Skip to main content
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care logoLink to Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
. 2020 Aug 25;9(8):3863–3866. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_764_20

Use of ultrasonography in COVID-19: Probing for success

Sanchit Kumar 1, Arvind Kumar 1,, Pawan Goel 1, Surabhi Vyas 2, Upendra Baitha 1, Naveet Wig 1
PMCID: PMC7586522  PMID: 33110780

Abstract

The ongoing pandemic of COVID-19 has put an immense strain on healthcare facilities around the world. Unique challenges are being faced in the adequate management of rapidly increasing number of cases while ensuring adequate healthcare providers apostrophe safety. Issues related to the difficulty of examination while wearing personal protective equipment, need for objectivity in triage and testing of patients, and evidence-based management of the critically ill has resulted in reliance on longitudinal radiological assessment. There are a number of portability, disinfection and radiation exposure related problems with the use of X-rays and computerized tomography (CT). Point of care ultrasonography provides a pragmatic, safe, and repeatable approach for addressing the pertinent clinical questions that have traditionally relied on X-rays and CT scans. Here, we summarize the use ultrasound assessment can play in the triage, identification, and subsequent management of patients with COVID-19.

Keywords: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, ultrasound, triage

Introduction

The COVID-19 outbreak has quickly evolved into a global pandemic that has left countries around the world battling to contain the spread of this novel coronavirus.[1] In addition to being a significant strain on healthcare resources, the pandemic has given rise to a number of issues pertaining to containment, stratification, testing, and management of affected patients. While global personal protective equipment (PPE) shortages have resulted in guidelines to ensure rational usage, the priority of protecting caregivers has become especially paramount.[2]

Issues with Patient Management

With proper precautions to protect healthcare personnel from the virus, taking care of patients with diagnosed or suspected COVID-19 creates a number of challenges:

  • Inadequate clinical examination including auscultation while in PPE

  • Maintenance of proper infection control measures while using bedside portable X-rays

  • Logistical issues with arranging CT scans for infected/suspected patients

  • Adequate utilization and protection of healthcare personnel by minimizing exposure wherever possible (e.g., minimizing aerosol generation, dedicated radiology equipment for COVID areas)

Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS)

A number of clinical questions that traditionally require X-rays and CT scans can also be answered by using bedside ultrasound (USG). Easy availability, accurate and quick result apart from the ability to perform longitudinal assessment at frequent intervals without the use of ionizing radiation makes ultrasound a useful modality for patient management. Both linear and curvilinear probes using B-mode scanning (with or without M mode) and Color Doppler (for deep vein scans) can enable most issues to be addressed using ultrasonography. For these reasons, it becomes important for the first-line clinicians to be aware of the benefits of using POCUS in aiding clinical management. These practical application related aspects as they pertain to the COVID-19 pandemic are being summarized below.

Proposed Utilities

Ultrasound can help in decision making at various levels of patient care—from identification of cause of respiratory distress to nuanced decision making in mechanically ventilated patients. Such uses in the given scenario may include-

  • Triage of patients: The portability and increased sensitivity of LUS provides a convenient, objective, and repeatable assessment of the degree of lung involvement, that, along with clinical profiles, could help to triage patients and determine the level of care required. While some algorithms have been proposed, these need to be validated in different settings before more widespread use.[3] One such example is shown in Figure 1.

  • Evaluation of severe acute respiratory distress: After initial assessment of vitals and adequate stabilization, use of the BLUE protocol devised by Lichtenstein et al. provides a rapid method of assessment of patients with respiratory distress.[4] As COVID has been seen to involve peripheral and subpleural areas, especially the posterior and inferior regions including lower lobes, it may be prudent to use a more complete evaluation of the thorax, especially scanning the dependent areas adequately with lung ultrasound (LUS) compared to the usual areas defined in the BLUE protocol.[5,6,7,8,9]

  • Diagnosis of COVID-19: Lung ultrasound is more sensitive than traditional chest X-rays in detecting lower respiratory tract involvement even when used in resource limited settings.[10,11] Use of LUS may therefore provide a more rapid and sensitive method of detecting COVID-19 related pulmonary manifestations. Preliminary LUS findings in COVID-19 include pleural line abnormalities, subpleural consolidations, B-lines including the “waterfall or light beam sign,” consolidations (C-profile) and small localized pleural effusions.[5,9,12,13] As more literature is produced, standardized reporting and data acquisition may provide data about findings that may differentiate COVID-19 from other etiologies.[14]

  • Critical care related:

    • Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) vs cardiogenic pulmonary edema: Cardiogenic edema with a diffuse B-profile, lack of subpleural consolidation, and absent areas of sparing can be distinguished from ARDS and thereby help guide management of such patients.[15]
    • Confirmation of endotracheal tube position: Direct visualization of the endotracheal tube feedback about adequate tube placement.[16]
    • Assessment of fluid responsiveness: Many critically ill patients develop hypotension and protocols using USG help in predicting the ones likely to respond to intravenous fluids.[17,18]
    • Guided central and arterial lines: Using ultrasonographic guided cannulation and central/arterial line placement results in improved success and reduction of complication.[19,20]
    • Screening for deep vein thromboses: Evidence now exists that COVID-19 is a pro-thrombotic state which may require careful management.[21,22] Bedside ultrasound can help screen for thromboses and improve decision making regarding prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation.[23]
    • Assessment of adequate lung recruitment: As the profiles on lung ultrasound extend from a spectrum of air (A-profile) to increasing interstitial and alveolar fluid (increasing number of B-lines) to frank consolidation (C-profile), the properties can be used during recruitment maneuvers to assess their adequacy in recruiting additional alveoli.[24,25]
    • Predicting efficacy of prone positioning: Changes in aeration of dependent areas as assessed by ultrasound can help in predicting patients likely to have good response to proning.[26,27,28]
    • Weaning from mechanical ventilation: Studies using ultrasound assessment of diaphragm excursion and diaphragm thickness fraction to predict poor weaning outcomes have been shown to have good predictive values and may therefore help in bedside decision making for the same.[29,30,31]

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Algorithm for use of lung ultrasound for triage of suspected COVID-19 patients

Infection Control for USG Machines

For all its benefits, ultrasound machines can be a source of infection transmission if not adequately disinfected between patient scans. Infection control guidelines for ultrasound machines have been published but manufacturer specific recommendations[32] regarding compatible agents and regimens must also be reviewed before standardized adoption of these measures for safe and effective operation of these devices.[32,33,34] These usually include using cleaning solutions followed by disinfection (with sodium hypochlorite). Dedicated machines in COVID/triage areas can further enable safer utilization of ultrasonography in patient management.

Conclusion

Given the constraints in usual patient care and management imposed by the COVID-19 outbreak, bedside ultrasound can serve to provide clinicians fast and accurate diagnostic as well as prognostic information regarding patient status. It can help guide therapy by the assessment of fluid status, guided catheter positioning, evaluation for lung recruitment candidacy, measuring the efficacy of prone ventilation, and prediction of weaning tolerance. Incorporation into institutional protocols and standardized reporting can further enable rapid acquisition of performance data that can serve to further improve patient care. Bedside ultrasonography can therefore be a useful modality in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic.

Financial support and sponsorship

None.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO Declares COVID-19 a Pandemic. Acta Biomed. 2020;91:157–60. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i1.9397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organization. Rational use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Interim guidance, 19 March 2020. 2020. Available from: https://appswhoint/iris/handle/10665/331498 . Cited 2020 Apr 19.
  • 3.The role of POCUS | Butterfly iQ [Internet] Available from: https://www.butterflynetwork.com/covid19/role-of-pocus . Cited 2020 Apr 19.
  • 4.Lichtenstein DA, Mezière GA. Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: The BLUE protocol. Chest. 2008;134:117–25. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Huang Y, Wang S, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Zheng C, Zheng Y, et al. A Preliminary Study on the Ultrasonic Manifestations of Peripulmonary Lesions of Non-Critical Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (COVID-19) [Internet] Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network; 2020. Available from: https://papersssrncom/abstract=3544750 . Cited 2020 Apr 19. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Coronavirus Disease 2019: Initial Detection on Chest CT in a Retrospective Multicenter Study of 103 Chinese Subjects | Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging [Internet] Available from: https://pubsrsnaorg/doi/101148/ryct 2020200092 . Cited 2020 Apr 19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 7.Soldati G, Smargiassi A, Inchingolo R, Buonsenso D, Perrone T, Briganti DF, et al. Is there a role for lung ultrasound during the COVID-19 pandemic? J Ultrasound Med. 2020;39:1459–62. doi: 10.1002/jum.15284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bernheim A, Mei X, Huang M, Yang Y, Fayad ZA, Zhang N, et al. Chest CT Findings in Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19): Relationship to duration of infection. Radiology. 2020;295:200463. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Peng Q-Y, Wang X-T, Zhang L-N Chinese Critical Care Ultrasound Study Group (CCUSG) Findings of lung ultrasonography of novel corona virus pneumonia during the 2019–2020 epidemic. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:849–50. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05996-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Testa A, Soldati G, Copetti R, Giannuzzi R, Portale G, Gentiloni-Silveri N. Early recognition of the 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) pneumonia by chest ultrasound. Crit Care. 2012;16:R30. doi: 10.1186/cc11201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bitar ZI, Maadarani OS, El-Shably AM, Al-Ajmi MJ. Diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound in patients with pneumonia in the intensive care unit: A single-hospital study. Health Sci Rep. 2019;2:e102. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Volpicelli G, Gargani L. Sonographic signs and patterns of COVID-19 pneumonia. Ultrasound J. 2020;12:22. doi: 10.1186/s13089-020-00171-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Xing C, Li Q, Du H, Kang W, Lian J, Yuan L. Lung ultrasound findings in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Crit Care. 2020;24:1–3. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02876-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Soldati G, Smargiassi A, Inchingolo R, Buonsenso D, Perrone T, Briganti DF, et al. Proposal for international standardization of the use of lung ultrasound for patients with COVID-19. J Ultrasound Med. 2020;39:1413–9. doi: 10.1002/jum.15285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Copetti R, Soldati G, Copetti P. Chest sonography: A useful tool to differentiate acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema from acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2008;6:16. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-6-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Thomas VK, Paul C, Rajeev PC, Palatty BU. Reliability of ultrasonography in confirming endotracheal tube placement in an emergency setting. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2017;21:257–61. doi: 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_417_16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Boyd JH, Sirounis D, Maizel J, Slama M. Echocardiography as a guide for fluid management. Critical Care. 2016;20:274. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1407-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Monnet X, Marik PE, Teboul J-L. Prediction of fluid responsiveness: An update. Ann Intensive Care. 2016;6:111. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0216-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yeap YL, Wolfe JW, Stewart J, Backfish KM. Prospective comparison of ultrasound-guided versus palpation techniques for arterial line placement by residents in a teaching institution. J Grad Med Educ. 2019;11:177–81. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00592.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Saugel B, Scheeren TWL, Teboul J-L. Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement: A structured review and recommendations for clinical practice. Crit Care. 2017;21:225. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1814-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bikdeli B, Madhavan MV, Jimenez D, Chuich T, Dreyfus I, Driggin E, et al. COVID-19 and thrombotic or thromboembolic disease: Implications for prevention, antithrombotic therapy, and follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:2950–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cui S, Chen S, Li X, Liu S, Wang F. Prevalence of venous thromboembolism in patients with severe novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18:1421–4. doi: 10.1111/jth.14830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vlachou I, Petrocheilou G, Evodia E, Pappa M, Livieratos L, Myrianthefs P, et al. Deep venous thrombosis doppler screening in critically ill patients: Is it justified? Crit Care. 2011;15(Suppl 1):P15. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tusman G, Acosta CM, Costantini M. Ultrasonography for the assessment of lung recruitment maneuvers. Crit Ultrasound J. 2016;8:8. doi: 10.1186/s13089-016-0045-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tang K-Q, Yang S-L, Zhang B, Liu H-X, Ye D-Y, Zhang H-Z, et al. Ultrasonic monitoring in the assessment of pulmonary recruitment and the best positive end-expiratory pressure. Medicine. 2017;96:e8168. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang X, Ding X, Zhang H, Chen H, Su L, Liu D. Lung ultrasound can be used to predict the potential of prone positioning and assess prognosis in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2016;20:385. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1558-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Prat G, Guinard S, Bizien N, Nowak E, Tonnelier J-M, Alavi Z, et al. Can lung ultrasonography predict prone positioning response in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients? J Crit Care. 2016;32:36–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Haddam M, Zieleskiewicz L, Perbet S, Baldovini A, Guervilly C, Arbelot C, et al. Lung ultrasonography for assessment of oxygenation response to prone position ventilation in ARDS. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1546–56. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4411-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Qian Z, Yang M, Li L, Chen Y. Ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic dysfunction as a predictor of weaning outcome from mechanical ventilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e021189. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li C, Li X, Han H, Cui H, Wang G, Wang Z. Diaphragmatic ultrasonography for predicting ventilator weaning: A meta-analysis. Medicine. 2018;97:e10968. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Llamas-Álvarez AM, Tenza-Lozano EM, Latour-Pérez J. Diaphragm and lung ultrasound to predict weaning outcome. Chest. 2017;152:1140–50. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cleaning Recommendations from Ultrasound Manufacturers [Internet] Available from: https://wwwasechoorg/covid-19-resources/cleaning-recommendations-from-ultrasound-manufacturers/ Cited 2020 Apr 19.
  • 33.Abramowicz JS, Basseal JM. WFUMB position statement: How to perform a safe ultrasound examination and clean equipment in the context of COVID-19. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020;46:1821–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.03.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Official Statement-American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) [Internet] Available from: wwwaiumorg 2020 . Available from: https://wwwaiumorg/officialStatements/57 . Cited 2020 Apr 19.

Articles from Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES