechanism for receptor-regulated Ca2+ entry [5]. At any given point, resting cCa2+is kept low (below 100 nM), and this is achieved by Ca2+ efflux action of pumps, exchangers and organelles such as ER and the mitochondria, which act as Ca2+ sinks. To maintain the optimal cCa2+ concentration ([Ca2+] ~100nM), intracellular Ca2+ stores are constantly refilled while cCa2+ is extruded from the cell by the plasma membrane Ca2+ ATPase (PMCA) pump, exchangers and solute carriers. Intracellular Ca2+ is mainly stored in the ER lumen, which is constantly refilled by the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) pump [5]. Upon cell stimulation, cell surface receptors can activate phospholipase C (PLC), which hydrolyses the membrane phospholipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to form inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG). Subsequently, IP3 diffuses to the ER membrane, where it binds the IP3 receptor (IP3R), triggering Ca2+ release from the ER. ER Ca2+ can be released directly into the cytosol or into organelles such as mitochondria [6], in turn contributing to cellular Ca2+ homeostasis.

cCa2+ transients are defined and shaped by the mitochondria. The first observation of mitochondrial Ca2+ (mCa2+) uptake was evidenced five decades ago when several groups witnessed isolated mitochondria to buffer Ca2+ [5]. Since then, mCa2+ has been found to be utilized by the dehydrogenases of the TCA cycle (pyruvate dehydrogenase, iso-citrate dehydrogenase and α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase) for ATP generation, to shape cCa2+dynamics and to activate various cell death pathways [7]. Mitochondrial calcium uniporter (MCU), situated on the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM), enables uptake of substantial amounts of Ca2+ from the cytosol during intracellular Ca2+ signaling events [8]. The selectivity of MCU to Ca2+ has been well established [9][10]. Although the affinity of MCU for Ca2+ is very high [equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) ≈ 2 nM], MCU relies on the highly negative membrane potential of the IMM to drive Ca2+ into the matrix, as the basal Ca2+ concentration in the cytosol is not sufficient to allow an efficient mitochondrial uptake through the MCU [8]. Nevertheless, cytosolic Ca2+concentrations above a set threshold are needed to potentiate MCU activity (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Schematic depicts agonist-induced transfer of calcium from ER to mitochondria.

Figure 1.

Resting state refers to the state wherein Ca2+ concentration between ER mitochondrial nano domains are <0.5μM and IMM and OMM accumulation of calcium is <2μM. Stimulated state refer to ER-mitochondrial nano domains at >0.5μM after agonist stimulation and post e.g.IP3 association to IP3 receptor resulting in IMM and OMM accumulation of calcium is >2μM. This results in MICU1/MICU2 conformational change controls MCU open Probability through EMRE conformational change.

It is now well established that one of the main functions of mitochondria-ER contact sites [11], stabilized by tethering proteins like mitofusin 2 (MFN2) [12], is to generate highly localized and concentrated Ca2+ microdomains, which facilitate Ca2+ transport into mitochondria [5]. When released from the ER, Ca2+ first passes from the cytosol to the intermembrane space (IMS) through the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM). Passage through the OMM occurs through the voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC); from the IMS, MCU [13] subsequently transports Ca2+ across the IMM into the matrix. Mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake is involved in control of metabolism and ATP production to the regulation of cell death, conversely depletion of mitochondrial membrane potential abrogates mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake, and defects in the respiratory chain have been associated with a decreased ability of mitochondria to uptake Ca2+ [14][15]. Mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake has also been linked to numerous physiological functions such as cell death, autophagy, skeletal muscle trophism, immunity, cardiomyocyte contraction and heart rate [14][15]. In the last six years, the discovery of MCU and its regulators have allowed us to obtain a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying mitochondrial Ca2+ regulation and to investigate the role of MCU function in intracellular Ca2+ signaling.

ER-Mitochondrial contact sites: Ca2+ homeostasis between membranes

Precise maintenance of compartmentalized levels of Ca2+ maintain physiologic intracellular ionized calcium is essential to calcium homeostasis. Changing mitochondrial motility mediates intracellular proximity to various cellular organelles or the plasma membrane to facilitate Ca2+ homeostasis. The specific mechanism of cellular Ca2+ homeostasis occurs by the exchange of Ca2+ between the ER and mitochondria. Inter-organelle communication such as structural and functional interactions between ER and mitochondria play a central role in multiple pathways, ranging from cellular processes or signaling pathways, all finally impacting cellular metabolism. Ca2+ transfer into mitochondria occurs at highly specialized regions of close contacts between mitochondria and ER called mitochondria associated membranes (MAMs). Transfer of Ca2+ from ER to mitochondria is crucial for the control of mitochondria energy metabolism, since mitochondrial Ca2+ levels control the activity of Krebs cycle’s dehydrogenases and impact ATP synthesis [16]. Ca2+ release into the cytosol through the ER Ca2+ release channel IP3R creates a cCa2+ nanodomain that is sufficiently concentrated, within the μM range, to be sensed by adjacent mitochondria [17]. A complex comprising of IP3R, VDAC at the mitochondrial OMM and chaperone glucose-regulated protein 75 (GRP75) has been shown to regulate ER-mitochondrial Ca2+ transfer [18]. The ER protein sigma receptor-1 (SigR1) also forms a complex with IP3R3, and upon ER Ca2+ depletion, Sig1R binds IP3R3 and stabilizes it to prolong Ca2+ signaling from the ER to mitochondria via IP3R at MAMs [19]. Increasing Sig1R expression in cells counteracts ER stress, thus inhibiting apoptosis [19].

Recent reports demonstrate that mitochondrial calcium uptake 2 (MICU2), a gatekeeping regulator of MCU, controls the cross talk between IP3R and MCU [20]. While the MAM tethers Mdm1p, Mdm10p, Mdm34p and Mdm12p have been identified, which make up the ER-mitochondria encounter structure (ERMES) [19]. Nevertheless, the ER vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein B (VAPB) and the mitochondrial membrane protein tyrosine phosphatase interacting protein-51 (PTPIP51) proteins have been shown to form such a tether in mammalian cells, which when disrupted influences mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake [21]. During early phases of ER stress, ER mitochondria contacts are brought closer by ~5 nm, and this coupling has been shown to promote mitochondrial respiration and bioenergetics [22]. Further, sustained activation of ER stress impairs mitochondrial metabolism [23], suggesting a strong link between metabolic insufficiency and ER stress-mediated apoptosis [17]. In addition, genetic or pharmacological inhibition of IP3R alters mitochondrial function, lowering ATP production and triggering autophagy [24]. Moreover, ER stress has been linked to the loss of MAM proteins such as phosphofurin acidic cluster sorting protein 2 (PACS2) [25], SigR1, mitofusin 2 (Mfn2) or cyclophilin D (CypD) [19]. Conversely, while early phases of ER stress increased ER-mitochondria coupling to promote mitochondrial respiration and bioenergetics (as mentioned above), massive and/or prolonged mitochondrial Ca2+ accumulation induced swelling and dysfunction of the organelles [23].

Protein kinase-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), an important ER stress sensor, is localized at MAMs and increases the physical coupling between both organelles [26]. Furthermore, PERK activity is regulated by Mfn2 [27], an important tether at the MAM interface [12], which has been associated with ER stress responses [19]. As unfolded protein response (UPR) signaling controls insulin action [28] and secretion [29], MAMs could therefore regulate glucose homeostasis through effects on UPR signaling. At MAMs, CDSH iron sulfur domain protein 2(Cisd2) interacts with GTPase, IMAP Family Member 5 (Gimap5) and modulates mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake, in order to maintain intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis [30]. Interestingly, conventional loss of Cisd2 altered mitochondria function, impaired glucose tolerance and induced premature aging, whereas white adipose tissue(WAT)-specific loss of Cisd2 impaired the Ca2+ buffering capability of mitochondria, increased cCa2+, impaired the differentiation of WAT, and decreased insulin-stimulated glucose transport [30]. Furthermore, [Ca2+]c increases have been shown to slow/stop mitochondrial motility via Ca2+-sensitive uncoupling of the connection with the microtubules, in which the mitochondrial rho GTPase-1 (MIRO1) plays a central role [31]. Ca2+-sensitive Miro1/2 promote engagement between ER Ca2+ release nanodomains and mitochondria [32]. Colocalization of MIRO1 with ER-mitochondria contacts has been reported in mammalian cells, and the yeast homologue of MIRO1, Gem1, has been shown to be a regulatory component of the ERMES complex, supporting a role for MIRO/Gem1 in the ER-mitochondrial contact formation [32].

Mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter

Mitochondrial calcium dynamics began to be appreciated with the discovery of the Ruthenium Red sensitive mitochondrial channel [8,33]. Attempts were made to identify the structure and composition of this membrane-potential-dependent core component responsible for Ca2+ transport into the mitochondrial matrix. Those efforts were successful, as mitochondrially localized Ruthenium Red sensitive CCDC109A with two putative transmembrane domains was identified and named MCU [34][8][35] (Figure 1). Voltage clamp experiments revealed that inwardly rectifying Ca2+ currents were mediated by MCU, which matched the properties characterized in the Kirichok and co-worker seminal work[36]. The MCU C-terminal domain (CTD) is composed of two transmembrane TM domains (TM1 and TM2) and two coiled coil domains required for interaction with several regulators (see below). An initial NMR-driven model of the Caenorhabditis elegans MCU CTD suggested the loop connecting TM1 and TM2 contains conserved Asp240 and Glu243 residues (i.e. Asp261 and Glu264 in humans), important in the Ca2+ selectivity by MCU [37]. While the Asp240 and Glu243 are, indeed, vital for Ca2+ selectivity, these acidic residues are likely integrated into TM2 based on more recent structural investigations of full-length MCU from various organisms (Figure 2A and 2B). Similarly, while the C. elegans MCU CTD structure suggested a pentameric assembly [37], four independent groups have firmly established a tetrameric architecture for fulllength MCU through several cryo-electron microscopy and crystal structures [9,10,3841]. These structures show the conserved W-D-Φ-Φ-E-P-V-T-Y sequence motif of the MCU pore (where and D and E are Asp261 and Glu264 in human MCU, respectively), forms the Ca2+ selectivity filter by assembling to two acidic rings separated by one helical turn in TM2 along the central axis of the channel pore [38]. Further, the Asp and Glu sidechains of the conserved W-D-Φ-Φ-E-P-V-T-Y motif (also known as the DIME motif) are pointed towards the central axis [39] (Figure 2B).

Figure 2. Cryo-EM structure of the human MCU-EMRE super-complex.

Figure 2.

A. Dimer of functional MCU tetrameric channels. Each MCU tetramer (cyan) is in complex with four EMRE peptides (blue). The individual MCU channels dimerize via interactions between the N-terminal domains (MCU-NTD; pink). The Asp261 (red sticks) and Glu264 (red sticks) of the DIME motif (indicated) are located closest to the intermembrane space side of each channel. The juxtamembrane loop (magenta spheres) is located on the matrix side of each channel. The residues making up MRAP within each MCU-NTD (red spheres) are localized only between MCU-NTDs within one channel. B. Top view (from the intermembrane space) of a single MCU channel highlighting the pore entrance. The Asp261 and Glu264 sidechains (red sticks) of the DIME motif are directed to the centre axis of the channel. Coordination of a single Ca2+ (yellow sphere) is primarily mediated by the Glu264 side chain in this structure. The inner surface of the channel is lined with the TM2 helices, while the TM1 helices pack on the outside of each TM2 helix. Four EMRE peptides are oriented at the periphery of each channel. C. Bottom view (from the matrix) of a single MCU channel highlighting the pore exit. The juxtamembrane loop (magenta spheres) forms an exit pore constriction. In the presence of EMRE, the juxtamembrane loop does not obstruct the pore exit due to interactions between the N-terminal region of EMRE and CC2 of MCU. In (AC), the MCU and EMRE protein backbone is represented as a cartoon ribbon. TM1/2, transmembrane 1/2 (cyan); CC1/2, coiled-coil-1/2 (cyan); MCU-NTD, MCU Nterminal domain (pink); MRAP, MCU regulating acidic patch (red); Ca2+, calcium ion (yellow); DIME, Asp-Ile-Met-Glu motif; EMRE, essential MCU regulator (blue); MCU, mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter; N, amino terminus; C, carboxyl terminus. The structure images were rendered in PyMOL (Schrodinger, LLC) using the 6O58.pdb coordinates.

The structure of N-terminal domain (NTD) of MCU, encoded by exons 3 and 4 of the MCU gene, adopts a β-grasp like fold comprised of two α−helices and six β-strands; moreover, this central core also contains two highly conserved leucine rich loops [42][43,44]. Atomic resolution structures of MCU-NTD revealed a cluster of negatively charged residues called the MCU-regulating acidic patch (MRAP) on the surface of the β-grasp fold, which binds divalent cations. Remarkably, interaction of either Ca2+ or Mg2+ with the MRAP causes a loss of mCa2+uptake in mammalian cells, highlighting a mechanism for matrix divalent cation-mediated regulation of MCU channel function. The sensitivity of MCU function to MCU-NTD was reinforced by data showing that overexpression of MCU with MRAP mutants could also inhibit the channel [44].

Positive and negative regulators of MCU

Interestingly, reconstitution of the MCU complex in yeast, showed that expression of the human MCU alone was not sufficient to promote mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake [45]. MCU regulator 1 (MCUR1) is a positive regulator of MCU function. MCUR1 was identified in an RNAi screen of mitochondrial proteins where knockdown resulted in the inhibition of mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake. The IMM localization of MCUR1 was verified experimentally for the yeast FMP32 and human paralogs of MCUR1 (initial identified as CCDC90B) [42][46]. MCUR1 directly interacts with MCU to promote Ca2+-uptake; thus, loss of MCUR1 results in a reduced mCa2+ uptake and has been shown to perturb bioenergetics [47,48]. MCUR1 is also an assembly factor for complex IV cytochrome oxidase (COX), and loss of MCUR1 results in impaired oxidative phosphorylation (Ox-phos), leading to reduced IMM potential [49]. Germ line deletion of MCUR1 did not show any discernable phenotype, while cardiac specific MCUR1 knockout (KO) was postnatally fatal at ~3 weeks [42]. Electrophysiological and biochemical studies from tissue specific KOs demonstrated a significant decrease in MCU current due to the disruption of the MCU super-complex in the absence of MCUR1. Our group showed that MCU failed to assemble as a higher order complex in the absence of MCUR1, which also has transmembrane and coiled-coil domains. The coiled-coils, which are well known protein-protein interaction domains, and the perturbation of MCU assembly in the absence of MCUR1 suggest MCUR1 has, at least in part, a scaffolding function [50]. Furthermore, we and others found that the MCU N terminal region is likely to associate with MCUR1 rather than MICU1 or MICU2. Consistent with a scaffolding role, recent work by Adlakha and colleagues demonstrated MCUR1 directly interacts with MCU, which is destabilized upon Ca2+ binding. Thus, Ca2+ could regulate the MCUR1:MCU interactions. Further work needs to be performed to elucidate and characterize the exact mechanisms underlying MCUR1-mediated regulation of MCU [51].

EMRE is a 10-kilodalton, metazoan-specific single transmembrane protein with an aspartate rich C-terminus. EMRE maintains the pore in an open conformation while additionally transducing MICU1/2 Ca2+ sensing to pore gating [45][40]. EMRE interacts directly with MCU through a GXXXG motif in the transmembrane helix, bridging the Ca2+-sensing role of MICU1 and MICU2 with the Ca2+-conducting role of MCU [42]. Disrupting the EMRE–MICU1 interaction leads to loss of MICU1–MICU2 from the uniporter complex, yielding a MCU–EMRE subcomplex with a high open probability [52].

The IMS localized, EF hand-containing protein mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake-1 (MICU1) was identified well before the discovery of MCU. MICU1 belongs to a family of MICU regulators that also includes MICU2 and MICU3 [53]. Our data proposed MICU1 to be the MCU “gatekeeper” [42,48][1], sensing a rise in cCa2+ and increasing the open probability of MCU [42,54]. Ca2+-free conditions reveal MICU1 to form a hexamer that directly or indirectly interacts with MCU and inhibits its activity through the C-terminal helix [55]. Like most ion channels that open upon agonist stimulation, the MCU channel open probability increases when cCa2+ rises above 2 μM [42,48]. MICU1-MICU2 hetero-dimers co-operatively function as a switch for MCU-mediated mCa2+ uptake [56]. Disulfide bonded MICU1 and MICU2 or MICU3 at low cCa2+ has been proposed to inhibit MCU from conducting Ca2+. cCa2+ increases are sensed by the MICU EF hands, which undergo rearrangements and promote Ca2+ influx through the MCU complex [42,57] Figure 1.

MCU is also negatively regulated by a dominant negative form of MCU, MCUb, whose tissue expression profile differs from MCU [58]. MCU interacts with MCUb; however, despite showing a high sequence identity and similarity with MCU, MCUb alone does not reconstitute Ca2+ channel activity. There is evidence to suggest that other paralogs of MCU do not act as dominant negative effectors of the channel. In the MCU complex of trypanosomatids, two additional unique paralog subunits (i.e. MCUc and MCUd) are required for Ca2+ transport [59]. Ultimately, hetero-oligomeric structures are a likely result of the heterologous expression and assembly of MCU, MCUb, MCUc, and MCUd.

Structural mechanisms of MCU regulation within super-complexes.

Interestingly, in the context of full-length MCU tetramers, the NTD region adopts different assembly patterns depending on the MCU orthologue. For example, the MCUNTD from lower order organisms assembles as a dimer of dimers directly under the pore [9,10,38,39], but a dimer of tetramers across two human MCU channels[41]. In other words, the mode of NTD assembly is distinct in MCU proteins from different species. MCU-NTD is arranged in a compact circle in fungal structures [9,10,38,39], while zebrafish and human structures (i.e. metazoan) show more linear, semi-circular tetrameric assemblies [9,10,38,39,44]. In the human MCU structure, MCU-NTD tetramers from different channels interact, dimerizing entire channels (Figure 2A&2B). Co-complexation with EMRE is key to this full channel dimerization, since elimination of EMRE results in movement of the NTD semi-circular assembly from the side of the channel to the base, precluding channel-channel interactions[44]. It has been suggested that full channel dimerization via the NTDs could help to preferentially locate MCU to the curved outer regions of the IMM (closest to the OMM), where channel complexes would be well-situated to most directly respond to μM increases in Ca2+ [44].

The recent human EMRE-MCU co-complex structure has also revealed an equimolar stoichiometric assembly between these proteins within each channel. Mechanistically, the single EMRE transmembrane domain makes extensive contacts with the MCU TM1 and TM2 regions of different subunits, and the EMRE N-terminal region interacts with coiled-coil-2 of MCU, located on the matrix side of the channel. This coiled-coil interaction is believed to pull the juxtamembrane loop of MCU away from the pore exit, allowing Ca2+ permeation [44] (Figure 2C). It is important to note that the required stoichiometry for a functional channel may not be 4 EMRE:4 MCU subunits, as recent work using MCU-EMRE concatemers have shown that 1 EMRE per 4 MCU subunits is sufficient for channel activation, while 2 EMRE:4 MCU subunits recapitulates more closely the size and activity of endogenous channels[60]. In fact, the same study demonstrated that a 4:4 EMRE-MCU stoichiometry increased the threshold of cytoplasmic cCa2+ necessary for channel activation.

A study recently submitted to bioRxiv resolved a human MCU-EMRE-MICU1MICU2 super-complex structure by cryo-EM [61]. A very similar dimer of tetrameric MCU channels was elucidated as shown in Figure 2A, with 4 EMRE subunits integrated into each MCU channel (i.e. 4 EMRE: 4 MCU subunits per one channel). However, in this super-complex, one MICU1 and one MICU2 subunit was also complexed per channel, showing an overall EMRE:MCU:MICU1:MICU2 stoichiometry of 4:4:1:1 per channel. Lipid (i.e. cardiolipin and phosphatidylcholine) interactions with protein components were also found to play a role in super-complex stabilization [61]. Interestingly, in this super-complex structure, MICU1-MICU2 heterodimers were found to interact across individual channels, away from the pore openings, much like the MCU NTD interactions observed across channels that stabilize the matrix side of the channel. It is also noteworthy that the non-occluding position of MICU1-MICU2 relative to the pore is consistent with a bioRxiv submission showing that Ca2+ binding to the MICUs increases the open probability of MCU pore, which was found to be a constitutively active Ca2+ channel [54]. The mechanism underlying the open probability regulation by the MICUs may involve the interactions between the poly-basic region of MICU1 [54] and aspartate rich C-terminal region of EMRE, identified in the cryo-EM structure [61] and previously reported. EMRE may also play a role in bridging MICU1-MICU2 Ca2+ sensing in the IMS with matrix Ca2+ and Mg2+ sensing by MCU, as a recent submission to bioRxiv has i) verified that both Mg2+ and Ca2+ binding to the MCU-NTD MRAP can feedback inhibit the channel, as we first demonstrated ([44], and ii) suggested that divalent cation occupancy of MRAP determines the efficacy of MICU1-MICU2-mediated regulation of MCU channel activity [62].

Ca2+ exchangers regulate mitochondrial Ca2+ efflux

Calcium efflux from the mitochondria is believed to be carried out by Ca2+/hydrogen (H+) and a sodium (Na+)/Ca2+ exchanger function. The mitochondrial Na+/Ca2+/lithium (Li+) exchanger (NCLX) is an IMM protein that extrudes one Ca2+ from the mitochondria for every three Na+ or Li+ imported; NCLX has an estimated turnover rate of 1,000 cycles per second [17][63]. NCLX is regulated by PTEN-induced putative kinase 1 (PINK1) and PKA, where PINK1 causes reduced mitochondrial Ca2+ efflux, and PKA activation in the absence of PINK1 restores efflux [64]. NCLX regulates SOCE indirectly through Ca2+ overload induced ROS [65]. Inhibition of NCLX in primary pancreatic β-cells inhibited mitochondrial Ca2+ efflux induced by high glucose, coinciding with reduced rates and amplitudes of cCa2+ signals and delayed insulin secretion [17]. Thus, NCLX plays a critical role in the communication between the plasma membrane and mitochondria and in regulating cCa2+ signals [66].

The Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE), which is responsible for Na+ efflux from mitochondria into the cytosol, is a major regulator of mitochondrial Na+ in several cell types [67]. NHE is, therefore, critical for maintaining Na+ gradients across the mitochondrial membrane, and its function is vital for NCLX activity and for the maintenance of Ca2+ homeostasis in mitochondria. Although leucine-zipper EF-hand containing transmembrane protein-1 (LETM1) was originally proposed to be a potassium (K+)/H+ exchanger on the IMM, several publications have since characterized the mitochondrial Ca2+/H+ antiporter of this transmembrane protein, both reconstituted in liposomes without any other regulatory proteins and in mammalian cells [68][69][70].

Cytosolic Ca2+ drives mitochondrial dynamics and shape

Mitochondria dynamics include motility including long distance and shorter distance along microtubules, ensured by mitochondrial adaptor proteins, motor proteins and cytoskeleton components, which are regulated by cCa2+. The canonical opinion in the field is that mitochondria undergo changes in shape in response to insults causing mitochondrial fragmentation, and smaller fragmented mitochondria undergo rapid phenotypic changes when compared to massively elongated mitochondria. Drp1 dependent fragmentation of the mitochondria integrates Ca2+ signals to modulate mitochondrial shape in cancer. Drp1 recruitment to mitochondria is regulated by the Ca2+ dependent phosphatase calcineurin, dephosphorylating Drp1 at Ser637 upon a rise of cCa2+ [71]. However, recent findings show a novel mechanism by which mitochondria transition from long filamentous to short circular morphologies. The OMM bound EF-hand containing Ras GTPase Miro1/2 senses cCa2+ levels to modulate mitochondrial movement locally and globally [46,47]. Calcium sensing protein Miro1 is tethered to the OMM and closely associated with the motor complexes kinesin/track/syntaphilin. We demonstrated Drp1 independent mitochondrial shape transition, termed MiST, due to high cCa2+ influx, specifically via Miro1 EF-hand-1 hand sensing of high cCa2+. The Kd for MiST was determined to be > 1 μM cCa2+ [73]. This Miro-dependent mechanism could likely be an alternative to Drp1 dependent mitochondrial fragmentation to aid motility in non-excitable as well as excitable cells. In an attempt to elucidate how mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), located in the matrix of the mitochondria, is released into the cytosol and activates the cGAS STING pathway that causes cells to secrete type 1 interferon, studies showed a dynamic change in mitochondrial phenotype from filamentous to globular upon treatment with Bcl2 inhibitor[74]. Herniation of IMM releases mtDNA through OMM pores formed by Bax-Bak oligomers [74]. Interestingly, there is evidence to suggest basal mitochondrial Ca2+ concentration could influence mitochondrial motility [75]. Despite these observations and signaling pathway illuminations, mitochondria shape and dynamics are influenced by various unknown factors and remain to be fully elucidated.

Concluding Remarks and Perspectives

Cellular Ca2+ dynamics depends on the precise compartmentation of Ca2+ to elicit regulated responses to stimuli. The ER-mitochondrial contacts function to bring about a strict regulation of Ca2+ release and uptake into mitochondria upon the signal transduction in a spatio-temporally regulated manner. Recent evidence has shed a light on the crucial role of MCU and its regulators in cellular Ca2+ dynamic signaling for metabolic needs as well as Ca2+ homeostasis. Independently of the role of MCU in cancer cell migration, different studies have highlighted the role of mitochondrial Ca2+ homeostasis in immune cell polarization and chemotaxis. Taken together, these data obtained in different specialized cells and animal models highlight the crucial and evolutionarily conserved function of MCU. So far, the non-exclusive connections between ATP and ROS production and cCa2+ signal regulation have been investigated. To fully elucidate these mechanisms, it will be important not only to decipher the potential role of MCU on Ca2+ flicker formation/intensity but also the impact of MCU on mitochondrial motility/shape dynamics that govern Ca2+ micro and nanodomains, controlling local and global cellular Ca2+ dynamics.

The generation of germline and tissue specific MCU KO animals permitted the understanding of the physiological significance of the channel. Pathological understanding of the MCU channel has been under ongoing investigations and requires better designed, more controlled and new studies to fully elucidate its role in disease manifestation and reveal potential therapeutic interventions [76]. For example, given the work showing that MCU can be regulated through Ca2+ and Mg2+ binding at the MRAP region in the NTD, studies on supplementing Mg2+ to limit MCU channel activity under conditions of Ca2+ overload may be warranted. Similarly, studies have shown, like most ion channels, MCU also undergoes oxidative modifications that can profoundly regulate function. Thus, MCU can serve as a matrix ROS sensor, and understanding the molecular mechanisms of MCU oxidation in inflammatory diseases may open previously unappreciated therapeutic avenues [77]. Furthermore, MCU KO has been shown to trigger mitochondrial shape transition (i.e. MiST) due to elevated cytosolic Ca2+, leading to MiST-mediated cell death and underscoring the vital crosstalk between cytosolic Ca2+ signals and mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake [73]. Future studies on MiST mediated pathways need to be explored with objectives focused on pathophysiological significance.

Footnotes

We do not have any conflict of interest.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Berridge MJ, Lipp P, Bootman MD: The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2000, 1:11–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bagur R, Hajnóczky G: Intracellular Ca(2+) Sensing: Its Role in Calcium Homeostasis and Signaling. Mol Cell 2017, 66:780–788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pinton P, Pozzan T, Rizzuto R: The Golgi apparatus is an inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-sensitive Ca2+ store, with functional properties distinct from those of the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO J 1998, 17:5298–5308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stathopulos PB, Li G-Y, Plevin MJ, Ames JB, Ikura M: Stored Ca2+ depletion-induced oligomerization of stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1) via the EF-SAM region: An initiation mechanism for capacitive Ca2+ entry. J Biol Chem 2006, 281:35855–35862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rizzuto R, De Stefani D, Raffaello A, Mammucari C: Mitochondria as sensors and regulators of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2012, 13:566–578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Glitsch MD, Bakowski D, Parekh AB: Store-operated Ca2+ entry depends on mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake. EMBO J 2002, 21:6744–6754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Glancy B, Balaban RS: Role of Mitochondrial Ca2+ in the Regulation of Cellular Energetics. Biochemistry 2012, 51:2959–2973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.De Stefani D, Rizzuto R, Pozzan T: Enjoy the Trip: Calcium in Mitochondria Back and Forth. Annu Rev Biochem 2016, 85:161–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Baradaran R, Wang C, Siliciano AF, Long SB: Cryo-EM structures of fungal and metazoan mitochondrial calcium uniporters. Nature 2018, 559:580–584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fan C, Fan M, Orlando BJ, Fastman NM, Zhang J, Xu Y, Chambers MG, Xu X, Perry K, Liao M, et al. : X-ray and cryo-EM structures of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter. Nature 2018, 559:575–579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Giacomello M, Pellegrini L: The coming of age of the mitochondria–ER contact: a matter of thickness. Cell Death Differ 2016, 23:1417–1427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.de Brito OM, Scorrano L: Mitofusin 2 tethers endoplasmic reticulum to mitochondria. Nature 2008, 456:605–610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shoshan-Barmatz V, De S, Meir A: The Mitochondrial Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel 1, Ca(2+) Transport, Apoptosis, and Their Regulation. Front Oncol 2017, 7:60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tilokani L, Nagashima S, Paupe V, Prudent J: Mitochondrial dynamics: overview of molecular mechanisms. Essays Biochem 2018, 62:341–360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nemani N, Dong Z, Daw CC, Madaris TR, Ramachandran K, Enslow BT, Rubannelsonkumar CS, Shanmughapriya S, Mallireddigari V, Maity S, et al. : Mitochondrial pyruvate and fatty acid flux modulate MICU1-dependent control of MCU activity. Sci Signal 2020, 13:eaaz6206.* This work revealed that nutrient stress elicited a transcriptional program that restricted Ca2+ influx into mitochondria through the MCU to prevent changes in mitochondrial dynamics and bioenergetics.
  • 16.Denton RM: Regulation of mitochondrial dehydrogenases by calcium ions. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009, 1787:1309–1316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pathak T, Trebak M: Mitochondrial Ca(2+) signaling. Pharmacol Ther 2018, 192:112–123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Szabadkai G, Bianchi K, Várnai P, De Stefani D, Wieckowski MR, Cavagna D, Nagy AI, Balla T, Rizzuto R: Chaperone-mediated coupling of endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondrial Ca2+ channels. J Cell Biol 2006, 175:901–911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rieusset J: The role of endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria contact sites in the control of glucose homeostasis: an update. Cell Death Dis 2018, 9:388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Payne R, Hoff H, Roskowski A, Foskett JK: MICU2 Restricts Spatial Crosstalk between InsP(3)R and MCU Channels by Regulating Threshold and Gain of MICU1-Mediated Inhibition and Activation of MCU. Cell Rep 2017, 21:3141–3154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.De Vos KJ, Mórotz GM, Stoica R, Tudor EL, Lau K-F, Ackerley S, Warley A, Shaw CE, Miller CCJ: VAPB interacts with the mitochondrial protein PTPIP51 to regulate calcium homeostasis. Hum Mol Genet 2011, 21:1299–1311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Herrera-Cruz MS, Simmen T: Of yeast, mice and men: MAMs come in two flavors. Biol Direct 2017, 12:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bravo R, Vicencio JM, Parra V, Troncoso R, Munoz JP, Bui M, Quiroga C, Rodriguez AE, Verdejo HE, Ferreira J, et al. : Increased ER-mitochondrial coupling promotes mitochondrial respiration and bioenergetics during early phases of ER stress. J Cell Sci 2011, 124:2143–2152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cárdenas C, Miller RA, Smith I, Bui T, Molgó J, Müller M, Vais H, Cheung K-H, Yang J, Parker I, et al. : Essential regulation of cell bioenergetics by constitutive InsP3 receptor Ca2+ transfer to mitochondria. Cell 2010, 142:270–283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Simmen T, Aslan JE, Blagoveshchenskaya AD, Thomas L, Wan L, Xiang Y, Feliciangeli SF, Hung C-H, Crump CM, Thomas G: PACS-2 controls endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria communication and Bid-mediated apoptosis. EMBO J 2005, 24:717–729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Verfaillie T, Rubio N, Garg AD, Bultynck G, Rizzuto R, Decuypere J-P, Piette J, Linehan C, Gupta S, Samali A, et al. : PERK is required at the ERmitochondrial contact sites to convey apoptosis after ROS-based ER stress. Cell Death Differ 2012, 19:1880–1891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Muñoz JP, Ivanova S, Sánchez-Wandelmer J, Martínez-Cristóbal P, Noguera E, Sancho A, Díaz-Ramos A, Hernández-Alvarez MI, Sebastián D, Mauvezin C, et al. : Mfn2 modulates the UPR and mitochondrial function via repression of PERK. EMBO J 2013, 32:2348–2361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Salvadó L, Palomer X, Barroso E, Vázquez-Carrera M: Targeting endoplasmic reticulum stress in insulin resistance. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2015, 26:438–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hasnain SZ, Prins JB, McGuckin MA: Oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress in β-cell dysfunction in diabetes. J Mol Endocrinol 2016, 56:R33–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chen YF, Kao CH, Chen YT, Wang CH, Wu CY, Tsai CY, Liu FC, Yang CW, Wei YH, Hsu MT: Cisd2 deficiency drives premature aging and causes mitochondria-mediated defects in mice. Genes Dev 2009, 23:1183–1194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nguyen TT, Oh SS, Weaver D, Lewandowska A, Maxfield D, Schuler M-H, Smith NK, Macfarlane J, Saunders G, Palmer CA, et al. : Loss of Miro1-directed mitochondrial movement results in a novel murine model for neuron disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014, 111:E3631–E3640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Modi S, López-Doménech G, Halff EF, Covill-Cooke C, Ivankovic D, Melandri D, Arancibia-Cárcamo IL, Burden JJ, Lowe AR, Kittler JT: Miro clusters regulate ER-mitochondria contact sites and link cristae organization to the mitochondrial transport machinery. Nat Commun 2019, 10:4399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kirichok Y, Krapivinsky G, Clapham DE: The mitochondrial calcium uniporter is a highly selective ion channel. Nature 2004, 427:360–364.** This work characterized the biophysical properties of MCU channel and its ion selectivity.
  • 34.** Baughman JM, Perocchi F, Girgis HS, Plovanich M, Belcher-Timme CA, Sancak Y, Bao XR, Strittmatter L, Goldberger O, Bogorad RL, et al. : Integrative genomics identifies MCU as an essential component of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter. Nature 2011, 476:341–345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.De Stefani D, Raffaello A, Teardo E, Szabò I, Rizzuto R: A forty-kilodalton protein of the inner membrane is the mitochondrial calcium uniporter. Nature 2011, 476:336–340.** These studies revealed the molecular identity of mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter.
  • 36.Chaudhuri D, Sancak Y, Mootha VK, Clapham DE: MCU encodes the pore conducting mitochondrial calcium currents. Elife 2013, 2:e00704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Oxenoid K, Dong Y, Cao C, Cui T, Sancak Y, Markhard AL, Grabarek Z, Kong L, Liu Z, Ouyang B, et al. : Architecture of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter. Nature 2016, 533:269–273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yoo J, Wu M, Yin Y, Herzik MA Jr, Lander GC, Lee S-Y: Cryo-EM structure of a mitochondrial calcium uniporter. Science 2018, 361:506–511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nguyen NX, Armache J-P, Lee C, Yang Y, Zeng W, Mootha VK, Cheng Y, Bai X-C, Jiang Y: Cryo-EM structure of a fungal mitochondrial calcium uniporter. Nature 2018, 559:570–574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sancak Y, Markhard A, Kitami T, Kovacs-Bogdan E, Kamer K, Udeshi N, Carr S, Chaudhuri D, Clapham D, Li A, et al. : EMRE Is an Essential Component of the Mitochondrial Calcium Uniporter Complex. Science 2013, 342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang Y, Nguyen NX, She J, Zeng W, Yang Y, Bai X-C, Jiang Y: Structural Mechanism of EMRE-Dependent Gating of the Human Mitochondrial Calcium Uniporter. Cell 2019, 177:1252–1261.e13.* This work presented the first medium/high-resolution insights into the interaction of human EMRE with MCU and the underlying mechanisms of co-complexation between these proteins. The work also revealed how two MCU channels can interact via the NTD regions and a mechanism for EMRE-dependent gating of the channel.
  • 42.Mallilankaraman K, Doonan P, Cardenas C, Chandramoorthy HC, Muller M, Miller R, Hoffman NE, Gandhirajan RK, Molgo J, Birnbaum MJ, et al. : MICU1 is an essential gatekeeper for MCU-mediated mitochondrial Ca(2+) uptake that regulates cell survival. Cell 2012, 151:630–644.** This work determined MICU1 to be the MCU “gatekeeper”, sensing a rise in cCa2+ and controling the open probability of MCU at < 2.0 μM cytosolic Ca2+ concentration.
  • 43.Lee Y, Min CK, Kim TG, Song HK, Lim Y, Kim D, Shin K, Kang M, Kang JY, Youn H-S, et al. : Structure and function of the N-terminal domain of the human mitochondrial calcium uniporter. EMBO Rep 2015, 16:1318–1333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lee SK, Shanmughapriya S, Mok MCY, Dong Z, Tomar D, Carvalho E, Rajan S, Junop MS, Madesh M, Stathopulos PB: Structural Insights into Mitochondrial Calcium Uniporter Regulation by Divalent Cations. Cell Chem Biol 2016, 23:1157–1169.* This work presented several high-resolution structures of the human MCU-NTD, defining an MCU-regulating acidic patch (MRAP) that binds divalent cations. The paper pinpointed a mechanism for Ca2+ and Mg2+-binding dependent inhibition of the MCU channel, involving divalent cation interactions with MRAP.
  • 45.Kovács-Bogdán E, Sancak Y, Kamer KJ, Plovanich M, Jambhekar A, Huber RJ, Myre MA, Blower MD, Mootha VK: Reconstitution of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014, 111:8985–8990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Vais H, Tanis JE, Müller M, Payne R, Mallilankaraman K, Foskett JK: MCUR1, CCDC90A, Is a Regulator of the Mitochondrial Calcium Uniporter. Cell Metab 2015, 22:533–535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chaudhuri D, Artiga DJ, Abiria SA, Clapham DE: Mitochondrial calcium uniporter regulator 1 (MCUR1) regulates the calcium threshold for the mitochondrial permeability transition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016, 113:E1872–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mallilankaraman K, Cárdenas C, Doonan PJ, Chandramoorthy HC, Irrinki KM, Golenár T, Csordás G, Madireddi P, Yang J, Müller M, et al. : MCUR1 is an essential component of mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake that regulates cellular metabolism. Nat Cell Biol 2012, 14:1336–1343.* This work identified CCDC90A as a molecular scaffold for MCU complex assembly and function.
  • 49.Paupe V, Prudent J: New insights into the role of mitochondrial calcium homeostasis in cell migration. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2018, 500:75–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tomar D, Dong Z, Shanmughapriya S, Koch DA, Thomas T, Hoffman NE, Timbalia SA, Goldman SJ, Breves SL, Corbally DP, et al. : MCUR1 Is a Scaffold Factor for the MCU Complex Function and Promotes Mitochondrial Bioenergetics. Cell Rep 2016, 15:1673–1685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Adlakha J, Karamichali I, Sangwallek J, Deiss S, Bär K, Coles M, Hartmann MD, Lupas AN, Hernandez Alvarez B: Characterization of MCU-Binding Proteins MCUR1 and CCDC90B - Representatives of a Protein Family Conserved in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotic Organelles. Structure 2019, 27:464–475.e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Tsai M-F, Phillips CB, Ranaghan M, Tsai C-W, Wu Y, Williams C, Miller C: Dual functions of a small regulatory subunit in the mitochondrial calcium uniporter complex. Elife 2016, 5:e15545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Perocchi F, Gohil VM, Girgis HS, Bao XR, McCombs JE, Palmer AE, Mootha VK: MICU1 encodes a mitochondrial EF hand protein required for Ca(2+) uptake. Nature 2010, 467:291–296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hoffman NE, Chandramoorthy HC, Shamugapriya S, Zhang X, Rajan S, Mallilankaraman K, Gandhirajan RK, Vagnozzi RJ, Ferrer LM, Sreekrishnanilayam K, et al. : MICU1 Motifs Define Mitochondrial Calcium Uniporter Binding and Activity. Cell Rep 2013, 5:1576–1588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wang L, Yang X, Li S, Wang Z, Liu Y, Feng J, Zhu Y, Shen Y: Structural and mechanistic insights into MICU1 regulation of mitochondrial calcium uptake. EMBO J 2014, 33:594–604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kamer KJ, Grabarek Z, Mootha VK: High-affinity cooperative Ca(2+) binding by MICU1-MICU2 serves as an on-off switch for the uniporter. EMBO Rep 2017, 18:1397–1411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wang X, Wang W, Li L, Perry G, Lee H, Zhu X: Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 2014, 1842:1240–1247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Raffaello A, De Stefani D, Sabbadin D, Teardo E, Merli G, Picard A, Checchetto V, Moro S, Szabò I, Rizzuto R: The mitochondrial calcium uniporter is a multimer that can include a dominant-negative pore-forming subunit. EMBO J 2013, 32:2362–2376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Huang G, Docampo R: The Mitochondrial Ca(2+) Uniporter Complex (MCUC) of Trypanosoma brucei Is a Hetero-oligomer That Contains Novel Subunits Essential for Ca(2+) Uptake. MBio 2018, 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Payne R, Li C, Foskett JK: Variable Assembly of EMRE and MCU Creates Functional Channels with Distinct Gatekeeping Profiles. iScience 2020, 23:101037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhuo W, Zhou H, Guo R, Yi J, Yu L, Sui Y, Zhang L, Zeng W, Wang P, Yang M: Structure of intact human MCU supercomplex with the auxiliary MICU subunits. bioRxiv 2020, doi: 10.1101/2020.04.04.025205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Vais H, Payne R, Li C, Foskett JK: Strongly coupled transmembrane mechanisms control MCU-mediated mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake. bioRxiv 2020, doi: 10.1101/2020.04.07.029637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Palty R, Silverman WF, Hershfinkel M, Caporale T, Sensi SL, Parnis J, Nolte C, Fishman D, Shoshan-Barmatz V, Herrmann S, et al. : NCLX is an essential component of mitochondrial Na+/Ca 2+ exchange. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:436–441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Giorgi C, Marchi S, Pinton P: The machineries, regulation and cellular functions of mitochondrial calcium. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2018, 19:713–730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ben-Kasus Nissim T, Zhang X, Elazar A, Roy S, Stolwijk JA, Zhou Y, Motiani RK, Gueguinou M, Hempel N, Hershfinkel M, et al. : Mitochondria control storeoperated Ca(2+) entry through Na(+) and redox signals. EMBO J 2017, 36:797–815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Luongo TS, Lambert JP, Gross P, Nwokedi M, Lombardi AA, Shanmughapriya S, Carpenter AC, Kolmetzky D, Gao E, van Berlo JH, et al. : The mitochondrial Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchanger is essential for Ca(2+) homeostasis and viability. Nature 2017, 545:93–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bers DM, Barry WH, Despa S: Intracellular Na+ regulation in cardiac myocytes. Cardiovasc Res 2003, 57:897–912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Doonan PJ, Chandramoorthy HC, Hoffman NE, Zhang X, Cárdenas C, Shanmughapriya S, Rajan S, Vallem S, Chen X, Foskett JK, et al. : LETM1-dependent mitochondrial Ca2+ flux modulates cellular bioenergetics and proliferation. FASEB J Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol 2014, 28:4936–4949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Jiang D, Zhao L, Clapham DE: Genome-wide RNAi screen identifies Letm1 as a mitochondrial Ca2+/H+ antiporter. Science 2009, 326:144–147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Shao J, Fu Z, Ji Y, Guan X, Guo S, Ding Z, Yang X, Cong Y, Shen Y: Leucine zipper-EF-hand containing transmembrane protein 1 (LETM1) forms a Ca2+/H+ antiporter. Sci Rep 2016, 6:34174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Cereghetti GM, Scorrano L: The many shapes of mitochondrial death. Oncogene 2006, 25:4717–4724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Birsa N, Norkett R, Higgs N, Lopez-Domenech G, Kittler JT: Mitochondrial trafficking in neurons and the role of the Miro family of GTPase proteins. Biochem Soc Trans 2013, 41:1525–1531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Nemani N, Carvalho E, Tomar D, Dong Z, Ketschek A, Breves SL, Jaña F, Worth AM, Heffler J, Palaniappan P, et al. : MIRO-1 Determines Mitochondrial Shape Transition upon GPCR Activation and Ca(2+) Stress. Cell Rep 2018, 23:1005–1019.* This work demonstrated that the mitochondrial GTPase family protein Miro-1 senses cytosolic Ca2+, eliciting a mitochondrial shape transition (MiST). The MiST was shown to occur independent of mitochondrial fission and fusion machineries.
  • 74.McArthur K, Whitehead LW, Heddleston JM, Li L, Padman BS, Oorschot V, Geoghegan ND, Chappaz S, Davidson S, San Chin H, et al. : BAK/BAX macropores facilitate mitochondrial herniation and mtDNA efflux during apoptosis. Science (80- ) 2018, 359:eaao6047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Chang KT, Niescier RF, Min K-T: Mitochondrial matrix Ca2+ as an intrinsic signal regulating mitochondrial motility in axons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:15456–15461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Pan X, Liu J, Nguyen T, Liu C, Sun J, Teng Y, Fergusson MM, Rovira II, Allen M, Springer DA, et al. : The physiological role of mitochondrial calcium revealed by mice lacking the mitochondrial calcium uniporter. Nat Cell Biol 2013, 15:1464–1472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Dong Z, Shanmughapriya S, Tomar D, Siddiqui N, Lynch S, Nemani N, Breves SL, Zhang X, Tripathi A, Palaniappan P, et al. : Mitochondrial Ca(2+) Uniporter Is a Mitochondrial Luminal Redox Sensor that Augments MCU Channel Activity. Mol Cell 2017, 65:1014–1028.e7.** This work revealed that MCU channel senses mitochondrial matrix ROS levels and undergoes oligomerization. The oxidation of MCU core subunit enhances channel activity but the cysteine residues are dispensable for its activity.

RESOURCES