Skip to main content
PLOS Genetics logoLink to PLOS Genetics
. 2020 Oct 15;16(10):e1009140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009140

Drosophila Caliban preserves intestinal homeostasis and lifespan through regulating mitochondrial dynamics and redox state in enterocytes

Zhaoxia Dai 1,#, Dong Li 1,2,*,#, Xiao Du 1,2, Ying Ge 1, Deborah A Hursh 3, Xiaolin Bi 2,4,*
Editor: Bingwei Lu5
PMCID: PMC7591072  PMID: 33057338

Abstract

Precise regulation of stem cell activity is crucial for tissue homeostasis. In Drosophila, intestinal stem cells (ISCs) maintain the midgut epithelium and respond to oxidative challenges. However, the connection between intestinal homeostasis and redox signaling remains obscure. Here we find that Caliban (Clbn) functions as a regulator of mitochondrial dynamics in enterocytes (ECs) and is required for intestinal homeostasis. The clbn knock-out flies have a shortened lifespan and lose the intestinal homeostasis. Clbn is highly expressed and localizes to the outer membrane of mitochondria in ECs. Mechanically, Clbn mediates mitochondrial dynamics in ECs and removal of clbn leads to mitochondrial fragmentation, accumulation of reactive oxygen species, ECs damage, activation of JNK and JAK-STAT signaling pathways. Moreover, multiple mitochondria-related genes are differentially expressed between wild-type and clbn mutated flies by a whole-genome transcriptional profiling. Furthermore, loss of clbn promotes tumor growth in gut generated by activated Ras in intestinal progenitor cells. Our findings reveal an EC-specific function of Clbn in regulating mitochondrial dynamics, and provide new insight into the functional link among mitochondrial redox modulation, tissue homeostasis and longevity.

Author summary

Self-renewal and differentiation of somatic stem cells are critical for tissue homeostasis. In Drosophila, intestinal homeostasis is maintained by tightly controlled proliferation and differentiation of intestinal stem cells (ISCs). In this study, we demonstrate that maintenance of mitochondrial dynamics and redox balance in enterocytes (ECs) by Caliban (Clbn) is critical for ISCs proliferation and intestinal homeostasis. We show that clbn mutant flies have shortened lifespan, involving disruption of intestinal homeostasis. We find that Clbn is highly expressed and localized to the outer membrane of the mitochondria in enterocytes. Clbn is important for mitochondrial dynamics, as loss of clbn in enterocytes results in mitochondrial fragmentation. Mitochondrial defects cause accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and cellular damage, which in turn leads to activation of oxidative stress and promotion of ISCs over-proliferation. We further show that depletion of clbn promotes tumor growth in gut generated by activated Ras in intestinal progenitor cells. Our results establish Clbn as a modulator of mitochondrial dynamics in enterocytes, and highlight the importance of mitochondrial dynamics in the regulation of somatic stem cells activity and tissue homeostasis.

Introduction

Tissue homeostasis needs to be properly maintained to preserve the organismal fitness, especially in tissues with high turnover rate, such as the intestinal epithelium. The digestive tract is constantly challenged by chemicals, toxins, and pathogens in ingested food, and needs to be regenerated continuously. The intestinal stem cells (ISCs) exhibit the ability to self-renew to maintain the stem cell population, generate daughter cells of all mature cell types, and replace damaged and aged cells during normal epithelial regeneration as well as in response to cellular stress and injury. These functions are essential for intestinal homeostasis. Deregulation of ISCs proliferation or differentiation can lead to developmental abnormality and chronic diseases [1].

The Drosophila intestinal system shares anatomical and functional similarities with the mammalian digestive system, and is a facile model for dissecting the signaling mechanisms that control stem cell self-renewal and differentiation [2]. The Drosophila ISCs originate from adult midgut precursors (AMPs), the endodermal progenitors, during the larval stage [3], and reside adjacent to the basement membrane [4, 5]. ISCs self-renewal and differentiation are controlled mainly by differentially regulated Notch pathway activity. The daughter cells with high Notch activity become transient, differentiating precursor cells called enteroblasts (EBs), which terminally differentiate into enterocytes (ECs). The daughter cells with low Notch activity retain ISCs identity and are primed to differentiate into pre-enteroendocrine (pre-EE) cells and further into enteroendocrine (EE) cells when the neuronal transcription factor, Prospero is highly expressed [410]. Multiple evolutionarily conserved signaling pathways are required to maintain normal ISCs activities, such as Notch, EGFR, Wnt, JAK-STAT, JNK, BMP, Hippo, Slit/Robo etc [7, 1117].

Mitochondria are highly dynamic organelles that continually fuse and divide. The morphology of mitochondria is well balanced between fusion and fission reactions and linked with ROS production [18, 19]. Defective mitochondrial fusion and fission are often associated with aging, metabolic disease, and cancer [20]. The regenerative potential of stem cells is closely correlated with the level of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS). Normal physiological levels of ROS are essential for stem cells functions and fate decision [21,22]. Mitochondria are the principal source of cellular ROS (mtROS), and a regulated physiological level of mtROS is important to maintain stem cells self-renewal and differentiation. Recent studies suggest that genes regulating mitochondrial fusion-fission dynamics play important roles for the maintenance of stem cells functions, fate decisions and aging processes [2326].

Similar to mammals, Drosophila intestinal stem cells also have increased proliferation in response to oxidative stress. Commensal bacteria in the Drosophila gut can induce NADPH oxidase 1 (NOX1)-dependent endogenous ROS generation and proliferation of intestine stem cells [27], and enteropathogenic bacteria ECC-15 infection induces oxidative burst, activates JNK and JAK-STAT signaling pathways and increases ISCs proliferation [28]. Increased level of unfolded protein response of the endoplasmic reticulum (UPRER) in tissues can activate the JNK pathway by producing ROS and cause hyper-proliferation of ISCs [29]. The master regulator of cellular redox state, Nrf2, maintains intestinal homeostasis through controlling ISCs proliferation [30]. Mitochondrial dynamics also regulate differentiation of ISCs in Drosophila; knock-down of opa1 or mitofusin (mfn) to inhibit mitochondrial fusion causes differentiation failure [31]. Although the roles of mitochondria in stem cell self-renewal and differentiation are becoming more evident, many questions are still open. Further work needs to be done to identify genes related to mitochondria dynamics and metabolism, and to decipher their functions in the maintenance of stem cell homeostasis.

We have previously shown that Drosophila Caliban (Clbn) works as a nuclear exporting mediator for Prospero in S2 cells and a tumor suppressor in human NSCLC cells [32]. We generated clbn gene knock-out fly (a deletion covering the entire clbn protein-coding region) using homologous recombination, and demonstrated that Clbn regulates DNA damage induced p53-dependent and–independent cell apoptosis, and S phase cell cycle checkpoint by antagonizing E2F1 activity [3334]. A recent study demonstrated that Clbn can bind to fly Ala- and Thr-tRNAs, and loss of clbn rescued the mitochondrial morphology and DA neuron loss phenotypes in muscle of PINK1 mutant, although clbn mutant showed normal phenotype [35]. In the present study, we carried out series of genetic analyses, and provided the direct evidence that Drosophila Clbn is required for the maintenance of adult intestinal homeostasis and lifespan by specifically regulating mitochondrial dynamics and redox balance in enterocytes. Flies loss of clbn have shortened lifespan. Clbn resides in mitochondrial outer membrane in enterocytes. Depletion of clbn in enterocytes results in mitochondrial defects and accumulation of ROS production and cellular damage, which in turn leads to activation of oxidative stress and promotion of ISCs hyper-proliferation. Thus, our results demonstrate the novel function of Clbn in regulating mitochondrial dynamics and intestinal homeostasis and further highlight the importance of mitochondrial dynamics control in regulating somatic stem cells proliferation and tissue homeostasis.

Results

Flies loss of clbn have shortened lifespan and dysfunctional intestinal barrier

Flies loss of clbn gene are viable, show no external morphological defects and small developmental delays under physiological conditions [33]. However, clbn knock-out flies exhibited a reduced lifespan compared with control flies, and most of clbn mutated flies died at eight weeks after birth (Fig 1A). Consistently, the clbn knockdown flies had reduced lifespan, and restoration of clbn expression can fully rescue the lifespan of clbn knock-out flies (Fig 1A). As defects in the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis could result in shortened lifespan in flies [36], we assessed whether intestinal morphology and integrity were damaged in clbn mutant. We did not observe a morphology change in guts from clbn mutant adults at 15-day-old. We next examined integrity of the intestinal barrier by feeding flies with non-absorbable blue food dye. In wild-type flies, blue food dye was restricted to the pro-boscis and in digestive tract, whereas blue dye spread to other body parts in clbn mutant, indicating the intestinal barrier was dysfunctional in clbn mutant (Fig 1B–1E).

Fig 1. Loss of clbn leads to shortened lifespan and adult intestinal defect.

Fig 1

(A) Survival curves of indicated genotypes. Clbn knock-out or knock-down flies exhibited shortened lifespan compared with control flies. n > 100. (B, D) 15-day-old wild-type female flies were fed with food containing a nonabsorbed food dye (FD&C blue dye #1). (C, E) 15-day-old clbn KO female flies consumed the same food dye exhibited “smurf” phenotype. (F-F”) The posterior midguts of 15-day-old control (esg >GFP), clbn KO/+ and clbn KO flies stained with anti-Prospero antibody (red) and DAPI (blue). (G, H) Quantification of the number of esg-GFP+ cells (G) or Prospero+ (H) cells in control (n = 12), clbn KO/+ (n = 13) and clbn KO flies (n = 10). (I-I”) The posterior midguts of control (Myo1Ats >GFP), clbn KO/+ and clbn KO flies aged at 29°C for 15 days. (J) Quantification of the number of EC cells in control (n = 15), clbn KO/+ (n = 16) and clbn KO flies (n = 13). (K-K') The posterior midguts of 15-day-old clbn KO/+ and clbn KO flies stained with anti-phosphorylated histone H3-PH3 antibody and DAPI. (L) Quantification of the number of PH3+ cells in clbn KO/+ (n = 8) and clbn KO flies (n = 10). The data shown are means ± SEM, and P value was noted as follows: **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Scale bars: 20 um.

Loss of clbn causes over-proliferation of intestinal stem cells

To explore the cause of defective intestinal barrier in clbn mutant, we defined the number of ISCs, EBs, EEs and ECs in the fly midgut. To distinguish the different cell types in intestinal epithelium in female adult flies, we used esgGal4>GFP to label progenitor cells (ISCs and EBs), Myo1A>GFP to label ECs, and anti-Prospero antibody staining to label EEs. In young flies (5-day-old), loss of clbn did not significantly affect the number of ISCs, EBs and EEs (S1 Fig). However, clbn mutant at day 15 or 30 after birth had significantly increased number of ISCs and EBs when compared with that of control flies (S1 Fig), while the number of progenitor cells was comparable between clbn heterozygous flies and control flies, suggesting increased proliferation of progenitor cells and rapid epithelial turnover in clbn mutant (Fig 1F–1F" and 1G). We further used the ISC marker delta-LacZ and the EB marker Su(H)GBE>GFP to distinguish ISCs from EBs, and observed a marked increase of both ISCs and EBs in the clbn mutant (S2 Fig). Furthermore, the number of EE cells (Pros+) was significantly increased in the clbn mutant (Fig 1F", 1H and S1 Fig), however the number of EC cells was reduced (Fig 1I–1I" and 1J). Immunostaining with anti-phospho-histone H3 (PH3) antibody revealed a significant increase of PH3+ cells in clbn mutant, and most of PH3+ cells were esgGal4>GFP+ (Fig 1K′, 1L and S1 Fig), indicating the over-proliferation of intestine stem cells in clbn mutant.

To address the possibility that the changed number of ISCs, EBs, EEs and ECs in clbn mutant resulted from a block to differentiation, we performed the mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (MARCM), and detected the presence of EEs with anti-Prospero antibody and ECs with anti-Pdm1 antibody in clbn mutant clones, respectively. The EEs and ECs were presented within clbn mutant clones without significant changes in cell numbers (S3A–S3F Fig), indicating that clbn is not required for epithelial cell differentiation in the midgut. Moreover, the cell numbers in MARCM clones were comparable between wild-type and clbn mutant, suggesting that Clbn might function non-autonomously in regulating ISC proliferation (S3H Fig). Together, these findings indicated that clbn is essential for the control of ISCs proliferation and intestinal homeostasis, but dispensable for cell differentiation.

Clbn resides in enterocytes to modulate intestinal homeostasis

Next we detected the cellular localization of Clbn in the fly intestinal epithelium using anti-Clbn antibody staining. Clbn protein was highly expressed in Myo1A>GFP + ECs, and most of Clbn protein was cytoplasmic (Fig 2A and 2A'). However, the esg>GFP+ progenitor cells or Pros+ EEs had little or no expression of Clbn protein (Fig 2B–2C'). The expression of clbn was confirmed by qPCR on sorted ISC/EB, EE and EC cells using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (Fig 2D). To further explore the site that Clbn acts in the midgut, we used a panel of Gal4 drivers to drive knock-down of clbn in the different cell types in midgut. The number of progenitor cells and EE cells were significantly increased when clbn was knocked-down in the ECs under Myo1A-Gal4 (S4A, S4B, S4F and S4G Fig), while knock-down of clbn in the ISC and EB cells under esg-Gal4, or knock-down of clbn in the EE cells under pros-Gal4, had no significant effect on the number of ISC, EB and EE cells (S4C, S4D, S4F and S4G Fig). Moreover, knock-down of clbn in the smooth muscle surrounding the gut with mef2-Gal4 had no effect on the number of ISC, EB and EE cells (S4E–S4G Fig), suggesting that Clbn performs its functions specifically in ECs to regulate intestinal homeostasis.

Fig 2. Clbn is highly expressed in ECs and EC-specific expression of clbn rescues defect in clbn mutant.

Fig 2

(A-C') Clbn localization in ECs detected with anti-Clbn antibody staining (white) in 5-day-old female midgut, EC cells were marked with Myo1Ats > GFP (A', green), progenitor cells were marked with esgts > GFP (B', green, arrowhead), and EE cells were marked with anti-Prospero antibody staining (C', red, arrowhead). (D) Histogram of the relative mRNA level of clbn in gut, ISC/EB, EE, and EC cells determined by RT-qPCR in three independent experiments (mean ± SEM). (E-H) The posterior midguts of 15-day-old female control (esgts > GFP) and clbn KO flies stained with anti-Prospero antibody (red) and DAPI (blue). Expression of clbn in the posterior midgut of 15-day-old female flies driven by Myo1Ats -Gal4 (G) or esgts-Gal4 (H) under clbn KO background, and detected with anti-Prospero antibody (red), anti-β-gal antibody (green) and DAPI (blue). (I) Quantification of the number of progenitor cells in control (n = 12), clbn KO (n = 10), and flies expressing clbn driven by Myo1Ats-Gal4 (n = 12) or esgts-Gal4 (n = 11) under clbn KO background. (J) Quantification of the number of Prospero+ cells in control (n = 12), clbn KO (n = 10), and flies expressing clbn driven by Myo1Ats-Gal4 (n = 12) or esgts-Gal4 (n = 11) under clbn KO background. The data shown are means ± SEM, and P value was noted as follows: ***P < 0.001. (K-L) Survival curves of indicated genotypes. The expression of Clbn in indicated cell types was validated by Western-blot. Scale bars: 20 um.

To further confirm that Clbn works in the ECs to regulate intestinal homeostasis, we performed rescue experiments. Forced expression of clbn in ECs using Myo1A-Gal4 completely rescued the abnormal increased number of progenitor cells and EE cells in the clbn mutant, while expression of clbn in progenitor cells using esg-Gal4 partially rescued dysplasia in the clbn mutant (Fig 2E–2J), indicating that Clbn functions mainly in ECs to regulate intestinal homeostasis. Furthermore, the shortened lifespan of clbn mutant can be largely rescued by expressing clbn in ECs (Fig 2K), while no rescue effect was observed when expressing clbn in ISCs and EBs (Fig 2L).

Clbn regulates mitochondrial dynamics in ECs

The cytoplasmic localization of Clbn in ECs shows a “perinuclear” pattern, and Clbn protein is highly enriched around nucleus (Fig 2A and 2A'), which suggested that Clbn might be localized to mitochondria. To test this hypothesis, we used a mito-GFP reporter driven by Myo1A-Gal4 to label the mitochondria in the ECs. The Clbn protein predominantly colocalized with the mito-GFP in the ECs (Fig 3A–3C‴). Furthermore, by performing cell fractionation experiments using intestinal extract, we observed highly enriched Clbn protein in the fraction containing mitochondria marker ATP5A (Fig 3D). To determine the sub-mitochondrial localization of Clbn, the mitochondria from midgut was purified and then digested with protease K. Clbn was completely removed by protease K treatment (Fig 3E), as that of Tom20, a marker of the outer membrane protein. In comparison, Cytochrome C and SOD2, which reside at the inter-membrane space and the matrix, respectively, were resistant to protease K treatment (Fig 3E). Thus, Clbn localizes to the mitochondrial outer membrane. Taken together, we concluded that Clbn resides at the outer membrane of mitochondria in ECs to perform its functions.

Fig 3. Clbn is localized to mitochondria in ECs.

Fig 3

Mitochondria in ECs of 15-day-old female control (A-A”) and clbn KO flies (B-B”) were labeled with mito-GFP (green) and stained with anti-Clbn antibody (red) and DAPI (blue). (C-C”) Induced expression of clbn in clbn KO ECs of 15-day-old females driven by Myo1Ats-Gal4 and stained with anti-Clbn antibody (red) and DAPI (blue). Mitochondria were labeled with mito-GFP (green). Scale bars: 10 um. (A”'-C”') The degree of colocalization of Clbn and mitochondria was quantified by Pearson’s correlation. (D) Western blot analysis of Clbn distribution in cytoplasmic (CP), mitochondrial (M) and cytosolic (CS) fractions. Samples were probed with anti-Clbn, anti-ATP5A, anti-RpS6, anti-KDEL, and anti-tubulin antibodies. RpS6 and KDEL were used as markers of the ribosome and endoplasmic reticulum (ER), respectively. (E) Submitochondrial localization of Clbn. Mitochondria from midguts were digested with or without protease K (PK). Protein extract was subjected to Western blot analysis. Tom20, Cytochrome C (Cyt.C), and SOD2 were used as markers of the outer membrane, inter-membrane space, and matrix, respectively.

We next investigated the roles of Clbn in regulating mitochondrial morphology in ECs. In control flies, mitochondria form the net-like structure around the nucleus (Fig 4A), while in clbn mutant, mitochondria were highly fragmented (Fig 4B). In young flies (5-day-old), loss of clbn did not significantly affect the mitochondrial morphology (S5A Fig). However, clbn mutants at day 15 after birth exhibited fragmented mitochondria morphology (S5B Fig). Moreover, we analyzed the ultrastructure of mitochondria in ECs by TEM and found that loss of clbn led to fragmented mitochondria (Fig 4G and 4H), indicating that loss of clbn in flies change the mitochondrial dynamics in ECs. To determine whether Clbn generally regulate mitochondrial morphology in other tissues, we examined the mitochondrial morphology in flight muscle of the clbn mutant. Interestingly, no obvious changes of mitochondrial morphology were detected in flight muscle of clbn mutant when compared with the control (S5C and S5D Fig), indicating the function of Clbn in regulating the mitochondrial dynamics is EC-specific. To further confirm the role that Clbn plays for the maintenance of mitochondria is EC-specific, we performed rescue experiments by over-expressing clbn in ECs. Restoration of clbn expression in ECs successfully rescued the abnormal mitochondria morphology observed in clbn mutant (Fig 3C–3C"). Taken together, clbn is essential for the maintenance of mitochondria structure specifically in ECs.

Fig 4. Clbn regulates mitochondrial dynamics in ECs.

Fig 4

Mitochondria in ECs of 15-day-old female control (A) and clbn KO flies (B) were labeled with mito-GFP (green) and stained with DAPI (blue). (C-D) Knockdown of drp1 in ECs of 15-day-old females driven by Myo1Ats-Gal4 and stained with DAPI (blue). Mitochondria were labeled with mito-GFP (green). (E-F) Over-expression of marf in ECs of 15-day-old females driven by Myo1Ats-Gal4 and stained with DAPI (blue). Mitochondria were labeled with mito-GFP (green). Scale bars: 10 um. (G-J) Representative electron microscopy images of ECs from 15-day-old female adults with indicated genotypes, arrow indicated mitochondria. Scale bar: 500 nm. (K) Survival curves of indicated genotypes. (L-Q) Mitochondria in ECs of control (I), clbn KO (J), over-expression of dNOT4 (K), dUPF1 (L), deRF1 (M) and dXRN1 (N) under clbn KO background were labeled with mito-GFP (green) and stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars: 15 um. (R) Volcano plot based on fold change and adjust P value of all transcripts in clbn KO flies. Genes expressed at similar level between wild-type and clbn KO flies were shown as grey dots. Genes with fold change ≥ 2 and adjusted P < 0.05 in clbn KO flies were depicted in blue dots (61 genes, down-regulated) and red dots (35 genes, up-regulated). Symbols of differential genes related with mitochondria were shown. (S) Heat map representation of differentially expressed genes related with mitochondria. The color key represents normalized gene expression. (T) RT-qPCR validation of differentially expressed genes from 15-day-old females guts. The down- and up-regulated genes identified by microarray analysis were shown in blue or red, respectively. The data shown are means ± SEM.

Mitochondrial morphology is regulated by continuous fusion and fission. These dynamic processes are controlled by a group of GTPases conserved from yeast to human. Mitofusins play important roles in mediating fusion of outer mitochondrial membrane. The Drosophila mitofusin, also named Marf (mitochondrial assembly regulatory factor), plays a more general role to regulate mitochondrial fusion. While dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) is a major player responsible for mitochondrial fission [3738]. To define whether Clbn and Drp1/Mfn work in the same pathway, we evaluated mitochondrial morphology in ECs upon knock-down of drp1 or over-expression of marf in combination with clbn knock-out. Both drp1 knock-down and marf over-expression in ECs can largely rescue mitochondrial fragmentation in clbn mutant (Fig 4C–4F, 4I and 4J). Knock-down of drp1 can also partially rescue the ISC overproliferation in clbn mutant (S6 Fig). Furthermore, knock-down of drp1 or over-expression of marf partially rescued the shortened lifespan of the clbn mutant (Fig 4K), indicating Clbn functions upstream of Drp1 and Mfn in regulating mitochondrial dynamics in ECs.

Clbn is the fly homolog of yeast RQC2 or Tae2. RQC2/Tae2 is a subunit of the ribosome-associated quality control (RQC) complex, which recruits the alanine- and threonine-charged tRNA to stalled ribosomes and is required for CAT- tailing in yeast [39]. In Drosophila, Clbn can also bind to Ala- and Thr-tRNAs, and loss of clbn rescued mitochondrial morphology, ATP production, and DA neuron loss phenotypes of PINK1 mutant [35]. To examine whether the mitochondrial defects in clbn mutant is associated with the quality control of ribosomes, we over-expressed dNOT4, dUPF1, deRF1 and dXRN1 in clbn mutant, these RQC pathway genes work in the same pathway as PINK1 to control mitochondrial function in ECs [40]. Over-expression of these RQC factors in ECs had no effect on ISCs over-proliferation and mitochondrial fragmentation phenotypes of clbn mutant (S7 Fig and Fig 4L–4Q), indicating that defect in intestinal homeostasis in clbn mutant is independent of quality control of ribosomes.

Multiple genes related with mitochondria are differentially expressed in clbn mutant

To investigate the intrinsic mechanisms of Clbn functions, we systemically analyzed genes expression in clbn mutant using a microarray assay. A whole genome transcripts with 18,952 probe sets representing 12,874 genes were evaluated, which is more than 72.4% of fly genes (17,772 genes, dmel_r6.25_FB2018_06 from flybase). Among them, 35 genes were up-regulated and 61 genes were down-regulated in clbn mutant (S1 Table) using the parameters of adjusted P < 0.05 and fold-change ≥ 2. To identify the functional differences that reflect the transcriptional difference between the clbn mutant and wild-type fly, a gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) with GO biological process was performed, gene sets with P < 0.01 were chosen to indicate significance. The GO biological processes correlated with top 15 up-regulated gene sets (n = 112) were associated with stem cell differentiation, DNA repair, RNA processing, ribosome biogenesis etc, while top 15 down-regulated genes sets (n = 150) were associated with monocyte chemotaxis, amino acid transportation, muscle contraction and metabolisms etc (S8 Fig, S2 Table).

Interestingly, multiple differentially expressed genes in clbn mutant have been reported or inferred with functions in mitochondria (Fig 4R and 4S), although the top 15 up-regulated and down-regulated GO pathways do not include mitochondria (S8 Fig). Among these genes, sfl is inferred to regulate mitochondrial organization [41], Aplip1 regulates axonal transport of mitochondria and JNK cascade [42], and 312, also named MALSU1, is inferred as a component of mitochondrial assembly of ribosomal large subunit 1 [41]. Some genes regulate metabolic functions related with mitochondria, i.e. UQCR-11 and CG8199 are inferred as a component of ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase complex or mitochondrial alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex respectively [41], and CG9149 is inferred with mitochondria with unknown functions [41]. Moreover, VhaM9.7-c and CG33970 have ATPase activity [41], Calx is a Na/Ca-exchange protein and regulates calcium ion binding [43], AOX3 [44], CG18547, CG5493, and CG6910 are inferred to regulate oxidation-reduction process and electron transport [41, 45] (Fig 4R and 4S). We further validated a number of these genes using RT-qPCR analysis. Indeed, most of genes we detected showed similar relative expression pattern as in microarray data (Fig 4T).

Loss of clbn leads to mitochondrial defect

The functional output of mitochondria can be monitored by the mitochondrial membrane potential and ATP production. We used 5,5',6,6'-tetrachloro-1,1',3,3'- tetraethylbenzimidazolyl-carbocyanine iodide (JC-1), a more mitochondria specific cationic fluorescent dye, to quantify the mitochondrial membrane potential. At low membrane potential, JC-1 forms the green-fluorescent monomer, while at higher potential, JC-1 forms aggregate and shows red-fluorescence. We observed reduced JC-1 aggregate in clbn mutant (Fig 5A–5A”), indicating a mitochondrial depolarization in clbn mutant. Furthermore, the ATP level was significantly reduced in clbn mutant, which can also be rescued by restoration of clbn expression in ECs (Fig 5B).

Fig 5. Loss of clbn leads to mitochondrial defect.

Fig 5

(A-A') JC-1 staining of mitochondria in midgut in wild-type and clbn KO flies. (A”) Quantification of the relative amount of JC-1 aggregate in control (n = 10) and clbn KO (n = 10) flies. (B) Quantification of the relative ATP level of guts with indicated genotypes. (C-C') gstD1-GFP expression in midguts of control and clbn KO flies. (C”) Quantification of the fluorescence intensity. (D-D') Dihydroethidium (DHE) staining of midguts of wild-type and clbn KO flies. (D”) Quantification of the fluorescence intensity (n = 10). (E-E') Midguts of wild-type and clbn KO flies were stained with anti-phosphorylated H2Av antibody (γ-H2Av) (red) and DAPI (blue). (E”) Quantification of the γ-H2Av foci (n = 10). The data shown are means ± SEM, and P value was noted as follows: **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. All flies used in these essays were 15-day-old female adults.

Mitochondrial dynamics are closely connected with the level of ROS, and mitochondrial dysfunction could induce the production of ROS and activation of oxidative stress. We next monitored the ROS level in ECs using the ROS reporter gstD1-GFP and dihydroethidium (DHE) probe. As expected, increased expression of gstD1-GFP and DHE fluorescent intensity were observed in clbn mutant (Fig 5C–5D”). The accumulation of ROS in clbn mutant can be partially rescued by knock-down of drp1 (S9 Fig), which is consistent with that knock-down of drp1 partially rescued the ISC over-proliferation in clbn mutant (S6 Fig). Furthermore, we observed more γ-H2Av foci in ECs in clbn mutant (Fig 5E–5E”), the equivalent of mammalian γ-H2AX, indicating increased DNA damage in clbn mutant. All these data indicated that Clbn is an essential component of mitochondria in ECs and required for normal mitochondrial morphology and functions.

Increasing evidence suggests that the gut microbiota plays a vital role in mediating intestinal homeostasis. We also observed a high bacterial load in clbn mutant (S10A Fig), which is consistent with the loss of intestinal homeostasis in clbn mutant. To address the possibility that microbiota change contributes to the loss of intestinal homeostasis in clbn mutant, we reared germ-free clbn mutant and examined gut phenotype. The germ-free clbn mutant exhibited similar ISCs over-proliferation, mitochondrial fragmentation and ATP production phenotypes as the conventionally raised flies (S10B–S10H Fig), which confirmed that disrupted intestinal homeostasis in clbn mutant was caused by loss of clbn gene.

Activation of JNK and JAK/STAT signaling pathways contributes to over-proliferation of ISCs in clbn mutant

We further investigated the cellular signaling pathways that are responsible for over-proliferation of ISCs in clbn mutant. As reactive oxygen species activate the Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling pathway in Drosophila [27, 28], we monitored JNK activity by using an enhancer-trap line, puc-lacZ, as a reporter and examined its expression in ECs. In control flies, puc-LacZ expression was low (Fig 6A). However, a significant increased expression of puc-lacZ was observed in clbn mutant (Fig 6A'). Moreover, the expression level of puc-LacZ in clbn MARCM clones was greatly increased when compared with that in surrounding control ECs (Fig 6B–6B').

Fig 6. Activation of JNK and JAK/STAT signaling pathways in clbn mutant midgut.

Fig 6

(A-A') Anti-β-gal antibody staining to show puc-LacZ in ECs of 15-day-old female control (A) and clbn KO (A') flies. (B-B') Adult midguts carrying MARCM clones of indicated genotypes were immunostained with anti-β-gal antibody (red). (C) Histogram of the relative mRNA level of upd2, upd3, krn and dpp in the guts of 15-day-old female control and clbn KO flies determined by RT-qPCR in three independent experiments (mean ± SEM). (D-D') Adult midguts carrying MARCM clones of indicated genotypes were immunostained with anti-β-gal antibody (red). (E-E') Expression of the 10 × stat-GFP in 15-day-old female control and clbn KO flies. (F-F') The posterior midguts of 15-day-old female of indicated genotypes. Knock-down of stat92E in ISC/EB rescued the ISC over-proliferation phenotype in clbn mutant. (G-G') Adult midguts carrying MARCM clones of indicated genotypes were immunostained with anti-Armadillo antibody (red), anti-Prospero antibody (red) and DAPI (blue), arrowhead indicated progenitor cells. Scale bars: 15 um. Genotypes for MARCM: (B-B') yw, hs-flp/+; UAS-GFP/+; tubGal4, FRT 82B, tubGal80/FRT 82B, puc-lacZ, clbn KO; (D-D') yw, hs-flp/upd-lacZ; UAS-GFP/+; tubGal4, FRT 82B, tubGal80/FRT 82B, clbn KO; (F-F') yw, hs-flp/+; UAS-GFP/+; tubGal4, FRT 82B, tubGal80/FRT 82B, clbn KO.

In Drosophila, JAK-STAT, EGFR, WNT and Dpp/TGF-β signaling pathways play major roles to regulate ISCs proliferation in midgut, at physiological condition or in response to stress [36, 46, 47]. We therefore performed RT-qPCR and examined expression level of ligands for these pathways. We observed the ~ 8-fold increase of unpaired 2 (upd2) expression, and ~ 19-fold increase of unpaired 3 (upd3) expression, the two ligands of the JAK/STAT pathway, whereas expression level of keren (krn, a ligand for EGFR) and dpp (a ligand for TGF-β) was not significantly changed (Fig 6C). Consistently, expression of upd-lacZ reporter was greatly increased in clbn mutant clones (Fig 6D–6D'), while staining signal of anti-diphosopho-ERK antibody (dpERK), a direct readout of MAPK signaling activity, was not changed in clbn mutant (S11 Fig).

We also measured activity of JAK-STAT, WNT and Notch signaling pathways using reporter lines. Compared with control flies, expression of 10 × stat-GFP, a Stat92E reporter, was greatly increased in the clbn mutant (Fig 6E–6E'), indicating that flies loss of clbn had aberrant activation of JAK-STAT signaling pathway. Moreover, knock-down of stat92E in ISCs/EBs can rescue the ISC over-proliferation phenotype in clbn mutant (Fig 6F–6F'). We did not observe any significant change of Notch or Wnt signaling pathways in clbn mutant, using a Notch responsive element (NRE) reporter NRE-GFP and a wingless reporter wg-lacz (S12 Fig). To provide further evidence that Clbn regulates ISCs proliferation non-autonomously, the wild-type control clones or clbn mutant clones were induced during adulthood. In the control clones, ISCs and EBs were distributed evenly along the midgut with high level of membrane-associated Armadillo/β-catenin protein (Fig 6G), and in clbn mutant clones, the aberrantly increased number of progenitor cells were present in proximity to the ECs (Fig 6G').

Intestinal epithelial junctions are disrupted in clbn mutant

As the clbn mutant displayed defects in intestinal barrier (Fig 1B–1E) and increased proliferation of ISCs, we therefore assessed whether intestinal epithelial junctions were damaged in clbn mutant. Immunostaining with anti-Armadillo antibody to mark cell junctions revealed that Armadillo was strongly expressed around progenitor cells and presented at the cell membrane of ECs, and all cells in intestinal epithelium were well organized and assembled in the control flies (Fig 7A and 7A'). However, in clbn mutant, the cellular architecture became aberrant and disorganized, and Armadillo protein presented at ECs membrane was decreased (Fig 7B and 7B'). The defect of cellular architecture in clbn mutant can be largely rescued through the EC-specific blocking of JNK activity by expression of a dominant negative form of Bsk (UAS-bskDN) (Fig 7C and 7C').

Fig 7. clbn mutant displays disrupted intestinal integrity and increased mortality to stress.

Fig 7

Adult midguts of 15-day-old female control (A-A') and clbn KO (B-B') flies were immunostained with anti-Armadillo antibody (red) and DAPI (blue). (C-C') Blocking JNK activity in ECs using bskDN largely rescued the defect in clbn KO flies. (D-F) Survival curves of flies of indicated genotypes fed with sucrose (D), DSS (E) or Ecc15 (F). n > 100. Scale bars: 20 um. Mitochondria in ECs of 15-day-old female control (G), clbn KO (H), over-expression of bsk DN under clbn KO background (I) and over-expression of clbn (J) were labeled with mito-GFP (green) and stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars: 20 um.

Flies loss of clbn are susceptible to stress

Recent studies suggest that intestinal regeneration makes an important contribution to fly viability and life span [36]. Flies with intestinal dysplasia are short-lived, and animals with impaired ISCs proliferation or daughter cells differentiation die faster when challenged with pathogens, genotoxins, or ROS inducing compounds [48]. We therefore investigated the ability of clbn mutant to resist stress. Under low nutrition condition, the clbn mutant had a significantly reduced lifespan: all clbn knock-out flies were dead at day-42 after eclosion, while more than 70% clbn heterozygous flies were still viable (Fig 7D). Moreover, the clbn mutant had greatly reduced viability when treated with dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) or enteropathogenic bacteria ECC-15 (Fig 7E and 7F). Consistent with shortened lifespan, flies with loss of clbn had more progenitor cells in the midgut at low nutrient condition or when treated with DSS or ECC-15 (S13 Fig). The increased mortality and over-proliferation of progenitor cells seen with low nutrition, DSS treatment or bacterial infection of clbn mutant can be largely rescued by inhibiting JNK signaling in ECs (Fig 7E and 7F and S13 Fig). On the other hand, blocking JNK signaling didn’t rescue the defective mitochondrial morphology in ECs (Fig 7G–7I), indicating that mitochondrial fragmentation is an upstream event to Clbn depletion.

Loss of clbn promotes tumor progression in gut

The sustained proliferative signaling and the reprogramming of energy metabolism are two of the hallmarks of cancer [49]. Our previous study demonstrated that over-expression of clbn in A549 lung cancer cell line can repress colony formation and invasiveness [32]. In addition, flies with loss of clbn have activated JAK-STAT signaling pathway which is responsible for cell proliferation (Fig 6), and changed mitochondrial metabolism (Fig 4). These findings promoted us to consider whether loss of clbn contributes to the tumor growth in response to tumorigenic stimuli in gut, although clbn knock-out flies generate no spontaneous tumors under physiological conditions. Over-activation of the mitogenic EGFR signaling pathway can establish a tumor model in the fly midgut [2, 50, 51], therefore, a constitutively active form of Ras oncogene at 85D (also known as RasV12) was induced by esgts>Gal4 to activate EGFR signaling pathway in the progenitor cells. In the control flies, progenitor cells were randomly scattered along the basement membrane in the midgut (S14A–S14A’ Fig). Consistent with aforementioned data, we observed robust proliferation of ISCs in clbn mutant (S14B Fig). The ISCs accumulated and attached to the basement membrane and had normal apical-basal polarity (S14B’ Fig). Forced expression of RasV12 in progenitor cells for 3 days resulted in hyper-proliferation of ISCs and tumor formation, with accumulation of aberrantly differentiated progenitor cells and loss of epithelial cell polarity (S14C and S14C′ Fig). Depletion of clbn enhanced this effect, promoting tumor mass growth and invasion induced by RasV12 expression (S14D and S14E Fig). This suggests that dysfunctional mitochondria dynamics and metabolisms and disrupted intestinal homeostasis caused by loss of clbn might contribute to ISC tumor initiation or progression.

Discussion

Modulation of mitochondrial dynamics and redox balance is vital for tissue homeostasis. Mitochondrial dynamics between the fusion and fission state play a critical role in determining mitochondrial morphology and functions. In this study, we established Clbn as an essential mitochondrial component in enterocytes that regulates mitochondrial dynamics, redox balance and intestinal homeostasis. Loss of clbn causes mitochondrial fragmentation, and blocking mitochondrial fission by knock-down of drp1 or over-expression of marf can largely rescue the mitochondrial morphology in clbn mutant. These data suggest that Clbn promotes mitochondrial fusion and/or inhibits fusion by negatively regulating Drp1, and/or positively regulating Mfn. As the main source of intracellular ROS, mitochondrial damage could trigger ROS over-production and leads to oxidative stress and tissue damage [52]. Recent studies indicate that progenitor-specific mitochondrial dysfunction has significant impacts on ISCs proliferation, differentiation and tissue homeostasis in Drosophila [30, 31]. Loss of Nrf2 in ISCs causes accumulation of reactive oxygen species and deterioration of gut homeostasis [30]. Prevention of mitochondrial fusion by knock-down of opa-1 or marf in intestinal progenitor cells can block differentiation into enterocytes [31]. Previous studies have shown that maintenance of mitochondria in ISCs is essential for tissue homeostasis [30, 31]; our data suggest that maintenance of mitochondrial dynamics and redox balance in ECs is also critical for ISCs proliferation and intestinal homeostasis. Mitochondrial dysfunction in ECs in clbn mutant results in lower mitochondrial membrane potential, less ATP production and higher level of ROS, which leads to ISCs over-proliferation and loss of intestinal homeostasis (Fig 8).

Fig 8. Model of Clbn-dependent regulatory mechanisms in maintaining mitochondria dynamics and intestinal homeostasis.

Fig 8

Clbn mediates mitochondrial dynamics in ECs and removal of clbn leads to mitochondrial fragmentation and loss of intestinal homeostasis.

Our previous works have shown that Clbn has diversified functions, including nuclear exporting [32], DNA damage induced apoptosis [33] and cell cycle checkpoint [34]. A recent study also demonstrated that Clbn can bind to fly Ala- and Thr-tRNAs and involved in PINK1 associated RQC pathway [35]. In this report, we identify a novel function of clbn in maintaining intestinal homeostasis by regulating mitochondrial dynamics in ECs. This function seems not to be general, but EC-specific, because we did not observe abnormal mitochondria in other tissues, such as flight muscle, from clbn knock-out flies. This idea is further supported by the data that EC-specific restoration of clbn expression can largely rescue the defect of gut and shortened lifespan of clbn mutant. The mitochondrial and gut defect observed in the clbn mutant should be a direct consequence of abnormal mitochondrial dynamics in ECs caused by clbn depletion. Several lines of evidence support this notion. Firstly, Clbn is localized to mitochondrial outer membrane in ECs, indicating a role in mitochondrial regulation. And blocking JNK activity in ECs partially rescued the gut defect and longevity of clbn mutant, but didn’t rescue the defective mitochondrial morphology, indicating that mitochondrial fragmentation is an upstream event to Clbn depletion, but not a secondary effect caused by other defective processes. Secondly, ECs are terminally differentiated cells under cell cycle arrest, so the mitochondrial defect is less likely associated with the functions of Clbn in regulating G1/S transition. Lastly, over-expression of several factors in RQC pathways did not rescue mitochondrial morphology defect and ISCs hyper-proliferation in clbn mutant, which excludes the involvement of RQC in intestinal defects caused by clbn depletion.

Stem cell aging is a cause of organismal aging especially in high-turnover tissues such as intestine, and dysregulation of aging processes could promote tumor formation and progression. The incidence of spontaneous tumorigenesis in intestine is largely unaffected by mutation of clbn gene, however, the growth of intestine-tumor induced by activation of Ras gene was enhanced in clbn knock-out flies, indicating that increased oxidative stress induced by mitochondrial impairment could enhance Ras-driven epithelial tumorigenesis. Consistent with our results, a recent study demonstrated that blocking autophagy enhances RasV12-driven epithelial tissue over-growth via the accumulation of reactive oxygen species and activation of the JNK pathway [53]. Considering the versatility of Clbn functions, particularly its importance in regulating redox balance and mitochondrial dynamics, the relative contribution of each of these processes in modulating stress response and tissue homeostasis remains to be determined. It is likely that Clbn could be a coordinating regulator that links these processes together in response to various stresses. It will be interesting to determine whether SDCCAG1, a homologue of Clbn, also regulates tissue homeostasis in high-turnover tissues in mammals. Our work may provide new insights in the mechanisms that control redox balance and tissue homeostasis.

Materials and methods

Fly genetics

All flies were maintained at 25°C on standard corn meal unless specified. Fly lines used in this study were as follows: clbn 1Q (clbn KO) and UAS-clbn were described in [32]; esg-Gal4, UAS-GFP; Su(H)GBE-Gal4, UAS-GFP; Myo1A-Gal4; Gal80ts; delta-lacZ; upd-lacZ; wg-lacZ and 10 × stat-GFP were gifts from Dr. Lei Zhang, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences; pros-Gal4, mef2-Gal4, gstD1-GFP and mito-GFP were gifts from Dr. Wanzhong Ge, Zhejiang University; puc-lacZ was gift from Dr. Renjie Jiao, Guangzhou Medical University; act-Gal4, bsk DN; NRE-GFP; UAS-Ras V12; esg-lacZ; yw, hs-flp; UAS-GFP; tubGal4, FRT82B, tubGal80; stat RNAi, drp1 RNAi, UAS-marf, UAS-dNOT4, UAS-dUPF1, UAS-deRF1, UAS-dXRN1 were obtained from Bloomington Stock Center.

MARCM analysis

To generate MARCM clones during adulthood, progenies of the desired genotypes were collected within 3–5 days after eclosion and were heat-shocked in a 37°C water bath for two 60-min heat shocks over 2 days. The adult clones were examined 7–10 days later.

Generation of anti-Pdm1 antibody

The cDNA fragment of Pdm1-aa 332–588 was amplified with primers pdm1-F: CCCAAGCTTGCCAACAGCCACGCAGTTCCA and pdm1-R: CCGCTCGAGTTTAGGGACTGTCCAGGGAGGGAT, and PCR product was constructed into Hind III/Xho I sites of pET-28a plasmid (Novagen), and protein expression was induced in BL21 competent cells. The gel slice corresponding to Pdm1 fusion protein was cut, crushed, emulsified with Freund's adjuvant and injected into rabbits to generate anti-Pdm1 antibody (Abgent Biotechnology, Suzhou, China). Sera were collected over a period of 2 months and purified with Protein A beads.

Mitochondrial fractionation

The guts from 5-day-old female adults were dissected in cold PBS and cut into small pieces, then treated with 1× trypsin in EDTA (Thermo Scientific) for 2 h at room temperature and homogenized. Cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions were isolated following the manufacturer′s instructions (Mitochondria Isolation Kit for Tissue, 89801, Thermo Scientific) and analyzed by Western blotting. The submitochondrial localization assay was performed as previously described [54]. The intact mitochondria were resuspended in 20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.4, 0.6 M sorbitol. Protease K (100 μg/ml) was added to mitochondria preparation and kept on ice for 20 min. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Mitochondria were collected by centrifugation at 16,000 g for 5 min at 4°C and followed by SDS–PAGE and Western blot analyses.

Immunostaining and imaging

The intestines from female adults were dissected in cold PBS and fixed immediately in PBS containing 4% (weight/vol) paraformaldehyde. Samples were then washed in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 (vol/vol) three times, blocked in PBTB [PBT containing 5% (vol/vol) normal goat serum], and incubated with primary antibodies overnight. The following primary antibodies were used: rabbit anti-Clbn (1:400), mouse anti-Prospero (1:200, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), rabbit anti-Pdm1 (1:400), mouse anti-Armadillo (1:50, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), rabbit anti-β-galactosidase (1:200, Promega), rabbit anti-phospho–histone-H3 (1:200, Millipore), rabbit anti-H2AvD pS137 (1:200, Rockland), rabbit anti-dpERK (1:200, Cell Signaling Technology), Alexa-Fluor-555-conjugated Phalloidin (1:500, Thermo Fisher Scientific). After three washes with PBT, secondary anti-rabbit or anti-mouse fluorescence antibodies, including Alexa 488 and 555 (1:400, Cell Signaling Technology), were used. Samples were mounted and analyzed on a Olympus FV1000 confocal laser-scanning microscope. The images were processed using Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, and ImageJ.

Transmission electron microscopy

The intestines from 15-day-old female adults were dissected in cold PBS and fixed immediately with 2.5% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde with Phosphate Buffer (PB) (0.1 M, pH 7.4), washed four times in PB. Then tissues were immersed in 1% (weight/vol) OsO4 and 1.5% (weight/vol) potassium ferricyanide aqueous solution at 4°C for 2 h. After washing with PB, tissues were dehydrated through graded alcohol (30, 50, 70, 80, 90, 100, 100%, 10min each) into pure acetone (2 × 10 min). Samples were infiltrated in graded mixtures (3:1, 1:1, 1:3) of acetone and SPI-PON812 resin (19.6 ml SPI-PON812, 6.6ml DDSA and 13.8ml NMA), then changed pure resin. Finally, tissues were embedded in pure resin with 1.5% BDMA and polymerized for 12 h at 45°C, 48 h at 60°C. The ultrathin sections (70 nm thick) were sectioned with microtome (Leica EM UC6), stained by lead citrate, and examined by a transmission electron microscope (FEI Tecnai Spirit120kV).

JC-1 assay

Whole guts from 15-day-old female adults were dissected and transferred into 5 μM JC-1 (Thermo Scientific) in DMSO and incubated in dark for 30 min at room temperature. Samples were washed 2 times and mounted in PBS. Images were taken in the 568 nm channel using the Olympus FV1000 confocal laser-scanning microscope and the number of JC-1 red fluorescent aggregates was counted using ImageJ software.

ATP measurement

For each measurement, 10 guts from 15-day-old female adults were dissected and the ATP level was measured using a luciferase-based bioluminescence assay (ATP Bioluminescence Assay Kit HS II; Roche Applied Science) according to manufacturer's instructions.

DHE assay

Dihydroethidium (DHE) staining was performed as previously described [28]. Briefly, guts from 15-day-old female adults were dissected and handled in Schneider′s medium throughout whole procedure. After incubation in 30 uM DHE (Invitrogen) for 5 min in dark at room temperature, samples were washed three times and mounted in Schneider′s medium. Images were captured immediately with a Olympus FV1000 confocal laser-scanning microscope.

Western blot

Protein extracts from mitochondrial fractionation were subjected to SDS/PAGE electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membrane. Membranes were immunoblotted with rabbit anti-Clbn (1:2,000), mouse anti-ATP5A (1:1,000, ab14748, Abcam), anti-KDEL (1:1,000, ab69659, Abcam), α-RpS6 (1:300, CST), α-Tom20 (1:800, #13929, CST), α-SOD2 (1:800, NB100-1992, Novus Biologicals), α-Cytochrome c (1:1,000, 7H8.2C12, Novus Biologicals), and mouse anti-tubulin (1:1,000, ab44928, Abcam) antibodies separately. Blots were subsequently incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat-anti-rabbit or goat-anti-mouse secondary antibodies (GE Healthcare), and processed for chemiluminescence (GE Healthcare).

FACS

FACS were performed as described previously [55]. Briefly, 200 guts were dissected in RNase-free PBS and dissociated for 45 min using elastase. Cells were then sorted using FACS Aria III (BD Biosciences) and sorted straight into RNA extraction buffer. The following fly lines were used to select different cell populations: esg-Gal4 UAS-GFP; tub-Gal80ts (ISCs and EBs), tub-Gal80ts UAS-GFP; Pros-Gal4 (EEs), Myo1A-Gal4; tub-Gal80ts UAS-GFP (ECs).

RT-qPCR

Total RNA was extracted from 10 guts of 15-day-old female adults using TRIzol (Invitrogen), and cleaned with RNAeasy kit (QIAGEN). The complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad). Quantitative PCR was performed using the iScript one step RT-PCR SYBR green kit (Bio-Rad) for three independent biological replicates. The ribosomal gene rp49 was used as the normalization control. All results were presented as mean ± SEM. Primers used for RT-qPCR were in S3 Table.

Microarray assay and analysis

Embryos of Oregon R and clbn knock-out flies at 18 hr were collected and aged 2–4 h, and mRNA were isolated using Qiagen Oligotex Direct mRNA isolation kit. The microarray assay was performed with a Affymetrix CHP Analysis, and gene expression was evaluated using Genechip Drosophila Genome 2.0 Array (Affymetrix), which includes 18,952 probe sets representing 12,874 genes (R package drosophila2.db). Gene expression data was preprocessed using rma (R package affy). Differential expression analysis was performed using limma (R package limma) to identify individual genes demonstrating enrichment. Differentially expressed genes with adjusted P < 0.05 and fold-change ≥ 2 were considered statistically significant. Volcano plot was used to visualize differential expression distribution. Functional enrichment analysis was performed to determine differences in gene sets between phenotypes (GSEA) using gsea function in R package clusterProfiler [56] with Gene Ontology biological process in msigdbr package. One thousand gene set permutations were run for each pathway. Minimal size of each gene set for analyzing is 10, and maximal size of genes annotated for testing is 500. Gene sets with P < 0.01 were chosen to indicate significance. Top 15 gene sets up-regulated and down-regulated were shown in bubble plot. Expression pattern of differentially expressed genes related with mitochondria, ATP, electron transport was shown in heat map.

Smurf assay

Intestinal integrity was determined using the Smurf assay as described [57]. Briefly, female flies of each genotype were transferred onto fresh medium containing FD&C blue dye #1 (2.5% w/v) for 8 h. A fly was counted as a Smurf when dye coloration was observed outside of the digestive tract.

Bacterial infection and DSS feeding assays

Erwinia carotovora ssp. carotovora 15 (Ecc15) was cultured in LB broth at 29°C for 16 h. Fiften-day-old female adults were starved in empty vials for 2 h at 25°C, then transferred to vials containing a piece of 2.5 cm × 3.75 cm chromatography paper. Chromatography paper was wetted with 2.5% sucrose solution (control), Ecc15 bacteria (final OD600 = 100) in 2.5% sucrose, or 5% Dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) in 2.5% sucrose solution as feeding medium. Flies were transferred to new vials with freshly prepared feeding medium every day. After 3 days, guts were dissected and examined.

Lifespan assay

The control flies and clbn KO flies were collected at eclosion. Fifteen flies were reared per tube to avoid overcrowding, and flies were transferred to a new tube every 3 days. Survival flies were checked on a daily base until natural death. At least 12 tubes per genotype were scored, and more than 100 flies were scored per genotype. Survival curves were plotted using Excel.

Bacterial load

Flies were surface sterilized with 70% ethanol and then dissected on ice in sterile PBS. Dissected intestines were stored in sterile eppendorf tubes at -80°C prior to DNA extraction and were then extracted using the PowerSoil DNA isolation kit (MoBio). The q-PCR reactions were conducted in three independent biological replicates using SYBR Green PCR master mix (Takara). Universal primers for the 16 S ribosomal RNA gene were against variable regions 1 (V1F) and 2 (V2R). The Drosophila Actin 5C gene was used for normalization. PCR primers are shown in S1 Table.

Generation of axenic flies

Germ-free flies were generated following the previous report with minor modification [58]. Three to 5 days old flies were transferred on fresh fruit juice agar plates. After 1 day of habituation, flies were allowed to lay eggs for 4–6 hours. Eggs were washed with 70% EtOH, sterile water and dechorionated using 10% bleach for ~ 10 min. Eggs were then transferred under a sterile flow hood and maintained on axenic food until adult stage.

Statistics

All statistical comparisons were performed using data collected from three biological replicates with origin 9.0. Unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to assess statistical significance between two genotypes/conditions and one-way ANOVA for comparison of multiple samples. The significance level was indicated as * for P < 0.05, ** for P < 0.01, and *** for P < 0.001.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Loss of clbn causes increased number of progenitor cells and enteroendocine cells in flies older than 15 days.

The posterior midguts of 5-day-old, 15-day-old and 30-day-old female control (A-C) and clbn KO flies (D-F) stained with anti-Prospero antibody (red) and DAPI (blue). (G-H) Quantification of the number of progenitor cells (ISCs and EBs) (G) or EEs (H) in control (n = 10) and clbn KO flies (n = 10). (I-J) Quantification of the number of PH3+ (I) or Prospero+ cells (J) in the whole gut of control (n = 10) and clbn KO flies (n = 10). The data shown are means ± SEM, and P value was noted as follows: *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001. Scale bars: 20 um.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Loss of clbn causes increased number of ISCs and EBs.

(A-C) The posterior midguts of 15-day-old female control (delta-lacZ), clbn KO/+ and clbn KO flies were stained with anti-β-gal antibody. (D-F) The posterior midguts of 15-day-old female control (Su(H)GBE >GFP), clbn KO/+ and clbn KO flies. (G-H) Quantification of the number of ISCs (G) or EBs (H) in control (n = 10), clbn KO/+ (n = 10) and clbn KO flies (n = 10). The data shown are means ± SEM, and P value was noted as follows: ***P < 0.001. Scale bars: 20 um.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Clbn is dispensable for cell differentiation in midgut.

MARCM clones in control (A-A', C-C') or clbn KO flies (B-B', D-D') were immunostained with anti-Prospero antibody (A-B), anti-Pdm1 antibody (C-D) and DAPI. Clones were marked by GFP (green), EEs by Prospero (red), and ECs by Pdm1 (red). Scale bars: 15 um. (E-F) Quantification of the number of EEs (E) and ECs (F) in clones of control and clbn mutant. The EE/EC cell numbers were normalized with the average clone size. (G-G') MARCM clones in clbn KO flies were immunostained with anti-Clbn antibody and DAPI. Clones were marked by GFP (green). Scale bars: 15 um. (H) Quantification of number of cells in MARCM clones in control (n = 40) and clbn KO (n = 40) flies. Genotypes: (A-A', C-C') yw, hs-flp/+; UAS-GFP/+; tubGal4, FRT 82B, tubGal80/ FRT 82B; (B-B', D-D') yw, hs-flp/+; UAS-GFP/+; tubGal4, FRT 82B, tubGal80/ FRT 82B, clbn KO.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. EC-specific knock-down of clbn results in increased ISCs proliferation.

(A-E) The posterior midguts of flies of 15-day-old female control (esg-lacz) (A), clbn knock-down in ECs (B), progenitor cells (C), EEs (D), and visceral muscle (E) were stained with anti-β-gal antibody (green), anti-Prospero antibody (red) and DAPI (blue). (F) Quantification of the number of progenitor cells in flies of control (n = 12), ECs knock-down of clbn (n = 10), ISCs and EBs knock-down of clbn (n = 10), EEs knock-down of clbn (n = 10), and visceral muscle knock-down of clbn (n = 10). (G) Quantification of the number of Pros + cells in flies of control (n = 12), ECs knock-down of clbn (n = 10), ISCs and EBs knock-down of clbn (n = 10), EEs knock-down of clbn (n = 10), and visceral muscle knock-down of clbn (n = 10). The data shown are means ± SEM, and P value was noted as follows: ***P < 0.001. Scale bars: 20 um.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Clbn is localized to mitochondrial outer membrane in ECs and loss of clbn leads to mitochondrial fragmentation in ECs but not in flight muscle.

Mitochondria in the ECs of 5-day-old (A) and 15-day-old clbn KO female flies (B) were labeled with mito-GFP (green) and stained with DAPI (blue). Mitochondria in the flight muscle of 15-day-old female control (C) and clbn KO flies (D) were labeled with mito-GFP (green) and stained with Phalloidin (red) and DAPI (blue). Scale bars: 20 um.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Knockdown of drp1 rescues ISC over-proliferation in clbn mutants.

(A-B) The posterior midguts of 15-day-old female flies of indicated genotypes were stained with anti-β-gal antibody (green). (C) Quantification of the number of lacZ+ cells in flies of indicated genotypes (n = 10). The data shown are means ± SEM, and P value was noted as follows: ***P < 0.001.

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Loss of clbn leads to ISCs over-proliferation and mitochondrial fragmentation independent of ribosome-associated quality control pathways.

(A-F) The posterior midguts of 15-day-old female flies of control (esg-lacz) (A), clbn KO (B), over-expression of dNOT4 (C), dUPF1 (D), deRF1 (E) and dXRN1 (F) in ECs under clbn KO background were stained with anti-β-gal antibody (green), anti-Prospero antibody (red) and DAPI (blue). (G) Quantification of the number of progenitor cells in flies of control (n = 10), clbn KO (n = 10), over-expression of dNOT4 (n = 10), dUPF1 (n = 10), deRF1 (n = 10) and dXRN1 (n = 10) in ECs under clbn KO background. (H) Quantification of the number of Pros+ cells in flies of control (n = 10), clbn KO (n = 10), over-expression of dNOT4 (n = 10), dUPF1 (n = 10), deRF1 (n = 10) and dXRN1 (n = 10) in ECs under clbn KO background.

(TIF)

S8 Fig. Bubble plot based on GSEA analysis shows top 15 gene sets up-regulated and down-regulated.

Biological processes were ranked as enrichment score of each gene sets. The color of bubbles represents enrichment score. The size of bubbles represents–log10 (P value).

(TIF)

S9 Fig. Knockdown of drp1 rescues ROS accumulation in clbn mutants.

(A-B) Dihydroethidium (DHE) staining of midguts of indicated genotypes. (C) Quantification of the DHE fluorescence intensity (n = 10). The data shown are means ± SEM, and P value was noted as follows: **P < 0.01.

(TIF)

S10 Fig. Microbiota does not contribute to the intestinal defects in clbn KO flies.

(A) Level of bacteria in guts of wild-type and clbn KO flies was detected by qPCR for bacterial 16S rDNA. (B-C) The posterior midguts of 15-day-old germ-free female control (B) and clbn KO flies (C) were stained with anti-Prospero antibody (red) and DAPI (blue). (D-E) Mitochondria in ECs of 15-day-old germ-free female control (D) and clbn KO flies (E) were labeled with mito-GFP (green) and stained with DAPI (blue). (F-G) Quantification of the number of ISCs and EBs (F) or EEs (G) in control (n = 10) and clbn KO flies (n = 10). (H) Quantification of the relative ATP level in guts of indicated genotypes. Scale bars: 20 um.

(TIF)

S11 Fig. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway is not induced in the clbn mutant.

The posterior midguts of 15-day-old female control (esg>GFP, A-A'), clbn KO (B-B') and Ras over-expression (C-C') flies were stained with antibody against the diphospho-form of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (dpERK) (red). Scale bars: 15 um.

(TIF)

S12 Fig. The Notch and Wnt signaling activity is not changed in the clbn mutant.

Expression of NRE-GFP (Notch activity reporter) and wg-lacZ (Wnt activity reporter) was detected in posterior midguts of 15-day-old female control (A, C) and clbn KO (B, D) flies. Scale bars: 20 um.

(TIF)

S13 Fig. Loss of clbn results in more progenitor cells in response to various stress.

Representative images of posterior midguts of 15-day-old female flies of indicated genotypes, 72 h after feeding with sucrose (A-B, G-H), DSS (C-D, I-J) or ECC-15 (E-F, K-L). The progenitor cells were labeled with esg-lacZ (green). Scale bars: 20 um. Quantification of the number of PH3+ (M) and Prospero+ (N) cells in the whole gut of indicated genotypes (n = 15).

(TIF)

S14 Fig. Loss of clbn promotes ISCs tumor growth.

(A-D) Progenitor cells of midguts from 15-day-old female flies of indicated genotypes were labeled by GFP. (A'-D') Sagittal view of the midgut from flies of indicated genotypes. GFP driven by esgts-Gal4 (green) marks the progenitor cells, Phalloidin (red) marks the visceral muscle and brush border, and DAPI (blue) highlights the nuclei. (E) Cells per ISC tumor induced by Rasv12 in control (n = 12) or clbn KO (n = 13) flies. The data shown are means ± SEM, and P value was noted as follows: **P < 0.01.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Up and down-regulated genes in clbn mutant.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. List of gene sets for GSEA analysis.

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Primers for RT-qPCR.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Wanzhong Ge, Renjie Jiao, Lei Zhang, the Bloomington Stock Center for fly stocks, Xixia Li and Xueke Tan for helping with electron microscopy sample preparation and taking TEM images at the Center for Biological Imaging (CBI), Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dr. Paul Badenhorst for microarray assistance, Dr. Guangchuang Yu and FigureYa (Xiao Ya Hua Tu) for the figure technology support, Cindy Lim and members of the Bi laboratory for advice and discussions.

Data Availability

The raw microarray data was deposited at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-MEXP-1817/?query=Mortin. The main analysis script can be found at https://github.com/ying-ge/clbn.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China to XB (Grant No. 31771437, 31970605) and DL (Grant No. 31501165). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Li H, Jasper H. Gastrointestinal stem cells in health and disease: from flies to humans. Disease models & mechanisms. 2016;9(5):487–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jiang H, Edgar BA. Intestinal stem cells in the adult Drosophila midgut. Experimental cell research. 2011;317(19):2780–8. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.07.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Micchelli CA. The origin of intestinal stem cells in Drosophila. Developmental dynamics: an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists. 2012;241(1):85–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Micchelli CA, Perrimon N. Evidence that stem cells reside in the adult Drosophila midgut epithelium. Nature. 2006;439(7075):475–9. 10.1038/nature04371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ohlstein B, Spradling A. The adult Drosophila posterior midgut is maintained by pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2006;439(7075):470–4. 10.1038/nature04333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Guo Z, Ohlstein B. Stem cell regulation. Bidirectional Notch signaling regulates Drosophila intestinal stem cell multipotency. Science. 2015;350(6263). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Biteau B, Jasper H. Slit/Robo signaling regulates cell fate decisions in the intestinal stem cell lineage of Drosophila. Cell reports. 2014;7(6):1867–75. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.05.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ohlstein B, Spradling A. Multipotent Drosophila intestinal stem cells specify daughter cell fates by differential notch signaling. Science. 2007;315(5814):988–92. 10.1126/science.1136606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Perdigoto CN, Schweisguth F, Bardin AJ. Distinct levels of Notch activity for commitment and terminal differentiation of stem cells in the adult fly intestine. Development. 2011;138(21):4585–95. 10.1242/dev.065292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zeng X, Hou SX. Enteroendocrine cells are generated from stem cells through a distinct progenitor in the adult Drosophila posterior midgut. Development. 2015;142(4):644–53. 10.1242/dev.113357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bardin AJ, Perdigoto CN, Southall TD, Brand AH, Schweisguth F. Transcriptional control of stem cell maintenance in the Drosophila intestine. Development. 2010;137(5):705–14. 10.1242/dev.039404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Biteau B, Hochmuth CE, Jasper H. JNK activity in somatic stem cells causes loss of tissue homeostasis in the aging Drosophila gut. Cell stem cell. 2008;3(4):442–55. 10.1016/j.stem.2008.07.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Buchon N, Broderick NA, Kuraishi T, Lemaitre B. Drosophila EGFR pathway coordinates stem cell proliferation and gut remodeling following infection. BMC biology. 2010;8:152 10.1186/1741-7007-8-152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lin G, Xu N, Xi R. Paracrine Wingless signalling controls self-renewal of Drosophila intestinal stem cells. Nature. 2008;455(7216):1119–23. 10.1038/nature07329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jiang H, Patel PH, Kohlmaier A, Grenley MO, McEwen DG, Edgar BA. Cytokine/Jak/Stat signaling mediates regeneration and homeostasis in the Drosophila midgut. Cell. 2009;137(7):1343–55. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tian A, Jiang J. Intestinal epithelium-derived BMP controls stem cell self-renewal in Drosophila adult midgut. eLife. 2014;3:e01857 10.7554/eLife.01857 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ren F, Wang B, Yue T, Yun EY, Ip YT, Jiang J. Hippo signaling regulates Drosophila intestine stem cell proliferation through multiple pathways. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107(49):21064–9. 10.1073/pnas.1012759107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tan DQ, Suda T. Reactive Oxygen Species and Mitochondrial Homeostasis as Regulators of Stem Cell Fate and Function. Antioxidants & redox signaling. 2018;29(2):149–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Khacho M, Slack RS. Mitochondrial and Reactive Oxygen Species Signaling Coordinate Stem Cell Fate Decisions and Life Long Maintenance. Antioxidants & redox signaling. 2018;28(11):1090–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moro L. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Aging and Cancer. J Clin Med. 2019;8(11). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Owusu-Ansah E, Banerjee U. Reactive oxygen species prime Drosophila haematopoietic progenitors for differentiation. Nature. 2009;461(7263):537–41. 10.1038/nature08313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Noble M, Smith J, Power J, Mayer-Proschel M. Redox state as a central modulator of precursor cell function. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2003;991:251–71. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07481.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Khacho M, Clark A, Svoboda DS, Azzi J, MacLaurin JG, Meghaizel C, et al. Mitochondrial Dynamics Impacts Stem Cell Identity and Fate Decisions by Regulating a Nuclear Transcriptional Program. Cell stem cell. 2016;19(2):232–47. 10.1016/j.stem.2016.04.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kasahara A, Cipolat S, Chen Y, Dorn GW, 2nd, Scorrano L. Mitochondrial fusion directs cardiomyocyte differentiation via calcineurin and Notch signaling. Science. 2013;342(6159):734–7. 10.1126/science.1241359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Luchsinger LL, de Almeida MJ, Corrigan DJ, Mumau M, Snoeck HW. Mitofusin 2 maintains haematopoietic stem cells with extensive lymphoid potential. Nature. 2016;529(7587):528–31. 10.1038/nature16500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jiang JC, Stumpferl SW, Jazwinski SM. Dual roles of mitochondrial fusion gene FZO1 in yeast age asymmetry and in longevity mediated by a novel ATG32-dependent retrograde response. Biogerontology. 2019;20(1):93–107. 10.1007/s10522-018-9779-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jones RM, Luo L, Ardita CS, Richardson AN, Kwon YM, Mercante JW, et al. Symbiotic lactobacilli stimulate gut epithelial proliferation via Nox-mediated generation of reactive oxygen species. The EMBO journal. 2013;32(23):3017–28. 10.1038/emboj.2013.224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Buchon N, Broderick NA, Chakrabarti S, Lemaitre B. Invasive and indigenous microbiota impact intestinal stem cell activity through multiple pathways in Drosophila. Genes & development. 2009;23(19):2333–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang L, Zeng X, Ryoo HD, Jasper H. Integration of UPRER and oxidative stress signaling in the control of intestinal stem cell proliferation. PLoS genetics. 2014;10(8):e1004568 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hochmuth CE, Biteau B, Bohmann D, Jasper H. Redox regulation by Keap1 and Nrf2 controls intestinal stem cell proliferation in Drosophila. Cell stem cell. 2011;8(2):188–99. 10.1016/j.stem.2010.12.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Deng H, Takashima S, Paul M, Guo M, Hartenstein V. Mitochondrial dynamics regulates Drosophila intestinal stem cell differentiation. Cell death discovery. 2018;4:17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bi X, Jones T, Abbasi F, Lee H, Stultz B, Hursh DA, et al. Drosophila caliban, a nuclear export mediator, can function as a tumor suppressor in human lung cancer cells. Oncogene. 2005;24(56):8229–39. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208962 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang Y, Wang Z, Joshi BH, Puri RK, Stultz B, Yuan Q, et al. The tumor suppressor Caliban regulates DNA damage-induced apoptosis through p53-dependent and -independent activity. Oncogene. 2013;32(33):3857–66. 10.1038/onc.2012.395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Song F, Li D, Wang Y, Bi X. Drosophila Caliban mediates G1-S transition and ionizing radiation induced S phase checkpoint. Cell cycle. 2018;17(18):2256–67. 10.1080/15384101.2018.1524237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wu Z, Tantray I, Lim J, Chen S, Li Y, Davis Z, et al. MISTERMINATE Mechanistically Links Mitochondrial Dysfunction with Proteostasis Failure. Molecular cell. 2019;75(4):835–48 e8. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jiang H, Tian A, Jiang J. Intestinal stem cell response to injury: lessons from Drosophila. Cellular and molecular life sciences: CMLS. 2016;73(17):3337–49. 10.1007/s00018-016-2235-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Westermann B. Mitochondrial dynamics in model organisms: what yeasts, worms and flies have taught us about fusion and fission of mitochondria. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2010;21(6):542–9. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sheridan C, Martin SJ. Mitochondrial fission/fusion dynamics and apoptosis. Mitochondrion. 2010;10(6):640–8. 10.1016/j.mito.2010.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shen PS, Park J, Qin Y, Li X, Parsawar K, Larson MH, et al. Protein synthesis. Rqc2p and 60S ribosomal subunits mediate mRNA-independent elongation of nascent chains. Science. 2015;347(6217):75–8. 10.1126/science.1259724 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Joazeiro CAP. Ribosomal Stalling During Translation: Providing Substrates for Ribosome-Associated Protein Quality Control. Annual review of cell and developmental biology. 2017;33:343–68. 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gaudet P, Livstone MS, Lewis SE, Thomas PD. Phylogenetic-based propagation of functional annotations within the Gene Ontology consortium. Briefings in bioinformatics. 2011;12(5):449–62. 10.1093/bib/bbr042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Horiuchi D, Barkus RV, Pilling AD, Gassman A, Saxton WM. APLIP1, a kinesin binding JIP-1/JNK scaffold protein, influences the axonal transport of both vesicles and mitochondria in Drosophila. Current biology: CB. 2005;15(23):2137–41. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Webel R, Haug-Collet K, Pearson B, Szerencsei RT, Winkfein RJ, Schnetkamp PP, et al. Potassium-dependent sodium-calcium exchange through the eye of the fly. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2002;976:300–14. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04753.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Marelja Z, Dambowsky M, Bolis M, Georgiou ML, Garattini E, Missirlis F, et al. The four aldehyde oxidases of Drosophila melanogaster have different gene expression patterns and enzyme substrate specificities. The Journal of experimental biology. 2014;217(Pt 12):2201–11. 10.1242/jeb.102129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Saisawang C, Wongsantichon J, Ketterman AJ. A preliminary characterization of the cytosolic glutathione transferase proteome from Drosophila melanogaster. The Biochemical journal. 2012;442(1):181–90. 10.1042/BJ20111747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li H, Qi Y, Jasper H. Dpp signaling determines regional stem cell identity in the regenerating adult Drosophila gastrointestinal tract. Cell reports. 2013;4(1):10–8. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.05.040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Li Z, Zhang Y, Han L, Shi L, Lin X. Trachea-derived dpp controls adult midgut homeostasis in Drosophila. Developmental cell. 2013;24(2):133–43. 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.12.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Biteau B, Karpac J, Supoyo S, Degennaro M, Lehmann R, Jasper H. Lifespan extension by preserving proliferative homeostasis in Drosophila. PLoS genetics. 2010;6(10):e1001159 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Biteau B, Jasper H. EGF signaling regulates the proliferation of intestinal stem cells in Drosophila. Development. 2011;138(6):1045–55. 10.1242/dev.056671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Patel PH, Dutta D, Edgar BA. Niche appropriation by Drosophila intestinal stem cell tumours. Nature cell biology. 2015;17(9):1182–92. 10.1038/ncb3214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.West AP, Shadel GS, Ghosh S. Mitochondria in innate immune responses. Nature reviews Immunology. 2011;11(6):389–402. 10.1038/nri2975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Manent J, Banerjee S, de Matos Simoes R, Zoranovic T, Mitsiades C, Penninger JM, et al. Autophagy suppresses Ras-driven epithelial tumourigenesis by limiting the accumulation of reactive oxygen species. Oncogene. 2017;36(40):5658–60. 10.1038/onc.2017.239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zhang Y, Chen Y, Gucek M, Xu H. The mitochondrial outer membrane protein MDI promotes local protein synthesis and mtDNA replication. The EMBO journal. 2016;35(10):1045–57. 10.15252/embj.201592994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dutta D, Xiang J, Edgar BA. RNA expression profiling from FACS-isolated cells of the Drosophila intestine. Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol. 2013;27:Unit 2F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. Omics: a journal of integrative biology. 2012;16(5):284–7. 10.1089/omi.2011.0118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rera M, Azizi MJ, Walker DW. Organ-specific mediation of lifespan extension: more than a gut feeling? Ageing research reviews. 2013;12(1):436–44. 10.1016/j.arr.2012.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ryu JH, Kim SH, Lee HY, Bai JY, Nam YD, Bae JW, et al. Innate immune homeostasis by the homeobox gene caudal and commensal-gut mutualism in Drosophila. Science. 2008;319(5864):777–82. 10.1126/science.1149357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Bingwei Lu, Gregory P Copenhaver

24 Mar 2020

Dear Dr Bi,

Thank you very much for submitting your Research Article entitled 'Drosophila Caliban preserves intestinal homeostasis and lifespan through regulating mitochondrial dynamics and redox state in enterocytes' to PLOS Genetics. Your manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important problem, but raised some substantial concerns about the current manuscript. Based on the reviews, we will not be able to accept this version of the manuscript, but we would be willing to review again a much-revised version. We cannot, of course, promise publication at that time.

Should you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration here, your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. In particular, more than one reviewer would like to see stronger evidence for mitochondrial localization of Clbn. We will also require a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

If you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration at PLOS Genetics, please aim to resubmit within the next 60 days, unless it will take extra time to address the concerns of the reviewers, in which case we would appreciate an expected resubmission date by email to plosgenetics@plos.org.

If present, accompanying reviewer attachments are included with this email; please notify the journal office if any appear to be missing. They will also be available for download from the link below. You can use this link to log into the system when you are ready to submit a revised version, having first consulted our Submission Checklist.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see our guidelines.

Please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying graphs or summary statistics are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this upon resubmission if not already present. In addition, we do not permit the inclusion of phrases such as "data not shown" or "unpublished results" in manuscripts. All points should be backed up by data provided with the submission.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool.  PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

PLOS has incorporated Similarity Check, powered by iThenticate, into its journal-wide submission system in order to screen submitted content for originality before publication. Each PLOS journal undertakes screening on a proportion of submitted articles. You will be contacted if needed following the screening process.

To resubmit, use the link below and 'Revise Submission' in the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder.

[LINK]

We are sorry that we cannot be more positive about your manuscript at this stage. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any concerns or questions.

Yours sincerely,

Bingwei Lu

Associate Editor

PLOS Genetics

Gregory P. Copenhaver

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: In this paper, the authors identified fly Caliban (Clbn) as a specific regulator of mitochondrial dynamics in enterocytes (ECs) and a key modulator of intestinal homeostasis. Clbn inactivation leads to mitochondrial fragmentation, ROS accumulation, intestinal stem cell overproliferation and shortened life span. Overall, this is an interesting study with well-controlled results. However, before recommending publication the following points need be addressed:

1. If intestinal homeostasis defects in clbn mutants are mainly due to mitochondrial fragmentation in ECs, restoring mitochondrial dynamics should rescue the intestinal phenotypes. Indeed, the authors found that preventing mitochondrial fission through drp1 knockdown or marf overexpression can partially rescue the shortened lifespan phenotype of the clbn mutants. It remains unclear whether drp1 knockdown can rescue other important phenotypes, such as ROS accumulation and ISC overproliferation, in clbn mutants.

2. The authors propose that ISC overproliferation in clbn mutants are due to upregulation of JAK-STAT signaling, which is in turn promoted by increased release of Upd from clbn mutant ECs. It would be important to further confirm this notion by testing whether downregulation of JAK-STAT signaling specifically in ISCs (for example through esg-Gal4>UAS-stat-RNAi) can rescue the ISC overproliferation phenotype in clbn mutants.

3. If clbn loss lead to mitochondrial fission and fragmentation in ECs, can Clbn overexpression results in mitochondrial fusion?

4. Some experiments in the paper, such as lifespan assay shown in Fig.1 and survival assay shown in Fig.6, did not show N number in the figure legends or main text.

Reviewer #2: In this paper, Di et al investigate the functions of Caliban (Clbn), with a focus on functions in the adult gut. The gene is clearly important and the phenotypic analysis is quite good, with a number of interesting cellular phenotypes detailed in a competent way using up-to-date methods. They postulate that Clbn functions in mitochondria, and that it’s action in gut enterocytes is critical for viability and normal lifespan. The later point is well supported by a very nice gut-specific lifespan rescue result shown in Fig 2 shown. In addition, interesting, convincing results showing various stress responses are presented in Fig 4, 5, and 6. However, the data relating to a mitochondrial-specific function of Clbn (Fig 3, 4) is inconclusive and doesn’t sufficiently support the authors’ conclusions. This significantly detracts from the papers’ general significance as a gene-function study. In addition, the paper is not very well written, and has many shortcomings in grammar, organization, textual presentation. The figures are well done, however. Detailed comments follow:

1. The authors claim that clbn is localized in mitochondria because: 1) It has a peri-nuclear stain and co-localized with mito-GFP; 2) Clbn protein fractionated with the mitochondria marker ATP5A. However, a pervious study (Doghman-Bouguerra, M., & Lalli, E. BBA. 2019) showed this protein associates with ribosomes, probably on the ER. ER is known to interact with mitochondria, and mitochondria-associated membranes (MAM) are important for mitochondria dynamics. MFN2 and Drp1 are on the MAM. Therefore, Clbn might well be ER- or MAM-localized. The images shown here are not high resolution enough to tell.

2. It is interesting that Clbn does not affect mitochondria in flight muscle, this may be because there is no ER-mitochondria interaction in the muscle. If the authors study MAM, it will make this paper so much better and more impact. In Fig3 D,E, one can see evidence of lost MAM. The authors should consider doing experiments focused on whether Clbn functions in MAM.

3. In the Western blot of mitochondria fractions, a ribosome associated protein and an ER associated protein should be used as negative controls, to rule out localizations there.

4. If the author can do a immune-TEM for Clbn localization, this might resolve the issue of its true localization.

5. The authors state that “The regenerative potential of stem cells is closely correlated with the level of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS). Normal physiological levels of ROS are essential for stem cells functions and fate decision.” Citations supporting this notion are missing.

6. In Fig 3S (MARCM clones), the authors should measure the clone size or cell number. The mutation promotes ISC proliferation, so the clone size should be bigger and with more cells. Please normalize the EE/EC cell numbers with total cell number or clone size.

7. JC-1 staining should be included in Fig 4.

8. The introduction does not establish that Clbn is a mitochondrial protein, nor does it introduce mutant allele or summarize previous work using this allele.

9. The lifespan rescues in Fig 2 are on a very different time scale than the lifespans shown in figure Fig 1. How do the authors account for this difference? Please discuss.

10. The data shown in Fig 7 (tumor interaction) is not quantitative, and is therefore inconclusive.

Reviewer #3: uploaded as an attachment

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No: No raw data is presented for the graphs.

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Attachment

Submitted filename: comment.pdf

Decision Letter 1

Bingwei Lu, Gregory P Copenhaver

3 Sep 2020

Dear Dr Bi,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Drosophila Caliban preserves intestinal homeostasis and lifespan through regulating mitochondrial dynamics and redox state in enterocytes" has been editorially accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics. Congratulations!

Please note that both Reviewers #1 and #2 have some suggestions for re-organizing some of figures (moving items between main figures and supplementary material).  This is largely a stylistic issue so we will leave this up to your discretion, but we would like to point out the both reviewers recommend shifting Fig S5A and B into the main figures (in our experience if multiple reviewers recommend something, it is likely many of your readers would also find the change helpful).  Feel free to make these changes in the final draft that you prepare for the production team (the editorial team will not need to re-evaluate).

Before your submission can be formally accepted and sent to production you will need to complete our formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. Please be aware that it may take several days for you to receive this email; during this time no action is required by you. Please note: the accept date on your published article will reflect the date of this provisional accept, but your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until the required changes have been made.

Once your paper is formally accepted, an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you’ve already opted out via the online submission form. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online or are unsure if you have already indicated as such, please let the journal staff know immediately at plosgenetics@plos.org.

In the meantime, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production and billing process. Note that PLOS requires an ORCID iD for all corresponding authors. Therefore, please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field.  This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager.

If you have a press-related query, or would like to know about one way to make your underlying data available (as you will be aware, this is required for publication), please see the end of this email. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming article at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. Inform journal staff as soon as possible if you are preparing a press release for your article and need a publication date.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Genetics!

Yours sincerely,

Bingwei Lu

Associate Editor

PLOS Genetics

Gregory P. Copenhaver

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

www.plosgenetics.org

Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

----------------------------------------------------

Comments from the reviewers (if applicable):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: In the revised version, the authors have sufficiently addressed my concerns.

One minor point: Since the subcellular distribution of Clbn within ECs is very important, it would be ideal if new results in Fig S5A and S5B could are moved to main Fig 3.

Reviewer #2: In this interesting paper, Dai et al report a cell-type specific function for Caliban (Clbn) in enterocytes of the Drosophila gut. They present a number of interesting observations, including mitochondria fragmentation and ROS accumulation after Clbn loss, and they show that this mitochondrial could stress causes Upd induction, JAK-Stat pathway activation, and intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation. The fly lifespan is also negatively affected. Although the original data was all of good quality, the sub cellular localization of Clbn was not clear, and the reviewers had some question as to the specificity of the phenotypes to mitochondrial functions. This point is addressed somewhat in the revision by new data showing the Clbn can be detected on the mitochondrial outer membrane, though much is also present in the cytosol (Fig S5AB). Unfortunately, the mechanisms via which Clbn KO causes mitochondrial fragmentation and ROS generation are still unclear, but these issues are difficult to address and can be attacked in future research on this conserved protein. Several other follow up experiments addressing the reviewers’ comments are provided. Overall, the response to the reviews is conscientious. The revised paper is a complete story that will contribute to the general understanding of mitochondrial function, as well as gut homeostasis. We would like to recommend that it be published. A couple of specific comments:

1. I think the new data in Fig S5A and B should be added to a main figure. The most notable long-lasting discoveries in this paper will likely be those in cell biology, as opposed to fly midgut function, and so data pertaining to the molecular and cellular function of Clbn is most valuable.

2. Likewise, the data in Figs S7 (I-N) and S14 are also valuable and should be moved to main figures.

3. The data on tumor growth (Fig 7C-E) is not very important (in my opinion) and could be moved to the supplement.

4. I would like to see some better, higher magnification, higher resolution, 3D reconstructed pictures of the mitochondrial fragmentation phenotype. This should be straightforward using a modern confocal microscope. Some more, more highly magnified TEMs of this would also be a nice addition.

Reviewer #3: The manuscript has been considerably improved. The authors have addressed my concerns.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Yan Song

Reviewer #2: Yes: Bruce A Edgar

Reviewer #3: No

----------------------------------------------------

Data Deposition

If you have submitted a Research Article or Front Matter that has associated data that are not suitable for deposition in a subject-specific public repository (such as GenBank or ArrayExpress), one way to make that data available is to deposit it in the Dryad Digital Repository. As you may recall, we ask all authors to agree to make data available; this is one way to achieve that. A full list of recommended repositories can be found on our website.

The following link will take you to the Dryad record for your article, so you won't have to re‐enter its bibliographic information, and can upload your files directly: 

http://datadryad.org/submit?journalID=pgenetics&manu=PGENETICS-D-20-00223R1

More information about depositing data in Dryad is available at http://www.datadryad.org/depositing. If you experience any difficulties in submitting your data, please contact help@datadryad.org for support.

Additionally, please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying display items are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this before we can formally accept your manuscript, if not already present.

----------------------------------------------------

Press Queries

If you or your institution will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, or if you need to know your paper's publication date for media purposes, please inform the journal staff as soon as possible so that your submission can be scheduled accordingly. Your manuscript will remain under a strict press embargo until the publication date and time. This means an early version of your manuscript will not be published ahead of your final version. PLOS Genetics may also choose to issue a press release for your article. If there's anything the journal should know or you'd like more information, please get in touch via plosgenetics@plos.org.

Acceptance letter

Bingwei Lu, Gregory P Copenhaver

8 Oct 2020

PGENETICS-D-20-00223R1

Drosophila Caliban preserves intestinal homeostasis and lifespan through regulating mitochondrial dynamics and redox state in enterocytes

Dear Dr Bi,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Drosophila Caliban preserves intestinal homeostasis and lifespan through regulating mitochondrial dynamics and redox state in enterocytes" has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics! Your manuscript is now with our production department and you will be notified of the publication date in due course.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, unless you have opted out or your manuscript is a front-matter piece, the early version of your manuscript will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting PLOS Genetics and open-access publishing. We are looking forward to publishing your work!

With kind regards,

Jason Norris

PLOS Genetics

On behalf of:

The PLOS Genetics Team

Carlyle House, Carlyle Road, Cambridge CB4 3DN | United Kingdom

plosgenetics@plos.org | +44 (0) 1223-442823

plosgenetics.org | Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Loss of clbn causes increased number of progenitor cells and enteroendocine cells in flies older than 15 days.

    The posterior midguts of 5-day-old, 15-day-old and 30-day-old female control (A-C) and clbn KO flies (D-F) stained with anti-Prospero antibody (red) and DAPI (blue). (G-H) Quantification of the number of progenitor cells (ISCs and EBs) (G) or EEs (H) in control (n = 10) and clbn KO flies (n = 10). (I-J) Quantification of the number of PH3+ (I) or Prospero+ cells (J) in the whole gut of control (n = 10) and clbn KO flies (n = 10). The data shown are means ± SEM, and P value was noted as follows: *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001. Scale bars: 20 um.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Loss of clbn causes increased number of ISCs and EBs.

    (A-C) The posterior midguts of 15-day-old female control (delta-lacZ), clbn KO/+ and clbn KO flies were stained with anti-β-gal antibody. (D-F) The posterior midguts of 15-day-old female control (Su(H)GBE >GFP), clbn KO/+ and clbn KO flies. (G-H) Quantification of the number of ISCs (G) or EBs (H) in control (n = 10), clbn KO/+ (n = 10) and clbn KO flies (n = 10). The data shown are means ± SEM, and P value was noted as follows: ***P < 0.001. Scale bars: 20 um.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Clbn is dispensable for cell differentiation in midgut.

    MARCM clones in control (A-A', C-C') or clbn KO flies (B-B', D-D') were immunostained with anti-Prospero antibody (A-B), anti-Pdm1 antibody (C-D) and DAPI. Clones were marked by GFP (green), EEs by Prospero (red), and ECs by Pdm1 (red). Scale bars: 15 um. (E-F) Quantification of the number of EEs (E) and ECs (F) in clones of control and clbn mutant. The EE/EC cell numbers were normalized with the average clone size. (G-G') MARCM clones in clbn KO flies were immunostained with anti-Clbn antibody and DAPI. Clones were marked by GFP (green). Scale bars: 15 um. (H) Quantification of number of cells in MARCM clones in control (n = 40) and clbn KO (n = 40) flies. Genotypes: (A-A', C-C') yw, hs-flp/+; UAS-GFP/+; tubGal4, FRT 82B, tubGal80/ FRT 82B; (B-B', D-D') yw, hs-flp/+; UAS-GFP/+; tubGal4, FRT 82B, tubGal80/ FRT 82B, clbn KO.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. EC-specific knock-down of clbn results in increased ISCs proliferation.

    (A-E) The posterior midguts of flies of 15-day-old female control (esg-lacz) (A), clbn knock-down in ECs (B), progenitor cells (C), EEs (D), and visceral muscle (E) were stained with anti-β-gal antibody (green), anti-Prospero antibody (red) and DAPI (blue). (F) Quantification of the number of progenitor cells in flies of control (n = 12), ECs knock-down of clbn (n = 10), ISCs and EBs knock-down of clbn (n = 10), EEs knock-down of clbn (n = 10), and visceral muscle knock-down of clbn (n = 10). (G) Quantification of the number of Pros + cells in flies of control (n = 12), ECs knock-down of clbn (n = 10), ISCs and EBs knock-down of clbn (n = 10), EEs knock-down of clbn (n = 10), and visceral muscle knock-down of clbn (n = 10). The data shown are means ± SEM, and P value was noted as follows: ***P < 0.001. Scale bars: 20 um.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Clbn is localized to mitochondrial outer membrane in ECs and loss of clbn leads to mitochondrial fragmentation in ECs but not in flight muscle.

    Mitochondria in the ECs of 5-day-old (A) and 15-day-old clbn KO female flies (B) were labeled with mito-GFP (green) and stained with DAPI (blue). Mitochondria in the flight muscle of 15-day-old female control (C) and clbn KO flies (D) were labeled with mito-GFP (green) and stained with Phalloidin (red) and DAPI (blue). Scale bars: 20 um.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. Knockdown of drp1 rescues ISC over-proliferation in clbn mutants.

    (A-B) The posterior midguts of 15-day-old female flies of indicated genotypes were stained with anti-β-gal antibody (green). (C) Quantification of the number of lacZ+ cells in flies of indicated genotypes (n = 10). The data shown are means ± SEM, and P value was noted as follows: ***P < 0.001.

    (TIF)

    S7 Fig. Loss of clbn leads to ISCs over-proliferation and mitochondrial fragmentation independent of ribosome-associated quality control pathways.

    (A-F) The posterior midguts of 15-day-old female flies of control (esg-lacz) (A), clbn KO (B), over-expression of dNOT4 (C), dUPF1 (D), deRF1 (E) and dXRN1 (F) in ECs under clbn KO background were stained with anti-β-gal antibody (green), anti-Prospero antibody (red) and DAPI (blue). (G) Quantification of the number of progenitor cells in flies of control (n = 10), clbn KO (n = 10), over-expression of dNOT4 (n = 10), dUPF1 (n = 10), deRF1 (n = 10) and dXRN1 (n = 10) in ECs under clbn KO background. (H) Quantification of the number of Pros+ cells in flies of control (n = 10), clbn KO (n = 10), over-expression of dNOT4 (n = 10), dUPF1 (n = 10), deRF1 (n = 10) and dXRN1 (n = 10) in ECs under clbn KO background.

    (TIF)

    S8 Fig. Bubble plot based on GSEA analysis shows top 15 gene sets up-regulated and down-regulated.

    Biological processes were ranked as enrichment score of each gene sets. The color of bubbles represents enrichment score. The size of bubbles represents–log10 (P value).

    (TIF)

    S9 Fig. Knockdown of drp1 rescues ROS accumulation in clbn mutants.

    (A-B) Dihydroethidium (DHE) staining of midguts of indicated genotypes. (C) Quantification of the DHE fluorescence intensity (n = 10). The data shown are means ± SEM, and P value was noted as follows: **P < 0.01.

    (TIF)

    S10 Fig. Microbiota does not contribute to the intestinal defects in clbn KO flies.

    (A) Level of bacteria in guts of wild-type and clbn KO flies was detected by qPCR for bacterial 16S rDNA. (B-C) The posterior midguts of 15-day-old germ-free female control (B) and clbn KO flies (C) were stained with anti-Prospero antibody (red) and DAPI (blue). (D-E) Mitochondria in ECs of 15-day-old germ-free female control (D) and clbn KO flies (E) were labeled with mito-GFP (green) and stained with DAPI (blue). (F-G) Quantification of the number of ISCs and EBs (F) or EEs (G) in control (n = 10) and clbn KO flies (n = 10). (H) Quantification of the relative ATP level in guts of indicated genotypes. Scale bars: 20 um.

    (TIF)

    S11 Fig. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway is not induced in the clbn mutant.

    The posterior midguts of 15-day-old female control (esg>GFP, A-A'), clbn KO (B-B') and Ras over-expression (C-C') flies were stained with antibody against the diphospho-form of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (dpERK) (red). Scale bars: 15 um.

    (TIF)

    S12 Fig. The Notch and Wnt signaling activity is not changed in the clbn mutant.

    Expression of NRE-GFP (Notch activity reporter) and wg-lacZ (Wnt activity reporter) was detected in posterior midguts of 15-day-old female control (A, C) and clbn KO (B, D) flies. Scale bars: 20 um.

    (TIF)

    S13 Fig. Loss of clbn results in more progenitor cells in response to various stress.

    Representative images of posterior midguts of 15-day-old female flies of indicated genotypes, 72 h after feeding with sucrose (A-B, G-H), DSS (C-D, I-J) or ECC-15 (E-F, K-L). The progenitor cells were labeled with esg-lacZ (green). Scale bars: 20 um. Quantification of the number of PH3+ (M) and Prospero+ (N) cells in the whole gut of indicated genotypes (n = 15).

    (TIF)

    S14 Fig. Loss of clbn promotes ISCs tumor growth.

    (A-D) Progenitor cells of midguts from 15-day-old female flies of indicated genotypes were labeled by GFP. (A'-D') Sagittal view of the midgut from flies of indicated genotypes. GFP driven by esgts-Gal4 (green) marks the progenitor cells, Phalloidin (red) marks the visceral muscle and brush border, and DAPI (blue) highlights the nuclei. (E) Cells per ISC tumor induced by Rasv12 in control (n = 12) or clbn KO (n = 13) flies. The data shown are means ± SEM, and P value was noted as follows: **P < 0.01.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Up and down-regulated genes in clbn mutant.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Table. List of gene sets for GSEA analysis.

    (XLSX)

    S3 Table. Primers for RT-qPCR.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: comment.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The raw microarray data was deposited at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-MEXP-1817/?query=Mortin. The main analysis script can be found at https://github.com/ying-ge/clbn.


    Articles from PLoS Genetics are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES