Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2020 Sep 27;12(9):e10687. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10687

Seymour Fracture in a Pediatric Patient: A Case Report

Sumedha Bandi 1, Emily Drone 2, Ariel Vera 2, Latha Ganti 2,3,4,
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC7593213  PMID: 33133852

Abstract

In this report, the authors present the case of a child who sustained a specific type of mallet finger injury known as a Seymour fracture. This is an important injury to recognize in the emergency department as it is associated with significant morbidity if not treated appropriately. This is especially of concern in children, where the tissue can get trapped in the growth plate. Children also face a high risk of deformity due to growth arrest. Management includes thorough washout, reduction of displacement, and antibiotics and tetanus prophylaxis if there is an open fracture.

Keywords: seymour fracture, mallet injury

Introduction

Pediatric hand fractures make up 2.3% of all ED visits [1]; these are more common in boys [2], with the most common mechanism being those secondary to sports-related activities. Phalangeal fractures are most common in the 9-12-year age group, and the most commonly affected finger is the middle finger [1].

A mallet finger injury is one of the most common injuries and is frequently associated with sport-related activities. One specific type of mallet finger injury, the Seymour fracture, results from a juxta epiphyseal fracture on the distal phalanx of the finger [1]. This injury involves avulsion of the nail and is usually classified as a Salter-Harris grade I or II fracture.

Early evaluation and appropriate treatment of a Seymour fracture include the administration of tetanus and antibiotic prophylaxis, and prompt orthopedic consultation [3]. Seymour fractures can reliably be identified with a good lateral X-ray and a high degree of suspicion.

Case presentation

A school-aged boy presented to the emergency department after catching his middle finger of his left hand in a hoverboard, which had caused avulsion of the distal phalanx through the skin. The bone was seen protruding through the bleeding, injured nailbed (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Photograph showing avulsion of the distal phalanx through the skin.

Figure 1

His vital signs included temperature of 98.1 °F, pulse of 98 beats per minute, respiratory rate of 16 breaths per minute, blood pressure of 117/73 mmHg, and oxygen saturation at 100% on room air. Physical examination revealed nail avulsion and ecchymosis. The sensation in the hand was intact. The radial pulse was also intact. The range of motion of the other fingers was also found to be intact. No laboratory studies were obtained. Radiographs demonstrated a severely displaced fracture through the epiphyseal plate of the base of the distal phalanx with a marked transverse displacement of the distal phalanx, with small soft tissue gas noted at the fracture site (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Radiograph marked transverse displacement of the distal phalanx (blue arrow), with small soft tissue gas noted at the fracture site (yellow arrow).

Figure 2

The wound was thoroughly irrigated with 250 ml of normal saline. No evidence of a foreign body was found. The patient’s tetanus status was up to date; he was given a weight-based dose of liquid ibuprofen for analgesia and one gram of cefazolin for the open fracture. The patient was transferred to the hand surgeon at the local children’s hospital due to the degree of displacement and the need for a thorough washout and closed reduction of the fracture.

Discussion

A Seymour fracture can easily be overlooked as a minor injury to the nail. The nail bed laceration itself is usually not visible, but the proximal edge of the nail plate sits on top of the eponychial fold rather than beneath, making the nail appear “too long” in comparison to the other nails [1].

The pathophysiology, being similar to that of a mallet injury in adults, most commonly involves crushing injuries, sports injuries, and falls. This injury typically occurs when the distal phalanx of a fully extended digit undergoes forceful flexion, or when the distal phalanx experiences a crush injury [3]. Early evaluation and treatment have been the most effective in minimizing the risk of infection and any other complications [4]. It is important to consult orthopedics or a hand specialist, especially with pediatric patients. Open injuries may warrant operative intervention given that they are more prone to soft tissue infection and development of osteomyelitis [3]. Injury-related complications include osteomyelitis, distal phalanx growth disturbance, flexion deformity, and nail deformity [5]. Treatment-related complications like a secondary fracture displacement are uncommon but have been reported [6]. However, the majority of patients have good clinical outcomes.

Treatment for a Seymour fracture is dependent on whether it is an open or closed fracture. In the case of an open fracture that is prone to infection, it should be treated with operative irrigation, debridement, and intravenous antibiotics, along with a careful exploration to remove the proximal nail plate from the site of incarceration [5-6]. In closed fractures with severe soft tissue damage including the nail fold, the use of antibiotics is recommended [5]. Whenever possible, the nail should not be removed. The nail stabilizes the fracture, and the removal could make the injury more troublesome [6]. Interposed tissue should be removed from the fracture line. Late presentations of Seymour fracture often result in infection, growth arrest, and persistent mallet deformity of the distal phalanx [6].

Conclusions

Seymour fractures are rare and often underestimated injuries that require early treatment. This case presentation highlights the common features of a Seymour fracture. The common pitfalls associated with this fracture are as follows: 1) clinicians tend to minimize workup in pediatric patients and 2) proximal nail injury can look deceptively benign.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported (in whole or in part) by HCA Healthcare and/or an HCA Healthcare affiliated entity. The views expressed in this publication represent those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of HCA Healthcare or any of its affiliated entities.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained by all participants in this study. HCA Centralized Algorithms for Research Rules on IRB Exemptions (CARRIE)/IRB manager issued approval 2020-482. HCA Centralized Algorithms for Research Rules on IRB Exemptions (CARRIE)/ IRB manager issued approval 2020-482. Based on the information provided and attested as true, the research plan described does not require IRB oversight. This is because you are either a) not engaging in research with human subjects as defined by federal regulations; b) engaging in research with human subjects deemed excluded from IRB oversight per 45CFR46.102(l) OR c) engaging in research with sufficient human subject protections in the design to meet one or more IRB exemption criteria set forth in 45CFR46.104.

References

  • 1.Pediatric hand fractures. Nellans KW, Chung KC. Hand Clin. 2013;29:569–578. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.08.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hand fractures in children: epidemiology and misdiagnosis in a tertiary referral hospital. Chew EM, Chong AK. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37:1684–1688. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Seymour fractures. Abzug JM, Kozin SH. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38:2267–2270. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.08.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Delayed presentation of Seymour fractures: a single institution experience and management recommendations (Epub ahead of print) Samade R, Lin JS, Popp JE, Samora JB. Hand (N Y) 2019 doi: 10.1177/1558944719878846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pediatric hand and wrist fractures. Liao JCY, Chong AK. Clin Plast Surg. 2019;46:425–436. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2019.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Seymour fractures: retrospective analysis and therapeutic considerations. Krusche-Mandl I, Köttstorfer J, Thalhammer G, Aldrian S, Erhart J, Platzer P. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38:258–264. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES