Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Oct 27;15(10):e0236384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236384

Plasma neurofilament light protein correlates with diffusion tensor imaging metrics in frontotemporal dementia

Nicola Spotorno 1,2,*, Olof Lindberg 3, Christer Nilsson 4, Maria Landqvist Waldö 5, Danielle van Westen 6, Karin Nilsson 2, Susanna Vestberg 7, Elisabet Englund 8, Henrik Zetterberg 9,10,11,12, Kaj Blennow 9,10, Jimmy Lätt 13, Nilsson Markus 6, Wahlund Lars-Olof 3, Santillo Alexander 2
Editor: Joseph Najbauer14
PMCID: PMC7591030  PMID: 33108404

Abstract

Neurofilaments are structural components of neurons and are particularly abundant in highly myelinated axons. The levels of neurofilament light chain (NfL) in both cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma have been related to degeneration in several neurodegenerative conditions including frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and NfL is currently considered as the most promising diagnostic and prognostic fluid biomarker in FTD. Although the location and function of filaments in the healthy nervous system suggests a link between increased NfL and white matter degeneration, such a claim has not been fully elucidated in vivo, especially in the context of FTD. The present study provides evidence of an association between the plasma levels of NfL and white matter involvement in behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD) by relating plasma concentration of NfL to diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics in a group of 20 bvFTD patients. The results of both voxel-wise and tract specific analysis showed that increased plasma NfL concentration is associated with a reduction in fractional anisotropy (FA) in a widespread set of white matter tracts including the superior longitudinal fasciculus, the fronto-occipital fasciculus the anterior thalamic radiation and the dorsal cingulum bundle. Plasma NfL concentration also correlated with cortical thinning in a portion of the right medial prefrontal cortex and of the right lateral orbitofrontal cortex. These results support the hypothesis that blood NfL levels reflect the global level of neurodegeneration in bvFTD and help to advance our understanding of the association between this blood biomarker for FTD and the disease process.

Introduction

In the central nervous system, neurofilaments are cytoskeletal components of neurons that are particularly abundant in axons, where neurofilaments provide structural support and contribute maintaining size, shape, and caliber of the axons [1]. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is the most abundant and soluble of the neurofilament subunits and can be reliably measured in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as well as in blood. The high correlation between CSF and blood concentrations of NfL (e.g., in plasma [2,3]) opened the avenue to the development of an accurate and noninvasive biomarker for diagnostics and, possibly, for monitoring the effect of disease modifying drugs during treatment trials. In recent years, NfL has rapidly emerged as one of the most promising fluid biomarkers in several neurodegenerative conditions including Alzheimer’s disease [4] and atypical parkinsonian disorders [5]. Early on a markedly increased CSF levels of NfL in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) as compared with controls and Alzheimer´s disease was found [6], a finding valid also for NfL in blood [7], and increased peripheral NfL has now been reliably validated in FTD [813]. A dramatic increase compared with controls and other neurodegenerative conditions has been also exhaustively documented in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [1416].

NfL is mostly found in long, myelinated axons, and was found early to correlate with white matter changes (white matter is, together with myelin and glia, constituted by axons) [17], but only few studies have investigated the association between NfL and other in vivo markers that reflect the involvement of white matter in the neurodegenerative process [12,18]. In ALS, increased NfL concentration in both CSF and blood have been reported to correlate specifically with the degeneration of the cortico-spinal tract [16,19], while in FTD, both Steinacker and colleagues [12] and Sherling and colleagues [18], have shown an association between the serum concentration of NfL and decrease in frontal white matter volume. Understanding the link between peripheral NfL and aspects of the neurodegenerative process in FTD would be critical to guide the interpretation of NfL levels in the context of both clinical practice and treatment trials. To the best of our knowledge, no previous study has investigated the link between peripheral NfL level and the pathological changes in white matter occurring in FTD using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) which is one of the most sensitive imaging techniques to capture such changes in vivo.

In the present study, we used DTI to explore the potential relationship between plasma NfL concentration and white matter degeneration in a group of patients affected by behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD). DTI has already proved to be able to reflect white matter degeneration profiles in FTD [20] and considering the results of previous studies, we aimed to test whether the peripheral concentration of NfL are associated with the degeneration of specific tracts, as appears to be the case in ALS, or if NfL reflects the general level of severity of white matter atrophy in bvFTD, as suggested by the previous studies [12,18]. To this end, the association between DTI metrics and NfL levels was investigated both unbiasedly at the whole-brain white matter level and in a region-of-interest analysis focusing on white matter tracts that are known to be involved in the bvFTD pathological process. Previous studies on FTD based on the quantification of DTI metrics [2022] as well as on a combination of tensor based tractography and quantification of DTI metrics [23] have indeed showed extensive pattern of white matter involvement including the fronto-occipital fasciculus, the superior longitudinal fasciculus, the uncinate fasciculus, the dorsal cingulum bundle, the anterior thalamic radiation, and the inferior/hippocampal portion of the cingulum bundle. We also included in our analysis tracts in which degeneration has been reported to correlate with NfL level in previous DTI studies, in particular the cortico-spinal tract [16,19]. Moreover, we aimed to explore the potential association between NfL levels and cortical thickness to investigate the specificity of the hypothesized link between plasma NfL levels and white matter degeneration.

Material and methods

Participants

Twenty patients affected by the behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) were included in the study. The participants took part in the Lund Prospective Frontotemporal Dementia Study (LUPROFS), a longitudinal study of patients with any of the frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders which included patients from 2009 to 2014 at the Memory Clinic of Skåne University Hospital in Lund, Sweden. The LUPROFS protocol includes clinical examination, caregiver history, symptom rating, neuropsychological examination, standardized neurological examination and, at baseline, CSF and blood sample and MRI. bvFTD patients were diagnosed by a multidisciplinary team accordingly to the International Behavioral Variant FTD Consortium Criteria [24]. Genetic screening for mutations in the genes of microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT), progranulin (GRN), and in chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9ORF72) was performed in all patients. Postmortem neuropathological examination was aimed for in all patients deceased during follow up. The exclusion criteria included: > 3 lacunar strokes or any number of other type of strokes visible on MRI examination, alcohol addiction, or any other significant neurological or psychiatric comorbidity. Patients were included in the present study only if they had a clinical diagnosis of probable or definite bvFTD, underwent MRI successfully with all relevant sequences to this study, and underwent MRI within a year from blood sampling. Twenty of the 41 subjects with bvFTD included in the LUPROFS cohort, could be included in the present study. No standardized assessment of motor functions was performed as part of the study, however, one patient had a diagnosis of FTD with motor neuron disease (FTD-MND, according to the Awji criteria [25]). More details on inclusion procedure and instruments can be found in [23]. 22 healthy controls were also included in the study for the purpose of building an unbiased white matter template (see the sction on the Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) analysis). Healthy controls underwent the same protocol as the included patients. Demographic and clinical features of the cohort are presented in Table 1. The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board, Lund, Sweden (Number 617/2008). Patients and healthy controls were informed of the study content in both oral and written form. Informed consent was obtained in written form.

Table 1. Demographic information.

bvFTD Healthy controls
Number (Female) 20 (10) 22 (11)
Diagnostic confidence* 9 cases–definite+ 11 cases–probable
Age (std.) 68 (9) 65 (11)
MMSE (std.) 23.2 (4.9) 29.6 (0.5)
Interval plasma–MRI in months (std; interval range in months) 0.2 (3.1; 0–10) --
FTLD-CDR (std.) 1.7 (0.6)
FTLD-CDR sum of boxes (std.) 8.7 (4.0) --

Values are given as mean and standard deviation (std).

Abbreviations: bvFTD: behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia; FTLD-CDR = frontotemporal lobar degeneration Clinical Dementia Rating; MMSE: Mini Mental State Examination.

*According to International Behavioral Variant FTD Consortium Criteria [24]. + 6 patients fulfill definite bvFTD criteria according to neuropathological examination, 2 according to genetic examination, and one according to both. Demographic factors and clinical characteristics were compared using Chi-square (x2) and Mann-Whitney U tests [Sex: x2 = 0, p > 0.9; Age: U = 155, p = 0.052; MMSE: U = 13.5, p < 0.001].

Imaging protocol

MRI was performed using a Philips Achieva 3T scanner equipped with an eight-channel head coil. Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) was performed with an echo-planar single-shot spin echo sequence. Diffusion encoding was performed in 48 directions at a b-value of 800 s/mm2 along with 1 volume with b-value of 0. The voxel size was 2×2×2 mm3, TR 7881 ms and TE 90 ms. A T1-weighted 3D volumetric sequence was also acquired with a voxel size of 1×1×1 mm3, TR 8.3 ms, TE 3.84 ms, FOV 256×256×175 mm3.

Plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) protocol

Plasma NfL concentration was measured using an in house ultrasensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on a Single molecule array platform (Quanterix Corp, Billerica, MA, USA), as previously described [26]. All measurements were performed in one round of experiments, using one batch of reagents with intra-assay coefficients of variation below 10%.

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) analysis

The diffusion data were corrected for motion and eddy current induced artifacts using an extrapolation-based registration approach as previously reported [27]. A single diffusion tensor model was fitted to these data using FMRIB Software Library and parametric maps of fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), radial diffusivity (RD), and axial diffusivity (AD) were subsequently computed. Tract-based spatial statistics pipeline (TBSS, [28]) was then applied to the parametric maps. In brief, the FA maps were warped to the FMRIB58_FA standard template (FMRIB, University of Oxford, UK; resolution: 1×1×1mm3) in MNI152 space (Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Canada) using FMRIB's non-linear registration tool (FNIRT v1.0). All the warped FA maps, including the maps of the healthy controls, were subsequently averaged to create a mean FA template, from which the FA skeleton was computed, imposing an FA threshold of 0.2. The FA maps of each participant were then, projected onto the skeleton as well as the other DTI scalars. In the present study we focus especially on a subset of tracts of interest, that consistently have been reported as affected in bvFTD in previous DTI studies [20,21,23] namely: the fronto-occipital fasciculus (FOF), the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), the uncinate fasciculus (UF), cortico-spinal tract (CST), the dorsal cingulum bundle (dCin), the anterior thalamic radiation (ATR), and the inferior/hippocampal portion of the cingulum bundle (iCin). In order to extract summary metric from these tracts the Johns Hopkins University white-matter tractography atlas (available in FMRIB software library; FSL) [29] were intercepted with study-wise FA skeleton and the median values of FA, MD, RD and AD were extracted from each tract of interest for each participant.

Cortical thickness analysis

Cortical reconstruction and volumetric segmentation were performed on the T1-weighted 3D image using Freesurfer 5.3 image analysis pipeline which is documented and freely available for download online (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/). The technical details of these procedures are described in prior publications, which are listed at https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FreeSurferMethodsCitation. Briefly, the whole-brain T1-weighted images underwent a correction for intensity homogeneity, skull striping, and segmentation into grey and white matter with intensity gradient and connectivity among voxels. Cortical thickness was measured as the distance from the gray/white matter boundary to the corresponding pial surface. Assessment of intracranial volume was also performed using Freesurfer. Reconstructed data sets were visually inspected for accuracy, and segmentation errors were corrected. Quality control of the Freesurfer output was performed by OL.

Statistical analysis

A set of whole-skeleton voxel-wise regression analyses on the DTI metrics was performed with the Randomize tool [30] version 2.9 available in FSL with 10000 permutations, threshold-free cluster enhancement [31] and 2D optimization for tract-based DTI analysis. NfL level was included as independent variable in each model along with age at scan as a nuissance covariate. Whole-skeleton statistical significance was set at the family-wise error corrected threshold of p<0.05.

Potential differences between DTI metrics in the tracts of interest across hemisphere were assessed with Wilcoxon test. The association between DTI metrics and NfL was investigated employing multiple linear least square regression models and Benjamin Hochberg procedure for False Discovery Rate (FDR; p-value threshold = 0.05). Plasma NfL levels were log transformed and modeled as independent variable along with age as a nuisance covariate.

Cortical thickness analysis was performed using the QueryDesign Estimate Contrast (QDEC) tool. In parallel with the DTI analysis the model includes cortical thickness as dependent variable while plasma NfL levels were modeled as independent variable along with age at time of MRI scan as nuisance covariate. The results of the GLM analysis were corrected for multiple comparisons at the cluster level using the Monte Carlo simulation. The level of statistical significance was evaluated using a cluster-wise P (CWP) value correction procedure for multiple comparisons based on a Monte Carlo z-field simulation with a cluster forming vertex-z-threshold of 1.3 corresponding to p < 0.05. All the analyses were performed using Python (3.7) except the voxel-wise analyses (as previously described).

Results

Voxel-wise TBSS analysis

The voxel-wise regression analysis in patients affected by bvFTD revealed a negative correlation between plasma NfL levels and a widespread pattern of reduction in FA values which encompass the uncinate fasciculus bilaterally, the anterior thalamic radiation, the corpus callosum (genu, body and splenium), the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (more extensively on the right side) and the left corticospinal tract/cerebral peduncle (see Fig 1). No positive correlation between plasma NfL levels and FA was found and plasma NfL levels did not correlate with any other of the DTI metrics (MD, RD or AD) after correction for multiple comparisons.

Fig 1. Results of the voxel-wise TBSS analysis.

Fig 1

Highlighted clusters (in red) represent significant (family wise error, FWE < 0.05) age corrected negative correlations between fractional anisotropy (FA) and plasma neurofilament light (NfL) protein levels among the patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). The average skeleton is displayed in green. The results were overlaid onto the study-specific mean FA map.

Tracts of interest analysis

Considering that the voxel-wise analysis revealed significant results only for FA we focused the tract of interest analysis on this metric. The Wilcoxon test showed significant differences in FA values between the right and left side of some of the tracts of interest [FOF: W = 170, p<0.001; dCin: W = 247, p<0.05; SLF: W = 281, p<0.05]. Therefore, further analysis was performed separately for the two hemispheres.

A negative correlation between FA and plasma NfL level was significant after correction for multiple comparisons (Bonferroni corrected alpha = 0.05/12) in several tracts of interests namely in the FOF [lFOF: β = -0.03, FDR-p<0.05; rFOF: β = -0.03, FDR-p<0.05], in the SLF [lSLF: β = -0.03, FDR-p<0.05; rSLF: β = -0.03, FDR-p<0.05], in the left UF [β = -0.03, FDR-p < 0.05], in the right ATR [β = -0.04, FDR-p<0.05] and in the right dCin [β = -0.04, FDR-p<0.05]. The correlation between FA values and NfL in the left ATR, the right UF and in the left dCin was only marginally significant [lATR: β = -0.02, p = 0.06; rUF: β = -0.04, p = 0.06; ldCin: β = -0.03, p = 0.05]. No significant correlation was found in the CST [lCST–group: β = -0.01, p>0.1; rCST–group: β = -0.01, p>0.1] (see Fig 2 and S2 Appendix for the complete statistical results). FA was significantly reduced in the bvFTD group relative to the healthy controls in all the tracts of interest except in the inferior cingulum bundle (see S1 Appendix).

Fig 2. Regional analysis of specific tracts.

Fig 2

Abbreviations: ATR: anterior thalamic radiation; CST: corticospinal tract; dCin: dorsal cingulum bundle; FA: fractional anisotropy; FOF: fronto-occipital fasciculus; iCin: inferior/hippocampal portion cingulum bundle; NfL: neurofilament light chain; SFL: superior longitudinal fasciculus; UF: uncinate fasciculus. Median FA values for each tract of interest plotted as a function of the log transformed plasma NfL levels among the patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia bvFTD. The translucent area around the regression line represents the 95% confidential interval for the regression estimate.

Cortical thickness analysis

Whole-brain regression analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between cortical thickness and plasma NfL level in the right medial prefrontal cortex and in the right lateral orbitofrontal cortex (see Fig 3).

Fig 3. Relationship between cortical thickness and plasma NfL levels.

Fig 3

Highlighted clusters represent significant (family-wise error, FWE < 0.05) age corrected negative correlations between cortical thickness and plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels among the patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD).

Discussion

This study explored for the first time the association between plasma NfL levels and DTI metrics in a group of patients affected by bvFTD. We first took a voxel-wise approach to test the extent of the association between DTI metrics and NfL across all white matter structures and then we focused specifically on a subset of tracts of interest, that consistently have been reported to be affected in previous DTI studies on bvFTD [2022]. The voxel-wise analysis revealed a pattern of negative association between FA and plasma NfL levels that was consistent with the spatial distribution of white matter degeneration in bvFTD as assessed by neuropathology [32] and previous DTI studies [2022]. The analysis of specific tracts of interest also showed a negative correlation between plasma NfL levels and FA, in all the tracts under examination with the only exception of the cortico-spinal tract. These results suggested a strong link between white matter involvement in bvFTD and the increase of plasma NfL level, providing further evidence of the link between peripheral NfL concentration and the central pathological process in bvFTD.

NfL is the most promising fluid biomarker for diagnostics and monitoring degeneration in FTD both in the context of clinical practice as well as in clinical trials [33] In the diagnostic process, NfL is the only fluid biomarker with potential to separate bvFTD from psychiatric disorders [34,35], which constitute the main differential diagnosis for bvFTD [36]. Plasma is arguably preferable to CSF for NfL measurements due to the minimally invasive procedure required to sample it. Considering the potential value of this marker, it is relevant to clarify what aspect of the FTD pathological process is reflected by NfL levels. The present results point to a clear link between white matter degeneration (and presumably neuronal axons, its main constituent together with myelin and glia) and NfL (presumably mainly emanating from neuronal axons) levels in plasma. Both CSF and blood concentrations of NfL have been previously associated with grey matter atrophy in several neurodegenerative diseases, including FTD. For example, van der Ende and colleagues have recently reported that the rate of changes in serum NfL concentration in genetic FTD cases was correlated with rate of volume reduction in several cortical and subcortical regions including frontal lobe, insula, cingulate gyrus, hippocampus, putamen, temporal lobe and amygdala [37]. Similarly, Meeter et al. have shown a negative association between NfL levels in the CSF and parahippocampal volume in a large cross-sectional study on the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia [9]. However, these studies did not assess the association between NfL and white matter involvement. Both Scherling and colleagues and Steinacker and colleagues have, instead, reported negative correlation between CSF concentration of NfL and both gray and white matter volume across different phenotypes of FTD [18]. The present study using DTI metrics indicate a spatially more diffuse relationship between NfL and white matter, compared to the association between NfL levels and white matter volume. Although, a direct comparison between studies employing alternative techniques is not possible, the difference could be due to the superior sensitivity of DTI in detecting pathological processes in white matter. Although NfL are structural components of axons, they are also present in gray matter; therefore, gray matter degeneration could contribute to the increase of peripheral NfL concentration. In Alzheimer’s disease, plasma NfL levels have been shown to correlate both cross-sectionally and longitudinally with cortical thinning in regions typically affected by the Alzheimer neurodegenerative process, such as entorhinal, inferior temporal, middle temporal, and fusiform cortex [4]. In the present study, plasma NfL levels were also associated with cortical thinning in a portion of the right medial prefrontal cortex and the right lateral orbitofrontal cortex. These regions constitute a subset of the prefrontal, insular and temporal cortex typically affected by atrophy in bvFTD [38]. The extent of the association between NfL and cortical thinning appears to be relatively modest compared to the widespread pattern of associations with FA. Such a difference could be related to the biology of NfL, which are particularly abundant in highly myelinated axons, but the difference in statistical results could also be due to lack of power for detecting statistical associations with a morphometric analysis.

In the present study we tested whether bvFTD plasma NfL levels are associated with a particular spatial profile of white matter involvement, where several scenarios could be hypothesized. In ALS, an increase in the peripheral concentration of NfL levels has been associated with changes in diffusion metrics mostly in the cortico-spinal tracts [1416]. Thus, given the close relationship between ALS and FTD, a subclinical corticospinal tract involvement could drive the increased NfL levels in FTD. Analogously, a semantic dementia (i.e. semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia) like pattern, with NfL correlations with the uncinate fasciculus mainly, could be expected given that semantic dementia shows higher NfL levels than other primary progressive aphasias and has a characteristic involvement of the uncinate fasciculus [9]. A specific association with the uncinate fasciculus could also be expected given that this is one of the earliest tracts affected in bvFTD [39] and increased NfL seem to be an early event in FTD [37]. Both the voxel-wise results and the regional analysis seems to point, instead, to a diffuse association of NfL with FA in the main tracts that are involved in the neurodegenerative process of bvFTD. The association appeared to be prominent in the majority of tracts studied, which all are long interlobar tracts with diverse functions (i.e. association, commissural, and projection tracts), with the notable exception of the CST. The results in the CST appear counter intuitive given what is reported above on regarding ALS. However, there are inconsistencies and the largest study of ALS to date has indeed not shown correlation between NfL and DTI metrics [40].

The association between plasma NfL levels and FA values in the majority of tracts affected by the disease process is in line with both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in the FTD spectrum showing that levels of NfL are increased with disease severity and associated with poorer prognosis [7,10,11,18,37,41]. Although it is not the primary outcome of the present study, the association between NfL levels and disease severity holds also in our cohort has revealed by a positive association between NfL and FTLD-CDR sum of boxes [Spearman’s rho = 0.7; p < 0.001]. Of particular interest is that both Meeter and colleagues [11] and van der Ende and colleagues [37] showed that in genetic FTD cases, the serum concentration of NfL is clearly higher in symptomatic versus asymptomatic mutation carriers. We believe the current finding further strengthen the validity of NfL as a biomarker of disease severity and thus potentially as a surrogate outcome measure in treatment trials. What emerges as a caveat from this, and previous studies, is that the association with disease severity could mean that NfL is less useful in patients that not yet have a full clinical bvFTD dementia (i.e. prodromal bvFTD, or bvFTD at the mild cognitive impairment level), which would limit its application in the psychiatric differential diagnostic setting.

In addition to the relatively small sample size, other limitations should be taken into account while evaluating the results of the present study. bvFTD is a clinical phenotype, and, currently there is no in vivo marker that can disentangle the underlying pathology, namely tauopathy or TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) proteinopathy. Evidence of increased NfL levels in ALS/MND, which is most commonly a TDP-43 proteinopathy [4244], and in the semantic variant primary progressive aphasia [9,10], which also most commonly characterized by misfolding of TDP-43 [45], suggest a link between NfL and TDP-43 proteinopathy in the FTD spectrum [10]. However, other studies have shown that NfL levels are elevated in primary tauopathies like progressive supranuclear palsy [5]. Although, the purpose of our study was the investigation of the association between plasma NfL levels and DTI metric in a clinical phenotype (bvFTD), the potential confounding effect of mixed underlying proteinopathies must be taken into consideration. Increased peripheral NfL has now been reliably validated in FTD [813] and was not a purpose of the current study; however the lack of a direct comparison of plasma NfL levels between bvFTD and healthy controls is also a limitation of the present study. Moreover, the lack of association between plasma NfL levels and DTI metrics other than FA in the TBSS analysis is surprising when considering the extent of the association between NfL levels and FA values. A follow up study in a bigger cohort is warranted to investigate whether, with greater statistical power, associations with other metrics would emerge. Different DTI metrics could also be differently sensitive to different biological process. For example, FA appears to distinguish between progressive supranuclear palsy and Parkinson’s disease with higher level of accuracy than other DTI metrics [46], while axial and mean diffusivity seem to be the first DTI-related abnormalities to occur in Alzheimer’s disease [47]. However, one should bear in mind that, although DTI metrics are sensitive to pathological processes in white matter, they cannot be interpreted as a direct proxy of a specific biological process like axonal degeneration, which is the likely cause of the increased peripheral levels of NfL. A measure such as FA is, indeed, sensitive both to anisotropy, which is caused by the presence of elongated cell structures, like axons, and orientation dispersion, which is caused by fanning or crossing fibers [48]. Therefore, DTI cannot pinpoint the biological bases of a reduction in FA nor reflect the complexity of white matter organization. Alternative acquisition strategies have been proposed [4850] but the estimation of an exact biologic property remains challenging despite the use of both advanced DWI sequences and modeling [51].

With these caveats in mind, the present study provides in vivo evidence of a relationship between plasma NfL levels and involvement of white matter tracts in bvFTD pathophysiology. These results advance our understanding of the link between one of the most promising fluid biomarker of neurodegeneration in FTD and the pathological process occurring in this condition and further support the application of blood-derived NfL concentration as a noninvasive biomarker for application in a clinical setting and in treatment trials.

Supporting information

S1 Appendix. Tracts of interest analysis: Comparison of FA values between bvFTD and healthy controls.

(DOCX)

S2 Appendix. Tracts of interest analysis: Association between FA and plasma NfL levels in the tracts that exhibited a reduction in FA in the bvFTD cohort.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank both the patients and their relative who took part to the study. Without their dedication this work would have not been possible We would also like to thank the staff of the Memory Clinics at Skåne University Hospital. The LUPROFS study on which the present work is based on was initiated 2008 by the authors CN, DvW, MLW, AS, KN, SV and EE.

Data Availability

Data are available upon request. Data contain sensitive information about patients status. We are prohibited from sharing the data publicly for general research that was not described in the consent procedure. Data are available upon request from researchers who have ethical approval from the Skåne University Hospital, Bild och Funktion, forskningssamarbete.bf.sus@skane.se. Further data access queries can be directed to Sophia Zackrisson, Skånes universitetssjukhus, Diarium, Rådhus Skåne, 291 89 Kristianstad, Sweden, e-mail address: sophia.zackrisson@skane.se, phone: +46 40 33 87 97

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. NS, OL, LOW and AS were all supported by the Schörling foundation. NS is also supported by the National Institute on Aging (NIA), grant numbers: AG052943, AG017586. AS is also supported by the Swedish Society for Medical Research, The Benthe Rexhed Gersteds foundation, The Bundy Academy, The Strategic Research Area MultiPark (Multidisciplinary Research in Parkinson’s disease) at Lund University, and Region Skåne. HZ is a Wallenberg Scholar supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (#2018-02532), the European Research Council (#681712), Swedish State Support for Clinical Research (#ALFGBG-720931), the Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF), USA (#201809-2016862), and the UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL. KB is supported by the Swedish Research Council (#2017-00915), the Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF), USA (#RDAPB-201809-2016615), the Swedish Alzheimer Foundation (#AF-742881), Hjärnfonden, Sweden (#FO2017-0243), the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the County Councils, the ALF-agreement (#ALFGBG-715986), and European Union Joint Program for Neurodegenerative Disorders (JPND2019-466-236).

References

  • 1.Liem RKH, Cleveland DW (1996) Neuronal Intermediate Filaments. Annu Rev Neurosci 19:187–217. 10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.001155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mattsson N, Andreasson U, Zetterberg H, et al. (2017) Association of plasma neurofilament light with neurodegeneration in patients with Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol 74:557–566. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.6117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lu CH, Macdonald-Wallis C, Gray E, et al. (2015) Neurofilament light chain: A prognostic biomarker in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology 84:2247–2257. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mattsson N, Cullen NC, Andreasson U, Zetterberg H, Blennow K (2019) Association between Longitudinal Plasma Neurofilament Light and Neurodegeneration in Patients with Alzheimer Disease. JAMA Neurol 76:791–799. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hansson O, Janelidze S, Hall S, et al. (2017) Blood-based NfL: A biomarker for differential diagnosis of parkinsonian disorder. Neurology 88:930–937. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sjögren M, Rosengren L, Minthon L, Davidsson P, Blennow K, Wallin A (2000) Cytoskeleton proteins in CSF distinguish frontotemporal dementia from AD. Neurology 54:1960–1964. 10.1212/wnl.54.10.1960 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rohrer JD, Woollacott IOC, Dick KM, et al. (2016) Serum neurofilament light chain protein is a measure of disease intensity in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 87:1329–36. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Olsson B, Portelius E, Cullen NC, et al. (2019) Association of Cerebrospinal Fluid Neurofilament Light Protein Levels with Cognition in Patients with Dementia, Motor Neuron Disease, and Movement Disorders. JAMA Neurol 76:318–325. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Meeter LHH, Steketee RME, Salkovic D, et al. (2019) Clinical value of cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain in semantic dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 90:997–1004. 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Landqvist Waldö M, Frizell Santillo A, Passant U, Zetterberg H, Rosengren L, Nilsson C, et al. (2013) Cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain protein levels in subtypes of frontotemporal dementia. BMC Neurol 13:54 10.1186/1471-2377-13-54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Meeter LH, Dopper EG, Jiskoot LC, et al. (2016) Neurofilament light chain: a biomarker for genetic frontotemporal dementia. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 3:623–636. 10.1002/acn3.325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Steinacker P, Anderl-Straub S, Diehl-Schmid J, et al. (2018) Serum neurofilament light chain in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 91:E1390–E1401. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bridel C, Van Wieringen WN, Zetterberg H, et al. (2019) Diagnostic Value of Cerebrospinal Fluid Neurofilament Light Protein in Neurology: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 76:1035–1048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Poesen K, Van Damme P (2019) Diagnostic and prognostic performance of neurofilaments in ALS. Front Neurol. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gaiani A, Martinelli I, Bello L, et al. (2017) Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Neurofilament light chain levels in definite subtypes of disease. JAMA Neurol 74:525–532. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.5398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Menke RAL, Gray E, Lu CH, Kuhle J, Talbot K, Malaspina A, et al. (2015) CSF neurofilament light chain reflects corticospinal tract degeneration in ALS. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2:748–755. 10.1002/acn3.212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sjögren M, Blomberg M, Jonsson M, Wahlund LO, Lind K, Rosengren L, et al. (2001) Neurofilament protein in cerebrospinal fluid: A marker of white matter changes. J Neurosci Res 66:510–516. 10.1002/jnr.1242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Scherling CS, Hall T, Berisha F, et al. (2014) Cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament concentration reflects disease severity in frontotemporal degeneration. Ann Neurol 75:116–126. 10.1002/ana.24052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schreiber S, Spotorno N, Schreiber F, et al. (2018) Significance of CSF NfL and tau in ALS. J Neurol 265:2633–2645. 10.1007/s00415-018-9043-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mahoney CJ, Ridgway GR, Malone IB, et al. (2014) Profiles of white matter tract pathology in frontotemporal dementia. Hum Brain Mapp 35:4163–4179. 10.1002/hbm.22468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lam BYK, Halliday GM, Irish M, Hodges JR, Piguet O (2014) Longitudinal white matter changes in frontotemporal dementia subtypes. Hum Brain Mapp 35:3547–3557. 10.1002/hbm.22420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Santillo AF, Lundblad K, Nilsson M, Waldö ML, Van Westen D, Lätt J, et al. (2016) Grey and white matter clinico-anatomical correlates of disinhibition in neurodegenerative disease. PLoS One 11:1–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Santillo AF, Mårtensson J, Lindberg O, Nilsson M, Manzouri A, Landqvist Waldö M, et al. (2013) Diffusion Tensor Tractography versus Volumetric Imaging in the Diagnosis of Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia. PLoS One 8:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, et al. (2011) Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 134:2456–2477. 10.1093/brain/awr179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.de Carvalho M, Dengler R, Eisen A, et al. (2008) Electrodiagnostic criteria for diagnosis of ALS. Clin Neurophysiol 119:497–503. 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.09.143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gisslén M, Price RW, Andreasson U, Norgren N, Nilsson S, Hagberg L, et al. (2016) Plasma Concentration of the Neurofilament Light Protein (NFL) is a Biomarker of CNS Injury in HIV Infection: A Cross-Sectional Study. EBioMedicine 3:135–140. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.11.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nilsson M, Szczepankiewicz F, Van Westen D, Hansson O (2015) Extrapolation-based references improve motion and eddy-current correction of high B-value DWI data: Application in Parkinson’s disease dementia. PLoS One. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, et al. (2006) Tract-based spatial statistics: Voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 31:1487–1505. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hua K, Zhang J, Wakana S, Jiang H, Li X, Reich DS, et al. (2008) Tract probability maps in stereotaxic spaces: Analyses of white matter anatomy and tract-specific quantification. Neuroimage 39:336–347. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Winkler AM, Ridgway GR, Webster MA, Smith SM, Nichols TE (2014) Permutation inference for the general linear model. Neuroimage 92:381–397. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Smith SM, Nichols TE (2009) Threshold-free cluster enhancement: Addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage 44:83–98. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Englund E, Brun A (1987) Frontal lobe degeneration of non-Alzheimer type IV. White matter changes. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 6:235–243. 10.1016/0167-4943(87)90024-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Meeter LH, Kaat LD, Rohrer JD, Van Swieten JC (2017) Imaging and fluid biomarkers in frontotemporal dementia. Nat Rev Neurol 13:406–419. 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Eratne D, Loi SM, Walia N, et al. (2020) A pilot study of the utility of cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain in differentiating neurodegenerative from psychiatric disorders: A ‘C-reactive protein’ for psychiatrists and neurologists? Aust N Z J Psychiatry 54:57–67. 10.1177/0004867419857811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Katisko K, Cajanus A, Jääskeläinen O, et al. (2020) Serum neurofilament light chain is a discriminative biomarker between frontotemporal lobar degeneration and primary psychiatric disorders. J Neurol 267:162–167. 10.1007/s00415-019-09567-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ducharme S, Dols A, Laforce R, et al. (2020) Recommendations to distinguish behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric disorders. Brain 143(6):1632–1650. 10.1093/brain/awaa018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.van der Ende EL, Meeter LH, Poos JM, et al. (2019) Serum neurofilament light chain in genetic frontotemporal dementia: a longitudinal, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Neurol 18:1103–1111. 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30354-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Schroeter ML, Raczka K, Neumann J, von Cramon DY (2008) Neural networks in frontotemporal dementia-A meta-analysis. Neurobiol Aging 29:418–426. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.10.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dopper EGP, Rombouts SARB, Jiskoot LC, et al. (2014) Structural and functional brain connectivity in presymptomatic familial frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 83:e19–e26. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Steinacker P, Feneberg E, Weishaupt J, et al. (2016) Neurofilaments in the diagnosis of motoneuron diseases: A prospective study on 455 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 87:12–20. 10.1136/jnnp-2015-311387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Meeter LHH, Gendron TF, Sias AC, et al. (2018) Poly(GP), neurofilament and grey matter deficits in C9orf72 expansion carriers. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 5:583–597. 10.1002/acn3.559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Neumann M, Sampathu DM, Kwong LK, et al. (2006) Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Science 314:130–133. 10.1126/science.1134108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hardiman O, Van Den Berg LH, Kiernan MC (2011) Clinical diagnosis and management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 7:639–649. 10.1038/nrneurol.2011.153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sreedharan J, Blair IP, Tripathi VB, et al. (2008) TDP-43 Mutations in Familial and Sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Science 319:1668–1672. 10.1126/science.1154584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Spinelli EG, Mandelli ML, Miller ZA, et al. (2017) Typical and atypical pathology in primary progressive aphasia variants. Ann Neurol 81:430–443. 10.1002/ana.24885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Spotorno N, Hall S, Irwin DJ, et al. (2019) Diffusion Tensor MRI to Distinguish Progressive Supranuclear Palsy from α-Synucleinopathies. Radiology 293:646–653. 10.1148/radiol.2019190406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Acosta-Cabronero J, Alley S, Williams GB, Pengas G, Nestor PJ (2012) Diffusion Tensor Metrics as Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease. PLoS One. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Westin CF, Knutsson H, Pasternak O, et al. (2016) Q-space trajectory imaging for multidimensional diffusion MRI of the human brain. Neuroimage 135:345–362. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Eriksson S, Lasic S, Topgaard D (2013) Isotropic diffusion weighting in PGSE NMR by magic-angle spinning of the q-vector. J Magn Reson 226:13–18. 10.1016/j.jmr.2012.10.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shemesh N, Özarslan E, Komlosh ME, Basser PJ, Cohen Y (2010) From single-pulsed field gradient to double-pulsed field gradient MR: Gleaning new microstructural information and developing new forms of contrast in MRI. NMR Biomed 23:757–780. 10.1002/nbm.1550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lampinen B, Szczepankiewicz F, Novén M, van Westen D, Hansson O, Englund E, et al. (2019) Searching for the neurite density with diffusion MRI: Challenges for biophysical modeling. Hum Brain Mapp 40:2529–2545. 10.1002/hbm.24542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Joseph Najbauer

14 Aug 2020

Pécs, Hungary

August 13, 2020

PONE-D-20-20650

Plasma neurofilament light protein correlates with diffusion tensor imaging metrics in frontotemporal dementia

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Spotorno,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised by the Reviewers, listed below.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 28 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Joseph Najbauer, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

--------------------------------------------------------

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

3. Thank you for including your competing interests statement; "I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: HZ has served at scientific advisory boards for Denali, Roche Diagnostics, Wave, Samumed and CogRx, has given lectures in symposia sponsored by Fujirebio, Alzecure and Biogen, and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS), which is a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program. . KB has served as a consultant, at advisory boards, or at data monitoring committees for Abcam, Axon, Biogen, JOMDD/Shimadzu. Julius Clinical, Lilly, MagQu, Novartis, Roche Diagnostics, and Siemens Healthineers, and is also a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS)."

Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests).  If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include your updated Competing Interests statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

4. Please amend either the abstract on the online submission form (via Edit Submission) or the abstract in the manuscript so that they are identical.

5.  Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In their manuscript, Spotorno and colleagues describe the relationship between NfL levels in blood and white matter integrity as measured by DTI in a small cohort of bvFTD patients. The relevance of the study is clear and the methods and statistical analyses seem appropriate. The manuscript is generally well written. I have some minor comments:

Introduction

In the paragraph starting with ‘The present study…’, the authors mention previous studies of white matter integrity in FTD. I suggest the authors clarify which measures of white matter were used. Is this based on neuroimaging measures other than those extracted from DTI?

Methods

- The methods section mentions that the data is derived from a longitudinal FTD study. Did participants also undergo repeated MRI scans and blood sampling? If so, it would be of interest to investigate whether NfL levels also predict subsequent decline in white matter measures.

- The small sample size makes the reader question whether many patients were excluded from this study, and if so, for what reason. Can you specify this more clearly?

- Table 1: were the definite cases autopsy-proven or genetic cases?

- Table 1: besides standard deviation, can you provide the range of the interval between plasma and MRI? This is important for interpretation of the results.

Results

- In the voxel-wise TBSS analysis, it seems surprising that there are negative correlations between NfL and FA but not with other DTI measures. I suggest some comment on this in the discussion section.

Reviewer #2: In this manuscript, Spotorno and coll show their findings on a potential relationship between plasma NfL levels and involvement of white matter tracts in bvFTD. These data are very interesting and deal with a very current topic. As a further strong point, the manuscrpit is well written with a thorough data discussion. I'd just add results of a direct comparison of NFl serum levels between patients and controls. Moreover, I would be interested to know if bvFTD patients were examined for motor involvement and, if yes, I'd also add a specific correlation analysis with the CST DTI values.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 27;15(10):e0236384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236384.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


24 Sep 2020

Dear prof. Najbauer,

Thank you for your consideration of our work. We provide here a point-by-point description of response to reviewer comments below. For your convenience the major changes in the text of the revised manuscript are provided below in italics and highlighted in the revised manuscript.

Journal Requirements

• Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

We have checked PLOS ONE’s style requirements and edited the manuscript accordingly.

• We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly.

The justification of the restricted access to the original data has been included into the revised cover letter.

• Update the conflict of interest statement.

The conflict of interests statement has been updated in the manuscript and reported in the revised cover letter.

• Please amend either the abstract on the online submission form (via Edit Submission) or the abstract in the manuscript so that they are identical.

We have updated the abstract on the online submission form.

• Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly.

The captions of the supporting information have been added to the manuscript and the in-text citations have been updated.

Page (21)

Supporting information captions

S1 Appendix: Tracts of interest analysis: Comparison of FA values between bvFTD and healthy controls

S2 Appendix: Tracts of interest analysis: Association between FA and plasma NfL levels in the tracts that exhibited a reduction in FA in the bvFTD cohort

Reviewer 1

In their manuscript, Spotorno and colleagues describe the relationship between NfL levels in blood and white matter integrity as measured by DTI in a small cohort of bvFTD patients. The relevance of the study is clear and the methods and statistical analyses seem appropriate. The manuscript is generally well written. I have some minor comments.

We thank this reviewer for this overall positive appraisal of the importance and rigor of our work.

• Introduction: In the paragraph starting with ‘The present study…’, the authors mention previous studies of white matter integrity in FTD. I suggest the authors clarify which measures of white matter were used. Is this based on neuroimaging measures other than those extracted from DTI?

Thanks for the important question. We have updated the introduction in order to clarify which metrics have been used in the literature. The studies we referred to quantified DTI metrics or combined tensor based tractography with the quantification of DTI metrics such as FA.

Please see the changes in the Introduction section of the revised manuscript.

Page 4

“Previous studies on FTD based on the quantification of DTI metrics [20–22] as well as on a combination of tensor based tractography and quantification of DTI metrics [23] have indeed showed extensive pattern of white matter involvement including the fronto-occipital fasciculus, the superior longitudinal fasciculus, the uncinate fasciculus, the dorsal cingulum bundle, the anterior thalamic radiation, and the inferior / hippocampal portion of the cingulum bundle. We also included in our analysis tracts in which degeneration has been reported to correlate with NfL level in previous DTI studies, in particular the cortico-spinal tract [16,19]⁠.”

• The methods section mentions that the data is derived from a longitudinal FTD study. Did participants also undergo repeated MRI scans and blood sampling? If so, it would be of interest to investigate whether NfL levels also predict subsequent decline in white matter measures.

Sadly, longitudinal MRI and blood sampling were not collected as part of the current study. We have added this information to the methods section:

Page 5

”The LUPROFS protocol includes clinical examination, caregiver history, symptom rating, neuropsychological examination, standardized neurological examination, and, at baseline, CSF and blood sample and MRI”

• The small sample size makes the reader question whether many patients were excluded from this study, and if so, for what reason. Can you specify this more clearly?

Thank you for this important comment. Although the sample size is limited, this is roughly what is expected based on the population size of the catchment area of the study, and the inherent difficulty of conducting research on patients with frontotemporal dementia which are, not seldom, uncooperative. Based on our own epidemiological research (Nilsson et al 2014, Plos One), in our catchments area 36 FTD individuals are expected to develop FTD during the period in which the LUPROFS study was conducted. In addition, patients were also referred from neighboring areas since our unit served as tertiary center for neurodegenerative diseases. The total number of bvFTD patients included in the LUPRUFS study was 41 (including possible, probable and definite cases). However, only 20 fulfilled the inclusion criteria of this specific study. We agree that it is critical to clarify the inclusion/exclusion procedure and we have updated the method section accordingly:

Page 5

”The participants took part in the Lund Prospective Frontotemporal Dementia Study (LUPROFS), a longitudinal study of patients with any of the frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders which included patients from 2009 to 2014 at the Memory Clinic of Skåne University Hospital in Lund, Sweden”

“The exclusion criteria included: > 3 lacunar strokes or any number of other type of strokes visible on MRI examination, alcohol addiction, or any other significant neurological or psychiatric comorbidity. Patients were included in the present study only if they had a clinical diagnosis of probable or definite bvFTD, underwent MRI successfully with all relevant sequences to this study, and underwent MRI within a year from blood sampling. Twenty of the 41 subjects with bvFTD included in the LUPROFS cohort, could be included in the present study.”

• Table 1: were the definite cases autopsy-proven or genetic cases?

Thank you for the important question. The information has been added to Table 1.

Page 6

“6 patients fulfill definite bvFTD criteria according to neuropathological examination, 2 according to genetic examination, and one according to both.”

• Table 1: besides standard deviation, can you provide the range of the interval between plasma and MRI? This is important for interpretation of the results.

The interval between plasma collection and MRI scan range between 0 and 10 months. This information has been added to Table 1.

• In the voxel-wise TBSS analysis, it seems surprising that there are negative correlations between NfL and FA but not with other DTI measures. I suggest some comment on this in the discussion section.

Thank you for highlighting this important point. It is indeed unusual that a single DTI metric is associated with a variable while the other metric are not. It has been reported that DTI metrics could be differentially sensitive to biological and pathological processes. However, we prefer to not speculate on this difference because associations between NfL levels and other DTI metrics could be hidden by the relative low statistical power of the current study and they could emerge in studies with bigger cohorts. Moreover, the tensor model is not suited to support the biological interpretation of specific metrics. We have included these considerations the discussion session of the revised manuscript.

Page 15

“Moreover, the lack of association between plasma NfL levels and DTI metrics other than FA in the TBSS analysis is surprising when considering the extent of the association between NfL levels and FA values. A follow up study in a bigger cohort is warranted to investigate whether, with greater statistical power, associations with other metrics would emerge. Different DTI metrics could also be differently sensitive to different biological process. For example, FA appears to distinguish between progressive supranuclear palsy and Parkinson’s disease with higher level of accuracy than other DTI metrics [46]⁠⁠⁠, while axial and mean diffusivity seem to be the first DTI-related abnormalities to occur in Alzheimer’s disease [47]⁠. However, one should bear in mind that, although DTI metrics are sensitive to pathological processes in white matter, they cannot be interpreted as a direct proxy of a specific biological process like axonal degeneration, which is the likely cause of the increased peripheral levels of NfL. A measure such as FA is, indeed, sensitive both to anisotropy, which is caused by the presence of elongated cell structures, like axons, and orientation dispersion, which is caused by fanning or crossing fibers [48]⁠⁠. Therefore, DTI cannot pinpoint the biological bases of a reduction in FA nor reflect the complexity of white matter organization. Alternative acquisition strategies have been proposed [48–50]⁠⁠ but the estimation of an exact biologic property remains challenging despite the use of both advanced DWI sequences and modeling [51]⁠⁠.”

Reviewer 2

In this manuscript, Spotorno and coll show their findings on a potential relationship between plasma NfL levels and involvement of white matter tracts in bvFTD. These data are very interesting and deal with a very current topic. As a further strong point, the manuscrpit is well written with a thorough data discussion.

We thank this reviewer for the positive feedback on our work.

• I'd just add results of a direct comparison of NFl serum levels between patients and controls. Moreover, I would be interested to know if bvFTD patients were examined for motor involvement and, if yes, I'd also add a specific correlation analysis with the CST DTI values.

Although the comparison of NfL levels between patients and controls was beyond the purpose of the present study and that elevated peripheral levels of NfL in FTD have been reported in previous studies (e.g, Olsson et al., 2019, JAMA Neurol; Meeter et al., 2019, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; Landqvist Waldö et al., 2013, BMC Neurol.) we agree that the comparison between NfL in plasma between FTD patients and controls iscertainly is an important topic and the lack of such comparison in the current cohort is a limitation which have been included in the discussion of the revised manuscript.

Page 15

“ Increased peripheral NfL has now been reliably validated in FTD [8–13] and was not a purpose of the current study; however the lack of a direct comparison of plasma NfL levels between bvFTD and healthy controls is also a limitation of the present study.”

The FTD patients were examined for motor involvement but, regrettably, only in a clinical routine protocol without using any standardized measurement scale. Thus, any quantitative analysis, such as the correlational analysis suggested, cannot be performed in the present chort. However, one patient had a FTD MND diagnosis. This is explicitly mentioned in the methods section of the revised manuscript.

Page 5

“No standardized assessment of motor functions was performed as part of the study, however, one patient had a diagnosis of FTD with motor neuron disease (FTD-MND according to the Awji criteria [25])”

Attachment

Submitted filename: responses_to_reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Joseph Najbauer

12 Oct 2020

Pécs, Hungary

October 12, 2020

Plasma neurofilament light protein correlates with diffusion tensor imaging metrics in frontotemporal dementia

PONE-D-20-20650R1

Dear Dr. Spotorno,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript (R1 version) has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Joseph Najbauer, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

-------------------------------

Additional Editor Comments:

PLEASE NOTE: There are extra spaces inserted after reference numbers throughout the manuscript text - please correct.

Acceptance letter

Joseph Najbauer

16 Oct 2020

PONE-D-20-20650R1

Plasma neurofilament light protein correlates with diffusion tensor imaging metrics in frontotemporal dementia

Dear Dr. Spotorno:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Joseph Najbauer

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Appendix. Tracts of interest analysis: Comparison of FA values between bvFTD and healthy controls.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Appendix. Tracts of interest analysis: Association between FA and plasma NfL levels in the tracts that exhibited a reduction in FA in the bvFTD cohort.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: responses_to_reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Data are available upon request. Data contain sensitive information about patients status. We are prohibited from sharing the data publicly for general research that was not described in the consent procedure. Data are available upon request from researchers who have ethical approval from the Skåne University Hospital, Bild och Funktion, forskningssamarbete.bf.sus@skane.se. Further data access queries can be directed to Sophia Zackrisson, Skånes universitetssjukhus, Diarium, Rådhus Skåne, 291 89 Kristianstad, Sweden, e-mail address: sophia.zackrisson@skane.se, phone: +46 40 33 87 97


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES