Abstract
Introduction
The rapid clearance of factor IX necessitates frequent intravenous administrations to achieve effective prophylaxis for patients with hemophilia B. Subcutaneous administration has historically been limited by low bioavailability and potency. Dalcinonacog alfa was developed using a rational design approach to be a subcutaneously administered, next-generation coagulation prophylactic factor IX therapy.
Aim
This study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety profile of dalcinonacog alfa administered subcutaneously in hemophilia B dogs.
Methods
Two hemophilia B dogs received single-dose daily subcutaneous dalcinonacog alfa injections for six days. Factor IX antigen and activity, whole blood clotting time, and activated partial thromboplastin time were measured at various time points. Additionally, safety assessments for clinical adverse events and evaluations of laboratory test results were conducted.
Results
There was an increase in plasma factor IX antigen with daily subcutaneous dalcinonacog alfa. Bioavailability of subcutaneous dalcinonacog alfa was 10.3% in hemophilia B dogs. Daily subcutaneous dosing of dalcinonacog alfa demonstrated the effects of bioavailability, time to maximal concentration, and half-life by reaching a steady-state activity sufficient to correct severe hemophilia to normal, after four days.
Conclusion
The increased potency of dalcinonacog alfa facilitated the initiation and completion of the Phase 1/2 subcutaneous dosing study in individuals with hemophilia B.
Introduction
Hemophilia B is a hereditary X-linked bleeding disorder caused by factor IX (FIX) deficiency [1]. Hemophilia B, characterized by frequent (in severe phenotypes) and spontaneous bleeding [1, 2] into joints, muscles, and body cavities, can lead to arthropathy with progressive cartilage damage, chronic pain, disability, diminished quality of life and ultimately joint destruction [1]. Disease classification of mild, moderate, or severe phenotype is based on residual plasma FIX levels [3, 4]. Approximately 60–70% of patients have a moderate or severe form [5–7]. Historically, treatment has been on demand, (using clotting FIX replacement therapy administered when a hemorrhage occurs), or before surgery [8]. Currently, the standard of care treatment is intravenous FIX replacement therapy administered prophylactically, at regular intervals to maintain adequate FIX levels and prevent the onset of bleeding episodes [8–11]. Routine prophylaxis can substantially reduce bleeding episodes [11–13], prevent joint diseases [11, 14] and reduce the risk of death, but unfortunately, many patients do not receive prophylaxis and need to treat bleeding episodes on-demand [15, 16]. Treatment with FIX products, namely recombinant human FIX (rFIX), requires two or three intravenous (IV) infusions per week to achieve effective bleeding prevention due mostly to the short half-life of FIX [17–21]. A high frequency of prophylactic infusions can be a major adherence barrier, especially in pediatric patients, and those with poor venous access [22–24]. Extended half-life FIX products have recently become available. These require approximately weekly IV infusions, and some have reduced extravascular distribution that has been associated with reduced prevention of bleeding [25, 26]. A subcutaneous FIX product with a longer half-life to prolong the protective hemostatic effect would reduce the need for repeated venous access. This could potentially improve the acceptance of prophylactic regimens and adherence by patients with hemophilia. Subcutaneous administration could be the preferred route of administration for convenience and less pain but has been limited historically by low bioavailability and potency [27–31].
Dalcinonacog alfa (also known as CB 2679d), was designed using a rational design approach to be a next-generation of coagulation FIX administered subcutaneously for prophylactic therapy. Dalcinonacog alfa has three amino acid substitutions in two loops within the FIX protein (Fig 1): By way of the mature FIX sequence numbering, (1) R318Y located in the ‘150-loop’, stabilizes activated FIX (FIXa), directly interacts with the substrate factor X (FX) and provides resistance to antithrombin; (2) R338E, and, (3) T343R, both located in the ‘170-loop’, significantly enhance affinity to the cofactor, activated factor VIII (FVIIIa) and increase the catalytic activity FIXa [32]. For clarity and reference to other nomenclature, R318Y/R338E/T343R refer to R150Y/R170E/T175R in classic chymotrypsin numbering [33] and R364Y/R384E/T389R in the Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) nomenclature, which includes the 46 amino acid propeptide [34]. These molecular structure substitutions enable dalcinonacog alfa to increase catalytic activity (dalcinonacog alfa has demonstrated 3-times the catalytic efficiency to FX [substrate]); increase affinity for FVIIIa (dalcinonacog alfa has a 10-times higher affinity to cofactor FVIIIa) and improve resistance to inhibition by antithrombin (dalcinonacog alfa has 15-times the resistivity to inhibitor antithrombin compared to wild-type FIX [wt-FIX]), with a resultant 20-fold enhanced potency in vitro (clotting activity) and in vivo (tail clip model) and 8-fold increased duration of aPTT activity in vivo compared with recombinant wt-FIX dosed at the same mass [35, 36]. Additional preclinical studies found that the pharmacokinetic profile of dalcinonacog alfa was similar to BeneFIX when dosed using the same mass; however, dalcinonacog alfa has approximately 22-times greater potency and, therefore, can achieve higher activity at an equal mass dosing level [37].
The aim of this preclinical study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of dalcinonacog alfa in hemophilia B dogs after daily subcutaneous administration.
Materials and methods
Study drugs
Dalcinonacog alfa is produced by a recombinant Chinese hamster ovary cell clone in suspension culture that coexpresses rFIX and recombinant human wild-type furin. Dalcinonacog alfa was injected at single subcutaneous doses of 42, 72, 125, and 143 IU/kg, followed by intravenous 50 IU/kg. Subsequently, 300 IU/kg was injected subcutaneously daily for six days. Dalcinonacog alfa was engineered by Catalyst Biosciences, Inc. and ISU Abxis manufactured the drug for this study (Lot#E1601 Y, Sample ID: ISU304 6/9/16). ISU Abxis and Catalyst Biosciences, Inc. collaborated on the pre-clinical and early clinical development for dalcinonacog alfa.
Animals
Scarce hemophilia B dogs that had not previously been exposed to human clotting factors were chosen to characterize the PK, PD, and safety profile of dalcinonacog alfa. Canine models of hemophilia B are extensively used and are highly predictive to evaluate the PK and efficacy of human coagulation factors, due to the similarities with regard to severe bleeding phenotype and hemostatic protein PK [39–41]. Specifically, the PK, PD, and clinical efficacy of recombinant clotting factor concentrates were accurately predicted by pre‐clinical dog studies [42]. Animals were bred and maintained at the Francis Owen Blood Research Laboratory (FOBRL) at the University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill, NC. Dogs at the FOBRL are housed in dedicated indoor-outdoor runs that meet or exceed USDA space requirements. The FOBRL is inspected by the UNC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) semi-annually, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) annually and Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALACi) every three years. The FOBRL has consistently passed all of these inspections including those that occurred during the course of this study. Food is provided once or twice a day to maintain an acceptable body condition and appropriate weight as determined by the attending veterinarians. Water is provided ad lib. Environmental enrichment is provided by the Division of Comparative Medicine personnel who specialize in this field and who work with the FOBRL husbandry staff to deliver enrichment. The enrichment program includes, but is not limited to, daily interaction with other dogs and with humans, outdoor exercise in dedicated play yards, paired housing, a wide variety of chew toys and treats such as milk bones. This study was conducted in four hemophilia dogs (Tony, Bennet, P07, and P41 –Table 1) and was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The mutation in the Chapel Hill hemophilia B dogs is a missense mutation (G to A at nucleotide 1477) that results in the substitution of glutamic acid for glycine-379 in the catalytic domain of the FIX molecule [43]. All animal study procedures were approved by the UNC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the UNC. No surgery was performed and all efforts were made to minimize suffering. During the course of this study, the dogs were monitored for activity level several times every day, food and water consumption daily, body weight, daily temperatures, change in hematocrit or complete blood counts and serum chemistry values. The attending veterinarians performed physical exams on these dogs prior to their entry into this study and helped monitor the subcutaneous injection sites during and after the study. No euthanasia was required for this study.
Table 1. Hemophilia dogs used in this study.
Doga | Sex | DOB | First Dose | Age at First Dose | Weight at First Dose |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tony | Male | 18-Dec-11 | 11-May-16 | 4 years and 5 months | 23.0 kg |
Bennett | Male | 24-Apr-14 | 11-May-16 | 2 years and 1 month | 19.8 kg |
P07 | Female | 10-Mar-11 | 19-Sep-16 | 5 years and 6 months | 24.5 kg |
P41 | Male | 18-Dec-11 | 19-Sep-16 | 4 years and 9 months | 21.8 kg |
DOB, date of birth; kg, kilogram.
aThe mutation in the Chapel Hill hemophilia B dogs is a missense mutation (G to A at nucleotide 1477) that results in the substitution of glutamic acid for glycine-379 in the catalytic domain of the Factor IX molecule [43].
Administration and blood sampling
Single doses of dalcinonacog alfa 43 and 125 or 72 and 143 IU/Kg were injected subcutaneously into two dogs (Bennett and Tony) and blood was sampled at 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 24, 30, 48, 54, 72, 96, 120, and 144 hours. Each dog then received 50 IU/kg intravenously and blood was sampled at 0.25, 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours. 300 IU/kg was administered via subcutaneous daily injection for six days into two other hemophilia dogs (P07 and P41) and blood was sampled at 0, 6, 24, 30, 48, 54, 72, 78, 96, 102, 120, 126, 144, 168, 176, 192, 200, 219, 240, 248, 264, 272, 288, 312, 336, and 360 hours (Fig 2). Blood was collected by venipuncture of the cephalic vein (16 to 22 mL of blood collected per time point). The average weight of P07 and P41 was 23.5 kg. We estimate ~80 mL of blood per kg or a total blood volume of ~1,852 mL. Thus, 16 to 22 mL would be ~0.8 to 1.2% of the total blood volume per sample. During the 15-day period, these otherwise healthy dogs are actively replacing with newly synthesized red blood cells. Complete blood counts were performed frequently to monitor for significant drops in hemoglobin or hematocrits, which did not occur.
Venipuncture is performed by experienced personnel who pay careful attention to the need to plan for repeated sampling over the 15-day period. This includes alternating limbs, holding all venipuncture sites until hemostasis is clearly evident and utilizing sites that are at least 1 to 2 cm from any visible previous puncture. In general, hemophilia B dogs weighing at least 20 kg tolerate this number of venipunctures well.
Determination of FIX antigen and activity
The concentration of rFIX antigen in canine plasma samples was determined using an ELISA (Asserachrom IX:Ag, Diagnostica Stago, cat no 00943). Baseline antigen levels were undetectable [44]. FIX activity was assessed at Haematologic Technologies using an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) Factor IX one-stage clotting assay on an ACL-TOP instrument (Instrumentation Laboratories) using the recommended HemosIL® or SynthasIL® reagents and calibrators.
Determination of WBCT
Whole blood clotting time (WBCT) was measured at each time point. WBCT was performed using a two‐tube procedure at 28°C [41]. One mL of whole blood collected was distributed equally between two siliconized tubes. The first tube was tilted every 30 seconds. After a clot formed in the first tube, the second tube was tilted and observed every 30 seconds. The WBCT is the clotting time (in minutes) in the second tube.
Determination of aPTT
Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was measured at each time point on a STart Hemostasis Analyzer (Diagnostica Stago, Parsippany, NJ) using TriniCLOT Automated APTT reagent and 180-second incubation. The aPTT assay was performed twice, once using a 60‐second incubation and once using a 180‐second incubation.
Safety assessments
Safety assessments included observation for clinical adverse events and evaluations of laboratory test results and blood samples were collected as outlined previously. This included hematology, chemistry, prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2), d‐dimer, and fibrinogen. No formal inferential statistical analyses were performed.
Results
Single subcutaneous doses did not result in any consistent change in WBCT or aPTT and antigen levels were below the level of quantification at all time points. Intravenous dosing confirmed the expected pharmacokinetics for a FIX compound and corresponding shortening of WBCT and aPTT (S1 Table). WBCT for P07 and P41 was 54.5 and 60 minutes at baseline (normal <13 minutes) and following daily subcutaneous administration of dalcinonacog alfa decreased to 20 and 26 minutes, respectively, at six hours (Fig 3A). The progressive decrease in WBCT reached a nadir of 15 and 15.5 minutes at 120 and 78 hours, respectively. WBCT remained <18 minutes through 200 hours, 80 hours after the last subcutaneous injection. Daily subcutaneous administration of dalcinonacog alfa shortened aPTT in P07 from 57.9 seconds at baseline to 28.0 seconds at 120 hours and in P41 from 46.7 seconds at baseline to 28.3 seconds at 126 hours (Fig 3B). For P07 and P41, daily subcutaneous dalcinonacog alfa produced daily fluctuations (peaks and troughs) of dalcinonacog alfa antigen with a progressive increase in both until dosing was completed. The decrease in aPTT mirrored the reduction in WBCT. We do not have sufficient information to explain why the aPTT decreased from 58.7 seconds to 47 seconds after time point 264 hours. Since the FIX:Ag was undetectable at those times, it is likely that this fluctuation in aPTT result is due to background variation in the absence of detectible FIX [45].
There was a progressive increase in plasma FIX antigen with daily subcutaneous injection of dalcinonacog alfa. After six doses there was a peak FIX antigen of 173.3 and 188 ng/mL in dog P07 and P41, respectively (Fig 3C). FIX activity is presented in Fig 3D. The plasma FIX activity correlated well with FIX antigen; (Fig 3E). Bioavailability was determined as the ratio of the dose adjusted area under the curve (AUC) for the SQ infusion relative to that for the IV infusion. The bioavailability of subcutaneous dalcinonacog alfa was 10.3%. The half-life was calculated based on the use of a piecewise log-linear regression that was fit using a robust fitting algorithm (M-regression) [46, 47]. The subcutaneous half-life after daily dosing was 155 hours compared with an IV alpha phase half-life of 28 hours and a beta phase value of 59 hours. Only two dogs were evaluated in this study, which precludes reasonable estimates of the standard errors of the statistical estimates provided.
D-dimer levels remained within the normal range at all times (range in clinically healthy dogs is 0.1 to 0.5 mg/l [48]). No thromboses were observed; coagulation was improved but not normalized. There were no treatment-emergent, clinically significant adverse events, and no abnormal hematology, chemistry, or pro-coagulant laboratory abnormalities throughout this study. Other preclinical studies in wild-type and hemophilia B dogs and in minipigs confirmed the lack of treatment‐emergent, clinically significant adverse events. Furthermore, there was no skin reaction at 24 h and 48 h in all minipigs following SQ dosing of dalcinonacog alfa [49, 50].
A: WBCT
B: aPTT
C: FIX Antigen Levels
D: FIX Activity Levels
E. Correlation of FIX activity and antigen in plasma
Discussion
A subcutaneous FIX product with a longer half-life to prolong the protective hemostatic effect would potentially offer several benefits to patients with hemophilia B, including a reduced number of intravenous injections, consistent higher FIX activity levels, improved acceptance of prophylactic regimens and patient adherence, and enhanced quality of life [30]. It appears that the enhanced biological properties of dalcinonacog alfa may confer these benefits. The benefit of daily SQ dalcinonacog alfa is resultant high levels and is steady high levels likely sufficient to prevent spontaneous bleeds.
The intravenous pharmacokinetic profile of dalcinonacog alfa was similar to recombinant FIX but had 22-fold reduced mass when dosed using the same activity, as it has approximately 22-times greater potency [37]. Single-dose subcutaneous injections did not result in measurable antigen levels in the blood and we attribute this to the need to distribute factor to the extravascular compartment before blood levels can be detected. [51]. Daily subcutaneous dalcinonacog alfa, which has no alteration of the collagen-binding site located in the N-terminal Gla-domain, distributes freely in the extravascular compartment based on volume of distribution PK calculations, as does wild-type FIX. Four days of regular injections in dogs sufficiently demonstrated the effects of the bioavailability, potency, and prolonged effective half-life to reach activity levels sufficient to correct severe hemophilia to normal. Subcutaneous dalcinonacog alfa did not produce any clinical adverse events for the duration of the study. A limitation of canine models of inherited bleeding disorders is the development of antibodies to human proteins precluding long-term use. Preclinical animal studies cannot predict antibody development in humans [52]. Additional studies are required to monitor immunogenicity to dalcinonacog alfa. Although this study initially utilized a chromogenic activity assay, we subsequently learned that the activity of dalcinonacog alfa is best determined by a one-stage assay [44, 53] Results presented in Fig 3D thus represent those of the one-stage clotting assay. Interestingly, a significant correction in the WBCT and aPTT was observed within the first 24 hours after the first dose of 300 IU/kg dalcinonacog alfa, whereas the observable plasma levels of FIX activity were approximately 5% and negligible antigen was detected. These data suggest that dalcinonacog alfa is efficacious at correcting markers for normal coagulation at low plasma concentrations in keeping with more rapid and increased enzyme kinetics and activity.
Early individualized prophylactic therapy in individuals with hemophilia B has proven and profound medical benefits [11–16]. However, prophylaxis therapy needs to be effective, safe, convenient, and simple to utilize to improve acceptance by caregivers and individuals with hemophilia B [22–27].
Conclusion
The data from this preclinical study demonstrate that regular subcutaneous administration of dalcinonacog alfa, resulting in high and prolonged circulating FIX activity, may provide a more effective and convenient treatment than current intravenous rFIX products. The increased potency of dalcinonacog alfa allows low-volume injection and attains meaningful antigen and activity levels in the blood. Moreover, no potential safety concerns were identified with dalcinonacog alfa. However, immunogenicity should be closely monitored in future studies with dalcinonacog alfa. Clinical trials have been initiated to evaluate the efficacy, PK, PD, bioavailability, and safety of daily subcutaneous treatment with dalcinonacog alfa for bleeding prophylaxis in adults with hemophilia B.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
MLL and HL analyzed the data. TCN, EPM, and RAR designed and executed the canine study. The medical writing support was provided by Bronwyn Boyes.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by Catalyst Bioscience, Inc. The medical writing support was provided by Bronwyn Boyes and sponsored by Catalyst Bioscience. The funder provided support in the form of an institutional contract for authors [TCN, EPM, RAR], and did not have a role in data collection, but did have a role in the study design, and analysis, decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section. HL is an employee and MLL is a contractor of the funder.
References
- 1.Mannucci PM, Tuddenham EG. The hemophilias—from royal genes to gene therapy. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(23):1773–1779. 10.1056/NEJM200106073442307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Berntorp E, Shapiro AD. Modern hemophilia care. Lancet. 2012;379(9824):1447–1456. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61139-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.White GC 2nd, Rosendaal F, Aledort LM. Definitions in hemophilia. Recommendation of the scientific subcommittee on factor VIII and factor IX of the scientific and standardization committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Thromb Haemost. 2001;85(3):560 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Treatment Guidelines Working Group, on behalf of the World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH). Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia [Internet] 2nd Edition. Québec: World Federation of Hemophilia; 2012. [cited 2020 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www1.wfh.org/publication/files/pdf-1472.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Aznar JA, Lucía F, Abad-Franch L, Jiménez-Yuste V, Pérez R, Batlle J, et al. Hemophilia in Spain. Haemophilia. 2009;15(3):665–675. 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2009.02001.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Katz J. Prevalence of factor IX inhibitors among patients with hemophilia B: results of a large-scale North American survey. Haemophilia 1996;2(1):28–31. 10.1111/j.1365-2516.1996.tb00006.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nerich V, Tissot E, Faradji A, Demesmay K, Bertrand MA, Lorenzini JL, et al. Cost-of-illness study of severe hemophilia A and B in five French hemophilia treatment centres. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30(3):287–292. 10.1007/s11096-007-9181-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Giangrande P. Hemophilia B: Christmas disease. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2005;6(9):1517–1524. 10.1517/14656566.6.9.1517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fischer K, Van Den Berg M. Prophylaxis for severe hemophilia: clinical and economical issues. Haemophilia. 2003;9(4):376–381. 10.1046/j.1365-2516.2003.00764.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ljung RC. Prophylactic infusion regimens in the management of hemophilia. Thromb Haemost. 1999;82(2):525–530. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Manco-Johnson MJ, Abshire TC, Shapiro AD, Riske B, Hacker MR, Kilcoyne R, et al. Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophilia. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(6):535–544. 10.1056/NEJMoa067659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tagliaferri A, Franchini M, Coppola A, Rivolta GF, Santoro C, Rossetti G, et al. Effects of secondary prophylaxis started in adolescent and adult haemophiliacs. Haemophilia 2008;14(5):945–951. 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2008.01791.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Valentino LA, Mamonov V, Hellmann A, Quon DV, Chybicka A, Schroth P, et al. ; Prophylaxis Study Group. A randomized comparison of two prophylaxis regimens and a paired comparison of on-demand and prophylaxis treatments in hemophilia A management. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10(3):359–367. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04611.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Oldenburg J, Zimmermann R, Katsarou O, Theodossiades G, Zanon E, Niemann B, et al. ; Cross-sectional MRI study investigators. Controlled, cross-sectional MRI evaluation of joint status in severe hemophilia A patients treated with prophylaxis vs. on demand. Haemophilia. 2015;21(2):171–179. 10.1111/hae.12539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Andersson NG, Auerswald G, Barnes C, Carcao M, Dunn AL, Fijnvandraat K, et al. Intracranial hemorrhage in children and adolescents with severe hemophilia A or B—the impact of prophylactic treatment. Br J Haematol. 2017;179(2):298–307. 10.1111/bjh.14844 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stieltjes N, Calvez T, Demiguel V, Torchet MF, Briquel ME, Fressinaud E, et al. ; French ICH Study Group. French ICH Study Group. Intracranial haemorrhages in French hemophilia patients (1991–2001): clinical presentation, management and prognosis factors for death. Haemophilia. 2005;11(5):452–458. 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2005.01090.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.White GC, Courter S, Bray GL, Lee M, Gomperts ED. A multicenter study of recombinant factor VIII (Recombinate) in previously treated patients with hemophilia A. The Recombinate Previously Treated Patient Study Group. Thromb Haemost. 1997;77(4):660–667. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Santagostino E. Prophylaxis in hemophilia B patients: unresolved issues and pharmacoeconomic implications. Haemophilia. 2010;16(Suppl 6):13–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schulte S. Half-life extension through albumin fusion technologies. Thromb Res. 2009;124(Suppl 2):S6–S8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.National Hemophilia Foundation. Fast Facts [Internet] New York: The Foundation; c1948–2020 [cited 2020 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.hemophilia.org/About-Us/Fast-Facts. [Google Scholar]
- 21.BeneFIX® Coagulation Factor IX (Recombinant) Prescribing Information [Internet] New Jersey: Wyeth Pharmaceuticals LLC; July 2019. Available from: http://labeling.pfizer.com/showlabeling.aspx?id=492 [Google Scholar]
- 22.De Moerloose P, Urbancik W, Van Den Berg HM, Richards M. A survey of adherence to hemophilia therapy in six European countries: results and recommendations. Haemophilia. 2008;14(5):931–938. 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2008.01843.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Blanchette P, Rivard G, Israels S, Robinson S, Ali K, Walker I, et al. ; Association of Hemophilia Clinic Directors of Canada and Canadian Association of Nurses in Hemophilia Care. A survey of factor prophylaxis in the Canadian hemophilia A population. Haemophilia. 2004;10(6):679–683. 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2004.01045.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hacker MR, Geraghty S, Manco-Johnson M. Barriers to compliance with prophylaxis therapy in hemophilia. Haemophilia. 2001;7(4):392–396. 10.1046/j.1365-2516.2001.00534.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Escuriola Ettingshausen C, Hegemann I, Simpson ML, Cuker A, Kulkarni R, Pruthi RK, et al. Favorable pharmacokinetics in hemophilia B for nonacog beta pegol versus recombinant factor IX-Fc fusion protein: A randomized trial. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2019;3(2):268–276. 10.1002/rth2.12192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Morfini M. A new, promising, extended half-life rFIX concentrate. Lancet Haematol. 2017;4(2):e59–e60. 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30003-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Russell KE, Olsen EH, Raymer RA, Merricks EP, Bellinger DA, Read MS, et al. Reduced bleeding events with subcutaneous administration of recombinant human factor IX in immune-tolerant hemophilia B dogs. Blood. 2003;102(13):4393–4398. 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tischer B, Marino R, Napolitano M. Patient preferences in the treatment of hemophilia A: impact of storage conditions on product choice. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:431–441 10.2147/PPA.S151812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Thornburg CD, Duncan NA. Treatment adherence in hemophilia. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:1677–1686. 10.2147/PPA.S139851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stoner KL, Harder H, Fallowfield LJ, Jenkins VA. Intravenous versus Subcutaneous Drug Administration. Which Do Patients Prefer? A Systematic Review [published online ahead of print, 2014 Jul 12]. Patient. 2014; 10.1007/s40271-014-0075-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Peyvandi F, Garagiola I, Young G. The past and future of haemophilia: diagnosis, treatments, and its complications. Lancet. 2016;388(10040):187–197 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01123-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Blouse G, Levy H. Redesigning Factor IX to Display Increased Potency and Enhanced Duration of Action In Vivo. Unpublished, manuscript in preparation. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Neurath H, Walsh KA. Role of proteolytic enzymes in biological regulation (a review). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976;73(11):3825–3832. 10.1073/pnas.73.11.3825 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.den Dunnen JT, Dalgleish R, Maglott DR, et al. HGVS Recommendations for the Description of Sequence Variants: 2016 Update. Hum Mutat. 2016;37(6):564–569. 10.1002/humu.22981 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hong S-B, Levy H, Jung JY, Park M, Seo AR, Seo SH, et al. Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneously Administered CB 2679d/ISU304 in Wild-Type and Hemophilia B Mice. Unpublished, manuscript in preparation. [Google Scholar]
- 36.You CW, Shin H-J, Levy H, Lee M, Hong S-B, Siegel J, et al. Phase 1/2 Trial of Subcutaneously Administered Factor IX Variant CB 2679d/ISU304: Pharmacokinetics and Activity. Unpublished, manuscript in preparation. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Date on file. Catalyst Bioscience.
- 38.Hopfner KP, Lang A, Karcher A, et al. Coagulation factor IXa: the relaxed conformation of Tyr99 blocks substrate binding. Structure. 1999;7(8):989–996. 10.1016/s0969-2126(99)80125-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yen CT, Fan MN, Yang YL, et al. Current animal models of hemophilia: the state of the art. Thromb J. 2016;14(Suppl 1):22 10.1186/s12959-016-0106-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Nichols TC, Dillow AM, Franck HW, et al. Protein replacement therapy and gene transfer in canine models of hemophilia A, hemophilia B, von Willebrand disease, and factor VII deficiency. ILAR J. 2009;50(2):144–167. 10.1093/ilar.50.2.144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nichols TC, Franck HW, Franck CT, De Friess N, Raymer RA and Merricks EP. Sensitivity of whole blood clotting time and activated partial thromboplastin time for factor IX: relevance to gene therapy and determination of post‐transfusion elimination time of canine factor IX in hemophilia B dogs. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10:474–476. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04613.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Brinkhous KM, Hedner U, Garris JB, et al. Effect of recombinant factor VIIa on the hemostatic defect in dogs with hemophilia A, hemophilia B, and von Willebrand disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989;86(4):1382–6. 10.1073/pnas.86.4.1382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Evans JP, Brinkhous KM, Brayer GD, Reisner HM and High KA. Canine hemophilia B resulting from a point mutation with unusual consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:10095–10099 10.1073/pnas.86.24.10095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Williams SC, Gray E. Activity measurements of dalcinonacog alfa. Haemophilia. 2020;26(2):346–353. 10.1111/hae.13949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Herzog RW, Arruda VR, Fisher TH, Read MS, Nichols TC, High KA. Absence of circulating factor IX antigen in hemophilia B dogs of the UNC-Chapel Hill colony. Thromb Haemost. 2000;84(2):352–354. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lee ML, Poon W-Y, Kingdon HS. A two-phase linear regression model for biological half-life data. J. Lab Clin. Med., 115, 745–748, 1990. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lee ML, Schroth P, Bray G, Gomperts ED. The use of robust regression techniques to obtain improved coagulation factor half-life estimates. XVIth Congress of the International Society for Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Florence, Italy, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Dewhurst E, Cue S, Crawford E, Papasouliotis K. A retrospective study of canine D-dimer concentrations measured using an immunometric "Point-of-Care" test. J Small Anim Pract. 2008;49(7):344–348. 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2008.00583.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hong S-B, Levy H, Jung JY, Park M, Seo AR, et al. Pharmacokinetics of subcutaneously administered CB2679D/ISU304 in wild-type and hemophilia B mice. Unpublished, manuscript in preparation. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hong S-B, Levy H, Jung JY, Park M, Seo AR, et al. Pharmacokinetics of subcutaneously administered CB2679D/ISU304 in minipig compared with BeneFIX. Unpublished, manuscript in preparation. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Feng D, Stafford KA, Broze GJ, Stafford DW. Evidence of clinically significant extravascular stores of factor IX. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11(12):2176–2178. 10.1111/jth.12421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Nichols TC, Hough C, Agersø H, Ezban M, Lillicrap D. Canine models of inherited bleeding disorders in the development of coagulation assays, novel protein replacement and gene therapies. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14(5):894–905. 10.1111/jth.13301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gray E, Tubbs J, Thomas S, et al. Measurement of activated factor IX in factor IX concentrates: correlation with in vivo thrombogenicity. Thromb Haemost. 1995;73(4):675–679. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.