Abstract
Phosphate dosing is used by water utilities to prevent plumbosolvency in water supply networks. However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding biofilm formation on lead and plastic materials when phosphate concentrations are modified in drinking water systems. In this study, biofilms were grown over lead coupons and PVC tubes in bioreactors supplied with local drinking water treated to provide different phosphate doses (below 1, 1 and 2 mg/L) over a period of 28 days. A range of commercial iron pellets (GEH104 and WARP) were tested aiming to maintain phosphate levels below the average 1 mg/L found in drinking water. Changes in biofilm community structure in response to three different phosphate treatments were characterised by Illumina sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene for bacteria and the ITS2 gene for fungi. Scanning electron microscopy was used to visualise physical differences in biofilm development in two types of materials, lead and PVC. The experimental results from the kinetics of phosphate absorption showed that the GEH104 pellets were the best option to, in the long term, reduce phosphate levels while preventing undesirable turbidity increases in drinking water. Phosphate-enrichment promoted a reduction of bacterial diversity but increased that of fungi in biofilms. Overall, higher phosphate levels selected for microorganisms with enhanced capabilities related to phosphorus metabolism and heavy metal resistance. This research brings new insights regarding the influence of different phosphate concentrations on mixed-species biofilms formation and drinking water quality, which are relevant to inform best management practices in drinking water treatment.
Subject terms: Biofilms, Metagenomics
Introduction
Lead has been commonly used in building water supply infrastructure given its ductile properties and easy moulding to make pipes. However, lead is a heavy metal that can be toxic for organisms since it accumulates in the food chain and remains as a persistent environmental toxin1. Therefore, lead is considered the second most dangerous environmental poison according to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Priority Substance List (2017). Its toxic effects have been related to neurotoxicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicology, renal failure, anaemia or cardiac dysfunctions, being children the age group with higher risk for lead poisoning2.
Lead can enter in drinking water distribution systems (DWDS) through leaching from lead pipes and other plumbing fittings3. Many DWDS in the world have lead pipes, including the United Kingdom (UK), where lead can be prevalent in properties built before 1970, and it has been estimated that 9 million households are affected by lead pipes4. Currently, the European Parliament establishes that the legal level of lead content in drinking water is 10 μg/L, and it is aiming to reduce this concentration to 5 μg/L in the following 10 years (COM(2017)0753—C8-0019/2018—2017/0332(COD)). Since the 1990s most of the UK’s public water supplies are being dosed with orthophosphate acid or a sodium orthophosphate to minimise plumbosolvency5–7, using concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 2 mg/L of phosphate (PO43−)6. The different PO43− species are able to interact with the soluble lead ions (Pb2+), to form a layer of lead phosphate compounds which covers the inner side of the pipe8–10. Cities like Brussels or The Hague have chosen the costly option of substituting lead pipes in their distribution networks4, yet using PO43− is a successful and cost-effective alternative to spending ~£10 billion to remove all lead pipes in the UK7.
In DWDS, more than 95% of the biomass contained in these systems are microorganisms attached to structures forming biofilms11. In DWDS, biofilms have been associated with processes that might alter water quality such as metal bio-corrosion12, discolouration events12,13, pathogens appearance12,13 and lead accumulation and release14–17. Therefore, the consequences that PO43− has on biofilm formation must be considered when used in plumbosolvency treatment15.
To what extent PO43− affects the microbial ecology of DWDS remains unknown and previous research provides contradictory results. Several studies conclude that PO43− promoted the development of planktonic microorganisms in drinking water, and changed the bacterial community structure increasing Gram-negative bacterial content18. In relation to biofilm development on a range of substrates, it has been reported that PO43− increased the number of bacterial cells, promoted biofilm viability19 and diversity20,21, but reduced the production of exopolysaccharides22. In contrast, other studies indicated that the bacterial density was not affected by PO43− 23 and even a decrease of heterotrophic bacteria was observed24.
In relation to lead, there are only few studies focusing on the study of microbial communities growing on this type of metal15–17,20,25 and results from these suggested that lead did not affect biofilm biomass20, richness20 and bacterial numbers17, yet exerted a selective pressure on biofilm communities by favouring bacteria able to accumulate and resist heavy metals15,17,20.
In the UK, water utilities are moving towards reducing the costly use of chemical additives, including PO43−, but this is currently constrained by the limited knowledge on the potential consequences that this might have down the pipeline. Therefore, to study the impact of phosphate reduction on the microbiome of DWDS and inform future management practices we aimed to remove PO43− from local drinking water. Most of the studies on phosphate removal have been performed to remove this chemical from wastewater effluents; however, there is limited knowledge on phosphate removal in drinking water. Previous research has shown that granular ferric hydroxide is effective at adsorbing and maintaining low concentrations of phosphate in water26–30. Considering this information, we tested for the first time the capability of two commercial iron pellets (GEH104 and WARP) for removal of phosphate in drinking water.
The aim of this study was to provide better insights into the effect of PO43− dosing on the development of mixed-species biofilms on lead and PVC surfaces in drinking water systems. With this aim, different doses of PO43− were used to develop biofilms under three conditions: (i) control condition: UK standard drinking water PO43− concentrations (1 mg/L of PO43− as phosphorus), (ii) high phosphate condition: double dose of the standard concentrations (2 mg/L of PO43− as phosphorus) and (iii) low phosphate condition: PO43− limited concentration below 1 mg/L.
To our knowledge, this is the first study that provides information about the effect of PO43− on mixed-species biofilms developed on lead and PVC materials in drinking water and aims to improve management strategies of DWDS. The data will inform water companies on the consequences of PO43− dosing in DWDS. This will impact drinking water network management decisions for (i) maintaining water quality standards by controlling microbial growth, (ii) facilitate changes in dose management, (iii) reduce chemical dosing costs, (iv) reduce downstream PO43− removal costs and (v) reduce environmental impact of PO43− leaking from ageing water infrastructure and treated water discharge.
Results
Kinetics of iron pellets to remove phosphate from drinking water
Both types of pellets, WRAP and GEH104, absorbed PO43− successfully (Fig. 1a). There was a proportional relationship between the quantity of pellets added and the PO43− removed. With the higher amount of PO43− used (1 g/L), the pellets WRAP and GEH104 removed 63% and 57%, respectively. However, GEH104 generated less turbidity than WARP (Fig. 1b). Therefore, GEH104 were the pellets selected to run the experiments to test the effect of low PO43− on biofilm development in the bioreactors. Due to the proportional relationship between the amount of pellet and the PO43− removal rate, it was estimated that with 1.7 g/L of GEH104 added to the water, most of the PO43− would be removed during the 28-days experiment. To verify these calculations, a second experiment with 1.7 g of GEH104 pellets and 1 L of local drinking water was run for 8 h and in triplicate. These results showed that 1.7 g of GEH104 pellets could remove 96.08 ± 2.48% of PO43− in drinking water (Fig. 1c). Therefore, for the experiment in the bioreactors, a superior concentration of 2 g/L of GEH104 was used.
Water physicochemical analysis: bioreactors and local drinking water supply
The results of water quality parameters measured in the three bioreactors and the local drinking water supply used for the experiments are summarised in Table 1. The orthophosphate content in water was stable in the three experimental cases (high phosphate: 2.48 ± 0.25 mg as P/L, control phosphate: 1.09 ± 0.09 mg as P/L and low phosphate: 0.03 ± 0.09 mg as P/L) and in local drinking water (1.12 ± 0.17 mg as P/L). Total organic carbon (TOC) did not experiment high fluctuations during the experiment, being lower in the case of low phosphate (0.95 ± 0.16 mg C/L) comparing with the other two cases (high phosphate: 1.41 ± 0.13 mg C/L and control phosphate: 1.47 ± 0.08 mg C/L) and the local drinking water (1.46 ± 0.14 mg C/L). Turbidity, lead and iron content in the local drinking water used to supply the system were very low (0.10 ± 0.05 µg Pb/L 12.47 ± 11.63 µg Fe/L and 0.26 ± 0.22 NTU). When the water in the bioreactors was analysed these three parameters were lower under high phosphate conditions (5.51 ± 2.54 µg Pb/L, 118.43 ± 27.51 µg Fe/L and 1.17 ± 0.33 NTU) than in the other two PO43− conditions (control phosphate: 7.75 ± 3.53 µg Pb/L, 239.07 ± 147.97 µg Fe/L and 1.57 ± 0.94 NTU, and low phosphate: 29.64 ± 11.95 µg Pb/L, 334.53 ± 62.52 µg Fe/L and 3.70 ± 1.76 NTU). On average, the water temperature remained stable for the three conditions studied during the duration of the experiment (high phosphate: 20.18 ± 1.76 °C, control phosphate: 20.66 ± 1.80 °C and low phosphate: 21.18 ± 1.43 °C), but it was lower in the local drinking water supplying the system (16.61 ± 2.29 °C).
Table 1.
Sample | Time (day) | Free chlorine (mg/l) | Total chlorine (mg/l) | Turbidity (NTU) | pH | Room temperature (°C) | Water temperature (°C) | Iron, total as Fe (µg/l) | Lead, total as Pb (µg/l) | Orthophosphate as P (mg/l) | Phosphorus, total as P (mg/l) | Total organic carbon (mg/l) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High phosphate bioreactor | 0 | 0.35 ± 0.06 | 0.45 ± 0.09 | 1.64 ± 0.76 | 6.75 ± 0.01 | 17.33 ± 0.10 | 15.60 ± 0.00 | 114.00 ± 2.65 | 9.63 ± 0.16 | 2.34 ± 0.04 | 2.24 ± 0.03 | 1.60 ± 0.10 |
7 | <0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.92 ± 0.19 | 6.86 ± 0.10 | 17.67 ± 0.28 | 19.43 ± 0.21 | 97.13 ± 1.53 | 5.05 ± 0.34 | 2.13 ± 0.03 | 2.16 ± 0.02 | 1.47 ± 0.06 | |
14 | <0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 1.08 ± 0.06 | 6.74 ± 0.03 | 17.5 ± 0.33 | 19.13 ± 0.21 | 133.67 ± 0.58 | 5.73 ± 0.48 | 2.79 ± 0.01 | 2.77 ± 0.01 | 1.27 ± 0.06 | |
21 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 1.33 ± 0.18 | 6.85 ± 0.01 | 20.00 ± 0.00 | 21.13 ± 0.12 | 157.33 ± 2.08 | 4.32 ± 0.23 | 2.65 ± 0.02 | 2.66 ± 0.03 | 1.40 ± 0.00 | |
28 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.11 ± 0.03 | 0.92 ± 0.18 | 6.87 ± 0.01 | 21.67 ± 0.22 | 22.97 ± 0.06 | 90.00 ± 0.40 | 2.83 ± 0.03 | 2.45 ± 0.03 | 2.38 ± 0.02 | 1.33 ± 0.06 | |
Global average | 0.07 ± 0.12 | 0.14 ± 0.09 | 1.17 ± 0.33 | 6.85 ± 0.16 | 18.42 ± 1.72 | 20.18 ± 1.76 | 118.43 ± 27.51 | 5.51 ± 2.54 | 2.48 ± 0.25 | 2.44 ± 0.26 | 1.41 ± 0.13 | |
Control phosphate bioreactor | 0 | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 0.47 ± 0.01 | 0.67 ± 0.52 | 7.17 ± 0.01 | 17.33 ± 0.10 | 15.73 ± 0.15 | 112.00 ± 3.61 | 9.32 ± 0.65 | 1.22 ± 0.00 | 1.16 ± 0.02 | 1.53 ± 0.06 |
7 | <0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 1.01 ± 0.03 | 6.92 ± 0.09 | 17.67 ± 0.28 | 19.70 ± 0.00 | 131.00 ± 0.00 | 4.12 ± 0.01 | 1.12 ± 0.00 | 1.14 ± 0.00 | 1.57 ± 0.06 | |
14 | <0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.00 | 0.97 ± 0.26 | 6.81 ± 0.02 | 17.5 ± 0.33 | 19.37 ± 0.06 | 153.33 ± 5.77 | 3.85 ± 0.27 | 1.11 ± 0.03 | 1.12 ± 0.01 | 1.40 ± 0.00 | |
21 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 3.07 ± 0.06 | 6.92 ± 0.02 | 20.00 ± 0.00 | 21.30 ± 0.00 | 421.00 ± 3.61 | 10.01 ± 0.25 | 0.99 ± 0.01 | 1.04 ± 0.02 | 1.47 ± 0.06 | |
28 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 3.08 ± 0.25 | 6.90 ± 0.01 | 21.67 ± 0.22 | 23.40 ± 0.00 | 378.00 ± 3.61 | 11.47 ± 0.15 | 1.06 ± 0.03 | 1.11 ± 0.00 | 1.40 ± 0.00 | |
Global average | 0.08 ± 0.11 | 0.14 ± 0.09 | 1.57 ± 0.94 | 6.97 ± 0.19 | 18.42 ± 1.72 | 20.66 ± 1.80 | 239.07 ± 147.97 | 7.75 ± 3.53 | 1.09 ± 0.09 | 1.11 ± 0.05 | 1.47 ± 0.08 | |
Low phosphate bioreactor | 0 | <0.02 | 0.05 ± 0.00 | 2.55 ± 0.37 | 6.39 ± 0.03 | 17.33 ± 0.10 | 18.80 ± 0.26 | 283.00 ± 2.00 | 37.30 ± 0.44 | 0.06 ± 0.00 | 0.06 ± 0.00 | 0.90 ± 0.00 |
7 | <0.02 | 0.05 ± 0.00 | 2.81 ± 0.36 | 6.84 ± 0.10 | 17.67 ± 0.28 | 19.90 ± 0.00 | 275.00 ± 1.00 | 20.97 ± 0.50 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.00 | 1.20 ± 0.00 | |
14 | <0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 2.69 ± 0.21 | 6.41 ± 0.01 | 17.5 ± 0.33 | 19.93 ± 0.06 | 395.67 ± 23.86 | 20.07 ± 0.32 | <0.046 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.80 ± 0.00 | |
21 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.09 ± 0.00 | 2.66 ± 0.12 | 6.52 ± 0.03 | 20.00 ± 0.00 | 21.57 ± 0.06 | 406.67 ± 1.53 | 46.97 ± 0.83 | <0.046 | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 0.83 ± 0.06 | |
28 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.07 ± 0.00 | 2.60 ± 0.06 | 6.53 ± 0.01 | 21.67 ± 0.22 | 23.50 ± 0.00 | 312.33 ± 3.21 | 22.90 ± 0.36 | <0.046 | 0.04 ± 0.00 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | |
Global average | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 3.70 ± 1.76 | 6.66 ± 0.21 | 18.42 ± 1.72 | 21.18 ± 1.43 | 334.53 ± 62.52 | 29.64 ± 11.95 | 0.03 ± 0.09 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.95 ± 0.16 | |
Local drinking water | 0 | 0.42 ± 0.01 | 0.42 ± 0.01 | 0.28 ± 0.32 | 7.00 ± 0.09 | 17.33 ± 0.10 | 15.5 ± 0.01 | 4.82 ± 1.17 | 0.17 ± 0.021 | 1.18 ± 0.02 | 1.16 ± 0.01 | 1.67 ± 0.06 |
7 | 0.47 ± 0.03 | 0.70 ± 0.06 | 0.13 ± 0.13 | 7.10 ± 0.03 | 17.67 ± 0.28 | 13.67 ± 0.12 | 9.46 ± 0.96 | <0.02 | 1.17 ± 0.01 | 1.18 ± 0. 02 | 1.53 ± 0.06 | |
14 | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0.80 ± 0.05 | 0.29 ± 0.27 | 6.89 ± 0.04 | 17.5 ± 0.33 | 16.76 ± 0.12 | 32.47 ± 18.33 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 1.21 ± 0.01 | 1.21 ± 0.010 | 1.37 ± 0.06 | |
21 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | 0.67 ± 0.08 | 0.40 ± 0.40 | 6.97 ± 0.01 | 20.00 ± 0.00 | 18.27 ± 0.15 | 11.63 ± 0.47 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.83 ± 0.01 | 0.82 ± 0.011 | 1.37 ± 0.06 | |
28 | 0.43 ± 0.01 | 0.67 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.07 | 6.98 ± 0.04 | 21.67 ± 0.22 | 20.17 ± 0.12 | 3.96 ± 0.98 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 1.23 ± 0.02 | 1.20 ± 0.01 | 1.37 ± 0.06 | |
Global average | 0.43 ± 0.07 | 0.72 ± 0.14 | 0.26 ± 0.22 | 7.14 ± 0.20 | 18.42 ± 1.72 | 16.61 ± 29 | 12.47 ± 11.63 | 0.10 ± 0.05 | 1.12 ± 0.17 | 1.11 ± 0.17 | 1.46 ± 0.14 |
It is shown the physicochemical parameters measured during 28 days of the DWBR and the local drinking water. The table indicates the measure taken every 7 days, with the average of the three replicas and the corresponding standard deviation.
Microbial community structure
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs were performed to study the structure of biofilms developed over the surface of the materials used to build the bioreactors. Figure 2 shows the lead coupon surface and the section of PVC tubing under high and low phosphate experimental conditions. It is possible to observe a high accumulation of inorganic materials on the lead coupons, which made the visualization of microorganisms within biofilms difficult. However, individual microbial cells were observed for biofilms under high phosphate dosing. For PVC samples, individual microbial cells and biofilm-like structures were observed over all the analysed surface, especially in the case of low phosphate.
Results of bacterial classes (Fig. 3a) showed that Alphaproteobacteria was the most abundant class in lead coupons (35–72%), but its abundance decrease in PVC tubing samples (6–34%), where Betaproteobacteria was more abundant (45–90%). Other classes with representative abundance were: Actinobacteria (0–20%) Gammaproteobacteria (0–19%) and Sphingobacteria (0–24%). Regarding fungal classes (Fig. 3b), sequences related to Eurotiomycetes (13–80%) and Sordariomycetes (5–44%) were detected with a considerably relative abundance in all the samples. Other classes that were highly represented in all the samples analysed included Agaricomycetes (0–17%), Dothideomycetes (1–19%), Leotiomycetes (8–49%), and Microbotryomycetes (0–20%).
Figure 4 shows the results for the relative abundance of the most abundant OTUs at genus level. The bacterial analysis (Fig. 4a) showed that the most abundant genera for lead coupon samples developed under the control phosphate case study were Sphingomonas (20–22%), Afipia (16–18%), Chitinophaga (8%), Blastomonas (6–8%) and Acidobacterium (5–6%). In the PVC tubing samples, under control phosphate condition, Sphingomonas and Blastomonas maintained a similar relative abundance when compared with lead coupons samples (10–15% and 8–10%) Afipia and Acidobacterium abundance was reduced (1–9% and 0%), while other genera increased their relative abundance like Aquabacterium (from 1 to 49–59%) and Acidovorax (from 3–4% to 8–9%).
The relative abundances of Sphingomonas and Afipia in lead coupons developed under high phosphate were similar when compared with control phosphate lead coupons samples (20–26% and 16–19%, respectively). However, other genera increased in abundance in phosphate-enriched samples like Mycobacterium (from 1 to 8–20%), Sphingobium (from 3–4% to 8–11%) or Bradyrhizobium (from 2 to 6–8%), while others reduced it like Chitinophaga (3–5%), Blastomonas (2–3%), Acidobacterium (0%) and Acidovorax (0%). However, in PVC tubing samples under high phosphate treatment, the relative abundance of the most abundant genera in lead coupons was reduced as follows: Sphingomonas (3–8%), Afipia (1–9%), Mycobacterium (0–6%), Sphingobium (0%) and Bradyrhizobium (0–1%). While, the abundance of other genera increased and this was particularly notable for Aquabacterium (45–88%), Nevskia (1–19%) and Acidovorax (2–11%).
Under low phosphate condition, in lead coupons samples genera like Chitinophaga, Acidovorax, Aquabacterium, Sphingobacterium, and Variovorax increased their relative abundance when compared with control and high phosphate samples (14–15%, 7–8%, 7%, 4–5% and 2–4%, respectively). Several genera such as Sphingomonas (10–12%), Afipia (4–6%), Blastomonas (0%), and Sphingobium (0%) decreased while other remained relatively well represented such as Mycobacterium (6–7%) and Bradyrhizobium (5–7%). Biofilm PVC samples developed under low phosphate treatment, had high relative abundance of Aquabacterium (27–58%), Acidovorax (11–16%), Sphingomonas (8–21%), Sphingobacterium (2–23%), Variovorax (2–9%) and Mycobacterium (0–6%).
In all the analysed samples, potential pathogenic genus such as Legionella were presented in biofilms form both type of materials, but with low relative abundance (0–3%), especially in lead coupons samples (1–3%).
When fungal relative abundance was analysed (Fig. 4b), the most represented genera in all the samples were Cadophora (0–49%), Exophiala (6–80%) and Fusarium (4–35%). Cladosporium, Isaria and Rhodotorula were more abundant in biofilm samples developed under phosphate-enriched treatment and in both type of materials (2–16%, 1–22% and 1–19%). Cryptococcus and Aspergillus were more abundant under low phosphate in both materials (1–42% and 0–25%). It is notable that Candida, a potential pathogenic fungus had very low relative abundance in the lead coupons samples (~0%), but its presence increased in PVC tubing samples, especially under low phosphate condition (0–3%). Please note that the replica 3 of PVC in the low phosphate case, had a considerable different composition when compared with the other replicas of the same case study.
Venn diagrams of microbial community structure
The Venn diagrams (Fig. 5a) show that independently of the treatment and material analysed, more than 50% of the bacterial genera were common to all the samples (Fig. 5b). What we consider as “unique” or “rare” bacterial genera, represented <10% for high phosphate and control phosphate samples, and between 6 and 18% for biofilm samples grown under low phosphate treatment, suggesting that the absence of PO43− might promote a higher abundance of unique or rare bacteria genera.
For fungi, the common genera for all samples consisted of 57–70% of the total relative abundance of all samples (Fig. 5b). The unique/rare genera were usually below a relative abundance of 10% in all the cases, except in the PVC tubing samples under low phosphate treatment (11.1%). Overall, these unique genera have a very low relative abundance for both type of microorganisms (bacteria and fungi) in all the samples.
Non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis based on the relative abundance of microorganisms
Non-metric multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis of bacteria at genera level, shows a clear separation of the bacterial community structure depending on both the PO43− treatment and the material used to support microbial growth (Fig. 6a). According to the Global ANOSIM analysis, considering all the samples (Fig. 6b), there were significant differences between the PO43− treatments (ANOSIM: Global-R = 0.560 p-value = 0.001), and between the materials (lead and PVC) (ANOSIM: Global-R = 0.552 p-value = 0.001). When treatments were compared to each other (pairwise comparisons), significant differences were found for the samples with PO43− presence (high and control phosphate) and the limited PO43− treatment (low phosphate) (ANOSIM high–low phosphate: R = 0.648 p-value = 0.002 and ANOSIM control–low phosphate: R = 0.758 p-value = 0.002, respectively).
The MDS analysis of fungal communities (Fig. 6c) did not show a clear separation between samples regarding PO43− treatments. The ANOSIM analysis indicated significant differences between the case studies when the factor PO43− treatment was considered (ANOSIM: Global-R = 0.308 p-value = 0.002). As observed for bacteria, significant differences were observed between the presence and absence of phosphate (ANOSIM HP-LP: R = 0.333 p-value = 0.004 and ANOSIM CP-LP: R = 0.422 p-value = 0.006). No significant differences were found associate to the type of material analysed (ANOSIM: Global-R = 0.021 p-value = 0.207).
Alpha diversity
Figure 7 shows the results of the alpha-diversity analysis; dominance, Shannon index (diversity) and Chao-1 (richness) and the results of the non-parametric test Mann–Whitney U (Supplementary Table 1) between samples. These showed that there were significant differences (p-value ≤ 0.05) between all the indices in samples from every experimental treatment on biofilms developed on lead coupons. However, no significant differences were observed for PVC tubing samples (p-value > 0.05). Furthermore, there were significant differences (p-value ≤ 0.05) between the indices according to the materials studied (lead and PVC).
Considering fungal communities, there were no significant differences (p-value > 0.05) in richness for all the samples and treatments analysed. There were significant differences (p-value ≤ 0.05) in dominance and diversity indices between treatments in lead coupons samples, and between high phosphate and low phosphate treatments in PVC tubing samples. However, when the indices were compared according to type material, only significant differences (p-value ≤ 0.05) were observed for dominance and diversity for biofilm samples under control phosphate treatment. When bacterial and fungal diversity indices were compared, there were significant differences (p-value ≤ 0.05) in all of cases, except in low phosphate PVC tubing samples (p-value > 0.05).
Correlations between physicochemical and microbiological parameters
Supplementary Table 2 shows a matrix of the non-parametric Spearman’s correlations (two-tailed) between physicochemical and microbiological data (diversity indices and key representative genera) and indicates statistically significant correlations at different p-levels.
Regarding physicochemical parameters, all were correlated significantly (p-value < 0.05) between them. Water temperature was positively correlated with turbidity, iron and lead. However, it was negatively correlated with chlorine, orthophosphate, pH and TOC. Orthophosphate was positively correlated with chlorine, pH, TOC, but negatively with turbidity and iron, lead.
With reference to diversity indices, bacterial indices did not have significant correlations (p-value > 0.05) with physicochemical parameters, and it was noticed that bacterial diversity and richness were positively significant correlated (p-value < 0.05) with several genera like Legionella, Mycobacterium or Sphingomonas. Regarding fungal indices, diversity and dominance were significant correlated (p-value < 0.05) with all the physicochemical parameters and some genera like Acidovorax, Afipia, Exophiala and Rhodotorula. The correlations indicated that chlorine, pH, PO43− and TOC were positively significant correlated (p-value < 0.05) with fungal diversity. However, lead, iron, and turbidity were positively significant correlated (p-value < 0.05) with fungal dominance.
In relation to microbial genera (bacteria and fungi), three genera were strongly correlated with all the physicochemical parameters: Afipia, Rhodotorula and Acidovorax. Aphia and Rhodotorula were positively correlated with PO43−, TOC and pH but negatively with lead, iron and turbidity, and the opposite was observed for Acidovorax.
Discussion
Water companies invest considerable resources in developing effective and cost-effective methods to remove PO43− from wastewater effluents before is discharged back to the environment26,27 to prevent eutrophication events31. However, reducing PO43− in drinking water successfully, to promote the supply of drinking water free of or with less chemicals, was one of the biggest challenges of this study. This was specially challenged without significantly modifying any other characteristics that could affect the overall quality and safety of the drinking water supplied.
In this study, a concentration of 1.7 g/L of GEH104 iron pellets removed 96.08 ± 2.48% of PO43− from 1 L of drinking water (1.3 mg/L of PO43− as P) in 8 h. In other studies, removal of PO43− was also successful. For example, Genz et al.28 showed that granulated ferric hydroxide had a higher adsorption for PO43− and a higher affinity at low concentrations compared to other adsorbents like activated aluminium oxide, in assays with membrane bioreactors. Ernst et al.32 showed that in membrane bioreactors, a fixed-bed made of granular ferric hydroxide was able to maintain a total phosphorus concentration of <0.03 mg/L for municipal water reuse. Yousefi et al.29 reported that a dosage of 4.03 g of granular ferric hydroxide could remove 92.14% of PO43− in 82 min from an aqueous solution with an initial concentration of PO43− of 1.78 mg/L and pH = 5.81. Comparing with the other studies in wastewater systems mentioned before, the iron pellets tested in this study required more time to remove a comparable percentage of PO43−, but the amount of pellet used was less. Therefore, the results in this paper ratified that iron pellets, in particular GEH104, can be used to successfully reduce the content of PO43− in drinking water without increasing significantly other key quality parameters, including turbidity.
In lead coupons, SEM micrographs (Fig. 2) show that biofilm-like structures were mixed with different chemical compounds which can form geometrical structures. Nadagouda et al.33, studying the formation of compounds on lead pipes in a laboratory-based DWDS, observed that pH values between 6 and 7, favoured the formation of chemical structures with different shapes, such as nanorods, microrods, and dendritic structures on lead surfaces with PO43− concentrations of at 3 mg/L. We were able to observe similar dendritic structures on the material surfaces (PVC and lead) analysed in this study. The composition of these structures was not analysed, but, according to other studies they might be apatite species. Peters et al.34, using spectrometric techniques to study lead service drinking water pipes, showed that lead carbonates were formed under pH adjusted-waters, and species like apatite were observed when orthophosphoric acid was added. This is in agreement with Hopwood et al.35, who found that lead water pipes from Yorkshire (UK), fed with PO43− treated drinking water, contained a variety of apatite minerals, included lead apatite species which are the least soluble form of lead36. In addition, microorganisms have the potential to induce metal precipitation in a range of environmental settings. Couasnon et al.37 tested the capacity of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 biofilms to bio-induced the precipitation of lead-bearing mineral in aqueous cultures. The authors reported that pyromorphite was the first solid to precipitate within hours and that pyromorphite covered the surface of biofilms forming a crust. The appearance of these compounds was attributed to EPS and PO43− groups released by metabolically active cells in biofilms.
The results from the water physicochemical analysis showed that higher PO43− concentration favoured less lead and iron dissolution, thus proving the efficiency of PO43− as an anticorrosion agent in drinking water systems. PO43− has been reported to be a corrosion inhibitor that reduces metal content in water5,38. However, as observed in this study, PO43− addition can indirectly promote the increase of free chlorine in the water by reducing the amount of metal available to be oxidized by the disinfectant39. Chlorine decay in water supply systems can be attributed to the interaction between the pipe material, the attached biofilm and the accumulated sediment40. Chlorine can interact with organic matter in the pipes and favour the appearance of disinfection by-products like trihalomethanes (THM)40,41. It has been reported that bacteria isolated from drinking water supplies such as Afipia and Methylobacterium were able to degrade THM and haloacetic acids42,43. The presence of this type of bacteria could explain the reduction of free chlorine in low phosphate condition observed in this study. The results from this study agree with those of Jang et al.21, which reported an increase of chlorine in a reactor with corrosion-susceptible cast iron pipes in the presence of PO43−. Increased free chlorine levels can reduce the number of active cells in the water thus indirectly controlling biofilm formation44. Despite this, chlorine has a limited effect on biofilms, due to the difficulty of penetrating the different biofilm layers45, especially if biofilms are thick, dense or with high EPS production45.
Several studies have reported that increasing PO43− levels in drinking water reduces the production of EPS in biofilms22,46,47. Among other functions, EPS is involved in protecting biofilm cells from external damage as well as maintaining its integrity and aiding the attachment of cells to substrates48. Reduction of EPS in response to PO43− increase can favour a weaker biofilm, sensitive to the action of oxidants like chlorine45,49 and more susceptible to its detachment from pipes. Xing et al.49, testing the effect of ozone-biologically activated carbon treatment with various PO43− doses in annular reactors, reported a decrease in the total amount of EPS, followed by a reduction in chlorine consumption and disinfection by-products formation. In agreement with these observations, this study showed that PO43− addition promoted a decrease in bacterial diversity in lead coupons.
We also observed a significant correlation between TOC and PO43−. The influence of these two parameters as limiting nutrients able to control microbial growth has been widely discussed in the literature. In studies carried out in carbon-limited waters, the addition of phosphorus did not have any effect on microbial biofilm activity24,50,51. However, in drinking water with high amounts of organic matter, microbial growth can be limited by phosphorus instead of organic carbon52–54. Indeed, Park et al.55 suggested that TOC and PO43− interact having a combined impact on biofilm formation in drinking water systems. Butterfield et al.56 reported that iron oxide-containing corrosion products in drinking water promoted the adsorption of organic carbon and favoured biofilm growth. This could explain why in this study bacterial diversity was higher when PO43− and TOC were low but iron and lead content in the water were higher.
This study shows for the first time clear differences in the microbial community structure of mixed-species biofilm due to PO43− treatment. The addition of PO43− promoted the presence of microorganisms (e.g. Sphingomonas, Bradyrhizobium, and Acidovorax) related with mechanisms of phosphorus mobilization. For example, species belonging to the genera Sphingomonas can carry a gen involved in PO43− solubilization and transport57 like gcd gene58 and pst operon59. Similarly, Bradyrhizobium strains have the ability of solubilizing PO43− from hydroxyapatite60 in aqueous culture medium. Furthermore, the addition of PO43− in this study promoted the presence of microorganisms able to tolerate or accumulate heavy metals including Acidovorax and Sphingomonas57,61. We found fungi including Aspergillus and Fusarium that have been reported as important phosphorus solubilizing microorganisms62–64 in a range of environments. Fusarium, Aspergillus, Exophiala or Rhodotorula can tolerate and remove heavy metals from the environment65–70. For example, Rhodotorula when forming biofilms is successful at removing Pb2+ from aqueous solution thanks to the EPS production and the precipitation of lead with PO43− 71. The results from this study show that PO43− can promote specialised microorganisms in biofilms, both fungi and bacteria, which could have bioremediation applications, therefore promoting a protective environment inside the pipe.
Bacteria belonging to the genera Sphingomonas, Afipia and Acidovorax, and fungal genera such as Exophiala, Cadophora and Fusarium, were detected in all the conditions and materials studied. It can be suggested that these microorganisms form a core community and play a key role in biofilm formation, as proposed by other researchers studying mixed-species biofilms72–77. In these studies, bacteria belonging to the genera Acinetobacter, Burkholderia, Methylobacterium, Mycobacterium, Sphingomonas and Staphylococcus played an important role in the formation of biofilms an aggregates78–81.
When the microbial communities were analysed based on materials (lead vs. PVC), bacterial community structure and alpha-diversity indicators were significantly different. Samples from lead coupon samples were more diverse than PVC tubing samples. On the one hand, several studies in DWDS pipes made of different materials, agree that in plastic-based materials like PVC biofilm formation was lower when compared to cast iron82 or stainless steel83. On the other hand, other studies in drinking water systems support the opposite17, for example, Belcher17 reported that bacterial communities developed on PVC had a higher Shannon index than lead. In this study, lead was clearly promoting bacterial diversity and influenced the community structure of biofilms.
Fungal diversity was not significantly affected by type of material. This is in agreement with other studies where fungal communities in drinking water biofilms tended to be less diverse and more stable over time73 when compared with bacteria. From this study, we can confirm that fungi formed part of mix-species consortia with bacteria in biofilms, being an important component of the microbial communities of lead and PVC materials in DWDS73,74. Despite fungi are not usually included in drinking water regulations, the monitoring of these organisms should be considered by water utilities due to their involvement in processes that can deteriorate water quality.
The results from this study were performed in bioreactors and despite the dynamic conditions under which the biofilms were grown, further studies using real scale DWDS and hydraulic conditions like those in real water networks will help to reinforce findings from this research.
Future studies will benefit from considering the role of other physicochemical parameters at different PO43− concentrations in lead pipes, like manganese, nitrate or THM. Particularly, the monitoring of manganese could be of interest due to its ability to accelerate the oxidation of Pb(II) carbonate solids by free chlorine in lead pipes84. Another aspect of this study that could be developed further is the detection of specific pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes due to phosphate dosing in lead pipes. We found that lead promoted the appearance of pathogenic species but at very low relative abundance. Longer studies (> 28 days) will help to elucidate the role of biofilms as reservoirs of pathogens under phosphate enrichened conditions.
The results of this research show several key findings for the management of DWDS as follows:
Iron pellets GEH104 were effective at reducing PO43− in drinking water, removing the 96.08 ± 2.48% of PO43− in 8 h.
Phosphate dosing of 2 mg/L was successful at reducing metal content and lead dissolution in drinking water, comparing with the other conditions studied (below 1 and 1 mg/L).
Phosphate dosing had a significantly stronger effect on bacterial than on fungal communities on both type of materials (lead and PVC).
Lead favoured bacterial diversity, while phosphate reduced it and increased fungal diversity in biofilms.
The combined presence of phosphate and lead materials favoured the appearance of microorganisms specialized in phosphorus metabolism and metal resistance. Some of these microorganisms have bioremediation capabilities, therefore can be used to promoting a protective environment inside the pipe.
The data from this study yields new information about the consequences of PO43− variation in DWDS. Showing that lead promoted a more diverse bacterial community than PVC and that phosphate reduced bacterial biofilm diversity in both type of materials, while increasing fungal diversity. Therefore, it can be concluded that phosphate variation can induce changes in the structure of biofilms and affect the level of chlorine in the water, impacting the disinfection strategies where a chlorine residual is kept safeguarding water safety. This new knowledge is of great relevance for water utilities to improve management strategies and inform decisions to control microbial growth in drinking water pipelines.
Methods
Bioreactor system set up
In order to study the development of microorganisms under different doses of phosphate, three drinking water biofilm reactors (DWBR) were designed and assembled for each experimental case (Fig. 8).
Each DWBR is composed by a tank of 25 L capacity with a lid connected to a source of local tap water, a float valve which controls the entrance of water to the tank, a high-pressure diaphragm pump (Flojet Series R3811/03811 XYLEM) to create a constant flow of 5.3 L/min, which was the flow recommended for lead pipes sampling85, and one Bio-inline bioreactor (Model IBR-500 Bio-inLine® Biofil Reactor, Biosurface Technologies Corporations, Bozeman, USA) with 12 lead coupons (1.27 cm of diameter) (Heaps Arnold & Heaps LTD, Rotherham, UK). Ball valves and gate valves were added to control the flow through the system, and two drains (one principal and one secondary for emergency), were installed to renew the water inside the tank twice per day (flow of 35 mL/min). To connect all the parts of the bioreactor, a black PVC flexible tubing (inner diameter: 9.75 mm) (RS PRO, Northants, UK) was used. The water used for the experiments was the local drinking water supply, where the water is treated with ferric sulphate at treatment level (as coagulant) and monosodium phosphate is used to minimise lead dissolution during distribution. The target PO43− dose is 1.3 mg as P/L, but this varied during the experiment.
The DWBR were cleaned before starting the experiment with Rodolite H (RODOL Ltd, Liverpool, UK), a solution of sodium hypochlorite with less than 16% free chlorine, at a concentration of 20 mg/L73. Lead coupons were cleaned by submerging them for 45 min in a solution of RBS 2% (RBS® 35 concentrate, Fluka Analytical), a general cleaning detergent composed by a mixture of anionic and non-ionic surfactants, and by shaking them at 100 rpm. Then, the coupons were cleaned during 15 min in distilled water at 100 rpm and, finally, they were sterilised with UV light, with an exposure time of 30 min86.
To feed the DWBR with high PO43−, a concentration of 65 mg/L of sodium dihydrogenorthophosphate (monosodium phosphate 32%, Airedale Chemicals, Keighley, UK), was added to double the normal concentration of phosphate in the local drinking water and supplied with a peristaltic pump at a speed of 17 mL/min. For the DWBR with a PO43− limiting concentration, PO43− was removed with GEH104 iron pellets (GEH Wasserchemie GMBH & CO. KG, Osnabrück, Germany) at a concentration of 2 g/L. A pre-treatment tank containing the iron pellets used to remove the PO43− from the main drinking water supply was needed. In the pre-treatment tank, the pellets were located into filter bag shocks (REDSEA) overlapped with a hole size of 225 and 150 µm, and the pellets were changed three times per week. The pre-treatment tank was built in a higher elevated position than the tank connected to the DWBR (to favour the transport of water between the two tanks), and a diaphragm pump was added to ensure that all the water in the tank passed through the filter bag containing the iron pellets.
Phosphate kinetic studies: removal of phosphate from the local drinking water supply
In order to remove PO43− from the local drinking water supply, a set of experiments were performed using two commercial iron pellets (granulated ferric hydroxide): GEH104 (GEH Wasserchemie GMBH & CO. KG, Osnabrück, Germany) and WARP (Aquaminerals B.V, Nieuwegein, Netherlands). WARP (Aquaminerals B.V, Nieuwegein, Netherlands) and GEH104 (GEH Wasserchemie GMBH & CO. KG, Osnabrück, Germany). WRAP are pellets of 1–4 mm, red/brown in colour, and they are predominantly formed of ferrihydrite (Fe5HO8·4H2O). GEH104 pellets have a size of 0.2–2 mm, black colour, and are composed mostly of akageneite (ß-FeOOH) and ferric oxyhydroxide (Fe(OH)3).
To prevent PO43− absorption on glass surfaces, note that for all the experiments involving iron pellets, all the glassware was washed with a 10% HCl solution for 30 min, rinsed with abundant distilled water and dried in a convection oven at 60 °C. Before starting the tests, the pellets were pre-treated by rising them (100 g) with ultrapure deionized water 10 times, then, the pellets were oven-dried at 105 °C overnight.
To compare the PO43− adsorption capacity of the iron pellets, three different quantities (0.2, 0.5 and 1 g) of each type of pellet was mixed in 1 L of local drinking water within a flocculator (Stuart Equipment SW6, Staffordshire, UK) at 150 rpm during 8 h at room temperature. To obtain an absorption kinetic curve of each pellet, the concentration of PO43− was measured every 2 h. A sample aliquot of 10 mL was taken from each experimental case and the PO43− concentration was measured using PhosVer® 3 Phosphate Reagent Powder Pillows (HACH) and a spectrophotometer set to a wavelength of 880 nm (Jenway 7300 Visible Spectrophotometer).
Physicochemical analysis of water quality
During the 28 days of the experiment, several physicochemical factors were analysed daily for the water in the three DWBR as well as the local drinking water feeding them. Every analysis was performed in triplicate and the average of the replicates was calculated. Several parameters were measured daily in the laboratory; turbidity by means of a Palintest turbidity meter (Palintest PTH7091, UK), chlorine (free and total) with a chlorine meter (ChloroSense Palintest, UK), temperature and pH using a HannaH1991003 pH-meter (Hanna Instruments, Bedfordshire, UK) and orthophosphate concentration which was measured as explained above with PhosVer® using a Jenway 7300 Visible spectrophotometer. In addition, triplicate bulk water samples were collected weekly, and analysed for total lead, total iron, orthophosphate, total phosphorus and total organic carbon by an accredited drinking water laboratory, ALS environmental (Coatbridge, UK).
Biofilm sampling from bioreactors
After 28 days of biofilm development, lead coupons were collected from the bioreactor and placed in a sterile petri dish with 30 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7). Then coupons were brushed using toothbrushes to remove the biofilm attached to the coupon surface as described in Deines et al.87. The toothbrushes were previously sonicated in an Ultrasonic Water Bath (Model AL04-04-230, Advantage-Lab, Menen, Belgie) during 45 min in a solution of 2% of RBS and during 10 min in distilled water, and then, they were sterilized in an autoclave (Autoclave Prestige 2100 Classic 9 litres, Prestige Medical, Blackburn, UK) during 20 min at 121 °C. The biofilm solutions were filtered through a sterile filter (0.22 µm MCE Membrane MF-Millipore, UK), and the filters were kept at −20 °C until DNA extraction was performed.
In addition to the lead coupons, three pieces of PVC flexible tubing of 75 cm from each bioreactor were taken after 28 days to study biofilm growth on this material. A longitudinal cut along the tubes was performed with a sterile scalpel, and then, each half-tube was brushed internally using sterile toothbrushes and 30 mL of PBS (pH 7). The PBS solutions with the biofilms were filtered through a sterile filter (0.22 µm MCE Membrane MF-Millipore, UK), and filters kept at −20 °C until DNA extraction.
Extraction of DNA
The procedure for extracting DNA was based on a modified protocol described by Douterelo et al.12. Filters with concentrated biofilm solution, were placed into a 2 mL Eppendorf tubes. Then 740 μl of SET lysis buffer (40 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 9, 0.75 M sucrose) was added and the filters were crushed with sterilized pestles (autoclave 20 min 121 °C). Ninety microlitres of lysozyme (9 mg/ml) was added and filters incubated at 37 °C for 30 min with shaking (100 rpm) in a Hybaid hybridisation oven (Thermo Scientific, UK). Subsequently, 90 μl of sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) and 25 μl of proteinase K (20 mg/ml) were added to the tube and the sample incubated at 55 °C for 2 h with shaking in a Hybaid oven. The supernatant (aqueous phase) was transferred to a clean 2 mL Eppendorf tube, and then 137 μl 5 M NaCl and 115 μl CTAB/NaCl solution (100:41 mg/ml) were added and incubated at 65 °C for 30 min with shaking in a Hybaid oven. The supernatant was treated twice with 838 μl of chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1) (Sigma, UK) and DNA was precipitated with 815 μl of isopropanol. The pellet was then washed twice in 1 ml of 70% ethanol, dried for 30 min and re-dissolved in 50 μl DEP-treated sterile water. Quantity and purity of the extracted DNA were assessed using NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop, Wilmington, USA).
Sequencing analysis
Sequencing was performed by Illumina MiSeq technology by MR DNA Molecular Research Laboratory (www.mrdnalab.com, Texas, USA) following the manufacturer’s guidelines. For studying the bacterial communities, the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced using primers 28F and 519R. For fungal characterisation, the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer regions ITS1-2 were targeted. Sequence data was processed by MR DNA using as described in Douterelo et al.74. The number of shared genera between samples and the Venn diagrams was calculated using the web tool provided by the Bioinformatics & Evolutionary Genomics group at the University of Gent (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/). Alpha-diversity metrics including dominance, Shannon Index (diversity, number of different OTUs taking into account their relative abundance) and Chao-1 (richness, number of different OTUs) of bacterial and fungal communities at 97% sequence similarity cut off, were calculated with the software PAST version 4.088.
Scanning electron microscopy
On day 28, a lead coupon and a piece of PVC tubing were taken from the high phosphate and low phosphate experimental bioreactors for visualization with SEM by the Electron Microscopy Facility of the Faculty of Science of the University of Sheffield. The coupons were fixed for 24 h in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Glutaraldehyde, 25% aqueous solution, Thermo Fisher, UK) and washed in PBS and post fixed using 2% aqueous Osmium tetroxide, washed briefly in water and dehydrated. The dehydration consisted of a series of treatments with graded ethanol, samples were dried in a 50/50 mixture of 100% ethanol and hexamethyldisilazane (HEX) with a final drying step in 100% HEX. Samples were mounted onto a pin-stub using a Leit-C sticky tab and Leit-C plast, gold-coated using an Edwards S150B sputter coater and examined in using a Tescan Vega3 LMU SEM.
Statistical analysis
To establish differences in microbial communities (bacteria and fungi), the sequences relative abundance at 97% similarity cut off was used. All data were transformed by square root calculations and Bray–Curtis similarity matrixes were generated using the software Primer-E v7 (PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UK)89 and visualised using non-metric multidimensional scaling (MDS) diagrams. The analysis of similarity statistics (ANOSIM) was calculated using the same Bray–Curtis similarity distance matrixes using Primer-E v7. R statistic values from the MDS analysis indicated the strength of the impact that the factors had on the samples73, in this case treatment (high phosphate, control phosphate, low phosphate) and material (lead and PVC). R values vary between 0 and 1, where 1 indicates high separation of the samples between levels of the factor and 0 indicates no separation73.
The statistical differences between alpha-diversity metrics in each sample were tested by performing a non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test with SPSS Statistics 26 (IBM, USA). Correlations between physicochemical and microbiological parameters were explored by Spearman’s rank non-parametric correlations using SPSS Statistics 26 (IBM, USA). Alpha-diversity metrics and the relative abundance of the most representative taxonomic genera for bacteria and fungi were used as microbiological parameters in the establishment of correlations.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This research has been funded by the UK National Biofilm Innovation Centre (NBIC), Research Grant Ref 001POC18046 | RIS17564-19, BBSRC Grant Ref. BB/R012415/1. We would like to recognise and thank the Electron Microscopy Facility of the Faculty of Science of the University of Sheffield for its contribution in sample visualization by SEM. We would like to thank Dwr Cymru Welsh Water for its support and technical advice and to AquaMinerals B.V. and GEH Wasserchemie GmbH & Co. KG for providing the iron pellets for the analysis.
Author contributions
G.D.O. and I.D. were involved in the design, execution, and analysis of the experiment results, as well as writing the manuscript. A.A., H.J. and E.K. were involved in experimental design, data analysis, and the preparation of the manuscript. E.R., C.C.P. and P.G. were involved in data analysis, and the preparation of the manuscript.
Data availability
Raw sequence data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in NCBI library as a Sequence Read Archive (SRA) with the accession code PRJNA663268 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/study/?acc=PRJNA663268).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41522-020-00152-w.
References
- 1.Wierzbicka M, Antosiewicz D. How lead can easily enter the food chain—a study of plant roots. Sci. Total Environ. 1993;134:423–429. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(05)80043-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wani AL, Ara A, Usmani JA. Lead toxicity: a review. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2015;8:55–64. doi: 10.1515/intox-2015-0009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jarvis P, Quy K, Macadam J, Edwards M, Smith M. Intake of lead (Pb) from tap water of homes with leaded and low lead plumbing systems. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;644:1346–1356. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hayes CR, Skubala ND. Is there still a problem with lead in drinking water in the European Union? J. Water Health. 2009;7:569–580. doi: 10.2166/wh.2009.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McNeill LS, Edwards M. Phosphate inhibitor use at US utilities. J. Am. Water Work. Assoc. 2002;94:57–63. doi: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.2002.tb09506.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cardew PT. Measuring the benefit of orthophosphate treatment on lead in drinking water. J. Water Health. 2009;7:123–131. doi: 10.2166/wh.2009.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hayes CR, Hydes OD. UK experience in the monitoring and control of lead in drinking water. J. Water Health. 2012;10:337–348. doi: 10.2166/wh.2012.210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Xu Y, Schwartz FW. Lead immobilization by hydroxyapatite in aqueous solutions. J. Contam. Hydrol. 1994;15:187–206. doi: 10.1016/0169-7722(94)90024-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mavropoulos E, Rocha NCC, Moreira JC, Rossi AM, Soares GA. Characterization of phase evolution during lead immobilization by synthetic hydroxyapatite. Mater. Charact. 2004;53:71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2004.08.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Trueman BF, Krkošek WH, Gagnon GA. Effects of ortho- and polyphosphates on lead speciation in drinking water. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2018;4:505–512. doi: 10.1039/C7EW00521K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liu G, et al. Pyrosequencing reveals bacterial communities in unchlorinated drinking water distribution system: An integral study of bulk water, suspended solids, loose deposits, and pipe wall biofilm. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48:5467–5476. doi: 10.1021/es5009467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Douterelo I, Sharpe RL, Boxall JB. Influence of hydraulic regimes on bacterial community structure and composition in an experimental drinking water distribution system. Water Res. 2013;47:503–516. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lau HY, Ashbolt NJ. The role of biofilms and protozoa in Legionella pathogenesis: Implications for drinking water. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009;107:368–378. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04208.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ancion PY, Lear G, Lewis GD. Three common metal contaminants of urban runoff (Zn, Cu & Pb) accumulate in freshwater biofilm and modify embedded bacterial communities. Environ. Pollut. 2010;158:2738–2745. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.White C, Tancos M, Lytle DA. Microbial community profile of a lead service line removed from a drinking water distribution system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011;77:5557–5561. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02446-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kogo A, Payne SJ, Andrews RC. Impact of corrosion control on biofilm development in simulated partial lead service line replacements. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2017;34:711–720. doi: 10.1089/ees.2016.0507. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Belcher, K. O. Accumulation of Lead by Biofilms in Drinking Water Distribution Systems (University of Arkansas, 2018).
- 18.Kasahara S, Maeda K, Ishikawa M. Influence of phosphorus on biofilm accumulation in drinking water distribution systems. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply. 2004;4:389–398. doi: 10.2166/ws.2004.0130. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rubulis J, Juhna T. Evaluating the potential of biofilm control in water supply systems by removal of phosphorus from drinking water. Water Sci. Technol. 2007;55:211–217. doi: 10.2166/wst.2007.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Payne SJ, Piorkowski GS, Hansen LT, Gagnon GA. Impact of zinc orthophosphate on simulated drinking water biofilms influenced by lead and copper. J. Environ. Eng. 2016;142:1–9. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jang HJ, Choi YJ, Ro HM, Ka JO. Effects of phosphate addition on biofilm bacterial communities and water quality in annular reactors equipped with stainless steel and ductile cast iron pipes. J. Microbiol. 2012;50:17–28. doi: 10.1007/s12275-012-1040-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fang W, Hu J, Ong S. Effects of phosphorus on biofilm disinfections in model drinking water distribution systems. J. Water Health. 2010;8:446–454. doi: 10.2166/wh.2009.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gouider M, Bouzid J, Sayadi S, Montiel A. Impact of orthophosphate addition on biofilm development in drinking water distribution systems. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009;167:1198–1202. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Appenzeller BMR, et al. Effect of adding phosphate to drinking water on bacterial growth in slightly and highly corroded pipes. Water Res. 2001;35:1100–1105. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00337-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Butt, S. Uniderstanding Phosphate for Controlling Metals Release and Biofilm Formations in Drinking Water Distribution Systems (Dalhousie University, 2016).
- 26.Chen J, et al. Efficient removal of phosphate by facile prepared magnetic diatomite and illite clay from aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2016;287:162–172. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.11.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Awual MR. Efficient phosphate removal from water for controlling eutrophication using novel composite adsorbent. J. Clean. Prod. 2019;228:1311–1319. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.325. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Genz A, Kornmüller A, Jekel M. Advanced phosphorus removal from membrane filtrates by adsorption on activated aluminium oxide and granulated ferric hydroxide. Water Res. 2004;38:3523–3530. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yousefi M, Nabizadeh R, Alimohammadi M, Mohammadi AA, Mahvi AH. Removal of phosphate from aqueous solutions using granular ferric hydroxide process optimization by response surface methodology. Desalin. Water Treat. 2019;158:290–300. doi: 10.5004/dwt.2019.24281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sperlich, A. Phosphate Adsorption Onto Granular Ferric Hydroxide (GFH) for Wastewater Reuse (der Technischen Universität Berlin, 2010).
- 31.Axinte O, et al. Evolution of trophic parameters from Amara Lake. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2015;14:559–565. doi: 10.30638/eemj.2015.240. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ernst M, et al. An integrated wastewater treatment and reuse concept for the Olympic Park 2008, Beijing. Desalination. 2007;202:293–301. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.12.067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nadagouda MN, et al. Effect of phosphate inhibitors on the formation of lead phosphate/carbonate nanorods, microrods, and dendritic structures. Cryst. Growth Des. 2009;9:1798–1805. doi: 10.1021/cg8009699. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Peters NJ, Davidson CM, Britton A, Robertson SJ. The nature of corrosion products in lead pipes used to supply drinking water to the City of Glasgow, Scotland, UK. Fresenius. J. Anal. Chem. 1999;363:562–565. doi: 10.1007/s002160051247. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hopwood JD, et al. The identification and synthesis of lead apatite minerals formed in lead water pipes. J. Chem. 2016;2016:13–17. doi: 10.1155/2016/9074062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hopwood JD, et al. Development of chloropyromorphite coatings for lead water pipes. J. Mater. Chem. 2002;12:1717–1723. doi: 10.1039/b111379h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Couasnon T, et al. Experimental assessment of occurrences and stability of lead-bearing minerals in bacterial biofilms. Chem. Geol. 2019;505:23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.11.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tam YS, Elefsiniotis P. Corrosion control in water supply systems: Effect of pH, alkalinity, and orthophosphate on lead and copper leaching from brass plumbing. J. Environ. Sci. Heal. - Part A Toxic./Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2009;44:1251–1260. doi: 10.1080/10934520903140009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rahman MS, Gagnon GA. Bench-scale evaluation of drinking water treatment parameters on iron particles and water quality. Water Res. 2014;48:137–147. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Brown D, Bridgeman J, West JR. Predicting chlorine decay and THM formation in water supply systems. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2011;10:79–99. doi: 10.1007/s11157-011-9229-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Rodriguez MJ, Sérodes JB. Spatial and temporal evolution of trihalomethanes in three water distribution systems. Water Res. 2001;35:1572–1586. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00403-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tsagkari E, Sloan WT. Impact of Methylobacterium in the drinking water microbiome on removal of trihalomethanes. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2019;141:10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2018.07.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhang P, et al. Biodegradation of haloacetic acids by bacterial isolates and enrichment cultures from drinking water systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009;43:3169–3175. doi: 10.1021/es802990e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Douterelo I, Husband S, Loza V, Boxall J. Dynamics of biofilm regrowth in drinking water distribution systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016;82:4155–4168. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00109-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schwering M, Song J, Louie M, Turner RJ, Ceri H. Multi-species biofilms defined from drinking water microorganisms provide increased protection against chlorine disinfection. Biofouling. 2013;29:917–928. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2013.816298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kirisits, M. J., Evans, A. & Lauderdale, C. Effect of phosphorus limitation on the production of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) by drinking-water bacteria. in Biological Treatment Symposium 2013, 59–63 (2013).
- 47.Noh JH, et al. Effects of phosphate and hydrogen peroxide on the performance of a biological activated carbon filter for enhanced biofiltration. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020;388:121778. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Flemming HC, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010;8:623–633. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Xing X, Wang H, Hu C, Liu L. Effects of phosphate-enhanced ozone/biofiltration on formation of disinfection byproducts and occurrence of opportunistic pathogens in drinking water distribution systems. Water Res. 2018;139:168–176. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rompré A, Prévost M, Coallier J, Brisebois P, Lavoie J. Impacts of implementing a corrosion control strategy on biofilm growth. Water Sci. Technol. 2000;41:287–294. doi: 10.2166/wst.2000.0457. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chandy JP, Angles ML. Determination of nutrients limiting biofilm formation and the subsequent impact on disinfectant decay. Water Res. 2001;35:2677–2682. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00572-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Miettinen IT, Vartiainen T, Martikainen PJ. Phosphorus and bacterial growth in drinking water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997;63:3242–3245. doi: 10.1128/AEM.63.8.3242-3245.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sathasivan A, Ohgaki S, Yamamoto K, Kamiko N. Role of inorganic phosphorus in controlling regrowth in water distribution system. Water Sci. Technol. 1997;35:37–44. doi: 10.2166/wst.1997.0295. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sathasivan A, Ohgaki S. Application of new bacterial regrowth potential method for water distribution system - A clear evidence of phosphorus limitation. Water Res. 1999;33:137–144. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00158-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Park SK, Hu JY. Interaction between phosphorus and biodegradable organic carbon on drinking water biofilm subject to chlorination. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010;108:2077–2087. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04514.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Butterfield PW, Camper AK, Ellis BD, Jones WL. Chlorination of model drinking water biofilm: Implications for growth and organic carbon removal. Water Res. 2002;36:4391–4405. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00148-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Asaf S, Numan M, Khan AL, Al-Harrasi A. Sphingomonas: from diversity and genomics to functional role in environmental remediation and plant growth. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2020;40:138–152. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2019.1709793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yang M, et al. Phosphorus dissolving capability, glucose dehydrogenas expression activity of two phosphate solubilizin bacteria. Wei sheng wu xue bao= Acta Microbiol. Sin. 2016;56:651–663. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Qi Y, Kobayashi Y, Hulett FM. The pst operon of Bacillus subtilis has a phosphate-regulated promoter and is involved in phosphate transport but not in regulation of the Pho regulon. J. Bacteriol. 1997;179:2534–2539. doi: 10.1128/JB.179.8.2534-2539.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Abd-Alla MH. Solubilization of rock phosphates by Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium. Folia Microbiol. 1994;39:53–56. doi: 10.1007/BF02814530. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ghane M. Isolation of heavy metal resistant Acidovorax sp. from agricultural soil and optimization of metal biosorption. J. Microb. World. 2017;10:37–48. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sharma SB, Sayyed RZ, Trivedi MH, Gobi TA. Phosphate solubilizing microbes: sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013;2:1–14. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Alori ET, Glick BR, Babalola OO. Microbial phosphorus solubilization and its potential for use in sustainable agriculture. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:1–8. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Saritha, M. & Prasad Tollamadugu, N. V. K. V. The Status of Research and Application of Biofertilizers and Biopesticides: Global Scenario. Recent Developments in Applied Microbiology and Biochemistry (Elsevier Inc., 2019).
- 65.Shen M, et al. Identification of glutathione S-transferase (GST) genes from a dark septate endophytic fungus (Exophiala pisciphila) and their expression patterns under varied metals stress. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:1–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Buzejic A, et al. Pb and Hg heavy metal tolerance of single- and mixedspecies biofilm (Rhodotorula mucilaginosa and Escherichia coli) Kragujev. J. Sci. 2016;38:115–124. doi: 10.5937/KgJSci1638115B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Grujić S, Vasić S, Radojević I, Čomić L, Ostojić A. Comparison of the Rhodotorula mucilaginosa Biofilm and Planktonic Culture on Heavy Metal Susceptibility and Removal Potential. Water Air. Soil Pollut. 2017;228:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s11270-017-3259-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Abdullahi M, Ibrahim AD. Bioaccumulation of lead (Pb), chromium (Cr) and cadmium (Cd) by Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium oxysporum isolated from tannery wastewater. J. Environ. Toxicol. Public Heal. 2018;3:18–24. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Li J, et al. Biochemical changes of polysaccharides and proteins within EPS under Pb(II) stress in Rhodotorula mucilaginosa. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019;174:484–490. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Long J, et al. Inactive Fusarium Fungal strains (ZSY and MJY) isolation and application for the removal of Pb(II) ions from aqueous environment. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019;72:442–452. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.12.047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Cho DH, Kim EY. Characterization of Pb2+ biosorption from aqueous solution by Rhodotorula glutinis. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2003;25:271–277. doi: 10.1007/s00449-002-0315-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Douterelo I, Jackson M, Solomon C, Boxall J. Spatial and temporal analogies in microbial communities in natural drinking water biofilms. Sci. Total Environ. 2017;581:277–288. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Douterelo I, Fish KE, Boxall JB. Succession of bacterial and fungal communities within biofilms of a chlorinated drinking water distribution system. Water Res. 2018;141:74–85. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.04.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Douterelo I, Dutilh BE, Arkhipova K, Calero C, Husband S. Microbial diversity, ecological networks and functional traits associated to materials used in drinking water distribution systems. Water Res. 2020;173:115586. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Henne K, Kahlisch L, Brettar I, Höfle MG. Analysis of structure and composition of bacterial core communities in mature drinking water biofilms and bulk water of a citywide network in Germany. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012;78:3530–3538. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06373-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Kelly JJ, Minalt N, Culotti A, Pryor M, Packman A. Temporal variations in the abundance and composition of biofilm communities colonizing drinking water distribution pipes. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e98542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Ling F, Hwang C, LeChevallier MW, Andersen GL, Liu WT. Core-satellite populations and seasonality of water meter biofilms in a metropolitan drinking water distribution system. ISME J. 2016;10:582–595. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Simões LC, Simões M, Vieira MJ. Biofilm interactions between distinct bacterial genera isolated from drinking water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007;73:6192–6200. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00837-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Rickard AH, McBain AJ, Stead AT, Gilbert P. Shear rate moderates community diversity in freshwater biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004;70:7426–7435. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.12.7426-7435.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Tsagkari E, Keating C, Couto J, Sloan W. A keystone methylobacterium strain in biofilm formation in drinking water. Water. 2017;9:778. doi: 10.3390/w9100778. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Simões LC, Simões M, Vieira MJ. Intergeneric coaggregation among drinking water bacteria: Evidence of a role for Acinetobacter calcoaceticus as a bridging bacterium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008;74:1259–1263. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01747-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Niquette P, Servais P, Savoir R. Impacts of pipe materials on densities of fixed bacterial biomass in a drinking water distribution system. Water Res. 2000;34:1952–1956. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00307-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Yu J, Kim D, Lee T. Microbial diversity in biofilms on water distribution pipes of different materials. Water Sci. Technol. 2010;61:163–171. doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Pan W, Pan C, Bae Y, Giammar D. Role of manganese in accelerating the oxidation of Pb(II) carbonate solids to Pb(IV) oxide at drinking water conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019;53:6699–6707. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b07356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Welter G. Typical Kitchen faucet-use flow rates: Implications for lead concentration sampling. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 2016;108:E374–E380. doi: 10.5942/jawwa.2016.108.0085. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Katara G, Hemvani N, Chitnis S, Chitnis V, Chitnis DS. Surface disinfection by exposure to germicidal UV light. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2008;26:241–242. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.42034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Deines P, et al. A new coupon design for simultaneous analysis of in situ microbial biofilm formation and community structure in drinking water distribution systems. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010;87:749–756. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2510-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST-palaeontological statistics software pakage for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001;4:1–9. [Google Scholar]
- 89.Clarke, K. & Warwick, R. Primer-6 Computer Program (2005).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Raw sequence data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in NCBI library as a Sequence Read Archive (SRA) with the accession code PRJNA663268 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/study/?acc=PRJNA663268).