Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53823-w, published online 05 December 2019
This Article contains errors. In Figures 4A and 5A “ns” is incorrectly written as “nc”. The correct Figures 4 and 5 appear below as Figures 1 and 2.
Figure 1.
Enhancement of space-time binding in the EM Test. (A) The graphs present the accuracy means for object-time, object-space, and space-time binding components of the EM Test in the TD sample divided by age-groups (2–4; 4–6; 6–8 yrs). (B) Presents the accuracy means of Space-Time Test compared to space-time binding scores of the EM Test (left), and Object-Time Test compared to object-time binding of the EM Test for 2–4-years old children (right). (C) Presents the distribution of each EM binding components across all TD subjects. ns; p < 0.05 *p < 0.01 **.
Figure 2.
Deficit in space-time binding and full EM in Williams Syndrome. (A) The graphs represent the accuracy means for Space-Time, Object-Time and EM tests in WS patients, compared to MA and CA controls. (B) The graphs present the mean accuracies for spatial location and space-time binding adjusted for spatial location performance (above), and for object identity and object-time binding adjusted for object identity accuracy (below). Adjusted means were calculated using GZLM. ns = not significant. p < 0.05 *, p < 0.01 **.
In addition, the legend for Table 1 is incorrect.
“Correlations between EM Test components. Pearson’s zero-order correlation for object-time, object-space, and space-time binding components and the total score of the EM Test in the TD sample.”
should read:
“Correlations between EM Test components. A. Pearson’s correlation for object-time, object-space, and space-time binding components and the total score of the EM Test in the TD sample. B. Partial two-tails correlations between object-time and object-space binding components controlled for the effect of object-space, object-time and space-time binding. ns; p < 0.05 *; p < 0.01 **”
Finally, in Table 2, the value “.566**” is incorrectly given as “566**”, and the value “.093 (ns)” is incorrectly given as “,0.93 (ns)” and “0.093 (ns)”, and the value “.330**” is incorrectly given as “0.330**”.
The correct Table 2 appears below as Table 1.
Table 1.
Partial correlations between EM Test components. Partial correlations between object-time and object-space binding components controlled for the effect of object-space, object-time and space-time binding. ns; p < 0.05 *; p < 0.01 **
| Controlled for object-space binding |
Controlled for object-time binding |
Controlled for space-time binding |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object-space binding | Object-time binding | Object-space binding | Object-time binding | Object-space binding | Object-time binding | |
| Object-space binding | 1 | .093 (ns) | 1 | .330** | 1 | .566** |
| Object-time binding | .093 (ns) | 1 | .330** | 1 | .566** | 1 |