Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2020 Sep 16;71(20):6655–6669. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa386

Ancestral function of the phytochelatin synthase C-terminal domain in inhibition of heavy metal-mediated enzyme overactivation

Mingai Li 1, Enrico Barbaro 1, Erika Bellini 2, Alessandro Saba 3, Luigi Sanità di Toppi 2,, Claudio Varotto 1,
Editor: Ann Cuypers4
PMCID: PMC7586750  PMID: 32936292

The characterization of Marchantia polymorpha phytochelatin synthase provides novel insights into the evolutionary function of the enzyme’s elusive C-terminus as a regulatory domain inhibiting enzyme overactivation by metal ions.

Keywords: Cadmium, C-terminal domain, Marchantia polymorpha, overactivation, phytochelatin, phytochelatin synthase, site-directed mutagenesis, twin-cysteine motif, zinc

Abstract

Phytochelatin synthases (PCSs) play essential roles in detoxification of a broad range of heavy metals in plants and other organisms. Until now, however, no PCS gene from liverworts, the earliest branch of land plants and possibly the first one to acquire a PCS with a C-terminal domain, has been characterized. In this study, we isolated and functionally characterized the first PCS gene from a liverwort, Marchantia polymorpha (MpPCS). MpPCS is constitutively expressed in all organs examined, with stronger expression in thallus midrib. The gene expression is repressed by Cd2+ and Zn2+. The ability of MpPCS to increase heavy metal resistance in yeast and to complement cad1-3 (the null mutant of the Arabidopsis ortholog AtPCS1) proves its function as the only PCS from M. polymorpha. Site-directed mutagenesis of the most conserved cysteines of the C-terminus of the enzyme further uncovered that two twin-cysteine motifs repress, to different extents, enzyme activation by heavy metal exposure. These results highlight an ancestral function of the PCS elusive C-terminus as a regulatory domain inhibiting enzyme overactivation by essential and non-essential heavy metals. The latter finding may be relevant for obtaining crops with decreased root to shoot mobility of cadmium, thus preventing its accumulation in the food chain.

Introduction

Plants are sessile organisms, thus they have evolved diverse defense mechanisms such as accumulation and detoxification of different metals to adapt to environmental stresses related to the mineral composition of soil. Some heavy metals such as zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) are essential for plant growth and development, as they are cofactors in protein structural and catalytic components, mediating ligand interactions and redox reactions (Giles et al., 2003; Olson et al., 2013; Schmidt and Husted, 2019). Other heavy metal(loid)s such as cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), and lead (Pb) are non-essential, as they have no biological function in plants. On the contrary, they are toxic even at micromolar concentrations, because of their competition with endogenous metal cofactors for binding sites (Rea, 2012). Excess heavy metals can even lead to acute toxicity and plant death. Therefore, tight regulation of heavy metal accumulation in plants is an important mechanism to maintain plant fitness (Tennstedt et al., 2009). In plants, phytochelatins (PCn) are among the most important and studied chelators for heavy metal detoxification (Clemens, 2019).

PCn are non-ribosomally synthesized cysteine-containing peptides which have the general structure (γ-Glu-Cys)n-X (where n=2–5, and X is generally glycine) (Grill et al., 1985). PC biosynthesis starts from glutathione (GSH) in a transpeptidase reaction catalyzed by phytochelatin synthase (PCS; EC 2.3.2.15) (Grill et al., 1989). PCn were discovered first in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Kondo et al., 1984) and then in plants from cell cultures of Rauvolfia serpentina (Grill et al., 1985). Afterwards, PCn were identified in all plant species investigated as well as in algae, fungi, diatoms, and animals (Rea et al., 2004; Tsuji et al., 2004). PCS genes are constitutively expressed, and PC accumulation is activated by exposure to various physiological and non-physiological metal ions (Vatamaniuk et al., 2000) and sequestrated into the vacuole through ATP-dependent transporters (Song et al., 2010). Vacuole sequestration terminates the complexation of PCn with heavy metals and prevents accumulation of heavy metal ions in the cytosol.

Cloning and functional characterization of PCS genes from Arabidopsis thaliana (AtPCS1), S. pombe (SpPCS), Triticum aestivum (TaPCS1), and Caenorhabditis elegans (CePCS1) (Glaeser et al., 1991; Howden et al., 1995; Clemens et al., 1999, 2001; Ha et al., 1999; Vatamaniuk et al., 1999, 2001) dramatically increased our knowledge of how PCn control heavy metal detoxification at the molecular level. In addition, the identification of PC-deficient mutants from Arabidopsis (cad1) and S. pombe further broadened our understanding of the roles of PCn in heavy metal accumulation and tolerance. Based on these pioneer studies, later research attempted to increase heavy metal accumulation and tolerance in plants. A series of PCS genes from different species were isolated and overexpressed in model species (Liu et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2018; Li et al., 2019), but, surprisingly, these transgenic approaches resulted in diverse outcomes. For instance, transgenic plants, which were highly sensitive to Cd treatment, were obtained by overexpressing AtPCS1 in Arabidopsis (Lee et al., 2003a), even though there was only a small increase of PCn compared with wild-type (WT) plants. On the other hand, overexpression of the same gene in Brassica juncea resulted in high tolerance to Cd and Zn exposure, and the accumulations of Cd and Zn were significantly lower than in WT plants (Gasic and Korban, 2007). Overall, it was estimated that 33.3% of experiments with transgenic plants overexpressing PCS1 showed a positive relationship between Cd tolerance and accumulation, while 25% evidenced a negative relationship (Lee and Hwang, 2015). At present, the reasons underlying such contrasting effects are still not clear. The elegant works performed independently by different groups, however, indicate that the different response to Cd exposure of transgenic plants might be caused by several concurring factors, including differences of PCS activities, endogenous PC and GSH concentrations, as well as PC polymerization levels in transgenic plants (Wojas et al., 2008; Brunetti et al., 2011; De Benedictis et al., 2018). Another important aspect intensively addressed was the elucidation of the structural bases of PCS function. Analysis of AtPCS1 by limited proteolysis showed that the conserved N-terminal domain is necessary and sufficient for enzyme catalytic activity, while the evolutionarily divergent C-terminal domain is involved in responsiveness to a wide range of heavy metals (Ruotolo et al., 2004). The crystal structure of a cyanobacterial PCS homolog (lacking, like all cyanobacterial PCS enzymes, the C-terminal domain) suggested that the N-terminus is essential for core catalysis, and further implied the involvement of the C-terminal domain present in eukaryotes in sensing free heavy metals (Vivares et al., 2005; Rea, 2006). The different responsiveness to a set of heavy metals of LjPCS1 and LjPCS3, two different PCS enzymes in Lotus japonicus, indicated that the different patterns of heavy metal activation between these two proteins were mainly due to the differences in their C-terminal domains (Ramos et al., 2008). More recently, in Arabidopsis, the region of the AtPCS1 C-terminal domain responsible for Zn-dependent PC formation was identified through a set of C-terminal truncations (Kühnlenz et al., 2016), while As-specific activation of PC synthesis was demonstrated to occur in another small region of the C-terminal domain (Uraguchi et al., 2018).

Although the molecular mechanisms of heavy metal detoxification by PCn from higher plant species have been studied intensively during the last decades, very few studies on early diverging plant lineages have been carried out. The constitutive presence of PCSs in some species of bryophytes and lycophytes was demonstrated through HPLC and MS analyses (Petraglia et al., 2014; Bellini et al., 2020b), and PC-mediated heavy metal detoxification was confirmed to be compartmentalized in vacuoles in the liverwort Lunularia cruciata (L.) Dumort (Degola et al., 2014) and Leptodictyum riparium (Bellini et al., 2020a). However, no isolation and detailed functional characterization of PCS genes from bryophytes have been reported to date. Bryophytes, comprising liverworts, mosses, and hornworts, are the earliest diverging lineages of land plants (Qiu et al., 2006; Shimamura, 2016); so far, the phylogenetic relationship among these three bryophytes is still enigmatic (Shaw and Renzaglia, 2004), but liverworts are considered to be placed in a key phylogenetic position among the earliest land plants. The model species Marchantia polymorpha is a dioecious liverwort with separate female and male gametophytes that produce archegoniophores and antheridiophores, respectively. Due to its dominant haploid life cycle and easy asexual propagation through gemmae yielding isogenic experimental lines, M. polymorpha has well established molecular genetic tools ranging from mutant populations, genetic transformation, silencing, and genome editing (Ishizaki et al., 2016). Furthermore, its genome was fully sequenced recently (Bowman et al., 2017). Therefore, M. polymorpha has been widely used as a model species to elucidate the evolutionary processes of gene regulation mechanisms across land plants (Busch et al., 2019; Naramoto et al., 2019), but, to date, no systematic investigation has been performed on heavy metal detoxification in this species.

In this study, the putative PCS gene from M. polymorpha (MpPCS) was isolated and functionally characterized in vivo through overexpression in yeast and Arabidopsis to address the question of whether it is functional and can complement higher plants PCS enzymes. With MpPCS being the most basal PCS with a C-terminal domain in land plants, we further asked whether analysis of the few highly conserved cysteines in this region affect metal responsiveness to elucidate the ancestral function of this enigmatic domain.

Materials and methods

Plant materials, growth conditions, and stress treatments

Marchantia polymorpha L. Cam2 (UK Cambridge-2 WT) female gametophytes, A. thaliana Col-0 WT, and Cad1-3 mutant and transgenic plants were used in this study. Marchantia polymorpha was propagated in Petri dishes containing half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 1% sucrose and 1% phytoagar under long-day conditions (16 h light/8 h dark) at 21 °C with a light intensity of 60 µmol m–2 s–1 in the growth chamber. For heavy metal treatments in M. polymorpha, 2-week-old gemmae were transferred to fresh Petri dishes either without or with addition of 50 µM CdSO4 or 200 µM ZnSO4. The gemmae were independently collected before and after treatments for 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80 °C until used for real-time and thiol-peptide analyses. Three biological replicates at each sampling time point were applied for the entire treatment. For heavy metal treatments in Arabidopsis plants, sterilized seeds were germinated in half-strength MS agar medium and 2% (w/v) sucrose, supplemented either with 50 µM or 85 µM CdSO4, or with 200, 400, or 600 µM ZnSO4 in 100×100×15 mm square plates. In total, 15 seeds for Col-0 and each transgenic line were sown in one plate. After stratification at 4 °C for 3 d, the plates were grown vertically for 10 d under standard long-day conditions at 23 °C with a light intensity of 100–120 µmol m–2 s–1 in the growth chamber. At least 80 plants per genotype were processed for this analysis. For thiol-peptide analyses of cad1-3 complementation lines, plants grown for 10 d on the control plates were transferred either to plates containing 85 µM CdSO4 or to fresh plates, and maintained for an additional 3 d. A total of 15–20 seedlings per genotype were pooled as a single biological sample, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80 °C.

Cloning, plasmid constructs, and transformation

For the analysis of the MpPCS expression pattern in M. polymorpha, a promoter region of 2.8 kb upstream of the MpPCS coding sequence (CDS) was amplified using primers MpPCS-prom_For and MpPCS-prom_Rev (see Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online) with Phusion High Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Thermo Scientific), cloned into pENTR/D TOPO vector (Invitrogen), and recombined into the destination vector pMpGWB104 (Ishizaki et al., 2015) in front of the β-glucuronidase (GUS) CDS using LR clonase II (Invitrogen). The T-DNA was integrated into the M. polymorpha genome by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation as previously described (Kubota et al., 2013). T1 transgenic plants were selected on half-strength solid Gambourg B5 medium supplemented with 10 mg l–1 hygromycin. The isogenic G1 lines from the T1 lines were obtained by subcultivating single gemmae, and gemmae generated from G1 lines (G2 generation) were used for experimental analyses.

For overexpression of MpPCS in M. polymorpha, the full-length MpPCS cDNA was amplified with primers MpPCS_For and MpPCS_Rev (Supplementary Table S1). The resulting PCR fragment was cloned into the pENTR/D TOPO vector (Invitrogen) and recombined into the destination vector pK7WG2 under the transcriptional control of the strong constitutive Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter (Karimi et al., 2002) in the same way as mentioned above to yield the final construct (p35S::MpPCS). This construct was transformed into A. tumefaciens strain GV3101-pMP90RK by electroporation and further transformed into the A. thaliana Col-0 ecotype by the floral dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998). T1 transgenic lines were screened on solid MS medium supplemented with 50 mg l–1 kanamycin. Homozygous single-copy T3 seeds from two selected lines were used for all downstream analyses.

Mutational analysis of MpPCS was carried out as follows. In total, six mutations targeting three positions with higly conserved cysteines were introduced into the MpPCS WT CDS using the Quikchange Site Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene) in the M. polymorpha pENTR_MpPCS plasmid. All primers used for mutagenesis are listed in Supplementary Table S1. The resulting entry vectors, respectively named pENTR_MpPCS_M1, pENTR_MpPCS_M2, pENTR_MpPCS_M3, pENTR_MpPCS_M4, pENTR_MpPCS_M5, and pENTR_MpPCS_M6, and the cognate WT pENTR_MpPCS plasmid were further recombined into the pYES-DEST52 vector (Invitrogen™) and transformed into Cd-sensitive Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain YK44 (ura3-52 his3-200,ZRCDCot1, mating type α) using the lithium acetate method (Gietz and Schiestl, 2007). All sequences used for any of the constructs described above were verified by sequencing with a 96-capillary 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Thermo Scientific).

Histochemical analysis of GUS expression in transgenic Marchantia polymorpha

About 10–15 gemmae of 17-day-old WT and transgenic M. polymorpha lines were incubated at 37 °C overnight in GUS assay solution as previously described (Gazzani et al., 2009); the chlorophyll was cleared with a series of incubations in fresh 70% ethanol (v/v).

Total RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and real-time PCR (RT-PCR) analyses

Total RNA was extracted from 100 mg of frozen plant material using a Spectrum Plant Total RNA Kit (Sigma-Aldrich®) following the manufacturer’s instructions, and treated with Amplification-Grade DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich®) for elimination of genomic DNA contamination. The integrity and quality analyses of extracted total RNA were performed in Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies), and cDNA was then synthesized with 1 μg of total RNA using SuperScript™III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen™). Semi-quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was carried out for different organs of M. polymorpha using the MpACT gene as a reference (Saint-Marcoux et al., 2015) and using ActinII for Arabidopsis transgenic plants. For real-time analysis, qRT-PCR was conducted with Platinum® SYBR® Green qPCR SuperMix-UDG (Invitrogen) using MpAPT and MpACT as reference genes for M. polymorpha (Saint-Marcoux et al., 2015) and AtActII and AtEF1α for Arabidopsis transgenic plants in a Bio-Rad C1000 Thermal Cycler detection system. Stability of reference genes was calculated with the RefFinder software (Xie et al., 2012). All reactions for qRT-PCR analyses were performed in triplicate, and the 2−ΔΔCT method was applied to calculate fold changes. Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

Phylogenetic reconstruction

Arabidopsis thaliana PCS1 protein was blasted against the M. polymorpha MarpolBase ‘primary’ and ‘alternative’ (version 3.1, November 2015) protein databases (https://marchantia.info/tools/blast/plant/) using an E-value cut-off of 10–5. The A. thaliana PCS1 protein was further blasted against all angiosperm Phytozome 12 (Goodstein et al., 2012) proteomes. The resulting hits were downloaded and representative sequences were selected based on protein completeness and phylogenetic distance from each other, to provide a representative sample of PCSs in plants. Proteins were aligned using the MAFFT online server (Katoh et al., 2019), and regions with low homology were removed using the GBLOCKS server (Talavera and Castresana, 2007) with standard settings. The best-fitting model of protein evolution was selected with the online version of SMS (Lefort et al., 2017) and this model was directly applied for maximum likelihood phylogenetic reconstruction using the PhyML online server (Guindon et al., 2010) and aBayes approximate support branch estimates. The resulting tree was visualized with FigTree v1.4.4.

Yeast complementation assay and induction for thiol-peptide analyses

A single colony from each transformant carrying either the WT construct (pYES52-MpPCS), one of the six mutations (pYES52-MpPCS_M1, pYES52-MpPCS_M2, pYES52-MpPCS_M3, pYES52-MpPCS_M4, pYES52-MpPCS_M5, pYES52-MpPCS_M6), or the pYES52 empty vector was cultured in YSD-U liquid medium overnight at 30 °C. Culture aliquots normalized to OD600=0.5 were pelleted and resuspended in 500 µl of YPGAL [1% (w/v) yeast extract, 2% (w/v) peptone, 2% (w/v) galactose] liquid medium and further diluted to 10–1, 10–2, and 10–3, and 5 µl from each aliquot were spotted on YPGAL solid medium supplemented with or without CdSO4/ZnSO4. Yeast growth was stopped after a 3 d incubation at 30 °C. For the in vivo assay of thiol-peptides, yeast cells at an OD600 of 0.1 were shaken overnight at 30 °C in YSD-U liquid medium, and protein expression was induced at an OD600 of 0.5 for 4 h by supplementing 2% galactose and 100 µM CdSO4. Afterwards, cells were harvested by centrifugation, washed twice with distilled water, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80 °C. All experiments were independently repeated four times.

Generation of recombinant protein for MpPCS, its C-terminal mutations, and PCS activity assay

The CDSs of full-length MpPCS and the six mutants mentioned above were amplified from the corresponding pENTR clone used for plant transformation with primers listed in Supplementary Table S1 and cloned into the expression vector pET28a in-frame with an N-terminal 6×His-tag. The expression plasmids were transformed into Escherichia coli Rosetta™(DE3)pLysS cells, which were induced by adding 0.5 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside with overnight culture at room temperature. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and the soluble fraction of recombinant protein was purified as previously described (Fischer et al., 2014), further desalted using a PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare), quantified with the Quant-iT Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and assessed by 10% SDS–PAGE. The PCS activity assay was carried out as previously described (Ogawa et al., 2010; Uraguchi et al., 2017). In brief, the reaction mixture (100 μl) containing 200 mM HEPES–NaOH (pH 8.0), 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 12.5 mM GSH, 100 μM Cd or 200 μM Zn, and 50 ng of recombinant PCS was incubated at 35 °C for 60 min, then terminated by the addition of 25 μl of 10% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). The terminated reactions were maintained at 10 °C in the autosampler tray and immediately analyzed by HPLC-ESI-MS-MS to identify and quantify PCn produced using the analytical method described in (Bellini et al., 2019). For an accurate quantification, terminated reactions were diluted by a factor of 100 only for PC2.

Analyses of thiol-peptides

Marchantia polymorpha and A. thaliana samples, previously stored at –80 °C, were extracted according to Bellini et al. (2019), whereas yeast cells were extracted following the protocol described in Ramos et al. (2008) with some modifications. Briefly, yeast cells were resuspended in 300 μl of the extraction buffer containing 0.1% (v/v) TFA, 0.5 mM DTPA (diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid), and 200 ng ml–1 (glycine-13C2,15N)-labeled GSH and PC2 internal standards. All the other analyses and quantification of thiol-peptides were performed following the procedures detailed in Bellini et al. (2019). System control, data acquisition, and processing were carried out using AB Sciex Analyst® version 1.6.3 software.

Cad1-3 complementation

Cad1-3 mutant plants were used for transformation by the floral dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101-pMP90RK harboring a plant gene expression construct (p35S::MpPCS). Transformed seeds were selected on MS agar medium containing 50 mg l–1 kanamycin, and T3 homozygous seeds were used for complementation analyses.

Statistical analyses

Data with one independent factor were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Data with two independent factors were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. Tukey’s multiple comparison and least significant difference (LSD) tests were used to identify significant differences. Differences were considered significant if P≤0.05 in the two-sided test. Compact letter display was used to summarize the differences among means. All analyses were run in R version 4.0.0 (04.24; R Core Team, 2020) using the scripts provided in Mangiafico (2015). All experiments were perfomed with at least n=3 biological replicates.

Results

Phylogenetic reconstruction of MpPCS

Based on a homology search of AtPCS1 in the fully sequenced genome of M. polymorpha (Bowman et al., 2017), the full-length coding region of PCS of M. polymorpha (MpPCS) was identified and isolated (accession number Mapoly0046s0028.1). Only a single copy of PCS is present in the M. polymorpha genome, in contrast to the two copies found in Arabidopsis and many other higher plant species (Filiz et al., 2019). The MpPCS protein is, as expected, basal to all angiosperm PCSs (Fig. 1A). MpPCS encodes a 530 amino acid polypeptide with a predicted molecular mass of ~57 kDa. The protein sequence alignment among MpPCS and other PCSs from higher plant species indicated that it shares 46–52% overall sequence identity (Fig. 1B). Conservation of the N-terminal domain is higher than that of the more divergent C-terminal domain, and the N-terminal domain has the typical catalytic triad of PCS enzymes, namely Cys56, His162, and Asp180 (Romanyuk et al., 2006; Li et al., 2019) (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Phylogenetic reconstruction and multiple sequence alignment of PCS proteins. (A) Maximum likelihood tree of PCS proteins from representative plant taxa. Numbers are approximate Bayes (aBayes) support values calculated by PhyML. (B) Multiple sequence alignment of MpPCS (Mapoly0046s0028.1), SmoPCS (98967), OsaPCS (LOC_Os06g01260.1), and AtPCS (AT5G44070.1). Dashes (–) represent gaps; dots indicate residues identical to those of the first sequence. The amino acids of the catalytic triad (Cys56, His162, and Asp180 in A. thaliana, corresponding to the same positions in MpPCS) are highlighted with a yellow background. The boundary between the N-terminus (1–221 amino acids in A.thaliana) and the enzyme end is indicated with a black arrow. The color of the amino acids indicates the chemico-physical properties (e.g. red is used for negatively charged and blue for positively charged amino acids).

MpPCS is constitutively expressed and repressed by Cd2+ and Zn2+ treatment in vegetative organs of M. polymorpha

Semi-quantitative RT-PCR was performed to determine the expression patterns of MpPCS in M. polymorpha gemmae, entire plants, 4-week-old thalli, and rhizoids. This analysis indicated that MpPCS was expressed at similar levels in all four organs examined here (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, the expression pattern of MpPCS was visualized in transgenic M. polymorpha expressing the GUS gene under the control of the MpPCS promoter. The GUS staining analysis of 17-day-old gemmae showed that MpPCS was expressed mainly in the midrib region of the thallus and rhizoids; no expression was observed correspondingly in WT plants (Fig. 2B, C).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Expression pattern of MpPCS and thiol-peptide quantification. (A) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR of MpPCS transcription in different organs, using MpAct as an internal reference gene (33 PCR cycles for MpPCS and 27 for MpAct). Spatial expression pattern of 17-day-old wild-type (B) and transgenic M. polymorpha plants (C) by GUS staining. The ventral side of the thallus is shown; scale bars in the corner indicate 1 mm. Relative expression levels of MpPCS by qRT-PCR from 2-week-old M. polymorpha exposed to 50 µM CdSO4 (D) or 200 µM ZnSO4 (E) for different lengths of time as indicated. Bars indicates the SD (n=3 biological replicates) and different letters represent statistically significant differences (one-way ANOVA test, P<0.05). (F) GSH amount. (G) PC2 amount. (H) PC3 amount. Bars indicate the SE (n=4 biological replicates), and different letters represent statistically significant differences (two-way ANOVA test, P<0.05).

To assess the general responsiveness of MpPCS in M. polymorpha to heavy metal treatments, 2-week-old gemmae were treated with either 50 µM CdSO4 or 200 µM ZnSO4, and the entire gemmae were collected at different time points before and after heavy metal treatments and subjected to qRT-PCR analysis. The overall stabilities of the two reference genes used, MpACT and MpAPT, were 1.41 and 1.19, respectively. The expression levels of the MpPCS transcript under CdSO4 and ZnSO4 treatments gradually decreased, reaching the minimum after 12 h of treatment, and then increased after 24 h to a level similar to that at 1 h of treatment (see Fig. 2D). One-way ANOVA further indicated that the expression level of MpPCS after 3, 6, and 12 h of treatment with both heavy metals was significantly different from those of the other time points tested (Fig. 2D, E). Given the identical trends for Zn2+ and Cd2+ treatments, we assessed the amount of GSH and PCn only for Cd. The means of the GSH amounts over time were significantly different from those of control gemmae, as the amount of GSH had a slight increase at 12 h after CdSO4 treatment (one-way ANOVA, F5,18=12.992, P=1.898×10–5; Fig. 2F). On the other hand, PC2 content increased from 3 h on and reached a plateau at about double the amount of the control from 6 h to 24 h (one-way ANOVA, F5,18=40.267, P=3.713×10–9; Fig. 2G). The amount of PC3 did not significantly change as compared with the control, although significant differences could be found among time points (one-way ANOVA, F5,18=3.5281, P=0.0213; Fig. 2H).

MpPCS overexpression confers heavy metal tolerance to YK44 yeast and hypersensitivity to Arabidopsis plants

Overexpression of candidate PCS genes in heterologous systems is a common method to assess their functionality and capacity to change responsiveness to heavy metals (Lee et al., 2003b). First of all, MpPCS was transformed into yeast strain YK44, which is hypersensitive to heavy metal treatment. Growth of yeast lines transformed with either the MpPCS CDS or the empty vector was examined on YPGAL medium supplemented without and with different concentrations of Cd2+ and Zn2+. This analysis clearly showed that in the control medium (no heavy metals), growth of yeast transformed either with MpPCS or the empty vector was similar, while yeast expressing MpPCS grew more than the empty vector control line at concentrations of 100 µM CdSO4 and 700 µM ZnSO4 (Supplementary Fig. S1). Therefore, overexpression of MpPCS enhanced resistance of yeast strain YK44 to heavy metal stress.

In addition, transgenic Arabidopsis plants were generated to evaluate the ability of the 35S::MpPCS construct to affect tolerance to heavy metals in planta. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR was carried out first to estimate the relative expression of MpPCS in single-copy transgenic Arabidopsis lines (Supplementary Fig. S2), and the two lines with the highest relative expression were selected for phenotypic analyses. In control growth medium, both transgenic lines overexpressing MpPCS under the control of the strong 35S promoter and Col-0 WT plants grew comparably, as no statistical differences were detected in fresh weight and root length among genotypes (Fig. 3A). However, when plants were grown in medium supplemented with 50 µM CdSO4, the mean fresh weights of both transgenic lines were significantly lower than that of Col-0 plants (Fig. 3B), and root length was also much shorter compared with Col-0. The same growth trend, in a more severe manner, was also observed for both transgenic lines and Col-0 plants treated with 85 µM CdSO4 (Fig. 3B). To assess whether the phenotypic variation observed for CdSO4 treatment would be the same also for an excess of an essential heavy metal, both transgenic lines and Col-0 WT plants were grown on the same basal medium with different concentrations of ZnSO4. Col-0 plants grew more than both transgenic lines under 200 µM ZnSO4 treatment (Fig. 3A), and both fresh weight and root length were significantly different between the two transgenic lines and Col-0 (Fig. 3B). Significant differences were also observed under 400 µM ZnSO4 treatment (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Phenotypic variations upon CdSO4 or ZnSO4 treatment of Arabidopsis transgenic plants overexpressing MpPCS from M. polymorpha. (A) Phenotypes of 10-day-old MpPCS transgenic and wild-type Col-0 plants under non-treated (top) and treated conditions with different concentrations of CdSO4 (50 µM and 85 µM; middle) or ZnSO4 (200 µM and 400 µM; bottom). Dashed lines indicate the separation of different genotypes. (B) Fresh weight of the corresponding plants shown in (A); bars represent the SD of three biological replicates, and two stars indicate statistically very significant differences compared with Col-0. At least 60 plants were used for each analysis.

Overexpressing MpPCS complements the Arabidopsis Cad1-3 mutant

The cad1-3 mutant, a knockout mutation of Arabidopsis PCS1 (AtPCS1), is highly sensitive to treatment with heavy metals such as Cd2+ (Howden et al., 1995; Ha et al., 1999). Thus, to verify whether MpPCS was the functional M. polymorpha ortholog of AtPCS1, a complementation assay was performed by overexpressing MpPCS in the cad1-3 mutant. In total, 13 independent homozygous lines were used to assess growth under different concentrations of CdSO4 treatment compared with Col-0 and the cad1-3 mutant. In control growth medium, seedlings of all transgenic lines grew similarly compared with those of Col-0 and the cad1-3 mutant, and no statistically significant differences in fresh weight were detected among all genotypes (Fig. 4). When the growth medium was supplemented with 50 µM or 85 µM CdSO4, the fresh weights of all lines and Col-0 were very similar from each treatment: statistical analysis indicated that no significant differences for the majority of lines were detectable, but many were significantly more resistant to CdSO4 treatment compared with the Cad1-3 mutant. We then assessed the amount of GSH and PCn for controls and plants treated with 85 µM CdSO4. A significant interaction was found among Cd2+ concentration and genotypes with respect to GSH concentration (two-way ANOVA, F3,24=4.5085, P=0.01206; Fig. 4B). The amount of GSH was significantly higher for the MpPCS-27 transgenic line compared with all other genotypes in control conditions, while both transgenic lines had a higher GSH amount under Cd2+ treatment. All genotypes had higher GSH amounts under Cd2+ treatment than under control conditions (Fig. 4B). A significant interaction was found among Cd2+ concentration and genotypes with respect to PC2 concentration (two-way ANOVA, F3,24=99.83, P=1.082×10–13; Fig. 4C). PC2 content did not change for the cad1-3 genotype, but increased significantly for all other genotypes upon Cd2+ treatment. Both transgenic lines had levels of PC2 comparable with (MpPCS-50) or slightly higher (MpPCS-27) than Col-0 (Fig. 4C). A significant interaction was also found among Cd2+ concentration and genotypes with respect to PC3 concentration (two-way ANOVA, F3,24=308.66, P<2.2×10–16; Fig. 4D), with a similar trend to that of PC2, but in this case Col-0 produced more PC3 than both transgenic lines (Fig. 4D). To confirm whether phenotypic complementation was due to overexpression of the MpPCS gene, the expression level was measured by qPCR for all tested lines. Even though variations of expression levels were detected, MpPCS was expressed in all 13 lines (Supplementary Fig. S3).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Functional complementation of the cad1-3 mutant by overexpressing MpPCS. (A) Fresh weight was measured to evaluate the recovery of Cd2+ hypersensitivity from thirteen 10-day-old independent transgenic T3 lines compared with cad1-3 and Col-0 plants growing in a medium supplemented with 0 µM (top), 50 µM (middle), or 85 µM (bottom) CdSO4. Bars correspond to the SD (n≥45 plants). (B) GSH amount. (C) PC2 amount. (D) PC3 amount. For thiol-peptide analyses, 10-day old seedlings were treated with or without 85 µM CdSO4 for an additional 3 d. Bars indicate the SE (n=4 biological replicates), and different letters represent statistically significant differences (two-way ANOVA test, P<0.05).

Diverse heavy metal responsiveness in C-terminal point mutations of MpPCS in yeast and PCS activity assay of recombinant protein

To pinpoint whether the amino acids in the C-terminal domain of MpPCS had a role in sensing of different heavy metals, six independent sets of mutations were constructed, targeting three different positions with evolutionarily conserved cysteines (mutants MpPCS-m1, MpPCS-m2, MpPCS-m3, MpPCS-m4, MpPCS-m5, and MpPCS-m6; Fig. 5). Upon transformation into yeast strain YK44, heavy metal responsiveness was first qualitatively evaluated on the growth medium following exposure to Cd2+ and Zn2+. In control YPGAL medium, yeast lines transformed with all six mutant constructs, WT MpPCS, and empty vector grew similarly, indicating that none of the constructs caused any effect on yeast in the absence of excess heavy metals (Fig. 6). Upon exposure to 100 µM Cd2+, the six constructs displayed variable levels of resistance to Cd2+. The yeast line transformed with MpPCS-m3 showed the highest resistance to Cd2+, being even more resistant than the line expressing WT MpPCS. On the other hand, the MpPCS-m4 line was less resistant than the MpPCS line, with growth levels similar to the empty vector line. The other mutations showed levels of resistance similar to the WT MpPCS line. Also in the case of Zn2+ treatment, the mutant lines showed different resistance patterns. Again, the MpPCS-m3 mutation caused higher tolerance to Zn2+ treatment than WT MpPCS. MpPCS-m1, MpPCS-m5, and Mpo-PCS-m6 lines were also resistant to Zn2+, but less so than the MpPCS line. The other mutations caused an almost complete loss of resistance to Zn2+, with growth rates very similar to that of the empty vector line. Given the identical trends for Zn and Cd treatments, we assessed the amount of GSH and PCn only for Cd in the yeast lines transformed with the empty vector, the WT MpPCS, and the MpPCS-m3 mutant. In the case of GSH concentration, no significant interaction was found between the amount of Cd2+ and genotypes (two-way ANOVA, F2,18=1.380, P=0.277; Fig. 6B), and no significant difference was found in GSH content between Cd2+ concentrations and among genotypes (two-way ANOVA for Cd2+ treatments, F2,18=2.846, P=0.084). Thus, all the strains contained, under both control and treated conditions, the same amount of GSH (Fig. 6B). In the case of PC2, we found an interaction among amount of Cd2+ and genotypes (two-way ANOVA, F2,18=33.161, P=9.203×10–7; Fig. 6C). As expected, only trace amounts of PC2 were present in lines transformed with the empty vector either in the absence or in presence of 100 µM Cd2+. Significantly larger amounts of PC2 was present in lines transformed with either the WT MpPCS or the MpPCS-m3 constructs, with the latter containing less PC2 than the former in both control and treated conditions (Fig. 6C). In the case of PC3, the results were similar [interaction among amount of Cd2+ and genotypes, two-way ANOVA, F2,18=235.95, P=1.22×10–13 with the difference that the mean PC3 amount in MpPCS-m3 did not differ from those in lines transformed with the empty vector (Fig. 6D).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Scheme of C-terminal mutations in MpPCS proteins. The numbers above the wild-type sequence indicate the first and last positions of mutated amino acids, a dot indicates any amino acid identical to that of wild-type MpPCS, and the symbol ‘//’ marks the omission of a partial amino acid sequence due to space limitations.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Yeast complementation assay and thiol-peptide quantification. (A) Yeast growth comparison of the heavy metal-hypersensitive strain YK44 transformed with empty vector, wild-type MpPCS (MpPCS-WT), and C-terminal mutagenized MpPCS (MpPCS-m1, MpPCS-m2, MpPCS-m3, MpPCS-m4, MpPCS-m5, and MpPCS-m6) growing in YPGAL medium supplemented with 0 µM, 100 µM CdSO4, or 800 µM ZnSO4. Dilution factors are shown above each picture. (B) GSH amount. (C) PC2 amount. (D) PC3 amount. For thiol-peptide analyses, yeast cells were treated with or without 100 µM CdSO4 for 4 h. Bars indicate the SE (n=4 biological replicates), and different letters represent statistically significant differences (two-way ANOVA test, P<0.05).

To confirm the qualitative differences observed in yeast in responses of the six mutations to Cd2+ and Zn2+ relative to wild-type MpPCS, we expressed all constructs as 6×His tag N-terminal fusions in E. coli. Soluble recombinant proteins could be purified only for three constructs (WT MpPCS, MpPCS-m3, and MpPCS-m5; Supplementary Fig. S4). For two other constructs (MpPCS-m2 and MpPCS-m4), proteins were expressed exclusively in inclusion bodies, while in the case of MpPCS-m6, no recombinant protein was expressed either in inclusion bodies or in the soluble supernatant in E. coli, suggesting that the mutations involving stretches of several amino acids could affect protein folding/stability. Thus, PCS activity could be measured exclusively for WT MpPCS, MpPCS-m3, and MpPCS-m5 enzymes upon Cd2+ and Zn2+ activation through quantification of the three major PC polymerization levels (PC2, PC3, and PC4). In the presence of 100 µM CdSO4, the means of total PCn formation were significantly heterogeneous across the three enzymes (one-way ANOVA, F2,12=62.3, P=4.58×10–7), and it was significantly higher in both MpPCS-m3 and MpPCS-m5 enzymes compared with WT MpPCS in the order MpPCS-m3>MpPCS-m5>MpPCS (Supplementary Fig. S5). In the presence of 200 µM ZnSO4, the production of PCn was still significantly heterogeneous across the three enzymes (one-way ANOVA, F2,12=131.6, P=6.86×10–9). Also in this case, the highest PCn production among them was from MpPCS-m3, while MpPCS did not differ significantly from MpPCS-m5 (Supplementary Fig. S5). In addition, to evaluate in more detail the pattern of individual PCn production, the comparison among different genotypes upon heavy metal induction was examined. For the 100 µM CdSO4 treatment, the activity of MpPCS-m3 was significantly higher than those of MpPCS and MpPCS-m5 for the production of PC2 and PC3, as well as PC4 (Fig. 7). The activity of MpPCS-m5 was also significantly higher than that of MpPCS for PC2, but significantly lower than MpPCS for PC3 and PC4 production. The same pattern was also observed for MpPCS-m3 subjected to ZnSO4 treatment, and also for MpPCS-m5 only for PC3 and PC4 formation; however, no significant difference between MpPCS and MpPCS-m5 was detected for PC2 (Fig. 7). Thus, the MpPCS-m3 and MpPCS-m5 mutations significantly varied in the polymerization level of PCn as compared with WT MpPCS, with MpPCS-m3 having a higher polymerization level and MpPCS-m5 having a lower polymerization level than the WT in both heavy metal treatments.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

PCn production by recombinant proteins MpPCS, MpPCS-m3, and MpPCS-m5 in vitro. Average PC2 (top), PC3 (middle), and PC4 (bottom) production was measured by activation with 100 µM CdSO4 or 200 µM ZnSO4 (indicated above the picture) in a reaction containing 500 ng ml–1 MpPCS, MpPCS-m3, or MpPCS-m5 proteins purified from E. coli. Bars correspond to the SD of the means. Five replicates were used for these analyses. The same letters above the bars represent no significant differences from each other (Tukey–Kramer test, P>0.05).

Discussion

Decades of studies have shown that PCn are constitutively present in various plant lineages and play critical roles for detoxification/homeostasis of a wide range of heavy metals (Degola et al., 2014; Kühnlenz et al., 2016; Fontanini et al., 2018). Till now, however, only the genes encoding PCS proteins in higher plant species have been isolated and functionally characterized (e.g. Loscos et al., 2006; Li et al., 2019). In contrast, no detailed molecular studies of PCSs of early diverging land plants such as liverworts have been conducted, despite the high relevance of this clade which is considered to encompass the earliest representatives of the radiation of plants on land (Bowman et al., 2016). Thus, in this study, we addressed the functional characterization of MpPCS from M. polymorpha to shed new light on the evolution of molecular mechanisms for heavy metal detoxification in land plants and in particular on the role of the PCS C-terminal domain.

MpPCS is the functional ortholog of angiosperm PCS genes

Several lines of evidence indicate that MpPCS shares common features with the PCS genes characterized in angiosperms so far. MpPCS has the two domains found in all other PCS proteins, a typically highly conserved N-terminal domain and a more divergent C-terminal domain. MpPCS further displays in its N-terminal domain fully conserved amino acids of the catalytic triad (Fig. 1B; Romanyuk et al., 2006). The MpPCS gene is constitutively expressed in different organs under control growing conditions (Fig. 2A), and its overexpression in yeast strain YK44 enhances heavy metal resistance upon exposure to Cd2+ or Zn2+ like many other functional PCSs (Supplementary Fig. S1; Liu et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2014). Furthermore, overexpression of the MpPCS CDS fully complements the PC-deficient mutant cad1-3 in Arabidopsis (Fig. 4). Additionally, the purified recombinant protein MpPCS was able to catalyze the synthesis of PCn using GSH as substrate following activation by Cd2+ or Zn2+in vitro (Fig. 7; Supplementary Fig. S5). Taken together, these data clearly demonstrate that MpPCS is the ortholog in M. polymorpha and has the same function as AtPCS1.

Previous studies have shown transcriptional regulation of angiosperm PCS genes upon heavy metal exposures. For instance, the transcripts of AtPCS1 in Arabidopsis young seedlings were induced upon heavy metal Cd2+ exposure (Lee and Korban, 2002). Also, a dramatic increase of TaPCS1 expression in wheat root was observed after Cd2+ treatment (Clemens et al., 1999), and the time course analyses of MaPCS1 and MaPCS2 expression patterns in different organs of mulberry also indicated significant induction upon exposure to Cd2+ or Zn2+ (Fan et al., 2018). Interestingly, in contrast to these results, the expression of MpPCS was repressed upon Cd2+ and Zn2+ exposure. Analogously to higher plant PCS genes, however, MpPCS induction by Cd2+ was modest, attaining just a 2-fold change as compared with untreated controls (Lee and Korban, 2002; Li et al., 2019), confirming the overall limited transcriptional responsiveness of PCS in the course of evolution. This observation further suggests that the well-known heavy metal-dependent post-transcriptional regulation of PCS enzymatic activity has been playing a major role in the tight control of PCn production since the early stages of evolution of this enzyme. Our results on both the differential transcriptional regulation and enzymatic activation by Cd2+ as compared with Zn2+ further confirm the highest induction capacity of the former to elicit PCn biosynthesis, as previously suggested not only for higher plants but also for another liverwort, Lunularia cruciata (L.) Dumort (Degola et al., 2014; Petraglia et al., 2014).

Many studies have attempted to increase the heavy metal tolerance of plants by overexpressing PCS genes from different species, but only in a minority of cases have enhanced tolerance to heavy metals and increased PCn content been attained (Liu et al., 2012; Shukla et al., 2012; Fan et al., 2018). More commonly, overexpression of heterologous PCS genes resulted in hypersensitivity to heavy metals (Wojas et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2012; Li et al., 2019). In the case of transgenic plants overexpressing MpPCS in Arabidopsis, a substantial increase of sensitivity to Cd2+ or Zn2+ compared with WT Col-0 was obtained (Fig. 3A, B). Almost certainly this result can be explained by a depletion of the pool of GSH, the substrate of PCS enzymes, and the resulting disruption of the cellular redox balance (Wojas et al., 2008; Brunetti et al., 2011). Taken together, our results highlight how, despite hundreds of million of years of divergent evolution between extant liverworts and angiosperms, the involvement of PCS in heavy metal detoxification is fully functionally conserved between M. polymorpha and A. thaliana.

A conserved cysteine motif in the land plant PCS C-terminal domain prevents enzyme overactivation by heavy metals

The C-terminal domain of PCS has been demonstrated to be fundamental for the sustained PCS activity and stability necessary for plants to cope with elevated concentrations of the non-essential Cd2+ ion and proposed to be involved in heavy metal perception/specificity as well as metallochaperone and metallothionein functions (Ruotolo et al., 2004; Vestergaard et al., 2008). Identification of MpPCS as the functionally validated enzyme from the most basal land plant sequenced to date provides a unique opportunity to functionally test the ancestral role of this still enigmatic domain, as conserved cysteines have been proposed to be those most relevant for metal binding (Maier et al., 2003). Among the three sets of most conserved cysteines in the C-terminus of land plants PCSs, two (C355–C356 and C372–C373) were homologous to residues previously identified to bind Cd2+ in TaPCS1 (C351–C352 and C369–C370), while C231 did not bind any metal ion (Maier et al., 2003). While, in general, in our work the mutations involving multiple substitutions in a stretch of residues around the conserved cysteines (MpPCS-m2, MpPCS-m4, and MpPCS-m6) impaired protein solubility/stability too heavily to provide useful information, mutations of only the conserved cysteines (MpPCS-m1, MpPCS-m3, and MpPCS-m5) were highly informative. Consistent with a possible structural role, the C231A (MpPCS-m1) single mutation provided a very weak increase in heavy metal tolerance in yeast and could not be stably expressed in E. coli, suggesting that it is essential for correct folding/stability of the enzyme. In contrast, the other two double mutant proteins, C355A–C356A (MpPCS-m3) and C372A–C373A (MpPCS-m5), could be solubly expressed in E. coli, suggesting that they do not overly destabilize the enzyme. Indeed, the quadruple mutant of AtPCS1, where both cysteine homologs to C372A–C373A and an additional two cysteine residues in close proximity (not conserved in MpPCS) were mutated to alanines, was previously demonstrated to be fully stable (Vestergaard et al., 2008). In vivo yeast expression does not support that the MpPCS-m3 mutation enhances PCn production as compared with the WT MpPCS, indicating that in this heterologous system the MpPCS-m3 mutant enzyme is less active than the WT enzyme in the conditions tested. Currently the reasons for this difference remain to be investigated. However, in vitro enzymatic assays demonstrate that MpPCS-m5 and especially MpPCS-m3 mutations enhance PCn production as compared with the WT enzyme. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a mutation increasing the enzyme Cd2+-responsive activity has been found. Recently, deletion of the last 10 amino acids of the AtPCS1 C-terminus was found to increase As3+-dependent PCn production, suggesting that some of the residues in this region may inhibit PCS activation by As3+ (Uraguchi et al., 2018). Our findings indicate that in addition to As3+-, Cd2+-dependent repressing mechanisms also possibly exist to prevent enzyme overactivation. Most importantly, these regulatory functions of the PCS C-terminus are evolutionarily conserved and can have different degrees of selectivity: while the MpPCS-m5 mutation selectively abolishes Cd2+-dependent repression, MpPCS-m3 mutation abolishes both Cd2+- and Zn2+-dependent repression in vitro. We speculate that the cysteines at both sites may constitute low-affinity binding sites for Cd2+ and Zn2+ that, above a certain threshold concentration of these metal ions, act by inhibiting PCS activity. A protective function of the C-terminus had been previously proposed in cases where the free heavy metal ion concentration would exceed those required for formation of the metal–thiolate substrate (Romanyuk et al., 2006; Rea, 2012). AtPCS1 activity as a function of Cd2+ concentrations is indeed bell-shaped, with a maximum at ~1 µM (Rea, 2012), implying either heavy metal-mediated enzyme inactivation or the existence of feedback inhibition mechanisms to avoid enzyme overactivation in the presence of high heavy metal concentrations. Our results indicate that such mechanisms indeed exist, are conserved across the whole evolutionary history (hundreds of million of years of divergent evolution between extant liverworts and angiosperms; Rubinstein et al., 2010) of land plants, and are mediated by metal-binding cysteines. This finding points to a likely role for the PCS C-terminal domain in maintaining homeostatic levels of essential ions (Steffens et al., 1986; Grill et al., 1987; Kühnlenz et al., 2016) and GSH (Lee et al., 2003a), while preventing Cd2+ toxicity. From an applied perspective, if confirmed in planta, the higher activity of PCS mutants with increased activity may be exploited to decrease the root to shoot transport of Cd2+, as previously suggested in the case of arsenic (Uraguchi et al., 2018). This, in turn, would contribute to reduce the amount of this highly toxic heavy metal in the human food chain.

Supplementary data

The following supplementary data are available at JXB online.

Table S1. List of primers used in this study.

Fig. S1. Yeast growth of heavy metal-hypersensitive strain YK44 transformed with empty vector and wild-type MpPCS.

Fig. S2. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR of MpPCS transcription in 16 independent Arabidopsis transgenic lines.

Fig. S3. Relative expression of MpPCS by qRT-PCR from 7-day-old seedlings of 13 transgenic Arabidopsis lines.

Fig. S4. Recombinant proteins MpPCS-WT, MpPCS-m3, and MpPCS5 purified from E. coli and electrophoresed by 10% SDS–PAGE.

Fig. S5. Total PC (PC2, PC3, and PC4) production by recombinant proteins MpPCS, MpPCS-m3. and MpPCS-m5 in vitro.

eraa386_suppl_Supplementary_Material

Acknowledgements

This work was kindly supported by Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca-PRIN 2015 funds (prot. 20158HTL58, PI Professor Luigi Sanità di Toppi) and the Autonomous province of Trento through core funding of the Ecogenomics group.

Author contributions

ML, LST, and CV planned and designed the research. ML performed experiments and analysed the data, with the help of EBe and EBa. ML and CV wrote the manuscript. ML, EBe, AS, LST, and CV corrected the manuscript.

References

  1. Bellini E, Borsò M, Betti C, Bruno L, Andreucci A, Ruffini Castiglione M, Saba A, Sanità di Toppi L. 2019. Characterization and quantification of thiol-peptides in Arabidopsis thaliana using combined dilution and high sensitivity HPLC-ESI-MS-MS. Phytochemistry 164, 215–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bellini E, Maresca V, Betti C, et al. 2020. a The moss Leptodictyum riparium counteracts severe cadmium stress by activation of glutathione transferase and phytochelatin synthase, but slightly by phytochelatins. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, 1583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bellini E, Varotto C, Borsò M, Rugnini L, Bruno L, Sanità di Toppi L. 2020b Eukaryotic and prokaryotic phytochelatin synthases differ less in functional terms than previously thought: a comparative analysis of Marchantia polymorpha and Geitlerinema sp. PCC 7407. Plants 9, 914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bowman JL, Araki T, Kohchi T. 2016. Marchantia: past, present and future. Plant & Cell Physiology 57, 205–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bowman JL, Kohchi T, Yamato KT, et al. 2017. Insights into land plant evolution garnered from the Marchantia polymorpha genome. Cell 171, 287–304.e15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brunetti P, Zanella L, Proia A, De Paolis A, Falasca G, Altamura MM, Sanità di Toppi L, Costantino P, Cardarelli M. 2011. Cadmium tolerance and phytochelatin content of Arabidopsis seedlings over-expressing the phytochelatin synthase gene AtPCS1. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 5509–5519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Busch A, Deckena M, Almeida-Trapp M, Kopischke S, Kock C, Schüssler E, Tsiantis M, Mithöfer A, Zachgo S. 2019. MpTCP1 controls cell proliferation and redox processes in Marchantia polymorpha. New Phytologist 224, 1627–1641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Clemens S. 2019. Metal ligands in micronutrient acquisition and homeostasis. Plant, Cell & Environment 42, 2902–2912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Clemens S, Kim EJ, Neumann D, Schroeder JI. 1999. Tolerance to toxic metals by a gene family of phytochelatin synthases from plants and yeast. The EMBO Journal 18, 3325–3333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Clemens S, Schroeder JI, Degenkolb T. 2001. Caenorhabditis elegans expresses a functional phytochelatin synthase. European Journal of Biochemistry 268, 3640–3643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Clough SJ, Bent AF. 1998. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 16, 735–743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. De Benedictis M, Brunetti C, Brauer EK, et al. 2018. The Arabidopsis thaliana knockout mutant for phytochelatin synthase1 (cad1-3) is defective in callose deposition, bacterial pathogen defense and auxin content, but shows an increased stem lignification. Frontiers in Plant Science 9, 19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Degola F, De Benedictis M, Petraglia A, Massimi A, Fattorini L, Sorbo S, Basile A, Sanità di Toppi L. 2014. A Cd/Fe/Zn-responsive phytochelatin synthase is constitutively present in the ancient liverwort Lunularia cruciata (L.) Dumort. Plant & Cell Physiology 55, 1884–1891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fan W, Guo Q, Liu C, Liu X, Zhang M, Long D, Xiang Z, Zhao A. 2018. Two mulberry phytochelatin synthase genes confer zinc/cadmium tolerance and accumulation in transgenic Arabidopsis and tobacco. Gene 645, 95–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Filiz E, Saracoglu IA, Ozyigit II, Yalcin B. 2019. Comparative analyses of phytochelatin synthase (PCS) genes in higher plants. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment 33, 178–194. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fischer S, Kühnlenz T, Thieme M, Schmidt H, Clemens S. 2014. Analysis of plant Pb tolerance at realistic submicromolar concentrations demonstrates the role of phytochelatin synthesis for Pb detoxification. Environmental Science and Technology 48, 7552–7559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fontanini D, Andreucci A, Ruffini Castiglione M, et al. 2018. The phytochelatin synthase from Nitella mucronata (Charophyta) plays a role in the homeostatic control of iron(II)/(III). Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 127, 88–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gasic K, Korban SS. 2007. Transgenic Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) plants expressing an Arabidopsis phytochelatin synthase (AtPCS1) exhibit enhanced As and Cd tolerance. Plant Molecular Biology 64, 361–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gazzani S, Li M, Maistri S, Scarponi E, Graziola M, Barbaro E, Wunder J, Furini A, Saedler H, Varotto C. 2009. Evolution of MIR168 paralogs in Brassicaceae. BMC Evolutionary Biology 9, 62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gietz RD, Schiestl RH. 2007. Quick and easy yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nature Protocols 2, 35–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Giles NM, Watts AB, Giles GI, Fry FH, Littlechild JA, Jacob C. 2003. Metal and redox modulation of cysteine protein function. Chemistry and Biology 10, 677–693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Glaeser H, Coblenz A, Kruczek R, Ruttke I, Ebert-Jung A, Wolf K. 1991. Glutathione metabolism and heavy metal detoxification in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Current Genetics 19, 207–213. [Google Scholar]
  23. Goodstein DM, Shu S, Howson R, et al. 2012. Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Research 40, D1178–D1186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Grill E, Loffler S, Winnacker E-L, Zenk MH. 1989. Phytochelatins, the heavy-metal-binding peptides of plants, are synthesized from glutathione by a specific gamma-glutamylcysteine dipeptidyl transpeptidase (phytochelatin synthase). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 86, 6838–6842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Grill E, Winnacker EL, Zenk MH. 1985. Phytochelatins: the principal heavy-metal complexing peptides of higher plants. Science 230, 674–676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Grill E, Winnacker EL, Zenk MH. 1987. Phytochelatins, a class of heavy-metal-binding peptides from plants, are functionally analogous to metallothioneins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 84, 439–443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59, 307–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ha SB, Smith AP, Howden R, Dietrich WM, Bugg S, O’Connell MJ, Goldsbrough PB, Cobbett CS. 1999. Phytochelatin synthase genes from Arabidopsis and the yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. The Plant Cell 11, 1153–1164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4, https://paleo.carleton.ca/2001_1/past/past.pdf [Google Scholar]
  30. Howden R, Goldsbrough PB, Andersen CR, Cobbett CS. 1995. Cadmium-sensitive, cad1 mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana are phytochelatin deficient. Plant Physiology 107, 1059–1066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ishizaki K, Nishihama R, Ueda M, Inoue K, Ishida S, Nishimura Y, Shikanai T, Kohchi T. 2015. Development of gateway binary vector series with four different selection markers for the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha. PLoS One 10, e0138876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ishizaki K, Nishihama R, Yamato KT, Kohchi T. 2016. Molecular genetic tools and techniques for Marchantia polymorpha research. Plant & Cell Physiology 57, 262–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Karimi M, Inzé D, Depicker A. 2002. GATEWAY vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Trends in Plant Science 7, 193–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. 2019. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20, 1160–1166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kondo N, Imai K, Isobe M, Goto T, Murasugi A, Wada-Nakagawa C, Hayashi Y. 1984. Cadystin a and b, major unit peptides comprising cadmium binding peptides induced in a fission yeast—separation, revision of structures and synthesis. Tetrahedron Letters 25, 3869–3872. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kubota A, Ishizaki K, Hosaka M, Kohchi T. 2013. Efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha using regenerating thalli. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 77, 167–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kühnlenz T, Hofmann C, Uraguchi S, Schmidt H, Schempp S, Weber M, Lahner B, Salt DE, Clemens S. 2016. Phytochelatin synthesis promotes leaf Zn accumulation of Arabidopsis thaliana plants grown in soil with adequate Zn supply and is essential for survival on Zn-contaminated soil. Plant & Cell Physiology 57, 2342–2352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lee BD, Hwang S. 2015. Tobacco phytochelatin synthase (NtPCS1) plays important roles in cadmium and arsenic tolerance and in early plant development in tobacco. Plant Biotechnology Reports 9, 107–114. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lee S, Korban SS. 2002. Transcriptional regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana phytochelatin synthase (AtPCS1) by cadmium during early stages of plant development. Planta 215, 689–693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lee S, Moon JS, Ko TS, Petros D, Goldsbrough PB, Korban SS. 2003a Overexpression of Arabidopsis phytochelatin synthase paradoxically leads to hypersensitivity to cadmium stress. Plant Physiology 131, 656–663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lee S, Petros D, Moon JS, Ko TS, Goldsbrough PB, Korban SS. 2003b Higher levels of ectopic expression of Arabidopsis phytochelatin synthase do not lead to increased cadmium tolerance and accumulation. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 41, 903–910. [Google Scholar]
  42. Lefort V, Longueville JE, Gascuel O. 2017. SMS: smart model selection in PhyML. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34, 2422–2424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Li M, Stragliati L, Bellini E, Ricci A, Saba A, Sanità di Toppi L, Varotto C. 2019. Evolution and functional differentiation of recently diverged phytochelatin synthase genes from Arundo donax L. Journal of Experimental Botany 70, 5391–5405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu GY, Zhang YX, Chai TY. 2011. Phytochelatin synthase of Thlaspi caerulescens enhanced tolerance and accumulation of heavy metals when expressed in yeast and tobacco. Plant Cell Reports 30, 1067–1076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Liu Z, Gu C, Chen F, Yang D, Wu K, Chen S, Jiang J, Zhang Z. 2012. Heterologous expression of a Nelumbo nucifera phytochelatin synthase gene enhances cadmium tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 166, 722–734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Loscos J, Naya L, Ramos J, Clemente MR, Matamoros MA, Becana M. 2006. A reassessment of substrate specificity and activation of phytochelatin synthases from model plants by physiologically relevant metals. Plant Physiology 140, 1213–1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Maier T, Yu C, Küllertz G, Clemens S. 2003. Localization and functional characterization of metal-binding sites in phytochelatin synthases. Planta 218, 300–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Mangiafico SS. 2015. An R companion for the handbook of biological statistics.https://rcompanion.org/documents/RCompanionBioStatistics.pdf.
  49. Naramoto S, Jones VAS, Trozzi N, et al. 2019. A conserved regulatory mechanism mediates the convergent evolution of plant shoot lateral organs. PLoS Biology 17, e3000560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ogawa S, Yoshidomi T, Shirabe T, Yoshimura E. 2010. HPLC method for the determination of phytochelatin synthase activity specific for soft metal ion chelators. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry 104, 442–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Olson TL, Williams JC, Allen JP. 2013. Influence of protein interactions on oxidation/reduction midpoint potentials of cofactors in natural and de novo metalloproteins. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1827, 914–922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Petraglia A, De Benedictis M, Degola F, Pastore G, Calcagno M, Ruotolo R, Mengoni A, Sanità di Toppi L. 2014. The capability to synthesize phytochelatins and the presence of constitutive and functional phytochelatin synthases are ancestral (plesiomorphic) characters for basal land plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 1153–1163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Qiu YL, Li L, Wang B, et al. 2006. The deepest divergences in land plants inferred from phylogenomic evidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103, 15511–15516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ramos J, Naya L, Gay M, Abián J, Becana M. 2008. Functional characterization of an unusual phytochelatin synthase, LjPCS3, of Lotus japonicus. Plant Physiology 148, 536–545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. R Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  56. Rea PA. 2006. Phytochelatin synthase, papain’s cousin, in stereo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103, 507–508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Rea PA. 2012. Phytochelatin synthase: of a protease a peptide polymerase made. Physiologia Plantarum 145, 154–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Rea PA, Vatamaniuk OK, Rigden DJ. 2004. Weeds, worms, and more. Papain’s long-lost cousin, phytochelatin synthase. Plant Physiology 136, 2463–2474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Romanyuk ND, Rigden DJ, Vatamaniuk OK, Lang A, Cahoon RE, Jez JM, Rea PA. 2006. Mutagenic definition of a papain-like catalytic triad, sufficiency of the N-terminal domain for single-site core catalytic enzyme acylation, and C-terminal domain for augmentative metal activation of a eukaryotic phytochelatin synthase. Plant Physiology 141, 858–869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Rubinstein CV, Gerrienne P, de la Puente GS, Astini RA, Steemans P. 2010. Early Middle Ordovician evidence for land plants in Argentina (eastern Gondwana). New Phytologist 188, 365–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Ruotolo R, Peracchi A, Bolchi A, Infusini G, Amoresano A, Ottonello S. 2004. Domain organization of phytochelatin synthase. Functional properties of truncated enzyme species identified by limited proteolysis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, 14686–14693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Saint-Marcoux D, Proust H, Dolan L, Langdale JA. 2015. Identification of reference genes for real-time quantitative PCR experiments in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha. PLoS One 10, e0118678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Schmidt SB, Husted S. 2019. The biochemical properties of manganese in plants. Plants 8, 381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Shaw J, Renzaglia K. 2004. Phylogeny and diversification of bryophytes. American Journal of Botany 91, 1557–1581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Shimamura M. 2016. Marchantia polymorpha: taxonomy, phylogeny and morphology of a model system. Plant & Cell Physiology 57, 230–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Shukla D, Kesari R, Mishra S, Dwivedi S, Tripathi RD, Nath P, Trivedi PK. 2012. Expression of phytochelatin synthase from aquatic macrophyte Ceratophyllum demersum L. enhances cadmium and arsenic accumulation in tobacco. Plant Cell Reports 31, 1687–1699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Song WY, Park J, Mendoza-Cózatl DG, et al. 2010. Arsenic tolerance in Arabidopsis is mediated by two ABCC-type phytochelatin transporters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107, 21187–21192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Steffens JC, Hunt DF, Williams BG. 1986. Accumulation of non-protein metal-binding polypeptides (gamma-glutamyl-cysteinyl)n-glycine in selected cadmium-resistant tomato cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry 261, 13879–13882. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Talavera G, Castresana J. 2007. Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Systematic Biology 56, 564–577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Tennstedt P, Peisker D, Böttcher C, Trampczynska A, Clemens S. 2009. Phytochelatin synthesis is essential for the detoxification of excess zinc and contributes significantly to the accumulation of zinc. Plant Physiology 149, 938–948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Tsuji N, Nishikori S, Iwabe O, Shiraki K, Miyasaka H, Takagi M, Hirata K, Miyamoto K. 2004. Characterization of phytochelatin synthase-like protein encoded by alr0975 from a prokaryote, Nostoc sp. PCC 7120. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 315, 751–755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Uraguchi S, Sone Y, Ohta Y, Ohkama-Ohtsu N, Hofmann C, Hess N, Nakamura R, Takanezawa Y, Clemens S, Kiyono M. 2018. Identification of C-terminal regions in Arabidopsis thaliana phytochelatin synthase 1 specifically involved in activation by arsenite. Plant & Cell Physiology 59, 500–509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Uraguchi S, Tanaka N, Hofmann C, et al. 2017. Phytochelatin synthase has contrasting effects on cadmium and arsenic accumulation in rice grains. Plant & Cell Physiology 58, 1730–1742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Vatamaniuk OK, Bucher EA, Ward JT, Rea PA. 2001. A new pathway for heavy metal detoxification in animals. Phytochelatin synthase is required for cadmium tolerance in Caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276, 20817–20820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Vatamaniuk OK, Mari S, Lu YP, Rea PA. 1999. AtPCS1, a phytochelatin synthase from Arabidopsis: isolation and in vitro reconstitution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96, 7110–7115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Vatamaniuk OK, Mari S, Lu YP, Rea PA. 2000. Mechanism of heavy metal ion activation of phytochelatin (PC) synthase. Blocked thiols are sufficient for PC synthase-catalyzed transpeptidation of glutathione and related thiol peptides. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275, 31451–31459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Vestergaard M, Matsumoto S, Nishikori S, Shiraki K, Hirata K, Takagi M. 2008. Chelation of cadmium ions by phytochelatin synthase: role of the cystein-rich C-terminal. Analytical Sciences 24, 277–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Vivares D, Arnoux P, Pignol D. 2005. A papain-like enzyme at work: native and acyl-enzyme intermediate structures in phytochelatin synthesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102, 18848–18853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Wang F, Wang Z, Zhu C. 2012. Heteroexpression of the wheat phytochelatin synthase gene (TaPCS1) in rice enhances cadmium sensitivity. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica 44, 886–893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Wojas S, Clemens S, Hennig J, Sklodowska A, Kopera E, Schat H, Bal W, Antosiewicz DM. 2008. Overexpression of phytochelatin synthase in tobacco: distinctive effects of AtPCS1 and CePCS genes on plant response to cadmium. Journal of Experimental Botany 59, 2205–2219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Xie F, Xiao P, Chen D, Xu L, Zhang B. 2012. miRDeepFinder: a miRNA analysis tool for deep sequencing of plant small RNAs. Plant Molecular Biology 80, 75–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Zhang X, Rui H, Zhang F, Hu Z, Xia Y, Shen Z. 2018. Overexpression of a functional Vicia sativa PCS1 homolog increases cadmium tolerance and phytochelatins synthesis in arabidopsis. Frontiers in Plant Science 9, 107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Zhao C, Xu J, Li Q, Li S, Wang P, Xiang F. 2014. Cloning and characterization of a Phragmites australis phytochelatin synthase (PaPCS) and achieving Cd tolerance in tall fescue. PLoS One 9, 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

eraa386_suppl_Supplementary_Material

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES