Dear Editor,
We thank Tebala et al. for their interest and comments on our article.1 At the end of their letter, the authors point out that “resources and expertise are widely available” during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak and a restrictive use of laparoscopy would have been acceptable only in a war scenario. Unfortunately, the current data resemble many features of this kind of scenario, with shortage of personnel, reduction of surgical services, operating rooms converted in intensive treatment unit (ITU) beds, and surgeons shifted to medical tasks as a global response to the pandemic.2 As of May 12, 2020, 163 doctors died after contracting COVID-19 in Italy,3 and health workers are heavily affected globally. In this setting, any additional source of contagion may produce catastrophic effects and threat the entire health system. A tailored strategy to protect health workers and patients, avoiding unnecessary risks, is a priority.4,5
A second worst pandemic wave, as in the Spanish flu, cannot be excluded, and a self-preserving strategy must be already in place to guarantee an adequate surgical response in the future outbreak peaks, despite the shortage of personnel, beds, and operating rooms.
Regarding the lack of evidence of SARS-CoV-2 presence in the peritoneal fluid, some anecdotal evidences are emerging. Viral RNA was detected in the peritoneal fluid of a COVID-19 patient who had undergone a laparotomy for a nonischemic small bowel volvulus6 and in the peritoneal waste of a patient treated with peritoneal dialysis.7 Thus, a prudential approach may be reasonable until definitive evidence is established. Several systems for a safe smoke and pneumoperitoneum evacuation during laparoscopy have been described,8 but they are time-consuming and add a further burden of intraoperative maneuvers. Furthermore, some operative steps, such as a rapid conversion because of a major bleeding or trocars' removal under vision at the end of the procedure, may compromise a thorough gas exsufflation and, then, may potentially increase the risk of aerosolization and smoke dispersion in the operating theater.
In experienced hands, laparotomy is a quick and gasless procedure with no significant differences in the long-term outcomes compared with laparoscopy.9
According with many surgical societies,10 we recommend to implement nonoperative management strategies whenever clinically appropriate. Thus, treating by laparotomy a reduced number of high-priority elective cases and surgical emergencies (sometimes failures of nonoperative management and, then, associated with a nonnegligible risk of conversion) may represent the safest option for patients, health workers, and system sustainability during the critical periods of COVID-19 outbreak.
Francesco Pata, MD
General Surgery Unit, Nicola Giannettasio
Hospital, Corigliano-Rossano, Italy
La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
Diego Cuccurullo, MD
Department of General Surgery, Ospedali dei
Colli Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy
Mansoor Khan, MD, FACS, FRCS
Digestive Diseases Department, Brighton and
Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton
United Kingdom
DSTS Faculty, Royal College of Surgeons of
England, London, United Kingdom
Giulio Carcano, MD
Salomone Di Saverio, MD, FACS, FRCS
Department of General Surgery, University
Hospital of Varese, Varese, Italy
Department of General Surgery, ASST Sette
Laghi, University of Insubria, Regione
Lombardia, Italy
DISCLOSURE
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Di Saverio S, Khan M, Pata F, Ietto G, De Simone B, Zani E, Carcano G. Laparoscopy at all costs? Not now during COVID-19 and not for acute care surgery and emergency colorectal surgery: a practical algorithm from a Hub Tertiary teaching hospital in Northern Lombardy, Italy. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020;88(6):715–718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Di Saverio S, Pata F, Gallo G, Carrano F, Scorza A, Sileri P, Smart N, Spinelli A, Pellino G. Coronavirus pandemic and colorectal surgery: practical advice based on the Italian experience. Colorectal Dis. 2020;22(6):625–634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.FNOMCeO (the Italian National Federation of Medical Doctors and Dentists) Elenco dei Medici caduti nel corso dell'epidemia di Covid-19. Available at: https://portale.fnomceo.it/elenco-dei-medici-caduti-nel-corso-dellepidemia-di-covid-19/. Accessed March 25, 2020.
- 4.Di Saverio S, Pata F, Khan M, Ietto G, Zani E, Carcano G. Convert to open: the new paradigm for surgery during COVID-19? Br J Surg. 2020;107(7):e194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.COVIDSurg Collaborative Global guidance for surgical care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Surg. 2020. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Coccolini F, Tartaglia D, Puglisi A, Giordano C, Pistello M, Lodato M, Chiarugi M. SARS-CoV-2 is present in peritoneal fluid in COVID-19 patients. Ann Surg. 2020. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gisella V, Silvia D, Giuseppe G, Maria DF. SARS-CoV2 in the peritoneal waste in a patient treated with peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int. 2020;S0085–2538(20):30531–30537. [Google Scholar]
- 8.MIS Filtration Group How to manage smoke evacuation and filter pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopy to minimize potential viral spread: different methods from SoMe. Colorectal Dis. 2020;22(6):644–645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pata F, Khan M, Iovino D, Di Saverio S. Laparotomy represents the safest option during COVID-19 outbreak. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002791 Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pellino G, Pata F, Lui R, Espín-Basany E. A word of caution and call for cross-society collaboration to develop surgical guidance about COVID-19. Br J Surg. 2020;107(8):e245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]