Abstract
This study was proposed to examine the effects of pine needles powder (Pinus brutia) supplementation on growth performance, breast meat composition, and antioxidant status in broilers fed linseed oil-based diets. For this purpose, a total of 210, Ross-308 1-day-old male broiler chicks were allocated to 5 experimental groups each containing 42 birds. Broilers were fed a linseed oil-based basal diet supplemented with 0% (control), 0.25% (P1), 0.50% (P2), 0.75% (P3), and 1% (P4) pine needles powder. During the 42-D feeding period, no significant differences were observed between experimental groups for body weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio; however, carcass yield was increased linearly with pine needles powder supplementation. No marked changes in the breast meat chemical composition were observed among experimental groups. Supplemental pine needles powder linearly decreased the malondialdehyde concentration in breast meat and liver tissues; however, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging activity of breast meat samples remained unaffected. No significant variation was observed among experimental groups for superoxide dismutase enzyme activity in blood erythrocyte lysates, but blood serum total oxidation status tended to decrease with pine needles powder supplementation. In conclusion, results suggested that pine needles powder supplementation to broiler diets could be a viable option to improve the animal antioxidant status and meat oxidative stability; however, supplementation of Pinus brutia needles powder up to 1% into broiler diets was not sufficient to efficiently curb the fat-induced oxidation in meat. Further investigation is needed to determine the full antioxidant potential of pine needles powder supplementation in poultry by comparing different pine species, evaluating the bioavailability of their active compounds and determining most effective dietary concentration for broiler meat production without any adverse effects.
Key words: pine needles, natural antioxidant, broiler meat, polyunsaturated fats, oxidation status
INTRODUCTION
Poultry meat is one of the widely consumed meat sources in the world. A lot of research has been conducted to modify its nutrient profile, especially polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) content in line with the health requirements (Kalogeropoulos et al., 2010; Wood and Enser, 2017). However, one of the major issues confronting this modification includes “lipid oxidation,” as an increase in the PUFA content of meat makes it more prone to the oxidative deterioration (Ahn et al., 2007; Falowo et al., 2014). Thus, the concerns arise regarding quality and shelf life of the meat product. These days, the use of herbal supplements in animal diets has become very popular and this has shifted the researchers' attention towards natural additives for their application in animal diets as a source of functional ingredients.
Pinus brutia of family Pinaceae, commonly known as Turkish Red Pine, has the widest natural distribution area in Turkey and has been a source of traditional medicine in Turkey for years (Kızılarslan and Sevgi, 2013). Consumption of different parts of Pinus species such as leaves (needles), shoots, cones, and their extracts has been reported to cure asthma, wound, bronchitis, common cold, and cough in humans (Kültür, 2007; Ugulu et al., 2009; Cakilcioglu et al., 2011). Various studies also exhibited the antioxidant and anti-cancer effects of different pine tree products (Kwak et al., 2006; Park et al., 2008; Zeng et al., 2014). Pine needles are reported to possess a wide variety of beneficial compounds typical of medicinal plants such as essential oils (α and β-pinene), phenolic substances, vitamin C, protein, fat, and phosphorus (Pfister et al., 1998; Xie et al., 2015). Preliminary research suggested pine tree needles as a useful source of natural antioxidants in the diet, and studies showed that supplementation of pine needles powder (PNP) into broiler diets enhanced their antioxidant capacity without altering their performance (Park and Kim, 2011, Wu et al., 2015, Guo et al., 2018). However, to the best of our knowledge, literature evaluating the effectiveness of PNP supplementation in improving the oxidation resistance of PUFA-enriched broiler meat, thus its shelf life, is rather limited. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of supplemental PNP (Pinus brutia) on growth performance, breast meat composition, and antioxidant status in broilers fed linseed oil-based diets.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All experimental procedures in this study were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Ankara University (2017-2-16).
Pine Needles Powder Preparation and Chemical Analyses
Needles of Pinus brutia were freshly collected from pine trees in Ankara and Konya, Turkey. After that, needles were dried at 60°C for 48 h in a hot air oven, processed to powder, and sieved manually with 1-mm screen. PNP thus obtained was properly sealed in a plastic container and stored until used in the experiment.
Proximate analysis of PNP was performed by the method as described in AOAC (2000). Fatty acids from PNP were methylated (AOCS, 1997), and the obtained fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were analyzed by gas chromatography. Mineral profile was analyzed using ICP-MS (Agilent 7500, Yamanashi-Ken, Japan), while amino acid analysis was done by the HPLC (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) using modified OPA derivatization. Total polyphenols were determined spectrophotometrically as described by Hrncirik and Fritsche (2004). Vitamin C concentration was determined by redox titration using iodine solution, while vitamin E was determined using HPLC-UV Agilent 1100 series. Waxy substances (C40, C42, C44, C46) were determined with gas chromatography (Agilent 6890) by the method of EEC 2568/91. Total antioxidant (TAS, mmol Trolox equivalent/kg) and total oxidant (TOS, µmol H2 O2 equivalent/kg) levels in the PNP were measured using commercially available kits (Rel Assay Diagnostics, Gaziantep, Turkey; product no. RL 0017 and RL 0024, respectively) by Erel's colorimetric methods (Erel, 2004, 2005). Oxidative stress index (OSI) values were calculated as:
Experimental Animals and Diets
A total of 210 one-day-old Ross 308 male broiler chicks were randomly assigned to 5 experimental groups (6 replicates each, 7 birds/replicate). The dietary treatments comprised of linseed oil-based basal diet without any supplement (control) and basal diet with different levels of PNP including 0.25% (P1), 0.50% (P2), 0.75% (P3), and 1% (P4). Birds were fed into 3 phases: starter (0 to 10 D), grower (11 to 24 D), and finisher (25 to 42 D); basal diet for each phase was formulated to meet or exceed the requirements of broilers as stated in breed's catalog. Ingredients of basal diet along with the chemical composition are presented in Table 1. The experiment lasted for 42 D, and broilers were fed and provided with water ad libitum.
Table 1.
Starter |
Grower |
Finisher |
|
---|---|---|---|
Ingredients (%) | (0 to 10 D) | (11 to 24 D) | (25 to 42 D) |
Yellow maize | 43.90 | 44.00 | 47.45 |
Soybean meal, 48% CP1 | 21.00 | 17.40 | 17.40 |
Soybean (full fat), 38% CP | 29.04 | 32.00 | 28.00 |
Linseed oil | 1.00 | 2.20 | 3.00 |
Limestone | 1.50 | 1.30 | 1.25 |
Monocalcium phosphate | 2.40 | 2.00 | 1.90 |
Methionine | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.25 |
Lysine | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.15 |
Sodium bicarbonate | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
Salt | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Vitamin premix2 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
Mineral premix3 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
Salinomycin | 0.06 | 0 | 0 |
Analyzed chemical composition4 | |||
Crude protein (%) | 22.64 | 21.99 | 20.57 |
Metabolizable energy5 (kcal/kg) | 3,076 | 3,222 | 3,274 |
Calcium (%) | 1.29 | 1.15 | 1.04 |
Total phosphorus (%) | 0.91 | 0.81 | 0.78 |
Crude protein.
Vitamin premix (1 kg) 11,000,000 IU vitamin A, 3,500,000 IU vitamin D3, 100 g vitamin E, 3 g vitamin K3, 3 g vitamin B1, 6 g vitamin B2, 15 g pantothenic acid, 1 g vitamin B6, 20 mg vitamin B12, 35 g niacin, 1.5 g folic acid, 200 mg biotin.
Mineral premix (1 kg) 30 g copper, 120 g manganese, 110 g zinc, 2 g iodide, 300 mg selenium, 50 g iron.
As fed basis.
Calculated as described by Carpenter and Clegg (1956).
Collection of Data and Samples
During the experiment, all birds were weighed individually at days 1, 10, 24, and 42. For each feeding phase, feed intake (FI) and body weight gain (BWG) were recorded to calculate feed conversion ratio (FCR). Mortalities were monitored daily, and FI and FCR were adjusted accordingly for each experimental group. At the end of the experiment, 2 birds from each replicate were randomly selected and slaughtered. Liver samples were immediately removed and stored at −18°C for thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) analysis. Then, after proper evisceration hot carcasses were weighed individually.
For breast meat composition and oxidative stability determination, both right and left breast samples from each carcass were excised separately. Left breast samples were used to determine the pH after 1 and 10 D of storage at 4°C, whereas right breast samples were further divided into 3 equal cuts (upper, middle, and lower). Upper right samples were used for proximate and fatty acid analyses; middle and lower right samples were stored at 4°C for 1 and 10 D, respectively, and were used in determining the TBARS and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity.
For the determination of the levels of TAS and TOS and superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzyme activity, blood samples were taken (2 birds per replicate) from the wing vein into plain and EDTA-coated tubes, respectively.
Breast Meat pH and Chemical Analyses
The pH of breast meat samples (1 and 10 D of storage at 4°C) was measured using pH meter (Mettler Toledo, SevenGoTM, pH meter SG2, puncture pH electrode LE427). Proximate composition of breast meat was determined by the methods as stated in AOAC (2000).
The fatty acid profile of breast meat samples was determined using gas chromatography (Shimadzu GC-2010, Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a flame ionized detector (FID). Total lipids from 5 g of thawed meat samples were extracted using Soxhlet apparatus (AOAC, 2000), and FAMEs were prepared (Wang et al., 2011). FAMEs were then separated with a Teknokroma capillary column (TR-CN100, 100 m × 0.25 mm × 0.20 µm). Injection volume was set to 1 µ L with a split ratio of 1 : 100. Helium was used as carrier gas (1 mL/min). The detector gas flows were hydrogen at 30 mL/min, makeup (helium) at 30 mL/min, and air 300 mL/min. Both injector and FID temperatures were fixed at 240°C. The temperature program was as follows: the initial temperature was held at 40°C for 2 min, then increased to 165°C for 5 min, 215°C for 8 min, and finally 240°C for 8 min at 4°C/min each. The FAMEs were determined by comparing the retention times and area percentages with a standard FAME mixture (Supelco 37 Component FAME Mix, 1 mL, CRM47885 Supelco).
Analysis of Blood Samples
Erythrocyte lysate from blood samples containing EDTA was prepared, and SOD enzyme activity was determined using Cayman's Chemicals Kit (Item No. 706,002) as per the manufacturer's protocol. For TAS and TOS assays, blood serum from plain tubes was removed using centrifugation (1,690 × g for 10 min at 4°C; SL 16R centrifuge, Thermo Scientific, Osterode am Harz, Germany) and the analyses were performed as described earlier.
TBARS Assay
Lipid oxidation of breast meat samples stored at 4°C for 1 and 10 D was measured using the distillation method (Tarladgis et al., 1960), and malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration in breast meat samples was expressed as mg/kg wet meat. Liver samples were also assayed for MDA concentration using Cayman's chemicals TBARS Assay Kit (Item No. 10009055) as per the manufacturer's protocol.
DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity
For DPPH radical scavenging activity, breast meat samples (1 and 10 D of storage at 4°C) were extracted according to the method of Jung et al. (2010) and DPPH radical scavenging activity was determined using the protocol of Brand-Williams et al. (1995) with some modifications. Briefly, 1 mL of the extracted sample was diluted with 4 mL of distilled water and then mixed with 5 mL of methanolic DPPH solution (0.2 mM). After vortex, the mixture was left at room temperature for 60 min. The absorbance of the sample was measured at 517 nm using a UV-vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Model UV-1208). 5 mL of distilled water and 5 mL of DPPH solution served as control. The DPPH radical scavenging activity (%) was calculated as:
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 23.0 for Windows software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Normal distribution was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. One-way ANOVA was used to determine the effects of PNP supplementation on different parameters. Comparisons among means were done by the Tukey test. Polynomial contrasts were used to determine the linear, quadratic, and cubic effects of PNP supplementation on different parameters. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Characteristics of PNP (Pinus brutia)
Chemical analyses data exhibited PNP as a good source of crude protein, crude fiber, vitamin C and E, total polyphenols, alpha-linolenic acid, and minerals (Table 2, 3).
Table 2.
Item | Content |
---|---|
Dry matter (%) | 94.64 |
Crude protein (%) | 9.45 |
Ether extract (%) | 6.73 |
Crude ash (%) | 3.05 |
Crude fiber (%) | 27.8 |
Vitamin E (mg/kg) | 71 |
Vitamin C (mg/kg) | 124.2 |
Wax contents (mg/kg) | 1,608 |
Total polyphenols (g/kg) | 91 |
TAS (mmol/kg) | 5.16 |
TOS (μmol/kg) | 27.38 |
OSI | 0.53 |
TAS, total antioxidant status; TOS, total oxidant status; OSI, oxidative stress index.
Table 3.
Amino acids | g/100g | Fatty acids | %1 | Minerals | mg/kg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aspartate | 0.760 | Myristic | 4.04 | Calcium | 6,271 |
Glutamate | 0.974 | Palmitic | 12.75 | Phosphorus | 895 |
Asparagine | 0.011 | Stearic | 3.06 | Magnesium | 1,251 |
Serine | 0.468 | Palmitoleic | 0.60 | Manganese | 17.34 |
Histidine | 0.187 | Oleic | 20.43 | Iron | 155.2 |
Glycine | 0.494 | Linoleic | 17.09 | Copper | 2.32 |
Threonine | 0.427 | ALA | 30.01 | Zinc | 15.20 |
Citrulline | 0.032 | Arachidonic | 10.11 | Selenium | 0.04 |
Arginine | 0.662 | Gadoleic | 0.56 | Molybdenum | 0.48 |
Alanine | 0.483 | Behenic | 0.62 | Cobalt | 0.14 |
Tyrosine | 0.250 | Lignoceric | 0.33 | Chromium | 0.77 |
Cysteine | 0.030 | Margaric | 0.35 | Lead | 0.75 |
Valine | 0.438 | Heptadecenoic | 0.05 | Cadmium | 0.02 |
Methionine | 0.068 | Arsenic | 1.02 | ||
Tryptophan | 0.028 | Mercury | 0.04 | ||
Phenylalanine | 0.442 | ||||
Isoleucine | 0.339 | ||||
Ornithine | 0.029 | ||||
Leucine | 0.677 | ||||
Lysine | 0.531 | ||||
Hydroxyproline | 0.027 | ||||
Sarcosine | 0.009 | ||||
Proline | 0.540 | ||||
Total | 7.91 |
Percentage of total fatty acids.
ALA, alpha-linolenic acid.
Animal Performance and Carcass Yield
As shown in Table 4, PNP supplementation into broiler diets had no effect on BWG, FI, and FCR when compared to the control group (P > 0.05). A linear increase in carcass yield of experimental groups (P < 0.05) was observed with the increase in PNP levels (Table 5).
Table 4.
Dietary treatments |
Significance (P-value) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item | Control | P1 0.25% | P2 0.50% | P3 0.75% | P4 1% | SEM1 | Combine | Linear | Quadratic | Cubic |
Day 0 to 10 | ||||||||||
BWG (g) | 200.98 | 207.39 | 195.68 | 201.74 | 199.87 | 2.184 | 0.591 | 0.622 | 0.948 | 0.524 |
FI (g) | 240.22 | 239.17 | 237.27 | 241.20 | 242.56 | 2.130 | 0.958 | 0.679 | 0.578 | 0.915 |
FCR | 1.20 | 1.16 | 1.21 | 1.20 | 1.21 | 0.009 | 0.241 | 0.234 | 0.588 | 0.321 |
Day 11 to 24 | ||||||||||
BWG (g) | 987.15 | 980.05 | 969.56 | 1001.80 | 983.21 | 7.240 | 0.744 | 0.796 | 0.756 | 0.380 |
FI (g) | 1355.54 | 1348.34 | 1350.65 | 1344.19 | 1334.75 | 7.698 | 0.945 | 0.436 | 0.848 | 0.830 |
FCR | 1.37 | 1.38 | 1.39 | 1.34 | 1.36 | 0.009 | 0.415 | 0.283 | 0.540 | 0.415 |
Day 25 to 42 | ||||||||||
BWG (g) | 2210.96 | 2206.69 | 2237.59 | 2193.44 | 2198.35 | 10.279 | 0.720 | 0.613 | 0.530 | 0.855 |
FI (g) | 3582.81 | 3563.60 | 3541.87 | 3609.19 | 3597.40 | 15.803 | 0.708 | 0.523 | 0.454 | 0.513 |
FCR | 1.62a,b | 1.62a,b | 1.58b | 1.65a | 1.64a | 0.007 | 0.020 | 0.133 | 0.077 | 0.292 |
Day 0 to 42 | ||||||||||
BWG (g) | 3399.10 | 3394.13 | 3402.84 | 3396.99 | 3381.42 | 13.070 | 0.991 | 0.745 | 0.763 | 0.815 |
FI (g) | 5178.58 | 5151.10 | 5129.78 | 5194.58 | 5174.72 | 20.392 | 0.888 | 0.816 | 0.578 | 0.555 |
FCR | 1.52 | 1.52 | 1.51 | 1.53 | 1.53 | 0.004 | 0.329 | 0.365 | 0.158 | 0.558 |
BWG, body weight gain; FI, feed intake; FCR, feed conversion ratio.
Standard error of mean.
Different superscript letters (a, b) within the same row indicate significant differences between experimental groups (P < 0.05).
Table 5.
Dietary treatment |
Significance (P-value) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item | Control | P1 0.25% | P2 0.50% | P3 0.75% | P4 1% | SEM1 | Combine | Linear | Quadratic | Cubic |
Carcass yield (%) | 72.73 | 72.83 | 73.23 | 73.88 | 73.44 | 0.137 | 0.058 | 0.010 | 0.457 | 0.137 |
pH d-1 | 6.04a | 5.84b | 5.90b | 5.94a,b | 5.92b | 0.015 | <0.001 | 0.086 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
pH d-10 | 6.06 | 6.09 | 6.15 | 6.17 | 6.12 | 0.015 | 0.194 | 0.075 | 0.137 | 0.404 |
Standard error of mean.
Different superscript letters (a, b) within the same row indicate significant differences between experimental groups (P < 0.05).
Breast Meat pH and Chemical Composition
When compared to the control group, pH of breast meat samples (1 D of storage at 4°C) from PNP supplemental groups (except P3 group) was significantly low (P < 0.05). Within supplemental groups, however, no differences were observed. On day 10 of storage, no significant differences were present between experimental groups for breast meat pH (Table 5).
No significant differences were observed between experimental groups for breast meat proximate composition including dry matter, protein, fat, and ash contents. Also, when compared to the control group no significant differences were observed for fatty acid composition (Table 6).
Table 6.
Dietary treatments |
Significance (P-value) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item | Control | P1 0.25% | P2 0.50% | P3 0.75% | P4 1% | SEM1 | Combine | Linear | Quadratic | Cubic |
Dry matter (%) | 26.63 | 26.37 | 26.46 | 26.24 | 26.64 | 0.089 | 0.595 | 0.890 | 0.196 | 0.686 |
Crude protein (%) | 24.20 | 24.05 | 24.08 | 23.94 | 24.21 | 0.084 | 0.856 | 0.912 | 0.359 | 0.709 |
Crude fat (%) | 1.28 | 1.26 | 1.27 | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.020 | 0.967 | 0.506 | 0.893 | 0.967 |
Crude ash (%) | 1.13 | 1.10 | 1.12 | 1.10 | 1.14 | 0.010 | 0.701 | 0.727 | 0.280 | 0.851 |
Fatty acids2 | ||||||||||
Myristic acid | 0.347 | 0.408 | 0.352 | 0.362 | 0.422 | 0.010 | 0.063 | 0.150 | 0.453 | 0.021 |
Myristoleic acid | 0.036 | 0.047 | 0.040 | 0.032 | 0.038 | 0.002 | 0.207 | 0.416 | 0.491 | 0.030 |
Palmitic acid | 18.032 | 18.733 | 18.014 | 17.780 | 16.990 | 0.259 | 0.329 | 0.101 | 0.251 | 0.636 |
Palmitoleic acid | 1.192 | 1.060 | 1.193 | 0.979 | 1.318 | 0.045 | 0.142 | 0.583 | 0.110 | 0.357 |
Stearic acid | 10.464 | 10.281 | 10.552 | 10.815 | 10.063 | 0.142 | 0.538 | 0.791 | 0.342 | 0.151 |
Oleic acid | 24.318a,b | 23.207b | 25.083a | 23.588a,b | 24.679a,b | 0.191 | 0.007 | 0.374 | 0.482 | 0.747 |
Linoleic acid | 30.826 | 31.471 | 30.804 | 31.994 | 31.829 | 0.219 | 0.280 | 0.105 | 0.897 | 0.978 |
GLA | 0.199b | 0.273a | 0.161b | 0.199b | 0.212b | 0.008 | <0.001 | 0.303 | 0.609 | 0.001 |
ALA | 13.270 | 13.317 | 12.748 | 13.010 | 13.178 | 0.257 | 0.961 | 0.794 | 0.630 | 0.782 |
DGLA | 0.714 | 0.618 | 0.561 | 0.676 | 0.711 | 0.0338 | 0.564 | 0.831 | 0.132 | 0.620 |
Erucic acid | 0.495 | 0.439 | 0.375 | 0.450 | 0.439 | 0.018 | 0.337 | 0.426 | 0.129 | 0.540 |
Arachidonic acid | 0.049 | 0.069 | 0.063 | 0.049 | 0.049 | 0.003 | 0.171 | 0.390 | 0.093 | 0.089 |
EPA | 0.056 | 0.083 | 0.052 | 0.070 | 0.074 | 0.004 | 0.090 | 0.416 | 0.921 | 0.119 |
SFA | 28.846 | 29.417 | 28.920 | 28.954 | 27.478 | 0.351 | 0.494 | 0.205 | 0.233 | 0.860 |
MUFA | 26.040a,b | 24.754b | 26.692a | 25.051a,b | 26.473a | 0.210 | 0.006 | 0.393 | 0.255 | 0.906 |
PUFA | 45.113 | 45.829 | 44.388 | 45.993 | 46.051 | 0.371 | 0.577 | 0.444 | 0.583 | 0.819 |
USA | 71.154 | 70.582 | 71.080 | 71.046 | 72.523 | 0.351 | 0.493 | 0.205 | 0.232 | 0.860 |
GLA, gamma linolenic acid; ALA, alpha-linolenic acid; DGLA, dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid.
SFA, saturated fatty acids; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated acids; USA, unsaturated fatty acids.
Standard error of mean.
Percentage of total fatty acids.
Different superscript letters (a, b) within the same row indicate significant differences between experimental groups (P < 0.05).
Blood Sample Analyses
No significant differences were observed between experimental groups for TAS, TOS, and OSI values (P > 0.05). SOD levels in blood erythrocyte lysates were also not affected by PNP supplementation (P > 0.05) (Table 7).
Table 7.
Days of storage | Dietary treatments |
Significance (P-value) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item | Control | P1 0.25% | P2 0.50% | P3 0.75% | P4 1% | SEM1 | Combine | Linear | Quadratic | Cubic | |
TAS (mmol/L) | 1.64 | 1.64 | 1.65 | 1.75 | 1.82 | 0.043 | 0.618 | 0.146 | 0.541 | 0.903 | |
TOS (μmol/L) | 4.62 | 4.48 | 4.49 | 3.99 | 3.90 | 0.222 | 0.810 | 0.245 | 0.842 | 0.878 | |
OSI | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.015 | 0.508 | 0.102 | 0.748 | 0.850 | |
SOD (U/mL) | 403.22 | 396.72 | 411.68 | 386.15 | 355.43 | 18.048 | 0.933 | 0.463 | 0.611 | 0.833 | |
MDA liver2 | 1.184a | 0.997a,b | 1.064a,b | 0.927a,b | 0.834b | 0.034 | 0.013 | 0.001 | 0.328 | 0.242 | |
MDA meat3 | 1 | 0.684a,b | 0.709a | 0.600b | 0.642a,b | 0.632ab | 0.011 | 0.013 | 0.022 | 0.356 | 0.266 |
10 | 1.558a | 1.518a | 1.015b | 1.321a | 1.424a | 0.040 | <0.001 | 0.049 | <0.001 | 0.267 | |
DPPH (%) | 1 | 25.289 | 26.804 | 31.058 | 24.088 | 30.168 | 1.073 | 0.170 | 0.347 | 0.065 | 0.056 |
10 | 43.926 | 43.625 | 46.653 | 38.712 | 40.915 | 0.985 | 0.101 | 0.150 | 0.092 | 0.052 |
TAS, total antioxidant status; TOS, total oxidant status; OSI, oxidative stress index; SOD, superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-picrylhydrazyl.
Standard error of mean.
μM MDA/mg liver tissue.
mg MDA/kg breast meat.
Different superscript letters (a, b) within the same row indicate significant differences between experimental groups (P < 0.05).
Antioxidant Status of Meat and Liver
MDA levels in breast meat samples stored at different time intervals are presented in Table 7. For 1-D storage at 4°C, lowest MDA levels were observed in the P2 group; however, they were not significantly different when compared to the control group (P > 0.05). More prominent results were observed at the 10th day of storage where P2 supplemental group resulted in a significant decrease in MDA levels in breast meat when compared to the control group (P < 0.05). An increase in PNP supplementation produced a linear decrease in breast meat MDA levels at both storage times (P < 0.05). MDA levels in liver tissues also decreased linearly with an increase in PNP supplementation (P < 0.05).
No significant effect of PNP supplementation was observed on DPPH radical scavenging activity of breast meat at both storage times (Table 7). P2 supplemental group showed the numerically highest activity for scavenging the DPPH radical at both storage times.
DISCUSSION
In the present experiment, supplementation of PNP (Pinus brutia) up to 1% into broiler diets showed no negative effects on birds' health. Among experimental groups, changes in BWG, FI, and FCR were statistically insignificant. These findings were in agreement with some previously available studies showing no significant effects of PNP supplementation on broiler performance parameters (Kim, 2011; Kim et al., 2012; Park and Kim, 2013; Wu et al., 2015). Guo et al. (2018) reported that in Guangxi-Tiejiaoma broilers FCR was negatively affected when fed diets containing high levels of PNP (3 and 5%); however, 1% PNP supplementation had no effect on FCR when compared to the control group. This negative effect on FCR could be attributed to increased fiber and wax content or other anti-nutrients present in PNP when supplemented at higher levels.
The present study showed that supplementation of PNP decreased the pH of breast meat samples (1-D storage at 4°C); however, no change in pH was observed for meats stored up to 10 D. Kim et al. (2012) also reported a significant decrease in pH of thigh meat of broilers when supplemented with PNP (1 and 2%), and this decrease was explained by the presence of bioactive compounds in the meat especially polyphenols and flavonoids from the PNP. Park and Kim (2011) also observed similar results for pH of thigh meat when broiler diets were supplemented with 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9% PNP. In their experiment, supplementing broiler diets with 0.6 and 0.9% PNP had resulted in a significant decrease in pH of thigh meat as compared to the control and 0.3% supplemental group. In another experiment with 1, 3, and 5% PNP supplementation, no difference was observed between groups regarding the pH of fresh breast and thigh meats (Xiong et al., 2011).
In agreement with our study, Xiong et al. (2011) reported no significant effects of PNP supplementation (1, 3, and 5%) on crude fat and ash contents of breast meat; however, they stated a significant increase in protein content of breast meat. Limited data are available regarding the effects of PNP supplementation on proximate composition of broiler breast meat. For thigh meat of broilers, some researchers (Kim, 2011; Park and Kim, 2013) reported no effect of PNP supplementation on proximate profile (moisture, protein, fat, ash), while some stated a significant decrease in the fat content of thigh meat (Xiong et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2012).
Research showed that the dietary antioxidants, rich in phenolic compounds, have the potential of improving the fatty acid composition of broiler meat especially the PUFA content (Jung et al., 2010; Saleh et al., 2017). The present study showed no clear effect of PNP supplementation on fatty acid composition of breast meat. In an experiment with broilers (0.3, 0.5, 0.9% PNP), Park and Kim (2011) reported that 0.9% PNP supplementation had significantly increased oleic acid in thigh meat while linolenic acid was decreased when compared to the control group. Vitina et al. (2011) and Polis et al. (2013) stated that supplementation of spruce and pine needles extractives had positive effects on MUFA (including oleic acid) and PUFA (including eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids), while concentrations of saturated fatty acids (including myristic, palmitic, and stearic) were reduced when compared to the control group. These effects on fatty acid profile might be due to the high concentration of active substances in extracts than needles. No further data are available regarding the effects of PNP on meat fatty acid profile.
SOD is considered the main element of the first level defense against oxidation (Surai, 1999); it dismutases the main free radical produced in the cells, the superoxide radical (Halliwell, 2012). Also, through this prevention of free radical production, SOD may discourage the production of MDA caused by lipid peroxidation (Liu et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2018). Thus, SOD and MDA are important biomarkers evaluating the oxidative damage in animals. The present study exhibited no significant changes in SOD enzyme activity in experimental groups. In an experiment, supplementation of 3% Pinus yunnanensis needles powder to broilers had significantly increased serum SOD levels as compared to the control, while 1 and 5% PNP supplemental group showed no effect (Guo et al., 2018). In agreement to our findings, Wu et al. (2015) also stated no change in SOD enzyme activity in serum and liver samples when broilers were supplemented with Pinus ponderosa needles powder (containing 0.3 and 0.6% non-fermented PNP in the starter and grower phases, respectively); however, when fermented PNP was added in the diet, a significant increase in SOD activity was observed. Fermentation of PNP might have increased the availability of bioactive compounds to broilers, thus increasing the SOD activity.
TBARS is the most common and practical analysis used to determine the lipid oxidation as MDA concentration. The supplementation of Pinus brutia leaves powder in broiler diets resulted in a linear decrease in MDA levels in breast meat stored at 4°C for 1 and 10 D. P2 supplemental group seemed more effective in decreasing the meat MDA concentration, and this effect was more prominent in meat samples stored for the 10-D period. The present study also showed a linear decrease in the liver MDA levels with PNP supplementation. Park and Kim (2011) also observed a linear decrease in MDA levels in thigh meat of broilers supplemented with 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9% PNP. In another experiment, Park and Kim (2013) observed similar results regarding MDA values in thigh meat of broilers supplemented with 0.5 and 1% PNP. Supplementation of 5% Pinus yunnanensis needles powder had significantly decreased the serum MDA levels as compared to the control group (Guo et al., 2018). Wu et al. (2015) also observed a significant decrease in blood serum and liver MDA levels of broilers fed diets supplemented with fermented PNP. However, no effect was observed with non-fermented groups.
DPPH radical scavenging activity is also an important indicator of antioxidant potential of foods. In an experiment, higher DPPH-radical scavenging activity in the thigh meat of broilers was observed in 1 and 2% PNP supplemental groups as compared to the control group (Kim et al., 2012). Similar results were obtained by Park and Kim (2011) regarding DPPH-radical scavenging activity in the thigh meat of broilers supplemented with 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9% PNP. The present study showed no significant effect of PNP supplementation on DPPH activity of breast meat. However, at both storage points, P2 supplemental group showed numerically higher scavenging activity. The reason for this is unknown, but the same group also presented with lowest polyunsaturated fat content. Thus, it is plausible that a precise concentration of an antioxidant is required to combat the PUFA-induced oxidation in meat. Among other oxidative damage biomarkers, the TOS, TAS, and OSI levels in the blood serum of experimental groups also showed that, although not significant, but with the increase in the PNP supplementation in the broilers diets there was a decreasing trend in the oxidative damage, thus describing the enhanced antioxidant capacity of broilers with PNP supplementation.
CONCLUSION
Early studies reported the prominent antioxidant potential of PNP supplements to broiler diets, but its efficacy in PUFA-enriched meat was not investigated. In the present study, a linear decrease in the MDA concentration in the breast meat and liver tissues of supplemental groups with an increasing trend in the antioxidant status of the birds showed the potential of PNP to reduce the lipid oxidation. However, for PUFA-enriched breast meat, the dietary supplementation of PNP up to 1% was inadequate in order to produce a prominent antioxidant effect and was dependent on the PUFA levels in the meat. Regarding performance parameters, no improvement was recorded; however, a linear increase in carcass yield was observed with PNP addition. Effect of PNP supplementation on the chemical composition of breast meat was not clear and needs more research. In conclusion, the current study suggests that PNP can be a viable option as a natural antioxidant for broiler diets. However, more research is needed to further examining the different antioxidant systems in the animal body and also determining maximum dietary supplementation for PNP into broiler diets without toxicity effects.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thanks to Dr. Zuhal Dilaver, Landscape Architecture Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Ankara University, for her assistance in identification of plant material.
This research was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey, TÜBITAK (117O701).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- Ahn J., Grün I.U., Mustapha A. Effects of plant extracts on microbial growth, color change, and lipid oxidation in cooked beef. Food Microbiol. 2007;24:7–14. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2006.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- AOAC . 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. AOAC International; Maryland: 2000. Official Methods of Analysis. [Google Scholar]
- AOCS . American Oil Chemists Society; Champaign, IL: 1997. Official Methods and Recommended Practices. [Google Scholar]
- Brand-Williams W., Cuvelier M.E., Berset C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 1995;28:25–30. [Google Scholar]
- Cakilcioglu U., Khatun S., Turkoglu I., Hayta S. Ethnopharmacological survey of medicinal plants in Maden (Elazig-Turkey) J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011;137:469–486. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.05.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carpenter K., Clegg K. The metabolizable energy of poultry feeding stuffs in relation to their chemical composition. J. Sci. Food. Agr. 1956;7:45–51. [Google Scholar]
- Erel O. A novel automated method to measure total antioxidant response against potent free radical reactions. Clin. Biochem. 2004;37:112–119. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2003.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erel O. A new automated colorimetric method for measuring total oxidant status. Clin. Biochem. 2005;38:1103–1111. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2005.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Falowo A.B., Fayemi P.O., Muchenje V. Natural antioxidants against lipid-protein oxidative deterioration in meat and meat products: a review. Food Res. Int. 2014;64:171–181. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo A., Cheng L., Al-Mamun M., Xiong C., Yang S. Effect of dietary pine needles powder supplementation on growth, organ weight and blood biochemical profiles in broilers. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2018;46:518–522. [Google Scholar]
- Halliwell B. Free radicals and antioxidants: updating a personal view. Nutr. Rev. 2012;70:257–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2012.00476.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hrncirik K., Fritsche S. Comparability and reliability of different techniques for the determination of phenolic compounds in virgin olive oil. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Tech. 2004;106:540–549. [Google Scholar]
- Jung S., Choe J.H., Kim B., Yun H., Kruk Z.A., Jo C. Effect of dietary mixture of gallic acid and linoleic acid on antioxidative potential and quality of breast meat from broilers. Meat Sci. 2010;86:520–526. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalogeropoulos N., Chiou A., Gavala E., Christea M., Andrikopoulos N.K. Nutritional evaluation and bioactive microconstituents (carotenoids, tocopherols, sterols and squalene) of raw and roasted chicken fed on DHA-rich microalgae. Food Res. Int. 2010;43:2006–2013. [Google Scholar]
- Kim Y.J. Effects of dietary supplementation of pine needle powder on carcass characteristics and blood cholesterol contents of broiler chicken. Korean J. Poult. Sci. 2011;38:51–57. [Google Scholar]
- Kim Y., Kim C., Choi J., Choi I. Effect of dietary mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris L.) and pine needle powder (Pinus densiflora) on growth performance, serum cholesterol levels, and meat quality in broilers. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012;11:11998–12004. [Google Scholar]
- Kızılarslan Ç., Sevgi E. Ethnobotanical uses of genus Pinus L.(Pinaceae) in Turkey. Indian J. Tradit. Know. 2013;12:209–220. [Google Scholar]
- Kültür Ş. Medicinal plants used in Kırklareli province (Turkey) J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007;111:341–364. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2006.11.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kwak C.S., Moon S.C., Lee M.S. Antioxidant, antimutagenic, and antitumor effects of pine needles (Pinus densiflora) Nutr. Cancer. 2006;56:162–171. doi: 10.1207/s15327914nc5602_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu H., Luo P., Chen S., Shang J. Effects of squid ink on growth performance, antioxidant functions and immunity in growing broiler chickens. Asian Austral. J. Anim. Sci. 2011;24:1752–1756. [Google Scholar]
- Park C.I., Kim Y.J. Effects of dietary supplementation of pine needle powder on meat quality and physico-chemical properties of chicken meat. Korean J. Poult. Sci. 2011;38:247–254. [Google Scholar]
- Park C.I., Kim Y.J. Effects of dietary supplementation of yacon (Polymnia sonchifolia) by-products and pine needle powder on growth performance and meat quality of chicken thigh meat. Korean J. Poult. Sci. 2013;40:187–195. [Google Scholar]
- Park G., Paudyal D.P., Hwang I., Tripathi G.R., Yang Y., Cheong H. Production of fermented needle extracts from red pine and their functional characterization. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2008;13:256. [Google Scholar]
- Pfister J.A., Panter K.E., Gardner D.R. Pine needle consumption by cattle during winter in South Dakota. J. Range Manag. 1998;51:551–556. [Google Scholar]
- Polis O., Korica A. M., Vitina I., Krastina V., Cerina S., Jansons I., Jemeljanovs A., Anenkova R., Lujane B. 2013. Use of New Feed Ingredients on the Basis of Tree Foliage Extractives. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM: Surveying Geology & Mining Ecology Management, Page 331.
- Saleh H., Golian A., Kermanshahi H., Mirakzehi M.T. Effects of dietary α-tocopherol acetate, pomegranate peel, and pomegranate peel extract on phenolic content, fatty acid composition, and meat quality of broiler chickens. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2017;45:629–636. [Google Scholar]
- Surai P.F. Vitamin E in avian reproduction. Poult. Avian Biol. Rev. 1999;10:3–60. [Google Scholar]
- Tarladgis B.G., Watts B.M., Younathan M.T., Dugan L., Jr A distillation method for the quantitative determination of malonaldehyde in rancid foods. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1960;37:44–48. [Google Scholar]
- Ugulu I., Baslar S., Yorek N., Dogan Y. The investigation and quantitative ethnobotanical evaluation of medicinal plants used around Izmir province, Turkey. J. Med. Plant. Res. 2009;3:345–367. [Google Scholar]
- Vitina I., Krastina V., Daugavietis M., Miculis J., Cerina S. Applying spruce needle extractives in broiler chicken feeding. Agron. Res. 2011;9:509–514. [Google Scholar]
- Wang X., Cao Y., Fu Y., Guo G., Zhang X. Liver fatty acid composition in mice with or without nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Lipids Health Dis. 2011;10:234. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-10-234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wood J.D., Enser M. Manipulating the fatty acid composition of meat to improve nutritional value and meat quality. In: Purslow P.P., editor. New Aspects of Meat Quality. Woodhead Publishing; Oxford, England: 2017. pp. 501–535. [Google Scholar]
- Wu Q., Wang Z., Wang G., Li Y., Qi Y. Effects of feed supplemented with fermented pine needles (Pinus ponderosa) on growth performance and antioxidant status in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2015;94:1138–1144. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie Q., Liu Z., Li Z. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of essential oil of six pinus taxa native to China. Molecules. 2015;20:9380–9392. doi: 10.3390/molecules20059380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiong C., Guo A., Wu P., Cheng F., Wang F. Effects of pine needle powder on slaughter performance, organ index and meat quality in broilers. Acta Agric. Univ. Jiangxiensis. 2011;33:949–954. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng W.C., Zhang Z., Jia L.R. Antioxidant activity and characterization of antioxidant polysaccharides from pine needle (Cedrus deodara) Carbohydr. Polym. 2014;108:58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]