Skip to main content
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases logoLink to Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases
. 2020 Oct 16;2020:8635191. doi: 10.1155/2020/8635191

Prevalence of Active Trachoma and Associated Factors in Areka Town, South Ethiopia, 2018

Melese Menta Alambo 1, Eyasu Alam Lake 2, Shimelash Bitew Workie 1, Addisu Yeshambel Wassie 3,
PMCID: PMC7585665  PMID: 33123195

Abstract

Background

Globally, 1.2 billion people live in trachoma endemic areas, 40.6 million people are suffering from active trachoma, and 48.5% of the global burden of active trachoma is distributed in five countries including Ethiopia. However, there is no evidence or no conducted survey/research data or document regarding trachoma prevalence in Areka Town. We, therefore, did a study to assess the prevalence of active trachoma and associated factors in Areka Town in South Ethiopia.

Methods

A community-based cross-sectional study was employed. A total of 586 children aged 1–9 years were involved. We compiled a structured questionnaire from the relevant literature and pretested before use. A range of data was collected on the sociodemographic, facility, and service-related, and environmental factors. The outcome variable was measured by using frequencies, cross-tabulation, and percent. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to control potential confounders and to identify the predictors.

Results

This study revealed that 37.9% of children aged 1–9 years have active trachoma (95% CI: 34%–42%). Households without latrine (AOR = 6.88; 95% CI: 2.13–22.18), openly disposing domestically produced waste (AOR = 4.62; 95% CI: 2.41–8.83), cooking in the same room (AOR = 5.13; 95% CI: 2.21–11.88), and using the cooking room without a window (AOR = 2.28; 95% CI: 1.11–4.69) were more likely to have their children develop active trachoma. Similarly, children with caretakers having inadequate knowledge about trachoma (AOR = 8.10; 95% CI: 2.04–32.17) were more likely to develop active trachoma. However, households consuming more than 20 liters of water per day were 82% (AOR = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.07–0.44) less likely to have their children develop active trachoma while compared to those consuming less than the figure.

Conclusions

The prevalence of active trachoma in the children aged 1–9 years in the study area was found to be high, and it is much higher than the WHO elimination threshold.

1. Introduction

Trachoma is a bacterial eye infection caused by the bacterium called Chlamydia trachomatis [13]. It can be transmitted from person to person through contact with infected ocular and nasal discharges, often through fingers and clothing or fomites, and is also spread by eye-seeking flies. In a typical endemic setting, repeated chlamydia infection of the conjunctiva begins early in life (1–2). This can initiate recurrent episodes of chronic conjunctival inflammation, characterized by the formation of lymphoid follicles [14].

According to the World Health Organization simplified classification or grading of trachoma infection [5, 6], follicular trachoma (TF) is described as the presence of 5 or more follicles (of at least 0.5 mm) in the upper tarsal conjunctiva, trachomatous inflammation (TI) is described as conjunctiva that obscures more than half of the deep normal tarsal vessel, trachomatous scarring (TS) is described as the presence of scarring in the tarsal conjunctiva, trachomatous trichiasis (TT) is described as at least one lash touches the eyeball, and corneal opacity (CO) is described as the presence of easily visible corneal opacity which obscures at least some of the pupil [5, 6].

Trachoma is known to be one of the major causes of blindness in Ethiopia. However, recent data that indicate the disease burden were lacking [7]. The national prevalence of active trachoma (either TF or TI) for children in the age group of 1–9 years is 40.14%. Considerable regional variations are observed in the occurrence of active trachoma; the highest prevalence is in Amhara (62.6%), Oromia (41.3%), and Southern Nations, Nationalities, and People's Region (SNNPR) (33.2%), Tigray (26.5%), Somali (22.6%), and Gambella (19.1%). The rural prevalence of active trachoma is almost fourfold compared to the urban prevalence (42.5% rural vs. 10.7% urban) [2, 5, 8]. The national prevalence of trachomatous trichiasis (TT) is 3.1% with the highest prevalence in Amhara Regional State (5.2%). Trachomatous trichiasis is higher in females compared to males (4.1% vs. 1.6%). Over 9 million 1–9-year-old children live with active trachoma [2, 5, 7, 8]

The intensive effort of the Global Elimination of Trachoma of 2020 (GET 2020) has successfully reduced the global burden of active trachoma from 84 million cases in 2003 to 21.4 million cases in 2012 [2, 5, 9, 10]. This success has been partly due to the surgery, antibiotics, facial hygiene, and environment (SAFE) strategy. However, currently, about 334, 000 disability-adjusted life years are lost due to trachoma [2, 5, 9]. In addition, blindness from trachoma and care of patients with trachoma slows down economic growth and that leads to a global productivity loss of $3 billion to $6 billion (average $ US 5.3 billion) annually. This loss is from the poorest community where trachoma is endemic such as Ethiopia [5]. About 229 million people live in endemic areas, 176 million live in Africa, and 80% of the global burden is now limited to 14 countries including Ethiopia [2, 5, 9].

According to a Ministry of Health report, the SAFE strategy has been implemented in some regions of the country, such as Amhara Region. Amhara Region can demonstrate promising success result in controlling trachoma by implementing the SAFE strategy. Likewise, 14.7 million people in the region were covered by azithromycin mass administration in 2010, and more than 89, 000 latrines were constructed in the region within one year. However, to scale up the intervention to other areas, the main problem is a lack of data. According to the International Coalition for Trachoma Control (2011) reports, about 46 million Ethiopians are living in trachoma suspected endemic areas. Recommendations of the different studies were that Ethiopia, as one of the priority countries, needs an urgent mapping of trachoma. It is important to improve the quality and availability of epidemiological data to guide the trachoma elimination program of the area [2, 5, 9].

Identifying the magnitude of trachoma and associated factors could, therefore, help to design context-specific trachoma prevention and control intervention strategies such as the SAFE strategy, and the World Health Organization (WHO) and its partners are targeting the Global Elimination of Trachoma as a cause of blindness by the year 2020 (GET2020) [2, 5, 9]. Active and potentially blinding trachoma is highly prevalent throughout SNNPR, and in 108 woredas, the disease presents a significant public health problem [5].

GET2020 trachoma prevention, control, and intervention program such as the SAFE strategy is strongly influenced by institutional factors and traditional practices in the community such as Ethiopia [5]. Some of these factors are providing traditional medicine to individuals with active trachoma signs, not taking trachoma cases to health facilities due to that they believe it as a mild and not harmful problem, believed that the child becomes healthy later; they may also believe that either there is no medicine at the health post and/or even at the health-center level [5].

Therefore, the area needs undertaking further research to identify the ground to reduce the burden of trachoma, especially at community-level that helps the government and implementing partners to make an evidence-based decision in promoting and provision of quality-care, and therefore, the purpose of this study will be to assess the prevalence and factors associated with trachoma in Areka Town.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Setting and Period

The study was conducted in Southern Nations, Nationalities, and People's Region (SNNPR), Wolaita Zone, Areka Town. It is located in 329 kilometers south of Addis Ababa, 85 kilometers from Hawassa, and 29 kilometers from the capital city of Wolaita Zone (Sodo). Areka Town is one of three city administrations (namely, Sodo Town, Areka Town, and Bodity Town) of Wolaita Zone. The study was conducted from September 01–31/2018. There are one governmental health center, one nongovernmental hospital (Dubo St. Mary Hospital), and four kebeles in Areka Town, and trachoma-related services are performed in all health settings in the study area. The town has a total population of 60827, 1–9-year-old children account for 32% (19465), and it has 6488 households.

2.2. Study Design

The community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Areka Town, SNNPR.

2.3. Source Population

All children in Areka Town from 1–9 years of age.

2.4. Study Population

Children from 1–9 years of age those are selected by using a systematic sampling method.

2.5. Inclusion Criteria

All selected children aged 1–9 years (selected from the integrated registration book).

2.6. Exclusion Criteria

All children from 1–9 years of age who are unable to undergo physical examination due to serious medical illness (other than eye cases) and who live in the households with a selected child, but not selected (even if they undergo eye examination for sake of treatment).

2.7. Study Variables

  •   Outcome variable: active trachoma (presence of follicular trachoma (TF) and/or inflammatory trachoma (TI)).

  •   Independent variables: environmental factors (access to latrines, solid waste disposal, cooking room condition and domestic water consumption, source of water, distance to the water source, compound cleanness, and keeping animals in houses).

  •   Socioeconomic and demographic factors (sex, age, family size, educational status, number of 1–9 years of age children, average monthly income, and occupation).

  •   Individual/personal factors (clean face, knowledge of caretakers, and discharge on the ocular and nasal area).

2.8. Sample Size Determination

The sample size was calculated by using the single population, which was

n=z2pqd2, (1)

where n = the desired sample size when the target population is over ten thousand people. z = the standard normal deviate corresponding to 95% confidence interval (z = 1.96). p = the proportion of the target population estimated to have the characteristics being investigated; hence, p = 33.2%, of active trachoma in SNNPR. q = the proportion of the target population without the characteristics being investigated (q = 1 − p). d = the degree of accuracy at 95% confidence interval, and let it be (0.04). Sample size n=([(/2)2∗p(1 − p)]/d2).

By using p of SNNPR, the sample was found to be 532. With a 10% nonresponse rate, the total sample required was 586.

2.9. Sampling Technique

All four kebeles were included in the study, and the required sample size of 586 was proportionally allocated to each kebele based on their total target population (1–9 years children); finally, the study subjects and households were selected by using a systematic sampling technique (every Kth = 3).

2.10. Data Collection Procedures

Data were collected from September 01–31/2018 using questionnaires and an observational checklist. Structured questionnaires were prepared by the investigator, which include the basic sociodemographic, environmental, and behavioral characteristics regarding the trachoma prevalence of households in the communities of the study area. The questionnaires were originally developed in English and then translated into the local language (Amharic). The Amharic version was later translated back into English with the help of language professionals/experts. All necessary corrections were made for the actual questionnaire. The questionnaire was pretested in households of Achura Kebele which was near to the study area that had similar characteristics to the areas where the actual study was carried out.

Training on eye examination, grading, and reporting the result was given to the graders/collectors for two days. Immediately after the training, health professionals went to the field to perform eye examinations on selected study children. The guide used for reporting examination results was the simplified trachoma grading scheme, which was developed by the WHO for fieldwork. The examiner then should evert the upper eyelid to examine the conjunctiva over the stiffer part of the upper eyelid (tarsal conjunctiva). The normal conjunctiva of the upper tarsal area is pink and is smooth, thin, and transparent. Over the whole area of the tarsal conjunctiva, there are large deep-lying blood vessels that mainly run vertically from the upper and lower edges of the tarsal plate. Based on the presence or absence of signs of trachoma, cases are graded as trachomatous inflammation-follicular (TF) and trachomatous inflammation intense (TI), in children aged 1–9 years. Finally, the presence or absence of each sign of trachoma was recorded on the collection form for each study individual.

2.11. Operational Definitions

2.11.1. Active Trachoma

Active trachoma includes either TF and/or TI seen at upper tarsal conjunctiva. It manifests with foreign body sensation, pain which is worsened during blinking, tearing, fear of light, and mild eye discharge seen in the morning.

2.11.2. Household

It consists of one or more people who live in the same house.

2.11.3. SAFE

It is a strategy developed to eliminate blindness caused by trachoma through doing surgery, antibiotic treatment, facial cleanliness, and improving the environment.

2.11.4. Adequate Water

It is recommended a minimum average of 20 liters (1-2 pots) per person per day of water supply for all basic needs is considered adequate.

2.11.5. An Improved Toilet Facility

It is a structure used by household members and able to separate waste from human contact.

2.11.6. Caregivers

Caregivers are caretakers or parents of children who took care of the selected children at the time of data collection.

2.11.7. Unclean Face

The presence of “sleep” (or ocular discharge) around on the eyes and the presence of nasal discharge on the upper lip or cheeks.

2.11.8. Clean Face

Absence of dirt, dust, and nasal or eye discharge on cheeks and forehead.

2.11.9. Serious Medical Illness

Illness other than eye case in which unable to undergo a physical examination.

2.11.10. Knowledge about Trachoma

The median value of the records of the four items used to assess the knowledge of caretakers was taken. Those respondents having scored greater or equal to the median value were categorized as knowledgeable, and those who have scored less than the median were categorized as less knowledgeable.

All the above definitions were adopted from Operational Definitions for NTDs control program, Kenya University in collaboration with WHO/UNICEF, May, 2016.

2.12. Data Quality Management

To ensure the quality of the data, the tool was checked for face validity by use of the pretest on 29 caretakers (5%). The training was given for 4 diploma nurses who are from nearby health centers of Achura as data collectors, and for who are BSc nurses or public health officers and/or those trained on ophthalmic issues or IECW (integrated eye care worker) was used as a supervisor. The data collectors and supervisors were trained for two days on the techniques, ways of data collection, about the objectives of the study, and variables on the data abstraction sheet.

Throughout the progress of the data collection, interviewers were supervised at each site, regular meetings were held between the data collectors and the principal investigator together in which problematic issues arising from interviews which were conducted and mistakes found during editing were discussed, and decisions were reached. The collected data were reviewed and checked for completeness before data entry; the incomplete data were discarded. The data entry format template was produced and programmed. Double entry was done on 10% questionnaires to check consistency by using EpiData software. The simplified WHO trachoma grading system was used [11] to identify persons with trachoma. Both eyes were graded separately, for active trachoma in children aged 1–9 years.

2.13. Data Analysis Procedures

The coded data were entered into EpiData 3.1 and were exported to SPSS version 20 software package for further statistical analysis. A P value <0.25 was a candidate for multivariate analysis, and a P value <0.05 was considered significant. Using logistic regression, multivariable analysis was also carried out. The odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to determine the effect of potentially associated variables on household prevalence of trachoma, and multicollinearity issues were checked. The goodness of fit of the final model was checked using the Hosmer and Lemeshow test of goodness of fit considering good fit at P value <0.05 level of significance.

2.14. Ethical Consideration

Ethical clearance was obtained from the research and publication office of Wolaita Sodo University Institute of Public Health ethical review board. Permission letters were obtained from the Wolaita Zone Health Department and Areka Town Health Office. Finally, practical permission was obtained from the respective kebele. Consent was gained from each interviewee by confirming that all the data extracted will be kept confidential and will not be used for any other purposes than the stated research objective. Finally, children with active trachoma were treated according to the guideline.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the Respondent Answered the Questionnaire

Five hundred eighty-six respondents participated in this study with an overall response rate of 100%. Two hundred sixty-nine (45.9%) of the study participants were females. The mean age of the respondents was 37.85 ± 7.7 SD. Five hundred eight (86.7%) of the respondents were married. One hundred seventy-six (30%) were in the age group of 35–39 years. As to their educational status, 60 (10.2%) were unable to read and write, and the rest had achieved some level of education. Concerning occupation, 223 (38.1%) of their households live on selling/buying (merchant) as their main income (Table 1).

Table 1.

Sociodemographic characteristics of respondents in Areka Town in Southern Ethiopia, 2018 (N = 586).

Variable Category Frequency Percent
Sex Male 317 54.1
Female 269 45.9
Age of respondents <25 years 28 4.8
25–29 years 46 7.8
30–34 years 96 16.4
35–39 years 176 30
40–44 years 147 25.1
45 and above 93 15.9
Marital status of respondents Married 508 86.7
Divorced 24 4.1
Widowed 54 9.2
Occupation of respondents Farmer 69 11.8
Craftsmen 30 5.1
Merchant 223 38.1
Employee 180 30.7
Housewife 75 12.8
Retired 9 1.5
Average monthly income ≤1500 birr 245 41.8
≥1501 birr 341 58.2
Family size Less than 5 431 73.5
5 and above 155 26.5
Age of observed child Aged 1–4 years 316 53.9
Aged 5–9 years 270 46.1
No. of <9-year-old child 2 or less 547 93.3
3 and above 39 6.7
Educational/enrollment status of observed children Not eligible 322 54.9
Eligible, not enrolled 39 6.7
Enrolled 225 38.4

3.2. Knowledge of Respondents towards Trachoma

Regarding the knowledge of respondents towards trachoma, 478 (81.7%) of respondents know what the trachoma is. Four hundred thirty-two (73.7%) of respondents answered that trachoma is a preventable disease. Four hundred twenty-eight (73%) of respondents replied that blindness can be caused by trachoma. Four hundred twenty-four (74.4%) of respondents had information that trachoma is transmittable (Table 2).

Table 2.

Knowledge of respondents and source of information towards trachoma in Areka Town in Southern Ethiopia, 2018 (N = 586).

Variable Category Frequency Percent
Do you know what the trachoma is? Yes 478 81.7
No 108 18.4
Do you know that blindness is caused by trachoma? Yes 428 73
No 158 27
Do you think that trachoma is transmittable? Yes 424 72.4
No 162 27.6
Is trachoma transmitted through flies? Yes 409 69.8
No 15 2.6
Is trachoma transmitted through contaminated fingers? Yes 199 34
No 225 38.4
Is trachoma transmitted by sharing contaminated towels? Yes 108 18.4
No 316 27.6
Can we prevent trachoma? Yes 432 73.7
No 154 26.3
Can we prevent trachoma by burying/burning wastes? Yes 179 30.5
No 251 42.8
Can we prevent trachoma by treating cases? Yes 172 29.4
No 258 44
Can we prevent trachoma by separating cattle shelter from human living? Yes 66 11.3
No 364 62.1
Can we prevent trachoma by using separate kitchen? Yes 75 12.8
No 355 60.6
Is information about trachoma got from health personnel? Yes 391 66.7
No 42 7.2
Is information about trachoma got from mass media? Yes 141 24.1
No 292 49.8
Is information about trachoma got from others/neighbors? Yes 229 39.1
No 204 34.8

The median value of the knowledge of children's caretakers was calculated as 430 (73.4%) (as shown in Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Caretakers knowledge towards Trachoma in in Areka Town in Southern Ethiopia, 2018.

3.3. The Practice of Respondents towards Trachoma Infection

In the respondents' practice towards specific dimensions, only 141 HHS (14.1%) consume less than the recommended daily adequate (20 litters) water per day with the rest 75.9% consuming the recommended amount to prevent trachoma infection. Two hundred seventy-two (46.4%) respondents travel <30 minutes to get water for domestic use. Three hundred seven HHS (52.4%) use a separate kitchen for cooking. Two hundred four (34.8%) of respondents simply discard the waste nearby the house. Regarding water source, the majority (418) of the respondents use a pipe as a water source followed by 96 of them use unprotected spring (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Source of water for domestic use in Areka Town in Southern Ethiopia, 2018.

Based on this study, from 255 (43.5%) respondents simply disposing domestically of produced waste, 204 (80%) respondents discard simply near the living house. Out of 586 respondents, 418 (71.3%) respondents were using pipe water. Three hundred forty of the examined children (58%) had a relatively clean face with the rest 42% having had unclean (Table 3).

Table 3.

Practice of respondents towards trachoma in Areka Town in Southern Ethiopia, 2018 (N = 586).

Variable Category Frequency Percent
Households' daily water consumption <20 liters 141 24.1
20–40 liters 269 45.9
40–80 liters 128 21.8
80 and more 48 8.2
Source of water River 54 9.2
Unprotected spring 96 16.4
Rainwater 12 2
Protected spring 56 9.2
Protected well 56 9.6
Pipe water 418 71.3
Traveling the distance to get water In a compound 200 34.1
<30 minutes 272 46.4
30–59 minutes 114 19.5
Place of cooking In the same room where they sleep 141 24.1
In the same house but a different room 138 23.5
In the separate kitchen 307 52.4
Does your cooking room have a window? Yes 382 65.2
No 204 34.8
What do you do the produced waste? Bury/burn 331 56.5
Discard 255 43.5
If simply discard, where do you dispose of the waste? Nearby the house 204 34.8
Far away from the house 45 7.7
Do you have a latrine? Yes 517 88.2
No 69 11.8
If you have a latrine, what type? Covered pit latrine 219 37.4
Uncovered pit latrine 274 46.8
VIP latrine 21 3.6
Latrine with water carriage system 3 0.5
Do you have your own cattle? Yes 245 41.8
No 341 58.2
If you have cattle, where do you pass/integrate them in the night? In the same house 129 22
In the same house in a different room 57 9.7
In separate shelter 53 9
Facial cleanliness of children Clean 340 58
Unclean 246 42

Out of 586 children who were examined for active trachoma, 222 (37.9%) of children developed active trachoma and the rest, 364 (62.1%) children, were negative for active trachoma.

3.4. Factors Associated with the Prevalence of Active Trachoma

Bivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictor variables of overall trachoma prevalence. The crude odds ratio (COR) along with a 95% confidence interval was estimated to assess the association between each independent variable and the outcome variable. Variables with a P value <0.25 in the bivariate logistic regression analysis were considered as candidate variables for the multivariable model.

During bivariate analysis, variables that were associated with the prevalence of active trachoma were households with no latrine, households cooking in the same room, households cooking room with no window, households those simply disposing waste, households consuming less than 20 liters of water, households those were with no knowledge of trachoma prevention, households those were traveling 30–59 minutes to fetch water, households those do not know trachoma, households with no knowledge about trachoma that can cause blindness, households with no knowledge about trachoma transmission, households with cattle, and eligible children but not attending the class. However, during multivariate logistics analysis, households with no latrine, households those cook in the same room, households whose cooking room with no window, households of simply disposing of waste, households of consuming less than 20 liters of water, and households those do not know trachoma were predictors of active trachoma.

Children living in a household without latrine were approximately seven times (AOR = 6.88; 95% CI: 2.13–22.18) more likely to develop active trachoma while compared with those children who live in a household having latrine. Similarly, Children living in the household cooking in the same room were above five times (AOR = 5.13; 95% CI: 2.21–11.88) more likely to develop active trachoma while compared with children who live in households those cook in separate room/kitchen. This study also revealed that children living in a household in which the cooking room has no window were about 2 times (AOR = 2.28; 95% CI: 1.11–4.69) more likely to develop active trachoma compared to those with window. Children living in a household of openly disposing domestically of produced waste were more than 4 times (AOR = 4.62; 95% CI: 2.41–8.83) more likely to develop active trachoma while compared to those children living in a household that bury/burn the waste. Children living in a household that consume more than 80 liters of water were 93% (AOR = 0.07; 95% CI: 0.01–0.39) less likely to develop active trachoma when compared to those who consume less than 80 liters per day. This study also depicts that respondents who do not know what trachoma were about 8 times (AOR = 8.10; 95% CI: 2.04–32.17) more likely to have their children affected by active trachoma while compared with respondents know well about trachoma (Table 4).

Table 4.

Factors associated with prevalence of active trachoma in Areka Town in Southern Ethiopia, 2018 (N = 586).

Variable Category Total children Children with active trachoma P value COR (95% CI) PV. adj. AOR (95% CI)
No No
Do you have a latrine? Yes 517 159 1 1
No 69 63 0 23.6 (10.03–55.76) <0.01 6.88 (2.13–22.18)
Place of cooking In the same room 141 17 0 28.38 (16.52–48.76) 0 5.13 (2.21–11.88)
The same house but different room 138 60 0 4.48 (2.82–7.10) 0.68 0.86 (0.42–1.76)
In separate kitchen 307 45 1 1
Does your cooking room have a window? Yes 382 72 1 1
No 204 150 0 11.96 (7.99–17.90) 0.02 2.28 (1.11–4.69)
Domestically produced waste disposal Bury/burn 331 42 1 1
Simple disposal 255 180 0 16.51 (10.84–25.16) 0 4.62 (2.41–8.83)
Water consumption per day Less than 20 liters 141 111 1 1
20–40 liters 269 84 0 0.12 (0.08–0.20) 0 0.18 (0.07–0.44)
40–80 liters 128 24 0 0.06 (0.03–0.11) 0.06 0.38 (0.14–1.05)
More than 80 liters 48 3 0 0.02 (0.01–0.06) <0.01 0.07 (0.01–0.39)
Knowledge Knowledgeable 430 90 1 1
Less knowledgeable 156 132 0 20.78 (12.69–34.02) 0.42 1.83 (0.42–7.92)
Traveling the distance to fetch water In a compound 200 36 1 1
Less than 30 minutes 272 99 0 2.61 (1.68–4.04) 0.89 0.96 (0.53–1.75)
30 to 59 minutes 114 87 0 14.68 (8.36–25.77) 0.11 0.37 (0.11–1.24)
Know about what trachoma is Yes 478 123 1 1
No 108 99 0 31.75 (15.57–64.74) <0.01 8.10 (2.04–32.17)
Know that trachoma causes blindness Yes 425 96 1 1
No 161 126 0 12.34 (7.96–19.12) 0.18 0.50 (0.18–1.37)
Knowledge about the communicability of trachoma Yes 424 84 1 1
No 162 138 0 23.27 (14.19–38.18) 0.35 1.96 (0.49–7.86)
Owner of cattle? Yes 245 153 0 6.56 (4.53–9.49) 0.19 1.49 (0.82–2.69)
No 341 69 1 1
Educational status of the child Not eligible 322 13 1 1
Eligible but not attending 39 33 0 8.9 (4.53–9.49) 0.45 1.74 (0.41–7.37)
Enrolled 225 66 0.03 0.67 (0.47–0.96) 0.89 1.69 (0.92–3.12)

4. Discussion

Active trachoma infection might have its own effect on contributing to a high burden of blindness among children aged 1–9 years. The primary aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of active trachoma on 1–9 years of age children and its predictors in Areka Town in South Ethiopia.

The overall prevalence of active trachoma of 1–9-year-old children was 37.9% (95% CI: 34–42%). The proportion of active trachoma in the current finding was lower than the result in Amhara (62.6%) [7], Amaro and Burji woredas (48.5%) [12], and Horo Guduru Woreda (48.9%) [13]. The difference might be due to the difference in sample size and study population. However, it was higher than other related studies conducted in different parts of Ethiopia: Baso Liben District (24.1%) [14], Oromia Region (23.4%) [13], Amhara (21.6%) [5], Somali (22.6%), SNNPR (33.2%), Tigray (26.5%), and Gambella (19.1%) [7], and Dera Woreda (15.6%) [15], Dembia District (18%) [3], South Wollo (26.4%) [16], and Harari Regional State (1.3%) [17]. It was also higher than related studies from Senegal (2.5%) [8], Nigeria (0.04–19%) [18], Kenya (18.7%) [2], and Burkina Faso (9.5%) [19]. The difference might be due to the difference in sample size and study population, and the disparities in the socioeconomic status of the respondents. However, the current finding is somewhat similar to the result of studies conducted at the national level (40.14%), Oromia (41.3%), Zala District of Gamo Gofa Zone (36.7%) [20], and Senegal (38%) [8].

In this study, about 88% (517) respondents have access to a latrine, and the regression analysis showed that inadequate access to latrine was significantly and positively associated with the prevalence of active trachoma (AOR = 6.88; 95% CI: 2.13–22.18). The study of Beselam Tadesse and three other researchers in the North and South Wollo Zones of Ethiopia revealed that having access to latrine was negatively and independently associated with active trachoma prevalence [5]. This result shows a similarity with the current study finding when interpreted in another way. The current finding is also similar to other studies conducted in Dera Woreda [15], Girar Jarso Woreda [4], Somali Region [9], SNNPR [12], and different parts of Ethiopia [18, 21].

In the current study, out of total 586 households interviewed, more than 52% (307) of the households use a separate kitchen for cooking and the rest 47% (279) cook in the same house. Three hundred eighty-two (65.2%) cooking rooms have a window, and the remaining 204 (34.8%) do not have a window. Finding from this study revealed that cooking in the same house/room (AOR = 5.13; 95% CI: 2.21–11.88) and those cooking rooms without window (AOR = 2.28; 95% CI: 1.11–4.69) made significant association with the prevalence of active trachoma while compared with using separate room/kitchen for cooking, and cooking in a kitchen having a window, respectively. No research findings depicted a similar outcome in these particular variables, so that this particular study result contradicts to other research studies, and might need further investigation by another scholar.

In this particular study, openly disposing of domestically produced wastes was positively and significantly associated with developing active trachoma (AOR = 4.62; 95% CI: 2.41–8.83). Many other studies also showed similar results in Girar Jarso, Dembia and Dera, Mojo, and Lume Woredas of Ethiopia [3, 4, 15, 21], and Senegal [8]. Moreover, a study conducted in Harari Region showed that the collection of wastes by the municipality after households' openly disposing of domestically produced wastes was significantly associated with active trachoma [22]. Indeed, many types of research studies that were done in different parts depicted that domestically produced waste disposal have no appreciable association with the prevalence of active trachoma [5, 9, 10, 13, 19, 21, 23]. This is controversial to the current study.

In the current study, 24.1%, 45.9%, 21.8%, and 8.2% of the households consume less than 20 liters, 20 to 40 liters, 40 to 80, and more than 80 liters of water on a daily base, respectively. This study showed that households' daily water consumption of more than 20 liters was negatively and notably associated with developing active trachoma (AOR = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.07–0.44). This result was similar to the other study conducted in Girar Jarso Woreda of North Shewa and Baso Liben District of East Gojam which revealed that those households consuming less than 20 liters of water per day were more likely to achieve active trachoma [4, 14]. However, many study results conducted in different parts of the country revealed that domestic water consumption in daily base did not make a significant connection with the development of active trachoma [3, 5, 8, 9, 13, 1517, 21, 24, 25].

In the current study, about 430 (73.4%) of the respondents had adequate knowledge about trachoma, with the rest 156 (26.6%) having had inadequate knowledge. This finding depicted that less knowledge about trachoma as a disease was significantly and positively associated with developing active trachoma (AOR = 8.10; 95% CI: 2.04–32.17). The current finding is similar to other studies done in Baso Liben District of East Gojam [14] and Zala District of Gamo Gofa Zone [20].

5. Conclusion

The prevalence of active trachoma in the children aged 1–9 years studied in Areka Town, Southern Ethiopia, was found to be high, and it is much higher than the WHO elimination threshold. Children from households with less access to a latrine, openly disposing of domestically produced wastes and daily water consumption of fewer than 20 liters, and children whose caretakers have inadequate knowledge about trachoma were more likely to be affected by active trachoma. Intervention modalities that would address the identified risk factors are highly recommended to prevent and control active trachoma in this setting.

5.1. Recommendation

The prevalence of active trachoma in the study area is far from the elimination of trachoma as a public health problem. Thus, its prevalence can be controlled in the study area by the following:

  1. Improving awareness of the community is a need through health education programs regarding proper solid waste disposal using a multidisciplinary approach (offices of municipality, health, and administration of respective kebeles)

  2. The health sector needs to promote achieving high coverage and appropriate utilization of latrine

  3. The use of a separate kitchen and a cooking room with a window is needed by using a multidisciplinary approach

  4. Multisectorial collaboration (offices of water, health, and mayor) is needed to promote adequate recommended daily water consumption by making safe water available and accessible to the community

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their deepest heartfelt thanks to Addis Ababa University for allowing them to conduct this study. Their special thanks go to Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital staff for their support during the data collection process. The study was funded by Addis Ababa University.

Abbreviations

CHWs:

Community health workers

CO:

Corneal opacity

GET:

Global Elimination of Trachoma

GET2020:

WHO Alliance for the Global Elimination of Trachoma by the year 2020

ITI:

International Trachoma Initiative

MOH:

Ministry of Health

MOPHS:

Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation

MOP:

Mode of prevention

MOT:

Mode of transmission

SAFE:

Surgery, antibiotics, facial hygiene, and environment

SNNPR:

Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples' Region

TF:

Trachoma follicular

TF:

Trachomatous follicular

TS:

Trachomatous scarring

TT:

Trachomatous trichiasis

WASH:

Water, sanitation, and hygiene.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethical Approval

Ethical clearance was obtained from Wolaita Sodo University. Personal patient information was not recorded, after finishing the data collection, the patients' documents were returned to the card room, and the information was used for study purposes only.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Authors' Contributions

MM was involved in the conception, design, analysis, interpretation, report, manuscript writing, design, analysis, interpretation, and report writing. EA, SB, and AY were involved in the design, analysis, and interpretation of the data. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  • 1.Mitra A. K., Mawson A. R. Neglected tropical diseases: epidemiology and global burden. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2017;2(3):p. 36. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed2030036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nyamwaro C. M. Prevalence, and Risk Factors for Trachoma Infection Among Children Aged 1–9 Years Old in Oldonyonyokie Location, Magadi Division, Kajiado County, Kenya. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ferede A. T., Dadi A. F., Tariku A., Adane A. A. Prevalence and determinants of active trachoma among preschool-aged children in Dembia district, Northwest Ethiopia. Infectious Diseases of Poverty. 2017;6(1):p. 128. doi: 10.1186/s40249-017-0345-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ayalew T. Prevalence of trachoma and associated factors of children aged 1–9 years in community led total sanitation and Hygiene triggered village and none triggered in Girar Jarso Woreda, North Shoa, Oromia, Ethiopia. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR) 2016;2(9):1444–1455. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tadesse B., Worku A., Kumie A., Yimer S. A. The burden of and risk factors for active trachoma in the North and South Wollo zones of Amhara region, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Infectious Diseases of Poverty. 2017;6(1):p. 143. doi: 10.1186/s40249-017-0358-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lavett D. K., Lansingh V. C., Carter M. J., Eckert K. A., Silva J. C. Will the safe strategy be sufficient to eliminate trachoma by 2020? Puzzlements and possible solutions. The Scientific World Journal. 2013;2013:18. doi: 10.1155/2013/648106.648106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Berhane Y., Alemayehu W., Bejiga A., et al. Prevalence of trachoma in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health Development. 2014;21(3):211–215. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Harding-Esch E. M., Kadimpeul J., Sarr B., et al. Population-based prevalence survey of follicular trachoma and trachomatous trichiasis in the Casamance region of Senegal. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:p. 62. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4605-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ali Y. M. Trachoma Risk Factors and Control Strategy in Somali Regional State, Ethiopia. Amsterdam, Netherlands: KIT (Royal Tropical Institute); 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Deribe K., Meribo K., Gebre T., et al. The burden of neglected tropical diseases in Ethiopia, and opportunities for integrated control and elimination. Parasites & Vectors. 2012;5:p. 240. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Thylefors B., Dawson C. R., Jones B. R., West S. K., Taylor H. R. A simple system for the assessment of trachoma and its complications. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1987;65(4) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Adera T. H., Macleod C., Endriyas M., et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for trachoma in southern nations, nationalities, and peoples’ region, Ethiopia: results of 40 population-based prevalence surveys carried out with the global trachoma mapping project. Ophthalmic Epidemiology. 2016;23(sup1):84–93. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2016.1247876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bero B., Macleod C., Alemayehu W., et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for trachoma in Oromia regional state of Ethiopia: results of 79 population-based prevalence surveys conducted with the global trachoma mapping project. Ophthalmic Epidemiology. 2016;23(6):392–405. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2016.1243717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ketema K., Tiruneh M., Woldeyohannes D., Muluye D. Active trachoma and associated risk factors among children in Baso Liben district of East Gojjam, Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1105):p. 7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Alemayehu M., Koye D. N., Tariku A., Yimam K. Prevalence of active trachoma and its associated factors among rural and urban children in Dera Woreda, northwest Ethiopia: a comparative cross-sectional study. BioMed Research International. 2015;2015:8. doi: 10.1155/2015/570898.570898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.King J. D., Teferi T., Cromwell E. A., et al. Prevalence of trachoma at sub-district level in Ethiopia: determining when to stop mass azithromycin distribution. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2014;8(3) doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002732.e2732 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Assefa N., Roba A., Ahmed T., Birmeka J., Zergaw E. Prevalence and factors associated with trachoma among primary school children in Harari region, eastern Ethiopia. Ophthalmology Research: An International Journal. 2017;7(3):1–9. doi: 10.9734/or/2017/37212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Muhammad N., Damina M., Umar M., Isiyaku S. Trachoma prevalence and risk factors in eight local government areas of Zamfara state. Nigerian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2015;23(2):48–53. doi: 10.4103/0189-9171.170989. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Alexei Ivanov J. Ø. F. Towards Elimination of Blinding Trachoma in Burkina Faso, West Africa. The Results of Three Consecutive Years of Mass Antibiotic Treatment and Health Education. Oslo, Norway: Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kassahun Mengistu M. S., Woldemichael K., Gesesew H., Markos Y. Prevalence and factors associated with trachoma among children aged 1–9 years in Zala district, Gamo Gofa zone, Southern Ethiopia. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2016;10:1663–1670. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S107619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yalew K. N., Mekonnen M. G., Jemaneh A. A. Trachoma and its determinants in Mojo and Lume districts of Ethiopia. Pan African Medical Journal. 2012;13:p. 8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Assefa N., Roba A. A., Ahmed T. A., Birmeka J. K., Zergaw E. D. Prevalence and factors associated with trachoma among primary school children in Harari region, eastern Ethiopia. Ophthalmology Research; An International Journal. 2017;7(3):p. 10. doi: 10.9734/or/2017/37212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Esmael Habtamu T. W., Aweke S., Tadesse Z., et al. Trachoma and relative poverty: a case- control study. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2015;9(11) doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004228.e0004228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rog M., Swenor B., Cajas-Monson L. C., et al. A cross-sectional survey of water and clean faces in trachoma endemic communities in Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:p. 495. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Haile M., Gaynor B. D., Tadesse Z., et al. The association between latrine use and trachoma: a secondary cohort analysis from a randomized clinical trial. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2013;89(4):717–720. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES