Skip to main content
Ecology and Evolution logoLink to Ecology and Evolution
. 2020 Sep 20;10(20):11217–11236. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6762

Genetic diversity, population structure, and gene flow analysis of lowland bamboo [Oxytenanthera abyssinica (A. Rich.) Munro] in Ethiopia

Oumer Abdie Oumer 1,2,, Kifle Dagne 1, Tileye Feyissa 3, Kassahun Tesfaye 3,4, Jayaraman Durai 5, Muhammad Zeeshan Hyder 6
PMCID: PMC7593185  PMID: 33144960

Abstract

Bamboo, a member of subfamily Bambusoideae in the grass family (Poaceae), is one of the most important nontimber forest resources and a potential alternative to wood and wood products. Ethiopian lowland bamboo (Oxytenanthera abyssinica) is an economically and ecologically important species which accounts about 85% of total bamboo coverage in the country. This species is experiencing population decline due to a number of anthropogenic factors. As a foundation step, genetic diversity, population structure, and gene flow analysis of various O. abyssinica populations found in Ethiopia are studied using inter‐simple sequence repeat markers. One hundred and thirty isolates of bamboo belonging to 13 geographically diverse populations were collected for DNA extraction and analysis. Heterozygosity, level of polymorphism, marker efficiency, Nei's gene diversity (H), and Shannon's information index (I) analysis, analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA), analysis for cluster, principal coordinates (PCoA), and admixture analyses were performed based on the markers banding pattern. The results indicated high genetic variation (84.48%) at species level. The H, I, observed and effective number of alleles at the species level were 0.2702, 0.4061, 1.8448, and 1.4744, respectively, suggesting a relatively high level of genetic diversity. However, genetic differentiation at the population level was relatively low. Using grouped populations, AMOVA revealed that most (61.05%) of the diversity was distributed within the populations with F ST = 0.38949, F SC = 0.10486, and F CT = 0.31797. Cluster analysis grouped the populations into markedly distinct clusters, suggesting confined propagation in distinct geographic regions. STRUCTURE analyses showed K = 2 for all populations and K = 11 excluding Gambella population. Using these markers, we found strong evidence that the genetic diversity of the lowland bamboo is associated with distinct geographic regions and that isolates of Gambella Region, with their unique genetic origin, are quite different from other bamboos found in the country.

Keywords: bamboo, genetic differentiation, ISSR primers, Oxytenanthera abyssinica, population structure


Bamboo, a member of subfamily Bambusoideae in the grass family (Poaceae), is one of the most important non‐timber forest resources and a potential alternative to wood and wood products. Ethiopian lowland bamboo (Oxytenanthera abyssinica) is an economically and ecologically important species which accounts about 85% of total bamboo coverage in the country. This species is experiencing population decline due to a number of anthropogenic factors. As a foundation step, genetic diversity, population structure, and gene flow analysis of various O. abyssinica populations found in Ethiopia are studied using inter‐simple sequence repeat markers. One hundred and thirty isolates of bamboo belonging to 13 geographically diverse populations were collected for DNA extraction and analysis. Heterozygosity, level of polymorphism, marker efficiency, Nei's gene diversity (H) and Shannon's information index (I) analysis, analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA), analysis for cluster, principal coordinates (PCoA), and admixture analyses were performed based on the markers banding pattern. The results indicated high genetic variation (84.48%) at species level. The H, I, observed and effective number of alleles at the species level were 0.2702, 0.4061, 1.8448, and 1.4744 respectively, suggesting a relatively high level of genetic diversity. However, genetic differentiation at the population level was relatively low. Using grouped populations, AMOVA revealed that most (61.05%) of the diversity was distributed within the populations with F ST = 0.38949, F SC = 0.10486, and F CT = 0.31797. Cluster analysis grouped the populations into markedly distinct clusters, suggesting confined propagation in distinct geographic regions. STRUCTURE analyses showed K = 2 for all populations and K = 11 excluding Gambella population. Using these markers, we found strong evidence that the genetic diversity of the lowland bamboo is associated with distinct geographic regions and that isolates of Gambella Region, with their unique genetic origin, are quite different from other bamboos found in the country.

graphic file with name ECE3-10-11217-g007.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Bamboo is a member of the grass family, Poaceae, and constitutes a single subfamily Bambusoideae with 121 genera and 1,662 species (Canavan et al., 2016; Vorontsova, Clark, Dransfield, Govaerts, & Baker, 2016). It is the fastest‐growing plant in the world (up to 100 cm per day; Tao, Fu, & Zhou, 2018) and is one of the most important nontimber forest resources and a potential alternative to wood and wood product (Ekhuemelo, Tembe, & Ugwueze, 2018). Currently, 100 species are commercially cultivated around the world (Li et al., 2020) Bamboo is a multi‐purpose plant, with over 10,000 documented uses and applications. It has rapid regeneration capacity and the possibility of annual harvesting within a few years of planting offers significant advantages over the other forest species (Akinlabi, Anane‐Fenin, & Akwada, 2017; Diver, 2006). Bamboo has also been proven to address many global challenges and contributes to the following United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: SDG 1 (no poverty), 7 (affordable and clean energy), 11 (sustainable and resilient housing), 12 (efficient use of resources), 13 (address climate change), and 15 (life on land) (Bau & Trinh, 2019; Ekhuemelo et al., 2018; Kaushal et al., 2018; Yuen, Fung, & Ziegler, 2017). Due to its potential for water recharge and mitigation soil erosion, bamboo also provides an opportunity for watershed development and restoration of degraded areas (Kaushal et al., 2019, 2020). Furthermore, bamboo is a fodder for livestock and food for humans contributing to ensuring food security (Andriarimalala, Kpomasse, Salgado, Ralisoa, & Durai, 2019; Choudhury, Sahu, & Sharma, 2012; Halvorson, Cassida, Turner, & Belesky, 2011; Mulatu, Bahiru, Kidane, Getahun, & Belay, 2019; Nongdam & Tikendra, 2014). Bamboo has huge economic potential; the global production and local consumption are worth an estimated 60 billion USD, and the international export of the material is valued at USD 2 billion per annum (International Network for Bamboo & Rattan, 2019).

The major species richness of bamboo is found in Asia‐Pacific region, followed by South America. Africa has the fewest number of species is (Bystriakova, Kapos, Lysenko, & Stapleton, 2003), while Europe and Antarctica have no native bamboo species (Zhao et al., 2018). According to the Food and Agriculture Organization's thematic world bamboo resources assessment report and regional remote sensing assessment of bamboo resources in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Uganda, these three countries possess the majority of the bamboo resources in Africa by (Lobovikov et al., 2007; Zhao et al., 2018). Africa is home to 43 species, 40 of which are found mainly in Madagascar, with the remaining three found in mainland Africa (Embaye, 2000). Two indigenous woody bamboo species grow in Ethiopia: the monotypic genus lowland bamboo (Oxytenanthera abyssinica [A. Richard] Munro) and the African Alpine Bamboo, or highland bamboo (Yushania alpina K. Shumann Lin; synonym: Arundinaria alpina, Oldeania alpine K. Schumann). These two species are indigenous to Ethiopia and endemic to mainland Africa (Embaye, 2000; Ensermu, Tamrat, Alemayehu, & Gebremedhin, 2000). Ethiopia contributes more than 1.47 million hectares of bamboo coverage (Zhao et al., 2018), which accounts for about 67% of the total bamboo coverage in the continent and 7% of the global coverage (Embaye, 2000). The lowland bamboo (O. abyssinica) accounts for 85% of the total national coverage, while the highland bamboo (A. alpina) accounts for the remaining 15% (Embaye, 2000; Embaye, Christersson, Ledin, & Weih, 2003; Lobovikov et al., 2007). The lowland bamboo grows in an elevation a range of between 540 to 1,750 m and highland bamboo at a higher elevation above 2,480 m (Zhao et al., 2018).

Assessing the genetic variability of a species within and among different populations is important to devise mechanisms for effective identification, conservation, and multiplication of suitable genetic materials. The genetic diversity of bamboos has not been adequately explored, and relatively limited numbers of molecular finger printing studies have been conducted. The main reason for this exploration of limited genetic diversity is related to the difficulty in assessing the phenotypic variability of clones (Li et al., 2020). Molecular marker techniques such as random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), inter‐simple sequence repeats (ISSR), and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), simple sequence repeat (SSR), expressed sequence tag derived simple sequence repeat (EST‐SSR), sequence‐related amplified polymorphism (SRAP), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), and inter‐retrotransposon amplified polymorphism (IRAP) have been used for characterization of some bamboo germplasm (Li et al., 2020; Ma et al., 2013; Nag et al., 2013; Nilkanta, Amom, Tikendra, Rahaman, & Nongdam, 2017; Tian, Yang, Wong, Liu, & Ruan, 2012; Yang, An, Gu, & Tian, 2012) around the world. ISSR molecular markers are widely used for population genetic analysis of different plants, generating more reliable and reproducible bands than RAPD (Nagaoka & Ogihara, 1997; Zhang & Dai, 2010). Use of ISSR is also technically simpler, quicker, and more cost‐effective (Oumer, Yohannes, Kassahun, Abel, & Endashaw, 2015; Tesfaye, Govers, Bekele, & Borsch, 2014) than RFLP, SSR, and AFLP markers, as no previous sequence information is required to generate DNA amplification products (Mukherjee et al., 2010; Tian et al., 2012). ISSR markers are observed to be highly variable within the species and reveal many more polymorphisms since they use longer primers that allow more stringent annealing temperatures (Hillis, Moritz, & Mable, 1996).

Genetic erosion of bamboo and their wild relatives are accelerating at a higher rate because of human activities such as deforestation, wild fire, overexploitation, and the introduction of exotic species without proper research on the potential impact of genetic pollution and problems associated with the transfer of exotic germplasm (Canavan et al., 2016; Tian et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020). Starting from 2007, Ethiopia has introduced 23 new bamboo species belonging to seven genera (Mulatu, Alemayehu, & Tadesse, 2016). These species are under multiplication at the Holetta and Gurd‐Shola nurseries of the Central Ethiopia Environment and Forest Research Center (CE‐EFRC), Addis Ababa. Overall, it is estimated that about 40 bamboo species are introduced to the country and are being multiplied for planting and/or planted in different geographical locations of the country. Such a massive introduction of exotic species will accelerate the genetic erosion of the native bamboo in the country.

About half of the world`s woody bamboo species are vulnerable to extinction as a result of massive forest destruction (Bystriakova, Kapos, & Lysenko, 2004). In addition to the genetic erosion by exotic species, bamboos in Ethiopia are vulnerable to erosion by human activities. The construction of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) with catchment area covers 172,250 km2 (Abtew & Dessu, 2019) is built primarily on major lowland bamboo growing areas of the Metekel Zone of the Benishangul‐Gumuz Region (BGR) and is a prime example of human activities contributing to bamboo deforestation in the country. Moreover, lack and/or gap of knowledge on the plant's biology, genetics, and techniques and technologies for value addition constituting a failure to fulfill the plant's economic potential has also led to unsustainable management of the bamboo plant. The lack of research conducted in Ethiopia, especially on the diversity and systematics of O. abyssinica (the species with great ecological and industrial benefit and great coverage in Africa) at DNA level, prompted the commencement of this research. Therefore, in the present study, we used 19 ISSR primers out of 108 initial screenings and 38 final screening of ISSR primers aiming to assess the genetic diversity, population structure, and gene flow analysis of O. abyssinica collected from lowland bamboo growing areas in Ethiopia.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Plant material collection and sampling strategy

Young leaves (5–7 in number) from 130 individuals belonging to 13 populations (each population represented by 10 individual bamboo culms) were collected from the natural lowland bamboo (O. abyssinica) growing areas of Ethiopia. Since 64.07% of the country's lowland bamboo grows in the BGR (Zhao et al., 2018), nine populations were collected from this region and the remaining four populations were collected from three other bamboo growing regions. GPS data and altitudinal information for each population are presented in Table 1. Maps of collection sites are shown in Figure 1.

Table 1.

Details of codes, geographic locations and GPS coordinates of bamboo collections

Region Zone District Specific collection site Sample code Average GPS reading of the population

Altitude

m.a.s.l

X Y
BGR Metekel Guba Yarenja BGM‐Guba 11°16′13.1″ 035°22′15.4″ 824
Dangur Misreta BGM‐Dangur 11°18′50.3″ 036°14′10.6″ 1,240
Mandura Etsitsa BGM‐Mandura 11°09′14.5″ 036°19′50.3″ 1,039
Pawe Mender 30 BGM‐Pawe 11°18′32.5″ 036°24′40.2″ 1,118
Assosa Bambasi Ambesa Chaka BGA‐Bambasi 09°53′55.0″ 034°40′01.8″ 1,518
Assosa Tsetse Adurnunu BGA‐Assosa 10°09′29.9″ 034°31′37.1″ 1,507
Kurmuk HorAzab BGA‐Kurmuk 10°32′33.7″ 034°28′57.9″ 1,275
Kemash Kemash Kemash BGK‐Kemash 09°29′31.4″ 035°52′35.2″ 1,234
Yasso Dangacho BGK‐Yasso 09°52′27.5″ 036°05′32.6″ 1,176
Oromia West Wollega Gimbi AbaSena forest ORWW‐Gimbi 09°01′32.2″ 035°59′54.1″ 1,407
BunoBedele DabuHena Didhessa valley ORBB‐Dabu Hena 08°40′21.1″ 036°23′32.9″ 1,399
Gambella Gambella Abol Penkwe GGAM‐Abol 08°14′13.1″ 034°31′06.2″ 435
SNNPs Konta Konta Koyshe SNNPs‐Konta 06°43′35.6″ 036°34′26.8″ 958

Abbreviations: BGR, Benishangul‐Gumuz Region; BGM, Benishangul‐Gumuz Region Metekel Zone; BGA, Benishangul‐Gumuz Region Assosa Zone; BGK, Benishangul‐Gumuz Region Kemash Zone; ORWW, Oromia Region West Wollega Zone; ORBB, Oromia Region Buno Bedele Zone; GGAM, Gambella Region Gambella Zone; SNNPs, South Nation's Nationalities and Peoples.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Maps showing sample collection area: (a) Ethiopia's bamboo cover map in the Finer Resolution Observation and Monitoring‐Global Land Cover (FROM‐GLC) classification scheme with other land cover classes; (b) Map of Ethiopia showing sample collection area; and (c) Clipped map showing sample collection area

2.2. DNA extraction, testing gels, DNA normalization, and primer screening

A total of 130 O. abyssinica individuals were used in the study. Five to seven young fresh leaves were preserved in zip‐lock plastic bag with the appropriate amount of silica gel. An amount of 100 mg of silica gel dried leaves was crushed by a mixer and miller (Retsch Mixer Mill MM 400) in the presence of three 3.2 mm diameter stainless steel beads in a 2‐ml sterile centrifuge tube. Genomic DNA was isolated separately using a modified 2% cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) DNA isolation method at Plant Molecular Biology Laboratory (PMBL) and Plant Genetics Research Laboratory (PGRL) of Addis Ababa University. One milliliter preheated 2% CTAB extraction buffer (2% CTAB, 100 mM Tris‐Base pH 8.0, 25 mM Na2‐EDTA, 2 M NaCl, 250 mg/ml PVP and 2% β‐mercaptoethanol) was added to the tube containing crushed leaf powder. The dissolved CTAB mix was incubated for 30 min at 65°C. The tubes were gently inverted every 10 min. Seven hundred microliters of the supernatant (clear liquid only) was transferred to a new sterile centrifuge tube using blue pipette tips, which were cut. Seven hundred microliters of chloroform was added, mixed thoroughly, and centrifuged at 16,000 g for 10 min at 26°C. Six hundred microliters of the supernatant was transferred to the new fresh Eppendorf tube, and 60 µl of 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.2) was added and thoroughly mixed. Six hundred microliters of ice‐cold isopropanol was added and gently mixed by inverting the tubes 3–5 times, and then, the tubes were placed in a refrigerator at −20°C for 2 hr. The mix was centrifuged at 16,000 g at 4°C for 5 min to precipitate the DNA. The supernatant was discarded, and the DNA was washed using 1 ml of 70% ethanol by dissolving the pallet completely in the wash buffer and centrifuged at 16,000 g for 3 min at 4°C. The wash step was repeated by cold absolute ethanol (1 ml), and the pellet was air‐dried. The pellet was dissolved in 60 µl 0.1X TE (10 mM Tris‐HCl pH 8.0 and 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0) buffer containing RNase. The concentration and quality of DNA were checked by test gel electrophoresis in 1% agarose and measured by using NanoDrop (Thermo Scientific NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer). Each sample was measured, and those with high DNA quality were used for PCR amplification after normalization of each sample to a concentration of 100 ng/μl. Gel documentation was taken by Bio‐Rad Gel Doc™ EZ System Imager.

Thirty‐eight primers (35 designed from the University of British Colombia (UBC) and 3 from previous work) out of 108 ISSR primers (100 from UBC and 8 from the literature) were screened for the initial testing of polymorphism and reproducibility. Nineteen primers were found to be reproducible and polymorphic and used for further ISSR‐PCR work for the study. Among these 19 ISSR primers, ten were dinucleotide, two were tri‐nucleotide, two were tetra‐nucleotide, three were penta‐nucleotide, and two were 5′ anchored primers. Primers were further categorized into 3′ anchored, 5′ anchored, and unanchored based on anchorage property (Table 2).

Table 2.

Details of ISSR primers used for diversity analysis in this study

No. Nucleotide Sequence Primer name Repeat motifs Anchorage property Selected for PCR Optimized T a (oC)
1 (AG)8T UBC807 Dinucleotide 3'‐anchored
2 (AG)8C UBC808 '' ''
3 (GA)8T UBC810 '' '' 42
4 (GA)8A UBC812 '' '' 42
5 (CT)8T UBC813 '' ''
6 (CT)8G UBC815 '' '' 42
7 (TC)8C UBC823 '' ''
8 (TC)8G UBC824 '' '' 43
9 (AC)8T UBC825 '' ''
10 (AG)8YT UBC834 '' '' 43
11 (AG)8YC UBC835 '' '' 45
12 (GA)8YT UBC840 '' '' 42
13 (GA)8YC UBC841 '' '' 43
14 (GA)8YG UBC842 '' ''
15 (CT)8RC UBC844 '' '' 43
16 (CT)8RG UBC845 '' ''
17 (CA)8RG UBC848 '' '' 47
18 (GT)8YG UBC851 '' ''
19 (TC)8RT UBC853 '' ''
20 (TC)8RG UBC854 '' ''
21 (AC)8YG UBC857 '' ''
22 (ACC)6 UBC861 Tri Unanchored 55
23 (AGC)6 UBC862 '' ''
24 (AGT)6 UBC863 '' ''
25 (ATG)6 UBC864 '' '' 39
26 (GATA)4 UBC872 Tetra
27 (GACA)4 UBC873 '' '' 42
28 (CCCT)4 UBC874 '' ''
29 (CTAG)4 UBC875 '' ''
30 (GATA)2(GACA)2 UBC876 '' '' 39
31 (CTTCA)3 UBC879 Penta ''
32 (GGAGA)3 UBC880 '' '' 45
33 (GGGTG)3 UBC881 '' '' 47
34 BDB(CA)7 UBC888 5′‐anchored 5′‐anchored 47
35 DBD(AC)7 UBC889 '' '' 45
36 (AGG)6 ISSR_1 Tri Unanchored
37 (ACTG)4 ISSR_2 Tetra ''
38 (GACAC)4 ISSR_3 Penta '' 55

Y = C or T → (Pyrimidine); R = A or G → (Purine); B = C, G, or T → (not A); D = A, G, or T → (not C).

2.3. ISSR‐PCR amplification and gel electrophoresis

Each DNA amplification reaction was performed in a final volume of 10 µl containing 5.5 µl of 2x Taq plus Master Mix (containing Taq DNA polymerase, dNTPs, MgCl2, PCR buffer, PCR reaction enhancer, stabilizer, and a blue tracer dye), 3.5 µl of ddH2O, 0.5 µl of ISSR primer (0.2 pmol/µl), and 0.5 µl of normalized genomic DNA (100 ng). The blue dye and a stabilizer of 2x Taq plus Master Mix helped to directly load the final products onto a gel for analysis. The thermal profile included pre‐PCR denaturation at 94°C for 4 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturing at 94°C for 30 s, annealing for 30 s at the optimized temperature (details are given for each respective primer given in Table 2), extension at 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products were stored at 4°C until loading on agarose gel electrophoresis. Five microliters of the ISSR‐amplification product of each sample was loaded on 1.67% agarose gel and in 0.5x TBE buffer at a constant voltage of 100 V for 1:30 – 2 hr. The agarose gel was stained with 3.0 µl ethidium bromide after dissolving the agarose powder in 0.5% TBE buffer. The ISSR bands were visualized and photographed under Bio‐Rad Gel Doc™ EZ System Imager that was connected to a PC with Image Lab software and stored for later data scoring. To estimate the molecular sizes of the resolved fragments, a 100 bp DNA marker was used.

2.4. Scoring of bands

ISSR bands were scored manually. According to the weight of the DNA ladder (100 bp), the same weight bands were marked as a line. The bands that were clearly visible and repeatable on the electrophoresis map were marked as "1," the absence of a band at the same site was marked as "0" and ambiguous bands were considered as a missing data and marked as "?". Intensity variations among fragments having approximately the same molecular size were not considered although in some cases intensity differences of the bands were observed. A binary data matrix was compiled with individuals in the column and the ISSR markers in the row for each primer set and vice‐versa according to the requirements of the software. Each amplified fragment was named by the code of the primers across the row and/or column followed by the Arabic numbers starting from the fragment having high molecular weight to the fragments with low‐molecular weight. Both the total number of bands amplified by each primer and the number of polymorphic bands were calculated.

2.5. Data analysis

2.5.1. Band pattern frequency, markers efficiency, and gene diversity analysis

On the basis of the recorded band profiles, different software was employed for data analysis. POPGENE version1.32 (Yeh & Boyle, 1999) and GenAlEx (genetic analysis in excel) version 6.5 (Peakall & Smouse, 2012) were used to calculate genetic diversity for each population as the number of polymorphic loci, percent polymorphism, gene diversity, and Shannon diversity index. GenAlEx6.5 was also used to calculate band patterns on its frequency and polymorphism. The polymorphism information content (PIC), marker index (MI), expected heterozygosity (H), and discriminating power (D) were inferred via iMEC (https://irscope.shinyapps.io/iMEC/) online.

2.5.2. Proportion of genetic variability within and among populations

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was used to calculate the F‐statistics that were used to estimate the proportion of genetic variability found among populations (F ST), among populations within groups (F SC), and among groups (F CT) using Areliquin version 3.01 (Excoffier & Lischer,  2006) and GenAlEx6.503 (Peakall & Smouse, 2012). The genetic similarity matrix among the 130 individual samples of O. abyssinica was calculated in all pair‐wise comparisons following Jaccard's similarity coefficients.

2.5.3. Clustering and admixture analysis

NTSYS‐pc version 2.02 (Rohlf, 2000) was used to generate the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) phenogram, allowing for a sequential, agglomerative, hierarchical, and nested (SAHN) cluster analysis using the similarity matrix and compare the individual genotypes. The neighbor‐joining (NJ) method (Saitou & Nei, 1987; Studier & Keppler, 1988) was used to compare individual genotypes and evaluate patterns of genotype clustering using Free Tree 0.9.1.50 Software (Pavlicek, Hrda, & Flegr, 1999) and TreeView (Page, 1996). Patterns of genetic variation among individual samples were also further examined in three dimensions with the help of principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) on the basis of Jaccard's coefficients of similarities, which was calculated using PAST software version1.18 (Hammer, Harper, & Ryan, 2001). The first three axes were later used to construct the scatter plot with STATISTICA version 12.0 software's (StatSoft & Inc., 2010) and XLSTAT 2014.5.03.

A Bayesian model‐based clustering algorithm in STRUCTURE ver. 2.3.4 (Falush, Stephens, & Pritchard, 2003; Pritchard, Stephens, & Donnelly, 2000) was applied to infer the pattern of population structure and detection of admixture. To determine the most likely number of populations (K), a burn‐in period of 50,000 was used in each run, and data were collected over 500,000 Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) replications for K = 1 to K = 13 and K = 1 to K = 12 (excluding samples from Gambella Region) using 20 iterations for each K. Each test takes more than 300 hr. for analysis using a PC with 8GB RAM and a core i7 processor. The optimum K value was predicted following the simulation method of Evanno, Regnaut, & Goudet, 2005 using the web‐based STRUCTURE HARVESTER ver. 0.6.94 (Earl, 2012). A bar plot for the optimum K was determined using Clumpak (Cluster Markov Packager Across K) beta version (Kopelman, Mayzel, Jakobsson, Rosenberg, & Mayrose, 2015).

3. RESULTS

3.1. ISSR marker banding patterns

Based on the results from gel pictures taken for each primer, the pattern of DNA amplification obtained was clear and reproducible (Figure 2) even though scoring of bands and interpretation of certain gel pictures were challenging. The size of the band generated ranged from 100 to 1,700 bp (Table 3). The number of bands produced by each primer varied from 13 bands for UBC‐844 to 24 for UBC‐815. Among 348 scored bands, 294 (84.48%) of fragments showed polymorphisms. Based on the repeat motif property of primers, dinucleotides produced 185 scorable bands, tri‐nucleotides 32, tetra‐nucleotides 39, and penta‐nucleotides produced 56 scorable bands. Based on the anchorage property of primers, anchored primers produced 221 bands and unanchored primers produced 127 bands. 3′ anchored (are also dinucleotides) produced 185 bands, whereas 5′ anchored primers produced 56 bands (Table 3).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A representative of ISSR‐PCR electrophoresis profile of 13 populations of O. abyssinica using (a) UBC‐834, (b) UBC‐845, and (c) UBC‐888

Table 3.

Band polymorphism produced by 19 ISSR primers from 13 populations of O. abyssinica along with molecular size ranges in base pairs (bp)

Primers Individual primers Molecular size range in bp
NSB NPL PPL (%) H ± SD I ± SD N m
UBC‐810 18 16 88.89 0.2130 ± 0.2037 0.3322 ± 0.2632 2.1307 1,400–100
UBC‐812 19 19 100 0.3747 ± 0.1784 0.5428 ± 0.2197 2.9205 1,300–300
UBC‐815 24 24 100 0.3318 ± 0.1638 0.4973 ± 0.1992 2.2082 1,400–200
UBC‐824 16 15 93.75 0.3149 ± 0.1563 0.4749 ± 0.2082 1.5946 1,600–300
UBC‐834 22 22 100 0.3712 ± 0.1173 0.5506 ± 0.1389 1.4004 1,700–200
UBC‐835 23 22 95.65 0.2776 ± 0.1623 0.4307 ± 0.2046 1.1409 1,600–100
UBC‐840 16 15 93.75 0.2826 ± 0.2044 0.4242 ± 0.2629 2.9005 1,500–150
UBC‐841 16 14 87.50 0.3050 ± 0.2012 0.4500 ± 0.2665 2.5796 1,100–100
UBC‐844 13 12 92.31 0.2314 ± 0.1714 0.3678 ± 0.2243 1.2566 950–350
UBC‐848 18 15 83.33 0.1451 ± 0.1633 0.2546 ± 0.2047 0.3496 950–150
UBC‐861 14 12 85.71 0.2530 ± 0.1835 0.3905 ± 0.2437 0.3456 1,300–300
UBC‐864 18 13 72.22 0.2775 ± 0.1983 0.4087 ± 0.2832 1.8663 1,400–400
UBC‐873 21 16 76.19 0.2603 ± 0.2106 0.3857 ± 0.2884 2.5901 900–200
UBC‐876 18 13 72.22 0.2520 ± 0.2214 0.3711 ± 0.3012 2.2620 1,100–300
UBC‐880 21 19 90.48 0.3311 ± 0.1962 0.4844 ± 0.2537 1.1703 1,100–200
UBC‐881 19 13 68.42 0.1913 ± 0.2157 0.2899 ± 0.2912 1.9785 1,100–200
UBC‐888 22 12 54.55 0.1542 ± 0.2121 0.2316 ± 0.2911 3.2746 950–300
UBC‐889 14 9 64.29 0.2619 ± 0.2297 0.3778 ± 0.3197 2.0015 900–200
(GACAC)4 16 13 81.25 0.2594 ± 0.2081 0.3892 ± 0.2775 0.8541 1,200–300
Average 18.32 15.58 84.48 0.2702 ± 0.1945 0.4061 ± 0.2595 1.5474
All primers 348 294
Based on repeat motif
Dinucleotides 185 174 94.05 0.2894 ± 0.1780 0.4389 ± 0.2288 1.6598
Tri‐nucleotides 32 25 78.12 0.2668 ± 0.1893 0.4007 ± 0.2626 0.8552
Tetra‐nucleotides 39 29 74.36 0.2565 ± 0.2128 0.3789 ± 0.2906 2.4322
Penta‐nucleotides 56 45 80.36 0.2632 ± 0.2112 0.3912 ± 0.2811 1.1952
Based on anchorage property
3′ anchored 185 174 94.05 0.2894 ± 0.1780 0.4389 ± 0.2288 1.6598
5′ anchored 36 21 58.33 0.1961 ± 0.2223 0.2884 ± 0.3067 2.4821
3′ + 5′ anchored 221 195 88.24 0.2742 ± 0.1885 0.4144 ± 0.2487 1.7315
Unanchored 127 99 77.95 0.2620 ± 0.2048 0.3898 ± 0.2775 1.3081

NSB ‐ number of scorable bands, NPL ‐ number of polymorphic loci, PP ‐ percent polymorphism, H ‐ genetic diversity, I ‐ Shanon's information index and N m ‐ estimate of gene flow. (Remark): all dinucleotides are 3′ anchored.

3.2. Level of polymorphism of Ethiopian lowland bamboo

3.2.1. ISSR primers on genetic polymorphism of Ethiopian lowland bamboo

The highest number of scorable bands (NSB) was produced by primers UBC‐815 (24), UBC‐835 (23), UBC‐834 (22), and UBC‐888 (22) and the lowest NSB were produced by primers UBC‐844 (13) and UBC‐889 (14). The number of polymorphic loci (NPL) ranges from 24 (UBC‐815) to 9 (UBC‐889). Percentage of polymorphic loci (PPL) was 100% for primers UBC‐812, UBC‐815, and UBC‐834, the lowest PPL were exhibited by primers UBC‐888 (54.55%), and UBC‐889 (64.29%) and the average PPL for all primers were 84.48%. Based on the repeat motifs and anchorage property of primers, dinucleotide repeat motifs showed higher PPL (94.05) than tri‐ (78.12), tetra‐ (74.36), and penta‐nucleotide (80.36) repeat motifs. 3′ anchored primers showed higher PPL (94.05) than 5′ anchored (58.33). Anchored primers show higher PPL (88.24) than unanchored primers (77.95).

The lowest heterozygosity (H) value (0.1451 ± 0.1633) was shown by primer UBC‐848, and the highest (0.3747 ± 0.1784) was exhibited by primer UBC‐812. Again, dinucleotide repeats showed the highest heterozygosity (0.2894 ± 0.1780). Similarly, the maximum and minimum Shannon's information index (I) was 0.5506 ± 0.1389 by UBC‐834 and 0.5428 ± 0.2197 by UBC‐812. The highest estimate of gene flow (N m) was observed in UBC‐888 (3.2746) and least N m was observed in UBC‐861 (0.3456). The average N m for overall primers was 1.5474. Tetra‐nucleotide (2.4322) and 5′ anchored (2.4821) primers showed the highest N m values (Table 3).

3.2.2. Analysis of markers efficiency

The highest expected heterozygosity (H), polymorphism information content (PIC), and discriminating power (D) values were shown by anchored primers in general and 3′ anchored and dinucleotide repeats (UBC‐834 and UBC‐835) in particular. The H, PIC, MI, and D values for anchored primers were 0.503661, 0.470489, 0.503661, and 0.455827, respectively; 3′ anchored and dinucleotide repeats were 0.520932, 0.459651, 0.520932, and 0.698063; UBC‐834 were 0.732223, 0.507292, 0.732223, and 0.438911; and UBC‐835 were 0.686454, 0.508061, 0.686454, and 0.323554. The lowest H, PIC, and D values were observed in tri‐nucleotides and 5′ anchored primers. Again, dinucleotide and anchored primers showed higher D values than other repeat motif types and unanchored primers (Table 4).

Table 4.

Polymorphism statistics calculated using iMEC for the O. abyssinica populations based on 19 ISSR primers data set

ISSR Primer/Marker H PIC MI D
UBC‐810 0.465799 0.447393 0.465799 0.863768
UBC‐812 0.499475 0.43114 0.499475 0.766033
UBC‐815 0.515089 0.46009 0.515089 0.844063
UBC‐824 0.482959 0.439253 0.482959 0.833903
UBC‐834 0.732223 0.507292 0.732223 0.920051
UBC‐835 0.686454 0.508061 0.686454 0.896514
UBC‐840 0.485022 0.438254 0.485022 0.829166
UBC‐841 0.499998 0.430879 0.499998 0.751081
UBC‐844 0.436556 0.460587 0.436556 0.323554
UBC‐848 0.40574 0.473565 0.40574 0.438911
Dinucleotides (3′ anchored) 0.520932 0.459651 0.520932 0.746704
UBC‐861 0.477973 0.441648 0.477973 0.357648
UBC‐864 0.483738 0.438876 0.483738 0.651802
Tri‐nucleotides (Unanchored) 0.480856 0.440262 0.480856 0.504725
UBC‐873 0.495109 0.433311 0.495109 0.698195
UBC‐876 0.537861 0.460926 0.537861 0.696486
Tetra‐nucleotides (Unanchored) 0.516485 0.447119 0.516485 0.697341
UBC‐880 0.499527 0.431114 0.499527 0.269529
UBC‐881 0.494796 0.433466 0.494796 0.253031
(GACAC)4 0.499963 0.430896 0.499963 0.745775
Penta‐nucleotides (Unanchored) 0.498095 0.431825 0.498095 0.422778
UBC‐888 0.482824 0.474689 0.482824 0.157652
UBC‐889 0.489958 0.487964 0.489958 0.73447
5′ anchored 0.486391 0.481327 0.486391 0.446061
Overall 0.509003 0.454179 0.509003 0.633244
Summary based on primers repeat motifs
Dinucleotides 0.520932 0.459651 0.520932 0.746704
Tri‐nucleotides 0.480856 0.440262 0.480856 0.504725
Tetra‐nucleotides 0.516485 0.447119 0.516485 0.697341
Penta‐nucleotides 0.498095 0.431825 0.498095 0.422778
Summary based on primers' anchorage property
3′ anchored 0.520932 0.459651 0.520932 0.746704
5′ anchored 0.486391 0.481327 0.486391 0.446061
3′ + 5′ anchored 0.503661 0.470489 0.503661 0.596383
Unanchored 0.49885 0.437525 0.49885 0.592655

Abbreviations: D, discriminating power; E, effective multiplex ratio; H, expected heterozygosity; Hav, mean heterozygosity; MI, marker index; PIC, polymorphism information content; R, resolving power.

3.2.3. Band pattern and heterozygosity

The highest number of band patterns was observed in the Konta population (227) followed by Guba and Pawe populations (219) each. The highest number of private bands was observed in Gambella populations (69), 6 in Konta, and 1 in the Pawe population. There were no private bands in the other populations. A majority of the bands was obtained from the number of different bands with a frequency of ≥5% (NDBF ≥ 5%). Mean of expected heterozygosity (He) and mean of unbiased expected heterozygosity (uHe) along with standard errors showed the highest values in the Guba (0.219 ± 0.013, 0.231 ± 0.013) and Dabu Hena populations (0.218 ± 0.013, 0.229 ± 0.014) (Table 5).

Table 5.

Band patterns observed across O. abyssinica populations in Ethiopia using nineteen ISSR primers

Population NDB

NDBF

≥5%

NPB NLCB (≤25%) NLCB (≤50%) Mean He ± SE Mean uHe ± SE
Gambella‐Gambella
Abol 215 215 66 24 35 0.198 ± 0.013 0.208 ± 0.013
SNNPs‐Konta Special Woreda
Konta 227 227 6 16 28 0.210 ± 0.013 0.221 ± 0.014
Benishangul‐Gumuz‐Metekel Zone
Mandura 195 195 0 6 13 0.184 ± 0.012 0.194 ± 0.013
Dangur 211 211 0 2 14 0.213 ± 0.013 0.225 ± 0.014
Guba 219 219 0 6 19 0.219 ± 0.013 0.231 ± 0.013
Pawe 219 219 1 10 21 0.208 ± 0.013 0.219 ± 0.013
Benishangul‐Gumuz‐Kemash Zone
Kemash 210 210 0 2 10 0.213 ± 0.013 0.224 ± 0.014
Yasso 212 212 0 3 11 0.193 ± 0.013 0.204 ± 0.013
Benishangul‐Gumuz‐Assosa Zone
Assosa 205 205 0 2 13 0.204 ± 0.013 0.215 ± 0.014
Bambasi 210 210 0 4 17 0.205 ± 0.013 0.216 ± 0.013
Kurmuk 200 200 0 2 10 0.196 ± 0.013 0.207 ± 0.013
Oromia‐West Wellega Zone
Gimbi 210 210 0 2 11 0.203 ± 0.013 0.214 ± 0.014
Oromia‐Buno Bedele Zone
Dabu Hena 214 214 0 5 16 0.218 ± 0.013 0.229 ± 0.014

NDB = No. of different bands, NDBF ≥ 5% = No. of different bands with a frequency ≥ 5%, NPB = No. of bands unique to a single population, NLCB (≤25%) = No. of locally common bands (Freq. ≥5%) found in 25% or fewer populations, NLCB(≤50%) = No. of locally common bands (Freq. ≥ 5%) found in 50% or fewer populations, He = Expected heterozygosity = 2 * p * q, uHe = Unbiased expected heterozygosity = (2N/(2N − 1)) * He Where for Diploid Binary data and assuming Hardy‐Weinberg Equilibrium, q = (1 ‐ Band Freq.)^0.5 and p = 1 − q.

3.3. Genetic polymorphism and Shanon's information index

Among the thirteen populations, the Guba population was identified as having the highest percent polymorphism (47.13%) followed by Dabu Hena (45.40%) and Bambasi (44.83%). Populations from Mandura (40.52%), Gambella, and Yasso (41.09%), on the other hand, were observed to have the lowest percent polymorphism. High genetic variation at the species level was observed in the present investigation with 84.48% PPL. The values for Nei's genetic diversity (H), Shannon's diversity index (I), observed number of alleles (Na), and effective number of alleles (Ne) along with standard deviation (SD) at species levels were also 0.2702 ± 0.1945, 0.4061 ± 0.2595, 1.8448 ± 0.3626, and 1.4744 ± 0.3960, respectively, showing a relatively high level of genetic diversity (Table 6). However, genetic differentiation at the population level was relatively low when compared to genetic variation evident at the species level. This was proven by relatively moderate PPL recorded in the range of 40.52% to 47.13% and averaging 43.41%. Guba showed higher H value (0.2193 ± 0.2383) followed by Dabu Hena or Didhesa valley population (0.2165 ± 0.2407).The Mandura, Abol, and Yasso populations were observed to be the least diverse, with gene diversity values of 0.1842 ± 0.2285, 0.1978 ± 0.2390, and 0.1922 ± 0.2342, respectively. The same diversity patterns were also observed for I, Na, and Ne, whereby Guba, Dabu Hena, and Bambasi populations showed the highest and Mandura, Yasso, and Abol populations showed the least. In general, Metekel Zone of BGR showed the highest NPL, PPL, H, I, Na, and Ne even though the Buno Bedele Zone of Oromia Region showed the highest value by single population. Polymorphism within the population was found to be lower than 50% for all populations. Additionally, the total genetic diversity (Ht) was 0.2708 ± 0.0379, the genetic diversity within populations (Hs) was 0.2047 ± 0.0327, the coefficient of gene differentiation (G st) was = 0.2442, and estimate of gene flow among populations (N m) was = 1.5474) (Table 6).

Table 6.

Genetic diversity within populations and genetic differentiation parameters of 13 populations of O. abyssinica

Populations With all primers
NPL PPL (%) (H ± SD) (I ± SD) Na Ne
Gambela
GGAM‐Abol 143 41.09 0.1978 ± 0.2390 0.2767 ± 0.3336 1.4109 ± 0.4927 1.3857 ± 0.4686
SNNPs
SNNPs‐Konta 153 43.97 0.2102 ± 0.2408 0.2942 ± 0.3359 1.4397 ± 0.4971 1.4097 ± 0.4730
B‐Gumuz‐Metekel Zone
BGM‐Mandura 141 40.52 0.1842 ± 0.2285 0.2611 ± 0.3214 1.4052 ± 0.4916 1.3484 ± 0.4408
BGM‐Dangur 155 44.54 0.2112 ± 0.2400 0.2962 ± 0.3349 1.4454 ± 0.4977 1.4102 ± 0.3349
BGM‐Guba 164 47.13 0.2193 ± 0.2383 0.3088 ± 0.3330 1.4713 ± 0.4999 1.4224 ± 0.4661
BGM‐Pawe 155 44.54 0.2078 ± 0.2366 0.2927 ± 0.3310 1.4454 ± 0.4977 1.3996 ± 0.4622
Zone Mean 153.75 44.1825 0.2056 ± 0.2358 0.2897 ± 0.3301 1.4418 ± 0.4967 1.3952 ± 0.4260
B‐Gumuz‐Kemash Zone
BGK‐Kemash 155 44.54 0.2129 ± 0.2411 0.2981 ± 0.3363 1.4454 ± 0.4977 1.4150 ± 0.4735
BGK‐Yasso 143 41.09 0.1922 ± 0.2342 0.2705 ± 0.3281 1.4109 ± 0.4927 1.3690 ± 0.4543
Zone Mean 149 42.815 0.2025 ± 0.2376 0.2843 ± 0.3322 1.4282 ± 0.4952 1.3920 ± 0.4639
B‐Gumuz‐Assosa Zone
BGA‐Assosa 147 42.24 0.2040 ± 0.2407 0.2851 ± 0.3356 1.4224 ± 0.4947 1.3987 ± 0.4730
BGA‐Bambasi 156 44.83 0.2056 ± 0.2353 0.2902 ± 0.3292 1.4483 ± 0.4980 1.3937 ± 0.4583
BGA‐Kurmuk 146 41.95 0.1962 ± 0.2353 0.2761 ± 0.3293 1.4195 ± 0.4942 1.3773 ± 0.4571
Zone Mean 149.67 43.01 0.2019 ± 0.2371 0.2838 ± 0.3314 1.4301 ± 0.4956 1.3899 ± 0.4628
Oromia‐W/Wellega
ORWW‐Gimbi 148 42.53 0.2023 ± 0.2399 0.2842 ± 0.3344 1.4253 ± 0.4951 1.3961 ± 0.4717
Oromia‐Buno‐Bedele
ORBB‐Dabu Hena 158 45.40 0.2165 ± 0.2407 0.3035 ± 0.3360 1.4540 ± 0.4986 1.4207 ± 0.4721
Mean of Populations 151.0769 43.4131 0.2046 ± 0.2377 0.2875 ± 0.3322 1.4341 ± 0.4960 1.3959 ± 0.4543
Overall for species 294 84.48 0.2702 ± 0.1945 0.4061 ± 0.2595 1.8448 ± 0.3626 1.4744 ± 0.3960
Summary of Genic Variation Statistics for all Loci Total and (Mean ± SD) H t 0.2708 ± 0.0379
H s 0.2047 ± 0.0327
G st 0.2442
N m 1.5474

NPL ‐ Number of polymorphic loci; PPL ‐ percentage of polymorphic loci; H ‐ Nei's gene diversity; I ‐ Shannon's information index; Na ‐ observed number of alleles; Ne ‐ effective number of alleles; H t ‐ total genetic diversity; H s ‐ genetic diversity within populations; G st ‐ the coefficient of gene differentiation; and N m ‐ estimate of gene flow among populations.

3.4. Analysis of molecular variance

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was carried out in two phases; the first phase focused on the entire population's overall loci by considering them as one geographic region and the second phase separated populations into seven groups based on administrative Zones. The analysis was carried out by computation of the distance between “haplotypes,” each individual's data pattern as one “haplotype” and computing variance components for each level (Excoffier & Lischer, 2006).

Partitioning of genetic diversity by AMOVA (Table 7) using grouped populations revealed that out of total genetic diversity, most of the ISSR diversity was distributed within the populations (61.05%); remaining diversity was distributed among groups (31.80%) and among populations within groups (7.15%), with F ST = 0.38949, F SC = 0.10486, and F CT = 0.31797. Similarly, partitioning of genetic diversity without grouping revealed that out of total genetic diversity, most of the ISSR diversity was due to differences between individual plants within the populations (63.65%), while the remaining diversity was due to differences among populations (36.35%) with a F ST value of 0.36354. In both cases, the analysis of molecular variance revealed the same patterns of genetic diversity and support the larger genetic diversity found within the populations rather than among the populations, and are similar to Shannon's diversity index.

Table 7.

AMOVA for the entire 13 populations and seven administrative Zonal groups of O. abyssinica in Ethiopia

Source of variation df Sum of squares Variance components Percentage of variation
With seven Zonal grouping

Among

Groups

6 2,124.524 16.38900 Va 31.80

Among Populations

within Groups

6 409.983 3.68630 Vb 7.15

Within

Populations

117 3,681.700 31.46752 Vc 61.05
Total 129 6,216.208 51.54282
Fixation Indices F SC = 0.10486 F ST = 0.38949 F CT = 0.31797
Entire Ethiopian populations

Among

Populations

12 2,534.508 17.97415 Va 36.35

Within

Populations

117 3,681.700 31.46752 Vb 63.65
Total 129 6,216.208 49.44167
Fixation Index F ST = 0.36354

3.5. Cluster analysis

Intrageographical cluster analysis of UPGMA (Unweighted Pair Group Methods using arithmetic Averages) and NJ (Neighbor‐Joining) was computed for all individuals and populations of O. abyssinica. The UPGMA dendrogram resulting from a SAHN clustering analysis and NJ analysis on the basis of Jaccard's coefficients of similarity was constructed. The Jaccard's coefficient of similarity was obtained after pair‐wise comparisons were performed using binary character matrices (of the presence and absence of bands) that were produced from amplified fragments.

Most primer combinations in terms of nucleotide repeats and anchorage property showed almost similar clusters like the overall assessment. However, tri‐nucleotide repeat ISSR primer mixes Kurmuk samples of BGR with those of the Oromia Region, areas that are distant from one another. 5′ anchored primers, on the other hand, mix samples from the Kemash Zones of the BGR samples with those of Oromia Region. The poorest tree topology was observed by penta‐nucleotide primers that mix Assosa, Pawe, and Yasso populations in the same cluster while they were geographically very distant and even in three separate administrative zones of BGR (Figure 3a‐g). Generally, dinucleotides also 3′ anchored primers and anchored primers showed better clustering results (Figure 3a). Moreover, the UPGMA (Figure 4) and NJ (Figure 5) clustering methods of 130 individuals of O. abyssinica all 19 ISSR primers produced exactly the same tree topology according to their geographic distance and location.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Dendrogram depicting clustering patterns for thirteen (13) populations of O. abyssinica based on Jaccard's similarity coefficient. (a) Dinucleotide also 3′ anchored, (b) Tri‐nucleotide, (c) Tetra‐nucleotide, (d) Penta‐nucleotide, (e) 5′ anchored, (f) 3′ and 5′ anchored and (g) Unanchored ISSR primers

Figure 4.

Figure 4

UPGMA‐based dendrogram for thirteen O. abyssinica populations based on Jaccard's similarity coefficient using 19 ISSR primers

Figure 5.

Figure 5

NJ analysis of 130 individuals based on Jaccard's similarity coefficient. Samples encircled inside the bigger circles represent a single population and bigger circle represent Zonal samples

3.6. Principal coordinate (PCoA) analysis

The data obtained from 19 ISSR primers were used in PCoA analysis using Jaccard's coefficients of similarity for grouping of individuals and clustering of O. abyssinica using three coordinates (Figure 6a,b). The analysis was carried out using STATISTICA version 12.0 and XLSTAT 2014.5.03 software. STATISTICA revealed three‐dimensional (3D) graph showing that the first three coordinates of the PCoA had Eigen values of 11.79, 6.89, and 6.12 with variances of 27.68%, 16.19%, and 14.33%. This 3D graph retrieved from STATISTICA (Figure 6a and Figure S3) showed the clustering of only five groups. The first group (Group 1) showed grouping of the Gambella‐Abol population, Group 2 contained the SNNPs‐Konta population, Group 3 had populations from the Kemash Zone of the BGR and from the West Wollega and Dabu Hena Zones of Oromia Region, Group 4 contained Assosa Zone populations, and Group 5 contained Metekel Zone populations. Populations from Group 3 could not be differentiated from one another. Populations of Assosa, Bambasi, and Kurmuk from the Assosa Zone of the BGR (Group 4) also clustered together. XLSTAT, on the other hand, categorizes into four groups. Group I and Group II both in the same sign (+/+ and −/−) were among the samples with relatively least diversity apart from the Dabu Hena population. Groups III and IV of opposite signs (either ± or ∓) were the most diverse samples and the most distant from one another. Apart from samples from the Assosa Zone, all populations showed their own cluster based on their geographical location. The populations were grouped into 11 clusters and XLSTAT 3D graph PCoA analysis (Figure 6b) yielded more detailed information than the 3D graph retrieved from STATISTICA.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Three‐dimensional representation of a principal coordinate analysis of genetic relationships among 130 individuals of 13 populations of O. abyssinica inferred from a similarity matrix using (a) the Jaccard's index at STATISTICA and (b) Pearson PCoA method using XLSTAT

3.7. Admixture analysis

The Bayesian approach‐based assignment of the 130 individual clumps to different populations and determination of their population structure (Evanno et al., 2005), using STRUCTURE outputs, predicted K = 2 for 13 populations for whole samples and K = 11 for 12 populations (excluding Gambella samples) to be the most likely number of clusters (Figures S1 and S2). Based on this value, Clumpak result (bar plot) showed little admixtures indicating geographic origin based structuring of populations.

4. DISCUSSION

The ultimate goal of this study is to develop genomic tools and resources with the possibility of contributing to development strategies for effective conservation and sustainable use of the O. abyssinica of Ethiopia for ecological and economic gains. So far, however, no studies have reported on its molecular genetic diversity. Hence, as a first step toward this goal, we have sought a greater understanding of the genetic diversity profile at the species and population level through an examination and assessment of 13 O. abyssinica populations using 19 ISSR markers. These molecular markers have been successfully utilized for assessing the genetic diversity and revealed a remarkable molecular genetic diversity among the Ethiopian lowland bamboo populations found in the country's different geographic locations.

4.1. ISSR markers for the genetic polymorphism in O. abyssinica populations

Out of the total 348 scorable bands produced with a total of 19 primers, 294 bands were polymorphic. In terms of the number of polymorphic fragment detected and percentage of polymorphic loci per class of primer, 3′ anchored dinucleotides were found to be superior. While the tri‐nucleotide primers generated 32 bands, tetra‐nucleotide generated 39 bands, and the penta‐nucleotide primers generated 56 bands, of which 25, 29, and 45 were polymorphic loci, respectively. Based on the anchorage property of the primers, 5′ anchored primers showed the poorest polymorphism with 36, 21, and 58.33 NSB, NPL, and PPL, respectively. Generally, anchored primers with NSB (221), NPL (195), and PPL (88.24) showed better NSB, NPL, and PPL than unanchored primers with values of 127, 99, and 77.95 respectively. This investigation, like those of Ng and Tan (2015) and Tarinejad, Sofalian, Valizadeh, and Shams (2015), showed anchored primers in general and 3′ anchored and dinucleotides ISSR primers in particular revealed better polymorphism than unanchored and other repeat motifs of ISSR markers for the study of O. abyssinica populations collected across Ethiopia. In terms of bands specificity, the highest numbers of private bands observed in Gambella, moderate in Koyshe, and almost none in other populations makes the Gambella population isolated and different from other O. abyssinica populations in the country.

The choice of molecular markers largely depends on the level of polymorphism to be detected and their genomic coverage rather than on the technology used to generate the markers. Estimates of marker‐based selection depend on the linkage of the genomic region and the marker itself. Because highly informative markers can reduce the amount of genotyping required for inference of ancestry, it is desirable to measure the extent to which specific markers contribute to this inference (Amom et al., 2020; Rosenberg, Li, Ward, & Pritchard, 2003). Several approaches have been developed previously for measuring polymorphism information, but a user‐friendly platform to calculate this information is missing or otherwise inaccessible (Nagy et al., 2012). The iMEC (marker efficiency calculator) created by a group of researchers (Amiryousefi, Hyvönen, & Poczai, 2018) is coded in R and is available as a web application helps to detect markers for lots of genetics researches. For the present study, the highest PIC, MI, H, and D were shown by anchored primers in general and by 3′ anchored and dinucleotide repeats in particular. Amom et al., (2020) using 10 ISSR primers for the genetic relationship study of five native and economical important bamboos of Northeast India, found that PIC values ranged from 0.271 to 0.454 with an average PIC value of 0.350 per primer. Penta and tri‐nucleotides as well as 5′ anchored primers showed the lowest H, PIC, and D values. Like the studies of Tarinejad et al. (2015) and Ng and Tan (2015), anchored and dinucleotide repeat primers showed more polymorphism and discriminating power than unanchored primers. It is noteworthy that dinucleotide repeats, anchored either at the 3′ or 5′ end, usually revealed high polymorphism and the primers anchored at the 3′ end gave clearer banding patterns compared to those anchored at the 5′ end (Joshi, Gupta, Aggarwal, Ranjekar, & Brar, 2000; Pradeep Reddy, Sarla, & Siddiq, 2002; Tarinejad et al., 2015).

4.2. Genetic differentiation and population structure

The high number of alleles and high polymorphism are very important for the correct estimation of the genetic diversity of germplasm. The degree of polymorphism showed the extent of diversity and effectiveness of the markers (Chesnokov & Artemyeva, 2015), and consequently, polymorphic information is related to expected heterozygosity and is usually determined from allele frequency. In the present study, the largest NPL (164 and 158), the highest PPL (47.13% and 45.40), H (0.2193 ± 0.2383 and 0.2165 ± 0.2407), and I (0.3088 ± 0.3330 and 0.3035 ± 0.3360) were found in the Guba and Dabu Hena populations. The lowest values of NPL, PPL, H, and I were observed in the Yasso, Abol and Kurmuk populations.

The overall NPL (294), PPL (84.48%), H ± SD (0.2702 ± 0.1945), I ± SD (0.4061 ± 0.2595), Na (1.8448 ± 0.3626), and Ne (1.4744 ± 0.3960) were recorded in the current study of O. abyssinica populations based on 19 ISSR markers. Compared to other bamboo species, the O. abyssinica populations in Ethiopia showed higher genetic diversity with H = 0.2702 ± 0.1945 and I = 0.4061 ± 0.2595. The H = 0.0418 ± 0.0456 and I = 0.0624 ± 0.0651 were recorded in Chinese giant bamboo (Dendrocalamus giganteus) population with low genetic diversity and high genetic differentiation (Tian et al., 2012). The H (0.175 ± 0.152) and I (0.291 ± 0.209) were observed in the Dendrocalamus hamiltonii population of the northeast Himalayas with low genetic diversity and a moderate level of genetic differentiation (Meena, Bhandhari, Barhwal, & Ginwal, 2019). High genetic variation at the species level with H = 0.1939 and I = 0.3218 were recorded in Melocanna baccifera (Roxb.) Kurz: bamboo of Manipur, Northeast India (Nilkanta et al., 2017). A high level of genetic diversity with H = 0.219 and I = 0.349 was also reported in Dendrocalamus membranaceus, a declining bamboo species in Yunnan, China, as based on ISSR analysis (Yang et al., 2012). Therefore, this tells us there is high genetic diversity and differentiation in O. abyssinica populations collected throughout Ethiopia. The Metekel Zone of BGR samples could be considered to possess higher genetic variation while Gambella, and SNNPs populations possess lower genetic variation when compared to other, indicating that these populations were subjected to genetic isolation.

Additionally, the present study on O. abyssinica recorded the total genetic diversity (H t = 0.2708 ± 0.0379), genetic diversity within populations (H s = 0.2047 ± 0.0327), the relative magnitude of genetic differentiation among populations (G st = 0.2442), and estimate of gene flow among populations (N m = 1.5474). The H t = 0.1961, H s = 0.1639, G st = 0.1942, and N m = 2.5455 with high genetic diversity was also recorded in Melocanna baccifera (Roxb.) Kurz: using seven ISSR primers (Nilkanta et al., 2017). The H t = 0.167, H s = 0.138, G st = 0.247, and N m = 1.52 with a low level of genetic diversity were also recorded in D. hamiltonii using 17 SSR markers (Meena et al., 2019).

4.3. Levels of genetic diversity among and within populations

Most bamboo populations are established through vegetative propagation. Sometimes, a population might be of a single rhizome clonally extended to a vast area. Hence, all individuals of a population might have similar or nearly similar genetic makeup (Bamboo Phylogenetic Group (BPG), 2012). The genetic similarity might result in total loss of the population if a certain disease or pest arises. Flowering creates an opportunity for gene mix up in the next generation since seeds can have more genetic variability. Bamboo is an out‐crossing wind‐pollinated plant where there is high gene random mix up, although flowering is an extremely rare event, sometimes only occurring once in life. As bamboos are mostly multiplied clonally, a single plant can form huge populations over time (Miyazaki, Ohnishi, Takafumi, & Hiura, 2009). This may follow a deficit of genetic variation within a population (Wong, 2004).

Our results of AMOVA with respect to grouping and without grouping populations are consistent with several works on bamboo. A study by Li et al. (2020) on IRAP marker‐based genetic diversity and population structure of 58 Phyllostachys accessions (Asian bamboo) using 16 primers reported that 75% of variation was within the population and 25% among the populations. The findings of Meena et al. (2019) on 19 populations of D. hamiltonii using 17 SSR markers indicated an AMOVA result of 16.53% among populations and 83.47% within populations (assuming no hierarchical grouping), and 6.28% among groups, 12.45% among populations within the group, and 81.26% within populations in four hierarchical groups. Nilkanta et al. (2017), who used five ISSR markers on M. baccifera (Roxb.) Kurz: bamboo of Manipur, Northeast India, found an AMOVA of 22% among populations and 78% within populations. Yang et al.'s study (2012) on D. membranaceus using 10 ISSR markers also reported an AMOVA result of 78.95% within the population and 21.05% among populations. Again, Attigala, Gallaher, Nason, and Clark (2017) on the study of genetic diversity and population structure of the threatened temperate woody bamboo Kuruna debilis (Poaceae: Bambusoideae: Arundinarieae) from Sri Lanka using 12 microsatellite loci reported an AMOVA result of 8.35% among groups, 7.52% among populations within groups, and 84.13% within populations. But compared to the above work on different bamboo species, the within‐population percentage of 61.05% for O. abyssinica is smaller.

On the other hand, F SC = 0.10486, F ST = 0.38949 and F CT = 0.31797 in seven groups and F ST = 0.36354 without grouping were recorded from O. abyssinica populations of Ethiopia. F SC = 0.132, F ST = 0.187, and F CT = 0.062 in four groups and F ST = 0.165 without grouping were reported from D. hamiltonii (Meena et al., 2019). Higher population divergence or differentiation was observed in D. hamiltonii (F ST = 0.165), and very great or significant genetic differentiation with F ST = 0.36354 was recorded in O. abyssinica populations. For the interpretation of F ST, it has been suggested that a value lying below 0.05 indicates little genetic differentiation; a value between 0.05 and 0.15, moderate differentiation; a value between 0.15 and 0.25, great differentiation; and values above 0.25, very great or significant genetic differentiation (De Vicente, Lopez, & Fulton, 2004; Wright, 1984). However, for interpretation through comparisons with earlier findings, another widely used measure of genetic differentiation such as G ST was also considered along with F ST. The measure of genetic differentiation (G ST = 0.2442) recorded in O. abyssinica was comparable to those of another bamboo species such as D. hamiltonii (G ST = 0.247) (Meena et al., 2019), D. membranaceus (G ST = 0.252) (Yang et al., 2012), and M. baccifera (G ST = 0.194) (Nilkanta et al., 2017).

Many factors can determine the genetic structure and differentiation of plant populations, including reproductive biology, natural selection, genetic isolation or genetic drift, geographic distribution range, and gene flow (Hogbin & Peakall, 1999; Loveless & Hamrick, 1984; Schaal, Hayworth, Olsen, Rauscher, & Smith, 1998). Many ISSR, RAPD, and sequence‐tagged microsatellite sites (STMS)‐based genetic analyses showed that long‐lived, out‐crossing taxa retained most of their genetic variability within populations (Meena et al., 2019; Nilkanta et al., 2017; Nybom, 2004). The woody bamboos have a long vegetative phase of 20–150 years and typically a species with one of the greater longevities of the grass family (Ma et al., 2013). As one of those critical influences, the out‐crossing of a plant species tends to explain 10%–20% of the genetic variation among populations, whereas the selfing of a species leads, on average, to 50% variation between populations (Miyazaki et al., 2009). Oxytenanthera abyssinica can reproduce via seed in the wild, although this phenomenon is rare, and the rate of seed setting is low (Embaye, 2000; Ensermu et al., 2000; Zhao et al., 2018). Furthermore, studies on floral biology have indicated that O. abyssinica is likely anemophilous and prone to being an out‐crosser (Thakur, Barthwal, & Ginwal, 2016), which also was supported by the genetic differentiation (G ST = 0.2442) that was similar to the average of out‐crossing species (G ST = 0.22) (Nybom, 2004).

4.4. Clustering and admixture analysis

ISSR markers analysis for the genetic relationship study of five native and economical important bamboos (Amom et al., 2020), for the genetic diversity and structure of Dendrocalamus hamiltonii (Meena et al., 2019) and for the population genetic study of Melocanna baccifera (Roxb.) Kurz (Nilkanta et al., 2017), revealed that most of the populations were clustered in accordance with their geographical distribution and location. In our results, populations were also clustered in accordance with their geographical distribution and location. Most primer combinations in terms of nucleotide repeats and anchorage property showed almost similar clusters the overall assessment. But tri‐ and penta‐nucleotide repeat ISSR primer and anchored primers resulted in the poorest tree topology. The reasons that tri and penta‐nucleotides reveal the poorest information may be due to the availability of SSRs in small numbers when compared to other repeats motifs (Zhao et al., 2015).

Admixture results via STRUCTURE and web‐based data retrieval from structure harvester and CLUMPAK with and without Gambella samples showed different delta K values (K = 2 and K = 11) with an optimum population structure consisting of two and 11 sub‐populations. The delta K = 11 value is in agreement with the result of XLSTAT clustering the Ethiopian lowland bamboo into their geographic location. This implies that samples collected from the Gambella Region are different from others and may indicate a possible existence of additional bamboo species in the country.

5. CONCLUSION

The aim of the present study was to explore the extent of genetic diversity, population structure, and gene flow analysis of O. abyssinica populations and to devise mechanisms for effective identification, conservation and sustainable use of bamboo resources in Ethiopia using ISSR markers. Although a relatively high level of genetic diversity exists at species level, and a relatively low genetic differentiation was observed at the population level, most of the diversity was distributed within the populations, and cluster analysis grouped the populations into sharply distinct clusters, all of which could be attributed to the plant's cross‐pollination nature and long‐standing presence in the area. Using these ISSR markers, we found strong evidence linking geographic origin with diversity. The Metekel Zone in particular is in need of a conservation strategy, as it was found to have the most diverse population and samples from the Gambella Region were found to be different from those taken from others regions, indicating the availability of additional bamboo species in the country. Though the present investigation yielded some information on the genetic diversity of O. abyssinica populations in Ethiopia using ISSR markers, there is a need for further critical work involving molecular markers giving greater genome coverage to improve our understanding of genetic diversity in bamboo at the species and population level.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Oumer Abdie Oumer: Conceptualization (lead); data curation (lead); formal analysis (lead); funding acquisition (lead); investigation (lead); methodology (lead); project administration (lead); resources (lead); software (lead); supervision (lead); validation (equal); visualization (lead); writing–original draft (lead); writing–review and editing (lead). Kifle Dagne: Conceptualization (equal); data curation (equal); formal analysis (equal); investigation (equal); methodology (equal); project administration (equal); resources (equal); software (equal); supervision (equal); validation (equal); visualization (equal); writing–original draft (equal); writing–review and editing (equal). Tileye Feyissa: Conceptualization (lead); data curation (equal); formal analysis (lead); investigation (equal); methodology (equal); software (equal); supervision (equal); validation (equal); visualization (equal); writing–original draft (equal); writing–review and editing (equal). Kassahun Tesfaye: Conceptualization (lead); data curation (equal); formal analysis (lead); funding acquisition (equal); investigation (equal); methodology (lead); project administration (lead); resources (lead); software (equal); supervision (equal); validation (equal); visualization (equal); writing–original draft (equal); writing–review and editing (lead). Jayaraman Durai: Funding acquisition (lead); project administration (supporting); writing–original draft (supporting); writing–review and editing (equal). Muhammad Zeeshan Hyder: Conceptualization (equal); data curation (equal); funding acquisition (equal); investigation (equal); methodology (equal); project administration (equal); resources (equal); software (equal); supervision (equal); validation (equal); visualization (equal); writing–original draft (equal); writing–review and editing (equal).

Open Research Badges

This article has been awarded <Open Data, Open Materials, Preregistered Research Designs> Badges. All materials and data are publicly accessible via the Open Science Framework at https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.b5mkkwh8z.

Supporting information

Fig S1‐S3

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank the regional and district level natural resource experts for their contribution to the collection of samples from naturally grown bamboos. We also would like to thank CE‐EFRC for providing us with chemicals and with vehicle for collecting samples across the country under what were often difficult conditions.

Oumer OA, Dagne K, Feyissa T, Tesfaye K, Durai J, Hyder MZ. Genetic diversity, population structure, and gene flow analysis of lowland bamboo [Oxytenanthera abyssinica (A. Rich.) Munro] in Ethiopia. Ecol Evol. 2020;10:11217–11236. 10.1002/ece3.6762

Funding information

The following grant information was disclosed by the authors: International Network for Bamboo and Rattan (INBAR): International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)‐European Union (EU) (IFAD‐EU) funded program: South‐South knowledge transfer strategies for scaling up pro‐poor bamboo livelihoods, income generation and employment creation, and environmental management in Africa (Phase II) (Grant No: 2000000529/2000000979); and Training the next generation of scientists provided by Carnegie Cooperation of New York through the Regional Universities Forum for Capacity Building in Agriculture (RUFORUM) (RU/2016/Carnegie/DFS/007). The role of the funding bodies is limited to direct funding of the project activities in the field and laboratory that resulted in this manuscript. J. D., via INBAR was involved in the design of the study and reviewed drafts of the paper.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Oxytenanthera abyssinica (A. Rich.) Munro; lowland bamboo (Poaceae, Bambusinea) in Ethiopia: Genetic diversity, population structure and gene flow analysis submitted with https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.b5mkkwh8z.

REFERENCES

  1. Abtew, W. , & Dessu, S. B. (2019). Grand Ethiopian renaissance dam site importance In The grand Ethiopian renaissance dam on the blue nile (pp. 63–77). Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 10.1007/978-3-319-97094-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akinlabi, E. T. , Anane‐Fenin, K. , & Akwada, D. R. (2017). Bamboo: The multipurpose plant. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 10.1007/978-3-319-56808-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Amiryousefi, A. , Hyvönen, J. , & Poczai, P. (2018). iMEC: Online marker efficiency calculator. Applications in Plant Sciences, 6(6), e01159 10.1002/aps3.1159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Amom, T. , Tikendra, L. , Apana, N. , Goutam, M. , Sonia, P. , Koijam, A. S. , … Nongdam, P. (2020). Efficiency of RAPD, ISSR, iPBS, SCoT and phytochemical markers in the genetic relationship study of five native and economical important bamboos of North‐East India. Phytochemistry, 174, 112330 10.1016/j.phytochem.2020.112330 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Andriarimalala, J. H. , Kpomasse, C. C. , Salgado, P. , Ralisoa, N. , & Durai, J. (2019). Nutritional potential of bamboo leaves for feeding dairy cattle. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 49 10.1590/1983-40632019v4954370 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Attigala, L. , Gallaher, T. , Nason, J. , & Clark, L. G. (2017). Genetic diversity and population structure of the threatened temperate woody bamboo Kuruna debilis (Poaceae: Bambusoideae: Arundinarieae) from Sri Lanka based on microsatellite analysis. Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka, 45(1), 53 10.4038/jnsfsr.v45i1.8038 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bamboo Phylogenetic Group (BPG) (2012). An updated tribal and subtribal classification of the bamboos (Poaceae: Bambusoideae). Bamboo Science and Culture, 24, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bau, H. , & Trinh, T. L. (2019). INBAR Technical Report A Manual for Bamboo Forest Biomass and Carbon Assessment. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bystriakova, N. , Kapos, V. , & Lysenko, I. (2004). Bamboo biodiversity: Africa, Madagascar and the Americas (No. 19). UNEP/Earthprint. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bystriakova, N. , Kapos, V. , Lysenko, I. , & Stapleton, C. M. A. (2003). Distribution and conservation status of forest bamboo biodiversity in the Asia‐Pacific Region. Biodiversity & Conservation, 12(9), 1833–1841. [Google Scholar]
  11. Canavan, S. , Richardson, D. M. , Visser, V. , Le Roux, J. J. , Vorontsova, M. S. , & Wilson, J. R. (2016). The global distribution of bamboos: Assessing correlates of introduction and invasion. AoB Plants, 9(1), plw078 10.1093/aobpla/plw078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chesnokov, Y. V. , & Artemyeva, A. M. (2015). Evaluation of the measure of polymorphism information of genetic diversity. Ceльcкoxoзяйcтвeннaя Биoлoгия, (5, (eng)). [Google Scholar]
  13. Choudhury, D. , Sahu, J. K. , & Sharma, G. D. (2012). Value addition to bamboo shoots: A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 49(4), 407–414. 10.1007/s13197-011-0379-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. De Vicente, M. C. , Lopez, C. , & Fulton, T. (2004). Genetic diversity analysis with molecular marker data: Learning module. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI). [Google Scholar]
  15. Diver, S. (2006). Bamboo: A multipurpose agroforestry crop. Appropriate Technology Transfer for Rural Areas: ATTRA. [Google Scholar]
  16. Earl, D. A. , & vonHoldt, B. M. (2012). STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources, 4(2), 359–361. 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ekhuemelo, D. O. , Tembe, E. T. , & Ugwueze, F. A. (2018). Bamboo: A potential alternative to wood and wood products. South Asian Journal of Biological Research, 1(1), 9–24. [Google Scholar]
  18. Embaye, K. (2000). The indigenous bamboo forests of Ethiopia: An overview. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 29(8), 518–521. 10.1579/0044-7447-29.8.518 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Embaye, K. , Christersson, L. , Ledin, S. , & Weih, M. (2003). Bamboo as bioresource in Ethiopia: Managements and strategy to improve seedling performance (Oxytenanthera abyssinica). Bioresource Technology, 88, 33–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ensermu, K. , Tamrat, B. , Alemayehu, G. , & Gebremedhin, H. (2000). A socio‐economic case study of the bamboo sector in Ethiopia: an analysis of the production‐to‐consumption system. [Google Scholar]
  21. Evanno, G. , Regnaut, S. , & Goudet, J. (2005). Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Molecular Ecology, 14(8), 2611–2620. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Excoffier, L. , & Lischer, H. (2006). An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Computational and Molecular Population Genetics Lab (CMPG), Institute of Zoology, University of Berne, Switzerland.
  23. Falush, D. , Stephens, M. , & Pritchard, J. K. (2003). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics, 164(4), 1567–1587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Halvorson, J. J. , Cassida, K. A. , Turner, K. E. , & Belesky, D. P. (2011). Nutritive value of bamboo as browse for livestock. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 26(2), 161–170. 10.1017/S1742170510000566 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hammer, Ø. , Harper, D. A. , & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), 9. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hillis, D. M. , Moritz, C. , & Mable, B. K. (1996). Molecular systematics (Vol. 23). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hogbin, P. M. , & Peakall, R. (1999). Evaluation of the contribution of genetic research to the management of the endangered plant Zieria prostrata. Conservation Biology, 13(3), 514–522. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98182.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. International Network for Bamboo and Rattan (INBAR) . (2019). Bamboo and Rattan Commodities in the International Market. [Google Scholar]
  29. Joshi, S. P. , Gupta, V. S. , Aggarwal, R. K. , Ranjekar, P. K. , & Brar, D. S. (2000). Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationship as revealed by inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) polymorphism in the genus Oryza. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 100(8), 1311–1320. 10.1007/s001220051440 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kaushal, R. , Kumar, A. , Jayaraman, D. , Mandal, D. , Rao, I. V. R. , Dogra, P. , … Mishra, P. K. (2018). Research methodologies for field monitoring, analysis and evaluation of resource conservation aspects of bamboos. INBAR, 9(4), 124. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kaushal, R. , Singh, I. , Thapliyal, S. D. , Gupta, A. K. , Mandal, D. , Tomar, J. M. S. , … Durai, J. (2020). Rooting behaviour and soil properties in different bamboo species of Western Himalayan foothills, India. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–17. 10.1038/s41598-020-61418-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kaushal, R. , Tewari, S. , Banik, R. L. , Thapliyal, S. D. , Singh, I. , Reza, S. , & Durai, J. (2019). Root distribution and soil properties under 12‐year old sympodial bamboo plantation in Central Himalayan Tarai Region, India. Agroforestry Systems, 94, 917–932. 10.1007/s10457-019-00459-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kopelman, N. M. , Mayzel, J. , Jakobsson, M. , Rosenberg, N. A. , & Mayrose, I. (2015). Clumpak: A program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K. Molecular Ecology Resources, 15(5), 1179–1191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Li, S. , Ramakrishnan, M. , Vinod, K. K. , Kalendar, R. , Yrjälä, K. , & Zhou, M. (2020). Development and deployment of high‐throughput retrotransposon‐based markers reveal genetic diversity and population structure of asian bamboo. Forests, 11(1), 31. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lobovikov, M. , Ball, L. , Paudel, S. , Guardia, M. , Piazza, M. , Wu, J. , … Russo, L. (2007). World bamboo resources: A thematic study prepared in the framework of the global forest resources assessment 2005 (Vol. 18, (1–37). Rome, Italy: Food & Agriculture Organization. [Google Scholar]
  36. Loveless, M. D. , & Hamrick, J. L. (1984). Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 15(1), 65–95. 10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.000433 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ma, Q. Q. , Song, H. X. , Zhou, S. Q. , Yang, W. Q. , Li, D. S. , & Chen, J. S. (2013). Genetic structure in dwarf bamboo (Bashania fangiana) clonal populations with different genet ages. PLoS One, 8(11), e78784 10.1371/journal.pone.0078784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Meena, R. K. , Bhandhari, M. S. , Barhwal, S. , & Ginwal, H. S. (2019). Genetic diversity and structure of Dendrocalamus hamiltonii natural metapopulation: A commercially important bamboo species of northeast Himalayas. 3 Biotech, 9(2), 60 10.1007/s13205-019-1591-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Miyazaki, Y. , Ohnishi, N. , Takafumi, H. , & Hiura, T. (2009). Genets of dwarf bamboo do not die after one flowering event: Evidence from genetic structure and flowering pattern. Journal of Plant Research, 122(5), 523–528. 10.1007/s10265-009-0241-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mukherjee, A. K. , Ratha, S. , Dhar, S. , Debata, A. K. , Acharya, P. K. , Mandal, S. , … Mahapatra, A. K. (2010). Genetic relationships among 22 taxa of bamboo revealed by ISSR and EST‐based random primers. Biochemical Genetics, 48(11–12), 1015–1025. 10.1007/s10528-010-9390-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mulatu, Y. , Alemayehu, A. , & Tadesse, Z. . (2016). BAMBOO SPECIES INTRODUCED IN ETHIOPIA Biological, Ecological and Management Aspects, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Ethiopian Environment and Forest Research Institute (EEFRI). t.ly/EuMk [Google Scholar]
  42. Mulatu, Y. , Bahiru, T. , Kidane, B. , Getahun, A. , & Belay, A. (2019). Proximate and Mineral Composition of Indigenous Bamboo Shoots of Ethiopia. Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9, 215–221. 10.15580/GJAS.2019.2.032319049 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Nag, A. , Gupta, P. , Sharma, V. , Sood, A. , Ahuja, P. S. , & Sharma, R. K. (2013). AFLP and RAPD based genetic diversity assessment of industrially important reed bamboo (Ochlandra travancorica Benth). Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 22(1), 144–149. 10.1007/s13562-012-0114-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nagaoka, T. , & Ogihara, Y. (1997). Applicability of inter‐simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in wheat for use as DNA markers in comparison to RFLP and RAPD markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 94(5), 597–602. 10.1007/s001220050456 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Nagy, S. , Poczai, P. , Cernák, I. , Gorji, A. M. , Hegedűs, G. , & Taller, J. (2012). PICcalc: An online program to calculate polymorphic information content for molecular genetic studies. Biochemical Genetics, 50(9–10), 670–672. 10.1007/s10528-012-9509-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ng, W. L. , & Tan, S. G. (2015). Inter‐simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers: Are we doing it right. ASM Science Journal, 9(1), 30–39. [Google Scholar]
  47. Nilkanta, H. , Amom, T. , Tikendra, L. , Rahaman, H. , & Nongdam, P. (2017). ISSR marker based population genetic study of Melocanna baccifera (Roxb.) Kurz: a commercially important bamboo of Manipur, North‐East India. Scientifica, 2017 10.1155/2017/3757238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Nongdam, P. , & Tikendra, L. (2014). The nutritional facts of bamboo shoots and their usage as important traditional foods of northeast India. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2014, 1–17. 10.1155/2014/679073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Nybom, H. (2004). Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Molecular Ecology, 13(5), 1143–1155. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02141.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Oumer, A. , Yohannes, P. , Kassahun, T. , Abel, T. , & Endashaw, B. (2015). Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) analysis of Ethiopian white lupine (Lupinus albus L.). African Journal of Biotechnology, 14(18), 1552–1563. 10.5897/AJB2014.14379 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Page, R. D. (1996). Tree view: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Bioinformatics, 12(4), 357–358. 10.1093/bioinformatics/12.4.357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Pavlicek, A. , Hrda, S. , & Flegr, J. (1999). Short communication freetree‐freeware program for construction of phylogenetic trees on the basis of distance data and bootstrap/jackknife analysis of the tree robustness. Application in the RAPD analysis of genus Frenkelia. Folia Biologica (Praba), 45, 97–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Peakall, R. , & Smouse, P. E. (2012). GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research‐an update. Bioinformatics, 28, 2537e2539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Pradeep Reddy, M. , Sarla, N. , & Siddiq, E. A. (2002). Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) polymorphism and its application in plant breeding. Euphytica, 128(9–17), 2002. [Google Scholar]
  55. Pritchard, J. K. , Stephens, M. , & Donnelly, P. (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155(2), 945–959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Rohlf, F. J. (2000). NTSYS‐ pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.02.Exeter software. New York: [Google Scholar]
  57. Rosenberg, N. A. , Li, L. M. , Ward, R. , & Pritchard, J. K. (2003). Informativeness of genetic markers for inference of ancestry. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 73(6), 1402–1422. 10.1086/380416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Saitou, N. , & Nei, M. (1987). The neighbor‐joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 4(4), 406–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Schaal, B. A. , Hayworth, D. A. , Olsen, K. M. , Rauscher, J. T. , & Smith, W. A. (1998). Phylogeographic studies in plants: Problems and prospects. Molecular Ecology, 7(4), 465–474. 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00318.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. StatSoft, Inc . (2010). STATISTICA (version 12.0). [Google Scholar]
  61. Studier, J. A. , & Keppler, K. J. (1988). A note on the neighbor‐joining algorithm of Saitou and Nei. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 5(6), 729–731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Tao, G. , Fu, Y. , & Zhou, M. (2018). Advances in studies on molecular mechanisms of rapid growth of bamboo species. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 26(5), 871–887. [Google Scholar]
  63. Tarinejad, A. , Sofalian, O. , Valizadeh, R. , & Shams, K. (2015). Efficiency of anchored and non‐anchored ISSR markers to estimate genetic diversity among bread wheat cultivars. Iranian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 4(2), 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  64. Tesfaye, K. , Govers, K. , Bekele, E. , & Borsch, T. (2014). ISSR fingerprinting of Coffea arabica throughout Ethiopia reveals high variability in wild populations and distinguishes them from landraces. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 300(5), 881–897. 10.1007/s00606-013-0927-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Thakur, A. , Barthwal, S. , & Ginwal, H. S. (2016). Genetic diversity in bamboos: Conservation and improvement for productivity. ENVIS Forestry Bulletin, 131–146. [Google Scholar]
  66. Tian, B. , Yang, H. Q. , Wong, K. M. , Liu, A. Z. , & Ruan, Z. Y. (2012). ISSR analysis shows low genetic diversity versus high genetic differentiation for giant bamboo, Dendrocalamus giganteus (Poaceae: Bambusoideae), in China populations. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 59(5), 901–908. 10.1007/s10722-011-9732-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Tian, X.‐K. , Wang, M.‐Y. , Meng, P. , Zhang, J.‐S. , Zhou, B.‐Z. , Ge, X.‐G. , … Li, M.‐H. (2020). Native bamboo invasions into subtropical forests alter microbial communities in litter and soil. Forests, 11(3), 314 10.3390/f11030314 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Vorontsova, M. S. , Clark, L. G. , Dransfield, J. , Govaerts, R. , & Baker, W. J. (2016). World Checklist of Bamboos and Rattans: In Celebration of INBAR's 20th Anniversary. Beijing: [Google Scholar]
  69. Wong, K. M. (2004). Bamboo the amazing grass: a guide to the diversity and study of bamboos in Southeast Asia. [Google Scholar]
  70. Wright, S. (1984). Evolution and the genetics of populations, volume 4: Variability within and among natural populations (Vol. 4). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago press. [Google Scholar]
  71. Xu, Q. F. , Liang, C. F. , Chen, J. H. , Li, Y. C. , Qin, H. , & Fuhrmann, J. J. (2020). Rapid bamboo invasion (expansion) and its effects on biodiversity and soil processes+. Global Ecology and Conservation, 21, e00787 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00787 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Yang, H. Q. , An, M. Y. , Gu, Z. J. , & Tian, B. (2012). Genetic diversity and differentiation of Dendrocalamus membranaceus (Poaceae: Bambusoideae), a declining bamboo species in Yunnan, China, as based on Inter‐Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) analysis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 13(4), 4446–4457. 10.3390/ijms13044446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Yeh, F. C. , R‐Cai. Yang , & Boyle, T. (1999). Population genetic analysis of codominant markers and qualitative traits. Belgian Journal of Botany, 129, 157. [Google Scholar]
  74. Yuen, J. Q. , Fung, T. , & Ziegler, A. D. (2017). Carbon stocks in bamboo ecosystems worldwide: Estimates and uncertainties. Forest Ecology and Management, 393, 113–138. 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.01.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhang, L. J. , & Dai, S. L. (2010). Genetic variation within and among populations of Orychophragmus violaceus (Cruciferae) in China as detected by ISSR analysis. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 57(1), 55–64. 10.1007/s10722-009-9450-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhao, H. , Yang, L. I. , Peng, Z. , Sun, H. , Yue, X. , Lou, Y. , … Gao, Z. (2015). Developing genome‐wide microsatellite markers of bamboo and their applications on molecular marker assisted taxonomy for accessions in the genus Phyllostachys. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 1–10. 10.1038/srep08018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Zhao, Y. , Feng, D. , Jayaraman, D. , Belay, D. , Sebrala, H. , Ngugi, J. , … Gong, P. (2018). Bamboo mapping of Ethiopia, Kenya and Uganda for the year 2016 using multi‐temporal Landsat imagery. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 66, 116–125. 10.1016/j.jag.2017.11.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Fig S1‐S3

Data Availability Statement

Oxytenanthera abyssinica (A. Rich.) Munro; lowland bamboo (Poaceae, Bambusinea) in Ethiopia: Genetic diversity, population structure and gene flow analysis submitted with https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.b5mkkwh8z.


Articles from Ecology and Evolution are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES